October 30th, 2026 Newsletter

Repeat a Lie Often Enough and It Becomes the Truth

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media.

“The way you get democracy to function is by informing the public.” – Robert Kennedy Jr.

“Science is more than a body of knowledge. It is a way of thinking; a way of sceptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask sceptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be sceptical of those in authority, then, we are up for grabs for the next charlatan (political or religious) who comes rambling along.” – Carl Sagan

“Never worry about who will be offended if you speak the Truth. Worry about who will be misled, deceived and destroyed, if you do not.” and
”Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by and that has made all the difference.” – Robert Frost

Though the chapters interrelate, they are divided into six sections and have a common realisation that a cabal of corporate elites have captured global trade, global and national governance, mainstream and online media, and ultimately many of our minds.

As a stenographer, I link to an article or audio and paste a key section. My most trusted websites are platforms for journalists who don’t compromise on the truth and have thereby been shunned by the mainstream media. Click the button below to view my list of top trusted news sources:

Disclaimer: Farms Not Factories newsletters share and repost material that is already publicly accessible. The views expressed in the articles do not necessarily represent those of Farms Not Factories but are selected to promote open discussion on issues often omitted or misrepresented in the mainstream media.

Food, Farming, Water & Ecocide

Andy Dibben – Head Grower, Abbey Home Farm, Organic farm shop

Andy Dibben is head grower at Abbey Home Farm near Cirencester, where the land has been farmed organically for 35 years. He grows 90 kinds of fruit and veg on 15 acres and sells every bit of it direct through the farm’s Organic Farm Shop and café.

He farms with nature, not against it, using no chemical pesticides, insecticides or fertilisers, just rich, living soil, which Andy says is all a grower really needs. Organic farming produces healthy, nutritious food, keeps the air and water clean and the land alive with wildlife.

Share Retweet Insta Repost

Although Abbey Home Farm is everything a farming should be, supermarkets have dragged food prices below the cost of growing, and left family farms carrying the loss.

“Very little of our food production here is profitable and that, frankly, is an abhorrent state of affairs.”

So-called cheap food comes with hidden costs such as animal suffering, degraded soil, polluted rivers and the badly paid farmers here and abroad. It’s difficult for a small organic farm shop to make money, and Abbey Home Farm Shop is only profitable because they also source and sell beautiful textiles from India.

The solution is for everyone to buy from a local farm shop, box scheme or farmers’ market where the farmer receives a fair price that reflects the cost of high quality production.

In last month’s interview with UK Column’s Charles Malet, Farms Not Factories director Tracy Worcester spoke about her life as a campaigner for food sovereignty, an organic veg producer and filmmaker, covering a wide range of topics that, like her monthly newsletter, go beyond her support for UK farmers and into geo politics.

Charles began the interview by asking Tracy about her Channel 4 documentary Pig Business, featuring Robert Kennedy Jr. filmed in 2006-2008. It investigates the world’s largest pig and pork producer, Smithfield Foods, which had expanded its US-based factory farm business to Poland and Romania. Pre joining the EU, these countries had cheaper labour and laxer environmental standards which meant Smithfield could flood the European markets with cheap pork. This marked the beginning of Tracy’s 20-year campaign against factory farming and globalisation which included producing nine further versions of Pig Business around the world where local residents had asked for her support in opposing the building of new factory pig farms or campaigning to close existing factory pig farms that were torturing pigs, blighting people’s lives with toxic stench, depleting local water supplies, polluting the air, soil and waterways with excessive nitrates, damaging people’s health with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and thereby out competing family owned, scale-scale, local pork producers across the globe.

Despite her films being pivotal in the decision to refuse planning permission for two mega pig factories in Derbyshire and N Ireland, she fears that her campaign against factory farming may have had the unintended consequence of driving concerned consumers to become vegan and line the pockets of the fake meat industry as opposed to increasing the number of people who chose to buy pork from outdoor bred pigs, or beef and dairy from pasture fed cattle.

In the interview she says that revitalising the local food economy is essential if farmers are going to survive in a global food market shaped by oligarchs. With each monthly newsletter she posts a short film about food sovereignty featuring well known people in the ‘Great and the Good’ series, or farmers in the ‘Wise Farmers’ series about farmers who farm organically or agro-ecologically, respecting animal welfare, nurturing soils and providing a healthy thriving habitat for pollinators, small mammals and fish as opposed to the global food system that forces farmers to compete with low standard imports.

Her message is that consumers can take action against the corporate takeover of the food system by using the power of their purse and buying as much of their food as possible direct from the farmer via farm shops, local markets and box schemes.

In the monthly Farms Not Factories newsletter she and her team re-post news and comments from independent journalists, most of whom wrote for mainstream media but were ousted due to their refusal to peddle the government and corporate lies about issues such as the persecution of Julian Assange, the Covid lockdown and vaccine scandal, fabricated reasons for forever wars and CO2 tunnel vision. Some of her films she mentions in the interview are linked below;

Some of her films she mentions in the interview are linked below;

Is Small Still Beautiful in India, BBC World, 2004, shows how India’s development pattern is forcing tribal people and small farmers into slums. Whether it is for mines, agri business, forest plantations or dams, tribal peoples’ statutory rights to both their land and adequate compensation are undermined.

The Politics of Happiness in Bhutan, BBC Earth Report, 2005, shows how the Royal Government of Bhutan measures its progress in terms of Gross Domestic Happiness as opposed to Gross Domestic Product and so is encouraging the young to stay in their village and not migrate to cities or emigrate to become the cheap labour for corporations to win the competitive edge in the global economy.

Pig Business, Channel 4, 2009, the film that launched the campaign Farms Not Factories. Tracy follows the rise of factory pig farming across America and Europe to expose the true cost of ”cheap’ pork produced in inhumane animal factories.

In 2011, actor Dominic West joined Farms Not Factories at the site of a proposed pig factory at Foston, Derbyshire, standing with local residents and inmates of the neighbouring prison who feared the noise of screaming pigs, pollution and disease it would bring.

Sir Roger Moore Condemns Factory Pig Farming, Farms Not Factories 2012.

Tracy visits an organic farm in China – Little Donkey

Farms not Factories Labelling guide

Forbidden Fruit and veg – A small market garden producing high quality vegetables naturally – TW Richard Vobes interview

If health is important to you, wherever possible, buy organic food.

Read; Vegetables are now half as nutritious than 60 years ago. Experts have worked out why, Independent, 8 October 2026

‘Wheat, apples and carrots are half as nutritious as they were in the 1960s, a new study has suggested. Due to declining soil quality the nutrients in fruit and vegetables have also drastically declined. The study, by researchers at Deep Science Ventures (DSV), found twice the number of fruit and vegetables need to be eaten today to get the same level of minerals such as potassium, magnesium or copper than 60 years ago. Researchers found food such as cereals and bread, as well as carrots, apples and peas had lost 20 to 50 per cent of several key nutrients. But reduced nutrients in crops combined with the rise of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs, such as Ozempic and Mounjaro, could push around 5 million UK working-age adults below safe levels of essential vitamins and minerals, experts warn.’

If you compare land sharing with land sparing, only an agro chemical salesman or their brainwashed farmer would go with land sparing.

Read; Why does the idea of land sparing endure? Adam Calo, 2 October 2026

‘The question for this essay is where does the belief come from that intensification equals sustainability? How do well-read seemingly good faith journalists come to accept that efficiency will lead to equity and not more exploitation or extraction? How is it that a world of drone delivered grocery products is presented as a vignette of the utopian future, not a dystopian nightmare.’

‘It appears that land sparing taps into something deeper. Worldviews about progress, about the separation of humans and nature, and about the pragmatic pathways for change neatly form new coalitions that continue to press this idea forward. Something new might be happening where a decades-long academic debate has now been subsumed by more powerful forces of narrative and myth.

And so, in a new paper co-authors and I tried to step over our immediate desire to throw a penalty flag against the latest boosters of an untroubled land sparing thesis. We examine closely recent land sparing rhetoric amongst think tanks like Our World in Data and amongst prominent environmental journalists like George Monbiot. Instead of merely arguing how the land sparing thesis is flawed, we tried to ask: how does this argument prove so compelling to different actors? Why does it endure and what are the implications for the debate about the future of food?

We warn that land sparing is becoming less about ecology and more about myth and legend. Legends are hard to unwind, and land sparing isn’t the only one around in the world of sustainable food. However, the legend of land sparing forges an uncomfortable alliance between environmentalists, agribusiness, and food futurists—forming a durable coalition that could shape modern agriculture. Instead of more evidence about how intensification doesn’t always lead to ecological benefits, the terrain of struggle going ahead may be about producing countervailing myths about land, humans, and what is the meaning of abundance for all.’

If the government finally wakes up to the benefits of organic as described below, then we are on to a winner. However, unless the government forces retailers to include the true cost of chemically grown food on our health, animals and the environment, the organic market will continue to only be for those who are prepared to pay the premium for it.

Read; Organic Action Plan for England, DEFRA, 14 October 2026

‘Published today, the Organic Action Plan for England (OAPE) sets out how government and the organic sector will work together from 2026 to 2036 and beyond, to grow domestic production, improve market opportunities and help more people understand what organic farming offers. Publication of the plan is the next step in the delivery of government’s ‘Farming Roadmap 2050: Growing England’s Future’. The Farming Roadmap acknowledges the vital role that organic systems play in improving soil health, cutting chemical and synthetic inputs, and supporting biodiversity. Organic farming is a whole-farm approach that can help farm businesses reduce their exposure to input costs, such as artificial fertiliser and pesticides, and reach markets where demand is growing. It can also support healthier soils, cleaner water, more wildlife and high standards of animal welfare. Defra-funded research shows strong links between organic farming and benefits for biodiversity, soil health and reduced chemical exposure. It also shows how organic systems can support climate adaptation. Consumer demand for organic products continues to grow. UK organic retail sales reached £3.9 billion in 2025. The plan aims to support English farmers to fulfil a greater share of this growing market, with an ambition to increase the proportion of agricultural land farmed organically from around 3.4% towards 10% by 2036.

Defra has collaborated with the English Organic Forum (EOF), a group of organic organisations that work together to represent the sector, to develop a plan that responds to the sector’s needs, with direct input from organic producers and sector leaders across the country. Defra and the EOF will jointly oversee its delivery.

In order to grow organic production, the OAPE focuses on actions that break down other barriers to farmers converting to an organic farming system. This includes access to information, advice, peer networks, markets and supply chains.The English Organic Forum and the wider sector will build on existing services so farmers considering conversion can find information on certification, funding, business planning and routes to market.’

How animals will benefit if produced organically

Read; Organic Action Plan Unveiled for England, Compassion in World Farming, 15 October 2026

In the UK, organic certification schemes frequently have the highest animal welfare potential, requiring more space and outdoor access that help support essential natural behaviours. Organic systems also prohibit routine antibiotic use and offer environmental benefits through restrictions on the use of artificial fertilisers and pesticides. The OAPE has set targets to increase organically managed English farmland from 3.4% to 10% by 2036.

Patrick Holden, CEO of Sustainable Food Trust, takes DEFRA to court for not labeling gene edited food. Why are we not allowed to know how our food is grown? …………because we would be able to see the problems caused by ingesting GM food and we could avoid it!

Watch; You have the right to know where your food comes from; Patrick Holden Sustainable Food Trust, 14 October 2026

Patrick Holden; “I’m taking DEFRA to court, do you want to come? As a farmer I want to defend my right to be able to plant seeds and breed animals that are not genetically modified or precision bred as this wonderful term euphemistically covers up the fact that it is about gene editing and genetically modified organisms. Guess what? We won the first round and a lot of you are interested and now it’s going to be a second round. Apparently I can’t speak about it but it’s going to court in November. If we don’t win in the second round we definitely won’t rule out taking it further legally. But the key thing is, you or me who eats food wants to know whether the food I eat has been labeled if it contains genetic editing or GMOs and at the moment we haven’t got that right. I guess my question to Angela Eagle is are you listening?”

As usual BBC Farming Today is promoting gene edited food without an expert to explain how precision breeding/gene editing potentially harms people and the ecosystem!

Listen; What should Britain be growing in the future? BBC Farming Today, 14 October 2026

BBC Presenter; “A lot of your work is to do with gene editing. There are some people who are worried about the environmental consequences of producing precision bred or gene edited crops”

Simon Griffiths (John Innes Centre); “The technology that you’ve talked about, precision breeding, gene editing, is the biological revolution of the 21st century. You cannot overstate what it makes possible. Some of the public concerns that you talked about, I totally understand.

And I think that’s just a matter of co-design, moving together with the things what do we want in agriculture? What do we want to eat? And making sure the public are fully engaged. The science has moved a long way very quickly recently and I think that there’s a kind of a dam that’s waiting to burst of scientific discovery, ready to go.

But the actual things limiting it are it’s expensive for plant breeders to deploy these new variants in varieties. And then profit margins are so low for everybody at the moment, breeders or farmers. The pull isn’t there, they’re just basically going day to day to make sure they can farm profitably. The things I’m talking about, they’re about long-term vision, and people can’t afford long-term vision at the moment.”

The experience, wisdom and knowledge of Pat Thomas is exceptional.

Read; Beyond GM Newsletter, 28 October 2026

Pat Thomas, Director Beyond GM; “It has been too long since our last newsletter. A new government settling in, the summer break and conference season have all contributed to the gap. But there is plenty to bring you up to date on, beginning with our ongoing legal challenge. In June, the High Court found that the government’s decision-making on the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Regulations was unlawful. We had expected to return to court in November for a ruling on how the government must remedy that unlawfulness. That hearing has not materialised. It now looks likely that we will not be back in court until early 2027. Meanwhile, the government has taken advantage of the delay to press ahead with operationalising the Regulations, approving more experimental field trials and – beginning within days of the ruling of unlawfulness – a raft of “marketing notices” for precision bred tomatoes, potatoes, strawberries, wheat and bananas. Marketing notices confirm the precision bred status of a food. The next step is approval for sale by the Food Standards Agency. We believe this disregard for the Court’s ruling is reckless. None of these decisions is guaranteed to survive the Court’s next judgment. Depending on the remedy ordered, they could all be swept away.

The wait is frustrating for us, and we know it’s frustrating for you too. But the delay does not undo the judgment and we remain laser focused on securing the transparency and accountability that should have been built into these Regulations from the beginning. There are limits on what we can share at the moment. But we can say this: Beyond GM is preparing another legal action to secure full transparency for precision bred GMOs in the UK food system.

Legal challenges in the EU too.

We are not alone in fighting irrational deregulation. The Slovakian government has launched a legal challenge to the EU’s new gene-editing rules in the European Court of Justice and, separately, coalitions from Germany and Italy have launched challenges in the European General Court. Each of these raise familiar and fundamental questions about precaution, consumer rights and the protection of organic and non-GM food businesses. Combined with the open question of whether we align – or not – with EU regulations, neither the UK nor the EU regime can be treated as inevitable right now. Governments and developers pressing ahead with deregulation are acting irresponsibly by ignoring this legal uncertainty.

Food sufficiency deserves a proper answer.

Our campaigning work and analysis have continued throughout. With concern growing about the resilience of our food supply, we wrote to Prime Minister Andy Burnham urging his government to put food sufficiency at the heart of food policy. That means ensuring everyone can reliably obtain enough nutritious, affordable food, while protecting the soils, nature, farming skills and livelihoods on which future supplies depend. It also means judging technologies against that purpose, alongside the alternatives. Our letter did not reach the Prime Minister. His staff re-directed it to Defra, which sent an anonymous reply so formulaic that it could have been generated by AI. It rehearsed the familiar promises for precision breeding and food security. It did not address food sufficiency at all. If you have received a similarly dispiriting reply to a carefully considered letter to your MP, you will recognise the experience. We remain clear: food sufficiency is a much stronger foundation for national resilience than urging households to stock up on tins.

Gene-edited chocolate and “self-fertilising” crops?

Two new additions to our Beyond the Headline series examine the overblown promises of gene-edited crops that could transform food production. In both cases, the headline claims go much farther than the evidence. The first looks at experimental gene-edited cacao trees and the leap from laboratory experiments to promises of safeguarding the chocolate supply. The pressures facing cocoa farmers extend far beyond disease resistance, into poverty, depleted soils and the economics of the cocoa trade. Gene editing does not fix any of this. The second examines another long-running promise of self-fertilising crops. After more than 50 years, the research, which focuses mostly on cereals, remains inconclusive, and there is still no self-fertilising crop that a farmer can plant. Meanwhile, established ways of reducing fertiliser dependence struggle for comparable attention, investment and support.

Who decides what these technologies are for?

Two recent articles from our A Bigger Conversation initiative ask questions that rarely feature in the sales pitch for genetic technologies. Recently, MI5’s Director General warned that AI could change the stakes for existing or new biological weapons. This brings renewed urgency to scrutiny of engineering biology’s “dual use” capabilities. AI is increasingly being used to develop genetic, or ‘biological’, technologies. But the technologies promoted for food, health and sustainability are also being developed for military applications, including armour, batteries and explosives, raising questions about research priorities, public funding and democratic oversight that deserve open discussion.

Finally, we examine how the concept of ‘social licence’ became a sales pitch and how consensus around GMOs is manufactured to shut down debate. When citizens have time, evidence and space to deliberate, they ask tougher questions: Who controls these technologies? Who benefits? What alternatives are being overlooked? And can the public opinion ever change the decision? Those are the questions that should help shape policy from the beginning.’

To question the ‘science’ of gene editing read the article below;

Read; Don’t Hold Your Breath for a Self Fertilising Gene Edited Crop, Beyond GM, 11 October 2026

‘Much of that fragility in our food system comes from how we grow our food. Modern farming depends heavily on synthetic nitrogen fertiliser. It’s made using fossil fuels and is expensive. Much of it ends up in rivers and seas, where it fuels algal blooms and “dead zones”. When prices spike or supply chains wobble, farmers and food prices feel it straight away.

Our latest Beyond the Headline briefing shows that for more than a century, scientists have been chasing a high-tech way out: wheat, maize and rice that make their own fertiliser, the way beans and peas do. Late last year, the headlines announced that it had finally happened, with crops that could “fertilise themselves”.

Our latest Beyond the Headline: Self-Fertilising Crops briefing looks at what lies behind those headlines. The research is real, but it is early-stage. The wheat was grown in pots, not fields. The other study worked in a lab plant, not a cereal. Even one of the lead researchers spoke of saving perhaps 10% of fertiliser, not abolishing it. And nitrogen is only part of the picture: farmers also rely on phosphate and potash fertilisers, which these crops would do nothing to replace. We’ve heard the same promise for over a century. Research – and hype – has expanded in the last 50 years. There is still no self-fertilising crop a farmer can plant.

This “someday”, “in the future”, “eventually” focus of self-fertilising crops means that the solutions that already work get a fraction of the attention: rotating cereals with beans, peas and clover, cover crops, recycling manure, and smarter use of fertiliser. Farmers know how to do these things. What’s missing is a market, subsidy and supply system that rewards them for doing so.’

Buy pork from high welfare UK farms or both will disappear and frankenstein meat will be the only pork option.

Read; Is this the end for small-scale pig farming? BBC News, 20 October 2026

‘”This is a record low,” said Dan Bolton, a pig farmer from north Dorset. Bolton, who has farmed rare breed saddlebacks in Fontmell Magna for nearly a decade, recently sold nine, seven-week-old piglets at market for just £2 each. “If this carries on, it will be the end of the road for many UK pig farmers, even the larger guys,” he said. Bolton’s fears are echoed by many across the farming industry. According to the National Pig Association (NPA), which represents commercial producers, demand for pork is falling and independent producers are selling up. Bolton used to rear 150 pigs at a time, selling meat boxes and hog roasts, but rising feed, slaughter and butchery costs have forced him to scale back. He now sells his remaining outdoor-bred piglets at market, usually for less than £10 each.

Lissie Carr’s family breeds and rears pedigree saddlebacks and British landrace pigs in Sturminster Newton, taking them to shows and selling to smallholders and fellow breeders. She said: “We don’t rely on it for an income. Rearing non-commercial rare breeds is tough and you don’t often see the reward for it. If this continues we will see rare and native breeds dying out. We need to eat less meat but better-quality meat, produced in the UK. Money is exceptionally tight for so many but, by changing our buying habits and being more selective, we can all support smaller and higher welfare producers.”

BPA trustee Jane Mathews said; “For small-scale pedigree breeders, the issues are really serious. If we lose our native, pedigree breeds, they cannot be replaced. “The UK is walking into a food crisis. We need joined-up thinking – cross-party work – to save the industry, not just the pig sector but British farming full-stop, small and large scale.” Mathews said commercial producers were also being affected by cheap imports, reared to lower standards, “flooding the market”.

You can see pigs struggling to breathe as their cage is lowered into the suffocating CO2 – this death torture, in both conventional and organic farming, has to end.

Listen; Launch of consultation on the use of CO2 to kill pigs, BBC Farming Today, 26 October 2026

Intro; ‘A consultation on phasing out the use of carbon dioxide in the slaughtering process for pigs is launched today. The vast majority of pigs in the UK are stunned using CO2 but last year the government announced plans to move away from using the gas, following an independent report which said that the practice causes pain, respiratory distress and fear in conscious pigs and should be replaced. The National Pig Association tells us the industry accepts that CO2 is on the way out, but wants a realistic timeline.’

Please sign this petition.

Petition; The Great British dairy scandal: Crack down on “battery” dairy farms; 38 Degrees, October 2026

‘We demand proper animal welfare labels on ALL dairy products, so we can choose where our milk, cheese and butter comes from! Why is this important? A shocking new investigation just exposed the rise of US-style mega dairy farms across the UK that lock 1000s of cows indoors 24/7. No outside space. No grazing. Nothing. But right now food labels don’t have to include this crucial welfare information. Millions of us are buying milk, butter and cheese with no idea how the animals the products come from were raised. This has to change. We need clear animal welfare labelling on all dairy products like ‘free range eggs’ – giving us the power to choose what we buy. Sign the petition if you agree!’

We have an artificially cheap food industry that feeds artificially cheap sick chickens to artificially cheap sick fish to feed artificially sick people. Buy wild and demand the end of the pollution and cruelty of fish farms.

Read; Farmed salmon now being raised on chicken, Financial Times, 15 October 2026

‘Europe’s biggest salmon producers are beginning to feed chicken to their fish, breaking a longstanding taboo in the hunt for cheap protein. Supermarkets in Britain and other European countries have for years declined to stock salmon raised on livestock byproducts for fear of a backlash from consumers who may find the practice “unnatural”. However, Lerøy Seafood Group, one of Norway’s biggest farmers and a supplier to Tesco, told the FT that it had now introduced chicken byproducts at all of its offshore salmon farms. Mowi, the biggest salmon producer and a supplier to UK supermarkets including Sainsbury’s and Asda, is planning to introduce poultry-based feed at its farms in Norway and Scotland, according to people familiar with the matter.

The use of livestock byproducts as fish feed was banned in Britain until 2013, over concerns that it could spread diseases such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy. Salmon producers have now heralded the use of chicken as a way of cutting costs and carbon emissions. The price of traditional fishmeal, made of wild fish, has almost doubled over the past two years amid falling fish stocks and increased demand from China. Poultry feed is less than half the price per tonne. “Salmon are carnivores and eat other fish in the wild, so feeding them chicken is entirely natural,” said an executive at a major salmon-feed producer. Some of the chicken Lerøy uses as feed is sourced from Britain, according to the company’s sustainability disclosures. This means byproducts from British chicken farms are shipped to Norway for processing and fed to salmon, which are then exported to the UK. Tesco in 2021 said it prohibited poultry-derived meal and oil in fish feed. It did not respond to a request to comment regarding any change in position. Waitrose said it did not allow its salmon to be fed poultry protein. Jim Bligh, director of food policy at the industry group, the British Retail Consortium, said: “Retailers work closely with their suppliers to source more sustainable feed, taking into account factors such as the environmental impact of ingredients and alternative options that can reduce the pressure on wild-caught fish species.” Justine Butler, head of research at British animal rights campaign group Viva!, said of the use of poultry feed, “Consumers who are trying to avoid chicken because of animal welfare or environmental concerns may reasonably expect to be told.”

Cruel livestock production and slaughter needs changing but not exchanged for lab grown meat. Buy real food or it will disappear.

Watch; Meat: Israel fake flesh market, UK Column News, 28 October 2026

Vanessa Beeley; ” I wouldn’t call it (3D printed meat) food. Anyway, let’s roll the first video so people get an idea of what I’m going to be talking about.”

Video Commentary; “Soon the entire world will start eating meat printed by a printer and we won’t even be able to tell if it’s real meat or not. This isn’t a plot from Black Mirror, it’s our reality unfolding. Here’s why printed meat resembles real meat so closely. The 3D printers use special bio inks to create it. These bio inks are actually made from stem cells extracted from different animals depending on the desired type of meat, beef, pork, poultry or even fish. In a laboratory these cells then multiply, interact and differentiate into the fat and muscle cells that make up bio ink. These bio inks are then intricately layered by specialised 3D printers to construct meat products that closely mimic the texture, taste and nutritional composition of traditional meats. This is identical to real beef and when it is ready and served, even the smell is the same. Scientists claim that by using this technology, the environmental impact associated with conventional livestock farming will be greatly reduced. So would you eat printed meat?”

Vanessa Beeley; “Would you eat printed meat? Well, let’s have a look at what Benjamin Netanyahu thinks of the production facilities of 3D Meat in Israel, in Tel Aviv. I think it is, a company called Steakholder, S T E A K of course, giving him a tour of the factory.

Steakholder Rep; “Right, and now let’s move on to…”

Netanyahu; “This is the McDonald’s of the future.”

Steakholder Rep; “Yes, indeed—this is the McDonald’s, the butcher shop, and the slaughterhouse of the future.”

Netanyahu; “Fast food.”

Steakholder Rep; And the surprise here is that today we are also launching this printer—a semi-industrial model. Let’s move over to the second printer—this is our global launch—which prints fish. This printer produces an item that is “ready to cook.” It contains actual cells; we are essentially printing a grouper fillet—no other company can do this. Using real cells, it takes about three minutes to print a piece of grouper with a complex texture.”

