The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. If you would like to keep up to date with the very latest information, you can follow me on X, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram or Telegram.
“The way you get democracy to function is by informing the public.” – Robert Kennedy Jr.
“Science is more than a body of knowledge. It is a way of thinking; a way of sceptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask sceptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be sceptical of those in authority, then, we are up for grabs for the next charlatan (political or religious) who comes rambling along.” – Carl Sagan
“Never worry about who will be offended if you speak the Truth. Worry about who will be misled, deceived and destroyed, if you do not.” and
”Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by and that has made all the difference.” – Robert Frost
Though the newsletter chapters interrelate, they are divided into six sections and have a common realisation that a cabal of corporate elites have captured global trade, global governance, mainstream and online media, and ultimately many of our minds.
As a stenographer, I link to an article or audio and paste a key section. My most trusted websites are platforms for journalists who don’t compromise on the truth and have thereby many have been shunned by the mainstream media. These include; SUSTAIN, The Sustainable Food Trust, Soil Association, Farm Gate, The Organic Grower Podcast, Global Research News, Consortium News, Children’s Health Defence, Geopolitical Economy Report, The Grayzone, Unlimited Hangout, 21st Century Wire, UK Column; The Duran, Robert F Kennedy podcast, The Jimmy Dore Show, Palestine Declassified, Alex Krainer, Mattias Desmet, Dr John Campbell, The Cradle, Quds News Network, The Grayzone News, The Electronic Intifada, Jonathan Cook, Richard Medhurst, Russell Brand, Judging Freedom, Craig Murray, Syriana Analysis, The Exposé, The Intercept, Declassified UK, The Light printed newspaper, and via Telegram, For The People, Assange News, Resistance News Network, Juan Sinmiedo, Resistance News Network, B’Tselem, Pepe Escobar.
Wise Farmers: Ben Andrews
After university, Ben Andrews moved to seek his fortune in London but soon realised it wasn’t for him. Shocked to find many people had no idea where their food came from, he returned to his family’s 450-acre organic, mixed farm in North Herefordshire, where he supplies fresh produce to nationwide distributor Abel&Cole – from salad crops and cereals to sunflowers and beans.
‘…if you look at local veg and fruit boxes or visit local markets, the veg is cheaper than supermarkets and much fresher without transport to distant supermarkets.’
He’s also a passionate voice in the farming industry, speaking at events like Groundswell, Landworkers Alliance and Riverford’s ‘Farmers Against Farmwashing’ campaign: www.stopfarmwashing.co.uk
Watch the full video and read the blog to learn more about how Ben’s farming practices are helping to increase biodiversity while producing organic food following true land sharing principles – food grown in symbiosis with nature.
Food & Farming/Inheritance Tax/CO2 tunnel vision
This past Saturday, I attended the Food In Our Hands march of 300 small scale farmers and their supporters that was organised by the The Landworkers’ Alliance. The passion and clarity of the speeches were nothing short of inspiring hitting at the root causes of our food system’s failings.
Jyoti Fernandes, the Campaigns Coordinator of the Landworkers’ Alliance, brilliantly articulated how “The market does not deliver. The market does not serve. The market has failed.” She went on to remind us that the government has a moral duty to ensure the right policies are in place to protect our farmers and food workers. Jyoti also spoke about anti-patriarchal, anti-capitalist solutions, calling for a food system that is not driven by market forces but by the needs of society and the environment.
The message was loud and clear: we need to resist the corporate takeover of our food system. It’s not about efficiency, progress, or growth—it’s about reconnecting farmers with citizens and creating a food system that supports people today and for generations to come.
Richard Choksery, a horticulturist and Community Engagement Manager, spoke with similar conviction, warning that the Labour government has no mandate for equitable access to land and food. He called out the “twisted ethics” of a government that prioritises profit over people, over the environment, and over the future of farming. His words struck a chord: “The industrial ethic values land solely for profit, regardless of the cost,” but it’s destroying everything that’s vital—our land, our communities, and our way of life. He ended; “I challenge this government to let us show them what the true health promoting abundant growth looks like. And if they don’t, perhaps it’s time to raise the digger’s standard and occupy the land.”
As I watched the march, it became increasingly clear to me: Globalisation, economies of scale, and a profit-driven food system are literally killing our farmers. If we don’t support small-scale, chemical-free, and independent farms, we will soon be left with nothing but lab-grown meat, GM crops, and processed, 3D printed junk food. The fight for a resilient, sustainable food system has never been more urgent.
We must stand with farmers and land workers by buying direct from their local food hubs like farmers markets, farm shops, box schemes as found on line through Big Barn and Open Food Network.
Read; Our new report ‘Share The Land’; Landworkers Alliance, 8 April 2025
‘Our new report ‘Share The Land’ models a vision for land use in the UK which is grounded in an agroecological land-sharing approach to farming and food production, exploring the trade-offs that arise between more localised production, dietary change and meeting climate and biodiversity targets.
The UK needs land to be able to grow food, but it also needs to consider land for nature and climate. Some argue that to address these two needs we should adopt a ‘land-sparing’ approach to land use. This approach would leave more areas untouched for wildlife and re-wilding by concentrating food production into a smaller area, propped up by more intensive farming methods. But this approach is incompatible with the values of agroecology. A land-sparing approach would require greater use of chemical pesticides and fertilisers, more intensive and lower-welfare livestock farms and economies of scale which would mean fewer people would be employed in farming.
Instead, we are proposing a ‘land-sharing’ approach, which adopts agroecological farming methods, such as mixed farming systems, agroforestry and recycling nutrients, to produce food in a way which cools the planet, regenerates natural systems and promotes biodiversity. Without making any other changes to our food system, adopting a land-sharing agroecological approach to farming would mean that land use goes up, as agroecological yields are lower per hectare, and this is something that we explore in Scenarios 1 and 2 of our report.
Localising food systems is one of the key principles of food sovereignty. This is why our model has sought to intentionally reduce the amount of food the UK imports, and instead prioritise local food systems. Scenario 3 of our model shows how much land would be needed if we were to produce the vast majority of our food here in the UK using agroecological methods. This would mean reducing the amount of domestic-type foods that we import from overseas, but still importing goods that cannot be grown in the UK, such as rice, coffee and tropical fruit, putting an end to the export of animal products such as milk, lamb, beef, pork, eggs, and poultry meat and instead distribute them through regional food webs in the UK.
This shift away from global supply chains towards agroecological local food webs would enable the UK to have a more secure and reliable food supply, but it will require a significant upscaling of the local food sector in the UK. Our recently published “Local Food Growth Plan” report lays out a clear action plan for upscaling the local food sector in the UK; through better investment in local food infrastructure, cross sector collaboration, and ambitious public procurement policies.
Many young people can only dream of following this family’s bid for freedom from Global Reset tyranny by setting up an off-grid community on 13 ½ acres of land
Watch By 2030 you’ll own nothing and they’ll call it freedom wildmindscommunity, 7 April 2025
“You’ve heard the slogans Build Back Better, The Great Reset, Net Zero by 2030. But here’s what they’re really planning, 15- minute smart cities designed to restrict your movement under the guise of sustainability, digital IDs tracking every move you make from what you buy to where you go, Central Bank Digital currencies designed to monitor, control, and even freeze your finances if you step out of line, and carbon lockdowns using climate emergencies to limit and control your travel and consumption. And all of it’s designed to make you dependent. All of it’s designed to make you compliant. When I realised what was happening, I made a choice. In 2022, I sold my home, my business and almost everything I owned to break away from that system. Along the way a partnership was formed and together we secured 13 1/2 acres of land and built an off grid community farm from scratch. It wasn’t easy, but now we’ve built something real, something outside of their control, land, food, water, energy, all independent from their system. And if we can do it, so can you. So if you’re ready to break free from their agenda, comment yes and I’ll send you the step by step path to get land and build a life of FREEDOM.”
Support your local food hub to hold on to our precious farmers
Read Can Local Food Hubs Fix Our Broken Food System? Wicked Leeks, 27 March 2025
‘What’s not to love about local food hubs? This is where consumers support growers via short supply chains, reducing waste, food miles, and carbon emissions. And when you buy from your local producers, the food system becomes more resilient, since neighbourly sourcing enriches the communities it serves in a positive feedback loop, rather than the pockets of distant shareholders.
Shop at Tamar Valley Food Hubs for example and producers receive 85p in the pound. And for every pound spent, a further £3.70 is generated in social, economic and environmental value. Such hubs are an antidote to our neoliberal, supermarket-dependent oligopoly, which is propped up by globalised supply chains and where only 9% of the £130 billion generated a year reaches growers themselves.
However, while supermarket chains celebrate billions in profits for the last financial year, many local food hubs are only just making ends meet. This is despite the boost they got when the global pandemic hit and consumers realised the importance of local food resilience. The cost of living crisis and our reliance on cheap food – which is some of the cheapest in the developed world – is still a challenge for local food hubs.
“We’re more expensive than supermarkets. There’s no way we can avoid that though we try and hit a range of price points to attract consumers. People don’t often do their full shop with the food hub, but purchase items from us that they really value,” explains Rachael Forster, Marketing Manager at Tamar Grow Local.
Many are run as not-for-profits or community interest companies, others promote organic or agro-ecological growing, some are focused on wholesale, while others have a retail component or supply to caterers, as well as offering up public sector procurement. The core aim of all of them is to make good quality, healthy food more accessible to local communities.
“A good number are run by creative people that are passionate about making local food economies work. These people desperately want to build local food systems,” states Nick Weir, Community Facilitator at the Open Food Network, which provides a digital platform for farmers and producers.’
The Welsh Government has the right idea about reconnecting farmers with consumers through local food chains.
Listen; Welsh community food strategy; Farming Today; 30 April 2025
Presenter; “The Welsh Government has launched what it calls a new Community Food Strategy, which it says will strengthen local food systems, improve healthy eating and create more sustainable communities. The idea is to enable more local food networks, connecting Welsh farmers and producers with consumers and supporting community-led food projects. It’s committed to spending £2,000,000 on the project this financial year, with funding secured until 2028. And the Government says it’ll increase public sector spending on Welsh food by at least 50% by 2031. One of the organisations that’s been working to support the development of local food systems is Foodsense Wales. Its head, Katie Palmer, told me how her group is involved.”
Katie Palmer; “We’ve been working together with a number of stakeholders for a number of years to advocate for this bottom up approach around developing local food systems that help support the local economy, that help build resilience in our local supply chains. But they’re also working with communities and harnessing our Welsh language and culture here and looking at ways that we can really inspire the people of Wales to want to eat good food and to produce good food.
Welsh Vegging Schools is an initiative to drive local and organic production of horticulture in Wales to supply Welsh veg into the public sector and particularly into schools, and it’s using that secure marketplace that we have. We’ve got a number of growers, for example, that are benefiting through the Welsh Vegging Schools initiative, we’re working with 15 this year and all of those growers are linked into the work that we’re doing with the Food Partnerships. And the funding that Food Partnerships is managing to access actually is benefiting local growers because they’re able to access some capital funds, for example, which has helped provide things like polytunnels or packing sheds or key pieces of infrastructure that we need in order to expand horticultural production in Wales.”
Read How diseased ‘Frankenchickens’ sold in your supermarket are making you ill Alexa Phillips, 5 April 2025
‘Sean Gifford, managing director of the Humane League, an animal welfare charity, said the figures pointed to “an absolute horror show of suffering and animal welfare problems” in chicken farming. He and other charities said many of these problems can be traced back to the use of Frankenchickens, which have been genetically selected to put on breast meat unnaturally quickly. About 90 per cent of chickens bought in UK supermarkets are Frankenchickens, according to the RSPCA. The average chicken now grows to slaughter weight in 35 days – four times faster than about 50 years ago. Due to their abnormal weight, these birds often struggle to get up and move, according to the RSPCA, The Humane League and Open Cages, another animal welfare charity. They are typically given less than an A4 sheet of paper’s worth of space in a shed that does not get cleaned during their lifetime. As a consequence, they end up living in their own urine and faeces, suffering from burns and infections due to the ammonia. Cramped conditions mean diseases spread quickly among the animals.
Since Frankenchickens suffer from poor health, they are “pumped full of antibiotics”, which is contributing to the growing human health problem of antibiotic resistance, Gifford said. Frankenchickens are five times more likely to be treated with antibiotics than other breeds, according to the Alliance to Save Our Antibiotics, a campaign group.”We should really only be giving antibiotics to human beings, but we’re regularly, prophylactically feeding them to farmed animals,” Gifford said. “Healthy animals that are slow-growing breeds and are allowed enough space to do what comes naturally to them are generally healthier and require far fewer antibiotics. It is a human health crisis time bomb.”
Cóilín Nunan, scientific adviser at the Alliance to Save Our Antibiotics, said the prevalence of fast-growing chicken breeds “leads to higher levels of antibiotic use” on farms, which “contributes to antibiotic resistance”. Farm antibiotic use accounts for about 30 per cent of British antibiotic use, according to Compassion in World Farming. “The more antibiotics are used – whether on humans or animals – the more the bacteria will tend to evolve to become resistant to the antibiotics”, Nunan said. Antibiotic resistant bacteria in chicken carcasses can pass on to consumers when they are handling the raw meat and if they do not cook it well enough, which can lead to an antibiotic resistant infection. “This can ultimately kill you”, Nunan said. Chickens’ manure containing this bacteria also gets spread on land and can then end up on vegetables and in drinking water, he added. These dangerous bacteria include E. coli, campylobacter, salmonella, MRSA and Clostridium difficile. Seventy percent of human campylobacter infections in the UK come from chickens, and are more likely to come from poultry subject to more stress, according to the Food Standards Agency and the RSPCA.’
The supermarkets are excessively upping the price of high quality, high welfare food, not least chickens, so increasingly consumers can only afford to buy their cheaper, low standard equivalent.
Read/Listen Do you care about chicken welfare? No you don’t Harry Wallop, 9 April 2025
Here’s a statistic that surprises me, considering a generation of consumers has now grown up with Jamie Oliver shedding tears over the plight of supermarket chickens (remember that?) and with vegans telling us – non stop – what miserable lives factory-farmed fowls face:
– Just 3 per cent of all the chickens that we eat in the UK are free range, another 1 per cent are organic.
This means that 96 per cent of all the chickens we buy from Tesco or Nando’s or KFC or even Waitrose are barn-reared birds, with no access to outdoor space. If you think you are buying a better bird by buying Red Tractor, a British farming assurance scheme, think again. A basic bird has a stocking density of 39kg m2. This means you can fit 18 adult birds into 1m2, the size of the floor of a red telephone box. A Red Tractor chicken has a stocking density of 38kg m2. This translates into 17 birds.
For comparison’s sake a free range bird, when in a barn (and they do spend a lot of time in barns, at night or when it rains or when they don’t want to go outside) has a stocking density of 27kg m2, or 12 birds in a telephone box. Organic, which comes with pretty high welfare standards, has a stocking density of 21kg m2, or 9 birds or so.
Why do so few consumers want to buy free range? Well, the most obvious answer is price. At Aldi a large chicken – which comes with a slightly vague promise of ‘Room to Thrive’, so better than basic – costs £2.59 a kilo. A free range bird from Aldi costs £5.49 a kilo. You are paying more than double for a free range bird. Want an organic one? Well, Aldi won’t sell you one, but Asda will and it costs £9 a kilo. That is a huge, huge premium for higher welfare meat.
There are two things, however, worth considering. The first is that consumers do happily pay a premium for higher welfare eggs. This is a curious conundrum. While free range makes up a mere 3 per cent of meat, 74 per cent of all the eggs we eat are free range. This figure has shot up amazingly quickly; it was 32 per cent 20 years ago, and in the 1980s it was as low as 1 per cent. Free range eggs are now the norm.
But, here, the welfare premium is not so stark. A box of six medium Big & Fresh barn eggs at Asda costs £1.50. A box of six medium free range eggs from Asda costs £1.65.
All those who care about animals, about local food and about healthy and humane farming were relieved when the council refused permission for an indoor factory farm that would have cruelly confined 14,000 pigs and 714,000 chickens in overcrowded, unhealthy and stressful conditions requiring them to be dosed with antibiotics to keep them alive. Thankfully the world is waking up to the horrors of factory farming and people are increasingly sourcing meat from farms where animals have access to outdoors and have plenty of space and fresh air.
Read; Cranswick plans rejected Farmers Guide, 4 April 2025
‘On the council’s decision, Labour MP for South West Norfolk, Terry Jermy, who spoke out against the proposals, as well as all similar ones in the UK, is quoted by BBC Norfolk Breakfast as saying: “Very pleased, obviously. I think it was crucial today that we put a line in the sand. If this had been approved we would have seen more applications like this not just in Norfolk but around the country. It gives us the opportunity to have a conversation about the sort of farming that we want.”
The solution to our broken food system and diet is not to go vegan but to eat less, but better quality meat and diary. I define quality as animals being outdoor raised with enough space to express their natural ways on small scale traditional farms.
Read We need to talk about industrial livestock production (ILP); Eating Better,
‘This work marks a significant milestone in Eating Better’s commitment to addressing industrial livestock production. Individually, some of our alliance members pursue projects and advocacy aimed at facilitating a shift from industrial farming methods to more sustainable, circular approaches. Together, as Eating Better, we can amplify these efforts, using the power of the alliance to call for change as one united voice. As a step in this journey, this work explores what industrial livestock production truly entails and what steps are needed to create a better food system. We define industrial livestock
production, connect the arguments against its existence into wider food systems thought, and explore the scaffolding and power dynamics which must be deconstructed in order for us to shift to producing and consuming ‘less and better’ meat and dairy as standard. There is a positive future for livestock in the UK, but only if it’s rooted in sustainable systems, not in industrial models.
Diets in the Global North are heavily reliant on meat and dairy, and in the UK we consume double the global average. This demand is both fueled and enabled by the expansion of industrial livestock production and the consolidation of power by global scale corporations. To shift away from industrial livestock production and make ‘better’ practises the norm, the food system must be transformed to make healthy and sustainable choices more accessible. The ‘less’ in ‘less and better’ meat and dairy must come from phasing out our reliance on industrial livestock systems. We must actively make space for investment and growth in plant-based diets and better livestock farming practices, to enable a shift away from the consumption of industrially produced meat and dairy. Industrial livestock production is an unjust system for people, animals and the planet Industrial livestock production concentrates power, which displaces UK farmers and restricts access for those pursuing agroecological practices. It deepens inequality, undermines food security and fuels climate change – which is the greatest threat to our global food supply. ILP drives environmental destruction, biodiversity loss, public health risks and widespread animal welfare violations. Its impacts are crosscutting in nature, and addressing them requires a systems-based view. In order to rebuild a fair and equitable livestock system, we must dismantle the scaffolding on which industrial production relies. There is a strong appetite for change within the farming community, and many farmers have already adopted ‘better’ practices. However, industrial livestock production has created numerous barriers to achieving this transition. To truly support farmers in making these changes, we must focus on dismantling the structural supports on which the current system relies. The government, corporations, retailers and other major players must be held responsible for their role in perpetuating these systems, and adopt transparent and sustainable practices that prioritise animal welfare, environmental health and social equity.’
The countless years many of us have put into ending factory farming has made zero difference to the lives of our beleaguered farm animals simply because consumers are not buying pork from higher welfare farms.
Read The Slaughterhouse Speed Trap and The Laws of The Jungle Elizabeth Kucinich, 8 April 2025
‘From when we campaigned in the US and Poland, nothing has changed in this brutal factory farming system. The work of the devil in humans is evident in the genocide in Gaza. Even people we thought we could trust, like Bobby Kennedy, can lose their moral compus when the zionists get hold of their minds to enact odious murder in Gaza. I presume Bobby has been black mailed to endorse the cruelty in Gaza which, like the pig industry, is unspeakably vile. So called humans are torturing humans like the pigs, and in both instances, they are funded, applorded and promoted by the beasts that are our politicians. Sorry to be so morbid but I despair in the human race.’
Instead of improving the condition of livestock to prevent disease, US corporate captured politicians are giving the green light to gene editing pigs to help them survive in their concentration camps.
Listen; Gene edited Pigs; Farming Today 2 May 2025
BBC intro; ‘Gene-editing technology which makes pigs immune to a highly infectious virus, developed at Edinburgh University’s Roslin Institute, has been approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration. The virus causes a disease called PRRS or Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, which causes premature births in pigs as well as other painful symptoms and costs the pig industry billions. Current legislation doesn’t permit its use in the UK. We speak to one of the scientists who’s been working on the project for more than seven years.’
Dr Christine Tate Burkard; “It’s a massive bit of gratification. I’m very passionate about this project. I grew up on a pig farm. Luckily, I grew up in a country where PRRS has been eradicated, but I’ve seen it in many other countries how animals suffer from this disease firsthand. Working on this as a researcher and actually seeing this implemented in pigs now and probably these pigs hitting the market in a few years time finally adding another important tool to the toolbox of combating PRRS infection worldwide is extremely gratifying to see.”
BBC Presenter; “Can you explain what you do to the DNA and why that means it won’t become infected?”
Dr Christine Tate Burkard; “So what we’ve done with the PRRS resistant pigs is that we’ve changed basically the lock shape of the protein that the virus has to bind to to actually be able to enter the pig cells. This looks like nine pearls on a string and we have removed pearl number five to change the look of that pearl necklace so to speak. So minor modification, the pig is still 100% pig. We’ve not actually added anything non piggy to this.”
BBC Presenter; “And the edit has no other impact on the health or the behavior of the pigs.”
Dr Christine Tate Burkard; “So this is a big question. We’re obviously here not to play god, but to actually do a safe process of genome edit. And once we have edited them in our small cohort of research pigs, we have checked whether these animals are healthy, produce normal healthy offspring and this has been taken to another level by genus PIC who are developing these pigs for market. They have had to go through three generations of breeding to actually get FDA approval. US Food and Drug Administration.”
BBC Presenter; “do you have any indication about if and when this kind of technology, these kinds of pigs might be approved here?”
Dr Christine Tate Burkard; “What we have in The UK since 2023 is the next generation breeding technology act and that defines new breeding technologies that still means only England actually because Next Generation Breeding Technology Act doesn’t apply to Wales not in Ireland or Scotland. But what it would entail would be a similar regulatory process to the FDA approval but we have no details yet of how this regulatory process will look like.”
BBC Presenter; “People who are opposed to gene editing may have ethical concerns about the potential risks in the future. How do you respond to that?”
Dr Christine Tate Burkard; “We know that this is a welfare issue in animals and it’s both an ethical question. Should we do it or shouldn’t we do it? We should do it to prevent disease. So actually, I would argue in terms of welfare, these animals are potentially better safeguarded than conventionally bred animals.”
BBC Presenter; “Just because you can do it, do you think consumers will accept it? Do you think they’re going to want to buy pork that comes from genetically edited pigs?”
Dr Christine Tate Burkard; “I think we all have a bit of a hesitation when we read about something being bioengineered, biotechnology because we have negative associations historically. But what we can say is that the World Health Organization tells us that in the twenty, thirty years that people have been eating genetically modified organisms, it actually has no impact on our health.”
Cruelty must be banned because, unless the industry puts money behind promoting their higher welfare labels, consumers will continue to ignore animal welfare and go for the cheapest.
Read Red Tractor proposes tiered welfare labels for UK pork FarmingUK, 29 April 2025
‘Red Tractor is now inviting feedback from pig producers on new proposals to introduce a tiered approach to welfare standards and labelling for UK pigmeat. The six-week consultation aims to reduce audit burdens, improve consumer transparency and enhance recognition of higher-welfare production systems.Modelled on the poultry tiering system introduced in 2020, the proposal for the pig sector includes two new voluntary welfare tiers.
The Enhanced Welfare tier would apply to pork from pigs that are outdoor-bred or outdoor-reared and then finished indoors with more space and a solid, bedded lying area.
The Free Range tier would cover pork from pigs that have continuous access to the outdoors.
Each tier would carry a dedicated Red Tractor logo, allowing consumers to distinguish between levels of welfare while maintaining the core assurance mark’s reputation.’
For the entire week BBC Farming Today interviewed CEOs in the fish industry with only one short interview with a Wild Fish Campaigner on how disastrous this industry is for the farmed fish and water ecosystem.
Listen Salmon Farming BBC Farming Today, 12 April 2025
Andrew Graham-Stewart; “I’ve just dug out some of the officially published figures for the Mowi farm on Colonsay. Back in January 2020 it had an escape of 73,600 fish. In the second-half of 2024 the sea lice numbers on the fish were well over the code of good practice level for the industry on 10 occasions but perhaps the most shocking thing about the farm on Colonsay is how it has failed so dismally on the mortalities front. In October 2023, 202,000 fish died in just one week. That contributed to the most recent production cycle. This production cycle ended in September 2024, and the total losses amounted to 40% of the stock. So the Mowi example really doesn’t stand up as being anything akin to sort of environmental responsibility or even welfare responsibility.
Presenter; “Mowi told us the figures are correct, but said that the fish deaths were down to Storm Babbitt, which prevented them treating the fish for gill damage caused by a naturally occurring amoeba. They say both overall fish escapes and sea lice numbers are at their lowest for decades, a point also made by the industry body Salmon Scotland. But Mr Graham Stewart says that’s nothing to be proud of.”
Andrew Graham-Stewart; “Well, the 2024 figure of 18% mortality according to Salmon Scotland we find it rather odd to for the industry to claim that as a success. This is only low relative to previously disastrous years. Any other livestock farming operation with 18%, let alone 25%, will be in serious trouble for allowing so many deaths. Then the industry’s claim to have spent, I think it’s a billion pounds on fish health, it’s hardly a great boast when so many fish are still dying. That billion pounds must include the huge spending on all the pesticides and chemicals that end up being dumped in the sea, and all the physical and freshwater treatments for sea lice, which kill and maim so many salmon and cleaner-fish.
Presenter; Although the industry has, for instance, on sea lice, it has moved away from that that use of pesticides, hasn’t it, to use fish who eat the the lice off the salmon.
Andrew Graham-Stewart; “Well, they use what’s called cleaner-fish. That’s wrass and lumpfish. Their use is surely unethical by any normal considerations and at the end of the production cycle they all die. I don’t think the use of cleaner fish is anything to celebrate.”
Presenter; “What could the industry do to make improvements that would satisfy wild fish?”
Andrew Graham-Stewart; “In the short term, the needs to might be a moratorium on any expansion of the industry until they’ve got all the problems that they’re confronting under control. And in the medium to long term, we believe salmon farming in open cages should not be permitted. They’re likely to move production further and further north to the likes of Iceland or northern Norway. And as a regards Scotland, whilst the industry is significant economically, particularly in terms of exports, we believe that that economic contribution to Scotland PLC is overstated. All we ever hear about is the economic positives, none of the negatives, not least the negative impacts on other industries that depend on unpolluted coastal waters. Our conviction is that ceasing salmon farming would enable other, more sustainable sectors to thrive.”
To the detriment of our well-being, politicians, like brainwashed zombies, blindly follow the NetZero scam. Our poor farmers have been forced to jump through hoops to follow the mantra, including altering their cows’ digestive metabolism.
Read Danish farmers: Bovaer is animal cruelty Rhoda Wilson, The Exposé, 14 April 2025
‘Kent Nielsen, a citizen journalist in Denmark, has published a video and Twitter posts stating that two Danish farmers have already reported that cows being fed Bovaer have developed fevers, diarrhoea and mastitis. One farmer has had 6 cows die after feeding them Bovaer.
The Danish government has been force implementing the feed additive Bovaer into the national herd. The programme began in April 2024 when the Danish government set aside 518 million Danish crowns ($74 million) to finance the feed additive. By January 2025, farmers were being fined for not adding the harmful chemical to cattle feed.
A petition against the use of Bovaer, which was started in January 2025, says, “As of January 2025, the government will force farmers to add the chemical Bovaer to feed additives … Farmers who do not join will be punished with fines by the state.”
The petition goes on to state that several experts have come forward expressing concerns about the health consequences for both animals and humans who consume Bovaer-fed animal products. “Critics argue that the additive’s long-term effects on animal health and the environment are unknown,” the petition states.
Emeritus Jan Raa, who is a Norwegian Professor of microbiology with a PhD in organic chemistry, warns in sharp terms in an article published on 13 December 2024 that: “Methane can predispose people to disease. In the article, he describes how methane inhibitors in animal feed can destroy the intestinal flora of both humans and animals.”‘
The video shows gallons of milk going down the drain as our farmers are dependent on single buyers who are unable or unwilling to fulfill their contract with the farmer. The contractor should not only be fined if they fail to pick up milk but they, and the supermarkets, should be obliged to have provisions to ensure the food, in this case milk, is used and not wasted. Small scale, diverse markets of yesteryear are far more efficient.
Watch This is truly awful yet food prices keep rising tomthedevonfarmer, 22 April 2025
“Hey folks, the video you’re about to see, it’s pretty heartbreaking. The guy’s not getting paid for this. He’s literally having to throw his milk away. And this is purely because Mueller, that’s the dairy company that make yoghurt and milk, etcetera, aren’t picking up. They’re not picking up the phone, they’re not picking up the milk, they’re not paying him. It’s absolutely disgusting. So take a look and hopefully you’ll boycott Mueller for a while. This is just sickening. Anyway, enjoy and please share the hell out of this.”
Dairy Farmer; “Welcome to another day with Mueller Diaries, no answer, no correspondence, don’t ring, don’t e-mail. We just have to tip the milk and there’s not a damn thing we can do. It’s just a joke. It honestly is. what is the point of 29 years of milking cows to see this? Never in 29 years I’ve ever had that. Ever. there’s just not words to describe this. Honestly, we can’t give it away. we’re losing thousands a day, a week, it’s heading on, two weeks now. Nothing from Mueller. And where does it end, watching 29 years of work literally go down the drain? Like I say, can’t even give it away, there’s my letter, they’ll prosecute me if I give it away. Damned if we do, damned if we don’t. I can’t put it into words anymore.”
Big Ag tax dodging
Read UK Factory Farm Companies Dodge Millions in Tax as Government Cuts Nature-Friendly Farming Support; World Animal Protection, 28 April 2025
‘New research conducted exclusively on behalf of World Animal Protection, alongside a separate report by the Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO), has exposed a calculated tax avoidance scheme by global meat giant JBS, the owner of UK brands Moy Park, Pilgrim’s UK, Fridge Raiders and Richmond.
According to SOMO, JBS avoided paying between £170 million and £340 million in corporate taxes between 2019 and 2022. Despite its track record, the company was recently given the green light to list on the New York Stock Exchange, opening up even more access to US capital markets.
British farmers left stranded while JBS profits soar
The revelations come at a time when the UK government has suspended funding for environmental payments that help farmers adopt more humane, sustainable practices such as keeping pigs and chickens in woodlands.
In March 2025, Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) applications were abruptly halted, leaving many farmers who had planned to improve animal welfare and protect nature in a state of uncertainty. Meanwhile, global meat producer JBS, whose factory farms confine millions of animals in horrific, cramped conditions, has been quietly avoiding millions in tax.
JBS’s deep roots in the UK
JBS operates across more than 700 UK chicken farms through Moy Park and generates around £300 million in retail sales through Fridge Raiders and Richmond alone.
Globally, JBS is the largest factory farming company, with the capacity to slaughter 5 billion chickens, 53 million pigs, 27 million cows, and 8 million lambs every year. The company’s record includes inhumane farming methods, illegal deforestation, and a 50% rise in its emissions in recent years.
A company built on exploitation
Alongside its tax avoidance, JBS has been repeatedly fined for a litany of abuses including exploiting child labour, bribery, price-fixing, and illegal deforestation. Over the past year, JBS breached environmental limits across several Moy Park farms and was fined £6 million for relying on migrant children to carry out dangerous work in its US slaughterhouses.
Globally, JBS is the largest factory farming company, with the capacity to slaughter 5 billion chickens, 53 million pigs, 27 million cows, and 8 million lambs every year.
Government action is urgently needed
Lindsay Duncan, UK Farming Campaigns Manager, World Animal Protection, said:
“Instead of contributing its fair and reasonable share of tax to the UK, JBS uses expensive lawyers and consultants to take advantage of tax loopholes, all while making profit from UK brands like Moy Park, Pilgrim’s, Richmond and Fridge Raiders. Meanwhile, UK farmers are struggling with the cutting of environmental payments as the government fails to find enough budget. The UK government must get its priorities right. It must stop enabling profit-hungry meat companies like JBS to blatantly avoid tax and put more support toward British farming that is good for animals, the planet and farmers.”‘
Tech food
Lab grown meat is expensive so, while beef prices are unusually high, the corporates are promoting the fake version. DON’T BUY IT!
Watch; Supermarkets Push Prices Up While Lab-Grown Meat Sneaks In; UK Column, 9th April 2025
Sandi Adams; “The supermarkets could easily push the sale of cheaper lab-grown highly-processed artificial meat and I think they will with real meat being priced out of the supermarket. What a great opportunity to replace it with all these meatless products. Supermarkets are profit-driven and alternative proteins offer lower production volatility and higher margins and they also appeal to the SDG (Sustainable Development Goals) investors and NetZero agendas which are being pushed by the UN. So we’ve got all these agendas pushing the meatless market. They’ve got control over food supply chains and they don’t have to deal with stubborn farmers and activists. Now supermarkets are already subtly nudging, they’re being pressured with SDG frameworks and government incentives to promote sustainable proteins, which increasingly includes, lab grown, insect-based or plant-based substitutes. Lab-grown meat is on the horizon, it’s getting regulatory approval in various markets in the UK and next in line we’ve got 3D printed meat. So this isn’t just about price, it’s about control and reshaping the food system.
The UK government has allocated approximately £75 million towards the development of sustainable protein sources including cultivated meat, insect protein, all of the meatless agenda. To facilitate the introduction of lab-grown meat products, the Food Standard Agency has received £1.6 million to establish efficient safety assessment process for all these novel foods. Meanwhile, Morrisons and other major UK supermarkets have been closing their fresh meat and fish counters. Morrisons announced in March 2025 that they plan to close 35 meat counters and 35 fish counters by the end of April, and already Tesco and Sainsbury’s have closed their fresh fish and meat counters. Well, the supermarkets can continue with their meatless agenda and peddle inferior highly processed meat products, fake meat products, but I think it will fail. It really is time that we moved away from the supermarkets. Farmers are under pressure, but the future depends on us really. It presents a crucial moment for consumers to make informed choices that support the farmers by prioritising high welfare and locally sourced meat and veg.”
Gene editing is dangerous and totally unnecessary but lucrative for corporations who can patent the plant/animal experiment.
Watch; Genetic Editing Gone Wild; UK Column, 9 April 2025
Mike Robinson; “In this country this nonsense is enabled by The Precision Breeding Act 2023 and if you remember when it was introduced, Joe Churchill, Minister for Agri- innovation, said new tech genetic technologies could help us tackle some of the biggest challenges of our age around food security, climate change and biodiversity loss. But as Charles reported some time ago, this isn’t just about vanity projects like woolly mammoths and wolves. This is happening to our food supply. And so the question is what could possibly go wrong? Well, let’s let’s have a look at it because meanwhile in Australia, efforts are afoot to deal with the cane toad, a problem there, by genetically engineering those animals to create a cane toad tadpole which never grows up. Instead it remains a tadpole, a cannibalistic tadpole that voraciously eats other cane toad eggs. And the nut jobs have done this claim, this will reduce the wild population of cane toads which is out of control in Australia now. The project, which is a collaboration between a number of universities and foundations and also state governments, has so far received permits to run experiments in controlled settings in Western Australia and the Northern Territories, and the gene-edited tadpoles have not been tested in the wild yet, but field trials are expected in Western Australia later this year after what they laughingly call a risk assessment. Now the depressing irony here is that cane toads were initially released in Queensland in 1935 in order to control cane beetles, but ended up creating a bigger problem than the one that they were trying to solve in the first place. So again, I’m going to ask what could possibly go wrong? What could possibly go wrong, Charles?”
Charles Malet; “Well, I think the list is probably limitless. And as far as I recall, when Pandora’s Box was opened, it was it was not a great outcome. So I think this is absolutely extraordinary in so many respects, it’s completely beside the point whether the technology exists or not, the idea that the introduction or the removal of one species can be done in such a way as to not disrupt that ecosystem with a net negative outcome is perfectly extraordinary. Nobody knows, and so it’s the same with all of these things, to suggest that just because it can be done, that therefore somehow it’s legitimate to do it is perfectly bizarre. And you referred to the gene editing spring trials this year, if you read the safety data or provisions in place to try to stop anything happening, they’re absolutely laughable, you just put a 20-metre strip around the edge of a field that you’re growing something in and then you hope for the best, that is literally what you do, so it’s a terrible joke, but it is a joke “.
A new bio-stimulant chemical has been approved to speed crops growth. Post covid, none trusts corporation’s ability to test the long term effects on our bodies and ecosystem but our opinion is not invited?
Listen biostimulant for wheat; BBC Farming Today, 30 April 2025
BBC intro; ‘Scientists say they’ve developed a spray, which boosts the equivalent of a plant’s blood sugar and could improve wheat yields by 12%. Researchers from Rothamsted, The University of Oxford and the Rosalind Franklin Institute say they can achieve bigger improvements than via breeding and their biostimulant spray will be used around the world and will be commercially available from next year.’
BBC Presenter; “And so this is to do with the sugar signaling in wheat. So what does it make it do that improves yield?
Doctor Cara Griffiths; “The T6P itself, which is what our biostimulant is, works as a bit of a sucrose fuel gauge in your plant. It tells a plant how much energy it has and how to use it. And it tells a plant how to use its energy by interacting with an enzyme that every single plant has called SnRK 1. And there’s two modes that SnRK 1 can have, a feast mode or a famine mode. What T6P does is turn on the feast mode of this enzyme and it pulls all of the nutrients, all of the resources, into the tissues where it’s applied.
So in this study we apply it during grain developments just once and this draws all of the resources to the grain resulting in huge yield increases year on year.”
BBC Presenter; “Now these tests were on spring wheat but I understand you are doing further tests on winter wheat?”
