January 31st, 2025 Newsletter

Plant Truth Bombs in Sleeping Minds

The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media. If you would like to keep up to date with the very latest information, then please follow me on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram or Telegram.

“The way you get democracy to function is by informing the public.” – Robert Kennedy Jr.

“Science is more than a body of knowledge. It is a way of thinking; a way of sceptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask sceptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be sceptical of those in authority, then, we are up for grabs for the next charlatan (political or religious) who comes rambling along.” – Carl Sagan

“Never worry about who will be offended if you speak the Truth. Worry about who will be misled, deceived and destroyed, if you do not.” and
”Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by and that has made all the difference.”
– Robert Frost

Though the newsletter chapters interrelate, they are divided into five sections and have a common realisation that a cabal of corporate elites have captured global trade, global governance, mainstream and online media, and ultimately many of our minds.

As a stenographer, I link to an article or audio and paste a key paragraph or two. My most trusted websites are platforms for journalists who don’t compromise on the truth and have thereby been shunned by the mainstream media. These include; Local Futures, SUSTAIN, Farm Gate, Global Research, Children’s Health Defence, Geopolitical Economy Report, The Grayzone, Unlimited Hangout, 21st Century Wire, UK Column; The Duran, Robert F Kennedy podcast, The Jimmy Dore Show, Palestine Declassified, Alex Krainer, Mattias Desmet, Dr John Campbell, The Cradle, Quds News Network, The Grayzone News, The Electronic Intifada, Jonathan Cook, Richard Medhurst, The Light printed newspaper, and Russell Brand or follow us on Telegram, For The People, Assange News, Resistance News Network, Juan Sinmiedo, Resistance News Network, B’Tselem, Pepe Escobar and TheElectronicIntifada.


The Great & The Good: Patrick Holden

Patrick and Becky Holden run a 300-acre organic dairy farm in West Wales where the milk from ninety pedigree Ayrshire cows is made into the world-renowned Hafod cheese. Patrick has been a hugely influential figure in the organic movement since the early seventies when he and five ‘idealistic and arguably naïve’ friends set up a back-to-the-land rural community based on food self-sufficiency at Bwlchwernen Fawr where, fifty years later, he and Becky still live and farm.

He was Director of the Soil Association for fifteen years, and is founder and CEO of the Sustainable Food Trust. In the video he and Becky explain how they produce some of the world’s finest cheddar cheese from the milk of cows who are treated with utmost respect and graze a fertility-building mixture of herbs, legumes and grasses.

Patrick says, “These are cows that know they’re loved and are trusted and trusting. And a cow herd is a community. There’s an extraordinary sensitivity about animals, they can nourish us emotionally and spiritually.”

Read the blog. Watch and share the video:

Post Instagram


Food & Farming/Inheritance Tax/CO2 tunnel vision

Inheritance Tax

If we recognise the value of farmers who feed us, we can support them by attending their tractor demonstration on Feb 10th, signing their Family Farm Tax petition, donating to their gofundme and posting their material on social media. Twitter; Facebook; Instagram; Website

Join us at the Change YOUR Tune Starmer Tractor Rally

Date: 10th February 2025, 13.00 – 17.30

Location: Whitehall, London

Farmers from across the country will come together to ensure they are heard and seen in Westminster as MPs in Parliament  debate the Family Farm Tax Petition which has over 150,000 signatures.

There will be a stage and large screen. At 3.30 farmer Nick’s song, speakers include Tom Bradshaw, Baroness Molleux, Mo Fisher, Gareth Wynn-Jones, Oli Fletcher. Then at 4.30 the parliamentary debate will be streamed to the big screen to everyone on Whitehall.

You can listen to the debate online via the UK Government’s YouTube channel


If we want to eat healthy, wholesome food we must buy it from UK farmers and pay them a fair price. Ideally avoid buying  meat and vegetables from supermarkets and instead seek out your local farmer’s market or farm shop – look them up via Big Barn.

Watch; Why Does US Food Make People Fat And EU Food Does Not? Organiser of above march, Liz Webster #SaveBritishFarming, 26 January 2025

Liz Webster; “Brexit Britain has to decide whether to get back closer to the EU or embrace a USA deal which is catastrophic for UK farming and food standards. The family farm tax, if allowed to continue, certainly clears the decks in preparation for a USA deal which would ensure even more intensified and processed food. Is this what the UK people want?”

Liz Webster; “Over the last few decades since really the 1980s with the growth of the supermarket power, farmers have been making less and less money. And then in recent times with Brexit, the support that we have enjoyed that we learned to invest in our food production after the last war has been removed. So never in a time in living memory has our food production, our food factories, had such little support when all around the world, every government subsidises food to ensure their countries are stable and strong.

So we’re in a very, very weak position with a government and many in Westminster who just don’t understand how dangerous it is for us to lose our ability to feed ourselves. And I think in many ways we’ve been so good at doing the job quietly. And we’ve also relied on the farmers on the continent to kick off when things happened, trade deals and so forth when we were in the EU and now we’re on our own.

And British farmers are having to learn to campaign and it doesn’t come naturally to them. But we’re on a fast learning curve. We’re uniting and getting that message across. But ultimately I say to everyone, if you eat, you are in agriculture. My grandfather was a cook in the RAF in the war, and he was based in India. And he absolutely made sure I understood the importance of food because he witnessed a famine out there.

And in South Wales where I grew up, we had massive problems with food in the war. So those lessons have been forgotten. And so what we need is for the country to understand why we need a government that invests and supports our farms, which makes sure we have healthy food and a beautiful environment. We all identify as being British through the look of the land. And it only looks the way it looks because we farmed Britain for thousands of years now.”

Presenter, Sam Seder; “You made the case passionately for government support for farming and food security. But let me put the question to you again. Why do you say that’s the threat? Because a bit of a tinkering with the inheritance tax rules, which won’t affect that many farms anyway.,

Liz Webster; “We have to spend a fortune to make a tiny amount of money. And some of them are existing on below minimum wage. Many of them are having to get a second job to afford to run the farm and feed Britain because of, as I’ve said, the recent developments in supermarket power and particularly the Brexit changes. And so all of these changes have happened. And then to put the inheritance tax on top, when farms are worth a lot of money, we are asset rich, cash poor, we can’t afford it.

So it’s putting a tax on farmers, which means that when the owner of the farm dies, they will have no alternative but to sell the farm. And the people that are buying farms are big corporations who want it for investment, not for family farms.

And that is the danger we face. And for all of us as a nation, we need to come together and say, ‘well, do we want to have loads of factory farms like they have in America, an intensified food production and mass industrialisation of the countryside?’ What will it look like? What will it mean for our public health and also food security on an island if we’re relying on food to come in from the other side of the world? How safe is that? And we learned in the last two wars that it’s not a good idea to rely on food from the other side of the world.

We need to work with the continent next to us. Most countries trade with the countries near to them, particularly for food because it makes sense. You want your food to be as fresh as possible and you want your supply chains to be safe and secure.”

Presenter, Sam Seder; “Do you think the government is going to budge?”

Liz Webster; “Well, if they don’t budge, we will keep ramping up protests, campaigning and winning more and more support and that will hit them in the ballot box. So the more they dig in, then the less support that the Labour party is going to have. And that’s already really happened since the budget. And it’s not only family farms, it’s family businesses as well. SMEs are all up in arms. Sainsbury’s itself is announcing cuts because of the budget.

So we are getting a lot of attention, but really this government is anti-business and they really need to listen. And we are doing a lot of the campaigning for SMEs, and I think they are behind us, which is brilliant, but we need them to listen. And that’s why we need the public to email their MPs, particularly if they’re Labour ones and make them change direction because we’re on the wrong road right now. Instead of trying to be like Margaret Thatcher and ‘the lady’s not for turning’, Rachel Reeves needs to understand that we need a brave chancellor who can recognise when they’ve made a mistake and she’s made terrible mistakes in that budget.”


If subsidies, trade agreements and cut throat supermarkets force farmers to maximise production by using chemicals and factory farming, it is not their fault. WE have to buy the food we want them to produce. If we lose more of our farmers from this new misdirected inheritance tax, our food will exclusively come from corporations.The millionaires and banksters will continue to dodge taxes by buying up the land and putting it in trust. They will pretend that their insects, lab grown meat, highly processed and patented vegan crap is nutritious. Who do you trust more, your local farmer or some faceless transnational corporate giant?

Watch or Read: Why selling up is a real possibility for fourth generation family farmers; Jan 24 2024

Daniel Brown said: “300 acres is not a huge amount of land. A £1 million pound (inheritance) tax bill to be found creates some real headaches.

“It’s paid over 10 years, you’ve got to find £100,000 a year, you’ve got to pay your income tax first, so really you’ve got to pay £140,000 a year. How do you do that?

“Farming is boom and bust, you have some good years but you have some really bad ones and you still have to pay the inheritance tax in the bad years. We’re not sure how you would do it.”

The difference between paying inheritance tax on a house is that the money would normally come from the sale of a house. But with a farm, it is a working asset; the money would have to come out of the business.

Daniel Brown says the tax will remove any incentive for future investment in his farm.

He has plans to invest in a second grain silo which will store the wheat the farm produces for its chicken feed, but is holding back because of the new tax rules.

Daniel Brown said: “Obviously, with the new inheritance tax rulings any investment in your business boosts the value of the business. So therefore you’ve got to find an extra 20% on top of the cost of the grain silo because you’ll have to pay it one day.”

Under gifting rules for inheritance tax, transferring assets to an individual more than seven years before death would not incur inheritance tax. But Daniel says it just isn’t that simple.

Daniel Brown said: “As I understand it, Mum and Dad have a farmhouse they live in. They built it themselves in the 1990s. They have to gift that to me and then pay me a commercial rent to live in it. Because if they live in it, it’s not a gift.

“We run the farm as best we can, Dad’s still involved, he needs somewhere to live. The obvious thing is to live in the house he built. Why do we have to start playing these games, gifting things before we need to?”

Over the nine years that Peter and Daniel Brown have had chickens at Poplar Farm, they have produced 100 million eggs. They are proud of their place in the community and their contribution to the country’s food chain.

But the impact of the new tax, Daniel Brown says, will set the farm on the back foot for years.

Combined with the extensive hours, physical labour and the unpredictability of farming, he says for the first time, he can see the day when he would choose an easier way to make a living.”

TW – NO FARMERS N0 FOOD!


Food & Farming external costs of industrial ag

Below is exactly the kind of speech you’d expect from a minister whose leader, Keir Starmer, has no interest in farming or animal welfare. He doesn’t care if food is produced in the UK or imported from countries where standards, and therefore production costs, are lower, unfairly undermining our farmers who have to adhere to UK laws. The government even seems to think that we can and should raise sentient pigs in cruel, intensive conditions and export the pork to China – thus competing with pork produced in high rise factory pig farms with cheap Chinese labour!

Read; Steve Reed (Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) speech at the 2025 Oxford Farming Conference Gov.uk, 9 January 2025

“We will expand global trade opportunities, like increasing access for UK pork exports to China worth an additional £80 million pounds a year.”

Ignoring public concerns, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs announces that the government will ‘unlock’ precision plant breeding technologies (gene editing) that are illegal in Scotland, N Ireland, Wales and the EU.

“I can today confirm we will introduce secondary legislation to Parliament by the end of March, unlocking new precision breeding technology that will allow farmers to grow crops that are more nutritious, resistant to pests and disease, resilient to climate change and benefit the environment.”


‘Gene editing’ (GE) has been renamed ‘precision breeding’ to distance it from the fact that the genes within the plant have been altered. It should be defined as a genetically modified organism, GMO, as in the EU, Scotland, N Ireland and Wales. Our tech-addicted Labour government has the BBC, its PR arm, to promote it with no one to give the counter argument as to its safety.

Listen; Gene editing BBC Farming Today, 14 January 2025

BBC Presenter; “The DEFRA Secretary of State has given the go ahead for progressing legislation to allow crops developed with precision breeding or gene editing to be grown in England. Steve Reid confirmed that secondary legislation will be laid before Parliament this spring. The new legislation applies to plants only, not to animals. Primary legislation to allow gene editing had already been passed by the previous Conservative government in 2023, but the secondary legislation required to put it into effect has been on hold ever since.

Tom Allen Stevens, arable farmer, British on Farm Innovation Network; “We had the primary legislation last year that allowed gene edited precision bred crops to be grown in commercial fields, just in England. But the question is, when you’ve grown those crops, what can you then do with them? And the secondary legislation is all about the food regulations and labelling and things like that around the actual produce from the crops themselves.

BBC Presenter; How keen are farmers to grow these crops?

We haven’t yet seen what the technology can do, and until we can actually see that, then I don’t think many farmers will really understand the benefits or get it. And likewise, until food manufacturers have actually seen what they can do, they’re not necessarily going to ask for them. Now, we’ve done quite a lot of analysis of our members. There are some of them who are really, really keen to grow these new crops and see what they do. Equally we’ve got one or two members who are really quite concerned about it and they don’t want to be involved in it at all. We got some members who say, no, this is meddling with nature, we shouldn’t be doing it.


The use of AI in the development of genetically engineered plants doesn’t bode well for our health.

Read; Convergence of generative AI and genetic engineering raises new concerns GM Watch, 23 January 2025

‘AI technologies now enable developers to even create “new-to-nature” proteins and organisms, which could pose previously unknown risks.’

‘A new report released today by Save Our Seeds highlights the increasing use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the development of GM plants, raising significant new concerns about their safety.

These developments come at a time when the European Union is considering a far-reaching deregulation of GM plants engineered with gene-editing technologies such as CRISPR-Cas. Under draft EU rules, most gene-edited plants would bypass existing EU requirements for GMO risk assessments, traceability, and consumer labelling.

The proposed rules assume that developers are making only small genetic modifications and that these changes could also be achieved through conventional breeding. These assumptions have long been disputed. With the rise of AI-driven genetic engineering, they have become even more questionable.

AI technologies now enable developers to even create “new-to-nature” proteins and organisms, which could pose previously unknown risks.

If the EU moves forward with this deregulation, GM plants created by automated AI systems could enter the market without detection method, safety testing or consumer labelling, exposing EU citizens and the environment to previously unknown hazards.

Franziska Achterberg, Head of Policy and Advocacy at Save Our Seeds, said, “The convergence of these two technologies amplifies the weaknesses of gene editing — such as unintended side effects — by adding known shortcomings of generative AI, including the ‘black box’ effect, hallucinations, and data distortions.”

Achterberg added: “Rather than dismantling essential safeguards, the EU should establish forward-thinking GMO regulations that strengthen its oversight and control of genetically engineered plants, addressing the new challenges arising from these technological developments.”’


Alert! New GMO Deception – from Julian Rose, 26 January 2025

‘A new form of GMO is being sneaked into Europe under the pretext of being a ‘gene editing technique’ rather than a genetic engineering process. This is a deception and far from the truth. It goes under the name ‘NGT’ (new genomics techniques) but all the same agrichemical and seed corporations that push GMO are behind its development and distribution. Corporate lobbyists have persuaded the EU Commission to deregulate NGT’s. This means not to treat them as GMO, imposing none of the restrictions that are applied to genetically modified organisms. They have also succeeded in shifting standard testing and liability procedures from biotech companies to the food industry. An extraordinary sleight of hand. In doing this they are pushing safety and efficacy responsibilities onto food distribution chains that have nothing to do with NGT production. What’s more there will be no labeling of such products as ‘NGT’, so neither retailers nor consumers will have any idea of what is being sold or ingested. This is all a massive fraud and once again exposes the complicity of EU officialdom in sharing its bed with Big Pharma and the agribusiness conglomerate. NGT’s are GMO. They just tinkered with the gene engineering methodology to make the outcome into a new ‘patentable organism’. Don’t be fooled! Wherever one sees Syngenta, Bayer et al. scheming-up ways to get their DNA altered toxic products onto the world market, one knows that vast sums of money will be following on. To swing existing laws away from protecting consumers and retailers – and instead protecting manufacturers from the liabilities that are quite obviously theirs.’

We must join together now – in urgently warning EU farmers and retailers of the deception which is being pushed on them! Help your food remain GMO Free by spreading this message as widely as possible.

To read the full report on GM Watch; 14 January 2025


This episode of BBC Farming Today 27 January 2025 reports on ‘the new International Barley Hub (IBH) in Dundee, where scientists are exploring the genetic diversity found in their collection of ancient barley varieties for traits that could be beneficial on modern farms.’

However, there is no mention that they are gene editing (GE) the seeds. Unlike in the EU, Scotland, N Ireland and Wales, it is legal in England to sell gene edited varieties unlabelled. So presumably the BBC feel they don’t have to mention the controversial word gene editing. Again there was no counter argument on the program to explain that perhaps gene editing crops is not healthy for consumers. The publicly-funded research institute, the IBH is tampering with ancient varieties presumably for seed companies to patent and pour millions into a PR machine to get them past any legislation and, unlabelled, onto our plates. I guess that is what they call public/private partnership! Well how about asking the public if we want to eat this food?

BBC Presenter; “So these little brown packets of (barley) seeds could hold some of the answers to the big issues we are facing.”

International Barley Hub rep; “Yeah, absolutely. And they’re like little treasure troves of diversity and traits and genes that we have been left behind by our forebears over the last 10,000 years. And we, we’ve picked them up, we look after them, we protect them, and then we utilise them to give us the benefits that we need for the future.

BBC Presenter; “How soon might farmers be able to benefit from the work that’s being done here?

International Barley Hub rep; “They’re coming through the pipeline all the time. So there are some things that are very close to market right now, so there may be benefits seen in the next couple of years, but there are things that we are starting to understand at the scientific level now, which may take a decade to come to market.”



Avian flu scare mongering in the US.

Read; Bird Flu — From Birds to Cows … and Humans? Mercola, 31 December 2024

Back at it again! This time, it’s not quite COVID — but the headlines are eerily familiar. The latest chapter in the bird flu saga is unfolding in animals, with the virus taking an unexpected leap from birds https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/12/31/h5n1-bird-flu.aspxto dairy cows and, yes, even humans.

On March 25, 2024, the first-ever cases of “bird-to-cow” transmission of H5N1 avian influenza were reported in the U.S. Since then, the virus has made its way across 16 states, impacting 845 dairy herds, according to the CDC. According to the Ohio Department of Agriculture, however, most cows reportedly recover within a few days. Where did the bird flu come from?

Many point fingers at wild birds, the usual culprits when it comes to avian flu. But before we rush to blame nature, it’s worth asking: is this virus truly “natural” or have we inadvertently tinkered with something that’s now out of control?

Enter Gain-of-Function (GOF) research — a controversial scientific process that involves modifying viruses to better understand how they spread and evolve. The “goal” is to prepare for potential pandemics. Yet, some critics argue this kind of “tinkering” may have unintended consequences.

Historically, natural H5N1 infections rarely posed a direct threat to humans. But now, concerns are growing that a “mutated version” of the virus has emerged — one with “pandemic potential.” The mutated virus is now spreading to other animals, particularly mammals, and the bird flu has now hit our milk supply — so it is time for quarantines, testing, and vaccines.

Let the Fear Mongering Begin!

Started in chickens … now jumping to other mammals and dairy cows … and fear mongering that it will soon jump to humans.

Last week, MSNBC aired a controversial statement from Mike Bloomberg, who urged Senators to block RFK Jr.’s nomination as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). Bloomberg argued that RFK Jr.’s opposition to pandemic vaccines could prevent the approval of “life-saving” bird flu vaccines. But are these fears warranted, or is the public being swept into unnecessary panic?

Mass Killing of Livestock

Between January 2022 and December 2024, 122,960,216 birds have been euthanised to “stop the spread” of bird flu. What if those were false positive tests?

Infected and exposed animals are often culled — a practice that has primarily impacted chickens in recent years but now, for the first time, includes dairy cows. While specific numbers of culled cows are not always detailed in public reports, the available information indicates that culling is a significant component of the response to H5N1 outbreaks in dairy herds.

This has led to challenges in managing carcass disposal, with some rendering plants struggling to keep up with the increased number of carcasses.

Again, what if these are false positive tests? Culling animals at the first sign of infection essentially ensures that natural immunity has no chance to develop. Here is a quote from Joel Salatin from 2023:

“By culling animals whenever a case is detected basically guarantees that natural immunity will never develop. The parallels between HPAI expert orthodoxy and COVID orthodoxy are too numerous to mention … The HPAI worry feeds food worry, which makes people clamor for government security. People will accept just about anything if they’re afraid …

As we move forward, it is vitally important for you to keep an eye on the narratives we’re being fed. If bird flu becomes a human epidemic or pandemic, there are plenty of reasons to suspect it’s a weaponised virus, and the ‘solution’ offered will be the same as that for COVID-19: ‘Get vaccinated.'”‘


Avian flu scaremongering in the UK. A man in the West Midlands has been confirmed as having avian flu, which he caught on a farm after close and prolonged contact with a large number of infected birds. If, like the birds, he was tested with a PCR test, could it have been a false positive? Even the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis said the test was not to be used to prove the presence of a disease due to the false positives. Its use to test humans for the Covid 19 virus stealthily pushed us into receiving the experimental Covid 19 vaccine that has since proved to be neither safe nor effective. The CIA finally admits that the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China lab leak is the most likely origin of the Covid 19 virus where it presumably had gain of function tampering to cause the pandemic. With appropriate gain of function tampering, perhaps bird flu will be the next human pandemic that our imposter health tzar, Bill Gates will make eye watering profits for him and his Big Pharma colleagues and their bankster investors. After the deaths and injuries caused by the Covid 19 jab, let’s hope most people refuse to play Russian Roulette and say NO to a future human bird flu vaccine. So, the 5 million human H5 influenza vaccine purchased to prepare for a potential pandemic can be binned.

Listen; Avian Flu in People BBC Farming Today, 29 January 2025

BBC Presenter intro; “So how much of a worry should avian flu be for people after the UK Health Security Agency confirmed a case in a person on Monday? Professor James Wood is a veterinary epidemiologist from the University of Cambridge. He told me it’s very unusual for people to contract bird flu.”

Professor James Wood; “We’ve had hundreds of outbreaks on poultry farms over the last four or five years in the UK and despite really stringent follow up from UK HSA who’ve been doing clinical monitoring and actually a lot of testing, particularly in the last two or three years, this is only about the seventh case overall that we’ve had.”

BBC Presenter; “As we’ve reported on this program, there have been cases of avian flu in people in the United States. Is this the same thing?”

Professor James Wood; “What we’ve got here is actually an entirely different scenario. It’s only linked by the fact that we are calling it bird flu. It is a really rather different strain.”

BBC Presenter; “How would we tell if someone had it?”

Professor James Wood; “The only way that you’d know for sure that you had bird flu is if the UK HSA came and took a sample from you, found a virus in it and then analysed the virus and demonstrated it was bird flu. The very few people that have had symptoms of bird flu, there’s nothing very specific about their signs at all. Which again, is in stark contrast to what we’re seeing with the USA in dairy cattle, where people have really severe conjunctivitis with some raised temperatures. I think it’s important to emphasise that the very small number of people that have had bird flu in this country have all been really heavily exposed to infected poultry, so unless you are working in the poultry industry, it’s not something you really need to worry about at all.”

BBC Presenter; “And just to confirm, this doesn’t spread from person to person, does it?”

Professor James Wood; “This virus and particularly this strain of virus that we have seen in the UK has not spread between people, but there is the chance of this virus adapting or recombining with another human seasonal influenza virus to make what you might say is a super virus, and then be able to spread between people. One of the reasons for doing everything that we do around bird flu is to try and make sure that chances of that happening are minimised.”


Predictably, Gates drones on about how we need more vaccines, more quarantine, more monitoring, seemingly stuck in the truthless Fauci wasteland of four years ago.

Read or Listen; Bill Gates says the odds of another pandemic in the next 4 years are 10%–15%, and we’re not prepared Stuart Dyos, Fortune, 26 January 2025

‘Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates warned the world is still not adequately prepared for another pandemic and is poised to repeat the mistakes made during the last one. Bill Gates thinks another pandemic is entirely possible, and the world is not as prepared as it should be.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, the philanthropist was asked what keeps him up at night. “The chance of a natural pandemic in the next four years is somewhere between 10 and 15%,” Gates replied. “And it’d be nice to think we’re actually more ready for that than we were last time, but so far we’re not.”

Challenged on that statement, the Microsoft co-founder reiterated himself saying, “We’re absolutely not.”

“People—rather than having a consensus about what tools are missing—are mostly still replaying the various mistakes that were made,” Gates added. “I wouldn’t say that we’re as far along as you’d expect after trillions of dollars and millions of lives have been lost.”

Through the Gates Foundation, the billionaire has been warning about climate concerns, cyberattacks, and public health needs, while also pushing for solutions. In September, he said global unrest could spark a major war and that another pandemic was likely in the next 25 years.

In 2022, Gates authored the book ‘How to Prevent the Next Pandemic’ and voiced his concerns around the lack of planning with governments around the world, including the US, in the handling of the 2020 pandemic.

He also called for stronger quarantining policies, investing in disease monitoring, as well as increased vaccine research and development. Additionally, the Gates Foundation pledged up to $125 million in the U.S. to “help end the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and prepare for future pandemics.”’


If you were unwilling to get an mRNA Covid vaccine, or suffered as a result of getting one, you might like to know that in the US there is no label to inform consumers that they are eating pork from pigs that have been given one of these new gene edited vaccines.

Watch; mRNA has reached the Pork Industry; “Sudden And Unexpected” @toobaffledJan 28, 2025·

“MRNA vaccines have reached the pork industry, and here’s what they’re not telling you. So all across the US pork can be vaccinated with the mRNA vaccine and not be labelled on the packages that you were buying in the grocery store. So we have no idea what pork has been vaccinated, what pork hasn’t been. My best advice to get around this is find a great local pork dealer, go directly through them, and as always guys, buy American and buy local.“

For more info look at; What you need to know about mRNA Vaccines and our Livestock


Another small scale pig farm lost due to being squeezed by a commercial contract so they’ve reduced their herd and now don’t sell pork direct to the public, but only sell it in their dishes in the cafe.

Read; The Story Pig, 25 January 2025

‘As always as with any business things change and here at The Story Pig we are changing and moving slightly sideways. For 10 years now we have been building up our pig herd, investing heavily in equipment and machinery and home breeding programme, until eventually we were running at 500 Tamworth/ Duroc pigs all outside producing we are sure the very best pork in our area. Supplying our own butchery and wholesaling to a few others, one of which was taking the majority of our pork and had for the past few years been pushing us to produce more for them. But as I started by saying things change and about 15 months ago we felt that change, our relationship felt different, less equal and much more like we were dealing with a supermarket rather than a high end hotel and restaurant. We started to get emails about price and much less engagement about how we produced our pork, gone were the requests to visit the farm and show the butchery team and front of house staff how we did things , replaced by a feeling of no interest in how we did these things. With farming of any type there is a long lead in, with our breed of pigs it’s typically 12 months from birth to slaughter and to that end we always had a years pigs ahead of us, costing us a fortune to feed and maintain. Suffering slightly from premonitions , usually not good ones I said to Charlotte last spring that I was not happy with our relationship with said wholesale partner and in my words “if we don’t change things, they will bankrupt us” and so slowly we sold many of our sows to slow and stop the cycle. This was probably the hardest decision we have had to take so far on our journey with The Story Pig. And true to form slowly with out knowing of our thoughts, they cut our price and numbers until just before Christmas we had an email from an accountant to say we won’t need anymore pigs from you. Luckily we had reduced our numbers by then to a point where we could deal with this and move forward.”


All abattoirs, whether they’re big or small, have to follow the same regulations. The government refuses to modify the regulations to accommodate small abattoirs that cannot cope with the complicated safety, waste disposal and veterinary supervision regulations, which is the reason many of them have had to close.

Read; Hampshire’s Last AbattoirWhat Newman’s Closure Means for Farmers, Welfare, and Food Security Helen Freeman, 26 January 2025

‘Just before I left to attend the Oxford Real Farming Conference this year, farmers across the South East of England received devastating news: Newman’s Abattoir, the last remaining abattoir in Hampshire, will be closing its doors at the end of the month. For small-scale farmers like me, this isn’t just a logistical inconvenience—it’s a devastating blow to our operations, animal welfare standards, and the future of Newman’s, a family-run multi-species slaughterhouse in Farnborough since the 1950s, has been an essential part of the farming community. Currently co-owned by brothers William and Robert Newman, the abattoir serves Hampshire, the Isle of Wight, Surrey, Berkshire, and West Sussex. With its capacity for halal slaughter, multi-species processing, and private kill services, it supplies meat to over 150 local butchers as well as the renowned Smithfield Meat Market. Its closure on January 30th will send shockwaves through the farming community—not just in Hampshire, but far beyond.

The Bigger Picture: A Crisis in UK Abattoirs

This isn’t just our story—it’s the reality for countless small-scale farmers across the UK. In 1900, there were 30,000 Food Standards Agency (FSA)-registered abattoirs in the UK. By 2003, that number had plummeted to 320. Today, just 122 remain—and not all of them accept multi-species slaughter or provide private kill services. In regions like Northumberland, which relies heavily on livestock farming, there hasn’t been a local abattoir for years, forcing animals to endure hours of travel to slaughter.

At the ORFC, Amy Quirk warned that “if the current rate of closures continues, there will be no abattoirs left in the UK within nine years.” The implications for food security are enormous. Without local slaughterhouses, we risk losing small-scale farmers, rare breeds, and high-welfare British meat. Supermarkets will increasingly rely on cheap imports, flooding shelves with substandard products like hormone-fed beef from Brazil and chlorine-washed chicken from the USA.

Animal welfare also suffers. Longer journeys to slaughterhouses create unnecessary stress, undermining the high-welfare standards that small farms work so hard to maintain.’


A headline behind the Pig Progress editorial paywall caught my eye and is enough evidence of outright cruelty to the mother pigs (sows) in industrial pig factories to ban them

‘Around one-third to half of the sow population gets replaced, meaning millions of sows are going to be slaughtered every year. Reasons may include low performance, lameness, illness, injuries or undesired behaviour. Cull sows are often in a poor condition when they are sent to slaughter. Pig welfare expert Dr Irene Camerlink asks at what point it is better to euthanise the sow on-farm rather than to put her on a truck’


Though there’s a pay wall, it’s interesting to see the Daily Telegraph criticising highly processed food.

Read; Modern British food is making us ill – these are the old-fashioned meals to eat instead The Telegraph, 23 January 2025

Americanised and processed, our diet today could be contributing to higher rates of bowel cancer. Here’s what to swap to improve your health.


At least some research institution is pointing out the madness in our short term thinking that growing food is no different to making cars or mining coal.

Researchers granted £2m to help prevent food shortages in the UK; Aleksandra Cupriak; 29th January 2025

“The UK’s food system is currently optimised for efficiency rather than resilience, relying heavily on imports, seasonal labour, and just-in-time supply chains.

This makes it particularly susceptible to disruptions that could lead to a collapse, defined as a situation where the public lacks access to affordable food, resulting in economic productivity losses, disease outbreaks, extreme hunger, malnutrition, or civil unrest.”


If we could all put our minds to finding ways to grow food in our neighbourhood we would be free from the toxic pap sold in supermarkets and fast food outlets, while getting vital vitamins from being outside in the sunlight, exercise from working the soil and finding community in like minded souls. If possible, buy your fruit and veg from local shops via Big Barn or Bowler Hat Farmer or a veg box via Riverford or your local box scheme like ours at Forbidden Fruit and Veg – where animals are treated well, the soil is fertilised with natural manure, and crops are grown without the use of toxic pesticides and herbicides.

Learn; Join ORFC in the Field! Immersive workshops at agroecological farms across the UK; Oxford Real Farming Conference

‘Want to learn practical skills at some of the UK’s most innovative farms? This year, we invite you to join us in the field for a series of hands-on workshops dedicated to highlighting outstanding agroecological practices and building connections and networks to transform our food system.’

In the Field at OrganicLea, London Peri-Urban Growing

4th – 5th April 2025

£160 for two days, including lunch (limited to 70 places)

‘In April, join us for two days of dynamic workshops focussed on growing a successful peri-urban project with pioneering workers’ co-operative, OrganicLea. From choosing the right horticultural tools to ferments, beer-brewing and funghi, these two days will set you up to make a career in growing work for you while cultivating community.’

Book Your Spot at ORFC in the Field at OrganicLea!

With a flourishing network of radical grassroots community food projects in North London, we’ll be looking at ways to nourish all forms of life within the city by building relationships with the land we work.

Join us amongst the spring flowers and young vegetables, where we’ll be getting our hands into the soil, meeting like-minded and passionate individuals, and sharing hearty seasonal feasts from OrganicLea and Pea Shoot Feasts in what promises to be an amazing start to the new season. For everyone interested in radical urban growing projects and a good food future in our cities, this isn’t one to miss!’