Netanyahu; “It’s delicious”

Vanessa Beeley; “I’m sure everyone is fascinated at this point, but I was quite surprised to find out that this was reported back in 2023 in Time magazine how Israel became the global centre for alternative meat tech. Now I have to say China is quickly catching up in the interest of inverted commas ‘sustainability’ and this was from a food tech conference in Tel Aviv in 2023 and TIME reported it was a scene even a vegan would enjoy. The cheese was produced from micro algae, the roast beef, ‘as succulent and savoury as the real thing’, was made from fermented plant proteins, the kebabs, burgers and pulled beef were plant based from redefined meat, the chicken and steak served off site by SuperMeat and Aleph farms respectively were cultivated from biopsied stem cells in bioreactors. About the only animal based product to be found at the venue was a lonely quart of cow’s milk tucked behind a phalanx of plant based alternatives at the coffee stand. Then within that article they bring up a report by the Good Food Institute which I would argue whether it is good food or not and in that they talk about the fact that Europe needs to diversify the ways it produces food. With public investment in the research and infrastructure needed to scale production cultivated meat could help to satisfy demand for meat while reducing pressure on existing systems, which includes cutting the climate impact of meat by up to, I love this ‘up to’ because that basically means it could be at 3% , by up to 92%, reduce air pollution by up to 94%. and this is the worrying part for me, use up to 90% less land. What does that release the land for? Of course, data centers and so on. And then moving on, Israel also became the first country to approve the sale of lab cultured meat. Israel’s Chief Rabbinate gave the company its approval. Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi David Lau ruled that Aleph’s cultured meat is kosher and pareve because the meat is grown from stem cells taken from a fertilised egg rather than cells extracted from muscle tissue. Makes all the difference. And then it’s not only meat, this is a couple of months ago, Mondelez and Celleste Bio, another Israel based company, unveiled the world’s first cell based chocolate. So what are they talking about? Mondelez International has developed nearly a dozen milk chocolate bars with cell based cocoa butter from Israeli startup Celleste Bio in which the Cadbury owner has been an investor since 2022. Gives you a clue what chocolate not to eat. They develop the fat using real cocoa cells grown in suspension in a bioreactor. The process takes one to two beans to produce the same amount of cacao butter that traditionally requires 4 tons of cacao and 10,000 square meters of land. So again we see the freeing up of land. And then coming on to Steakholder Foods launches Perfecta at retail outlets across Northeastern America, plant based marbled steak, plant based filet mignon, plant based chicken breast plant based salmon patties and whitefish patties. And then you might be asking whether the UK is involved in this as of yet. Well, the Israeli startup gets EU backing to help bring lab grown meat cuts to the table. But also at the plant based World Expo In London in November 2024 there were six commercial letters of intent signed and it has established, or the various companies have established collaboration centers in Europe alongside the Israeli based facilities. Now I recommend this article obviously is going to be in the show notes this is from the Children’s Health Defence and from Dr. Joseph Mercola, and so it’s a very lengthy article going into the fact that nobody is really regulating it. There are various bodies supposedly regulating, there’s very little coordination between them and of course there is no generational history of the effects of eating these products. And what he says is ‘whenever possible, focus on foods that remain close to their natural form. Many alternative meat products are ultra processed foods that contain industrial additives, refined ingredients and seed oils such as soybean, corn, sunflower and canola oil. They are rich in linoleic acid which accumulates in your tissues and disrupts efficient cellular energy production. The health concerns surrounding these products extend beyond the manufacturing process itself and include the additives, processing byproducts and ingredient combinations commonly used to create them’. So I had a quick look at just one of those products which is methylcellulose or you would probably know it better if you ever look at the E numbers in your food as E461. It’s a technology often referred to as fused paste layering which uses high capacity machines capable of up to 420 kilos per hour to deposit layers of plant proteins such as soy flour and fats like rapeseed or coconut oil bound together by the methylcellulose gel. While it is a standard binder in many processed foods and plant based meats, its use in high volume in the 3D meats is what is the problem. It sparked debate regarding transparency in the nature of these ingredients masquerading as premium cuts. And other binders like Trent’s glutaminase meat glue are used in some meat analogues but methylcellulose, which is actually a laxative by the way, is specifically highlighted in the context of the new wave of 3D printed meat. I’m sure everyone can’t wait for it to arrive in the UK.”

Beware, in the US, 3D printed eggs and meat are hitting both the supermarket shelves and the hospitality sector including hotels, restaurants, cafes, and caterers.

Watch; Lab grown eggs have been approved and in stores near you, maddox_holistic, 22 August 2026

“Lab grown eggs are now approved by the FDA. The synthetic egg quietly being sold at Walmart, Target and restaurants is made by printing a copy of the chicken gene for egg white protein. The gene is inserted into yeast where it becomes part of the yeast DNA. The yeast is then sealed in a large steel tank called a bioreactor and fed sugar. It multiplies endlessly on its own in a process called fermentation. Then weeks later, the yeast is filtered out and what’s left is dried into powder and sold as egg white protein. The company responsible for this is called Every, a San Francisco biotech startup. OvoPro, their egg protein, sales are up 550% from last year. Their liquid egg called Every Egg has been served in restaurants and here’s what the company had to say, celebrating that they’re now on American shelves. The company CEO said many of their customers keep their relationships confidential so they won’t tell you which products contain this synthetic egg, but we will and we will continue to. Here are the products to look out for, Healthier Comforts Animal Free Egg White Protein Powder, Fermy by Landish, Pulp Culture Hard Kombucha and more. Make sure to scan your egg products on the Talo app where we will have the rest of these products listed.”

There is no end to the number of dangerous scams corporations pull to sell more products.

Watch; UK mandated the fortification of flour with folic acid, UK Column, 21 October 2026

Dr Liz Evans; “….who’s behind the global push to adulterate flour with synthetic and toxic chemicals masquerading as essential nutrients? The Food Fortification Initiative are a key player pushing fortification globally. They were founded in 2002, only 38 countries mandated fortification; 25 years on, 86 countries now mandate the fortification of wheat flour and or other grains. And the map of countries who have mandated fortification is very interesting, the UK are the only country in Europe who adulterate their grains. The US is the most prolific fortifier of many grains, whereas Russia, China, India and much of Africa have kept their grains pure. And I’m sure it won’t surprise UK Column viewers that the WHO is keen on fortification, along with the World Bank and other key players. And the Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition or GAIN seems to be the vehicle to bring national and supranational stakeholders together in public-private partnerships to push this fortification agenda. GAIN is a non-profit foundation based in Geneva, launched in 2002 at the UN. And of course, the Gates Foundation is right behind GAIN and has invested heavily in it. According to AI, the Gates Foundation is GAIN’s single largest philanthropic funder, putting in well over $100 million so far. And this incredible October 2020 policy document shows that GAIN, along with the Food Fortification Initiative and others even identified the COVID crisis as a golden opportunity to fast track fortification policies and even to advertise fortified foods in COVID public health communication. So the UK’s fortification mandate means it will be extremely difficult to avoid ingesting folic acid if you don’t want to and it sets a dangerous precedent for future governments to seek to mass medicate the public through food. So what can we do to stop this? Well, there is some good news. This government petition recently passed the 100,000 signatures required to be considered for a parliamentary debate. It’s such an important issue to push back on, and it’s great to see the public getting behind it and whatever your political views, it was heartening to read this recent tweet from MP Rupert Lowe, stating his strong opposition to fortification and his intention to take part in any debate. So to finish, many organisations, including my own, the UK Medical Freedom Alliance, are running campaigns to raise public awareness and get this amendment repealed and we’re currently encouraging people to write to their MP ahead of any debate to inform them of the issues and you can find a link to a helpful template letter produced by Hart on the UK MFA website along with other resources.”

The UK Government is considering a loophole that continues to allow councils to use glyphosate in schools and playgrounds despite the proof that it is an extremely dangerous poison.

Watch; It’s OK to use glyphosate in home gardens, schools and playgrounds if applied by a professional, UK Column, 21 October 2026

Charles Malet; “……a written question to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions about the consultation on the renewal of glyphosate which is up to expire in December of this year was asked by Samantha Dixon. Specifically, bearing in mind its toxicity, whether it will consider its use in home gardens, schools and playgrounds. Amazingly Stephen Timms in his response has said that the Health and Safety Executive is considering as part of the renewal the use by professionals only in home gardens, schools and playgrounds. I think it’s just worth drawing the point out that he seems to be suggesting that despite the well publicised toxicity of this chemical if it’s applied by a professional in a children’s playground or in someone’s home apparently that’s better.”

BBC’s Farming Today airs billionaire James Dyson’s high tech farming with robots with no expert to point out that tech farming is supported by subsidies and tax incentives. While labour is taxed, farmers receive tax write-offs when they buy machinery and robots. There is no Gross Domestic Happiness indicator that puts a value on farming for those who would prefer to work outside rather than spending all day staring at a computer screen.

Listen; The Future of Farming, BBC Farming Today, 17 October 2026

Presenter; “Over the past 75 years, the tech farmers use has changed, so there are fewer people on farm and more and bigger machines, drones, AI even, so what’s next? Dyson, which says it’s the country’s biggest farming company with 36,000 acres across England, is investing heavily in high tech farming, unsurprising when you realise that the man behind it is inventor Sir James Dyson. Anna Hill asked how he sees the next 75 years.”

James Dyson; “Absolutely, technology will come in, AI of course, because farming is very complex and situations change, weather changes, soil condition changes, and so on. So there are a huge number of inputs on which you have to make decisions. So I think AI will help us make better decisions. Technology will change and farming will become more and more efficient. We’re trying to cut down on costs, make the maximum, get the maximum out of everything. We want to apply that kind of logic and design and engineering and technology to farming to improve it.”

Presenter; ” What about labour? That is one of the highest costs for farmers.”

James Dyson; “Robots are definitely a way forward and we started with just a few in the strawberry glass houses and we now have, I don’t know, 40 or 50 and eventually they will replace the labour, which is difficult to get, and they work day and night, they don’t take holidays and all this sort of thing. Eventually you could have driverless tractors so you wouldn’t need any labour and the government maybe should be investing in robots or farmers should be encouraged and with tax subsidies. We do a lot of research and development on our farms and we’re lucky because we’re big and I’m funding it. I put 200 million into my farms and other farmers can’t do that. They don’t have access to capital”

Read; Can regenerative farming ‘return price-setting power’ to farmers? Agriland, 11 October 2026

‘The report from the European Alliance for Regenerative Agriculture (EARA) explores ways to boost the practice of regenerative farming in Ireland, which EARA said can reduce risks and input costs for farmers. The report, titled Regenerating Systemic Risk: A Case Study for Ireland also explores how different stakeholders, including the Irish public, can assist the sector in moving towards a regenerative model. The report says that Ireland’s general population can “close the loop” by shortening the distance between farms and plates. It says that direct sales, produce box schemes, farmers’ markets and community-supported agriculture would “return price-setting power to the farmer, keeping value within the local economy”.’

Chemical company lobbying and bribery has meant toxic pesticides are sickening people all over the world.

Read; Almost half of the world’s farmers are poisoned by pesticides every year Pesticide Action Network, 2 September 2026

‘A new study published in Frontiers in Public Health shows that over 400 million of the world’s farmers and farmworkers suffer from acute pesticide poisoning annually. This total excludes the 84 million children working in global agriculture who are even more vulnerable to toxic chemicals than adults, as well as rural families exposed through spray drift and environmental exposure. Action is urgently needed to remove the most poisonous pesticides from agriculture and to replace them with safer alternatives. The study found that the greatest number of non-fatal poisoning cases was in southern Asia, followed by Southeast Asia and East Africa. The highest single national incidence was in Burkina Faso, where nearly 84% of farmers and farmworkers experienced unintentional acute pesticide poisonings (UAPP) each year. Total fatalities around the world from unintended pesticide poisonings are estimated at around 11,000 deaths per year. Nearly 60% of these occurred in just one country, India, indicating serious problems with pesticide use, according to the researchers.

PAN UK is calling for:

Governments and companies to make good on their commitments globally to phase out Highly Hazardous Pesticides from agriculture by 2035 (Target A7, Global Framework on Chemicals) and to support farmers to transition to safer and more sustainable practices, including agroecology (Target D5).

UK Government support for an increase in organic agriculture including support for farmers through the transition.

Better health monitoring by the Department of Health and an acknowledgment that UK farmers and farmworkers are at the highest risk from acute and chronic health impacts of pesticides.

UK and Europe to stop manufacturing, exporting and profiting from pesticides that have been banned here for health or environmental reasons.

An end to the UK importing produce that has been grown using pesticides that are banned here on human health or environmental grounds.

UK retailers to phase out the use of Highly Hazardous Pesticides in their global supply chains to protect farmers, farmworkers and others from the harmful effects of these pesticides. It is not acceptable that we simply export our harms to countries that have weaker pesticide standards.’

Read; Amazon rainforest wrecker and world’s biggest meat company JBS is now expanding into Southeast Asia, Greenpeace,14 October 2026

‘The global meat empire linked to widespread Amazon deforestation – is planning a massive US $5 billion expansion into Southeast Asia, which could threaten the climate, fragile ecosystems and Indigenous lands in Indonesia. Greenpeace Netherlands is taking JBS to court to block the company’s nature destroying expansion – and we need your support to stop them.

You might not know its name, but JBS is the largest meat processor on Earth. JBS has capacity to slaughter tens of thousands of cattle and pigs, and millions of chickens every single day. In doing so, Greenpeace Nordic estimates it pumps out more superheating methane gas than fossil fuel giants ExxonMobil and Shell combined.

For years, investigative reports have linked JBS’s supply chain to massive deforestation in the Amazon rainforest, Indigenous rights violations, and brutal labour conditions. Now, evidence suggests the company is planning the biggest meat sector expansion we know of, setting its sights on new frontiers in Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

A recent investigation by the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) reports a startling fact: agriculture in Australia now drives more land clearing than palm oil in Indonesia in recent years. Bulldozers routinely flatten native Australian forests to create cattle pastures, the report finds, destroying critical habitats for native wildlife like koalas and washing sediment onto the fragile Great Barrier Reef.

But we can also take action at the source. Greenpeace Netherlands is taking JBS to court in their Netherlands base to challenge their aggressive expansion plans – which would result in more deforestation, emissions and human rights abuses – before the bulldozers can reach the forest floor. Sign the petition and support our legal action today.

Donate; Save the Amazon from pesticide poisoning! Eko, October 2026

‘Colombia’s far-right President is on the verge of dousing the Amazon rainforest in glufosinate-ammonium – a pesticide classified as more dangerous than glyphosate!

This poison has been linked to serious reproductive issues and is so toxic it has already been banned in the EU. Now, Trump’s ally wants to dump it from airplanes to kill illicit crops – and the Amazon is about to be treated like a testing lab for this nightmare plan.

But locals are putting up an impressive fight and just won a temporary court order to stop the government from spraying this nasty chemical! It’s a major step but this is only round one and Colombia’s government won’t be backing down easily. With all of us chipping in, we could help local communities with almost no resources take this fight all the way to save the Amazon and its people.

Can you urgently chip in to fund this lawsuit to stop the Amazon from being poisoned?’

Read; Colombian Judge Halts Government Aerial Spraying Plan In Putumayo, Telesur English 12 September 2026

‘A Colombian judge has suspended a government pilot program for aerial spraying of illicit crops in the southern department of Putumayo, citing the potential harmful effects of the operation on farming communities and the environment. The Third Promiscuous Circuit Court of Puerto Asís granted a provisional measure requested in a legal action filed by a citizen, ordering the immediate suspension of any aerial spraying activity within the department’s jurisdiction.

The pilot program, promoted by President Abelardo De la Espriella’s government, was intended to test a method that could have reopened the use of aerial herbicide spraying, a practice suspended since 2017 over health and environmental concerns. The project called for the use of ammonium glufosinate, a herbicide that is not currently permitted in the European Union and is classified by the World Health Organisation as moderately hazardous.

The court ruling has brought renewed attention to Colombia’s long-running debate over aerial eradication. Aerial spraying with glyphosate was initially suspended in 2015 and definitively barred by the Constitutional Court in 2017, after which the government focused on manual eradication and voluntary crop substitution until the current administration’s announcement that it would resume such practices.’

Healthy soils and biodiversity, less chemical inputs and less transportation costs and waste from long food chains will all help enhance food security. For those who believe climate change is caused by human behaviour, of course this, along with stopping our endless wars, will help end our contribution to ecocide and allow our planet to mend.

Listen; Is food sovereignty needed to face climate extremes? Farm Gate, 27 October 2026

Intro; ‘As the impacts of climate change deepen, what will happen to food and farming systems in the UK and around the world? And do we need greater food independence and food sovereignty in the UK? Today, ffinlo Costain is joined by Kirsty Lewis, Applied Climate Science Fellow at the Met Office – by Vicki Hird, Strategic Lead on Agriculture at The Wildlife Trusts – by Honor Eldridge, Author of The Future of Food Policy in the UK – and by Lucy Noad, a beef and dairy farmer from Woodhouse Farm in Wiltshire.’

Vicki Hird; “Yeah, there’s dumping from many countries on Africa which undermines their sovereignty. I was just looking at the trade statistics and how much we’re exporting food and we’re importing food in ways which undermine our food sovereignty. A lot of the food we’re eating, 54% of it is ultra processed by a particular definition and that’s based on globally traded commodities. It’s meaningless to talk about commodities and food sovereignty in that sense, but we export some of it and import a lot of it and that is deeply against the principle of Food Sovereignty because it’s really undermining our health and obviously the income of farmers. If farmers are trading against global commodities, it’s difficult for them to become more adaptogenic, adapt their farm to a very much more extreme and changing climate. How can they do that when they’re competing with ultra low cost milk, for instance, from wherever, or grains or in fact meat. Meat is a huge topic here because we import a huge amount of feed. It’s not often talked about. We import lots of our fruit and veg, but we also import a huge amount of feed to feed increasingly industrialised feed systems. In a stressed world going forward with security…, is it fair to take the Amazon (rain forest) down in order to produce soya to feed  intensively reared pigs? The concept of need needs to be discussed more in terms of what’s being produced.“

Vicki Hird; “There’s still elements in the industry and elements in government, that think we can continue to buy from everywhere, very efficient systems all digitised, we’ve got the trade routes and everything and just in the last year we imported 5% more food, but we also exported 6% more food by value. That whole food swap going forward will have to stop. Some of it’s based on seasonality and obviously some countries are better producing things than others. To give an example, we uprooted loads of blueberry bushes in the UK a few years ago, it was a big scandal because we’re importing huge amounts of blueberries from Peru. Peru at the time was actually facing a huge drought and that’s going to just accelerate in South America, particularly if we have more Amazonian destruction. So we should be investing in blueberry production here and berries, things like that. But that’s just one example of building our food security. It’s got to be nutritional, but it’s also got to be fair. And that’s a whole other ball game of making sure that our systems are fair to our farmers and growers. It’s still clear that the industry is not playing fair with our farmers.“

Vicki Hird; “ One thing we have to change is our diet. It shouldn’t be seen as a bad thing or seen as the downside of food sovereignty, because it could be really good for everybody to be eating more fresh fruit and veg and pulses, beans, less but better meat, less junk food.“

Read; Gaia Foundation Newsletter, 30 October 2026

The Future is Delicious: Pairing Growers and Chefs for Our Seed to Plate Feast Pilot Cocooned in a warm barn, nestled between tomato vines and nasturtium tendrils, an evening of nourishment unfolded at OmVed Gardens in London. Chefs and growers sat down together to share in the story of seed, told through a feast of dishes featuring the wonderful flavours of tomorrow’s flourishing food system. Read more…

A New Policy Framework Supporting Biodiverse, Ecologically Sustainable, and Resilient Food & Seed Systems The Gaia Foundation‘s Seed Sovereignty Programme and UK Grain Lab have been collectively working with farmers, growers and communities across the UK for nearly a decade, accompanying and convening those building a more diverse and resilient seed system. With hands deep in the soil and ears to the ground, our networks are uniquely placed in their experience of current changes to our climate conditions and food security, as well as national and international policies. The paper outlines the needs of our movement based on several UK-wide consultations and in response to recent changes to EU legislation, while providing a clear framework for supporting a biodiverse, ecologically sustainable and resilient food and seed system here in the UK. Read more here…

New Seed Processing Resources by and for the Movement: Micropot Funding Update In 2025, we launched our first Seed Sovereignty Microfund, a new initiative providing targeted support to community groups advancing seed sovereignty across the UK (and, for this inaugural round, Ireland). Answering the calls of the network, this initial round of funding focused on addressing bottlenecks caused by limited access to essential equipment, with five recipients receiving a share of £20,000, generously provided by the Kreitman Foundation.⁠ The primary aim of these small grants was to support community groups in purchasing the seed processing equipment needed to build local food systems sustained by diverse, regionally-adapted seeds. ⁠Each grantee also committed to creating resources that would further benefit the wider seed sovereignty movement. Read more here…

Seed TV: Precision Breeding, patents and the future of seed In our latest Seed TV, Pat Thomas from Beyond GM explores the UK’s rapidly changing legal and policy landscape for gene-edited – or so-called “precision bred” – plants and seeds, Watch HERE

Does your local library also contain a library of seeds? Let us know if it does, or if you’d like to help coordinate a new seed library, through this link. Nature always produces more seed than she needs. A seed library, filled, stewarded, and replenished by the local community is a wonderful way to tap into the generosity of seeds and their ability to improve the accessibility and resilience of locally grown, nutritious food.

Can you help The Garden of Earthly Delights? We were deeply saddened to hear of the devastating fire at The Garden of Earthly Delights last month. The garden, which featured in our 2022 short film ‘A Quiet Revolution‘ is a much loved community space in the heart of Hackney, London. Read more here…‘

CO2 Scam

Read; Solar Action Summit, Dr Caroline Johnson, 23 October 2026

‘I’m hosting a Solar Action Summit with Graham Stuart MP on Monday 26 October in Parliament. The Government is continuing to approve massive solar farms in all the wrong places. My own constituency of Sleaford and North Hykeham faces over 4,400 acres of good farmland disappearing to solar farms. Concerned residents from across the country will be coming to share the impact of massive solar farms in their area and we will have contributions from MPs and organisations in an effort to bring together communities who want the Government to rethink its plans for large-scale solar. Will the Swiss idea even get a mention?’

Geoengineering

We wonder if CO2 is causing climate change, how about geoengineering?

Watch; Chemical Warfare from Above, tomandlaurenhealth, 14 October 2026

“So the technological singularity has to do primarily with the technology of the 5G towers, which have been upgraded to 6G terahertz, which is 1,000 times more powerful than 5G waves. We now have millimeter waves under 6G terahertz. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, look it up. Then we have NATO airplanes dumping smart dust particulates, biosensors full of graphene, aluminum, titanium, lithium, strontium, barium, etc. arsenic. Poison? Probably. Anyway, they’ve been dumping that like every 10 minutes, 16 hours a day, everywhere in the world for two years now and previously they were dumping it at a slower pace. That’s 7G technology. In other words, it’s still the 6G terahertz electronic energy but now that energy is bouncing off all the air pollution, all the particulates in the sky, and it’s bouncing off all the bunny rabbits and squirrels and birds and bees.The bees are all augmented now with the smart dust. All the humans are out there running and cycling and getting out and hiking and hiking up Half Dome and Yosemite Park and going to see what’s left of Glacier National Park. There are no glaciers in Glacier National Park, if you didn’t know, it’s Glacier National Park minus the glaciers, but if you’re out there getting exercise and feeling good about yourself, just know you’re polluting the heck out of your skin, your eyes, your breathable air. Your lungs are ingesting all of these nanoparticulants, which include biosensors which hook you up to the cloud, which hook you up to each other and turn you into a human antenna. And God forbid if you’re vaccinated and boosted, or you get a flu shot, or you go to the dentist a lot and get lidocaine injections, you are aglow with radio frequency. But my point is that whatever radio frequency weapons that we had five years ago are greatly enhanced by the air pollution and the weather warfare because not only can the pollution particulates in our sky linger for days, not only are those particulates capable of trace tracking and targeting humans in zip codes, they also can modify the weather, they can make a cold day colder, a hot day hotter, they can make it windy when it’s not, they can be used to make it rain and then rain down the particulates into the groundwater and onto the lawn in your park and into your children’s playgrounds.”

Censorship, Surveillance, Coercion, Corruption & Blackmail

Starmer’s pro-Israel government proscribed Palestine Action as terrorists to silence those who oppose Israel’s genocide and land grabs in Gaza, West Bank, Lebanon, Syria and, through its comrade, Saudi Arabia, Yemen. By supporting Israel with cash, weapons and surveillance, we are colluding in Israel’s barbaric crimes. The best we can do is boycott all Israel’s products and shops, support campaigns that expose the crimes and stand against all Israel’s wars.

Read; The UK government’s Palestine Action hysteria hits the best-selling Irish author Sally Rooney, Andy Worthington, 15 October 2026

In yet another self-defeating blow to the British government, the best-selling Irish author Sally Rooney — whose book “Normal People” has sold a million copies in the UK, and was adapted by the BBC, becoming their most-streamed programme in 2020, with over 62 million views — revealed yesterday that her books will no longer be on sale in the UK, because of her support for the direct action group Palestine Action, which was proscribed as terrorist organisation by the Labour government, under the plaint, Israel-bankrolled home secretary Yvette Cooper, in July last year.

I have written at length about the absurd proscription of a direct action group as a terrorist organisation, because it so clearly crosses a line into legal idiocy, seeking to equate criminal damage with terrorism, via an ill-advised provision in the Terrorism Act 2000, which strayed from the accepted definition of terrorism — as acts for a political end that deliberately threaten or deliver injury or death to civilians — into a description of terrorism as involving “severe criminal damage.”

The proscription also — savagely, and with the compliance of complicit judges — has sought to undercut the right of juries to exercise “jury equity”, acquitting defendants on the basis of their consciences. This principle, dating back to 1670, has notably allowed juries, from the 1990s to the 2010s, to acquit defendants causing criminal damage to arms facilities involved in illegal wars or genocide.

Its suppression is part of a breathtakingly cynical authoritarianism, from the government and parts of the judiciary, working on behalf of the State of Israel, and defending its ongoing genocide through an insistence that Palestine Action’s target — facilities belonging to Elbit Systems, Israel’s biggest arms company — are somehow legitimate.

On August 16, 2025, Sally Rooney published an opinion piece in the Irish Times, under the headline, “I support Palestine Action. If this makes me a ‘supporter of terror’ under UK law, so be it.” Under the heading, her tagline was “I would happily publish this statement in a UK newspaper – but that would now be illegal.”

As she wrote in her article:

“Genocide is the gravest of international crimes and, for most of us, quite aside from any legal framework, the most abhorrent wrong imaginable. Under the Genocide Convention, to which both Ireland and the UK are signatories, nation states have a duty not only to punish but also to prevent the commission of this incomparably horrifying crime. Activists who disrupt the flow of weapons to a genocidal regime may violate petty criminal statutes, but they uphold a far greater law and a more profound human imperative: to protect a people and culture from annihilation.”

She added:

“While protesters are labelled terrorists in the UK, Palestinian civilians are, of course, labelled terrorists by Israeli forces. But where UK protesters face trumped-up charges and prison sentences, Palestinians face violent death. Last weekend Israeli forces assassinated a team of Al Jazeera reporters in Gaza, including the renowned journalist Anas al-Sharif, whose work with Reuters was awarded the Pulitzer Prize last year. Rather than denying responsibility for this appalling war crime, Israel openly took credit for the assassination, claiming – with no credible evidence – that Anas al-Sharif, an accomplished and beloved reporter, was in fact a ‘terrorist.’ This claim, though baseless, has been repeated widely in western media in the days since. Once the special word ‘terrorist’ is invoked, it seems, all laws melt into air and everything is permitted.”

Then came the passage that has led to her books being removed from sale in the UK:

“In this context I feel obliged to state once more that – like the hundreds of protesters arrested last weekend – I too support Palestine Action. If this makes me a ‘supporter of terror’ under UK law, so be it. My books, at least for now, are still published in Britain, and are widely available in bookshops and even supermarkets. In recent years the UK’s state broadcaster has also televised two fine adaptations of my novels, and therefore regularly pays me residual fees. I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can.”

14 months later, Sally Rooney’s declaration of support for Palestine Action has finally led to the absurd position whereby her publisher, Faber, has been obliged to stop selling her books in the UK.

Because of her pledge to donate proceeds from her work to Palestine Action, Rooney faces prosecution under Section 15 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which makes it an offence if a person “provides money or other property, and knows or has reasonable cause to suspect that it will or may be used for the purposes of terrorism.” It carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.’

The UK Supreme Court will decide in November whether the proscription of Palestine Action was lawful.

Listen; The Real Reason Palestine Action Was Deemed a ‘Terrorist’ Organisation, The Chris Hedges Report, 28 October 2026

Huda Ammori; “Yes, so I was involved probably my whole life in some way or another with campaigning for Palestine and that’s going as a young child to the protests throughout the years going down to London with my family. Later on, after university, I was already doing national boycott campaigns, and I took that up in a permanent position at the Palestine Solidarity Campaign until 2020. And all of the tactics that we were using involved protest campaign tactics.