Doctor Cara Griffiths; “Oh yes absolutely we’re also testing a lot of winter wheat in The UK and we’re finding the yield increases in high yielding climates like the UK are far higher than what we were seeing in Argentina.”
BBC Presenter; “Now this as you say is sprayed. So what happens when this produce meets weeds?
Doctor Cara Griffiths; “We haven’t tested the effect on weeds primarily because the timing of application of T6P to the crop will be well after any management practices have occurred, really. When it comes to increasing or enhancing the growth of weeds, I think it’s very unlikely, but it’s not something that we’ve tested yet.”
BBC Presenter; “And what about side effects on things like invertebrates?”
Doctor Cara Griffiths; “We’ve been going through the reach registration process for this chemical because it is a new chemical and we need to do all of those kind of tests for it, and we’re not seeing any danger to invertebrates or any algal blooms or anything toxic happening with the use of this compound. Could it work on things other than wheat? Oh absolutely, so we’ve been going through some testing on this T6P product with the multiple crops. We’ve been doing soy, maize, barley, oats, sorghum, strawberries, tomatoes, they all have effects in all of those crops, we just targeted the spraying at a slightly different time.
We need to marry up the biochemistry to the product, and I think that’s what the beauty of what we’re doing is. We’re trying to enhance the natural biochemistry. We’re not trying to change it.”
Plants grown in water in vertical farms should be banned due to the absence of trace elements from the soil into the food. But in fact they failed because the subsidies ran out! There are massive real costs of tech food compared to growing food in nature.
Listen Vertical farms BBC Farming Today, 19 April 2025
Sally Challoner; “Lots of vertical farms have gone bust in recent years, not just here but globally, including Agricool and Future Crops Cooperative and Growing Underground in London, which was launched with great fanfare 10 years ago in an old World War 2 shelter. They do use a lot of energy for heating and lighting though. Most farms here use renewables. A bigger problem is that it’s also notoriously difficult here in the UK to get investment for start-ups or small businesses that are seen as more risky or long term. Banks here have long faced accusations that they failed to support small businesses, and as we know, the returns on salads and herbs aren’t huge. This farm in Gloucestershire only opened last year and was actually at the time, claimed to be the biggest in the world. The biggest vertical farm now is in Dubai, but the farm in Gloucester is large, 15,000 square metres and the potential to produce 1,000 tonnes a year. That came at a price of course, £23 million to set up. It was very advanced in terms of the technology it used.”
Presenter; “Do you think this is a blow for those who see vertical farming as the future for at least some of food growing? Yes. The idea was that vertical farms can be where the people are on industrial estates in cities for example, or near transport hubs, and as they stack the crops they take up less land. They can grow faster than conventional farms as they control the climate and as the risks are more controllable. It was hoped investors would be attracted to this sector where they might not want to invest in traditional farming, with all the risks of weather and market volatility that we report on so regularly. At the launch of the Gloucestershire Farm, Mr Lloyd Jones said it could produce at a super competitive price and that while commercial success has always been a challenge, he felt they’d cracked it. But with the massive cost of building the facility, high energy costs and relatively low prices for the food they produce, it seems major backers have decided the project just wasn’t viable.”
‘The engineered genetic structures that are now accompanying processed foods contain man-made genetic sequences that are foreign to our digestion and physiology.’
Read Where Have We Arrived in the Food Chain and Where Do We Go From Here? Guy Hatchard, 14 April 2025
‘Increasingly, the biggest sources of pollution in our lives are the pre-prepared foods we buy at the supermarket. The substitution of natural enzymatic processing aids with genetically engineered versions has increased not just the level of pollution but the type of hazard. Engineered versions are designed to be more long lasting and powerful in their action. Moreover, as we have reported in our article “Major Health Alert: the Extraordinary Genetically Modified Invasion of Our Supermarkets by Stealth“, they are contaminated with antibiotics and antibiotic resistant bacterial strains as well as genetic promoters designed to catalyse cell proliferation.
For example, sauces and pickled condiments like chutneys, ketchup and mayonnaise contain acetic acid (Food Additive No. E260). Acetic acid is the main component of vinegar and is widely used in various food products as a flavour, acidity regulator and preservative. It used to be produced through a process of natural fermentation and was generally recognised as safe (GRAS) when consumed in reasonably small quantities. Now the majority is produced synthetically on an industrial scale, using genetic engineering. The changes introduced in the manufacturing process are manyfold, including:
– Artificial stimulation of the expression of the gene for pyrroloquinoline quinone-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (PQQ-ADH), an enzyme.
– Modifying acetogenic bacteria which enable acetic acid to be produced from a wider range of raw materials
– Introducing high temperature tolerant modified bacterial genes
These processes inevitably involve residual contamination of the end food product including novel DNA along with associated health consequences that have not been studied or acknowledged by the processed food industry. Patak’s Mango Chutney for example now includes E260 among its ingredients. We have stopped buying it. There is actually no need to include any E260. Herbs and spices supply enough flavour and its sugar content preserves long life. This is just one product among thousands that have been altered by genetically modified microorganisms.
Cooking has always involved processes, but until the chemical proliferation of the twentieth century these were naturally induced by boiling, decoction, precipitation, fermentation, dehydration, milling, etc or through the addition of natural herbs and products from plants and animals. Over millennia our physiology became accustomed to these, not just through repeated exposure, but because they involve natural DNA that echoed our own, with which we share long phylogenetic roots. Our digestion is able to naturally derive nourishment from these. Another word for nourishment or nutrition is the assimilation of order or intelligence.
The engineered genetic structures that are now accompanying processed foods contain man-made genetic sequences that are foreign to our digestion and physiology. The body has no history of assimilating these, nor would we want to. Genetic sequences initiate a completely different kind of pollution from chemicals, they contain instructions to carry out and control complex biological processes. They can potentially interface with parts of our physiology and overwhelm or take over other processes. Many of them are actually designed to do so during food processing but when ingested they can start similar foreign processes in our physiology. These can be very unhealthy, such as those genetically engineered to precipitate solids in solution used to make cheeses which might affect our blood, coronary and arterial systems, menstruation, haemorrhoids, varicose veins, circulation, brain blood supply, etc.
Importantly, genetic sequences are the physical counterparts of conscious processes. They are as if thoughts or memories, fragments of consciousness expressing itself. As we have reported here and here, studies show people receiving organ transplants can experience the preferences or desires of the donor. People receiving stem cells during bone marrow transplants can experience psychological difficulties. Contamination from synthetic genetically engineered sequences during food processing is a novel form of contamination whose consequences remain unresearched.’
In the name of innovation, our taxes are being poured into gene editing, and chemical,and mechanical technology inputs to increase corporate profits.
Read DEFRA’s £45 Million Farming Innovation Boost – But Who Really Benefits? Helen Freeman, 14 April 2025
‘Today DEFRA announced a £45.6 million injection into farming innovation, headlined as a way to boost food production, raise farm profits and “work with nature.” On paper, it sounds like good news. But for those of us farming at the ground level, it raises more red flags than reassurance. Let’s break it down. This funding is being channelled into:
• Robot fruit pickers
• On-animal health monitors
• Variable irrigation systems
• Precision-bred crops
• Technologies to reduce emissions
And while the government claims this will support nature and food security, what it really reads like is a blueprint for a more industrialised food system. It’s slick, shiny and deeply disconnected from the reality of small-scale, nature-friendly farming. Gone are the days of support schemes like the SFI (Sustainable Farming Incentive), which at least attempted to recognise the role of regenerative and agroecological farming. Now we’re looking at funding designed for those with the resources to deploy robotics, adopt genetic engineering and chase volume-driven yields. These aren’t solutions for the average family farm; they are a gateway to factory farming 2.0. And who loses?
• Small farmers, who can’t afford to integrate these high-tech solutions
• Nature, when “precision breeding” replaces traditional diversity and soil-based growing
• Food sovereignty, as these technologies concentrate power in the hands of a few
• Consumers, who are sold the illusion of progress while the ingredients in their food become even harder to trace.
Let’s not kid ourselves. You don’t need a robot to know when a cow is stressed; you need a farmer who’s present. You don’t need gene-edited crops to feed Britain; you need fair prices for real food grown on healthy, living soil. This announcement makes it clearer than ever: we are heading down a path where only large-scale operations will survive, and the UK’s food supply will become even more centralised and fragile. This is not innovation. It is exclusion. I’ll continue saying it. We need to support small farms, fund soil-first, people-first agriculture and protect farmland from being handed over to corporations in the name of “progress.” Watch closely. Because this isn’t just about tech and tractors. It’s about who gets to farm and who gets left behind.’
Another example of why its best to avoid ultra-processed foods and instead protect our health and wellbeing by buying locally produced, chemical-free veg, and fresh meat and dairy from local farms you know and trust.
‘Meat glue, a hidden ingredient in most processed foods from chicken nuggets to veggie burgers, is driving up rates of celiac and other inflammatory digestive conditions.’
Read FDA Says ‘Meat Glue’ Used in Many Processed Foods Is ‘Safe.’ Scientists Have Another Theory by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., The Defender, 25 April 2025
‘Microbial transglutaminase, or “meat glue,” a hidden ingredient in most processed foods from chicken nuggets to veggie burgers, is driving up rates of celiac and other inflammatory digestive conditions, researchers say. The FDA considers it “safe.”
Gluten and genetics may not be the only culprits behind skyrocketing cases of celiac disease and related inflammatory digestive autoimmune conditions. Scientists now believe the “meat glue” widely used in processed foods from chicken nuggets to veggie burgers may also play a role.
Recent research shows that an enzyme called microbial transglutaminase induces celiac disease and related inflammatory digestive diseases such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis, writer Linda Bonvie reported on her Substack, Badditives. Also known as “food glue,” transglutaminase is an enzyme widely used as a food additive to help foods stick together and look more appealing. Meat glue is “beneficial for the food industry,” researchers Dr. Aaron Lerner and Torsten Matthias, Ph.D., said in one of several research papers they’ve published on the topic. But apparently, it’s not so good for public health.
Meat glue, Bonvie wrote:
“is the darling of Big Food for lots of reasons: it can glue together scraps of fish, chicken and meat into whole-looking cuts (often called ‘Frankenmeats’); extend the shelf life of processed foods (even pasta); improve ‘texture,’ especially in low-salt, low-fat products; make bread and pastries (particularly gluten-free ones) rise better, and, as one manufacturer puts it, allow for use of things that would ordinarily be tossed out — unappetizing leftovers and scraps of food that would ‘otherwise be considered waste ingredients, creating an added-value product.’”
According to Lerner and Matthias, meat glue can change the nature of gluten and make the immune system more reactive to them, which can cause conditions like “intestinal junction leakage” and set the stage for a variety of health issues.
New government policies couched in words of health and wellbeing are double speak for the ongoing corporatisation of every sector of our food economy.
Watch; UK Column News – 30th April 2025
Charles Mallet; “As it stands, two thirds of adults in this country are overweight, and half of those are obese. And the government has just announced last month that it’s going to come up with yet another food strategy (Leading food experts join Government food strategy to restore pride in British food) to sort everything out. As the image accompanying the press release shows, it’s got off to a rather inauspicious start with the depiction of a supermarket trolley laden with many of the root causes of ill health. With this in mind, it comes as little surprise to find that the Nascent Food Strategy Advisory Board is stacked out with industry heads who have every interest in preserving the status quo or at least adopting it slightly in order to maximize profits on fake food.
Of course, the National Farmers Union talks of prioritizing growth and therefore is right behind it by which they mean really falling in line with government initiatives to give up on the production of real food or looking after the environment and to go in for subsidy based on inefficient energy schemes and artificial food via robotics and AI. This comes as the BBC’s Panorama program exposes what should have been common knowledge that baby food is full of sugar. There was also talk of a sugar levy being applied to milk based drinks, which makes it relevant that the only farmer to sit on this new board is a man named Sam Godfrey, who until last year was on the NFU’s sugar board, literally promoting a product that should not belong in any human diet.
Notable by its absence from the board of fisheries, and here is Elspeth McDonald of the Scottish Fisherman’s Federation, and she’s written to Daniel Zwickner, the minister, to ask for an explanation as to why they should be admitted.Since this initiative says that it’s concerned with health, why would there be no room at the table for the National Health Service, which spends the equivalent of the entire farming budget every five days.
The remit of the food strategy advisory board is ironically; ‘to provide more easily accessible and affordable healthy food to maintain our food security by building resilience in the face of climate shocks and geopolitical changes, strengthening the supply chain which operates so effectively to keep us fed, and inevitably to reduce the impact of farming and food production on nature, biodiversity, and climate whilst ensuring growth is at the heart of our strategy.’
It’s a word soup, though not a digestible one. And I would say it’s plainly influenced at its core by a legion of people who have no interest in or understanding of the landscape which surrounds us nor the means by which food may be produced for the mutual benefit of the farmer and the consumer.
Exhibit A in this regard would be the latest offering from UK FIRES who wrote the absolute zero document in 2019, which attempted to suggest that it’s possible for an entire country to stop producing any carbon dioxide. This time round, they’re suggesting doing anything except for actually growing things. They say here technologies relating to electrification, alternative protein production (fake meat, insects), precision agriculture (gene editing), and controlled environment agriculture (indoor farms eg factory farms and vertical farms) must be adopted at scale. So when it does come to growing things, mainstream industrial agriculture dictates that this comes at a significant cost both to the land and, of course, anyone eating that which has come off it. Processed food is the result of the system driven by chemical inducements at every turn.
And one of these is the constant application of pesticides, another subject ignored thus far by the board. However, the suggestion that something toxic enough to kill insects could present danger to people has got through to the World Health Organization, which remains determined to do nothing about it. The UK government prefer to employ more or less the same head in the sand technique wherever possible, and this is from 2021 in which they attempt to dismiss any causal link between consuming toxins and getting ill, stating here that ‘evidence has not established these causal links between low level long term pesticide exposure and health impacts’. That said, they do report on a regular basis on the pesticide residues found in foods coming into and grown within the UK.
If you really do want to know what you are eating or might be eating, then I would urge you to scan through it. Not only are a bewildering array of pesticides listed, but an extremely high percentage of the food tested was found to have pesticide residue present. Of course, it remains up to the government to set the maximum limits.
Rather than go through a mass of chemicals, I’ll focus on just one in order to illustrate just how little regard the government and the industry has for health. It’s noted that there’s an issue with sodium chlorate, and this is a weed killer which is banned in The UK and The EU.
But because it’s also used in what’s called ‘microbiological safety’, the term they give to for killing anything that isn’t already dead, the government states that these residues are unavoidable and important for the maintaining of microbiological control vital for food safety. So we are not treating these results as breaching the maximum residue limit. So in other words, absolutely, they do what they please in that regard. And they go on to say that they’re not advising any organization to change its practices, but that they are going to, quote, ‘consider what to do about chlorate residues in food and water’. Now to reinforce the point that there is no pressure to act, this is what happens when companies do exceed the limits, which is that they get a letter sent to them, and they’re given four weeks to provide a statement for inclusion in the report.
The expert committee on pesticide residues reviews any replies received, and this is how much they care. Supplier response is none.
The involvement of NESTA confirms that behavioral change really is at the heart of all of this, which sets the conditions for more and more farmland to be taken from its owners. This is a document from 2023 in which controlling obesity was linked solely to the input of calories regardless of nutritional content. A form of social credit system, therefore, which can be applied across the board. The media continues to reinforce the narrative that a diet of whole foods devoid of chemicals is silly and difficult, here showcasing Gwyneth Paltrow, who’s taking up content space with the news that she eats bread.
And finally, we should not forget the words of a previous environment secretary, Therese Coffey, who was adamant that the world’s most harmful herbicide, glyphosate, was an integral part of regenerative farming, thereby confirming that when it comes to health, food, and nutrition, neither the government nor industry should ever be listened to.”
This is a brief summary of the World Economic Forum’s dictates to control every aspect of our lives.
Watch Australian senator Malcolm Roberts exposes the WEF’s ‘evil agenda’ against our food; tomandlaurenhealth, 6 March 2025
“When the World Economic Forum launched their social media campaign in 2018 carrying the slogan “You’ll own nothing and be happy”, I thought, finally, the predatory billionaires who tried to run the world had shown their hand. The public can finally see their fate if the World Economic Forum are allowed to succeed. That didn’t happen. The media, who have the same owners as the World Economic Forum, persisted with calling the World Economic Forum’s evil agenda ‘a conspiracy theory’. Even in this place, there are only a handful of senators with the courage to call out the agenda for what it is; economic exploitation and social control over the weak. The World Economic Forum revealed another aspect of their plan when they launched a campaign against laundry. Yes, really, laundry! Jeans should not be washed more than once a month, most other clothes once a week. You will wear dirty clothes and be smelly, apparently, and happy. The temptation is to laugh at their desire to control even mundane aspects of our lives. Yet the truth is much more frightening than that. The World Economic Forum have now turned their evil agenda to food. The campaign against farming is really a campaign against one of the necessities of life. Food. Predatory billionaires, parasitic billionaires owning near urban intensive production facilities, producing food like substances for the masses, forcing the public into acceptance to the World Economic forum’s fake global warming scam. These are their own stated motives; ‘Who controls the food supply, controls the people. Who controls the energy can control whole continents. Who controls money can control the world’. The World Economic Forum and the predatory billionaires they represent are currently trying to do all three.”
Bid farewell to healthy cows grazing in fields. Due to fake NetZero calculations targeting cows, subsidies are instead incentivising farmers to grow trees.
Listen; Swapping cows for trees BBC Farming Today, 28 April 2024
Presenter; “Deborah and Tom Willoughby have started an agroforestry project which qualifies for government funding. They say planting crops alongside fruit and nut trees now makes sense for their finances and for the environment, as the BBC E Midlands environment correspondent Sally Bowman reports. We’ve mainly planted apple trees, but we’ve also got walnuts trees, we’ve got hazelnuts and we’ve got some pear trees and a few plums. Deborah Willoughby now nurtures baby trees instead of baby dairy calves. After nearly 30 years, she and her husband Tom decided to give up their organic dairy near Normanton on Soa in Nottinghamshire.”
Deborah Willoughby; “We just found that we were just kind of never going to get out of debt really. When things were good, they were really good and you’d never quite get out of debt. And then things would go bad again and the milk price would drop and we’d be back to having to borrow money again.”
Presenter; “The couple are still breeding calves, but for beef, not dairy. Today the herd is enjoying a meal of home grown winter silage. The farm also grows oats and barley and grow forestry that’s planting trees right next to crops is having a bit of a moment right now. Fans say it hugely reduces soil erosion and boosts fertility. It soaks up carbon and gives farmers more products to sell. There’s even a cash sweetener in the form of government funding of £10,000 for every hectare of newly planted woodland. So why aren’t more farmers doing it? “
Deborah Willoughby; “Maybe it’s because it’s an unknown and an unsure about it, but maybe as people learn and see that it is achievable that it can be profitable and and maybe it can help your business at those times when if there is a drought and one crop doesn’t come, then you’ve got 2 crops in the field that you can harvest.”
Tom Willoughby; “I think farm incomes are under such pressure that having to look at alternatives and this is one of the alternatives.”
So-called progress comes with huge costs to our deep cultural desire to preserve farming systems, not least hill farms, that work for humans, animals and ecology.
Watch The Decline of British Hill Farming Farming Explained, 13 April 2025
Oli Fletcher; “Hill farmers are quite special because what they do is so traditional and so purely rural. In their timeless work is a connection to the land and history, often in fairly solitary places, and this can serve to culturally anchor the nation as a whole. This might sound quite pretentious, but it’s why we have national parks. We’ve talked about this before in many of my earlier videos, but the idea of national parks after the war was to create an unspoilt environment that would stay truly rural, a sort of living Museum of Englishness where English people would be preserved into the modern age. The purpose of this was to allow people from the cities to go there on holiday and learn from the people who still lived and worked the hills and fells in a way as old as time. This is why national parks are often in hilly areas. The first ones were the Peak districts, the Lake districts and Snowdonia alongside Dartmoor, and most of the other ones are also upland hilly areas. So after the war this was the idea. Hill farmers received a lot of specific support and grassland scientist George Stapleton really loved hill farmers, but the reason he was keen on them is because hill farming manages the landscape and makes it an appealing place to visit. Walking in England is great because you get to see the history of the place. You see the old barns and the ancient field boundaries and the old farmsteads and such.
But if we zoom forward to the present day, it’s become apparent that there are lots of disadvantages to living in the goldfish bowl for city people that is a National Park, as national parks are supposed to fit within a city person’s view of what the countryside should be. Farmers are often restricted from putting up new sheds, for example, to keep up with the times. But more importantly, a city person’s view of what the countryside might be can change. And today that’s put hill farmers in the firing line as an extensive form of agriculture which uses a vast area of land to produce a bit of lamb and wool. Hill farming areas were selected by Henry Dimbleby in his food plan to be returned to nature. In other words, there is an increasing belief that hill farming is not productive enough to be justified and that nature would be a better use of that land. This all ties back to the view that farming is uneconomic that we’ve been talking about. But hill farmers haven’t been supported to restore nature in their areas. Hill farmers are receiving only 8% of the government’s new farming support scheme, the Sustainable Farming Incentive, despite the uplands occupying about 15% of England’s area. This makes their financial situation even trickier. But there is other stuff going on here. Where George Stapleton wanted to preserve the culture of hill farming folk, there are people today who have convince themselves that the culture of hill farming is actually something quite sinister.
Monbiot seems to believe that this false idol surrounding hill farmers has been manufactured as propaganda by farmers’ ability to influence the media. He seems to think the lie of the Good Shepherd is reinforced culturally through things like Jesus and Peppa Pig and petting zoos and nursery rhymes. “We grant farming an uncontested political space offered to no other profession. We humbly accept their cows are sacred and their lambs are holy, and walk away. Bucolic nostalgia shuts down our normal imagination, unstrings our critical faculties, stops us from asking urgent and difficult questions. But at a time of global ecological catastrophe, we cannot afford this indulgence.””
Use the power of your purse to shape the type of food you want to see produced.
Watch The Power of (good) Food with Nick Weir of the Open Food Network Accidental Gods, 11 December 2024
Nick Weir; “The Open Food Network is a piece of software. We believe that the reason global food systems are broken are largely due to issues of ownership and control and that if we’re going to build a new system from the bottom up, it needs to be in joint ownership, open ownership and joint control. So the platform was, is and always has been open source, and that’s the word open in the Open Food Network. And we are incredibly passionate about the importance of the technology that we’re developing being in common ownership.
The software platform is incredible. It enables anybody producing food to profile themselves for free. There’s no cost whatsoever. We want as many people to profile themselves. When I say food producer, it can be anybody from field scale agricultural process through to somebody who has an apple tree in their back garden and they want to sell a few apples in the autumn. So every scale of food producer, they can talk about themselves. We encourage them to talk about their food growing practises, about their ethics and their approach to food. They are encouraged to give as many contact details as they like and then to list their products and to to give as much detail about the products, individual products as possible. And then they can do one or two things. They can just sit there and wait for someone to notice them and to say, can I come and buy some produce from you? As well as doing that, they can choose to set up their own shop. So they can set up payment methods and shipping methods and create quite quickly an online shop. And if they can see that somebody else has already created an online shop close by, they can start to network with them and they can say, ‘would you like to add my apples from my back garden onto your shops?’ So we get this beautiful mycelial-like network of people growing foods, people starting to distribute food, people connecting with each other and building what we call food hubs. So a hub, a bit like a bicycle wheel, has many spokes bringing multiple producers together onto a single online shop front and then the shoppers and the buyers can browse and buy from a whole range of producers.”
The war in Ukraine is about plundering resources, not least fertile agricultural land, in Ukraine and ultimately Russia.
Watch; You’re going to be poor forever; R F Kennedy, 22 November 2024
R F Kennedy; “Ukraine has to put all its government- owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Ukraine. There’s been 1,000 years of war fought over that land as the richest farmland in the world. It’s the breadbasket of Europe. 500,000 Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine. They almost certainly didn’t know about this loan condition. They’ve already sold 30% of it. The buyers were DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto. Who do you think owns all of those companies? BlackRock. And then in December, President Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? BlackRock. So they’re doing this right in front of us. They don’t even care that we know.”
If you want to learn how to grow a market garden, listen to this interview with veg box grower Ruth Hancock.
Listen Ruth Hancock and Fresh and Green Vegetables The Organic Grower Podcast, 10 April 2025
Saving seed is a powerful act of resistance and resilience against the corporate stranglehold over our food.
Listen Robyn Minogue — Resilience in Seed 27 July 2023
‘In this episode, Dave and Mike speak with Robyn Minogue of ‘Outside’ and the Gaia Foundation. They talk to Robyn about the strength we find in community, as well as the power growers can derive from saving seed, not only politically, but also in the resilience of our growing systems in a changing climate. The role of the Gaia Foundation, and Robyn’s, centres on seed and seed sovereignty. This episode delves into various aspects of seed saving: learning how to start, incorporating growing and saving seed into growing systems, and why it is important for both people and planet. As always, Dave and Mike also found themselves talking about our connection to land, and to each other — as well as hearing a bit about what can drive us all to change, to activism, and how we may be helped along the way.’
Finally good news to incentivise growing more fruit and veg in the U.K.
Read ‘£2.3bn economic boost’ if Brits eat more UK-grown fruit and veg Farming UK, 28 April 2025
‘The report argues that it makes strong economic sense to prioritise the expansion of the sector — especially as only 16% of fruit and 50% of vegetables consumed in the UK are domestically grown.As part this expansion, a dedicated horticultural strategy would be needed to overcome several challenges facing growers.These include high energy costs, unfair supply chains, and a food system where retailers earn more profit from unhealthy food than from fresh produce. Importantly, the researchers stress that expanding horticulture would not harm the UK’s ability to produce other food.
They estimate that an additional 113,622 hectares would be needed to increase production by 86% — a figure smaller than the 133,000 hectares currently used to grow bioenergy crops for fuel rather than food. Bioenergy crops, they point out, are an inefficient form of energy production, yielding 100 times less energy per hectare than solar power and relying heavily on government subsidies. Lydia Collas, head of natural environment at Green Alliance, said the UK public needed to eat more fruit and vegetables to improve health.
“But if we don’t grow more of them here, we’ll let profitable horticulture and the jobs it could support go elsewhere,” she added. “We currently import more than half of our apples when we have everything we need to eat British apples year-round.’
Starmer’s 25- year Plan has no protection from cheap substandard imports and no payments to our farmers, so they must rely on so-called market CO2 sequestration and BNG (biodiversity net gain) payments that have no incentive to grow food.
Listen Farm profitability Farm Gate, 23 April 2025
Joe Stanley (GWCT Allerton Project); “So The 25-Year Plan for farming was launched by Steve Reed, Secretary of State, and with my slightly cynical hat on, the first thing that many farmers have said in response to this 25-Year Plan to make farming more profitable, and this was certainly something that was put to him at the NFU’s conference, back in February was; the first thing you should do is essentially rescind the inheritance tax that you’ve levied on farms, as AHDB and NFU both said, essentially 75% of farms are going to be saddled with, in most cases, entirely unsustainable level of debt in the coming 2 decades or so. Now, we’re not going to go back into that now. But again, I think that is the first thing that most farmers are thinking about when we’re talking about profitability in farming. But ultimately what the government’s trying to do here or what Steve Reed is trying to do, is to build on his New Deal for Farming, which was set out ahead of the last election. I’m on record as saying that the New Deal was pretty thin gruel. I really do feel that in many cases what we’re looking at here with this 25-Year Plan is essentially what government do to come up with a policy which doesn’t really involve spending any money. Now The New Deal for farming was essentially saying; farmers are going to take advantage of things like great British energy, farmers are going to take advantage of things like a renewed trade relationship that we’re going to build with the EU in the coming years under a Labour government. Now, there was nothing in there that was actually specifically going to help farmers in the short term, specifically, nothing in there really that involved the government putting its hand into its pocket.
And this is why, I described it as really thin gruel. And again, this 25-Year Plan, it was announced to great fanfare. I sense all it’s really trying to do is to move the conversation on from inheritance tax. No farmer is going to disagree that we need to have a more profitable industry, whether we’re talking about food, whether we’re talking about nature, we have to have those profits coming into the sector from the marketplace in order to sustain that industry. But my concern is that what we’re just seeing here is an opportunity to essentially kick the ball down the road.”
ffinlo Costain; “There are all kinds of other confusions that the government has set in place with its approach to policy on ELMS and all kinds of things. They’re saying that they want to manage this transition at the same time as effectively cutting off the legs from the farming industry by taking away some of the key funding. But at the same time, clearly what the government wants, and I don’t think there’s any obfuscation about this, is they want farmers to be independent and there’s no secret here they want to stop subsidising agriculture. So far as they’re concerned, since the end of the Common Agricultural Policy, that subsidy has ended. It’s now about payments. It’s payments for specific actions largely around nature. And there will be some payments in the future, we suspect through ELMS for those areas that are particularly challenging, like the uplands in terms of producing food and and fibre from those areas.”
Watch this wonderful film about the falsehood that GDP measures success, when in fact GDP increases with war, pollution, sickness and social breakdown.
Watch; They Call it Progress Local Futures, 22 April 2025
‘Governments around the world incessantly tell us about the importance of economic growth. But they don’t tell us that this growth is making global corporations richer, while making us poorer. Watch our latest animation ‘They Call It Progress’ for a closer look at what economic growth — measured as a rise in GDP — is actually about. Growth isn’t about health, well-being, or happiness. Not even about increasing our financial wealth.
The rise in GDP – Gross Domestic Product – is used as an indicator of progress. But GDP simply measures the flow of money. Harmful events, like war leading to a rise in arms sales, an environmental disaster requiring clean-up, and a sick population needing medicating, all boost the GDP. Jobless growth (fewer jobs) and low pay can also favor a rise in GDP. Economic growth tells us nothing about the health and well-being of people or the planet. Let´s expose the myth of economic growth together and reject GDP as a measure of progress. Genuine progress comes when we care for each other, for the land, water, and air. It is when we live in peace and have dignified livelihoods, affordable housing, and good health. Let´s push to redirect power from money-grabbing corporations to life-serving and affirming communities that have our well-being at heart. Help us spread the message by sharing ‘They Call it Progress‘.
Food and farming under so called Free Trade
Trade tariffs to protect local food production would be a great but not if the size of the tariffs is simply to blackmail countries to play by Trump’s rules, otherwise they will get high tariffs. As Helena says; ‘we need to condemn globalisation loud and clear. And we need a cohesive strategy that moves us sensibly and sanely in the opposite direction.’
Read; Trump’s Tariffs = Localist Liberation? by Helena Norberg-Hodge and Henry Coleman, 10 April 2025
‘Last week, on so-called “Liberation Day,” the Trump administration announced its new wave of tariffs. The language was poignant. Liberation. It was a word meant to stir, to conjure up the dream of breaking free from foreign exploitation. Dependence on global trade is indeed a trap. For decades, our deepening reliance on faraway markets and supply chains has left us unable to meet even our most basic needs – from food to jobs to medicine. We’ve become chronically dependent on the whims of global businesses, banks, and their distant, profit-hungry boards – institutions over which we have no control.
So there is a real need to move away from this dependence by diversifying our national economies. In fact, in an era of climate shocks and pandemics, it makes sense to decentralize the production of our basic needs as much as possible. And this would require the right to prioritise and protect our local, regional and national economies from global monopolies. Oh protectionism, that old word. Thanks to Trump, it’s been taken down off the back shelf and dusted off for the first time in decades. Most mainstream commentators speak the word like vitriol, but common sense begs: what’s wrong with protecting your own economy? The question is: protection from whom?
Trump believes the danger comes from other countries “ripping us off.” But that’s yesterday’s story. Today, multinational corporations hold more wealth and power than many nation-states – and they owe allegiance to no country. Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) clauses in trade treaties allow corporations to sue governments for trying to protect people or planet. From Thailand to Germany, governments have been sued for “lost profits” over everything from banning toxic mining to raising minimum wages. This paralyses national governments and makes a joke of democracy. It leaves no doubt about who calls the shots in the global economy.
Against this backdrop, tariffs offer no path to freedom. They are outdated, antagonistic gestures that pit countries against one another at a time when we should be uniting against our real common oppressor: corporate rule. That said, it is possible that tariffs could help reduce the most absurd kinds of global trade. Take, for example, the fact that, every year since the covid pandemic, the US has imported about 1.5 million tons of beef – more than any other country. And guess what – it exported almost exactly the same amount. This trade-for-trade’s-sake squanders precious resources, drives up emissions, enforces toxic monocultural farming across vast areas, and contributes to the build-up of mountains of plastic. But emissions from global trade receive no mention in the COP climate negotiations.
So perhaps a silver lining might yet be eked out of the tariffs proposed. To make a real difference, however, they’d need to be part of a coordinated plan to rebuild healthy national, regional or local economies. And Trump’s tariffs are part of no such plan. In fact, quite to the contrary: the administration recently cut $1 billion in funding for two USDA programs designed to help local food purchasing – initiatives that were just getting on their feet, born as they were out of the supply-chain chaos of the COVID era. Meanwhile, Trump’s tax cuts continue to favor the global elites, and his plans to ramp up industrial extraction do not square with any attempt to protect and nurture local resources.
In exposing the limitations of tariffs, let’s not buy into the propaganda spouted by the mainstream corporate media, which continues with zealous assertions that global trade benefits us all. Even left-wing commentators have been largely unhelpful in exposing the truth about global trade: that it’s enriched global corporations at the expense of society; that it’s been an ecological disaster and an economic trap. It’s also been an assault on people’s jobs and prosperity. In the Global South, millions of land-based people have been disenfranchised and uprooted to fuel sweatshop economies. In the North, workers have been laid off or demoted as jobs were shipped overseas. With the deregulation of trade and finance, the gap between rich and poor has widened to obscene proportions in almost every country, and even once-affluent middle-classes are plagued by economic instability and a cost-of-living crisis.
In this way, the economic tyranny of globalization is what made space for demagogues like Trump to come to power in the first place. The forces that elected him are largely borne of rising economic insecurity and discontent with the political process. And he is far from an isolated phenomenon. Confusion and fear, unaddressed by mainstream media and politics, has been capitalized on by the far-right worldwide. So, yes, we need to condemn globalization loud and clear. And we need a cohesive strategy that moves us sensibly and sanely in the opposite direction.
The strategy would be two-fold:
Re-regulate multinational corporations. Rein in their impunity, revoke their special rights under trade law, and hold them accountable. This would be the first port of call for halting the corporate takeover of our democracies and protecting human rights and the environment.
Simultaneously rebuild resilient, regional economies. This means reinvesting in local infrastructure, supporting education and training for place-based employment, prioritizing research and development for smaller-scale production, clearing red tape for local businesses, and—most crucially—regenerating the real economy: soil, water, biodiversity, and the fabric of interdependent human communities.
In many areas of the world, from the USA to China, from India to Australia, people are already engaged in this work: they are forming local business alliances, starting local finance initiatives, exploring locally-based education and energy schemes, and, most centrally, building a genuinely regenerative local food movement. All of these efforts reweave the fabric of local interdependence and connection. And while they are already growing, policy change is really needed to help them multiply and flourish. This two-pronged plan has a name: localization. And that would offer a real escape from the global trade trap – a scheme worthy of the word liberation.’
To be healthy now and into the future, resist the corporate-controlled global trade in food described by Vandana Shiva by buying chemical and cruelty-free local, seasonal, unprocessed food.
Watch; “The Seeds of Vandana Shiva” mangutv, 7 February 2025
Vandana Shiva; “We cannot eat mindlessly. We cannot allow a system that has created hunger with a billion people hungry, where millions die every year for lack of food, when the earth gives enough food for all. And yet an industrial system denies other species their right to food. It denies peasants their right to food. It denies the poor people their right to food. This is a violent economy. Food is the most fundamental right for us. It’s a social imperative to take responsibility, to take responsibility and know what we are growing, how we are growing, to know the farmer who grew our food and to eat locally. The social imperative is the social revolution of our times.”
Vandana Shiva has been saying for decades that the corporate global food system destroys soils, breaks up rural communities, drives farmers into debt and suicide and produces unhealthy, contaminated food.
Watch; If ever there was a time for humanity to wake up, now is the time; James Melville, 19 April 2025
Vandana Shiva; “My country was the first where they made cash illegal. In 2016 digitalisation was forced on the country, at 8 o’clock in the evening it was announced that at midnight cash was illegal, the big notes, and 70% of the economy crashed. This digitalisation is now going all over the world and there’s a war on cash. They call it war on cash because cash is merely a medium of exchange. It has no value in itself. It’s just a promise. You read the dollar note, it says I promise to pay the bearer. When it’s digital, even a credit card, you’re giving rents to the global financial system. But when it’s cryptocurrency in the hands of algorithms, in the hands of big tech, they will do what is happening in China, create a social credit system to decide a new caste system. And you might have also followed that while all this has been happening, the founder of the World Economic Forum did a book called The Great Reset on how to deal with the COVID crisis. And everything we’re seeing unfold is part of that Great Reset. But an element of that Great Reset is ‘you will own nothing’. Now I’m a believer in the Commons, and it would be so good if all land was a Commons, if all seed was a Commons, if food was a Commons, if health was a Commons, so that we had strong public health systems, strong community health system, deep knowledge about being healthy. But when Klaus Schwab says you will own nothing, he says, we’ll own it all. That’s why you have Gates, not just owning the seed, wanting to own our food, but also of course controlling health and now owning land. If ever there was a time for humanity to wake up, now is the time.”
My colleague’s comment on reading the article below; ‘Just criminal. Makes me want to go to support Marxism. Fuck off US farm corporates.’
