May 1st, 2026 Newsletter

Divide and Rule

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media.

“The way you get democracy to function is by informing the public.” – Robert Kennedy Jr.

“Science is more than a body of knowledge. It is a way of thinking; a way of sceptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask sceptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be sceptical of those in authority, then, we are up for grabs for the next charlatan (political or religious) who comes rambling along.” – Carl Sagan

“Never worry about who will be offended if you speak the Truth. Worry about who will be misled, deceived and destroyed, if you do not.” and
”Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by and that has made all the difference.” – Robert Frost

Though the chapters interrelate, they are divided into six sections and have a common realisation that a cabal of corporate elites have captured global trade, global and national governance, mainstream and online media, and ultimately many of our minds.

As a stenographer, I link to an article or audio and paste a key section. My most trusted websites are platforms for journalists who don’t compromise on the truth and have thereby been shunned by the mainstream media. Click the button below to view my list of top trusted news sources:

Disclaimer: Farms Not Factories newsletters share and repost material that is already publicly accessible. The views expressed in the articles do not necessarily represent those of Farms Not Factories but are selected to promote open discussion on issues often omitted or misrepresented in the mainstream media.

Together Alliance March, 28th March 2026

The 500,000-strong demonstration in London on 28 March featured a diverse coalition of over 250 to 450+ organisations, including NGOs, charities, trade unions, and faith groups representing roughly seven million people. As described by the organisers, Together Alliance, it was the largest anti-far-right march in UK history.They wanted to show that there was no animosity between UK citizens whatever their ethnicity or religion, and blamed the present economic and social chaos on the greed and power grab of a cabal of corporate leaders and their stooges in politics and the media.

Billionaires Elon Musk and Peter Thiel were frequently named as the arbiters of the dystopian world of surveillance, censorship and energy-intensive AI and high tech that dehumanises us.

“Billionaires, who have never been friends of ordinary working people, try to divide people of all different races and religions.”

The marchers included farmers who wanted to revolutionise farming by promoting local food and farming over corporate capitalism and global trade.

Anti-racist voices expressed their abhorrence of the CIA, MI6 and Mossad’s forever wars in the Middle East and the Islamophobia promoted by the likes of Tommy Robinson.

On the march, the National Secretary of Jewish Voice for Liberation said, “We are very much in support of the Palestinians, wholly opposed to what Israel is doing with its conducting a genocide in Gaza.”

It was a joy to hear a big picture analysis of the road to justice, free speech and peace,shared by so many good souls.

Share Retweet Insta Repost

Food & Farming / Co2

If we drank UK milk, our farmers wouldn’t be going out of business.

Read; Muller puts more milk producers on 12 months’ notice, Farmers Weekly, 31 March 2026

‘A number of dairy farmers supplying Muller in North Wales and Scotland have been issued with 12 months notice to their supply contracts, and been told their last milk collections will be on 31 March 2027. Muller producers received a letter including a termination notice on Monday (30 March). It stated that the current market environment continues to be “challenging” for both dairy farmers and processors alike.’

If we don’t pay a fair price to our farmers, by avoiding the supermarkets and going direct, we will lose them.

Read; Food, Fuel, and Frustration: Rural Britain’s Bumpy Ride, Jamie Blackett, 31 March 2026

‘So the net effect is that British farmers are not going to be digging for victory this year. Some arable farmers with sheds full of pre-bought fertiliser at the old price are contemplating making a better return by selling the fertiliser and fallowing the land. All of us will be conscious of the ready reckoner that calculates the cost of the fertiliser, the yield expectation and the expected price of grain and tells you whether it is worth putting it on or not. Dairy farmers are shrugging their shoulders and thinking that with low milk prices they would be better to rely on slurry and nitrogen fixing legumes than waste money on ammonium nitrate. Arable and milk yields are likely to be very low this year as a result, whatever the weather does, at a time when imports may be scarce and expensive, because other countries have low yields as well, and because moving commodities around may be costly if oil prices stay high.The price of a bowl of Weetabix covered in milk may be set to reach record highs.’

Be a chem-free regenerative farmer (ie organic without the rules)

Listen; ‘What’s good for the land, is good for us’ Farm Gate, 14 April 2026

‘ffinlo Costain and David R Montgomery, the author of Dirt: The Erosion of Civilisations, discuss worms, the plough, soil bank accounts, regenerative farming, human nutrition and why human health improved in the UK during the Second World War. Montgomery is also co-author (with Anne Biklé) of What Your Food Ate and The Hidden Half of Nature. His new book, ReGen: A New Future for Farming, Food and Health, is out later in 2026.’

David Montgomery; “One of the things I wrote about in ‘Growing A Revolution’ was that there’s plenty of regenerative farmers around the world who are weaning themselves off of both mechanical till, a mechanical disturbance, the tillage, and also weaning themselves off of the chemical disturbance by either minimising their use or avoiding it (glyphosate) altogether. To rebuild the fertility of the land as a result of intensive farming, we need to minimise or avoid both physical and chemical disturbance in farming. Glyphosate-intensive farming, no-till farming that relies on glyphosate for weed control, that’s not really regenerative, the same way that organic farming that relies on heavy tillage for weed control is not really regenerative. Those are both degenerative practices. But there are ways to combine minimising physical and chemical disturbance. That’s where the sweet spot for regenerative farming is. I’ve been very happy to report that most of the regenerative farmers I visit who follow those principles of minimising physical and chemical disturbance, keeping the ground covered with cover crops and growing a diversity of crops, the sweet spot combination that keeps the soil on the land by reducing erosion, but also builds soil organic matter and feed soil life. They can be as productive and more profitable than their conventional neighbours. And that’s what turned me into an optimist on this issue, because I think there’s a way forward. It’s just not the way that we’re teaching most farmers to farm these days.

Below is a study proving the above financial benefits of nurturing the soil and using less expensive inputs.

Read; Pesticide-free agriculture is profitable and boosts yields, a new French study shows, Pesticide Action Network, 16 April 2026

‘While the environmental and health harm of pesticides are well-known, many people ask: Can agriculture thrive without them? The answer, backed by a groundbreaking 10-year study in France, is a resounding YES. And the benefits extend far beyond mere feasibility. Although pesticide-free systems yields were often below those of conventional farming, some reached equivalent levels or even exceeded them. Moreover, estimated income was twice, three times or more the French national minimum wage in 80% of the monitored arable land.

This 10-year study, led by France’s national agronomic and environment research institute INRAE, analysed nine farming systems – including arable and mixed farming – across various regions of France. The trials were designed collaboratively with farmers and agricultural advisers within experimental units. They used an approach based on agro-ecological crop protection principles (prevention of the diseases, reliance on plant biodiversity and improvement or protection of soil health), while mineral fertilisers were allowed. The goal was to use zero pesticides while reducing biotic stress (caused by pests, fungi and weeds), with rotations that varied in duration from 5 to 9 years. Even biological pesticides were not used.

Pesticide-free crops often yielded less than conventional systems using chemical pesticides. When comparing bread wheat, conventional farming yielded on average approximately between 500 g/m² and 700 g/m², whereas pesticide-free farming yielded approximately between 600 g/m² and 400 g/m², and organic farming 250–300 g/m².

However, under certain conditions, pesticide-free crops matched or even surpassed conventional yields. At the Auzeville farm, pesticide-free wheat production exceeded conventional production in 2018, reaching 500 g/m² whilst the conventional version remained at around 400 g/m². The same applies to the production of other crops. For example, pesticide-free durum wheat production reached conventional levels in 2017, while pesticide-free triticale production surpassed conventional production in 2016 and 2019.’

A regenerative farmer using glyphosate must be called a chem-regen farmer.

Read; Glyphosate use in UK farming increases by 1,000% since 1990, Pesticide Action Network, 9 April 2026

‘Glyphosate – often known by its most common brand name, Roundup – has been the cause of controversy for many years due to the ever-growing body of evidence that it has the potential to cause irreversible harms to both human health and the environment. In the US, it has been the subject of a spate of court cases which has seen the manufacturer pay out $11 billion to cancer-sufferers who claim that the herbicide caused their non-Hodgkin lymphoma or related cancers. The French government has acknowledged the link between Parkinson’s and glyphosate and has been paying out compensation to farmers.

The chemical has also been shown to have wide-ranging negative environmental impacts, from contaminating water to directly and indirectly harming a range of wildlife including amphibians, bees, and other pollinators. While touted by some as a solution to climate change, glyphosate is based on fossil fuels and produces 31.29 kilograms of CO2e per kilogram of chemical produced.

Due to overuse, weeds in the UK are now becoming resistant to glyphosate. The first instances of resistance were confirmed in 2025, and cases are now becoming more commonplace. Resistance has long been a problem in the US where glyphosate is used in vast quantities.

In 2023, the EU banned the use of glyphosate in pre-harvest desiccation, a practice which involves dousing a crop in chemicals just before harvest to dry it out. However, the UK continues to allow glyphosate to be used as a pre-harvest desiccant, despite it often leading to high residue levels in food.’

The psychopaths in power evidently want to make us and our planet sick.

Watch; The Secret Plan to Cover the World in Herbicide, Mother Jones, USA.27 April 2026

Intro; “When the US Forest Service sent a routine letter about wildfire recovery in one word buried in the text stopped me cold: herbicides. This spring, federal agencies plan to spray glyphosate—the world’s most controversial and widely-debated weedkiller—across thousands and thousands of acres of public land. Land where families camp, hikers explore, hunters pursue game, and children swim in mountain streams. And almost no one knows it’s happening.

The new Inheritance Tax on farms penalises farmers who are not married to their partners.

Read; Unmarried couples, divorcees and single farmers face added inheritance tax challenges, Farming Life, 14 April 2026

‘Unmarried couples, divorcees and single farmers could face inheritance tax bills potentially hundreds of thousands of pounds greater than their married counterparts following the implementation of controversial IHT tax changes this month (April).

While the two significant changes announced at the end of last year, raising the 100% APR / BPR allowance from £1m to £2.5m per person and allowing the transfer of any unused allowance to a surviving spouse or civil partner have helped soften the blow for many, not all farming families will benefit to the same extent, according to calculations from NFU Mutual, the financial advice firm.’

You can ignore the BBC’s fear porn about the increased cost of petrochemical inputs and listen to Professor Tim Lang explain that we can feed the nation without chemical inputs.

Listen; fertiliser, BBC Farming Today, 25 April 2026

BBC intro; “A new report warns that UK farming’s reliance on imported fertiliser and minerals, puts it at risk in times of geopolitical stress. Analysis, published by the National Preparedness Commission, highlights the fragility of global supply chains on which UK agriculture depends. Fuel and fertiliser costs are soaring because of disruption caused by the war in the Middle East. That’s having a big impact on farmers and it’s also putting pressure on food prices as MPs on the Environment Food and Rural Affairs select committee have been hearing. They were told that food prices were 40% higher than before Covid and that the food supply chain needed urgent government support with fuel costs.’

Presenter; “If we did turn away from artificial fertilisers, we wouldn’t produce enough food, would we? “

Tim Lang; “We could produce enough food, but the balance of what is produced and where it goes would change. The big quick point to make, and it’s very complex to actually deliver, is you stop growing vast amounts of grain to then feed to animals who are poor converters. We use land for grain based on artificial fertilisers, this is cheap food but it’s not actually cheap, it’s vulnerable, it’s not resilient, and it has all sorts of implications for ecology and public health and now national security.”

There is no interest in local food and farming from globalist Starmer.

Read; New farming and food board raises questions over who gets a seat at the table, Sustain, 26 March 2026

‘The government’s new Farming and Food Partnership Board held its first meeting, bringing together leaders from farming, food retail and hospitality to drive farm profitability and food security. But with no terms of reference published, seats still to be filled, and voices from sustainable and nature-friendly farming conspicuously absent, whose vision of British agriculture will shape its agenda?’

Watch; From intensive arable to thriving organic: The Balmerino transformation, Soil Association, 17 March 2026

‘Discover how Kilburns Farm in Balmerino, Fife, radically reshaped its future by shifting from intensive arable production to a pasture-based, organic, mixed livestock system.

This uplifting short film shows how farmer Rachel Ives has restored wildlife, rebuilt soil health and created a resilient, low input, nature rich farm business.’

Who is the British aristocrat pushing these Irish farmers off their Irish sheep farming moors? Let’s name and shame him.

Watch; An Injustice is being done to these men, Conor D McGuinness, 9 April 2026

‘…they have farmed the Knockmealdowns for generations and are now being driven off the land by an absentee landlord, a British aristocrat who is imposing a 900% rent increase. It’s 2026, not 1846. Listen to these young men – their love for the land, and their despair at being the last generation to tend these hills.The silence and inaction from Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and the Healy Rae / Lowry independents is terrible.’

Ban fishing in Marine Protected Areas.

Listen; Marine Protected Areas, BBC Farming Today, 1 April 2026

‘1.3 million tonnes of fish were caught in the UK’s ‘Marine Protected Areas’, or MPAs, between 2020 and 2024. Greenpeace, who’ve calculated that figure from official sources, say it makes what should be havens of safety for marine life, little more than meaningless lines on a map. They argue that marine eco-systems are protected on “paper only” while industrial-scale fishing and boats with bottom trawling gear, that drags across the seabed, are still allowed in MPAs.’

Watch; They’re Putting Potato In Your Beef. Here’s Why, Radmore Farm, 6 April 2026

‘Every time supermarket beef shrinks in the pan — now you’ll know why. I’m a working British farmer who doesn’t supply supermarkets, which means I can tell you what farmers inside the supply chain can’t. Modified potato starch is being added to beef at the processor level — not by the farmer — specifically to retain injected water weight. Legal. Declared. Buried in small print. This is ‘food fraud UK’ hiding in plain sight. I’ll show you exactly how the system works, what to look for on the label, and what you can do about it.’

We can all help bring an end to cruel, polluting factory farming by only buying high welfare products labelled free range, outdoor reared/bred, or best of all organic.

Read; Ammonia pollution hotspots found in areas of UK with most pig and poultry factory farms, The Guardian, 16 April 2026

‘Ammonia pollution hotspots have been identified in areas with some of the greatest numbers of intensive pig and poultry farms in Britain, research has revealed.

A new map for the first time reveals the most severe concentrations of ammonia emissions are clustered in Lincolnshire, Herefordshire and Norfolk. These regions all have a high density of intensive poultry and pig units that drive dangerous levels of ammonia, according to researchers from Compassion in World Farming (CiWF) and Sustain.

The research comes as the government attempts to rewrite planning rules to make it easier to build intensive livestock farms despite concerns about water pollution, air quality and local opposition, the Guardian revealed earlier this month.

Michele Franks, who lives near a poultry megafarm in Lincolnshire told researchers emissions regularly force her indoors, triggering chest tightness, eye irritation and breathing difficulties during shed clean-outs that can last up to five days at a time.

“When the chicken sheds are cleaned out, the smell and the polluted air hits me straight away – my chest tightens, my eyes sting, and I have to shut every window in my house just to cope,” she said. “I’m asthmatic, and for days I can’t even step into my own garden. They say escape to the country for cleaner air but no one should have to live sandwiched between industrial units that make them gasp for breath.”

CiWF and Sustain are calling for an end to the expansion of factory farming.’

Read; UK looks to relax planning rules for factory farms after industry lobbying, The Guardian, 2 April 2026

‘Ministers are rewriting planning rules to make it easier to build intensive livestock farms despite concerns about water pollution, air quality and local opposition. Documents obtained by the Guardian under the Freedom of Information Act show that proposed changes to the national planning policy framework (NPPF) were discussed by ministers and officials in response to concerns of the country’s leading chicken producers, who have been lobbying on the issue for at least two years.’

Read; Density of animal feeding operations, including concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), and cancer incidence: A county-level ecological study across three U.S. states, Yale University, April 2026

‘Our findings provide suggestive evidence linking higher exposure to AFO/CAFOs to increased cancer incidence in diverse U.S. states. While the ecological design limits causal interpretation, the observed associations raise important concerns about potential health risks in communities located near large-scale animal operations.’

Read; Industrial chicken producer hits out over Wye and Usk river pollution claim, The Guardian, 27 April 2026

‘Lawyers for one of the country’s biggest producers of industrially farmed chicken have attacked a claim that they are responsible for pollution in the River Wye and River Usk.

More than 1,300 people have signed up to sue Avara Foods, its subsidiary Freemans of Newent and the local sewage company Welsh Water for extensive and widespread pollution in the rivers and their catchment areas.

In what their lawyers are calling the UK’s biggest ever environmental pollution claim, they blame the companies for the rivers turning green in the summer and becoming smelly and slimy.

But at a preliminary hearing at the high court in London on Monday, Charles Gibson KC, representing Avara and Freemans, said the claim that their activities had caused the river pollution was “entirely inferential and is an oversimplification”.’

‘If the government supported land sharing instead of land sparing, we could get rid of the expensive inputs and farm in symbiosis with nature, increasing the health of both the consumer and soil.’

Read; Built on inputs not resilience: The UK’s food security problem, Sustainable Food Trust, 31 March 2026

‘The UK imports 60% of its fertiliser and close to 50% of its food, often from countries which in turn import significant amounts of fertiliser and rely on input-heavy production systems. The UK’s system is also heavily centralised and consolidated, nine big retailers account for more than 94% of all retail food.

If the government created support that took a whole farm approach, integrating nature and food production through agro-ecological farming methods, and promoted healthier diets aligned with what the UK can sustainably produce, we could move away from input-heavy agriculture, reducing our reliance on imports and increasing the resilience of domestic production to extreme weather. A decentralised supply chain is also critical for true resilience, embedding smaller-scale localised infrastructure across the country would be more flexible, able to pivot in a crisis and be less of a target from a security point of view. Empowering communities to produce food should also be taken seriously, supporting community growing, improving access to growing spaces and embedding practical food growing skills within the curriculum for young people. And we need to address our huge reliance on imported fruit and veg by creating market gardens and horticulture enterprises across the UK, accompanied by localised processing facilities.’

Ffinlo Costain interviews two farmers about converting to Regen farming

Listen; ‘It’ll never work on my farm’ Farm Gate, 21 April 2026

Tom Edmonson, Farmer; “High welfare (pigs), smaller groups, reduced antibiotic usage, everything that we should be doing, but we had a couple of batches where it just for one reason or other didn’t go right for us. And we had a period of vice, tail biting, ear chewing by the pigs because they weren’t happy for whatever reason whether it be the food quality or the weather conditions. It was quite a period of foggy weather where it was always quite damp and the pigs are quite sensitive to those changes within those systems and I got to a point where I was going out in the morning and I’d have to go out and euthanise pigs because of the tail biting and things like that and it got to a point where I was euthanising quite a high number on some days.

And when we got to a point where we realised the consumer didn’t want what we were producing, they wanted what our vision for the farm was, and what it could be from smaller amounts of different species of animals, so chickens for eggs and pigs in a smaller way, and cows and sheep, all produced within this regenerative farming system. People do want that and I can produce that and I can make money doing that. And actually, everyone’s happier and it’s got all these added benefits that you can’t really measure, such as increased bird life and insects and all these things. And a few years down the line of doing this and we’ve got a really good group of customers who we’ve created great relationships with, and it’s made farming for us much happier. And it’s a really a thing we’re really, really proud of doing, and it’s amazing.”

Interesting history of the modern food system dominated by supermarkets and volatile global supply chains.

Watch; The Evil Genius Of The Global Food System, Richard Hames Meets Charles C. Mann, Novara Media, 14 February 2026

Intro; “Richard Hames presents a new show about the systems that make modern life possible. We’ve made the planet into a giant machine, filled with the strangest stories – and now it’s all coming apart. It’s time to Do Your Own Research. There’s nothing in the world more important than the food system. The twentieth century was scarred by enormous famines – and, like the one in Gaza, they are still deliberately engineered. But since the 1970s, the absolute number of deaths from famine has dropped by over 90%.

On a global scale, we now make so much food that farmers will sometimes destroy it just to keep the prices high. How is there so much food? How did we get to a world where, globally, people are more likely to be obese than underweight? And, amid all these calories, how are so many people still malnourished? Why is it suddenly all so expensive? And is it all about to come crashing down? Charles C. Mann explains the historical power of bird shit, the strange reason Indian scientists put wheat in a nuclear reactor, and how the genius who made modern farming possible also invented the gas that was used to murder millions in the Holocaust. We’re mapping the world and everything in it.’

The Covid 19 jab was neither safe or effective – don’t expect this bird flu one to be any different. Avoid it like the plague.

Listen; Bird flu vaccine for people,, BBC Farming Today, 25 April 2026

‘A new trial is starting this summer, as part of a programme to develop a vaccine for people against bird flu. 3,000 volunteers are needed from the UK to take part, and 1,000 in the USA. Researchers at the National Institute for Health and Care Research are hoping that poultry workers might take part.’

Yorkshire farmers discussing farming

Watch; There’s a crisis in farming… and this is how we fix it! Cannon Hall Farm; 16 Apr 2026The Cannon Hall Farm Podcast

Intro; “There’s a crisis in farming that needs addressing and Farmers Rob & Dave have drafted in their Dad, Roger, to talk all about it. Roger has 70 years of farming experience so can modern day agriculture learn from its past?!’

If you are interested in buying or making healthy local bread, this program is for you.

Listen; Cereal Revisited, Farmarama, 29 April 2026

“Welcome to Farmerama, I’m Katie Revell. If you’re a long time listener, you might remember the series we released back in 2019, Cereal. It was a six part investigation into the way grain and bread is produced in the UK, and into the true costs of that system, to the planet and to people.

But it also told the stories of the alternative grains movement, farmers, millers, bakers, and others, who are building a better system from the ground up. We were really blown away by the impact that Cereal had, and the feedback we got from listeners about how it changed their thinking and sometimes their actions as well. We still hear from people about what the series meant to them, and how it changed their beliefs or their behaviour in some way, big or small.

So six years on, we wanted to revisit the Cereal series, to understand the influence it’s had, and to celebrate everyone who’s been working to build a more localised grain economy, and to develop a bread system and a food system that supports both people and planet. We’ve called this episode Cereal Revisited. It features some of the original contributors to Cereal, reflecting[…]”

This video seems to divide farming between intensive agriculture or wildlife whereas we could have both. Land-sharing is where crops are grown in symbiosis with nature. But corporations don’t want farmers to come away from their petrochemicals and so the stooge politicians are subsidising farmers to grow intensively in the middle of the fields and leave less favourable land to wildlife, called land-sparing.

Watch; Derek vs Derek International Trailer; 3 February 2026

A funny film about a serious issue, restore nature or produce food? Featuring Derek Banbury, a dairy farmer who is horrified at the “devastation” of his neighbour’s farm. Over the hedge lives another Derek – dubbed the “maverick rewilder” by the media – Derek Gow is an ex-sheep farmer hellbent on turning his land into an oasis for nature. The pair argue over everything from food production and hedges to beavers and escaping wild boar. Made by BAFTA award winning director James Dawson, it’s blunt, funny and heartwarming in equal measure.

Around it’s release in 2026, our dream is for the film to drive real world change for both food security and nature. Recognising farmers as key to both but often under-supported.

Director, James Dawson:

“Five years ago, I realised that the countryside was becoming central to the conflict around the climate crisis and biodiversity loss. I felt it was undervalued as a focus for films. And not properly understood. So I went in search of a story that would allow this conflict to be explored in real time. And yet wouldn’t easily drop into the cliches that seem to dominate so much of the debate in our polarised world.

When I found the two Dereks I knew they were a great way of crafting a story that could tease out the underlying issues in a funny and engaging way.My hope is their story will at turns amuse, entertain and provoke audiences to think about the difficult questions the film poses and to catalyse tangible change for farmers and for nature.”

Theatrical release planned for Autumn 2026. To find out about screenings you can sign up for our newsletter here: https://www.derekvsderek.com/contact

Watch panel discussion; Technocracy’s War on Food: Who’s Controlling Your Plate?, Technocracy Roundtable, Patrick Wood, 26 January, 2026

Intro; This is deadly serious. Technocrats promise cradle-to-grave maintenance, but not choice. In short, they are running our natural food supply into the ground while providing artificial foodstuffs from their genetic laboratories.

This is a long-form discussion between Patrick Wood, Courtenay Turner, Craig Wenclewicz, and Aaron Day.

I totally agree with this philosopher’s dystopian description of our Western culture. This is also in the food section as it is an important message that should be heard – ie our culture is turning most of us into big powerful and little weak monsters. I can see it in myself perhaps because I have seen the kindness, openness, happiness, generosity and love of rural people in the so-called Third World, particularly Muslims.

Watch; You don’t know them (Westerners), Middle Nation, 10 April 2026

Shahid Bolsen; “You’re looking at a person, a Westerner, okay? You’re looking at a Westerner who has been completely seized by a very twisted culture that has been twisted as a culture for longer than almost any other continuous culture on earth. So your advice, your nasiha, your reminders, even your condemnation, your attempts at rehabilitation and so forth, these are not going to be processed. These are not going to be processed. The person that you’re trying to talk to is not available. The person that you’re trying to talk to is buried beneath a mountain of Westernism. And if you know what to look for you will see what I mean. And you can think back on any encounters that you’ve ever had with Westerners and you’ll see what I’m talking about. You’ll remember the combativeness, the competitiveness, the hostility, the obfuscation, the gaslighting, the evasiveness around any sort of moral framing about anything. You’ll remember them baiting you, them trying to provoke you, the pressure to accommodate them. On and on and on. It’s uniform. It’s uniform. Everyone has had this experience because it’s uniform. And it’s uniform because it is a condition. It’s the same condition, even if the carriers of the condition are different. That’s why I say, you know that you’re dealing with a condition and not an individual. I’m telling you, you don’t know any Westerners. You don’t know any Westerners that you know. You understand me? If you know any Westerners, you don’t know any Westerners. You don’t know them. You don’t know those people. You have no idea who they are because they have no idea who they are. This is ironic because another one of the facets or one of the defining traits or characteristics of their so called civilisation or the condition of Westernism is this hyper fixation on individualism, on the importance of the individual, the sanctity of the individual and so forth, right? And yet Westerners are not ever even allowed to know themselves. They’re not allowed to even know themselves. They are caught forever , in the riptide between the culture, what their culture has made them in reality and what their culture has made them pretend to be. You understand me? And these two things, both of these things are definitively opposites. Understand? The culture is objectively vile. It’s objectively vicious and perverted and deranged and depraved. Objectively that’s not how they were born. That’s not what they were born to be. That’s not what they were created to be. That’s not what their fitra is, but that’s what Westernism made them in reality. And then the culture makes them pretend to be good, upright, moral and so forth, and it makes them pretend to disapprove of everything that their own culture promotes, make them pretend that they disapprove of everything their culture applauds and everything that their culture rewards. So you’re caught between these two things, these two falsities, and you never even get a chance to ever find out who you really are as a person.”

Gene Edited Crops are GMOs

Agro-chemical companies are lobbying the EU to scrap safety and labelling rules for gene edited plants which have until now been regulated as GMOs.

Read; EU vote on new GMOs: Wrong for farmers, wrong for consumers, wrong for nature, by Friends of the Earth Europe, GM Watch, 20 April 2026

‘Tomorrow, on 21 April, EU foreign affairs ministers will endorse the wide deregulation of a new generation of genetically modified food and seeds (new GMOs, produced with so-called “new genomic techniques”). It means they will agree to exclude them from existing labelling and safety check requirements, taking away farmers and consumers’ right to choose what they grow in their fields and eat. This decision goes against both the food industry’s and citizens’ clear demand to keep their right to know about all generations of GMOs.

It marks the first vote by EU ministers on this file since 2023, and it is noteworthy that it is taken by foreign affairs ministers rather than those responsible for agriculture or the environment. Foreign affairs ministers have been voting on all the legislative packages dismantling EU’s social and environmental protections, so-called ‘Omnibus’. This clearly shows this new GMOs file is part of a broader deregulatory agenda from European decision makers.

Mute Schimpf, food campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, said; “For over twenty years, Europeans have made it clear they don’t want GMOs on their plates. How dare our ministers now try to sneak them in, blacking them out from labels? This isn’t about innovation, it’s about allowing a handful of big biotech and pesticide corporations like Bayer to make ever more profits on the back of millions of farmers, consumers, and nature.”

By excluding them from the current GMO legislation, new GMOs will now be marketed and grown without any type of safety check and monitoring for potential harm to people’s health and nature. Biotech corporations selling them will no longer be held liable if harm occurs or if they contaminate conventional or organic fields and produce.’

Read; Biotech lobby groups are set to trap farmers and breeders in patent minefield, GM Watch, 14 April 2026

‘Deregulation of new GM crops will increase seed market concentration, undermine resilience of the food system. By Corporate Europe Observatory and GMWatch

Industry lobby documents reveal a fierce ongoing battle on patented seeds and agricultural crops. A new EU law that would scrap any safety or labelling rules for a class of new GM crops produced with new genomic techniques (NGTs) is in its final stages. As all GM crops are covered by patents, this will negatively impact the way our food is produced – meaning more market power in the hands of just a handful of corporations, less choice in seeds for farmers and more risk of being sued, and restricted access to plant genetic material for smaller plant breeders. This raises strong concerns, as our food security depends on the availability of diverse and locally adapted seeds.’

Survey shows 80% of citizens in five EU countries oppose patents on seeds

Read; European Parliament vote to deregulate new GMOs: Biotech lobby pushes false solutions for patent problem, GM Watch, 13 April 2026

‘On 18 May the European Parliament is expected to vote on a new law that would exempt food plants obtained from new genetic engineering techniques (NGTs) from existing GMO rules. The deregulation of NGTs will undermine food safety standards and consumers’ right to choose, and is also likely to lead to further concentration in the seed sector through the patenting of food crops.

A new article by Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) and GMWatch shows that industry lobby groups try to allay concerns about the impact of patented crops with shallow and misleading arguments. A new survey shows that most EU citizens oppose patents on plants and animals.’

Dario Aranda reports on “a massive open-air experiment”

Read; Argentina: 30 years of genetically modified soy, GM Watch, 30 March 2026

‘The arrival of GM soy marked a turning point in Argentina’s agricultural model and served as a beachhead for GM crops in South America, writes Argentine journalist Dario Aranda in an article for Tierra Viva news agency.

Dario recounts; “In a fast-track process, aligned with the United States and Monsanto, Carlos Menem’s government approved the GM soy seed, which would soon become a monoculture.” Over three decades of the GM model, he writes, thousands of families have been evicted from their lands, millions of hectares of land have been ravaged, and epidemics of diseases caused by agrochemicals have burgeoned. But resistance and the determination to sow the seeds of a different model of agriculture continue to grow.

There follows a Deepl translation of Dario’s article into English, slightly edited for clarity.’

As it’s illegal to grow GMO crops in the UK, seed-owning corporations are alleging that gene editing is different because the gene changes could have happened naturally and it is essential to fight climate change!We must fight against the flawed narrative that will see frankenstein food grown in the UK. Organic might be more expensive but your body needs natural food.

Listen; Precision-bred barley BBC Farming Today, 25 April 2026

‘We visit a field trial of a gene-edited barley which contains higher levels of fat. Scientists believe this will make it a more efficient livestock feed, and could also reduce methane emissions by making it more digestible.’

Tom Allen-Stevens; “This is new technology and England is the only place in the country where we can bring it onto commercial farms. It’s gene editing technology and in the rest of Europe it’s counted as GM, but exclusively here in England we’ve now got this new legislation that where it’s been bred, that could have happened naturally, it is treated as conventional. And so this is the very first trial on a commercial farm.”

Professor Eastman; “Where you use modern breeding technologies to produce a crop. If the changes you make are equivalent to the changes that could have occurred naturally, then the material is not GM. The organism is the same as could have been developed using conventional breeding technology.”

Presenter; “We aren’t naming the farmer for this trial for security reasons and biosecurity around the real life cultivation of gene edited crops is obviously a major concern.”

CO2 Tunnel Vision

The mining required to build the so-called renewable energy market is vast.

Watch; Net Zero Mining Math, Electroverse, 31 March 2026

“The talk around net zero ignores many inconvenient facts, but top of the list is probably the mining requirements to get us there. For the world to reach net zero by 2050, that is to build the solar panels and wind turbines required, we’d need to mine over 4.5 billion tonnes of copper, 940 million tonnes of nickel, 9 billion tonnes of graphite and 4 million tonnes of germanium. At today’s mining rates, that would take more than a thousand years. Net zero is nigh-on impossible to achieve, and even attempting to do so will ravage vast areas of the planet.”

Near where I live in Wiltshire, 2,000 acres of beautiful food-growing land will be covered in solar panels the height of double decker buses, surrounded by high metal security fences and infamously inflammable battery stations. The Australian bankster, Macquarie (under whose ownership Thames Water saw its debt increase from roughly £2.4 bn to £10.8 bn) owns Island Green Power which will build the monstrosity claiming it will heat 115,000 homes. If it was to benefit locals, they would be built on roofs. In reality the countryside is the cheapest option to power their world of infinite tech and with only a few homes, they hoped that there would be less opposition.