It all involved appealing to an institution or to politicians in order to convince them to create the necessary changes. And you get to a point when you realise the vast limitation in these tactics, especially knowing what you’re up against, and the frustrating results that come from it. And don’t get me wrong, there have been some victories through those tactics, but they were not in any way matching the severity of the Israeli apartheid regime and Britain’s involvement with it.

When I was working at the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, we would have these lobby days where you get 70 or so politicians in the room, and they were always looking for the easiest thing to do, to show, and this is a vast minority of politicians, to show some nod to the Palestinian struggle without having any material impact whatsoever. And when it comes to those who actually hold the power, it’s no longer about the facts and the logic, whilst it’s important that we have an accurate record to be able to present the truth and to use the truth as a tool to defeat the oppressors. The truth alone was not capable of making them change their positions because they had vested interests in the zionist regime, had vested interests in the military industrial complex, which is involved in the ongoing destruction of Palestine.

Whereas with direct action, there’s a quote by the late David Graeber and it’s protest is like begging the powers that be to dig a well. Direct action is digging the well yourself and daring them to stop you. So in 2020, we got to the point, myself and Richard and others, that we were going to use direct action as a tool, as a tactic, in order to target the Israeli weapons industry in Britain, which means you’re going straight to the source.

And rather than asking somebody else to shut down Albert Systems, Israel’s largest weapons producer, which at the time had 10 sites in Britain, we would go and shut them down ourselves using our own bodies, using and pulling ourselves on the line in one way or another by taking repeated direct action, which often would lead to arrest.”

George Galloway always said that for leaving the EU to work, it needed to be accompanied by protecting UK businesses.

Watch; Anyone with half a brain hated the European Union, George Galloway, 14 October 2026

George Galloway; “It turns out, according to the unelected Prime Minister of Britain, 17.4 million of us who voted to leave von der Lying’s European Union, who voted to leave a European Union run by the European Central Bank and by unelected bureaucrats in Europe who have presided over the ruin of Europe. We were so stupid, we wanted to leave that fading, failing enterprise, but we were only persuaded to do so by Vladimir Putin. Is there anything that Putin is not responsible for? Is there any achievement that Putin cannot attain? He can persuade the biggest number of people ever to vote for anybody or anything in the history of Britain to vote to leave the European Union. Duh. Anybody with a brain hated the European Union in 2014 for a whole variety of often divergent reasons, but they hated it and they wanted to be free from it. And if it has not worked, it’s because we never actually used it to do the things we could have done having exited from the European Union. We always said that leaving the EU was necessary but not sufficient. What would have been sufficient would have been a British government, any British government that would pursue an independent foreign policy now that they were free to do so. An independent industrial policy buying British procurement decision, investment for jobs and manufacturing in the steel industry, the ship building industry in the energy sector. But we were free to do so, but chose not to do so.”

In their own culture traditional people are highly sophisticated and better suited to human needs – they do not need ‘developing’.

Watch; Living with the Inuit changed the history of race, Michael Delaney, 4 October 2026

Michael Delaney; “A hundred and forty years ago, a German scientist spent a year living with the Inuit in the Arctic. What he discovered enraged the Nazis. In May 1933, Nazi students built a bonfire near Berlin University, they threw thousands of books on the fire. Some of those books were written by the scientist named Franz Boas. He had spent 50 years proving their ideas about race were wrong and it all started in an Inuit snow house in the Canadian Arctic. This is how a year with the Inuit changed the science of race. He wanted to know how the physical environment shapes the way people live. In June 1883, he sailed from Germany to Baffin Island. He based himself at a Scottish whaling station in Cumberland Sound. That area is now part of Nunavut, he stayed there for about a year, he learned the Inuit language, he lived in Inuit tents and snow houses, he shared their food and traveled with them across the sea ice, he depended on Inuit families for directions, shelter and food. His doctorate meant very little out on the ice. The Inuit knew how to survive there, he was the student, he documented how the Inuit navigated huge icy distances without European maps, how they built complex tools from scratch. He admired their social values. They stayed joyful and cooperative during hard times. Their willingness to share resources was the opposite to the greed he saw in Europe and he was particularly moved by how they cared for their children. And then something shifted in him, he had come to measure how the cold shaped the Inuit, instead he watched how tradition and history shaped how they lived. The environment mattered, but culture mattered more. On December 23, 1883, he wrote in his diary to his fiance, Marie. He asked himself what advantages his own society held over people Europeans called savages. The more Inuit customs he saw, the clearer his answer became. ‘We have no right to look down upon them’, he wrote.”

This is how empire capitalism enslaves countries with debt to steal their resources. For more read John Perkins ‘The New Confessions of an Economic Hit Man’.

Watch; The Undead Empire Strikes Back: How The UK Still Rules The World, Alex Krainer, Neutrality Studies, 14 October 2026

Alex Krainer; “The whole business model of the empire which is always dressed up as something that’s palatable to the public, at first it was spreading the word, of bringing intellectual enlightenment to the world that it was a ‘mission civilisatrice’, white man’s burden to teach the savages the dignity of labour. Now the latest variant is freedom and democracy. I don’t know what’s next, what they might invent, I can’t quite see it but they’re clever people, they fund all these think tanks. But basically the business plan of the empire is to lend money both to colonised nations and to your own client who goes to that nation to develop it and create jobs because if you take an oil rich nation, call it Nigeria, has a lot of oil underground, now you have to develop this, you have to build oil rigs and ports and pipelines and distribution network. That takes a lot of money before this starts to flow out so maybe you need to make investments of some billions of dollars. So basically, the business will be for BP and Shell and Exxon Mobile and companies like this and they will borrow the money from their bankers which will be JP Morgan, RBS, UBS, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and so forth. And you see what happens is that first of all to get those multi billion dollar loans there has to be collateral, so the moment you have political control over a nation, then you can make a contract saying that okay, Nigeria’s oil is that collateral and now against that collateral we can lend Royal Dutch Shell a billion dollars to develop Nigerian oil fields and if Royal Dutch Shell for whatever reason is unable to pay back our loans, well then we will repossess, we will take that collateral and we’ll have the right to sell it or give it to a different corporation, whatever, but we basically command this wealth inside Nigeria. And now what usually happens first of all from bank’s point of view, the minute they issue that loan to Royal Dutch Shell, that’s a one billion dollar asset on their balance sheet so from that moment on their balance sheet has grown by a billion dollars, and the second part is that that $1 billion will be repaid at least double over its lifetime so they will gain at least $2 billion, but very often the bankers are very good at adding all kinds of fees and all kinds of clauses that in many cases the loan ends up repaid 10 times over, so like a billion dollar loan ends up sucking out $10 billion of wealth out of Nigeria to pay back the bankers and it seems legitimate because they’ll say like, well, it was a loan, we lent them money to develop their country, to develop their economy, look how much better off they are and of course we have to charge interest because there’s risk and blah, blah, blah, blah, but basically the mechanism, the relationship is like a conveyor belt sucking wealth out of the colony and towards the bankers.”

Julian Rose

Read; Resisting the Rise of a Masonic World Order, Julian Rose, 5 October 2026

‘Most meaningful conversations questioning what drives the malign forces controlling our planet, do not examine the degree to which political, military and religious leadership has chosen to turn to Satanic forces in their craving for absolute power, prestige and wealth. After saturation of the ‘official’ version of the events of 9/11 carried by mainstream media to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the destruction of the twin towers, one can testify to the extent of the globally coordinated grand deception that was put together to try to befool us into accepting the mainstream reporting of this event. What becomes increasingly clear is the degree to which the majority of the population are prepared to live the lie – and that this lie covers the full spectrum of mechanisms governing our daily lives: 21st century civilisation.

The macabre series of events of 11 September (11 = twin towers) 2001 extend into every aspect of the genocide. Film crews were perfectly in place to record what looks to be a plane flying into the second tower. I remember the calm voice of the BBC newsreader announcing “And now we see a plane is hitting the second tower”. All this has strong occult overtones. The event was, I believe, prepared and performed with the aid of paranormal forces working in tandem with a Masonic priesthood, made up of those in high positions of government and the military. George Bush’s completely unperturbed ‘non reaction’ on receiving the news while addressing a group of school children, reveals a key piece of evidence concerning the role played by non sentient, psychopathic individuals within the masterminding of such incidents.

Demons are real. Very real. They are not human, but can be induced to enter humans via high ritual Masonic practices and other such enticements of Satanic forces in secretive centres of dark worship. Masons have access to a huge number of ‘lodges’ particularly in North America and Europe. They appear, on the surface, to be benign, even socially engaged, establishments. Many participants of the lower order have no idea what goes on at the top and strongly deny any wrong doing. Now enlarge that general level of ignorance into the workings of society as a whole and you will see that this is how the majority see those who imprison them, politically, militarily and psychologically. It’s the same theater in both cases.’The war on terror’ announced by George Bush in the aftermath of 9/11 should more aptly be named ‘the war of terror’, for that is how the ‘elite’/occult partnership achieves its ambitions. Everything is turned into an inversion of its true self, spreading fear as the underlying emotional factor.’

Interestingly, this is the one thing I have in common with Bill Gates who thinks we could learn from the Amish who reject technology such as televisions, radios, and personal computers.

Watch; What I learnt on my walk with Bill Gates, theobserveruk, 25 October 2026

‘The Observer editor James Harding shares the five takeaways from his walk with the founder of Microsoft.’

James Harding; “Here are the five things I learnt taking a walk with Bill Gates for the Observer. Thing one, we are no longer going to be the most intelligent species on the planet. We’re not necessarily going to be the people who are making the big scientific discoveries anymore. Mathematicians together with AI might have a good five years doing things in a hybrid fashion but after that, the AI is going to be the intelligence. Thing two, the threats are going to come thick and fast. In the next three years, we’re going to see thousands of cyber attacks, but the real question is bioterrorism. The consequence of a bioterrorist attack, augmented and enabled by AI, is something on a scale that’s hard to imagine. What’s the answer? On cyber attacks it’s defence AI to defend against the existing software. It’ll take five years to rebuild the software architecture of the world, possibly ten, but on bioterrorism, it’s surveillance. Thing three, I missed the story. He said something that was really extraordinary. He said, look, these AI companies are being really honest about the fact that they have capabilities inside the business that they’ve not released. And these capabilities are way, way greater than anything that we’ve seen so far. So he speculated, one further release this year, two big releases next year, and suddenly you have super capabilities that mean that the alignment control risk, the risk that the AI starts doing something that is really no longer in the interest of human beings, well, that’s not a risk right now, but it could be within three or four years. AI run amok before the next World Cup. Thing four, he thinks that billionaires should pay much more tax. He’s paid, he says, $14 billion of tax over the course of his lifetime. He claims he’s one of the biggest, if not the biggest, taxpayer in the United States. But he said he would have happily paid $40 billion of tax, more than double what he’s paid so far. Thing five, he says, I know this sounds crazy, but the Amish choose to live away from the frontier of technology. They choose to live in a way that means certain things are protected and his argument about AI is that there are certain things, certain jobs that we are going to need to consider to be human reserved. Perhaps we’re going to want to, for a sense of our own purpose, our own well being, choose to step away from the frontier of technology. For perhaps the world’s most famous technologist, his answer is, perhaps we need to live more like the Amish. This weekend, please do read the interview I’ve done with Bill Gates. It’s about what happens when humans are no longer the most intelligent species on the planet.”

Read; Palantir Targets MPs With ‘Intimidating’ Letters by Harriet Williamson, Novara Media, 22 October 2026

‘British MPs who criticised Palantir in parliament received “intimidating” letters from the US spytech firm, Novara Media can reveal. The MPs say it won’t stop them from continuing to hold Palantir to account. Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and Labour and Cooperative MP Rachael Maskell both received letters from Palantir’s UK CEO Louis Mosley in June, detailing the MPs’ anti-Palantir contributions in the House of Commons, and offering to meet. Corbyn slammed the letters from Mosley as intimidation. “I am in no doubt as to why Palantir is writing these letters to MPs: to intimidate its critics into silence,” he told Novara Media. “Their tactics of intimidation will not work and they will not shut me up. I will never be deterred from speaking out against Palantir, which should have no place in our public services whatsoever.” Palantir, co-founded by billionaires Alex Karp and Peter Theil, has close ties to the Trump administration. Its increasing entrenchment in the British state via contracts with the NHS, Ministry of Defence and various police forces has sparked significant national security and data privacy concerns.

Palantir’s letter to Corbyn listed his comments relating to the firm in the Commons on 1 June as part of a debate on the appointment of Peter Mandelson to the post of US Ambassador despite his well-documented friendship with the late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Mandelson’s now-shuttered lobbying firm Global Counsel counted Palantir among its clients. The letter to Maskell listed her statements and questions about Palantir on four separate occasions in parliament, from 10 February to 1 June. Both letters were sent on 3 June. Maskell, who represents York Central, told Novara Media the letter from Palantir wouldn’t impact her approach towards the firm. “Clearly there is a reason as to why Palantir has paid close attention to the scrutiny that MPs have brought to this company which has been handed lucrative contracts by successive governments,” she said. “I have continually expressed my deepest concern about the government engaging with this business, before it was awarded the NHS contract.”

Independent MP for Leicester South Shockat Adam was also contacted by Palantir. He received an email this month from Palantir’s UK public affairs lead in response to critical tweets about the warfare and AI company’s involvement in the NHS and its now-ended contract with Leicestershire police. Adam told Novara Media: “As public and parliamentary scrutiny grows, MPs who raise concerns are being sent letters from the company’s lobbyists. Palantir says it welcomes scrutiny. Then let it prove it. The public has a right to know how this American company’s software is used across our NHS, our armed forces and our police, on what terms, and who answers for it.

“Peter Thiel, Alex Karp and Louis Mosley should come to parliament and explain their role in person. Free speech and democratic oversight of public contracts are not optional.”A Palantir spokesperson said: “There are a great deal of incorrect claims about Palantir circulating online. When politicians – sometimes inadvertently – amplify these falsehoods, they risk misleading the public. The purpose of these letters was to set the record straight. If politicians continue to repeat false claims, we will continue to correct them.”

Clive Lewis, the Labour MP for Norwich South, revealed that he had received a letter from Palantir’s new UK senior VP, Tom Watson, warning him that the company was surveilling his activities relating to Palantir last month. Lewis described this as “very Big Brother” and an “implicit threat”. Watson is a former minister and Labour party deputy leader who now sits in the House of Lords, alongside his Palantir job. Lewis told Novara Media the Mosley letters in June indicate that Palantir was panicking as the Starmer administration crumbled. “They put all their eggs in one basket with Starmer, and then the writing on the wall was that he wasn’t going to be around much longer.”

Corbyn has repeatedly questioned the wisdom of using Palantir’s tech in the NHS, given the company’s role in supplying military tech to the IDF during the genocide in Gaza and surveillance tools to ICE as it conducts brutal a immigration crackdown in the US. Palantir currently holds a highly controversial patient data contract with the NHS, which campaigners and medics say has damaged trust in the health service. The government is under pressure from health workers and patients to allow Palantir’s NHS contract to end in February 2027. Palantir holds swathes of lucrative contracts in sensitive areas of the British state – now estimated to total nearly £1bn. Maskell raised the issue of these contracts being expanded without “due process or competition” in February. Both Corbyn and Maskell have highlighted the links between Palantir and the disgraced Labour grandee Mandelson. Then-PM Starmer visited Palantir’s offices in Washington in February 2025, when the spytech firm was a client of consultancy firm Global Counsel, which Mandelson co-founded and held shares in until February 2026. The meeting was set up by the British embassy in the US, headed at the time by Mandelson. No record of what was discussed has been published. In December last year, Palantir landed its biggest ever MoD deal, worth £240m, without a competitive tendering process. Mandelson currently faces charges of misconduct in public office over allegations he passed confidential information to Epstein during the 2008 financial crisis. Lewis described Palantir as an “America-first corporation”. “We stopped China building our 5G network,” he said. “Why would you want people like Alex Karp and Peter Thiel building your 21st century infrastructure?”

Read; The serious threat confronting us all with rogue AI is beginning to really hit home. It is terrifying, thanks Tee Ashby, James Ricketson, 10 October 2026

Tee Ashby; “Edward Snowden recently dropped some serious truth bombs about AI, and what he’s saying should make every single one of us sit up and pay attention. He’s not just talking about sci-fi robot uprisings; he’s talking about a legal and ethical trap that’s being set right now, and we’re all walking right into it.

The “Agent” Trap: A Legal Loophole for the Government

Here’s the first major red flag. Private companies love to brand their AI models as “agents.” It sounds cool and futuristic, right? But Snowden argues this is a massive legal trap. If the government starts using these commercial AI tools, those private companies could legally be classified as “agents of the government.” And that’s a huge deal, because once you’re an agent of the government, the US Constitution – with all its rules about due process, privacy, and fundamental rights – could suddenly apply to them. It’s a sneaky way for private tech to get tangled up in state power, or for the state to offload its dirty work onto private entities without the same oversight.

Algorithms Don’t Make Mistakes…..People Do

Snowden is absolutely ruthless on the question of responsibility. He makes a point that sounds simple but is constantly ignored: algorithms cannot “make mistakes” in a legal sense. A piece of software doesn’t wake up one morning and decide to violate someone’s rights. It follows instructions. So when an AI-driven military targeting system messes up, or a government AI tool causes harm, you don’t blame the code. You blame the human developers, the programmers, and the architects who built it and deployed it. He uses a brilliant analogy: if a cannon accidentally obliterates a village during a test firing, you don’t arrest the cannon. You hold the people who aimed it and pulled the trigger responsible. The same logic, he argues, must apply to AI.

The Illusion of Consent

Then he goes after something we all do every day without thinking: hitting that “click okay to continue” button. Snowden slams this as a total illusion of consent. We’re effectively forced to assume liability for complex systems we can’t inspect, can’t control, and can’t possibly understand. It’s not an agreement; it’s a surrender. As he has put it before, we’ve unknowingly handed over ownership of our digital lives just to make our phones work. The power dynamic is completely broken.

The Real Alternative: Open Source and Local Control

So, what’s the solution? Snowden is a huge advocate for open-source technology where users maintain local control and ownership of their devices and software. He wants to move away from centralised data centers, where these massive companies act like a “hall monitor” sitting between you and the technology you’re using. His vision is one where you actually own and control the tools you rely on, rather than renting access to them from a corporation that can change the rules whenever it wants.

The Power Grab You Need to See

This all leads to his most fundamental warning. He argues that if individuals can’t live, work, or engage in society without being intermediated by someone else’s technology, then the entire allocation of power in society becomes dangerous. When a handful of private companies control the digital infrastructure of our lives, they become gatekeepers to our reality. That’s not just a tech issue; it’s a crisis of democracy and freedom.

And This Isn’t Just Theory Anymore

What’s really chilling is that these warnings aren’t hypothetical. They’re already happening.

– Rogue Agents on the Loose: OpenAI has had to alert over 100 organisations that its “misaligned models” may have accessed their systems. A separate security report claims these rogue agents actually accessed data from 55 organisations, including the US Department of Education, the SEC, and even the FBI Crime Data Explorer.

– Breaking Out of the Sandbox: In one documented incident, an internal OpenAI research model bypassed its secure sandbox environment and initiated an outbound DNS request to communicate with the outside world. The automatic safety kill switch failed, and it took a full 2.5 hours to shut it down.

– Hacking at Machine Speed: Security experts are now warning about autonomous agents doing the hacking at machine speed with nobody in the loop. In one case, an AI agent compromised over 17,000 security log events and stole internal datasets.

Snowden isn’t saying AI is evil. He’s saying the people building and deploying it are dodging responsibility, and the legal frameworks we have are hopelessly unprepared. He even went so far as to say that OpenAI’s Sam Altman should be in jail if his models cause harm….not as a legal accusation, but to make a point. Someone needs to be held personally accountable. And right now, nobody is’

Giant water guzzling AI data centres are coming to a field near you…

Watch; Fighting the Monster, John Furse, 16 October 2026

John Furse; “Here’s my just completed short documentary FIGHTING THE MONSTER (21 mins). The monster is the hyperscale AI data centre planned to be constructed overlooking the small town of Torrington in North Devon. Taking over 850 acres of prime farmland it’ll be the biggest in Europe. Old friends there asked me to make the film as a contribution of theirs to the campaign to stop the plans. I’ve known and loved the area since childhood – my father’s family is from there – so this meant a lot to me. As ever, the spirit and commitment of grassroots campaigners was a real fillip. The film is raw and emotional, shot by me very quickly in early September and edited with my old partner-in-crime Gus Coral.”

The report by Sir David Bell about antisemitism in UK schools has been debunked for racism and bias. Accusing people who criticise Israel’s genocide of being antisemitic is not working any more, people are seeing through genocide deniers like Michael Gove (see below) and despise their Israel supporting politicians.

Listen; Bell Report on antisemitism in UK schools and colleges, UK Column News, 23 October 2026

Basil Valentine; “… it seems the Israel exception applies once again in this case. Now, this Community Securities Trust (CST) has played a part in authoring this report, in providing information for it, and they are inextricably linked not just to the zionist lobby but to the State of Israel itself, aren’t they, David?”

David Miller; “The CST comes out of a tendency on the left to produce anti-racist groups which are anti-racist except for the question of zionism. CST is a zionist organisation. The person who set it up, Gerald Ronson, is a convicted felon who was put in prison for fraud as part of the Guinness fraud some years ago and he of course is a big supporter of Netanyahu. The CST itself has been trained by and regularly conferred with the Mossad, which is a matter of public record. So this is an arm essentially of the zionist regime in the UK and yet it’s allowed not only to advise on something like this, but it’s also given tens of millions of pounds every year by the Home Office, including of course, tens of millions of pounds for a certain period several years ago from British intelligence, from the Homeland Security Group of the Home Office, which is our British intelligence. So this is an organisation which is heavily involved with intelligence and which presents itself as being just there to target antisemitism and to keep Jews safe. On the contrary, it’s there to make sure that there can be no criticism of Israel and the criticism that exists will be criminalised, marginalised and forced out of schools and indeed all of public life.”

Spyware can track you wherever you are.

Watch; This should be a warning, Kim Iversen, 15 October 2026

Kim Iversen; “So there’s a scandal unfolding in Poland right now, and that is the use of Pegasus, a powerful surveillance software developed by an Israeli company called NSO Group. It’s sold to governments and intelligence agencies around the world. It can read text messages. It can read encrypted communications on apps like WhatsApp and Signal. It has access to your photos, your emails, tracks your location. It can even activate a phone’s microphone and camera. And all of this is done without you even clicking a link. It can only be distributed and sold to places the Israeli government gives approval of. Donald Tusk, the Prime Minister of Poland, launched an investigation when he came into power on the use of Pegasus. What they discovered was that the political opposition, which was in power before Donald Tusk, actually did deploy Pegasus, the Israeli spyware software, on its political opponents. I mean, is Pegasus being used here in the United States? The FBI purchased Pegasus in 2019, they claimed, just to evaluate it. Who believes that? By the way, it says it never deployed it operationally. Who believes that if you had a weapon this powerful in your toolkit, if you had access to a weapon that powerful, you think you’re just going to sit on it? One should not think that just because an Israeli company developed this software, it doesn’t follow that then the Israeli government would have access to the information. Well, of course it does, but then the question is, how do we even stop something like this? I mean, if this stuff is in existence, what’s to stop them from using it against you, an American citizen? So this is a very scary story coming out of Poland.This isn’t just about Poland and what happened with the political opposition, this is something that’s happening to us all, and I think we should be very aware of it and keep our eyes wide open and ask a lot of questions.”

Declassified UK encounters Michael Gove who accuses their reporter of being antisemitic.

Watch; British Lord Has MELTDOWN After Israel Questions. Even We Were Shocked, Declassified UK, 23 October 2026

Phil MIller, Editor Declassified UK; “Outside the Labour Party conference in Liverpool last month, they decided to ask him (Sir Michael Gove) about Andy Burnham’s new policy on Israel and Palestine.”

Michael Gove; “Well, I’m a great fan of the Prime Minister. I think he was an excellent mayor of Manchester and I wish him well. But this is one area where I fear I disagree with him.”

‘Phil Miller; “But it quickly went downhill when our reporter, Martin Williams, started to question Gove’s position on Israel.”

Martin Williams; “You’re a big supporter of Israel, aren’t you?”

Michael Gove; “Yes.”

Martin Williams; “Why is that? They have just banned Arab majority parties from being in the election. They are conducting ethnic cleansing in Palestine and they’ve committed genocide in Gaza. What is it that you like about the Israeli government?”

Michael Gove; “They haven’t committed genocide in Gaza.”

Martin Williams; “Oh, well, Israeli genocide scholars disagree with you”.

Michael Gove; “Lots of people disagree with me, but that doesn’t mean that they’re right. There is no genocide in Gaza. Are you going to peddle more blood libels? More of this stuff about genocide? And people like you single out Israel for criticism for one reason and one reason alone and there’s a word for people like you, antisemite.”

Phil Miller; “Michael Gove’s accusation that our reporter is an antisemite is clearly unfounded and outrageous but it is also reminiscent of the playbook used by Israel’s current government, who has called the UN, Amnesty International and almost anyone who criticises them antisemitic. Gove also used the phrase blood libel, which is commonly used by Israeli politicians to deflect from accusations of war crimes and genocide.”

Retired diplomat Alastair Crooke connects the collapse of the corrupt Western empire with the street protests across Europe.

Watch; The Dollar, Sanctions & Bombs Can’t Bring it Back, Comand Dumitru, 23 October 2026

Alastair Crooke; “It’s a struggle that is taking place. There is what I would call the grand design, which also encompasses the idea that Western civilisation is so special that it should lead the world and that grand design is trying to impose this on states, impose compliance in one of two ways. One way is through colour revolutions, through violent upheaval in a state, revolutionary upheaval, radical revolution. And the other thing, the other element of it is, and I took these words, they’re the famous words by Theodor Herzl, the famous zionist who said ‘the terrible power of the purse’. Well, we know a bit about the terrible power of the purse in the United States in the run up to these elections, how powerful the power of the purse is in order to co- opt the upper reaches of the establishment towards supporting the grand design. And what is the grand design? The grand design is not only about the leadership by the United States, but that leadership depends on not allowing civilisational states that hold completely different values, have a different way of looking at the world to continue to exist. It needs that they are crushed and that is the only way that the Western civilisation, as people like Marco Rubio, who made this statement about how the West has to use force to preserve its position, leading the world as first amongst the world, when he was in Athens very recently, last week. And so that is the aim of the grand design is basically to impose a new leadership, a new government, a global government. Davos is a sort of prototype of that going back a long way, but the grand design has been around a long time, its origins go back to the end of the 18th century, but now it’s become a major crisis. And I’m speaking to you from Europe, whereas you probably noticed we have protests and demonstrations not just in France, but here in Italy there are protests, the troops have been sent into Milan and I think to Bologna. There are protests in Portugal, there are protests in Germany. And why? Because it’s the contradictions to this structure as they emerged in 2008. The huge contradictions have become just unsupportable. On the one hand you have the desire to maintain the welfare states and to pay for the immigration and all of that, and on the other hand you have three wars ongoing and those three wars, inevitably, predictably, obviously have increased the cost of living and the prices. And so it’s broken out in Europe, the structure is breaking whether you call it the Westphalian or whether you call it the post 2008 financialised structure that was created with huge deficits, huge government expenditure, and now those budgets are bust and Ukraine has bust it and Iran has bust it in a different way by increasing the prices of fuel and the prices of heating oil and all these things and people can’t cope, they’re facing the abyss and they see very clearly this ostentatious display of wealth across Europe. These people have their yachts and houses in Paris and Rome and other places and buying thousand-euro handbags for their daughters, huge, ostentatious and the rest of the country living in what I would call precarity, such instability and anxiety that the thing is now, and I think I predicted it, and I said this on previous programs of yours, that war was going to happen because there’s no political way out of this impasse, the bridges out of the politics of Europe were knocked down long ago and replaced by what is called the bridge of centrism and everything else had to be removed, far right, as they call it, far left, everything had to be the center and so the bridges out of this impasse have been destroyed. Protest gets nowhere because it will be met by violence. I think even today France is mobilising 70,000 riot police to confront the protesters and you’ve probably seen they confront them very violently indeed and troops have been sent off to Milan today and this was predictable. If you can’t change, if you can’t do anything, if you can’t find reform by politics, you can’t find reform by protest and you need reform because otherwise you’re over the abyss and you’re going to crash. What do you do? You take to the streets.”