Read ‘Vance Go Back!’ — Indian Farmers on US VP’s Visit; Consortium News, 24 April 2025
‘Thousands of farmers and working-class people in cities and villages across India took to the streets to protest the visit of U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance. They claim he has come to finalize an agreement which will be a disaster for India’s agriculture and small industries. Vance arrived in New Delhi on Monday on a four-day tour in the country. As per widespread reports, his primary agenda is to finalize a trade agreement between the two countries. The talks over the agreement have been ongoing since the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the U.S. in February. The protesters gathered in villages and district headquarters across India with posters and banners denouncing the Indian government’s failures to safeguard their interests and chanting slogans such as “Vance go back,” and “India is not for sale!” In some places protesters also burned effigies of Vance. Left-leaning All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS), the largest farmers’ group in the country, issued a statement on April 18 in which it asked all its units to launch the ‘Vance go back’ campaign and to oppose the proposed trade agreement with the U.S. It called the agreement a surrender of India’s interests.
The AIKS statement claimed that Vance’s visit to India “is a part of putting pressure upon the state of India and the corporate-led ruling classes to surrender the national interests to facilitate windfall profiteering to the multinational companies.” “The Indian prime minister has capitulated to the dictates of the U.S. president Donald Trump and is going ahead with the plans to ease tariff and non-tariff barriers for U.S. products, including farm products,” the statement claimed.
Trump announced a 26 percent tariff on all Indian exports to the U.S. on April 3 under his administration’s so-called reciprocal tariff regime. Though the imposition of new tariff rates was postponed for three months, Trump has long claimed that India’s tariff regime is unfair to U.S. products, accusing it of blocking access to its markets. Howard Lutnick, U.S. commerce secretary, has specifically claimed that India will not be allowed to have closed agricultural markets. He had claimed that opening India’s agriculture sector for American farm products was a central objective of the proposed trade deal.
AIKS claims opening India’s farm sector to U.S. farm products will harm Indian agriculture — already in a years-long crisis — and affect millions of farmers and their families. Any deal of the nature described by U.S. officials would mean death for India’s dairy industry in particular, AIKS claimed. “The on-going trade negotiations is a deliberate move so that cheaper cotton, soybean, maize, apple etc. from the U.S. can be dumped in India, literally swamping the market. This will lead to a price crash for Indian farmers,” AIKS claimed.
The farmers’ group claims such a deal would negatively affect the Indian farmers’ struggle against the government’s attempt to introduce corporate interests in agriculture. It also raised concerns that if U.S. farm products flood Indian markets, pushing for a legal minimum support price (MSP) for Indian farm products would become much more difficult. Vijoo Krishnan, general secretary of AIKS and a politburo member of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), claimed in a video message on Sunday that, if the trade agreement with the U.S. goes as planned, it will further intensify the crisis of Indian agriculture, increasing farmers’ indebtedness. “In the last few years over 150,000 farmers have committed suicide due to indebtedness, this phenomena may increase in the coming days” if we fail to stop the trade agreement with the U.S., Krishnan said.’
From the enclosures of common land, which privatised common pasture, our disconnection from the land continues today.
Watch Should we redistribute land? Farming Explained, 6 April 2025
Tony Gosling; “We’ve got about 60 million acres. Make sure everyone’s got at least 1/4 of an acre, and then you’ve got a contented population that are not being coerced into working for somebody they don’t agree with, don’t trust or don’t like. It’s the rentier class. These are the people that want to sit on their backsides and do nothing and just rake it in from everyone else and I think that they should be gaoled.
I personally prefer a feudal system in that you have a relationship with your local feudal landowner rather than with a bank that might own or a merchant that might own doing something from afar. ……So you really want to have someone local who you pass in the street as your local landowner rather than some sort of faceless company or corporation.
I’m very much more of a royalist because I could see that Charles 2nd was trying to stop this mass depopulation (of the countryside) and he was trying to stop the enclosure and privatisation. In a way all the privatisation we’re seeing today through the Thatcher era and carrying on today. This was one of the first big privatisations that ever happened in the world. And it led to mass urbanisation, the industrial revolution and empire. I think we’ve just got to understand how all this fits in. I think there’s one village in Nottinghamshire which has never been enclosed. Blackstone, it’s called, and it’s just a different atmosphere.
I’m not saying that modern farming is a bad thing, but this is the context we’re in, where the population of England, particularly Britain obviously has been made landless. So we’re rooted in the land, it’s our country supposedly. But no, we have to float around on it and we’ve got no rights to it’s resources and we’ve got no rights to somewhere to work or live and that’s a process which really kicked off with the enclosures.”
The same free trade agenda that India is fighting against has been destroying UK farmers since the Thatcher era. Despite this, in the podcast below the BBC typically gives no protectionist voice to counter the free trade narrative. If the US exported goods worth $92 billion to the UK last year, and food exports made-up just $3 billion of that, we are already undermining our farmers. Why not take a leaf out of Putin’s book where he welcomed sanctions – not having to compete with cheap imports encouraged Russia to grow its own food. So, in the name of food sovereignty, the government should stop signing trade treaties, end all those that we have signed and thus protect home production.
Listen Trade talks BBC Farming Today, 25 April 2025
Presenter; “Talk of tariffs is giving way to talk about a trade deal between the UK and the USA, so we thought we’d try to work out what that might mean for food and farming. The government says they’re not going to negotiate on Food Standards, but given that the US exported goods worth $92 billion to the UK last year, that’s about £69 billion worth, and food exports made-up just $3 billion of that, how strong a voice can UK food and Agri business have in any negotiation? I spoke to Chris Southworth, secretary general of the International Chamber of Commerce.
Chris Southworth; “Well, first of all, nobody knows what the deal is because business have not been consulted properly. So it’s an unknown quantity. What we’re looking for is a really ambitious deal with or without the tariffs. I think we should be looking for that anyway. But the big opportunity here is not so much on on agriculture or food where there’s big disagreement on Food Standards, but much more on investment, data digitalization and trade. The improving the trade environment between the US, where we can work together to transform the trading environment globally. Let’s look at the agricultural side of things and things that farmers in particular are concerned about Now. The Prime Minister and the Chancellor have both reiterated that they’re not going to negotiate on Food Standards. So no beef where cattle have been given growth hormones, which are banned here, no chickens washed in antimicrobial washes. What farmers are worried about is that when push comes to shove, they might give way on that.”
BBC Presenter: “Is that at all likely?”
Chris Southworth; “We don’t know is the answer, but what we do know is that’s a complete showstopper in the sense that nobody agrees. We all agree with the farmers on that front. We all want high Food Standards. There’s a big global market for high Food Standards from the UK. We all recognise that the farmers and farming sector is under terrific pressure already. We don’t want to add more pressure to that. So I think the farmers in this case have huge support.
BBC Presenter; “There are, I suppose, sort of compromises, aren’t there? Because the USA does produce beef which isn’t fed hormones. So could we, for instance, allow that as a way of just making headway if we needed to?”
Chris Southworth; ” I think that’s one approach, quite complicated in terms of how you actually implement that, whether it’s a sort of green lane for non-hormone beef and chlorinated chicken and red lane for the opposite. But that’s quite hard to implement when it comes to exports and imports and customs and all the practical processes of trade.
BBC presenter; “You were saying earlier that we know very little about this trade deal because nothing’s being consulted on what businesses expect to have input.
Chris Southworth; “Yes, but I think so would consumers, so would unions, and so would others. So, we have to stand up for what we believe. We can’t compromise our relationship with the EU, which is a much bigger trade market than the US. That’s our biggest trade relationship. There’s a real opportunity to reset that relationship right now. And this, I suppose, is what makes a negotiation with America even more complicated, because we’re also looking towards Europe, which has a very different approach. Well, lots of other countries are in similar situations. If you look at the likes of Singapore they have to navigate around the needs of the ASEAN markets, but also China is the big, big market on their doorstep, but also the US. It’s not either or it’s a both and we just have to find that delicate balance between finding areas of agreement with the US but also not closing doors on the EU, which is a much bigger market, and keeping doors open to the rest of the world where there is a huge advantage and a real demand for UK goods and services.”
An African Green Revolution funded by the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and western governments, is destroying Africa’s food sovereignty and farm livelihoods.
Watch; How philanthropists are destroying African farms; It’s Complicated, 3 April 2025
‘What happens when western billionaires try to ‘fix’ hunger in developing countries? Neelam Tailor investigates how philanthropic efforts by the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and the organisation they set up to revolutionise African farming – the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) – may have made things worse for the small-scale farmers who produce 70% of the continent’s food.
From seed laws that criminalise traditional practices to corporate partnerships with agribusiness giants such as Monsanto and Syngenta, we explore how a well-funded green revolution has led to rising debt, loss of biodiversity and deepening food insecurity across the continent.’
Neelam Tailor; “In 2006, Bill Gates and a number of other philanthropists launched an ambitious plan to revolutionise farming in Africa. Now, taken at face value, that sounds like a good thing, but It’s actually created a new reliance as well as a whole host of other problems such as outlawing centuries-old traditional farming methods, forcing farmers to be dependent on Western corporations and creating a biodiversity crisis. And the really crazy thing is, this isn’t the first attempt at a western-led green revolution in developing countries. We’ve been here before, and the last time it didn’t end well, A similar project in India led to mass bankruptcies and an epidemic of suicides across the country. So why are philanthropists meddling in developing countries’ farming once again? For as long as farming has existed, African farmers have saved, swapped and shared seeds, a money-free system that’s provided over 90% of the seeds they plant. There are an estimated 33 million small scale farms across the continent, producing around 70% of Africa’s food supply. This biodiverse, self-sustaining method has fed communities for generations. Despite these methods, Africa struggled with poverty and hunger for centuries. And the reasons go far beyond agriculture. Nineteen of the world’s twenty poorest nations are in Africa. In large part, this is a legacy of colonial exploitation, which has stripped the continent of people and resources. Even after gaining independence, many African nations were left with weakened institutions, debt burdens and trade systems that prioritise profits and exports over feeding local communities.
And it was against this backdrop in 2006 that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation launched the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa, or AGRA, to boost farm productivity and help farmers and their families lift themselves out of poverty in hunger. Bill Gates believes that the key to solving the continent’s hunger is in optimising farming. AGRA now works in 13 African countries, aligning seed laws with its mission for Africa to feed itself and the world. But what does that actually mean in practice? In Kenya, one of AGRA’s key focus countries, the 2012 Seed and Plant Varieties Act made it illegal to sell, share or save uncertified seeds for commercial crops.
Farmer Lady; “When I was a child we used to save the seeds from our harvest. This is what we planted and would grow into healthy maize. Now all our strength and hope is with the government, but they want to oppress us to our demise.”
Neelam Tailor; “Farmers can keep seeds for personal use, but those who trade them face fines of over £6,000 or up to two years in prison. And Kenya isn’t alone. Across the continent, new seed laws are forcing farmers to abandon their traditional practices and buy certified seeds from multinational corporations every planting season. But this model isn’t new. AGRA’s approach was modelled on the Green Revolution in Asia and Latin America, which introduced high yield seeds, fertilisers and pesticides to boost crop production in the 50s and 60s. It was heavily funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, started by America’s first billionaire, John D Rockefeller. They hired scientist Norman Borlaug, often called the father of the Green Revolution. Borlaug’s high yield wheat varieties were hailed as a breakthrough, and in 1970 he won a Nobel Peace Prize for his work. However, while these innovations averted food shortages in the short term, they led to long term issues. In India, the Green Revolution replaced diverse crops with monocultures which degraded soil and drained water supplies.
By the 1990’s, the crisis had spiralled into an epidemic of farmer suicides as thousands trapped in debt from expensive seeds and fertilisers took their own lives. Critics argue that the same patterns are now being replicated across Africa. For a clear example, we can look to Zambia. Once hailed as an AGRA success story, in 2009 the country launched subsidies to push over one million farmers to switch to commercial seeds and intensive fertiliser. But the country has since faced droughts which wiped out these non-traditional crops and the soil is so degraded from chemicals that farmers struggle to grow anything else. The number of undernourished Zambians increased by 29%. Today six million Zambians, nearly 1/3 of the population, face malnutrition. But there’s an even bigger problem, the growing corporate grip on Africa’s seeds. AGRA and its allies promote commercial seed laws that benefit a handful of corporations like Bayer, Monsanto, Syngenta and DuPont, which now control 60% of the world’s seeds and nearly 70% of the chemicals used to grow food. The laws are also reinforced by UPOV 91, an international agreement that restricts farmers from saving or sharing seeds. The goal? To give plant breeders exclusive rights to their seed varieties, supposedly to boost innovation and food security. But in reality, small scale farmers can’t even access that system. The certification process is too expensive and their seeds, which naturally evolved to changing environments, can’t meet uniformity requirements.
Meanwhile, Western corporations patent and profit from plant varieties that have existed for generations. AGRA’s deep ties to Agri-business giants has raised concerns as well. Rob Horsch, a former senior executive at Monsanto, helped shape AGRA’s policies while working at the Gates Foundation before retiring in 2021. In 2010, the Gates Foundation bought 500,000 shares in Monsanto, fuelling speculation about it’s influence over African agriculture. And yet, despite all this, AGRA has failed to meet it’s own goals. It’s set out to cut food insecurity in half by 2020, but hunger has actually increased in many regions.
The good news is this isn’t happening in silence. A number of countries in Africa have rejected GM crops and monocultures altogether, and in countries bringing in strict seed laws, farmers are fighting back. In 2022, faith and farming leaders demanded the Gates Foundation pay reparations for the ecological and social damage caused by its Green Revolution policies. And one of the biggest challenges for these laws is happening right now in Kenya, where farmers have taken the Seed and Plant Varieties Act to court for violating their constitutional rights to practise traditional farming and to have sovereignty over their food.”
Trump is going to control relations with countries through how high or low he imposes tariffs.
Listen Trump Tariffs: Method or Madness? UK Column News, 25 April 2025
Mark Anderson; “There was also talk a few weeks ago on UK Column about is there a plan amongst all this seeming chaos by the Trump administration? Is there a method to the madness? I’m not going to say firmly there is or there isn’t. I looked around a lot and made some calls, this Money and Macro site is pretty objective. He’s not totally sold on what Trump is doing. He’s trying to look at it as unbiasedly as he can. The host of this, we have a video clip called, ‘He Actually has a Plan’, and it has to do with the mega master plan to replace the neoliberal order and things like that. So let’s watch a little bit of this. It gives you some idea of what could be a plan, but the jury’s still out in some respects.”
Trump; “I always say tariffs is the most beautiful word to me in the dictionary.”
Presenter; “Donald Trump, who changes his mind between breakfast lunch and suppertime. What the heck is going on? Why is Trump hitting his closest allies with tariffs? Why does he no longer care about crashing the stock market? Does this guy actually have a plan? Yes. Believe it or not, I’m here to tell you that yes, as Trump’s new Treasury Secretary Scott Bassett recently put it. ‘President Trump’s tariff policies had begun the process of reorienting our international economic relations.’ That’s right, he says tariffs have begun the process. In other words, his tariff chaos is just the start of a much bigger plan. A plan aims to upend the entire world trading system that the US itself created. This has really only happened twice before, once in 1944, marking the start of the Bretton Woods system, and then in the early 80s with Reagan and Thatcher marking the beginnings of the neoliberal world order. So here we are today, 2025. Is this the start of a completely new global order, a new US-centred order that will emerge right after the current chaos in which countries are divided in three groups, or as Scott Bessent (US Treasury Secretary) says, ‘I think we should make it very clear that there is a green, a yellow and a red bucket and we let everyone know where they are’. In these buckets, it will become very clear that some countries get low tariffs, military protection and maybe even some preferred U.S. dollar access, while others are left to fend for themselves.”
Inheritance Tax
Farmers need to take dramatic actions against a government that wants the corporations to own and control our food economy. Their 2-week wheat strike might only have confirmed the government’s priority to source lower standard food from abroad but it was perhaps a call to support farmers or lose them.
Watch Milling wheat strike in UK Olly Harrison, 31 March 2025
Olly Harrison, Farmer and Activist; “You might be wondering why bread and hot cross buns are scarce at shops at the moment and I’ll tell you why. Because milling wheat is staying on farms. Farmers that are growing milling wheat have gone on strike. From the 1st of April they will not be loading any trucks with milling wheat and we’re probably going to run out of flour which will result in run out of hot cross buns and bread. So if you wonder why the shelves are empty, get on to your local MP and say you need to help these farmers out. You can’t carry on putting them out of business. It’s not good. So yeah, if there’s rationed bread and cakes and hot cross buns it’s the politicians fault. It’s not our fault we can’t carry on any longer, we won’t be in business.”
Read; Bread shortages expected as UK farmers launch milling wheat strike Farmers Guide, 1 April 2025
‘From today, 1st April, a large number of farmers have agreed that they will not load milling wheat out of their stores. This movement is set to showcase the fragility of UK supply chains and prove that dependency on imports is not in favour of customers. Farmers who are milling wheat growers have been encouraged to join others and not load from 1st April for at least the first two weeks of the month. If you have an existing contract, you have until the end of the month to deliver it. The organisers of the movement, who also stand behind the London farming rally, said that if you are not a milling wheat grower, you may wish to invest in your farm’s future with a trip to your local shops and buy a bit extra and “get those shelves empty faster”. UK farmers have also been asked to spread the word about the initiative.’
CO2 tunnel vision
With their blind obsession with renewable energy, urban-based food, farming and environmental NGOs are perpetuating the carbon tunnel vision scam fueling the theft of precious farm land to build solar farms and not grow food.
Read; Mass-scale solar panels, James Melville, 15 April 2025
‘Energy Secretary, Ed Miliband has approved a number of mass-scale solar panels on UK prime farmland despite local community objections. Solar panels shouldn’t be used on prime agricultural land. Instead, put them on brownfield land, car parks, roofs and roads.’
Energy Secretary, Ed Miliband has approved a number of mass-scale solar panels on UK prime farmland despite local community objections.
Solar panels shouldn’t be used on prime agricultural land. Instead, put them on brownfield land, car parks, roofs and roads. pic.twitter.com/DpH8FXxrPF
— James Melville ???? (@JamesMelville) April 15, 2025
Economic growth is the driver for corporate profits from trashing our old systems and adopting new. An example of this scam was when Dr Richard Beeching Chairman of the British Railways Board, a Tory Minister, closed railway lines and stations to force us to buy cars from the government’s corporate funders. We would have been better off without our dependence on cars and all the external costs suffered by the excessive use of road vehicles from mining resources and accidents to noise and pollution; give me an Armish lifestyle anyday.
Read; Britain’s net zero economy is booming Political Concern, 11 April 2025
‘Rachel Reeves, said recently: “There is no trade-off between economic growth and net zero. Quite the opposite. Net zero is the industrial opportunity of the 21st century.”
Damian Carrington, the Guardian’s Environment editor, reports that the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), commissioned the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, to analyse the growth attributable to businesses working in areas including renewable energy, electric vehicles, heat pumps, energy storage, green finance and waste management and recycling.
The figures contradict claims by Reform UK that “net zero is crippling our economy“.’
Read Ed Miliband is risking economic and energy security on the altar of net zero James Melville, 6 April 2025
‘Ed Miliband is risking economic and energy security on the altar of net zero (while rewarding major corporations paid by the taxpayer). Fears for food security as Miliband pushes through Britain’s biggest solar farm.’
More and more precious heritage farmland is being covered with solar panels that should be on warehouses, motorway embankments and parking lots.
Listen Solar panels on framland ffinlo Costain, Farm Gate, 28 April 2025
George Dunn, Chief Executive Tenant Farmers Association; “I think the problem here, ffinlo, is that we are forced into a position of having to take what might be couched in linear programming terms as corner solutions due to the grid capacity and the structure of our electricity generation network. Frankly, our grid connection network is not fit for purpose and neither is it efficient to be transporting electricity over vast areas using underground and overground cables. Both these issues mean that we have developers looking to take large tracts of land out of agricultural use and into solar energy schemes to fit with that archaic network of grid connections. And the situation between those who own the land and those who rent the land is I suppose a bit like the analysis of the English breakfast between the pig and the chicken, the chicken needs to make a contribution, it’s the pig who has to make the sacrifice. And in this case, it’s the tenant who’s forced to sacrifice their business and their farming of the holding for a decision to allow a development which the landlord will invariably take advantage of. Now, although there’s often talk about grazing between the panels for sheep, it’s not really a realistic economic prospect from most tenant farmers.
Geoengineering
#Nutter pic.twitter.com/Q9IyjvWSrp
— Kimmi Diamond ???? (@Kimmi520381244) April 28, 2025
We have to wonder who is brainwashing politicians to be so stupid to believe that climate change is so bad that they have to change the climate and poison themselves along with their minions, in an imagined way, to prevent the climate from changing!!!!
Read UK To Greenlight Experiments To “Dim The Sun” In Bid To Stop Global Warming by Tyler Durden, ZeroHedge 24 April 2025
‘It’s a project reminiscent of the movie Snowpiercer, in which governments institute a global experiment to spray chemicals into the atmosphere to stop global warming and end up creating a new ice age instead. Once again reality is downstream from fiction as the UK is set to bankroll an experiment to “dim the sun“. This goal will be pursued in field trials which could include injecting aerosols into the atmosphere, or brightening clouds to reflect sunshine.
The project is being considered by scientists as a way to prevent “runaway climate change”, despite the fact that there is zero evidence to support the claim of runaway climate change. ARIA, the Government’s advanced research and invention funding agency, has set aside £50 million for projects, which will be announced in the coming weeks.’
This video will prove to those who still think chem (chemical) trails, that are manipulating the weather, are con (condensation) trails that appear naturally after normal aeroplanes.
Watch Observe closely as the chemtrail plane switches off the sprayers once it completes delivering it’s payload; Bryan Douglas, 19 April 2025
Though i have run out of time to listen to it, for an update on a myriad of news items (some of which are in the newsletter below) watch;
UK Column News; Friday, 2nd May 2025; presented by Mike Robinson, Patrick Henningsen and Mark Anderson with Friday’s UK Column News.
Censorship/Surveillance/Coercion/Corruption/Blackmail
Though the title mentions Bolsonaro, the article is about how USAID undermines democracies the world over to ensure the U.S. gets its stooge politicians into power.
Read USAID funded Brazil’s judiciary to target Jair Bolsonaro and his supporters; Rhoda Wilson, The Exposé, 31 March 2025
‘It’s not only in Brazil where USAID money has been used to fund nefarious activities.
Revelations since the Trump Administration began reorganising and cutting USAID indicate that USAID has been involved in funding and promoting censorship initiatives abroad. According to internal documents, USAID has been working with private sector technology companies, media organisations, education ministries and national governments to adopt social media censorship practices under the guise of combating misinformation.
USAID’s Disinformation Primer, an internal document, outlines strategies to influence these entities to adopt censorship practices. The document identifies ordinary people forming independent opinions online as a significant threat.
Additionally, USAID has been linked to funding media outlets that engage in smear campaigns and censorship against dissident voices. For instance, BBC Media Action, a charity linked to the BBC, received substantial funding from USAID and has been accused of engaging in censorship under the guise of “combating misinformation”.
“[USAID], known as a front for US intelligence operations, has financed regime change and other American interests worldwide. It also funds news organisations that are aligned with US foreign policy objectives. This includes large international organisations that, in turn, fund smaller media organisations like BBC Media Action,” The Defender said.
The agency also funds smaller media organisations directly and operates its own media initiatives to challenge regimes that the US considers problematic, The Defender said. “Reporters Without Borders, which lamented the Trump cuts to USAID, reported that in 2023 the agency funded 6,200 journalists, 707 non-state news outlets and ‘supported 279 media-sector civil society organisations dedicated to strengthening independent media’.
Quoting Michael Shellenberger, The Defender said, “USAID has, in recent years, been funding censorship worldwide through its countering disinformation programme, which is part of its consortium for elections and political process strengthening. This work has included funding for so-called fact-checking organisations.”’
Many countries are run by banksters.
Watch Canada’s Trump election: Sleazy politics amid US tariffs & annexation threats Geopolitical Economy Report, 28 March 2025
Radhika Desai; “What we are suffering from right now is too much financialisation. We need to shift our policies towards a more productive economy, which bankers of the ilk of Mark Carney are not going to be able to do.”
Dmitri Lascaris; “The Western world is becoming dominated by bankers. Emmanuel Macron, the president of France, is a banker, and the man is fabulously unpopular. The Prime Minister of Greece, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, is a banker. In Italy they had two bankers, they had Mario Monti, and then they had Mario Draghi, Goldman Sachs bankers. How’s that country faring nowadays? And then they brought in this guy Frederick Mertz in Germany, who was the German, the chairman of Germany’s BlackRock operations. We are becoming completely dominated by the banking industry at the political level.
Radhika Desai; “Since Donald Trump’s re election the world has been on a geopolitical roller coaster and Canada in particular has gone from being a nice boring country that’s on nobody’s radar to being in the eye of the Trump storm and it’s been a hair raising ride so far. Trump’s election has already had many effects on Canadian politics. He prompted Prime Minister Trudeau’s visit to Mar a Lago in an unprecedented visit to a president-elect to avoid dangers of tariffs. And once he got there, it was only to suffer the insult of being told that Canada should consider becoming the US’s 51st state to avoid tariffs and later being called Governor Trudeau. Trump has also precipitated a party leadership election challenge, and as the election neared, the party establishment went to work recruiting an apparently impeccable candidate, former governor of the banks of Canada and England, and is totally a part of the globalist World Economic Forum style elite, namely Mark Carney.
Watch Marine Le Pen Thunders After France Verdict; Watch Macron Rival’s ‘Nuclear Bomb’ Warning; Times of India, 1 April 2025
‘French far-right leader Marine Le Pen appeared in her usual fierce campaigning mode during a press conference after yesterday’s court verdict effectively banning her from the 2027 presidential race. Calling the guilty verdict a nuclear bomb used against her, Le Pen declared the National Rally would “not let the French people have the presidential election stolen from them.” Watch for more details.’
Read So, let me get this straight Margarita Simonyan, 1 April 2025
‘Le Pen faces imprisonment over €2.9M EU funds that she allegedly misused. But IMF chief Christine Lagarde was found guilty of handing €403M of EU taxpayers’ money to a tycoon, yet received no sentence and is now running the ECB.’
Watch Setting the Record Straight on the North Tower Antenna International Center for 9/11 Justice, 5 April 2025
‘Seventeen years after he forced NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) to backtrack on its false claim that Building 7 did not come down in free fall, retired physics teacher David Chandler has produced yet another measurement that blows the NIST World Trade Center investigation out of the water. This time around, Chandler has taken aim at NIST’s unproven assertion that the vertical drop of the North Tower’s antenna, which began a half-second prior to the downward motion of the building, was merely an illusion caused by the top of the building along with the antenna tipping southward as the exterior columns on the south face allegedly gave way before the rest of the structure. In his recent paper in the Journal of 9/11 Studies (https://ic911.org/films-and-videos/sh) Chandler proves that the antenna did indeed experience a vertical drop prior to any significant tipping, which must have been caused by the simultaneous failure of all of the core columns prior to the failure of any exterior columns. This finding invalidates NIST’s scenario that the collapse of the North Tower initiated along its south face. It also solidifies yet another piece of evidence for controlled demolition.
In this episode of IC911’s new podcast, IC911 Executive Director Ted Walter speaks with Chandler and civil engineer Jonathan Cole about the significance of Chandler’s new paper.
About the Guests
David Chandler has been actively researching the scientific aspects of 9/11 since 2007. He is currently the coordinator of Scientists for 9/11 Truth in addition to serving on the board of the International Center for 9/11 Justice. Chandler is best known for his research into the dynamics of the World Trade Center building collapses — which is documented in the many analytical videos (https://ic911.org/films-and-videos/sh) he produced and narrated as well as in papers — and for forcing the National Institute of Standards and Technology to admit that WTC 7 underwent more than two seconds of absolute free fall. He has also extensively studied the attack on the Pentagon (https://911speakout.org).
Jonathan Cole, PE (Professional Engineer), has been a registered professional engineer for over 35 years. In 2010, he began conducting real-world experiments in his backyard to either prove or disprove the official explanation of the Twin Towers and Building 7’s destruction. He is well-known for the videos he made documenting these experiments, all of which can be found at his YouTube channel physicsandreason (physicsandreason) and at 911speakout.org (https://911speakout.org/jonathan-cole)’
The Online Safety Act, disguised as a measure to protect adults and children from ‘harmful’ content, is a sweeping power-grab by the government that can now censor online content at will. Ofcom has been given powers to arbitrarily impose fines of up to £18 million. Bitchute is stepping down as the risks from these new powers mean they could be bankrupted for publishing material the government doesn’t like. The UK government kept Julian Assange in detention for 15 years, as an example of what could happen to any journalist that publishes truthful information that embarrasses our vindictive, secretive and lawless government.
UK Column reports on how UK censorship rules prevent Bitchute from operating in the UK
‘BitChute UK Regulation ‘After careful review and ongoing evaluation of the regulatory landscape in the United Kingdom, we regret to inform you that BitChute will be discontinuing its video sharing service for UK residents. The introduction of the UK Online Safety Act of 2023 has brought about significant changes in the regulatory framework governing online content and community interactions.’
As UK Column is the very best news channel, whenever I link to them I will list their time stamps so you can choose what to watch.
Timestamps: 00:00 UK Censorship Expands: BitChute Withdraws, Ofcom’s Reach Grows, Another Platform Falls Silent 12:20 Digital ID Disaster Incoming: Data Leaks, Dead Phones, No Battery, No Access! 20:53 Strategic Shifts in the Middle East: Militias Reposition, Pressure Builds, Alliances Tested 29:48 Trump Talks: Iran & Netanyahu 33:00 Genetic Editing Gone Wild: Woolly Mammoths, Dire Wolves, and the Return of Prehistoric Pets 38:19 Supermarkets Push Prices Up While Lab-Grown Meat Sneaks In 48:11 Grain Strikes, Biactive Herbicide and Folic Acid 56:06 Turkey and Israel: Rivals Over Syria’s Future
‘The shaping of the UN into; ‘A “World Brain” or a “digital crystal ball” run by Artificial Intelligence and governed by a small elect elite with “the ability to predict what will happen or what is needed in the future”.’
Listen Cabal v. Cabal: The Great Reset Is Technocracy by Jacob Nordangard, The Pharos Chronicles, 5 April 2025
“A week ago I participated in Brownstone Institutes spring retreat in Spain. I gave a 15 minute talk about the events now unfolding. Afterwards, fellow participant Ivor Cummins made a short interview with me.
This is the manuscript to my talk:
We are witnessing a monumental shift in world affairs. The second phase of what I label a technocratic coup has now been initiated. This is a revolution that is set to change everything in our global society. With a geopolitical map quickly being redrawn and the migration of humanity into the cybernetic digital machine.
The first phase of this Grand Transformation was rolled out during the COVID-19 “pandemic” and the joint declaration of “the Great Reset” by Klaus Schwab and Antonio Guterres from the newly formed global public-private partnership consisting of World Economic Forum and the United Nations.
The event kick-started a political process in the UN called Our Common Agenda that led up to the adoption of the Pact for the Future in September 2024. This largely overlooked document was written as a roadmap for navigating the troubled times we now find ourselves in.
A blueprint written by and for the modern day alchemists. Futurists intoxicated with delusions of grandeur, with the aim of realizing the promises of the Forth Industrial Revolution and a new technocratic global order based on scientific management and efficiency.
The end goal is to upgrade the United Nations into a future-oriented organisation that uses strategic foresight and behavioral design with the grandiose objective of steering the earth and achieving a balanced system. A “World Brain” or a “digital crystal ball” run by Artificial Intelligence and governed by a small elect elite with “the ability to predict what will happen or what is needed in the future”.
The Nine Fundamental Principles of Propaganda pic.twitter.com/WxkysfTHg5
— Ihsanullah Tipu Mehsud (@IhsanTipu) April 30, 2024
For inquisitive minds there is much wisdom at Stand in the light festival in Cumbria, 23 May 2025
With Sandi Adams prevented from speaking in Glastonbury, UK’s free speech police are silencing those opposing the World Economic Forum’s new world order.
Watch Silencing Glastonbury: When the People Are No Longer Heard UK Column News, 16 April 2025
Timestamps: 00:00 Fear-Based Control in Ukraine? UK State Propaganda and Mind Control 15:17 Antalya Diplomacy Forum: Jeffrey Sachs Lays It Bare 22:40 Cheltenham Event Stream Still Available — UK Column Is Member Funded, Please Join Us 26:39 Silencing Glastonbury: When the People Are No Longer Heard 31:51 From Banning the Local Press to Glory: Rees of Easton and His Lordship Ascension 39:53 Freeports in the UK: Tax Games — or Something More? What Are Special Economic Zones? 45:56 Predictix: DNA, AI, and the Infiltration of UK Mental Health
Sandi Adams; “We were going to host an event with Clive De Carle and Richard Vobes on the 2nd of May, and we were told when the organiser went to pay for the event it was already booked and she was told that we weren’t going to be allowed to speak. And we found out that earlier on in the year that they decided to censor certain talks in the Town Hall. It was the Property and Assets Committee that were put together and it was because Sasha Stone had done a speech at some kind of event there that only a few, well a couple of people who were within the Council and one that wasn’t, complained about it. So they use this as an excuse to actually ban what they call conspiracy theorists. They haven’t said as much, but the letter that we got from the town council seemed to point in that direction. But what they had a real problem with was Clive De Carle’s wonderful alternative medicines, supplements and his magic chair that they seem to have a problem with. And they almost made it sound as though he was pushing quackery.They said I would cause some kind of community tension by what I was talking about, because I was going to talk about UK corporate land grab and also the bid for the World Heritage site status by Glastonbury town council of Glastonbury. So they didn’t like any of that. But what’s interesting to do with Clive is that they mentioned that there was a conflict of interest with what he was doing, which is alternative medicine. And what is coming up in one of the buildings next door to the Town Hall, which has been paid for by the this big grant that we’ve had from government, it’s £23.3 million, I think from the Work the Town Deal, and so this is going into ANHS Trust Wellness Centre, that’s going into the building next door to the Town Hall, it’s a bit like a corporate takeover. So there’s a big thing to stop the World Heritage thing happening because there’s a lot of worry about that. It needs to be talked about. There is a consultation going on at the moment that they’ve already paid £30,000 for to gain status. It will cost £500,000. So we’re looking at all this very carefully and they don’t like it at all. So we’re not allowed to speak, basically.”
Boosted by Liz Truss’ extreme free market fanaticism, the UK is creating more ‘freeports’ where global capital and climate finance replace UK law and taxation.
Listen Freeports in the UK: Tax Games — or Something More? What Are Special Economic Zones? UK Column News, 16 April 2025
Sandi Adams; ” In these special economic zones they have taxes that are reduced or eliminated, planning regulations relaxed, environmental and labour laws may be weakened and often businesses, multinationals are given special privileges. Now they have a very different legal framework, so it’s a transfer of UK law into private legal frameworks of corporations. The freeport areas that we’ve got at the moment are Teesside, Humber, Thames, Felixstowe, Harwich, East Midlands, Liverpool City Region, Plymouth and Solent. Then you’ve got the zones that are planned across West Midlands, Greater Manchester, Liverpool South and West Yorkshire, the Northeast and Northwest Yorkshire. Now these these tend to cluster in post industrial areas under the banner of regeneration. We’re seeing a lot of this, but the true beneficiaries are often global capital and multinational corporations. So these zones aren’t isolated policies, they’re components of a broader global restructuring agenda linked to Netzero and climate finance. SEZs (Special Economic Zones) and freeports will become hubs for Netzero infrastructure. These the projects are often bankrolled by public money, but controlled by private interest, creating greenwashing and public-private control. So it’s all about PPP, public private partnerships, controlling of the freeports. So you don’t know what’s going in and out of these ports. It could be anything, it could be drug trafficking, it could be people trafficking, it could be anything because they’re not regulated, they make up their own rules and they profit from the free trade that’s going through them. That’s the problem, SEZs align with the SDG goals like sustainable industry and resilient infrastructure, but in practice they concentrate control into fewer hands. That’s the problem. They enable technocratic governance, they support datafication and surveillance under smart city models. They’re stepping stones towards a post democratic world really. They embed unelected corporate power. They serve Net zero and technocratic control goals. So in essence, these are a real stepping stone to taking the power away from the people and UK government and turning it into technocratic governance.”
Mark Carney, ex-governor of the Bank of England and now Prime Minister of Canada, was in total agreement with Trudeau’s violent assault on the truck convoy protests against mandatory vaccinations in 2021.
Listen Meet Mark Carney, Globalist Insider The Corbett Report, 24 April 2025
James Corbett; “We’ll look at specifically what Carney said during the Freedom Convoy there in Canada a few years ago. Again, my listeners should be well aware and familiar with that story and the incredible, absolutely nightmare dystopic crackdown on protest that happened in Canada, the criminalisation of dissent that I have documented on this podcast before.”
Mark Carney; ‘It’s time to end the sedition in Ottawa by enforcing the law and following the money. In our capital city, many people have been terrorised for more than a week. Women fleeing abuse have been harassed. Many elderly have been too afraid to venture outside their homes for groceries. Families have been deprived of sleep for days on end by the constant barrage of 100 decibel noise. Control over the city’s downtown, which includes the parliamentary precinct, was ended by the police and taken over by what the chair of the Police Services Board describes as an insurrection.'”
Chris Vlek; “Now, did any of that happen?”
Jody Ledgerwood; “No, well the police did definitely end it, but they were the insurrection, it wasn’t us. The harassment and the abuse and the terrorising, that was police and what we found out from police later on was that over 100 vehicles, all with Canadian flags on them, all got trashed that night. So it was actually the people that were peacefully dancing and praying and singing and sharing their food, and sharing the shelter with the citizens of Ottawa. It was them that were harassed, either their vehicles were smashed or their stuff was stolen.”
James Corbett; “If this was about the values, for example protesting for climate change, Just Stop Oil, some sort of nonsense like that, absolutely, Mark Carney would not only have not written an op-ed calling them seditionists for protesting in such a way, he would have applauded their actions. Drawing the line means choking off the money that financed this occupation, he wrote, obviously a forewarning to the Canadian public about the absolute incredible travesty of injustice that was about to occur with the seizing of bank accounts. he goes on to spell it out in black and white, ‘by now anyone sending money to the convoy should be in no doubt you are funding sedition, which of course is a pretty serious charge that brings with it some pretty serious legal penalties.”‘
Justice has prevailed allowing Andrew Bridgen’s libel case against Matt Hancock to go ahead. After Andrew Bridgen tweeted, ‘As one consultant cardiologist said to me, this is the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust’, Hancock’s libelous reply was; ‘The disgusting and dangerous antisemitic, anti-vax, anti-scientific conspiracy theories spouted by a sitting MP this morning are unacceptable and have absolutely no place in our society.’