Read; Protest to stop countryside being covered in solar panels, 27 April 2026

Martin Smith, Wiltshire Council ward representative for Sherston and cabinet member for highways, set out the council’s opposition to the plan.

“Wiltshire Council has come out against the Lime Down project,” he said.

“We think it’s far too big, and we think it’s in the wrong place.

“The cumulative impact, because it extends over such a large area, will have a very negative impact on the communities.”

Professor Richard Skeffington from Sherston said: “My particular expertise is flood risk.The area is very prone to flooding. During Storm Bert in 2024, we were close to being ankle-deep.”

This series of lectures exposing the Net Zero scam are useful to have at the ready to send to people who still accept the mainstream narrative.

Watch; The Great Net Zero Debate, UK Column

Farming Today talks to a climate fundamentalist from Scotland’s Rural College who says farmers must do more to reduce CO2, although farming accounts for only 11% of UK emissions, and to Emile Frison who says agro-ecology improves soils and eliminates the need for imported fertilisers and herbicides. Hurray for more expensive petro chemical inputs.

Listen; Greenhouse gas emissions from farming, fertiliser dependency, BBC Farming Today, 20 April 2026

Presenter; “The Climate Change Committee, which advises the government, reckons that agriculture accounts for 11% of the UK’s total emissions of greenhouse gases. The most significant are methane from, for instance, ruminant livestock like cattle, and nitrous oxide from synthetic fertilisers. The National Farmers Union set a goal of reaching net zero on greenhouse gas emissions across farms in England and Wales by 2040, 10 years before the government target. That’s by using things like additives in feed to reduce emissions from cows and precision fertiliser spreading. The other part of the equation is locking away more CO2 in soils and trees. Vera Eory, leader in sustainable agriculture at Scotland’s Rural College, says despite those aspirations, the pace of emissions reduction has slowed in recent years and the targets aren’t likely to be met.”

Vera Eory; “All the statistics and the analysis of policy instruments, current and those suggested for the future, suggest that unfortunately their effort is not sufficient. And maybe a lot stronger interventions are needed, both in food production, agriculture, land use and across the whole food supply chain, including consumption.”

Presenter; “So does this need to be action at food chain level, or are there things that farmers could and should be doing to speed up the rate of change?”

Vera Eory; ” It’s two things which need to happen together and one is changes in production methods, which farmers can do, different farming practices, which many of them are already doing. But more could be done to reduce emissions from crop and livestock production. But also consumption needs to change with a moderate, modest shift towards more plant-based diets and reducing livestock consumption. I would also add, and that’s a really important aspect that could free up some land in the UK, which is extremely important for the UK’s resilience, not only agricultural resilience, but in general climate resilience. We could somewhat compensate for the potential decreases in yield because of climate impact. And we could also increase land devoted to flood management, for example, and afforestation and peatland restoration and biodiversity.”

Presenter; “This is where we get into big arguments with some farmers who will say that when you have animals grazing, firstly they’re doing it on land which is sometimes not much productive for anything else. And secondly, there is carbon stored in that land. Do you see a need for more radical change or can farmers do small things on farm to make a real difference?”

Vera Eory; “I still think that both are needed, unfortunately, and I know it is not very comfortable for anyone, not for consumers, not for farmers, not for myself either. So I’m not advocating it knowing that it’s a very popular answer. But the choices to be made on farms and to reduce emissions by only changing technologies and practices can get us to roughly 25% reduction in agricultural emissions since 1990, which would leave still far much residual emissions which won’t be suitable for compensation because the methods for offsetting, the technological methods are either not feasible enough and far too expensive, or the land based methods for sequestration, they require that land and also they are temporary because eventually the carbon stocks get to an equilibrium and carbon sequestration stops happening, even in forests. Grazing and grasslands are great. I would say that we will need the grazing to happen, we will need some livestock, but the total amount needs to be reduced because if one thinks about the grazing land and the grassland, indeed they have a high carbon value, high carbon stocks, but forested areas have even higher carbon stocks.”

Presenter; “All this week we’ll be looking at on-farm innovations to cut emissions. The Ulster Farmers Union is calling for government help for farmers because of the impact of the war in Iran on fuel and fertiliser prices. Amongst other things, it suggests a one- off fertiliser support scheme and transparency in pricing. But a group of global sustainability experts says this is the moment that food systems should end what they call a dependence on synthetic fertilisers. As we’ve been reporting, the spike in energy prices because of conflict in the Middle East has meant a spike in fertiliser prices. Nitrates are produced through a process which combines air and natural gas. On top of that, a significant proportion of the world’s fertiliser supplies also travels, or not, through the Strait of Hormuz. Emil Frison from the think tank the International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems says the situation has exposed the vulnerability of global agriculture”.

Emile Frison; “We are not seeming to be learning from past lessons. Already in the financial crisis, 2008, 2009, even more so, and more recently in the COVID crisis, the Ukraine war crisis, the problem of access to affordable fertilisers has been repeated and no measures have been taken at least seriously about changing the system.”

Presenter; “But the industry would point out that they say that the use of fertiliser doubles yields across the world. So how do you maintain yields?”

Emile Frison; “The examples that we see in Africa, in, even in Europe is that you can maintain levels of productivity to meet our needs by an agro-ecological production system. Of course, the industry that is selling fertilisers and pesticides will continue to claim that without their inputs, there’s going to be insecure food insecurity. But that is just to defend their interests and it’s a kind of lobbying that they are doing to maintain the current policies.”

Presenter; “To be fair, you are also lobbying just in the opposite direction. What you’re talking about is a regenerative farming system, as we would call it here in the UK, which is gaining in popularity, but does see yields fall.”

Emile Frison; “There are immediate yield losses. If you have a system where you have had very intensive input of synthetic fertilisers and pesticides, you have destroyed the soil. What is needed is to really rebuild soil health and to come back to a production system that does not need all those synthetic inputs. And that’s sometimes taking a few years. And so what is needed is really to invest in that transition period. And that is what is the main thing that is lacking now. In many parts of the world we don’t even have that drop in product productivity because we do not have soils that have been so heavily destroyed by the chemical inputs, and therefore you can see productivity increases even in the first year by adopting agro-ecological practices.”

Presenter; “What sort of actions on farm are you thinking about?”

Emile Frison; “Diversity provides for greater resilience. It’s about rotations, longer rotations that allow the soil to recover greater health, maintaining a green cover the whole year round. This allows, in many cases also to rebuild nitrogen in the soil by nitrogen fixation by leguminous plants. So there’s a whole series of practices, but the application of which will be location-specific, because each environment is different and we have to see what is best adapted to these local environments.”

A project to measure CO2 from sheep on moors – utterly ridiculous !!! Farmers only follow this BS to collect the subsidy offered for anything that falls into the government’s CO2 tunnel vision. 

Listen; Emissions from Upland Sheep, BBC Farming Today, 4 April 2026

Presenter; “How do you measure a sheep’s emissions?”

Ellie Rayner, Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust; “So we used three different field types.We used modified grassland, which is dominated by rye and clover, and we used a species-rich grassland which has had no chemical input for the last 30 years. And then we used a moorland habitat which had heather, sphagnum moss, bilberry. And then I went about doing forage surveys for each of these fields. So I used a quadrat and I did 30 samples across the different field types and identified the species that the sheep might be eating.These little chambers are called portable accumulation chambers and they were supplied by the Scottish Rural College. And you put the sheep in there. Each sheep goes in for 50 minutes and on this wagon there is 12 chambers. So you do it in different instalments of 12 sheep. And then there’s a probe in there and that takes emissions every 20 seconds to measure the methane and CO2, and it goes to this little device and then they can analyse it. It’s what they’re farting and what they’re burping, but it’s mainly the burping end that is the most interest for the project. We found that Swaledale sheep produce less CO2 on moorland habitats.”

Presenter; “By how much?”

Adrian Thornton-Berry; “Fourteen percent less CO2 from the moorland habitat, taking to account the weight difference.”

Presenter; “And why does it matter that sheep produce less emissions of CO2?”

Adrian Thornton-Berry; “We’ve got a really, really important landscape here. There’s a lot of natural habitat still within this farm landscape. And the key is that we carry on with farming and farmers. We need to find a means to replace the loss of subsidy that we’ve had. Without that, the future of hill farming is very, very bleak and we will lose people from the hills and once they’ve gone, they’re not coming back”.

Presenter; “So is it a case of labelling the lamb as lower emissions or is it about offsetting what business does through how you practise your work?”

Adrian Thornton-Berry; “Well, the corporate social responsibility agenda is all about trying to do things that are better for the planet. And I believe that Swaledale sheep, and this study supports that, using protein from them is probably a better way, a better protein than something that’s produced off a more intensive type farming system. So we’ve got to have something where somebody will say, right, we need to support this because it’s environmentally good and it’s producing multiple benefits for society and for the farming community.”

Yes to green fields, no to fields of metal and glass.

Read; Yes to fields of wheat, no to fields of iron’: how the world’s greenest country soured on solar The Guardian, 20 March 2026

‘In Denmark, the spread of solar panels has become a divisive issue among voters, especially in rural areas.

Opponents of solar farms say the photovoltaic panels are ugly, destroy nature and deflate property prices in neglected hinterlands. As drone shots of encircled farmhouses have become a symbol of urban overreach, the campaign has led even some established parties to soften their support of solar.

The resistance has led to cancelled projects. The municipality of Køge voted in January to cancel a renewable energy park in Vallø, and in Viborg, the council voted last month to stop a planned solar farm in Iglsø while approving only the wind and biogas components of another project in Vinge. In Samsø, the first island in the world powered entirely by renewables, councillors from across the political spectrum voted last year to reject a solar park.’

Watch; University of Alabama, Huntsville, Shows No warming, Electroverse, March 2026

“There has been no net warming since 1998, as per the UAH (University of Alabama, Huntsville) satellite record, February 2026 has just come in at 0.39 C. That is cooler than February 1998. The UAH measures lower troposphere temperatures using microwave sensors onboard NASA and NOAA satellites, providing near global coverage independent of what are often compromised surface stations. Despite the rise in atmospheric CO2, the satellite record shows no net warming since the 1998 El Nino spike.”

Sneaky way of exporting our CO2 emissions by importing wood from Canada and the US to fuel Drax, the enormous electricity power station in Yorkshire that was converted from coal to biomass in 2018.

Read; The Great British net zero con-trick of Drax, James Melville, 15 April 2026

‘The Labour government is trying to force through an extension that would give Drax an estimated £1.8bn in taxpayer funded subsidies on top of the £11bn it has already received. Drax has burned an amount of wood equivalent to 300 million trees. Burning wood creates 18% more CO2 emissions than coal. And here’s the con trick: Drax is a sneaky way of exporting our CO2 emissions. We pay billions of pounds to cut down ancient forests in the US and Canada, ship the wood across the Atlantic in diesel tankers, then burn it in a Yorkshire-based power station.And here’s the kicker – the CO2 emissions tally is not counted against the country that burns it, but the country that grows it. So Drax emissions are counted against the countries who grow and export the wood for Drax, like Canada and US, not UK who burn it.So the UK can reduce CO2 figures by importing the burning wood grown elsewhere. A gigantic net zero con-trick that is the exact opposite of ‘environmentally friendly’.’

Though I don’t think that climate change is caused by CO2, I do think it could be caused by wrecking the planet, not least depleting the lungs of the planet, namely trees/forests. So Colombia’s efforts to keep its Amazon Rainforest from oil extraction, should be supported and the oil industry’s use of kangaroo courts to sue governments that attempt to protect their environment and human rights should end.

Read; The legal block on climate action, The Ecologist, 24 April 2026

‘Colombia has sent a strong signal about corporate influence over its climate policies as it gears up to host the first Conference on Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels. Can the world follow? Colombia is to withdraw from the Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), an opaque mechanism allowing foreign investors to sue governments for decisions that affect their profits, including those aimed at protecting human rights, worker rights, health and the environment.’

Ed Miliband, as Energy Secretary, has the power to over-ride the planning process, ignore local objections to the destruction of the countryside, and approve giant solar projects that are big enough to qualify as ‘National Infrastructure’ to be built on heritage farm land.

Read; This area of Norfolk is going to be covered by solar panels and infrastructure that is the equivalent of 43,000 tennis courts. Countryside vandalism, No Farmers No Food, 13 April 2026

‘This area of Norfolk is going to be covered by solar panels and infrastructure that is the equivalent of 43,000 tennis courts. Countryside vandalism.’

Read; Labour is effective at damaging the country, The Times, 27 April 2026

‘Who could have predicted from those promises that Miliband would be overriding local protests to approve giant solar or wind installations running for miles through beautiful Oxfordshire, Wiltshire or Welsh countryside, turning fields — a third of them prime agricultural land — into a glinting maze of concrete, glass and wire, dismissing dissenters as “blockers and moaners”? Or that instead of building solar over land already lost to nature, like car parks, offices or beside motorways, the government would aim to cover more than 200,000 acres by 2030 in what are effectively solar factories? Or that our energy costs would be among the highest in Europe?

Mitigating climate change is admirable but this ugly industrialisation of the countryside is a giant, reckless experiment, a headlong rush into a technology whose consequences we don’t yet understand. Nobody knows whether cracked or ageing solar panels or turbine blades, constructed with dangerous chemicals, will fatally pollute the topsoil on which they sit, or where, how and at whose cost they will be recycled after a life of just 30 to 40 years.

Miliband assumes Britain will simply make this work. Does anyone really imagine that a country which cannot clean up its rivers, halt the spread of vast criminal waste dumps or meet its recycling targets will magically transform into a state which can be trusted with the processing of an incalculable quantity of waste; perhaps quarter of a million acres of hazardous, delicate solar panelling and thousands of giant turbine blades?

Nobody in the world has managed this at any scale so far. The beauty and nature part of the nature and climate crisis are being trampled over, at high cost, and for doubtful gains.’

Geoengineering

Listen; James Lee Dismantles the Chemtrail Narrative | Jerm Warfare, UK Column News, 9 April 2026

James Lee; “Weather is chaos. The atmosphere is a very chaotic system. We have no way of predicting what the weather is going to be like three days from now with any certainty. What about that rainfall that happened in Dubai, I think about a year ago? So we looked at that and we did a forensic autopsy of what actually occurred. And interestingly enough, now I’m going to put my tinfoil hat on, I always like to clarify when I tell people I’m speculating, but what I saw was the weather system that actually hit Dubai, it actually swing up through Iran before coming down into Dubai, which is interesting because since 2018, Brigadier General Golam Jalali said that Israel was stealing Iran’s clouds and then shortly thereafter. You can’t make this stuff up. It’s on weathermodificationhistory.com. Just click the timeline button on weathermodificationhistory.com It’ll be like one of the most recent post. And then they went further and they said Israel and other surrounding countries are stealing Iran’s rain. And then they got really specific and said Israel and the United Arab Emirates are making our clouds barren and stealing our clouds. So is it any coincidence that Iran, which also has a weather modification project programme, they have the ability to do it, that a storm system which passed through Iran and then dumped all that rain on there? Is this a possibility that Iran went up and seeded, heavily seeded, a very moist system that was coming through their region, which then dumped all that rain in Dubai? Highly likely. Provable? No. Something I would take to court? Probably not, but when you look at the history of weather warfare, these are the problems that people have with the way I do things. I don’t speak in absolutes because at the end of the day, since the weather warfare ban of 1978, in the Environmental Modification Convention Treaty, they have never created a way to catch somebody doing weather warfare. If you ban a thing, you want to be able to make a way to catch people doing the thing so that when they violate the thing. So I think this is intentional that they haven’t really ever made a way to catch somebody doing weather modification for warfare purposes.

Can you say for certain that they’re doing this intentionally to mess with our weather? Probably not, but just their act of being greedy with their water because they have serious problems with water. China is a paper tiger, they have so many internal problems. Water is just one of them, flooding is another one. So they have no control over what they’re doing, but they’re doing everything they can to bring as much of that water from the southwest up to the northeast. And they’ve actually coined this the Sky River Project, which is eerily similar to Project Sky Water which I just mentioned. ‘Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat’ is the slogan on weathermodificationhistory.com and when I asked James Roger Fleming about this, I said would weather modification on this scale be considered geoengineering? Which brings us to our second tier.”

Jerm; “Just hang on before you, before you go any further, you do also get a little bit scientific you when you speak about your tiers of atmospheric manipulation where the modification falls into the troposphere, if I’m correct. And geoengineering would fall into the stratosphere.”

James Lee; That’s correct. But I mean, let’s be real. Some geoengineering occurs in the troposphere. So geoengineering falls into a couple of categories. If you really divided it in half, you have solar radiation management, the blocking of incoming solar radiation reflecting it back to space. This is increasing albedo. There are multiple ways to do this which we’ll get into in a second. The other one is carbon dioxide removal and most people don’t even know that this is geoengineering, but it is. So carbon dioxide removal includes many different things like direct air capture where you literally just suck the CO2 out of the air, to biochar, bioenergy, carbon capture and sequestration, what’s called BECCS, multiple versions of this. It’s equally as dangerous because in America they’re talking about making 48 inch pipes is 2 foot, this is roughly almost a metre wide, pipe that’s pumping CO2, liquid CO2 at 3,000 psi so that they can now use it as an energy source to do everything like sustainable aviation fuel, create jet fuel out of CO2, they call it blue energy. Anyway, the scary part about it is if you have a rupture of one of these 3,000 psi pipes in your neighbourhood everybody’s going to die because it basically makes it impossible for you to breathe. And the worst part is the first responders that have showed up to previous ruptures of the CO2 pipelines, their engines cut off because they couldn’t even get enough oxygen to run their engines. So you got ambulances and police cars that are just rolling to a stop. Nobody can even get there to save you. Now these are small ruptures that have occurred and not very many people died. But if carbon sequestration continues at the scale that they’re talking about and Europe is talking about massive pipelines as well, this is not just an American thing, it’s a big problem. I wrote about it on my substack and I called it carbon sewer pipes.

At the end of the day, my goal when I started out doing this was that I wanted to make sure that for my daughters, they grew up in a world where this climate cult, this New Green Deal agenda, never got away with legalising geoengineering on a worldwide scale. When we have companies like Make Sunsets, which are just two yahoos yucking it up and on the west coast throwing balloons in the air and selling cooling credits, but now we have a private industry, a private company named Stardust Initiative, Stardust Lab, Stardust Solutions, they have multiple names, but it’s Stardust, two dudes from the Israeli Atomic Energy Agency have now got $60 million worth of venture capital and are basically positioning themselves to become a defence contractor for any government that says, let’s geoengineer. When we’re at that stage of the game, this chemtrail narrative that Dane Wigington and the chemtrail industrial complex is pushing becomes dangerous because it is such a distraction that we can’t have an honest discussion about people like Stardust. Last year, when the UK mentioned their ARIA projectthey were funding, I think, somewhere around $12 million worth of geoengineering projects. These are field experiments. People got hyperbolic about it. There were very prominent YouTubers, some with 800,000 subscribers, going on X and saying, it’s go time, red alert, shoot pilots. When we’ve got to that level of discourse because of the reckless irresponsibility and playing on the fears of very… and I hate to use the word gullible because I was gullible, I think that’s unfair, I think that people put a lot of trust in people that they have no business trusting. You should not trust me either, I’m just being blunt, I am a human, I am fallible, I am not an expert, I’m always a student, sometimes a teacher, but never an expert. I’m still learning as well.”

Aluminum, barium and strontium is being sprayed in our skies.

Watch; They threatened to throw her in a mental hospital for six months, You Can’t Make This Stuff Up, 19 April 2026

Presenter; “One of the first people to ever blow the whistle on what she says is absolutely happening and that our own government has been involved for decades, spraying chemicals into the air with no regard for the people those chemicals could be hurting. I want to welcome in former U.S. Air Force environmental specialist and geoengineering whistleblower Kristen Megan. It’s great to have you back, Kristen, appreciate you being here. So you’ve been talking about this issue for years now. Can you take us through what you say is absolutely happening?”

Kristen Meghan; “Thanks for having me back. This is absolutely happening and it’s basically now openly admitted, even though you’re getting kind of pushback from the EPA, but I don’t think it’s intentional. What I discovered, starting in 2007, I was working in bio-environmental engineering in the Air Force, and like I had mentioned previously, I tried to debunk this, and in the attempt to debunk it, I realised as somebody who was approving forms called Air Force form 3952, I had to reject these toxicants, formerly known as MSDS, now as SDS, because they’re the very same toxicants we were trying to engineer out of the workplace. So why would we be procuring more? So lots of soil sampling, air sampling. Once I got threatened, I knew I’d found something and it’s very much happening. In fact, when I finished my master’s around 2015, it was in one of my environmental textbooks that they were doing it. So It’s a shock to me that people still think it’s not happening. Yes, I sold the book, but I wish I still had it.”

Presenter; “And we can all see it. If you look up and it just doesn’t make sense that it’s coming from like a Delta flight flying overhead. So your role in the Air Force, if I’m understanding it correctly, was basically to approve these flights long before takeoff. And eventually you just said, no, I’m not going to do this anymore. Is that accurate, broadly?”

Kristen Meghan; “Well, it wasn’t approving the flights. So when you’re using hazardous materials, you have to track them from cradle to grave, use and disposal. So when I was in the Air Force, I’m basically OSHA and EPA, but in the military, so I had to make sure that we were keeping workers safe. So we had to understand what we were bringing on and how could it affect human and environmental health.”

Presenter; “People will say to me, they’re like, well we don’t think this is happening. If this isn’t happening why have multiple states passed laws banning weather engineering, including Florida, including Texas? Can you explain that?”

Kristen Meghan; “Yeah, that’s exactly it. I know a lot of people have taken the angle of, because people still don’t believe it, even if you don’t believe it, there’s people that are trying to take action saying, look at what they’re claiming, because when the government claims that they’re going to do something, they’re already doing it and they’re trying to say, even if you don’t believe it, would you want it to happen? It has these human and environmental impacts. So yes, and there’s a lot of those legislators have reached out to myself and Dane Wigington over the past couple years. So they have the information in all the government documents that are on geoengineering.

Presenter; “Biggest question, in your opinion, why is this being done? And again, it might not be EPA, could be DARPA could be War Department, could be private companies, but why are they doing this?”

Kristen Meghan; “I think there’s a multitude of reasonings. You control the weather, you can handicap many people. We did it flooding the Ho Chi Minh Trail. But when you had this huge climate change initiative, we needed to find ways to dim the sun and decrease the solar load. So this is fear based. And I also think it’s financially incentivised through betting on crops and again, handicapping anyone in war.”

Presenter; “So it kind of takes away the organic from anything organic you’re buying because this is then sprayed into the air and then gravity brings it down. Eventually the rain brings it down and it is all over all of us. What are these chemicals doing to people?”

Kristen Meghan; “Well, a lot of them are heavy alkaline metals and salts. And what they do again is that synergistic toxicity. You’re breathing it in, you have the dermal absorption and an inhalation. And it does depend on relative humidity and different weather patterns. Like I live in Michigan, so we have all seasons in the same day. The dissipation rates are faster when you ingest that, it is eating away at your gut health. And the thing is, when they’re using strontium and barium, those things bioaccumulate in the bones. And it also displaces potassium. And if anyone’s ever had low potassium, you know that causes a massive issue with your nerves and your heart and it can mimic a heart attack. So we’re getting massively bombarded because again, different routes of exposure and depending on where you live you can be more exposed already because you have background elements in your drinking water.”

Censorship / Surveillance / Coercion/ Corruption / Blackmail

Watch; People Can Change It, The Real Economy, April 2026

‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement – A legal process that allows a foreign company (investor) to sue a government if that government passes laws or takes actions that hurt the company’s profits or investments.’

Narration; “When I heard about the ISDS clause, at first I was just like, this is too crazy to be true. And then you find out that it is true.”

Helena Norberg-Hodge; “The global economic empire that we have today has roots that go back hundreds of years.”

Narration; “About 500 years ago, European empires expanded across the entire world, driving people off their lands, forcing them into mines and factories and cotton fields and plantations. When colonialism supposedly ended, the system lived on in a new form. Instead of armies, it came with contracts, crippling debts and so called ‘aid packages’. Constitutions written to deregulate markets, cut protections and privatise. Today, the successors of colonial merchants, global corporations and banks have become so large they effectively control governments. They shape economic policy.”

Helena Norberg-Hodge; “This set up a perfect system whereby economic activity around the world was dominated by the giants and those that benefited from global trade. All of this was part of setting up a global system that wasn’t accountable to people anywhere.”

Narration; “Humanity was never the problem, global corporate rule was, so let’s be honest about what needs to change, not humanity. What needs to change is the corporate machinery that turns life into profit. And we need to change our blind adherence to this system.”

Fatima Osman Abdalla; “People don’t have control over their own lives. People are working jobs that are making them sick. Can we do this differently? Is there another way? We’re talking about the ISDS clause, which is the right for corporations to sue our governments. But it symbolises something much deeper. It symbolises the fact that we have handed over power to global corporations. There’s this whole system of a corporate veto where they can say no to publicly mandated decisions because it limits profits. It raises the question like, ‘do we really even live in a democracy anymore’?”

Helena Norberg-Hodge; “And we all feel it. We know that we can no longer trust our elected representatives to do what they say they’re going to do. This is such a specific thing that we can target and we can change. It’s an artificial system. It’s a man-made system, it’s made by people. People can change it.”

The consequence of the development paradigm above is below.

Read; A Brief Synopsis of Our Global Predicament by Julian Rose, Global Research, 27 April 2026

‘On the global stage it appears, with a few exceptions, that every nation is defining itself as an enemy of another nation – and an increasing number backing this with the build up of a force of arms. War is big business and fear is the great repressor of human resilience and resistance. So long as these two states dominate world affairs the globalist elite that provokes and finances them, retains complete control.

This ‘elite’ has built its empire on an unprecedented appropriation and centralisation of global wealth which now includes the expansion and domination of artificial intelligence and related advanced technologies. This vast financial wealth is gained by controlling the money (debt) owed to banking and investment institutions that are the creditors of the neo-liberal global economy]. By maintaining a level of crisis as a permanent feature of world economic and social affairs, this elite (also known as shadow government) undermines the normal workings of national and international economic activity, forcing millions of businesses (big and small) into increased hardship and bankruptcy.

The assets of these enterprises are then stolen by the creditors in lieu of non payment of their debts. The founder of The World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, stated quite categorically in 2020 that by 2030 “You will own nothing and you will be happy”. This is the demonic reality of the world we find ourselves in, in 2026.According to the shadow government’s agenda, by 2030 globalist creditors will have appropriated the world’s wealth while driving large sections of the population into impoverishment. All high level institutions of the world, whether secular, religious, military, social, technological, educational, pharmaceutical, agricultural – and many more of the same – play their part in maintaining this ultra-repressive top-down control.It forms a cult of power and control that finances and stages international conflicts, such as those we see today in Ukraine, Israel, Gaza, Iran, Venezuela, with the promise of Cuba, Greenland and even Canada to join the current hit list.

The European Union, NATO, The United Nations, The World Health Organisation, The World Economic Forum, The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund are all in there – along with all main banking institutions including Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan and additionally global investment institutions such as Black Rock, Vanguard and State Street. While the military industrial complex stands at the head of the war profiteering agenda, there can be no ‘peaceful resolution’ to world conflicts as long as this situation prevails. Its protagonists are presently set on the mass roll-out of IT; “Smart’ 24/7 surveillance technologies (including your mobile phone); central bank digital currencies; “transhuman’ brain-chipped humans; advanced social engineering of human behaviour and totalitarian government.There is a lot to deal with. Not least the fact that Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu have combined to head the current enforced regime of chaos, destruction and death. Only a few years ago, ironically, many were seeing America as a great ‘ally’ of Europe against the supposed threat of the Soviet regime.

The repercussions of these ‘designer conflicts’ affect us all– and of course that is a major part of the plan. Psychopaths and psychotic lovers of power want their slaves and know how to win them through lies, cunning, deception and holding the reins of power. But there is something called ‘resistance’. And so long as that word reaches the foreground of people’s minds, the possibility of non-compliance with the abusive power of the cult elite remains real. We are genetically predisposed to be social beings. Our natural inclination is to share and support each other. The enforced antagonism of the anti-life elite cabal is working to prevent such unity and we must be aware – this is an intentional weapon designed to fragment humanity. Unity is our strength and resistance to enforced separation our immediate challenge.

I retain a deep and lasting respect for Polish underground resistance movement against the Nazi occupation in World War II. It’s needed again now, to defeat the modern day fascism that is being criminally inflicted on us all. The new resistance is about refusing to fall for the fake stories governments tell about why we must give up the best tools of our trades and households because of the lie spread around the world that they are ‘changing the climate’ and not conforming to the fabricated Net Zero Green Deal stranglehold on our basic freedoms and creative powers. The globalist shadow government controls national governments and none of their actions are about the interests of people. They are only about self enrichment and an obsession with holding onto power. We should not look for excuses to turn our backs on the necessity of this new resistance. Every one of us, individually, simply has to take a stand on the issues we know to be undermining the quality of our lives (of life) and that of our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren.

They have the right to a life – but will only get it if we combine to clear the path ahead and stand firm in the eternal values of truth, love and courage. The proud struggle to remain human and to resist evil has never been more crucial than today.’

Introduction by my friend and comrade Lucy Morgan Edwards to the article below about the motivation of the endless Middle East wars being due to the Capitalists and Islamists having radically different banking systems; ‘Iran, it is not only the largest and strongest of the Islamic countries but operates the world’s only fully interest-free (riba-free) banking regime. This stands in direct contrast to the conventional Western model, which relies on interest as its primary revenue mechanism.’

‘I can’t emphasise enough how important this piece is. Ellen describes what others call the ‘Babylonian money magic’ systems (in today’s parlance this would be the labyrinthine multi trillion dollar derivatives complex). She links this to the Iran war, the ‘Seven countries in Five Years’ that Gen Wesley Clark informed us were planned for invasion after 9/11 and the BIS (Bank for International Settlements) system which those countries (through their disavowal of usury) stand outside. Part of me wonders if this is why Muslims, who do not practice or believe in usury generally, are being so demonised.

Ellen also reminds us that once this derivatives bubble is popped (likely now by the Strait of Hormuz crisis) this will trigger the ‘Great Taking‘ (of all our assets including property in my opinion) as set out by David Roger’s Webb who has laid out how they’ve changed legal architecture around securities etc on a global basis so our assets become the collateral to pay off the debts created by the Epstein class when their $800 trillion bubble pops! Please spread the word!
Lucy

Read; All Wars Are Bankers’ Wars: Iran and the Bankers’ Endgame by Ellen Brown, Michel Chossudovsky, 13 April 2026

‘In February 2026, the United States and Israel launched surprise airstrikes on Iran. The officially proffered reasons — preventing Iran’s acquisition of a nuclear weapon and forestalling its aggression — have not held up under scrutiny. As James Corbett documented in recent Corbett Report episodes, the nuclear pretext appears to be recycled propaganda, and the scale and timing of the strikes raise deeper questions about motive.

The thesis that “All Wars Are Bankers’ Wars” was popularised by Michael Rivero in a 2013 documentary by that name. His accompanying article begins with a quote from Aristotle (384-322 BCE):

The most hated sort [of moneymaking], and with the greatest reason, is usury, which makes a gain out of money itself, and not from the natural use of it. For money was intended to be used in exchange, but not to increase at interest.

Rivero then traces how private banking interests have financed and profited from conflicts on both sides for centuries — from the founding of the Bank of England in 1694 to fund William III’s wars to modern regime-change wars.

Full-Spectrum Financial Dominance

Other commentators point to the report of the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) titled “Rebuilding America’s Defences”` (September 2000), which called for “full-spectrum” U.S. military forces to achieve global preeminence. It postulated the need for a “catastrophic and catalysing event — like a new Pearl Harbor” to accelerate the military transformation the authors envisioned.

This was followed by a 2007 Democracy Now interview in which Gen. Wesley Clark revealed that weeks after 9/11, he had been shown a classified Pentagon memo outlining plans to “take out seven countries in five years”: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off with Iran. The first six have since been destabilised or regime-changed. Iran, considered the ultimate prize for Middle East dominance and oil control, remains the last one standing.

Why those seven, and why was Iran the ultimate prize? Greg Palast’s 2013 article titled “Larry Summers and the Secret ‘End-Game’ Memo” supplied the missing financial logic. In 1999, the world was opened to unregulated derivatives trading, so that sovereign bonds, oil flows, shipping routes, and war-risk policies could all be collateralised, rehypothecated (pledged multiple times over), and gambled upon. The lynchpin was the 1997 WTO Financial Services Agreement (the Fifth Protocol to GATS), which became operational in 1999.

None of the seven targeted countries joined the WTO, and they were also not members of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). That left them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers’ central bank in Switzerland. Other countries that were later identified as “rogue states” were also not members of the BIS, including North Korea, Cuba, and Afghanistan.