Dr Jane Goodall famously said, “Someday we shall look back on this dark era of agriculture and shake our heads. How could we have ever believed that it was a good idea to grow our food with poisons?” If they get banned in the US, the pressure to ban them here should be felt by our farmers.

Read; Top 10 JUNK SCIENCE FOOD STUFF and chemical ingredients that should be BANNED when Trump and RFK Jr. take control S. D. Wells, 28 December 2024

‘In a righteous world with an effective justice system, if someone were to knowingly and purposely poison someone else’s food, they would be put in prison for a long time, even if it was just a tiny dose of poison that added up to be lethal over time. In America, this is called “junk-science” food stuff, and it’s perfectly legal, according to the Food and Drug Administration.

Ingredients in American food are banned in other countries around the world. They wouldn’t dare poison their own people. What kind of government and food industry would? The answer to that question is quite daunting, because in America, people are allowed to invest in companies that make other people very sick, and these same investors can buy stock in companies that pretend to “treat” those sicknesses with diagnostic testing, pharmaceutical drugs, and surgery.

All of this insane poisoning of the food (and medical) system could be quickly heading towards a finale. Donald J. Trump has won the Presidency of the United States for the second time, and he will take office in less than one month. He has appointed several very important, intelligent, health-minded people to top positions in regulatory agencies, which they all plan to clean house and revamp completely. This is a blessing for all Americans, whether they realise it yet or not


Protecting nature is vital but not if it is used as an excuse to stop growing food. If the politicians chose land sharing instead of land sparing, we would see our food grown in symbiosis with nature rather than only expecting nature to thrive round the field edges while toxic chemicals continue to kill biodiversity in the centre.

No nature, no farmers, no food

The Wildlife Trusts have published a briefing – Environmental Land Management schemes & Food Security – the case for increased investment in nature for UK Food Security.

The Wildlife Trusts are calling for:

  • A plan to deliver at least 3,000 Countryside Stewardship Agreements per year by 2028, supported by increased resourcing for Natural England to process and offer agreements and a ring-fenced budget
  • An increase to the annual farming budget to £3.1 billion/year in England to support nature-friendly farming, safeguard livelihoods, improve animal welfare and meet critical climate, nature and water targets
  • A focus on ensuring that Landscape Recovery projects get off the shelf and enter the implementation phase, delivering real outcomes on the ground
  • Publication of an outcomes-focussed Land Use Framework which sets out an overarching framework that guides prioritisation for land use change, and a national spatial plan that broadly identifies constraints and opportunities for land use

A Welsh farmer goes through the terms of the Sustainable Farming Scheme, due to be rolled out across Wales in 2026. This farming policy and subsidy payments will replace the pre-Brexit EU payments and reward actions taken by farmers to improve the relationship between farming and Nature.

Listen; Welsh Farm Policy Update BBC Farming Today, 28 January 2025

“To gain access to the funding under the new rules, farms will have to sign up to 12 so-called universal actions. These range from soil health planning and habitat maintenance, to “continuous professional development”.


The new system of farm payments in England that replaces the EU payments since Brexit, the Environmental Land Management Scheme, has different rules from Wales. My fear is that the subsidies put such an emphasis on nature that growing food may no longer be profitable for farmers who have to compete with ever cheaper imports from abroad and cutthroat demands and delayed payments from supermarkets.There are new subsidy options that discourage chemical use, which is brilliant, but unless the farmer is compensated for growing food in an organic system, they will rely on the market that still prioritises cheap, over healthy, food.

Listen; English farm payments BBC Farming Today, 29 January 2025

BBC Presenter intro; “Farming Today, SFI (Sustainable Farming Incentive), finding out how it’s working with beef producer and farm consultant Rob Halliday on his farm in Cornwall.”

Rob Halliday; “This is very typical of Cornish countryside, undulating ground, lots of hedges, smaller fields and very much suited to livestock and livestock rearing.”

BBC Presenter; “How do you get the money under SFI, the Sustainable Farming Incentive then? What sort of things can you be doing to earn the money?”

Rob Halliday; “So there’s quite a wide range of options now. Everything from producing environmental plans for the farm, hedgerow management plans, hedgerow maintenance and management itself. And then there’s money for doing things like planting bird feed or in our case quite a lot of herbal ley, a mixture of grasses, legumes, and herbs. So things like chicory and plantain.”

BBC Presenter “How does that help?”

Rob Halliday; “Well it’s certainly been very beneficial in terms of probably a more mixed diet for the animals that are eating it. Probably more in the way of soil activity. There’s deeper rooting so it’s hopefully improving soil structure over time. And also there’s a variety of different flowering plants in there. So encouraging birds and bees onto the farm.”

Rob Halliday; “We are selecting where we can find any good quality hardwood oaks particularly to try and grow into hedgerow trees.”

BBC Presenter “How do they calculate what you can earn from doing that? Is it sort of pounds or pennies per yard?”

Rob Halliday “So the hedgerow management option will be paid £13 per hundred meters per side of the hedge and we’ve got just over 11 kilometers of hedgerow on this farm. We have only used the schemes where they effectively bolt on and improve our business. We haven’t substituted our production because fundamentally I believe that in the future we need to make sure that we have a productive business at our core. It’s enabled us to enhance some of our intrinsic value, some of our value bottoms, our hedgerows, the easier wins, but also hopefully improve some of our livestock health along the way.”

BBC Presenter “Are, are those easy wins for you, the farmer or are they easy wins for nature”

Rob Halliday; “I think, I think they’re probably easy wins for both because they’re effectively here and we have to get away from this dichotomy of it’s either food or nature. The two are very much intertwined.

BBC Presenter “The Sustainable Farming Incentive, it’s like a massive menu with everything on it. Is that a strength or a weakness?”

Rob Halliday; “It’s both. Farms are not homogenous. You know, if you take us to Hampshire, to the fences, the cross section is huge. So I think you need to have the options to enable it to fit individual farms. Of course the inherent problem with having lots of options is it becomes ever more complicated. And so probably for farmers to dip in and sign up to the scheme is quite hard work because there’s an awful lot of background learning. So it is to a point still an agent’s charter and it would be nice to try and see if we could have the scheme to run for farmers, by farmers.”


Both excellent films and a good chance for you to meet our hero, Patrick Holden at the talk post screenings.

Friday, 28 February

One Last Farm, One Last Chance: 2 Film Screenings & Panel Discussion

Join us for a thought-provoking screening of two films, plus a panel discussion, exploring the role of food production in restoring nature. By One Last Farm Documentary

Fri, 28 Feb 2025 18:00 – 21:00 GMT; Location – Bristol Aquarium, Anchor Road Bristol BS1 5TT.Bristol Megascreen, BS1 5TT

Join us for an evening that explores the vital connection between food production and a healthy planet! We’ll kick off the event with a special film screening of One Last Farm, followed by Save Our Wild Isles: Hungry for Change. After the films, stick around for a panel discussion featuring the filmmakers and leading voices at the intersection of food production and nature conservation. The evening concludes with a drinks reception and a chance to continue the conversation. It’s the perfect opportunity to learn, connect, and be inspired by a vision of sustainable farming that benefits both nature and society.

THE FILMS:

One Last Farm

A poignant documentary about Yew Tree Farm, Bristol’s last working farm, and its fight to protect a unique wildlife habitat from development. Produced by Nikki Dodd. www.onelastfarm.com

Save Our Wild Isles: Hungry for Change

An award-winning film from Nick Gates and Silverback Films that brought together experts from three of the UK’s largest conservation organisations. The National Trust, the RSPB and WWF reveal the impact of the food system on UK nature and crucially what could be done to reduce its impact. https://www.saveourwildisles.org.uk/business/food-and-farming

THE PANELISTS:Nikki Dodd, Nick Gates, Patrick Holden, Sumita Hutchison, Guy Poultney, and Catherine Withers.


CO2 tunnel vision

Though the BBC producers have totally embraced the narrative that CO2 is a massive problem, in this Farming Today program the speakers explain how growing food is in fact going to thrive in the UK. ‘As the climate warms, UK farmers may be able to start growing new crops – from oranges to okra. That’s according to a new study from the UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and the University of East Anglia which looks at the future suitability of more than 160 existing and new food crops in a warming climate’.

Listen; Crops in a new climate BBC Farming Today, 27 January 2025

Dr John Redhead; “We were really reassured when we ran these computer models that the crops that they were suggesting were likely to do well under climate change are these ones that we know farmers that are already experimenting with the chickpeas, the hao beans, the citrus fruits, the olives. That’s actually likely to become much more commercially viable for a wider range of farmers to fit these crops into their current rotations amongst their current farming practices.”

BBC Presenter; “Are there any crops that we might not be able to grow if average temperatures rise by two or say four degrees?”

Dr John Redhead; “So actually under a two degree scenario, there are very few crops that show a blanket decrease in suitability across the UK. What you instead get is this big polarisation where things like wheat, barley, potatoes, onions, some of our big staple crops drop in suitability in the south and east, but the climate actually gets better and more suitable for them as you go further north and west. So on average, they look like they’re doing okay. Of course, the challenge there is we currently grow most of our food in the south and east.

BBC Presenter; “We’ve just heard that report about barley, about scientists looking to breed more climate resilient crops, isn’t it more likely that we’re just going to stick with the crops that we know, but make changes to them (TW – she is implying genetically engineering them) like we’re hearing about there, so that they can cope as the climate changes.

Dr John Redhead; “That is one really important way of doing things. The challenge with that is climate change is happening fast and there is always the possibility that we simply run out of road with taking that approach.


Read or watch; The climate change movement is the “new communism” says Australian parliamentarian; Rhoda Wilson; The Expose; January 30, 2025

Intro; ‘The second Make Europe Great Again (“MEGA”) conference was held at the European Parliament Building in Brussels, Belgium, this week on Tuesday and Wednesday. It was organised by European anti-globalist groups to bring together leaders from various countries. Discussions focussed on preserving identity, freedom and the values that have shaped European societies, as well as strategies to combat the globalist left’s influence.

Hosted by the Alliance for Unified Romanians and the European Conservatives and Reformists, the summit welcomed over 500 leaders from countries including the UK, Spain, Italy, France, Romania, Argentina, Sweden and Poland.

John Ruddick, an Australian parliamentarian from New South Wales, attended the event and joined Liberty Sentinel on the sidelines to give his thoughts.

‘Liberty Sentinel’s Andrew Muller then asked Mr. Ruddick what his thoughts were on the United Nations (“UN”) and the climate change agenda.

“I know climate politics is a big deal in the United States; it’s five to ten times bigger in Australia. It’s obsessive,” Mr. Ruddick said.

“My personal view is that global warming is the new communism. I don’t call it ‘global warming’ and I don’t call it ‘climate change’, I call it ‘global boiling’.

“I call it ‘global boiling’ because the UN Secretary-General, the Portuguese guy, a couple of years ago there were a few hot days in Europe – these things happen, it happened in the Roman times – but during those three hot days, unusually hot days, he said, ‘The era of global warming is over we’re now entering the era of global boiling’.”

“That was so absurd,” Mr Ruddick said laughing, “that no one has repeated it since. But he hasn’t retracted it and he was the UN Secretary-General. So, I’m thinking, ‘Global boiling it is because it’s absurd’. I’ll stop using it if the Secretary-General says, ‘Oh well, I did go too far there’.”

Mr. Ruddick recommends people watch a film released in 2024 by Joel Gilbert titled ‘The Climate According to AI Al Gore’. We have embedded a trailer for the film below Mr. Ruddick’s conversation with Liberty Sentinel.

Liberty Sentinel: Global Warming is the “New Communism,” Argues Australian MP, 30 January 2025 (12 mins)

Read more: European Leaders to Fight “Globalist Left” at Make Europe Great Again Conference, New American, 23 January 2025


Good news the Climate and Nature Bill has been halted……… till July

Our local MP Roz Savage (S. Cotswolds, Lib Dem), English ocean rower and long time environmental campaigner, proposed the Climate and Nature Bill. Like many environmentalists and food and farming campaigners, she still doesn’t realise that the need to stop fossil fuels polluting the environment has been hijacked and turned into a climate change alarmists’ CO2 tunnel-vision scam, with farmers as the scapegoats. To compete with cheap imports and fit in with supermarkets’ economies of scale, they have been forced to industrialise and now it’s become a crime to use fertiliser, pesticides and raise livestock.

Instead of helping farmers go organic, politicians are obeying their corporate funders and World Economic Forum stakeholder capitalist comrades to promote food from labs not from the soil. Farmers are being systematically deprived of a livelihood, the new inheritance tax on farms is just the last straw. Though they want to grow food for the nation, cruel and unfair practices by supermarkets (changing orders at short notice, delaying payments) force them to accept higher incomes from growing trees and renting land for solar farms. Ironically in her own constituency Savage is fighting a 2,000-acre solar farm to be built on food-growing land and which, due to its massive size, will avoid the local planners and go straight to NetZero-obsessed Ed Milliband for approval. With the 6 month delay to her Climate and Nature Bill she might just wake up and see the absurd rules being put on farmers in the name of climate and biodiversity, and get behind policies that support genuine nature-friendly farming by real farmers and do not reward landowners who have allowed their land to be used for carbon capture and not for growing food.

Watch; Climate and Nature Bill halted by 120 – 7. It is adjourned until 7th July David Kurten, 24 January 2025

“There is some good news today about the Climate and Nature Bill. It’s qualified good news. It was defeated in the House of Commons today by 120 votes to 7.

The Climate and Nature Bill would have ended private property as we know it, decimated agriculture and required the government of the UK, whichever government it was, to adhere fully to all of the targets and aims and interim targets of the Paris Climate Agreement and something called the Kunming Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework as well. So it’s very, very good news that it was voted against by a large majority in Parliament, but it’s qualified because it’s not a vote against the bill. The vote taken today was just to adjourn the debate for six months. So it’s not been completely defeated.

It’s still in Parliament and they’re going to continue the debate again on the 7th of July. So it’s going to come back to the House of Commons again and they’re going to debate it after horse trading between the different parties that are interested in this bill. Of course, most of the parties in Parliament support NetZero and climate alarmism to one extent or another. Tory, Labour, Lib Dem, Green, there is not much difference between them at all.”


Starmer’s flawed, WEF-inspired globalist plan is to get rid of farmers and to grab their land for global property developers, offshore-registered solar panel projects and rewilding, while dishing out grants for fake meat and high-tech alternative proteins.

Read; Solar farms v people power: the locals fighting for their county The Guardian, 29 December 2024

‘Two years ago, Chris and Jenna Humphrey moved from their urban house to their rural dream. “We wanted our kids to have this,” says Chris, gesturing at the green fields surrounding their cottage, which sits in splendid isolation in the south Norfolk countryside.

Now there’s a blight on their wide horizons. On three sides of their home, the fields are set to be filled with solar panels for one of Britain’s growing number of huge solar farms – “solar factories”, say opponents. “I’m all for solar,” says Chris, a software developer. They have panels on their garage roof. “It just seems criminal that hundreds of new houses are being built down the road and none have solar panels, when they would benefit households. These solar farms seem like corporate thinking to generate profits – they are putting profits before the countryside, food production and the environment.

There is no compensation for people who might lose businesses or house value. Roy and Heidi Martin have spent the last three years converting their disused barn into two immaculate holiday lets overlooking fields that will be filled with panels. Roy believes their business will be completely unviable. “People come here for a quiet retreat. It’s the last thing they are going to want,” he says. “I’ve put everything into this – my life savings, two years of every penny I could earn, and what are we going to be left with?” he says.

A local estate agent has suggested that the value of the worst-impacted houses could fall by 30%. If that happens, Chris and Jenna Humphrey will be in negative equity, their mortgage will be larger than their house’s value.’


More land grab for those profiting from the Climate change scam.

Read; How is this allowed? Nick Timothy MP, X, 24 January 2025

‘How is this allowed? Ed Miliband has approved another giant solar and battery farm. 49% of the site is top-graded agricultural land.

The applicant? Ecotricity, owned by … Labour donor Dale Vince. They’ve given £5.4 million to Labour since 2022.’


With such belligerent WEF stooges in the Labour party, it has been an utter waste of time locals campaigning against the monster solar parks on our doorstep. Our Stop Lime Down Solar Park campaigners are hoping that by the time the Climate Change scam solar projects get permission, the government will have been defeated. However, that hope is fading with new rules to speed up the planning process. Trump has seen through the WEF’s climate hoax but the only party in the UK to see through the scam is George Galloway’s Workers Party and Nigel Farage’s Reform Party. Both will put a stop to the demise of our farmers through the inheritance tax and end the war in Ukraine!

Read; Ministers consider weakening rights of communities to block clean-power projects Financial Times, 13 December 2024

‘Ministers are considering weakening the rights of communities to object to new pylons or wind farms in their neighbourhoods as they race to decarbonise the electricity system by 2030.

The UK government is exploring overhauling planning rules so that claimants can only apply for judicial reviews of large infrastructure projects once in each case. It wants to tackle the “blockers, delayers and obstructionists” that energy secretary Ed Miliband has argued are getting in the way of reform.

It set out the proposals in a wide-ranging plan published on Friday on how to reach its manifesto goal of “clean” power by 2030. The government envisages unabated gas-fired power stations supplying less than 5 per cent of annual electricity generation, with the rest coming from low-carbon sources. That compares to around 30 per cent from gas this year.

Miliband said the plan could only be met with “big, bold change” and the government was “embarking on the most ambitious reforms to our energy system in generations”.

The clean power goal will require a huge buildout of new wind and solar farms as well as the pylons and cables needed to move electricity around, including roughly 1,000 km of electricity networks on land.

But ministers are concerned these could be derailed by local communities challenging the projects in the courts. Residents in several areas are protesting against plans for new pylons, with concerns ranging from the environmental impact to the effect on house prices.

Opponents often apply for judicial reviews of projects that have been granted planning approval, meaning they can get a judge to review the process and potentially quash the permission. In some cases, campaigners have applied repeatedly against the same projects.

In its Clean Power 2030 Action Plan, the government says there is a case for finding ways to “streamline” the process to ensure it does not “unduly slow down vital infrastructure development”.

It adds: “For example, this could include changing the rules so that claimants in each case only have one attempt to seek permission for judicial review.”‘


So much for a free market. Most projects subsidised and built in the name of NetZero actually increase CO2 emissions along with having a plethora of other external costs; ‘manure biogas further enriches, entrenches, and expands a brutal factory farm system by incentivising dairy farms to grow herd sizes in order to produce more manure and thus receive more lucrative federal and state credits from the gas that these “cash cows” generate.’ Although the article below is about America, a factory farm proposal in the UK is usually accompanied with plans for an anaerobic digester – i.e. it ticks a spurious green box!

Read; Big Oil and Big Ag are teaming up to turn cow poop into energy — and profits. The math doesn’t add up Vox, 14 January 2025

‘In a new report, anti-factory farming nonprofit Farm Forward found that the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), President Joe Biden’s landmark climate legislation, funneled over $150 million in subsidies to manure biogas projects in 2023 alone, primarily through grants under the US Department of Agriculture’s Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) and valuable tax breaks.

Hundreds of millions of additional Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) dollars could be dished out to manure biogas projects over the next few years, according to Farm Forward. After the passage of the IRA, the American Biogas Council welcomed its potential to “fuel growth of the biogas and clean energy industries for years to come.” Hundreds of millions of dollars have also been granted by California, which has the most extensive biogas program in the US.

At worst, critics say, manure biogas further enriches, entrenches, and expands a brutal factory farm system by incentivising dairy farms to grow herd sizes in order to produce more manure and thus receive more lucrative federal and state credits from the gas that these “cash cows” generate. That’s at odds with the consensus among climate scientists, who warn that rich countries like the US must drastically reduce livestock populations — particularly cattle — to meet global warming targets.

It has also created a new revenue stream for oil and gas giants, such as Chevron, BP, and Shell, who have invested in biogas projects and sell it under the guise of renewable energy.

Biogas may seem renewable on the face of it; so long as people consume dairy, cows will keep generating manure. But this marketing sleight of hand belies two fundamental aspects of US dairy production. The first is that cow manure on its own doesn’t naturally contain methane; rather, the way that large dairy operations store manure produces the potent greenhouse gas, despite low-methane alternative storage methods. Second, the US has long had an oversupply of milk; we could meet dairy demand with fewer methane-generating cows.

“Our sense is that the Inflation Reduction Act is being perverted to entrench Big Oil and Big Ag — that the incentives of the IRA are doing real harm, both, I think, for the climate movement and certainly for efforts to reform and transform industrial animal farming towards more sustainable, humane forms of agriculture,” said Andrew deCoriolis, executive director of Farm Forward.

Over the next decade, greenhouse gas emissions are expected to decline in every sector except agriculture, where emissions are projected to slightly increase. Instead of incentivising farmers to grow more climate-friendly foods or finally regulating farm pollution, as some other countries have begun to do, US policymakers — using funds from the IRA and elsewhere — have doubled down on throwing money at technologies like manure biodigesters. They provide some modest albeit expensive short-term environmental benefits, but at the cost of further locking us into the animal factory farming model.

“It’s this perpetual mill of handouts,” said Tyler Lobdell, staff attorney with the nonprofit Food & Water Watch, “and all of these decisions we’re making today are going to make it so much harder to stop that gravy train down the road.”’


A report proves that there are natural ways to sequester carbon which are more effective than high-tech ‘solutions’ such as feed additives like Bovaer.

Read; Funding systemic change will increase the likelihood of meeting long-term climate and nature targets SustainableViews, 28 January 2025

‘Investors should focus on financing nature-based solutions, rather than technologies that reduce emissions from current practices, to bring livestock farming in line with climate targets, concludes a report by food systems investor network the Fairr Initiative.

The report tracks 22 on-farm interventions “frequently cited” by the agrifood sector as ways of addressing climate and nature risks from intensive livestock production. Twelve of the interventions assessed were nature based and 10 were technology based, and covered livestock production including animal feed production, livestock rearing and management, and crop and animal waste management.

The report found nature-based interventions, such as planting hedgerows, rotating crops or natural animal feed additives, receive less public funding (around $127mn a year based on a 2021 and 2022 average) than tech-based solutions including nitrogen and urease inhibitors, synthetic animal feed additives, and animal health and performance monitoring (roughly $157mn a year).

This financing discrepancy exists even though nature-based solutions have longer-term impacts on greenhouse gas emissions reductions and removals, biodiversity, freshwater use, chemical inputs and nutrient levels than tech-based solutions, the report says.’


This program explains how the government’s NetZero carbon farming policies and subsidies work so farmers can make ends meet while both growing food and increasing biodiversity and sequestering carbon.

Listen; Filling the Funding Gap: How much can nature pay me? Farm Gate, 21 January 2025

ffinlo Costain; “This is the first of 11 programmes in a series called Filling the Funding Gap that will run on the Farm Gate Channel over the next few months. Throughout the series we’ll be discussing how particular natural capital markets work and whether they can help farmers to bridge the gap between public payments and the real costs of transition towards resilient and regenerative food production.

Later in the series we’ll host discussions about nature credits earning money from energy production and water management. We’ll ask how farmers and other land stewards can get paid to store carbon, how to access, finance and manage transition in land based businesses and where the tenant farmers as well as landowners can benefit from natural capital markets. But in this introductory programme we’re taking a broad overview, discussing what we mean by natural capital markets, the extent to which they currently function and we’ll consider some of the ethical dimensions of monetising the natural world in the first place.”

Martin Lynes, Chief Executive at the Nature Friendly Farming Network; “From a cash flow point of view it can be great though. Typically you end up selling units very early on in the stages of these projects, so you get really good strong cash flows from it in the early days. But then of course there are commitments that need to be met -.Taking BNG (Biodiversity Net Gain) for instance, for the lifetime of that, for 30 years.

And so you have costs which need to plan for that entire time. And with any long term costs clearly comes inflation. So I think careful planning and caution is required when looking at any of these projects.”


Tony Gosling’s fascinating articles about the history and present state of Britain’s land and farming, and how the government is helping Blackrock acquire UK farmland.

Read; FIVE SUGGESTIONS TO SAVE BRITISH FARMING: BUT WHY ARE MONBIOT, FAIRLIE AND THE ‘GREENS’ DANCING TO THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM’S FINANCE CAPITALISM TUNE? Tony Gosling, The Land is Ours, 2 January 2025

‘Not content with making millions landless in the 18th century through enclosure, a new Treasury unit is now stealing Britain’s remaining family farmland, for Blackrock.’

‘Five suggestions to Save British Farming:

  1. set up a charitable fund to pay off distressed farmers’ inheritance bills;
  2. institute a chain of collectively owned farm shops in every market town to act as a mini supermarket for seasonal produce;
  3. demand boycotts of supermarkets and/or products where price fixing is taking place, robbing farmers;
  4. blockade factory farms and mass mechanised greenhouses owned by front companies for private equity firms;
  5. set up a direct action group to occupy and obstruct individuals and businesses which are destroying UK family farming.’

Ecocide

Farming salmon is a crime against the ecosystem, our food security and the sick fish.

Listen; Warnings over the future of the Scottish salmon industry BBC Farming Today, 20 January 2025

“For years, sea lice have been the source of the sector’s woes. They attach themselves to salmon and eat into their skin. Cleaner fish called wrasse which eat the sea lice have helped ease lice numbers. But warming seas have brought new challenges like algal blooms and micro jellyfish.

Around a quarter of stocks are still dying, which Abigail Penny from Animal Equality UK says is too high.

The industry continues to be in a state of crisis. We’re seeing alarmingly high death rates, disease and lice outbreaks and environmental degradation as a result of the industry. And the Scottish government has simply been too slow to act.

Ministers say improvements have been made and they’ll consider the report carefully. The committee says it will review progress again in a year’s time.”


We must have the power to protect our coasts from corporate plunder

Listen; Sandeel Court Case BBC Farming Today, 21 January 2025

“The first courtroom trade battle since Brexit is due to start next week over fishing rights in the North Sea. The dispute is over the humble sandeel, a collective name for several species of small fish which are food for larger fish, and many seabirds, including puffins and kittiwakes, which are protected. The UK has banned vessels from catching sandeels in its waters to protect the wildlife that depend on them. Well, now that ban is being challenged in court, with the European Union saying it discriminates against Danish fishing companies and breaches the post Brexit trade deal.”

Paul Seddon, BBC political reporter; “The UK government says that continued fishing of sandeel in the North Sea, along with the effects of climate change, poses a threat to the overall number of sandeels and therefore to the marine ecosystem.

Danish fishermen do fish sandeel to sell it to producers of fish oil and fish meal, which is a kind of food for animals or other types of fish.

Now, really, what this comes down to is the balance between the UK’s right to take conservation measures and the right of EU vessels to gain access to UK waters to fish the sandeel commercially.

The EU is looking for a ruling that this ban breaches the trade deal. Now, the UK is obviously hoping that that challenge is dismissed. This is the first time that this arbitration mechanism has actually been used.”

“Charles Clover is co-founder of the Blue Marine Foundation, a marine conservation charity. He told me this is a test case for the UK’s ability to protect its own marine wildlife.”

Charles Clover; “It’s fairly catastrophic for the environment if it goes down. I don’t think that it will because I think that according to the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, we are entirely entitled to do what we are doing. These countries are just testing it, but the irony is that they are testing protections that actually exist under their own laws. There is a law that says that seabird populations should be healthy.

They’re supposed to be observing this as well. So if they take this down, this ban on sandeel fishing on the Dogger bank and in UK waters, they will be taking down their ability to meet EU law. I can’t understand it.

And what does this mean then for the rules in our marine protected areas? You know, some people would like to see more protection for those marine protected areas, wouldn’t they?

This case is one of the most important for the environment in 45 years, because if we lose it, and I don’t think we will, we will not be able to protect our environment in our sovereign waters. And that is ludicrous. If it goes down, there’s a probability that France, which wants to fish, wants to trawl in our waters, in our marine protected areas, will be back for them too. That’s the reality of the situation.

So this is very serious and I’m confident that we will win, but it, it will be catastrophic for the environment if we don’t.”


Geoengineering

This might be a good article to send those who still think that Geoengineering is a conspiracy theory.

Listen or read; Florida State legislation to ban weather modification progresses; Rhoda Wilson, The Exposé, 27 January 2025

‘Florida Senator Ileana Garcia has introduced a bill, SB 56, aimed at banning “weather modification activities” in the state.

Titled ‘SB 56: Weather Modification Activities’, the Bill would prohibit the injection, release, or dispersion of any substance or apparatus into the atmosphere within Florida’s borders for the express purpose of affecting the temperature, weather or intensity of sunlight. It includes a ban on what is colloquially known as chemtrails and formally known as stratospheric aerosol injection from aeroplanes.

If passed, it would repeal nearly a dozen provisions in Florida statutes that allow state-licensed weather modification such as cloud-seeding and would also ban all study, research or experimentation in the field of weather modification.’


Censorship/Surveillance/Coercion/Corruption

When the world is going in the direction that no one wanted, including our taxes paying for endless wars, cost of living crisis, NetZero scam, mandatory vaccinations, poisons sprayed on our food, insect-based and lab-grown food, beautiful buildings replaced by hideous concrete high-rises, a sea of solar panels on our precious food-growing land, polluted air, water and sea, perhaps it’s time to question who is ruling us and realise that they obviously put profit and power before our wellbeing and that democracy has failed. So it’s time to take back control, not least through the power of our purse.

Read and Listen; They Don’t Just Tell Us What To Think, They Train Us HOW To Think; Caitlin Johnstone; January 31, 2025

And this, ultimately, is why the world looks the way it looks,: because powerful people have been so successful at manipulating the way the public thinks about things.

‘It’s not just that they tell us what to think, it’s that they train us how to think.

From grade school on we are fed a framework for thinking about the world whose premises are completely fraudulent. Any analysis which does not take place within that framework is portrayed as ignorant at best and dangerous extremism at worst.

Before we come up with a single thought of our own about politics, we are trained to assume as our starting point that elections are real and that the official democratically elected government is the only power structure calling the shots in our country. We are trained to assume that decisions get made in our government based on how people vote in elections between two parties who oppose each other and promote the most organically popular positions on important issues in order to win votes. This is all complete bullshit, but it’s the foundation we’re taught to premise all our ideas and opinions about political matters upon.

Before we come up with a single thought of our own about government, we are trained to assume as our starting point that the people running things in our country are known to us and occupy official positions in our capitol. We are trained to assume that if we have a problem with the way things are going, there are official channels through which the powerful can be held to account and real changes can be advanced. The fact that we are actually ruled by unelected plutocrats and empire managers who often have no position in the official government is never seriously entertained.

Before we come up with a single thought of our own about the media, we are trained to assume as our starting point that we live in a free country with a free press instead of a dystopian civilization where the news media function as the propaganda services of our rulers. We are trained to assume that while some parts of the media may have obvious biases regarding which mainstream political faction they favor, it’s still possible to get a more or less accurate read on what’s happening in the world by listening to both sides of that ideological divide. None of this is true, but it’s the framework in which all mainstream analysis of the western media occurs.’


The zionist are operating across the so-called developed, ‘free’ countries to weed out and persecute those who don’t follow their Israel Project narrative.

Watch; Another Journalist Arrested In Another Western Nation For Wrongthink About Israel Caitlin Johnstone, 25 January 2025

“They’ve arrested another pro-Palestinian journalist, this time in Switzerland.

The Electronic Intifada’s executive director Ali Abunimah has reportedly been detained by Swiss police in Zurich, after having been interrogated for an hour and released the previous day when entering the country. Abunimah, who is Palestinian-American, has played a leading role in exposing and critiquing the apartheid abuses of Israel for many years.

In October of last year, Electronic Intifada’s associate editor Asa Winstanley saw his home raided by British “counterterrorism” police in response to his social media posts about Israel’s western-backed abuses in the middle east. Multiple electronic devices were seized. No charges were ever filed.

In August of last year, journalist Richard Medhurst was arrested by British counterterrorism police and held for nearly 24 hours under section 12 of the UK’s Terrorism Act of 2000. Later that month, a human rights activist named Sarah Wilkinson was detained by police and had her home raided for online speech crimes. Both cases appear to have been the result of expressions of opinion deemed too sympathetic to resistance groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, which have been designated as “terrorist” organizations by the British government. Activists Mick Napier, Tony Greenstein, and Richard Barnard have been similarly persecuted in the UK.

In the United States speech rights have been getting stomped out in different ways since October 2023, ranging from violent police crackdowns on college campus demonstrations against Israel’s genocidal atrocities in Gaza to banning TikTok in order to suppress pro-Palestinian speech. Silicon Valley tech platforms which are intimately intertwined with the US government have been censoring speech that is critical of Israel with increasing aggression, and President Trump has just signed an executive order which appears to be geared toward deporting visitors to the United States who participate in pro-Palestinian activism.