Breaking News Bridgen v Hancock Royal Courts of Justice judgement – Bridgen wins and the case will continue to final hearing. This is the second time Hancock has tried and failed to strike out the claim.
Breaking News Bridgen v Hancock Royal Courts of Justice judgement – Bridgen wins and the case will continue to final hearing. This is the second time Hancock has tried and failed to strike out the claim. pic.twitter.com/mbInjvt8YO
— Andrew Bridgen (@ABridgen) April 14, 2025
Russian-born journalist Yasha Levine explains the history of the weaponisation of the internet by US spooks to invade China’s infospace and spread misinformation and promote US-style criminal capitalism.
Watch The Secret Military History of the Internet The Chris Hedges Report, 2 April 2025
‘The internet, from its inception, was created as a tool of mass surveillance. Yasha Levine traces the origins of the web in his book, “Surveillance Valley,” and how its roots in counter insurgency shape its function today. ‘
Yasha Levine: “The origin of the Internet was about fighting insurgencies, about studying foreign populations, but also creating a platform that would allow America to run the world and to see the world – to make it transparent.
Chris Hedges; “Well, let’s talk about its domestic use. Because it wasn’t just used on fighters in Vietnam, it was used on anti-war activists in the United States.
Yasha Levine; “Anything that you deploy for use abroad, it immediately gets imported back into for domestic purposes. So almost immediately, this ARPANET (US military precursor to the internet) technology was used to ingest information about activists against the Vietnam war specifically. And what’s interesting is because a lot of the research that was part of the ARPANET programme that created the Internet was done at universities, students actually knew quite a bit about these things even in the late 60s.
Chris Hedges; “You talk in the book about, I think it was students at Harvard and MIT saw where this was going and publicly protested.”
Yasha Levine; ” It was interesting to me, writing this book and researching this book because I went into the archives at MIT, at Harvard, and looked at various declassified documents, and what was amazing to me is that students from the Students for Democratic Society at Harvard and MIT had a more complex and sophisticated critique of Internet technology or network technology than people did in the Obama era, because I was writing this book at the tail end the Obama era. And so people still viewed the Internet technology as a liberatory technology, as a democratic technology, that the Internet would create this global democratic village, people still believed that back then, people don’t believe it so much anymore.
Meanwhile, of course, the Internet is owned by these massive corporations, some of the wealthiest corporations on the planet. Of course they work with the NSA, with the CIA, with the FBI, the relationship has been intertwined from the very beginning, but people believed it, people believed the kind of marketing mythology that these Internet companies have pushed as part of their product. But in 1969 and 1968, when the first links were activated of the ARPANET links, the first nodes were starting to work together, already students at these universities were protesting them.”
Chris Hedges; “I want to get into the fact that these tech billionaires now are are essentially running rampant within the Trump administration. But talk a little bit about what you call the censorship arms race. This is the early 2000s, because I thought that was a really important point.”
Yasha Levine; “Because while on the one hand the Internet was being sold to American, but also global consumers as this ‘technology of utopianism and democracy’, America saw the Internet as a tool of American foreign policy and American power abroad. Because America developed this technology and as it was going outside of America and globalising and being picked up in Europe, in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union, and in China as well, America, the State Department and the CIA saw the Internet as a crowbar or something, that could essentially beam propaganda, you could use the Internet to reach foreign populations in a way that you couldn’t before. And so with China specifically, there began to be a conflict very early on in the 2000s about who gets to control the your domestic Internet space, and China very quickly understood that the Internet is a threat, that the Internet is a tool of American power, and then if it didn’t control its domestic Internet space, it left itself open to foreign influence from America and to various destabilisation programmes to propaganda and things like that, so China began to essentially control what gets past its national firewall, and to begin to erect this kind of defence against unfiltered American Internet content. Primarily a lot of these programmes that were targeting the Chinese population were funded by the CIA or spin offs from the CIA like Radio Free Asia and things like that. And so America could not accept that, it could not accept that another country would say, look, we want to control what happens within our borders, we don’t think that allowing CIA propaganda to just target our population is good for China, so we’re going to have a kind of a censorship regime against the outside. America could not abide that, to America that was essentially like someone closing its markets to American corporations. China would not allow Google or other American companies to operate freely in China, and so the US began funding these kind of anti-censorship technologies. In the first iteration, the organisation that was making these anti-censorship technologies, essentially tools that people in China could download to go around the firewall. Initially the main organisation that was involved in that was Falun Gong, which is this pretty crazy right wing cult that’s backed by the CIA that puts on all these sort of Chinese anti-communist ballets that you see posters for all over cities in America, and this cult was creating these programmes. But very quickly it moved to a different organisation, and that organisation was the Tor Project that became kind of the major anti-censorship tool that America was promoting in China, but also in other countries like in Iran and then later in Russia.”
How the Deep State infiltrates political parties to weaken them to become controlled opposition.
Listen Nigel Farage and the Destructive “Toryisation” of Reform UK UK Column, 17 April 2025
‘Reform UK’s Chairman for South Derbyshire, Job West, sent in his resignation letter on 10 February 2025. He stresses that he does not have confidence in Nigel Farage as the leader of Reform UK or in the management of Party Chairman Zia Yusuf, to whom his letter is addressed.
Job states that he had joined Reform with “the intention of destroying the uniparty [system] and that he considered the devastating defeat of the Conservatives [in the 2024 general election] to be the first step in achieving a truly representative government for the British people”. He adds that he “had hoped that Reform UK would be a truly democratic and grassroots-led movement”.’
Brian Gerrish; “As far as the activists were concerned, all of their hard work in the elections then started to break down. It started to sort of dissolve because you didn’t have the leadership, you didn’t have the direction, you didn’t have the enthusiasm from the senior league UKIP leadership team. And that particular incident was a key one for me where I thought what we’ve got happening here is a deliberate policy by the UKIP leadership to make sure that where success was taking place, it had limited effect. All that effect was dissipated. So I’ll pass it back to you again. But that’s one of the key things that came into my head when I read your resignation letter with Reform.”
Job West; “Well, I think that’s exactly the case. That’s the opinion that I’ve come to with Reform and I did see it with UKIP. I saw it back with UKIP back in 2018. I saw going back to the Tommy Robinson thing, there was Gerard Batman just stood down. Gerard Batman was trying to bring in the Tommy Robinson element into UKIP. There was a group within UKIP who under no circumstances wanted anything to do with Tommy Robinson. The election for the leadership came up and Richard Brain stood for the leadership. He won with 53% on the first ballot, so they didn’t have to have a second ballot. And he stood with the commitment that he would bring peace between the two factions. He said if you want to support Tommy Robinson, you can support Tommy Robinson. We’re not going to kick you out of the party. But equally I’m not going to pursue Tommy Robinson to become part of the party, perfectly rational, sensible position to take, a really middle of the road position for him to take. He got in, he was voted in, he was in for a month, maybe six weeks, and I watched as the NEC of UKIP and the chairwoman, Kirsten Harriet, backed up by the likes of Neil Hamilton and Ben Walker and a lawyer that they brought in called Piers Wauchope, did everything they could to make sure that Richard Brain was completely frustrated in what he was trying to do to the point where he and Liz Phillips just walked away from the party altogether. At the time I just thought, well, that’s just infighting in politics, that’s ridiculous. But now I recognise, because I’ve seen it in Reform, I see the pattern, what they try to do, I think with political parties, especially like you say, UKIP or Reform, smaller parties, or maybe The British National Party, all these parties, I think they get people to a certain point and then they frustrate them. They realise that frustration is a really good tactic to use in order to stop people being able to advance. Its that Fabian Society sort of like tactic where, if they can frustrate people, put people off, dishearten people, demoralise them so that they just shook their heads and feel what’s all this about? It’s a really effective, it’s subtle, it doesn’t take a lot of energy. All it takes is a few lies here, a bit of misdirection there, a little bit of gossip there. Its really easy to effect. It doesn’t take a lot of effort to do. But you can break down and you can control people’s ambitions or what they want when it comes to politics and how they people want to live their lives. You can do that. And it’s really easy. And when I think about the amount of resources that the state has and that the ruling class have at their disposal. Let’s say they have a meeting and let’s say they say, I know, how are we going to control this patriotic feeling that’s rising in the country? we’ve got to do something to be able to manipulate and control it. So there’s going to be parties that rise up. When those parties rise up, we’ll put our people in, they’ll be there to control that opposition. And this is what I’ve come to the conclusion, all political parties can be, I’m not saying they are, but they are open to the process of controlled opposition by our ruling class. And I believe it is our ruling class that is the problem.
And I genuinely think now what ordinary people have to do is to turn around and think to themselves what if I keep on waiting for the Saviour to come, the Saviour political movement to come and save me, you’re going to be wasting your time because you’re going to be waiting, because it could well be that every political party that comes along can be controlled and manipulated. So what people have to do is stand on their own feet, on their own connections, their own trust, relationships with people who are local and close to them. I think that is the way to go. Don’t bother looking up for your leadership, look to the side, look to your friends, look to your family. They’re the people whom you can work together with to live a better life. Try as much as you possibly can to avoid relying on government upon the state because I truly believe that the real problem is that class of people who find themselves in the positions of power. I am beginning to come to the conclusion that those particular positions in life, whether it be Westminster, Whitehall, the top of the civil service, whether it be the City of London and Commerce, they attract people who have a psychopathy, a psychopathic, sociopathic, narcissistic ideology. And that’s why we have the problems that we do. And once you’ve got a civilisation like ours that has now turned its back upon its own Christian, Protestant, Reformed ethics and morals, and you have this complete hedonism and will to power ideology where all that matters is me and there’s no great transcend power above me to which I am beholden, once you create that situation, which is what’s happened since the 1960s in this country, you’ve got a ruling class who are without morals, without ethics, don’t give a damn except for themselves. And they are psychopaths and they are narcissists and they are sociopaths. And the problem with pyramid systems is that they draw the few to the top who are the worst kind of people to rule.”
Brian Gerrish; “I came from a professional background, I came from a military background. Nigel Farage not only would not engage with me, he banned me from from attending the major UKIP events. There has to be a reason for this.”
Job West; ” As far as I’m concerned, life is a choice between good and evil. And I genuinely believe that these very people that I’m describing as parasites, vampires, psychopaths, who run our country, do so because in a materialistic way, let’s say, rather than a metaphysical way, they believe in evil. They believe that it’s quite all right to lie. They believe that it’s quite all right for people to die as long as their advantage is advanced. I believe that they’re quite prepared to rob people, to deprive people of their wealth, to take it off of them, unlawfully cheat them of it. I believe that these people see that as their right, they’re superior beings so they have the right to do this to you. And I see our political class as a materialistic manifestation of an evil that I’m afraid mankind has to live with. Until our Lord Jesus Christ returns, I’m afraid we’re just going to have to knuckle down and deal with people like that. And this is the process that we’re all involved in. People like you, people like me, people who are watching this programme because if they’re watching UK Column, that means that they are aware that something is going wrong and they want to find out the truth. You don’t come to somewhere like UK Column because you’re happy with GB News or you’re happy with the BBC, it’s when you’re unhappy with the BBC, you’re unhappy with GB News, that you come to UK Column and places like this because you’re not being told the whole truth and you need to find out the truth. There’s a feeling inside of us, and I believe that that’s a spiritual reality that exists in human beings. Some of us do have this inclination to need and desire the truth, it’s just something that’s visceral inside of us, we’ve got to have it. We need to discover it for our own peace of mind for the contentment of our own souls. Unfortunately, there is also the opposite. There are people who have no interest in the truth whatsoever.”
In the past Reiner Fuellmich sued Deutsche Bank that helped expose the Volkswagen emissions fraud. He is also the courageous German lawyer who spoke out against medical malpractice and scientific fraud during Covid for which, in an increasingly authoritarian corporate captured Germany, he has been jailed for over two and a half years.
Read; Reiner Fuellmich Sentenced To 3 Years and 9 Months Minus 13 Months For Time Served The Truth Barrier, 24 April 2025
‘The public gallery burst out ‘not in my name’.’
Covid/Vaccines Scam
Who can question a turncoat, a former Blackrock banker, when he says that the financial system is shaping the odious new world order.
Watch The Covid vaccines were designed to take care of a pension problem with the boomers Sudden And Unexpected, 7 April 2025
‘Ed Dowd, former BlackRock portfolio manager: “The Covid vaccines were designed to take care of a pension problem with the boomers, and then bring in 10 to 15 million younger, mostly male folks as replacement population.”
“If I was going to want to take care of a debt problem and inflate the economy, I would do exactly what’s happened.”‘
This is a blinding example of the revolving door between big pharma and the US health agencies that R F Kennedy Jr. has promised to tear down.
Read This is Julie Gerberding Jonathan Ramirez, 20 April 2025
‘This is Julie Gerberding. She was the CDC director who ordered CDC researchers to destroy evidence from a CDC study that proved the MMR jab causes Autism and other NDD associated with brain damage and brain inflammation.
This is Julie Gerberding. She left the CDC to take a job as president of Merck’s vaccine division. Merck is the maker of the MMR jab.
What do you call it when corporations get in bed with state authority and collude to amass power and subvert the will of the people?’
The truth about vaccine damage is slowly becoming mainstream, and one by one lawyers in US states are banning its use. When R F Kennedy Jr. tried to warn us about the dangers of the jab during Covid he was de-platformed and vilified.
Read Minnesota becomes 11th state to introduce mRNA vaccine ban Elizabeth Johnson, 11 April 2025
‘Minnesota has become the 11th state to see legislative efforts to ban vaccines based on mRNA gene technology as speculation grows about the safety of the controversial COVID shot. LifeSite notes that the ambitious legislation, HF 3152, would stipulate that “(n)o person shall provide or administer a gene-based vaccine to another person in this state.” The bill defines “gene-based vaccine” as a “vaccine developed using messenger ribonucleic acid technology, modified messenger ribonucleic acid technology, self-amplifying messenger ribonucleic acid technology, or deoxyribonucleic acid technology.” Those found in violation of the law could face disciplinary action from state medical licensing boards as well as fines up to $500.
However, it is unlikely the bill will pass the necessary hurdles to become law — Minnesota’s Senate is controlled by Democrats, who tend to support mRNA vaccines, and the House is split evenly between the two parties. Governor Tim Walz, former Vice President Kamala Harris’ running mate in the 2024 election and made a name for himself during the pandemic of far-reaching COVID lockdown policies and a vaccine mandate. According to Nicholas Hulscher of the McCulloch Foundation, which performs independent studies into public health and policies, the bill’s introduction makes Minnesota the 11th state to see such a proposal in the legislature, joining Washington, Idaho, Montana, Iowa, Texas, Tennessee, Kentucky, New York, South Carolina, and Florida. “If I was a manufacturer of car tires and they delammed at 1,000 miles, I should be liable for that,” Iowa Sen. Doug Campbell has noted. His bill was introduced as an outright ban of mRNA vaccines but was later modified to require that pharmaceutical companies waive liability protections.
This is still precisely what Big Pharma wants to avoid, of course, as the adverse effects reported from the COVID vaccine are highly concerning. CDC researchers have noted a “high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination” and one study analysing 99 million people across eight countries “observed significantly higher risks of myocarditis following the first, second and third doses” of the mRNA vaccine as well as an increase in “pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,” along with other “potential safety signals that require further investigation.” Predictably, Hulscher notes, “the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex” has suppressed most of these legislative efforts to ban the mRNA vaccine, and that most bills “pass initial committee hearings but get killed without vote by ‘leadership.’”
The WHO Pandemic Treaty allows the WHO increased global powers to mismanage the next plandemic, to take control from governments and adopt WEF-style powers to grant contracts to pharma companies, restrict people’s freedom to refuse vaccines and impose arbitrary lockdown rules such as curfews and closing down schools and universities.
Watch WCH TEAM UPDATE: The WHO Pandemic Treaty: What You Weren’t Told World Council for Health, 28 April 2025
“The World Health Organisation has quietly passed a pandemic treaty—without public participation or informed consent. This decision has serious consequences for health freedom, sovereignty, and democratic governance. Why it matters:
– Hidden clauses and centralised control
– Potential impacts on national sovereignty
– Your rights during future health crises’
James Roguski; “The WHO wants is to be in charge of the global supply chain and logistics network. They want to be involved in the procurement, the signing of contracts of all of these different products that get made, because they’re looking to create a problem that they can then offer the solution for. This is all going to be financed through the Financial Coordinating mechanism, which is in both the amendments to the regulations, and this proposed pandemic agreement. It’s all going to be overseen by a new bureaucracy called the Conference of the Parties. Now, if you’ve ever heard the abbreviation, COP might remind you of what you really should be comparing this to, which is the Framework Convention for Climate Change. The Framework Convention for Climate Change was signed by all the nations through the UN in 1992, and they’ve met year after year after year, and it just keeps getting bigger and bigger and bigger. They now have a trillion dollars flowing through that agreement to protect the world from climate change. Well, this document really is a Framework Convention for the prevention, preparedness and response to pandemics that they are looking to create, at least in your mind, because they never defined the word pandemic. The word pandemic is used in the document 248 times, but what they defined is not a pandemic, but a pandemic emergency, which basically means that if the Director-General of the WHO says there might be a problem somewhere, we’re in a pandemic emergency, there’s no recourse, he has declared it. Let the money and the contracts flow.
Now it’s your local government and the tyrants that you deal with in your own country who will implement whatever draconian measures the WHO is going to order. The WHO wants to be sitting on the profit and the products to hand out contracts to all of their cronies. And what we are dealing with I’ve dubbed the new OPEC. It’s not the oil producing and exporting countries, it’s the organisation of pandemic emergency corporations. For everybody in the United States who thinks that this doesn’t matter, there’s nothing in this document and there’s nothing in U.S. law that prevents any and all of the pharmaceutical companies based in the United States and all of the relevant stakeholders, all of the non- government organisations in the United States and around the world from participating in this agreement. This is a business deal and the 400 relevant stakeholders, think Bill and Melinda Gates and Welcome Trust and even the Rotary International Organisation, they pushed for this document to be agreed upon because they stand to be on the receiving end of billions, potentially even trillions of dollars. If anyone in the United States is paying attention to DOGE and USAID, and you understand the corruption that happens when you have a bureaucracy, that you’re not paying attention to, funnel money to non- government organisations to do the bidding of the government that the government can’t necessarily do.
We’re dealing with WHOAID now, I just made that up, but that’s what this is. This is crony capitalism, this is a racketeering organisation to pretend to find problems that would have been better off left alone, signed contracts to make billions of dollars of poison and biological weapons that they have in the stockpile so that when they say there’s an emergency, the money flows. Now they don’t need to have an emergency to get the contracts, but just like the military-industrial complex that is busy manufacturing weapons of war, they make more money when those weapons of war get used up and they have to replace them. So they’re going to make money whether or not there is ever a pandemic ever again because they’ll put all the vaccines and the drugs and the tests into the stockpiles and the WHO wants to be in charge of the global supply chain and logistics network and all of the procurement. What we’re dealing with is just organised crime and people have misrepresented what’s going on with these documents. It is your local tyrants who will implement the lockdowns and the mandates and all that sort of stuff. What WHO did to you over the past five years are entirely capable of doing that all over again because people have not looked in to the local emergency rules and regulations and statutes in your country. It wasn’t the WHO that mandated things, it was your president, it was your provincial premier, it was your municipality, it was your County Health Department.They don’t need no stinking treaty or no stinking amendments to abuse your rights and freedoms that’s written into the laws in your local area. The WHO’s International Health Regulations and the amendments and the pandemic agreement is a corrupt mafia business deal designed to poison more people with biological weapons that demonstrably have no benefit and caused more harm. And I think, I don’t mean to speak for Philippe, but I think he will go on about how there is no justification to do any of this without a proper review of how wrong everything they did was over the last five years.”
‘Dr Sam Bailey tells Charles Malet how the Medical Council of New Zealand reacted when she spoke out about the corruption of the medical profession in the COVID era, convening a tribunal in an attempt to make her pay for her own persecution and punishment, to the tune of NZ$148,000‘
Watch; Facing the Tyrants UK Column interview, 15 April 2025
Intro; ‘Dr Sam Bailey tells Charles Malet how the Medical Council of New Zealand reacted when she spoke out about the corruption of the medical profession in the COVID era, convening a tribunal in an attempt to make her pay for her own persecution and punishment, to the tune of NZ$148,000.’
Dr Sam Bailey; “At that time, it was just before the elections were happening, and a lady that I knew was running a PCR clinic in my hometown, Christchurch. And she told me that they’d shut it down for several months before and that the Ministry of Health were pumping all this money in. I knew when they did that, that the testing would go up and therefore the cases would go up, and the fear, and so I made a video about that. And as a side issue, I said “I won’t have a coronavirus vaccine if and when it comes about”. I thought, I’m saying this is my opinion. And I specifically said, “I’m not telling you what to do”. You’ve got to make your own decision, but this is what I’m doing. Then I had a phone call from the TV show, from the lawyer saying take down your video. And I was so affronte, I was like, what do they think? They’re not the editor of my YouTube channel. They can go and get stuffed, and so I said no. They said, ‘take down, take out the bit on vaccines’. I knew then what this is all about. And this happened and you realise how planned these things are because that happened. Then I had an e-mail from the Medical Council saying I’d had all these complaints about this video. There were smear articles from AFP and the fact-checking organisations, Facebook was blocking my video. it was like my whole world changed at that point. The job that I’d had for a long time, for 12 years, told me to stop coming into work. It was at the time really shocking and you’re just running on adrenaline. I had no idea what was coming, but I’m so grateful for it because it was really what needed to happen to me to make me really wake up to much bigger problems. It is amazing.”
Charles Malet, Presenter; “With the benefit of hindsight again, and given your experience with clinical trials, were you shocked, either directly or indirectly, at the power of the Pharmaceutical industry?”
Dr Sam Bailey; ” I think what shocked me most, Charles, was just, I thought we lived in the country with free speech. I know that sounds so naive. At the time I really believed that I could say what I thought and there wouldn’t be negative consequences in that way, that they would target my work and my reputation and everything else. And that’s what really shocked me, I was thinking, oh, this is really controlled. And then later on I found out that the Ministry of Health had been watching me for six months before they did anything. And the head of the Medical Council, the CEO was talking to the director general of health and these are incredibly powerful conversations about me and about my YouTube channel and the problem I was causing for them. What shocked me too, when I found out later, that I thought I’m just one individual. How can it be that I’m causing so many ripples? But it was very coordinated.”
Charles Malet; “I know, it’s amazing, especially that the specific trigger for that was quite clearly a reference to a vaccine that as far as anyone was aware by that point didn’t even exist. Would there be a suggestion that you might put out a different message or would it just be do take it down? Were you ever given the sense that you would at some point promote such a product?”
Dr Sam Bailey; “No, this all came from that TV show lawyer basically stopping it. I think they thought that I would just go away quietly. And they were, I think surprised that I was not going to do that, and at this point the Medical Council are asking me to sign a gag order and say that I can’t make any videos on COVID-19. I can talk about anything else, but not COVID-19. there was no way I was going to bend the knee to that because it’s like leading the camel in the tent. You don’t let them have anything. I’m so grateful I did that because most of the doctors that have gone through this process, at least in New Zealand, have signed that order because they thought that they had to, whereas I knew straight away that this was only going to lead to very bad things.”
Charles Malet; “On the PR side of it, obviously you are in New Zealand and across the world a public figure. You have, as you described previously, been on television in your capacity as a practising doctor subsequently on YouTube. You are well known to a lot of people who’ve looked into this and actually taken the time to try and work out what on earth is going on. How has this been reported elsewhere? Because clearly you have put that out. We’re talking about it on UK Column interview. It seems from perhaps our side of the fence that there’s a terrific potential for a backfire effect against the Medical Council. It seems to be an incredibly stupid thing for them to do because it draws attention to you and to what you’re doing. And we’ll ask people to ask questions, but has there been a messaging attempt from them in so far as this is concerned?”
Dr Sam Bailey; “I think what has been really interesting, I can only comment on what I’ve seen in New Zealand because I’ve had a lot of smear attacks by the mainstream media and 90% plus of people in the comment section are supporting me. It was astonishing because most people that I talked to tell me that they could find one comment out of 100 or 200 comments and one’s negative or something, so I know that the public are on my side. But also in terms of the Medical Council, they really are an ivory tower that are just in their own land and I don’t think they realise what is coming to them in terms of negative consequences just from the public. The messaging is for the doctors. This is what it’s all about. I don’t think the Medical Council necessarily care about the public, which is a foolish mistake in my opinion. But they are very worried about doctors doing the same as me and speaking out, and they’re really clamping down. Recently there was a case of a Doctor who spoke out because they were going to bring in McDonald’s into a small kind of rural touristy town, and the doctor said that they didn’t think it was a healthy choice, that they shouldn’t be doing this, and the Medical Council were trying to censor this doctor for saying that. And you realise this is just escalating and I think the most important message really is for doctors to realise that this is such a slippery slope. I know that it’s bad for me, but really it’s not bad for me because it doesn’t change what I do. But I can see what is happening to doctors and how they are being very much funnelled into a certain direction. I foresee it as something terrible. But what the public say, which I think is great, is that they do not trust doctors and the medical system as such, like they did prior to 2020 because of everything that’s happened.”
Charles Malet; “That’s absolutely right, there’s one thing I haven’t allowed you to make clear, which is that even if the fine was only for $5, your point in relation to all of this and your response of course, is that this concerns the principal and not the amount of money. So to just give your view of your response to the demand for money.”
Dr Sam Bailey; “So I’m not paying them anything. And I’ve had incredibly generous offers of people wanting to do Go Fund Me and the crowdfunding sort of things. I know I could probably raise that money easily, but I don’t want to, I don’t want anyone else’s money and I don’t want to pay money to this corrupt….., they’re essentially like a terrorist organisation. They operate out of instilling fear in people. And I will not do it. I will not submit to them.”
As promised, Bobby Kennedy is adding to his extensive research on the side effects of Big Pharma’s drugs and vaccines that he believes have caused a chronic disease epidemic .
Watch; The Truth is Finally Coming Out Russell Brand, 21 April 2025
R F Kennedy Jr; “By September, we will know what has caused the autism epidemic and we’ll be able to eliminate those exposures.”
Parent; “So they make you feel that, if you don’t just say ‘yes’ to everything, your child’s going to die.”
Russell Brand; “Bobby Kennedy has said he will have an answer by September, tick tock, tick tock, that’s coming up pretty fast as to what is causing the childhood autism pandemic. Now, in a sense that is a euphemism for our vaccines and the heavy childhood vaccine schedule contributing to the rise of autism and ADHD. What else could it be? Environmental factors, bad diet, the fact that it went undiagnosed. When I was a kid, he was just naughty. Now everyone’s got ADHD, everyone’s autistic, no one can concentrate. For me, it seems likely that there is some connection between the peculiar number of vaccinations that are being mandated and the rise of autism. Certainly in the most general sense possible. I understand that the state, and the sets of powers that the state serves, benefit from a docile, sick, broken and disconnected population. But that’s just the musings and reckonings of one man. What we want is hard evidence. And with Jay Bhattacharya at the NIH, meaning he’s the person that determines which clinical trials take place and how they are funded by your tax dollars. We are likely to at last get some answers to whether or not there’s a link between vaccines and autism. And wouldn’t you think that the people that make vaccines will be pretty keen for those clinical trials to take place? From the most basic understanding possible? The fact that vaccines are granted indemnity from legal action makes them a pretty unique business. If we were to sell you a product and that product made you sick, and say if it was a kombucha or a coffee or whatever, if it made you ill you can sue the company. You can’t do that with vaccines or when you do that its the government that generally handles the legal costs or consequences of those cases. So let me know in the comments and chat, should pharmaceutical companies be given the tariffs that Donald Trump is talking about? Should their unique state be ended and do you believe that Bobby Kennedy will have the power to expose what appears to be some kind of duplicity, deception, dishonesty or at least opacity behind the pharmaceutical industry? Let me know in the comments and chat. Let’s have a look now at Bobby Kennedy’s claim that he will have an answer soon. And as you know, I love and trust Bobby.”
R F Kennedy Jr; “And we’re trying to refocus the press to get them to pay attention to the chronic disease epidemic as you’ve asked us to. now 38 percent of American youth are pre-diabetic. This was unknown 30 years ago. Every child that becomes diabetic there should be a headline about them. We have 100 million adults who are pre-diabetic or diabetic and the autism rates from most recent numbers we think are going to be about one in 31. So they’re going up again from one in 10,000 when I was a kid. We are going to know by September. We’ve launched a massive testing and research effort that’s going to involve hundreds of scientists from around the world. By September, we will know what has caused the autism epidemic and we’ll be able to eliminate those exposures.”
Watch; UK CARDIOLOGIST EXPLAINS MRNA DAMAGE TO THE BLOOD VESSEL LININGS; True Stories from the Health Forum NZ, 25 March 2025
‘Cardiologist and doctor Dean Patterson from Guernsey, explains *the lipid nanoparticles and mRNA go everywhere, they also transfect the cells in the lining of the blood vessels (Endothelium) This can trigger multiple cardiovascular issues and disseminated body wide clotting issues.’
Dr Dean Patterson; “I’m a consultant cardiologist and I’m a general physician. I’ve been working in the small island of Guernsey for 18 years. This is a perspective that I’m going to present, which is very much from my own point of view. What we’re trying to do is document some of the events that have happened and to shine a light on people that have been harmed from the COVID-19 vaccine. When you look at this slide, what it’s talking about is what is the heart of the matter, how can we tie together some of these cardiovascular and systemic effects in different organs when an agent is deemed to be toxic? And indeed, in the tabular format on this slide, this is actually from the FDA list of side effects of special interest which were known about in October 2020. So when you have an agent that can cause disruption to what the lining of the blood vessels is called, which is the endothelium, this is present along the valve tissue inside the left ventricle and throughout the heart, but also throughout all blood vessels throughout the body there is an endothelial lining. And when you get disruption to this through any inflammatory process, you can get thrombosis. And we know the spike protein causes endothelial disruption. So its really important to understand that the lipid nanoparticle with disease potential, it also can become quite degrading to the endothelium. You can get thereafter you get platelets, which are the foot soldiers which stop bleeding whenever you cut yourself. They can inappropriately manifest into a thrombotic cascade and you can end up with inappropriate thrombosis. And we’ve heard about some of the thrombosis pathways which can have abnormal very thick and rubbery clots. So once you understand that this is a potential key mechanism, I understand that any organ that this effects can cause widespread disease. So you can get neurological effects. You can get myelitis, encephalitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, a number of other situations which don’t sound like blood clots on paper. But if you’ve got small blood vessels and these organs being affected in this way you can suffer with those problems. We know about myocarditis, which I’ve seen a lot of, but suddenly you can get myocardial infarction, stroke, thrombosis within the abdominal cavity, so you can get infarction in the spleen and in kidneys. We know about the AstraZeneca side effect of this very unusual type of thrombosis. And whilst the AstraZeneca vaccine is not an mRNA vaccine, it just also points back to the spike protein mechanism which I think we need to be knowing more about.”
Watch; Unheeded Warnings; newstart-2025, 8 April 2025
Intro; ‘Dr. Angus Dalgleish, cancer expert and former mRNA consultant, raises alarms about booster vaccines. ‘I saw cancer patients relapse after boosters—leukemias, lymphomas, T-cell suppression, and antibody issues. The spike protein was the wrong choice for a vaccine we didn’t need. Why is it still pushed?’
“I actually consulted for a company that called itself the Messenger RNA vaccine Company for over 5 years, so I know what I’m talking about. People try to dismiss me, oh, he’s just a cancer doctor, what does he know? But I know an awful lot more than they do and that messenger RNA technology for designing cancer vaccines couldn’t get over the hurdle. Then all of a sudden we have a pandemic that kills very few people less than .085% worldwide and they want to give everybody a vaccine, which is essentially a gene therapy which has never been tried properly at all in humans with a list as long as your arm of side effects. We have been calling those side effects out, and from my point of view, I suddenly realised people getting boosters were coming to my clinic had been free of cancer for years and they were relapsing, we were getting people suddenly presenting with leukemias and lymphomas. I looked at what the similarities were and they’d all had booster vaccines. And then I looked at what happens if you get a booster vaccine. Well, you get AT cell suppression, particularly if you’ve got cancer and you switch the type of antibody response because the antibodies you engender are against the virus that disappeared years ago and they do not cross-react with the variants. So what they do is enhance infection with other viruses. It’s called antibody dependent enhancement. But it was highly predicted and I predicted this in another paper I did with colleagues very early in 2020. Basically it said ‘do not use the spike protein as a vaccine’. It’s the last thing you should do.150 companies and academics chose to do just that with hardly anybody saying let’s avoid it, design a vaccine that doesn’t induce side effects. Well, actually by the time the vaccine was rolled out, we didn’t need the vaccine. That’s the other issue, so why was it mandated, why is it still going on? In my own country I’m bombarded with reminders to go and attend for a vaccine booster. This is absolutely outrageous when I can’t get an appointment for other emergencies but they want to give me a vaccine which will only cause me harm. That’s why I’m here to get this message across.”
A new Cleveland Clinic study found that far from preventing influenza, flu vaccinated people are actually more likely to be infected.
Watch Cleveland Clinic just DESTROYED the Flu Vaccine Narrative Redacted, 12 April 2025
Natali Morris; “All right well, bad news for the flu shot because a new Cleveland study found that the vaccine did not prevent influenza quite the contrary actually. Those who took it were more likely to get infected. So when you talk to people, that old wives tale, oh, don’t get the flu shot, it causes the flu. Turns out that the data supports that. Here is the study, seek it out for yourself. It was published by doctors from the Cleveland Clinic, but it has not yet been peer-reviewed because the data set goes through March 26th, so it’s only a few days old. It pertains to the 2024-2025 vaccine that you can still get if you want to. The employees of the Cleveland Clinic were required to get the flu shot, so 82% of them did, and they followed 53,000 employees. Here’s what they found. It shows that at first they were all getting the flu at an even pace, but over the course of the study, the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among those who took the flu shot. In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, clinical, nursing job and employment location, the risk of influenza was significantly higher for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Now they do say within the first 70 days pretty much no one was getting the flu, but that’s not to say that the vaccine wanes because the unvaccinated were also not getting it. So we can’t take that away. When they discuss their limitations, they say that the vaccine was the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in about 99% of the study. And it’s possible that other influenza vaccines may have been more effective and cannot be excluded. The problem is that this is the case for every flu vaccine because vaccine makers come up with the formulation of the vaccine in the spring before each flu season, which is the fall, and they make their best guess as to which strains to include that they think will be prevalent in the future. They’re they’re forecasting, they can never accurately predict what will be that strain. Like the COVID vaccine, every time they pushed out a new one for a new variant, that variant was no longer present. They could never really know. Now a few weeks ago the FDA approved the 2025/2026 vaccine and the FDA recommends that it contains these strains here. Well, if you pause this and then compare it to the strains that are circulating now, this is the data for April of 2025. They’re basically saying that in 2025/26 put the strains in that are circulating now, they’re using the ones that are in effect now that people are getting right now. So they can’t vaccinate for future mutations because they can’t travel to the future yet. So we never really know. And it’s worth noting that the annual flu vaccine does not go through clinical trials. Also, it is not tested. It is never tested as to whether or not it stops influenza. All they ever do is test for the antibodies in the blood of the creatures that receive it. So from this study alone, it’s clear we need more research about why do we mandate the flu vaccine if it is this ineffective and may in fact make people more likely to get the flu.”
Watch; Turbo Cancer…The SV40 That Contaminated Polio Vaccines Is The Same SV40 Found In Covid Vaccines; Valerie Anne Smith, 21 April 2025
Dr Jack Kruse, Neurosurgeon; “There’s some data point that everybody’s missing. Every single vaccine maker except one, Pfizer, was ready to deploy the COVID jab. Operation Warp Speed comes out, Trump gets told about it. Who wasn’t ready? Pfizer. So what does Pfizer decide to do? They go downstairs, three floors to their genetic department, and they find SV40. They use SV40 to design their job because they’re late to the game. And what do they then do? They tell their scientists to use a molecular tool to take the evidence of SV40 out and then they just focus in on those clean versions to the FDA and they get approved. SV 40 is what we got in the Cutter event during FDR term in polio. So I want you to think critically now for first principles. Tell me how a monkey virus that shows up in 1951 through 1959 now shows up on COVID vaccines that are supposed to be new and improved 75 years later and Pfizer tries to take it out so you don’t see it. That’s why there’s two legal definitions for the Pfizer jab.
It’s pure malice. The official story is they wanted to kill people. In 2021, I’m in clubhouse, and everybody said, look, I just did a documentary with Robert Malone, who’s an inventor, co-inventor of the MRA technology, and Robert McCullough, who’s been famous for all the stuff he’s done. and guess what I do? I don’t talk about the science at all. I talk about one thing. You can go back and watch this. There’s two patents for Pfizer. I said there’s something nafarious going on here, and I don’t tell anybody why I’m making this a big deal in this documentary because you heard all the things that I learned in my life in the Danny Jones podcast about SV40 and all that. I had a sneaking suspicion in 2020 that because there were 2 legal definitions, that SV40 was going to be used in somebody’s jab and the most likely candidate was Pfizer. So what did I tell everybody in the clubhouse? Don’t take the jab, and especially don’t take the Pfizer jab.”
Provoked War with Russia
Brief update on Trump’s failure to end the war in Ukraine;
Watch; Minerals deal, back to the sunk cost fallacy; The Duran, May 2 2025
Alexander Mercouris; “(the new deal) is still a very lopsided agreement in favor of The United States, and Zelensky didn’t get the most important thing he wanted, which was a security guarantee. It doesn’t apparently include any security guarantees. But, nonetheless, it is a deal which is much more favorable to Zelensky than the deal that Trump was proposing just a few weeks ago.