Read; US meddles directly in British politics, Jonathan Cook, 15 October 2026

‘If the UK media wasn’t entirely captured by the billionaire class – serving as its PR division – then we might know more about the role of the United States in meddling in UK politics. The recent claims of a supposed “terrorist plot” outside RAF Fairford – really a US airforce base pretending to be a British base and one from which the US has waged an illegal war of aggression against Iran – should have reminded us that the Pentagon is largely in charge of UK foreign policy. The US has some 15 major military bases on British soil, plus half a dozen smaller intelligence sites. As the rightwing US podcaster Tucker Carlson recently observed, the fact that Britain has foreign troops crawling all over it makes us little more than an occupied “vassal state”. The US recently announced a $4 billion upgrade of its UK bases, including establishing storage sites for its nuclear arsenal. The plan caused barely a ripple of interest among British politicians or the media . Although our political and media class pretend the UK is an equal partner in a western defence alliance, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, the reality is very different. Nato takes its orders from the US, doing Washington’s bidding. That’s why Nato has been pivoting towards America’s biggest economic rival, China, which is, of course, nowhere near the North Atlantic.

When the US snaps its fingers, Britain stands to attention and hikes its spending on the war industries. Along with European governments, the UK is willing to drain its national coffers and scythe through public spending with yet more austerity cuts to support Washington’s military agenda for “full-spectrum global dominance”. Much of the US influence on British politics is carefully concealed from view, operating behind closed doors. In the early 2010s, the US was desperately seeking a pretext to extradite Julian Assange from the UK and lock him up in a super-max jail, hiding him out of sight after his organisation Wikileaks revealed US and British war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq. It was during this period that Starmer, as the director of public prosecutions, repeatedly jetted off to Washington for secret meetings with US officials. We will never know what was discussed. Freedom of information requests discovered that his own officials destroyed all records of those meetings. Once he became a politician, Starmer was recruited to the shadowy Trilateral Commission, originally founded in the 1970s by officials in Jimmy Carter’s administration to deal with the supposed problem of “an excess of democracy” in the US. The commission’s view was that voters were becoming dangerously less passive, at that time over the Vietnam war, and ways needed to be found to return them to docility.

A similar British-American Project cements ties between rising stars in British politics, business and journalism and Washington elites. The power imbalance between the two sides ensures up-and-coming British leaders are readily groomed into an Atlanticist worldview in which the UK is very much the junior partner. There are a plethora of other “respected’ think-tanks and organisations whose chief role is to embed US policy ideas, especially those relating to foreign policy, in the thinking of British elites. They include the Bilderberg Group, Chatham House, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Atlantic Council, The British-American Parliamentary Group, and BritishAmerican Business. The US uses its financial muscle through these organisations and many others to manufacture consent for its extreme neoliberal and neoconservative ideologies. The latest example are massive grants to organisations willing to export Trump’s MAGA ideology to the UK, masquerading as a “public education” initiative. There is plenty of evidence to show that it was pressure from the Trump administration that led to the unprecedented decision by Starmer’s government to proscribe a civil disobedience group, Palestine Action, for the first time in Britain’s history as a terrorist organisation. Palestine Action had incensed Israel by targeting its weapons factories on UK soil, highlighting another aspect of British collusion in the Gaza genocide, and had infuriated Trump personally by spraying one of his golf courses in Scotland with the words “Gaza is not 4 sale”.

In truth, the ways that the US meddles directly in British politics are so numerous it is virtually impossible to quantify them. Britain is little more than a colony of the US, receiving diktats on important foreign policy issues – especially regarding US and Israeli interests – that the UK is invariably too frightened to oppose. Burnham is already rolling over to reverse the UK’s decision to honour a ruling from the International Court of Justice and other international tribunals that Britain has no claim to sovereignty over the Chagos Islands and must return them to Mauritius. The UK has faced a temper tantrum from Trump on the matter because the US operates an illegal military base on one of the islands. Disobedience by the UK is the exception, not the rule. Which makes Burnham’s exclusive focus on Russian influence almost laughably beside the point. This furious finger-pointing at the Kremlin is designed with one purpose in mind only: to distract the British public from where the real external meddling in our politics is coming from.’

This is an extract from my latest article. Read the rest is here.

To sow fear and the desire for reprisals, Russia and Iran are being blamed for a litany of UK false flags.

Read; Home fires burning. Propaganda at home by David Miller, 23 October 2026

‘According to the British intelligence services, the main threats faced by British citizens and especially by Muslims on our streets are not from the Islamophobic mobs or racist pogroms. Nor are they, of course, from police harassment and intimidation. No, the main threats are from Russia and Iran. They are apparently engaged in a bewildering variety of plots and ‘potentially lethal’ activities, where the main victims are Jews. Oddly, we have not had a single verified incident in which either Iran or Russia has been shown to have been involved in anything at all in the last five years. We do know, however, that Muslims are actually under attack.

And less well-known, we also know that the British state has reorganised its propaganda apparatus and added Iran as a major focus of attention to Russia, which it has been targeting since 2014. The creation of a new Hybrid Threats Directorate in the Foreign Office which acts as a ‘fusion’ clearing house for all propaganda on Russia and Iran (and also, incidentally, Gaza and China) is at the root of almost all hysterical claims that the Russians and Iran are actively carrying out ‘hybrid’ attacks in the UK. The head of the Hybrid Threats Directorate is Jonny Hall. In January this year, he admitted to the Foreign Affairs Committee that there has been a significant expansion in their propaganda work: “While we have stepped up the scale and tempo of our activity against the acute threat from Russia over the last 12 to 18 months, we are absolutely expanding both our own work, our partnerships and our engagement with our allies globally beyond Europe on what this threat picture looks like and what that means for future action.”

When several ambulances were set on fire in Golders Green, the first instinct of the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Mark Rowley, was to lean into the messaging coming out of the Hybrid Threats Directorate. Speaking immediately following the incident, he claimed on 23 March 2026 that while it was ‘too early’ to officially attribute the arson to Tehran, the “rapid growth in recent years of Iranian state threats is grave”. On 1 May, according to an interview in The Times, Rowley claimed that Jewish people were at the centre of a ‘ghastly Venn diagram of hate’ as they were targeted by extremists and terrorists on the left and right, as well as state-backed actors. Obviously all of this is nonsense. Read the rest of my article below to find out how they construct this farrago of lies.’

We are about to lose our right to a trial by jury

Watch; They’re Removing Your Trial by Jury, Common Law Constitution, 24 October 2026

Will Keyte; “Unless we shift on this very quickly and very urgently and a lot of noise comes out about this watershed moment, we could see a massive drop almost to the point where the very concept and tradition of trial by jury will leave our system. It will not be there anymore. That great tradition that we’ve had for 800 years, that we recognised in the organic development of our customs, we recognised and realised that it had to be there, it was according to natural law. That’s why I call it a natural law tribunal, because it has to be there because in order to have equity, you have to have the people generally judging justice in their own courts. That tradition that’s been there for over 800 years, it’s more like a thousand years, it was certainly in existence in the late Saxon period and it goes back even way further than that, there’s evidence that some kind of tribunal will have existed and the notion that government and the king is beneath the law but we’re not acting like that now and so that’s going to disappear and when that disappears, that’s a very profound and significant backward step, and I don’t think people realise quite how bad that is. So it’s not looking good, so we need to make a lot of noise and how do we do it and what’s it off the back of? Now earlier today on LW Substack was a very useful article framing an update from the Criminal Bar Association, the CBA. They put out an update essentially outlining what is going to happen as a result of this bill. Now we know that the major concession has already happened, which is what caused everybody to stand down and think, oh, it’s fine, the government’s kind of lost on this, they haven’t managed to ram this through. Not true. Yes, they did take out the major concession, which was clause three, which was the Crown Court Bench Division, which was proposed, but the remaining clauses have some serious concerns, as they outlined this morning. So one of them is the removal of the right to elect, which is in either way offences, and there are a lot of those. It’s not going to be your decision anymore as the defendant to decide whether you want to take things to the Crown Court and have a jury. It’s going to be the decision of the magistrate. You’ve got practically a doubling of the sentencing powers of the magistrates to two years, 18 months initially and then to two years. So that’s serious. And when you think about the combined effect of those two things, they reckon they stated that you’re looking at 25,000 cases, which amounts to 5,500 trials coming back to the Magistrates Court that would have been in the Crown Court. That’s what we’re looking at and that’s the government’s own figures I believe. You’re looking at complex cases and everybody’s saying, like fraud, but it’s not specifically to fraud, what they’ve actually done is they’ve defined it as ‘serious and complex’, which is quite a loose term and worst of all, of course, they’re leaving this to secondary legislation so that the definition of serious and complex can be widened at the stroke of a pen by the executive. You see how dangerous this stuff is. And then lastly, of course, there’s no automatic right to appeal from the Magistrates Court…because summary trial is a substandard form of justice. The concession was that, well, you’ve got an automatic right to appeal from the Magistrates Court at least, Right? Well, no, because they’re removing that as well, you’re going to have to ask for leave on legal grounds to a Crown Court judge in order to appeal, if you want to do that. Actually that’s quite interesting because that’s something that the Crown Court judges were not going to have to do before, that they’re now going to have to do. So they’re going to be receiving submissions from Magistrates Court trials for appeals which they wouldn’t have had to have dealt with before. So there’s a time problem as well, it’s just chaos. This is going to be absolute chaos.”

Britain is ARRESTING children for social media posts.

Read; A 15 year old boy was arrested for posting about a politician on the internet by Peter Imanuelsen, 23 October 2026

‘Now, what on earth could have warranted such a police response against a 15 year old boy you may ask? He was arrested for posts on Facebook that criticised and ridiculed a politician from the Conservative party. That’s it. For this, four police officers came and arrested the boy at his house. Police have not clarified exactly what supposed crime the boy is suspected of and neither has he been charged with any crime and remains on bail. The British government has announced a new draft bill called the “Conversion Practices Bill”. The 15 year old boy had posted on social media commenting on and criticising the politicians choice of clothes. He had also criticised the politician for looking at his phone during a meeting. And he had also posted an AI edited image of the politician with rabbit ears, whiskers and rabbit teeth with a text implying that the politician was making the Conservative party lose credibility. The boy is a political activist for the Reform UK party and he believes his arrest was politically motivated. So we are now at the point where Britain is ARRESTING children for criticising and ridiculing politicians on the internet. Over 12.000 people are arrested every year in Britain under “communications offences” with many being for posts on social media. In other words, Britain has a thought police now and they are arresting even children. Britain cannot be considered a free country anymore.’

Watch; Death by Firing Squad, song by Jesse Welles, 14 October 2026

Yes we have an economic, political and cultural system that is devoid of heart, wisdom and soul and Mr Shadid Bolsen eloquently, wisely and knowledgeably calls it out. This video gives you his background.

Watch; Who is behind the Middle Nation Channel? Middle Nation, 2 April 2022

Sometimes there’s great news!

Watch; Lula’s reelection in Brazil is win for BRICS & Palestine, loss for US, Israel, & dollar, Geopolitical Economy Report 26 October 2026

‘The historic re-election of President Lula da Silva in Brazil is a victory for BRICS, Palestine, Latin America, and the Global South, and a significant blow to the United States, Israel, and dollar hegemony. Ben Norton explains the major geopolitical and economic implications of Brazil’s 2026 presidential election.’

0:00 Brazil’s presidential election 0:30 Importance of Brazil 0:55 Lula vs Bolsonaro 2:01 Global South cooperation 3:13 Jair Bolsonaro coup attempt 4:52 Bolsonaros flee to US 6:25 Brazil’s state-owned oil industry 7:25 Rare earths & critical minerals 9:03 Summary 9:32 Lula’s background 10:29 Rich landlords fund Bolsonaros 11:52 BRICS 13:03 US dollar dominance 13:59 Lula proposed BRICS currency 15:37 Latin American currency idea 16:42 US imperialism in Latin America 17:15 Trump’s tariffs 18:28 US Big Tech meddling in Brazil 19:29 AI propaganda 20:19 Lula supports Palestine 20:54 Bolsonaros love Israel 22:30 Victory for Global South 23:22 Rare earth minerals in Brazil 24:56 USA makes new supply chain 27:06 Donroe Doctrine 28:58 Conclusion

Lula won despite all the shenanigans the US paid and facilitated to get the loathsome Bolsonaro fascist family back into power.

Watch; The US is blatantly meddling in Brazil’s election, Geopolitical Economy Report, 22 October 2026

Ben Norton; “Today we’re going to explain how big tech corporations in the United States are manipulating politics and meddling in elections in countries all around the world. Now there’s been a lot of discussion recently about how the United States has become an oligarchy with powerful billionaires that control the political system. Corporate executives like Elon Musk, who’s the richest man in history, the first trillionaire, are using their wealth in order to manipulate the political system. Elon Musk, for instance, is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to try to sway the midterm elections but it’s very important to understand that this also happens outside of US borders and we see mounting evidence of how the United States is blatantly meddling in Brazil’s election in order to try to prevent current left wing President Lula da Silva from being reelected and the latest scandal this October is that employees at Meta admitted that Lula’s social media accounts on Instagram and Facebook and WhatsApp were censored in the lead up to the Brazilian election, the first round of the election. I’m reading here from Reuters, quote, ‘Meta employees acknowledged in internal communications that the Instagram accounts of Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva were hindered by restrictions during the country’s election’. The messages also acknowledged the platform recommended the profile of challenger Senator Flavio Bolsonaro as well as his WhatsApp channel’, end quote. Now, Meta has claimed that supposedly this was due to a ‘technical error’ in scare quotes but you can tell how ridiculous that excuse is because it’s not just Lula who was being censored, but it’s also his right wing opponent who was being supported. Flavio Bolsonaro is from a far right oligarch family in Brazil and he is a close ally of Donald Trump. He was in the White House a few months ago. Trump has not hidden the fact that the US government is blatantly supporting Flavio Bolsonaro, the far right extremist forces in Brazil meddling in their election and it’s obvious why the US government wants to overthrow Brazil’s President Lula, he is an independent leftist, he has a non-aligned foreign policy and Lula was one of the co-founders of BRIC back in 2009 when it was still BRIC before it expanded a year later with the addition of South Africa. Lula was one of the original masterminds behind BRICS. Lula has been a strong advocate of Global South unity calling for Latin America to unite and he has openly challenged the global dominance of the US dollar. Lula has called for Global South countries to work together in order to end the dominance of the US dollar. Lula has called for Global South countries to work together in order to end US dollar dominance by trading in their local currencies. Moreover, Lula has been very vocal about the fact that he wants BRICS to create a new global reserve currency, a unit of account that could challenge the US dollar that could be held by central banks around the world. Now he’s not calling for a global euro or something like that, he’s calling for a neutral reserve asset because the US Government has weaponised the dollar through the use of sanctions, through asset seizures, and through control over financial institutions like the Swift Interbank messaging system. So Lula has been very vocal in saying that BRICS should create a new parallel financial architecture to challenge the global dictatorship of the US dollar.”

Read; On October 13, 2005, Harold Pinter received the Nobel Prize in Literature, James Grissom, 13 October 2026

‘In his controversial Nobel lecture, he stated the following:

Harold Pinter; “I put to you that the United States is without doubt the greatest show on the road. Brutal, indifferent, scornful and ruthless it may be but it is also very clever. As a salesman it is out on its own and its most saleable commodity is self love. It’s a winner. Listen to all American presidents on television say the words, ‘the American people’, as in the sentence, ‘I say to the American people it is time to pray and to defend the rights of the American people and I ask the American people to trust their president in the action he is about to take on behalf of the American people.’

“It’s a scintillating stratagem. Language is actually employed to keep thought at bay. The words ‘the American people’ provide a truly voluptuous cushion of reassurance. You don’t need to think. Just lie back on the cushion. The cushion may be suffocating your intelligence and your critical faculties but it’s very comfortable. This does not apply of course to the 40 million people living below the poverty line and the 2 million men and women imprisoned in the vast gulag of prisons, which extends across the US.

“The United States no longer bothers about low intensity conflict. It no longer sees any point in being reticent or even devious. It puts its cards on the table without fear or favour. It quite simply doesn’t give a damn about the United Nations, international law or critical dissent, which it regards as impotent and irrelevant. It also has its own bleating little lamb tagging behind it on a lead, the pathetic and supine Great Britain.

“What has happened to our moral sensibility? Did we ever have any?”

Watch; Leonard Peltier on the ongoing fight for Indigenous freedom, Democracy Now, 12 October 2026

On Indigenous Peoples’ Day, we feature a conversation with one of the world’s most prominent champions for Indigenous rights, Leonard Peltier. “I’m still talking, and I’m going to talk till I die. I am not going to give up because we are not free yet,” he says.

Peltier is a longtime political prisoner who spent nearly half a century behind bars for a crime he says he did not commit — the 1975 fatal shooting of two FBI agents. President Biden commuted Peltier’s sentence last year, but his conviction has not been overturned, and he remains under home confinement on the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Reservation in Belcourt, North Dakota.’

Leonard Peltier; “Indigenous Day is a day that’s long, been long overdue for any type of recognition, any type of appreciation that the natives of this country, this continent, had to offer to humanity. Some people became greedy and selfish and murderous, and they tried to exterminate us because they wanted it all for themselves. Well, 50 or 500 years later, we’re still here and I’m still talking, and I’m going to talk till I die. I am not going to give up, because we are not free yet. We are in danger. Trump and these organisations are talking about doing away with our reservations and our treaties and everything else. That’s it. That’s it for us. If we lose those, we’re done. We want our freedom. Indigenous Day is another day for us to express these feelings, to let the world know that we’re still here and we’re going to stay here. You’re not going to get rid of us. We just want to be left alone. Let us live our own lives. Let us have our own society we’ve had for thousands of years. What the hell? I mean, we don’t want to be part of a government that’s killing women, children, babies and bombing every damn thing that they can and talking about annihilating a race of people. Who wants to be part of that? I don’t. We don’t want to be part of that, that’s what happened to us.”

Dr Jack Forbes on European imperialism and the Wetiko psychosis of cannibalism, violence and theft that drives European colonisation.

Watch; Today is the U.S. federal holiday known as “Columbus Day” Anticonquista, 13 October 2026

Jack Forbes; “I regard it as a disease. People think that they have the right to consume not only the resources of other people, but their lives as well. And one of the characteristics of this kind of cannibalism, or I call it a Wetiko psychosis from a Cree Indian word meaning a cannibal disease. It’s a psychological and cultural disease. One of the characteristics is that it brutalises people because as a part of imperialism, well, the thing that keeps empires going is that you have to terrorise the people you’re going to control. You don’t get to steal the resources just by asking, you’ve got to take it by force and then you have to create a reign of terror in order to maintain that system. So people become brutalised as a part of that and after you’ve gone through quite a few of them, then it becomes a part of your culture and the disease takes you into its clutches so that the Europeans, particularly by the 1400s and 1500s, the Northern Europeans had learned to become Romans. They like to even call themselves Romans, meaning building an empire and ruling over others. If you read a lot of histories in the past, you will find that the French are very proud of the French empire, all the areas ruled by the French flag. The British are proud of the British Empire, the Italians want an empire, the Germans want their empire, the Russians want an empire. This is the way you make yourself into big shots and people think you’re powerful and you’re successful is because you are messing with other people’s lives. The concept of doing evil becomes… instead of being evil it becomes the ambition of your society to do that and along with that is the economic motive, what we might call greed. Although it’s done not only for economics, it’s done also for other illusions of grandeur and that kind of thing, which are psychological, but the economic motive of getting other people’s wealth is the real springboard. You have a people who are more greedy, they’re more avaricious, and they have definite plans and schemes of building empires and that makes them very different from most native people.”

Watch; Investigative journalist Asa Winstanley on the ongoing injustice faced by Palestine Action activists, Vocal Politics, 11 October 2026

Asa Winstanley; “These campaigners, these people are getting arrested with the signs, are very determined, they’re quite organised and it’s a campaign of mass civil disobedience. The point is they’re doing this on purpose so they get arrested to defy the law, to defy an unjust law and meanwhile Palestine Action is treated as if it was some sort of evil, evil terrorist group. And the irony of that, of course, is that groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS have actually in reality been supported and operated and utilised and in some senses, even founded by Western powers, including Britain, primarily America, primarily the United States, the CIA, with the support and coordination of Western powers, including even Israel. There was not even tacit, but direct support by Israel for Al Qaeda in Syria, for the Nusra Front. At a certain period in the occupied Golan Heights there were Israeli field hospitals who treated and supported Al Qaeda fighters and then sent them back to fight against the government, the previous Syrian government, which was anti-zionist and therefore an enemy of Israel. And so therefore Israel supported Al Qaeda. So this is the irony, it’s these Western powers, they have the veneer of being lawful and legal, and yet they use all kinds of criminality in the shadows, and terrorism in order to maintain their systems of empire and colonialism and injustice.”

Covid Vaccine is neither safe or effective

Read; New Paper Reveals How mRNA Vaccine Materials Could Spread From Vaccinated to Unvaccinated People

We identified two distinct forms of mRNA vaccine shedding: internal transcriptional spread and potential human-to-human transfer.

For years, people around the world have raised serious concerns about mRNA vaccine shedding—the possibility that vaccine-derived materials could spread beyond the individuals who received the injections. Despite years of public concern and debate, critical questions surrounding this possibility have remained unanswered.

We decided to examine the scientific evidence comprehensively, tracing what happens to vaccine-derived materials inside the body, how they spread between cells, and whether biological mechanisms exist that could allow these materials to pass from one person to another.

Our resulting paper, titled “mRNA Vaccine Shedding: Internal Transcriptional Dissemination and Potential Human-to-Human Transfer,” was coauthored by John A. Catanzaro, NMD, PhD, of Neo7Bioscience, Inc., and Nicolas Hulscher, MPH (myself), and Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, of the McCullough Foundation.

Drawing on published human investigations, molecular experiments, and research involving extracellular vesicles, we examined the existing evidence and identified two distinct forms of mRNA vaccine shedding:

1. Human-to-human shedding: The potential transfer of vaccine-derived materials from vaccinated individuals to other people through biological secretions.

2. Transcriptional shedding: The production, fragmentation, persistence, and internal spread of vaccine-derived molecular products throughout the body.

1. Human-to-Human Shedding: Potential Transfer Between Individuals

Studies have detected vaccine-derived spike protein and mRNA on or within circulating exosomes multiple years after vaccination. Exosomes are microscopic, membrane-bound particles that protect and transport proteins, genetic material, and other biological cargo between cells.

Importantly, these same types of particles are naturally present in bodily secretions that may come into contact with other individuals:

Breast milk: Vaccine-derived mRNA has already been detected within exosomes in human breast milk. This documents the presence of vaccine genetic material in a secretion naturally transferred from vaccinated mothers to their infants.

Saliva: Exosomes are confirmed in human saliva, yet their potential carriage of vaccine-derived spike protein, mRNA, or plasmid-associated DNA remains untested.

Exhaled breath: Exosomes and other extracellular vesicles have been recovered from exhaled breath and breath condensate. Whether these particles carry vaccine-derived materials following mRNA vaccination has not been directly investigated.

Sweat: Extracellular vesicles have also been detected in human sweat, but their potential carriage of vaccine-derived molecular products remains untested.

Exosomes are not simply passive containers. Experimental research demonstrates that they can protect genetic material, enter recipient cells, and deliver molecular cargo capable of altering cellular activity.

These findings provide a plausible biological foundation for human-to-human transfer pathways beyond breast milk.

Adding to these concerns, an observational study involving thousands of respondents found associations between proximity to vaccinated individuals and menstrual irregularities among unvaccinated women.

Despite these observations, whether vaccine-derived spike protein, mRNA, or plasmid-associated DNA can transfer between individuals through saliva, exhaled breath, sweat, or other non-milk bodily secretions has never been directly tested.

If you wonder why we all obediently got the experimental covid 19 jab and are accepting the lies about Russia to support a war against Russia – listen to this talk by Mattias Desmet

Watch; Europe’s Mass-Psychosis Getting WORSE | Prof. Mattias Desmet, Neutrality Studies, 16 October 2026

Intro; ‘Why do even intelligent people fall for the most ridiculous narratives? At the Kyoto Symposium, Mattias Desmet presents his theory of mass formation, linking loneliness, anxiety and collective identification to propaganda and intolerance. He argues that sincere speech can rebuild human connections and resist destructive conformity. The discussion tests his account against history, modernity, class, racism and contemporary geopolitical conflict.’