Here in Australia, government leaders from both parties pushed hard for a ban on people protesting this past October 7, and police investigated protesters for waving Hezbollah flags at a demonstration in Melbourne under a new law banning the public display of symbols of designated “terrorist” groups. Zionists have been using the Australian courts to bully prominent journalist Mary Kostakidis on accusations of unlawful hate speech for sharing video footage of the now-deceased Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah.”

Read; I’m Free! Ali Abunimah, 27 January 2025

‘I’m free! I wrote this on the plane and I’m posting it just after landing at Istanbul. On Monday evening I was brought to Zurich airport in handcuffs, in a small metal cage inside a windowless prison van and led all the way to the plane by police. This is after three days and two nights in a Swiss prison cut off from communication with the outside world, in a cell 24 hours a day with one cell mate, not even permitted to contact my family. On Saturday in a police interview in the presence of my lawyer they accused me of “offending against Swiss law” without ever telling me what crime I had committed in Switzerland or listing any charges. As far as I know I have not been charged with any crime whatsoever and I was held in “administrative detention.” On Sunday morning, they took me from my cell for questioning by Swiss defense ministry intelligence agents without the presence of my lawyer, and they again refused to allow me to contact her or my family. I refused to talk to them without my lawyer and told them take me back to my cell. During my imprisonment I refused every meal and every cup of coffee or tea they offered me except the last meal, after I knew I would be going home. I accepted only water, which is the right of every human being. All of this was after I was abducted off the street around 1:30pm on Saturday while on my way to the Palestine teach-in by undercover agents, handcuffed, forced into an unmarked car and sped straight to the prison. My “crime”? Being a journalist who speaks up for Palestine and against Israel’s genocide and settler-colonial savagery and those who aid and abet it. I came to Switzerland at the invitation of Swiss citizens to talk about justice for Palestine, to talk about accountability for a genocide in which Switzerland too is complicit. But while I was hauled off to prison like a dangerous criminal before I even had a chance to say a word, the Israeli president Isaac Herzog, who declared at the start of the genocide that there are no civilians in Gaza, no innocents, received a red carpet welcome in Davos, a carpet soaked in the blood of the more than 47,000 known victims of the genocide and the thousands more still under the rubble, or who died of deliberately inflicted starvation and denial of medical care. And on this very day Netanyahu freely travels to Poland to make a mockery of the Auschwitz commemoration despite an outstanding ICC arrest warrant. That is the perverse, unjust world we live in. This ordeal lasted three days but that taste of prison was more than enough to leave me in even greater awe of the Palestinian heroes who endure months and years in the prisons of the genocidal oppressor. More than ever I know that the debt we owe them is one we can never repay and all of them must be free and they must remain our focus. The police gave me my phone back only at the gate of the plane so I’m only seeing now the extent of the overwhelming support and solidarity from all over the world. I’m deeply grateful to each and every person who stood up for me. I’m especially grateful to my lawyer Dina Raewel and her team, to our friends in Zurich who I learned afterwards demonstrated outside the prison, to my family and my colleagues at EI and so many others. I honestly had no idea what was happening outside that concrete room! Thank you from the bottom of my heart. I want to tell the whole story of what happened, perhaps in an @intifada livestream in the next day or two, because I think it’s important for people to know the depths to which their Western so-called “democracies” have sunk in the abject service of genocidal zionism. Right now I’m glad to be on my way home. I’m looking forward to hugging my mom and dad, taking a shower and sleeping in my own bed. Journalism is not a crime! Speaking out for Palestine is not a crime! Standing against racist genocidal zionism is not a crime! Say it with me: From the River to the Sea Palestine Will Be Free!

Watch; Update with Ali Abuminar and panel on Electronic Intifada 28 Jan 2024


Welcome to Starmerland. Although Israel has been put on notice by the International Court of Justice for genocide, and the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant for the war crimes of starvation, murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts, the Israelis, and those that arm them, are free. Meanwhile 18 pro-Palestine activists have been jailed for damaging a Bristol based weapons factory supplying Israel.

Watch; The SHOCKING evidence Starmer doesn’t want you to see Declassified UK, 23 January 2025

Phil Miller, Reporter, Declassified UK; “Despite the ceasefire in Gaza, police in the UK are cracking down on pro-Palestine activists like never before. This video from London shows a night raid on the home of someone suspected of belonging to the group Palestine Action. But now we at Declassified have uncovered new evidence that appears to vindicate the group’s highly controversial strategy of direct action at arms factories that it says are supplying Israel. Joining me to discuss this is my colleague John McEvoy, who’s just published his investigation on Declassified’s website.

Can we start by talking about what’s become one of the most controversial protests by Palestine Action, which has seen around 18 of their members being held in prison awaiting trial? And that’s the case of the Elbit factory in Filton. Can you tell us about what’s happened there with Palestine Action and what your research has showed about what that company’s been doing during the genocide in Gaza?”

John McEvoy, Reporter, Declassified UK; “So there’s been major actions at the Elbit Filton site, which is based in Bristol, and the activists actually caused around, at least according to the police estimates, more than £1 million worth of damage there. And the police have cracked down enormously on Palestine Action, particularly relating to this action. Active or alleged activists have been raided under counter-terror legislation. Some activists are being held on remand awaiting trial. They might not even get a trial within the next year. So these are really repressive measures that the UK government is taking against Palestine Actionists. Yet in this article is published in collaboration with Irish news site The Ditch, what we found is that many of these factories in the UK, and particularly those associated with Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest arms manufacturer, including this Filton site, have been exporting items to Israel over the past 16 months amid the Gaza genocide. And that is the claim, the very specific claim, that Palestine Action has been making over the past 16 months, that there are factories in the UK, that are directly complicit in the Gaza genocide by way of their exporting weapons and components for weapons to Israel. And so what we found is, and this is based on cargo documents that Declassified, in The Ditch, obtained and that we’ve sifted through over the past months. In fact, a shipment was made from the Filton site to an Elbit factory in Israel last year.”

Phil Miller; “And I should say you approached Elbit for comments. And the company denies any wrongdoing. It says it fully complies with UK export laws. But we know that those laws have all sorts of carve-outs and loopholes that enable certain types of weapons to still be exported to Israel despite the genocide and despite Labour’s kind of partial suspension of some arms export licences.”

John McEvoy; “I mean, what we’ve seen over the past week or so is that they have perhaps even less respect for civil liberties. I mean, it’s quite incredible what we’ve seen over the past week, right? We had, you know, former leader of the Labour Party, Keir Starmer’s predecessor, Jeremy Corbyn, as well as the former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell being questioned by the police. And so this is far more significant than what we already saw under the Conservatives.

It must be noted as well that one of Palestine Action’s most fierce opponents is John Woodcock, also known as Lord Walney, who remains the UK government’s so- called independent advisor on political violence. Now, John Woodcock, who’s advising the government, has called on Palestine Action to be banned in official reports, in public statements. And John Woodcock, as you know, we revealed last year in Declassified UK, has accepted funding from Elnet, which is a pro-Israel lobby organisation. He also works alongside arms lobbying organisations which have connections to Leonardo, which is involved in the arms trade supplying Israel.

So we have someone who’s supposedly an independent advisor to the UK government with several conflicts of interest directly relating to his attempted crackdown on Palestine Action. So, it goes without saying that he should be removed from his position immediately, but he’s just one element within the wider crackdown on Palestine solidarity in the UK, which is incredibly worrying.”


Starmer is going to put Holocaust education on the curriculum for every UK child. He says ‘we’ve got to be bolder and more defiant about the national importance of holocaust education.’ But he denies the Israeli holocaust/genocide that everyone can see on their screens every day, following the zionist doctrine of ‘don’t believe what you see’. He is just another zionist-captured politician who makes sure his government funds, arms and provides media cover for Israeli atrocities. With mind-numbing hypocrisy, his government materially supports an apartheid, terrorist, genocidal regime whose leaders are under arrest warrants for mass starvation and murder while his same government prosecutes truth-telling journalists who ‘support or approve of’ Hamas. With financial bribes, zionists have hypnotised our politicians to support Israel’s never-ending war against civilians, to steal their land, demolish their houses and deprive them of their human rights, and now they are trying to colonise our minds to turn us all into zionists so we will look the other way.

UK Column News – 29th January 2025

Presenter Charles Malet; “Back in September Keir Starmer spoke at the holocaust memorial trust where he referenced online misinformation and conspiracy theories and reinforced the point about building a national holocaust memorial and learning centre even though planning permission has not been granted. He said,

“We will build it next to Parliament boldly, proudly, unapologetically. Not as a jewish community initiative but as a national initiative. A national statement of the truth, the whole truth of the holocaust.”

Apart from this being a corruption of the planning process and the restrictions on developments in the Tower Gardens, it is also dismissing all the other things that are going on there. He said,

“We’ve got to be bolder and more defiant about the national importance of holocaust education. As you will all know, the holocaust is on the curriculum at Key Stage three, and there is currently a review of our national curriculum, but tonight I’m making two decisions in advance of that review. First, the holocaust will remain on the curriculum, come what may and second, even schools who do not currently have to follow the national curriculum will have to teach the holocaust when the new curriculum comes in for the first time. Studying the holocaust will become a critical, vital part of every single student’s identity and not just studying it, learning from it too, so it seems reasonable to ask why this subject should be the only one forced into the curriculum by law.”

“Now, closely related to this is the news from just over a week ago from the Knesset saying that the final readings have been approved for the second and third readings in the prohibition on denial of the events of the October 7th, 2023 Massacre Bill, which has been sponsored by a group of members of the Knesset. 16 of them supported the bill without any opposing votes or abstention it. It’s also proposed to add a new offence according to which person publishes statements denying the October 7th massacre with the intent of defending the Hamas terrorist organisation and its partners or expressing sympathy or identification with them, well be charged with a criminal offence bearing a penalty of five years imprisonment. This really does seem like a very significant move to make, and I’m ascribing a quote here to St. Augustine. Whether or not he said it or wrote it, it’s neither here nor there, but it is as follows. “The truth is like a lion. You don’t have to defend it, let it loose. It will defend itself.”


The World Economic Forum (WEF) convened its Annual Meeting in Davos from January 20-24, 2025, gathering heads of state, industry innovators, and thought leaders to plot their New World Order. Insane, millenarian fantasist Schwab announces his decree for a totalitarian future in which all aspects of all our lives will be controlled by a murky, secretive plutocracy led by….Klaus Schwab and his stakeholder capitalist henchmen!

Watch; Klaus Schwab, the unelected overlord of the globalist elite, just unveiled his 2025 “Risk Report”—a dystopian manifesto straight out of Orwell’s nightmares Dr Simon Goddek, X, 23 January 2025

“I sat through his cringe-inducing speech so you don’t have to and translated it into plain English.

“We must address misinformation and disinformation.”

Translation: Any dissenting opinion must be censored and labeled as dangerous.

“There are increasing divisions within societies and countries.”

Translation: People are waking up to our lies, and we need to regain control before they turn against us.

“We stand at the brink of the Intelligent Age.”

Translation: AI, digital surveillance, and automation will replace your job, monitor your thoughts, and ensure compliance.

“This transition carries unprecedented risks for humanity.”

Translation: Your freedoms will be eliminated under the guise of security and progress.

“It also offers significant opportunities for a new Renaissance.”

Translation: A future where unelected technocrats like myself dictate every aspect of your life.

Their “future” is your chains. Fight back!”


In Davos, Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset transition to Stakeholder Capitalism is disrupted by Trump rejecting most of his woke scams.

Watch; World News Reported in Context to The Great Reset of Capitalism 29th Jan 2025 Yellow.Forum

Klaus Schwab; “Just four days into your new mandate, we highly appreciate your presence with us today. As you might expect, Mr. President, your return to office and your forthcoming policies have been at the focus of our discussions this week.”

Trump; “My administration has taken action to abolish all discriminatory Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) nonsense. These are policies that were absolute nonsense and I’ve made it official policy of the United States that there are only two genders, male and female, and we will have no men participating in women’s sports and transgender operations, which became the rage will occur very rarely I terminated the ridiculous and incredibly wasteful Green New Deal.

I call it the Green New scam, withdrew from the one-sided Paris Climate Accord and ended the insane and costly Electric Vehicle Mandate. We’re gonna let people buy the car they wanna buy. I declared a National Energy Emergency. It’s so important, National Energy Emergency to unlock the liquid gold under our feet. In addition, I’m pleased to report that America is also a free nation once again. On day one, I signed an executive order to stop all government censorship.

No longer will our government label the speech of our own citizens as misinformation or disinformation, which are the favorite words of censors and those who wish to stop the free exchange of ideas and frankly, progress. We have saved free speech in America, and we’ve saved it strongly.”


If Kennedy takes the reins in HHS, psychopathic bullies like Bill Gates will be disabled.

Watch; Bill Gates Drafts Executive Order to Make ‘Vaccine Hesitancy’ a Criminal Offense in America Fact checked by The People’s Voice Community, 28 January 2025

‘The World Economic Forum, in conspiracy with Bill Gates, has devised a plan to sabotage Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination as Health Secretary. Why? Because RFK Jr threatens their ultimate goal: ensuring everyone is subjected to mandatory mRNA vaccinations every six months – no exceptions, no escape. But it doesn’t stop there. Vaccine hesitancy is being weaponised against us, tied to social credit score systems designed to strip away our freedoms. Non-compliance? That’ll make you a second-class citizen, unable to work, shop, or even access basic services.’


Insights into the shenanigans going on in the WEF meetings over the last few days.

Watch; The World Economic Forum: Public-Private Partnerships and the Road to Global Control; UK Column News, 27 January 2025

Presenter, Ben Rubin; ” The World Economic Forum is committed to improving the state of the world. You can read that in two ways, just making things better, or you could be talking about global governance. The state of the world. I think that’s what they’re doing, you know, does exactly what it says on the tin; The World Economic Forum.

Now I’m going to talk a little bit about how global governance drills right the way down to the front line of British politics and our economic system and give you a few examples of how that has been happening over the last week. The World Economic Forum took place in Davos, started last Monday, and we kicked things off by talking about wealth inequality. So last week I showed you these numbers, this graph showing the huge increase in wealth inequality in the US over the past 60 years, and how it tracks very closely to the founding of the World economic forum in 1971.

The Global Leader of Tomorrow programme, which started in 92.

The Young Global Leader programme, which started in 2005.

The Global Shapers programme started in 2011.

These numbers run up to 2014 and they show a doubling of wealth concentration into the hands of the 1% over 52 years. And if that line carries on going at that same trajectory, we can probably assume that we’re looking at about 85 to 90% control by the 1% today. And as we know, they want to drive that up to 100%. ‘We will own nothing and we will be happy.’ We think that’s probably around 2030. We use a key date for the global 1% for the world Economic Forum and for this entire agenda.

Crucially, I’m really going to reinforce this point,; it’s not an accident.The point of the system is what it does. POSIWOD. That comes from Stafford Beer. The concentration of wealth into ever fewer hands is the plan, and it’s directly linked to the existence of the World Economic Forum and the things that happen there.

And this is essentially being delivered through a fascist system. So this is a quote from Mussolini. ‘Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.’ And Benito Mussolini invented fascism, so I’m going to go with his definition over anyone else’s.

Let’s bring that to life a little bit. What does this corporatist system look like? How is it being run? Well, this is what it looks like. So this is the World Economic Forum, UN Strategic Partnership Framework signing ceremony in June 2019. So the World Economic Forum represents the corporate side of things; the private markets and the UN represent the state side of that. That’s a public private-partnership. And you can see here Berg Blender, President of the World Economic Forum, a man who makes me ashamed, I’m afraid to say, to be Norwegian. I’m a quarter Norwegian and he’s Norwegian and that is not good for Norway, that guy being up there. He’s alongside Uncle Klaus, Founder and Chairman of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, very well known figure. And they’re there alongside Antonio Guterres, still currently the Secretary General of the UN and a lady called Amina Muhammad, who describes herself as Nigerian, British. I don’t know what that means. You know, British or Nigerian, I think.

But anyway, she’s Deputy Secretary General of the UN and she’s Chair of the UN Sustainable Development Group. Crucially, because the Sustainable Development Group oversee the Sustainable Development Goals and this is the programme that is driving the global policy agenda. There are 17 of these. Read them and weep. Or maybe not actually, because they sound quite nice on first examination. So, no poverty, zero hunger, you know, these are all things that we can get behind. Right?

But the devil, as they say, is in the detail. And behind each of those goals is a global fascist public-private marketplace that is designed to accrue power and wealth for the global 1%. That’s what these goals are doing, that’s how they’re being deployed ultimately. Don’t take my word for it, let’s just have a quick look here at a slide from Lisa Witter from Apolitical Foundation, who I’ve spoken about a lot previously. Apolitical Foundation is currently rethinking the entire purpose and vision of Britain for the UK government. She’s also a young global leader of the World Economic Forum. And the way that she talks in her own materials and provide a link to the video that this comes from, this is how she talks about the SDGs. She says that they are being used to merge the two main global power structures; government on the left hand side, which is public and financial markets, as she describes it, on the right hand side, which is private, and the ring in the centre, those are the 17 SDGs. That’s what binds those two things together. And that’s coming from a young global leader of the World Economic Forum. And that symbol is incredibly important. If someone’s wearing that badge. If you can see someone wearing that badge or they’re stood near it, they’re representing that, then ultimately they’re the enemy of the 99% of the global population. And importantly, actually, at the bottom there, you can see that climate change is involved.

That’s the big grift that’s driving everything forward. They want to make everything a climate issue because that’s what’s driving the SDGs in this huge global public private marketplace.

Now let’s get back to Davos and show how that’s been deployed at Davos House. And this is the World Economic Forum outpost of Goals House, which is run by Freud Communications, a UK based strategic communications consulting firm, a private sector organisation. And this is basically the global propaganda hub for the SDGs. Let’s have a little look inside. What’s going on? I’ve clipped this together from a few of their videos. It’s a grand convening, lots of powerful people, business cards being swapped, networking taking place. Some of the big beasts of liberal media. So we’ve got John Sepel there this year, comparing and hosting. James Harding doesn’t seem to have made it, actually. He’s probably too busy getting his feet under the table at The Guardian. But we had bad Al Campbell there, who is now a mere podcaster. He’s no longer the iron fist in Blair’s velvet glove, although he probably still is actually in the background. Moira Forbes from the Forbes dynasty. And she’s doing a lot around the female agenda, the lady boss stuff alongside Janet Trancarly from EY. And then David Beckham actually shaming himself and his nation really struggling to pronounce the word philanthropy, actually, which is quite entertaining. And we’re going to come back to Beckham at the end of the show. Debbie’s got a little video clip that she’s going to share with us there. And this is what it’s all about. So it’s dreaming big dreams. It’s all very lofty and aspirational and feel good. And the people who walk through the doors, they’re represented with this kind of messaging. And to be honest with you, I think a lot of people there probably think that this is a good thing. There’s a lot of talk of love and that sign is brought there by the Freud Communications team that comes from their London office. I don’t think their definition of love is the same as everyone else’s, though, I think is really just manipulative. A lot of this stuff, this tapestry also comes from the Freud Communications office. I’ve talked about this a lot on The UK Column over the past 12 months. That is the Walthamstow Tapestry by Grayson Perry. Walthamstow is in E17 in London. I think that’s a direct reference to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. There’s a lot of symbology here, and that basically shows human babies being sacrificed to Satan by the corporations. And I just don’t think that’s an accident, to be honest with you.The fact that that’s there and that they have these meetings in front of that tapestry, I think it’s just mind blowing.

What does that process look like? Well, the public private-partnership. So I’ll give you just one example here of TikTok and the World Health Organisation Foundation, talking about Mind matters, enhancing digital well being through public private partnership. So that’s TikTok, who is one of the main drivers of mental health problems, particularly in young people, convening a meeting about digital well being…….”. (there’s more brilliant description but in the interest of your time, I have cut to just include Blair)

“And of course, Tony Blair was there at Davos last week talking about the clean energy transition. And again, this is another perfect example of a public private partnership. You’ve got Tony Blair, exec chairman of his own institute, representing the government, representing the state all around the world. And then you have Greg Jackson on the left there, who’s the CEO of Octopus Energy. And they co hosted what they call’ a high level roundtable on how we can accelerate the clean energy transition’. So again, this is all clean energy, climate change, public private, marketplace, huge coalescence of power and money in order to implement this global agenda………….”


I wonder how many non-zionists are invited to the WEF’s Shabbat dinner, celebrating the Jewish sabbath?

Read; The Truth Behind Davos Paul Cudenec, 17 January 2025

‘Monday January 20 sees the start of the World Economic Forum’s 2025 meeting at Davos, Switzerland.There will no doubt be much media hype about the fine words of various high-profile speakers, but little or no mention, I suspect, of an exclusive gathering of some 175 very special attendees held on the Friday of each year to round off the week on an appropriate note. This is the WEF’s Shabbat dinner, celebrating the Jewish sabbath.’

Writes blogger Robert Scoble: “Klaus Schwab, the Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum, told me that it is his favorite event of the whole week. “You can’t get in without a private invite and it was one of those things that you just can’t believe you’re part of. I was pinching myself to make sure I wasn’t dreaming”.

Jewish Insider executive editor Melissa Weiss, who lives in Tel Aviv, explains: “The annual Shabbat dinner held at the conclusion of the weeklong confab for the last 25 years is sponsored by the World Economic Forum and hosted by WEF founder Klaus Schwab and his wife, Hilde. She quotes Rabbi Avraham Berkowitz, who, she reveals, has travelled to Davos annually for two decades and is involved in the planning for the annual dinner. He says: “When it comes to Shabbat, it’s at the end of a week of intense meetings and networking and business. “So then people come to the last important meal: It’s spiritual, it’s purposeful, it’s Yiddishkeit.”

Israeli businessman Yossi Vardi is a driving force behind the event, Berkowitz told Weiss, and it seems that the late Israeli president Shimon Peres was “an annual staple at the dinner”. Yossi Vardi is described by Wikipedia as “an Israeli entrepreneur and investor, known for his involvement in the early development of Israel’s high-tech sector and the Israeli internet industry. As well as being a member of the WEF, Vardi has acted as an advisor to Amazon, to the World Bank and to the UN Development Program “on issues of energy policy and strategy in the developing world”.

He was the chairman of the Jerusalem Foundation, a highly sinister zionist organisation, whose website declared two decades ago that the idea of a Palestinian state must be “removed from the international agenda” and that “the de-legitimisation of the Palestinian narrative becomes a vital prerequisite to any comprehensive resolution of the Palestinian issue”.


In this documentary (extract below) Richard Jeffs narrates the story of Klaus Schwab’s rise to global power through the World Economic Forum, an unelected body of corporate tycoons and politicians intent on global governance through Stakeholder Capitalism and the Great Reset. It’s hardly surprising that Schwab praises Trudeau who ordered multiple violent assaults on Canadian truck drivers who were quite rightly refusing to accept mandating the untested, ineffective and dangerous Covid vaccine. Though 70% of the truckers had been jabbed, they respected free choice.

Watch; Stakeholder Capitalism Episode 1, Dir Richard Jeffs, Released October 2024

Schwab; “We are working closely together with governments from around the world, including all G20 countries.”

Commentary; “His exclusive elite members, called stakeholders, include the heads of all G20 countries from the US and UK to communist countries like China.”

Schwab; “What we are very proud of now is a young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau. So we penetrate the cabinets.”

Commentary; “After penetrating our cabinets, Schwab and his stakeholders have enacted a 10 year transition to another political system which Schwab designed.”

Schwab; “I pioneered the stakeholder concept called stakeholder capitalism. Stakeholder capitalism is finally becoming mainstream.”

Commentary; “This single global authoritarian system provides the stakeholders unprecedented control over our companies and lives.”

Schwab; “The Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a number of countries.”

Commentary; “Promoted on the cover of Klaus Schwab’s book, stakeholder capitalism slogan is propagated by the heads of all G20 countries and other powerful stakeholders. In the UK, Prime Minister and stakeholder Rishi Sunak has already made stakeholder capitalism’s credit score mandatory for large companies.”

Sunak: “We’re announcing the UK’s intention to mandate climate disclosures.”

Commentary; “Sunak’s opposition, Keir Starmer, is also a World Economic Forum stakeholder. It doesn’t matter which party we vote for. Both have a ‘stakeholder responsibility in accelerating the transition’ to stakeholder capitalism by enacting its Marxist and tyrannical policies.”

Schwab; “This is the best time for leaders to work jointly for the world to become more inclusive, more sustainable”.

Commentary;” If you’ve wondered what’s causing these strange events. It’s because we’re witnessing a cultural revolution, a social movement manufactured by tyrants.Other powerful UK stakeholders include Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock and Sadiq Khan, as well as the head of the BBC and our media regulator Ofcom. They’ve been indoctrinating us to believe narratives about them acquiring totalitarian authority are dangerous, right wing conspiracy theories.”

Voice; “What can you do if someone has fallen down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole?”

Commentary; “As well as manipulating us with propaganda, the stakeholders have been cancelling and censoring anyone who shares the truth.”

For more information about the Yellow.Forum please see here where you will also find a short film called Stakeholders Seize Ownership of Family Farms


Wow this is a powerful description of the insidious deceit that has infiltrated every level of authority including politicians, bureaucrats, businessmen, law enforcement, medics, universities, schools and mainstream media. It is behind a paywall so I have pasted some of his words below.

Watch; UK Column On Location: Bristol—Dr Ahmad Malik UK Column 8 January 2025

“First of all, I’d just like to talk about Isaiah 5:20 ‘Woe unto them that call evil good and good evil. That put darkness for light and light for darkness, that put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.’

You see folks, we are living in the age of inversions where everything that once seemed clear and logical has been flipped. Morality, nature, biology and even science has been redefined and some would say corrupted. This inversion is not accidental, it is deliberate. It is essential to understand these inversions so we can make sense of the world and we understand what is wrong.

I’ve talked about some of these inversions on my podcast, but I’m going to highlight a few of them here. Let’s take my old domain medicine. It’s not about healing. Maybe it never was.

It’s about sickness. It’s no longer about curing people, it’s managing their diseases for pure naked profit. Let’s talk about the justice system which protects the criminals instead of protecting the innocent. The system shields the guilty and punishes the whistleblowers and those doing the right thing.

Sorry. Politicians do not represent or serve the public. They serve the interests of corporations and powerful lobbies. They are selected, not elected.

What about regulatory bodies? They don’t protect the public interest, but the corporate interest. The agencies that are supposed to safeguard us, the public, now do the bidding of the industries they’re meant to regulate. Let’s take the police.

They don’t protect us from criminals, they entrap the innocent. Law enforcement increasingly targets those who speak out, while actual crime is often ignored. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s an undercover cop here or someone from MI5.

What about the news? They don’t report the news. It propagandises and brainwashes. Mainstream media no longer informs but manipulates, creating narratives to control public perception. Education is not about learning, it’s about indoctrination.

Critical thinking is discouraged and replaced by ideology and rote conformity. Science does not tolerate questioning. What was once an open field of inquiry is now dogma, where questioning the official narrative gets you punished. Let’s take our military. They aren’t defending our borders. They’re deployed for geopolitical games and feeding the military industrial complex while our borders are left open and vulnerable. Our religious leaders worship the holy vaccine, not God. Churches that should be sanctuaries of the faith now promote the latest pharmaceutical saviour as gospel truth.

And men are now women apparently. And women are men. Wow. Basic biological facts are denied in the name of ideology, confusing and harming future generations. My children are going, Dad, what the heck is this? And I’m like, I know the gas of life is now poisoning the planet. Carbon dioxide, a fundamental component of life, is now vilified as a deadly pollutant.

But this is just the tip of the iceberg. There’s even more, folks. And if I run out of the list, come and see me at the break and tell me the ones I’ve missed. Freedom is now control. The policies that are marketed as promoting freedom are in reality tools for increased surveillance and control over our lives. Censorship is free speech. We need to restrict speech because it’s necessary to protect free expression. While honest dialogue is stifled.

Tolerance is intolerance. The call for tolerance has paradoxically led to suppression of any dissenting views, creating a culture of intolerance. Equality is inequality. The very policies promoting equality often create new forms of discrimination, undermining true meritocracy.”

You can follow Dr Ahmad Malik on Substack: Honest Health; podcast; X/Twitter: @DrAhmadMalik). Doc Malik previously interviewed Debi Evans in September 2023.


Below is an unusually accurate and chilling speech from Boris Johnson to the UN about how in the name of helping us, big tech is used to surveil our every move.

Listen; UK Column 17 January 2025;

GOV.UK (2019): Speech: PM speech to the UN General Assembly, 24 September 2019

“You may keep secrets from your friends, from your parents, your children, your doctor – even your personal trainer – but it takes real effort to conceal your thoughts from Google. And if that is true today, in the future there may be nowhere to hide. Smart cities will pullulate with sensors, all joined together by the “internet of things”, bollards communing invisibly with lamp posts.”


Government wants to interfere/control every aspect of our lives; “welcome to our modern digital government.” Let’s remember that AI is very energy intensive and so emits huge amounts of carbon, but the government is very selective about which industries it will pursue to reduce carbon and which it wants to promote. As part of their pretence that reducing CO2 will prevent climate change, they have chosen to scapegoat farming to prove how hard they are trying to meet NetZero targets, arguing to themselves that if our farmers go bankrupt, we can always sell the land to Blackrock and import the food we need via trade deals with Australia and Canada. And please their corporate colleagues by increasing sales of fake food.

Listen; UK Column News Podcast 22 December 2024

Mike Robinson, UK Column; “We were talking about Stargate that was announced by Trump. Last week we were talking about the fact that the UK government is pushing in exactly the same agenda, direction, with data centres to be built at all costs and so on. So let’s just remind ourselves what was said in the little promo video that the government produced. We’ll just play a short excerpt from this from Wednesday’s news last week”.

Government Promo video; “We’re entering a new era of AI. This tech has the potential to improve everyone’s lives across our country and to grow the economy. But to do this, we need to invest in the UK’s infrastructure and skills. So here are five recommendations from my AI Opportunities Action plan. First, we’re creating new AI growth zones. These will speed up the construction of AI data centres. Huge warehouses full of computers that power services like AI and data processing”.

Mike Robinson; So that gives you a feeling of what they’re talking about. Absolutely the same policy that we have seen announced by Trump in the last day or two. Now, the government has announced that it’s launching a gov.uk digital wallet and app which they claim is going to simplify access to services and documents. The document they chose to highlight for the greatness of this scheme was the digital driver’s licence. But as we mentioned a number of weeks ago, they’re already talking about the veterans’ card being the first digital ID that they’re going to add to this new system. They also announced reforms to public sector technology, and these two things combined, they claim are going to save us all £45 billion and drive efficiency and growth. I don’t believe a word of it.

Last week we highlighted the British government’s AI agenda and that involved dropping everything to build these new data centres and energy infrastructure, and of course, that is, exactly what Trump has announced as well. Yesterday’s announcement of the new digital wallet goes hand in hand with the announcement on AI last week. Let’s listen to their sales pitch on that.

Government Promo video; “The newly formed digital Centre of Government is our vision for the future. We will deliver five changes for the British people. Easier lives, next generation public services designed around the user to save you time. If the government knows your date of birth, it should know when you’re old enough to apply for a provisional driving licence or state pension faster growth. If the government knows you’re setting up a business, it should know what support you might be entitled to and prompt you about them. Firmer foundations, digital public infrastructure and digital credentials will secure public services so they are trustworthy and resilient. Smarter organisations tackling duplication and using AI to automate more things behind the scenes. Imagine if, when you move house, you only have to tell the government once, and then all the relevant services are informed automatically. Higher productivity and efficiency, saving public money and enabling frontline workers to focus on delivery. This is a vision for everyone. We are putting new tech in people’s pockets, slashing time wasted dealing with annoying processes so they can focus on what matters to them. Welcome to our modern digital government.”

Mike Robinson; Are you excited about that?

Charles Malet; Well, I’m not sure I am, but I can imagine a lot of hackers licking their lips because of course they say that there will be better access to data. But for whom, I think, has got to be one of the big questions.”


Big tech billionaires are influencing the government to create a new digital state in the aftermath of societal breakdown. Out of the chaos a new public/private world order will be built along the lines advocated by Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset, where global governance will control our every move. To ‘Build Back Better’ – of course!

Listen; UK Column News Podcast 13 January 2025

Brian Gerrish; “I believe we’re looking at deliberate, orchestrated breakdown across our society. It’s the NHS, it’s education, it’s the police, it’s the military. This is not accidental. We are being attacked by our own government. And I think, Ben, you’ve got more to tell us about how this is being done.”

Ben Rubin; “Absolutely. And it’s not just our own government, it’s also the market, importantly the public private partnership that’s being used to create chaos out of which a new order will be built. And I’m going to reintroduce you to this gentleman, Brent Hoberman CBE, the British establishment are absolutely at the centre of all of this. We’re going to meet a few people today who have honours from the Royal family and I mentioned him first on the UK Column on 16 December last year. He’s the exec chairman of Founders Factory. He was the co-founder of lastminute.com which he sold for $1.1 billion in 2005, is where he established most of his wealth and he’s now been ploughing that into disruptive innovation startups. He also works on the UK Advisory board for Government Digital Services. So he sits right at the heart of digitisation of the British state.