As for Iran, it is not only the largest and strongest of the Islamic countries but operates the world’s only fully interest-free (riba-free) banking regime. This stands in direct contrast to the conventional Western model, which relies on interest as its primary revenue mechanism. “Money making money out of itself” underpins the global derivatives complex, which is built on rehypothecated, collateralised debt-at-interest.

The last piece in the financial control grid was detailed in David Rogers Webb’s 2024 book The Great Taking. The Everything Bubble, including what some commentators estimate to be more than a quadrillion dollars in derivative bets, is just waiting for a pin. When it bursts, it will trigger large institutional bankruptcies; and under the legal machinery Webb documents, the derivative players will take all.

The 2026 Hormuz insurance crisis triggered by Lloyd’s of London could be that pin. More on all that below.

The City of London and Lloyd’s Weaponise Chaos

For more than three centuries, the City of London – the “Square Mile” that is London’s financial center — has financed both sides of wars and sold insurance against the destruction that would follow. Lloyd’s of London is the insurance pillar of the City’s financial control grid. It is not actually an insurance company but is a corporate body that “operates as a partially-mutualised marketplace within which multiple financial backers, grouped in syndicates, come together to pool and spread risk.”

Lloyd’s has built its reputation on always performing, but it performs at a cost. In 1898, it formalised long-standing practice by introducing the “Free of Capture and Seizure” clause, stripping war risks from standard policies so it could charge extortionate premiums when conflict erupted. It exercised that clause in both world wars and is exercising it in 2026.

After the strikes on Iran, Lloyd’s Joint War Committee expanded its “high-risk” zone in the Middle East. Several of its underwriters issued 72-hour cancellation notices effective March 5, and war-risk premiums for Hormuz transits jumped from 0.25% to 1–5% of hull value. Lloyd’s has stressed that coverage remains available — at the right price. But for a $100 million oil tanker, that means an extra $1–5 million per voyage, a premium the owners are understandably reluctant to pay.’

Beware – zionists have their tentacles in every sector of our lives and will destroy you if you criticise them. Hence the suspension of Tony Greenstein, ‘a fearless campaigner against zionism and for the rights of the Palestinian people and the rule of international law’, from the Green Party.

Read; Jewish anti-zionists send public letter of complaint to the Green Party, The Canary, 27 April 2026

‘The following public letter to the Green Party comes from two Jewish anti-zionist organisations. Jewish Network for Palestine and International Jewish Anti-zionist Network have written the letter in response to the suspension of Tony Greenstein from the party.

We reproduce the letter in full:

We are writing to the Green Party as members of two Jewish anti-zionist organisations operating in Britain – Jewish Network for Palestine (JNP) and International Jewish Anti-zionist Network (IJAN), and representing many thousands of members and followers – protesting against the recent Green Party’s shameful decision to suspend the membership of Tony Greenstein, claiming a “history of antisemitism including court decisions” as the foundation for this action.

Tony Greenstein, a pro-Palestinian activist and Jewish Anti-zionist Green Party Member has been active against Israeli racism, ethnic cleansing, Apartheid and genocide for many decades; he is a member of Jewish Network for Palestine and on its Steering Committee. He has been a fearless campaigner against zionism and for the rights of the Palestinian people and the rule of international law. He has been given no information other than spurious claims without evidence or proof for this offensive claim. We are deeply concerned this could be part of a broader smear campaign against pro-Palestinians within the Green Party, along the lines of the Hasbara campaign against the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn.

We were offered no information about the source of such accusations but believe the Party has been bullied into taking action without any basis in fact. No court decision anywhere has decreed Tony Greenstein is an antisemite, so there is no substance to this accusation, and the Party should have checked this before signing up to an accusation which itself is antisemitic. The claim that Tony has “a history of anti-semitism” is false and especially infuriating as Tony is the author of a most detailed recent book about the links between zionism and the Nazis during the period 1933-45, and is an authority about antisemitism himself; much more so than the people who accused him anonymously.

Like so many Jews, Tony comes from a family which suffered losses during the Holocaust, and the accusation, as well as the suspension from the Party, are hurtful, offensive and unjustified antisemitic acts by the Green Party.

So, we have some questions for Zack Polanski, for which we should have simple and truthful replies:

1. Is the Green Party now taking on the mantle of accusing Jews with antisemitism if they criticise Israel for its crimes – crimes the whole world is aware of and for which it is now under inquiry by the ICC and ICJ – the highest courts of humanity?

2. Has the party become an instrument of Israeli Hasbara? By acting like an inquisitorial court driven by zionist accusations, without providing details to the accused, any pretence of justice seems to have been abandoned. Do you find this an acceptable way to treat your members, and are you committed to continue using this flawed approach?

3. Who has put such accusations against Tony Greenstein, and what is the evidential foundation of such scurrilous claims? Is it the practice of the Party to accept accusations and keep the identity of the accuser a secret, and not expose them to a simple procedure of a proper inquiry and cross-questioning?

4. What kind of process is being used by the party, in which no proof is necessary, no evidence is presented, no procedure is followed, and no justice can be seen, let alone done? Is the GP now open to any accusation of antisemitism against anti-zionist Jews and others, not upholding an evidential procedure, requiring proof from named persons, and allowing the accused a process of self-defence, not to mention some information about the basis for the inquiry?

5. Does the Party believe it has the expertise, procedures, information and the moral authority to dictate to Jews, as well as non-Jews, committed to international law and the struggle against Israeli racist crimes and crimes against humanity – that they must support zionism, in defying not only of their personal moral code, but that of the international legal authorities?

6. Will the Green Party act against those Jews, and others, who have supported, and continue to support the crimes of the zionist state? Is the Party committed to ending the Racist zionist Apartheid in Palestine? If so, will supporters of the zionist crimes be ousted by the Party as opponents of both international Law and the Green Party positions?

Given that there were no clear or truthful grounds for the decision taken by the Committee, and no proper process followed, and hardly any information supplied by the deciding body, we call on the Green Party to immediately apologise to Tony Greenstein and annul the incorrect and shameful decision.

We also call upon the Party to clarify its rules, make then compatible with local and international law, and overhaul its faulty procedures so such decisions cannot be taken in such manner in the future.

We are convinced that the Green Party owes such clarity to its members, to the law-abiding Jewish community, and the Palestinians under the zionist genocidal jackboot.

Signed for JNP and IJAN, David Cannon, Chair of JNP.’

Watch; Ex-CIA officer reveals Trump ignored 18 US intelligence agencies on Iran not being threat, Al Mayadeen, 25 April 2026

John Kiriakou, Former CIA officer; “As an American, I am embarrassed to say, I’m ashamed to say that it appears that President Trump is getting his intelligence on Iran from the Mossad. That’s really where this is all coming from. The CIA has been clear in writing, both in classified channels and in unclassified channels, that Iran was not a threat to the United States. We know that the Director of National Intelligence argued against this war, saying that there was no threat to the United States and that the United States should not do Israel’s dirty work for it, and the President decided to ignore that advice. And it’s more than just the CIA we’re talking about. The entire American intelligence community, which, believe it or not, is made up of 18 separate intelligence services. It’s not just the CIA, it’s NSA and DIA and Army Intelligence, Navy Intelligence, Air Force Intelligence. All of these organisations together all concluded unanimously that Iran was not a threat. And then you have this very unusual situation on top of it, where the Israeli government is leaking to the Israeli media the fact that they have been able to convince President Trump to do what Benjamin Netanyahu wants him to do. It’s the Israelis making the calls. George Galloway, a well known British parliamentarian, said just a couple of weeks ago, half jokingly, that Benjamin Netanyahu hadn’t been seen for seven days. So who’s running the United States? And that’s really what it comes down to, that as strong and as tough as Donald Trump wants to appear in the media, he takes his marching orders from Benjamin Netanyahu.”

Read; Is this true? Or fake news? Propaganda? James Ricketson, 25 April 2026

‘You must be wondering why Donald Trump, after all the tough talk, quietly stepped back and offered an indefinite pause on military escalation with Iran. No grand announcement. No victory speech. Just a sudden, unusual stillness. Iran sent him a map. Not a peace proposal. Not a diplomatic note. ???? ???????????????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ????????????????????????. That map said more than a thousand missiles ever could. The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow waterway between Iran and the Arabian Peninsula. The world already knew it carries nearly 20% of global oil. What fewer people talk about is that the same narrow passage is threaded with undersea cables that carry the internet, banking data, and financial transactions for hundreds of millions of people across the Middle East, Asia, and beyond.’

Read; Israel’s AI foreign influence op blames Palestinians for killing Hind Rajab, Max Blumenthal, The Grayzone, 28 April 2026

‘A new website established by the Israeli government through a contract with Trump’s former campaign manager seeks to manipulate AI platforms into denying established accounts of Hind Rajab’s killing.’

‘Israel has created nine English language websites explicitly aimed at manipulating AI platforms like Claude and ChatGPT. Its vehicle for maintaining these websites is Clock Tower X, a company founded by Brad Parscale, the former manager of President Donald Trump’s 2020 re-election campaign. Now a federally-registered foreign agent, Parscale is the point man on a gargantuan contract aimed at reversing Israel’s public relations crisis by flooding online media with anti-Palestinian propaganda.

Among the new websites registered by Israel and maintained by Clock Tower X is a portal dedicated to “prov[ing] that Hamas’s terrorist designation reflects global consensus, and undeniable evidence of violence, not conspiracy.” Called Factsignal.org, the site has distributed materials attempting to cast doubt on an incident that has become a symbol of the crimes committed by the Israeli army against the civilian population of Gaza.’

Fake news created by AI at an Israeli company dressed up as compassionate reporting for victims of abuse in order to demonise actors/countries pre regime change.

Listen; Mossad and CIA efforts to keep the (Iranian) war going, UK Column News, 29 April 2026

Mike Robinson; “The propaganda around Iran and the efforts to keep the war going don’t end.”

Vanessa Beeley; “No, they don’t. But what is interesting, we’ve been talking for some time at UK Column about the fact that the riots back in January were orchestrated by Mossad and CIA, and this is now confirmed by Hebrew media. This was in Ynet this morning. It’s translated from Hebrew, which I always find throws up some quite strange English phrases, but it basically says the absolute victory that never happened. This is how the operation to overthrow the Iranian regime has been torpedoed for now. And they talk about influencing the system, funding the protests, eliminating the leaders, triggering the Kurdish separatists in Iraq to attack Iran, pushing the Iranians onto the streets to force regime change. It was actually in the end prevented by JD Vance, who didn’t approve the use of the Kurds, and by Erdogan in Turkey, who also, of course, didn’t want any kind of amplification of the Kurdish cause because that would impact on Turkey. And if we go back to the text in the article itself, what they actually say is, a regime can be overthrown from above by relying on senior officials and it can be overthrown from below by fostering mass protest. Of course, this is very much what they tried to do in Syria. The very strange phrase, ‘it would both stuff the chicken’s head and cook its legs’, I have no idea how that is translated from Hebrew, but I think you get the picture. What is interesting, it says the organisation which was set up to effectively push through the strategy was established four years ago, which of course is when the Mahsa Amini riots began in 2022 in Iran. So it’s been working on this destabilisation from within for some time. And then if we look at what they claim to be the three-day assessment, they underestimated the survival ability of Iran. Even with the assassination of the leadership, they still managed to replace the leadership and continue fighting back against the two nuclear states that were effectively leading the aggression. They underestimated the power of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. They claim that the US was not prepared, but they are saying, we don’t understand how that is possible because they were being warned by intelligence advisors within the US that the Strait of Hormuz could potentially be closed. And then of course, there’s a gibe there at the end about Keir Starmer saying that he failed to come to the assistance of President Trump, which was another element in the failure of the campaign and the fact that Trump of course, thought it would all be over within a few days.

This was a post by the Cradle, I think it was yesterday, so it says Israel based ‘Generative AI for Good’, a lot of people have responded to that and said it should be for evil, founded by Shiran Mlamdovsky Somech has produced an AI generated video depicting a supposed Iranian sexual violence survivor for war propaganda purposes. The video was actually established before the war began against Iran. It’s framed as being based on actual testimony, yet there’s no verifiable evidence provided to support that claim, risking serious doubts about its authenticity and intent. She has previously been associated with creating similar AI-generated content alleging sexual violence linked to October 7, which has also faced scrutiny over a lack of substantiation. There is multiple documentation of that. So let’s just have a look at this video to see how effective it is.”

Video; “I remember everything. There was very heavy shooting. I was arrested, they put me inside a van.They would take us in groups of 7-8 women at a time to a certain room, and I thought they would only beat us there. They took 7-8 women. They raped us in groups.”

Vanessa Beeley; “I would point out, and many people did point out on X, of course, who is the country that is effectively defending people against prosecution for rape of Palestinian prisoners in the Sde Teiman jail? There is an obsession with the subject of rape with these AI-generated videos that are being put out to criminalise target organisations like Hamas or countries like Iran. So who is producing these videos? It’s an organisation called ‘Generative AI For Good’. Let’s have a look at their partners. So they’re partnered with, you can see immediately there, Microsoft and Meta that we know are pretty much surveilling and controlling so-called free speech across the majority of social media apps, including of course WhatsApp. Now the Flagship Initiative, according to their own website, if we can just have that up. So we’ve mentioned the CAO, her flagship initiative, ‘Hearing Their Voices’, uses AI avatars and voice technology to safely preserve and share testimonies of survivors of conflict related sexual violence from Iran, Israel, October 7, Syria, Ukraine, Iraq and beyond. Launched at the United Nations, the project won the inaugural SIMA Impact AI Award. So effectively we’re being given testimonies that are effectively deep fake and we’re being told we have to believe them without any substantiation whatsoever. We’re entering very dangerous territory here. And then I looked further into the website. I do intend doing a more in depth investigation into them, but this is another element of their work or their projects, ‘Hack the Hate’. Again, I would point to the hack element of that because we know from former Mossad director Yossi Cohen that every phone in the world has a bit of Israel in it. And this is a speaker at this event who belongs to the Unit 8200 Alumni Association. Now what is very interesting to me, if we then look at the impact of this part of their projects, we see there that Israel leads with this text. So this basically to me means that Israel is going to be leading with this kind of deep fake evidencing or justification for war, for destabilisation, for cracking down on dissidents. When they talk about start of a movement, look at the image they’re using and compare it to the one on the right. The one on the right is of Otpor that was an orchestrated movement that brought down President Milosevic back in 2000, funded by Soros, by the National Endowment for Democracy, by USAID. So effectively a CIA-orchestrated movement that has then been repeated in Syria, in Ukraine and in Iran. So very interesting symbolism going on there.”

From Corporate Britain to Sovereign Britain – A Freedom Strategy that Puts Humanity First! Intro from my colleague, Justin Walker;

Read; THE GREAT RISING, Humanity First,

‘This will take a few weeks to gain traction but no one else is out there offering a winning strategy, nor mentioning the actual proven solutions needed to collapse the house of cards that we are all up against. With what’s happening on the completely contrived world stage, a big push is now urgently required that will win over the relatively new podcasters, opinion-formers and politicians who are aware that something is terribly wrong but who have not properly understood and grasped the full extent of the mind-set and cabal that we are all up against. If you don’t have this deliberately suppressed knowledge, it is virtually impossible to win.

Please do all you can to make this initiative a success, Cheers Justin (on behalf of the Great Rising team)’

Watch; Palantir Publishes Weird Manifesto For AI World Dominance, Novara Media, 21 April 2026

Steven Methven; “So you have a whole bunch of things there, Harriet. You have the idea that it’s a civic duty of a company like Palantir to tackle crime, for example, and we know that they use their technology in all kinds of pre-crime kind of identification stuff. It’s a civic duty of people to be conscripted into the military so that when we go to wars, people share the cost. I mean, people already share the cost, they pay for it. You’ve got the idea that Palantir has a civic duty to defend the state, which invariably means creating huge offensive weapons and systems like an iron dome or something, which are about killing people in other countries. There are all the elements of a very frightening kind of picture of the relationship between a software company and the state. The other thing is, of course, is pitching AI weapons as the new deterrent. So taking over where the nuclear bomb leaves off as the main way of maintaining peace, which is that you show people that you can take them out in a really hard way if they mess with you. So it’s a kind of might is right mentality. You’ve done a lot of writing in Palantir. Does any of this surprise you?”

Harriet Williamson; “Not in the slightest. Not at all. No part of this surprises me. This is a really disturbing authoritarian, techno-fascist manifesto. It’s pitching for this highly militarised state, which would obviously benefit Palantir’s bottom line. And as we know that under the Trump administration, Palantir has an absolute wealth of government contracts, and it has been instrumental in facilitating Trump’s immigration enforcement crackdown via ICE. And that Palantir has developed and created tools specifically for ICE, including ones that actually use people’s healthcare data to populate maps to show where the most people who might be targeted for ICE raids are. Even before we go on to Palantir’s involvement in Israel’s genocide in Gaza this is deeply, deeply, disturbing and absolute shame upon our government for allowing this company, this really dangerous company, which I think should actually be treated as a hostile foreign actor, into the most sensitive and privileged parts of the British state, including things like nuclear weapons, the Ministry of Defence, and most egregious of all, the NHS. Our private health care data can be accessed by this company. The guardrails in place by NHS England do not stop Palantir employees for being able to access identifiable healthcare data from the British public. Like that is absolutely true. And shame, actually, also on Politico, for allowing their newsletter to be sponsored by Palantir all of last week. I was absolutely disgusted to see that. The deepening NHS access by Palantir, we’ve got crossbench MPs now calling for that break clause in February next year to be triggered to get us out of this contract with this pretty dangerous US spy tech firm. MPs from Labour, from the Dems, and obviously Green Party leader Zack Polanski has been pushing for this as well. We’ve got a system that’s now embedded in the NHS, which runs on Foundry, which is the civil equivalent of Gotham, which is the Palantir tech. It’s their software platform that is used by militaries around the world. We’ve got Palantir staff and other government departments in this country being able to access our healthcare data, which seems like, worryingly familiar when you look at what ICE can do with healthcare data, like Obamacare data in the US, that’s really, really scary. And we’ve got NHS provider trusts getting repeated requests every week for people’s healthcare data from Palantir. And that is information we’ve got via campaign groups like Medax, which are made up of NHS staff. This is utterly terrifying. We know that they got in the door through Covid, through Covid databases and it was part of their strategy to pitch low, to gobble up other businesses and to flatten out any criticism that way. And this Covid database, it paved the way for way more lucrative contracts within the NHS. And people are warning now that our NHS may become dependent on Palantir. It’s going to become a monopoly supplier. It’s called vendor lock-in, that’s what they call it. The NHS hasn’t got proprietary anything over this system. The Federated Data Platform is Palantir software. It absolutely owns it. The FT this week was like, well, maybe it actually saves money. They published a positive editorial leader on it. How can that be the absolute standard for why we should let this company into our NHS and have access to our data? A company of which its co-founder and chairperson Peter Thiel, has said that the NHS essentially needs ripping up and that our love for the NHS as British people is Stockholm Syndrome. How has this been allowed to happen?”

Watch; What is Palantir? Novara Media, 4 April 2026

‘What’s the hidden connection between the NHS, Israel, Jeffrey Epstein and the Lord of the Rings? Harriet Williamson asks why a spy-tech firm – whose technology is used by the IDF in Gaza and ICE in the US – has access to NHS data in the UK. Palantir’s biggest ever UK government contract, worth £240m, was awarded after prime minister Keir Starmer attended a meeting at the firm’s headquarters in Washington last February. But Starmer never declared the visit to the public’.

Harriet Wiiliamson; “What’s the hidden connection between the NHS, Israel, Jeffrey Epstein and the Lord of the Rings? It’s a spy tech firm called Palantir. Let me explain. The US company was named after the crystal balls in J.R.R. Tolkien’s epic fantasy trilogy. And as any fan knows, the evil Lord Sauron could look into a Palantir and see in any direction, at any distance, which, as we’ll find out, is a little on the nose. Palantir, co- founded and chaired by anti-democracy tech billionaire Peter Thiel, sells its software platforms to governments around the world. Its main products are called Gotham and Foundry. They basically pull together loads of different types of information to create big searchable databases. These databases then get used for analysis, intelligence gathering and policing by the worst people, namely the IDF, CIA, FBI, US Department of Defence and ICE. Palantir even made ICE its own tool called Elite, which fills a map with potential deportation targets so agents can choose which neighbourhoods to raid. Palantir’s AI tools are unsurprisingly, big favourites in the war industry. They allow militaries to generate automated kill lists which have been widely employed by the IDF during Israel’s genocide in Gaza. And Palantir isn’t just being used by the US and Israel. It’s embedded in the heart of the British state thanks to £670 million worth of government contracts. This means that Palantir has its dirty fingerprints all over the NHS. Yep, Palantir has access to your healthcare data, along with the military, the police and even our nuclear weapons. Palantir’s biggest ever UK contract worth £240 million was given after Keir Starmer attended a secretive meeting at the company’s Washington, D.C. headquarters with then U.S. ambassador Peter Mandelson in February last year. Yes, that Mandelson, the man arrested over allegations that he shared market sensitive information with Jeffrey Epstein, the world’s most famous paedophile. But Palantir’s ties to Epstein go even deeper. Peter Thiel and Epstein cultivated an intimate business relationship years after the prolific paedophile’s first arrest for child sex offences. And leaked recordings show that Epstein promoted Palantir to Israel via former Prime Minister Ehud Barak. There’s no record of what Starmer discussed at Palantir HQ last February, and the visit was not listed on his register of interests. I wonder what they talked about.”

Get Palantir’s murderous hands out of the NHS

Watch; Palantir: NHS data campaign gathers pace, UK Column News, 17 April 2026

Mike Robinson; “Palantir is in the centre of all this to some degree, but the question of Palantir’s access to NHS data is one that continues to rumble on. So what’s the latest on it?”

Basil Valentine; “Yes, Mike, no doubt Palantir would like to be at the centre of all data gathering with respect to UK citizens, but the involvement of Peter Thiel’s company in the NHS is a story we’ve been following for a few weeks now, here on Fridays on UK Column, and I’m pleased to say the campaign to get them kicked out of the NHS to start with, hopefully from all the other government contracts they’ve got, is gathering pace. MPs are apparently now queuing up to demand that the government scrap its £330 million NHS contract with the zionist spytech firm, calling it ‘dreadful and shameful’ in a debate yesterday, after which the government themselves said, apparently that it was, I quote, ‘no fan of the US company’s policies’. Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs led the calls for the firm, which also works for Donald Trump’s ICE immigration crackdown and of course, the Israeli military to be removed as the supplier to the NHS Federated Data Platform, the FDP, with the Labour backbencher Samantha Niblett in particular questioning whether or not it could be trusted as a custodian of of the intimate health records of tens of millions of British citizens. The Lib Dem MP Luke Taylor called the deal ‘shameful’ and said Palantir and Peter Thiel must have their hands’ ripped off our NHS’ before it’s too late. So it seems we really are making some progress on this issue. Now this week on Politics Live, Palantir’s UK boss, Louis Mosley, was quietly eviscerated by the academic Faiza Shaheen. Now, incidentally, Shaheen stood as the Labour candidate in the 2019 general election and lost, and was then selected again by her local Labour Party in 2022, but was not endorsed by central office in July 2024, when, of course, Peter Mandelson and Morgan McSweeney were known to be combing through the prospective candidates list and weeding out anybody who they didn’t like. She obviously fell foul of them and stood as an independent, but wasn’t elected. Anyway, let’s see her quiet takedown of Louis Mosley and Palantir now.”

Faiza Shaheen; “Palantir has such a key role in helping Israel kill children in Palestine and Lebanon. That has to be aligned, surely. And what does a company that is so involved in how to kill children with Israel and how to deport children from the US have an interest in the NHS and in our data? And I think that’s the concern here, is the lack of trust. Now, you can read out that list. Absolutely. You speak to doctors, they say that it’s fragmented and the information isn’t all in one place and the rest of it as patients as well. But there’s lots of other companies that could do that who don’t have this deeply immoral approach in the way that they do their business. And I think we are absolutely right and Zack Polanski is absolutely right to say that we want your company out of the NHS.”

Basil Valentine; “Now. In response to the MPs calls, the government confirmed it will consider whether to continue the deal when a break clause is due in spring of next year, although £210 million of the £330 million has already been spent. Now, as a coda to this, in the face of rising pressure from doctors, MPs and the public, Dr. Zubia Ahmed, a junior health minister, said, if at that point in the break clause, we evaluate and we find there are other providers that can do the job better, then of course that needs to be looked at. But while MPs may be allowed to criticise Palantir, as we pointed out before, you can lose your job in the NHS if you join the chorus. According to the FT, an analytics officer who’d raised concerns about Palantir’s federal data platform was told by a senior NHS official, if you criticise the FDP one more time, you’re going to lose your job.”

Watch; The Evil Company Taking Over The NHS, Novara Media,15 April 2026

Alex Karp, CEO Palantir; “The obvious fact is, if you care about not being surveilled illegally, if you care about the treatment of people who come into the country illegally but deserve adequate treatment, if you care about lives in Gaza, in Ukraine and all over the world where Palantir is used, you’re going to want the best software in the world because it’s the only way you can reduce and more precisely target the people and justifiably… and actually the only way where you can say, this person did this and they deserve to go.”

Michael Walker; “So an admission there, like just a blank admission that the software is used to target people in Gaza and that that’s a good thing because it’s more accurate, humans don’t have to make judgments, so they can just hand it over to an algorithmically driven machine to do it. Makes killing easier, all those kinds of dystopian things. This was Faiza Shaheen’s response to Mosley.”

Faiza Shaheen; “But why should we trust you? Because, as we’ve seen, say, with the police in New York, when they tried to say we want Palantir to come out, it was really hard to kick you out of their data. You know that reliance grows and you do these free contracts or like, oh, try this, and then you’re like, oh, now we’re going to charge 300 million for it. It’s the way in which your company has behaved, we’re right to question how you may be and what you might do with our data and how difficult it will to get you out of our systems.”

Louis Mosley, Head of Palantir UK; “We would lose our business in this country if we ever did any of those things. We are legally prevented from doing so. So there is absolutely no way in which we are ever going to do any of the things that you are suggesting with patient data. We can’t. We can’t. And I would also say that really what we should be judged on is whether we’re delivering for patients in this country. And I would suggest that it will be very difficult to tell patients that their operations have to be delayed in this country because you have a political problem with the supplier and the way in which that software is being used in other countries around the world.”

Faiza Shaheen; “Well,I think that there’s other companies that can do that kind of work when we’re not arguing that it doesn’t. We don’t need some systems. But ultimately, when you hire a private company to do something, our taxpayers’ money goes to your company. And the other involvement that you have around the world does have an impact, right? It does mean it is connected. So when we pay you, it allows you to do all of these other things as well. And so the moral implications, the NHS is at the heart of our morals. It’s at the heart of who we are in this country so it’s absolutely right that the moral question there should be at the forefront. And honestly, I’m so disappointed with the Labour Party.”

Fab blade runners chopping down surveillance cameras

Watch; The blade runners of London jakevsthestate, 19 April 2026

“We could all learn something from the people of Britain right now. There’s these cameras, ultra low emission zone cameras, and they’ll just charge you for driving around in the intercity areas. And as you can see here, they be cutting them down. They cut them down a lot. They call them blade runners because they roll around the city and just chop them down everywhere. And I know what you’re thinking. There’s probably two or three cameras they get, they probably get a few a day,50% at any given time, throughout the city of London. These cameras are cut down, that’s how high a rate these guys work at. As you can see here, a whole intersection getting hit at once. Absolutely amazing. That’s what happens when people work together towards a shared goal.”

Watch; REVEALED: How British media ‘sanitised’ Israel’s genocide in Gaza, Middle East Eye, 23 April 2026

Mathilda Mallinson; “Today, ‘Sanitising Genocide’. New data exposes pro-Israeli bias in UK mainstream media. Out today, an investigation using AI to analyse hundreds of news articles claims to show how the UK mainstream media systematically sanitises genocide and dehumanises Palestinians. Newscord, a media monitoring organisation, fed its AI model 11,295 classified excerpts from Al Jazeera, BBC, the Guardian, Sky News comparing parallel stories about Israel’s war on Gaza in which at least 72,000 Palestinians were killed. The report found the BBC failed to name Israel as the perpetrator in Israeli attacks where civilians were killed in 50% of all analysed cases. Sky News and the Guardian did so in only 54% of reports. According to its linguistic metrics, the BBC and the Guardian humanised Israeli captives twice as often as they did Palestinian ones. Sky News gave Israeli perspectives nearly double the word count they did Palestinians, and across all four outlets only Al Jazeera gave Palestinian voices slightly more coverage. The report also goes into what is not mentioned. Sky News mentioned the word genocide just 12 times across the entire dataset, the BBC 15 times and the Guardian 21 times across all media. The veracity of Palestinian death tolls was consistently undermined. The BBC labelled Gaza’s Health ministry ‘Hamas affiliated’ in 60% of death toll citations, but mentioned the UN finds these sources credible in only 0.6%. Those casualty estimates have now been accepted by the Israeli military.”

David Miller was sacked as a professor of Sociology at Bristol University in 2021 for expressing opinions that were critical of zionism. He challenged his sacking at an Employment Tribunal that ruled that he was entitled to express his views and that his dismissal had been unfair. Due to the zionists funding Bristol University’s appeal against the Employment Tribunal decision, the professor continues his fight. If victorious, our right to be anti-zionist will be protected in law.

Watch; On Al Jazeera English the other day, Tracking Power, 9 January 2025,

David Miller; “What will happen is that that will legally establish the precedent even more firmly that it’s impossible to sack someone who’s an anti-zionist. So I think in the end, although I’m disappointed to have to go through this, I think it’s going to be a really a significant precedent and landmark judgement that we’re going to see at the end of this”

Al Jazeera; “And how necessary is this precedent? I mean, how stifled do you feel academia is when it comes to talking about pro-Palestinian issues?”

David Miller; “Well, it’s extremely stifled, but it’s not just academia. This case, of course, is to me as a professor of political sociology, but it’s also is a case which, once the precedent is established, will affect every worker in the country whether they are working in the police or in parliament or anywhere, every worker will be affected. But of course there’s not just academics who have been subjected to censorship and sacked as a result of their views or their expression of their legitimate views. It’s also been a whole range of other professionals. There have been many doctors and lawyers and accountants, even opticians or child psychologists who have been sacked as a result of speaking out on the genocide in Gaza. Because of course the zionists cannot stand the possibility that people speak up for the Palestinians and they try and avoid losing the global public relations war, which is what’s happening, they are trying to have people sacked so that they can no longer take a place, take a role in public society.”

Al Jazeera; ” What impact has all of this had on you and your professional life?”

David Miller; “Well, I’ve been sacked from my position. I have not been able to get another academic job. I will not ever be able to get another academic job. And of course that’s a significant detriment to me. It’s meant that I’ve had to find other ways to make a living, and of course I’ve done that by devoting myself to journalism and writing, especially on the zionist movement. So I think maybe if zionists thought that they could shut me up, they realise that they have been unsuccessful because of course I’ve made this into a massive issue of principle and as a result more and more people are supporting the kind of views which I’ve expressed, which prior to the beginning of the genocide were much less popular.”

Dennis Kucinich on the Duran

Watch; Debt, Decline and Iran: Why the U.S. Can’t Afford Another Forever War? w/ Dennis Kucinich, The Duran, 16 April 2026

Dennis Kucinich; “During and after World War II, Americans were organised along industrial production, first during the war for the wartime effort, but then afterwards that production began slowly to move more profoundly into steel, automotive, aerospace and shipping.Those industries were the mainstay of America’s strategic industrial base. Over the years, that base has been slowly disappearing, mainly through trade agreements and the search for lower wage climates. And as a result, you have areas like the area I represented for 16 years in Northern Ohio, where grass is growing in parking lots where they used to make steel cars, and broader in the Midwest, washing machines and dryers and all kinds of household equipment. We’ve lost much of that, in addition to the smaller machine shops. So let’s go to the war economy. When the nation was preparing for war years ago, it was labour intensive. The activity is labour intensive. All that changed today. Today it’s capital and technology intensive. That’s where the money goes. You have robots doing work that used to be done by human beings, and so what that means is that this is not about jobs anymore, it’s about expenditure. And the money that’s going to technology for these missiles, for example, is extraordinary. This is all about electronics, about the use of certain metals. It’s all changed. So war does not create jobs, as you point out, it takes away jobs. So Trump himself has basically confessed to that with a statement about no money for Medicare, Medicaid and childcare, but we have to have money for war. What that does is eventually breaks a society and America cannot be sustained with that. And what I want to add is this. America must change its role in the world. We can no longer be a nation above nations. We have to be a nation among nations. We have to roll back all these 800- plus military bases around the world. We can no longer afford it. We don’t need to do that. We need to lead the world in nuclear abolition. Not just having these arguments of picking and choosing winners and losers on nuclear weaponry. We need to begin to focus on things here at home. We cannot sustain this economy, more than 80% of our domestic spending going for the military. Because there is a schism that’s occurring between the domestic needs and this military industrial complex that Eisenhower warned about in his farewell speech years ago. So America’s role has to change. It must. There is no other way that this country can survive, because otherwise we’re going to be walking into that graveyard of empires which is well known about throughout history where countries became so puffed up with the arrogance of their leaders that they missed the signals of oncoming disaster.”