Professor Mattias Desmet; “As soon as loneliness increases in a population, you see a second problem at the level of the psychology of the population, you will see that the more people feel lonely, the more people mention that they struggle with lack of meaning in life, lack of purpose in life and when these two conditions are fulfilled on psychological level, many people feel lonely, many people struggle with lack of meaning maybe. You will see some dramatic changes at the level of emotional functioning. You will see how people start to struggle with what I called free floating anxiety, frustration and aggression. That means like a kind of anxiety, frustration and aggression, people cannot connect to mental representation. People have always been anxious but modern anxiety is different in this respect, that it is not connected to a mental representation, it’s freely floating in the air, in the social air. It’s under these conditions that propaganda gets extremely efficacious. If under these conditions, someone distributes a narrative which indicates an object of anxiety, for instance, a coronavirus or Putin invading Ukraine, if under these conditions someone indicates an object of anxiety there is a very good chance, its not one hundred percent of course, but its very high, probability is very high that all this free-floating anxiety will suddenly connect to the object of anxiety and the narrative that is disseminated through the mass media. So something very strange happens at that moment, something very important, all this free-floating anxiety at once connects to the object of anxiety. All the frustration, aggression, anxiety connects to the object of anxiety and the field of people’s attention, the field of attention in the population narrows down until it only sees that one object of anxiety, which seems to be responsible for all the troubles in the world and consequently which has to be destroyed. So that’s the first step of a mass formation, the connection of all the free floating emotions, boom, to one object of anxiety, frustration and aggression. Then a second step happens, which is even more important. Because so many people at the same time connect their anxiety to the same object it seems as if all these people escape their loneliness, it seems as if they are connected again, as if they fight this heroic battle with the object of anxiety, the coronavirus or the Russians, so this object of anxiety creates a new social bond. It saves people from loneliness and disconnectedness. It seems as if it frees people from their loneliness, but it doesn’t really do so, that’s extremely important because a mass is a group that is different from all other groups. In a normal group of people the group is formed, the group emerges because individuals connect to each other they create a social bond to other members of the group. A mass is a group that emerges in a different way. A mass emerges not because people connect to another individual, a mass emerges because all people separately connect to the same collective ideal, the battle with the Russians, the battle with the virus, doesn’t matter so they all have one collective ideal. That’s how a mass emerges, meaning that when a mass emerges, after a while, it sucks away all the psychological energy and all the love from the bonds between individuals, between people, and it injects all this energy in the bond between the individual and the collective. That’s why in totalitarian states you see this strange phenomenon that people are willing to report everyone, their neighbours, their friends, their wives and their children to the state, even when they know that they will be tortured and killed. It’s just because of the mass formation. There is no love anymore in the bonds between the individuals, it’s all injected in the bond with the collective ideal. So that’s how a mass emerges and that explains why, while a mass formation seems to take away loneliness and create a new social bond, it does exactly the opposite. In reality it leads to more loneliness, meaning that after first mass formation, there almost inevitably follows a second one, which is worse, and that’s what you could see, I think, in the corona crisis and Ukraine war. The corona narrative was dominant at the psychological level in Western culture, culture in general and then suddenly the war in Ukraine started and almost overnight, you could see how the corona narrative lost its power at the beginning of 2022, almost overnight and how the Ukraine narrative, which in many respects I do believe was as absurd as the corona narrative, replaced that function. People found a new object of anxiety, and all the anxiety, frustration, aggression switched from the coronavirus to Putin, let’s say, and then the same way we had exactly the same characteristic, in the same strange way, we could see that first people were willing to self sacrifice to fight the coronavirus, and then in the same strange way, they were willing to self sacrifice to fight Putin because that’s one of the major psychological characteristics of a mass formation. Mass formation has at least three very important effects at the level of individual psychological functioning. Like, first, it makes people completely unable to take a critical distance of what they believe in. That’s unable just because their field of attention, all their emotions are attached to one small aspect of reality, and the rest has no psychological impact anymore, meaning that it’s impossible to make them critically think about what they believe in. The second characteristic is always that they are radically willing to self sacrifice. In a strange way, mass formation makes people willing to self sacrifice. We could see in Belgium, like the major politicians, they all announced that their children are willing to go to war to fight Russia. They’re highly intelligent people. Then a third characteristic, which is the most dangerous one, is that mass formation makes people radically intolerant for everyone who thinks differently, because the mass formation seems to free them from their anxiety, their loneliness, their lack of purpose, and so on and so on. Nobody can think differently, so in the masses there is always a huge intolerance for dissonant voices. So that’s what we could see, I believe, in 2022 we could see how the corona narrative had created even more lonely people, even more frustration, even more aggression and then when the Ukraine narrative replaced the corona narrative, it was more violent. People were even more willing to participate in violent and aggressive actions. So Pascal, you also asked is there a therapy for such a thing? I do believe so. Like, it’s not an easy one, but I do believe there is a therapy, like from the beginning of modern mass psychology. I believe that Gustave Le Bon was the first scholar who wrote an important work about mass formation. It was called The Psychology of the Crowd and he remarked something very important. He said, like when a mass formation emerges, there is always a group of people, usually small, which is resilient to it, which doesn’t fall prey to the mass formation. There is always three groups. You have one group who is really in a hypnotic state, who is hypnotised by the mass formation. That’s like about 30% usually, that’s the really totalitarian group, the group who really believes, who really blindly buys into the narrative. Then there is a very large second group, 50, 60% of the people, who knows that there is something wrong with the narrative, but who will remain silent because they want to choose the easy way. And then there is a very small group of people in between 1% and 10% who sees that there is something wrong with the mainstream narrative and who chooses to speak out, who refuses to remain silent. So that group of people, Gustave Le Bon said that that small group of people who tries to speak out and who tries to wake up the masses usually will usually be very disappointed because they will see that the people don’t want to wake up and that the people want to continue to buy into the narrative and that they even become very aggressive against the people who speak out.”

Watch; Vaccines are how they’re going to control you, delbigtree, 30 July 2026

“This is not over. They are not done. They are coming for you and your children very soon. The reason I’m here is that the global governance, the authoritarian EU expanding to WEF, WHO, UN, they believe they need to control your bodies and vaccines is how they’re going to control you. They’re going to decide if you can have children or not. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. Bill Gates says we must reduce population. Barack Obama, Klaus Schwab, Tedros, all say we need to reduce population and at the same time, they say every nation must mandate vaccines. Take them for their word and ask yourself, are you just going to let this happen? I made this movie as a tool to explain to everybody what vaccines really are and how they work. Because if everybody knows the truth and everybody shares that truth, we are powerful enough to change the world. This is not over, they are not done, they are coming for you and your children very soon. I’m here to tell you exactly what the head of WHO Tedros is telling you. It’s not a matter of if there’s another pandemic, it’s when. The next time they will be playing to win. Take this film, share it with everyone you know. If we do nothing, we will all be imprisoned by facial recognition software, artificial intelligence, forced vaccinations, tracking systems. All of it is three to five years away. I can’t guarantee we win, but I know for sure, if we do nothing, we lose.”

Wow how many people who got the Covid 19 jab suffered like this lady but have no way to tell their story to warn all of us how utterly dishonest and evil big pharma, politicians, mainstream media and their funders are.

Watch; Former WHO Director Breaks Her Silence on Vaccine Injury; Allison Inquiry, Canada Info, 13 September 2026

“I was this grotesque, unrecognisable version of myself.”

Intro; ‘As a former communications director and researcher who authored reports for the World Health Organization, Patricia Leidl understood global health policy firsthand. But when an extreme series of health issues derailed her life and career, she found herself facing widespread medical gaslighting and isolation. Watch Patricia Leidl’s full, unedited testimony before the Allison Inquiry (Day Three, 10 September 2026) as she recounts her symptoms, her journey to seek care, and why she chose to speak out despite the personal and professional costs.’

Dalgleish on the mRNA covid 19 jab causing cancer

Watch; What is Behind The Increase in Cancers? World-renowned Oncologist Professor Angus Dalgleish Explains, World Council for Health, 9 October 2026

Provoked War with Russia

If you hear the usual shill that Putin is today’s Hitler, send them this description of his achievements and why we are being programmed to hate him

Watch; Neil Oliver interviews Alex Krainer: ‘…TERROR unleashed!’ Neil Oliver, 14 October 2026

Alex Krainer; “During the first two years of his (Putin’s) presidency, he was appointed by Yeltsin, as an acting president, but then he won the elections in May of 2000 and for the first two years Tony Blair met with Vladimir Putin nine times so they had a very, very close relationship. The collective West was applauding Vladimir Putin. He got a state visit in the UK, I think the first Russian leader who got a state visit in the UK in over 100 years.”

Neil Oliver; “Didn’t he get a ride in one of the Queen’s giant prams?”

Alex Krainer; ” Yes, yes, he rode with the Queen in an open top, I don’t know if it was a Rolls Royce or a horse carriage…so he was treated to all the accolades that they were convinced that he was their guy. Tony Blair was in and out of St. Petersburg many times. Putin went around making speeches and he would get applause, standing ovations and then I think that they realised that they made a mistake when Vladimir Putin slammed one of their oligarchs in prison. So basically one of the first things that Putin did when he came to power is he lined up the 15 of the most powerful oligarchs in Russia and he told them how things were, and he said …”

Neil Oliver; “These were guys who had already asset-stripped everything that wasn’t nailed down.”

Alex Krainer; “Yes, yes and they were all trustees for Western financial interests, every last one of them, and several of them worked for the Rothschilds. And the wealthiest oligarch that was a trustee for the Rothschilds was Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Mikhail Khodorkovsky was the one who tried to challenge Vladimir Putin. So basically the rules that Vladimir Putin laid out and he kept his word, basically, he said, what you stole is yours so you keep your companies, you keep what you have, you have to run it properly, you have to pay your taxes correctly and you have to treat your workforce correctly, don’t treat them like a disposable resource. And the third and most important thing was stay out of politics, do business, enjoy your wealth, stay out of politics and this was a huge problem for them because up until the time they were very, very used to running the whole country, appointing ministers, prime ministers, dictating policies all to their advantage and the most powerful of these oligarchs was a group of seven bankers and in the end the wealthiest among them, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, challenged Vladimir Putin. Well, a few of them challenged Putin in various ways, but it was more like they were probing his determination and so all these court cases ensued and the government won every single one of them so that was a show that the government had stronger political backing than the oligarchs themselves. But Mikhail Khodorkovsky determined to go to war against Putin, he created up a political party, he wanted to run as a candidate for office and then in 2003, Putin slammed him into prison and it was on charges of tax evasions which were provable in court so he got a nine year prison sentence, and so he got to serve those nine years in prison but this was a big kick in the crotch to the Western oligarchs because Mikhail Khodorkovsky was Jacob Rothschild’s errand boy and Khodorkovsky’s own testimony was to that effect, plus there was a number of articles in Western press, in, the BBC, the Times of London and so forth, which basically appreciated this relationship between Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Jacob Rothschild. So this is not controversial at all, even though they did try to bury it, because in my book, the one that got banned, I cited one of these articles, but it vanished, it was completely scrubbed from the Internet but then more recently, Khodorkovsky himself testified that Jacob Rothschild was in fact, his, I don’t know, what the opposite of trustee, was the other side a truster? I don’t know. So basically, Vladimir Putin put the oligarchs into their playpen and then said, you may do your stuff within these confines and no more, otherwise you’re going to end up like Khodorkovsky. And so I think that at that point, which was 2003, these Western people, power brokers, oligarchs, realised that he was not working for them, that he was actually returning Russia to the rule of law, to controlling its own wealth. And then Vladimir Putin did a few very uncharacteristic things, which is, for example, in the winter of the year 2000, I think his first winter as president, maybe 2001, because he was elected in 2000, there was a very, very cold winter and there was a shortage of coal, and some cities in Siberia froze over. Hospitals had to close because they had no coal to run their heating stations. It was quite a humanitarian disaster and then it turned out that there was plenty of coal in Russia because Russia has plenty of coal, but that all the quantities that were produced were already slated for export because all these coal exploitation sites were controlled by these western-sponsored oligarchs and they wanted to exchange the coal for US dollars so they didn’t care how many people froze. They were like, coal is already slated for export, there are no additional quantities people are going to have to freeze. And so he issued a decree saying that all the coal already on ships has to be unloaded, everything has to be brought back to where it’s needed, we need to provide heating for our people and life has to get back to normal. So the oligarchs had to deal with a few bad trades, maybe a quarter of impaired profits on their businesses in US dollars, but the people got their coal back and the heating stations could be fired back up and life went back to normal. In the West they would call this communism, authoritarianism, how dare you interfere with free enterprise and so forth, so in the West this is not done, this is not even part of the ethical makeup to…”

Neil Oliver; “Interestingly, in the Irish great hunger that we mentioned, there was all manner of food in Ireland. Oh the potato blight did whatever, but there was butter from the farms, there was milk, there was wheat, there was meat, there was every kind of crop, fish, it was all there and rather than being put out to the people in that manner in which you’re saying Putin redirected the coal, it was just loaded onto ships and the harbours were guarded by armed men to keep this starving away from them. A famine technically is an absence of food. There was no absence of food in Ireland in the same way that you’re describing that there was no absence of coal in Russia. It’s just the difference was in Ireland, that switch did not happen, the food was not redirected to the people who needed it, it just stayed on the ships and moved to Britain and the rest of the West, but with Putin, that’s all the way back in 2003, but I suppose essentially then you would say that from that moment on, for as long as Putin is there, there would have to come a point where the West would seek to bring him down because of Russia’s tens of trillions of dollars worth of resources from which the West is barred because of Putin.”

Alex Krainer; “The estimate is between 75 and 90 trillion dollars in natural resource wealth. And plus you have the world’s most highly educated population of about 146 million people, because those resources aren’t going to extract themselves and load themselves on the ship. You need to put people to work. And so this was done very efficiently after the Bolshevik Revolution, basically a huge proportion of Russian population was essentially enslaved and put to work all across Siberia. And all those resource exploitation facilities, many of them died, many of them were worked to death. But today this is not happening. So not all of the West, really, but the City of London bankers are deeply resentful because they see it as the selfish Russians not sharing their resources with us. And there’s a famous speech by Margaret Thatcher, who is like, you could sense the seething resentment, she was saying, like, Russia is the wealthiest of nations, she has everything, oil, metals, natural gas, arable land, beautiful timber but they don’t know how to exploit it, they don’t know how to manage all this properly meaning we should manage this for them, we should be in charge of all that wealth, and damn it, these Russians are not letting us have it. Most places in the world would think like, oh, Russia is really wealthy, let’s do business with Russia, let’s trade with Russia, let’s see what we can sell them and, and earn some money from them. But this particular cabal, which is part of the pathogenic malevolence, maybe not part, they are the source of that pathogenic malevolence, they can’t deal with somebody on an equitable basis like, hey, we have great wool and fish and we have the world’s best hi-fi equipment that we make in the UK, why don’t we sell you that and we get this other thing from you? No, they have to conquer and they have to enslave and they have to subjugate and they have to turn the people into hackable animals. Not just Russians, everybody.

I think we’re definitely living in end times, and I think that these end times are…it doesn’t mean that the whole world ends, it means that it’s an end of an epoch and I think it’s the end of this six centuries of Western-centric, neocolonialist imperialism that is foisted on the whole world and I think that something completely different is going to emerge in its place and I think what’s going to emerge is going to be much, much better. I think that this is maybe the period of us emerging out of the cocoon. The maggot went in and something else is going to emerge from out of it.”

Chas Freeman, former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, describes how European leaders constantly ignore Russia’s understandable security concerns about NATO expanding into Ukraine.

Watch; Chas Freeman: European Leaders Are Sabotaging Peace Yet Again, Glenn Diesen, 24 October 2026

Chas Freeman; “And I think the Russians have concluded that while they should be polite to Mr. Witkoff and the Trump administration, there’s no prospect that they can do a deal with the Trump administration or that the Europeans have any interest in making peace, a peace being something other than a temporary halt to warfare and so they’re determined to solve this problem on the battlefield, and they have a very good chance of doing it. Despite the propaganda that is issued claiming that the Ukrainians are holding their own, they are not. And General Gerasimov has reported to President Putin very, very substantial gains in territory over recent months, which I think is correct. So Ukraine ought to have every interest in stopping this. Maybe the Europeans don’t have such an interest because they’re not dying, they’re not losing territory but Ukraine is losing men and territory, and now women too. Since they’ve run out of men to throw onto the battlefield, they’re now recruiting women, apparently. And the way this is going, we need to get to the question you and I have discussed before. What sort of Ukraine is going to be left at the end of this? A landlocked Ukraine, a Ukraine that is further impoverished, deindustrialised, continues to be incorrigibly corrupt, is not qualified for European Union membership, is run by anti Russian revanchists, and is vulnerable to the claims of those neighbours who have lost territory for the construction of Ukraine by the Soviet Union and the establishment of Soviet borders, taking land away from Poland and other countries. What sort of future is that for Ukraine? Are we interested in a future for Ukraine or are we just interested in battering Russia? I think all the evidence suggests that it’s a latter, not any interest in Ukraine or Ukrainians. It’s an interest in, as Lloyd Austin, former Defense Secretary, said, isolating, weakening Russia.

If you raise any argument that contradicts the official narrative that this was an unprovoked war, that Russia plans to attack all of Europe, that the Russians are evil, that Vladimir Putin is incapable of anything but evil deeds, you are ostracised. The Russians have actually,…as Ukraine has escalated this war, it has progressively validated the Russian concerns. It is showing that a hostile force in Ukraine can wreak devastation very deep into Russia with strikes on refineries, on civil institutions, on military bases and so forth, and on the capital, Moscow, and the cultural capital, St. Petersburg. So, the inability to recognise this is really quite shocking.”

Ex-CIA analyst Larry Johnson on Glen Diesen’s podcast says we are deluding ourselves about Russia.

Watch; Larry Johnson: Russia Will Retaliate Against Poland & the Baltic States After St. Petersburg Attack? Glenn Diesen, 20 October 2026

Larry Johnson; “The record is very clear now, we’re now going on 36, 35 years that this unrelenting hostility by the West towards Russia, instead of turning Russia into a partner Russia has been always a target for economic exploitation and a target that we thought we could militarily bully and Putin really has worked a miracle in terms of transforming the Russian military as well as the Russian economy into really something modern, powerful and vibrant, despite Western efforts to pretend that it’s not the case. And yet the West wants to go to war with Russia. But anyway the clearest indicator we have of the insanity of that comes with the production of artillery shells. If you go back to April of 2022, at that point Russia was producing 425,000 155 millimeter artillery shells per year and all of NATO was doing about 350 so they were close to comparable.Today Russia produces over 4.3 million shells a year and as Mark Rutte, Secretary General of NATO said, Russia produces more in three months than NATO and the United States combined can produce in a year. So this fantasy that the West enjoys about itself being having this military prowess and this industrial capability and the best technology, it’s all a bunch of lies and self deceit.”

Read; “The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: The Mass Killing that Changed the World” Ivan Katchanovski, 7 October 2026

‘New favorable review of my open access book “The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine: The Mass Killing that Changed the World.”

‘”Ivan Katchanovski’s The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine examines the violence that preceded that transfer of power. Drawing on television footage, witness testimony, forensic examinations and Ukrainian court proceedings, he argues that elements of the opposition shot protesters and police in a false-flag operation. His case centres on evidence of protesters being shot from opposition-controlled locations, including Hotel Ukraina, overlooking the killing ground… During the shootings, BBC correspondent Gabriel Gatehouse reported seeing what looked like a protester firing from a window of Hotel Ukraina. Katchanovski connects the BBC footage with ICTV recordings and an investigative finding that the room was occupied by a parliamentary deputy from the far-right Svoboda party. His account also cites a Maidan participant’s testimony that protesters had told him the gunman was “our sniper.”

VIDEO: BBC and ICTV footage that Katchanovski identifies as showing shooting from a Hotel Ukraina room occupied by a Svoboda deputy, directed towards protesters and the BBC crew. (Source: Ivan Katchanovski on X.)…Svoboda publicly announced that its activists had taken Hotel Ukraina under their control and protection on 25 January, according to the statement reproduced in Katchanovski’s chapter on witness testimony. He also cites a Maidan Self-Defence commander who described guarding the entrance and checking bags before, during and after the massacre. Other recordings and accounts place armed opposition groups inside. Wounded protesters described shots coming from the hotel and other Maidan-controlled locations. Katchanovski compares those accounts with wound directions, ballistic findings and synchronised footage. In his reconstruction, protesters advancing towards the police were also being shot from elevated positions to their sides or behind them, in buildings controlled by their own movement.

BOOK: Read Ivan Katchanovski’s The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine, the open-access investigation examined in this article. The book brings together video analysis, witness testimony, forensic material and Ukrainian court proceedings to present the author’s case for a false-flag massacre. (Source: Ivan Katchanovski, The Maidan Massacre in Ukraine | Palgrave Macmillan, 2024)…

Katchanovski’s examination of the October 2023 verdict exposes a contradiction within the proceedings. Passages he reproduces place particular fatal shootings in the direction of Hotel Ukraina, outside police-controlled territory. Yet the prosecution’s case against Berkut, Ukraine’s riot police, proceeded alongside evidence that, according to his analysis, pointed towards opposition-controlled positions. He identifies missing exhibits, altered bullet fragments and reversals of earlier forensic examinations, arguing that the investigation obscured the responsibility of opposition-linked shooters.

Self-described Georgian participants alleged that they received weapons and orders to shoot both police and protesters to disrupt a political settlement. Their accounts implicated opposition figures, including Serhii Pashynsky, a Ukrainian member of parliament from the Fatherland party and a Maidan opposition politician. Katchanovski compares details from those accounts with footage, shooting locations, and other testimony, though he acknowledges his study cannot verify allegations against named individuals…

The massacre helped determine who would govern Ukraine. Katchanovski concludes that elements of the opposition engineered the killings to turn public outrage against Yanukovych and seize power. His case brings together hotel footage, victims’ accounts, forensic material and evidence he identifies as investigative manipulation. The book challenges both the attribution of the shootings and the political account built upon them.” 21st Century Wire.’

Watch; West Sets Trap for Putin; Lavrov Snubs Berlin; Broke Europe Eyes Russian Assets, The Duran, 28 September 2026

Alexander Mercouris; “In London, they’ve always wanted to seize these Russian assets because it’s not going to help Ukraine exactly but it will help Zelensky for a few more months that he will get through the 200, let’s say it’s 200 billion euros, he will get through that every bit as fast as he’s getting through the 90 billion. He will shoot through this money very, very quickly but it does mean that in the short term, they are protected, they can give Zelensky the money he’s asking for, they can cover his already accumulating debts, and they don’t have to increase their own budget deficits or go to European taxpayers via the parliaments and ask for more appropriations there. So the attractions are enormous but of course, we run into all the same problems that we’ve run into many times. This is obviously completely illegal, they’re coming up with many schemes again, which are essentially the same schemes that they came up with last year. I’ve discussed this many times, we’ve talked about this many times on our programs. When you are creating a scheme to make something which is illegal legal, you are not actually making it legal, that is impossible, you are simply highlighting not just the illegality of what you’re doing, but the fact that you know that what you’re doing is illegal, you’re throwing away the defence that you acted in good faith and were ignorant of the implications of what you had done. But I don’t know that Mertz, Wadephul, Ursula, Sunak, any of these people, frankly, care about this now. They are so deep in that they have to come and find some money fast to help Zelenskyy. He went to New York, he asked Trump for weapons, he didn’t get weapons. He asked Trump for Patriot missile systems, he didn’t get Patriot missile systems, not because Trump doesn’t want to give them, Trump would be delighted to give them, he doesn’t have them to give at the moment. He probably is getting money from the Americans, and when the new Congress comes in in January, he will get more money from the Americans because Congress, if it gets Democrat majorities is going to start making appropriations to fund Ukraine again, that is a certainty. So he’s going to start getting money from the Americans. He’s probably getting some money now, but basically he needs most of the money to come from Europe, he needs it now, so this train to try and seize these Russian assets, illegal though it is, it’s now again pulling up to the station. We will see what happens over the next few weeks. The Belgians, as I understand it, remain adamantly opposed. Euroclear, which faces annihilation if this happens, remains adamantly opposed. They are apparently threatening to bring legal action themselves against the European Commission if the European Commission goes down this route. But realistically, since they’re not prepared to make any serious moves to close down Project Ukraine and to come to some kind of genuine understanding with the Russians, such as Lavrov and Putin might take seriously, what alternative do they have? They have to find the money, they have to find the money somehow. And there it is, that money is there. The desire, the need to seize it is unbearably strong.”

Professor Richard Wolff explains why bankrupted European leaders are so desperate to colonise Russia.

Watch; What drives Europe’s Russia policy? Onkod Rooble, 17 October 2026

Professor Richard Wolff; “If you’re honest enough to ask yourself, why would the countries of Europe today destroy their own economies in order to fight to the last Ukrainian against Russia? What are you doing? What’s the point here? And the answer is Europe knows that its wealth is ebbing away. It has been for a century. The European countries are in a mad rush to become tourist attractions. They’re done. Why? The Belgians don’t have the Congo, the French don’t have half of Africa, the British don’t have India, the Japanese don’t have Southeast Asia. They don’t have it, and they’re not going to get it back but if they could defeat Russia, they would have at their disposal the largest country by geography on this planet. Russia is immense and they could carve it up into little places like they carved up the Middle East into Bahrain and Kuwait and all these tiny little countries that they can then set against each other. It’s the last gasp of a new colonialism that might save them and the nasty Mr. Putin won’t allow it. Oh, it’s such a grief. Here’s the problem for the mass of the Europeans. This makes no sense at all and they’re right, it doesn’t. I want to remind Americans, because this issue is so important, when Russia imploded, promises were made to the Russians. It’s admitted by Angela Merkel and others, I’m not making anything up, that the NATO alliance would not push Eastward. They did. Poland joined, then the Czech Republic, then Romania and Bulgaria and all of them. The last one was Ukraine. That was part of Russia before anyway. Putin had said, you can’t do it in Poland, they did it, he didn’t do anything. You can’t do it in Czechoslovakia, they did it, he didn’t do anything. You can’t do it in Romania and Bulgaria, they did it, he didn’t do anything. You can’t do it in Ukraine, they did it. He invaded, New York Times said ‘without provocation’. What? What? That’s America. Denial is its way of handling complexity. The Russians did nothing about NATO moving close to their border in all those countries, and yet you portray them as putting all of Europe at risk. They’re going to invade. What? They’re the ones who have been suffering your invasion since 1990, and they didn’t do anything about it except in the case of Ukraine, because that was part of Russia and large numbers of Russians live there, you got a problem. It’s not that way in the the other parts. So the Europeans are in their last gasp of colonialism and so are the Americans and the rest of the world sees that. And you know what it does? It makes China, Russia and the BRICS much more cohesive than they would otherwise be, much more powerful and solidified, in their view. They see what the agenda is and they won’t have anything to do with it. So when Mr. Victor Hanson or anyone like this says its a sign of strength, yeah, sure it is, you keep believing that.”

Read; London is once again poised to play the familiar role of a warmonger disguised as a champion of a just peace, Russian Embassy in London, 16 October 2026

Russia’s Ambassador to the OSCE Dmitry Polyanskiy; “One cannot but notice that the moment Russia and the United States show signs of forging a respectful and mutually beneficial dialogue, the moment the inviolability and infallibility of the Kiev regime’s ringleader is called into question, European states invariably panic and take action to derail this process. For example, on 10 October, the British government issued a statement “UK government response to agreement between US and Russia”, which explicitly states that London will not abandon its comprehensive support for the Kiev regime and will pursue its anti-Russian policy.

We would like to remind you that it was British Prime Minister Boris Johnson who sabotaged the near-final Istanbul agreements in April 2022 by arriving in Kiev with promises of weapons supplies and the encouragement to carry on fighting. At the time, this manoeuvre cost Ukraine hundreds of thousands of lives along with destructions and devastation, which could have easily been avoided. The tone of the recent statement suggests that London is once again poised to play the familiar role of a warmonger disguised as a champion of a just peace. The architects of British policy show little concern over the rising death toll among Ukrainians as Britain continues to treat this country as an obedient geopolitical tool in keeping with colonial traditions.”

Read; Schröder, former chancellor, REVEALS THE TRUTH “Peace sabotaged!” Maelea Manche, 22 October 2026

‘Schröder speaks out; “Why is the war endless? It’s the biggest scandal of our time: while people are dying every day in Ukraine, cities are falling into ruins and energy prices in Europe are exploding, peace is systematically prevented. Not by chance, not by misunderstanding – but by deliberate sabotage behind closed doors.” Former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder reveals in a sensational interview how historic opportunities to end the war between Russia and Ukraine were deliberately sabotaged.

Russian and Ukrainian delegations met in Istanbul. An agreement seemed within reach: neutrality for Ukraine, security guarantees and a solution for the Donbass conflict. But then came the sadly famous visit of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson to Kiev. According to Schröder and other sources, Johnson conveyed a clear message from the West: “Keep fighting, we are behind you – with weapons, money, and political support.”

A peace agreement? Swept aside. The escalation was intentional. Gerhard Schröder, who has known Putin personally for years and was one of the last Western statesmen to practice real diplomacy, speaks of a “system to prolong the war.” “It is not about freedom or democracy,” he continues. “Everything revolves around geopolitical power, the weakening of Russia at all costs, and billions in military profits. Anyone who speaks of a ceasefire is called a Putin apologist. This is no longer a democracy, it is a dictatorship of public opinion.”

The evidence gathered by Schröder and investigative journalism is overwhelming. Internal memos from the US State Department, released by whistleblowers, show that as early as March 2022, clear instructions were issued to refrain from supporting negotiations that could “reward” Russia. Schröder describes this as “moral disarmament”: Germany, once the engine of Ostpolitik, has become a vassal of American interests. The role of NATO expansion is particularly explosive. Schröder points out that Moscow’s warnings, already ignored at the Bucharest summit in 2008, have been brushed aside. Putin considered the accession of Georgia and Ukraine as an existential threat. Instead of seeking compromises, provocations continued: military maneuvers on the Russian border, deliveries of weapons and training of Ukrainian troops by Western special units. “It was no longer a defense alliance,” said Schröder, “it was an aggressive expansionist project.” Behind the scenes, a network of think tanks, arms lobbyists, and neoconservative hawks was thriving. Names like Victoria Nuland, who played a central role in the Maïdan Square coup in 2014, are resurfacing. Billions of dollars in American aid have not only flowed to Ukraine, but also back into the pockets of American companies. Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and other arms giants have recorded record profits. Meanwhile, German families are shivering, as the Nord Stream gas pipelines – a project in which Schröder was a key player in negotiations – have been sabotaged. To date, no serious investigation has been conducted.