He’s also on the advisory board of Google Cloud, so we can see how the technology companies and the state are really beginning to merge around people like this. He’s also on the advisory board for the World Economic Forum Digital Europe Group, and he is a young global leader of the World Economic Forum. So very important individual. We spoke about this meeting, this brainstorming session that he had last year with Rachel Reeves, UK Chancellor, and Peter Kyle, Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, where they talked about using AI across government, spreading AI outside of urban centres. Really importantly, they want this to be used across the whole country.

Also plugging Ewan Blair’s (Tony Blair’s son) recruitment company into central government to create a marketplace for new types of people being employed by central government and then also stripping back regulations around technology. That was the focus of this conversation. Hoberman is also very closely linked into Oxford University. We spoke about his backing for William Haig to be the Oxford Chancellor. Haig has been elected as Oxford Chancellor. Hoberman was part of the campaign to make that happen. And he’s also very keen, as I suppose you’d expect, on Elon Musk, helping Britain slash public spending. The digitisation of the state, bringing in big tech billionaires into central government in order to transform how things are run, the new order, ultimately, out of this chaos that we’re seeing, the breakdown that we’re seeing.

Their partners in this are big tech, Google, Salesforce, you’ve got McKinsey, the global strategy firm in there, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, you get an understanding of the kind of pedigree that we’re talking about here. Like, it’s quite an impressive mix, to be perfectly honest with you. And actually they’ve also sold this organisation, Founders Intelligence, into Accenture, which is one of the big systems integrators, the big technology consulting firms.

It’s a really interesting group. They’ve got a lot of stuff going on, but a lot of it for me is really, it’s about, first of all, burnishing the reputation of the big technology firm. So these big tech firms are key strategic partners to Founders Forum, and these are the people that are ultimately going to be building the infrastructure on which this new digital future is going to be built. But they are horrible companies, they are deeply unethical, they spy, they lie, they track, they trace, they abuse their power. And they’re really the robber barons of the 21st century. So in order to kind of address that, rather than changing their behaviour, what they do is they come along and they say, ‘hey, look, we’re going to invest in UK startups and we’re going to help create a new economic system for people to have an opportunity to create wealth for themselves by becoming startup founders.’


Shocking how few members of the US government apparatchik are prepared to speak truth to power. Jeffrey Sachs is an American economist and public policy analyst and a professor at Columbia University where he was former director of The Earth Institute. He worked on the topics of sustainable development and economic development. He is hugely appreciated by journalists who, in the pursuit of truth, have also broken ties with their former mainstream employers.

Watch; ‘I regard the United States as the most lawless and dangerous country in the world by far’ Jeffrey Sachs, X, 18 January 2025

“I regard the Unites States and the most lawless and dangerous country in the world by far. You cannot believe how much misinformation we get every single day. Because I have advised more than 100 governments around the world. I have seen things with my own eyes.

I’ve seen US CIA coups with my own eyes. Governments lie, but superpowers make super lies. And if you’re running the largest war machine in the world, hey, you are going to lie all the time. The entire Iraq war was not because they thought there were weapons of mass destruction. Weapons of mass destruction was the outcome of a focus group inside the Pentagon. How are we going to sell this war to the American people? Who made the decision two days ago that ATACMS can shoot deep inside Russia? Another brilliant move. We don’t even know if the President of the United States is compos mentis right now.

We have a deep state that takes these decisions. Not a word of explanation to the American people. It’s all lies. And I’ve seen it all through my life because I’ve been advisors to prime ministers and to presidents and to central bank governors and to some of the wonderful people on this panel, and I’ve seen a lot.”


If Robert Kennedy is allowed to drain the US health industry swamp he will also expose Big Pharma skulduggery in the UK and beyond.

Watch; Bill Gates Caught in a Fraudulent Petition Scandal! Your Daily Dose of News, 26 January 2025

‘Bill Gates has been revealed as the largest financial backer of a fraudulent petition aimed at blocking RFK Jr.’s confirmation as head of HHS. With over 17,000 alleged doctor signatures, the petition paints an alarming picture—but here’s the twist: it allowed multiple unverified submissions, proving it was engineered for manipulation.’


While there is massive support from medics for Robert Kennedy’s confirmation as HHS Secretary to ‘Make America Healthy Again’, snake oil big pharma have their apartchics’ claws out to stop him. I had to search outside of Google for the petition signed by 5,215 physicians, scientists, professors, and clinical providers.

Medical, Scientific Support for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Broadens and Surges as HHS Hearings Near; The Kennedy Beacon 26 January 2025

‘A broad swath of medical professionals, including scientists, physicians, noble laureates and healthcare providers, have circulated and signed a letter of support for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

On Wednesday, January 29, the United States Senate Committee on Finance will consider Kennedy for Secretary of HHS. Kennedy will also participate in a hearing with the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP), but the Finance Committee will vote on whether to advance Kennedy to a full Senate floor vote.’

Below is the full text of the RFK HHS Secretary Academic Support Letter, and a link here. If you have the required credentials, you can add your name.


On RFK’s Children’s Health Defense website see today’s confirmation-hearing via this link and read and watch; Senate Showdowns; JOHN DAY MD; 29 January 2025

‘Senate hearings to approve or reject RFK Jr. as head of the Department of Health and Human Services, and Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence are a squaring-off between the interests of American citizens in their own health, security and human rights, as opposed to the interests of the “Blob” or “Military Industrial Complex”, which includes big pharma, the NSA and Google these days. The interests of the deep-state & friends are to have every control mechanism in place before most of us realize it, so that we will have no choice but to comply with their new-order or disappear. I kept watching little bits of the Kennedy hearings, which were for show, and I wonder what deals and threats have been made. It is opaque. I called my Senators’ offices and respectfully requested that they vote to approve Kennedy to head HHS. I presume lists are made of that. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren attacked Kennedy hard, with disingenuous cheap shots. There were a lot of lies promulgated, as if true, and no clarifications permitted to Mr. Kennedy, on medical matters which I have researched. Kennedy will undergo further Senate hearings tomorrow (30th Jan), before the Senate can vote on his nomination.’


Gates makes money by funding the WHO et al who then buy the products he is heavily invested in. A merry go round of profits.

Watch; RFK Jr, takes a blowtorch to Bill Gates mindsetoftherich, 7 September 2024

RFK Jr; “I know most about Gates because I’ve written a book about him and what he calls philanthrocapitalism, which is you use philanthropy to make yourself rich and you use it strategically. And that’s what he’s done again and again. He’s gotten control of the World Health Organisation so that they mandate vaccines all over the world. And the companies that make those vaccines, Gates is, in many of them, the major shareholder. And he did the same thing with the Green Revolution. He got a hold of the regulatory agencies in African countries and forced them to change the nature of agriculture. You know, there’s 20,000 generations of agriculture, of people growing crops like sorghum and plantains and yuca and all these plants for subsistence, and he said, no, we’re going to transfer them all to these GMO monocultures of corn, and then we’re going to bring in companies that he owns, Kraft, Coca Cola, McDonald’s, these big food companies processing companies to buy that. And that’s going to be the deal. And then, of course, during COVID all of that shut down and you had 30 billion Africans now, as a direct result of Gates policy, who are now on the edge of starvation.

Interviewer; Tell that story that you shared with me a couple years ago about the vaccines that Gates sent over, supposedly for women that, I don’t know, was to control birth control or what?

RFK Jr; The real tell was what happened with the DTP vaccine, which is diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. Because of Gates pushing, this shot it is now the number one vaccine in the world, DTP, and it’s mainly given in Africa. That particular shot is discontinued in the United States because it was killing or badly injuring one out of every 300 kids that took it. We ended it in Europe and the United States, but Gates is giving it to every kid in Africa. In 2017, he asked the Danish government for money to support this programme and said, we’ve saved 20 million kids.

The Danish government said, can you show us the data? He couldn’t. So the Danish government went and did its own study and they had records of 30 years of this vaccine in a country called Guinea Bissau. And they looked at the records and what they realised in retrospect, which they were never seeing, is that the girls who were getting that vaccine at 6 months of age were 10 times more likely to die over the next six months as children who didn’t get it and they were dying of things that nobody on the ground had ever associated with vaccination.

They were dying of anaemia, bilharzia, and malaria and dysentery and nobody had ever made the connection that it’s only the girls who got the vaccine who were dying of those things, that the other kids were much healthier. And the Danish government had hired, retained the greatest vaccine scientists, all of them were pro vaccine, a guy called Peter Aaby who’s like a deity in that space and another called Sigrid Mogensen and a whole team of scientists knew that and those scientists started speaking up and saying you got to discontinue this vaccine and Gates made sure their careers were destroyed. So that’s when I understood that he actually understands what he’s doing and you know, this is not just him being hypnotised, he knows that this is wrong because this science was indisputable, and it really made me wonder about what his motivations are.”


To hold on to our freedom we must use cash. If we allow digital ID and digital monetary system we are relinquishing our power to the state and their puppeteers, the banksters and other deep state operatives.

Watch; How Central Banks Plan to Control You Catherine Austin Fitts, 11 November 2024

Catherine Austin Fitts; “Part of this debate is who’s going to control taxation and how our money is spent? And I assure you, if you love freedom, you want to make sure the people’s representatives continue to lead and manage the fiscal line of the house. And that is why you wanna stop a digital ID and an all digital monetary system, whether it’s a public crypto, CBDC, or private.

I call this the 12 steps to total control. If you walk around your life, your life is being digitised, your equipment in your home is being digitised. Your car, (I just rented a new car. It was, I had to put post notes all over the front. It was so digitised and flashing at me), but your transportation is being digitised. Now the BIS (Bank of International Settlement) is running a process to create a complete inventory and all the assets in the world, digital assets, and they’re going to tokenise them.

We have smartphones, telecommunication, and surveillance. All of these can be very invasive. And it’s amazing. I spend so much time in my life with people saying, ‘I can live with a smart meter. It’s really not that much of a big problem’. Or ‘I like my smartphone. It’s really convenient’. And, ‘why do you make such a fuss about QR codes? They’re irritating but I can live with QR codes’. Here’s the thing on all of those things, the problem is not each individual one. The problem is the day you implement a digital ID and you implement an all digital monetary system, guess what? It synthesises into one integrated system and your home, your car, your community become a digital concentration camp.

So let’s, let’s go back and look at what the pandemic looks like. If I say ‘you’re going to lock down and you can’t leave your home, except on Tuesday and Thursday to go grocery shopping, your money won’t work outside your home’. If I say, ‘I don’t want you driving anywhere,’ I can turn off your electricity, I can stop your electric car from working.

Some people say you can turn it off remotely. So I have extraordinary control. If you misbehave, I can cut or turn off your money. So we all know the story of the Canadian truckers. When the World Economic Forum says it’s 2030 and you have no assets, how are you gonna operationalise that? Well, I’ll tell you how you’re gonna operationalise that. If you have total financial transaction control, you can pretty much figure out how to inflate anybody’s assets or even take them.

I often have people say, ‘I have no assets. I don’t really care’. I say, ‘you have kids. They can take those kids away or they can mandate where they go to school or they can mandate their health policies’.

Okay, so what can we do? There’s a huge amount we can do. I dare say, if I collected up every portfolio and every retirement savings fund in this room of everybody sitting here, if we could create an aggregate balance sheet and financial statement, guess who’s financing the control grid? We are, we’re investing in the companies building the control grid.

Of course, our taxes are financing the government to build the control grid. If you look at the banks we deposit our money in, we’re, we’re banking the bank that did all the Madoff fraud and was in complete control of the Madoff fraud. We keep banking with them. Our message to the companies building the control grid, who are really running the government is, as long as we get cut in for a piece of the action, we’ll support you.

Okay? Now I have to tell you, if everybody got up tomorrow and said, the New York Fed is leading this, we are pulling all of our money out of the New York Fed bets tomorrow. We’ve had it, there would be a revolution. I can’t tell you how much power we have as individuals. Control and freedom happen one person at a time. And if you go through your balance sheet and your financial statements or your actions, so if you come into solar, one of our taglines is who’s your banker? Who’s your farmer? Where’s your money? And are you supporting your local sheriff? Okay. The power’s not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states.

And that is a provision that every country in Europe has spent a lot of time networking and working in Europe. I live in Europe. Half the year they would do anything to have our constitution. They’re so jealous. But the powers not delegated to the Federal Reserve are reserved to the states. And the states have the power to do a great deal to stop this.


David Miller is working to expose the power and influence behind our politicians and other public bodies.

Watch; Please support ground breaking investigations on Spinwatch David Miller, 11 January 2025

“In 2005, I set up this company called Public Interest Investigations with some others, and we used it to set up two websites, spinwatch.org and powerbase.info. Spinwatch was intended to do public interest reporting on propaganda, on lobbying, on special interests, and we’ve done a lot of work on that over the last 20 or so years. Power Base is a wiki. It’s like Wikipedia, but it has profiles of thousands and thousands of individuals and organisations who engaged in influencing public policy and the way in which society operates and undermining democracy, essentially. And so these have been resources which have been developed over nearly 20 years now, but which we’re looking to develop further and to do public interest reporting, especially on the zionist movement, Islamophobia, the way in which imperialism operates in the UK, the US and in other places as well.

And so what I’m hoping is that we’ll have a renewed interest in these topics because of the genocide in Gaza, and that will start to show people that they can actually fight back by using their own research and writing skills to expose the way in which power operates in society in order to undermine the way in which it is able to get away with whatever it wants in today’s world.”

Please visit us on:
spinwatch.org

powerbase.info

You can support us by donating at paypal.me/Spinwatch


Starmer will have to explain why, during his tenure as Chief Prosecutor, the Crown Prosecution Service destroyed emails and colluded with the Swedish prosecutor to keep Assange in prison.

Read; Judge Threatens to Break the UK’s Wall of Secrecy Around Assange’s Persecution Jonathan Cook, 12 January 2025

For years, the UK and Sweden stymied Freedom of Information requests to hide why prosecutors under Keir Starmer pursued the Wikileaks founder. Finally the game may be up.

After nine years of legal battles, a British judge has finally challenged the wall of secrecy erected by British and Swedish authorities around the legal abuse of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.

Judge Foss, sitting at the London First-Tier Tribunal, has ruled that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) must explain how it came to destroy key files that would have shed light on why it pursued Assange for 14 years. The CPS appears to have done so in breach of its own procedures.

Assange was finally released from Belmarsh high-security prison last year in a plea deal after Washington had spent years seeking his extradition for publishing documents revealing US and UK war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The CPS files relate to lengthy correspondence between the UK and Sweden over a preliminary investigation into rape allegations in Sweden that predate the US extradition case.

A few CPS emails from that time were not destroyed and have been released under Freedom of Information rules. They show that it was the UK authorities pushing reluctant Swedish prosecutors to pursue the case against Assange. Eventually, Swedish prosecutors dropped the case after running it into the ground.

In other words, the few documents that have come to light show that it was the CPS – led at that time by Keir Starmer, later knighted and now Britain’s prime minister – that waged what appears to have been a campaign of political persecution against Assange, rather than one based on proper legal considerations.

It is not just Britain concealing documents relating to Assange. The US, Swedish and Australian authorities have also put up what Stefania Maurizi, an Italian journalist who has been doggedly pursuing the FoI requests, has called “a wall of darkness”.

There are good grounds for believing that all four governments have coordinated their moves to cover up what would amount to legal abuses in the Assange case.

Starmer headed the CPS when many highly suspect decisions regarding Assange were made. If the documents truly have been destroyed, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to ever know how directly he was involved in those decisions.

Extraordinarily, and conveniently for both the UK and Sweden, it emerged during legal hearings in early 2023 that prosecutors in Stockholm claim to have destroyed the very same correspondence deleted by the CPS.

The new ruling by Judge Foss will require the CPS to explain how and why it destroyed the documents, and provide them unless it can demonstrate that there is no way they can ever be retrieved. Failure to do so by February 21 will be treated as contempt of court.”


The BBC has displayed shameful pro-Israel bias over Gaza which has caused a storm of protest from its own journalists. The pro-zionist bias is hardly surprising as their Middle East editor, Raffi Berg, is an out and out zionist. He even boasts that Netanyahu owns a copy of his book about Mossad!!!

Watch; BBC News is facing its most significant credibility crisis yet; trtworld; 2 January 2025

Total transcription of video voice over; “Leaked emails and chats, resignations and editorial battles. BBC News is facing internal turmoil over its pro-Israeli coverage of Tel Aviv’s genocidal war on Palestine’s Gaza. Touting itself as the world’s most trusted broadcaster, the news channel is facing a plethora of accusations by its own staff, including bias, censorship, creating false equivalence between the perpetrators and the victims and downplaying Palestinian suffering while glossing over Israeli atrocities. An in depth investigation by Dropsite News uncovered internal emails, testimonies, leaked documents and screenshots of chats that shed light on the channel’s biassed coverage of the ongoing Israeli war on Palestinians.

But how did it come to this? In November 2023, BBC News Senior management joined a morning editorial meeting with over 100 staffers to discuss Gaza coverage. The tone was set early when Deborah Ternas, the CEO of the network, said, “we’ve got to all remember that this all started on the 7th of October”. What followed was a fiery debate, with staff pushing back against what they saw as an oversimplification of the conflict that ignored the broader historical context of Israeli occupation and the suffering it had caused in Gaza.

Shortly thereafter, over 100 BBC employees signed a letter condemning the network for biassed reporting on Gaza and failing to meet its own editorial standards. Their demands: acknowledge that Israel was denying journalists access to Gaza, stop treating official Israeli statements as gospel and provide critical context on Gaza’s residents, most of whom are refugees whose families were forcibly displaced from other parts of Palestine in 1948. For many, the letter was a last resort, as their previous attempts to engage management had been completely ignored.”


Wikipedia is smearing people who don’t follow the mainstream narrative.

Read; Wikipedia Ruined My Life; Dr Vernon Coleman, January 2025

‘There’s all sorts of rubbish about me on the internet these days, some of it egregiously out of context, some of it just lies and most of it emanating from Wikipedia, Google and the other garbage distributors controlled by the conspirators. Even tradesmen look at Google and Wikipedia, recognise my name and sneer contemptuously when they see me. Bizarrely, some refuse to do essential repair work for anyone labelled `discredited’. If governments want to remove misinformation and disinformation from the internet they should start by closing down Wikipedia.’


A brilliant summary of how the psychopathic elite have infiltrated every aspect of our lives, paving the way for our demise.

Read; How Fascism Came Chris Hedges Report, 23 December 2024

‘President-elect Donald Trump does not herald the advent of fascism. He heralds the collapse of the veneer that masked the corruption within the ruling class and their pretense of democracy. He is the symptom, not the disease. The loss of basic democratic norms began long before Trump, which paved the road to an American totalitarianism. Deindustrialization, deregulation, austerity, unchecked predatory corporations, including the health-care industry, wholesale surveillance of every American, social inequality, an electoral system that is plagued by legalized bribery, endless and futile wars, the largest prison population in the world, but most of all feelings of betrayal, stagnation and despair, are a toxic brew that culminate in an inchoate hatred of the ruling class and the institutions they have deformed to exclusively serve the rich and the powerful. The Democrats are as guilty as the Republicans.

The utopian ideology of neoliberalism and global capitalism is a vast con. Global wealth, rather than being spread equitably, as neoliberal proponents promised, was funneled upward into the hands of a rapacious, oligarchic elite, fueling the worst economic inequality since the age of the robber barons. The working poor, whose unions and rights were stripped from them and whose wages have stagnated or declined over the past 40 years, have been thrust into chronic poverty and underemployment. Their lives, as Barbara Ehrenreich chronicled in “Nickel and Dimed,” are one long, stress-ridden emergency. The middle class is evaporating. Cities that once manufactured products and offered factory jobs are boarded-up-wastelands. Prisons are overflowing. Corporations have orchestrated the destruction of trade barriers, allowing them to stash $1.42 trillion in profits in overseas banks to avoid paying taxes.

Neoliberalism, despite its promise to build and spread democracy, swiftly gutted regulations and hollowed out democratic systems to turn them into corporate leviathans. The labels “liberal” and “conservative” are meaningless in the neoliberal order, evidenced by a Democratic presidential candidate who bragged about an endorsement from Dick Cheney, a war criminal who left office with a 13 percent approval rating. The attraction of Trump is that, although vile and buffoonish, he mocks the bankruptcy of the political charade.


A classic case of shooting the messenger.

Read; Greg Hadfield discusses exposing paedophile Ivor Caplin and being summoned to court for doing so Rhoda Wilson, The Exposé, 27 January 2025

‘Journalist Greg Hadfield is facing criminal charges for exposing Ivor Caplin, a powerful Labour Party politician recently caught soliciting underage boys. The retired Brighton-based journalist has been summoned to appear in court after drawing attention to an obscene Twitter/X message posted by Caplin.

Yesterday, Hadfield joined Kit Klarenberg, host of Active Measures, to discuss what has happened.

“You’d be forgiven for not knowing but in recent weeks Britain’s governing Labour Party has become engulfed in a major scandal,” Hadfield said. “on January 11th, Ivor Caplin, a former Labour MP and defence minister … who has close personal connections to influential … Labour figures including ministers currently serving in Keir Starmer’s historically unpopular government was arrested after sending indecent images to and attempting to meet with a 15-year-old boy for sex.”

Related:

Ex-Labour MP Ivor Caplin’s £350,000 home is ‘searched by police’ after he is arrested on suspicion ‘of engaging in sexual communication with a child’, Daily Mail, 11 January 2025

Who Is Ivor Caplin? Former Labour MP Who Criticised Elon Musk Now Embroiled In Child Sex Scandal, Times of India, 12 January 2025

“The timeline of Caplin’s now deleted X [formerly Twitter] account was a uniquely bizarre and grotesque mix of attacks on Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters, advocacy for Starmer, clips of hardcore gay porn, attempts to arrange meetings for sex with a wide variety of people often many years his junior and interactions with senior Labour figures,” he said.

Asking, “Could the media and political blackout on this story indicate there is a paedophile crisis in the British Labour Party implicating its highest echelons?”’


This article exposes the myth of the Chinese social credit system. In the information section of the video there are a bunch of citations to confirm Berletic’s statements.

Watch; China’s “Social Credit Score System” – Fact or Fiction? The New Atlas, 1 November 2022;

“A 32 year old entrepreneur who only gave his name as Chen told Foreign Policy, “I feel like in the past six months, people’s behaviour has gotten better and better. For example, when we drive now, we always stop in front of crosswalks. If you don’t stop, you will lose your points. At first we just worried about losing points, but now we got used to it.”

So they’re talking about public safety, not endangering people’s lives. A point system to encourage people not to endanger other people’s lives. They’re talking about crosswalks. They’re not talking about obedience to the Communist Party of China. They’re talking about everyday things that you should do so that you don’t endanger yourself and others. This is common sense. And the Business Insider is deliberately lying to you, trying to spin it as something sinister, which is something the Western media does about all nations the US targets around the world.

They smear them, they fabricate claims about them, they take ordinary things and they spin it as something sinister. And that is exactly what they’re doing with China and the myth of this centralised draconian social credit score that the Business Insider itself admits doesn’t exist. Now, I told you that the Business Insider cited several articles throughout its own article and I linked to all of them in the video description below. And one of them is Wired. And the additional language, because it is explaining the same thing. Business Insider explained that this is actually not about politics or morality. It’s about things that are offences anywhere in the world. But who are they citing? Who is adding this extra language to convince you otherwise, essentially lying to you, misleading you? Well, they say right here, Australian Strategic Policy Institute, otherwise known as ASPI. They’re one of the most persistent corporate and government funded think tanks pushing out lies, just straight up propaganda about China on a daily basis.

And why are they doing that? Who funds them? Always follow the money to figure out why we know they’re lying. Business Insider admitted that they are lying about this social credit system that they admit doesn’t even exist, that they misled you in their headline without directly saying it, but by just reading their article, that is obvious, we know they’re lying. Why are they lying? Who funds them? So here’s ASPI’s sponsors, Naval Group, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Saab, you have the Australian government here. You have Amazon, you have Microsoft, you have Google, you have Twitter. And the U.S. government, the U.S. State Department also funds ASPI.

So the US government has marked China for regime change, for undermining it, dividing, destroying it, preventing it from surpassing the West. And in order to do this, to get the population on board with what essentially is going to be a war, either by proxy or directly, and also a lot of uncomfortable economic measures taken before him, to get the public on board with this, they need to convince the public that China is actually a threat and it’s not just another example of the US bullying other countries on the global stage. So they have ASPI lie to you, and then publications like Business Insider, Wired, the Guardian, South China Morning Post, they all take turns repeating these lies.”


Actor Mel Gibson, who lost his home in the California fires, agrees with the anchor on Sky News that the California fires could have been deliberately started to enact a state/property developers land grab. A textbook public/private partnership!

Mel Gibson calls out ‘monumental mismanagement’ of LA fires by California government after losing his home Stephanie Giang-Paunon, Fox News, 16 January 2025

Mel Gibson; “I know they were messing with the water, letting reserves go for one reason or another. They’ve been doing that a while. California has a lot of problems that sort of baffle the mind as far as why they do things. And then in the events like this, you sort of look, well, is it on purpose? Which, it’s an insane thing to think, but one begins to ponder whether or not there is a purpose in mind. What could it be? Do they want the state empty ? I dunno.”

Stephanie Giang-Paunon Fox News; “There’s already talk, and we played a couple of sound bites of reimagining the way rebuilding occurs, and obviously there’s a great need for high density housing in California and across the country. That’s a big push by the climate folks, and you’re already hearing rumblings of that in this case. Like, goodbye single family homes. Hello? High density housing.”

Mel Gibson; “Yeah. It’s pretty scary. And it’ll take decades to do that too. Even if it’s a good idea, which I don’t know if it is, but reminds me of the old cattle barons clearing people off the land, you know? But I don’t know. I can make all kinds of horrible theories up in my head, conspiracy theories and everything else. It just seemed a little convenient that there was no water and that the wind conditions were right, and that there are people ready and willing and able to start fires. And are they commissioned to do so? Or are they just acting on their own volition? I don’t know. But yeah, they seem pretty well equipped some of these people that they’re catching.

I’ll sift through the remains of my place and see if I can find any clues for you!”


Conspiracy theory or fact?………that is the question you may ask of the next 2 articles. Therefore I have left them very long as you may need to be persuaded that we are ruled by demons.

Watch; What’s Causing THESE Los Angeles Fire Anomalies?! Brush Junkie, 13 January 2025

Intro: ‘Are mysterious forces behind the recent surge in wildfires plaguing Los Angeles? From unexplained blazes in the Hollywood Hills to suspicious fires in Pacific Palisades and Altadena, we’re digging deep to uncover the truth behind these bizarre Los Angeles fires. Is it arson, climate change, or something more sinister?

“This is an image of the Palisades from a satellite and it looks like every single block every single home is actually burning at the same time as if it all pretty much erupted at once instead of traveling from one side of town to the other. I wouldn’t have expected all of this to still be glowing as if it was all embers but this looked really strange and then we also have some aerial images that show these neighborhoods. This one still has a lot of smoke rising, but one thing I wanted to point out is there’s almost no homes that can be seen left intact in this image but there’s plenty of trees that still look like they have their foliage on there.

And then there’s another image, this is probably one of the most widely circulated images from the Palisades, and again it looks very reminiscent of Sonoma California and Paradise California and even sections of Maui that also looked like this, where the homes were completely leveled into a white dust and some of the trees actually still have their leaves.

We have something called the California Coastal Commission, they’ve been active for a few decades now but they are a group of Commissioners that permit building and rules and and make regulations on the coast, and yesterday, Newsome (Governor of California) signed a bill that will bypass the California Coastal Commission so that the rebuild can happen faster but what happens is they don’t have to follow the rules and regulations that they once were held to, and that is very reminiscent of Hawaii because previous to the fire, Governor Green (Governor of Hawaii) signed an addendum or something that would bypass Proclamation H, a Proclamation that will allow the rebuild to bypass a lot of the rules and and things.

This is one of the few remaining mobile home communities and we see this very common these type of places (where it’s not of a high income area) these areas tend to get hit really hard and if you notice you can’t really even tell that it was a mobile home park because everything is so flattened aside from the trees and some of these beams and not a single toilet, bathtub, sink.

Well before when the Franklin fire happened, I thought it was interesting that these areas survived because they’re usually the areas that get hit first but as we can see here this area is completely demolished and I don’t see this area being replaced with another mobile park, this area is extremely valuable, it overlooks the ocean, it’s prime real estate and that’s another commonality we’re seeing with Lahaina (Hawaii) on the water, extremely valuable real estate and a perfect opportunity to give an excuse to rebuild in another way.

So besides the structures there were trees that burned, but these trees actually burned as if they were electrified or some sort of plasma, it looks like either plasma or electricity has lit these up like a fiber optic cable and they’re glowing from the inside, it’s a really strange burn pattern and I just wanted to point that out. However there was a lot of trees that survive, like this eucalyptus, but what struck me is the fact that this tree overhangs a completely leveled home and there is even some burn damage below the tree but not really on the tree itself. The base of the trunk looks like it might be slightly scorched.”


The above is how they may have deliberately been set on fire and below is why

‘Deborah Tavares is ex Intel and understands the larger picture (depopulation, Agenda 2030, use of technologies we have not been told about). She discusses the LA Wildfires and analyses how they have been brought about, and what “they” want them to achieve. She tells us about the Patents for the various technologies that have been employed to start the fires (electro magnetic lasers etc).’

Watch; Firenados and UN/Rothschild Engineered Infernos Deb Tavares, 13 January 2025

Deb Tavares; “Hopefully the people of California will wake up slowly and one by one and quickly return to their senses because what’s happening here is not sustainable. In fact, as I stated earlier in the broadcast, the powers that ought not be in California just burn down their tax base. This is unrecoverable folks. And now we have major radio stations in LA publicly calling for Mayor Karen Bass to be removed. Listen to this folks.”

Radio; “Urgently call for the immediate recall of Mayor Karen Bass, due to her gross mismanagement and failure to effectively respond to the devastating 2020 fires in the wake of these catastrophic fires, our city has been left in crisis. Water supplies have been severely strained. Billions of taxpayer dollars have been misallocated or left unaccounted for, and countless lives have been lost. Families have been displaced. Homes destroyed, livelihoods shattered. Yet Mayor Bass has been absent from the front lines choosing to travel abroad while her constituents suffer.”

Presenter; And she’s back now. But guess what folks? A leaked memo reveals that that witch, that DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) hire, Karen Bass, demanded her fire department cut an extra $49 million from the budget just one week before the wildfires broke out. I bring it all up, Deb, simply because these people are accomplices with the UN agenda 2030 policies and Rothschild.”

Deb Tavares; We, are told by the Illuminati Secret Covenant that they will establish our government and establish opposites within, and they will own both sides. Okay? Really let that sink in. Everyone that’s listening, we are on our own. Even our court system is corrupt. All of it is corrupt. Attorneys have bar cards. (Bar cards, British accreditation). They’re initiating sustainable development laws. In other words, if companies are not actively reducing greenhouse gas emissions, they won’t get business. They won’t get bank loans. Attorneys are behind this. I have documents where this all is revealed, but I want to go over this very quickly because this is extreme.This is the Climate Action Plan, and these are the health effects from the Climate Action Plan plans. And there’s two categories. One is the climate change effect, and then examples of human health risks. So they talk about how they will increase extreme heat events. They’ve been doing that. Last summer it was so hot here we were experiencing microwave heat, much hotter than our thermometers were showing our temperatures.

It was hotter outside. There is a coverup for microwaving us during heat events. And what they say this will cause is heat related illnesses and death and worsening of chronic health conditions. They talk about increased air pollution, which they’re creating and causing as well. And the benefits of that will increase respiratory illnesses and seasonal allergies. And then they talk about the floods, the droughts, the wildfires, the storms, and the changes in weather patterns, which they control in all.

It will cause injury, death, respiratory illnesses, waterborne illnesses, foodborne illnesses, displacement, rest related mental disorders, mental impacts certainly increasing the shift in infectious diseases and higher food prices and food scarcity all being created. And we’re allowing it because they’ve all initiated these climate action plans. They’ve all brought this in and the higher food prices, of course, are going to increase hunger and death and minimise nutritional value. They talk about sea level rise, injury and death. I did a video on sea coastlines under attack.”

Solutions;

“We have to get auxiliary topside water tanks on our property. We have to get pumps to pump the water out to defend our homes. We have to put sprinklers on our roof. Our government is not going to help us. There’s not enough firefighting equipment nor firefighters. The firefighters are dying from being sprayed with the dumps. In fact, what we discovered here during the Redding Fire here in Northern California at a large meeting I attended after that fire is they couldn’t fly in and do water drops and or chemical dumps over Reddit because of all the drones.