Alexander Mercouris; ” As somebody who lives in Britain, I know all about that. But just to quickly say, I’ve seen that play out here in the country that was once the empire over which the sun literally never set. Last question for me. Is this war going to be the catalyst that is going to bring about change? The economic consequences seem to be far greater than the previous wars, though I think Vietnam actually did bring about significant economic change and significant economic damage. That’s my own view. But is this war whose economic consequences seem to be enormous, is this going to be the last war of this kind that America can afford to fight in this way? Your thoughts on this?”

Dennis Kucinich; “Well, we put all of our wars on a credit card. Okay. We spent, depending on who you talk to, at least $4 trillion in the war against Iraq, which resulted in the deaths of a million innocent Iraqis and 5,000 American soldiers.it only ends if the American people demand a different kind of country. You’re right about the cost, we’re already approaching about $50 billion, I think for this particular war. It’s a human impact that I think about. I’m sure that this is true of many reviewers. I find it very difficult to get out of my mind the fact that about 168 children in Manab, Iran were killed with a Tomahawk missile fired by the United States of America. I find it difficult to countenance that my country is funding a genocidal war against the people of Gaza, against the people of the West Bank, dispossessing them of their homes that we’re licencing, wiping out south Lebanon and maybe north of the Latani river, that we’re paying for this attack on Iran. What is this all about? I mean, millions of people have either been killed or put at risk because of this mentality, which is separate from morals, ethics. It’s all about the almost a maniacal imposition of power for the sake of resources and personal gain. My God, when are we going to learn? When are we going to learn that it’s time to live and let live and stop this murderous rampage across the world. As an American, I have to tell you, and as someone who’s been involved in government, this government has to change. Our purpose of governance has been alienated from our very founding which we celebrate this year, 250 years. This is not the America our founders envisioned, of an authoritarian government on a fascist rampage, a murderous rampage across the world. I don’t buy it. And I’m hopeful that more and more Americans don’t buy it. And I’m hopeful that more and more Americans will begin to look at what’s happening here at home and say it’s time that we took care of our own people instead of trying to kill other people around the world.”

The world’s banks are broke because of fractional reserve banking. A British MEP made this speech in 2013 and it is more relevant than ever.

Watch; “The Banks Are Broke’: This Viral Video From 2013 Is More Relevant Than Ever Crypto Citizens Network, 4 March 2021

Godfrey Bloom MEP; “Well, Commissioner, Mr. President, I rise again, I’m afraid, to make the same old hoary speech that I’ve been making here for several years. And that is, it is my opinion that you do not really understand the concept of banking. All the banks are broke, Bank Santander, Deutsche Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland, they’re all broke. And why are they broke? It isn’t an act of God. It isn’t some sort of tsunami. They’re broke because we have a system called fractional reserve banking, which means that banks can lend money that they don’t actually have. It’s a criminal scandal and it’s been going on for too long. To add to that problem, you have moral hazard, a very significant moral hazard from the political sphere. And most of the problem starts in politics and central banks, which are part of the same political system. We have counterfeiting, sometimes called quantitative easing, but counterfeiting by any other name, the artificial printing of money, which, if any ordinary person did, they’d go to prison for a very long time. And yet governments and central banks do it all the time. Central banks repress the amount of interest that rates are, so we don’t have the real cost of money, and yet we blame the retail banks for manipulating LIBOR. The sheer effrontery of this is quite astonishing. It’s central banks that manipulate interest rates, Commissioner. And plus, underneath all this, we talk loosely, in a rather cavalier fashion, do we not, about deposit guarantees? So when banks go broke through their own incompetence and chicanery, the taxpayer picks up the tab. It’s theft from the taxpayer. And until we start sending bankers, and I include central bankers and politicians to prison for this outrage, it will continue.”

President Trump shot in the ear ……really?!?!?!?

Watch; Israel’s Butler Shooting Secret… The Tucker Carlson Show, 9 April 2026

Tucker Carlson; “There’s no intelligence in the US Government that Joe Kent couldn’t see. He was one of the most informed people in the world and his conclusion was there’s something weird going on here and one of the clues is the Butler shooting where President Trump was shot in the ear. And according to Joe Kent, who would know, that investigation was closed before it pursued every possible lead. You can’t say he doesn’t know what he’s talking about and you can’t say the Trump administration didn’t trust him with all available US Intelligence until the day he left. You can’t say that because they did. He has said out loud he thinks the failure to investigate the Butler shooting is connected to the control that Israel has over the United States government, the demonstrable control.”

Watch; Jeffrey Sachs: Iran War Broke U.S. Empire & Alliance Systems, Glenn Diesen, 4 April 2026

‘Prof. Jeffrey Sachs discusses the unravelling of the US alliance system that has dominated the past decades and how a lingering imperial mindset prevents adjustment to new realities.’

Jaffrey Sachs; “I’ve been saying this exactly for the last decade at least, be careful of the United States. It’s got a delusional foreign policy. It believes that it runs the show, but it gets you into deep trouble. I have repeated dozens, if not hundreds of times, my favourite adage of Henry Kissinger that to be an enemy of the United States is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal. How many times have I said that to governments or in the European Parliament or to the Gulf leaders personally in recent years? Not just because of this war, but because of all of the circumstances that go back a very long time. I do not believe, for example, that countries gain any security whatsoever in hosting US military bases. I’ve argued for years and suggested for years that these countries invite the United States to go home. You don’t get security. These bases are a magnet for conflict. But more than that, they suborn your own sovereignty. European countries remain, 80 years after the end of World War II, semi-occupied by the United States. And the United States meddles deeply in European politics, to a shocking extent, actually. And so my own recommendation has been repeatedly, this idea that you are finding security in the United States is wrong.”

Escape the US government by forming independent communities

Watch; The Rise of Mobile Communities in America, Luke The Digital Nomad Guy, 17 March 2026

“Something is changing in America, and most people haven’t noticed yet. Across the country, people are parking their vans, their buses, their RVs side by side. Not because they have to, because they chose to. They’re forming communities, sharing resources, sharing skills, watching out for each other. No landlord, no lease, no HOA telling them what the colour of their door can be. Media calls this van life, but that’s not what this is anymore. This is people who looked at a $2,000 a month rent payment, a 30-year mortgage they’ll never qualify for in a system that keeps moving the goalposts, and said no, not out of desperation, out of clarity. They built something the housing market can’t touch. A community you can move. This isn’t a trend. It’s the beginning of something.”

Watch; ‘Epstein, Gates were setting up COVID…’: Economist’s EXPLOSIVE claims about pandemic shocks everyone,The Economic Times, 31 March 2026

‘Prof. Dr. Richard Werner speaks at the European Parliament during an event hosted by Christine Anderson, MEP, arguing against reliance on Digital ID, the use of central bank digital currency and the planned tokenisation of all assets, including nature and the air we breathe. Prof. Werner opposes the ongoing creation of a nightmarish digital prison desired by the central planners who work to curtail our rights and freedoms.’

Read; The Industrial Revolution in Reverse, Parallel Systems, 8 April 2026

Parallel Mike, Organic farmer, investor: ‘So what is really going on? In my opinion what is taking place in the Strait of Hormuz serves two purposes: firstly it’s a smokescreen for the financial collapse that they know is imminent and can only be staved off with another mega crisis event that enables them to implement extraordinary measures and financial interventions. It’s no coincidence that this crisis came when it did. The private credit bubble, the stock market bubble, and the real economy were all beginning to blow up simultaneously. It was last orders at the bar, and Jimmy was about to drive home drunk. They needed a crisis, and here it is. But it’s not only about propping up their financial ponzi scheme, they’re using this catastrophe to advance their wider agenda of control whereby they hope to further restrict what citizens can do, where they can go, how they behave, and where they can travel. Unlike the scamdemic, where they collapsed energy demand, through the shutting down economies, this time they’re going straight for the throat: targeting the supply itself. Once the global economy falls apart, demand will collapse anyway. Already we can see how they’re using the crisis as the justification to halt travel, ration fuel and food, and give the state the power to control who can buy and sell what, and when. Throw in digital IDs and digital currencies, and you can see how this aligns perfectly with their greater plan to implement a system of technocracy and digital financial system. It also feeds into longstanding anti-human agendas that all nations everywhere are signed up to, such as the Agenda 2030 goals and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, aka the Great Reset.’

Watch; Why the Establishment Wants to Destroy Farmers & the Working Class, De Nieuwe Wereld TV, 26 March 2026

‘What happens when a theoretical physicist turns his attention to human all-cause mortality, societal power structures, and the true cost of biological stress? In this deep-dive interview, host Jona Walk sits down with Denis Rancourt: former physics professor at the University of Ottawa and interdisciplinary researcher. Together, they explore a wide range of thought-provoking topics, starting with Rancourt’s critical analysis of the COVID-19 era through the objective lens of all-cause mortality data.

But the conversation goes much deeper. Rancourt explains how human societies function as dominance hierarchies, how biological stress and access to resources are tied to our evolutionary survival, and the mathematical models that predict the rise and fall of stable societies. Whether you’re interested in the hidden dynamics of geopolitics, the crisis of indoctrination in modern academia, or simply how to navigate times of great social upheaval, this interview challenges conventional thinking at every turn. Tune in to discover why strategic resistance, pushback, and “finding your inner rebel” might just be the most important things you can do for the future of society.’

Denis Rancourt; “In any dominance hierarchy, access to resources, there’s a gradient. So there’s necessarily a gradient of health, but there’s a gradient of access to resources. And food resources is a big one in animal societies. But it’s not just quantity of food, it’s quality of food, it’s nutritional value of the food that the people low in the dominance hierarchy will have less nutritious food, that’s part of the deal. And it’s true in animal societies as well, the dominants will go in and eat the nutrient-rich organs in the animal and so on, and the others will be gnawing on the tendons and the joints of the bones at the end. And that’s it. It’s not just quantity, it’s nutrition, and if you look at the United States, boy, is that ever evident. The people who suffer this epidemic of obesity, they’re eating sugar, they have the worst possible food, they can have as much as they want, basically, the corporations will ensure that everybody can be obese. They have so much food, but it’s highly toxic and low nutrition food. And so even the food pyramid itself is kind of an institutional manifestation of this law of dominance hierarchies where the underlings get less nutritious food. And it’s interesting that it’s been reversed recently under the Kennedy leadership and so on, because I see that reversal, I understand it from this perspective as fighting back, as people pushing back, and that there’s this reversal even at that level.So you can in a macroscopic way understand a lot of the battles and inter-institutional, inter-elite battles in terms of this dominance hierarchy and its rules.”

A time of government overreach for Israel

Watch; Eurocrats Trying To KILL This German Journalist (with his Family) | Hüseyin Dogru, Neutrality Studies, 3 April 2026

‘This is a grave case of political punishment without due process. I speak with journalist Hüseyin Doğru, who says EU sanctions turned him into a non-person inside Germany. The discussion covers the lack of trial or hearing, the struggle to challenge sanctions in court, frozen bank access, the seizure of his wife’s accounts, and the danger this creates for his children. They also discuss the silence of major media and unions, the wider use of sanctions and debanking against dissent, and the need for public protest and political pressure.’

Links: Hüseyin Doğru on X: https://x.com/hussedogru

Watch; Dr Chris Busby on JD Vance’s false flag mini nukes, Iran propaganda & nuclear vs. coal energy policy, Peter Borenius, 3 April 2026

Chris Busby; “Well, I would think that the most likely way of it all happening, if it’s going to happen, is that Netanyahu fires a load of nuclear bombs at Iran. The problem with that for him is it’s going to be a conventional nuclear weapon. And I haven’t come onto the unconventional ones I mentioned, but so far, we’re talking about plutonium and uranium bombs like Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Those things produce an enormous amount of fallout. They produce a load of cesium 137 and strontium 90 and a whole load of other horrible radioactive materials. And if they were used, would pretty much contaminate the whole area. Because of course, once this happens, this stuff blows all over the place. And so the entire area around the Middle East where they pump out the oil would be radioactively contaminated and everyone would have to leave. So those conventional atomic weapons that Israel has would create that. They would create a nuclear wasteland, a Mad Max wasteland in the whole of the Middle East. And the number of people who died would be quite significant. But anyway, of course, people would all run away. That’s what would happen. So before the radioactivity got high, they would all run away and live in Europe or wherever the nearest place was that wasn’t quite so radioactive. Of course, that radioactivity would spread all over the place. But for just a few of those weapons, it would not be enough to kill off the human race or anything bad like that because after all, they were huge loads of nuclear tests carried out in the Nevada desert and huge loads carried out in the Pacific in the 1960s and they didn’t kill off the human race, they just increased the cancer rate by a factor of about three or four globally. So that’s what would happen. But I haven’t moved on to the neutron weapon, the Lebanese, what I call Red Mercury, that one, because that doesn’t produce fallout. That one doesn’t produce fallout. It just produces neutrons and kills everybody. So it could be one of those that would work. They could easily have one of those sitting in their pocket and stroll into somewhere and blow it up.”

Read; Inside the £64bn Pharma Deal That Could Cost More Lives Than Covid, Bureau of Investigative Journalism, 13 April 2026

New UK–US pharma deal will mean that NHS pays pharma companies more for their medicines

Hundreds of thousands of deaths are predicted over 10 years due to money being diverted from other healthcare

Government’s claims about the value of the deal are dwarfed by experts’ calculations of its true cost

‘As for the deal itself, it commits the NHS to spend more on expensive new medicines and also to pay more for drugs it is already buying. It also affects how the assessments of new medicines will be made by NICE, the body that decides which drugs the NHS can purchase in England and Wales (Scotland and Northern Ireland are also informed by these decisions). This change in the NICE threshold means that some drugs will likely be approved that would previously have been rejected on grounds of cost-effectiveness – again taking money from the NHS budget. NICE said, “Our decisions strike a balance between making innovative treatments available to patients and ensuring the best use of public funding.” Agreements like this between the US and UK are vital in getting life-saving drugs to patients in the UK. But critics of the deal say that its funnelling of money away from hospital wards, A&E units and other vital forms of care will cost lives. In an open letter to Streeting, more than 200 experts, activists and health workers called the deal a “catastrophe” for all NHS patients. They described the possible consequences as “tragic” and “shocking”. Karl Claxton, a leading health economist who sat on NICE’s appraisal committee, led a team of researchers at the University of York to model potential outcomes. His findings are stark, “By 2033, the excess deaths from this deal will be greater than Covid.”

Despite the fact that the deal will have a huge impact on NHS spending and patients’ access to medicine, the government has refused to release key details about what it has actually agreed to. We sent freedom of information requests to both the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and DSIT asking for a copy of the deal’s impact assessment. Both departments refused to hand it over. DHSC said that releasing the information could undermine the UK’s negotiating position and damage future “commercial relations with the pharmaceutical sector”. DSIT, meanwhile, confirmed the existence of an unpublished annex to the impact assessment but said it will not make it public due to “international relations”. “We’re not allowed to see it because it might upset Donald?” said Scottish National Party member of parliament Seamus Logan on hearing about those denials. “That’s appalling. That’s absolutely appalling. “There has been absolutely no parliamentary scrutiny of the workings of this deal to date, and there absolutely must be,” he said. “We need to know what the cost of this deal really will be.”

Nick Dearden of the nonprofit Global Justice Now said; “When it comes to a piece of domestic policy regulation like NHS price controls, I find it extraordinary that the public or parliamentarians are not allowed to see their calculations.”‘

Watch; Psychiatrist EXPOSES the Sickness of Collective West Leadership | Niall McLaren, Neutrality Studies, 29 March 2026

‘What if the world at the moment seems insane because the people running its conflicts are in fact clinically psychotic? This is what I discuss today with the retired psychiatrist Dr. Niall MacLaren. We talk about his biocognitive model and how a craving for dominance dictates the actions of modern empires. His book, Narcisso-Fascism, explains why nations act like playground bullies and why we keep electing narcissists who love the rush of power. It is a deep dive into the testosterone economy and the biological reasons why peace is so hard to find in a world obsessed with being number one.’

Niall McLaren, 53.10; “Well, you just have to accept that the Chinese system is delivering. It is.”

Pascal Lottaz; “So is the Russian system, so is the Iranian system, to a good extent, it’s under strains for reasons, but they are delivering.”

Niall McLaren; “They deliver and get away from the notion that they have to do as we say. The American system is terrible. I’ve been in their hospitals, and they’re truly awful. And yet they just say, well, this is how it is but we’re the land of the brave and the land of the free. So we put up with that as long as we can walk around thinking we’re the strongest and toughest. So the propaganda and people like Murdoch and filling the world with trash and that has to stop. All of that’s got those got to stop.”

Pascal Lottaz; “So we got to find a way to do that. Is there. I mean, this is fascinating to me. Is there something that we didn’t talk about yet that you think you would want to address?”

Niall McLaren; “Lots, I think the trouble going on in the Middle East, it is so crystal clear that one group, small group, says we want 2 million square kilometres currently occupied by about 100 million people and they can all go, and we’ll have that because God said so. That is going to cause trouble, and the world has to say no, the entire world has to say no. The zionist project is only causing trouble. It has to be reined in and stopped. And they know that damn well, the zionists know that perfectly well. That’s why if you say anything against them, they attack you. They never say why you should support Israel, all they say is, if you don’t, you’re antisemitic, you’re guilty of a crime, and that’s just an ad hominem attack. That’s not an argument. It’s like an incantation, hocus pocus. You’re antisemitic, that silences you. That’s it. That’s what it is. So the world has to say to Israel that’s enough, stop, no more.”

Pascal Lottaz; “The interesting thing is, of course, that the large part of the world actually is not in favour of this and is saying this should stop. But the power structures are such that the violence can continue, and it does. And the people who get a kick out of this, they sit on the button and you can actually see it in Israeli society, how they even glorify this mass violence and mass slaughtering of Palestinians because it gives their group a kick out of it, so it’s just a football match on genocidal scale.”

Niall McLaren; “That’s correct. They’re just kicking heads. They’re not kicking footballs, they’re kicking heads around, kicking dead babies. And 90%, or something like that, of Americans, they don’t want to be involved. They don’t care. It’s only a small proportion of them, or maybe 80% don’t want to be involved, I’m not quite sure, but they don’t want to be involved, they just say we’ve got to look after ourselves. Why are we spending $200 billion there when we should be spending that on our hospitals and our schools? And they’re right, but the wrong people have got control of the country. Totally. In the case of the Trump administration, they are the absolute worst people. They’re like the Nazis. In fact, it’s the same in Israel. The programme for Greater Israel is, in political terms, precisely the same as Hitler’s programme for the Soviet Union. Invade, conquer, eliminate half the population, use the rest as serfs to build an eternal empire.”

Listen; AI Whistleblower: We Are Being Gaslit By The AI Companies! They’re Hiding The Truth About AI, Diary of a CEO, 26 March 2026

‘The truth about Sam Altman. AI Critic Karen Hao reveals what 90 OpenAI employees told her. Karen Hao is an AI expert, award-winning investigative journalist, and former reporter for The Wall Street Journal covering American and Chinese tech companies. She is also co-host of the podcast The Interface and freelances for publications like More Perfect Union and The Atlantic. Her latest book is the bestselling ‘EMPIRE OF AI: Inside The Reckless Race For Total Domination.’

She explains:

Why the US-China “AI arms race” may be misleading and politically driven

The truth behind the Pentagon using Claude for military strikes

Why AGI is a marketing scam used to consolidate trillion-dollar power

How agentic AI like OpenClaw will automate desk jobs within 18 months

The hidden human cost behind AI training

Chapters;

00:00:00 Intro 00:02:27 Why The AI Industry May Be Chasing Profit Over Progress 00:04:49 What 250 OpenAI Insiders Revealed Behind Closed Doors 00:10:48 Did Sam Altman Outmaneuver Elon Musk—Or Is There More To It? 00:14:47 What People Really Think About Sam Altman (And Why It Matters) 00:17:34 The Hidden Power Struggle To Remove Sam Altman 00:25:14 The Real Reason Companies Are Racing To Build AI 00:31:35 Do AI CEOs Truly Believe This Will Help Humanity? 00:33:08 Why OpenAI Refused To Be Part Of This Book 00:41:47 Why Sam Altman Was Forced Out 00:45:18 The Hidden Instability, What Was Altman Actually Disrupting Internally? 00:50:53 Ad Break 00:54:15 What Really Triggered Sam Altman’s Firing—And The Mass Exodus After 01:04:51 Should You Vote Based On AI Policies—And What’s At Stake? 01:12:30 How Robots Updating Instantly Could Change Everything 01:15:11 Will AI Surpass The Best Surgeons—And What Happens If It Does? 01:18:57 Are Self-Driving Cars Truly Safe 01:25:00 Which Jobs Actually Survive AI And Who Gets Left Behind? 01:35:03 What The Klarna CEO Reveals About The Future Of AI And Business 01:38:09 Ad Break 01:41:58 Is AI Quietly Eroding Meaning—And Impacting Health And The Planet? 01:50:52 How We Can Actually Build AI Without Putting Humanity At Risk 01:56:44 Will The AI Race Ever Slow Down Or Are We Past The Point Of Control?’

US taking control of global gas supply

Watch; Oil and Gas Wars, Analysis of global situation, UK Column News, 17 April 2026

Patrick Henningsen, at 16m00s; “US Liquid Natural Gas exports soared to record levels in March amid panic buying, and in April, even higher. And so you just look at the projections on this. They’re projecting now growth through 2030, so the whole industry, Wall street, everybody is dialled in on this right now. And you can watch the markets, you can watch the way it’s moving and you can see what’s happening here. So I just did a quick graph here. So the larger picture which we spoke about previously on this programme, we did speak about this, I think in February, March about Iran’s connection to Venezuela on this. The United States have intervened here in the last six months to basically stop or take control of the largest known oil reserves in Venezuela. They’ve moved in to throttle the Russian supply to the market, so they’ve hit Russia, throttled that market, and now they’re hitting the Persian Gulf. And if you look at that, that is basically a large percentage of the global export capacity, specifically going to China and the Far East. So that’s what the United States has done. You have to look at this strategically. And I believe, and I’m not alone, of course, a lot of analysts are now talking about this. Richard Medhurst, the British journalist, he’s done an excellent report on this recently and others have as well. So we’re looking at that situation here. And then look, bottom line, and we’ll bring up, this is the US industry here, US production, export volumes soaring. So in terms of oil and LNG, the United States is positioning itself to be the global go-to point. And they’re doing so, Mike, through piracy and sabotage and subterfuge and basically knocking out large percentages of the global market. They now have a near monopoly, which again we’ve been talking about for a long time on the European LNG market. They had a monopoly over Northern Europe, now they have it over the South. So this is to me what looks like the US establishment oil and gas industry, the foreign policy blob. They’re dialled into this. And this is the thing that no one’s talking about. And I think now we need to really look at this and realise that the Trump administration do have a plan and this is it.”

Watch; Israel: The story you won’t hear on MSM, UK Column News, 10 April 2026

Basil Valentine, at 7m20s; “We’ve got a big disconnect between what is in the public domain, particularly by the Israeli press, and the received wisdom, the accepted conventional reality that we have here, particularly in Britain. And the emergence of the Green Party as a significant force in UK politics has brought this into sharp focus. The latest Lord Ashcroft poll shows the Greens actually leading nationally for the first time, beating Reform. They’ve got over 31%. That brings people like the chap in the picture there, Bernard Mooney, into the picture because he’s holding up a sign saying that Israel knew about October 7th in advance and used it to cover up the subsequent evisceration of Gaza was that effect, and, of course, for deviating from the official narrative, he has been widely condemned, even though the Israelis themselves admit that they were responsible for some of those killed on and after October 7th. Crucially, Major General Nitzan Alon, who’s just stepped down as head of Israel’s hostages and missing persons unit, admitted not only that Israel knew it had killed the Bibas family and others, but also Israel knew that Hamas had not taken them. Plus, of course, we have the Hannibal directive from October 7th itself, where Israeli forces were ordered to kill anybody seen heading towards Gaza so that they could not be used as hostages. That applied to Israelis as well as Hamas fighters. Yoav Gallant admitted that. But these facts, of course, are inconvenient for an establishment, and by that I include the Labour Party, who want to reinforce the idea that, of course, Hamas were the only people responsible for killing anyone on October 7th. This letter is from the Labour leader of Lewisham Council condemning Bernard Mooney for what it calls conspiracy theories relating to October 7th and demanding, of course, that Zack Polanski and the Green Party disown him. I think this is a foretaste of what’s to come now that the Green Party is a major force in British politics and of course, is taking an increasingly anti-zionist stance. The motion at the spring conference to state as party policy that zionism is racism was filibustered the other day, but it’s bound to come back. And I shouldn’t think that Bernard Mooney is the only person who has discovered more about October 7th than the establishment would like us to know. But it’s really disgraceful of Labour Party apparatchiks to be accusing him or anybody else for that matter, of indulging in conspiracy theories regarding matters that the Israeli government themselves admit and that are out in the open in the public domain. So we’ve got this disconnect between what Israelis are willing to admit to and what is published in Israeli media, and on the other hand, the received wisdom, the consensus reality here in the UK, which brooks absolutely no dissent at all from the official narrative, which, of course, as we know, has been used to justify genocide.”

Max Blumenthal comments on the Elbit activists prosecution.

Max Blumenthal; “On April 13, six activists from Palestine Action went back to court after being acquitted this February. They had already served a year in prison in which they staged a hunger strike and one attempted suicide under extremely harsh conditions. If convicted, the six Palestine Action activists and 18 others will likely be sentenced as terrorists, facing long prison terms.

Let’s be completely clear, nothing that Palestine Action has done meets the commonly understood definition of terrorism, which is subjective anyway. The reality is that this group’s activism focuses on destroying weapons and damaging and occupying Israeli arms factories on British soil. And when they have been put on trial, juries have responded sympathetically to when defendants explained why they had targeted Israeli arms factories. And this has led to a series of dramatic acquittals. Now the British security state is so threatened by the prospect of further acquittals that it is corrupting the entire jury system and perverting whatever’s left of its democracy, all to protect an ethno-supremacist entity called Israel from the consequences of its genocidal actions.”

Huda Ammori, a co-founder of Palestine Action, brought a legal challenge, seeking a judicial review of the group’s proscription as a terrorist group and won. The government appealed and now Ammori’s lawyers are urging the Court of Appeal to uphold the High Court’s ruling.

Read; All eyes on the Court of Appeal, Hamza Yusuf, Declassified UK, 30 April 2026

The government’s appeal against the High Court ruling on the Palestine Action ban is before the courts – and the stakes could not be higher.

Among those watching the appeal closely will be over 3,300 people who have been arrested for defying the ban, including 523 in Trafalgar Square just this month.

But the case is also important for all who wish to demonstrate: the outcome will have acute ramifications for the right to protest, already diminished by several new laws in recent years.

Heard over two days in London this week, an unusually large panel of five judges rather than the standard three presided over the case, signalling its importance.

Last June, then home secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to ban Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act. The ban came into effect in July.

Huda Ammori, a co-founder of Palestine Action, brought an immediate legal challenge, seeking a judicial review of the group’s proscription.

In February, three senior judges found that the ban was unlawful on two grounds.

First, the proscription was a “very significant interference” with the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. Second, it breached the home secretary’s own policy on proscription.

However, after allowing the home secretary permission to appeal, the judges said that the ban should remain in place pending the appeal.

Now Ammori’s lawyers are urging the Court of Appeal to uphold the High Court’s ruling.

They’re also seeking a cross-appeal, arguing the ban was discriminatory on grounds of political opinion and ethnicity, and that Ammori should have been consulted before the proscription decision was made.

In an unprecedented move, Professor Peter Hallward hand-delivered a letter to the Court of Appeal signed by over 1,700 legal scholars and public figures – including Sally Rooney, Greta Thunberg, Brian Eno and Judith Butler – reading “We oppose genocide. We support Palestine Action.”

Defend Our Juries has described it as the largest single act of defiance against the ban, as the signatories risk arrest.

Police have spent well over £10 million enforcing the ban. Meanwhile, the Home Office has spent £700,000 on the legal battle.

Commenting on the case, Amnesty International said the Palestine Action ban was a grave misuse by the government of sweeping counter terror powers.

Human Rights Watch called the government’s direction “deeply alarming” and also warned that the UK is “adopting protest-control tactics” seen in countries where democracy is eroding.

Ms Ammori noted; “The ban on Palestine Action has created a profound chilling effect, fostering a climate of fear at precisely the moment when speaking out against Israel’s unrelenting crimes against humanity has been most urgent.”

Read; Starmer’s go-to excuse: ‘I was in the dark’. Don’t believe it. He’s deeply in the loop, Jonathan Cook, 17 April 2026

‘From Jimmy Savile to Peter Mandelson, Starmer has followed a trajectory of career-enhancing ignorance. He knows far more than he lets on. It’s the reason, after all, why he was knighted. Sir Keir Starmer must be the most ignorant man ever to have entered high office.’

Here are a few highlights:

– As Director of Public Prosecutions, Starmer was apparently never consulted on his office’s decision, in late 2009, not to prosecute prolific, and highly connected, paedophile Jimmy Savile, despite Savile being one of the most famous figures in Britain. Starmer claims he didn’t even know that his own Crown Prosecution Service had opened a file on Savile, a friend to the then Prince, now King, Charles. It will never be possible to confirm or dispute Starmer’s account because all the CPS files related to the case were destroyed – under Starmer’s watch.

– Again as DPP, Starmer was supposedly not informed that the CPS was insisting through 2010 and 2011 that Sweden press on with sexual assault allegations against Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, despite a lack of evidence. Assange had deeply embarrassed the UK and US by exposing their war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. Starmer’s officials again secretly destroyed the email trail between the CPS and Sweden that would likely have illuminated his role in the affair.

– As Labour leader, Starmer apparently had no knowledge of the fraudulent activities being carried out by Labour Together, the shadowy think tank that brought him to power, including its covert campaign to smear journalists who tried to expose its criminal acts.

– As prime minister, Starmer claims to have had no idea of the depth of the ties between Peter Mandelson and serial paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, even though Mandelson was the most influential figure in the Labour party backing his bid to become leader. In return, Starmer would promote Mandelson in late 2025 as ambassador to the US.

– Starmer said this week that he was kept in the dark that Mandelson had, in fact, failed vetting by the British security services for the post of ambassador. That requires that we believe his own Foreign Office, which overruled the security services’ decision, did so without consulting with him.

This is one long trajectory of career-enhancing incompetence. Does any of it sound even vaguely plausible?

There are lots of clues as to what might really be going on.

Such as a spate of secret flights to Washington by Starmer in 2011, when he was DPP, to meet top US law officials that, against protocol, went unrecorded. What was discussed will never be known because all CPS files related to the flights were, once again, destroyed. However, the meetings are likely to have included discussions, later acted on, to seek Assange’s extradition to the US for political crimes so he could be disappeared into one of its super-max jails.

Or Starmer’s decision in 2017, as a shadow cabinet minister, to secretly joining the shadowy, CIA-linked Trilateral Commission without telling the Labour party’s then leader, Jeremy Corbyn. Notably, Lord Mandelson has also enjoyed the rare “privilege” of being invited to join the Commission.

Or Starmer’s failure to declare to Labour members that his campaign to become Labour leader had been underwritten by prominent pro-Israel lobbyist Trevor Chinn.

Secrecy and destruction of records have been a consistent pattern under Starmer. Chinn was also the key funder of the Labour Together think-tank, which failed to declare its funding – and main donors – in violation of Electoral Commission rules, most likely to prevent Labour members knowing that its activities were being bankrolled, and the party captured, by billionaires like Chinn.

Starmer is far more in the loop than he lets on. After all, that is precisely why he is Sir Keir Starmer. For nearly two decades, his job has been to do exactly whatever the British establishment has demanded of him.’

Watch; The Confession That Never Made Headlines, islamicreminder, 12 April 2026

“We have a few days ago, an Israeli parliamentarian said, we can do what we want. I’m paraphrasing, nobody cares. We can kill 100 Palestinians in Gaza over one night, which has been happening with frequency and nobody cares anymore. The world will just let us do it. And it seems that our media are determined to prove him right because for weeks now we’ve had a UK surgeon who’s working out of a hospital in Gaza. He’s been giving interviews and saying, this is what it’s like. It’s 100 killed one night, 150 killed another night, 70, 75, another night. He says, this is a slaughterhouse. This is like being in a slaughterhouse. We have seen the Israeli government absolutely say the quiet part out loud that what they’re doing is ethnic cleansing in Gaza and we are not covering it. It is not on the front pages of our newspapers and that in itself is a disgrace. And that is what allows it to keep going.”