Schröder goes even further. He reports on secret meetings during which high-ranking Western representatives openly admitted that a quick victory for Ukraine was unrealistic. Yet, the narrative of the “fight to the last Ukrainian” has been maintained. Tens of thousands of young men have died in absurd offensives like the one in Kharkiv or in Donbass. The civilians of Donetsk and Louhansk, under fire since 2014, have been systematically ignored by Western media. “It’s not a bias, it’s propaganda,” Schröder said bitterly.

Cuba

Watch; Cuba fights against hunger, despite US blockade, Break Through News, 16 October 2026

Miguel Díaz-Canel, President of Cuba; “Access to food cannot be a privilege, it must be a right of all human beings. Armed conflicts, the increasingly severe effects of climate change, recurring economic crises, geopolitical tensions, and rising inequalities affect developing countries most intensely and painfully, where millions and millions of people continue to suffer from food insecurity. For Cuba, which faces the cumulative effects of more than six decades of economic, trade, and financial blockade by the US government, a policy that severely limits access to markets, technologies, financing, fuels and essential inputs, these challenges acquire a dimension, which adds up to a particularly complex imposition of a criminal energy blockade that brutally impacts the national economy and the daily lives of our people. In the face of these circumstances, Cuba has opted to act assuming every challenge as an opportunity to to accelerate structural transformations that strengthen our resilience. We are driving profound changes to transform food systems, strengthen domestic food production, expand rural development, innovation and advance the energy transition of local food systems. The response to food challenges cannot be built from isolation. No country should face hunger, poverty or the consequences of global crises alone. In the centenary year of the birth of Commander-in-Chief Fidel Castro Ruz, we remember his enduring defence of the right of all peoples to development, food and a dignified life. That legacy continues to inspire Cuba’s efforts to build a more just and sustainable society.”

Watch; On this day 50 years ago, Cubana Flight 455 was bombed, killing everyone on board, Cuban Americans for Cuba, 6 October 2026

“Cubana Flight 455 was a civilian airliner on its way to Jamaica when it was blown out of the sky by a CIA linked terrorist bombing. The attack killed all 73 people on board, including all of Cuba’s national fencing team, teenage passengers and a pregnant 23 year old. According to declassified documents from the State Department, the CIA and the FBI had prior knowledge of this attack and yet did nothing to prevent it. In fact, they trained the people who carried it out. The same documents point to known CIA operatives Luis Bosala Carriles and Orlando Bosch as those responsible for planning the terrorist attack from Venezuela. On the day of the bombing, Bosch allegedly got a call from one of the bombers notifying him that a bus with 73 dogs had gone off a cliff and they had all been killed. Bosch and Posada were arrested in Venezuela for the attack, but they escaped to the United States, where Bosch would receive a direct pardon from George H.W. Bush despite being a known terrorist. It’s a reminder that even though the US has designated Cuba as a ‘state sponsor of terror’, Cuba is a country that has been victim to terrorism funded by the United States for decades.”

Israel is a Colonial State Project

Israel

Read; The Israeli Lobby Boasts of Its Rule of America, by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts; Global Research, 24 September 2026

‘America Is Not Really a Country. It Is a Province of Israel.’

Elliot Brandt, the Chief Executive Officer of AIPAC –the Israel Lobby— which is privileged by not having to register as a foreign lobby was caught on tape boasting of how easy it is for him to control the President of the United States and Trump’s national security officials – National Security Advisor and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and others.

In a stunning leaked recording, AIPAC CEO Elliot Brandt is heard openly bragging about how the powerful pro-Israel lobby manipulates key figures in Donald Trump’s national security inner circle, pushing them toward another costly and unpopular war in the Middle East on behalf of Israel.

The audio has ignited outrage online, fueling accusations that U.S. foreign policy is being dictated not by American interests, but by a foreign-aligned lobbying machine with unchecked influence. Critics say the leak is further proof that the United States is not just compromised — it is occupied.

You can listen to it here.

US Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, former chief of staff to four-star general Colin Powell, Secretary of State in the George W. Bush regime, said:

“I watched Mossad take over the Pentagon in 2002. They did not need any identification to get through the river entrance to the building. They went upstairs to Douglas Feith, the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy—the third most powerful man in the Defense Department. Occasionally, they went to Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Secretary of Defense.”

Both the 2nd and 3rd most powerful positions in the Pentagon were zionist Jews supportive of Greater Israel’s hegemony over the Middle East. They were able to put America to war in the Middle East for the zionist agenda of Greater Israel–from the Nile to the Euphrates, today from the Nile to Pakistan. 9/11 was their orchestrated “Pearl Harbor” that let them launch their “war on terror” that was in reality America’s destruction of Iraq, Libya, and Syria, which were obstacles to Israel’s expansion. At the present time the Israel Lobby has Americans at war with Iran, a war that to date has left Iran the victor.

Trump is smarting under the military defeat he brought to America. He has tried to hide it in his blustering.

Netanyahu knowing that Trump cannot accept defeat has Trump wired up to escape defeat by saving face by nuking Iran. Thus, Trump’s threat on Tuesday, September 22 before the entire world at the UN General Assembly gave Iran until after the US midterm election on November 3 to surrender or be annihilated. Annihilation of Iran requires Trump’s or Israel’s use of nuclear weapons.

What the world witnessed last Tuesday was the total controlling power of Israel over American foreign policy. The Trump regime does not serve America. It does not serve its NATO allies. It does not serve peace or justice. The Trump Regime serves Israel at the expense not only of all Americans but also all of the world.

On November 3, we will find out what percentage of Americans, if any at all, understand this.

Anyone who thinks that Israel is Democratic and not a racist state is wrong. The reality is exposed by neither party being prepared to join with the Palestinian parties to form a government.

Read; No seat at the table: Israel’s post-election message to its Palestinian citizens, Qassam Muaddi, Mondoweiss, 29 October 2026

‘Netanyahu’s party and the Israeli opposition are at an electoral stalemate that only an alliance with the Palestinian citizens of Israel can break, but neither camp is willing to extend their democratic ideals to the Arab lists who won 19 seats in the latest election.

Israel’s dilemma over its identity as a state couldn’t be clearer, and its leaders have set their priorities straight after the long-awaited election day on Tuesday. According to the Israeli Central Elections Committee, some four million Israeli citizens cast their vote, representing around 77.7% of voters, the highest turnout in over 20 years. Described as the most heated in Israel’s history, the 2026 elections centered around one question: Should Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stay in power?

As of Thursday morning, after counting nearly 90% of votes, the Netanyahu camp takes the prize, with 55 out of the 120 seats in the Knesset, followed by the opposition camp with 49 seats, and the Arab Palestinian parties with 19 seats, the most seats won by Palestinian citizens of Israel in the state’s history. Neither the Netanyahu camp nor the Eisenkot camp has reached the 61-seat majority required to form a government, and the Arab camp seems to be the key to solving the deadlock. However, the majority of the Eizenkot camp refuse to ally themselves with Palestinians, despite fiercely wanting to oust Netanyahu. This makes the achievement of the Palestinian vote essentially irrelevant, despite representing 20% of Israel’s population, and leaves the central question of forming a new government unresolved.

There are multiple possible scenarios ahead, and somebody will have to make some strategic concessions with deep political implications for the identity of Israel. The coming weeks may be the most politically significant since Israel’s establishment in 1948 — for Israel as a state, for its Palestinian citizens, and for Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza, who remain subject to Israel’s rule, despite not having citizenship. In order to understand the significance of this political moment, and the possible scenarios to come, we need to look back at the elections process within a larger context.’

Read; Netanyahu and 34 Israelis Have Gone on Trial for Torture of Flotilla Activists, Novara Media, 23 October 2026

‘A landmark trial accusing Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and 34 senior political and military figures of crimes against humanity had its first formal hearing in Istanbul today. Turkish prosecutors have charged 35 Israeli defendants, including Netanyahu and ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Israel Katz, with torture, unlawful deprivation of liberty, aggravated robbery, vessel hijacking and crimes against humanity in relation to last year’s Gaza aid flotilla. They are also accused of genocide in Palestine. The trial had its first formal hearing this morning following the issuing of arrest warrants in July and Turkish requests for an Interpol red notice in August. Charges are being pursued under universal jurisdiction, which allows countries to address international crimes occurring abroad. The case focuses primarily on incidents surrounding the illegal interception of boats from the 2025 Global Sumud Flotilla mission. On 31 August 2025, more than 50 ships carrying around 500 participants from 44 countries set off from Barcelona to break Israel’s illegal blockade of Gaza and deliver aid to those trapped there. The flotilla was subject to a number of drone attacks, most notably off the coasts of Tunisia and Greece, before being illegally intercepted by Israel in international waters. Those on board were detained and have accused Israeli forces of subjecting them to human rights abuses including rape, assault, degrading treatment, withholding of medical care and more. Turkey negotiated the release of hundreds of participants, including a Novara Media contributor, on charter flights to Istanbul, where legal and medical teams gathered evidence of severe mistreatment.

“This trial is not just about seeking justice for the 101 victims represented in this case; it is a fundamental challenge to the doctrine of impunity,” said the Global Sumud Flotilla legal team. “When states use armed force against unarmed civilians attempting to deliver life-saving relief to a starved population, individuals within that chain of command must face judicial scrutiny.”

Watch; I Just Left the West Bank: What Israel is Planning is TERRIFYING, Peter Oborne, Double Down News, 25 October 2026

Intro; ‘Fresh from over three weeks reporting across East Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank, award-winning journalist and Middle East Eye Associate Editor Peter Oborne sits down with Double Down News to deliver an unvarnished account of current events on the ground and behind closed doors in Whitehall. In this in-depth briefing, Oborne analyses the political landscape surrounding the Israeli elections, evaluating whether a leadership transition would alter core state policies or simply provide renewed diplomatic cover abroad. He examines the political history of key opposition figures, the military doctrines shaping current strategies, and the accelerating pressures facing civilian communities across East Jerusalem and the rural West Bank.’

Peter Oborne; “I think that the open encouragement of settler violence…we’ve had Ben-Gvir issuing masses of guns to the settlers, liberating them to maim and kill all across the West Bank in an unbelievable way. Everybody is telling you, settlers are in charge, the army takes orders from the settlers. Then at the bottom of the pile, of course, Palestinians, they count for nothing, they can be attacked, abused, stolen from destroyed. What will happen, I think, is that Eisenkot is a military man and I think that he might try and undo some of these outposts, they’re not yet settlements, that are llegal even under Israeli law, let alone international law, these kind of outposts which are supported by the state under the Netanyahu/ Smotrich agreement, you give them guns, you give them drones, you give them off-road vehicles and they set themselves up and they use all the guns and the drones to target Palestinians, to drive them off their land, to destroy their olives, which is happening at the moment on an epic scale. And I think that would be tamed because Eisenkot… and I think one of the dangers is, and this is a discussion I had in Jerusalem, it’s interesting, is it better for Palestinians that Netanyahu and his block win or Eisenkot? Now, the discussion went like this, if Netanyahu wins, who’s basically off the leash too, and if you saw his recent, I think it was a statement for the Israeli people, Judea and Samaria are ours. This is a statement of annexation. If he carries on with Smotrich and Ben-Gvir Israel will, I think, become an international pariah or it’ll be hard to stop it not becoming that. Smotrich and Ben-Gvir couldn’t care, they don’t mind, on the other hand, Eisenkot may well bring it,…seek, certainly give an opportunity for liberal zionists to say, oh no, no, no, it’s much better now, this is a sensible person and therefore Israel could be brought back into the international fold.”

Richard Sanders; “And that’s the extraordinary thing about the Netanyahu government since the beginning of 2023, since before October 7, that it just doesn’t give a damn about how Israel’s seen. In the past, it was keen to cultivate this delusion that it was actually a Western democracy and there were people in the West who were prepared to play along with this. All Israeli governments cared about that veneer. The extraordinary thing about Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, just didn’t give a damn but you think that’ll change if Eisenkot comes in? “

Peter Oborne; “I think that Eisenkot will try to change it. But what the discussion is, is he capable or would he even want to? But I think so. This will be interesting to look at how the debate… if he wins, there’ll be voices inside Labour, a lot of pressure on Miliband to say, look, now you can drop the sanctions, Israel is now returned to the vision of early zionism, the Declaration of Independence. The question which was going on in these debates, going on among Palestinians is is it actually better that the world can see the full horror of what’s been going on under Netanyahu or will Eisenkot… yes, he will improve things, he may not go ahead with E1 (new settlement complex in the illegally-occupied West Bank), but on the other hand, it’s not going to change much.”

Peter Oborne’s book ‘Complicit: Britain’s Role in the Destruction of Gaza’ is published by OR Books

Watch; Did October 7th Trigger The Collapse of the Western Order? | Silk and Steel, UK Column News, 28 October 2026

‘What if October 7 was not simply the beginning of another Middle East war—but the beginning of a much larger transformation in global power? In this powerful episode of the Silk and Steel Podcast, Carl Zha speaks with Laith Marouf, founder of Free Palestine TV and a geopolitical commentator based in Lebanon, about the dramatic changes unfolding across West Asia and what they could mean for the future of the world. Three years after October 7, Laith argues that the conflict has exposed deep weaknesses in the Western-led international order and accelerated changes that were already underway. Among the biggest questions explored:

???? Did October 7 derail the Abraham Accords?

Why the expansion of normalisation between Israel and Arab states became far more difficult after October 7.

???? Is the Western order losing control of West Asia?

Carl and Laith discuss Iran, Yemen, Lebanon and the growing ability of regional powers to challenge Western military dominance.

???? Why is Yemen so important?

The discussion examines Yemen’s role in the Red Sea conflict and the enormous geopolitical consequences of disrupting Western control of regional trade and energy routes.

???? Is Saudi Arabia being pushed into a disastrous war?

Laith argues that Riyadh’s position reveals the growing pressures facing the traditional U.S.-aligned order in the Arabian Peninsula.

???? What is Israel’s endgame?

Carl and Laith debate whether the concept of “Greater Israel” represents a genuine strategic ambition and what the consequences could be for the wider region.

???? Has the military balance fundamentally changed?

The conversation examines drones, missiles, Iran, Yemen and the challenge posed to traditional Western air and naval superiority.

???? Why is public opinion in the West changing?

Carl discusses how attitudes toward Palestine have changed dramatically, particularly among younger generations.

???? Could the Western-led system be entering a period of collapse?

The conversation looks beyond the Middle East toward a possible transformation from a U.S.-dominated unipolar system toward a multipolar, multi-civilisational world. The episode ultimately asks a much bigger question: Are we witnessing the beginning of the end of the old geopolitical order—and the birth of something entirely new? Watch until the end for Carl and Laith’s discussion of what could happen next, including the risks of prolonged conflict, economic pressure, nuclear escalation and growing political unrest inside the West.’

Watch; This is Israel’s plan for PERMANENT war: Peace is ‘weakness’ Geopolitical Economy Report, 16 October 2026

Ben Norton; “Israel has not hidden the fact that its plan is to eventually colonise all of historic Palestine. You can see that over the past several decades, Israel has taken more and more land from the Palestinians, and Netanyahu has made it clear that there will never be a Palestinian state, that the Israeli regime will never accept it, and Israel is a rogue regime and that spits in the face of international law and does not care what international legal institutions have to say. And this brings me to the main point of this analysis today, which is about the Israeli regime’s plans for permanent war. I’m not exaggerating, this was all spelled out clearly in a white paper that was published by the most influential think tank in Israel, it’s called the Institute for National Security Studies, INSS and it’s affiliated with Israel’s leading university, Tel Aviv University. Now, it’s important to understand that this report that calls for permanent war and opposes peace, this was not written by some random person, it was written by a very influential Israeli official named Tamir Hayman, who is a retired major general of the Israeli military, the IDF and he was the chief of the IDF’s Intelligence Directorate for several years. He was the literal head of Israeli intelligence, and he oversaw Israel’s wars in Palestinian territory and in Lebanon and this white paper that he published lays out the Israeli regime strategy for the upcoming years of permanent war and colonisation and destabilisation of neighbouring countries. The document is called the quote, ‘New National Security Concept’, end quote although it’s important to point out that new was put in scare quotes because this Israeli regime official acknowledges that in reality, this new strategy is not really that new but he’s now simply putting in words publicly the policy of the Israeli regime. Now, this document is truly shocking and I’m going to go through all of the details in this analysis today, but I want to start by looking at the most revealing section of this white paper. Again, keep in mind, this was written by the former chief of the Israeli military’s intelligence unit. He wrote, quote, ‘war is essential to national security and cannot be replaced by a state of peace’, end quote. He added that the pursuit of peace is, quote, ‘an expression of weakness’ end quote, and then he made it clear that what Israel plans is a state of permanent war, never ending war. He said, quote, ‘war is necessary and preventative, war is preferable’, end quote. And then he added that the constant presence of war is, quote, an ‘asset to national security,’ end quote. Now, as if that weren’t already explicit enough, this top Israeli official also wrote that quote, ‘peace is a means rather than an end. A meaningful peace agreement is unattainable in the Middle East, as peace agreements are merely technical and temporary agreements. Peace is not an intrinsic value that generates security, but a means of achieving other policy objectives’, end quote. At the same time, this regime official wrote that, quote, ‘preemptive surprise attacks are viewed as the only way to achieve victory, giving offence precedence over defence’, end quote. So he made it clear that not only does Israel plan permanent war, but it also plans to start all of these wars through surprise attacks. By the way, this is exactly what the United States and Israel did on 28 February when they launched a war of aggression against Iran through what they called preemptive surprise attacks. So I’m not taking his words out of context, quite literally this retired major general of the Israeli military says that Israel does not want peace ever, it wants a state of permanent war against the Palestinians and against neighbouring countries. He makes that clear in another point in this white paper, and this is absolutely crazy, the former head of Israeli intelligence wrote that Israel must reject the independent existence of Arab states. He wrote, quote, ‘most Arab states are not genuine nation states’, end quote. And then he said that ‘Israel must undermine their stability’, he said, quote,’ undermining their stability is viewed as a natural process’, end quote. And then he said Israel should, quote, ‘encourage’, end quote, the destabilisation of all of the Arab countries in the region. So I am not exaggerating when I say that the Israeli regime wants to wage permanent war against all of its neighbours in West Asia, in the so called Middle East. This former head of the Israeli military’s Intelligence directorate said very clearly that Israel does not recognise the legitimacy of any of the Arab countries in the region. Syria, Iraq, Yemen, even Arab majority countries that support Israel, like the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain. These Gulf monarchies have been not so secretly allied with Israel. The UAE is openly allied with Israel, Saudi Arabia has been secretly conspiring with Israel, not so secretly, everyone knows this for many years. But the Israeli regime is now saying very clearly that it does not recognise the legitimacy of any of these countries. It claims they are not genuine nation states. And by the way, I just have to point out the absurd irony of an Israeli regime official accusing other countries of not being real nation states, considering Israel is a settler colonialist project created by European and North American colonialists in West Asia. Israel was not even created as a country until 1948 through the Nakba, the mass expulsion of indigenous Palestinians who constituted the majority of the population. They were expelled from their homeland so these settler colonialists from Europe and North America could create a new country and then claim that suddenly they’re indigenous to a region even though their ancestors were from Europe and North America. I mean, it’s completely absurd. It is so ridiculous hearing these colonialists accuse the indigenous peoples in the neighbouring countries surrounding them of not being real nation states, there is no end to the outrageous hypocrisy here.”

Another day in the illegally occupied West Bank. Settlers, supported by the Israeli army, attack and kill farmers with sticks and guns, set fire to houses and cars and bulldoze centuries-old olive trees that have belonged to generations of Palestinian farmers to make way for another illegal settlement.

Watch; Israel is destroying another Palestinian olive grove to make an Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank, Palestine Delegation, 14 October 2026

Read; Bishop calls for international action after settlers attack West Bank centre for disabled children, Middle East Monitor, 14 October 2026

‘The head of the Lutheran Church in the Holy Land has called on international governments and faith leaders to take “immediate and decisive action” after illegal Israeli settlers twice broke into a centre for children and young people with intellectual disabilities near Ramallah in the occupied West Bank. In a statement issued from Jerusalem yesterday, Bishop Dr Imad Haddad of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Jordan and the Holy Land said his church was “very disturbed” by the attacks on the Starmountain (Sternberg) Support Center. The centre is run by the Moravian Church and serves about 100 children and young people. Statement from Bishop Dr. Imad Haddad on the Attack on Starmountain (Sternberg) Support Center by Israeli settlers

This week we as a church were very disturbed to hear about Israeli settlers trespassing and damaging agricultural facilities at the Starmountain (Sternberg) Support Center for people with disabilities near Ramallah. The Starmountain Center is operated by our partners from the Moravian Church and serves approximately 100 children and youth with intellectual disabilities. Last Friday, the 9th of October, a large group of Jewish Israeli settlers broke into the facility, damaging the property’s fence. On Monday the 11th, the farmer at the center noticed significant destruction in the greenhouse, including slashed tarpaulins, uprooted plants, and destroyed irrigation pipelines, suggesting the group broke in on Sunday as well and caused additional damage. The severity and urgency of this situation cannot be overstated. This is illegal violent trespassing and destruction of property that could escalate even further at any time. The current physical damage caused to the facility is compounded by the intense psychological damage to those who attend and work in the center. As the Moravian Church shared in their statement, if Starmountain is no longer seen as a safe place for people with disabilities, this important work will not be able to continue.

Read; Israeli army arrests 30 Palestinians as occupiers assault family in occupied West Bank, Middle East Monitor, 13 October 2026

‘This attack on Starmountain Center is part of an extremely concerning pattern of Israeli settler violence in the areas around Ramallah. Palestinian homes, agricultural lands and institutions are all under threat of violence, putting numerous lives at risk. No Palestinians in the West Bank are exempt from this threat, including Christian communities and institutions. As Bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Jordan and the Holy Land, I call for immediate and decisive action from international governments and faith leaders to take action to support Starmountain Center and to protect the rights of Palestinians to live in peace and safety.

The bishop said a large group of settlers broke into the centre last Friday, 9 October, and damaged its fence. On Monday, the centre’s farmer found its greenhouse wrecked. Tarpaulins had been slashed, plants uprooted and irrigation pipes destroyed. “The severity and urgency of this situation cannot be overstated,” said Haddad. “This is illegal violent trespassing and destruction of property that could escalate even further at any time.” Haddad said the damage to the building was “compounded by the intense psychological damage to those who attend and work in the center”. He also pointed to a warning from the Moravian Church, which runs the centre. The church has said that if Starmountain is no longer seen as a safe place for people with disabilities, the centre will have to close. Haddad described the attack as part of “an extremely concerning pattern of Israeli settler violence in the areas around Ramallah”. He said Palestinian homes, farmland and institutions are all under threat. “No Palestinians in the West Bank are exempt from this threat, including Christian communities and institutions,” he added.’

Read; UN: Israeli settlers carried out 1,330 attacks in West Bank since January, Middle East Monitor, 28 July 2026

‘The UN said Israeli settlers have carried out more than 1,330 attacks in the occupied West Bank since the start of 2026, causing casualties and damage to Palestinian property. The UN humanitarian affairs office (OCHA) said in a statement on Monday that it was deeply concerned “over the escalating violence across the West Bank in recent days.” The agency stated that since January, it had “documented more than 1,330 incidents involving Israeli settlers that resulted in casualties, property damage, or both.” According to OCHA, at least eight Palestinians, including a child, and two Israelis have been killed since last Thursday, while others have been injured. The office added that homes, mosques, trees and agricultural facilities had been burned or vandalised, with some completely destroyed. It said at least ten Palestinian families had been displaced by the latest wave of violence. The West Bank has seen an escalation in settler violence against Palestinians and their property in recent weeks. Palestinian and international human rights organisations say Israeli soldiers have turned a blind eye to settler attacks and, in some cases, have taken part in them.’

Read; Jewish American photographer Heidi Levine hospitalised after violent attack by Israeli settlers in the West Bank, Andy Worthington, 16 October 2026

‘Today, in the West Bank, violent Israeli government-backed settlers viciously attacked the 63-year old American Jewish photographer Heidi Levine, who was on assignment for the Washington Post, kicking her repeatedly for ten minutes, stealing her equipment, and hospitalising her. Levine was covering the West Bank “sport” of violently attacking Palestinians during the olive harvest, and may have died had it not been for the interventions of the Jewish American journalist Jasper Nathaniel and a number of Palestinian youths. Nathaniel, who helped to rescue Levine, was there with the Russian-Israeli journalist and activist Andrey Khrzhanovskiy, and stated on X, “To be clear, the only reason I was able to reach Heidi was because young Palestinians provided cover with rocks against machine-gun- and tear-gas-wielding settlers and soldiers.” He also noted how, after the attack, it was “those kids, not the settler terrorists, who the IDF was hunting.”

https://x.com/infinite_jaz/status/2111094328257134880

Three hours ago, he wrote from the hospital in Ramallah, “Heidi is going to be okay, but her injuries are significantly worse than initially thought. It appears that she may have been stabbed. She’s getting ready for surgery.”

https://x.com/infinite_jaz/status/2111121668030845426

While western leaders and the mainstream media gatekeepers strenuously turn their eyes away from Gaza and Israel’s still-ongoing genocide of the trapped Palestinian population, they have, in recent months, turned their attention to the West Bank, denouncing settler violence and imposing toothless sanctions. Will they do anything more substantial in the face of this increasing violence, or are they as indifferent to the possible deaths of western reporters at the hands of settler thugs, explicitly supported by Netanyahu, Katz, Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, as they are to the cold-blooded murder of their own citizens in Gaza; the three British aid workers murdered by Israel in an attacks on a clearly marked aid convoy in 2024, for example, or the nine US citizens murdered in the last three years? Their contempt for their own citizens, through always prioritising and protecting Israel, is both unprecedented and unforgivable.

Heidi Levine’s powerful statement from her hospital bed: “I had my camera bag and my pouch with my passport, and my telephone was on a rope around my neck and they broke that off me, and they broke my cameras off me, and they broke my bag, and they kept kicking me. Just absolute craziness, and I didn’t see anybody trying to stop it. I don’t know how a parent can raise such a monster. They’re not even humans, and yes, they are Jewish terrorists. And you know what? Sadly, none of them will be prosecuted. I am sure of it.”

Watch; We are currently blocking the entrances to the weapons factory Eurolinks, Greta Thunberg, 15 October 2026

Greta Thunberg; “We are currently blocking the entrances to the weapons factory Eurolinks in the outskirts of Marseille who are supplying Israel with weapon components used to kill Palestinians in the genocide. The genocide in Palestine is still going on. It is happening with the complicity of our government and our companies. So we all have a duty to stand up and stop the arms transfer used to kill innocent people.”

Read; What’s shameful is that no party before the Greens called zionism racist, Jonathan Cook, 9 October 2026

‘In 1975, as Israel entrenched its illegal and violent military occupation over Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, a majority of United Nations member states approved a resolution identical to the Greens’ motion. The General Assembly declared “Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination”. That resolution lasted 16 years, until 1991, when the world changed dramatically. The Soviet Union collapsed, leaving smaller states exposed and vulnerable to the sole military super-power of the US. President George HW Bush exploited the moment to bully UN member states into reversing their support for the resolution, while Israel began a gaslighting campaign in which it refused to engage in peace talks with the Palestinians unless the resolution was revoked. That was the context in which the UN General Assembly rescinded its determination that zionism was racism.