Now you heard about the drone that hit one of those firefighting planes down there and took it out of commission. The drones supersede the ability for our services to get in there and help us. Why? Why? Why are they untouchable? That’s happened here in Redding.

Again, this is a weaponised weather warfare. We are in a fifth generation warfare operation. These are all criminal enterprises. We have to understand that. And only until we take personal initiative to protect one another, we are going to be murdered. We have to harden up to be left easy to be killed in a system that is set to kill millions. Millions. Look at the legal report, right, and listen to this.

This is important, but I want everybody to certainly download and read the Illuminati Secret Covenant. You will be killed to the bone and you should be. This is going to arm you to understanding drop by drop. How this has all happened to us. But it says the common people don’t want war. Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor for that matter, even in Germany, is that understood. But the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifist for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in all countries. We need to understand the conspiracy and how the world is ruled and how AI and computers are running this show that we’re in.

We, again, I can’t overemphasise the fact that this is a slave state operation. No question about it. And the arsonists are our own governments and they’re destroying us because the system is built upon weapons. Everyone’s using cell phones now. Cell phones we know are weapons. Everyone’s got wifi and wireless in their homes. All of this is adding to the combustibility.”

Presenter; “As we wrap up the conversation, I want to talk about solutions because I think there is a solution to all of this, and it’s called reaching the tipping point of human consciousness and awareness to the problem that war is being waged against us. I want to play this one-minute clip from Shark Tanks, Kevin O’Leary (sometimes known as Mr. Wonderful, is a Canadian businessman, investor, television personality, journalist, and author.), talking about how California is a dumpster fire and Gavin Newsom is the Justin Trudeau of California.

Kevin O’Leary; “California is a dumpster fire, and sadly it is a dumpster fire. It’s tragic what happened here. Gross mismanagement. We started talking about this with San Francisco, which is a war zone, and now LA, before this was riddled with crime. People walking in and out of the stores, just stealing stuff. You’ve documented that forever. It is time for change. Gavin Newsom is a terrible manager. He is the Justin Trudeau of California. He’s horrific, and obviously people should want to make a change and hire somebody else, but I think it goes the other way. I think they’re so tired of the rhetoric and the policy and the taxes and the mismanagement. You know, just watching that woman talk about, it’s all over the internet now, where is the water pressure in my fire hydrant to Gavin Newsom? And he says, ‘ah, it’s a local thing’. You can’t say that when you’re a politician. You have to own the problem. He doesn’t even understand that time for him to get removed from office immediately.”

Presenter; “What Kevin O’Leary said about Gavin Newsom being a bad manager is incorrect. He’s a very good manager for the New World Order for the United Nations and for Rothschild. He’s doing exactly what they wanted him to do. Should he be thrown out of office? Yes, I think he should be tried for his crimes and if found guilty, hang from the neck until dead. But he’s not a bad manager. He’s an excellent manager for the powers that ought not be.”

Deb Tavares; Absolutely. He is an excellent manager because he’s being controlled from above and he is showing the criminal crime scene and confirming that the damage was accomplished.”

Deb Tavares; “They’re destroying infrastructure in cities and they’re planning to abandon a number of cities. I found this on the FEMA website well over a year ago, and I pumped it out on many radio shows. But, and I forget all the cities that are going to be abandoned, but this is going to sound insane and I’ll explain it, but St. Louis is a city that they plan to completely abandon. There’s many cities. There was one in Tennessee, in New York, et cetera. How they’re going to abandon cities is they’re going to take out and take down the reservoirs, which we’re seeing happening now. Three reservoirs were recently removed on the California, Oregon border, and that has caused over 80,000 water users to have to truck in water or use the well water if they had wells already drilled. The purpose of that we’re being told is to replenish the endangered fish, the salmon, et cetera. And what they’re doing is they’re literally cutting cities off that are built around the infrastructure of reservoirs and dams. They’re also blowing dams and river and reservoirs up. We’re seeing that in many of the hurricanes and tornadoes. They’re taking out the infrastructure and we’re not gonna be able to build that back. And so cities will have to relocate simply ’cause they won’t have the water they need to continue to survive.

And again, I discussed this in great detail from the very documents that discuss this directly. So this is another method in forced relocation. And there are many methods of forced relocation. But I want everyone pleased, Sean, everyone needs to look up the sun surveillance equipment, SUN surveillance. When you are told you cannot leave your area, they will know if you do and they will be able to kill you from the equipment on the sun surveillance equipment that is being deployed everywhere.

This is frequencies, it’s all AI and it’s all a scripted reality. It’s already advanced with what we saw. Look at the cartoons of the Simpsons and look at how it was revealed ahead of time, what they did to the Towers 9/11. All of it is scripted, all of it, and it’s all political theater, as horrible as that sounds. They’re perfecting the system of slavery. And I can’t underscore enough for everybody to please read the Illuminati Secret Covenant. You’ll understand how this has been drop by drop by drop as instituted over decades, decades, decades as in like forever.”

“I want to thank you for the opportunity to talk about the fires. An area of which I suffered severely. I have, again, three websites. I’m running stopthecrime.net, primarywater.org and toxicsky.org. I hope that everyone starts to understand this is war. If the consequences of what they’re seeing live streamed looks like a war there in Los Angeles, it’s because it is, and the fires are not out of control. They are being controlled guys.”

Presenter; “Say one last thing as we say goodbye to Deb Tovar, Malibu, Santa Monica, some of the wealthiest areas of California. Calabasas, Brentwood, all under attack on purpose by, I would say, Rothschild, United Nations, World Economic Forum, Club of Rome. These are the people, the Council of 12. They want you off the rural lands and herded into smart cities. If you’re to survive at all.”


Covid/Vaccines Scam

For those who question the origin of Covid 19, this CIA lab leak confirmation might wake them up.

Listen; CIA says lab leak, Fauci’s pardon, NIH’s meetings, RFK Jr’s hearing & more; Vinay Prasad MD, MPH, 27 January 2025

“The CIA announced this week that lab leak is the more likely cause of Covid-19 than the natural origin. The CIA has come out, and before you say, ‘this is politically motivated,’ you need to know the CIA did this investigation under Joe Biden. Joe Biden didn’t release the report until Trump came into office and now the report has been released by the new CIA director.”

“Even if you’re someone who’s on the fence on this question surely you will concede that Facebook censoring people’s ability to discuss this was a government overreach and intrusion and that was representative of the censor culture we live in and that’s a stain on this government and on Facebook? Luckily Mark (Zukerberg) I think is actually turning around. Mark is starting to see the light. If you look at the timeline of events in the last two weeks you’re going to have to ask yourself why has the mainstream media failed so badly.

Biden, before he leaves office, pardons Anthony Fauci preemptively. I’m not familiar with pardoning scientists particularly preemptively because he’s not been guilty of any crime but the pardon goes back to 2014. That’s a very weird date; not 2012, not 2020, not 2019 Covid-19, but not 2020 it goes back to 2014. What happened in 2014? 2014 was the year that Obama put at ban on gain of function research.……2014 is the year in which, after the ban took place, Eco Health Alliance got their Grant to definitely not do gain of function research in Wuhan. The money is kind of being laundered through a third party site to do it because NIAD cannot directly do it and NIAD can’t probably fund it in the US, so they’re laundering it to go to third party.”


‘Esther McVey introduced a debate in parliament on the functioning of the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), with MPs from 3 different parties highlighting disastrous delays in dealing with safety issues dating back over 50 years. The only ‘good news’ was that they resolved “that the MHRA continues to need substantial reform.”

Read; ‘The most disgraceful period of recent history’ – MPs savage the MHRA (The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency) Sally Beck, 24 January 2025

‘ON Thursday January 16, Conservative MP Esther McVey led a backbench debate in the Commons criticising our drug regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

She highlighted the MHRA’s historical failings in investigating harmful drugs, its abysmal record regulating Covid vaccines, its lack of transparency, fatal conflicts of interest, its failed Yellow Card early warning system and its intimidation of journalists.

She then lambasted the organisation, established in 2003, for ignoring Covid vaccine safety signals which she said caused unnecessary injury and death, and for taking four years to publish minutes from a meeting with the Commission on Human Medicines (CHM) that discussed Covid vaccine benefits versus risk. ‘Full of redactions’, it left readers with ‘more questions than answers’. The MHRA had removed the CHM minutes from its website by the weekend. One can only hope to reinstate the redactions.’


New Zealanders had to fight the vaccine zealot Jacinder Ardern to avoid the neither safe nor effective Covid jab;

Read; “This is unethical and this is madness” – NZ doctor Alison Goodwin on the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, 3 July 2021; Elizabeth Hart, 23 January 2025

‘Where were the doctors who should have been challenging the Covid madness from the beginning? It seems most were silenced by their ‘regulators’, such as AHPRA in Australia, see for example: Reckless disregard for voluntary informed consent

But there were good doctors speaking out, if only more of their colleagues had joined them…

Consider for example general practitioner Alison Goodwin in New Zealand, speaking out in July 2021. Alison is a member of New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out With Science (NZDSOS). Alison is a doctor who held firm to fundamental medical moral and ethical principles, as she clearly states in her video statement below, e.g. At medical school three principles were ingrained into me:

Number one, first, do no harm.
Number two, the right to informed consent.

And number three, the right to decline a medical treatment.

If more New Zealand doctors don’t stand up and start defending these rights, I’ll be ashamed to call myself a doctor. To our leaders – I think this is unethical and this is madness. We must support those doctors and other practitioners who stood up and pushed back against the coercion and vaccine mandates, their stories must be told. Please watch Alison’s three minute video statement, a full transcript is recorded under the video. The video was originally published on the NZDSOS website.’


Scottish heroes fighting to get the truth out about vaccine injury.

Read; Exclusive| UK COVID-19 inquiry|15 Jan 2025 Biologyphenom, 16 January 2025

‘Testimony by Ruth O’Rafferty from the Scottish Vaccine Injury Group.’

Introduction

The Scottish Vaccine Injury Group (‘SVIG’) (on social media platform X @scottish_vig) has been set up to provide support for those who have suffered adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccines. All applicants are rigorously screened to ensure everyone who joins had an adverse reaction to Covid-19 vaccines. You can view their opening submission to the Scottish COVID-19 inquiry 24th October 2023 here. Since then, in the last 15 months membership of the group has tripled to 750 members.

A comment made by Hugo Keith KC-Counsel to the inquiry (at 7mins 30s) is very revealing and worth pointing out.

‘‘In your statements you have raised a vast number of points and issues, spanning the technology of vaccines, the scientific foundations for them, their authorisation, their research and development, their delivery, almost every aspect of vaccination…this falls widely outwith the scope of this inquiry and i don’t want to take time looking at those.’’

An abysmal performance by the KC overall with many interruptions at key moments of Ms.O’Rafferty’s evidence.


Clare Craig writes about the Process 1 (trialed jab) and Process 2 (untrialed jab) debacle. We mortals are one big fat experiment and cash cow to line the pockets of the banksters, Big Pharma and the military who are testing their bioweapons.

Read; Untested – the mass-produced covid vaccines that skipped clinical trials Dr Clare Craig, The Conservative Woman; January 25, 2025

‘WHAT IF the vaccine you received had not been in a clinical trial? For millions of people worldwide, this is precisely what happened when they unknowingly received a Covid vaccine manufactured using a process where the end product had never been trialled in humans. This manufacturing shift resulted in significantly higher rates of adverse reactions – 13 times more in some cases – representing a regulatory failure with profound implications for public trust and safety. Yet, the UK Covid-19 Inquiry tasked with investigating these critical decisions has avoided addressing this issue, which lies at the heart of the controversy on regulatory failure.

Imagine a chef perfecting a recipe in a small kitchen, only to mass-produce it in a factory using different ingredients and techniques. In December 2020, the UK’s drug regulator, MHRA, gave a temporary authorisation to a mass-manufactured vaccine (Process 2 or P2) without requiring human trial data. Available safety and efficacy data were based solely on Process 1 (P1), the small-scale clinical trial method. MHRA relied on lab-based ‘comparability’ studies to justify the switch, but these assessments failed to account for potential risks posed by even minor manufacturing changes.

This article delves into how the critical manufacturing switch occurred, why it went largely unchallenged, and implications for public health, safety, and regulatory accountability.’


Another crippling side effect of the Covid 19 jab.

Read; Dozens of British women have seen their breasts grow after the Covid jab – experts reveal why Mail Online, 12 January 2025

Dozens of British women have reported their breasts ballooning in size after receiving a Covid vaccine, MailOnline can reveal.

The revelation comes days after shocking images showed how a 19-year-old Canadian woman’s breast quadrupled in size in what experts believe is a rare reaction to Pfizer’s Covid jab dubbed the ‘Pfizer boob job’.

Now, MailOnline has uncovered data from the British drug medical safety watchdog showing 33 reports of similar cases of ‘breast enlargement’ following Pfizer’s vaccine.

A further 11 British women reported an expanded bust after AstraZeneca’s jab, while four reported the same bizarre reaction after a Moderna vaccine.

These reports, made to the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Yellow Card system, are based on patient testimony only.

They have not been verified by medical professionals, and experts flag that it is possible such unexpected bodily changes occurred by chance — and had nothing to do with the jab.

However, doctors have argued that the link between the unusual reaction and the vaccine is indeed plausible.


Along with the government’s increased compensation for vaccine harm should be an apology and a promise to never again push their corporate stooges’ drugs on us.

Read; The ‘fit and healthy’ Brits killed by the Covid jab and families fighting for damages – as minister announces plans to change compensation rules; Mail Online, 13 January 2025

‘Brits who have been injured or harmed by the Covid jab may soon be entitled to a different compensation package under new plans to ‘reform’ the current vaccine damages programme.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting has announced he is looking to change the rules, following claims that the current one-off payment of £120,000 is inadequate.

Campaigners have also criticised the requirement that claimants must be deemed at least 60 per cent disabled in order to qualify for the funds.

Now, in a letter to the family of a man left disabled by the AstraZeneca jab seen by The Telegraph, Mr Streeting said he has ‘commissioned officials to work up a number of options’ to reform the current vaccine damage payment scheme (VDPS).

Kate Scott’s husband Jamie suffered a permanent brain injury from a blood clot brought on by an incredibly rare reaction to the AstraZeneca jab missed in safety trials.

He was given the vaccine in April 2021 and has been unable to work since.

Mrs Scott described the VDPS as ‘ludicrous’ with the minimum 60 percent disabled threshold far too high.

‘If your injury equates to just a 10 percent change, that’s life-changing for you. It might mean you can’t work anymore,’ she said.

‘The Government needs to remember that people took the AstraZeneca vaccine for the greater good and because they were told it was safe and effective. They need to make sure families have proper support’.


Welcome to our totalitarian world.

Read; Scientists Sound Alarm About Using Mosquitoes to Vaccinate Humans Brenda Baletti, The Defender, 12 January 2025

‘Researchers in the Netherlands are developing a malaria vaccine that uses mosquitoes to inject genetically modified malaria parasites into humans. Critics say the concept poses serious dangers and violates informed consent.

Human clinical trials are underway to use mosquitoes to vaccinate people against malaria, cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough reported on his Substack.

McCullough cited a paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in November reporting results from a double-blind, controlled clinical trial at two university medical centers in the Netherlands.

The trial evaluated the safety, side effects and efficacy of immunising people via mosquito bites, using mosquitoes infected with a genetically engineered version of the parasite that causes malaria.

“It seems as if the world of vaccinology has ramped up to a feverish pitch with amplified research, massive funding, and no limit to the extent in which vaccines could be injected into humans,” McCullough wrote.

Researchers have been trying to develop a malaria vaccine since the 1960s, but they have been largely unsuccessful. It wasn’t until October 2021 that the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommended the first malaria vaccine, made by GSK, for children living in sub-Saharan Africa and other high-transmission regions.

Two years later, the WHO recommended a second malaria vaccine, developed by Oxford University and manufactured by the Serum Institute of India.

The vaccines, given to small children in four doses, offer only modest and short-lived protection — 50-80% efficacy for less than a year — and are even less effective in infants in high endemic areas.

Malaria is caused by plasmodium parasites, which spread to humans through bites from infected mosquitoes.

Given the limited efficacy of existing vaccines, researchers continue researching alternative vaccination strategies, including using genetically modified versions of the malaria parasites to elicit an immune response.

“In a simplified view, the innovation may seem like a good idea,” Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist at Children’s Health Defense, told The Defender. “Malaria commonly afflicts those in poorer countries with limited access to healthcare. If we could make a change to the environment that improves the lives of all and diminishes the lives of none, in theory that would be progress.”

“The problem,” he said, “is that every detail of it looks like a bad idea.”

“The mosquitoes act like a vaccine syringe and then inject that modified parasite in the case of malaria into the human body,” McCullough explained in an interview on Substack.

Adverse events included skin redness and itchiness from the bites, which most participants experienced and treated with antihistamines or topical corticosteroids. Some also reported muscle aches and pains and headaches.

Two participants had elevated troponin T levels, which indicates heart damage, or even a heart attack. However, investigators assessed these incidents as unrelated to the vaccination. One participant also showed elevated liver-function tests that researchers said were related to the antihistamines.

“The authors took a lot of liberties in identifying adverse events they considered related and unrelated to the experiment,” Jablonowski said. ”When 40% of your trial group have abdominal pains, 45% have a headache, 50% have malaise and fatigue, and 60% have nausea and vomiting — these are not small relative numbers.”


Andrew Bridgen is the only politician to speak out about the dangers of the Covid vaccine. He was undoubtedly the most popular candidate running in his constituency but for the crime of speaking out, the powers that shouldn’t be ensured he lost his seat in the last election.

Watch; Andrew Bridgen – Christmas Update 2024 Free NZ, 22 December 2024

“Well, at the end of the day, as I said, the darker it gets. The people in power currently who don’t deserve to be in power and are abusing their position, the darker it gets, the nearer we are to the end, they are getting desperate. At the end of the day, we know what we know. I mean there’s no way I’m taking any more medical interventions, mandated or otherwise. I think most of the world knows and no’s a very small word but when billions of us say it, it will resonate and shake the halls of these self-proclaimed elites around the world.

And let’s just get on with our lives, not be scared by all the fear mongering and the fear porn they’re putting out there to try and make people make illogical decisions. We know what we know. These won’t be any better. The evidence I’ve seen on the bird flu vaccines are that they’re four times more lethal than the COVID 19 vaccines.

I’ve seen the trial data and 1 in 200 people who took the trial died. Do not take these vaccines. They’re four times worse than whatever they try to threaten you with. Don’t take the vaccines because that’s not going to help.

If I was saying this in France now, that would get me so many years in prison and a massive fine for discouraging people from taking an approved medication. But that’s the data I saw of the trial data and I was shocked that the bird flu vaccines were still approved in America and they were being manufactured in the summer ready for this winter. The vaccines are all there and that’s the data. Four times more deadly than the COVID 19 vaccines.

I mean that has to drive people to stand up for their families and for their own health and their own lives. And say two letters, as you said, two simple letters, N and O. No, I’m not having it. No, you will not do it.

Well, there’s hope in that because as we each find our power within us, then they can never ever again do to us what they have got away with. And they are few, we are many. We must always remember that.”


A Romanian MEP and priest explains why he resisted mandatory Covid vaccinations in Romania; “The government cannot impose any medical treatment on you. The government can explain that you can do certain things, educate you, persuade you, but not obligate you or blackmail you to be injected with something or to swallow something.”

Watch or Read; An Interview with MEP Cristian Terhes; Robert W Malone, 7 January 2025

‘A European/Romanian point of view concerning recent events including the COVID crisis.’

Cristian Terhes; “What happened during the COVID crisis was just one example that when governments are using fear to manipulate people and to blackmail people, a lot of people are caving in. But as the time passes, people are waking up and they are realising that they were tricked. But that doesn’t mean that the government or people in power, companies whatever, will stop. They will find another excuse. So you have to be vigilant. And when it comes to freedom, my thesis was let’s say in the European Parliament that I’m never ever compromising on principles and on freedom because, once you make any compromise on this, then hell is going to break loose.”

“I don’t want to live in a society where in order to move from point A to point B, I have to show a green certificate or a QR code to someone.’ It’s absurd. It’s not a free society anymore. But look what they’ve done. They changed the narrative and the whole mindset of people, that we live in a free society, or at least in the Western world, based on the Judeo-Cristian values, we are all free, all created equal. But the government can in certain instances, justify instances to, let’s say, limit your rights for a very limited period of time, legally speaking. Well, what they’ve done during the pandemic, they changed that relationship that we were all locked in houses. And in order to travel free, you need to have a passport. So in other words, we were not the people anymore. We were people subjected to the measures of the government. And it was up to the wish and will and likeliness of people in government to allow you to travel from one point to another. And that’s exactly how ese were implemented everywhere around the world. And this is one of the main reasons why I was so severely outspoken against this.”


Where is Robert Kennedy Jnr to put a stop to Trump’s new AI cancer vaccine promoted by software company Oracle billionaire co-founder, Larry Ellison;

Watch; Grid and mRNA Shots Announced on Trump’s 2nd Day in Office The Greg Reese Report, 22 January 2025

Presenter; “At his very first press conference, President Trump announced plans for an AI healthcare system that can cure cancer. Artificial intelligence will create a gene sequence from everyone’s blood sample and determine what kind of cancer you will die from in the future without their vaccine.

Trump; “Could you just say one word? I hear so many positive things about what it’s going to do for medical research and for solving things, cancer and all the different problems. How will AI help us with the fight against various problems, diseases, etc.

Larry Ellison; One of the most exciting things we’re working on, again using the tools that Sam and Mahsa are providing, is a cancer vaccine.

It’s very interesting. Early diagnosis, it turns out. I’ll be quick. All of our cancers, cancer tumours, little fragments of those tumours float around in your blood.

So you can do early cancer detection, you can do early cancer detection with a blood test and using AI to look at the blood test, you can find the cancers that are actually seriously threatening the person. Again, cancer diagnosis using AI has the promise of just being a simple blood test. Then beyond that, once we gene sequence, once we gene sequence that cancer tumour, you can then vaccinate the person, design a vaccine for every individual person to vaccinate them against that cancer.

Presenter; And it will only take 48 hours to make your custom vaccine. So the idea of safety trials doesn’t even exist anymore.'”


More on the above;

Read; AI, mRNA, Cancer Vaccines and “Stargate” Robert W Malone, 22 January 2025

“In my opinion, what we seem to have here is a salesman – Larry Ellison – having successfully pitched a naive government customer – President Trump – outdated ideas and technology wrapped in sexy new words and concepts – “Artificial Intelligence”, and “mRNA vaccine”. Trump wants the USA to be #1 in Artificial Intelligence – that is his “pain point”. And he has a sense of personal achievement and investment in the mRNA platform consequent to Operation Warp Speed. And then you have the failed Biden cancer “moonshot” initiative. Which I am confident President Trump would love to boast. Put those three elements together and you have a winning pitch for a multi-billion dollar federal program.

Which I predict will be an abysmal failure. Hopefully I will be proven wrong, because who doesn’t want universal cancer vaccines. Just like who doesn’t want a universal influenza vaccine. But wanting something does not necessarily make it a good use of taxpayer dollars, or make for good stewardship of government resources. There are many unmet needs that those resources might be applied towards. The question is, in what we hope will be an era of fiscal restraint, is this program the best use of these billions of dollars?”


Thank god influencers are calling out the dangers of tech billionaires dictating what we need to be healthy. ‘AI-driven mRNA cancer vaccines could lead to an “extinction event”, former RFK Jr. running mate Nicole Shanahan has warned.’

Nicole Shanahan Warns AI-Backed mRNA Cancer Vaccine Will Depopulate Billions of Humans The People’s Voice, 23 January 2025

‘In an appearance on Megyn Kelly’s podcast Wednesday, Shanahan called for a moratorium on experimental mRNA technology because they already raise serious health concerns since the long-term effects are not yet fully understood.

“What we need for the mRNA platform right now is a moratorium. It’s not ready for human use,” Shanahan declared. “One of the reasons why it delivers an inconsistent result in individuals.”

Shanahan went on to explain how 5% of those who received the experimental COVID-19 mRNA jabs during the plandemic didn’t get the expected results — instead, many ended up with “turbo cancers,” “blood clots” and other adverse side effects, and others were even harmed as a result of spike protein “shedding.”

“In order for our population to grow, to be strong, to be fully able-bodied, and for our human economy to thrive, we do need a moratorium on the mRNA for the time being,” she said.

Kelly added, “Until it’s not Russian roulette to take it.”

Shanahan pointed out that many engineers and pharmacological researchers working on the development of the mRNA tech are overlooking a fundamental truth about human biology: it can’t be programmed the way a computer system can.’


Dr Mike Yeadon predicted in 2020 that the Covid vaccine would cause heart injury and blood clots and was instantly attacked by establishment medics.

Listen; Licence To Kill: Drugs With Consequences—with Dr Mike Yeadon UK Column, 14 January 2025

“I was looking at the structures of the vaccine, just like I looked at structures of molecules like 30, whatever it was 30 years ago. And I could immediately see several ways in which I would expect these injections to hurt. You didn’t spot all of them. But having that toxicology, mechanistic toxicology background, being in the drug industry for 30 plus years, that means I can look over the shoulder, virtually look over the shoulder of the designer and think, what are you trying to do when you design like that? And so, as a consequence, I was fairly sure by the end of 2020 that I would expect blood clots, heart injury, certainly blood clots in the brain. And I thought there’d be impact on fertility. I only got about a tenth of it, but those things I was sure of.

And so with a German public health doctor, Dr. Wolfgang Vodag, we wrote, you know, at the time, the largest scientific, we thought scientifically rational reason why you shouldn’t approve these. So we wrote to the regulator saying, please don’t approve these. This was before they were even authorised, because we are worried people will be harmed or killed. And within 24 hours, my life changed. Censorship went from being a little annoyed with me on Twitter to the BBC. Emma Barnett, someone senior from the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, who to this day should be ashamed of herself, came on and on Women’s Art Programme, they recorded, and Emma Barnett said, I’m so furious with these conspiracies, I’m going to name him Dr. Mike Yeadon. You know, he’s telling lies and misinformation. And then this other lady from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists said, no, he’s absolutely wrong, perfectly safe in pregnancy, indeed you must take them.

That’s how much my life changed in 24 hours, and it never got better. I wrote them a blistering message saying, if you don’t withdraw that, I’m going to sue you, because several of the things you’ve said I said, I didn’t. And other things you’ve said I’ve said that are wrong, are indeed correct, and I can prove it. You’ve got 24 hours. They took the segment down, ladies and gentlemen. They took it down. I probably should have sued them but you know, I’m just an ordinary guy. I don’t want to sue anybody. Also, I’d probably make lawyers rich and lose 18 months of my life.

I think I’m the most qualified, former pharmaceutical research person, in the world. Speaking out doesn’t mean I’m right about everything. But this is my field of expertise since I was an undergraduate all the way to my 60s. I’m not wrong. We said this would happen before the injections were rolled out. That and more did happen.

And I’m still smeared, censored, not injunctured. Make your own mind up. It’s like don’t let them do this to you. And be aware that this injecting you is all part of many other things going on.”


As Bill Gates pours his wealth into every coffer he wants to control, it takes a Russian military leader to dare speak out against his evil ways.

Read; Russian Military Blows Whistle on Bill Gates’ ‘Bioterrorism’ Plot to ‘Reduce Population’ Slay News, 22 January 2025

‘Russia’s Ministry of Defence (MOD) has accused billionaire Bill Gates of funding “bioterrorism-related activities with the goal of population reduction.” The Russian MOD raised the alarm in a press briefing where officials asserted that the Gates Foundation is a primary sponsor of the U.S. African Biolab Complex. Addressing the media, Major General Aleksei Rtishchev, Deputy Chief of the Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Protection Troops of the Russian Armed Forces, warned:

“American specialists capable of enhancing the pathogenic functions of microorganisms are actively operating.”

Rtishchev claims that the Russian military has uncovered evidence showing that Gates has been funding U.S. biological activity in Africa. Interestingly, Rtishchev also alleged that the Clinton Foundation is tied to the experiments. During the briefing, Rtishchev stated: “The US administration views the region as an unlimited natural reservoir of dangerous infectious agents and a testing ground for experimental medical drugs.”

The following translated key statements and slides from the briefing were obtained and shared by Sputnik in a post on X:

The U.S. military’s biological presence on the African continent is expanding rapidly, according to Rtishchev. “American specialists capable of enhancing the pathogenic functions of microorganisms are actively operating in Africa,” the Russian MOD leader stated.

The Russian Defence Ministry has unveiled which officials from the United States and various African nations are involved in the implementation of military biological programs on the African continent. Globalists view the region as an abundant reservoir of dangerous infectious agents and a testing ground for experimental medications, Rtishchev said.

McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher weighed in on the explosive allegations from Russia’s military. The Russian Ministry of Defense briefing revealed that “the Gates Foundation is a primary sponsor of the U.S. African Biolab Complex,” Hulscher notes. It comes after Gates recently made a disturbing confession about his experiments on people in third-world nations. As Slay News reported, Gates provoked outrage by gloating that he has been using India as his “laboratory” for testing experimental “vaccines.”’


Senator Michael Roberts warns the Australian government about scandals and corruption in the WHO

Watch; WHO Rape Scandal: At Least 83 Staff Sexually Assaulted, Raped, Victims As Young As 13—NONE FIRED; Tedros, Before His Ascent, Was Genocidal Killer And The People Of Ethiopia Tried To Warn Us The Truth Barrier, 22 January 2025

“The Albanese government continues the Morrison government’s campaign to sign away Australian sovereignty to the United Nations World Health Organisation, the WHO. Despite the attempt failing, WHO’s power grab is ongoing. WHO is not independent, their owners are corporate donors who contribute most of the WHO budget.

WHO’s current sugar daddy is Bill Gates who has made billions out of his investment in the same vaccines that WHO promotes. Gates bought the WHO and they now recommend his products. It is that simple. The head of the WHO is Tedros Ghebreyesus, previously health Minister of a terrorist organisation called the Tigray People’s Liberation Front, where he used international aid to buy power and punish his enemies.

The regions of Ethiopia that Tedros starved of medical supplies suffered disastrous cholera epidemics in 2006, 2009, 2011. Independent investigators found Tedros was, quote, ‘fully complicit in the terrible suffering and dying that spread in East Africa’. He is a killer. WHO is rotting from the head. Last week, Associated Press reported on the WHO sex crime scandal where WHO staffers sexually exploited girls and women during the Congo’s recent Ebola outbreak.

Inhuman. At least 83 WHO staff engaged in abuse, including rape and forced abortions with victims as young as 13. WHO refused to fire the perpetrators, using the absurd argument that their actions didn’t violate WHO’s sexual exploitation practice policies because the victims were not receiving WHO aid. The raping part is okay with Tedros. This is the person who heads an organisation that many in government and academia want to elevate above the Australian Parliament.

One Nation rejects the UN WHO power grab and will defend Australia’s sovereignty. So should you all.”


Turbo rates of cancer have been proved time and again by leading UK oncologists to be caused by mRNA vaccines. Perhaps Kennedy’s leadership of the HHS will confirm this fact and bring an end all the lies and suffering.

Read; New Data Sheds Light on a Cancer Epidemic That is Being Covered Up; Guy Hatchard, 23 January 2025

‘In November last year we published an article “mRNA Vaccines, Cognitive Dissonance and our Future Prospects” in which we reported on rises in cancer incidence and the public warnings being sounded by leading UK oncologists about the role of mRNA vaccines. There has been some push back. Apparently some medical authorities are in denial, they say there is no cancer epidemic taking place. What does the latest data tell us: Yes or No?

Last night I wanted to know how many people were developing cancer in Sweden because there were no lockdowns in the country. It is an interesting question for us because recent media reports of sudden cancer tragedies have been blamed on lockdowns which, according to a widely reported narrative, delayed appointments for check ups and tests at hospitals. Let’s be clear about it, delays could not actually ‘cause’ cancer, only, as the Lancet reports, complicate treatment and affect outcomes.

Compared to the average of the pre-pandemic years (2015-2019) when figures remained relatively stable, cancer incidence jumped by 10.9% in 2022 and pushed slightly higher in 2023. In all, it appears there were approximately 20,000 additional cases of cancer over the two years 2022 and 2023 more than you would expect from the historical trend. BUT it wasn’t due to lockdowns, they didn’t happen in Sweden. So what was the cause? The timing of the rapid increase is indicative and certainly favours COVID-19 vaccines. 87% of Sweden’s population over the age of 12 received at least one COVID-19 vaccine in 2021. It is possible that COVID-19 infection also played a role but far less likely as COVID-19 had its most severe impact in 2020. In any case, the exact relative importance of these two possible factors doesn’t influence an important implication of the figures, both COVID-19 vaccines and likely COVID-19 itself came out of biotechnology labs and exposed our internal cellular biology and immunity processes to novel bio-engineered genetic structures.