Hero Gaddafi’s 96-minute speech lambasting the UN and US

Watch; Gaddafi last speech at the UN, callofhistoria, 14 August 2025

“In 2009, Muammar Gaddafi spoke at the United Nations for the first time and gave a speech no one would forget. Normally leaders speak for fifteen minutes, but Gaddafi spoke for ninety-six. Right from the start he attacked the UN Security Council, saying it was controlled by a few powerful countries that used it for their own benefit while ignoring smaller nations. He criticised the US-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, calling them illegal and harmful to millions of people. Then came the most dramatic moment, Gaddafi held up the UN Charter, read from it and threw it aside in anger. At one point, he tore a page to show how badly those promises had been broken. He also demanded investigations into the killings of John F Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. and called for trillions of dollars in compensation to Africa for its colonial history. He then mocked the UN for failing to solve major problems and suggested a bold idea, combine Israel and Palestine into one country where everyone has equal rights. Some delegates clapped, others walked out. Love him or hate him, that day, Gaddafi made sure the world was watching.”

Beware of AI-generated interviews.

Watch; Iran’s Shahab-3 Just Obliterated Dimona — The World Will Never Be The Same, Scott Ritter Updates, 10 April 2026

Email from J R G Walker;

Subject: Is this reliable info or AI disinfo? The problem we now have!

‘There are a few glitches and odd pronunciations in the Scott Ritter video (such as ‘one-e-three hundred kilometres’ at 3:34 instead of ‘one thousand, three hundred’ or ‘thirteen hundred’ as most Americans would say). Also, if it’s real and Ritter has the evidence, why does he not show any of it? There’s a distinctly AI-style to the narrative, most particularly noticeable in the characteristic cataloguing of all the things that don’t apply before saying what it was (“it’s not this; it’s not that; rather, it’s so-on-and-so-forth” sort of thing). The narrative is monotonous and laboured, making the same points repeatedly to pad the content out. Contrary to what the ‘Ritter’ claims, the IAEA does not appear to have noted any event of significance in Dimona, which is surprising if it is true that Dimona has already suffered three previous Iranian strikes during the conflict. It does seem that the Jordanian government has indeed issued potassium iodide tablets either as a precautionary measure or that it is planning to do so.

There are weird glitches in the MacGregor video: at 0:03 “at 3.12 inches the morning” and at 1:40 “build the tank’s legendary survivability … features” (a typical AI text-to-speech delay), and again at 3:13 “celebrated fleets in modern military … history”; again at 4:05 “built and maintained at … enormous cost?”; again at 13:04 “no serious coverage in … Western media”. Most significantly at 25:23 we have “revolution of one thousand, nine hundred and seventy-nine” instead of “… nineteen seventy-nine”; furthermore, American speakers do not typically say “…hundred AND seventy-nine”, they just say “…hundred seventy-nine”. The speech is also punctuated by many oddly-placed ‘Uh’ insertions. There’s also the repeated ‘both-hands-lifting’ gestures at odd junctures and with unnatural timing.

It’s hard to say for sure but I’d be willing to bet these videos are both AI-generated. What we can be sure of is that it will become increasingly harder to discern AI-generated content from the real thing.Having said all that, the knowledge of military hardware, protocols and so on seems genuinely insightful. What is unclear is whether all the events referred to actually happened.’

Covid Vaccine Scam

Watch; Dr David Cartland versus Goliath, UK Column News, 7 April 2026

‘In this deeply personal and shocking Part 2 interview, Dr Cartland outlines the relentless persecution he has endured since he and Liz last spoke in December 2025. Dr Cartland was struck off the medical register after a tribunal hearing at the end of 2025. Now, in a highly unusual development, the Disclosure and Barring Service has placed him on the Vulnerable Adults’ and Children’s Barred Lists. This has led to the Football Association banning him, and Dr Cartland can no longer referee at football games or watch any football matches.He describes his punishments and treatment as a witch-hunt; one he says he has endured at the hands of the General Medical Council and other authorities since becoming a Covid whistleblower in 2021.However, despite the best efforts of the authorities to silence him and destroy his life, Dr Cartland says he will continue to speak truth to power and fight for justice. This is his sobering, but also inspiring, story of a real David versus Goliath battle.’

Watch; Vaccine injury and NAC, Dr John Campbell, 18 April 2025

Intro; “Doctor detoxifies herself from spike protein. Great academic discussion with Dr. Tina Peers. Never start or stop any medical treatment based on these videos, always go to your own health care provider.’

Dr Tina Peers, at 11m10s; “When you know your body and you know what you’re normally like and you can see these things are suddenly all happening and it was immediately after the injection, so we were on a quest to find how to help people and how to help myself, and then in the April of 2023, I came across the Zero Spike Project and somebody had alerted me to it, they said, oh, there’s going to be an interesting presentation for the World Council for Health on their Monday evening Zoom, open to everybody, all the public. And I had been watching them, but I didn’t watch all of them religiously, I was just busy with life, so anyway, I was alerted to this and I watched it and it was Fabio Zoffi from the Zero Spike Project. Now, this is a not for profit organisation that he set up with a few people at the beginning of the pandemic and they set themselves the task of trying to sort out all the health issues that were caused by the infection and also by the injection. They’ve written pages and pages, their scientists have studied all the effects of the spike protein in the body and this absolutely fantastic bible of all the problems and they’ve really researched it and then they were looking to get rid of the spike and they realised that because it’s not a human protein, we haven’t developed over evolution, a way of clearing it out of our bodies. So once you’ve got it, you’ve got it, which is why my symptoms persisted, etc. And they were trying different supplements out with the spike protein to see if anything would clear it, and they found that ordinary N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) when it was mixed with the spike protein, under the electron microscope, they could see that some of the spike protein was broken up into six pieces and they got really excited about that. But it was only a small percentage, 2%, 3%, 12% maybe, I think in one study it went up to 24% but most of the time it was less than that. And they were like, well, that’s not enough. It’s good, it’s a good start, but it’s not enough. And they were working with a quantum physicist and he said, ‘it’s a bit like light and a laser beam, you can have a torch where the light is all diffuse and then you can have a laser beam where all the light is in a very ordered way, and then it’s more powerful as a laser. And so they made a machine to make all the molecules in the NAC exactly like the ones that were doing the denaturing and the breaking up. I think of it like a parade ground with lots and lots of soldiers milling around and it’s just a mess, there’s loads of people milling around, they’re all the same, but they’re just not ordered. And then you say to them, attention, sound to attention, and suddenly they’re all ordered and they all look more powerful, organised, et cetera. It’s exactly the same thing with these molecules. So they made them all line up the way that the ones that had that potential to do that, the power to do that. So suddenly you had much more of the NAC that could do the denaturing. And when they mixed it with the spike protein, having done that, having augmented, denatured 99.8%, so it became much more powerful. So the ordinary N-acetyl cysteine will do something, but the augmented stuff is more. Is more potent. Much more powerful, so it literally goes up to 99.8% and it also does a couple of other things. It reduces the clots in the blood by 68%. They went down by 68% and ordinary NAC did about 11% of the clots, but it just became much more powerful. “

Read; Moderna Begins Injecting 4,000 Adults with modRNA Bird Flu Pandemic Vaccine Jon Fleetwood, 22 April 2026

‘New avian influenza jab funded with $54 million from Bill Gates’ vaccine cartel CEPI.’

‘In a major acceleration of bird flu pandemic orchestration and mass vaccination infrastructure, Moderna, Inc. yesterday announced that “the first participants in the U.S. and UK have been dosed in a Phase 3 study of the Company’s investigational mRNA-based H5 pandemic influenza vaccine candidate, mRNA-1018.”

This is the first mRNA-based pandemic influenza (H5 bird flu) vaccine to reach Phase 3 clinical trials anywhere in the world.

The move comes after President Donald Trump selected a military influenza pandemic policy architect—Dr. Erica Schwartz, who built and enforced surveillance, vaccination, and compliance systems—to take control of the CDC.

Signalling its high confidence that there will be future demand for influenza vaccines, Moderna announced on the same day that another of its influenza jabs, mCOMBRIAX® (mRNA-1083), has been granted marketing authorisation by the European Commission (EC).

Moreover, the Trump administration is currently funding gain-of-function experiments on influenza pathogens.

Just as coronavirus gain-of-function experiments and vaccine development (the problem and the solution) were simultaneously carried out before the COVID-19 pandemic, the same dual-track approach is now being applied to influenza—advancing high-risk pathogen work in parallel with the rapid rollout of mRNA vaccine platforms designed to respond to it.

Moderna’s Phase 3 bird flu injection is the real-time deployment of a DARPA-backed system that has long treated influenza viruses and mRNA countermeasures as part of the same pipeline—where pathogens can be constructed or reconstructed in the lab, converted into genetic sequences, and rapidly turned into injectables.

That system—funded by DARPA, revived by CEPI, and framed through ongoing pandemic warnings—is now moving into mass human trials, under a federal apparatus set to be led by the very architect of its military-run influenza pandemic surveillance, vaccination, and compliance infrastructure.’

Watch; Why was the ambition to get 90% of the population vaccinated? The Brownstone Show, 24 March 2026

Sonia Elijah, 42m00s; “They absolutely weaponised fear, they used coercion. And this is in the government white papers. I think it’s around mid-March 2020, you have a SAGE meeting going on where they absolutely say, I’ve actually even highlighted it in the book, you’ve got ‘use media to increase sense of personal threat’. So you have that. And so I’ve got a screenshot of that in the book. So this in their meetings, this is the SVIB subcommittee. And the report goes on to state how they’re going to use coercion, they’re going to explicitly use that in order to change people’s behaviour. It’s all about modifying behaviour, nudging people to follow the rules. So this is a covert psychological operation going on, and it’s in black and white there and they used it against the public. We know that as well as censorship, and we haven’t really discussed that much with the Trusted News Initiative how we had citizens under surveillance. And  if you really  sit back and think about it, it’s like a movie. The mind boggles what they got away with.”

Jeffrey Tucker; ” And I always keep going back to like, what was the point of this? And the entire thing, so it’s to test level of population compliance, to test mechanisms of controlling the public mind with censorship and that sort of thing. But then fundamentally it was to test a new technology, a new pharmaceutical technology. But it always struck me as strange, we know that the only medically significant consequences of COVID itself were restricted to an elderly population that was infirm for the most part. And in that way it’s different from a typical flu season, which actually harms a broader range of the public. And you believe you have this miracle, inoculation, whatever. Why was the ambition to get 90% of the population vaccinated? Or at least that’s what Fauci would say in the US.Was it just to sell more product?”

Sonia Elijah; “I think partly, yes. Get more shots in the arms, get more products sold, but also, we’ve missed out another key point, which I do mention in the book, is the introduction of vaccine passports. I do think vaccine passports is key because I see vaccine passports being a gateway to digital IDs. And this is the landscape. What we’re in now, Jeffrey, is we are seeing this rise in digital authoritarianism, we’re seeing this real push for digital IDs and vaccine passports. They were proof of concept that it worked, that we got people to use these QR codes and your vaccination status in order to just be part of society, in order to go to the theatre, in order to fly and get on a plane, in order to travel, in order to go to work.”

Jeffrey Tucker; “Did you have physical proof of vaccinations, like a piece of paper, or is everything digital?”

Sonia Elijah; “It’s like an app. You would download this NHS app, and every country had their own one, every country. And then you obviously have the EU. I know, in different states in the US, they had their passes, these COVID passes to be able to fly in Canada as well. And so I really think the vaccine passports was key to get people to comply with that and literally give up their freedoms, that’s the way they would get their freedoms is by complying. It’s really incredible if you think about it. But what I do talk about is the resistance to it, which is the freedom truckers in Canada, that whole protest and that was based on to push back against these vaccine passports. And we know what happened to the truckers and all their supporters, we had their bank accounts frozen. You’ve got debanking going on, you’ve got Trudeau invoking the Emergencies Act that had never been invoked before. It’s just incredible. I would say we’re at that precipice of this digital authoritarianism that the west seems to be sliding into.”

Provoked War With Russia

Watch; Hundreds Of Ukrainian Soldiers Have Surrendered! – NATO Is In A Panic, Efe Burke, 24 April 2026

Jeffrey Sachs; “Well, there should be a deal to end the war. First of all, this is a war that could have been avoided entirely. It was a war caused fundamentally by the US determination to expand NATO to Ukraine over Russia’s repeated and vociferous objections. In other words, it was a clash between the US and Russia in a proxy war in Ukraine. The war could have been avoided had the United States sensibly said we shouldn’t push our military alliance right up against Russia’s border, just like we would not tolerate Russia pushing its military, say up to our border in Mexico or someplace close to the US border. So we should have behaved better, that would have avoided the war. This war broke out in 2014 when the US helped to topple a government. So we shouldn’t have engaged in illegal regime change operations in Ukraine in 2014. We should have negotiated with Russia to avoid Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, which was actually the eighth year of an ongoing war, but a significant escalation. Before that escalation, President Putin had put on the table proposals for US-Russia, security arrangements that could have basically ended the conflict. The US under Biden refused to negotiate those. Another mistake then. This war could have ended in the spring of 2022, just weeks after Russia’s escalation because what Russia wanted was for Ukraine to say, okay, we’ll be neutral, we won’t join NATO. And Ukraine actually said that immediately after the Russian invasion in February 20, 2022. Zelenskyy said, okay, we’ll accept neutrality. And in Istanbul, Russia and Ukraine teams from the two countries hammered out an agreement which was nearly completed in April 2022. And then the United States and UK jumped in and told the Ukrainians, no, you keep fighting, you don’t have to accept neutrality, we have your back. That was perhaps a million dead since then because of the US telling Ukraine keep fighting, keep fighting our proxy war. Well, all of this is to say that the proposals now on the table, as far as we can judge, are worse than what was on the table for Ukraine in April 2022 because Russia’s made advances on the battlefield. But still the core of what it seems is on the table right now is the United States saying NATO won’t enlarge to Ukraine. The US will de facto recognise Russia’s new territories that were added on the battlefield. That is eastern Ukraine, the so-called Donbas region and parts of southern Ukraine, two regions called Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, and there would be security arrangements so that Russia would not invade further into Ukraine. Ukraine would not send missiles crashing into Russia afterwards. It’s all sensible and I hope this is what they’re actually discussing. Strangely enough, the Europeans are jumping up and down saying no, no, Ukraine must have the right to join NATO which would just continue this war and its devastation for no purpose. Zelensky is a dictator right now. He rules by martial law. The Ukrainian people are exhausted. They want a negotiated outcome. But Zelensky and a pretty corrupt government seem to want to carry on the war if someone will fund it and arm them. And so Zelensky’s position is ambiguous. And what the Russians exactly are going to accept will depend on the details of what’s really on the table. Often what happens is that the United States pre-negotiates with Europeans and with Zelensky and then turns to the Russians and the Russians say, no thank you, that’s not an agreement, we’ll continue to fight on. So the long and the short of it is if Trump is clear, consequent, realistic, the war will end. And he has to tell the Europeans and Ukraine, look, this is a lost war, it’s devastating to Ukraine, it never should have happened. NATO enlargement to Ukraine was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a casus belli cause of this war and we’re putting an end to all this fighting. And the Europeans, if they jump up and down, they can’t really do anything about it if the United States is firm and Zelensky can’t fight on if the United States is firm. So we’re potentially probably odds on likely to be near the end of this, this absolutely useless war.”

Watch; GERMANY IN THE CROSSHAIRS — RUSSIA MAY STRIKE POLAND, Pamela Messias, 23 April 2026

Larry Johnson; ” I don’t see how we avoid what I’ll call a global war. The continued assistance of Europe to Ukraine and providing drones is something that Russia is going to respond to, and they will, I believe they will attack the drone manufacturers in Germany or in Poland or in the UK or wherever they are. I think Russia is finally going to attack it and destroy it. And they’ll probably use the Oreshnik missile. I’m sitting here watching in just disbelief that Europe as a whole, they’re talking openly about building up their military capabilities because they want to go to war with Russia and it’s insanity. And the Russians have been watching this and not really reacting forcefully yet, but I think they’re going to take pre-emptive action, whether it’s against the Baltics or against Germany, but Russia is not going to sit back and wait to get punched.”

Watch; They’re Preparing BRITAIN for War – And YOU Are Involved,The Standards Guy, 12 April 2026

‘Not just the military… the entire country. Senior defence figures are warning that Britain must be ready for conflict — and that includes infrastructure, industry, and potentially YOU. But here’s the problem: We’re not ready.’

Tim Davies; “Apparently the whole nation’s going to war. That’s all being told now by the senior British military officer, a guy called Rich Knighton. Now, I know Rich Knighton because I actually interviewed for his personal staff officer position about 2015 and I rejected the position mid-interview. Nothing to do with Richard, of course. He’s a lovely man, fiercely intelligent, he’s an engineer. He was actually Chief of Air Staff after Mike Wigston, who brought in the whole diversity into the Royal Air Force. So we’re going to talk a little bit about that. I want to play you a 10 second clip with him and Deborah Haynes just talking about how we have to recalibrate ourselves as a nation because we’re all going to war, apparently.”

Rich Knighton, Chief of Defence Staff; “But your point is absolutely right. That threat is increasing. That’s why we need to improve and expand and spend more on defence, which we’re planning to do, but also it affects the whole nation. What we do in the armed forces matters, but for our population, our people, we need to recognise that that picture has changed. The peace dividend that we’ve enjoyed for the last 30 years is coming to an end.”

Tim Davies; “Now, one thing you have to remember when he talks about that is our armed forces are so depleted, it must be, because it keeps asking guys like me to come back, that the actual people are going to go and fight these wars are not really the regular armed forces. They don’t really exist in any kind of way, shape or form that could actually fight a conflict. They’re just the shock troops. If you go back to 1939, you think about who started this is why there was appeasement in 1938, because we never had a military. So these people that start the war, not the same people that finished the war, the people that went on the boats back in 1944 and they went to Normandy and they invaded Europe, not many of those people actually started the war. They get killed, there’s a rate of attrition. So if you think that you’re not going to be involved in any future conflict, you’re wrong. And I know you don’t think you’re wrong, but I’m telling you, you’re wrong and I’m on your side. I’m there with you because I’ve done 20 years military service, I don’t want to do anymore. But what Richard here is saying is the whole country has to be involved. Now, the Ukrainian Chief of Staff, he said that war is started by career soldiers and finished by teachers, engineers and accountants. He would know, because he’s seen what happens in Ukraine. They’re running out of men. And it’s really interesting to me that so many people are saying, well, I’m not going to go to war. It’s like, no, you won’t have a choice, mate. You won’t have a choice. What Richard is saying is it’s total war. Now, what total war is, is when our whole industrial base, if we still have one, is geared up towards conflict and that conflict may not be here in the UK, In fact, it probably won’t be. It’ll be something like, here’s how it’s going to manifest itself, is food prices will get so high, oil and gas prices will get so high, etc. etc, there’ll be riots on the street, massive protests, all that kind of stuff and then the government will say, well, we’ve got to go to war to solve this. And it might be Iran, Straits of Hormuz, it might be China with Taiwan, it might be Russia with further movement into Europe, which won’t ever happen because Schrodinger’s Russia, that’s the Russia that’s going to take over the whole world and take over the whole of Europe, but it can’t even take the whole of Ukraine. You can’t have both, mate.”

Watch; Russia in strong position, Putin in control w/ Gordon Hahn, The Duran, 4 April 2026

Gordon Hahn, at 5m20s; “There’s clearly impatience, dissatisfaction with the slowness. If you don’t understand the tactics and strategy that the Kremlin has decided to use in the progress in the war, it looks rather slow. But if you understand the tactics and strategy you see that it’s purpose is… it’s not through any military incompetence or necessarily bad strategy. It might be an inappropriate strategy, one could argue that, yes, there should be a harder line in terms of the way the war is being conducted, and that’s a legitimate argument and happens all the time inside countries and states and regimes that are undergoing a war, there’s differences over how one should approach the situation. Another issue is I think that the hard line that’s driving the hard line critique is the mounting drone attacks deep inside Russia, hitting oil and gas infrastructure, and there’s also a rise in the number of civilians who were being killed and injured, wounded by these attacks, so that’s creating consternation. And then you have the big driver, I think, in pushing things to a higher volume in terms of criticism, was the attack on Putin’s residency, which you pointed to as possibly leading to a new hard line. I think it’s definitely played a role in raising the temperature among hardliners. There’s no doubt about that, and I think in addition you add in the recent events with Iran, the Iranian war, because the Russians, for various reasons, Iran is seen as a near ally, a strategic partner. And Alexander Dugan, for example, has written an article saying Iran today, Russia tomorrow. And then you add in the fact that the beginning of the Iranian war began with a decapitation attack on the background of what had happened in Valdai with the apparent attempted assassination of Putin and Trump’s alleged role in that, in freezing Putin in place by telling him over the phone that I’m going to get back to you, I’m going to go talk to Zelensky, stay in place. And there was a legitimate wonder about whether Trump was engaging in what might have been an assassination attempt. So I think all those factors have led to outrage on the more traditional side of the political spectrum. So there’s no doubt about that. The question is, does this amount to a pre-coup situation? Does this make a pre-coup situation? And there’s no evidence of collaboration between different whims. There are no defections from the regime. There’s no criticism from high ranking officials.

18m35s; Putin described the war as a special military operation. This was specifically said to indicate, or a reflection of the fact, that they did not declare war on Ukraine. If they had declared war on Ukraine, gone to the Duma and so forth and declared war on Ukraine, you would see a completely different kind of military operation. You would have massive tank and personnel-carrier attacks, frontal attacks and so forth and so on. There’s several reasons why Putin decided not to engage in this kind of mass war that we’ve had in Europe since the Napoleonic era . The first is the domestic political reason, not necessarily the most important, but first comes to mind is domestic political reasons. He doesn’t want to have a large number of casualties because this is going to provoke dissent and discontent inside the country. So by using the tactics they engage in a phase of attrition and then when the enemy becomes weak, they advance forward territorially. But the main object, as you’ve noted and other military experts have noted, is that the idea is to destroy the fighting force of Ukraine, so this means that of course territorial gains are going to be incremental. That’s because this is not the main task. Now at some point they may have to go over into targeting the capital because they’ve realised that Zelensky is not going to engage in any peace talks seriously anyway, or there’s some provocation or the Maidan regime begins to collapse and Russia is going to have to step in to create order. There are all sorts of scenarios where this strategy and these tactics may have to be changed, but for now, this is the process. The second is, they say that Putin is weak because he doesn’t want to confront the West. Well, he’s not being weak, he’s being smart. He doesn’t need to have a war with NATO. He doesn’t need to have NATO directly involved putting boots on the ground, though I don’t think it would create a great problem, it would certainly lead to likely a situation where Putin might have to declare war and declare war on Ukraine, and he would also be fighting a larger number of forces which would increase the casualties, so it essentially would undermine his entire strategy for managing the war. So it’s not a matter of weakness, it’s a matter of being careful and intelligent. I’ve always argued that Putin’s a balancer, he always finds the golden mean between extremes. So what you’re seeing now emerging in society is a frustration in Russian society, which is leading to an extremist inclination that, ‘we just need to get this thing over, let’s bomb the decision-making centres,  let’s kill Zelensky, let’s just take all the of 100,000 reserves in and around Ukraine, maybe 200,000, and just go in full force and drive to the Dnieper at all costs, regardless of casualties and get this thing over with. And I think this is an extreme position. Putin basically tends to play the role of a balancer inside the regime and inside the society. He’s  a grown-up in the room and he tries to find the golden mean between different extremes. So on the one hand, he’s not for a free-rein market economy, but he’s not for a full state market economy. He’s not for a completely liberal republic, but he’s also not for an outright dictatorship, he’s balancing between those types of regimes. He’s not for American-style freedom of the press and freedom of speech, it’s a more toned down version. But you also have something very similar in England, for good or bad. It’s their country, it’s not my country, so I’m not going to make recommendations, but this is Putin’s approach, it’s his country and this is his approach.

57m00s; The drone attacks are significant. That was one of the things I wanted to bring up as a problem that I think Putin definitely does need to address because we’ve seen it over the course of March, the number of drone attacks hitting Russia, although most of them are taken down, but nonetheless over time that’s going to cause Russia problems, hitting sometimes over, over 300, I believe they hit one day, whereas before, they were able to shoot 30, 40, 50, now they’re routinely sending into Russia 150, 200 drones per night or per day per 24-hour period, and I think that that is a problem, and that can also raise the temperature of the critique coming from the hardliners. And to some extent there’s been an uptick in the number of civilians killed because of these drone attacks. And that can create problems with public opinion over time, depending on how far this goes. Putin’s last draw again is to declare war and go in full bore or do something close to that to satisfy the hardliners and then certainly put an end to this thing. But, I think this is true, actually without moving towards a full scale war, is there’s this grave risk of a quagmire in that, say the Russians drive all the Ukrainians beyond the Dnieper and then, plus you have their ability now to use drones. They can carry on the war from the other side of the Dnieper for a long time, getting continued Western assistance. Of course, it’s scaled down from what it used to be and probably is not going to increase essentially given the Iranian war, but nonetheless, it’s a problem that could fester for a long time. And then if you add on top of it, either before the retreat beyond the Dnieper or after a collapse of the Zelensky regime because of the crisis of the war and the country basicallybreaking up into different fiefdoms controlled by warlords, something akin to what happened during the 1917 revolution. And the Russians would then have a real problem on this border. They may not be dealing with a NATO Ukraine, but they’re dealing with a festering wound that they would have to possibly then move in to deal with. So there are a lot of traps that lay ahead in this thing for Russia and for the rest of us going forward.”

Zionism is a Colonial State Project / Iran, Israel, Gaza, Syria

Take Action; No Tax for Genocide, No Tax for War, April 2026

‘Use the law to uphold the law. If you pay tax, you have a right to challenge where your money goes. You don’t need to break the law to take a stand against what’s happening in the Middle East — you just need to harness it. By setting up a Taxation Trust you can lawfully withhold tax until there’s unequivocal proof that public money will only be used legally and ethically. You’re not evading or avoiding paying tax by using a Taxation Trust. Instead you’re holding power to account and demanding the UK stops financing war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Follow above link for more information.’

This No Tax for War Q&A Zoom session took place on 27 April 2026, hosted by Rich with Chris, Hugh, and others responding to questions. Several participants also share their experiences. Key topics include:

Practical aspects of using taxation trusts and managing deeds

Liability order and enforcement agent challenges

Responding to HMRC and local authority correspondence

Navigating court proceedings

The statutory provisions used to underpin the No Tax for War approach

A further look at the Consolidated Fund (building on the discussion in the 13 April 2026 session).

The next Q&A will be on Monday 11 May at 7pm.

Join the No Tax for War community for upcoming Q&A details

Join us on Telegram at NoTaxForWar.com Chat

Israel

Watch; If Trump resists Israel, they’ll kill him and terrorise America: observers; Nick Fuentes, James Hill, 10 April 2026,

‘Should we expect exploding phones and remote-controlled plane crashes? What do Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Green, Joe Kent, and a Mossad leader have in common? They and others claim American officials and taxpayers are slaves to Israel.

Nick Fuentes (in video), for example, details dangers citizens face:

Nick Fuentes; “Can an American president tell Israel no? Will we have to go to war with our own country to do this? What is Joe Lonsdale going to think? If or when Trump tells Netanyahu no, what is Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, Joe Lonsdale, Shaun Maguire, Bill Ackman, Ronald Lauder — what are these people going to think?What are they going to do to our country? If Trump tells Israel no, are our pagers going to explode? Are our radios and pagers and iPhones going to explode? Is Starlink going to stop working? Is a dirty bomb going to go off in New York City? Is Trump going to get assassinated in his motorcade like JFK?What is going to happen if an American president tells Israel no?

Because what it seems like is we’re going to have to fight a war in America if that happens.What happened to the Ayatollah? He was at his residence when a Tomahawk missile came out of the sky and killed him.Is something like that going to happen? Does the U.S. president have to go underground like Iran’s missiles?Does the U.S. president have to hunker down under the White House, under a hundred feet of clay, to tell Israel no?Does he have to end all of his public appearances and get rid of all of his devices and background check all his Secret Service and go to the — whatever that fortress is in Colorado, in the Rocky Mountains? Is he going to have to do that in preparation to tell Israel, here’s how it’s going to work: You don’t get to destroy Iran.”

Tucker: ‘Israel controls the White House’

Tucker Carlson agrees America can’t say no to Israel, as evidenced by U.S. National Counterterrorism Center ex-director Joe Kent’s assertion that the FBI stopped investigation of foreign involvement in Trump’s “assassination attempt” in Butler PA and in Charlie Kirk’s death or disappearance.

Another truth bomb from Nick Fuentes

Watch; Without America, the Whole World Turns To Iran islamicreminder, 29 April 2026

‘A podcast host asked the question nobody in power will touch: what actually happens to Israel the day America pulls its support? This scenario, deeply rooted in current geopolitics, suggests a potential iran israel war and significant shifts in the middle east. He spoke facts, highlighting how such a move could trigger widespread world news and reactions. The comments section went wild, reflecting global concerns about a possible US Iran war and its broader politics.’

Read or Listen; The West’s bubble of illusion about Israel – and about itself – is finally being burst Jonathan Cook; 1 May 2026

The genocide in Gaza and ethnic cleansing in Lebanon exhausted the West’s moral legitimacy. Now Iran is slowly exhausting the West’s military primacy.

For decades, two irreconciliable narratives about Israel and its motivations have existed in parallel.

On the one side, an official western narrative portrays a plucky, besieged “Jewish” state of Israel, desperate to make peace with its hostile Arab neighbours. Even to this day, that story dominates the political, media and academic landscape.

Time and again, or so we are told, Israel has held out an olive branch to “the Arabs”, seeking acceptance, but is always rebuffed.

A largely unspoken subtext suggests that supposedly irrational, bloodthirsty, Jew-hating regimes across the region would have completed the Nazis’ exterminationist agenda but for the West’s humane protection of a vulnerable minority.

A Palestinian counter-narrative, accepted across much of the rest of the world, is choked into silence in the West as an antisemitic “blood libel”.

It presents Israel as an ethnic supremacist, highly militaristic state – armed by the United States and Europe – bent on expansion, mass expulsions and land theft.

On this view, the West implanted Israel as a colonial military outpost, there to subdue the native Palestinian population, and terrorise neighbouring states into submission through relentless and overwhelming displays of force.

Palestinians cannot make peace, or reach any kind of accommodation, because Israel pursues only conquest, domination and erasure. No middle ground is possible.

The proof, note Palestinians, is Israel’s long-standing refusal to define its borders. As its military power has grown decade after decade, ever more extreme political agendas have surfaced, demanding not just Israel’s takeover of the last remnants of the Palestinian territories it illegally occupies but expansion into neighbouring states like Lebanon and Syria.

Iran

Watch; The 1953 CIA Secret CNN Forgot to Mention islamicreminder, 30 April 2026

Presenter; “They’re religious jihadis who want to eliminate western society, our way of life, they hate our way of life.”

Abby Phillip, CNN; “They overthrew the Shah of Iran, who we imposed on Iran because the Dulles brothers, one at the CIA and one at the State Department, decided that the oil beneath the soil of Iran belonged to BP and belonged to us. And when Mosaddegh, who was the leader of Iran, said that we would like to audit BP because we want to know if you are cheating us or paying the people of Iran based on the oil under their soil, and they said, you may not audit us. And then we overthrew him and he wound up dying in prison because we decided that we, in our arrogance as a country, got to own their oil. And so the hatred of the United States had to do with the hatred of the shah, who brutally repressed the people of Iran for 26 years.”

In 1978 Vanessa Redgrave used her Oscar platform to expose the truth about Israel.

Watch; Fully Vindicated Breezy Politics, 28 April 2026

Vanessa Redgrave; “Zionism is a brutal, racist ideology and it is a brutal, racist regime”

Oscar Host; ” And the winner is Vanessa Redgrave with ‘Julia’ “

Vanessa Redgrave to the audience; “I think you should be very proud that in the last few weeks you have stood firm and you have refused to be intimidated by the threats of a small bunch of zionist hoodlums whose behaviour is an insult to the stature of Jews all over the world. The zionists are using the same methods as Hitler and the German fascists. Zionism is a racist ideology, like the German fascist Nazi ideology and they’re using the same methods against the Palestinian people and the Arab people. It is a completely Nazi Hitler method, the zionist method.”

Powerful reel showing kids pushing  and kicking aside Israeli-owned shop branded bags to remind us to boycott them.

Watch; Boycott all Israel products, Amir Alshanti, 15 April 2026

Listen; Boom! United Arab Emirates Exits OPEC; The New Economics of Technocracy, 29 April 2026

‘History has just been made. The Petrodollar is dead. Asset tokenisation will replace the dollar when pricing oil. The IMEC corridor is rebooted with or without the Strait of Hormuz. All of this at the hands of the UAE, the balance of power in the Middle East has shifted. This validates my new book, The New Economics of Technocracy.

On April 28, 2026, the United Arab Emirates announced its withdrawal from OPEC, effective May 1, ending nearly six decades of membership in the oil cartel that has governed global energy markets since 1960. The announcement was brief. The implications are historic. What the UAE did on that date was not merely resign from an organisation, it served formal notice that the architecture of global energy commerce — the petrodollar system that has underwritten American financial hegemony since the Nixon era — is being dismantled and replaced.