I don’t think he should have wasted time with mineral rights extraction deals. I don’t think he should have wasted time with Kellogg (Keith Kellogg, Trump’s Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia). I don’t think he should have done any of those things. He should have moved forward, established diplomatic relations with Russia. Started maybe to relax sanctions, get the United States out of Ukraine. What he’s doing instead is he’s committed himself to Kellogg which has got him bogged down in negotiations and making ceasefire proposals, which the Russians were inevitably going to refuse, and we’re just going to open him up to pressure to start rearming Ukraine again.
And instead of getting out of Ukraine, he signed a mineral rights extraction deal, which is dragging him back into Ukraine. So it’s mistaken at every conceivable level. And it’s because Trump continues to have this habit of listening to the wrong people.
Alex Christoforou; We’re getting reports that Trump is going to actually send $50million in weapons to Ukraine. It’s not a small number compared to everything that Biden sent, but it’s the start. So he’s gonna go to congress, and he’s going to get an approval which will be granted to him to sell $50million to sell because they’re packaging it as selling. So he will sell $50 million to Ukraine. It’s going to be purchased by these schemes, these mineral oil gas schemes.”
Alexander Mercouris; “Plus he (Trump)’s talking about banking sanctions”
In the name of protecting Britain from Russia advancing into its former USSR territory, the UK’s youth will be used as cannon fodder for the EU’s war to steal Ukraine’s and Russia’s resources.
Watch; Starmer Signs EU Defence Deal as UK Hunts for Cannon Fodder; UK Column, 25 April 2025
Mike Robinson; “Back in December, The Telegraph carried an article saying that thousands of military personnel were and are leaving their jobs. Hardly surprising under the circumstances and the drive for war. But as we reported over the past year, the threat of conscription is ever present. And although overt discussion of conscription has basically dropped off the news agenda now, it’s very much still a thing. Mark Pritchard MP put it to Liz Kendall that one way of attracting some people back into work is for her to have discussions with her colleagues in the Ministry of Defence and that getting more young people into the armed forces would be a starting place.”
Liz Kendall; “I then claimed I’ll be having more conversations with colleagues in the Ministry of Defence to make sure we put this plan into action”
Presenter; “What plan and whose plan?”
Liz Kendall; “David Smith is the MP here, “The government recognises the armed forces as not only a vital institution for National Defence, but also as a potential career path that offers structure, skills and prospects for young people” He went on to say “the plan involves collaboration across different governmental departments, including the MOD, to facilitate recruitment processes and make military careers more accessible and appealing to the youth”.
So basically they’re there to sell the idea of death and destruction to young people by going into schools and propagandising them. That’s certainly what I would suggest anyway. David Smith went on to say “discussions involving the MOD are part of a broader strategy to diversify employment opportunities available to young Britons.” So Smith is discussing a plan. It’s absolutely clear that this issue of recruitment in the military is therefore being taken very seriously. And why would it not be? Because certainly the regime has a plan for what we are going to do internationally on the global stage with boots on the ground and so on, except we don’t have any boots to put on the ground.
Now procurement is a key part of the European Defence Union which as we’ve been highlighted for years is something that Britain has been a key driver of alongside the French. In fact, Britain’s involvement in EU Defence Union is a prerequisite of participation in the joint procurement programme, which UK based defence companies are obviously very keen to get involved with as efforts to reorient away from Trump’s USA continue. So, I don’t know how real that reorientation is away from the United States, whether it’s smoke and mirrors in order to try to build this European infrastructure, but nonetheless, that’s the excuse being used.
Patrick Henningsen; “The other thing is, who’s going to benefit from that? There may be some jobs in the UK, but the industry is financialised. It’s all based on share prices and stock market gains. It’s completely financialised, so, if you’re in that industry and you’re a private equity firm, you’re in the defence industry or you’re invested in that with your portfolio and index funds, you’re going to do great. But how’s that going to help the average person? How’s that going to help the baseline of the working class of the economy? I don’t think very much at all. In fact, it is completely globalised, the internal EU market between EU countries, separation, compartmentalisation of industries, plus stuff that’s being manufactured internationally. To get the best price. Why? To get the best bottom line, Why? To make sure that you pay out the best dividends to your shareholders, absolutely, that’s what it’s really all about. Ask Nigel Farage, he worked in the City of London, he certainly should know.”
Mike Robinson; “He should know, yes. Now this is important because the UK is filling the void left by the United States and providing logistical and intelligence support to Ukraine, as the Guardian was reporting a couple of months ago. It’s important though, to see this, I think, in the context of Britain’s role in Ukraine over the last couple of years, and that is to keep the meat grinder going. And to illustrate that point, I want to highlight this article from The Greyzone and Kit Klarenberg (also see article below). It’s headlined ‘UK Intel behind Ukraine’s disastrous Krinky invasion, leaked documents reveal’. Now this is extremely interesting article and really this story should be top billing in the mainstream press but it isn’t and I wonder why, with a sense of irony perhaps, but one reason is that Klarenberg is citing leaked documents and of course British mainstream media doesn’t really want to go there. But Klarenberg writes that the leaked documents that he has seen detail a blueprint for Ukraine’s failed effort to capture the village of Krynky. He says the plan was pulled together by an organisation called Project Alchemy, which he describes as a secret military intelligence cell created by the Ministry of Defence which, and this is a quote, ‘they sought at all costs to keep Ukraine fighting’. Now, we’ve known that the UK has been seeking at all costs to keep Ukraine fighting for, well, basically since Boris Johnson went to Zelensky and said “do not do the peace deal.”
New evidence proves that our so-called Ministry of Defence’ is directing the war in Ukraine – a proxy war that has sent hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians to be cannon fodder as we ensure Ukraine keeps fighting. ‘Wave after wave of British-trained Ukrainian marines were dispatched to almost certain death to Krynky. The decision to let the costly quagmire drag on, at a human and material cost no NATO military would ever allow, has come to be seen as one of the worst tactical mistakes of the war — and it appears top British generals are to blame.”
Read; UK intel behind Ukraine’s disastrous Krynky invasion, leaked documents reveal; Kit Klarenberg and Wyatt Reed, The Grayzone, 23 April 2025
‘Leaked documents reviewed by The Grayzone reveal that a blueprint for Ukraine’s failed effort to capture the village of Krynky was assembled by Project Alchemy, a secret military-intelligence cell created by the British Ministry of Defence which sought “at all costs” to “keep Ukraine fighting.” The Krynky plot led to a bloodbath that remains one of the war’s biggest disasters.
On the morning of October 30 2023, dozens of Ukrainian commandos on small boats glided across the Dnieper River to control Krynky, a village in Russian-occupied Kherson. They had spent the prior two months in remote areas of the British isles with similar terrain, running drills under the watchful gaze of UK generals. Now, they believed their hard work was about to pay off. Both British and Ukrainian officials were convinced the operation would turn the tide of the war, creating a beachhead allowing Kiev’s forces to march on Crimea and all-out victory.
Instead, the British-trained Ukrainian marines were led like lambs to the slaughter. The catastrophically planned effort saw a seemingly endless stream of heavily overloaded Ukrainian boats attempt to reach Krynky without air cover, under relentless fire by Russian artillery, drones, flamethrowers and mortars. Marines that made the journey were ill-equipped, resupplying those troops proved virtually impossible, and evacuating them was out of the question.
As the promised missile cover failed to materialise in the ensuing weeks, it became clear the effort had amounted to a disaster. Yet for the next nine months, wave after wave of British-trained Ukrainian marines were dispatched to almost certain death to Krynky. The decision to let the costly quagmire drag on, at a human and material cost no NATO military would ever allow, has come to be seen as one of the worst tactical mistakes of the war — and it appears top British generals are to blame.
Leaked documents reviewed by The Grayzone expose how the British not only presided over the training of the Marines involved, but built from scratch the “Maritime Raiding Force” which would ultimately be sacrificed over the course of the Krynky suicide mission.’
Here are two items that implicate UK operatives in silencing dissent from the Russiaphobe narrative:
Read British intel sought to silence West’s top Russia academic, leaks reveal Kit Klarenberg, The Grayzone, 1 April 2025
‘Leaked documents show UK intelligence operatives grooming British politicians to silence academics expressing skepticism of London’s Ukraine proxy war effort. One of the targets, Richard Sakwa, believes the campaign resulted in real-world harassment.
Leaked emails reviewed by The Grayzone reveal a high-level British intelligence plot to smear and silence British political scientists such as Richard Sakwa, who is widely regarded as one of the English-speaking world’s foremost authorities on Russia.
In a March 2022 email entitled “Russians in our Universities,” British military intelligence officer and former senior NATO advisor Chris Donnelly accused Sakwa of being a Russian “fellow traveller” who’d been “gradually breaking cover,” insisting the professor was “far too well-informed about Russian strategy to be called just ‘a useful idiot”. Another email reveals Donnelly fantasising about publicly exposing the Sakwa for being “funded by Russian entities” – a claim the professor strenuously denies.
Sakwa (West’s top Russia academic) said Donnelly’s (UK spy) actions were “extremely disturbing,” and suggested the emails indicate “there are cells in the British governmental apparatus who are working in ways which subvert the fundamental principles of British democracy, tolerance of divergent political views, and the encouragement of open debate and dialogue.”‘
While Richard Sakwa and other genuine regional experts warned over many years that transforming Ukraine into an anti-Russian bastion would lead to disaster for all involved, Western leaders turned instead to the paranoid pronouncements of spies like Chris Donnelly for guidance on how to respond to Moscow’s forcefully stated opposition to Ukraine joining NATO. And before the belligerent plans of Donnelly and his cadre could be discredited, they made certain that no one would be left to call them out.’
The above article mentions the Bucha incident in which Nazi Ukrainian militia commanders and western media conspired to fabricate a false flag narrative of a massacre of Ukrainian civilians by the Russian army. Watch the true story below narrated by Dmitry Polyanskiy, Russia’s First Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN. While the west lies, our ‘enemies’ tell the truth.
Watch Russia’s ‘Bucha Massacre’ Counter At UN, ‘Monstrous Provocation By Ukraine & British Backers To… Hindustan Times, 3 April 2025
‘A top aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin presented evidence suggesting that Kyiv and the UK conspired to defame Russia over the Bucha massacre. While Ukrainian President Zelensky urged European allies to unite and prevent future atrocities.’
“Three years ago, all media agencies of the world published breaking news. Hundreds of bodies were found on the streets of a small Ukrainian town of Bucha near Kiev, all of them with their hands tied. Most of the Western media outlets unequivocally and squarely blamed this massacre on Russia, and Bucha since then was deliberately and consistently turned into a symbol of Ukrainian martyrdom and alleged Russian brutality. This small place has become a quasi obligatory destination for any foreign delegation visiting Kiev. In this propaganda exercise, all the blanks, false claims and discrepancies of the official version of events were deliberately disregarded. But let’s ask ourselves a simple question. Do we know what really happened in Bucha three years ago? Do we care about the truth? It’s obvious that as far as the Kiev regime and its Western backers are concerned, they definitely don’t. And they don’t want the others to ask these questions too. They feel quite comfortable in the bubble of lies about Russia, which they have been consistently inflating for at least 2 decades and since. The Bucha hoax is one of the core elements of this bubble. The West is aggressively resistant to any attempts to question the Bucha narrative. I have no doubts that today in their statements, our Western colleagues will label our meeting quote, ‘Russian propaganda and manipulation’ end quote, ignoring facts and testimonies that they will hear. That’s their well known tactics to ignore truths and uncomfortable facts. But as we all know, facts are stubborn things and it’s hard to dismiss strong evidence. Therefore, we intend to briefly revisit today the events of end of March, beginning of April 2022. First of all, it is important to recall the context of these events. As you all know, Russia started its special military operation on February 24, 2022, and by mid March Russian troops have advanced as far as outskirts of Kiev, including Bucha. But since we were from day one prioritising a diplomatic solution over a military one, by that moment bilateral Russian Ukrainian talks on how to end this conflict proceeded, first in Minsk and then in Istanbul. And by the middle of March 2022, our negotiators initialled a draught agreement, which contained principles acceptable both to Russia and Ukraine. Given such a progress, as a gesture of goodwill, Russia took a decision to voluntarily withdraw from a number of northern regions of Ukraine, including the Kiev Oblast, where Bucha is situated.
But as everyone knows today, these peaceful efforts were derailed primarily by our British colleagues, who convinced Zelensky that if he rejects this peace offer and opts to fight for Western geopolitical interests, he will be able to defeat Russia with the economic and military support of the West. And the ambitious and narcissist Ukrainian president fell for the bait, thus making, as it is clear today, a fatal mistake for his country. But then everything looked different and the task was to create an unbeatable pretext that could convince his countrymen and the international public opinion that agreeing on something with Russia was not an option. Here came this idea of a terrible false flag operation and Bucha, jointly implemented between April 2 and 3 by Ukrainian Special Services Services and MI6. Later, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson capitalised on the international outcry after discoveries in Bucha and together with Zelensky, announced in Kiev on April 9 that instead of signing an agreement with Russia, Ukraine will continue to fight and the West will actively help it. And before that, our British colleagues who were presiding over our Council in April 2022, in blatant disrespect to their mandate, rejected our request of the urgent meeting on Bucha provocation that were tabled as early as April 3, thus displaying their clear involvement in this provocation. This unprecedented disdain for the Council working methods is documented through our letter circulated as an official document of the Council colleagues. Facts are indeed stubborn things, so let me briefly walk you through major discrepancies of the Bucha narrative. On March 30, 2022, following another round of talks in Ankara, the Russian and Istanbul, the Russian Ministry of Defence announced the withdrawal of forces from several regions, including Bucha. On March 31, the Bucha Town Council released a video statement from Mayor Anatoli Fedaruk, who announced the liberation of Bucha and confirmed that there are no Russian troops in the town. Without mentioning any mass atrocities, dead bodies, killings, graves or anything of this sort, let us show you the video posted by Mr Fedoruk. As you will see, he appears happy and smiling. It is hard to imagine that he would act this way against the backdrop of an alleged massacre in the streets.
On April 2nd, 2022, the National Police of Ukraine shared footage of on its Telegram messenger channel showing Ukrainian special forces entering Bucha, which you see on the screen. The footage shows no dead bodies in the streets. The police personnel interviewed several people in different locations across Bucha, yet none of them mentioned any massacre or mass killings. The camera also captures broader areas behind these people with no dead bodies insight. To sum up, for four days after the Russian military left Bucha, there was not a single sign of any atrocities. I repeat, not a single reference to it anywhere. There were also numerous images of photojournalists swarming around the streets of Bucha during these days, taking pictures on top of one another. The pictures themselves were rather standard for a conflict zone, burned military equipment and damaged surroundings, which is explainable since Ukrainian forces had been heavily shelling the town while the Russian army was there. But what is missing on all these early photos of Bucha immediately after withdrawal of Russian forces are bodies and the signs of mass executions. Let me draw your attention in this regard to another infamous video that was posted by certain Ukrainian Neo Nazi, Sergei Korotkikh, the leader of the Ukrainian territorial defence units that entered Bucha after the withdrawal of Russian forces. It depicts members of his unit discussing whether they should shoot people not wearing blue arm bands, the sign indicating support for the Kiev regime. And you understand that these could be only civilians, as the Russian forces had left the town four days ago. The commander’s affirmative response is clearly heard permitting such actions. Although Korotkikh has deleted his video copies remain accessible online.
So what we have just seen here is a selfie video of a known Neo Nazi who hates Russia and its supporters giving a direct order to Ukrainian militants to shoot civilians without the blue armband, which perfectly explains dead civilians with white arm bands or without blue ones in this area. If it’s not a smoking gun, what is it? And then, all of a sudden, shortly after the mentioned entry of Ukrainian forces, Ukrainian and Western media outlets circulated photos of several bodies in civilian clothes. What a coincidence. After several days of silence about any signs of killed civilians lying in the streets, these images immediately raised multiple questions among experts. First, these were the same few bodies pictured from different angles, not hundreds or even thousands as claimed by the Kiev regime. Second, Ukrainian propagandists and Western media claimed that these bodies had been lying in the streets of Bucha since March 11. The weather in Bucha was hot at this time, but the bodies don’t have any signs of decomposition. Moreover, they are not stiff and there are wounds with fresh blood on some of them, which is explainable if they had been killed one or two days before. One more unexplainable discrepancy, the bodies were visibly dirty since it was raining heavily during these couple of days, yet the clothes used to tie their hands was visibly pristine white. The only plausible explanation is that their hands were tied just before the photo shoot to support the political narrative. Last but definitely not least, many bodies had white clothes around an arm or leg, a sign used by the Russian armed forces to identify friendlies. In contrast to the pristine ribbons tying their hands, these pieces of clothes were visibly dirty from days of rain, suggesting that people were wearing them at the time of death. It is also a known fact that Ukraine used a different sign, a blue cloth or tape, to identify their friendlies. Looks fishy, doesn’t it?”
Testimony of the above propaganda theatre by Adrien Bocquet, a journalist on the scene in Bucha.
Watch; The Staging of Bucha – A Eye Witness Account Diplomatic_UNIT, 30 April 2025
Ursula talks up war with Russia and offers endless support for the neo nazi Ukrainian militia and the euro puppet Zelensky.
Listen Max Blumenthal: Netanyahu’s Domestic Woes Judging Freedom, 2 April 2025
Ursula von der Leyen; “We had a very good meeting of the coalition of the willing. The coalition of the willing has gotten bigger, stronger and very determined. I’ve basically three key takeaways. The first was a broad discussion on how to step up in the support for Ukraine in the short term financially and military wise. The military needs that are there in Ukraine that have to be fulfilled, but also the financial needs. And here I can contribute that we will front load the EU part of the G7 loans for Ukraine. Second topic, keep up the pressure on Russia. It was very clear that the sanctions stay in place. What we want is a just and lasting peace agreement. That is the goal. And the third key takeaway was on the long term support for Ukraine and our own European defence posture. Here, of course, the Readiness 2030 plan is crucial. It provides up to €800 billion of defence investment possibilities for the Member States, and this means, for example, joint procurement with Ukraine, joint procurement with Ukraine in the European Union, but also in the Ukrainian defence industry. It’s strengthening the defence industrial base of Ukraine. And of course, we need also a credible deterrence and defence posture in the European Union and thus we have to develop our own defence industrial base.”
Judge Napolitano; “As I submit, entirely consistent with what you said earlier, this woman wants to be the Princess of Europe.”
Max Blumenthal; “This is just another example of her centralising power around herself and centralising the bureaucracy around herself through war, through continuous process of maintaining Ukraine as an anti Russian porcupine in the region. And the EU politically is internally crumbling as a result of this policy as at least an indirect result. And the mask of liberal democracy and social democracy is being lifted in Romania, which is really the front line of NATO’s advance on Russia’s frontiers, that the popular right wing populist pro-peace candidate Georgescu has been prevented from even participating in an election in which he was clearly going to emerge victorious. First, it was said that the Russian government, Russian intelligence, ran a deceptive TikTok campaign on his behalf that was blown out of the water as false misinformation. And then Romanian authorities just simply cancelled the election. And now what we see happening in France with Marine Le Pen, someone I have not much agreement with her on, I’m not in her camp in any way, but it seems to me that someone like Le Pen, who is not possibly going to be sent to gaol and is not allowed to participate in an election which she may have won over a technicality of mishandling something like 2 million euros, when the head of the European Central Bank, Christine Lagarde, was found guilty of forking over 400 million euros in public money to an oligarch and she’s still at the central bank, it’s pretty clear what’s going on. The Pence National Rally is a Eurosceptic. They are opposed to von der Leyen’s agenda, as is Georgescu. So we see a casino through this military buildup, a casino democracy is coming into view where if the house run by von der Leyen doesn’t like the results, they just completely cancel the game.”
German MEP describes clamp downs on personal freedoms and liberties across Europe
Watch Christine Anderson on why Europe is COLLAPSING on purpose and Germany’s fascist reality Redacted, 28 March 2025
Clayton Morris; “I’ve spoken to journalists who’ve received letters from the government for speaking out against the war in Ukraine, journalists in Germany who feel the need that they might have to leave Germany. I’ve seen this across Europe. We’re seeing the clamp downs on free speech. We’re seeing the restrictions on being able to transact in a currency, the amount of cash currency in the way that you want. We’re seeing all sorts of clamp downs on personal freedoms and liberties it seems across across Europe. Are you seeing similarities to what the Socialists in the Nazi Party did in Germany to what’s now happening more broadly across Europe?
Christine Anderson; “AbsolutelyI do. So the mechanisms of totalitarianism are always the same, you need to silence people. That, by the way, is the difference between totalitarianism and a ‘mere’ dictatorship, A dictator is only concerned to keep himself in power, and he will take whatever measures he needs to make that happen. But he doesn’t care what you think of him. You’re not allowed to say it out loud, but what you think of him, he does not care. Just don’t speak up about it. Totalitarianism, on the other hand, is a whole different ball game. They need to control every aspect of every single citizen’s life and they need to control your thinking. That is the difference between dictatorship and totalitarianism, so what we’re seeing is actually totalitarianism. They want to control your thinking, what you’re saying. They lash out at anyone who is saying something different. And we’ve seen that especially in the Covid years, there were scientists that lost their jobs. So there was all sorts of things happening, look at all of the legislation around this whole transgender madness. In Germany, if you now use the wrong pronoun, you can actually be fined €10,000 for doing so. So that is totalitarian. So when I see someone in front of me and I see clearly that is a man and I’m not allowed to say that or I might even go to gaol for it, seriously, this is the stage we’re at right now. We’re talking about the Digital Services Act, which is censorship on social media. They’re, of course, framing it that we’re against hate speech and we want to fight misinformation, disinformation and malinformation. So they’re coming up with all sorts of things and reasons to silence you, and that is totalitarian.”
Clayton Morris; “It seems like Germany is in real trouble. We’ve been watching it the past few years and the economy collapsing. Turns out, when you turn off nuclear power plants and you allow the CIA and the United States to blow up your Nord Stream pipeline, that’s not a good strategy for economic success. And you let the crazy green policy drive your country into the ground. Is Germany really in trouble?
Christine Anderson; “We are just what you just mentioned. So they shut down all the nuclear power plants don’t even care about a critical infrastructure like Nord Stream 2 being bombed or whatever. But now they’re dreaming of building up our military and getting all the defence back and all of that. That’s ridiculous. But going back to Nord Stream 2, that was actually quite telling. So once again, critical infrastructure that’s just blown up just like that. Guess what the German government did, they did exactly nothing. Not only did they do nothing, they couldn’t have cared less. They were like, whoa, that’s gone now, so what, why cry over spilled milk? That was their attitude. So now let’s pay three times as much for natural gas and have it shipped on shipping containers. Even better than that, once Putin had invaded Ukraine, the German government were so principled. They told Putin look, as a punishment, we are no longer taking your gas. We refuse to take your gas, OK? Problem was we were bound by contract. So we paid for the gas but refused to take it, so then what Putin did, he took the gas that we paid for but refused to take and sold it to let’s say India and so he got paid twice for the very same gas. Then we said, hey guys, we heard you got a gas delivery, can we buy it from you? So you bought it from India, it really is insane, so we paid twice, Putin got paid twice for it.”
Alex Kramer describes both how Churchill got the US to join the Second World War and the UK’s obsession to defeat Russia is to plunder Russia’s resources. The UK “is desperate for fresh collateral to fuel a major new credit cycle needed to refloat its financial system”.
Read; Ukraine “rare earths” deal: the empire’s fatal mistake Alex Krainer, 8 March 2025
‘Rare earths deal is a very British hustle, a cheap rerun of Winston Churchill’s playbook to ensnare the US in World War 2. Now Starmer’s doing it for WW3.’
‘The minerals deal is the hook and the bribe to open the Americans to the possibility of committing to the British agenda. His recent statements corroborate this. Further, his government is doubling down on support for Ukraine even though the British military is no match for the Russians. The idea, as Starmer explained, is to show the Americans that Britain is serious. Those troops will be deliberately put in harm’s way as a trip wire to trigger further escalation as their government works to cobble up the coalition of the willing to pile in. In addition, they’re doubling public relations efforts to portray Zelensky as a heroic freedom fighter. With all these elements in place, it is not difficult to imagine scenarios that could lead to a serious escalation and set the United States on an irreversible collision course against Russia. What could be the reason behind the British establishment’s deranged obsession with vanquishing and dismembering Russia, and why do they seem so perfectly willing to set the world on fire to achieve that goal? I believe that the answer lies in her natural resource wealth, which dwarfs that of Ukraine. Britain, whose finances are in a catastrophic state, is desperate for fresh collateral to fuel a major new credit cycle needed to refloat its financial system without Ukraine’s and Russia’s resources. All they have are the printing presses, which will turn Britain’s stagflation into a hyperinflation and the final collapse of the empire. In fact, that’s almost certainly the most likely outcome of current events. The world has changed since Churchill contrived his own cunning plan. Starmer’s and Johnson’s hustle is almost transparent. Trying it on Donald Trump could turn out to be the undead British Empire’s fatal mistake. Finally, another aspect of this episode that’s worth mentioning is that it could well prove to be one of the most investable themes out there. The fallout from Britain’s conflict with Russia and the United States will likely lead to very substantial market dislocations, including the decline of the British pound and the price of her sovereign debt. The same almost certainly applies to European securities and the euro.’
Very informative analysis of the root causes of the provoked war in Ukraine.
Watch George Galloway speaking at the Sense and Sensibility Conference in Cambridge, 11-12 April 2025
George Galloway; “The United States and the European Union don’t give a damn about Ukrainians. They’ve never given a damn about Ukrainians. There weren’t many Ukrainians in their golf clubs. They didn’t have many Ukrainians round to their houses for dinner parties. The Ukrainians have been used for one reason and one reason only, to divide and if possible weaken and if possible to balkanise the Russian Federation. It is hatred of Russia by the Western powers grouped in NATO, which is the fundamental reason for this war”
You can catch up on the 7 hours of talks held in early April about the origins of the proxy war in Ukraine.
Read; THE ORIGINS OF THE RUSSIA-(NATO)-UKRAINE WAR Sense and Sensibility Conference, Cambridge, 11-12 April 2025
‘For many in the West, the Russia-NATO-Ukraine war began on February the 24th, when the Russian Federation announced the commencement of its Special Military Operation (SMO) against Ukraine. However, to those who are familiar with the history of this conflict, this is a war which had been ongoing for eight years prior to February 2022.
The Sense and Sensibility conference brings together global experts on the topic- from the American Continent, Great Britain and the Russian Federation, in a collaborative effort to identify the root causes that led to the declaration of the Special Military Operation (SMO) by President Putin in the February of 2022.
I wonder why this video is no longer viewable! Hungary is the only EU nation whose leader is following the wishes of his people and standing firm against war against Russia.
Watch; Hungary Halts EU War Machine—€40B Arms Plan Crushed, No Troops for Ukraine! Times Now World, 16 April 2025
‘Defying Brussels once again, Hungary has blocked the EU’s €40 billion weapons plan for Ukraine, with Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó declaring the war “not ours” and refusing to send “a single forint, a single weapon, or a single soldier.” Slamming the EU’s push as a “massive war package,” Budapest warned it would only prolong the conflict, destabilise Europe, and drain taxpayers—firmly rejecting Ukraine’s EU accession as a trillion-euro mistake.’
Though people in the EU are taking to the streets to demonstrate against the war in Ukraine, is the UK Stop the War Coalition being prevented from organising against this war? I wouldn’t be surprised if they’ve been co-opted – to my surprise, some of their board believe the propaganda that the war was not provoked!
European Revolt Intensifies Germans and Dutch Demand Immediate Stop to Ukraine Aid! Times Now World, 28 April 2025
‘Across Europe, a wave of fierce protests is growing, with citizens in key nations rallying against their governments’ continued support for Ukraine. In Germany, thousands flooded the streets of Nuremberg and Munich, demanding an end to financial and military aid, while in Amsterdam, demonstrators called for peace and mediation rather than further escalation. The protests were sparked by outrage over broken political promises and a growing disillusionment with EU policies, highlighting a deepening rift within Europe as many question the logic of sustaining support for Ukraine in its conflict with Russia.’
Macron joins a long list of criminal warmongering politicians, Blair, Bush, Cameron, Sarkozy, Johnson. Yet another example of a corporate-captured government trying to force its country into war against the will of its people.
Watch; Protesters tear EU flag as thousands rally in Paris against France’s Ukraine troop plan Times Now World, 28 April 2025
Watch; BRUSSELS ERUPTS: ‘In the Face of Fascism’ – May Day Protest Turns Chaotic; Times Now World; May 2 2025
‘On May Day, Brussels was transformed into a battleground as over 15,000 protesters clashed with police, demanding an end to capitalist oppression and fascism. What began as a peaceful march quickly spiraled into chaos, with flares, fires, and clashes filling the streets. Watch as protesters and police face off in one of the most intense May Day protests in recent history.’
This is a brilliant 1hr 33 mins speech about the history of US arrogance and consequential wars in over 30 years up to today that needs to be listened to in its entirety. To quote a small section would not do it justice – useful information to persuade those who have been brainwashed by the mainstream media lies.
Watch ‘Europe needs an independent foreign policy’ Professor Jeffrey Sachs at the European Parliament, 27 March 2025
Alex Kriel explains how sanctions on Russia have backfired, harming the EU and UK economies and strengthening Russia’s.
Listen; UK Column News Podcast 14 April 2025
Alex Kriel; “So right at the moment, there are 38,000 sanctions against individuals and corporates in Russia. That’s a figure calculated by the Kremlin. These sanctions have been in place now for over three years. And in terms of export performance of Russia, the effect has been essentially zero and it’s been zero in dollar terms. But what it’s done is it’s just shifted trade. All of the trade that went from Russia to Europe is now going from Russia to India, Russia to Turkey and Russia to China. So I don’t know if it’s possible to put the chart up, but even without the chart, you can see, just the contraction in the red, which is the reduction in (Russian) trade with Europe has been completely compensated for by incremental exports to those three countries I mentioned. So net, there’s been no impact really on exports from Russia. So at this stage, I think it’s fair to say that those things have not worked. And of course the Russian economy on a GDP level continues to grow. They’re revising the number upwards and downwards, but it’s somewhere about 4% GDP growth in 2024. So, far that hasn’t worked. And then also the other charts shows the leaks in the importing system. So this is an example where you have Estonia, their political leaders are the most pro war and anti peace in Europe. And while they’re out sort of warmongering, Estonian businesses are quadrupling the exports that they’re making to Russia’s neighbours in these CIS countries. So they’re now exporting 4 times more to Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Armenia than they were before this special military operation started in 2022. So you have a porous system of tariffs, of sanctions over imports and, and there are ways around it. So in dollar terms, those are not big numbers going from €5 million a month to €20 million a month. But it indicates the way that the sanctions regime can be bypassed or evaded. So I think they won’t be taken seriously. more threats of sanctions inside Russia, although Russia is also working on trying to undo some of those sanctions because in any one of these transactions, the buyer is also benefiting. So, in the example of Europe, Europe no longer has access to cheap pipeline Russian gas, and is now buying expensive LNG imports from the United States. So, in every one of those transactions, the other side is also losing. So Russia is trying to unfreeze some sanctions on agricultural exports. And that is something that’s going to help a lot of countries around the world if achieved, to get Russia back onto the SWIFT system for a limited set of transactions.”
Such are the UK and EU leaders’ egos that they think that they can fight Russia and, when they inevitably lose, America will fight along side them.
Watch; France believes it can defeat Russia; The Duran, 20 April 2025
Alexander Mercouris; “Not only are the Russians mobilising more than enough men every day to more than make up their losses but people are volunteering for the Russian army in more than enough numbers to enable the Russian army to grow and it is continuing to grow every day. So every day the balance shifts, the Russian army gets bigger, the Ukrainian army gets smaller. The Russians are continuing to produce huge numbers of weapons.
The military balance is shifting decisively in Russia’s favour and when Putin said a few days ago, that the time has come to end this, you can see why he is confident that that will happen.”
Alex Christoforou; “So if Russia goes on the offensive, if they start to advance significantly in the next couple of months, do you believe that France and the UK are going to make a move towards the Black Sea, towards Odessa, through Romania?”
Alexander Mercouris; “Believe it or not, I do, I really do. I think that they’re that crazy and that obsessed. Apparently, the French at the very latest Coalition of the Willing summit told the other Europeans, ‘don’t worry, the Russians have struggled to capture villages, if we arrive in Ukraine, there’s no way that they’re going to take us on over and above the Ukrainians’. Apparently the French actually said that. And apparently the other European leaders, those of them that retain some connection to reality, heard this with complete incredulity and were, to put it mildly, unconvinced. But I think that gives us a sense of the madness, the obsessiveness with which some people in France, Macron and his circle, are approaching this. So I think there will be French troops sent to Odessa, and I think we will probably start to see them appear there in the late summer. That’s probably the time when all of this will come together. And then heavens knows what’s going to happen. The Russians will certainly respond. And it could very well be that we’re going to start seeing French soldiers going back to France in body bags. And that will trigger, I suspect, a big crisis in France. British soldiers as well, I can’t imagine Macron sending French troops to Odessa without Starmer sending British ones.”
Alex Chrstoforou; “And what do you think the goal is in all this? Do you think that Macron and Starmer actually believe that Russia is going to be afraid of the French military forces and they’re not going to do anything? Do you think they actually believe that? or do you believe that this is all about trying to get the US involved, that once those troops are annihilated by the Russians, then Starmer and Macron are going to go crying to the Trump administration?
Alexander Mercouris; That’s a given, that’s what they’re going to do.
Alex Chrstoforou; “So what do you think the end goal is?
Alexander Mercouris; “I think when Macron first proposed sending French troops to Ukraine, which was last year, the objective was absolutely straightforward; it was to suck the Americans into the war at that time. Remember, we’re talking about Biden, Blinken, Sullivan, and as we now know, Millie, Cavoli, all of those people. So it was a kind of semi rational calculation given the attitudes of those people it’s understandable why Macron might have thought that if the French army enters Ukraine, the Americans will be there to back it. I think that now doubts about that have grown. I think there were those attempts by Macron and Starmer back in February to get Trump to commit to providing the British and the French with a backstop. Trump has clearly refused to do that. But if you notice, Macron and Starmer are still pressing on with this. I think that they’ve now have got themselves so committed to this plan that they’re not going to back off, even if they feel that the Americans are not going to be there. I think that they are now telling each other that there’s no way the Russians are going to take them on, that they’re so much better than the Russians, and that they can send their troops to Odessa and all will be OK and the French will take over Odessa, the British will take over Lviv, things of that kind, I think they really believe that. I think they talked themselves into believing it. Here’s what I think is going to happen. I think we’re going to see the Ukrainian army start to collapse over the course of the summer. I think there’s then going to be another rush to get a ceasefire going. I think they’re going to tell Zelensky at some point to declare a unilateral ceasefire and that they’re going to have French troops already in Romania and they’re going to get the troops from Romania into Odessa as soon as Zelensky declares that unilateral ceasefire. And they’ll hope that the Russians will then be deterred and will observe the ceasefire, which of course isn’t going to happen. The Russians have already made that absolutely clear. But I think that is the plan. So I’m sorry to say this, I think they are going to do it. And I think Macron has talked himself into believing that he can do it, and I think Starmer has the same.”
Alex Christoforou; “Yeah, that that’s why it was so important to not have Georgescu win in Romania.”
History will judge Boris Johnson’s cynical scheming and manoevering for Ukraine to continue the fighting when there was a workable agreement on the table that would have ended the war nearly three years ago and prevented the loss of thousands of Russian and Ukrainian lives. Its extraordinary that one malignant person can cause so much misery, death and destruction. With Blair, Cameron, Johnson and now Starmer its becoming a British tradition to tell lies to force countries into war.
Watch Aaron Maté: NATO’s War Narratives Collapse Glenn Diesen, 17 April 2025
Aaron Maté́; ” We just have such an obedient media system in which some facts can’t be acknowledged, so even Boris Johnson acknowledging that it was the Ukrainian ultra nationalists, the extremists who stood in the way of implementing the Minsk accords, that doesn’t matter. It just doesn’t register. We shared the clip of Boris Johnson, it goes out to our circles, our niche circles, but otherwise, it just doesn’t land because it’s inconvenient to the narrative. But what’s funny about Boris Johnson admitting that he’s Zelensky’s biggest foreign cheerleader, he’s really sung Zelensky’s praises because Zelensky’s essentially followed his orders. But what was Boris Johnson doing in saying that it was the ultra nationalists who sabotaged Zelensky’s peace mandate? He was undercutting the main argument that Zelensky made in the Oval Office to JD Vance when he told JD Vance, what kind of diplomacy are you talking about, after JD Vance advocated diplomacy. And Zelensky said to JD Vance, listen, I tried to make a deal with Putin, and he invoked the agreement that Zelensky signed with Putin in Paris in December 2019, in which there were supposed to be prisoner exchanges and there were supposed to be steps towards implementing the Minsk accords. And Zelensky said Putin didn’t follow any of it. So basically, Zelensky was trying to say that Putin had sabotaged their agreement that they signed together back in December 2019, and therefore he can’t make an agreement with him. Well, Boris Johnson comes out and says a few weeks later, yes actually, it was the ultra nationalists inside Ukraine that prevented Zelensky from implementing the compromise because they opposed the compromise. And what was the compromise? It was respecting the Minsk accords, respecting autonomy for ethnic Russians inside of Ukraine, which they refused to do because they don’t see these ethnic Russians as equal Ukrainians and they don’t even want them in their country. So Boris Johnson made that admission at a very, very inconvenient time for his life.