If COVID-19 vaccines are at fault, as some senior UK oncologists like Dr Angus Dalgleish and Dr James Royle think, (who btw are not conspiracy theorists, a term that is often used to shut down legitimate discussion about valid concerns) the timing also indicates that the speed of post mRNA vaccine cancer development qualifies for the epithet ‘turbo’.’


Provoked war with Russia/Romania/Greenland and Panama

Boris and Biden caused the deaths of thousands of young Ukrainians and Russians by insisting that Ukraine reject the peace accord and continue the war in order to pursue the US/ UK/ EU strategy to bleed Russia and steal Ukraine’s and ultimately Russia’s resources. Will Trump convince the US warmongers to concede to Russia’s annexation of Crimea and the four Donbas provinces?

Watch; A Battle Against Neutrality; Glen Greenwald interview with Jeffrey Sachs for System Update, 25 January 2025

Jeffrey Sachs; “…..you’re not going to get a meaningful peace agreement because I think it’s impossible for Trump to accept the two basic conditions that Putin insists on. One is, Putin says the West and Ukraine both have to recognise the annexation not only of Crimea, but of the four eastern oblasts that the Russians have now annexed. So we have to recognise that as a permanent feature of international politics. And second, we have to agree that Ukraine will never be in NATO. It will be a genuinely neutral country. So it can’t even be a de facto member of NATO, which is what it has been in recent years. I think it’s almost impossible for Trump to accept those two conditions. And if he were to accept those two conditions, which the Russians insist on, then Trump would face a tremendous backlash in the west, especially in the United States, but also a tremendous backlash in Ukraine.”

Glen Greenwald; “And in his own party.”

Jeffrey Sachs; “Absolutely. But this is the deal that the Russians insist on. You have to think about what caused this war to think smartly about how to end it. And there are two views as to what caused the war. One is the view that you and I share, which is that NATO expansion into Ukraine was the principal cause. The other view is that Putin is an imperialist who is bent on creating a greater Russia and conquering territory in Eastern Europe and maybe even in Western Europe. Well, if you believe that he’s an imperialist, he’s just interested in conquering territory, you can work out a bargain with him because there’s always room for him to recognise that he can’t conquer any more territory. He’s got quite a bit, and just settle with the territory you’ve conquered. That’s consistent with the argument that this war was an imperial war. If you believe that this war is all about NATO and that Ukraine and NATO was an existential threat that had to be dealt with, then the only way you can settle the war is by agreeing to the fact that Ukraine will never become part of NATO. And we are, up to this point, incapable of acknowledging that line of argument.”


More of above; Watch; Prof. John Mearsheimer: No Hope For Ukraine Peace Deal? Glen Greenwald interview for System Update, 26 January 2025


Be awake to a potential NATO/Ukraine false flag event to obtain more money and drag yet more Russian and Ukrainian boys to their untimely deaths.

Read; Zelensky Wants Escalation? Kiev Regime Plans Chemical and Nuclear Terrorist Attacks Says Former Ukraine Intel. (SBU) Agent Drago Bosnic, Global Research, 25 January 2025

‘As the new Trump administration is now focusing on a plethora of domestic issues left by its predecessors, the Kiev regime is desperate to stay in the spotlight. To achieve this, it needs something that would grab Trump’s attention, so it’s safe to assume anything goes as long as the money flow can be maintained.

For the time being, the United States seems to be pulling the plug on the Neo-Nazi junta, as one of Trump’s first executive orders was the moratorium on foreign “aid” in the next three months. Thus, the “sudden event” that is supposed to revert this needs to be “truly groundbreaking”.

Now, considering the history of the US-backed extremists running NATO-occupied Ukraine, this can only be something radical – more specifically chemical and nuclear terrorism. Namely, according to Vasily Prozorov, a former Ukrainian intelligence officer (specifically in the SBU, from 1999 to 2018, per some sources), the Kiev regime is planning to do exactly that.’

‘Prozorov says that its special services, in close cooperation with their American overlords, are “working on mechanisms for organising high-profile provocations [i.e. a false flag] with radioactive contamination of the area”. He further notes that “preparations for the operation have been going on for more than six months, and its implementation is scheduled for January-February 2025”.

The plan postulates that the Neo-Nazi junta intends to accuse Russia of “deliberately striking objects associated with radiation-hazardous production”. The most likely locations for the upcoming false flag operation are reportedly the Nikolayev Armored Plant and the “Radon” state corporation based in the Dnepropetrovsk oblast (region). The latter is tasked with radioactive waste disposal, making it particularly vulnerable to such attacks. Prozorov also warns that the Chernobyl NPP, as well as one of the enterprises in the Kharkov oblast could be next. He thinks that the goal is to “present Trump’s peace initiatives as untimely and inappropriate against the backdrop of Russia’s latest ‘atrocities’ and also to justify the need to provide itself with further military and financial assistance”.

Back in October, Prozorov reported that American intelligence was determined to orchestrate the expulsion of Russia from the OPCW (Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) under the false accusation that Moscow is supposedly “using unconventional weapons” during the special military operation (SMO). To that end, in 2023, “Realab”, a company registered in Ukraine and which specialises in the import of chemical reagents and precursors, purchased 12.5 liters of triethanolamine, 1.4 liters of sodium nitrogenous compound and 200 gallons of picric acid. These chemicals are produced by the CIA-affiliated Honeywell Research Chemicals, a company based in the US.

The report adds that the aforementioned chemicals can be used by the infamous SBU to produce a chemical warfare agent whose usage would then be attributed to the Kremlin. Prozorov posits that this plan is still in motion and lists the events in chronological order. According to his sources, in September 2024, 11 Canadian soldiers (specifically an engineering and sapper unit), held a series of joint military exercises with the Neo-Nazi junta forces, with one scenario involving the capture of the Chernobyl NPP.

This included simulated Russian drone and missile strikes on the plant, as well as a simulation of the spread of radioactive fallout based on weather observations and other factors (seasonal and climatic features). By the end of 2024, a new group of Canadian military personnel was scheduled for rotation and further exercises of various scenarios of the purported “Russian attack”.

Prozorov also adds that the Chernobyl NPP is virtually identical to the Kursk NPP, which the Kiev regime forces attack regularly and which they even planned to capture during the Kursk oblast incursion (also orchestrated by NATO and even included the participation of a former US ambassador). He thinks that the Neo-Nazi junta’s intelligence services planned to stage a false flag at the Kursk NPP, but this failed, so they reverted to the idea of conducting it in Chernobyl.’


Will Russia’s leading bankster continue to bring Russia down?

Read; The Trump-Putin Meeting: Who Will Dominate? Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, 28 January 2025

‘John Helmer wonders if Elvira Nabiullina, the Russian Central Bank director, has set up her protector Vladimir Putin for failure.

Elvira is known to be opposed to the rescue of Donbas Russians from oppression and extermination by Washington’s puppet in Kiev. Elvira’s first act of treason against Putin and the Russian state was arranging to leave Russia’s central bank reserves in Western institutions where Washington could seize them.

Her current treason is 21% interest rates which suppress investment and GDP growth and cause inflation which she then uses to justify her economy-killing high interest rates. Helmer provides the ruinous inflation rates Elvia’s anti-Russian, pro-Washington policy is causing in Russia. See this.

The inflation is being used by pro-western elements in Russia to blame the high cost of living on Putin’s never-ending war.

President Trump has concluded that inflation has weakened Putin’s position and that concessions can be wrung from him in exchange for an end to Washington’s support for the war. Additional pressure is put on Putin by President Trump’s aggressive move against Greenland in keeping with the Biden regime’s “2024 Arctic Strategy” that identifies Russia as the principal target.

From Putin’s standpoint, Ukrainian strongholds are falling rapidly without the drawn-out house by house clearing operations of previous advances. The liberation of the Russian areas of Ukraine likely will be complete prior to a Trump-Putin meeting. The meeting will be about the terms of peace with Trump pressuring Putin with more sanctions and Greenland threat to drop some part of Russia’s demand that Ukraine be de-militarized, de-Nazified, and forbidden NATO membership. Putin has received forceful warning not to negotiate away the reasons for which Russia fought an expensive three year war: see this. Trump cannot very well agree to the end of the conflict on Putin’s terms without being slammed with the media headline: “Trump Sells Out Ukraine to Putin.”

As Putin has permitted Washington and NATO to attack Russian cities, school children, infrastructure, and military bases with missiles fired by Washington and NATO into Russia without response, Putin is regarded by Washington as a nonentity, a pushover. If Putin and Trump meet, Trump could assume the dominant position and fail to realise that Putin, having fought for more than three years at enormous cost, cannot negotiate away the goals for which Russia has fought, especially with Russia having won the battlefield. There doesn’t seem to be much room for a mutually face-saving compromise.

Looking at Putin’s situation, President Trump assesses it as “Russia is kind of in big trouble. You take a look at their economy, you take a look at their inflation in Russia. I got along with Putin great, I would hope he wants to make a deal.”

Here is Helmer’s account. Come to your own conclusion.

Paul Craig Roberts is a renowned author and academic, chairman of The Institute for Political Economy where this article was originally published. Dr. Roberts was previously associate editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal. He was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy during the Reagan Administration. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.’


As truthful sources have been saying throughout this tragedy, the Ukraine war is a proxy, empire-building resource-grab provoked conflict by the CIA-run US government, with no other purpose than hegemony and theft.

Read; It’s Official: US Abandoning Ukraine Kit Klarenberg, 22 January 2025

‘On January 19th TIME magazine published an astonishing article, amply confirming what dissident, anti-war academics, activists, journalists and researchers have argued for a decade. The US always intended to abandon Ukraine after setting up the country for proxy war with Russia, and never had any desire or intention to assist Kiev in defeating Moscow in the conflict, let alone achieving its maximalist aims of regaining Crimea and restoring the country’s 1991 borders. To have a major mainstream outlet finally corroborate this indubitable reality is a seismic development.

The Western media has acknowledged Ukraine’s calamitous August 2024 invasion of Russia’s Kursk region was to all intents and purposes a British operation. London provided a vast welter of equipment to Kiev “central” to the effort, and “closely” advised their Ukrainian counterparts on strategy. The aim was to draw Russian forces away from Donbas and boost Kiev’s bargaining position, which has proven a staggering embarrassment on both fronts. But there was a wider, more insidious goal behind the incursion.

Britain openly and eagerly advertised its fundamental role in the Kursk misadventure to bolster public support at home for continuing the proxy war, and “persuade key allies to do more to help.” In other words, to normalise open Western involvement, and create the “direct conflict” the Biden administration was so keen to avoid. London was also at the forefront of pressuring NATO member states to permit Ukraine to use foreign-supplied weaponry and materiel inside Russia, which could likewise produce their long-sought hot war against Moscow.

Several Western countries – including the US – have offered such authorisation. Yet, Russia has consistently responded to strikes deep inside its territory with heavy duty counterattacks, which Kiev has been unable to repel. Meanwhile, London’s invitation to its allies to become more overtly involved in the proxy war was evidently rebuffed. In November 2024 too, pro-government outlet Ukrainska Pravda published a startling investigation, documenting in forensic detail how the October 2023 – June 2024 Krynky operation was, à la Kursk, essentially British.

Never spoken of by Ukrainian officials today, the nine-month effort saw wave after wave of British-trained and equipped marines attempt to secure a beachhead in a river-adjacent village in Russian-controlled Kherson. Poorly prepared, many died attempting to reach Krynky, due to relentless artillery, drone, flamethrower and mortar fire. Of those that survived the nightmarish journey, most were then killed under a constant and ever-intensifying blitz, in marsh conditions. Russia’s onslaught grew so inexorable, evacuating casualties or providing forces with even basic supplies became borderline impossible.

Survivors of the Krynky catastrophe – one of the absolute worst in military history – who spoke to Ukrainska Pravda revealed it was hoped the beachhead would be a “game-changer”, opening a second front in the conflict, allowing Kiev’s invading marines to march upon Crimea and all-out victory in the proxy war. They hoped to recreate the June 1944 Normandy landings – D-Day. It is all too easy to envisage British intelligence filling the heads of their Ukrainian trainees with such fantasies.

Fast forward to today, and Britain and France are openly discussing sending “peacekeepers” to Ukraine, to “help underpin” whatever “post-war settlement” emerges between Kiev and Moscow. This is after in February 2024, French President Emmanuel Macron suggested formally deploying his country’s forces to Ukraine to halt Moscow’s advance. The proposal was summarily dropped and forgotten when Russian officials made abundantly clear each and every French soldier dispatched to the frontline would be killed without hesitation, and Paris could become a formal belligerent in the war.

It appears the “peacekeeping” plan is likely to suffer the same fate. On January 20th, coincidentally or not the day of Donald Trump’s inauguration, CIA-created Radio Free Europe published an explainer guide on why sending European troops to Ukraine is “a nonstarter”. Among other things, as the Russians are unambiguously winning, they are unlikely to offer many concessions, particularly allowing foreign soldiers to occupy Kiev’s territory. Furthermore, “as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, Moscow can block any peacekeeping mission.”

As if the message to London and Paris wasn’t emphatic enough, two weeks earlier, at a press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort, Trump made numerous comments reiterating his commitment to ending the proxy war. “We’re going to have to settle up with Russia,” he declared. Notably, the President sympathised with Moscow’s “written in stone” determination Kiev not be enrolled into NATO, warned the situation “could escalate to be much worse,” and stated his hope the conflict could be wrapped up within six months.’


Once again WikiLeaks’ revelations have exposed the truth, this time that the CIA knew that to expand NATO to Ukraine would cross Russia’s red line.

Watch; CIA Files; The Secret Memo and Julian Assange Professor Jeffrey Sachs, 20 December 2024

“Our current CIA director, William Burns, in 2008 was the US ambassador to Russia. He understood completely that the US push to expand NATO to Ukraine was disastrous. And he wrote a memo back to Condoleezza Rice, and the memo said that the entire Russian political class opposes NATO enlargement and for real reasons.

How do we even see that memo? Do you think that a congressional committee called Condoleezza Rice and said, could we have the documentary evidence to understand the choices you’re making? Of course not. There’s no oversight when it comes to security issues.

We are already in a security state that has no resemblance to democracy whatsoever. But Julian Assange enabled us to see it.”


Western-run political elites have, with illegal means, stalled Romania’s elections due to the front runner, Georgescu, taking, ‘a firm stance against Bucharest’s participation in NATO’s crawling aggression in Europe, speaking against their policies in former Ukraine. He openly criticises the US Military Industrial Complex (MIC) and its role in prolonging the NATO-orchestrated conflict.’

Read; Romanians Firmly Refuse to be the Next Cannon Fodder in NATO’s Endless Wars. 100,000 Protesters Drago Bosnic and Prof Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, 16 January 2025

‘Much unlike them who are entirely controlled by the EU/NATO occupation regime, Georgescu was actually engaging with the Romanian people, mostly through social media. Running as an independent candidate, he’s certainly a breath of fresh air in the unfortunate NATO-occupied country. Unable to counter this, the Western-run political elites resorted to (il)legal means, with Iohannis, whose term was supposed to end on December 21, now slated to remain in power for nearly six months longer.

Namely, although there are still no official dates, the leaders of the ruling coalition government stated that they’d agreed on holding the two rounds of the do-over election on May 4 and May 18. Brussels probably believes this will give it enough time to place the “right candidate” in power. Georgescu has essentially promised to restore Romania’s sovereignty and put an end to the suicidal subservience to the political West (particularly in the context of the NATO-orchestrated Ukrainian conflict).

He doesn’t want the aforementioned NATO “missile defense shield” (based in Deveselu in southern Romania) calling it a “shame of diplomacy that is more confrontational than peace-promoting”. However, what’s even more disturbing for the war criminals in Washington DC and Brussels, Georgescu has taken a firm stance against Bucharest’s participation in NATO’s crawling aggression in Europe, speaking against their policies in former Ukraine. He openly criticizes the US Military Industrial Complex (MIC) and its role in prolonging the NATO-orchestrated conflict.

In addition, he also wants to restore Romania’s economic sovereignty and eradicate the EU-backed import lobby that has been strangling domestic production for decades. This has only contributed to the country’s chronic issues with poverty and constant emigration that further threaten its already long-struggling demographics.’

More on the above;

Read; Romania’s Voided TikTok Election; How a mischievous social media campaign backfired and led to the first scratched vote in EU history; Ryan Grim.Jan 28, 2025

“Thus did Romania become the first member state in the history of the European Union to cancel an election. The government had not called into question the legitimacy of the votes or vote-counting process. At issue is social media activity, primarily on TikTok, that boosted Georgescu’s profile and amplified his Euro-skeptical, far-right campaign in the final days before the tally. The cancellation of an election on these grounds marks a milestone in the development of Internet-age information war — one that underscores the fragility of the West’s collective commitment to democracy.

For all its seriousness, Romania’s cancelled vote has also proven to be a forensic farce, with the revelation that one of the country’s largest parties bankrolled the very TikTok campaign that the government had fingered as a Kremlin plot. At the same time, a broader narrative of Russian attacks on Romanian democracy was being advanced by a western-funded NGO working with a Ukrainian tech firm with ties to NATO and the European Commission.”


America may want to expand its empire but forgets that we now live in a multi-polar world and they must learn to play fair.

Trump vows to ‘expand’ US territory, invokes Manifest Destiny, hints at military force in Panama & Greenland Ben Norton, Geopolitical Economy, 23 January 2025

‘Donald Trump began his second term as president by vowing to grow the US empire. In his inauguration speech, Trump used explicitly imperialist rhetoric, promising to “expand our territory”. He even invoked “Manifest Destiny”, a concept employed by 19th-century US colonialists to justify ethnically cleansing Indigenous nations and stealing their land.

“The United States will once again consider itself a growing nation, one that increases our wealth, expands our territory, builds our cities, raises our expectations, and carries our flag into new and beautiful horizons”, Trump said, adding, “And we will pursue our Manifest Destiny into the stars”.

At his inauguration, Trump also pledged to forcibly take over the Panama Canal, in violation of the sovereignty of Panama, which has strongly rejected his threats and maintained that the canal is not for sale. To try to legitimise US meddling, Trump falsely claimed that “China is operating the canal”. This is not true. But Trump asserted, “we’re taking it back”.

Trump hints at military force in Panama and Greenland

In addition to Panama, Trump has threatened to colonise Greenland, an autonomous territory that has sought independence from Danish colonialism. Greenland’s Prime Minister Mute Egede has made it clear that his people want independence; they do not want to be part of the United States. “The Greenlandic people don’t want to be Danes. The Greenlandic people don’t want to be Americans”, Egede stressed.’


Zionism is a Colonial State Project/Gaza, Syria, Lebanon & Iran

Join us on *SATURDAY 1 FEBRUARY* to call out Bristol University to divest from Israel ⏰ *GATHER 12.30PM* ???? *SENATE HOUSE, TYNDALL AVE* to set off at 1pm to march through the city into Broadmead & rally at the podium outside Barclays bank✊????


Update on Gaza ceasefire.

Watch; Gaza Ceasefire Palestine Declassified, David Miller, 27January 2025

“On the 15th of January, 2025, news of an imminent ceasefire between Hamas and the zionist regime began to emerge, causing celebrations to erupt in Gaza and around the world against some of the most horrific brutality experienced by human beings this century, the people of Gaza have survived, dignified, heroic, and in defiance. The zionist regime has failed to achieve its war objectives of defeating Hamas and rescuing their captives.

Despite inflicting 15 months of terror, the ceasefire agreement assures the full withdrawal of Israeli forces, as well as the reopening of the Rafah Crossing, allowing an influx of vital humanitarian aid. The zionist strategy must also facilitate the entry of 608 trucks per day in addition to 200,000 tents and 60,000 caravans so people can have immediate shelter. Moreover, the agreement provides for the release of 1,000 resident hostages, as well as the release of all women and children under the age of 19 from zionist jails.

In addition to other terms like vacating Gaza’s airspace, for at least eight to ten hours a day, all hospitals must be rehabilitated in Gaza. The ceasefire agreement is a comprehensive defeat and humiliation for the zionist regime, although it has come after a huge human cost. While the true death toll is likely to become clearer in the coming weeks, it has been incredibly estimated that at least 10% of Gaza’s pre-war population have been exterminated.”

“This ceasefire agreement is not the end of the story. The zionist regime notoriously breaks its ceasefire agreements and continues to engage in bombings and killings.

The new Trump regime also has extreme plans for West Asia risking future war against Yemen and Iran in particular, which would’ve consequences across the region, particularly in Palestine. So while there is now some much needed relief for the people of Gaza, the wider war is far from over.”


Read; In historic return march, thousands of Palestinians arrive in northern Gaza Tareq S. Hajjaj, Mondoweiss, 27 January 2025

Late on Monday, 300,000 forcibly displaced Palestinians returned to Gaza City and northern Gaza for the first time since the start of Israel’s genocidal war.

‘A sea of people streamed through both lanes of al-Rashid Street, the coastal road in the western Gaza Strip designated for the return north as part of the ceasefire arrangement between Israel and Hamas. As thousands upon thousands of people marched on foot in the west, to the east, vehicles were lined up bumper to bumper and allowed to cross after inspection on Salah al-Din Street.

These were the scenes in Gaza on Monday, as hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who had been displaced in the southern Gaza Strip since the beginning of the war began to return home.

Families who spoke to Mondoweiss expressed their joy and feelings of hope upon crossing into northern Gaza, where what remained of their homes was waiting for them. The residents of Gaza City waited for their displaced relatives coming from the south, raising Palestinian flags and victory signs and welcoming the returnees.

“We endured everything throughout the war and stayed strong, but we cried more when we met our loved ones after coming home,” Ahmad Hussam, a returnee to northern Gaza, told Mondoweiss.

Since last Friday night, families have been removing their tents in southern Gaza and heading to the nearest point on the Netzarim axis, waiting to make the journey to return to their homes in north Gaza. Many had been camped out in the cold overnight so that they would be the first to be allowed through. According to the ceasefire agreement, the displaced were supposed to return to their homes in the northern part of Gaza on Sunday morning, but Israel obstructed their return under the pretext that an Israeli captive, Arbel Yehuda, had not been among the four female soldiers released by Hamas on Saturday. Yehuda is not held by Hamas but by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad in Gaza.

By Sunday, local media outlets reported that a settlement had been reached. The Israeli captive would be handed over early before next Saturday — when the regularly scheduled exchange of prisoners is supposed to take place.

On Monday evening, the Government Media Office in Gaza stated that 300,000 Palestinians arrived in Gaza City and north Gaza from the south.’


Read; Israel bombs horse cart, killing 5yr girl, because it was on a street not ‘approved’ for vehicles; SKWAWKBOX (SW) 29 January 2025

Traffic violation treated by Israel as excuse to breach ceasefire and murder child


Watch; Norman Finkelstein: Israel Succeeded In Making Gaza Unlivable; Al Arabiya English; 29 January 2025

Intro; ‘Political Scientist Norman Finkelstein joins Tom Burges Watson on Global News Today for an exclusive interview to discuss the situation in Gaza as a ceasefire between Palestine and Israel commenced, securing 60-days of peace as hostages and prisoners are traded between Hamas and Israel. Many Palestinians have began returning to Northern Gaza, but Norman quotes that 92% of Gaza is now unlivable, claiming Israel and their Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have succeeded in their aim to achieve this.’

Norman Finkelstein: “As to the prospects, my guess is that Donald Trump will give the Israelis a free hand, so long as it doesn’t become an international crisis in Gaza. So if quietly, the Israelis can block any humanitarian aid from entering Gaza, if quietly, the Israelis can prevent the reconstruction of Gaza. If quietly the Israelis can force a fait-accompli on the Palestinians in Gaza, namely stay and starve or leave, then President Trump will happily go along with it. But he’s sufficiently knowledgeable to know that if it becomes a public international issue, that it could become a quagmire for his administration as it did for the Biden administration.”


’The West’s ‘war on terror’ was built on a series of deceptions to persuade us that our leaders were crushing Islamist extremism. In truth, they were nourishing it.’

Read or listen; Thirty years of Middle East lies just keep coming back to bite us; Jonathan Cook; Jan 30, 2025

‘The story: Did you believe it 30 years ago when they told you that the Oslo Accords would bring peace to the Middle East? That Israel would finally withdraw from the Palestinian territories it had illegally occupied for decades, end its brutal repression of the Palestinian people, and allow a Palestinian state to be created there? That the longest running sore for the Arab and Muslim worlds would finally be brought to an end?

The reality: In fact, during the Oslo period, Israel stole more Palestinian land and expanded the building of illegal Jewish settlements at the fastest rate ever. Israel became even more repressive, building prison walls around Gaza and the West Bank while continuing to aggressively occupy both. Ehud Barak, Israeli prime minister of the time, “blew up” – in the words of one of his own main advisers – the US-backed negotiations at Camp David in 2000.

Weeks later, with the occupied Palestinian territories seething, opposition leader Ariel Sharon, backed by 1,000 armed Israeli troops, invaded occupied Jerusalem’s al-Aqsa mosque – one of the holiest places for Muslims in the world. It was the final straw, triggering an uprising by Palestinians that Israel would crush with devastating military force and thereby tip the scales of popular support from the secular Fatah leadership to the Islamic resistance group Hamas.

Further afield, Israel’s ever-more abusive treatment of the Palestinians and its gradual takeover of al-Aqsa – backed by the West – served only to further radicalise the jihadist group al-Qaeda, providing the public rationale for attacking New York’s Twin Towers in 2001.

The story: Did you believe it in 2001, after the 9/11 attack, when they told you that the only way to stop the Taliban harbouring al-Qaeda in Afghanistan would be for the US and UK to invade and “smoke them out” of their caves? And that in the process the West would save Afghanistan’s girls and women from oppression?’ Etc…

Last paragraph; ‘If you believed all of these stories, and still believe that the West is doing its best to bring to heel Islamic extremism and a supposed Russian imperialism in Ukraine, then you presumably also believe that Israel levelled Gaza, destroyed all its hospitals and starved its entire population of 2.3 million simply to “eliminate Hamas”, even though Hamas has not been eliminated.

You presumably believe that the International Court of Justice was wrong nearly a year ago to put Israel on trial for committing a genocide in Gaza. You presumably believe that even the most cautious Israeli Holocaust experts were wrong back in May to conclude that Israel had indisputably moved into a genocidal stage when it destroyed the “safe zone” of Rafah, where it had herded most of Gaza’s population. And you presumably believe that all the major human rights groups were wrong to conclude late last year, after lengthy research to protect themselves from smears from Israel and its apologists, that Israel’s devastation of Gaza has all the hallmarks of a genocide.

You will doubtless also believe that Washington’s long-held plan for “global full-spectrum dominance” is benign, and that Israel and the US don’t have Iran and China in their sights next.

If so, you will keep believing whatever they tell you – even as we hurtle, lemming-like, over the cliff edge, sure that, this time, it will all turn out differently.’


John Mearsheimer WARNS: Netanyahu’s DANGEROUS Move After Ceasefire as Trump Threatens Tel Aviv; Kamil Kerimov, 26 January 2025

Prof Mearsheimer; “Trump wants a deal, and he’s put enormous pressure on Netanyahu through Witkoff, who’s a tough character, knows how to play hardball, knows how to deal with somebody like Bibi Netanyahu, and what’s successful. And in addition, there are reasons for the Israelis to agree to a ceasefire at this point. I don’t think Netanyahu on his own would’ve agreed, but there are forces at play inside of Gaza involving Israel’s capabilities and Amma’s capabilities that points in the direction of moving toward a ceasefire.”

Prof Mearsheimer; “The big question is, what happens moving forward? Do the Israelis violate the ceasefire? It’s likely that they will, it’s not axiomatic, but it’s likely. And then if they do violate the ceasefire, will Trump behave like Biden or will Trump behave like he’s been behaving in the past few days?”

Prof Mearsheimer; “I’d be shocked if the Iranians and the Israelis weren’t preparing for war with each other. The Iranians purely understand that they have to be prepared for war, not only against Israel, but against the United States. Israel has its gun sites in Iran, and we probably have our gun sites on Iran. Any Iranians, needless to say, are putting their gun sites on Israel. They’re planning on retaliating.”

Presenter, Judge Napolitano; “Is Israel overextended Professor Mearsheime?”

Prof Mearsheimer; “Yeah, there’s no question about that. They’re in Gaza, although they may be getting out, they’re in Southern Lebanon and in my opinion, they’re showing few signs that they’re going to get out of there. They’re in Syria and that’s a tough neighborhood. And there’s no sign that they’re leaving Syria. And they have just been fighting a long war against the Palestinians and even against Hezbollah. And as I said before, the Israeli army is not constituted to fight long Wars. It’s constituted to fight short wars. So it’s an army that is wearing at the seams and they are overextended and they have lots more conflict in front of them.”


Read and watch; Israel Massacres 23 and shoots another 100 on the day it was supposed to leave Lebanon Craig Murray, 27 January 2025

‘Yesterday, not only did Israel fail to evacuate its army from Southern Lebanon as stipulated in the ceasefire agreement, Israel also shot over 130 Lebanese civilians attempting to return home in accordance with the deal, killing 23 and wounding 109 (of whom some are in critical condition).

This included a 12 year old boy wounded in the neck in Kfarkela, standing right next to my local producer Mahmood. I was twenty yards away and on my way to them. Four were killed in Kfarkela and overnight the Israeli army demolished numerous homes there in “punishment”.

Watch; Israel’s War Crimes in South Lebanon; Craig Murray, 28 January 2025


General Basyuk, who oversaw Israel’s slaughter in Gaza, meets UK officials

Read; Israel’s ‘genocide general’ welcomed in London – and the media yawns Jonathan Cook, 28 January 2025

‘There have been two stories deeply revealing – in starkly contrasting ways – of the West’s relationship to Israel’s industrialised, militarised slaughter of the people of Gaza over the past 15 months. Last week, Declassified UK carried out one of the fundamental duties of journalism. Its reporter Alex Morris sought to hold accountable a war crimes suspect evading justice. And not just any suspect.

Morris doorstepped Major General Oded Basyuk as he led an Israeli military delegation through the streets of London in meetings with the Ministry of Defence and the Royal United Services Institute, a UK “security think-tank” with close ties to the British government.

Basyuk, sometimes spelt Basiuk, heads the Israeli military’s operations directorate, whose responsibilities have included the development of the military strategy that guided Israel’s brutal 15-month assault on Gaza. The International Court of Justice ruled a year ago that a “plausible” case had been made that Israel was committing a genocide in Gaza. Israel has effectively been on trial ever since. Meanwhile, the ICJ’s sister court, the International Criminal Court (ICC), has issued arrest warrants for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defence minister, Yoav Gallant, for crimes against humanity – most notably for their policy of blocking aid and starving the entire population of 2.3 million Palestinians there.

Basyuk was one of the central figures helping to devise and direct these genocidal acts. He was also pivotal in overseeing the Israeli military’s invasion and occupation of south Lebanon. Israeli forces have been similarly levelling entire communities there and slaughtering civilians. In other words, Basyuk is one of the biggest cogs in Israel’s genocidal war machine.

If the ICC finds the nerve to take on the new Trump administration – which is almost certain to sanction court officials for charging Netanyahu and Gallant – Basyuk will be at the head of the queue for an arrest warrant. Which leads to a number of conundrums. Not least, why is a major war crimes suspect such as Basyuk freely wandering the streets of London in the midst of two genocide-related legal cases against Israel? Given that the ICC can issue arrest warrants in secret, and at short notice, how is Basyuk so confident that he can visit the UK without legal repercussions?

Further, Britain’s universal jurisdiction laws mean serious crimes can be prosecuted in the UK wherever they occurred, and separately from the ICC. A private application for his arrest could have been issued while he was here. The only plausible answer is that the government of Keir Starmer gave him a gold-plated assurance that he would not be arrested under any circumstances during his visit.

That is precisely what happened back in November when Israel’s now-outgoing military chief of staff, Lieutenant General Herzi Halevi, visited Britain to meet officials from the Ministry of Defence and Foreign Office. Starmer’s government issued Halevi with diplomatic immunity – a so-called “special mission certificate” – that blocked any possibility of legal redress against him. As a signatory to the Rome Statute, it should be noted, Britain is legally obliged to enforce an arrest warrant issued by the ICC, though it has equivocated about whether in practice it would carry out an arrest of either Netanyahu or Gallant, if put to the test.