The timing tells the story. The Strait of Hormuz has been under effective Iranian blockade since February 28, 2026, when the United States and Israel launched Operation Epic Fury against Iran and assassinated Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Tanker traffic through the Strait dropped approximately 70 percent. Oil prices shattered the $100-per-barrel threshold. The ceasefire negotiations that followed have been a rolling catastrophe — agreements made and immediately broken, tolls demanded, mines in the water, and a U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports creating what analysts have called a “dual blockade.” Against this backdrop, the UAE did not wait for resolution. It moved.

Watch; Mehdi Shuts Down Israel Occupying Force (IOF) Spokesman, MuslimsW4y, 18 April 2026

Mehdi Hasan; “I noticed that Doron (Spielman, Israeli military spokesman) said that Iran killed 30,000 of its people a few minutes ago. Now he’s saying 40,000 by the end of this discussion it will be 100,000. It’s funny how they inflate the numbers of people killed in Iran, but never recognise the hundred thousand people you killed in Gaza, that your military killed in Gaza, 100,000 people minimum killed in Palestine, which are actually verified numbers by international organisations like the Lancet Medical Journal. You deny those, but let’s put that to one side and deal with some of the stuff you’ve been saying. Number one, just some fact checks. A UN Security Council Resolution is binding under international law. The Reagan administration voted for it and you’ve never followed it. You proudly say you haven’t signed the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty). People watching at home will laugh their heads off. You’re basically saying because we didn’t sign an international treaty, we don’t have to follow international law. So then why doesn’t Iran just pull out of the NPT? Why doesn’t everyone just pull out the NPT and do what Israel did? You say Israel reserves the right to defend itself. That old chestnut. No other country in the Middle East is allowed to defend itself. Israel is the country that bombed, count them, six countries in the Middle East last year. I can’t think of a single country on planet Earth, aside from the US and Israel, that bombed half a dozen countries in the calendar year 2025. That is your country that you’re defending, a rogue nation that bombs whoever it sees fit and then claims to be a victim. For example, you mentioned in your comments, you said in 1967 we were attacked. Complete flat falsehood. Israel attacked first in 1967, everyone knows that, it’s a documented fact. You can call it a pre-emptive war, but you can’t just lie on here and say you were attacked. You were not. You said that Iran pioneered the use of terrorism in the Middle East. Actually, that was the zionist gangs, that was the Stern Gang and the Irgun who blew up British diplomats, bombed the King David Hotel, hung British sergeants, attacked British civilians and military and Arabs. It was actually Jewish and zionist terror gangs that pioneered terrorism in the Middle East 100 years ago. So a lot of your facts are just completely wrong.”

Watch; No Accountability Still, PulseofPal, 16 April 2026

“Lieutenant-Colonel Daniel Ella is a member of the Israeli occupation forces and is also the leader of the 52nd Armoured Battalion, the unit that’s responsible for the murder of Hind Rajab and the rescue workers that went to her aid on 29 January 2024, over two years ago. Now, if you’re not familiar with the story of Hind Rajab, why? It’s been over two years. But I’ll give you a very brief rundown. Hind Rajab was a 5-year-old Palestinian girl living in Gaza when on 29 January 2024 she made a call to rescue workers from a vehicle that she was trapped in, surrounded by dead family members. And she was on the phone to emergency services for hours and hours and hours while they tried to coordinate a rescue and and send rescue workers out to her so she could be saved. When the rescue workers went out to her after hours and hours and hours of coordination, the ambulance was blown up by an Israeli tank and Hind died from her injuries. There has been no accountability, there has been no repercussions. There has been nothing. Now Daniel Ella, who was the leader of that unit that is responsible for the murder of him, news is that he has been severely injured in an attack on southern Lebanon during the illegal Israeli invasion of Lebanon. Now of course, thoughts and prayers. I won’t tell you which thoughts and which prayers, but I thought this was a good moment to highlight the fact that we still have zero accountability for what has happened in Gaza. And now you’ve got the same people that were committing war crimes in Gaza, documented war crimes, out doing the exact same thing in Lebanon. Why is it that instead of accountability we’ve got Daniel Ella going to southern Lebanon? What is this? This is what this occupation stands for. This is why we’re seeing zero accountability. This is a genocidal fascist state and there will be no accountability until this is forcefully stopped.”

Netanyahu gave $38 million to Hamas

Watch; Netanyahu Caused Oct. 7th? Tucker Carlson Network, 27 March 2026

“Netanyahu was all the time helping Hamas to survive. He arranged for Hamas to receive $35 million every month from Qatar. Suitcases of money was given to Hamas under the request of Benjamin Netanyahu personally. And because the Qatarians knew him from the beginning, they were asking him to send them his requests because they knew that he’s going to lie in the future. He allowed more than $1 billion to be transferred to the hands of the Hamas. Because he believed that he can control the level of hatred. Your strategy was sustain the extremists, weaken the moderates. This exploded in our faces in the most brutal way on October 7. Netanyahu was all the time helping Hamas to survive.”

Israel is evil because it is built on supremacy and hate.

Watch; Abby Martin Went To Israel. IT’S WORSE Than You Think, Double Down News, 7 April 2026

Abby Martin; “The whole world has to isolate this rogue apartheid, genocidal, maniac, serial-killing, pathologically lying state. Isolate it. Shame anyone who goes there, academics, celebrities, politicians. They’ve been exposed for what they are. And zionism’s on its last leg. It only exists by the weight of its propaganda and that propaganda’s collapsed entirely. The world sees Israel for what it is and it can’t last for long in its current state. You cannot expect change in a society this far gone. It is full- throated fascist and that’s why they act the way they do with full total impunity, because they have no humanity left. This is a society so far gone, with protection of a military empire, with hatred in their hearts. And we’re seeing essentially the Fourth Reich today marching forward and there’s no allied forces coming to save us. The Israeli Knesset just passed a law allowing the execution of Palestinian prisoners, but not Israelis. This is the true face of apartheid Israel. But this is nothing new. I saw this firsthand when I was in Israel back in 2016. Full throated fascism.”

Vox Pop in Israel; “You can’t deal with these people. There’s no need to try, there’s no need to talk to them. There’s only one way to…like I would carpet bomb them.”

Abby Martin; “You would carpet bomb them?”

Vox Pop; “It’s the only way you could deal with it.”

Abby Martin; “I didn’t realise this. I didn’t realise how viscerally grotesquely genocidal Israelis were, how openly fascist they would be to anyone.”

Vox Pop; “Jews shouldn’t marry Arabs, shouldn’t marry Arabs.”

Abby Martin; “Why do you feel strongly about that? “

Vox Pop; “Because Jews is a special nation, that God gave it to the Jews. We don’t want the Arabs to be here.”

Abby Martin; “They knew that they were on camera, that’s what’s so alarming to me too. I wasn’t trying to hide, I wasn’t doing gotcha journalism. I was going up with a camera and saying, generally, what do you think about the situation?”

Vox Pop; “I think Israelis have to take over and they have to kick them away.”

Abby Martin; “I was so horrified and alarmed at the genocidal rhetoric that was being espoused. Every single person, for every generation, every walk of life. They wanted ethnic cleansing. They said we should nuke them. One little girl laughing. We should kill all Arabs. Kill all Arabs.”

Vox Pop; ” We need to kill the harabis.”

Abby Martin; “It shows you, the impunity back then, the arrogance, to just assume this is what you guys think too right. You’re an American. You agree with me. You guys have been doing the same thing. This is who we are. We’re proud racists. We’re proudly fascist. I felt like I was walking into Berlin in 1932. I really felt absolutely disgusted. I just couldn’t believe what I was hearing. I mean, just walking a couple steps, and as white as I am, “are you Arab? Are you Arab?” And I’m like, “what? I’m an American”. “Oh, good. We can talk about Arabs then. We can talk about how much we hate Palestinians”. I saw the writing on the wall back then. I saw that there’s no hope from within Israeli society. I went to rallies where they were calling to kick all the refugees out. These were things that we’re told, Israel’s a safe haven for Holocaust survivors, for genocide survivors. Well, why are all the refugees put out in the middle of the Negev desert into a concentration camp? Why don’t they want any African refugees there? They tokenise Ethiopian refugees, but then they make them take Depo Proverabirth control because they don’t want them to reproduce. This is the nature of Israeli society. It’s an ethno-state, and it’s built on supremacy and hate, because that’s what zionism is.”

Interviewer; “How many civilians have been killed in Gaza, from what you know?”

Vox Pop; “Who gives a shit?”

Interviewer; “Okay, but don’t you feel like, for example, children?”

Vox Pop; “Children grow up to be Arabs.”

Abby Martin; “You have to continue to expel. You have to continue to kill to keep that artificial majority in place.”

TV Presenter; “If you gave me a button to just erase Gaza, every single living being in Gaza would no longer be living tomorrow. I would press it in a second. I would press it right now. Give me that button and press it right now. There you go. And I think most Israelis would.”

Abby Martin; “During the Gaza genocide, to see people just proclaim out in the open the genocidal incitement.”

Israeli Politician; “It’s an entire nation out there that is responsible.”

Smotrich; “We will annihilate everything that still remains of the strip, and leave nothing standing. We shouldn’t even give water to the Gaza strip. We’re breaking Gaza apart, leaving it as a pile of rubble with total unprecedented destruction.”

Netanyahu; “You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our holy bible. We do remember and we are fighting.”

Crowd of soldiers; “You must remember what Amalek has done to you. We know our slogan, ‘There are no uninvolved civilians’.”

Abby Martin; ” It was heinous and horrifying. But finally, people saw Israel for what it is. It’s all been exposed. They’re not hiding anymore.”

TV interviewee 1 “Every child, every baby in Gaza is an enemy.”

TV Interviewee 2; ” I want to kick them out, to exterminate them, every last one of them.”

TV Interviewee 3; “We will not leave Gaza. You will die, you will starve, your homes will be burned.”

TV Interviewee 4; “I don’t think there’s anyone in Israel who should take pity on these Gazans. Not on adults, not on the elderly, not on young people and not on children. As far as I’m concerned they should starve to death.”

TV Interviewee 5; “We’re burning their villages, and its good to see we’re burning their villages.” (audience claps)

Abby Martin; “Israel’s propaganda is not working anymore because for the first time, Palestinians have been able to just show us the unvarnished truth of the reality that they endure on a daily basis. We see the settler terrorism. We see the people getting mowed down from for doing nothing. We see the crimes every single day. You cannot hide genocide from us. So the propaganda has become cartoonish.”

Dan Gillerman, Israeli diplomat; “I’m very puzzled by the constant concern which the world is showing for the Palestinian people and is actually showing for these horrible, inhuman animals.”

Abby Martin; “It’s inverted. Just everything that we know to be true. Black is white, up is down. It’s the most moral army in the world, a benevolent empire spreading human rights and democracy. Who the hell believes this anymore? So it’s become silly, it’s become absurd.”

BBC Presenter; “The Israelis today saying that Hamas use Palestinians as human shields, do they?”

Husam Zomlot, Palestinian Ambassador to the UK; “Killing the victims, then blaming the victims for killing themselves. I mean, what is this logic?”

Abby Martin; “They infantilise us, they treat us like children.”

BBC Interviewee; “This is a genocide happening in front of our eyes.”

BBC Presenter; “That word is, as you know, incredibly emotive. And the Israelis, as you know, will be saying that they are targeting Hamas only.”

Abby Martin; ” It’s become so obvious that we’re being dictated to, that our reality is curated by tech overlords who are profiting off the infrastructure of genocide, off the surveillance of our lives. All these things are interconnected. So the propaganda doesn’t work anymore. It’s too infantilising and stupid.”

TV News Presenter; “One day, after describing it as a tragic mishap, Israel has now claimed a deadly double strike on a Gaza hospital was prompted by the discovery of a Hamas camera.”

Abby Martin; “A Hamas camera is why they blow up journalists at a hospital, because they have a camera that was belonged to Hamas? I mean, it just makes corporate media journalists and establishment journalists look like buffoons, doesn’t it? For toeing this absurd propaganda that’s so hollowed out and childlike, they should be ashamed of themselves.”

Watch; Palestinians face death penalty under new Israeli law, UK Column News, 1 April 2026

Vanessa Beeley at 50m22s; “A lot of people will have been horrified to see that Israel in the Knesset effectively voted in the death penalty, but pretty much only for Palestinians, of course, that should come as no surprise. And I just pulled up a BBC report, and you’ll be surprised to learn that they came out pretty much in support. Now, before people raise their voices against that, they certainly don’t come out in condemnation. So this is the BBC report. ‘Palestinians convicted of lethal attacks face the death penalty under new Israeli law’. So immediately they’re framing it that it is perfectly justified for Israel to bring in the death penalty. They go on saying that there is some pushback from various civil rights groups, including Amnesty International. The Association for Civil Rights in Israel has already petitioned the country’s Supreme Court against the law. The law is unconstitutional, discriminatory by design, and for West Bank Palestinians, enacted without legal authority. The Supreme Court will now have to consider whether to hear the challenge to the bill. This is the final sentence. ‘Israel has only executed two people in its history. One of them the infamous Nazi official, Adolf Eichmann, who played an important role in perpetrating the Holocaust’. This is quite extraordinary from the BBC. They are effectively framing this criminal law as being, again, justified because Israel doesn’t execute many people, two in its history, and those were the Nazis. So they’re basically bringing up the Holocaust concept again as a framing for this entire unbelievable law that Israel has been allowed to bring in. And this is even more disgusting considering the fact that during the vote, far right MPs wore a badge of a noose pinned to their lapel. Racism, hate in plain sight. And the proposed law, as I said again, would apply to Palestinians accused of what they call militant activity, would not apply to Jewish Israelis accused of similar acts. Palestinians are tried in military courts, Israelis are tried in civilian courts.”

Watch; BOUND AND TORTURED PALESTINIAN HOSTAGES, alieninvasionai, 6 April 2026

Israel’s national security minister Ben Gvir; “Do you see them? this is how they are now, but one thing remains to be done and that is to execute them”.

Tucker Carlson exposes the hypocrisy in the definition of antisemitism.

Watch; The Dark Truth Behind Antisemitism Laws, Tucker Carlson, 19 April 2026

Tucker Carlson; “So what is antisemitism? And if you’ve been called it or if someone’s ever implied it, you have a problem with the Jews. You’re kind of obsessed with the Jews, say people who are completely obsessed with the Jews. You probably wonder, like, what are they accusing me of? Well, here it is. This is the IHRA International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, IHRA. You may hear this. The IHRA definition of antisemitism, do you know what it is? It’s on their website. It’s worth looking at, spent the morning reading it, fascinating. So here’s the actual definition of antisemitism. And by the way, this is a now globally recognised definition enshrined in law around the world, in more than 40 countries. This is the definition, and I’m quoting,’Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews which may be expressed as hatred towards Jews’. Huh? So antisemitism is a perception, it’s a feeling. Okay. I thought you could have any feeling or perception you wanted. You could look at facts and come to any conclusion you wanted. No, no, no, no, certain perceptions are inherently immoral. They’re quote, ‘antisemitic’, which may be expressed as hatred towards Jews. Oh, so you don’t have to hate the Jews to be antisemitic? No. Well, that answers the question for those of us who don’t hate Jews at all, how could you be antisemitic if you don’t hate Jews? Well, you can be according to the official definition of it. Continuing the quote, ‘rhetorical’, meaning talking words, speech, formerly protected, no longer. ‘Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities’. Wait a second. So antisemitism is not necessarily hatred of Jews and it can be expressed toward non-Jews. So you don’t have to hate Jews and you don’t have to express or have these perceptions, these feelings toward Jews. You can be non-Jews too. What is this? Well, the people who wrote it at the IHRA probably anticipated this would be confusing to you so they gave 11 examples of what antisemitism is. Just so you know, like, how do I know if I’m being antisemitic? Well, here are 11 example. Of those 11 examples, and we did the math, two thirds are criticism of Israel, the state of Israel, the nation, with the Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Bibi, criticism of Israel in 2/3 of the examples that the IHRA gave. That’s antisemitism, including, here we go, ‘Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of The Nazis’. Oh. In other words, if you think what’s happening in Gaza is genocide, well, Nazis committed genocide. Now the state of Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, meaning they’re trying to eliminate people on the basis of their blood. You were an antisemite. Oh, okay. You’re an antisemite if you think that. It also tells us that the suggestion that Jews killed Jesus is, quote, ‘classic antisemitism’. Classic antisemitism. So there goes the New Testament. The whole New Testament is antisemitic, too. Read the Gospels and see if they fall under that definition. They do. Why does this matter? Well, because about 40 US states and the District of Columbia and our biggest cities, Miami, Los Angeles, have adopted this. This is their standard that they voted on and adopted. It’s in the law. This standard, the one that tells you that criticism of the secular state of Israel or portions of the New Testament are, quote, ‘antisemitism’. The government of almost 40 states in the United States, I think 39 states, 40 countries around the world, but not just countries, NGOs, sports teams, the British Soccer League, Chelsea United, all of them have adopted this standard. Why would a sports team adopt this? Well, who knows why? Think about it for a minute. Why? Why would you declare something illegal? Oh, because you want to punish people who violate it. That’s why. This happened today. Ukraine, that beacon of democracy and freedom that we’ve sent hundreds of billions of dollars to, just made it law today that antisemitism, in other words, criticism of Israel is a felony punishable by up to eight years in prison. Eight years in prison. How could a rational person understand that? Well, a rational person could not understand that. Why would a citizen of one country be sent to prison for criticising the leadership of another country, a country not his own? Why would a citizen of one country be sent to prison for having opinions about historical events that he did not participate in and that were almost a century ago? Does that make any sense? No, except in religious terms. Those are blasphemy laws, same as the old blasphemy laws. And for all the talk of how the mullahs are bad, the mullahs are bad. Well, the mullahs probably are bad. Not defending the mullahs, but why are we told the mullahs are bad? The mullahs are bad because they’re religious extremists. They have blasphemy laws. They’ll hurt you if you say certain things. Okay, well, that looks a lot like what we’re seeing here.”

Read; My latest: How A Fake Iranian Terror Group Was Invented To Proscribe IRGC As terrorist Org in Europe Amid Iran War – The story of Ashab al-Yamin by David Miller, 2 April 2026

David Miller; “Investigative Analysis – A series of arson attacks and alleged incidents targeting alleged Jewish-linked sites across Europe have been attributed to a little-known group called Harakat Ashab al-Yamin al-Islamia (HAYI), or Ashab al-Yamin. The group has been widely described in media and security circles as an Iran-backed network, allegedly linked to the IRGC.

Since March 9, HAYI has been credited with what some analysts describe as “hybrid warfare” style operations spanning multiple countries from Greece and Belgium to France, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Among the most high-profile incidents was the burning of four ambulances in Golders Green, North London, on March 22.

The emergence of this group coincides with the escalation of the US-Israeli war against Iran. In parallel, media outlets and pro-war commentators have warned that Tehran could expand the conflict by carrying out attacks across Europe.

But a closer examination raises serious questions about its actual existence and the pro-Israel groups pushing this narrative.

Several of the incidents attributed to HAYI do not appear to have directly targeted Jewish communities. Others remain murky, with limited verified information about the perpetrators. And beyond scattered claims and online statements, there is little concrete evidence that this group as described actually exists.

In the fog of war, narratives can move faster than facts.

At the same time, governments across Europe and the UK are moving to formally designate the IRGC as a terrorist organisation — a policy long pushed by pro-war, pro-Israel lobbying networks. Many of the same actors amplifying the HAYI narrative are also leading that campaign within Western media to manufacture consent for war and accelerate this political objective of proscription. While raising the possibility that unverified claims of an Iran-linked threat are being leveraged to shape public fear and justify sweeping new security measures tied to the widening war.

This investigation examines each reported attack, the sources promoting the HAYI narrative, and how claims of a coordinated campaign may be shaping public perception — fueling fears of rising antisemitism, calls for expanded security measures and proscribing the IRGC as a terrorist organisation amid an illegal war. But what is Ashab al-Yamin? Where did it come from and does it exist at all?

This investigation reveals that there is no such group. It appears to be a fictional cut out. Half of its reported activities simply did not occur. The other half were so amateurish, and inconsequential – with not a single injury – One theory is that they may have been messily undertaken by hired gig criminals and/or incompetent Sayanim, the name given to Mossad’s network of little helpers in countries all over the world. This investigative analysis shows that even the zionist regime and its assets in establishment think tanks acknowledge that so-called “gig criminals” have been involved in this series of events, in a striking parallel with similar events in Australia (fourteen of them between October 2024 and January 2025) which were similarly low impact with no casualties, declared to be “fake” by Australian police in March 2025.’

Satirical account of the attacks on ambulances in London.

Watch; IDF Soldier sets fire to 4 Israeli ambulances! Bulls Nose News, 24 March 2026

“Four ambulances that have been destroyed in a fire in London has been ruled as an accident by the Metropolitan Police after the suspect arrested turned out to be an IDF soldier on leave from Gaza who claimed he accidentally destroyed the ambulances after he thought they were Palestinian ones and he was under attack. The incident, which received worldwide condemnation from everyone from Keir Starmer to Laura Loomer to Wes Streeting, is being investigated by counterterrorism police who who say that although the IDF soldier has come forward, they will not stop investigating this attack until they find a perpetrator that matches their predetermined idea of who did this. The IDF soldier was not injured in the incident, except for getting his eyebrows singed off by the fires when he was setting them, to which a medic who checked him over at a London hospital told him that the ambulances had a right to defend themselves. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also apologised for the incident which happened in a prominent Jewish area in London, saying, I must apologise to our brothers and sisters over there. Sometimes we train up these soldiers so well that we forget when we send them back into the normal world it can trigger certain kinds of responses, but as long as they stay away from emergency vehicles and primary schools, we’ll probably be okay.”

Watch; The Last Great President, ClaytonCuteriACP, 6 April 2026

J F Kennedy; “I have made it clear to the Israeli leadership that I do not support their expansionist ideas.”

Presenter; “Oh, what happened to him in Dallas again?”

J F Kennedy; “The indigenous people of that land have rights that cannot be ignored. We must find a fair solution, not one dictated by any single group.”

Presenter; “This ideology, we think, probably costed him his life. Really it truly feels like the more I learn about this man, he was truly the last great United States president.”

A montage of statements by Netanyahu over the years

Watch; “Iran is different” SHUT IT DOWNjakegtv, 6 April 2026

Netanyahu; “If you take away the Soviet Union and its chief proxy, the PLO,international terrorism would collapse.”

“If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime. I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region”.

“Iran exporting terrorism, not only to every part of the Middle East, but to Venezuela.”

“By the way, what are we doing with Greenland? We got to do something with Greenland.”

“You have to wash their brains and tell them there is a higher cause out there. It’s religious, ethnic, racial, whatever. And for that higher cause, you can disregard all the normal rules of morality.”

Read; Majority of young Britons believe Israel should not exist, The Jewish Chronicle, 5 June 2024

‘The majority of British 18- to 24-year-olds do not believe that Israel should exist, a poll has revealed. Overall, 54 per cent of voters in this age group say Israel should not exist, while just 21 per cent disagree, the data shows. Half of the same age group think the Israeli government is to blame for the war in Gaza, while 25 per cent believe Hamas is at fault for the conflict, the poll, released by news website UnHerd, found. Fifteen per cent blame the Israeli public and eight per cent the Palestinian people, according to the survey of more than 1,000 voters conducted by research group Focaldata.

More broadly, the poll reveals a desire to disengage from foreign wars. Nearly half of respondents (44 per cent) want to see Britain become less engaged in overseas conflicts, with seven per cent answering that we should be more engaged. Meanwhile, 21 per cent of voters say they would want their children to fight in the British Army to defend the UK from an invasion with 68 per cent opposed.’

Israel just passed one of the most extreme death penalty laws in the world for Palestinians. Support this petition to help stop it.

Petition; No Death Penalty for Palestinians! Avaaz, 8 April 2026

‘Europe is critical to Israel’s economic survival. The European Council has already made a statement against Israel’s approval of the death penalty, but Israel has proven time and time again that they won’t listen without definitive action. It’s time to put your money where your mouth is and suspend EU trade deals with Israel to prevent more Palestinian deaths.

Champagne bottle raised, a golden noose pinned to his chest like a badge of honour. This is Israel’s far right minister Ben-Gvir, who has championed a push for one of the most extreme death penalty laws in the world. And now, it’s passed.

Under this new law, Palestinians convicted of lethal attacks will be subjected to hanging – a method of execution so cruel and violent that it’s been abandoned by most of the world – within 90 days of sentencing and with no right to a pardon. Imagine toasting to that. For Palestine, where arbritary arrests and torture are already common, this is a terrifying new reality – and we must do what we can to stop it. The death penalty is wrong in all circumstances – and this is a position long held by the EU. They considered sanctioning Israel before, and they can do it again if we make this petition impossible to ignore.’

Israel is the chaos engine of the Middle East

Watch; Israel = “Militarized VAMPIRE Nation” The Katie Halper Show, 24 March 2026

‘Haim Bresheeth Zabnner was Professor of Media and Cultural Studies at University of East London and then a Professorial Research Associate at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS). He is Filmmaker, photographer, film studies scholar, and historian. His films include “A State of Danger,” a documentary on the first Palestinian Intifada. His books include “An Army Like No Other: How the Israel Defense Force Made a Nation.” Haim is the son of two Holocaust survivors and was raised in Israel. He is a member of Holocaust survivors and Descendents Against the Genocide and a founding member of Jewish Network for Palestine. On November 4, Haim was arrested over a speech he gave at a pro-Palestine demonstration outside the residence of Israeli ambassador Tzipi Hotovely in north London.’

Professor Haim Bresheeth-Zabner; “Israel is the destructive engine, the chaos engine of the west, living on death and destruction on blood. It’s a kind of a militarised vampire nation. What they want to do to Iran is total destruction of the state, the society, the culture. Iranian culture is 5,000 years old. So we’re talking about a destruction on so many levels that they’re talking about returning Iran to the Stone Age. This brutality, this cruelty, this madness is very calculated, it is functional. This is no longer about Gaza, it’s not even about Iran. It is about the project of controlling an important part of the world, which Iran is at the heart of at the moment. The only people who are punished are the victims, like the Palestinians, the Iranians, etc. I think this is unacceptable and will bring the end of humanity.”

Tucker Carlson says the U.S. leaders who support Israel over American interests are worse than evil Netanyahu

Watch; US Senators Are Betraying Our Nation Tucker Carlson, 10 October 2025

‘Rumors of a plan allowing for the resettlement of as many as 300,000 Israelis in Argentina’

Watch; Argentina’s Javier Milei sells out his country for Israel, The Grayzone, 27 April 2026

Intro; “The Grayzone’s Oscar Leon interviews Argentine journalist Sebastian Salgado about the significance of the bizarre visit this month by President Javier Milei to Israel. Salgado details the emergence of a project to erode Argentina’s national sovereignty by handing over control of the country’s water to an Israeli company and provide benefits to Israeli expats while selling off the country’s public assets to wealthy investors and multinationals. Salgado addresses disturbing rumors of a plan allowing for the resettlement of as many as 300,000 Israelis in Argentina, and the growing appeal of the Patagonia region to these outsiders. He argues that Milei’s ultimate legacy will be the balkanisation of the country by an economic hit man more loyal to a sectarian ultra-Orthodox religious cult than to his own nation’s interests.’

Does Israel have a right to exist? – NO

Watch; Does Israel Have a ‘Right to Exist’? Mehdi Debunks This ‘Bullsh-t’ Argument, Mehdi Hasan and Team Zeteo, 5 April 2026

‘Mehdi breaks down the ‘right to exist’ argument about Israel and why the discourse is clear Israeli propaganda plus he shares three ways you can counter-argument if you find yourself stuck in the same bullsh-t debate.’

Mehdi Hasan; “I have been debating hardcore zionists, Israelis, supporters of Israel for years now, decades. And the conversation always, always comes back to one line, one phrase, one talking point. Do you or do you not support Israel’s right to exist? You’ve all heard that line before, right? It’s the go-to move. If you don’t support Israel’s right to exist, you’re an extremist, you’re an antisemite, you want to wipe Israel and millions of Israeli Jews off the map. Even many critics of Israel are often left frantically conceding, yes, of course I support Israel’s right to exist. But you don’t have to concede on this point. It’s a bullshit argument. Some of you may know I wrote a book about debating, and if you don’t know, you know now and today I want to share with you three arguments you can use if you find yourself stuck in a debate with someone who insists you recognise Israel’s right to exist. Here’s how you debunk their argument. Time for a debunking. Number one, right to exist where? Where does this right to exist actually apply? Because Israel is the only country in the world that refuses to define its borders. So if you want me to recognise Israel’s right to exist, does that right of Israel’s extend to Gaza, the West Bank, the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem, all of which are considered illegally occupied territory under international law, and yet all of which are claimed to by the current government of Israel as Israeli land? So, right to exist where? Number two, what is this right to exist? Where does it come from? Because states don’t have a right to exist. No such natural or legal right exists. People, individuals, have a right to exist. Human beings have that right. Not states, not countries. States change their composition, their governing structures, their ideologies, their regimes, their borders all the time. They’re not fixed for eternity. The USSR broke up into Russia and 14 other new states. Yugoslavia broke up into Serbia, Bosnia, Croatia and the rest. Czechoslovakia split into Slovakia and the Czech Republic. What happened to the USSR’s right to exist? Or Yugoslavia’s or Czechoslovakia’s? I mean, think about it. Does the UK have a right to exist? And if so, does that mean Scotland, for example, can never vote for independence? Would we say to Scots who voted in a referendum to be independent from the UK, sorry, you can’t leave, that would be going against the UK’s right to exist. Of course not. People have rights, not states. To be clear, there is no right for countries to exist, nor for countries to continue to exist. None whatsoever. And number three, last but not least, if there is a right to exist, as they claim, does Palestine have a right to exist? Because last time I checked, Israel exists as a matter of fact. It’s a country with sovereignty. It’s on the map with its undeclared borders over at the UN. It’s Israel that’s a full member state, not Palestine. And it’s the US, by the way, blocking Palestine’s right to exist at the UN as a full sovereign member state. The idea that in a world where Israel is genociding the Palestinians in Gaza, ethnically cleansing them in the West Bank, and blocking their legal right to return from refugee camps across the region, the idea that in that world, Israel’s right to exist is the one we should be concerned about and not Palestine’s, is both ridiculous and, let’s be honest, racist. But look, this entire discourse is clear propaganda by supporters of Israel. Have you ever heard this phrase used in any other context, other than in the context of defending Israel? Do we talk about Belgium’s right to exist, Luxembourg’s right to exist, South Africa’s right to exist? Of course we don’t, because it’s all demonstrable bullshit. So don’t be cowed when the right to exist gotcha is thrown in your face. Don’t be browbeaten or intimidated or guilted into giving Israel a pass. That’s what they want, a pass. But this isn’t about Israel’s existence, it’s about Israel’s actions. It’s apartheid practices, its endless war crimes and, yes, it’s ongoing genocide in Gaza.”

David Miller on Tony Gosling’s show

Listen; Home Front! Treachery! Inside the zionists’ UK Fifth Column, Dr David Miller, Bristol Politics Show, 18 April 2026

Tony Gosling, at 8m02s; “Ever since I’ve known of you and known you, you’ve been doing work on this whole concept of spin, public relations, strategic communications, how it is that the mass media is used to bend the minds of the population to a certain conclusion, to force narratives really down people’s throats. And so why do you think they’ve targeted you (Palestine Declassified) for this programme which actually, if you look in the big scheme of things, hardly anyone is watching?”

David Miller; “Well, I’ll take that as a bit of an insult. We actually get a lot of traffic on X, on Rumble, on Telegram, @ Pdeclassified. We’re on Press TV website itself, and Facebook. Anyway, but let’s pass over that. And this is a programme which is the most critical programme on zionism you can get in this country, and of course, zionists hate it. They make sure that we’ve been attacked by American zionist groups, by zionist groups from all over the world, and they want the programme to be stopped. And that’s the reason that they’re going after us.

I’d like to thank the zionists for having me sacked from the University of Bristol because it’s allowed me to spend all my time investigating and researching zionists. And so that’s what we do. We look at the zionist front groups, the think tanks, the secret money channel from Tel Aviv into apparently independent companies in the US and then the way that the money then trickles back to, for example, the University of Cambridge, or the way in which the UK Lawyers for Israel operates, or the Campaign Against Antisemitism, tons and tons of these organisations, more than 3,000 zionist organisations, charities in this country, all of which are engaged in one way or another in supporting the genocide.”

Listen to the entire show; Home Front! Treachery! Inside the zionists’ UK Fifth Column, Dr David Miller, Bristol Politics Show, David Miller, 20 April 2026

‘The Bristol Politics Show with Tony Gosling speaking on Iran, Mandelson, zionism, corruption and all the rest.’

ISIS could be described as the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service as Israel is the only country they haven’t bombed.