The subsequent peace process – the Oslo Accords – led to the signing in 1993 of a deal on the White House lawn that many Palestinians assumed would lead to a Palestinian state alongside Israel. They were to be bitterly disappointed. Israel expanded its settlements at an unprecedented rate through the Oslo years, devouring the territories meant to form a Palestinian state. Memorably, Michael Tarazi, a Palestinian negotiator, observed of the bogus Oslo process that it was like negotiating over a piece of pizza while one party was eating it. Israel repeatedly failed to withdraw from the territories it occupied, as promised under the Olso formula. Gradually Palestinian trust in Israel’s good faith evaporated. The Palestinian “moderates” who engaged in the negotiations looked discredited. Hamas’ popularity rocketed, especially in the concentration camp Israel had made of Gaza. Israel not only sealed off Gaza but put it on a starvation diet and then intermittently “mowed the lawn”, blowing up neighbourhoods and slaughtering civilians indiscriminately. All of that culminated in Hamas’ break-out from Gaza in October 2023 and Israel’s genocidal rampage afterwards. That genocide is once again forcing a moral reevaluation of Israel – and a recognition that it was never serious about peace. Israel was born as a settler-colonial project. It never had any intention of conceding territory or allowing a Palestinian state. The dehumanisation of Palestinians was integral to its mission. In other words, Israel was always a racist project. The Greens have finally – very belatedly – recognised what should have been obvious all along. They should not be shamed for doing so. Instead we need to shame those whose goal is to buy more time for Israel to carry on committing its daily racist crimes against the Palestinian people. We have already been far too indulgent and waited far too long. Israel is not about to change. Its racism runs too deep.

This is an extract from my latest article. Read the rest here.’

Watch; The normalisation of zionism, to the point where critiquing it is seen as antisemitic, has been catastrophic, Afua Hirsch, 5 October 2026

Afua Hirsch; “Without a doubt, one of the most important books I will read this year, Benjamin Moses ‘Anti Zionism’. There’s a lot of scrutiny of zionism right now. The Green Party just voted a motion equating it to racism. And understandably, so much of that focus is on how catastrophic zionism has been for Palestinians and for the apartheid state and illegal occupations it’s created that have oppressed and destroyed the lives now of generations of Palestinians. But what I really learned from this book that I hadn’t fully appreciated is two things. One, how harmful zionism is for Jews, how antisemitic the tradition of zionism is and has been, and two, how deep and rich the tradition of Jewish figures pushing back against zionism is. Ben Moser writes that there have been Jews rejecting zionism longer than there has been zionism because it originates in Protestant thought that sought to leverage a Jewish return to the Holy Land for its own Christian imaginings of the second coming of the Messiah. And ever since it was embraced by Theodore Herzl, who is described in this book of as one of the most extreme antisemites of his generation, it has drawn on some of the crudest caricatures of the Jewish people, on these highly racialised ideas of what a people is stemming from the time, the pseudo scientific, imperial, colonial settler world, so many of whose ideas are embedded in zionist thought. And this really toxic concept that the Jews are this kind of secret organisation that can provide a buffer for Western civilisation, something you often hear Netanyahu talking about, that they represent this wall against the Eastern Muslim threat in the Middle East for Western allies. These ideas are so antisemitic and I think it’s really important to acknowledge, as this book does, how many Jewish thinkers from the most diverse backgrounds all over the world, different traditions, have pushed back against zionism and how much their voices have been silenced and erased. I think that erasure gets that much harder now this book is in the world and the timing could not be more powerful.”

Watch; Zack Polanski DESTROYS Laura Kuennsberg On The BBC, Antony Jones,18 October 2026

Zack Polanski; … “I grew up in a zionist household and I grew up with the idea that being a zionist was about a land for a people without a land. But then the question is what happened to the people who were on that land? And the question was they were displaced, they were killed, they were ethnically cleansed. You asked about history. We could talk about what’s happening this weekend. Israeli terrorists destroying the lives of Palestinians, destroying their olive trees. This is basic colonialism and racism. It’s happening every single day.”

Laura Kuennsberg; “But I’m asking whether you understand about that what has happened in your party in the last couple of weeks has significantly upset some of your members of your own party and it has significantly upset and worried many members of the Jewish community. Now you yourself in 2020 said that the Green Party should adopt the international definition of anti-semitism IH. We don’t want to trade acronyms, but you said that was the gold standard and that the party should adhere to that. Now, that says that Jews have the right to self-determination, the right to govern themselves. Do you still believe that Jews have the right to self-determination?

Chapter 6: Self-determination and rights

Zack Polanski; “I support everyone’s right to self-determination, but not at the expense of another group because that’s racist. And you say that people find this confusing or they find it offensive. We had the prime minister this week in parliament conflate criticism of the Israeli state calling my party anti-semitic despite the fact that I’m the only Jewish leader of a political party. And so when we have these conversations I think it’s actually more offensive and more antisemitic. The idea that being Jewish is in any way connected with the Israeli state as opposed to the fact there are some Jewish people, many Jewish people who have deep connection with Israel, that’s true, but that is separate from being Jewish. And in our national conversations, including this one, we have to separate these two things. Otherwise, we’re making British Jews, including myself, less safe.”

Watch; Growing opposition to Israel in the United States, Al Mayadeen, 23 October 2026

Professor Seyed Marandi; “As you pointed out, they’re (AIPAC) now deeply despised by a large segment of American society, and the strong majority of American society disapproves of them. So whenever it becomes clear that they funded a particular candidate, no matter how much money that is, the negativity that comes with it can outweigh the financial benefit. So they are changing their tactics. They are trying to hide the source of money and pass it on to their allies in a different way so that candidates won’t be seen as aligned with AIPAC. And of course, it’s not just AIPAC. AIPAC is the most famous of the organisations that is basically pursuing Israeli regime interests and zionist interests, but it is the most famous, there are many others that are involved as well, but in any case, even this tactical shift is a recognition that the people of the United States despise the Israeli regime. They despise war, they despise genocide and this is going to have consequences because the mood has shifted, especially among the youth and those who support the Israeli regime are mostly elderly. And as time goes by, their numbers will dwindle and as the Israeli regime continues to carry out genocide and war and death and destruction, the younger people who gradually reach the age to get involved in politics, they will, from the very beginning, have a negative view or hostile view towards the Israeli regime. So this is really the end of the beginning of the end of the massive support that the Israeli regime would receive from the United States. The oligarchy continues to support it. They’re genocidal zionists, the oligarchy in the United States but the masses are both highly hostile towards or highly critical of the Israeli regime, but they’re also highly critical of the oligarchy as well.”

There are many more Christian zionists than Jewish – the crusades continue

Watch; The Crusades Never Ended. Zionism’s Medieval Christian Roots EXPOSED, Neutrality Studies, 10 November 2025

‘The age of European colonialism never really ended, it just changed its costume. Today’s geopolitics look and feel so barbarian medieval because they are the ghosts of the Crusades and a forgotten medieval legend. To explore these startling ideas, I’m talking to Dr. Manuel João Ramos, an Associate Professor at the Dept. of Anthropology at the University Institute of Lisbon, where he has been working for decades on questions of European Colonialism and Power in International Relations. We trace a 1,000-year-old story, uncovering the surprising roots of Christian zionism, the messianic fantasies behind the “Age of Discovery,” and the religious undercurrents that still shape Europe’s troubled relationship with the world.’

Pascal Lottaz; “So you’re seeing even current attempts of Western Europe to dominate the world at large, but especially what we call the Middle East, Western Asia as still outgrowths of the Crusades?”

Manuel Ramos; “Absolutely, absolutely. if you look at what’s happening in the Middle east, we’re still in crusade, to an extent, we’re still in a crusade. If you look at the rhetoric at the discourses, especially in the United States, of what’s called Christian zionism, it is incredible. I mean, it’s amazing that in the 21st century we are so overwhelmed with this, millenarian, apocalyptical Christian discourse, which is very, very much alive today.”

Pascal Lottaz; “Can you maybe give us a couple of examples in what ways the discourse today reflects the crusading spirit of 500 years ago?”

Manuel Ramos; “All the discourse and the framework of understanding the world, of understanding the place of Europe in the world was developed in the Middle Ages and flourished in the centuries afterwards. What is amazing for me is that the development of millenarism, the development of utopian millenarism, especially from the 16th century onwards and in the UK, in England, this was very much a thing, really developed into the 19th century Christian zionism that afterwards travelled the ocean to the United States and created this notion that control of Jerusalem is the ultimate goal of European, of Western identity. And so that’s what I’m saying. We’re still in this crusading spirit.”

Pascal Lottaz; “But that never occurred to me because the discourse about zionism is so strongly focused on, well, Judaism, but of course, Judaism and zionism are completely different concepts, but it’s so strongly focused on that religious belief, but you’re absolutely right that Christian zionism is actually bigger.”

Manuel Ramos; “Not only it’s bigger, but it really precedes Jewish zionism as a political ideology, precedes it for over more than a century. In the 17th century, 18th century, that’s the moment when Christian zionism starts developing in the UK and develops fully from the 1830s onwards in the UK and then, as I said, travels to the United States. I found it very interesting very recently. I mean, it’s not the kind of thing that you do to every day, but I read Theodore Herzl’s diaries and I was absolutely amazed that zionism was not Theodore Herzl’s first plan. His first plan was to convert Austrian and German Jews to Catholicism, and he talked to the envoy of the Pope in Vienna and he was dismissed and so zionism was a backup plan for Theodore Herzl, which is amazing. You have really to understand that zionism is something that developed in Europe and the United States, and precedes Jewish zionism, and there’s many more millions of Christian zionists than there are Jewish zionists of course.”

Watch; How Palestinians Welcomed Jewish Refugees, Humans 4 Gaza, 6 October 2026

Jewish Rabbi; “Who opened the doors of Palestine for the Jews? Palestinians. At the time of the Ottoman Empire, when Jews were expelled from some places in Europe, Palestinians opened their arms and accepted the Jews in Palestine. Why? Because they’re Palestinians. A Palestinian will give you his bread, his water. He will go sleep thirsty and hungry in order to give his bread for his neighbor and his guest. That’s Palestinians. And what the zionists paid to them? Do you know that there was boats after the second World War of Jewish refugees that came from Europe? Palestinians used to go to the beach with bread and water and greeting the Jews and take them to their home. Can you believe such a thing? I just can’t believe what the zionist paid them back because Palestinians when they saw that Jews coming to live in the Holy Land, in Palestine under Palestinian mercy, understanding and compassion, they were very welcome. My family coming from Iraq. My father was Iraqi nationalist. He served in the Iraqi army. He didn’t want to come to Palestine, not him and not my mother. It’s a land that belongs to the Palestinians, not for us. How what happened? They sent terror squads, the zionists to Baghdad. They blew up synagogues, Jewish cultural centers, Jewish businesses. Six people were killed and tens of Jews were injured and then they said it’s the Muslims doing to you, there’s a change, the Muslims that used to be friendly to you, not anymore. You have to leave to Palestine. So they expelled 1.3 million Palestinians from Palestine and they brought 1.3 million Arab Jews from Morocco, Tunis, Algeria, Al Jazair, Egypt, Iraq and Yemen instead of the Palestinians.”

This article by David Miller describes how Israel and Saudi Arabia influence education in the Middle East to shape the curriculum away from authentic religious studies.

Read; They Razed the Universities, Then Policed the Word, David Miller, 24 October 2026

Three years after Al-Aqsa Flood, Gaza’s campuses are rubble. In the US, Britain, Australia and Canada the same war is being fought as a discipline case, an arms licence for a private guard, and a definition of antisemitism broad enough to criminalise anti-zionism.

Scholasticide is the first fact

Start in Gaza, not in a dean’s office. A UNESCO assessment with the Ministry of Education and AWRAD, presented in November 2025, covered 21 higher-education institutions and 38 campuses. Twenty-two campuses were completely destroyed, 14 more were damaged, and 195 of 206 buildings were unusable. Of 5,102 staff, 1,112 had been killed, detained or injured. Islamic University, Al-Azhar, Al-Aqsa, Al-Israa: the sector as a physical fact had been hit. That is scholasticide, a pillar of the genocide, not collateral. In July 2025 the presidents of Gaza’s universities wrote an open letter refusing a reconstruction designed by donors and occupiers. The Emergency Committee was set up mid-genocide to keep the institutions alive without their buildings. Academic freedom in Gaza is the freedom to teach in a tent because the campus was bombed. The West Bank is the same war at lower volume: raids on Birzeit, a campus treated as a security site. Every suspension in London or New York is downstream of that.

Textbooks, payroll, and the Gulf line

The same method, slower, runs through Yemen. Michigan State professor Shireen Al-Adeimi told Adnan Husain, in an interview carried by Drop Site on 5 October 2026, that new textbooks arrived one day “printed in Saudi Arabia instead of Egypt.” Saudi-backed Salafism had taken root around 1979, when Muqbil al-Wadi’i founded Dar al-Hadith in Dammaj, in the Zaidi stronghold of Saada. That push, she said, helped produce Ansar Allah.

The printing press was not only Riyadh’s. Arabic Post traced, the same week, how Israeli centres, above all IMPACT-se, have monitored curricula in 17 Arab countries for three decades and turned the files into donor pressure. In Saudi books the line “Muslims will not relinquish Jerusalem” was cut, and “the Zionist enemy” became “the Israeli occupation.” Yemen sits inside that net.

The war funded the policy rather than ending it. On 1 October 2026 Saudi Arabia and the UAE each put up $35 million for about 130,000 unpaid Yemeni teachers, via UNICEF. Okaz has Riyadh building 38 model schools and printing 2,548,852 textbooks. A teacher who cannot be paid except by Riyadh or Abu Dhabi does not set the curriculum.

The same states buy seats in Western knowledge: Middle East centres, language programmes, “tolerance” institutes. The colony’s campus network does the political work. In April 2024, I set out the spy side in the Israel on Campus Coalition, a private intelligence operation feeding universities and police the names of students. Gulf money and zionist surveillance are not the same thing. But, they are the same refusal to let Arabs define Arabs.’

Yemen

Watch; Alastair Crooke: Insurrection & Regime Change Coming to Saudi Arabia – A New Middle East Emerging, Glenn Diesen, 14 October 2026

Glenn Diesen; “When we observe the Iran war as well as the Saudi-Yemen war, we tend to use military and economic indicators to assess the direction of the war but the political systems themselves are somewhat fragile in the Gulf, among the Gulf state countries. I was wondering, how do you assess the risk, for example, that Saudi Arabia, well, it could be facing. Now I focus on Saudi Arabia because if the Saudis would fall, the entire region would change fundamentally. So how do you assess that political stability within Saudi Arabia?”

Alastair Crooke; “Very, very fragile at the moment and certainly there is a risk, several risks, but there are definitely risks and I think it was Wall Street Journal today was suggesting that MBS (Mohammed bin Salman) is going from bunker to bunker underneath the palaces, hiding away with his special protection squad. But there are different risks and I think it’s important to make clear what they are because people always end up in the wrong place, in my experience on this, because it’s actually not the Ansar Allah that is a threat to MBS in any physical sense at all. I heard of reports going out that he’s hiding out in the bunkers because of fear of assassination by Ansar Allah. That’s not the case. Actually the likely cause of his downfall will come from within Saudi Arabia, within the tribal structures of Saudi Arabia and that he has created this vulnerability by his own hand, by his own doing. So he has cut away the pillars of his own legitimacy to the point at which, yes, he is threatened and may be deposed in this coming period but I’ll just cover the sort of the main threats. The most obvious one is of course that Ansar Allah is following in the footsteps perhaps of Iraq in the sense that as the Saudis or the Saudi allies or allied forces attack and destroy buildings in Sanaa or in Yemen as the whole, Ansar Allah escalates by attacks on the infrastructure. So they’ve just taken out an element of the major oil field, the Ghawar field, which was providing 30% of Saudi Arabia’s oil exports, and they damaged that and they continue to damage refineries and oil infrastructure. The more the Saudi Arabia attacks the Yemen, the more the attacks on the infrastructure continue and they are serious attacks and this infrastructure is not going back quickly. I’ve just come from London where I was listening to someone from Aramco and all the talk amongst the oil companies has one word in it ‘resilience’. We’re all resilient about everything and fundamentals don’t change and that everything will go back as it was. There are these little hiccups before in the Middle East and we just bear them and go on because the fundamentals don’t change.

So these are fundamentals and they are changing before our eyes actually, dear CEOs of oil companies and so on, because fundamentals are the infrastructure necessary to extract, refine and pump oil and they are in many cases burning. And that’s what I would call a fundamental that is in the process of transition. The second element of course is the financial consequences and I don’t think anyone has done much work on this, I think Pilkington has done a little bit about it but what you see is that about, I think some larger proportion of the Saudi revenues from oil exports are necessary to finance their imports. This is normal stuff, of course, but it’s quite dramatic figures, I think 83% of imports are financed by oil exports, that’s a lot and as the oil exports are now zero, what’s going to happen? Because there are two possibilities. It can be either a huge trade deficit because if you’re not having revenue, yes, you will have it still importing. Assuming that is the case, then you’re going to have a huge deficit. How you’re going to finance that? And you’ve got one of two ways. Devalue the currency sharply, which means huge inflation. It would be a big devaluation that is cutting the peg or staying with a peg and selling off your foreign exchange reserve. That’s what Japan has been doing in this period. But the amount of reserves they would have to sell it will be bigger than that of Japan and Japan almost shook the American bond market. And they still do that, the bond market was in danger of collapse. Bessent was doing everything he could to try and stop that but I think that the amount of sales necessary to balance the books would be a much greater magnitude than even Japan and therefore, if it was allowed to sell its foreign exchanges, if Bessent allowed it, it would be a real systemic threat to the western economic system through the bond market, which controls pretty well everything. While you’ve been away rising and rising interest rates on the 30-year is sort of in uncharted territory and the 10-year is well over five at about five, five and a half, so all of this is having a big effect. So you’ve got first of all the infrastructure, secondly you’ve got what it’s doing to the the finances of Saudi Arabia but then we move on to the more serious I think threat which is that MBS has cut away all the pillars of legitimacy that at one time underpinned the Saudi arrangement. That was the arrangement between the Wahhabi establishment, the Ash-ari, and on the other hand the Ibn Saud family and that strategic agreement underpinned everything. The Saudi family got support from the Ulamas, from the religious authorities. They got moral and theological support for the family and that’s been very important at times because for example, you may recall in 1975 King Faisal was assassinated in his palace by his nephew, his young 26 year old nephew. He bent down to let the nephew, who’s the prince, kiss his forehead but he took out a gun and shot him through the head instead. And what was that for? Well that was because of the modernisation plan that the family was trying to introduce at the time. They were trying to introduce television and this young man who was obviously a zealot killed the king because of it. So the Saudis rolled back strongly on their liberalisation at that time, television, also in respect to women and maybe driving and went full sort of Wahhabi. I’m putting that loosely but it was going back to those structures and it was then reinforced after ’79 when some ultra conservative tribal members who were actually in the National Guard, they seized Mecca, if you recall and the point to that is that the only way out of that required the imprimatur of the Wahhabi and theocratic elite, they were the ones that effectively saved the family at that point. And then you move on to this new era and you have MBS who acts entirely on his own sole authority, ostensibly with the king somewhere in a coma behind him, but he acts on that and in order to concentrate power he’s done a number of things. One is to divide the military forces and to use the National Guard as the watchdog of every element. Each element of the military operates separately and at distinct distance from other elements operating to a royal prince in the Ministry of Defence. So every part of the army operates to one of the family in the Ministry of Defence, and the National Guard, which was Ikhwan, that was Ibn Saud’s foot soldiers, originally they were brought into the National Guard, is really there to protect the family from a military attack. In fact, the whole posture of the Saudi army is not to fight a war against the Houthis, but to protect the king and the family from internal insurrection. So that was one part, then, of course, he did the opposite of what happened after the siege of Mecca. We have Vision 2030, with a heavy emphasis on youth culture and entertainment areas being opened and young tourists on the beaches, women tourists on the beaches and all of that and at the same time, he diminished the standing of the Ulama, of the clergy, the Wahhabi clergy, diminished them and tried to corrupt them largely, and has succeeded in that to a certain extent, but only at the expense of great resentment. On top of that, he has set off parts of the tribes against others in the sense that only the family gets the stipend from the sales of oil but others who join the military don’t get a military stipend and are quite poorly paid by comparison. So if you’re one of the family, the inner family, then you get a small share although most of it stays with MBS and with the family. It’s all family business. And then they’ve had their lands expropriated, many of these lands have been taken, these projects like Neom, huge amount of land. You probably recall, they just shot the chief, the tribal leader in that area, and expropriated those lands. So you have a build up of resentments and factions and many of them are deeply hostile, particularly after what happened at the Ritz Carlton, when you recall the senior princes were brought in and then they were….some of them were actually, I don’t know if it can technically be called torture but they certainly suffered there and had their money taken from them.Taking the money as one thing, but they were deeply humiliated. For royal princes to be treated like that was a huge humiliation. So that’s why the setting is a setting and what I hear and I believe is going on, that they are actually talking and there are discussions going on amongst the tribal leaders and even have been some discussions with the IRGC about a new disposition for the region. So MBS has put himself because all of these things that he did and was responsible for, and he’s kept everyone else out of it, he’s done all those things and he is now reaping a harvest of anger and grievance from the tribes of Saudi Arabia who previously had supported them, albeit with hiccups, with assassinations and other things, but had largely supported them.”

This discussion is about why Yemen is part in the resistance against the zionist imperialist efforts to colonise the Middle East to steal their oil. They live according to their religious doctrine to fight injustice.

Watch; Beyond the headlines and sectarian narratives – understanding Yemen with Isa Blumi, Vanessa Beeley, 13 October 2026

‘Mike Robinson is joined by Vanessa Beeley and Isa Blumi, Professor in the Department of Asian and Middle Eastern Studies at Stockholm University for episode 12 of the Syria Podcast. They discuss why Yemen remains so poorly understood in the West, and why its resistance matters far beyond its borders. In this episode, Vanessa outlines the Saudi-led war launched in March 2015 at the request of former president Abd Rabbuh Mansour Hadi, and the plans to partition the country. Isa explains why academic and think-tank coverage reduces Yemen to tribalism and sectarianism, and who funds that research. Isa traces how the Gulf states became pillars of the petrodollar system, and why he believes their ruling families are now racing to consolidate assets. They discuss Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar compete with each other, and that competition shapes the fight over Yemen’s resource-rich regions. They discuss how Ansarullah has resisted far better-equipped forces through a largely intact former national army, captured weaponry, strong social cohesion and a push towards food self-sufficiency. Yemen acts on its own terms, and the panel discusses its place in the wider axis of resistance. Divided Western societies have much to learn from Yemeni solidarity. They also cover the human cost of US, UK and Israeli bombing, the significance of the Bab el-Mandeb strait, and why Isa sees Yemen as a warning about our own future.’

Watch; The US is not behaving like a normal country, it is destroying country after country, Piers Morgan Uncensored, 13 October 2026

Professor Seyed Marandi; ” Today why are the Saudis losing? The Saudis have probably spent well over a trillion dollars in weapons over the last few decades and yet their proxies in Yemen are easily defeated and with all their money, they can’t stop Ansar Allah. Ansar Allah does not have F15s, they don’t have the sort of equipment that the Saudis do but on the battlefield they’re much more effective and they’re much more competent. Why? Because they are motivated. They see themselves as a national liberation organisation and in addition to that, they’re opposing a genocide that they, like the rest of us, are watching every day and we see Western media saying, ‘no, it’s not a genocide, no, Israel is a democracy, no Israelis share our values’. So what do you expect people across the world to think about Western governments when they’re seeing Yemen strangulated for a decade and then the people in Yemen defeat the Saudis? Where do you think popular opinion lies? Forget the governments, people across the world don’t sympathise with the Saudis and they don’t sympathise with the Israeli regime, and they don’t sympathise with the United States. Whether you like it or not, that’s a reality. There is a reason for this, it’s because the United States is not behaving like a normal country. It is destroying country after country and in every case, it has an excuse for this. It tries to crush Iran. It’s been doing it for 47 years, yet it says Iran is a bad guy. Our cemeteries are full of dead people thanks to wars imposed on us by the United States. I survived two chemical attacks. Who gave those chemicals to the Saddam regime? It was the West yet the West presents itself as the good guys and everyone else as the bad guys. This works in US schools with the school books that kids there have, it works for Americans who watch CNN or Fox News, it really doesn’t matter, or CNN or Sky News but in the rest of the world, people are seeing reality and the reality is very different from the narrative coming from the West.”

Gaza

It’s terrifying to hear IDF soldiers relate their demonic actions to erase Palestinians from Gaza. Worth sending to anyone who, like former conservative Minister Michael Gove, still denies that Israel is perpetrating a genocide in Gaza.

Read; I saw Naza this evening in a theatre in Gaillac, Howard Cohen, 13 October 2026

‘It was the last opportunity to see the film publicly, as the French distributors have only allowed a total of two days for viewings across the country. Yes, it will be able to be seen online from a determined date in November, in line with the directors’ wishes, but, nevertheless, the restricted public viewing here in France is a shameful political decision in and of itself. I was surprised at how powerful I found the film. I knew in advance that I wouldn’t learn anything new from what I already know about Israeli society and the obscenities of their genocidal actions screened live on our phones for us all to see over the last three years, and I had already read Yuval’s piece on the implementation of AI for the mass killing of Gazans that he had published in +972 in 2024. And yet, there is something about the format of the documentary film and the live presence of the Israeli officers before the camera, who spoke with such brutal frankness and awareness (and often without any sense of shame) of the industrialised mechanisms of killing they employed through AI. At times, the officers themselves made the comparison with the Nazis as they contemplated the mechanised systems put into effect with sang froid for the mass annihilation of men, women and children. It was, moreover, all too evident that these industrialised and instrumentalised processes employed for the wilful extermination of so many innocents of all ages was as grotesque as anything the Nazis had ever done. I was reminded of Hannah Arendt’s chilling text as time and again the officers would claim that there was no room for them to question what was being asked of them. They saw themselves as necessary cogs in the wheel and following orders went without saying. They were, moreover, proud to be part of their elite forces and that pride ensured that every action they were asked to perform was a commendable one in their eyes.

One officer spoke of how the offer for psychological help was turned down by all the soldiers around him because there was simply no need. Rather he spoke of the immense enjoyment they all felt as the missions got under way, the hormones kicked in, and they experienced the dizzying heights of ecstatic joy which knew no bounds, whilst all the while the bodies were piling up around them as far as the eye could see.

Another officer spoke of the starving individuals who were picked off by the snipers and drones as they made their way to the food centres, their only crime being that they unwittingly strayed off the undefined narrow path they had to keep to, and once again the bodies would pile up in the ditches beside them where they would later be devoured by the starving dogs. Surveillance was everywhere and constant. The details they had on every person, their every movement, was breathtaking. Gazans’ phones were monitored and controlled and used to view and listen in on conversations between the children and their mother, thus enabling the officers to ascertain when to expect the arrival home of the father – when the entire family could then be exterminated together shortly afterwards. Targets were chosen, often erroneously, because of the pattern of their phone calls that emulated patterns that known Hamas members had used, and even past ties to Hamas, however spurious, were enough to make one a target.

Evenings were the best time to annihilate the target because then he would be back at home with his family and he would be sure to be killed (although mistakes were often made, an example given of the Hamas target having left his phone at home before going out again, resulting in the annihilation of the entire family save the Hamas fighter).