There are other puzzling questions that need answers. In the midst of legal cases at the world’s two highest courts against the Israeli military for crimes against humanity, why would the Ministry of Defence think that Basyuk – one of Israel’s highest ranking commanders – was a suitable person to be meeting with and talking to? What knowledge does Basyuk currently have to share with our own military chain of command that makes it so important to meet with him face to face in London, especially when his visit could potentially drag Starmer’s government into a legal showdown with the ICC or expose a shameful evasion of its legal obligations?

Basyuk’s visit serves as a reminder that the MoD is profoundly implicated in the Gaza genocide – as is Starmer himself. It has approved the continuing sale of more than 90 per cent of British weapons and components to Israel, including those that have kept Israel’s fleet of F-35s in the air so that they can carpet bomb Gaza.

Additionally, the MoD is believed to have helped ship US and German munitions to Israel through air bases in the UK and from an RAF base in Cyprus, Akrotiri, without which the mass slaughter of Gaza’s children would not have been possible.

As Declassified revealed in October, the UK has been allowing regular secret flights of US special forces from Akrotiri to Israel. And the MoD has been conducting surveillance flights over Gaza, almost certainly with the purpose of supplying intelligence to Israel to help it select targets as it has destroyed most residential properties, schools, universities, libraries, mosques, churches and bakeries.

A strong suspicion must be that the MoD invited Basyuk not only to deepen ties between the two militaries but to prepare for a renewed British role in the genocide should Israel return to the bombardment of Gaza after the first stage of the ceasefire is completed, as Netanyahu has threatened.

Media silence

And then there are questions for the British media. How is it possible that Basyuk, a major war crimes suspect, is strolling around London at the head of an official Israeli military delegation in the midst of a genocide investigation by the ICJ and no major British media outlet has shown the slightest interest in doorstepping him, or in asking questions of the government about his visit? Only Declassified UK – an independent outlet with a tiny fraction of the resources of the BBC, the Guardian, the Times or the Telegraph – has chased him down, embarrassed him by asking him to his face whether he is a war criminal, and drawn attention to his presence in the UK.

It is not even as though we can assume this collective failure by the British establishment media was an oversight, and that for some inexplicable reason their military and security correspondents all failed to learn of Basyuk’s visit, as Declassified UK had done.

Because all these media outlets also ignored the video that went viral of Declassified UK’s Alex Morris challenging Basyuk to his face, “Are you a war criminal, General Basyuk?” and “Are you worried about being investigated by the ICC for war crimes?” In stark contrast to the Israeli media, which widely reported on this supremely awkward confrontation for Basyuk, the British media has remained studiously silent. They have not wondered why Basyuk, or earlier Halevi, has been allowed into the UK. Or what assurances Basyuk was given. Or what he and Halevi were here to discuss with the British officials. Similarly, they have not taken this as an opportunity to focus on another story that so far has entirely passed them by and that Declassified has been at the forefront of exposing: Britain’s deep complicity in Israel’s genocide and the covert role in the genocide of RAF base Akrotiri, on Cypus.

These are not oversights. They are a consistent pattern of failure by the media that indicates one thing only: that these failures are entirely intentional. The British media has conspired with the British government every bit as criminally as the British government has colluded in Israel’s genocide in Gaza. Through its silence, the British media has given the government cover to assist Israel in its mass slaughter of Palestinian civilians.’


Listen or Read; Trump Reveals Plan For The Ethnic Cleansing Of Gaza; Caitlin Johnson; 26 January 2025

‘Well that didn’t take long. President Trump has said he wants to “clean out” Gaza and relocate its population to US client states Egypt and Jordan, which would of course be a textbook case of ethnic cleansing. It would also align perfectly with longstanding Israeli agendas to remove Palestinians from their homeland so that their territory can be seized and settled by Jews.

Speaking with the press on board Air Force One on Saturday, Trump said he talked to Jordan’s King Abdullah II about taking in large numbers of Palestinians from Gaza, and said he plans to speak with Egypt’s president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi about doing the same. “I’d like Egypt to take people and I’d like Jordan to take people,” Trump told reporters, saying the Gaza Strip is “a real mess” and “literally a demolition site. You’re talking about probably a million and a half people, and we just clean out that whole thing,” Trump said.

The president said that this new arrangement could be either temporary or long-term, but one would have to be extremely naive to believe that either Israel or Washington plan on emptying out Gaza of its inconvenient population, rebuilding it, and then bringing them all back to shiny new homes. Israel has a very extensive history of grabbing land from Palestinians and then refusing to give it back, which is why there are so-called “refugee camps” for displaced Palestinians that are as old as the state of Israel itself.

“Just five days into his second term as president, Trump left no doubt about what his intentions are for Gaza,” Joe Lauria wrote for Consortium News on Trump’s comments, adding, “He tried to present what he was saying as humanitarian concern, but only the most ill-informed person about Gaza would not see that he is talking about committing the crime of forcibly relocating a population.”

Trump supporters will no doubt defend his stated plans as a compassionate effort to rescue Palestinians from unfortunate circumstances, because Trump supporters are chowder-brained bootlickers who would defend literally anything their president did. But make no mistake: this is the advancement of an agenda to end the existence of the Palestinian people in their historic homeland, and would fulfill the darkest desires of the most depraved political factions in Israel.

Mere days after the Hamas attack on October 7 2023, Israel’s Intelligence Ministry produced a document proposing the removal of Gaza’s population to Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula. At around the same time, an Israeli think tank called the Misgav Institute for National Security & Zionist Strategy published a paper arguing that “There is at the moment a unique and rare opportunity to evacuate the whole Gaza Strip in coordination with the Egyptian government.”’


Watch; Scott Ritter: Putin’s High-handed Move WORRIES Trump! EU Crisis As Ukraine Kneels In Surrender; Kamil Kerimov; 28 Jan 2025

Presenter, “Judge Napolitano; How dangerous is it for Trump to be discussing the forcible removal of 1.7 million Palestinians to Egypt and Jordan, an event that it’s extremely unlikely to occur?”

Scott Ritter; “Well, it’s extremely unlikely. It’s not going to happen. And the simple reason is that both El-Sisi Cici of Egypt and the King of Jordan understand that if they were to receive Palestinian populations in these numbers, it would be the end of their governments. El-Sisi is not a very popular dictator, he governs with a heavy police state, this would bring about a level of instability that would see him overthrown and collapse. The same thing with the King of Jordan.

The majority of the population in Jordan are Palestinians. This would be the end of the King of Jordan. So it’s not gonna happen. We saw that El-Sisi and the King have said no. But that’s not the issue. The Palestinian people aren’t going to go home or aren’t going to leave Gaza. They didn’t sit there for the last however many months it has been taking the casualties, they didn’t suffer the way they did just to surrender at the end. Remember, Hamas is an extension of the people.

Hamas are children of the camps, and these people now have fought and won a battle about who is in control. Israel is not in control. That’s the ultimate conclusion here. There’s difficult days ahead, but the idea that these people who struggled so so hard are just going to up and turn around and leave, that isn’t going to happen. Donald Trump has made a huge mistake, publicly commenting about it because he’s going to back down.”


‘In this video, Mohammad Marandi exposes the truth about the Israel-Hamas ceasefire and discusses the latest news in Syria, Yemen, and more. Hear his insights on al Golani in Syria and the new Trump administration.’

Watch; MOHAMMAD MARANDI EXPOSES TRUTH About Israel-Hamas Ceasefire! India and Global Left; 26 January 2025

Mohammad Marandi; “I do believe that this was a significant victory and that the Israeli regime has been humiliated. After all, we’ve seen that they’ve attempted for over 15 months to wipe out the resistance and to wipe out the Palestinian people with no success whatsoever. And I also believe that the genocide or the holocaust in Gaza is a defeat for the Israeli regime. What has destroyed Israel in the eyes of the world is the fact that it has presented itself as a racist regime that is willing to slaughter people, a whole nation, women and children.

So there’s no reason at all to be optimistic about Trump or his people. After all, his son in law is a zionist. He spoke about Gaza as if that land does not belong to the Palestinian people in the past.

He needed a ceasefire before the inauguration. And I think it just shows how bad this is for the United States and how bad this is for US Hegemony. It shows that Trump does recognise that both inside the United States, public opinion has turned against the Israeli regime. We should remember that even some of Trump’s own supporters, staunch supporters, have turned against Israel.

Tucker Carlson, for example, in his show, has spoken to people who are deeply hostile towards Netanyahu and the regime. He is a very influential person. Candace Owens has turned completely against the Israeli regime.

But that does not mean that he is going to move to stop the genocidal behaviour of the regime in the long term, let alone to punish anyone for carrying out the greatest crimes that we’ve seen in the 21st century. Alongside, of course, the genocide in Yemen, which is often forgotten. The genocide in Yemen was supported by the United States, by the Europeans, by the Canadians, and it lasted for seven years. And the people of Yemen survived that, and they became the most effective, or at least one of the two or three most effective forces in hurting the Israeli regime during its genocide in Gaza.”

Lebanon

“Like in Gaza the Israelis carried out genocidal attacks in Lebanon, they bombed towns and cities and apartment blocks to wipe out ordinary people to put pressure on the resistance. These of course are crimes against humanity, but western media was completely indifferent to it, in fact western journalists who are based in Lebanon, their fixers, their cameramen, their staff, many of them lived in those neighborhoods, they knew quite well that the Israeli regime was targeting ordinary families out of hatred and spite and racism, but they would continue to say on their live programs or in their reports that the Israelis were bombing Hezbollah strongholds or Hezbollah centers, and use that sort of terminology to justify genocide. Just like in Gaza, these journalists are basically employees of major media networks that are controlled by these very powerful zionist or pro-zionist entities.”

Iran

“Contrary to what you would understand about Iran supposedly from western media where this is a dictatorship. Actually Iran is far more open than the west. Let me give you an example, in the west does any mainstream media outlet, a single one stand against the genocide in Gaza? None, they’re all pro genocide, every single one, you cannot name a single media outlet that is against the Israeli regime.

If one wants to understand Iran I think Gaza is the best example. Morally speaking, where does Iran stand? It is the country that supported the resistance, it is the country that reported that the resistance capabilities in Gaza all come from Iran, the same is true in Lebanon the same is true in Yemen. Iran supported the Palestinians and those who supported the Palestinians and the west supported genocide, and the west supported a holocaust, so when it comes to moral hierarchy who is higher up in this hierarchy, Iran or these western countries that own the genocide?”


Watch; Breaking news and analysis on day 12 of Gaza ceasefire; The Electronic Intifada; #TheElectronicIntifada #TheElectronicIntifadaPodcast; 30 January 2025

01:55 Nora Barrows-Friedman delivers news report

25:29 Abed Ayoub of ADC discusses crackdown on activists, students’ rights

57:16 Nora, Ali and Jon talk about announced death of Mohammad Deif

01:01:26 Jon Elmer delivers resistance report

01:48:20 Group discussion

Ali Abunimah; “Let’s talk about the executive signed yesterday by Donald Trump threatening those on student visas with deportation. If they criticise Israel or express a positive opinion of Hamas as a civil rights lawyer and legal expert, how do you analyse the impact this could have on students, their right to free speech and of course their right to protest colonialism and genocide?”

Abed Ayoub; “This is going to have a significant impact. And I think the impact is starting now, right? Whenever there’s an attack on free speech and freedom of expression, the first intent of those doing the attacking, the first, it’s stifling speech to give that chilling effect. So we’re already hearing from international students and many of the national student groups in the country that most of their international student members are backing off, or they’re afraid to stay engaged or they don’t want to be at a protest or be as visible as they were. That’s the first immediate impact.

And that shows the intention of this is to stifle these voices that are standing up for justice and for Palestine moving forward. The threat of taking away the visa simply because somebody is speaking up. This needs to be a concern for all Americans, everyone in the country, not just Arabs or Muslims or Palestinians.

These tactics, giving this precedent to a president and authority to the government to deport you or arrest you, go after you. It’s going to start with international students, but it’s not going to stop there. We’re gonna see attacks on journalists. We’re going to see attacks on others coming into this country as speakers. And I do want to keep in mind that there’s two orders. There was the one signed yesterday, then there was the one signed on his first day, which kind of went around the same lines of attack, were threatening us around the same thing.

These coupled together, it’s an attack on free speech. It’s an attack on our identity and who we are. And it’s an attack not just on us, on our allies. Remember, we’re not talking here that every international student is Palestinian or Arab. We have a limited number of international students in this country. So the international students that are going to be going after, they’re going to see the diversity they’re going to see students from across the world. So it is something to be of concern, something that we should be watching and all Americans should be afraid, concerned right now.”


Watch; Why Trump forced Israel to accept Gaza ceasefire, with Ali Abunimah The Electronic Intifada, 18 January 2025

Asa Winstanley; “I think that that part about Hamas ‘being in a position to control civilian affairs in the Gaza strip now’ is so key, because how long did we hear for the past 15, 16 months how many Western politicians we hear saying, even Bernie Sanders said something along the these lines, that Bernie Sanders said, ‘You can’t have a ceasefire with Hamas in place in the Gaza Strip’. All these European politicians say that Hamas can play no part in the future of the Gaza Strip and so on and so forth. In the texts of the leak of the agreements that are going around that have been distributed about the ceasefire text that has been discussed in Doha, there’s no mention of that, there’s no mention of Hamas ending civilian rules, so it’s very clear they’re going to be still in place again.“

Ali Abinumah; “And there’s nothing of course about Hamas disarming in the agreement and you actually can’t have a ceasefire without Hamas in place because who’s going to implement it? Who’s going to organise the return of your hostages and so on? I just want to remind people what Netanyahu said in Congress in June when he got what was it 57 standing ovations, he said ‘The war in Gaza could end tomorrow if Hamas surrenders disarms and returns all the hostages but if they don’t, Israel will fight until we destroy Hamas’s military capabilities and its rule in Gaza and bring all our hostages home, that’s what total victory means and we will settle for nothing less’. That’s what Netanyahu said, so by his own standard this is a complete defeat for Israel.

Let’s talk about why Trump would put pressure on Israel and what that means and how Trump did it, and I guess the first thing I want to do is remind people that on January 7th Trump posted this video of Columbia University Professor Jeffrey Sachs on his Truth Social website, and let’s actually watch the the clip, it’s a short video but this is what Donald Trump, the incoming president of the United States, posted on his social media account.

Jeffrey Sachs; “Syria and you may actually hear from grownup reporters who are lying through their teeth are ignorant beyond imagining that oh the war in Syria, yes Russia intervened in Syria. Well do you know that Obama tasked the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government starting four years before Russia intervened? What kind of nonsense is that? And how many times did the New York Times report on Operation Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al-Assad, three times in 10 years. This is not democracy, this is a game and it’s a game of narrative. Why did the US invade Iraq in 2003? Well first of all it was completely phony pretenses, it wasn’t ‘oh we were so wrong they didn’t have weapons of mass destruction.’ They actually did focus groups in the fall of 2002 to find out what would sell that war to the American people. Abe Shulsky if you want to know the name of the PR genius. They did focus groups on the war. They wanted the war all the time, they had to figure out how to sell the war to the American people, how to scare the shit out of the American people. It was a phony war. Where did that war come from? You know what, it’s quite surprising, that war came from Netanyahu actually. It’s weird, and the way it is that Netanyahu had from 1995 onward the theory that the only way we’re going to get rid of Hamas and Hezbollah is by toppling the governments that support them, that’s Iraq, Syria and Iran and the guy’s nothing if not obsessive, and he’s still trying to get us to fight Iran this day this week. He’s a deep, dark son of bitch, a sorry to tell you, because he’s gotten us into endless wars and because of the power of all of this in the US politics he’s gotten his way, but that war was totally phony so what is this democracy versus dictatorship? Come on these are not even sensible terms.”

Nora Barrows-Friedman; “….and that Hamas was the one holding up the negotiations. Over and over and over again we heard Tony Blinken say we’re waiting, the ball is in Hamas’s court, they refuse to come to the negotiations table, their demands are preposterous. But as we said at the time, during those instances that this was complete BS, that it was Israel always refusing to do the right thing, that it was Israel and the US ensuring that this genocide that this holocaust could be continuously perpetrated without any repercussions, without any justification, completely in flagrant violation of every single humanitarian international law on the books, and that Israel could again do what it wants because the US lets it.

We actually have a clip, maybe this is a good time to go to that clip of our friend Max Blumenthal challenging Tony Blinken at the US state department today.”

Max Blumenthal; “100 reporters in Gaza were on the receiving end of your bombs why did you keep the bombs flowing when we had a deal in May? We all knew we had a deal. Everyone in this room knows we had a deal Tony, and you kept the bombs flowing. Why did you sacrifice the rules-based order on the mantle of your commitment to zionism? Why did you allow my friends to be massacred? Why did you allow my friend’s homes in Gaza to be destroyed when we had a deal in May? You helped destroy our religion, Judaism, by associating it with fascism. You waved the white flag before, you waved the White Flag before Israeli fascists.Your father-in-law was an Israel lobbyist your grandfather was an Israel lobbyist, are you compromised by Israel? Why did you allow the holocaust of our time to happen? How does it feel to have your legacy be genocide? How does it feel to have your legacy be genocide? you too Matt, you smirk through the whole thing every day you smirk through a genocide.”

Ali Abunimah; “Does that mean that I think everything is going to be rosy, that Donald Trump is going to be a great ally of the Palestinian people, that he’s not going to take measures that are incredibly harmful to Palestinians? None of that, but for the moment this is where I think things are and things are contested and contestable, and is not a given anymore that the United States is just going to be in lockstep with Israel, especially after this catastrophic last 15 months, which even if you disregard the suffering of the Palestinian people, have done nothing for the United States nothing for its influence in the world, nothing for its hegemony, nothing for its economy, nothing good has come out of it, even from a purely American nationalistic perspective.”


In a humiliating appeasement of the extreme zionist lobby, Bristol University is appealing the employment tribunal decision that David Miller was unfairly dismissed because the tribunal ruled that criticism of zionism is protected free speech.

Watch; My landmark legal victory against @BristolUni is being appealed David Miller, 4 January 2025

“Hello, I’m David Miller. I regret to inform you my landmark legal case against Bristol University is being appealed. My case established that anti-zionist beliefs are protected under the Equality Act 2010. In 2021, I was wrongfully dismissed from my position as a professor at the University of Bristol for teaching about the zionist movement’s Islamophobia.

I fought back and with your generous support, I took the case to an employment tribunal and won. That victory established an important legal precedent. Anti-zionist beliefs are protected under the Equality Act of 2010. We achieved a landmark legal victory.

The tribunal ruled decisively in my favour, confirming that Bristol University discriminated against me because of my anti-zionist beliefs. They affirm that my belief is profound and cohesive and worthy of respect in a democratic society. This verdict sets a vital precedent. No longer can employers harass, discipline or dismiss workers simply for voicing opposition to the racist, colonial and genocidal ideology of zionism.

However, our struggle is not over. Bristol University has decided to appeal the tribunal’s ruling against them and they are determined to overturn this vital precedent. That means our fight will be going to the Employment Appeals Tribunal, which will cost a substantial amount of money. To defend my case, I need to raise at least £75,000.

If we succeed, we will strengthen the legal protection for anti-zionism and defend freedom of speech for everyone in Britain. But if Bristol University wins, it will undo everything we’ve achieved. This will be a huge blow to all those who are speaking out against the genocide that is taking place in Gaza. And that’s why I need your support.

Please donate whatever you can at www.fightingfund.org. we must never give in to the racist, genocidal ideology of zionism. If we stand up, we can defeat their attempt to silence us. Thank you.”


Of course the Western puppet Shah of Iran had to tow the zionist line.

Watch; Pahlavi Knew X, 18 January 2025

‘This 60 Minutes interview with Mike Wallace in 1976 was the moment the Shah of Iran began to fall out of favur with his Anglo-American and zionist handlers. He basically said the unsayable on the biggest broadcast news program in the U.S., if not the world, at that time. The rest is history…’

“Your Majesty, you’re not telling me that the Jewish lobby in the United States pulls the strings of the presidency?”

“Not entirely, but I think even a little too much, even for Israel interests.

“You think the Jewish lobby in the United States is too powerful for the interests of Israel?”

“I think so. Sometimes they are dis serving the interests of Israel because they’re pushing around too many people.”

“How do you mean, pushing around?”

“Well, pressuring. They have many means at their disposal. They are putting up pressure on many, many people. And at the end, I don’t think that it will even help Israel.

“Why? If this is true, why would the president of the United States pay attention to that lobby?”

“They are strong.”

“Strong in what sense?”

“They are controlling many things.”

“Controlling what?”

“Newspapers, medias.”

“Your Majesty…”

“Banks, finances. And I’m going to stop there.”


Whatever the consequences of the Gaza ceasefire on the people of Palestine, Israel will carry out its plan to pillage their oil resources off the coast of Gaza. We must continue to resist the zionists’ power and influence over all of our lives through demonstrations, marches, blogs, and participation in the BDS movement, as well as giving whatever support we can to charities that provide medical treatment, food and shelter for refugees from the genocide such as Medical Aid for Palestinians, Care Beyond Borders, MATW Project, Palestine Children’s Relief Fund and Islamic Relief.

Watch; Don’t Slow Down, No Matter a Gaza Ceasefire. David Miller, 17 January 2025

Intro; ‘With the prospects of a ceasefire agreement potentially being reached between the Palestinian resistance movements in Gaza and the Israeli occupation entity, it is crucial that the momentum and mobilisation for the pro-Palestine and anti-zionist movement that has been built over the past year in Britain, and beyond, does not slow down.

We must continue taking to the streets, demanding: (1) accountability for the Israeli genocidal war criminals; (2) the dismantlement of the Israeli settler colonial state and its ambition of a Greater Israel; and (3) the liberation of the entirety of Palestinian land — from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.’

“So if there’s a ceasefire announced, we’ll have to look at the precise details of the agreement. But it’s not a significant win for the Palestinians unless there is a complete removal of the Israel Defence Forces from Gaza. It doesn’t look at present as if that will be the case, but we’ll have to see. If there’s a ceasefire, then that will mean that we move to the next phase of the struggle.

This is not over. We have to remember that Israel is currently still taking territory in Syria. It still has not withdrawn from Lebanon, still is occupying part of Lebanon and we also see that what’s going on here is that the Israelis are trying to expand their influence in the whole region.

For example, in Syria, they’re talking about having intelligence control over half of Syria, including Damascus. So it’s perfectly evident that they are going to try to use the incoming Trump presidency to expand their influence and to add another 10 countries to the normalisation process, such that they become effectively a small empire in West Asia. So, of course there can’t be any demobilisation of the movement in the West. We have to continue to support the Palestinians.

It’s required for us to stay on the streets regardless of what is in the ceasefire agreement.”


Read; ‘Conspiracy Theory’ Now Fact: Greater Israel Has Arrived; Kit Klarenberg Jan 30, 2025

Ever since Tel Aviv’s 1948 creation, much has been said and written about ‘Greater Israel’ – the notion zionism’s ultimate end goal is the forcible annexation and ethnic cleansing of vast swaths of Arab and Muslim lands for Jewish settlement, based on Biblical claims this territory was promised to Jews by God. The mainstream media typically dismisses this concept as antisemitic conspiracy theory, or at most the fringe fantasy of a minuscule handful of extremist Israelis.

In reality, as The Guardian admitted in 2009, the idea of a Greater Israel has long-appealed to “religious and secular right-wing nationalists” alike at a state and public level in Tel Aviv. They have the shared objective of “[seeking] to fulfill divine commandments about the ‘beginning of redemption’, as well as create ‘facts on the ground’ to enhance Israel’s security.” The outlet acknowledged this motivation was a key contemporary driving force in mainstream zionist entity politics, which “effectively turned the Palestinians into aliens on their own soil.”

The Nation has described the push to establish Greater Israel as “the central ideological goal” of Benjamin Netyahu’s Likud Party, which has dominated Israeli politics in recent decades. In July 2018 too, the zionist entity passed the “Nation State of the Jewish People” law. It enshrines “the development of Jewish settlement as a national value.” Meanwhile, the state is legally obligated “to encourage and promote” the “establishment and consolidation” of settlements, in illegally occupied territory.


A turncoat from the inner sanctum of US power, Jeffrey Sachs’s analysis can be trusted.

Watch; Jeffrey Sachs: The Inevitable War With Iran, and Biden’s Attempts to Sabotage Trump Tucker Carlson, 16 December 2024

Jeffrey Sachs; It’s really possible for this incoming administration to change course because it doesn’t require a massive public education. It requires honesty. It requires seeing down the deep state internally. It requires making sure that the key appointments that want competence, honesty and security for America actually get the job. And of course, it requires President Trump following through on his profound main insight, which is that there is no reason for war with Russia, there’s no reason for war with China, and I want him really to know, there’s no reason for war with Iran. None.”

Tucker Carlson; “But every week, every day, Fox News tells me that there’s some, assassination attempt by Iran. They’re sending drones from their ships offshore over our country to scope it out for future attacks. I mean, Iran is presented in the US media as the aggressor trying to kill Trump for example.”

Jeffrey Sachs; “I don’t know if those Fox reporters have the chance to speak with the Iranian senior officials or Middle East officials. I do, all the time. I am able to ask questions, to check facts, to understand circumstances. I speak to lots of people engaged all over the Middle East on these questions and it’s simply not true.

So the first thing one should do, period, in this world is talk to the other side. And if, if Donald Trump has that, this would be the farthest reach. But if he has that impulse with Iran too, he will be perhaps amazed, perhaps gratified, but he would do a huge service for the American people, huge service for the American people.

This is extremely important. A war with Iran will be World War Three. So that’s the point. Iran is not alone and it will not remain alone. And so if we go to war with Iran, we are expanding the war with Russia. With Russia, we are at a possibility of peace, but we’re also at a possibility of nuclear war. They’re both very close. And if we go to war with Iran, we make the nuclear war all the more likely.”

Tucker Carlson; “Do you think that the people pushing us toward war with Iran understand that?”

Jeffrey Sachs; “No. No, I think that they’re following a plan, ‘seven wars in five years’ (quote from General Wesley Clark), that has been deep set and that has been Netanyahu’s baby all the time. Netanyahu I regard as one of the most delusional and dangerous people on the planet. And he has engaged the United States so far in six disastrous wars. And he’s aiming to engage us in yet one more. But Netanyahu’s track record is just about the worst of any person on the planet right now in terms of damage done.

I believe in Israel’s security alongside a state of Palestine, which I know completely to be possible and achievable and peaceful and ending this risk of World War 3 and could have prevented the million or so deaths that have come from Netanyahu’s wars up until now. And the Arab states have been saying this repeatedly since 2002. It’s called the Arab Peace Initiative. Anybody can look it up. They repeat it. They repeat it basically nonstop in the last two years. The Iranians want peace.”


These two interviews are examples of how all over the world Jews are sickened and shamed by Israel’s racial hatred and violence.

Watch; Why are you supporting Palestine today? Alarabnuk, 12 July 2024

“My name’s Uri. I’m from Brighton. I’m Jewish. Israel, contrary to the popular narrative, creates anti-semitism by associating Jews with war crimes. They claim to represent the Jews. They don’t. We’ve got thousands of Jews in this march, tens of thousands. We stand for equality. We stand to end apartheid and occupation and stop the genocide.”

“What is zionism and is it a good thing or a bad thing for Jews?”

“Zionism is a very bad thing for Jews. It creates anti-semitism. Zionism has got nothing to do with the religion of Judaism. Zionism is a colonial ideology, about 200 years old, founded by Jews who are not religious. It is a colonial ideology. The founders of zionism have called it a colonial ideology.

They went to the colonial powers, like Britain, to be inspired on how to do colonialism.”


If a friend’s values differ radically from one’s own, it is time to say goodbye! If you cant accept the concept of equal rights from the river to the sea, with those who are racist, go back to where you came from, then best we part ways.

Watch; You cannot change those who cannot see that normalising genocide is wrong – you have to walk away from them thenativeinformant, 24 October 2024

“I had a friend. No longer. We’re no longer friends. And she and I have had countless conversations about the Israeli Palestinian genocide way before October 7th. And we had chatted about it from the perspective of the two state solution, we had chatted about it in terms of our cultural belief systems. And I was always very supportive of what she believed and what she thought and any kind of ideological sense that she had led with or perhaps kept hidden from other friends. I was very much in support of her belief system because that’s her reality. And my intention is never to convince someone of some other reality that doesn’t align with that belief system, because that’s a whole lot of deprogramming they have to do.

There’s a whole lot of unlearning that they have to go through because clearly whatever they’ve experienced is systemic programming and systematic manipulation and normalisation of certain belief systems that I cannot, I cannot compete with. But I think the way that we ended our friendship was because we do not believe the same thing when it comes to humanity and genocide. Like, we fundamentally disagree. And if you don’t align yourself with your humanity and your understanding towards what is right and what is wrong and what is just, then I have no business having someone like you in my life.

Like, we cannot further our friendship. And even till this day, this person is still entrenching themselves in victimhood, is still taking on this role that they did nothing wrong, still trying to have this moral high ground into the conversation, because I hear it from other people and mutuals that we interact with. And it just blows my mind that clearly this collective psychosis that we’re going through is going to end friendships, relationships, professional relationships with colleagues, it’s going to happen. But if after a year you still believe what you believe and you still want to have this myopic, cushioned, curated, dare I say, manicured way of looking at the world that is rid of all the evil and you have no relationship to God.

A true understanding of what is right, fundamentally right, and what is wrong. I’m sorry, there’s like, there’s nothing more I can say to you. There’s really nothing. There’s no relationship that we can foster beyond this point.”


As Hamas is a proscribed organisation, there is a risk to one’s freedom to suggest in this newsletter that they are simply part of the resistance to free Palestine from zionist colonialism! ‘……an understandable reaction to the brutality of the occupation, the dehumanisation of Palestinians, and the vast asymmetry of power between a nuclear-armed Israel and an occupied, defenseless people.’

Read; Why the West is wrong about Hamas by Ashraf W. Nubani, The Electronic Intifada, 14 January 2025

‘Ashraf W. Nubani is an attorney with a masters degrees in history and Islamic religious leadership. He writes on US foreign policy and the Middle East, and is the author of Bridging the Gap: Islam’s Challenge for America.’

‘As a young, idealistic Palestinian American, raised with Western-articulated values, I once asked Ismail Abu Shanab – one of the founders of Hamas – many questions about the movement’s goals and strategy.

Abu Shanab, a US-educated engineer, was one of the most senior leaders of Hamas when I met him in 1998 in Gaza. That conversation – along with other personal encounters I have had with leaders of the movement, deepened my understanding of Hamas – and I came to view it not as a monolithic entity, but as a complex, principled movement grounded in Islamic values and committed to the Palestinian cause.

Despite these principles, Hamas is frequently misrepresented in Western discourse, where it is reduced to a caricature of violence and extremism. Equating Hamas with groups like ISIS is not only inaccurate but also deeply Islamophobic.

Hamas is a national liberation movement, comparable to Algeria’s National Liberation Front or South Africa’s African National Congress, indigenous resistance movements that freed their people from centuries of European colonial barbarism.

Its roots are deeply tied to Palestinian society, functioning as both a resistance movement and a social organisation, and since 2006, as an elected government – despite a partially successful US-orchestrated coup against it and severe sanctions and siege imposed by Israel’s sponsors and allies, aimed at ensuring its failure.

Nelson Mandela the “terrorist”

At the time, as a fresh law graduate, I was grappling with a moral quandary: How could martyrdom operations – framed as “suicide bombings” in Euro-American discourse – be reconciled with the principles of justice and humanity? What were the moral boundaries of resistance? To my surprise, Abu Shanab expressed opposition to such tactics from an Islamic juridical perspective. Islamic law, he explained, prohibits the killing of noncombatants, particularly the targeting of women and children.

He emphasised that these operations were not a preferred strategy but an understandable reaction to the brutality of the occupation, the dehumanisation of Palestinians, and the vast asymmetry of power between a nuclear-armed Israel and an occupied, defenseless people.

Abu Shanab’s argument was reminiscent of the one put forward by Nelson Mandela, the resistance fighter turned post-liberation president of South Africa, who is widely revered by the same Western states and leaders – ​​including US presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden – who now condemn Hamas.

“It is always the oppressor, not the oppressed, who dictates the form of the struggle,” Mandela wrote in his biography, The Long Walk to Freedom. “If the oppressor uses violence, the oppressed have no alternative but to respond violently. In our case, it was a legitimate form of self-defence.”

Israel’s response to 7 October has demonstrated that it kills innocent Palestinians by the tens of thousands – not because resistance fighters “hide behind civilians” or because these are unintended casualties of war. Israel kills Palestinians because they dare to resist its occupation in all forms.

Embedded in the hearts and minds of Palestinian civil society – whether in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip, “Israel proper,” or the diaspora – is a steadfast longing to be free of a racist ideology that feeds its superiority complex on the bodies of Palestinians, Lebanese and other Arabs, Muslims and Christians across the Middle East.