Watch; He told the truth, MuslimsW4y, 4 April 2026

“ISIS and Al Qaeda, who’s really behind them? Is it just a coincidence that they’ve happened to attack absolutely everybody except for Israel? So ISIS…that one’s just so simple, like that’s a layup given to us by the Israelis themselves, Israeli Secret Intelligence Services. These are fake Muslims who do not practice anything even remotely close to to what the Quran and Islam says. I say this as a Christian, so these people that you have been manipulated into believing are your enemies and confused with ISIS, the hypocrites who have no Islamic nothing in them, a creation of the Jewish state.”

Read; Cyprus, Netanyahu’s New Haifa, The Cradle, 23 October 2025

‘The influx of Israeli settlers and investors into Cyprus is worrying Cypriots and regional observers, who see it as an echo of Haifa’s past. Behind the current real estate boom lies a broader Israeli project to reshape the order in the Eastern Mediterranean, where Cyprus serves as both a gateway and an outpost. Last year, reports of Israelis buying land and real estate throughout the EU member state of Cyprus proliferated. While the numbers remain modest, the pace of acquisitions has accelerated. Some interpret this surge as a symptom of the erosion of Israel’s self-image as the “safest place for Jews”. Others see it instead as a consequence of the evolving geopolitics of the Eastern Mediterranean, which places Cyprus at the heart of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s expansionist maritime vision.

A New Border; Cyprus, the third largest island in the Mediterranean Sea, has been divided since Turkey invaded its northern part in 1974, leading to the creation of the unrecognised Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Approximately 400,000 Turkish Cypriots live in this part under Ankara’s control [the majority are Turks brought from mainland Turkey], while the internationally recognised Greek Republic of Southern Cyprus, with its 1.3 million inhabitants, is seeing its coastline increasingly covered with real estate owned by Israelis.’

Lebanon

Watch; Lebanon: Civil war brewing? UK Column News, 15 April 2026

Vanessa Beeley, at 22m54s; “There was outrage in Lebanon both last night and today. This is Khalil Nasrallah, a very well known journalist in Lebanon who basically said, the statement requires an urgent and clear Lebanese response because what the Israeli ambassador is saying implies continuing the war in coordination with the official Lebanese state. So as I said, complex and quite extraordinary scenarios here. Then another journalist, also very well known here in Lebanon, Hasan Illaik, he actually said, “I’m a Lebanese citizen and Joseph Aoun, the President, does not represent me. He reached Baabda palace through foreign intervention, as did Nawaf Salam”. As I said, they were brought to power by effectively Saudi Arabia and the zionist bloc. “The decision to negotiate directly with the enemy is a result of complying with a foreign agenda. It does not reflect the will of Lebanon or the Lebanese people. It is a pure disgrace”. Then in the last few hours there has actually been a legal response from a Labour member of the Parliament, and in this legal study he warns that criminalising self defence in Lebanon strips the government itself of legitimacy. And this is from the text of that study. In one of its sharpest critiques, the research accuses Salam’s government of criminalising a fundamental right at the height of ongoing aggression. The most egregious violation, it states, occurs when the authority not only fails to fulfil its mandate and but also strips the people of their right to defend themselves and criminalises this right during an actual aggression. Such actions, it argues, strike at the very foundation of the authority’s existence. There have also been other statements from members of Parliament, including the speaker of Parliament, Nabih Berri, who’s very much opposed to this action by members of the Lebanese government and their discourse effectively with the enemy, which is Israel. And then rather worryingly, this is another report that came out in Lebanese media, Al Jadeed. It’s been in this screenshot, translated into English, harsh conditions dividing Lebanon into three regional cities. Now this plan has come in from Ron Dermer, the Minister of Strategic Relations in Israel. What does it actually mean? So if we bring the map on screen and I’ll talk through this, they’re talking about the three sections. It was a little bit difficult to show it on the map, but the red arrow at the bottom represents an 8-kilometre buffer zone all along the border where the red striping is. So that is effectively a buffer zone fully under the control of Israel. And of course they’ve been on a daily basis detonating homes and villages in that area, the red stripe section represents zone 2. So further in from the 8-kilometre zone up to the Litani river that you can see very clearly there, that will mean full displacement of all people from that area and control by Israel. And Israel will be responsible for both forcing evacuation and, as they say, the destroying Hezbollah in that area. So what does that actually mean? That means that communities in the south that are then going to be displaced, as the red arrow shows, north of the Litani river, into areas that traditionally are, let’s say, opposed to Hezbollah. And then basically Dermer is saying the Lebanese Arab forces will then be responsible for, guess what, disarming Hezbollah in those areas. So what does this effectively mean? It means that Israel then intends to advance further beyond the Litani river on the pretext that there are now Hezbollah elements north of the Litani River. So this is very clear to everyone here what the intention is effectively to pretty much control all of Lebanon in the near future. And then if we look at what’s actually been happening, bearing in mind there is supposed to be some kind of ceasefire in Lebanon. This video, if I’ll talk it through. This is in Al Haush. This was yesterday. Al Haush is an area very close to Tyre or Sur, one of the oldest cities in Lebanon, going back to prehistoric times. Phoenician Roman ruins are there and Israel has been heavily bombing this area and destroying many of the historical elements within that city itself. It’s a coastal city, it’s one of the most beautiful in Lebanon, actually, and people will remember my reports on my visit to a town in the west, Beka’a Sohmor. This was again bombed yesterday. It’s been bombed on an almost daily basis. But this was a home of a woman and her three children. All of them were killed and one of the children whose name was was made public is Aya Hamoud on the right. So again, the wanton targeting of civilians in all of these areas, while of course claiming that they are Hezbollah strongholds, I also have to make the point that the likes of the BBC and CNN and Western media effectively are reinforcing that narrative, that even Tyre, which is being heavily targeted, is a Hezbollah stronghold. It isn’t. It has elements of Shia, it has Palestinian refugee camps, conglomeration of many of the factions within Lebanon itself. Just a reminder, people can read about my trip to Sohmor in the last couple of weeks at UK Column. And then finally, I want to look at this, because part of what they’re doing, of course, is the financial incentivisation to the members of the Lebanese government who are now involved in effectively fulfilling both Israeli and American agendas in Lebanon. In other words, criminalising Hezbollah and turning the state against Hezbollah. And guess what? The IMF, the International Monetary Fund and Lebanon hold talks on up to $1 billion in rapid financing. So what does this actually mean? We’ve seen this time and time and time again. Whenever there is any form of destabilisation, as there is currently in Lebanon or there was formerly in Syria, we see immediately this step towards debt enslavement. Not that Lebanon is financially in a very good state, having suffered under various Ponzi schemes for the last five decades, but extraordinary times, I don’t know where it’s all heading. There are talks now among various members of parliament who are protesting the direct negotiations with what they call the enemy. And it remains to be seen. History has shown before that there have been pushbacks against these kind of moves by members of the government. We don’t quite know what’s going to happen next.”

George Galloway explains the history of ethnic divides in Lebanon that allows the government to be servile to Israel. Since 1982 Hezbollah has been resisting the Israeli invasions, occupation and military attacks on civilians in Lebanon.

Watch; Traitorous Elements, George Galloway, 1 April 2026

George Galloway; “In Lebanon, the situation is more complicated. Lebanon was carved out by the Sykes-Picot agreement of Syria, of which it is naturally and legitimately a part. Syria and Lebanon were one country. The area around Mount Lebanon was carved out by French imperialism secretly. We only know about the Sykes-Picot agreement because of the Russian Revolution, which exposed these secret treaties that had been reached for the Middle East and proved that Britain and France had completely betrayed the Arabs. They promised the Arabs unity and independence if they would rise up against the Ottomans, who were fighting on the side of the Germans, the Axis. But they never had any intention whatsoever of honouring that promise. They instead carved up areas of influence and control between themselves. And I used to walk past every day in Parliament, the very room in which Sykes and Picot with their pencils and their rulers were drawing up these fake states. And Lebanon was one of those. The problem is that the Lebanese people are deeply divided on a confessional basis. There are Christians, different kinds of Christians, there are Sunnis, different kinds of Sunnis, and there are Shiites. The Shiites are easily the biggest population in Lebanon. If Hassan Nasrallah had wanted to be the president of Lebanon, which he couldn’t be, because you have to be a Christian to be the president of Lebanon, but Hezbollah and Nasrallah could have taken Lebanon any day of the week and in one day, but they did not want to do so. They wanted to preserve the balance of the three main populations, Sunni, Shia and Christian in Lebanon. But the problem is, although there are patriotic Sunnis, Arab nationalists, some of them are very, very close friends of mine and have been for half a century, they are less important than they used to be. After the fall of Saddam Hussein in Iraq, after the fall of Bashar al Assad in Syria, that kind of Sunni has become weaker. And the traitor element amongst the Sunni population, allied to the traitor part of the Christian population in Lebanon, have basically volunteered to become agents of Israel and America. So they are now determined to disarm the Lebanese resistance. Good luck with that, lads. You won’t last five minutes.”

Watch; This is the Heart of Beirut, sahouraxo, 14 April 2026

‘This is the heart of Beirut. Israel is flattening entire neighborhoods in Lebanon’s capital. Families and civilians are still buried beneath their own homes. A 5,000-year-old city is being wiped off the map in real time. And the world watches in silence.’

Watch; Professor Marandi: Lebanon’s ceasefire was ‘undermined’, Iran will not ‘tolerate this situation’ Al Mayadeen, 15 April 2026

Professor Marandi; “The Lebanese Prime Minister and his allies, they did not want the ceasefire, they wanted the war to continue, both so that people in the South would suffer and the resistance would suffer, and so that he could have his opportunity to normalise with Israeli regime, that’s why he was installed in the first place, and to have direct negotiations with Israeli regime, just like Jordan. So there’s no other reason why anyone would disrupt a ceasefire which was agreed upon between Iran and the United States. There’s no other reason to do so. They should have supported it. It would have helped the country, it would have helped the political situation in Lebanon, it would help the security situation and it would not have costed Lebanon anything because it was agreement, an agreement between Iran and the United States. But to undermine that and to say we’re going to go down a separate route is costly and in my opinion, of course, treacherous. But treachery aside, why would anyone forsake a ceasefire that was negotiated between two parties when it cost them nothing and only has gain for them? This is something that in future years people are going to remember, they will remember how this ceasefire was undermined. But ultimately Iran is not going to tolerate this situation, and we’ll see in how in the coming days Iran is going to increase the pressure. I can’t say, I’m not privy to the decision making process in Iran, but there’s no doubt that Iran is going to be relentless in increasing the pressure on Trump, and as we all know, the global crisis is looming. Every day we’re nearing a cliff, the prices right now are rising, but soon we’re going to see economies begin to shut down big segments of their production and their economy and the world is going to go into recession and then into depression and we will even have hunger across the world. So this is not a road that is sustainable for Trump, this is not a path that is sustainable for the Trump regime, and without a doubt, the world is going to blame Trump and it’s going to blame Netanyahu.”

Read; Water, Power, and Geopolitics: Zionist Israeli Ambitions and the Hydro-politics of Southern Lebanon, Vanessa Beeley, 1 May 2026

Lebanon’s rivers are more than lifelines; they lie at the heart of a long-standing struggle shaped by external ambition.

Lebanon’s rivers are more than lifelines; they lie at the heart of a long-standing struggle shaped by external ambition. From the Litani to the Wazzani, the Israeli entity’s efforts to dominate regional water reveal a deeper reality: control over southern Lebanon’s water has been pursued as power, not necessity.

Gaza

Read; Lacking Proper Sanitation, Gaza’s Tent Camps Are Being Overrun by Rodents By Nour Abo Aisha , Truthout, 24 April 2026

‘In Gaza, displaced families are locked in a relentless battle. Since February 2026, a new terror has emerged: Predatory rodents are shredding the tents that residents spent years pleading for at aid organizations and have also begun attacking and biting humans. This has created a state of panic across the camps. Parents now take shifts through the night, standing guard to protect their sleeping children from these aggressive creatures. As the displaced spend their third consecutive year living atop rubble, amid mounting waste and overflowing sewage systems, the camps seem to be the perfect breeding ground for this crisis.

Gaza is no longer merely heading toward an environmental and humanitarian catastrophe; it is living in the very heart of it. The specter of leptospirosis has become a grim reality, a plague that Dr. Bassam Zaqout, director of medical relief in Gaza, had previously warned would emerge. Zaqout clarified that this disease is transmitted through the urine of rats and other rodents, which are now swarming the camps. This outbreak arrives amid brutal living conditions: suffocating overcrowding, a dire lack of clean water, and the total collapse of basic health infrastructure — all of which have left the population’s health dangerously fragile in the face of infectious diseases.

Since the ceasefire agreement in October 2025, the suffering of Gazans has been pushed to the margins of global consciousness. There has been little relief from this human-made crisis in Gaza, as the displaced living in tents, forced into a reality they couldn’t have imagined in their darkest nightmares before October 7. To report on the visceral reality of this forgotten crisis and the emerging health threats, I went to the legislative camp in western Gaza City. It sits atop the ruins of the Palestinian Legislative Council building, originally established by the Egyptian government in 1962.’

Iran

Watch; Alastair Crooke: Iran Vows ALL-OUT Retaliation as Oil Crisis Erupts, Trump HUMILIATED, Danny Haiphong; 29 April 2026

Intro; “Former UK Diplomat and Middle East expert Alastair Crooke joins to discuss the ongoing Iran war, now in a critical phase as the Trump administration sends mixed signals and Tehran declares full readiness for all types of warfare thrown at it by the US-Israeli regime.’

Alastair Crooke, 7.20; “There was a reconsideration in Iran, and Iran came up with a really important change of strategy. And there was a usual misinformed nonsense that the Iranians had asked to meet Witkoff and Kushner again for a second time in Islamabad. And they were on the point of leaving because Trump said, oh, they capitulated. They’re going to give us all of the uranium, et cetera, et cetera. We’re getting quite familiar with this. It’s like an old record going on. And so they were about to fly out. All of this was nonsense. There was no intention by Araghchi or any of the Iranians to meet with the Americans. In fact, policy had changed. The new policy was not to discuss the nuclear issue now with the Americans, was to refuse negotiations on the nuclear issue. And what they wanted was a sequential process as the way ahead. And the sequential process was essentially that there would be, as I said before, the lifting of sanctions, the return of the frozen assets, but most importantly, agreement on Hormuz. They would open Hormuz, but strictly on Iranian terms, which would mean that those states that had supported military action against Iran would not be able to use the transit of Hormuz. It was also about the fees, that they would continue to charge fees and that they would decide who could pass and who could not, and that would be only arranged via the IRGC. So they wanted this to be discussed and they wanted to do this. And in return for that, then more energy would come out of Hormuz because Iranian energy would come up, but also other energy, not necessarily all energy, because some of them may be still regarded as having supported military attacks. Some of the states bordering Hormuz might be considered to have been contemplating or facilitating attacks on Iran. So nonetheless, it was seen to be a possible win for Trump that this was a climb down from the ladder. It was, of course, a toughening up of the Iranian position. But it was also intended that he could climb down the ladder by saying, okay, we will accept that, all sanctions can be lifted, and you will be able to open Hormuz so that enough oil can pass through it under your control system, but enough to keep the economies of the world still afloat. And that they said, well, the nuclear issue, maybe we can discuss that at a later date, maybe not. And so that was their position, and that was what Araghchii went, in fact, to Islamabad this last time. And presented to the Pakistanis and told them this is what it was the situation for now. And then he went to St Petersburg and spoke to Putin and Putin was very fulsome in his praise of Iran and said you’ve done a wonderful fight for your sovereignty which was very use of language particularly for Putin for a state to be greeted like that. And so then there was the deliberation about this in recent days in the White House. So now we need the background as to what’s going on because what the Iranians also see is a huge escalation of military forces in the area. There has been a literal air corridor bringing in troops, bringing in munitions, the number of aircraft coming in daily is fantastic, we’re talking about big operation. And so the Iranians when I was speaking to them recently or at least listening to them and speaking the Iranian have a strong belief that escalation is coming.”

24m40s; “It’s fascinating how they thought the timeline would play out, how the Kurds would take this role, that it was all ready to go and then suddenly Erdogan said something to Trump and Trump said no. I have to qualify by saying this is the Israeli narrative of the Mossad’s success. I have a different narrative about what happened to the Kurds than that. But nonetheless, it’s very important to understand how disillusioned and disappointed such prominent people can be. They thought this was a brilliant plan. It was all set to start in June. It had been planned beforehand. Mossad had all these agents in place and the uprising was going to take place. And they lay out the whole thinking going right back from before Netanyahu’s time to Olmert’s time, when first the idea of destroying Iran became current in Iran and now they are completely disillusioned. That was the title of their talk, the war that never happened, that Netanyahu promised it. It seemed that America had green lighted it and it never happened. Actually, it probably never was going to happen. That’s the truth. But they are in denial of that, that it was based on faulty intelligence and faulty analysis. It wasn’t simply that there were all of these triggers that stopped it happening, that it was much more deeper. And so from Netanyahu’s perspective, and I don’t mean just Netanyahu and I don’t mean just the right, because 93% of Israelis favoured war with Iran, wanted to see Iran destroyed, I mean completely destroyed, not just its nuclear capacities, they wanted to stop it functioning as viable state. And they were clear about this. And so now all of their effort is to try and persuade or press Trump into continuing the war. Because they say any deal now is going to be bad for Israel. Anything, any compromise possible would be bad for Israel and therefore unacceptable to them. And this is now becoming an existential crisis within Israel. Because the whole of this idea of Greater Israel, the forcing the military control of territory was about what I call an eschatological end. It was to try and force the coming into being of redemption, to force us on Greater Israel. That’s what the right came into power to do, was to remove the Palestinians from the area, was to instigate, institute halakha law, and it was to establish Israel on the land of Israel and that this would bring about redemption and a messiah. And they believed this, many of them, even secular Israelis began to believe in this apocalyptic… and they believed that a war was necessary. I remember listening to Smotrich six, seven years ago, and he was saying then, listen, this is the plan. We’re going to get rid of it. We’re going to change the Supreme Court. We’re going to do this and that. But I have to tell you one thing, that it will only really be unfolded in the wake of a huge crisis or a big war. So the Israelis were wanting a big war.”

Watch 4 minutes; Russia & China Now OPENLY Backing Iran!; The Duran, The Jimmy Dore Show, 29 April 2026

Intro; ‘The hosts of The Duran, Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris, note that when Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi met with Vladimir Putin, the Russian president praised Iran’s “heroic defense” of its sovereignty, but the more significant detail was that the head of Russian military intelligence, Admiral Kostyukov, was also in the room—signaling that Russia is providing not just political backing but also logistical support such as satellite data, radar systems, and drone technology.

They tell Jimmy that the United States is not simply fighting Iran but is taking on Iran with both Russia and China behind it, given the strategic alliance formed through the Ukraine war. They explain that Trump could have walked away from the conflict before imposing the naval blockade on the Strait of Hormuz, but now that the blockade is in place, nothing can be resolved until it is lifted. They also note that if the blockade were removed, ships would pay tolls in Chinese yuan to pass through the strait—with US and Israeli ships excluded while all others are allowed—further cementing China’s role in the region.’

Watch; After the Pause: Iran, Lebanon and the Next Round of Confrontation,  Vanessa Beeley and UK Column, 1 May 2026

What is really going on in the region; vanessa beeley and UK Column; May 01, 2026

Mike Robinson is joined by Vanessa Beeley and, for her first appearance on UK Column, Myriam Charabaty. The discussion ranges across Iran, Lebanon, and the wider region, beginning with the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and Donald Trump’s increasingly erratic statements on Iran.

Both guests argue that the so-called ceasefires with Iran and Lebanon are not ceasefires at all, but operational pauses used by the United States and Israel to regroup after failing to achieve their stated military objectives. Myriam sets out why a second round of confrontation is likely to be heavier than the first, including the possible use of tactical or biological weapons on a limited scale, while ruling out any meaningful ground invasion of Iran itself.

The conversation also covers Iran’s continued drone production, the attrition facing US forces across the region, the political pressures on Lebanon’s government over normalisation with Israel, and the positioning of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, the UAE, Kuwait, and Bahrain as the conflict develops. Vanessa and Myriam argue that the survival of the resistance axis is itself the measure of victory, and that American power in West Asia is now visibly failing.

ANTI-WAR PROTEST: Massive Protest Erupts Outside Raf Fairford In UK Over US Bombers,Times Now World, 26 April 2026

‘Hundreds of anti-war activists gathered outside RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire on Saturday, protesting the use of the base by US forces for military operations linked to Iran. Demonstrators accused the UK government of enabling foreign military action from British soil and waved Palestinian and Iranian flags while surrounding the perimeter fence. Organised by the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and the Stop the War Coalition, protesters called for an end to US bomber operations and greater diplomatic engagement in the Middle East. The UK government has previously authorised limited defensive use of British bases, while US officials have criticised restrictions on operational support. Authorities monitored the demonstration as tensions over regional conflicts continue to escalate globally.’

30 generals have refused to send troops to Iran

Watch; 25th Amendment NOW! Chuck Baldwin, 7 April 2026

Chuck Baldwin; “At least 30 generals have refused to execute Trump’s orders to commit war crimes and send US ground forces to Iran. At least 30 so far, 12 of them have been fired, including the commander of the US army Ground Forces. The rest of the generals will also be dismissed. Pretty much every commander who controls ground forces and has to go. Ladies and gentlemen, this is pure, unadulterated fascism. If JD Vance and Marco Rubio have any smidgen of a conscience or any smidgen of a desire for future political office, they will assemble the Cabinet, use the Authority of the 25th Amendment to the Constitution, and remove Trump from office. After that, he must be arrested, prosecuted, convicted of war crimes, and sent to to prison. We must end the lawlessness of Washington DC and bring the rule of law back to America.”

Watch; Iranian Women Resist Invasion, Hospitals Targeted and Petrodollar Collapse, 21 April 2026

Intro; MintPress News founder Mnar Adley, this essential interview with University of Tehran professor Dr. Setareh Sadeqi reveals the devastating reality of US-Israeli aggression against Iran that corporate media refuses to report. With over 307 medical facilities destroyed in one month, schools bombed, and universities targeted, Iran faces what officials describe as a genocidal campaign.

Dr. Sadeghi exposes:

• How BBC journalists calling for Iran to be “nuked” are tied to CIA-backed regime change networks

• Why Iranian women are leading mass rallies in defense of their nation—not against it

• The collapse of Western propaganda as independent Iranian creators go viral worldwide

• How Iran’s regulation of the Strait of Hormuz is accelerating the petrodollar’s decline

• UAE’s covert complicity in war crimes while positioning itself as a neutral party

• Why Russia and China are aligning with Iran against unipolar imperial domination

As Trump threatens to “wipe out Iranian civilization,” 93 million Iranians are uniting against what they identify as a war on their sovereignty, culture, and right to self-determination.

Dr. Sadeghi explains how attacks on hospitals, UNESCO heritage sites, and civilian infrastructure have strengthened national unity across political divides.

Dr. Setareh Sadeqi, 6.00; “Just last night, I saw people holding banners and placards that were referring to Christian zionism, referring to Epstein class. And I’m really amazed by how people kept informed about what exactly is happening. And they see our battle as a broader battle against a class of Satanism, basically, and when you get engaged in talks with men and women on the streets who are marching against this aggression, you hear them talk about the Epstein files, about zionism, about the crimes that both Netanyahu and Trump have committed. And so there is an increasing understanding and awareness of who and what exactly the Iranian nation is fighting against. So, as I said, they are seeing this as a broader battle for humanity and wanting to be on the right side of history, fighting against what represents or manifests Satanism and evilness, what represents an attack against humanity. Basically, it’s not only about Iran. It’s that we have two criminal regimes, terrorist regimes, that have been acting against humanity not only in Iran, but also in Palestine, in Lebanon, in Syria, but also across the world, with absolute impunity. And Iranians are taking pride in being the first nation or the first political establishment, let’s say, to have the courage and the power to stand against these aggressors, and to bring about some sort of punishment for the crimes that they have committed. And Iran has accused the United States of its intent to commit genocide.”

Only Iran says no to Israel Project in Middle East – Douglas Macgregor

Watch; Iran’s Defiance: Why Israel is Attacking! PursuitofTruth, 21 April 2026

Col. Douglas Macgregor; “The only nation state in the region that has said no thank you to Israel is Iran. Has anyone ridden to the rescue of the Palestinians who are being murdered or expelled from their homes? Has the Egyptian army said we have a moral obligation to our brothers to cross Israel’s border and protect all of these people who are being driven from their homes and killed? No. What about the Turks? What about the Turks? There’s the 500 pound gorilla in the room. The largest army in NATO, powerful state, supposedly Muslim, supposedly feeling solidarity with Muslims everywhere. And what have they done? Nothing. And Syria? What’s happened in Syria? We removed the moderate who actually ran the country and essentially tolerated Shiites, Jews, Armenians, Christians. We got rid of him. We’ve replaced him with an ISIS Al Qaeda alumnus. That suits Mr. Netanyahu. That seems to suit Mr. Erdogan. But now we see the Israelis moving north in Lebanon. Eventually the Israelis are going to move north in Syria. What will the Turks do at that point? The only nation state in the region that has said no thank you to Israel is Iran. And so it had to be attacked, it had to be destroyed. Only it refuses to be destroyed and it refuses to capitulate. That’s the stark truth.”

Watch; Professor Marandi on how Iran is trying to shift US policy away from Israeli Interests, Al Mayadeen, 21 April 2026

Professor Seyed Marandi; “Well, you know better than I the feelings that Iran has towards Lebanon. The Iranians did not accept the ceasefire as long as there was no ceasefire in Lebanon and Iran continued to prevent the ships from passing through the Strait of Hormuz. And that led to the US siege on Iranian ports. So the US siege on Iranian ports was the result of the fact that Iran said, no, Lebanon was supposed to be a part of the ceasefire, and it has to be a part of the ceasefire. So there’s no doubt that Iran will not end this conflict without the Israeli regime being forced to leave all of Lebanon. And, of course, the issue of Gaza and the issue of the Axis of Resistance and the West Bank, all of these have to be a part of the broader equation. But one thing that I would like to stress, and that is that what Iran really is attempting to do, and this is something that perhaps Larry Johnson, who is a very good friend and very knowledgeable friend, he could comment on this. One of the things that Iran is attempting to do in this war is to make the United States pay such a price, not only so that it will never attack Iran again, but to make the decision makers in the United States, force them, to choose American interests over Israeli interests. And the ceasefire in Lebanon was an instance where the United States forced its interests upon the Israeli regime, even though Netanyahu definitely did not want a ceasefire. Of course, the strange thing is that after that, Trump, instead of using this as an off ramp, he said he wants to preserve the siege on Iranian ports. This doesn’t make sense because, on the one hand, they forced the ceasefire on the Israeli regime, and then instead of expanding upon that and pushing the ceasefire towards further negotiations and perhaps further agreements, he did the opposite. But in any case, for Iran, it is important to make the Americans hurt in a way that they start thinking about their own interests over Israeli interests.”

Watch; Michael Hudson: Iran War Ignites Global Financial Armageddon, Glenn Diesen, 25 April 2026

Professor Michael Hudson, 16.00; “The US military doesn’t have an ability to do anything to really conquer Iran. All it can do is bomb it. Despite what Trump says, their navy’s not destroyed, maybe half of it is, their airforce is not destroyed, maybe half of it is, the missile launchers are not destroyed. What were destroyed were the balloons that they bought from China and inflated to look like missile launchers, which were bombed, that Trump said we’ve destroyed all of their missile launchers. So Iran is in a much stronger military position defensively. Iran is not an offensive power. The only countries that Iran can threaten are its Arab neighbours in West Asia. Iran’s not going to be a world power in the sense that America, Russia or China is a military power. It’s not going to be an investment power itself because it’s been stripped of its foreign means of investment. It’s not even going to be a major trade power. What is giving it all the power that it has is the moral power, saying ‘we are not going to stand up for letting the United States become the world’s dictator and using oil trade, food trade, the dollar as weapons against other countries to maintain one-sided exploitative control over them. We’re not going to let that happen.’ Somebody has to draw the line. It’s Iran that has drawn the line. That’s what its moral power is. Other countries really don’t have any choice except either to tell Iran, ‘you’re right, we have to make a change, we have to stop this aggression by the United States and Israel’. To say, ‘we will destroy your economy either militarily or economically if you don’t do what we want’. Or they’ll isolate themselves from the United States and Israel by going their own way. Essentially that means isolating the United States until it ends its military and financial attempt to weaponise everything that it does in every economic and social activity.”

Watch; 4,000 Iranian Missiles Flattened Northern Israel, An Unstoppable Act Of Revenge, NaMaria Ferreira, 22 April 2026

Presenter; at 11m40s; “Is Israel just trying to drag the US in a prolonged war and to what extent?”

Col Douglas Macgregor; “Oh, I think that’s very true. I think they would like to have us in a state of perpetual warfare with the enemies of Israel. That’s their view. But you need to come to terms with the reality; the Israelis don’t care about anybody in the Gulf. They couldn’t care less. They don’t care about anybody who is not a Jew. Let’s be frank. This is the state of Jewish supremacy. This is a war of Jewish supremacy. How many times do you have to listen to someone like Netanyahu or Ben Gavir or a host of other people tell you that at some point you have to take people at their word, believe what they are saying, and they don’t give a damn about us. We are only useful insofar as that they can employ our military power at will in support of their goals. Is it in our interest to destroy the Iranian nation state? No, we have no interest in that. Why would we be interested in doing a thing like that? We want to trade. Trade is the lifeblood of our nation. We are a commercial state. We’re not some sort of totalitarian Soviet Union that walls itself off and then tries to impose new communist regimes on other states. That’s all nonsense. Israel is interested in one thing, Israel. And if Israel has to sacrifice billions of people in order for it to feel safe, in order for it to dominate the region, that is exactly what Israel will do. Now, inside the United States, this truth is finally beginning to be felt. People are beginning to figure this out and they’re asking the question, what are we doing? What is this for? Why would we implement a draught and raise a million men and then move them 6,000 miles from the United States to attack people in Iran? People are asking that, what’s the reason? What’s the strategic purpose? Was Iran a threat to us? And people know that’s not true. We’ve been listening to all of these lies for years. ‘Oh, the Iranians are two weeks from a nuclear weapon’. Iran’s been two weeks from a nuclear weapon for at least 30 years. And by the way, if they get a nuclear weapon, they’re going to nuke America. What? Why? Is there a particular reason for that? No. And remember, historically, when we went into the Gulf, we said our purpose there was to permit commercial traffic. In other words, to facilitate it, to protect it, to encourage it, not to stop it. But then, under tremendous pressure from the Israeli lobby in the United States and the zionist billionaires that back it and Israel itself, we finally decided, all right, we’ll go to war and we’ll get the deal that you want. We’ll emasculate Iran, we’ll make them bow to your interests and what you want. After all that’s happened in the Gulf, that’s what the Gulf states have done effectively. Saudi Arabia has done that. Has anyone ridden to the rescue of the Palestinians who are being murdered or expelled from their homes? Has the Egyptian army said we have a moral obligation to our brothers to cross Israel’s border and protect all of these people who are being driven from their homes and killed? No. What about the Turks? What about the Turks? There’s the 500 pound gorilla in the room. The largest army in NATO, a powerful state, supposedly Muslim, supposedly feeling solidarity with Muslims everywhere. And what have they done? Nothing. And Syria, what’s happened in Syria? We removed the moderate who actually ran the country and essentially tolerated Shiites, Jews, Armenians, Christians. We got rid of him. We replaced him with an ISIS Al Qaeda alumnus. That suits Mr. Netanyahu, that seems to suit Mr. Erdogan. But now we see the Israelis moving north in Lebanon. Eventually the Israelis are going to move north in Syria. What will the Turks do? At that point, the only nation state in the region that has said no thank you to Israel is Iran. And so it had to be attacked, it had to be destroyed. Only it refuses to be destroyed and it refuses to capitulate. That’s the stark truth.”

21m10s; “Here’s the thing we haven’t talked about. That’s a nuclear weapon. We’re not going to use a nuclear weapon. I can tell you a lot of things about President Trump. He’s not going to do that, he is justifiably opposed to that, he sees that as the worst thing that could happen. And he’s right, it is. Because once you use it, it normalises the use of the weapon. The Russians, the Chinese, the Pakistanis, the Indians, all of the nuclear powers will not respond positively to that development. That could have terrible consequences for Israel. Terrible consequences. They’re the ones that are most likely to turn to the use of the nuclear weapon, not us. And my concern from the very beginning, and still, is that Mr. Netanyahu has more authority over us than President Trump has over him and Israel. And that’s because the Congress and the White House and the financial sector and media are all ultimately tied to him. The zionist billionaires that support him, bankroll him are going to keep him in a position of power over us if we allow it. And Mr. Trump is in office because of them. And there are people on the Hill that are there because of them. So how do you disengage from this war without risking risking a serious breach with Israel? And what that could mean here inside the United States for the political leader who does that, I don’t know. I don’t know the answer to the question. But I don’t see any evidence that the Iranians are going to change their views and their demands. If anything, this war and the damage we’ve done has reinforced it and stiffened their spines to the point where they will not bow.”