There was one article in the Financial Times last year called ‘Ukraine Faces Its Darkest Hour’ and it contained a rare acknowledgement of the role of the ultra nationalists. Let me quote some of it for you, this is from September 2024, and they say this, ‘Zelensky’s biggest problem might come from a nationalist minority opposed to any compromise, some of whom are now armed and trained to fight’. And it quotes one Ukrainian official saying that ‘any negotiation with Russia could be a trigger for social instability.’ Zelensky knows this very well. And finally, it quotes the chair of the Ukrainian parliament’s foreign affairs committee, who says this, ‘there will always be a radical segment of Ukrainian society that will call any negotiation capitulation.The far right in Ukraine is growing.The right wing is a danger to democracy’. So that’s a rare acknowledgement in establishment media, the Financial Times, about the threat that Zelensky faces and that Ukraine faces from within.”
Lavrov offers wise conditions for peace. “(The US) understands that returning to the 1991 borders, as Zelensky still demands, is impossible if only because people live on those territories, people whom Zelensky considers subhuman. He said this even before the special military operation started. He advised those who feel part of Russian culture to “get lost to Russia.”
Watch; Putin Aide, Lavrov Shocks Trump With BRICS Payment Move Despite US Threats Hindustan Times,12 April 2025
‘Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has revealed that BRICS is developing an alternative global payment system—one that could rival SWIFT and include non-member nations. Lavrov confirmed Brazil proposed the platform, and Russia’s own financial messaging network is being eyed as a model. The move could shift global financial power away from the West. Will this be the final push for global de-dollarisation?
Sergey Lavrov, Russian Foreign Affairs Minister; “I shared the current situation regarding the Ukrainian crisis and explained our consistent approach to a settlement that must be reliable, lasting, and sustainable. This can only be achieved by addressing the root causes of the conflict, which are well known and have been accumulating for years. In essence, they began forming with NATO’s increasing push eastward up to our borders and with the encouragement of the openly Nazi Kyiv regime, which came to power through an unconstitutional bloody coup. Among other things, this regime has legally eradicated everything related to Russia and the Russian world, the Russian language, culture, Russian language media, canonical orthodoxy in the form of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and more.
I informed our colleagues about certain details of our contacts with the Americans, including on Washington’s potential role in assisting with the settlement of the Ukrainian crisis. President Trump has consistently expressed his interest in this. And unlike Europe, which includes Britain and which completely ignores the root causes of the current situation, there is a desire in the US to understand the essence of the problem. Trump has publicly stated multiple times that dragging Ukraine into NATO was a mistake that played a decisive role in current events despite Moscow’s long standing warnings. They also understand that returning to the 1991 borders, as Zelensky still demands, is impossible if only because people live on those territories, people whom Zelensky considers subhuman. He said this even before the special military operation started. He advised those who feel part of Russian culture to get lost to Russia. Those were his words. Recently, in an interview, he said that his primary motivation is hatred of Russians. When asked if that included Putin personally, he said, no, all Russians, I hate them all. So how could anyone, even hypothetically, consider handing over these people to someone like that? Never and under no circumstances. The Trump administration understands this, and they publicly stated that Zelenskyy will have to accept the territorial issue.”
Brilliant history of how the US paid for the UK and EU’s post-war restructuring on condition that we joined the US crusade against Russia’s socialism. Today the excuse they use for NATO expansion and war with Russia is to scare us into thinking that Putin wants to rebuild the USSR – where is the evidence? He said that only a mad man would want to rebuild the USSR.
Watch The Deal Behind the New Deal is Collapsing (w/ Richard Wolff) The Chris Hedges YouTube Channel, 19 April 2025
Professor Richard Wolff; “Part of what you’re watching with the Trump administration can be, and in my judgement, ought to be, understood as a war on the working class at home but also abroad. What is being done? Let me start at the opposite end. What is being done in Europe is remarkable, a deal that came out of World War 2 in which the United States would defeat the new enemy, the Soviet Union, barely a few months after being the great ally. It became, overnight, the great enemy, showing a kind of flexibility which is at once astonishing but also impressive in terms of meeting your own needs and rearranging the pieces on the board that you’re playing with. The deal that was made was the following, we the United States, we have two big worries right now. Number one, the New Deal. An awful lot of money was taxed, or borrowed from rich corporations and the wealthy people, to provide a remarkable array of mass services, unemployment insurance, a minimum wage, the Social Security system, government employment. This had to be rolled back and the last 50 years are the story of the rollback of that New Deal. But it also required smashing the socialists and communists who had created that New Deal, with their alliance, for a while, with the Democratic Party, all of that had to be undone, and was undone. The second great anxiety at the end of the war was that we would fall back into a depression. Let’s remember it was only the war that finally got us out of the horrible collapse of capitalism, the worst in its history, from 1929 to 1940-41 and only by taking the remaining many, many millions of people, I’m going to be simple now, putting half of them in uniform and the other half making the uniforms. And then, the great worry, and it was very serious, at the end of the war we would demobilise all these people out of the military, out of producing for the military.
What would prevent us from slipping back? You can see the government did extraordinary things, the GI Bill to take all those soldiers and, instead of having them go into unemployment, stick them in university where the government would pay for it, the housing programme, the highway programme, all of them. But what people don’t recognise was that there was another part of this and that was the international part. The problem was Europe had the same depression history as this country did. During that time, as in the United States, socialist and communist parties became much stronger than they had ever been in Europe. So at the end of the war, you had the worry about slipping back, but you had an even bigger worry, you had very strong socialist and communist parties who had led the movement of the 1930s to get social services which were much more generous in Europe than they were in this country. Plus the socialists and communists provided the militants who were the anti-fascist resistance. So they were popular, they were strong. De Gaulle’s first government after 1945 had to have Communist Party people in the cabinet. For Italy the second biggest party In the 20 years after the war was the Italian Communist Party. I could go on and they all had the Soviet Union, literally, a few hours by train from them, so their capitalist classes were even more freaked out about what was going on and then the alliance with the Soviet Union, It was all too much. So what the United States did is cut a deal. We will solve our economic problem by putting Keynesianism on steroids. The government is going to come in and do what? Save us from the Soviet menace, build up the military-industrial and say to the Europeans, we’ll take care of it, we’ll provide you with the defence umbrella, we’ll provide you with all the support and all you have to do is make sure you crush the socialists and communists at home, and you are a good bulwark against the Soviet Union. And to that end, here’s what we’re going to do. You won’t have to cover defence. We’re taking care of that with our domestic military Keynesianism, and you’re going to take the money you would have had to spend to provide the social services that will allow you to compete with what the Russians are offering their people and had been already for quite a while at that time, so you’re going to compete with them. And then we’re going to take our National Endowment For Democracy, our CIA and all the rest and make sure the right politicians willing to commit to this deal sit at the top of the government in France, in Germany and Britain, and we all know the story of all of the money and the sloshing that was done. That was the way, we were going to destroy the socialists and communists inside and weaken or destroy, if we could, the one outside, and all of it justifying the massive government spending.
But the problem is, all of that was paid for by debt. The United States does not like to fight wars with taxes. It likes to fight wars with money borrowed, because if you tax the people, the opposition to the war would be much bigger and arise much sooner. So you can’t do that. You borrow the money. Here’s the irony. The Europeans were major lenders for a while to the United States to fund the Keynesianism that protected them from having to use their money for their own defence. The ironies of how this all fits together are a charming story. It’s never quite been put down on paper. What we have now is the collapse of that deal.
The United States had no competitor coming out of World War 2. Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, they were all destroyed. We came out king of the hill, our economy was in better shape coming out of the war than it was going in, and no-one else could say that, and the result was a very bizarre, unique, special moment that could not possibly last. I think historians will look back, be rather impressed it lasted as long as it did, but in any case it is now over. You can’t do it. The United States lost the war in Vietnam, it lost it in Iraq and losing it in Ukraine. Look at it, these are among the poorest countries on earth to which the US is losing and the Europeans are left, in a way one almost has to sympathise, they’re irrelevant. They’ve become the literal opposite of what they were 3 or 4 centuries ago, the centre of the universe, the apogee of culture, the colonial master, all of that, it’s all gone. Europe is a footnote, living in a world of fantasy. Being unable to stop the Russians with the United States, they actually think that they’re going to do it without the United States. These are levels of craziness that are part of the decline, I suspect, of all empires when they consume themselves.
Last point I am particularly struck with this crazy business of attacking federal employees in the name of efficiency. That is so laughable that one has to kind of take a deep breath because it’s sort of overwhelming what you get here. Two and a half million civilian employees of the federal government versus five million working for the state government and fifteen million working for the local government. if you care to damn about efficiency, or whatever that exactly means, your obvious targets would be local and state, but they can’t get at those, so they go after the federal. That’s not a decision of efficiency, that’s a decision of where can we make a public performance, and they’re making a public performance. It ruins the lives of those people. It destroys whatever function these agencies often had. It drives people entering the labour force, which is a larger number than those leaving the federal, they’re all going to go into the private sector where they’re going to bid down wages at the same time that they can’t control the inflation. You’re ripping up your working class more and more and more. As if there were no end to this process. These are the desperate behaviours of a dying empire. There’s really no other framework that I can think of that makes sense of this.”
Zionism is a Colonial State Project/Gaza, Syria, Yemen, Lebanon & Iran
Last minute update on Yemen’s fight against genocide in Palestine.
Watch; Houthi Missile Over Israeli Skies Leads To Major Panic; U.S. & Israel Failing Against Yemeni Group? Hindustan Times; 2 May 2025
‘Thousands of Israelis rushed to shelters in central & northern Israel on May 2 morning. This after a Houthi missile from Yemen took over the Israeli skyline. Air raid sirens were reportedly sounded in more than 250 Israeli settlements. Watch for more details.’
The Balfour family trustees cleared (evicted) the Maclennan clan from Strathconon as told by Tom Johnston in the History of the Working Classes in Scotland (1929). This week’s @ChurchTimes remembers how Lord Balfour was received in Palestine 1925 – check out the final sentence. pic.twitter.com/eCtauAXKIU
— Alastair McIntosh (@alastairmci) April 4, 2025
The zionists are worried that their propaganda is failing to disguise their intent of global domination. In diasporas across the globe, these genocidal racists are bribing, blackmailing, corrupting and surveilling every sector of society to censor the popular pro-Palestine narrative.
Read; Former US Senator Norm Coleman has raised eyebrows by declaring that “the masters of the universe are Jews” at a major zionist lobby event in Jerusalem. In an address to a summit hosted by the Adelson-funded Jewish News Syndicate on April 27, Coleman pointed to various major technology firms founded by Jews, suggesting the shared religion of the companies’ creators should translate into a greater zeal for censoring criticism of Israel.
“And when you think about it, the Masters of the Universe are Jews! We’ve got Altman at OpenAI, we’ve got [Facebook founder Mark] Zuckerberg, we’ve got [Google founder] Sergey Brin, we’ve got a group across the board. Jan Koum, y’know, founded WhatsApp. It’s us.”
The remarks came as Coleman lamented that pro-Israel propagandists are “losing the digital war” in battle for the hearts and minds of younger generations, and called for more stringent censorship of pro-Palestinian speech.
“A majority or Gen Z have an unfavorable impression of Israel. And, my friends, I think the reason for that is that we’re losing the digital war. They’re getting their information from TikTok, and… and we’re losing that war.”
Israel’s colonies, the US, UK and the EU are falling over themselves to appease the zionist war criminals and are arresting people who object to the genocide in Gaza. Every day the sentient world wakes up in anguish as more and more children’s lives are stamped out by the Israeli jackboot.
Read; FROM THE UNITED STATES TO EUROPE, CRITICIZING ISRAEL IS BECOMING A CRIME by Kit Klarenberg, 29 April 2025
Across the United States and much of the West, criticism of Israel and solidarity with Palestine are increasingly being criminalised—a project long championed by Israel’s government and its powerful lobbying networks. In February 2020, Israeli leader and internationally wanted war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu proudly declared that Tel Aviv had “promoted laws in most U.S. states” to punish those who boycott Israel, offering a rare glimpse into the foreign forces eroding free speech in the American heartland.
Since then, anti-boycott laws have quietly spread to dozens of states, forcing public institutions, businesses, and even individual contractors to pledge loyalty to Israel—or risk losing jobs, contracts, and funding. What began as a niche effort to shield Tel Aviv from grassroots criticism has rapidly escalated into a sweeping assault on free speech across the Western world. The overwhelming majority of states now boast laws making it illegal for local entities, including hospitals and schools, to work with individuals or companies that boycott Israel. For example, in 2016, Indiana’s Senate unanimously passed a law calling for mandatory divestment by state agencies, commercial enterprises, and nonprofit organizations—including universities—from any firm involved in “the promotion of activities to boycott, divest from, or sanction Israel.”
Through the giant tech corporations and AI, zionism is being infiltrated into every sector of our private and professional lives.
Read; 100+ Meta employees, including Head of AI Policy, confirmed as ex-IDF The Grayzone, 8 April 2025
‘Meta’s recruitment of vast numbers of former Israeli soldiers raises serious questions about the tech giant’s commitment to free speech – and provides a peek into a biased content moderation process that’s been heavily censoring pro-Palestinian accounts amid the Israeli siege of Gaza. More than one hundred former Israeli spies and IDF soldiers work for tech giant Meta, including its head of AI policy, who served in the IDF under an Israeli government scheme that allows non-Israelis to volunteer for the Israeli army.
Shira Anderson, an American international rights lawyer, is Meta’s AI policy chief who voluntarily enlisted for the IDF in 2009 under a program which enables non-Israeli Jews who aren’t eligible for military conscription to join the Israeli army. Through this program, known as Garin Tzabar, many non-Israelis who have fought for the IDF have been implicated in war crimes and crimes against humanity since Israel’s genocide of Gaza began in October 2023. Anderson served as a non-commissioned officer in the IDF for over two years where she worked in the Military Strategic Information Section, writing dossiers and public relations propaganda for the IDF. She was also the liaison between the IDF and foreign military attaches stationed in Israel, and liaison to the Red Cross. With AI a critical emerging technology for tech giants and militaries, Anderson’s role at Meta is an important one. She develops the legal guidance, policies and public relations talking points concerning AI issues and regulation for all of Meta’s key areas, including its product, public policy and government affairs teams.
At Meta, Anderson, who is based in Meta’s Washington DC office, is in familiar company. More than one hundred former Israeli spies and IDF soldiers are employed by the company, my new investigation shows, many of whom worked for Israel’s spy agency Unit 8200. These ex-IDF members are based evenly across Meta’s US offices and in its Tel Aviv office, and a significant number of them, like Anderson, have a specialisation in AI. Given that Israel has made extensive use of AI not just to conduct its genocide, but to establish its prior system of apartheid, surveillance and occupation, Meta’s recruiting of IDF AI specialists is particularly insidious. Did these former Israeli spies use their Unit 8200 connections to help the tech giant collaborate with the IDF to build kill lists? According to a report last year, Unit 8200 infiltrated WhatsApp groups and marked every name in a group for assassination if just one alleged Hamas member was also in the group, no matter the size or content of the group chat.
How did Israel’s spy unit gain access to WhatsApp user data held by Meta? Meta has serious, war crime-related questions to answer.
Questions that Anderson has no doubt drafted PR responses for.
Anderson has a long-standing allegiance to Israel. She joined the IDF after studying for a history degree at the University of California, Berkley, then completed a law degree at Duke University before returning to Israel where she worked for an Israeli thinktank run by the former head of the IDF. After this she became a legal assistant to the head of Israel’s Supreme Court. It was Israel’s Supreme Court that two weeks ago rejected a petition to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza, effectively greenlighting the use of starvation as a weapon. This is a war crime under the Geneva Convention.
Anderson herself is a strident denier of the genocide. During a podcast appearance last year she said, “I absolutely do not think genocide is happening” and denied Israel was deliberately targeted civilians. During the interview she called Hamas “a death cult” and said “Gaza is a failed state,” despite it not being a state, the central fact that underlies Palestinian resistance. This is something you’d hope an international rights layer would know. She made numerous genocidal statements during the interview, including that “the challenge in the West Bank” is that “international law doesn’t permit Israel to do what it does in Gaza” because the West Bank is occupied. As a result, she lamented, “different rules apply.” She invoked the trolley problem to argue why killing large numbers of civilians is justifiable and appears from her time as IDF Red Cross liaison to have a particular grudge against the aid organization, saying it “acts like a country” in Israel. You can hear it all here.
Anderson’s path to serve in the IDF, via the Garin Tzabar program, is also highly controversial. This initiative has enabled non-Israelis (known as ‘Lone Soldiers’) to join the IDF, murder Palestinians, commit war crimes, and then re-integrate into their home societies. Legal cases against Garin Tzabar volunteers who have returned to their homes after serving in the IDF are moving forward in a number of countries. In the UK evidence of war crimes committed in Gaza by ten Britons living in London has recently been submitted to London’s Metropolitan police.
How many possible war criminals are employed by Meta?
You can find the Tel Aviv-based Meta employee names here and here. You can find the names of the US-based employees and their locations here, here and here.
Some of the former Israeli spies now working for Meta spent significant amounts of time in Unit 8200, in some cases jumping straight from the IDF to Meta. Guy Shenkerman, for example, spent over a decade in Israel’s spy unit before moving to the US to join Meta in the summer of 2022. Miki Rothschild, a vice president of product management at Meta’s Sunnydale campus, spent three years during the second intifada as a commander of the IDF’s Moran Squad which controls long range missile strikes. Maksim Shmukler who works for Meta in Menlo Park and has also worked for Google and Apple, spent six and half years in Unit 8200 before moving to Texas.
Shenkerman, Rothschild and Shmukler are Israelis, while Shira Anderson volunteered to use her skills to launder the legalese that Israel relies on to whitewash genocide. The fact that the person who volunteered her professional services for an AI-powered apartheid state now helps determine how Meta will use our data to power an AI future should worry us all. It should especially concern us in light of America’s brutal crackdown on those who speak against genocide.
We recently saw how Meta sees this AI-powered future.
In November the company announced it was making its ‘Llama’ AI tools available to the US and its so-called ‘Five Eyes’ allies for national security applications. In the announcement Meta said it was “thrilled” to be working with America’s preeminent weapons manufacturers and national security state corporations including Lockheed Martin, Palantir and Anduril.
To recap: a former IDF officer is the head of AI policy for Meta, where she works alongside more than one hundred other former IDF and Israeli spies, and they are all now directly mobilized to work with America’s national security state apparatus and alongside a federal government disappearing and detaining dissidents who speak out against genocide.
The news that large numbers of former IDF members are employed by Meta comes after my investigations earlier this year revealed the former Unit 8200 AI specialists working on AI for big tech companies, and the former spies imported into Google via its acquisition of Wiz.
With the proliferation of former Israeli spies and soldiers into US big tech we are looking at the complete capture of the US national security state by pro-Israel voices. By voices who deny genocide as we watch journalists burn to death in tents. Who deny genocide as we watch headless babies carried aloft through the rubble and ruins of once vibrant streets. Voices who deny genocide as Israel’s highest court waves through starvation policies. By voices who, in Trump, appear to have found the ideal man to execute the zionist wish-list.
As an AI future advances, the people who constructed the digital architecture enabling total surveillance and control of the Palestinians, and who wrote the code that enabled their genocide, are now determining that future for all of us.’
It is so unlike big hearted R F Kennedy Jr. to be zionist that many are surmising that he is being blackmailed.
Watch Staring Down Blackmail: Talking RFK Jr. with Charles Eisenstein Bret Weinstein, 1 April 2025
‘Bret Weinstein speaks with Charles Eisenstein on the subject of blackmail in American politics. They explore the complexities surrounding zionism, the implications of antisemitism in political discourse, and the psychological mechanisms of coercion and blackmail that influence public figures.’
Bret Weinstein; “What brings us together? Well, I’ve been reading your work for quite some time. You and I ran into each other in person a few years back at a conference in Austin. And you reached out this well in the last few days as a result of having seen a piece that I had put out talking about the possibility that RFK is being blackmailed and that accounts for his strange focus on anti-semitism from his new position at the head of HHS. Now you were his head speech writer during the period when he was campaigning for president. So you know Bobby well. You and I both consider Bobby a good friend and this is a delicate topic, a question of whether or not someone is coercing him into focusing on anti-semitism and taking up other positions at a moment when you and I, as fellow Covid dissidents, would hope that he would be addressing issues of of health that he promised to address during the campaign. Is that a fair assessment?
Charles Eisenstein; Well I think that he is addressing issues of health and partly, on one level this is all a huge distraction and just another way for people to trip him up and divert his attention onto other matters. But there’s something deeper here as well that’s always bothered me. It’s no secret that I was vehemently opposed to his what I would consider very extreme zionist views during the campaign. And for me, the polarisation around the Palestine issue and in many quarters, the collapse of something really complex into a good versus evil narrative that is at the root of the same problem that we’re looking at in terms of public health, and the political transformation that we are all excited by in the MAHA movement, for example, isn’t about merely shifting the identity of the bad guy, but it’s a fundamental paradigm shift. It’s a different way of looking at the world. And that is why, aside from the fact that innocent men, women and children are dying, that’s why it’s so disturbing and and so seemingly incongruous with everything else that he stands for. And so that’s why I think why there is speculation, OK because we’re not the only ones who have noticed this incongruity. So that I think that’s why there’s speculation of like, OK, what’s going on here and oh, is it blackmail or something like that?”
Bret Weinstein; “So I will say what caused you to reach out to me a couple days ago was a segment of mine that you saw in which I reacted to the second. I had also reacted to the first, but I reacted to the second of Bobby’s official tweets from his official account saying what a terrible health crisis anti-semitism was. And my reaction was that feels like a hostage video. I know that Bobby has long standing commitments to Israel and but the idea of tweeting from his official account at the moment that MAHA should be firing on all cylinders, and blurring the distinction between a health crisis and anti-semitism of the genuine kind and anti-semitism of the the cloak variety, Is terribly unwise, and Bobby’s not an unwise guy, so what the heck is going on? Is somebody forcing him to to tweet this way? And as you said up top, it’s certainly at the very least a profound and divisive distraction at a moment that he should be focused on the things that are all of a sudden, after so much work on his part actually within range for him to do something about, it was a very strange choice.”
Charles Eisenstein; “It almost seemed like he was punching his ticket. You have to punch your pro- israel ticket every once in a while for some reason.”
Bret Weinstein; “I’m not saying that what’s going on with Bobby has anything to do with Epstein, but let’s just use Epstein and his video library as a way to to sort out what the chess board looks like. Something decided to collect compromat on a lot of important people that the immediate person who did the collecting is presumably dead. But the library exists somewhere, and there is every reason to at least wonder, if not assume that that library is serving its function, that it is having an effect on matters of policy relevant to whoever it is who collected it. And so that means that we in the public ought to always be asking ourselves, do we think that that’s a small influence on what narratives we know on what policy gets made, or do we think it’s a large influence or somewhere in between? My instinct is it’s probably a substantial influence. And so when I see somebody like Bobby behaving like he’s in a hostage video, it makes me wonder whether or not as many have speculated, that compromat is just simply a major feature of the landscape of policy in 2025 in the US, that it’s, it’s happening in front of our eyes.”
Charles Eisenstein; “Say in the case of of Israel, if you convince yourself that you fully believe all of the justifications for the slaughter in Gaza, if you fully believe all of the justifications for everything going back to 1948 and before then you don’t need to be blackmailed. It’s irrelevant. I’m not being blackmailed, they’re right on this issue. I don’t know, in the case of Bobby Kennedy if this is what’s going on, that would be speculation, and I just don’t like to, I don’t like to speculate. I don’t like to feed this drama, which ultimately takes on a flavour of casting people out, of dehumanising them, of dividing the world into us and them. But to understand the overall situation, if Donald Trump really wants to unravel the knot of corruption, this Gordian knot that has ensnared our entire society, it will necessarily ultimately involve Israel and its intelligence agencies and the the neocons who have been supporting them.”
The interview below is so good, that I have kept it in its entirety. It is about how zionism equates to fascism. ‘The brown shirts in Germany were a domestic German organisation focused on advancing Nazi ideology in Germany, whereas the zionist brown shirts operate today on behalf of a foreign regime inside of the United States, inside of the UK, inside of Germany and so on. So they’re collaborating directly with the US government and other Western governments and institutions on one side, they’re collaborating with the Israeli government on the other side, very directly so.’
Listen US & Israel Rain Hell Around the World, from Gaza to College Campuses, w/ Craig Mokhiber Rania Khalek, 2 April 2025
Rania Khalek; “Joining me to discuss this and more is Craig Mokhiber, former director of the New York Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, who resigned from his position in protest over the UN’s failure to stop Israel’s genocide in Gaza. A lot of dark things are happening. I’m so happy to have you on to help contextualise a lot of this. And something I want to start with is, you’ve described Israel’s proxy cells in Western countries, if you will, as today’s brown shirts, which I thought was a really, really interesting framing. And these brown shirts are harassing human rights defenders, journalists, students and public figures who speak out against Israeli atrocities. These are groups like Canary Mission, this very fascistic group, Betar, groups like Stand With Us. They have even been responsible, specifically Canary Mission and Betar, for furnishing the Trump administration with names of students to deport for their essentially pro-human rights views. I had somebody on my show recently, Doctor Lara who described these kinds of groups and called them an extension of Israel’s occupation, which I thought was another interesting way to put it. But I’m curious if you could maybe elaborate on your framing of these groups, why you see them as fascists, and how Western governments are actively enabling them.”
Craig Mokhiber; “I think this is an extraordinary development in the politics of Western countries, foremost among them the United States. This emergence of these zionist cells effectively that function on behalf of a foreign regime, Israel, but function inside the United States and other Western countries to basically harass human rights defenders and others and to influence U.S. government policy. But the reason I called them brown shirts is what they’ve emerged into from the historical reference of the brown shirts that were effectively patterned after the black shirts in fascist Italy, but the brown shirts in Nazi Germany that did a lot of the dirty work for the regime. And so if you look at what’s happening here now, you have direct collaboration between these neo-fascist, zionist hate groups on the one hand and the government of the United States on the other hand. Collaboration with the presidential administration, the Congress, state governments, local police forces, even university administrations, as we know, directly communicating with and collaborating with and furthering the goals of these organisations. And when I say they’re fascist, I mean that quite literally. Some of them are followers and adherents to a zionist fascists like Jabotinsky, who as one of the the founders of Israel, the head of the zionist Revisionist movement, which was a deeply terrorist hate group of zionists targeting Palestinians, founder of the haganah, which was a violent terrorist organisation, was key in the founding of Israel. A lot of these groups are either explicitly or implicitly followers of people like Jabotinsky. Later Meir Kahane another fascist zionist who started the Jewish Defence League in the United States and started the kach movement in Israel, which was even banned by the Israelis for being an overtly fascist party, so they were banned from the Knesset for a period of time. Well, now in Israel the followers of Jabotinsky and Kahane and people like that are in power and they also represent the majority of the citizenry in the state of Israel. And so Israel proxy groups in the West are channelling that fascistic ideology in their activities here in the United States and Canada and the UK and Germany and elsewhere and doing it in direct cooperation with government forces. And that’s what’s unique. In this country we had the Ku Klux Klan that was in league with local governments and local police forces, but they never had that level of collaboration at the national level with the federal government here. So this is unique for this kind of thing, but it wasn’t unique in Europe where that was the model of the Nazi brown shirts and the Italian fascist black shirts and so on. That’s where the historical precedent for these kind of groups lies. But there’s something different here too, because the brown shirts in Germany, for example, they were a domestic German organisation focused on advancing Nazi ideology in Germany, whereas the zionist brown shirts operate today on behalf of a foreign regime inside of the United States, inside of the UK, inside of Germany and so on. So they’re collaborating directly with the US government and other Western governments and institutions on one side, they’re collaborating with the Israeli government on the other side, very directly so. And so they’re essentially sitting between the demands of an oppressive regime on one side and U.S. government power. the other thing that I think distinguishes these modern zionist brown shirts is their funding. This is something the KKK could never have dreamed of. These groups are swimming in money from like- minded billionaires and millionaires that allow them to have access to resources that give them the access that they need in government as well. So for example, you have the zionist billionaire Adelson family right now, Miriam Adelson, who funded and organised a multi-million dollar cell that they called the Maccabee Task Force. It was first focused on college campuses persecuting students, trying to oppose BDS, which is a lawful movement against Israeli atrocities. And Miriam Adelson is the head of that organisation and its funder and also is the biggest donor to the Republican Party and the biggest donor to Trump specifically. There’s a great interview with Eli Clifton on Electronic Intifada doing an expo on this in particular. And that’s only one example of the access to funding that these fascistic groups operating in the US have now. And if you just look at what they’ve done right, they organised their movement to advance these zionist goals through zionist organisations all across the country. They’ve corrupted official institutions either through fear or through favour. Just look at the work of AIPAC and the level of influence that it has in the US Congress, either through massive donations on the one side or through threats on the other side. They organise appointments and election of people that are actually adherent to their ideology. And that’s the role that the Adelsons have long played with the US government. You have direct collaboration between the government and fascist movements like Betar and we see now targeting students and people here on green cards and visas for them to be harassed by official institutions of governance, including law enforcement. They waged a campaign for decades that they’re now harvesting the fruit of, to equate criticism of Israel with anti-semitism, which we all know is an absolutely ridiculous statement to make that somehow criticism of Israel is anti-semitic. And then they took it to the next step and are now equating human rights activism with terrorism, which gives them access to the most repressive laws available on the slate of laws in the US and in other Western countries, and using this, they harass and attack human rights defenders, try to intimidate and silence them. They criminalise this kind of speech. So first they started getting bans passed in government against boycotts of Israel, BDS and so on, then the banning and criminalisation of student protests, and then everything is next. They’ve outlawed boycotts, they’ve outlawed critical speech, they’ve outlawed peaceful protest if any of this is critical of their political ideology of the state that they represent, they mobilise the police power to persecute human rights voices. They mobilise media corporations to run cover for their activities, to disseminate their propaganda. And now they are literally using the government to abduct people off the streets and spiriting them away to dungeons, all in the name of a single oppressive foreign regime and it’s violent and racist ideology. That’s where we are. If you think anyone watching thinks that doesn’t matter, just consider this. You can criticise here in the US and in other Western countries, you can criticise any of the 193 countries in the world, including your own government. You can criticise the US as much as you want, but if you criticise Israel, you can be punished, including under the law. you can criticise any political ideology in the world, from communism to capitalism, democracy, monarchism, socialism, anarchism, Islamism, fascism. You can criticise any political ideology, but if you criticise zionism, you can be punished. So we shouldn’t be surprised about this. I tweeted earlier today that first political zionism was always a fascistic movement. And anyone who’s read history will know that that is the case going back to Jabotinsky and and beyond. But if you know Aimé Césaire, his famous book ‘Discourse on Colonialism’, he says that essentially fascism is colonialism applied at home. So these kinds of abuses were first imposed in colonies like Palestine against the indigenous people and eventually those brought back home. And what we are experiencing right now is the fascism of political zionism being applied here. This vicious colonial ideology of zionism, after destroying Palestine and destroying Palestinian lives, has been allowed to seep into our own institutions and culture at home. And that was always going to bring fascism here. So official institutions are corrupted by this ideology and by its adherents. Critical speech is criminalised, human rights defenders are being demonised, police power mobilised to crush all dissent. And that’s what we’re witnessing today. And this is the root of it and something that if people don’t wake up, it’s going to continue to spread further.”
Rania Khalek; “That’s a really important point that you say where we talk when we talk about colonialism coming home to roost, fascism coming home to roost. It’s really turning inward and something interesting about this moment, Craig, and there’s so many different angles I want to come at this from, but I just I wanted to get your reaction to the fact that it’s all being wrapped up in fighting anti-semitism, it’s all being wrapped up in protecting Jews. You have today’s neo fascists, the the basically like offspring of Nazis, literally using the so-called protection of Jews to commit a genocide, to abduct people off the street and put them in dungeons and to essentially get rid of our right to free speech in this country, which is an important one in the US. It’s kind of like a bedrock of the US and I wanted to get your reaction. There’s this clip. I’m sure you’ve already seen it. It’s been making the rounds. There’s this film called October 8th that was executive produced by Debra Messing, who’s a zionist and who thinks she’s indigenous to the Levant, which I think is hilarious because she’s not. But all that’s to say, October 8th is a zionist film. It’s very right wing, it tries to frame the protests on college campuses as being essentially Nazi protests, all to make Jews unsafe. And so there’s this clip of Sheryl Sandberg, ‘Lean In’ feminist Sheryl Sandberg, former, Chief Operating Officer of Facebook. This is a billionaire. This is a very comfortable woman who is an elite in this society. And I just, I just want to play this clip of Sheryl Sandberg from this film, October 8th, because it’s so absurd.”
Sheryl Sandberg; “I was on a walk with one of my closest friends who’s not Jewish. And just out of nowhere, not expecting to say this, what came out of my mouth was, will you hide me like it comes to that? Will you hide me and my family? And like, do I really think that’s going to happen in the United States? No. And it was interesting because she didn’t really know what I was talking about. So what do you mean hide you? And I explained that there are these righteous people that hid Jews. This is the story of Anne Frank. And then, of course, she said, oh, I know what you mean. But any Jew would have known what I meant immediately.
Rania Khalek; “OK, so this absurd victimhood complex that this woman who had probably has several yachts she could hide on if she needed to is just offensive for so many reasons. First of all, there’s an actual genocide taking place right now that she supports. She’s one of the people who promoted the rape hoax that was like a cornerstone or foundational to justifying the genocide in Gaza for the first year of it, or maybe even more, that some people continue to repeat despite there being no evidence that there was some mass rape that Hamas carried out across these Israeli towns in on October 7th. But moreover, there are medics being summarily executed. There are doctors being abducted and tortured from Gaza. Tens of thousands of children have been intentionally killed. Two million people, if that’s even how many people are left in Gaza, are being starved and the Israeli government is openly speaking about voluntary migration, which means ethnic cleansing. They are literally raining hell on Gaza. There are students who are mostly Middle Eastern being abducted off the streets for having an opinion against genocide. No one’s talking about hiding them. Their universities certainly aren’t going to be hiding them. Many universities like Johns Hopkins, don’t even intervene. So sorry, I’m reacting to this now. I want to get your reaction, Craig, because this actually, as hilariously ridiculous as it is, it’s also incredibly infuriating.”
Craig Mokhiber; “It’s hard to know when you see something like that, how much of it is just fascist theatre, an effort to, in a very skilled way, circulate a propaganda that inverts reality on its head by making the perpetrators the victims and the victims the perpetrators, which is a big part of hasbara propaganda. It’s one of the key techniques that are used. Or how much of it is that she’s sincere, which underscores what I’ve been saying for a while, You can see how a political ideology, an extreme political ideology like zionism that is supremacist in its nature, how that can morph into a mental illness. And that she sincerely feels that because she is disconnected with reality and even with morality by this extreme political ideology that is is morphed into a mental illness, and then she’s expressing the pain of that mental illness. I don’t care, if you ask me if somebody is defending a genocide. If it’s 1933 and somebody is defending the persecution of Jews in Germany and one of the persecutors says will you hide me? The answer is no, I won’t hide a criminal, I’m going to turn you into the police. So no, I will hide people who are fleeing the Nazis, just as I will hide people who are fleeing today, the zionists here. She has been a propagandist extraordinaire for the atrocities being perpetrated by the Israeli regime. A big part of me thinks that this is just a continuation of that and she’s adding a little bit of theatre to the mix. But there’s always the possibility that it’s her own madness is coming out as well, anti-semitism, this ruse of anti-semitism, a very real thing in our society, as you say, Nazis marching in the streets again. But this ruse of the abuse of anti-semitism, which was an Israeli government, a strategy that gave us the IHRA definition of anti-semitism, that includes criticism of Israel, is absurd on its face, but they’ve made a lot of progress in getting official institutions and governments to adopt that so they can persecute human rights defenders who speak out against Israel. And I said this 100 times before. If criticism of Israel is anti-semitism, then criticism of Iran is Islamophobic, criticism of India is anti-Hindu, criticism of Myanmar is anti- Buddhist, and you can go on and on and on. And if that’s not the case, if only criticising Israel is not allowed, that is a racist proposition because it means only the Palestinian people, unique in the world, cannot have their human rights defended in a context where Israel is perpetrating war crimes, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing, genocide, torture, extermination, has broken the world records for the targeting of medical workers and journalists and children. And if I can’t criticise that unless I’m an anti-semite, well so be it, call me an anti-semite, but here’s the big news flash for the zionist propagandist, nobody falls for that crap anymore, nobody is believing it. Because if everybody is an anti-semite, then nobody is an anti-semite. And the sad part of that is that they’re undercutting the struggle against real anti-semitism by making it a non credible accusation in all cases. Every decent human rights defender, the most prominent human rights defenders in human rights organisations have been smeared as anti-semites because they dare to call out Israeli apartheid, Israeli genocide, Israeli colonialism and the racism that is inherent in the political ideology of zionism. Nobody’s falling for that nonsense anymore.”
Rania Khalek; “Exactly. I want to turn to another tangentially related part of this, and that is something you recently wrote. ‘In my four decades in the international human rights movement, I have seen much cruelty in all corners of the world, but I have never witnessed the kind of unmitigated evil demonstrated today by political zionism’. And you went on to compare this threat to Nazism. You highlighted its impact not only on Palestine, but on Western governments, democratic institutions, the international law itself. I’m curious if you can expand on what makes this moment uniquely dangerous. Like what distinguishes this current time period in history from other historical atrocities? And I guess how do you see the collapse of international norms accelerating under the weights of this incredibly dangerous ideology?”