A lie often perpetuated is that Hamas seeks to wipe out the Jewish people. In a speech before thousands of students at the Islamic University of Gaza, shortly after his return from exile to Gaza in 1997, Hamas founder Sheikh Ahmed Yassin stated:

“I want to proclaim loudly to the world that we are not fighting Jews because they are Jews! We are fighting them because they assaulted us, killed us, took our land, our homes, our children, our women, and scattered us. We became a people without a homeland. We want our rights. We don’t want more. We love peace, but they hate peace, because people who take away the rights of others don’t believe in peace. Why should we not fight? We have the right to defend ourselves.”

Israel had released Yassin from prison and allowed him to return to Gaza as part of a deal with Jordan to free two Mossad agents who had attempted to murder senior Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal in Amman.

Israel attempted to assassinate Yassin in 2003, the same year it murdered Abu Shanab. It would succeed in killing Yassin, a frail man and a quadriplegic who had used a wheelchair since childhood, the following year.

As an illegal occupier, Israel cannot claim the right to “defend itself” under international law, particularly given its referral to the International Court of Justice for alleged acts of genocide and the indictment of its leaders at the International Criminal Court for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Euro-America must confront its double standards: How can it continue to support Israel, allowing that state to commit genocide in the name of a nonexistent “right to self-defence,” while condemning the Palestinian resistance that is fighting for a just cause?


These child-murdering monsters desecrate the human spirit and bring shame and self disgust to anyone with a human heart.

Watch; Norman Finkelstein on the “ceasefire agreement” between Israel and Gaza Community Church of Boston, 18 January 2025

“I suspect nobody among your viewers and listeners will know that on January 17th, that is today, January 17th 2009, operation cast lead ended. That was the Israeli assault on Gaza. At the time it seemed like a very large assault, it lasted from December 26th till January 17th when Amnesty International called it 22 days of death and destruction. And do you know why it ended? It’s an interesting story of great relevance with the recent developments in Gaza.

It ended because President Obama was going to be inaugurated president and he didn’t want this show in Gaza to distract attention from his coronation, and so he told Israel to end the attack, and it did very obediently, it did as the master ordered. As you will recall, about a month ago president Trump announced that if the hostages were not released at the time of his inauguration there would be all hell to pay.

Now president Trump, he didn’t want to begin his presidency by having to unleash a savage assault on Gaza, first of all because the people of Gaza had already paid hell in the past 15 months, so there wasn’t much more that he could do, and secondly because he didn’t want to begin his presidency on such a merciless, heartless note, and so he read the riot act or his emissary read the riot act to Netanyahu to sign the agreement which apparently doesn’t differ in any significant way from the agreement that was agreed to in May of this past year.

The lesson to be learned from this is when an American president says stop, it stops. All this talk about Americans having no power, that Netanyahu doesn’t listen and so on, it’s just nonsense. Now having said that, as you know, there are two components to the ceasefire. One is the mutual hostage exchange, the thousands of hostages that are being held by Israel versus the hundred or less hostages currently being held by Hamas. There is the hostage exchange but there is also a second aspect, that is the promise of admitting humanitarian aid on a high level, they say 600 trucks per day, allowing for the reconstruction of Gaza and all the rest.

For those who don’t know the history, lifting the blockade of Gaza allowing for the reconstruction of Gaza was promised after operation cast lead, it was promised after Israel assaulted the humanitarian flotilla the Mavi Marmara, it was promised after operation pillar of defence in 2012, it was promised after operation protective edge in 2014 and nothing came of it. At the time of operation pillar of defence, the defence minister was Ehud Barak and he said they were signing an agreement to end the operation, these high-tech killing sprees. They were signing an agreement and it included a ceasefire plus the lifting or the easing of the blockade, and at the time Barak told the other Israeli officials who were debating whether to sign the ceasefire plus the end of the blockade, or the easing of the blockade, he said, quote ‘a day after the ceasefire no one will remember what is written in that agreement.’ I think that’s absolutely correct. I think after the ceasefire and the mutual exchange of hostages between Israel and Hamas, all the promises about admitting humanitarian aid and allowing for the reconstruction in Gaza, all of that will vanish like snow in the spring sunshine, it won’t happen.”


Though an old interview that I have featured before, it is important to remember how zionists collaborated with the Nazis; ‘And that’s how they (zionists) saw them (Jews in the concentration camps). They were just the Jewish casualties in the battle to get a Jewish state. So if you accept their logic, and the logic of zionism, a Jewish state was everything, that was the main and sole goal. And of course there will be casualties along the way.’

Watch; How Zionists collaborated with the Nazis, in conversation with Tony Greenstein, The Electronic Intifada, 22 November 2022

Asa Winstanley; “I was reading the final few chapters of your book today, Tony, and in the conclusions you write quote, the zionist movement consciously ignored the holocaust while it was occurring, even to the point of denying or questioning whether it was happening throughout the war achieving Jewish statehood was the overriding priority. Now this is a really significant conclusion that you’ve reached.

It’s a really big claim which some of our listeners may find quite shocking. Could you lay out some of their. I mean obviously you don’t have time to go through the entire book but could you lay out some of the evidence that you put forward for this in your book?”

Tony Greenstein; “Well, after the allied declaration on 23 November, the jewish agency which had been in possession of information about the holocaust three months, that is from August, this is the most intense period of the holocaust. Probably one and a half million Jews died in those three months alone in 1942 they simply sat on the news of it. I mean Stephen Weiss, who was the leader of American jewry, boasted openly that I have been keeping it under wraps and not publicising it. It was at the request of the State Department. Regardless of factors, they simply kept quiet about it until they were forced to do that because the third load of exchange prisoners, prisoners who’d been exchanged with Nazi Germany, Jews arrived in Palestine. They described what was happening. They could no longer keep quiet about it so they issued a statement on 23 November 1942. The Allies followed suit very quickly afterwards on 17 December 1942 saying that yes, it wasn’t just random killings, it wasn’t large scale pogroms, it was a systematic extermination of the Jewish people of Europe and that was significant.

But yet even after that the zionists then simply reprinted Nazi propaganda in Osterland. A Nazi paper saying there were 55 ghettos still in Poland but 2 million Jews were still alive out of the 3.3 million. And this was, well, it was just a total lie. I mean there’s barely any Jews left by the end of 1942 Poland had been combed thoroughly. There were I think two or three ghettos, the Warsaw Ghetto, but most of its inhabitants had already been transported to Treblinka, which was the second largest city, second largest ghetto in Europe and there were one or two fragments dotted around but at least two and a half million, I would say of Poland’s jewry had been exterminated by then. So the zionists simply swallowed hook line and sinker who claimed that there were 55 or 53, the number varies, Jewish ghettos left in Poland. It was simply not true. Yet they repeated it.

And throughout they dismissed it. They continued to cast doubt, the newspapers, so a newspaper would print reports, they would have an editorial, saying these figures can’t be trusted, they may well be an exaggeration, we shouldn’t overemphasise and so on. But they also said, honest people like Nathan Schwalb, who was the Hechalutz representative in Geneva, who were quite open, he said, well, the allies have their casualties in the war and we have ours.

And that’s how they saw them. They were just the Jewish casualties in the battle to get a Jewish state. So if you accept their logic and the logic of zionism is that a Jewish state was everything that was the main and sole goal. And of course there will be casualties along the way.

You have to see zionism as a racial project to perpetuate the Jewish people. You can’t understand it any other way. It wasn’t to create a refuge for Jews or anything else. It was a perpetuation of the Jewish nation race. And that’s why today, I’ve given examples in my book, assimilation is compared to the holocaust. Why? Because if you assimilate, if you marry out, to a non-jew and disappear, that’s the same as disappearing in the gas chamber. That’s the logic. And in fact Lehava has the slogan assimilation is a Jewish holocaust or intermarriage as a Jewish holocaust. So they are quite open about it.”


Watch; Genocide in Gaza: Western Moral Collapse in the Age of Hyper-Imperialism; Vijay Prashad; Palestine Deep Dive, 11 November 2024

“NATO countries plus a few allies like Japan and South Korea, if you include that, it’s 74.3% of global military spending. People think, oh my God, China is becoming a major threat to the world. China’s military spending is 10% of the global total, Russia, 4%. It’s this NATO plus country with the United States as the major spender on military arsenal. This is the real threat to the world. And Israel is a part of this block.

The fact is, the United States and Israel are one country when it comes to the Palestinians, they operate hand in glove. If you start thinking that they are not hand in glove, you will get confused.

When Joe Biden would say, well, we’re trying to tell them to have a ceasefire, but meanwhile, he’s shipping 2,000 pound bombs. What he’s saying is merely to confuse the world. In fact, they weren’t trying to get Israel to have a ceasefire. There’s no evidence of that.

Blinken will travel to Tel Aviv 10 times during the conflict. But okay, when the Ansar Allah government in Yemen said that, ‘look, we cannot any longer tolerate weapons going through the Red Sea and going to help Israel kill more Palestinians, we’re going to stop that’, the United States government didn’t bother with any diplomacy. They didn’t send Blinken to Sana’a to go and talk to the Ansar Allah leadership, there was no diplomatic overture. They just threatened the Yemenis and then they bombed them. So look, in that sense, the United States was bombing Yemen on behalf of Israel. Where is the space between these countries?

So we generally think of this global north as a pact, as a bloc. Germany, with the United States, supplied almost 100% of Israel’s weapons, United States about 80%, Germany close to 20%. These are hand in glove. Britain provided a small percent but still very sophisticated equipment to the Israelis. They are hand in glove. I don’t imagine that it’s useful to continue the debate and discussion whether there’s any difference between Berlin, London, Washington and Tel Aviv. I think they are part of a bloc which we call the global north and they treat those who are on the other side of the international division of humanity without any care for their life, for decency.”


Privatising Syria: US Plans Post-Assad Selloff Kit Klarenberg, 23 December 2024

‘Following the abrupt fall of Bashar as-Assad’s government in Syria, much remains uncertain about the country’s future – including whether it can survive as a unitary state, or will splinter into smaller chunks in the manner of Yugoslavia in the 1990s. For the time being at least though, members of ultra-extremist Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) appear highly likely to take key positions in whatever administrative structure sprouts from Bashar al-Assad’s ouster, after a decade-and-a-half of grinding Western-sponsored regime change efforts.

As Reuters reported December 12th, HTS is already “stamping its authority on Syria’s state with the same lightning speed that it seized the country, deploying police, installing an interim government and meeting foreign envoys.” Meanwhile, its bureaucrats – “who until last week were running an Islamist administration in a remote corner of Syria’s northwest” – have moved en masse “into government headquarters in Damascus.” Mohammed Bashir, head of HTS’ “regional government” in extremist-occupied Idlib, has been appointed the country’s “caretaker prime minister”.

However, despite the chaos and precariousness of post-Assad Syria, one thing seems assured – the country will be broken open to Western economic exploitation, at long last. This is clear from multiple mainstream reports, which state HTS has informed local and international business leaders it will “adopt a free-market model and integrate the country into the global economy, in a major shift from decades of corrupt state control” when in office.

As Alexander McKay of the Marx Engels Lenin Institute tells Global Delinquents, state-controlled parts of Syria’s economy may have been under Assad, but corrupt they weren’t. He believes a striking feature of the ongoing attacks on Syrian infrastructure from forces within and without the country, is economic and industrial sites are a recurrent target. Moreover, the would-be HTS-dominated government has done nothing to counter these broadsides, when “securing key economic assets is vital to societal reconstruction, and should therefore be a matter of priority”:


From Tehran Professor Marandi has a clear view of neighbouring Syria, and the dark Israeli/US intrigues that led to its collapse into chaos, while America, as usual, hoovers up the oil, the crops and the minerals, while Syrian people go hungry.

Watch; Mohammad Marandi discussed the latest news in Syria 25 January 2025

“When the attack came and the Syrian armed forces were collapsing, basically because of well over a decade of sanctions and occupation, Americans were stealing all the oil, and they continued to steal all the oil and the wheat and the grain from the farmlands in eastern Syria, where most of Syria’s agricultural products are come from. All of these are being stolen by the Americans. Crushing sanctions, dirty war, all of these made the economy much weaker. Syria last year in 2024, the size of the economy was 15% of the size of the economy in 2010. So 15% of the economy, it just collapsed.

And so soldiers were impoverished, everyone was impoverished. And that is why it fell, because the country was broken, there were very few people to help the people of Syria.The Saudis and the Emiratis didn’t do anything, they didn’t help rebuild the country. And so what happened was that the Syrian government lost the ability just to defend itself, weakened. However, when Syria was collapsing, Iran was prepared to support Syria, but it was very difficult because Iran had to mobilise forces and send them all the way to Syria. And the collapse was very rapid. And there are other complications as well. Iran didn’t want to see Syria collapse. Iran does not want to see people slaughtered by Al Qaeda and Isis.

But let me put it this way. The fall of Syria was a tactical victory for Netanyahu and the Netanyahu-Erdogan alliance, because they are allies. We have to remember that over the past 15, 16 months, Erdogan has been sending oil to fuel the genocide in Gaza. The oil comes from Baku and it’s cheap oil, and some Syrian oil also goes through Turkey to Haifa, the port in occupied Palestine. So they’ve always had an alliance. Despite the rhetoric coming from Ankara. Erdogan has done a great deal to help the Israeli regime carry out the genocide. And it’s clear that what happened in Syria was in full coordination. There was full coordination between Biden, Netanyahu and Erdogan. Each of them got a piece of the cake. Although I don’t think that it’s going to go well for any of them.

So it was a tactical defeat, but I think in the long run it is actually a defeat for those who set out to destroy Syria and occupy the country, meaning Erdogan, Netanyahu and the United States. Because Syria is broken and now they own it and they are the ones who are going to have to pay and the country cannot be fixed with a few billion dollars. Also Al Qaeda and its allies are not going to be able to get the support of the people of Syria.

We already see that there’s heavy fighting in the East with the US-backed Kurdish forces. We see that in the South, the Druze, they are not prepared to allow this Al Qaeda or Jolani government to expand their influence in territories that they control. And in the rest of the country there is chaos. And to be very blunt, Iran has been vindicated because we are seeing every day new footage of atrocities being carried out by these terror groups.

And during the previous decade, Iran was constantly attacked for allegedly supporting a dictator. Now, the Iranians were never fans of the Syrian government. After all, it was ruled by the Ba’athist party and another faction of the Ba’athist party invaded Iran in the 1980s. Of course the two factions are always at odds with each other, but in any case, it’s not exactly a party that Iran loves. But Iran always said that whatever, whatever the Ba’athist government is, whatever President Assad’s government is, it is better than Al Qaeda and Isis. And I think much of the world agrees with that. Only in the West has it otherwise. And Arab regimes that were supporting the dirty war through Al Jazeera and other networks, they were propagating Al Qaeda.

So Iran has been vindicated. Every day that goes by, Iran is increasingly vindicated. And those pretenders who said that they supported Palestine or the people of Syria, I think they’ve been exposed. So in the long term, what’s happening in Syria is not going to go well for those who are now occupying it.

My opinion, and I think it the culture of this extremist organisation can expand into Turkey itself. It can expand into countries in the region which are all in the American camp. Jordan feels threatened, Egypt feels threatened, Saudi Arabia feels threatened. And this is not necessarily good news for the United States.

So I don’t think Jolani’s rule is going to last very long. I don’t know when it will come to an end. But I think that Mr. Erdogan, from what I’m hearing from friends who are in his party and others in Turkey, he is already regretting or the people around him are already regretting what’s happened. In fact, the expectation was not to take Syria. When Al Qaeda attacked, they were hoping to reach West Aleppo so that Mr. Erdogan could have a stronger hand at the negotiating table with the Syrians and to put pressure on the Syrians to actually negotiate. But everything fell apart which was unexpected for all of us. And so now they have to pay for the whole country and the country is in ruins.

Iran definitely will not have a good relationship with HTS. HTS is a terror organisation. It is Al Qaeda. When HTS separated from Al Qaeda, it did so with the consent of Al Qaeda because it was just a PR move. So there’s no ideological separation, there’s no ideological difference between ISIS, Al Qaeda and HTS. We have to remember that Jolani was the deputy of ISIS when it was the Islamic State of Iraq. He was the deputy of Abu Bak Baghdadi. He murdered thousands of people in Iraq in car bombs. So this is not a sane person, this is not a normal human being that Iran can have some sort of meaningful relationship with. We’re living in pretty uncertain times right now, mainly because of how fast the world is changing.

Iran wants to see Syria strong and stable, but now the burden is not on Iran’s shoulders. And the money that Iran spent to prop up Syria is no longer being spent there. So Iran doesn’t have to send Syria free food or free gasoline or free oil or free medicine. That was a burden for Iran. And now the burden is on Mr. Erdogan and on Qatar and whoever else is in charge of the country, because obviously Jolani isn’t in charge. So they are the ones who are going to have to cough up this money. And the situation today is much worse than what it was back then. So back then it was the Iranians, the Russians, the Iraqis and the Algerians who were supporting, it’s not their burden anymore. And Mr. Erdogan and Qatar have to pay for this mess that they’ve created. And it’s going to be very costly.”


These former Biden administration officials are among more than a dozen  who resigned in protest over U.S. support for Israel’s genocide in Gaza. ‘They accuse the Biden administration of violating multiple U.S. laws and disregarding the commitment to uphold international humanitarian law, all while forcing U.S. taxpayers to finance a genocide.’

Watch; They Resigned over Gaza, Al Jazeera +, 28 January 2025

“The legacy of the Biden administration will always include its illegal support for the genocide in Gaza.

That support has not only violated international humanitarian law, it violated the US Government’s own laws.

We are among more than a dozen U.S. officials who publicly resigned our posts in protest, along with many others who left quietly.

We took an oath to defend and uphold the Constitution, but we were asked to violate that oath, and we’re here to demand accountability.

I’m Anel Sheline, a former official in the U.S. State Department, Alexander Smith, USAID, Maryam Hassanen, Department of the Interior, Riley Livermore, U.S. Air Force.

Our government’s complicity in the destruction of Gaza has tarnished our reputation around the world as public servants.

Many of us tried to speak out internally. We then watched as our leaders gave political cover and massive funding to Israel, all while refusing to enforce US laws.

One of these, the Leahy Law, prohibits the United States from providing funding to units of a foreign military or police force if there is credible information that the unit has committed a gross violation of human rights.

Investigations by journalists, lawyers and human rights groups have revealed numerous allegations of Israeli forces using torture, forced disappearances, field executions and rape against Palestinians since October of 2023.

Those specific types of abuses are all listed as criteria that the U.S. State Department uses when it considers invoking the Leahy Law.

The Biden administration did briefly consider sanctioning one Israeli military unit in 2024 for its actions in the west bank, but they ultimately backed down. The US still has never applied the Leahy Law to Israel.

The United States has also violated Section 620i of the Foreign Assistance Act, which bars security assistance to countries that block U.S. humanitarian aid.

According to the U.S. government’s own records, it knew that Israel was blocking humanitarian aid in Gaza since at least April of 2024.

That’s according to an assessment by the State Department as well as a separate report by USAID.

But my former boss, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, buried those reports for months.

White House Spokesman;We expect Israel to fully implement its commitments quickly. As Secretary Blinken has said, ultimately it is the results that matter and we will be judging them. On those results, I would agree with the overall assessment that we are not yet at the level we need to be. These are ongoing assessments and that what, that’s what makes the process a little difficult.

It is an ongoing assessment every day where every day there’s got to be.

Reporter; You guys yourself set this 30 day deadline. Today is the deadline. Did they meet? Did they meet it?

White House Spokesperson; We at this time have not made an assessment that their that the Israelis are in violation.

While our leaders in the US gave political coverage to Israel American taxpayers have footed the bill. The United States has reportedly funded 70% of Israel’s war on Gaza. The Biden administration also violated multiple statutes in international humanitarian law.

These include Articles 3 and 4 of the Genocide Convention, which prohibit aiding, abetting, or otherwise assisting in the commission of war crimes, crimes against humanity, or genocide.

And Common Article 1 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions requires that party states take proactive steps to prevent violations of the conventions.

The US has vetoed four UN resolutions that tried to pause or end fighting in Gaza, and it brazenly put pressure on the international court system to insulate Israel from accountability.

And so Biden’s legacy also includes the diminishing of international norms that were designed to protect human rights.

We all chose to resign because we respect the law and we want to hold our government to the same standard.”


Israel has broken so many promises in the past that they cannot be trusted in the future.

Read; The Ceasefire Charade, Chris Hedges Report, 16 January 2025

‘Israel plays a cynical game. It makes phased agreements with the Palestinians that ensure it immediately gets what it wants. It then violates every subsequent phase and reignites its military assault.’

‘Israel, going back decades, has played a duplicitous game. It signs a deal with the Palestinians that is to be implemented in phases. The first phase gives Israel what it wants — in this case the release of the Israeli hostages in Gaza — but Israel habitually fails to implement subsequent phases that would lead to a just and equitable peace. It eventually provokes the Palestinians with indiscriminate armed assaults to retaliate, defines a Palestinian response as a provocation and abrogates the ceasefire deal to reignite the slaughter.

If this latest three-phase ceasefire deal is ratified — and there is no certainty that it will be by Israel — it will, I expect, be little more than a presidential inauguration bombing pause. Israel has no intention of halting its merry-go-round of death.

The Israeli cabinet has delayed a vote on the ceasefire proposal while it continues to pound Gaza. At least 81 Palestinians have been killed in the last 24 hours.

The morning after a ceasefire agreement was announced, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Hamas of reneging on part of the deal “in an effort to extort last minute concessions.” He warned that his cabinet will not meet “until the mediators notify Israel that Hamas has accepted all elements of the agreement.”

Hamas dismissed Netanyahu’s claims and repeated their commitment to the ceasefire as agreed with the mediators.

The deal includes three phases. The first phase, lasting 42 days, will see a cessation of hostilities. Hamas will release some Israeli hostages – 33 Israelis who were captured on Oct. 7, 2023, including all of the remaining five women, those aged above 50, and those with illnesses – in exchange for up to 1,000 Palestinians imprisoned by Israel.

The Israeli army will pull back from the populated areas of the Gaza Strip on the first day of the ceasefire. On the 7th day, displaced Palestinians will be permitted to return to northern Gaza. Israel will allow 600 aid trucks with food and medical supplies to enter Gaza daily.

The second phase, which begins on the 16th day of the ceasefire, will see the release of the remaining Israeli hostages. Israel will complete its withdrawal from Gaza during the second phase, maintaining a presence in some parts of the Philadelphi corridor, which stretches along the eight-mile border between Gaza and Egypt. It will surrender its control of the Rafah border crossing into Egypt.

The third phase will see negotiations for a permanent end of the war.

But it is Netanyahu’s office that appears to have already reneged on the agreement. It released a statement rejecting Israeli troop withdrawal from the Philadelphi Corridor during the first 42-day phase of the ceasefire. “In practical terms, Israel will remain in the Philadelphi Corridor until further notice,” while claiming the Palestinians are attempting to violate the agreement. Palestinians throughout the numerous ceasefire negotiations have demanded Israeli troops withdraw from Gaza. Egypt has condemned the seizure of its border crossings by Israel.

The deep fissures between Israel and Hamas, even if the Israelis finally accept the agreement, threaten to implode it. Hamas is seeking a permanent ceasefire. But Israeli policy is unequivocal about its “right” to re-engage militarily. There is no consensus about who will govern Gaza. Israel has made it clear the continuance of Hamas in power is unacceptable. There is no mention of the status of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), the U.N. agency that Israel has outlawed and that provides the bulk of the humanitarian aid given to the Palestinians, 95 percent of whom have been displaced. There is no agreement on the reconstruction of Gaza, which lies in rubble. And, of course, there is no route in the agreement to an independent and sovereign Palestinian state.

Israeli mendacity and manipulation is pitifully predictable.

The Camp David Accords, signed in 1979 by Egyptian president Anwar Sadat and Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, without the participation of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), normalized diplomatic relations between Israel and Egypt. But the subsequent phases, which included a promise by Israel to resolve the Palestinian question along with Jordan and Egypt, permit Palestinian self-governance in the West Bank and Gaza within five years, and end the building of Israeli colonies in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, were never honored.

Or take the 1993 Oslo Accords. The agreement, signed in 1993, which saw the PLO recognize Israel’s right to exist and Israel recognise the PLO as the legitimate representatives of the Palestinian people, and Oslo II, signed in 1995, which detailed the process towards peace and a Palestinian state, was stillborn. It stipulated that any discussion of illegal Jewish “settlements” was to be delayed until “final’ status talks, by which time Israeli military withdrawals from the occupied West Bank were to have been completed. Governing authority was to be transferred from Israel to the supposedly temporary Palestinian Authority. The West Bank was carved up into Areas A, B and C. The Palestinian Authority has limited authority in Areas A and B. Israel controls all of Area C, over 60 percent of the West Bank.

The right of Palestinian refugees to return to the historic lands seized from them in 1948 when Israel was created — a right enshrined in international law — was given up by the PLO leader Yasser Arafat, instantly alienating many Palestinians, especially those in Gaza where 75 percent are refugees or the descendants of refugees. Edward Said called the Oslo agreement “an instrument of Palestinian surrender, a Palestinian Versailles” and lambasted Arafat as “the Pétain of the Palestinians.”

The scheduled Israeli military withdrawals under Oslo never took place. There was no provision in the interim agreement to end Jewish colonization, only a prohibition of “unilateral steps.” There were around 250,000 Jewish colonists in the West Bank at the time of the Oslo agreement. They have increased to at least 700,000. No final treaty was ever concluded.

The journalist Robert Fisk called Oslo “a sham, a lie, a trick to entangle Arafat and the PLO into abandonment of all that they had sought and struggled for over a quarter of a century, a method of creating false hope in order to emasculate the aspiration of statehood.”

Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, who signed the Oslo agreement, was assassinated on Nov. 4, 1995 following a rally in support of the agreement, by Yigal Amir, a far-right Jewish law student. Itamar Ben-Gvir, now Israel’s National Security Minister, was one of many rightwing politicians who issued threats against Rabin. Rabin’s widow, Leah, blamed Netanyahu and his supporters — who distributed leaflets at political rallies depicting Rabin in a Nazi uniform — for her husband’s murder.

Israel has carried out a series of murderous assaults on Gaza ever since, cynically calling the bombardment “mowing the lawn.” These attacks, which leave scores of dead and wounded and further degrade Gaza’s fragile infrastructure, have names such as Operation Rainbow (2004), Operation Days of Penitence (2004), Operation Summer Rains (2006), Operation Autumn Clouds (2006) and Operation Hot Winter (2008).

Israel violated the June 2008 ceasefire agreement with Hamas, brokered by Egypt, by launching a border raid that killed six Hamas members. The raid provoked, as Israel intended, a retaliatory strike by Hamas, which fired crude rockets and mortar shells into Israel. The Hamas barrage provided the pretext for a massive Israeli attack. Israel, as it always does, justified its military strike on the right to defend itself.

Operation Cast Lead (2008-2009), which saw Israel carry out a ground and aerial assault over 22 days, with the Israeli air force dropping over 1,000 tons of explosives on Gaza, killed 1,385 — according to the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem — of whom at least 762 were civilians, including 300 children. Four Israelis were killed over the same period by Hamas rockets and nine Israeli soldiers died in Gaza, four of whom were victims of “friendly fire.” The Israeli newspaper Haaretz would later report that “Operation Cast Lead” had been prepared over the previous six months.

Israeli historian Avi Shlaim, who served in the Israeli military, wrote that,

‘The brutality of Israel’s soldiers is fully matched by the mendacity of its spokesman…their propaganda is a pack of lies…It was not Hamas but the IDF that broke the ceasefire. It did so by a raid into Gaza on 4 November that killed six Hamas men. Israel’s objective is not just the defense of its population, but the eventual overthrow of the Hamas government in Gaza by turning the people against their rulers.’

These series of attacks on Gaza were followed by Israeli assaults in November 2012, known as Operation Pillar of Defense and in July and August 2014 in Operation Protective Edge, a seven week campaign that left 2,251 Palestinians dead, along with 73 Israelis, including 67 soldiers.

These assaults by the Israeli military were followed in 2018 by largely peaceful protests by Palestinians, known as The Great March of Return, along Gaza’s fenced-in barrier. Over 266 Palestinians were gunned down by Israeli soldiers and 30,000 more were injured. In May 2021, Israel killed over 256 Palestinians in Gaza following attacks by Israeli police on Palestinian worshippers at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound in Jerusalem. Further attacks on worshippers at Al-Aqsa mosque took place in April 2023.

And then the breaching of the security barriers on Oct. 7, 2023 that enclose Gaza, where Palestinians had languished under a blockade for over 16 years in an open air prison. The attacks by Palestinian gunmen left some 1,200 Israeli dead — including hundreds killed by Israel itself — and gave Israel the excuse it had long sought to lay waste to Gaza, in its Swords of Iron War.

This horrific saga is not over. Israel’s goals remain unchanged – the erasure of Palestinians from their land. This proposed ceasefire is one more cynical chapter. There are many ways it can and, I suspect, will fall apart.

But let us pray, at least for the moment, that the mass slaughter will stop.


Ilan Pappé is an Israeli historian, political scientist, and former politician. He is a professor with the College of Social Sciences and International Studies at the University of Exeter.

Watch; Lobbying for zionism across the Atlantic Ilan Pappé, Instagram, 21 December 2024

“I have a new book coming out which is called Lobbying for Zionism Across the Atlantic, and I show how from 1900, both in America and in Britain, to target politicians wherever they are, at the beginning of their career, you commit them to zionism and later to Israel.

And at first of all, they were not powerful enough to influence enough people, but the more they grew in numbers, they were able to influence more. So when people say, why does Biden so automatically support Israel? The lobby doesn’t need to ring Biden and say to him, you better support Israel.

He knows the rules. He knows what happened to anyone who even dared to slightly like Obama or Carter, slightly challenge what happened to them. You read Obama’s memoirs, you can see how he said, ‘I suddenly understood any word I’m saying in Israel can bring down Congress. So I had to be very, very careful.’

And actually, what he admits, ‘I could not be loyal to my basic instinct, which was to be pro Palestinians. I couldn’t because I wouldn’t be a president.”


Spot on rant by ex-US Marine Ken O’Keefe

Watch; Right of Self-Defence? Ken O’Keefe debunks Western narrative, 10 January 2025

“He (Israel) has ignored the fact that the Palestinians have been treated as subhumans for many decades now. He has ignored the fact that basically he is giving the same rights of self defence to the aggressor. The aggressor, when he invades and steals a nation, does not have the right of self defence. Those that are being violated, those whose land is being stolen, those whose families are being murdered, they have the right of self defence.

It is not self defence when you have the fourth largest military in the world with high tech weaponry of the highest order, when you have a military that has total air superiority. There is no air defences, there is no air force, there is no navy, there is no army to speak of, that is not self defence. And how many rockets have killed people in Israel? It’s hardly more than a handful. And ultimately this is the only thing they have to fight back with. If they did have weapons to fight back with, I can tell you the cowardly Israeli nation would never stand a chance in the face of an equally armed Palestinian resistance, because they would destroy Israel in a heartbeat if there was a fair fight. But there is no fair fight.

It’s like shooting fish in a barrel, basically. And you talk about entire families that have been wiped out. It is a disgusting, criminal state, Israel. It is involved in organ trafficking, blood diamonds, sex slavery, weapons trading, passing on nuclear secrets, you name it. It is the ultimate criminal state and it is treating the Palestinians for many decades now as less than dogs. These are the facts, and nothing will change these facts, no matter how many prostitutes get on the television and spout their talking points handed directly to them from the UK, US governments and other mainstream media, which are nothing more than warmongers pretending to be truth tellers.”


Join us on *SATURDAY 1 FEBRUARY* to call out Bristol University to divest from Israel ⏰ *GATHER 12.30PM* ???? *SENATE HOUSE, TYNDALL AVE* to set off at 1pm to march through the city into Broadmead & rally at the podium outside Barclays bank✊????????????


Please donate

Forgive me for pointing out that, while we receive some one-off donations, I am funding Farms Not Factories myself, and if we are to continue to fight the cruel, antibiotic-led factory farm system, we will need some regular donations from like-minded people. Please consider a monthly subscription of £2/month and help us support a network of smaller scale, humane and healthy UK pig farms, local abattoirs and butchers.

“Our message is simple, we want to help bring an end to this dangerous, inhumane system. Vote for real farming over factory farming.”
– Tracy Worcester, Director

Share This Article

Related ArticlesView All

December 20th, 2024
Orchestrated Extermination of Independent Farmers

The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More

November 29th, 2024
I Farm, You Eat

The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More

November 1st, 2024
Home Grown Food Is Bad For The Climate!

The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More

September 24th, 2024
Constant Lying

The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More

August 28th, 2024
Farmers Not Robots

The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More

July 30th, 2024
Resist Big Brother

The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narrative that is censored in the mainstream media…. Read More