Watch; Iran War FALLOUT: It Gets Worse for USA | E. Mamedov and Dr. P. Shakarian, Neutrality Studies, 2 April 2026

Dr. Pietro A. Shakarian, at 46m37s; “Turkey has to be kind of careful because all the oil coming from Baku goes through Turkey to Israel. At the same time, the Turkish street is incredibly anti-Israeli and incredibly sympathetic with Palestine. So this is a big issue. It puts Turkey in a much more difficult position, but it also puts more pressure on Turkey that they see that they are being singled out, not only in the case of this video, which is set to Jim Morrison and the Doors ‘The End’, this kind of a thing, where Erdogan is the last one in the waiting room to be killed off. But in addition, even Naftali Bennett going and saying directly to the camera that Turkey is the next Iran, and that’s the former prime minister of Israel saying that. So that if that is not a clear message, I don’t know what else is. Plus, also, as Eldar is saying, the destruction of Iran, the dismantling of Iran, for Turkey to have an issue with the Kurds, and especially when they see that Trump has actually been trying to court the Kurds in Iran. He’s been trying to kind of maybe do a revival of the Mahabad project in Iran today or something like this. And it seems as if, according to what I’ve read most recently, the Kurds are not interested in that proposal. They’re not interested in that proposition because they’ve also been screwed over by the US in the past, in recent memory. So I think at the end of the day Turkey is very, very cognisant of what Israel’s intentions are, but they’re playing their hand very, very well and, and very, very cleverly.”

David Miller

Watch; Iran is Winning this War! Spinwatch, 17 March 2026

David Miller; “The air defence supplies which have been supplied by the Americans to the zionists are about to run out. So they’re running out so fast, in fact, that they’ve had to requisition spare air defence resources from South Korea because they can’t make enough fast enough to replace them. So this is a disaster for the US, a disaster for the zionists. They never anticipated that Iran would immediately attack 27 bases across eight countries or so across the whole of West Asia, nor that they would be able to keep the focus on the zionist entity itself and relentlessly bomb all their huge list of targets which are still not finished. So we’re seeing the possibility of the ending of this war on the basis of an abject zionist and US surrender. I wouldn’t be surprised if that happens. But we also, of course, have to see what happens with the rest of the missiles which the Iranian government has. I think we’ve seen one or two or a few of the more advanced missiles being used by Iran, and those missiles, of course, were kept in reserve so that the air defences would be overwhelmed and there would be clear skies for them to attack any target that they want.”

Watch; Iran is at a crisis point, Spinwatch, 15 April 2026

‘Iran is at a crisis point and the IRGC must reassert its control back from the reformists, argues anti-zionist academic David Miller.’

David Miller; “We’re the latest in a series of crisis points. Either the reformists, who appear to have the whip hand at present in Tehran, are allowed to continue with their disastrous policy of not re engaging now that there’s no ceasefire, or the IRGC re-asserts control under Khamenei. What’s happened, as I understand it from inside the process, is that the Ministry of Foreign affairs people have been allowed to freelance this and they have disastrously sold out the Iranian people. So it’s a crisis point, and it depends which way Iran goes. If Iran decides to go back to conflict, then they have every chance of decisively beating both the Americans and indeed the zionists.”

Zionist responds to the question; why should israel have a nuclear weapon and not Iran?

Watch; This Interview was FINISHED Now, Muslims Way Official, 8 April 2026

Interviewer; “Why should the world tolerate you having nuclear weapons and not say Iran.”

Israeli Official; ” First again, we never admitted to have such weapons. But the very comparison is, I must say, it’s very insulting and I tell you why. We suffered one Holocaust. We listen to our neighbours.”

Interviewer; “Is it because of the Holocaust that you should be allowed to have nuclear weapons?”

Israeli Official; “You know what? This interview was finished now. Your attitude is so hostile and your questions are so arrogant.”

We know WMD in Iraq were lies but what is revealed is that in reality, the invaders were after Saddam Hussain’s stores of gold bars and oil.

Watch; Nick Irving explains why Iraq made him question new nuclear weapons claims, Dutycalldaily, 6 March 2026

Nick Irving; “Israel has been saying Iran has had nuclear weapons since like the 90s. When I was in the military, we went to other places other than Iraq and Afghanistan. When it comes to to Iraq, we were sold an entire lie on that of nuclear, weapons of mass destruction, chemical warfare, buildings and all this and that. We had a mission going into a big warehouse where they believed weapons of mass destruction were being held there. Nothing was in there but chlorine and we had dropped two 500 pound bombs on it. The weapons destruction they were talking about was gold bars. Saddam Hussein had a lot of gold and a lot even more oil. That was the weapons we were going after of mass destruction, the root of all evil. “

Offscreen voice; “That entire raid, it was all a lie. And it is proven, documented and America just keeps moving on like okay, who’s next?”

Nick Irving; “Exactly, I’ve been there, I was sold that same lie and I went there and I saw the lie. You want me to believe this next one too from the same people who already lied to me?”

The US spent 40 years trying to break Iran but it actually built Iran

Watch; This Is How Iran Has Survived US Sanctions, SeizeGlobe, 30 March 2026

“The US spent 40 years trying to strangle Iran. Sanctions over sanctions. Most countries would collapse under that pressure. So how did Iran survive? When foreign goods became unaffordable, they built replacements. Today, Iran has its own version of Amazon, Uber, and Netflix. It’s all homegrown. Domestic brands now hold 80% of the appliance market. Entire industries rebuilt from inside. When engineers couldn’t access foreign chips, they improvised stripped components out of washing machines and refrigerators. Those same drones were later used by Russia to strike targets across Ukraine. And here’s the surprise, none of this was a government plan. It came from a generation of engineers and entrepreneurs who simply grew up believing they had no other option. Sanctions were built to break Iran. Instead, they built Iran. What you’re forced to build yourself, no one can ever take away.”

Iran split its command into 31pieces so no leader could be toppled.

Watch; What is IRGC’s mosaic doctrine? Iran continues to respond to US Israel strikes, Griha Atul, 16 March 2026

Griha Atul; “Iran built a military that cannot be stopped. Not by bombs, not by assassinations, not even by Iran itself. Here’s the doctrine that explains why this war has no off switch. When Saddam Hussein’s military collapsed in 11 days in 2003, Iran’s generals watched and drew one conclusion. A centralised military dies when you kill the head. So in 2005, IRGC General Mohammad Jafari formalised what is now called the Mosaic Doctrine. The idea, break the military into 31 pieces, one per province, and make each piece capable of fighting alone, forever. Each of Iran’s 31 provincial commands has its own headquarters, its own weapon stockpiles, its own intelligence network, its own own sealed orders, pre written, pre authorised, that activate the moment Central Command goes silent. No signal needed from Tehran, no order from the Supreme Leader. The trigger is the absence of an order to stop. This isn’t a flaw in the design, it is the design. On February 28, Israel and the US struck Iran’s leadership infrastructure in what they called Operation Epic Fury. Khamenei was killed. The communication backbone that would carry a ceasefire order degraded by thousands of strikes. And the 31 commands kept firing because the doctrine said, if no one tells you to stop, don’t stop. Here’s where it gets remarkable. Hamas, the organisation Iran armed for 17 years, publicly asked Tehran to stop targeting neighbouring countries this week. The Axis of Resistance is arguing in public for the first time since it was created, because even Iran’s own proxies now understand what the doctrine’s designers never built in. There is no off switch. The machine was built to survive without an operator. The operator is gone and the machine is running. This is not a war Iran is winning. This is a war Iran can no longer end.”

The engine behind Trumps war with Iran; hawkish US Senator and staunch Israel ally Lindsey Graham openly reveals his hatred for Iranians and their ancient civilisation, saying “now is the best opportunity to “neutralise” Iran in the past 2,000 years”.

Read; Iran scoffs at US senator’s claim that ongoing war could end ‘2,000-year conflict’ Press TV, 23 March 2026

‘Iran has highlighted the contradiction between US Senator Lindsey Graham’s claim that America’s 2026 war efforts against the Islamic Republic could end a “2,000-year-long conflict” and Washington’s earlier justification that the war was launched due to Tehran’s alleged “imminent threat.”

Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei made the remarks in a post on X on Monday concerning earlier comments made by the hawkish lawmaker.

“So, wasn’t it for an ‘imminent threat’ that you attacked Iran?!” Baghaei wrote. “Or has Iran been posing such an ‘imminent threat’ for the past 2,000 years to the United States as of 1776!!!?”

Observers commenting on the issue similarly questioned how it would be possible for the United States, a nation that has existed for less than 250 years, to resolve a “2000-year-long conflict” with Iran.

The United States and the Israeli regime launched their latest bout of unprovoked aggression against the Islamic Republic late last months, with Graham acting as a vocal supporter of such aggression.’

Watch; “Is Israel The Real Existential Threat?”Noble Impact, 31 January 2026

Professor Avi Shlaim, Historian; “Iran is not an existential threat to Israel, but it is a strategic threat. Now let’s compare the records of these two countries. Iran has never attacked a neighbour. Israel has repeatedly attacked its neighbours. Iran signed the Non Proliferation Treaty. Israel has refused to sign. Iran submits to inspection by the International Nuclear Energy Agency. Israel refuses to submit. Iran has no nuclear weapons. Israel has between 75 and 400 nuclear weapons. So Israel poses an existential threat to Iran. Now, okay, briefly and then I have one more point to make. For the last 40 years, Israel has conducted a systematic campaign of disinformation about Iran. Why the lies? Why the double standards? Why the hypocrisy?”

Danny Ayalon, Israeli diplomat; “Israel, only out of self defence, is defending itself. And Israel has never ever threatened another country.”

Avi Shlaim; “Israel has attacked its neighbours, not in self defence. One example, first one is the Suez War of 1956. It wasn’t a war of self defence. It was a colonial conspiracy to attack Egypt. Lebanon 1982 was most emphatically not a war of self defence. It was an Israeli invasion of Lebanon.”

Listen; Michael Hudson: World Will Not Be the Same After the Iran War, Glenn Diesen, 1 April 2026

‘Prof. Michael Hudson, a world-renowned classical economist, discusses why the war against Iran has changed the global economy permanently.’

Wise words about the antics of Trump and the killer clowns.

Watch; The U.S. has failed in all its objectives in Iran, The Cradle, 31 March 2026

Chas W. Freeman Jr. is a former US diplomat who served as ambassador to Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War and later as assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs. He also acted as principal interpreter for President Richard Nixon during the 1972 opening to China.

Chas Freeman, at 11m25s; “So I think this is going exceedingly badly. It has achieved none of the smorgasbord or word salad of objectives with which it was announced. It has not curtailed the Iranian nuclear programme. It has guaranteed that Iran will now go nuclear due to changes in leadership. And also the original fatwa which said that if Iran were threatened with existential destruction, then weapons of mass destruction, like nuclear weapons would be permissible. It did not produce a regime change in Iran, except that it killed a whole echelon of senior leaders and brought to power younger people who are more nationalist, more hardline, less compromising. It killed Ali Larijani, who might have been the one person in Tehran capable of negotiating a resolution of this war with the United States. It totally discredited American diplomacy, with Witkoff and Kushner twice serving as decoys for surprise attack. They are clearly not welcome interlocutors with Iran anymore. And we’ve seen J.D. Vance, the Vice President, offered up, apparently for talks in Pakistan. So we’ve seen no diplomacy at all. And Iran clearly does not want a ceasefire. It is determined to soldier on until it achieves its objectives, which it has clearly stated. One is restoring deterrence of Israel or destroying Israel, whichever it can accomplish first. The second, in other words, Israel has posed an existential threat to Iran, Iran has reciprocated with an existential threat to Israel. It has added to that to its conditions, a ceasefire and withdrawal from Lebanon, peace with Hezbollah. It has done everything it could to convince the Gulf Arabs that they cannot afford to have American bases on their territory because far from defending them, they attract attack. Iran is not going to go away. It’s been there for 2,500 years and it’s going to be there after this war. And at this point, we don’t know when or even if the war will end. It’s entirely possible, given history of the last 40 years in which there has been a low intensity conflict between Israel and Iran, which has spilled over to other countries, but which has involved an enormous number of assassinations and attacks on Iran by Israel, we don’t know whether this war will end. Perhaps it will relapse into a lower intensity conflict in which Israel continues to be bombed with missiles from Iran. There’s no evidence that Iran has run out of the capacity to attack anymore. The United States and Israel have the capacity to attack. But to go back to your initial question, Sharmine, how long will the American public be willing to arm Israel for wars that are either genocidal or utterly illegal, purposeless, and which draw the United States into them? I don’t know the answer to that question.”

How the president of the US describes Iran compared to reality

Watch; This is how the President of the United States describes the Iranian people. Vile, Shabnam Nasimi, 12 March 2026

Shabnam Nasimi, Afghan-British writer; “Watch how the President of the United States has described Iranians.”

Trump; “They are among the most evil people ever on earth. They cut babies, heads off, they chop women in half.”

Shabnam Nasimi; “Notice he didn’t say the Iranian regime, he didn’t say the government. And I know exactly what it means when a people get described like that. Because it’s been done to us too. You want to know why I started making content about history in Afghanistan and the region? Because the world already had an image of us. And it wasn’t human. It was rubble, it was terror, it was horror. It was never poetry, it was never hospitality. It was never a 5,000-year civilisation. So I made it my mission to show the other side, the side that exists, whether or not the news covers it. And this isn’t new. This is how it starts. You make a people monstrous in the public imagination. You strip them of their humanity. And then whatever comes next, people either cheer or they look away. I’ve studied enough history to know that pattern. And I’ve watched the same script before. You handed Afghanistan back to the Taliban. You left and now you point at what’s happening in the country and call us barbaric. The Taliban are not Afghanistan. They are not our culture. They do not represent us. We are a people of poetry, of music, of art, of love. And so are the Iranians. And that doesn’t just disappear. It was buried by those that you armed and handed power to. That is why I make what I make. Because dehumanising a people is never just words. It’s how you prepare the world for what comes next. My grandmother made bread by hand in a clay tandoor every morning in Afghanistan. My grandfather taught himself to read and to write and could recite Persian literature, the Shahnama, Hafez, Saadi, scholars who gave the world language, poetry, philosophy and science. My people have been feeding strangers and writing love poetry since before most modern nations even existed. My people practiced the first monotheistic religion in the world. It gave humanity human rights debate, spirituality and thought. Most evil on earth? We are ancient, we are complex, and we are human.”

Iranian leader says America will go for another country after it has destroyed Iran as it doesn’t want a multipolar world.

Watch; “We are ready to stop the war” Iranian Representative’s big remark on war negotiations with US, ANI News India, 3 March 2026

Dr Abdul Majid Hakeem Ilahi; “The aim of America is not Iran, but wants to attack the regime after Iran will come to another countries. It has been known that, according to investigations, in the near future there will be shift of power to some other countries. And in the near future, the most powerful countries in the world will be India, China, Russia and America as well. So America doesn’t want to have any partner, doesn’t want to be India the powerful country, doesn’t want China to be powerful country. Because of that, they create a lot of wars to stop this ongoing in the future. And we are ready. We are ready to stop the war. We are ready for negotiating. But the negotiating should be with the dignity, not dictating something against Iran. We are defending ourselves. We are looking for our right and nothing else.”

Listen ; Is Iran the ‘Leading State Sponsor of Terrorism?‘ The Chris Hedges Report, 3 April 2026

John Kiriakou, ex-CIA, at 17m50s; “The Israelis believe that they benefit from surrounding countries being mired in chaos. For example, in Syria, the Israelis benefited from never ending war there. I always maintained that the devil you know is better than the devil you don’t and that Bashar al-Assad was no threat to Israel. But then you put the former co-founder of ISIS in charge, a man who was a longtime member of Al Qaeda in charge. He immediately begins pogrom against minority communities, whether they’re Druze or Christian or what have you. And that’s supposed to be better for whom? In Iraq, the same thing. The Israelis were threatened by a central government led by Saddam Hussein. They benefited from chaos. Their view was if Iraqis are busy killing each other, they’re not going to be a threat to Israel. They won’t threaten to kill Israelis. We saw the same thing happen in Libya. Now we’re seeing the same thing happen in Iran. I think that you’re exactly right that the Israelis really want, at the end of this, a failed state. They want to see decades where Iranian is pitted against Iranian and they just simply take years and years to kill each other.”

Watch; Point of No Return – Prof Jiang x Tucker Carlson, Prof Jiang Educating, 27 March 2026

Tucker Carlson; “My question is because there are so many global players, big global players, the US and China, I think, who would be hurt by this? Why is there not an incentive to get it settled quickly and why can’t that happen?”

Professor Jiang Xueqin; “Once this war starts, it achieves a momentum and logic of its own. So the United States doesn’t really have an off-ramp, meaning that tries to negotiate a ceasefire with Iran, Iran would ask for reparations about $1 trillion basically, it would ask for the United States to leave the Middle East permanently to ensure its long term survival. If the United States were to do that, then the GCC nations would collectively become client states of Iran because only Iran can guarantee their safety as well as use of the shared Hormuz. The GCC is the basis of the petrodollar. So what the GCC does is it sells oil and US dollars and then recycles this money back into the American economy. So if the GCC were to abandon the petrodollar and this would have severe repercussions on the American economy. Also there’ll be a chain reaction in that Japan and South Korea would look at what’s happened in the Middle East and decide that the United States can no longer guarantee their safety. So they would have to remilitarise and they would have spent all the resources on adapting to possible China threat. And then you have Europe, and then Europe would look at what happened in the GCC as well as in Southeast Asia and they would be like, why are we fighting Russia? Wouldn’t it be in our best interest to negotiate a peace treaty with Russia as soon as possible? What this would mean they collapse of the US Dollar as a global reserve currency. Remember that America is sitting on $39 trillion in debt and so the American economy is a Ponzi scheme that relies on foreign nations to continually buy US dollars. So the US economy would not be able to withstand essentially American withdrawal from the Middle East. So the Americans are stuck where they are right now, unfortunately.”

Iranians are prepared to die for their country to remain independent of Western supremacist influence and its not existent culture

Watch; Ali Khamenei was at home, Scott Ritter, MOATS, 4 March 2026

Scott Ritter; “Ali Khamenei was at home in his residence, knowing he was being hunted down by the United States, knowing he was being targeted by death. He was surrounded by fellow Shaheeds who also knew that they were going to die. But they also understood that there was a purpose in their death, because by dying, they entered into martyrdom. And the Iranian people are in the streets, but they’re not shouting ‘death to Khamenei’, they’re shouting, ‘long live the martyr Khamenei’. That’s why we lost the war on day one. This was a trap set by the Iranians on day one by people of faith. Donald Trump wouldn’t even know what a Shia is or what a Twelver is. He doesn’t know who Hussein is. He doesn’t know who Ali is. He has no clue what the Battle of Karbala is. And yet he fell into a trap where all of this is relevant. He assassinated or facilitated the murder of the second most important man in the Shia faith, Ali Khamenei. This is the equivalent of killing the Pope if you’re Catholic, killing the Archbishop of Canterbury if you’re British, killing the head of the Orthodox Church, Kirill if you are Russian. And Donald Trump doesn’t understand this. If the purpose of this operation was to get the Iranian people in the street, Donald Trump succeeded. But he got the wrong people in the street for the wrong cause. The people of Iran today are rallying in support of the Islamic Republic. The Islamic Republic is invincible at this moment because you can’t kill people who are ready to die for their cause. And the Shia of Iran who are defending the Islamic Republic are prepared, to a man, to a woman, to become martyrs in the cause of their faith. And it is the Islamic Republic of Iran that they are defending. Not just their land, not just their culture, not just their history, but their faith. Donald Trump lost this war.”

How did tiny Israel persuade America to do its bidding in a way that it was going to hurt the US? Tucker Carlson

Watch; He Didn’t Have a Choice…Tucker Carlson, 4 March 2026

Tucker Carlson; “How did this tiny country convince the world’s great superpower with the greatest military in history, to do its bidding in a way that was going to hurt it? The most obvious answer is because Bibi told the President of the United States, you can join me or not, but I’m going. And at that point, you really only have two choices. Get on board or tell Israel no. And if they did it, that would not protect us, because there are hundreds of thousands of Americans in the Middle East and they’re also the world’s most important energy infrastructure. Now, of course, there’s a third theoretical option. You say, nope, and if you do it, we’re going to cut off aid. But that was not even on the table. The last president to do that was John F. Kennedy in 1962, when he got in a dispute with the founding prime minister of Israel, David Ben Gurion, over Israel’s nuclear programme at Dimona. And President Kennedy said, no, can’t keep testing, and I’m demanding inspections. And of course, he was not able to make good on those promises because he was killed. The truth is, and this is hard to say as a proud American, but the United States didn’t make the decision here. Benjamin Netanyahu did.”

Iran ceasefire scam

Watch; Max Blumenthal : Israeli Agents in the White House Judging Freedom, 9 April 2026

Judge Napolitano; Is there a ceasefire between the United States and Iran as we speak?

Max Blumenthal; “No, there’s not a ceasefire. And it looks to me, having lived through the last three years and seeing how pauses in, for example, the Gaza genocide were exploited for Israel to remobilise and rearm, that we’re witnessing something similar as US Marines are being deployed to the region. And as Israel was on the verge of running out of interceptors and Iran had really consolidated its momentum, the United States, via Pakistan, attempted to create the impression of a ceasefire. Now, this allowed Donald Trump to game the markets and we’re seeing that some White House insider has placed a close to $1 billion bet on the price of Brent crude going down as Donald Trump sent oil prices tumbling with his announcement of his acceptance of Iran’s National Security Council’s ten-point plan as a baseline for discussions and negotiations. But the more revealing part of this ceasefire was how the United States government, looks like the State Department, had provided Pakistan’s Shehbaz Sharif Pakistan’s leader, with the framework or the terms that were agreed upon for the ceasefire as a draft and Sharif or someone in his office posted the draft, including the header that said ‘Terms for Sharif’. And then they edited the tweet on X but everyone could see that he had basically been fed these terms. These terms explicitly included Lebanon as part of the ceasefire. So the United States had agreed to include Lebanon, Iran had agreed to include Lebanon through Pakistan. So what does Israel do? Commits one of the worst massacres in history in Lebanon, massacring over 250 people, wounding over 1,200 people. There are families lining up outside hospitals to identify the bodies of over 90 people. Today they were bombing not just the Dahia section of Beirut, which is the Shia majority area where Hezbollah has had some offices, and they can always justify mass destruction and killings of civilians on that basis that it’s majority Shia, they were bombing areas like Ain El Mreisseh, the Corniche in the centre of Beirut, areas where opponents of Hezbollah live. They killed a famous Lebanese poet and her husband. Entire families were killed inside their homes. They bombed a funeral in a cemetery with a 500-pound bomb. The entire purpose of this was to sabotage the ceasefire and to provoke Iran into defending its ally in Lebanon.”

Watch; “There is no figure in our society that commands that kind of allegiance” Palestine Declassified, 19 March 2026

‘British academic David Miller says “Ayatollah Khamenei’s legacy will be that people will start to understand that Iran is the MOST IMPORTANT anti-imperialist nation in the world.”‘

Chris Williamson; “It’s just pretty clear, isn’t it, that Ayatollah Khamenei has now been immortalised, hasn’t he, in history for all time?”

David Miller; “Well, of course, the view that you get in the Western media about Iran is that these are the ayatollahs, these are the mullahs, these are people who are religious fanatics and extremists. And you can see in all the videos that came out from inside Iran after the news of his martyrdom was released was just so different. It’s not commensurate with that way of understanding and the outpouring of grief, of loyalty, of solidarity. You can’t imagine something like that ever happening in the UK or in the US. There’s no figure in our society which commands that kind of allegiance and that gives a lie to all of the western media coverage about what happens, and it hopefully helps people to understand that Iran is not how it’s portrayed in the western media. It’s quite a different society. It’s a much more complex society than we have any understanding of. And also the role of religion in anti-imperialism is something which is really not well understood in the West. But I think Khameini’s legacy will be that people will start to understand that Iran is the most important leading anti-imperialist nation in the world.”

China is supplying Iran with arms

Listen; Iran is Decolonising West Asia — And the US Empire is Crumbling in Real Time, UK Column News, 30 March 2026

‘In this wide-ranging episode, Carl Zha joins Ali Mirza for a deep dive into the catastrophic Iran war that has exposed the hollow core of American military power and is reshaping the geopolitical landscape of West Asia and beyond.

The headlines write themselves:

• The US now begs for time – buying 10 days to avoid bombing Iran’s energy grid after Iran threatened to destroy regional desalination plants
• Market manipulation exposed: Over $500 million in suspicious bets placed just before Trump’s market-moving tweets
• Iran exports MORE oil now than before the war – 1.5 million barrels per day at $90 (double pre-war revenue)
• The US has depleted one-third of its missile interceptors in just four weeks
• China supplies Iran with missile precursors while it bans rare earth exports to the US
• US allies realise they’re on the bottom of the food chain – Israel is the only priority

We break down:

• Why Trump’s “victory” declarations are just market manipulation tactics
• The terrifying parallel to Vietnam: How 3,500 Marines became 500,000 troops
• Why a ground invasion of Iran is logistically impossible (90 million people, unforgiving terrain, no coalition)
• The fertiliser crisis: 20% of world’s natural gas from Qatar is offline – planting season is NOW
• The helium shortage: Taiwan’s semiconductor industry is in trouble – the AI bubble is about to burst
• Why Australia is days away from running out of jet fuel (32% came from China, which banned exports)
• How US allies in Asia are waking up: South Korea’s THAAD system stripped, the Philippines begging China for oil deals
• The perception shift in America: Even MAGA turns on Trump over this war

Plus: The USS Ford “laundry room fire,” why China is the bedrock of stability, and why Iran is single-handedly decolonising West Asia.’

Fascinating history of the West’s bully tactics to destroy Iran to steal their oil and undermine their ability to demand fairness and peace in the Middle East.

David Miller The Secret British Intelligence War on Iran; 26 April 2026

Read; The Petrogas-dollar; The Secret Strategy Behind The Iran War; Richard Medhurst, 22nd April 2026

Intro; “This is a truly outstanding piece of independent journalism: an approx 30 minute documentary film researched, written, and produced by Richard Medhurst. First broadcast 11 April 2026 and one of the most important films you can watch at this time. Medhurst reveals how the Iran War is just one chapter in a US plan to monopolize energy and dismantle the Silk Road. Witness the transition of an empire into a Pirate State that feeds on the cannibalization of its own allies. Medhurst connects the dots from Venezuela, to Iran, to China, to Greenland — and all roads lead to Washington. Some excerpts below.

“The war in Iran is much larger than anyone seems to grasp. True, the United States are being humiliated on the battlefield by Iran, losing not just their F-35s and radars, but their military prestige. But in the background, the United States have quietly been carrying out an armed robbery of the world’s oil and gas supply. In the last 3 months alone, the US have hit Russian tankers, refineries, crippled China’s oil supply, captured the world’s largest oil fields, and kidnapped and assassinated two heads of state. We are witnessing the transition of the United States from an empire into a pirate state and the birth of what I call the petrogas dollar or the LNG dollar.”

“What United States have in mind is not simply control of the Western Hemisphere. It’s about moving to the Western Hemisphere, the planet’s energy corridor. So to get your oil and gas, you now have to go to the Gulf of Mexico or through Washington rather than the Middle East. So the US accomplished this by using their dominant market position by killing off the competition quite literally and then transplanting the planet’s industrial base to their own soil. So as this rat race unfolds where everyone is scrambling to move their factories to the United States just to keep the lights on and scrambling to buy the last scraps of gas and oil at 10 times the price. This provokes a massive flight of capital to the United States, de-industrializing and effectively cannibalizing their so-called allies in the Gulf, Europe, Asia, which strengthens the dollar for the time being in a last ditch attempt to save US hegemony.”

“The strategic value of this plan for the US empire is simply critical. It trumps all potential costs. Even being humiliated by Iran on the battlefield, or losing hundreds of thousands of troops, or having a disgruntled population is all worth the cost for Wall Street. The United States are transitioning from an aerial power to a naval power. Fully cementing their status as a pirate state. If they’re able to control others economies, they may not even need to maintain their 800 bases. From a purely business perspective, when corporations find a more efficient way to do the exact same thing and save costs, they always go for it. So why wouldn’t that apply in this case? None of these events are coincidences. None of these things happened by accident. They were all carefully planned at the highest levels of government and corporate America. This is the United States of tomorrow. It’s a pirate state that is completely out of control and has only one goal in mind. World domination, control of everyone’s resources, and the use of piracy, violence, and assassination in order to get its way.”

Israel’s war on water–depriving Palestinians in Gaza of water for at least nearly two decades, if not longer

It’s part of Israel’s multi-layered manufactured misery in Gaza, long before October 2023; Eva Karene Bartlett; May 1 2026

To be clear, Israel has been weaponizing water–depriving Palestinians in Gaza of water–for at least nearly two decades, if not longer. When I lived in Gaza, I documented Israel’s systematic destruction of wells & cisterns in the formerly-rich agricultural land in eastern & northern Gaza, also noting, “(Following the Israeli December 2008/January 2009 war on Gaza) A UNDP survey following the attacks found that nearly 14,000 dunums of irrigation networks and pipelines have been destroyed, along with 250 wells and 327 water pumps completely damaged, and another 53 wells partially damaged by Israeli bombing and bulldozing. Water has been further contaminated by chemical agents used by the Israeli army during its war on Gaza…”

On top of depriving Palestinians of their ability to collect water, Israel cut off the natural flow of water to Gaza. On top of this, Israel ensured Gaza’s coastal waters remained polluted by sewage, never allowing Palestinians to properly maintain and treat sewage, pumping into the sea being the only option to avoid having sewage flood the streets (as happened many times). See:

Back in 2014 when I wrote an indepth overview of the many sadistic policies Israel employed to ensure Gaza was unliveable back then, I noted: “Damage to the coastal aquifer from over-extraction will be reversible in 2020 if no action is taken now, a 2012 UN report notes. At the moment, 95% of water in Gaza is undrinkable according to WHO standards.”

Read; It rained in Iran, Sprinter Press Agency, 28 April 2026

‘The years-long drought suddenly ended. It’s raining, rivers are returning to their dried-up beds, and the country is blossoming before our eyes. Many have noticed: the climate changed immediately after US and Israeli military facilities were destroyed in the region.

According to information from open sources, Iran carried out strikes on “cloud seeding” radars in the UAE. It was reported that after this, the temperature in Tehran dropped by five degrees, and it started raining and snowing. In the era after the leak of Epstein’s archives, it’s hard to be surprised by anything. If Western elites hid monstrous crimes against children for years, why wouldn’t they also siphon off water from an entire country? The war with Iran isn’t just being waged with missiles. It seems that it was also being waged with drought. If the destruction of facilities really led to the restoration of normal weather, then the drought wasn’t a natural anomaly, but a man-made weapon.

Iran got rain. Another topic that was previously mocked as conspiracy theory seems to be becoming a reality.’

Watch; Weather has been weaponised, causing harm, suffering, drought, and crop failures, George Galloway, 29 April 2026

George Galloway; “Rivers, lakes, gigantic floods are now raging in not just Iran, but in Saudi Arabia, in Turkey, in Iraq. Rivers that have never flowed for centuries are now brim full of water. It is snowing in Iran for the first time in very many years. Iran had the drought that you described and was on the point of considering the evacuation of the capital, Tehran, because of a critical water shortage. And now there’s water, water everywhere and plenty of drops to drink. And the argument that it was the destruction of the US Radar facilities in the United Arab Emirates that has, if you’ll forgive the pun, turned the tide and the tide is now taken at its flux is solving the water problem of the Persian Gulf, hopefully forever, is demonstrably proof that weather has been weaponised, that weather has been deployed as a weapon of war, as an act of war causing untold harm, suffering, drought and bad harvests and all of the consequences.”

Please donate

Forgive me for pointing out that, while we receive some one-off donations, I am funding Farms Not Factories myself, and if we are to continue to fight the cruel, antibiotic-led factory farm system, we will need some regular donations from like-minded people. Please consider a monthly subscription of £2/month and help us support a network of smaller scale, humane and healthy UK pig farms, local abattoirs and butchers.

“Our message is simple, we want to help bring an end to this dangerous, inhumane system. Vote for real farming over factory farming.”
– Tracy Worcester, Director

Share This Article

Related ArticlesView All

March 27th, 2026
0
Legacy Media Perpetuates Lies

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter
February 27th, 2026
0
Benefits of Organic over Conventional Farming

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter
January 30th, 2026
0
Protect UK Farmers from Low Standard Imports

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter
December 5th, 2025
0
Protectionism vs So-Called Free Trade

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter
October 31st, 2025
0
Find A Farmer

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter
October 3rd, 2025
1
Zionist Money Rules

The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More

Newsletter

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*