Craig Mokhiber; “What makes this uniquely dangerous is the power that is now behind it, because it includes the power of the United States government, a global empire unprecedented in the history of the world in its military and economic might, and its ability to touch the lives in horrific ways of people literally in every village across the entire globe. That is unique to have that level of power aligned with a fascistic, deeply racist and fundamentally violent political ideology. That is unique. And we’re already seeing the impact of that on peoples lives. It’s not contained in the front lines of Palestine where people are being genocide, but it has spread into Europe and the United States and Canada and Australia and New Zealand and in and to co-opted governments in the in the global South. It is spread obviously across the Arab governments of the region that have been corrupted and co-opted by US power, all aligned in defence of permanent impunity for an oppressive regime in the Middle East, meaning Israel. That is absolutely unique and we’re seeing the danger of it now. In the United States, the US bragging point, always exaggerated, we know, but it’s main bragging point internationally, it claimed to be the place where free speech was most protected. In other words the sacred cow of the US government has always been free speech, even as it denied all other human rights, but free speech it was going to defend. And now it is said there is an exception to free speech. As I said in our first exchange here, you can criticise any country, any political ideology, but you are not allowed to criticise Israel or its official racist political ideology. And we will crack down on people in this country. We will punish them, we will expel them, we will fire them, we will persecute them, we will sue them, we will kidnap them off the streets, we will lock them in dungeons only for the crime of criticising the Israeli regime or its official political ideology. That is amazing. And connecting this question is the one that you just asked me. You have a situation where the vanguard of the movement against the Israeli atrocities in the Israeli regime in this country has a disproportionate number of Jewish human rights defenders who are participating in that and they are, just to show that this is not about protecting Jews, they are suffering the same persecution for daring to speak out against Israel and against political zionism and against US collaboration in Israel’s crimes. They are suffering the same persecution. So this has nothing to do with anybody’s religion. It has everything to do with the defence of a political ideology that has corrupted official institutions from the federal government all the way down to local university administrations, and they are willing to use force to punish their own people, their own students, their own professors, their own workers, citizens, green card holders and so on in this in this country for daring to criticise the regime or its political ideology. I think that is unique in the history of the country.”
Rania Khalek; “Imagine paying $80,000 a year in tuition to a school that basically lets ICE come and take you away to Louisiana and where they literally torture you. It’s completely insane. All so that Israel can feel better. So that zionists can feel better.”
Craig Mokhiber; “It won’t stop at permanent residents, in lawful people who are lawfully in the country, this the the rhetoric that they are using is building the ground for the next step, which is come after U.S. citizens who have already come out after in other ways, who are have been persecuted in other ways. But now to come after them with the force of law enforcement and to start locking people up and saying, well, ‘you opposed the genocide, therefore you are supporting terrorism. Therefore, we’re going to lock you up on terrorism violations’. Don’t let anyone think that that’s not coming and coming very soon. If they get away with the persecution of the people who they are targeting now, that is the next long step and it’s what they’re preparing themselves for, it’s outrageous. You never would have seen this when I started at the UN. An independent special rapporteur mandated by the UN Human Rights Council will criticise an Israeli atrocity that occurs and then we’ll be publicly attacked by the US ambassador who will also tweet about smearing and slandering the person as they do it. So that the UN has gone through a very difficult period. Now, you look at this year and a half, of the current upsurge in genocidal attacks by the Israelis in Gaza and in the West Bank and beyond, and you look at the way the UN has responded and you see the impact of that. The secretary general has never even uttered the word genocide. He launders his speech on the subject to do equivalency between occupier and occupied, coloniser and colonised, oppressor and oppressed. He will use every extreme adjective to describe what Hamas does or what any other government does when they’re involved in atrocities. But he will never use those adjectives with the Israelis, who he frequently won’t even name. He will lament the deaths that happened, but he will never condemn the murderers when it comes to Israel, where he will in other situations from Ukraine to Sudan and elsewhere. That’s the impact. And they will come to you and they’ll say, OK, High Commissioner for Human Rights or whoever you are, we don’t like what you or this official said about one of these Israeli massacres. You need to back off because when time comes for the Budget Committee, we’re going to remember and good luck in getting the funding that you need for your anti racism programme or your right to health programme or whatever, whatever the case may be. The most important thing for people watching this to know is that there is enormous pressure on actors within the UN to do the wrong thing when it comes to Israel, to protect Israeli impunity and to throw the Palestinians under the bus. The only thing that can counter that is more pressure from the human rights defenders in the world to make sure that the secretary general, the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the heads of the agencies and departments, the member states of the UN feel more pressure to do the right thing, than they’re getting from Israel, from its Western allies and from its lobby groups to do the wrong thing.
For so long in the post war, in the post war history and that has emboldened and empowered Israel to continue its bloody reign of terror not just in Palestine, but in the broader region and to expand it and to expand it and to expand it. Israel is an annihilatory regime. Its very purpose is to annihilate the indigenous people of the region because it believes that its security comes from the destruction of anyone who might oppose it. that’s why it has always been a genocidal entity in Palestine, because you can’t have a Jewish supremacist state in a place where you have first a majority, still a majority by the way, if you count those forced into the diaspora of Palestinians, or even a significant minority. That means periodic ethnic cleansing becomes necessary and periodically 1947-1948 and then 2023-2024, 2025 expedited genocide in order to purge large amounts of the indigenous population. And the same logic is then applied to neighbouring countries, Israel will never be big enough as long as its neighbours to not support its annihilatory project. So you have to destroy and occupy repeatedly Lebanese territory, Syrian territory for a long time, obviously Egyptian territory. And you have to keep the pressure on any country in the region that has not been counted. Just look at the March of US empire on behalf of Israel and on behalf of oil. Obviously another geopolitical interest decade after decade and you see one by one any indigenous government in the Middle East that wasn’t under the command of the American government, if it couldn’t be co-opted would be crushed one by one. And who is left standing now? Yemen, half of Yemen, half of Lebanon, because Lebanon is divided in this respect. Syria has just fallen to those interests as well. And you’ve got Iran, not an Arab country, but a country in the region and a very powerful one. And the ones with the most power are the ones who are always going to be the targets. It’s why Iraq was targeted. It’s why Egypt was targeted, Syria was a targeted one by one. Any resistance has to be completely crushed because the only purpose of an annihilatory regime like the zionist regime in Israel is its own dominance, its own survival existence in that area. So that impunity has allowed this to spread and spread. when they carried out a mass transnational terror attack in Lebanon with explosive pagers, which was like one of the biggest terror attacks in modern history or maybe in the history of the world if you think in terms of its reach, and they were allowed to get away with that. That was another signal that international law does not apply to us, there’s nothing we can’t do because the reality of the world is that you’ve got powerful states like the US that will never let us be held accountable. That will not only protect our impunity, but will arm us in our crimes repeatedly, will fund us, will deny the funding of its people, its own people’s needs for healthcare and other things in order to channel billions and billions and billions every year, consistently year after year, decade after decade to this small oppressive regime in the heart of the Middle East. And we’re witnessing the culmination of that decade long 80-year plus project now. And it’s very dangerous because it’s reaching the point now where there are two possibilities. One is an all out war with Iran and resistance groups being involved around the region that will ultimately come back to touch the homeland as well. If people think that you can go every day to somebody’s house and assault their daughter and assault their wife and assault their husband and assault their father and burn down their house and go back and back and back and nobody’s ever going to hit you back, then you have not been living on the earth at all. Ultimately that is going to happen and you’re going to see a massive reaction from a powerful government in Iran that has capacities that are not comparable to any other of the regimes in the region. Or at the end of that, you’re going to see basically a regional level genocide perpetrated by Israel with the support of its Western sponsors. So reaching the culmination of that project is a point of danger for the entire globe, certainly for the region, but beyond the region as well. And the US should also think about this. They are spending whatever international capital they had. I don’t mean money here, but I mean political capital, they are spending it in droves in defence of an oppressive foreign regime that the whole world knows is an oppressive, racist, violent regime, a genocidal regime. It’s not going to get that capital back very quickly in a moment when the US star is declining, the empire is becoming weaker and weaker with the passage of time. Other powers are rising, other geopolitical coalitions are being built. the unipolar moment of absolute US imperialism is ending and yet it’s wasting whatever capital, diplomatic and political capital it has in the world on behalf of another country, on behalf of a foreign regime that is universally pretty universally despised outside of the elite corridors of Western governments. I know we’re heading into a very dangerous moment. I don’t see any sensible people in the Trump administration that are in a position or are willing or have the right incentives to put the brakes on this process. Israel has been working for decades to get the US to go to war with Iran on its behalf, and they are just giggling with glee now that they have a crazy enough administration in place where it might actually happen, it really does seem to be going in that direction.”
Rana Kabali; “Something you said recently or that you wrote on Twitter was you said you have known all along your silence is your crime. And you were talking about, obviously the silence over what’s happening in Gaza and everything attached to it. I guess can you speak to that moral burden of silence and how complicitly through inaction is enabling this genocide? And also, I guess I would add to that, Craig, like what does meaningful action look like at this stage? Because I think people are having a hard time understanding that. But specifically to those who have remained silent.”
Craig Mokhiber; “It’s pretty shocking. We all grew up reading the history of books of the March of fascism and Nazism and how so many people just remained silent, some because they didn’t care, others because they were afraid, others because they thought they had nothing to lose. And then the question is always, what would you have done during Nazism in Germany? What would you have done during Jim Crow in the United States? What would you have done during apartheid in South Africa? And people always just say, well, I would have spoken up, I would not have tolerated that. But what we see is that the masses of people, not to belittle the global upsurge in solidarity and the really principled and courageous activism of millions of people in the US, in the UK and Germany in the bellies of the beasts that are responsible for this genocide, standing up and, and saying no. And not to belittle the global solidarity that has revealed that most countries in the world and the vast majority of the people in the world stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people, no question about it. But in these places, these perpetrator states that I’ve been talking about, like the US and other other Western states, there has been far too much silent complicity going on. People who either don’t have a moral compass just to stand up because it’s wrong, or who don’t realise that, moral compass or not, this is going to come back to bite you. If there’s retribution, it’s going to come back to bite you because your rights are also being eroded. And at some moment what you say is going to be out of favour and you’re going to be the one punished for that. And too many people have just been so silent and just waiting to see what happens. And that is extremely dangerous because as I said, the hour is very late. This is not a projection of darkness that is decades down the road. They are in the final push to dismantle our human rights. If countries of the West, maddeningly, not because we are under attack, which often is the normal thing. If you go to war, you’re under attack or whatever, then there’s a clamp down on human rights so that everybody can be managed. But on behalf of an oppressive foreign regime, you’re taking my rights away so that this colonial regime in the Middle East can continue to perpetrate the genocide, not be punished for it, and by the way, paid for with my tax dollars.
Yes, it’s true that media corporations in the West are captured by this ideology, by this, by this influence. Yes, it’s true that they are directly complicit, disseminating propaganda on behalf of the Israeli regime. But we’re not living in an age where we get all our news from Walter Cronkite. We’re living in an age where we have access to the first live- streamed genocide in history on our phones, on our computer screens, on our tablets. We can have access through independent media, through social media. With all of the efforts to try to clamp down on the truth in the West these days, the information first hand is still there and is still available. And yet too many people sit in a complicit silence that will come back to bite them. So what does that mean for the rest of us? We have to do as much as we can to educate, to inform the people around us doing the kind of work that you’re doing, Rania and independent media and so many other great independent media voices to use our platforms, whatever they are, to try to speak up. And here’s the most important thing. There is an instinct when there is a crackdown on speech, to lower your voice out of fear. That is exactly it’s an instinct. It’s an understandable instinct. It’s exactly the wrong approach. This has to be resisted by doing precisely the things that they’re trying to stop from happening, speaking truth to power. This is the moment we have to raise our voices, not to lower them. We have to speak in whatever form we can find or create. We have to get the word out to our conservative uncles and to our unconcerned nephews and everybody else in between. And we have to make sure that everybody is making a righteous noise that this is not going to be tolerated because rights once lost are lost for a long, long time.”
Netanyhu needs unending war to stay out of jail.
Listen; INTEL Roundtable Johnson & McGovern : Weekly Wrap Judging Freedom 25 April 2025
Judge Napolitano; “American sources tell him that Trump is getting sick and tired of Netanyahu. At the same time, Yair Lapid, the leader of the opposition in the Knesset, said he expects to see Jews killing Jews in Israel soon. What is going on there?”
Johnson; “The complete disregard of Netanyahu for the lies, not only of the hostages that Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad are holding, but of committing Israeli troops to a battle that they know that they can’t win despite his claims that they were going to utterly defeat Hamas. It’s very apparent that they can’t. Netanyahu has sided so decisively with these religious fanatics, the settlers, the Mizrahi as Alastair refers to them, that it has created a genuine division. And the problem is it looks like the Mizrahi outnumber the Ashkenazi. The Ashkenazi was like the European version.
In fact, Netanyahu is one of the European versions. His family heritage is Polish. He wasn’t a native born to Israel. So, what you’re looking at here is the corruption scandal surrounding Netanyahu. The fact that he’s prolonging the war to stay out of court. The fact that there has been evidence introduced regarding subordinates of his for taking money from the Qataris. And when you start adding all of this up, Netanyahu is in a death match with the head of Shin Bet, Ronan Barr. it’s serious.
Barr claimed and, again, this is the Financial Times, Netanyahu asked him to either lie under oath or openly defy court orders. But, apparently, the the Israelis are not the only ones that are divided. Here’s Abu Abbas, the head of the PLO, calling on Hamas to turn over their weapons and end the war. You can’t make this stuff up. Abu Abbas, the head of the PLO; “It’s necessary for Hamas to end its control over the Gaza Strip and also hand over the weapons to the Palestinian National Authority. Since October 7, we have said one thing, to stop the fighting. Stop the fighting. Of course, no one responded to us because they disregard us because Hamas is happy and Netanyahu remains in power as long as there is war.”
The fact that US politicians are not acting in the best interests of Americans can be traced to the fact that they are compromised by their zionist donors. For others, especially those with good characters, Epstein Island-type blackmail may be forcing them to compromise on their usual high moral standards. ‘There’s a whole TikTok fan group, and I’m sure it’s on Twitter and everywhere else, that says RFK Jr. is compromised to be blackmailed.’
Watch; Karen Kwiatkowski: Why AIPAC Is Worried; Judging Freedom, 1 April 2025
Karen Kwiatkowski; “Netanyahu’s been Prime Minister for off and on 20 years or so. And he is a political animal. And he is very responsive to the political world, that he’s the political lake that he swims in, the swamp that he lives in, and he knows how that works.
Judge Napolitano; “What is the nature and extent of his tentacles into the United States Congress, either directly or through that group, AIPAC, American Israeli Political Action Committee?”
Karen Kwiatkowski; “I can understand why they want to get rid of TikTok or restrain TikTok because there’s a lot of information out there which is valid. That shows how many of our congressmen are not just bought and paid for, because you can go to open secrets or any other place and see who the donors are. But the sense that many of these congressmen are also scumbags, I use that word loosely, but people who do not live particularly upstanding lives are not driven or or do not proceed with character and all the things that they do. Many of these people are blackmailed, and they’re the kind of people that can be blackmailed because not everyone can be blackmailed, but many in our Congress can be.”
Judge Napolitano; “What does TikTok reveal about these people?”
Karen Kwiatkowski; “There’s a lot of them that seem to be under the thumb of AIPAC in particular. But then you have a combination, there’s a whole crowd of people that are still mad at (Attorney-General) Bondi for not revealing any type of useful information regarding Epstein’s island, that’s still an issue for people. There’s a whole TikTok fan group and I’m sure it’s on Twitter and everywhere else that says RFK Jr. is compromised to be blackmailed. So he’s a good Catholic, not as good as the Pope, the Pope will occasionally criticise zionism, not RFK Jr., he’s great on everything else, but not on this. So why? It’s inconsistent. And so a whole bunch of people in social media around the world talk amongst themselves about their favourite issue. And in almost every case where people are failing to live up to American and pro Trump, I should say, we just had an election. He’s popular president, but those voters are saying this isn’t right. Why is this? Why is this guy doing this? It’s not America first. And I think that’s really the big umbrella of complaint about the stuff that Israel is doing and the stuff that Trump is doing in service to Israel.”
Judge Napolitano; “What did the Congressman Massey reveal about AIPAC? That he is the only a member of Congress that doesn’t have somebody working in his office or directly connected to his office that’s an agent of AIPAC?”
Karen Kwiatkowski; “I believe he’s the only Republican member that doesn’t have a APEC minder. But it’s because I think maybe there’s some like to leave in some of these folks. I don’t think APEC bothers with them unless it is together information to destroy their character or make sure they don’t get elected again. But no, most Republicans, Massey is the only one. These people come from your district, but they’re not putting America first. these are people who don’t put America first. So what business do they have to dominate our Congress and our foreign policy? It’s not right, people sense that it’s not right and that sense of things not being where they are the way they should be. That’s what I think I see across the world in social media and of course non American and non Western media, which is well controlled by the Israeli narrative. But around the world, everybody sees the inconsistency and they wonder about it.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/realleft/p/uniting-the-pro-freedom-and-pro-palestine
A brilliant report by Lowkey about the historic web that connects tech giant Meta with the Israeli army and intelligence services.
Listen; Big Tech & the Free Speech Frauds Making the Genocide Happen, w/ Lowkey Rania Khalek Dispatches, 17 April 2025
Rania Khalek; “The headline for those who are just listening, ‘Leaked data reveals massive Israeli campaign to remove pro Palestine posts on Facebook and Instagram’. This will really surprise no one who’s been paying attention. if you can walk us through the role that Meta is playing or has played and continues to play in Israel’s genocidal apparatus with this just being one aspect”
Lowkey; “When you’re talking about Meta, you’re talking about the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp. And historically all of those separate entities have had an interesting walk with the Israel lobby. So to start with, the individual that all of us know, Mark Zuckerberg, funded the Zaka organisation which was credited with creating the 40 beheaded babies story. We also know that Jan Koum, who was the founder of WhatsApp, not only funded AIPAC but also funded other Israeli lobby groups, but also organisations which build illegal settlements in the West Bank. The other point of contention with WhatsApp has obviously since it was procured by Meta, has been the issue of whether it was providing information from the key platform WhatsApp to the Israelis in order to help them better target Palestinians in Gaza. We know that they had set this algorithm which essentially would criminalise people if they were in WhatsApp groups alongside others who were deemed to be Palestinian resistance organisers, members or fighters.
In some ways, of course, it’s well known that Meta has a long relationship with employing individuals. That came out of Unit 8200 in the Israeli military. And in fact, I was able to find one individual who was working both for Meta and Unit 8200 at the same time simultaneously, incredibly. And that individual was a Jonathan Ramel who worked for both Unit 8200 and Meta at the same time. But you also had so many other key figures at Facebook, for example, who in really sensitive positions like Eyal Klein, who worked as head of data science at Facebook after being at Unit 8200 for six years. You also have other former Unit 8200 agents working in Meta like Tom Chet, head of activations and production for North American businesses and software developer Omer Goldberg and other software engineers like Gil Osher and Yoav Goldstein. These were also former individuals from Unit 8200. And then the question also has to be when you look at how Meta procured the company Onavo in 2013. Now this company, Onavo was founded by Guy Rosen and Roi Tiger. Both of them were veterans of Military Intelligence Unit 8200. Now here’s the interesting aspect of it. Meta actually procured WhatsApp following obtaining Onavo, and Onavo acted as spyware going into Facebook users phones and monitoring their habits when using WhatsApp, and it was found that the information gained via this spying actually informed Meta’s decision to buy WhatsApp in the first place. Scandal around this actually forced Meta to shut down Onavo. However, its founder Guy Rosen went on to become the chief information security officer at Meta, heavily leaned on by Mark Zuckerberg. So this is the amazing thing, that these former Israeli spies that were absorbed into the company Meta actually, even though there were scandals linked to the intrusive and invasive nature of their operations at Meta, failed upwards and in the case of Guy Rosen became extremely important.
We also have to remember that Meta during the course of the genocide in Gaza has not only been accused of shadow banning, but actually it’s come out that 90,000 posts at least were deleted by Meta in response to direct approaches by the Israeli government. Now what you also have to remember is that the the key figure who is on the content moderating oversight board of Meta is Emi Palmor, now Emi Palmor was not only a former Israeli government censor, but she was also a Unit 8200 veteran and she set up the cyber unit within the Israeli military to actually make the reports to companies like Facebook and Meta. And then she went on to find herself on the content moderating oversight board of the company. Throughout this war on Gaza you’ve seen paid advertisements on Facebook telling Palestinians to leave their ancestral home and move to Jordan. And you’ve also seen paid adverts on Facebook calling for violence against Palestinians, including some even inciting a Holocaust for Palestinians.
Now, a key point of this is that the global advertising chief at Meta is Nicola Mendelsohn. Now she is the wife of Jonathan Mendelsohn, the former head of the Labour Friends of Israel. She has spoken at Israeli government- supported events in Tel Aviv and met with Shimon Peres while opening Facebook sites in Israel. And in addition to that, she actually met with Piers Morgan, who’s a close family friend of both her and her husband, Jonathan Mendelsohn, throughout his coverage of the genocide in Gaza. So essentially, what you’re talking about is an entity which is more powerful than many governments in the world. It has access to information from individuals across many different jurisdictions. And so therefore, the company has a huge amount of power. And what we have to understand as a really decisive factor in this Gaza genocide, in the war in Lebanon, is that Big Tech has really been essential. The Nakba was the precursor to this war. And you have seen so much work put into building up Israel’s advantage in the technology sphere. And we have seen it play out in a really real way. If anyone has anything to do with any of these U.S. companies in Gaza, then it is safe to say that that information is available to the Israelis. And actually, Meta is one of many tech companies who are essentially deeply integrated with Israeli occupation and violence.”
Book Surveillance Valley: The Secret Military History of the Internet referred to by Lowkey in the above interview
The US is a war-addicted zionist-controlled oligarchy, a sham democracy where politics is a money game and citizens’ real needs are irrelevant.
Listen LtCOL. Karen Kwiatkowski: Does the US Have a Functioning Democracy? Judging Freedom, 22 April 2025
Judge Napolitano; “Does the United States still have a functioning democracy? Who declares war? Who imposes taxes? What’s going on these days?”
Karen Kwiatkowski; “It does look very much like an executive state, and we elect a House of Representatives and they all do the bidding of a foreign nation among other things that they do. What they don’t do is reflect the interests of the average voter in their districts. They they reflect the interests of those who funded their elections. And it’s been that way in some ways for a long time. It’s rare to find a really good populist governor, hard to find a populist representative or senator who really is in touch with his constituents and really tries to do what’s not just good for them, but what they want and, and what they are communicating to him. We don’t have that. So in that sense democracy has been a largely a failure for quite a long time and not working.
We have controllers and we have a system in place. And that system, regardless of what country it is, whether it’s the Soviet Union, Chinese under Mao, Chinese under Xi, it doesn’t matter, the system in place protects itself first. It always protects itself first and it has interests and it protects those interests first. So that’s the system we have, whether it’s a constitutional republic, it’s representative, we have a very measured and calculated democracy, we have a balance of power, we have a constitution that limits government, we say these things and you can verify them in writing, but in practice we don’t have those things. What we have is a system that has been largely very successful in protecting its own interests and not really telling us what those interests are, but we can deduce what they are. They are to make money for themselves, to gain power and influence to have their will played out on the country. Take the DEI movement, well, there wasn’t broad support for that, but the people in power felt that it would be good for this country, that would be good for them, we’re going to force the country to do it, and we’re rejecting that now, and it’s a popular rejection. Trump in part ran on that, and we wholeheartedly elected him to get rid of it, he’s done it now, he also ran on peace, which apparently doesn’t profit too many politicians, what can you say? They’re not making money off peace, I wish they were, we would have more of it if they would, if they could somehow figure out a way to profit from it. But but what we have is war that a lot of people in Washington profit from, congress profits from it.
Judge Napolitano; “So the Congress hasn’t declared war since December 1941. How many wars have we fought since then? They’ve all been self initiated, initiated by the president. Chris got me the exact quote. It’s Mark Twain. It’s very close to what you said. Karen, ‘If voting made a difference, they wouldn’t let us do it’. it’s funny, but it’s sad and true.”
‘The British-based Palestine Solidarity Campaign has taken it upon itself to try and ban David Miller – and other anti-zionists – from speaking at public meetings up and down the country.’
Read; Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) shills for the Zionists; David Miller, 30 April 2025
‘I have repeatedly said that the cutting (material) edge of the anti-zionist movement is Palestine Action. But, of course, the PSC doesn’t want to hear, as it has been seeking to sabotage the activity.
Palestine Solidarity Campaign Shills For The Zionists @Tracking_Power | Al Mayadeen English @AlMayadeenNews https://t.co/f6kCSxC6FN
— Air (@LONERANGE) April 13, 2025
David Miller
The British-based Palestine Solidarity Campaign has taken it upon itself to try and ban me – and other anti-zionists – from speaking at public meetings up and down the country. In aid of the absurd campaign of censorship, it has tried to pressure and threaten its local branches. I am aware of several attempts to do this. First was the Hastings and Rye group who – to their credit – did not buckle under the pressure to disinvite me and to avoid posting a copy of my speech – or remove it later – on/from the local group website.
Next was Bristol, where the local group (and the local Stop the War group) unilaterally withdrew from the Bristol Palestine Alliance in a row, in part over whether I should be allowed to speak at a demo in Bristol. Other elements of the dispute involved objecting to Palestine Action’s Huda Ammori and Lowkey as speakers.
No doubt there have been other incidents, but the most recent was Chelmsford, where the pressure was so bad that the group unilaterally decided to resign from PSC. The PSC in London attempted to enforce the no-platform position by circulating a briefing they had compiled on things I had said. This was then developed and circulated to all branches and was discussed at a national branch meeting, taking up most of the time allocated for the meeting by all accounts.
The document was four pages long, and the purpose of this piece is to respond to the claims made in it. Before we get into details, one thing to bear in mind is that this type of response is due, in part, to the fact that the Left in the UK had been played by zionists in the anti-racist movement for decades. Genocidal zionists associated with the Revisionist zionist movement were involved in the creation of the ‘anti-fascist’ movement in this country, as I have revealed in earlier reporting. This particular group then (in 1948) affiliated en bloc with Irgun, the group responsible for the King David Hotel bombing and which was involved in 1947 and 1948 in terror attacks against British interests in Palestine and indeed in the UK itself. Since then, the British anti-racist movement has faced the difficulty of accommodating zionists in order to create a ‘united front’. This has been true since the 1970s in Rock Against Racism and the Anti-Nazi League, and it has remained the case ever since in groups like Unite Against Fascism and today’s Stand Up To Racism. The problem with allowing zionists to be involved in leadership positions is that it always comes with a price. That price includes avoiding or soft-pedalling the fact that zionism is a form of racism and adopting a strategy of opposing ‘fascism’ when the main form of racism in British Society is state and institutional racism against Black people, the Irish, and latterly, especially, Muslims. Jews are not the victims of either state or institutional racism in the UK today. It is a truly extraordinary fact that the Anglo-Left continues to feel so burdened by appeasing the sensibilities of the genocidaires of the zionist movement.’
Roger Waters believes that Israel’s US lobby is so ‘undeniably and appallingly evil’ that it may just fall over.
Watch; This is gestapo tactics, this is fascism; Roger Waters, 28 March 2025
“I didn’t know that the Israel lobby … were going to have so much power that they could rewrite the laws of the United States so that they could commit crimes like the arrest of…[Mahmoud] Khalil.
When that was going on last year at Columbia, we all watched horrified as they were sending in the militarised police and go, well hang on a minute, this is gestapo tactics. This is what this is; fascism at work and they have half gotten away with it already. Twenty years ago in interviews, I was saying the fight for universal human rights, specifically relating to the people of Palestine, is going to be fought on the campuses of the universities of North America. How right I was going to be, I had no idea. But also, I didn’t know that the Israeli lobby, the filthy fascist apartheid Israeli lobby were going to have so much power that they could rewrite the laws of the United States so that they could commit crimes like the arrest of the young man Khalil, who you were just talking about just now, who’s married to an American citizen who’s pregnant and who has a green card and who has an absolute legal right to be in North America and in the United States and to say whatever he believes in his heart. And they’re saying, ‘no, you can’t’. And neither can Ahmed and neither can Omar and neither can Roger Waters, and we’re going to destroy them all, just like we’re trying to destroy this honest, humane heart of gold young man and which they are. And obviously we’re closing ranks and we’re trying to help him in any way we can. But that’s why I was saying just now, maybe this is their Achilles heel. Achilles was dipped in the sticks by his mother to protect him from all evil in the future. But she had her thumb on his heel, so it left a tiny hole and that’s where he was hit by the arrow and it brought him down. He went from being this all powerful figure to nothing because he had this hole in his armour. Well, the hole in Trump’s armour and the hole in Israeli lobby’s armour is there. Evil. The fact that they’re so undeniably and appallingly evil in every way. Maybe that’s their Achilles heel and they may fail, they may fall over.”
Israel and its apologists claim they’re committing slaughter in Gaza to protect Jews and prevent another Holocaust. But that’s a scam.
Watch; How the Pro-Israel Lobby Hijacked Judaism and Spurred Trump’s Crackdown BreakThrough News, 23 April 2025
‘Historian of Palestine Zachary Foster joins @RaniaKhalek on Dispatches. He exposes how the pro-Israel establishment in the Jewish American community is helping the Trump administration weaponize antisemitism to justify genocide in Palestine and fascist policies at home, and how empire is using Judaism as a human shield for imperial conquest.’
Rania Khalek; “Walk me through what it means to be excommunicated. Does your family stop talking to you? What are the consequences of speaking out on this issue (being against genocide in Gaza)? Because there’s clearly a real policing going on.”
Zachary Foster; “It means that none of these organisations are willing to post you at an event. They will not hire you for a job in their rank and file. Your family members will not be willing to appear in social media posts with you. You post a photo with a family member, and they ask you to take it down. You you get uninvited from Thanksgiving dinners because you have the wrong political views, because you think genocide is a bad thing. That’s what I mean by excommunicated. It’s a very personal level. It happens at the professional level as well, and it happens at the leadership level, where if you look at the the rank and file and the board of trustees of all of these organisations and the board of directors of all of these organisations, they will not allow a single person to be part of these the rank and file of the staff, the leadership of the organisations and the board of directors, one hundred percent of them, ADL, AJC, not a single person, a single director at any of those boards, a single staff member in any of those organisations, a single, even member of those organisations can express anti-zionist views.”
Jeffrey Sachs pins the blame for all the wars in the Middle East on Netanyahu, armed, protected and financed by zionist-captured USA.
Watch ‘CIA, U.S…’: Jeffrey Sachs ‘UNCOVERS’ Jaw-Dropping Israeli-American Plot Against Iran, Arab World; Times of India, 13 April 2025
‘Renowned economist Jeffrey Sachs has launched a scathing critique of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, placing the blame squarely on Washington’s alliance with Israel’s far-right leadership. Speaking at the Antalya Diplomacy Forum, Sachs claimed that American interference—encouraged by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—has devastated the region. He cited covert operations like the CIA’s Timber Sycamore as catalysts behind the Syrian civil war and accused Israel of pushing for armed conflict with Iran after having allegedly promoted six previous wars.’
Jeffrey Sachs; “I think it’s important for us to understand where this entire war came from, it did not come from Bashar al-Assad. It came from Washington. There was a decision in 2011 to overthrow Assad. Actually, that came from Jerusalem, this has been a desire of the Israeli government that stretches back more than 25 years. Netanyahu’s idea is make the Middle East in Israel’s image, overthrow every government that opposes Israel. He’s had a friend in that, and that is the CIA and the United States government. So this war in Syria did not come from Assad’s repression. It did not come from Assad’s dictatorship. This war came from a presidential order by Obama to overthrow Assad starting in the spring of 2011. We have a name for this programme, it was Operation Timber Sycamore. The United States, together with other countries in this region, trained rebel trained fighters, especially jihadists, including the ones that just took power, to overthrow the regime. This created chaos. 600,000 dead in Syria in a war that has gone on for 14 years. The outcome of this war is what the CIA wanted back in 2011, which is that the Jihad group would take power in Syria after being armed by the United States. The reason I want to be clear about this is that we will not have peace in this region until we have public diplomacy that is based on real diplomacy, not on CIA operations. And we will not have peace until Israel stops its militarisation of the entire Middle East, because the Syrian war is just one of six wars that Israel has promoted, including in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia and Sudan. We had the list actually from Wesley Clark back in 2001 when he was handed a paper in the Pentagon that the goal was 7 wars in five years. The only war that hasn’t taken place yet, to Netanyahu’s great consternation, is the US war with Iran, which Israel is still trying to instigate to this very day. So the Syrian war is part of a regional tragedy. We have tragedy in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, South Sudan and Libya that I put at the hands of the United States government and its ally Israel, because none of these wars had to happen. These were all wars of choice. They were all wars that came from the idea of regime change operations, that the United States would determine which regimes operate in which. Countries will never have peace in this region if outside imperial powers like the United States are dictating the terms to this region. The only way to have peace in this region is if this region is determining its own future, not outside powers. And Israel could never do these wars on its own. These are American wars. America provides the financing. It provides the military backup. It provides the naval support. It provides the intelligence operations. It provides the munitions. Israel couldn’t fight for one day without the United States backing. Israel could not be committing a genocide in Gaza without the United States full operational complicity. I don’t mean political complicity. I mean direct, daily operational complicity. This has to end. This region has been divided for 100 years, first by the British Empire and then by the American Empire, and this is going on until today. We have a genocide going on right next door till today, till this morning, people being wantonly killed, brazenly killed, because the United States is providing the means for this. So this is what’s happening in Syria. Is the US on the fence? Hardly. It’s the major actor. By the way, I know first hand that in 2012, UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon appointed former Secretary General Kofi Annan as a special envoy to reach a peace in Syria. I loved Kofi Annan, I love Ban Ki- Moon. I worked for both of them. Kofi Annan arranged a peace in 2012. He arranged a peace in Syria. Why it didn’t happen? Because all the parties agreed to peace except one, literally one, that was the United States of America, the United States of America said there will be no peace unless Bashar al-Assad goes the first day. The other party said no, no, you can’t just determine that, maybe they’ll be a process, maybe they’ll be elections agreed, maybe they’ll be a two year process, a three-year process. The United States said no, Assad must go the first day of any agreement or we block it. And so Kofi Annan stepped down from his position after having negotiated a peace arrangement and we have had 500,000 people dead since then. We should not allow this kind of criminality to be normal. This region has been at war non-stop for 30 years. Actually, I would say for at least 57 years, since the Six Day War, because there has been no honest accounting of international law, no honest diplomacy. It’s been militarisation all the way through, and we could have peace immediately in this region. All that is required, in my view, is the United States change its veto of Palestine as the 194th UN member state because on that basis all the region would normalise relations and the wars all across this region would stop. But Israel has had control of over U.S. policy and it says no. It wants Greater Israel, it wants Israel and Syria, it wants Israel and Lebanon, it wants Israel and the West Bank, it wants Israel and E. Jerusalem, it wants Israel and Gaza. And until that stops, we’re not going to have peace. So is the US on the fence? Of course not. It’s the major protagonist of this whole war and has been for the last 14 years.”
Starmer is very quick to approve Jolani’s islamic militant grip on Syria, ignoring the sectarian murder of minorities and his HTS death squads that kill people they accuse of having supported Assad.
Syria; watch; UK Lifts Sanctions on Syria — Supporting Terrorists Now? UK Column News, 25 April 2025
Patrick Henningsen;. ‘The UK lifts sanctions on Syrian ministries and intelligence agencies’. There is Muhammad Al Jolani, AKA, Ahmed al-Sharaa, the Saudi-born self-proclaimed ‘president’ quote unquote of Syria. And so basically the president there has urged Western countries to relieve his country of sanctions and allow it to rebuild after 14 years of war, war that he himself is responsible for fomenting. So the UK is taking this bold step here. What has brought this on? But not to be outdone, this is Cory Mills, part of Trump’s inner circle. He’s been meeting with the al Qaeda and former ISIS deputy who is head of the military junta in Damascus, a terrorist, I think on the FBI’s most wanted list if I’m not mistaken there. He’s spoken with him and they’re open to the Abraham Accords normalisation with the state of Israel. That’s really what this is all about. And this is why there was sanctions before on Syria.
And so let’s look at this. Al Jolani has obeyed US, Israeli orders and arrested Palestinian Islamic Jihad officials, PIJ officials. So this is a major step here. So this is clearly at the behest of Israel and the US. This was a precondition. If you note, that was last week. So this was a precondition for this next step. So I think this is also part of where Britain’s evaluation of their status is as well. According to a former British diplomat, Craig Murray, the terrorist leader self appointed president, privately assured the UK that Syria will normalise ties with Israel, thus formally recognising the illegally occupied state and even exchanging ambassadors by the end of 2026. So my question is, and let’s go to the UK Gov website here. This is how they’re announcing it; ‘UK bolsters support for the quote, ‘Syrian people by amending Syrian sanctions’. So they’re lifting sanctions on Syria. Peviously that was because of quote ‘Assad’. We’re going to ask a legit question, here; is the UK formally recognising al Qaeda HTS, terrorist junta government in Damascus, a self-proclaimed government that said there will be no elections in the country? So this is a terrorist group, a terrorist leader, Al Baghdadi’s deputy at ISIS, the founder of al Qaeda in Syria, and you’re now formally recognising this government that took (power by) force and is currently running pogroms in the coastal regions of Syria against religious minorities and ethnic minorities. Everything I’m saying is absolutely ironclad fact. The question is, is this a formal recognition of a terrorist regime?”
Vanessa Beeley comments on a speech by Jeffrey Sachs about Operation Timber Sycamore, a 2012-2025 CIA/Israel plot, supported by the UK, to oust Assad.
Syria; watch; Antalya Diplomacy Forum: Jeffrey Sachs Lays It Bare UK Column News, 16 April 2025
Jeffrey Sachs; “I am not discussing the agency of the Syrian people, I’m discussing the opposite. Do not be naive. Do not think that 600,000 people died because of Assad and the protesters. This was a war. wars are expensive, they require billions of dollars, they require armaments. And I’m not talking about a conspiracy theory, I’m talking about a conspiracy. And you should know, everybody go look up Operation Timber Sycamore. Understand what happened in your region and if you think that calling in the CIA is going to do the bidding of agency in this region, you are sadly mistaken. This region has been manipulated by Britain, France and the United States for 100 years since the Versailles Treaty.”