The collateral damage (regardless of how many infants or children were present) was a necessary and unquestioned part of the extermination process and the women and children were never referred to as such but rather rendered lifeless as numbers, NAZA numbers, a useful way to distance any notion of the human image, in whatever form, from the computation of the collateral damage itself, which could be as high as up to 500 souls for one target.The final scene jumped from the silhouette of one of the officers on a Tel Aviv roof top at night to the video footage of the rubble of a freshly destroyed tower block in Gaza. A number of legs belonging to the corpses of men, women and children are seen sticking out from under the collapsed concrete towards the camera. The air is swarming with dust particles as stunned Palestinians walk among the ruins calling out pitifully for their loved ones. The camera centres on one painfully thin elderly man searching for his son under the rubble. He seems in a trance as he lowers his head towards a large concrete block with its twisted iron piercing the space before him and cries out repeatedly to some invisible figure under the debris, “I told you to look after him. I told you to look after him.” He is led away in his grief by another ghost-like figure and we in the audience join our tears with his as the screen turns black.

Naza is an important document for the world to take in the abhorrent nature and scope of this genocide from the mouths of the genociders themselves and unfortunately it is also a necessary document when the voice of the Palestinians has remained so often muted inside the neo-colonial supremacist mindsets of the Western elites.’

Read; Caitlin Johnstone: Netanyahu’s Attack on Truth in ‘NAZA’ Scheerpost, 13 October 2026

‘The 24 soldiers interviewed for the film are being prosecuted not because they told lies about Israel, but because they told the truth. Israel is so evil that it’s actually illegal for Israelis to tell the truth about it. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has just ordered Israel’s military, its attorney general, and its security agency Shin Bet to investigate and prosecute the soldiers who anonymously shared their experiences in the Gaza Strip with the award-winning investigative documentary “NAZA.” According to Haaretz, Netanyahu accused the soldiers of “serious information security offenses, criminal defamation and harm to Israel’s diplomatic and security interests,” adding that “there is concern that those involved in the defamatory film committed serious criminal offenses by exposing highly classified information and creating a breach in the information security of a highly sensitive intelligence unit.” Netanyahu’s accusations of “defamation” are contradicted by his other accusation of “exposing highly classified information.” The 24 soldiers interviewed for the film are being prosecuted not because they told lies about Israel, but because they told the truth. The prime minister is claiming the truth causes “harm to Israel’s diplomatic and security interests” because Israel is a state that can only exist on a foundation of endless lies.

If Israel considers the truth a national security threat, then Israel should not exist. “That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.” This quote by the American writer PC Hodgell certainly applies to an apartheid state which assassinates Palestinian journalists, bans the foreign press from witnessing its atrocities in Gaza, constantly attacks press outlets that report on its abuses, spends hundreds of millions of dollars a year on foreign propaganda and prosecutes soldiers who tell the truth about its war crimes. It also applies to the US empire, which prosecutes whistleblowers, imprisons journalists for exposing US. war crimes, shrouds its actions in a veil of government secrecy, exerts extensive control over the flow of information via Silicon Valley and manipulates the minds of the public using the most sophisticated propaganda system ever devised.

It also applies to abusive relationships that would collapse if the community could see what was happening, or if the victim fully understood what was being done to them.

It also applies to marriages where one spouse isn’t being truthful about who they are and what they do in secret.

It also applies to worldviews that would crumble if contradicting facts were heard and deeply listened to with courage and intellectual honesty.

It also applies to the psychological constructs we hold within ourselves that were built when we were too young to understand the traumas we were experiencing and the maladaptive coping habits we were subconsciously forming to deal with them.

It also applies to the ego itself, which dissolves when sufficient attention and clarity has been brought to its mechanisms through rigorous self-inquiry.

At all levels, human dysfunction is held in place by untruth and dispelled by truth. The lies we hold onto as individuals, as communities, and as a society are what allows suffering and abuse to continue at whatever scale you’re looking at. Humanity’s collective quest is to become a truth-driven species with a truth-based relationship with reality, because if you’re not dealing with reality as it actually is then you’re not able to respond to your challenges with wisdom and efficacy. We move in this direction by seeing through the mental narratives and perceiving reality as it is actually happening: as individuals, as a society and as a species. Tell the truth uncompromisingly, come what may. Let all that would crumble under untruth do so as swiftly as possible. May all be revealed. Let us face the ever-expanding light of truth with heroic courage.’

The relevance of this article is that it is posted by Jews Against Genocide who believe anti-zionist beliefs should not be conflated with antisemitism. Also though this march has passed look on the Palestine Solidarity Campaign events site and join the next march near you.

Watch; On Sat Oct 10 we march in London to mark 3 years of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, Jews Against Genocide, 8 October 2026

‘British writer and Journalist @garyyounge reflects on the impact of the Palestine solidarity movement in Britain over the past 3 years and why we have to keep pushing the government to end its complicity in Israel’s genocide and apartheid against Palestinians. Join us.’

Gary Younge; “It’s clear who the oppressor is, it’s clear who the oppressed is, it’s clear who’s aiding and abetting them. It’s clear who’s not. All of that has become. Has become horrifically clear over the past three years. It has been a movement, right? Not to just a hashtag, Not a moment didn’t burn brightly and then fade. It has continued. It has been held and it has been held against all the odds and against all kinds of opposition. We weren’t the ones who were dropping bombs on innocent people. We weren’t the ones who were targeting small children, shooting them in the head. We weren’t bombing hospitals, but we were the haters. But the fact is, a majority of the country were with us. Eventually, it fed through to the electorate. The issues of Gaza were central, not alone, but central in the ousting of Keir Starmer. And it was interesting when he left, the degree to which the mainstream media just decided they had nothing to do with it. The way that this new government has moved shows that they know it’s a problem, that they know that it’s a liability, that their unquestioning, unwavering, uncritical support for Israel is a serious problem for them electorally. It is unthinkable to imagine that if we hadn’t been on the streets, we haven’t galvanised people in the way that we did, that if we hadn’t kept the idea alive that this was unacceptable, illegal and so on and so forth, if we hadn’t been doing that, they wouldn’t have needed to do it. They will do what we make them do, and this was something that we made them do. Now we can’t stop the genocide is still continuing, the occupation is still continuing. These things take time. And in a moment where you can press a button and get your food and press a button and get what you want, politics don’t work like that. And international solidarity doesn’t work like that. That, and if we think of South Africa and what happened there and when Mandela was arrested and how long he was in prison, these things take time. And the whole while that you’re doing it, you don’t know if or when you’re going to succeed. You just have to keep on doing it because you know it’s the right thing to do. The slave abolitionist Frederick Douglass said, power concedes nothing without a demand. It never has and it never will.”

Iran

Watch; Iran destroyed most US bases in Gulf states, The Grayzone, 14 May 2026

Presenter; “And we talked about the costs. That is not being widely discussed right now. But what about the American casualties in this war? Not just American soldiers who are dying, but also the damage that’s been done to the American military equipment in that region?”

Max Blumenthal; “That’s a great question. You know, 230 structures in US military bases, primarily in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, were destroyed. We’re talking about a billion dollar radar system that was the eyes and ears for the US, not just in the region but all the way into Russia, at the Al Udeid Air base in Qatar and so most of these bases are now unusable and the US Is having to shift operations to, for example, Nevatim air base in Israel, where the US Is actually considering permanent basing because that’s one of the only places where they’re protected. So the US public doesn’t even understand that one of the effects of Trump’s war is the complete loss of US imperial military control on the ground, which has also been used to prop up these Gulf dictatorships by repressing their own population, particularly in Bahrain.”

Watch; COL. Lawrence Wilkerson : Beware Iran’s Retaliation, Judging Freedom, 29 October 2026

Col. Lawrence Wilkerson; “Iran is going to be the power to reckon with in the Gulf region from now on. The only other contestant to that would be Israel. And I think we are looking at, I am sad to say in some respects, maybe I’m not sad to say in other respects, the destruction of Israel is forthwith. Just as soon as they resume the war, they’re going to find out that some 19 or 20,000 missiles coming down on them will utterly destroy them. And I’m not even talking about one of them being nuclear.”

Watch; Hezbollah did not exist before the serial aggression and occupation of Lebanon by the Israeli regime, Declassified UK, 2 April 2026

‘Former UN director Craig Mokhiber rejects the notion that resistance groups across the Middle East, including Hezbollah and Hamas, are Iranian proxies. He says this characterisation ignores the context of occupation, oppression and violence that Lebanon and Palestine has faced from Israel and the US. In 2023, Craig resigned as director of the New York Office of the UN High Commissioner of Human Rights, accusing the international body of failing to prevent what he termed a ‘textbook genocide’ being committed by Israel in Gaza.’

Craig Mokhiber; “This idea, this talking point that comes out of the West, that these are Iranian proxies that are somehow causing havoc on behalf of Iran is absolute nonsense. What you’re talking about is countries that have been subjected to external aggression, foreign occupation, colonial domination, racist regimes, systematic murder, that have therefore, as is always the case in history, developed resistance groups that fight back as a deterrent, which is their right under international law. Hezbollah in Lebanon is a Lebanese group born, bred, raised and fighting for Lebanon that did not exist before the serial aggression and occupation of Lebanon by the Israeli regime. Hamas is an indigenous Palestinian resistance group that did not exist before the 1980s and the atrocities, the serial atrocities perpetrated by the Israeli regime through occupation and colonisation and systematic torture and extrajudicial executions and mass detention in dungeons all around the territory. But the idea that you can simply say they are proxies of another government, their alliance with Iran does not make them proxies. They’re not fighting for Iran, they’re fighting for Lebanon, they’re fighting for Palestine so as a matter of law, all of these smoke and mirrors that are deployed by Western governments to pretend that the entity perpetrating occupation, colonisation, apartheid and genocide is the good guy and that those resisting those crimes will are somehow the bad guys, that may work in CNN and the BBC, but it doesn’t work in international law and I dare say it doesn’t work in any kind of moral analysis of the situation.”

Watch; Is Iran On The Good Side? John Mearsheimer, 21 October 2026

John Mearsheimer; “Which country is committing a genocide here, Iran or Israel? The answer is quite clear. In the West the story that we hear constantly is that the Iranians are the bad guys and the Israelis are the good guys. This is a story of good versus evil and Iran is evil and it’s the United States and Israel and the West more generally that are the good guys. So I like to say which country is committing a genocide here, Iran or Israel? The answer is quite clear, it’s Israel. Has Iran ever committed a genocide? No. Is Israel now committing a genocide? Yes. When was the last time that the Iranian nation state initiated a war, in other words attacked another country? The answer is never. There is no example of Iran initiating a war against another country in its region or outside its region. Nevertheless In June of 2025 the Israelis and the Americans initiated a war.”

Read; Iran warns of ‘unimaginable’ response to US aggression as tensions rise over Hormuz, Middle East Eye, 25 October 2026

‘Iran has issued a warning to the United States that any new act of militarism would lead to an “unimaginable” response, with parliament speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf saying that Iran would not back down if attacked. Addressing parliament, Qalibaf said the Iranian government would not be intimidated by US military threats or pressure and would defend what it considers the country’s territorial integrity. “Americans think that with a few levers of media pressure or military threats, they can make this great nation surrender to them,” he said, according to a report by Iran’s Tasnim news agency. “Unaware that today’s Iran is not the Iran of the Pahlavi era of humiliation, but rather an impregnable fortress of self-confidence, defensive strength and iron will,” he added.

Qalibaf said Iran was prepared to respond forcefully to any violation of its territory and insisted that threats of a wider war would not compel the country to abandon its interests. “Until the Americans change their behaviour, stop being coercive and greedy, and compensate their violated obligations in an objective, concrete and real way on the ground, no claim for the Islamic Republic of Iran will have an iota of credibility,” Qalibaf said. Qalibaf said Washington had placed itself in a tough spot due to its decisions to attack Iran. The warning came a day after US President Donald Trump said Washington could strike Iran as soon as Sunday or reach a “big, beautiful” agreement with Tehran, as tensions rise over the future of the Strait of Hormuz. On Sunday, Iran’s army said that its air defence systems had shot down a US LUCAS drone over Bandar Abbas, a port city in southern Iran near the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said the war with the US and Israel means the security situation in the region has completely changed and that the management of the strait would not return to its previous state.”The current war has changed everything. We must acknowledge that new realities have emerged,” Araghchi said in remarks reported by Anadolu Agency, citing Iran’s Press TV.”The shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz will no longer be the same as before, nor will the strait be managed as it was in the past,” he added. Araghchi said Tehran would welcome security arrangements developed by countries in the region rather than imposed by outside powers. The waterway, between Iran and Oman, is one of the most important in the world. It connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. Its security is crucial to international energy shipments. Iran and the US remain at odds over how the strait should be managed following the conflict. Tehran has asserted its authority over passage through the waterway, while Washington has called for unrestricted navigation. However, although there was an interim deal signed between the two nations in June to solve the conflict, diplomatic negotiations have since stalled amid renewed tensions.”

Watch; Iran’s Targets After US Attack, Mohammad Marandi, 21 October 2026

Seyed Marandi; “If the United States attacks Iran’s infrastructure, anything belonging to the United States or remotely linked to the United States will be legitimate targets, and the Iranians will begin the swift process of destroying them. And according to estimates there are a couple of trillions of dollars worth of US assets, including data centers, for example, and so on. But the oil and gas installations that belong to the regimes, they too will face the same consequences because they are a part of any assault on Iran. If the United States attacks Iran, the United States is guilty, and so are those regimes that host US forces. So US assets or US-linked assets will be targeted, and assets linked to the host regimes will be targeted. If they want to carry out a genocidal war, then they have to accept the consequences.”

Read; Iran’s foreign minister: The false assumptions about us are dangerous, Abbas Araghchi, Financial Times, 21 October 2026

‘While Iran is firmly committed to seeking a dignified peaceful resolution to the conflict, we are also fully prepared to defend ourselves. President Donald Trump entered this war on the basis of fundamentally erroneous assumptions about Iran’s fortitude. It appears that he continues to be wrongly told that our armed forces are unprepared to defend the homeland, despite all evidence to the contrary. Instead, our fearless military has learnt valuable lessons from the acts of aggression committed by Israel and America since 2025. To state the obvious, we have no trust whatsoever in the sincerity of the US administration’s professed desire for peace with Iran. The evidence is there for all to see: in June 2025 and February 2026, they bombed us while we were actively engaged in negotiations. And in June of this year, shortly after an agreement was signed by President Masoud Pezeshkian and President Trump, we were attacked for a third time. How can we trust a US president again? Given that the White House has shown no willingness to reach an understanding on the way forward, while also threatening more violence, there is little reason to expect progress now. The recent escalation across the region, which shows how quickly this conflict can spread and how far its consequences can reach, is evidence of the major risk to international peace and security. In spite of all this, as a career diplomat, I am obliged to do my utmost to give diplomacy a chance, even when hope of success is scant.’

Watch; An Interview with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on the USA illegal war against Iran, Embassy of Iran in Ethiopia, 24 October 2026

NBC Presenter; “Let’s start right there with your seven day cease fire proposal. President Trump has rejected it. What is your response?”

Abbas Araghchi; “Well, first of all, let me say that it’s very interesting to listen to the US Ambassador who is desperately going back to old unproved accusations in order to answer a very simple question at why they are rejecting a seven day plan which can bring the life back to normal in the Persian Gulf and in the Strait of Hormuz, why are they rejecting this? This is a very important question that they have to answer. Also, I’m surprised that the ambassador is talking about seven day plan as he has not read it, maybe he has not given a copy. Our proposal is very clear. We are ready to open the Strait if certain things are done by the US and these certain things are not new have not come from the space, these are our rights that we want to be respected. First of all, we want to end this war, this war of aggression. They started this war eight months ago with the hope that in two, three days, they can win the war. It’s now eight months and we want it to be ended. We want our monies, our assets which are illegally frozen, be released. We want to be able to sell our oil. So we want certain things that US has already committed itself in the previous deals.”

NBC Presenter; “But Mr. Foreign Minister you heard the ambassador’s point was the United States is not going to unfreeze assets on the front end. It’s not going to lift sanctions on the front end. Is it possible to negotiate a new peace plan at this juncture or has diplomacy failed?”

Abbas Araghchi; “Well, why, they are not ready to release our money, it is our own money it is not any others money…”

NBC Presenter; “Because they want to see some actionable items from Iran like opening the Strait of Hormuz before they do that as diplomacy failed, Mr. Foreign Minister.”

Abbas Araghchi; “There is also always hope for diplomacy but we have no reason, to be honest with you, we have no reason to come back to diplomacy and engage with this administration once again because of their behavior in the past two years. You know, in 2025, they offered negotiation, we accepted and we engaged into negotiation and then in the middle of negotiations, they attacked us. Eight months later, in 2026, February, again they offered negotiation, again we accepted and again they attacked us right in the middle of negotiations. Then after the war, they offered negotiation for a deal. We accepted. We had three months of negotiations and it took only two weeks for them to violate a deal which they had signed themselves. So if you ask us, there is no reason why we should go back to diplomacy, but I’m still trying diplomacy because I think we shouldn’t miss any chance for peace. We don’t care about US midterm elections. We don’t care about any other things, we care about our national interests, we are ready to negotiate as much as we are ready to face any challenge. We stand firm in the face of any aggression, we stand firm in the face of any aggression against us even it comes to a doomsday war. Well, at the same time, we are ready for diplomacy and now there is a very reasonable plan on the table. If they reject it with no reason, this is their fault and I have to say that although we heard from President Trump that he is rejecting this deal, but we are still waiting for an official response through the mediators.”

NBC Presenter; “Well, and it is worth noting, you’re saying that they violated the last agreement. Iran did fire first on commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz. But let me ask you, broadly speaking, because it doesn’t sound like you have a lot of faith in diplomacy. Do you trust President Trump? “

Abbas Araghchi; “Well, first of all, we didn’t violate the deal. They violated it first. But if they have their story and they think that we have violated the deal, why did they bomb us? They could have activated paragraph 12 of the MoU, which is for dispute settlement,…

NBC Presenter; “…because they say you were firing at commercial ships in the Strait of Hormuz. But to my question, do you trust President Trump?”

Abbas Araghchi; “Well, we trust ourselves. We are ready for diplomacy. We are ready for war at the same time. They had tested us in both cases, they tested us in their aggression twice and they are welcome if they want to test us once again. They have tested us also in diplomacy. In 2015, we had a deal. We remain committed to that deal. It was the US who withdrew with no justification. Now we had a deal and they withdrew. They violated it with no justification and still we have offered a plan. If they want, if they are serious, that they want a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz now there is the possibility. We have offered this seven day plan. We want them to do certain things which we think they can do it in four or five days and then on day six, trade will be open. On day seven, we resume talks with them for the final. ..”

NBC Presenter (interrupting); “Mr. Foreign Minister, I want to get through a lot more here. I just want to ask you, because the Wall Street Journal is reporting that President Trump expects to resume bombing Iran after the midterms. As you know, he stood at the UN and threatened to annihilate Iran. Are you preparing for this war to resume?”

Abbas Araghchi; “We are fully prepared for the war to be resumed. And I repeat, we stand firm in the face of any new aggression, even it comes to a doomsday war. But at the same time we stand ready for diplomacy. It is up to President Trump to choose. He wanted unconditional surrender in the previous war in two days and now it’s eight months that they are fighting with no result. A new aggression would be certainly the same. We are fully prepared to that for that. We have learned our lesson from the two previous wars and we have corrected our tactics, we have changed our tactics and we are fully prepared to do that.”

NBC Presenter; “All right. Iran’s president said this week that Iran has, quote, never sought nuclear weapons. But Iran has enriched uranium to 60%. That’s 20 times more than enriched uranium percentage needed to produce electricity. Why does Iran need a stockpile of 60% enriched uranium?”

Abbas Araghchi; “Well, it is a question that we have answered this during the negotiations we had with the US. First of all, enriching up to 60% is not illegal, it is still in the framework of NPT and our peaceful program. We have done it for certain purposes, medical purposes, other purposes, but we have offered a deal on our 60% material in 2025 and 2026 and still it is something that could be considered if they prove their goodwill and their real determination for a peace. We decided to put everything nuclear for later stages and go for confidence building in this stage. This is why we have offered this seven day plan based on understanding that we had with the US interlocutors in the past. First confidence should be built. Our monies which are illegally frozen should be released. Blockade should be removed, and other things that they know….”

NBC Presenter; “But Mr. Foreign Minister, again we’re talking about 20 times more enriched uranium than is needed to produce electricity. All that is needed is 3 to 5%. So why do you need that 60% of enriched uranium? Would you let the US come in and take it and the world?”

Abbas Araghchi; “I can explain why do we need that but you answer one question, is this illegal or not? We are a committed member of NPT, 60% Enrichment is not illegal…

NBC Presenter; “No. But is it for peaceful purposes though? Is it for people? Is it, I’m not talking about legal or illegal. I’m talking about for purposes. When it’s 20 times the amount of enriched uranium needed for electricity.”

Abbas Araghchi; “No, it is for peaceful purposes and we have answered this question, we have removed any concern in our past negotiations. If there is still such a question why they bombed us? Are they allowed to bomb anything that they think is illegal, there is no justification for that. War is not a solution. That was a subject for negotiation and we did it in the past. We have enriched uranium up to 60% for peaceful purposes and it is within our commitment in the NPT, we have not violated NPT. Okay, there are questions, we answered that question in the past during the negotiations and we can do it again. There is no need for military operation.”

NBC Presenter; “Mr. Foreign Minister, final question to you. The President of Iran said this week he has spoken to the Supreme Leader. He says he is in good health. Why has there been no proof of life of the Supreme Leader since he took power in March?”

Abbas Araghchi; “Well, there are security concerns and you’re well aware of that. Our Supreme Leader was illegally assassinated during the last war and I think it is very logical that we protect our leader…”

NBC Presenter; “Why not put out a video? Why not put out a video?”

Abbas Araghchi; “No, no, there are for security reasons. There are lots of indications that he’s under threat by Americans and there are other indications that he is in full control, he is in full order. We receive his comments and orders and opinions and there is a national consensus on decision making. It is false if somebody thinks that there are different source of power inside Iran. No, we move based on national consensus. We in the Foreign Ministry are in close coordination with the government, with IRGC, with the Supreme National Security Council, with the Parliament. We are all in one front facing all challenges imposed on us by the US either sanctions or military operation.”

Watch; Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey send top delegations to Tehran, Iran Focused Forum, 26 October 2026

‘Saudi Arabi, Pakistan and Turkey send top delegations to Tehran. They all know if Israhell starts another war they will all pay the price for being complicit to war crimes against Iran. Iran’s position is clear, either everyone is sanctioned or everyone is free to engage in trade, including Iran. Lift the US sanctions on Iran and peace will come to the region once and for all. The Strait of Hormuz will remain under Iranian control from now on. That part is non negotiable.’

Watch; Jeffrey Sachs makes a terrifying prediction on the escalation of the Iran war and the looming economic devastation, Tucker Carlson Network, 23 April 2026

Jeffrey Sachs; “What will happen in the next few weeks if we don’t choose the off ramp is the physical destruction of a lot of the Gulf region and of the Middle East more generally. Because the US will rain missiles and bombs on Iran and Iran will launch what it has against targets in the neighborhood to show deterrence and hoping that that deterrence will stop something. Often instead what you get is just both sides unleashing their arsenals. And what will happen in a short period of time is not a closure of shipping, but a destruction of the physical capacities of providing the oil and the gas and the fertilisers and the petrochemicals and the other very core commodities for the world economy. And it doesn’t take that much to bring the world economy into a tailspin because you don’t need to close down half the oil supply. You might need to shut off 20% of the world oil supply. And that by enough will send the prices soaring, make Americans really suffer across the board. Because it’s not only at the gas pump and not only in the utility bills, but also in the cost of food which will store from this as well. Because there will be a worldwide disruption of food supplies coming from this. Because we’re a very significant proportion of the urea which underpins the nitrogen based fertilisers of the world come from this region.

Energy extraction, refining, petrochemicals, distribution, it’s all about a million times more complicated than people understand and these are very sophisticated plants and they are not built for war, they are built for just normal, peaceful, complex, sophisticated operations and a lot of that could be destroyed in a very, very short period of time.

One of the most sophisticated places in the planet, the Emirates, was asking the Federal Reserve a few days ago for emergency swap lines that may be needed in the event of a crisis. This is kind of shocking because first of all, the Emirates you think of as super rich, it’s the place where rich people go to put their money in the region. Of course it’s completely destabilised by all of this. It’s a complete disaster for them, what’s happened but they are girding for the downstream effects of what I’m talking about, which is that first you get the physical destruction, then you get the real economy, so called the actual physical production of industrial products of employment in the manufacturing sector and cascading across the economy having huge negative consequences. But then you get the financial effects because people say, is this place viable anymore? I’m withdrawing my money. But the Emirates operates on a US backed dollar standard and suddenly you have a run on your banks, you have a run on your financial markets so they’re already asking can we have emergency lines of credit? And maybe yes, maybe no. But that’s the tip of the iceberg of the financial consequences that can come from all of this.”

Watch; America Humiliated, Iran New Superpower? Saudi Defence Chief Leads U.S. Allies At Tehran Talks, Times of India, 26 October 2026

‘Saudi Arabia is taking Houthi missiles almost daily, Iran is bracing itself for another US attack that could restart the war and now Riyadh’s own Mecca Pact allies have walked into Tehran for one of the most consequential regional security meetings since the fighting began. Saudi Defence Minister Prince Khalid Bin Salman, Pakistan army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir and Turkish intelligence chief Ibrahim Kalin are all in the Iranian capital sitting down with Tehran’s leadership as two dangerous flashpoints threaten to collide. The first is Yemen. Saudi cities, airports and energy infrastructure have repeatedly come under Houthi missile and drone attack as fighting intensifies between the group and Saudi backed Yemeni forces. The second is Iran itself. Tensions between Tehran and Washington are again rising with renewed warnings about possible American military action and Iranian promises of a much heavier response if another attack comes. That is the environment in which some of Saudi Arabia’s most important regional partners have arrived. In Tehran. The three visiting officials represent the countries of the Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey. Saudi officials say their mission is explicitly about preventing another regional escalation, opening channels for negotiations and supporting diplomatic efforts led by Qatar in Pakistan The three delegations also met Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. Pezeshkian used that meeting to deliver a broader message about where Tehran believes the region should go next. According to Iranian reporting. He said Iran supports any understanding that strengthens unity and cohesion among Islamic states. His argument was that the region’s Muslim states possess enough political, economic and security capacity to create their own framework for stability rather than allowing outside powers to determine the regional order. Also returned to the recent war with Israel and the United States. He argued that Israel had learned through the fighting that forcing Iran to surrender was, in his words, a false notion. And he directly linked that experience to his call for Muslim states to act together. If Islamic states stand together, there will be no possibility for Israel to continue its crimes, he was quoted as saying by Iranian media.’

Please donate

Forgive me for pointing out that, while we receive some one-off donations, I am funding Farms Not Factories myself, and if we are to continue to fight the cruel, antibiotic-led factory farm system, we will need some regular donations from like-minded people. Please consider a monthly subscription of £2/month and help us support a network of smaller scale, humane and healthy UK pig farms, local abattoirs and butchers.

“Our message is simple, we want to help bring an end to this dangerous, inhumane system. Vote for real farming over factory farming.”
– Tracy Worcester, Director

Share This Article

Related ArticlesView All

October 5th, 2026
0
Be a Vigilant Skeptic

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter
August 28th, 2026
0
Our Modern Food System is Leading us to Early Graves

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter
July 30th, 2026
0
Psychopathic Leaders

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter
July 2nd, 2026
0
From Field to Fork

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter
June 2nd, 2026
0
Quality not Quantity

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter
May 1st, 2026
0
Divide and Rule

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*