Vanessa Beeley; ” This is an incredibly strong statement, bearing in mind the audience with whom he was putting out this statement. So he goes on to bring in Israel into the equation. So let’s hear this.”
Jeffrey Sachs; “It will not have safety or peace until the United States is out of this region through manipulation and war. You all say, ‘it’s Israel doing this.’ Its the same thing I’m talking about. It’s the same reason for Operation Timber Sycamore. It’s not an independent fact. It’s the reason why this happened.”
Vanessa Beeley; ” He then goes on to mention that it’s very foolhardy to see the United States as a friend of the region, and he brings up the subject of Iran. So let’s just quickly play this.”
Jeffrey Sachs; “If you think your big friend the United States is going to do your bidding and help you get your way, empires divide to rule. They are not doing the bidding of Turkey or Syria or Lebanon or anybody else in this region. Yes, you want to balance Persia or Iran, you call in the United States to do that. And you think this is going to work out well?”
Vanessa Beeley; “This is also a criticism of course, of Erdogan and his neo Ottoman Empire aspirations that of course led to his backing of the coup back in December 2024. So a very powerful speech. Shock waves have been caused. I’m receiving messages from people that I know inside Turkey saying we’ve got to start talking about what happened in Syria. So he definitely opened the floodgates on people wanting to know exactly what went on in Syria. Of course that can’t ignore the role that Turkey played. But the fact that he mentioned the zionist role alongside the US and basically said there’s absolutely no difference and it’s a very foolish mission to call in the US to help you resolve the problems in the region. Powerful statement and something that I think is going to have long lasting consequences.”
If you want to keep up with the latest developments in Syria and the wider region listen to this detailed analysis by Vanessa Beeley Syria Podcast Episode 7 UK Column, 28 April 2025
There’s no hope for peace in the Middle East when you hear the views of Trump’s ultra zionist Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth and US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee. Hegseth’s new tattoo ‘Kefir’ meaning non-believer is a symbol of his long-held islamophobic beliefs.
Israel; Watch Pete Hegseth gets new anti-Islam tattoo The Grayzone 1 Apr 2025
‘The Grayzone’s Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate on the Defense Secretary’s new tattoo, and what it says about his mentality.’
Max Blumenthal; “He’s sort of like the textbook stupid gentile slave for Israel. That’s like what he’s sporting on his arm. That’s how I see it. And here’s another one from a different generation, Hegseth is like the new generation of Christian zionists, they have tatts, they’re into lethality. Mike Huckabee, who’s nominated as U.S. ambassador to Israel, is sort of like the depend-wearing seniors who get on an El Al flight to Israel direct that you have to either sit next to them or ultra-Orthodox Jews or Israeli army veterans on your direct flight. And they’re all wearing like their Tor uniform that has an Israeli and a US flag on it and a cross on it. He represents that generation of gentiles who will do anything that Israel says. And he testified in Congress for his confirmation hearing, and here’s one of the few critical exchanges that Mike Huckabee underwent from Chris Van Holland, the senator from Maryland who, while voting for various baby-buster bomb packages for Israel, has spoken out against the humanitarian catastrophe Israel’s been causing.”
Senator; “You said in 2017, and I quote, ‘Israel has title deed to Judea and Samaria’, unquote. You did not mean that gave Israel the right to kick Palestinians off their lands in the West Bank. Am I right about that?”
Huckabee; “Senator, I’ve never indicated that that was a part of that. I simply referenced the biblical mandate that goes all the way back to the time of Abraham, 3,500 years ago, and that’s what I was referencing.”
Senator; “I’m trying to understand the consequences of that view. So in your view, if Israel eas to annex the West Bank, what rights would Palestinians have? Because when I asked you that question yesterday, you focused on the right to work, economic opportunities. So my question today is, would those Palestinian individuals in an annexed West Bank have the same legal and democratic rights as Israeli Jews living in the West Bank?”
Huckabee; “Annexation does not mean displacement of people.”
Senator; “No, I’m not asking about displacement right now. I’m asking if they remained there, would they have equal rights to Israeli Jews living on the West Bank?”
Huckabee; “There would be security there would. Be opportunity.”
Senator; “That’s not what I’m asking, OK? You know that. I’m asking whether they would have the same legal rights as a Israeli Jew who settled on the West Bank, living side by side. Would they have the same legal and political rights?”
Huckabee; “Senator, If you mean would they be able to live freely, they already do”.
Senator; “How about, how about voting? You’re, suggesting that the West Bank become part of Israel. Are you suggesting that Palestinians living in the West Bank should have the right then to vote in elections in Israel?”
Huckabee; “Senator, let me correct and say I’m not suggesting. Let me. Let me because I, want to move on, I, don’t want to….”
Max Blumenthal; “Well that’s the incoming U.S. ambassador to Israel, he believes that Israel has a biblical mandate to annex the West Bank, Palestinians don’t exist and can’t answer what role Palestinians will play in a state of Judea that controls everything from the river to the sea.”
Scott Ritter sees some hope for peace through Trump’s negotiations and dialogue with Hamas and Iran.
Watch; Scott Ritter: Can the Gaza Genocide Be Stopped? Judging Freedom, 28 April 2025
Scott Ritter; “This isn’t about doing the right thing by Israel. In fact, we’re doing the wrong thing by Israel because our support is actually undermining the legitimacy of Israel. In the long term, it could possibly lead to not the elimination of a Palestinian state, but the elimination of an Israeli state. So we’re not doing this for Israel. We’re not doing it for our national security. We’re doing it because a bunch of cowards in Congress have been intimidated by pro-Israeli lobby. Multiple administrations don’t have the courage to call out a foreign agent and they let them control Congress. That’s why we’re doing it, because we have power hungry narcissists who want to stay in power. This is the other side of Pete Hegseth, he refers to himself as a super zionist. How can the slaughter in Gaza be stopped? Well, I can tell you how it won’t be stopped by continuing doing what we’re doing. For all the people out there who are saying we need to protest in the streets, I admire these protesters, God bless you, you’re out there doing the thing. You haven’t saved a single Palestinian life. For all the people who think that by calling Israel names and speaking out against Israel, and I’ve been guilty of this, that we’re somehow promoting things, we haven’t saved any lives. We’ve only furthered this conflict. I did believe at one time during the 15 months of Hamas’s resistance that Hamas combined with Hezbollah and Iran could prevail militarily, accelerate the collapse of Israel. They almost pulled it off, but in the end the pagers went off, Nasrallah was killed, Syria fell and the chance for a decisive military defeat of Israel evaporated. So now I look in the mirror and say, what do I need to do? Do I need to continue what I’ve done in the past, knowing that now there is no mechanism in place and there won’t be for some time to bring about the military defeat of Israel? Do I criticise the supporters of Israel? And the answer is no. The only way out of here is going to be through negotiations. The only way out of here is going to be through compromise. And that can only happen if we stop throwing rocks at one another and learn to sit down with one another. Even if we may disagree with everything this person said and we may be revolted by the positions he or her has taken, we have to start talking with them. We have to have dialogue to begin a process that changes the paradigm, because the current paradigm only leads to dead Palestinians in Gaza. We need to change that paradigm so that we’re talking about the cessation of hostilities and the potential of the creation of a two-state solution. Are we close to a regional war in the Middle East? Oh, we’re hair’s breadth away from it. But the good news is that despite all of the the pressure that’s being placed on the different parties to promote the potential of conflict, we have a president of the United States that doesn’t want a larger war. Be critical of Donald Trump all you want to, but at least appreciate the fact that this man sincerely does not want a war. He has all the excuses necessary to go to war against Iran, but he recognises how devastating that will be for the region, for the world, for America. And he’s doing the right thing by saying no, we’re going to pick a different path, we’re going to talk, we’re going to negotiate, we’re going to have that dialogue. And as long as the president’s willing to send representatives to sit down with Iranians, as long as the Iranians are willing to send representatives to sit down with the president’s representatives, we have a real chance of avoiding the conflict. But the second you stop talking, the second you stop that dialogue, conflict becomes almost inevitable.”
Watch Exposing the UK Crackdown on Anti-Zionism David Miller and Kit Klarenberg; Active Measures 29 March 2025
‘Academic and journalist David Miller joins Active Measures’ Kit Klarenberg for a discussion on his recent detention by British authorities following his attendance to the funeral of the late Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah.’
This does not look good, the Met has reverted to its old style of violent door-ramming, baton-charge policing of the Thatcher years.
Read; Quakers condemn police raid on Westminster Meeting House 28 March 2025
“Police broke into a Quaker Meeting House last night (27 March) and arrested six young people holding a meeting over concerns for the climate and Gaza. Quakers in Britain strongly condemned the violation of their place of worship which they say is a direct result of stricter protest laws removing virtually all routes to challenge the status quo. Just before 7.15pm more than 20 uniformed police, some equipped with tasers, forced their way into Westminster Meeting House. They broke open the front door without warning or ringing the bell first, searching the whole building and arresting six women attending the meeting in a hired room. The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and the Public Order Act 2023 have criminalised many forms of protest and allow police to halt actions deemed too disruptive. Meanwhile, changes in judicial procedures limit protesters’ ability to defend their actions in court. All this means that there are fewer and fewer ways to speak truth to power. Quakers support the right to nonviolent public protest, acting themselves from a deep moral imperative to stand up against injustice and for our planet. Many have taken nonviolent direct action over the centuries from the abolition of slavery to women’s suffrage and prison reform. Paul Parker, recording clerk for Quakers in Britain, said: “No-one has been arrested in a Quaker meeting house in living memory. “This aggressive violation of our place of worship and the forceful removal of young people holding a protest group meeting clearly shows what happens when a society criminalises protest. “Freedom of speech, assembly, and fair trials are an essential part of free public debate which underpins democracy.”
29 March 2025; Reel; “A Palestinian orthopedic nurse was shot in the knee by Israeli soldiers for refusing to stop operating on a wounded patient. He is later taken prisoner by the Israelis for 45 days. When the Israelis confirmed he isn’t Hamas, they took out his eye and dropped him on the other side of the border, forcing him to crawl for 3km…” Dr Mark Perlmutter.
If any other country did this, the “West” would lose its mind and go to war. Now? Not even a condemnation…’
Watch; The teacher film From the River to the Screen: Inside ‘The Teacher’; Palestinian Director Farah Nabulsi interview with Rania Khalec
‘Oscar-nominated filmmaker Farah Nabulsi joins Rania Khalek on Dispatches to talk about her powerful new film The Teacher, an emotional and political drama set in the occupied West Bank. Inspired by true events, The Teacher follows a Palestinian schoolteacher as he confronts personal trauma, settler violence, and the capture of an Israeli soldier by the resistance, forcing impossible moral decisions that reflect the brutal reality of life under military occupation.The film captures the full spectrum of colonial violence, from land theft and demolitions to military raids and daily humiliation, and it does so without reducing Palestinians to one dimensional victims or symbols. It’s raw, grounded, and quietly revolutionary.’
Read; This Hell; Craig Murray, 9 April 2025
‘…now left-wing voices are effectively banned from mainstream media, whilst left-wing academics are most unlikely to progress in academia. Academia is itself now entirely run on a corporate model in the U.K. as throughout all the West.
A young Noam Chomsky would almost certainly be told by the university authorities to stick to linguistics and leave aside the philosophy and politics, or not get tenure. Chomsky was already a renowned linguist in 1967, when he published his breakthrough essay “On the Responsibility of Intellectuals.”
Essentially a call for academics to support the protest movement, a young professor who published it today would almost certainly get suspended if not sacked and even, in today’s climate, quite possibly arrested.’
Look at this 13 year old boy’s terrified expression
Ahmed Manasra was abducted by Israel at 13. Now, he’s 23.
WHERE IS HE ? https://t.co/pRCpUfOHHi pic.twitter.com/62dUDoncrJ
— Martyrs of Gaza (@GazaMartyrs) February 14, 2025
Read Ahmed Manasra Finally Free Naila, 10 April 2025
‘Ahmad Manasra was released from Israeli captivity on April 10, 2025, after serving nine and a half years for attempted murder, despite no evidence ever proving his guilt. Ahmad and his cousin Hassan Manasra were accused of stabbing two Israeli settlers near an illegal Israeli settlement in occupied Jerusalem on October 12, 2015. Ahmad was 13-years-old at the time and Hassan was 15-years-old.Hassan was shot dead by Israel authorities at the scene, while Ahmad was beaten by Israeli settlers and rammed by a car. Footage showed the young boy laying on the ground with a bloody head and his legs bent behind him, traumatised and calling for help. None came. He was surrounded by a mob who were filming him while taunting and threatening him with death, in haunting scenes that went viral on social media.
Following Ahmad’s detention, photos were released of him in handcuffs attached to his hospital bed at Hadassah Hospital. A month later, a recording of his interrogation was released where he was cursed and threatened by three Israeli interrogators, without any lawyer or parent present, signing confession to the crime written in Hebrew, a language he did not understand. During his interrogation, Ahmad was seen confused and terrified, complaining about pain in his head and demanding to see a doctor – he had suffered a skull fracture and intracranial haematoma after being hit by the car.’
Richard Medhurst, who in Feb 2025 was arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000 for speaking and writing against the government narrative on Gaza, talks to Chris Hedges about how he cannot now publish even established, proveable facts without risking re-arrest and a prison sentence of up to 14 years.
Watch The West Serves as Israel’s Police (w/ Richard Medhurst) The Chris Hedges Report, 1 May 2025
Richard Medhurst; “So after me, they went for Richard Barnard, Palestine Action, they charged him with 12/1A (Terrorism Act) then they went after Sarah Wilkinson, they raided her house and then I think they went after Asa Winstanley’s devices. So it was very, very, very clear that a crackdown had begun, and with my arrest.
Chris Hedges; “Do you have any idea what the timing? Do you think something triggered it or not.”
Richard Medhurst; “You could imagine that it might be linked to Labour coming to power, especially after what they did to Corbyn. There was a purge in the Labour Party and a crackdown and they got rid of anyone who was pro Palestine, including Jewish MPs, Jackie Walker, Tony Greenstein also booted from Labour and he’s been charged by the way, under the Terrorism Act and he was raided as well. But honestly, I think it’s also because we were having an effect in terms of our reporting. Again, we’re not taking sides. We were just telling the truth about what’s happening in Palestine.
Chris Hedges; “What effect does this had on other journalists around you? As you said, there have been others since they’ve gone after you, and I think Palestine Action is listed in this Israeli diaspora affairs report. I believe they’re also just as an organisation targeted for allegedly promoting anti-semitism. Have they succeeded, are they essentially shutting down voices that detail what’s happening in Palestine?”
Richard Medhurst; ” I think yes, I think they are succeeding. They’ve succeeded in getting away with genocide, so if you can get away with genocide on live TV you’re getting away with murder literally. But what they did to me was so new, not just the provision they used, but to make it an actual arrest and then to put me in gaol that it was so wild that I felt obligated to tell people about what was happening. And I think that they are succeeding in silencing people.”
Jonathan Cook is an exceptional journalist who has dedicated his skills to exposing the truth about the genocide in Gaza, the West Bank and surrounding countries. He is having to tread a narrow line to stay out of jail due to Stazi Starmer’s censorship regime which uses the terrorism act to silence those who do not share his support for the racist genocidal zionists.
Read Why I wrote an expert report against the UK classing Hamas as a terror group Jonathan Cook, 1 May 2025
‘Predictably, the British establishment is vilifying lawyers trying to end the proscription of Hamas’ political as well as armed wing. The lawyers have good arguments. So why is no one listening?
Given the intentional chilling effect of Britain’s Terrorism Act, and the expansive interpretation of it by British terrorism police in relation to reporting and commentary about Gaza, this article was subjected to two reviews by lawyers before it was okayed for publication by Middle East Eye. The lawyers insisted on several edits to remove any risk of prosecution. You can read the version approved for publication by Middle East Eye here.
I am myself publishing the unexpurgated version, with the text removed from the Middle East Eye article highlighted in bold. I am doing so to underscore both the climate of fear now rampant in newsrooms – a fear that is entirely skewing coverage of Gaza, aiding Israel’s genocide – and the quite preposterous way the police, in a bid to please the government, are interpreting the law. Reporting publicly known facts, it seems, can now get you arrested.
I ask you, plead with you – in the interests of keeping me out of jail – not to feel encouraged in any way while reading the text below to take a more sympathetic view of Hamas.]
This is the first time I have had to begin an opinion column with both a journalistic disclosure and a legal disclaimer. But hey ho, these are dystopian times we live in.
The disclosure: I was one of 20 people who contributed expert reports for a recent legal submission to the British home secretary, Yvette Cooper, calling on her to end the proscription of Hamas as a terrorist organisation.
You can read my submission – on the significant damage done to journalism by Hamas’ proscription – here.
If, as widely expected, Cooper does not approve the application, prepared by the London-based Riverway Law firm on behalf of Hamas, within the 90-day time limit, her decision will be referred to an appeal tribunal for judicial review.
The disclaimer: Nothing that follows is intended in any way to encourage you to take a more favourable view of Hamas. It is not intended in any way to encourage you to support Hamas. It does not endorse opinions or beliefs that are supportive of Hamas, as set out in the submissions calling for the de-proscription of Hamas.
The danger is this: under Section 12 of Britain’s draconian Terrorism Act of 2000, if anything I write, however inadvertently, encourages you to think more favourably of a proscribed organisation like Hamas, I face up to 14 years in jail.
The purpose of this article is to show how the law and the establishment operate together to stifle legitimate criticism of the Israeli occupation.
The law is so loosely worded that the British government, supported by a counter-terrorism police seemingly only too eager to please, can potentially arrest anyone praising the work of Gaza’s public hospitals in saving lives because Hamas is in charge of the enclave’s government, or prosecute anyone, including media outlets, giving a platform to Hamas politicians trying to advance a ceasefire.
If all this sounds crazy, given both that stating facts should not be illegal and that I cannot possibly know how anyone might receive and feel about any information regarding Hamas, then you are starting to understand why the application to the home secretary is so urgent and important.
Secret meetings
The UK may have declared Hamas’ armed wing a terrorist organisation a quarter of a century ago, but its political and administrative wings were added to the proscribed list much more recently – in 2021.
Which is why Cooper, the current home secretary, was misleading in the way she dismissively responded to the de-proscription application submitted to her office. She told LBC: “Hamas has long been a terrorist organisation. We maintain our view about the barbaric nature of this organisation.”
It was Priti Patel who, as home secretary, added Hamas in its entirety, including its political and administrative wings, to the proscription list shortly after she was rehabilitated and readmitted to Boris Johnson’s government in 2019.
Two years earlier, she had been forced to resign from her post as international development secretary in disgrace.
Why? Because she was found to have held 12 secret meetings with senior Israeli officials, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, without disclosing those meetings to her colleagues and while she was supposedly on a family holiday.
It later emerged she had also secretly met other Israeli officials in New York and Westminster.
Patel’s political career, to put it politely, has been distinguished by an evident attentiveness to Israeli concerns.
Undoubtedly her decision to proscribe Hamas’ political and administrative wings, treating them as identical to the armed section of the organisation, was high on Israel’s wish list.
It instantly degraded Britain’s political discourse so that it became all but impossible to discuss Hamas’ rule in Gaza or Israel’s blockade of the enclave in a balanced or realistic way. It resulted in a simplistic black-and-white picture of life in the enclave in which everything Hamas was bad – and therefore, by contrast, everything Israeli was good.
That would spectacularly serve Israeli interests two years later, when, following the Hamas-led attacks on 7 October 2023, Israel fed the western media entirely fabricated stories of Hamas “beheading babies” and carrying out “mass rapes”.
For months afterwards, as Israel set about murdering Palestinians in Gaza en masse and levelling their homes, the only question media interviewers directed at anyone criticising Israel’s actions was this: “Do you condemn Hamas?“
Even the ever-swelling death toll figures recorded by Gaza’s health ministry – proven to be so reliable in previous Israeli attacks that international bodies and the Israeli military itself relied on them – were suddenly treated as suspect and inflated. Independent research continues to suggest otherwise.
Western media outlets appended “Hamas-run” to the health ministry, and its casualty figures – almost certainly a massive undercount given Israel’s systematic destruction of the health sector – were now reported only as a “claim”.
In turn, these deceptions were implicitly used to justify Israel’s own, far greater atrocities in killing and maiming hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, most of them women and children, destroying the enclave’s hospitals and supporting infrastructure, while at the same time starving the entire population.
Eighteen months on, “evil Hamas” is still the story, not Israel’s all-too-obvious genocide.
Bullied into silence
Concerns about Hamas being proscribed in its entirety – not just its armed wing – are far from hypothetical, given the expansive wording of the UK’s Terrorism Act since 2019, when it was amended.
In particular, a revision to Section 12 means that anyone who “expresses an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation”, and one that might “encourage support” for that organisation, is liable to arrest by terrorism police, prosecution, and up to 14 years in jail.
For expressing an opinion.
The wording is so vague that, for example, simply criticising Israel for committing greater and more numerous atrocities than Hamas could theoretically have the counter-terrorism police banging on your door.
To avoid prosecution, Riverway Law’s website dedicated to its application to the home secretary carries a legal disclaimer: “By entering this website you acknowledge that none of the contents can be understood as supporting, or expressing support for, proscribed terrorist organisations under the Terrorism Act 2000.”
Watch; Rabbi Tells Hidden History Of Zionism and Islam; Narrative House, 14 January 2025
Rabbi Haim Sofer; My parents were Iraqi born and they’ve live with the Muslims there hundreds of generations. Iraqi Jews didn’t want to leave Iraq. They were very happy in Iraq. They had a lot of businesses there, outstanding relationships with the Muslim neighbours in an enormous way. So there was no reason whatsoever for the Iraqi Jews to leave Iraq and go to Palestine fighting another people, displace them and take their land and tell them from now on it belongs to us and just go away from here. They were not interested whatsoever.
Presenter; ” So how is it that 130,000 Iraqi Jews left in few months? How’s it happened?
Rabbi Haim Sofer; “The zionists knew that they’re not going to leave. So the zionists appointed a special terror squad, it’s called commandos. The terror squad went to Iraq with special uniforms, they were dressed like Arabs and they started attacking the Jewish synagogues, Jewish restaurants, Jewish gatherings, they dropped bombs on us. They dropped bombs in the restaurants and synagogues, they killed people and it was escorted with propaganda, with papers in Arabic, ‘Jews, the Muslims are changed, the good Muslims is finished. They’re here because there is a zionist state on its way.’ At the first wave, 10,000 left, they were very scared. The Muslim neighbours told them stay, it’s not us, stay, you’re welcome, don’t leave. But then what? After a few months of relative quietness, sadly there was another wave of explosions and attacks. It was a plan set up between the zionists and the Iraqi government. Noah Saeed made a deal with Ben Gurion, ‘give me the Iraqi Jews and you take their property, take their stores, take the bank accounts, confiscate their money. We’re talking about property and money. Everything you take for yourself, you just give us the Jews.’
Presenter; “Is this is the same thing that they did in countries like Egypt?”
Rabbi Haim Sofer; “In Egypt, in the Yemen, there was no reason why to leave. The Jews heard already that this state of Israel was established with murder, ethnic cleansing. Every guy which has a small brain understood that this conflict will never end till the Palestinians will get back their land. It will never end.”
Israelis practice their depths of debauchery in Israeli society
ISRAEL: Girls Raped in Ritual Ceremonies Reveal the Horrors – Investigative Report by IsraelHayom, Vanessa Beeley, 11 April 2025
‘The darkest ritual abuse exists in Israel as proven by decades of child abuse, rape and pedophilia.’
⚡️????????SHOCKING REPORT: Girls Raped in Ritual Ceremonies Reveal the Horrors – Investigative Report by IsraelHayom:
Victim. Binding. Punishment. Correction. Redemption. Prayers. Chants. Ecstasy.
Extreme pain. Torture. Humiliation.
Destruction of personality and soul.Testimony… pic.twitter.com/E0sXdekeuP
— Suppressed News. (@SuppressedNws) April 10, 2025
A recent investigative report by journalist Na’am Barkan for Israel Hayom has revealed the depths of debauchery in Israeli society. This is something that I have written about previously that you can read here.
The report contains testimony upon testimony from women who suffered systematic abuse during childhood, including group rape as a part of religious ceremonies. The rape was often by people they knew, even their closest family members. From the article:
Over the past few months, we spoke with these women, some of their relatives, and trauma experts in Israel and abroad. What emerges is disturbing, with descriptions that are difficult to read.
Israeli Police: “The matter is known and under investigation. Naturally, we cannot provide further details.”
One testimony from Emunah (a pseudonym, as with all the victims in the article) describes being offered as a sacrificial victim, abused by her own relatives, for “spiritual elevation or redemption” of her abusers.
More than ten women aged 20-45 have confirmed that such ritual abuse is taking place in Israel. Each woman has a different story. The women come from different backgrounds and from different areas of Israel.
“Maybe the world knows about rape, about incest, but this—the world doesn’t know,” Emunah says.
Ayala: “It’s always a dark place. There are between six and nine men there. Tie me to bed with my hands and feet, stand in a circle, mumble prayers or blessings, and there is the rabbi who always leads the situation and says what to do. There’s a ceremony, and every one of them rapes me “
The names of certain Rabbis were repeated in separate cases. Complaints filed a various police stations across the country were all closed, relatively quickly. Even when suspicions were previously raised about the existence of a child abuse network in Jerusalem, police investigators were unable to follow up due to an alleged lack of evidence etc.
More of above
Watch; Rape nation; Palestine Declassified; 27 April 2025
In today’s show, we’ll be laying bare the moral depravity of Israeli society, which has repeatedly demonstrated that it’s got no sense of the difference between right and wrong.
Watch; Exploiting Grooming Gangs; Palestine Declassified, 27 April 2025
Sexual exploitation has been weaponised by zionist assets to demonise Britain’s Muslim community, and blackmail politicians.’
There’s no end to Israel’s power to punish those who don’t support their genocide, this time 2 visiting UK MPs are deported
Read Israel deports two British MPs it says would spread ‘hatred’ the i paper, 5 April 2025
‘Two British MPs have been denied entry to Israel, according to Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Sky News, citing a statement from the Israeli immigration ministry, says that the detained parliamentarians are Labour MPs Yuan Yang and Abtisam Mohamed, who were rejected because they were suspected of plans to “document the activities of security forces and spread anti-Israel hatred.”
“I have made clear to my counterparts in the Israeli government that this is no way to treat British parliamentarians, and we have been in contact with both MPs tonight to offer our support,” Lammy said.
“The UK government’s focus remains securing a return to the ceasefire and negotiations to stop the bloodshed, free the hostages and end the conflict in Gaza,” he further added.’
Though Scott Ritter wants to stop Iran from having a nuclear bomb, Larry Johnson believes that if so many countries in the region see Iran as an enemy, have one, Iran has every right to have one too.
Watch If the US Fights Iran, the Navy Won’t Survive—Yemen Proved It! | Scott Ritter & Larry C. Johnson Dialogue Works, 6 April 2025
Larry Johnson; “On RT, they played a clip of Bibi Netanyahu speaking. He was addressing the US Senate committee in 2002 in the lead up to the war in Iraq. And he said, “I guarantee you 100% Iraq’s got weapons of mass destruction.” There may be somebody in our conversation who might know a little bit about that and knows that that was complete bullshit. The thing I see Iran doing, though, is not acting irresponsibly. We murdered General Soleimani, we’ve carried out multiple terrorist attacks and helped Israel carry out terrorist attacks against Iranian government facilities. This was under Biden, not under Trump. And so if you’ve got somebody that’s driving past your house, shooting at your house, and then you decide to go out and get a gun to protect yourself, you’re not the one at fault. You’re not the one to blame, you are taking appropriate measures.”
Professor Marandi, lecturer at the University of Tehran, a wise and truthful voice from Iran, says Iran does not approve of, or want nuclear weapons, but in the face of US/Israel aggression it may reluctantly be forced to develop the weapons.
Watch; INTERVIEW: If US can’t beat Yemen there’s no chance against Iran; George Galloway, 7 April 2025
Seyed Marandi; “The world is already turning against the United States and the West in general because of Gaza. The world is turning against the United States because of the trade war. Nuclear weapons would change the situation completely across the globe. But also Doctor Larijani, who is a senior advisor to the leader and used to be the speaker of parliament and who was also once the head of the Supreme National Security Council, he came on television a few nights ago and said that if the United States attacks Iran’s peaceful nuclear programme, Iran will produce a nuclear weapon. This is the first time anyone has said that openly and clearly. He also said something that didn’t get noticed, he said that if Americans struck the Iranian programme, it would not set it back. In other words, he was implying that the Iranians would be able to, even with an American strike, they would be able to build nuclear weapons. And since the Iranians are highly advanced, technologically speaking, their missile capabilities, I think everyone knows this, we’ve seen how they fired almost 200 missiles towards the Israeli regime and all got through the defences. The Iranian missile capability, the Iranian nuclear capability is such that if Iran develops a nuclear weapon, then that changes everything. But again, the Iranians don’t want to develop weapons. Doctor Larijani said we do not need weapons and he said the logic that Iran has always put forward was that it is an immoral weapon. That’s why there’s a fatwa. During the Iran-Iraq war, when Saddam Hussein was using chemical weapons given to him by the West, the Iranian leader refused to produce chemical weapons, even though he was under pressure. He was being pressured by senior politicians and people in the military. He gave a fatwa against it. Iran didn’t produce chemical weapons back then, and now the fatwa is against nuclear weapons. And in addition to that, Iran knows that if it produces nuclear weapons, that creates an environment in Central Asia, the Caucasus, the Arabian Peninsula and elsewhere for other countries to pursue nuclear weapons and that is destabilising. So for Iran, the ideal situation is to have a peaceful nuclear programme and no nuclear weapons. But the threat that Doctor Larijani made was a deterrent of sorts in order to make Trump understand that it will be his behaviour that determines whether Iran has nuclear weapons or not.”
Mansfield, “the ICC says; the occupation of Palestine is unlawful.”
Watch Lawyers accuse British Israelis of Gaza war crimes Declassified UK, 8 April 2025
‘Top barrister Michael Mansfield and a legal research team on Monday lodged an extensive report to London’s Metropolitan Police accusing 10 British citizens of war crimes in Gaza. The 240-page report was compiled by a team of lawyers in the UK and researchers based in The Hague for submission to the War Crimes Team at the Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Command. The submission was made on behalf of the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights and the British-based Public Interest Law Centre, which are representing Palestinians in Gaza and Britain. The report, which is the first of its kind, reportedly provides detailed, fully researched, and solid evidence of the involvement of British nationals in grave crimes committed in Gaza. It specifically identified 10 British suspects and presented a dossier of evidence of their involvement in “war crimes and crimes against humanity” committed by the Israeli military. It further calls for an investigation into those British nationals, with the aim of issuing arrest warrants and pursuing prosecutions in British courts.’
Michael Mansfield KC; “I want to start by saying thank you not only for you to come today, but to the two centres who’ve taken this initiative to do the research, compile the dossier for handing in today to the war crimes team. For me personally, it is extremely significant on two fronts. One was what happened in the Second World War. The United Kingdom was in the forefront of establishing an international regime of law and principle and institutions to match in order to prevent the recurrence of the horror that everybody’s familiar with during the Second World War. That was the object of the exercise, and the United Kingdom was there, was there in the Nuremberg trials that took place of the German war criminals, was there when it was necessary to construct the principles. Yes, as you may know what’s coming, slowly over the years, the efficacy of that structure that they established at that time, from 1945 onwards in the various conventions, the United Nations Charter and so on, has risen but is slowly falling. And we’re standing on the brink of the collapse of the rule of order because certain states have taken it upon themselves, and Israel isn’t the only one taking it upon themselves to act with impunity. They act with impunity on the basis that nothing’s going to happen to them and they can carry on with whatever territorial land grab or anything else that they’re interested in doing can be done without any repercussions. The very thing that the United Kingdom set its face against. And yet what is happening at the moment, because the Court, the International Court of Justice, not the same as the International Criminal Court, came out with a hallmark judgement last year, which you’re probably familiar with.
It was the one where they said, as an advisory opinion, that the occupation of Palestine has been unlawful, not just for one day, not for one week, not for one year, but for 75 years. Imagine, any of you, living under an occupation by an alien state. If we do not stand up this time, the ICC is under pressure, criticism, heavy criticism, embargoes on the officers of the court. They’re being derided, they’re being attacked. We have to stand up and be counted on behalf of those who are endeavouring, like today. And I think that the United Kingdom should be lending support to the ICC. And of course, one thing they should be doing through effectively the war crimes unit here is to uphold the rule that we set out in the first place. Like myself, been working in this business for well over 50 years. It’s dire, but it doesn’t have to be like that, provided this sort of initiative is given the support it deserves. Thank you.”
Zionists pride themselves at being the superior race. Indeed, they are the top of the worst of human traits; incessant lies, odious arrogance and bending the system to syphon excessive qualities of money into their pockets in order to dictate the rules of the game across every sector of society.
Read; Debunking Douglas Murray’s zionist lies; The Dissident, 12 April 2025
‘Murray claims that Israel’s genocide in Gaza is being done because Israel wants to “retrieve the hostages”.
He even said, “If they had given them back (the hostages), and they could give them back tomorrow, it would all be different”.
The reality is, Hamas did offer to release the hostages in exchange for Israel not entering Gaza shortly after October 7th, and Netanyahu rejected it.’
‘In a recent viral episode of the Joe Rogan Experience show, the libertarian comedian Dave Smith debated the neo-conservative journalist Douglas Murray on foreign policy.Watching the debate, every time Murray opened his mouth, all I was able to think of is the famous scene in the classic comedy film “A Fish Called Wanda” where Kevin Klien’s character calls John Cleese’s character a “pompous, stuck up, snot-nosed, English, giant twerp, scumbag, dickhead, asshole”. Throughout the debate, it was clear to me that Murray was following the long-standing tradition of people who say stupid things in a posh British accent to an American audience, who then think it is intelligent.
Murray began the debate with a smug, pompous, condescending lecture about the importance of “listening to experts”. Murray stated that “there’s been a tilt in the conversation” on Gaza “largely to do with people who have appointed themselves experts who are not experts”. Murrary stated that “I think authority matters” and that those who comment on events without expertise in the alternative media are “not knowledgeable about anything”. He claimed that many in the alternative media say “I’m not a journalist, but I’m going to spend my time talking about this thing.”
After this condescending lecture, Murray – the supposed foreign policy expert – went on to spout a long string of lies and outright falsehoods about Gaza, showing at best he is a moron and at worst (and more likely) he is intentionally lying. In this article, I will document all the zionist lies Murrray told in the Podcast.’
An example; ‘Murray claims that Israel’s genocide in Gaza is being done because Israel wants to “retrieve the hostages”. He even said, “If they had given them back (the hostages), and they could give them back tomorrow, it would all be different”. The reality is, Hamas did offer to release the hostages in exchange for Israel not entering Gaza shortly after October 7th, and Netanyahu rejected it.The former Israeli spokesman Haim Rubinstein revealed to the Times of Israel that:
‘We later found out that Hamas had offered on October 9 or 10 to release all the civilian hostages in exchange for the IDF not entering the Strip, but the government rejected the offer.’
Murray also claimed that “No Israeli soldier I have spoken to ever wanted to go and see Gaza again” after the ceasefire and that “They were dragged back because of Hamas’s actions.”Elsewhere on outlets like Sky News, Murray has claimed that the Gaza ceasefire was broken due to “Hamas repeatedly breaking phase one”.These claims are just flat-out false. A report in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz found that Netanyahu intentionally sabotaged the ceasefire.’
At the U.S. Capitol, ‘Ben-Gvir, Israel’s Minister of National Security, completely lost it.
WATCH Along with other protesters, Medea confronted Israeli war criminal Itamar Ben-Gvir 30 April 2025
‘Ben-Gvir, Israel’s so-called “Minister of National Security,” has openly called for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza and directs the bombing of civilians, aid workers, and critical infrastructure. His violent, irritable reaction to peaceful protest shows exactly the kind of brutality he unleashes on Palestinians every day.’
Israelis inhaling Toxic air is a small comeuppance on the Israeli 97% who physically carry out or support the genocide in Gaza
Read; War dust and collateral inhalation; Dennis Kucinich, 23 April 2025
‘Gaza is suffering the most intense bombing, per capita, of anywhere on earth, ever. Over 100,000 tons of bombs have been dropped on Gaza, an area slightly smaller than the City of Detroit, Michigan, resulting in the recorded deaths of at least 60,000 Gazans and injuries to hundreds of thousands.It is impossible to overstate the effects of the abominable bombing war on Gazans, their lives, their families, their health, and their communities.
What has escaped attention up until now is the undeniable environmental and health effects of the bombing of Gazans on Israelis, as well as on citizens of neighboring states, and the potential harm to U.S. military personnel in the region. A study of explosion physics based on declassified Department of Defense data, as well as blast temperature data and consequent emissions; a review of wind patterns, together with publicly available data of health effects from 9/11, as well as data gathered from U.S. veterans of the Persian Gulf War, yield a shocking conclusion. Israel, in executing the unprecedented bombing attack on Gaza, is, in effect, bombing itself, with grave consequences for the public health of its people. What is being visited upon Gaza does not stay in Gaza.’
For decades Netanyahu has been on a mission to destroy all nations who opposed the Israel Project; the zionist diaspora has bribed, blackmailed or coerced every politician to ensure that satan’s work is carried out.
Watch Satanyahu has been on a mession since 1982; wake.uu.pp, 29 April 2025
1982 Netanyahu “If you take away the Soviet Union and its chief proxy, the PLO, international terrorism would collapse.”
2002 Netanyahu “If you take out Saddam, Saddam’s regime, I guarantee that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region.”
2002 Netanyahu; “Obviously we’d like to see a regime change, at least I would in Iran, just as I would like to see in Iraq. The question now is a practical question. What is the best place to proceed? It’s not a question of whether Iraq’s regime should be taken out, but when should it be taken out?”
2002 Netanyahu; “For victories you amass, the easier the next victory becomes. The first victory in Afghanistan makes a second victory in Iraq that much easier. The second victory in Iraq will make the third victory that much easier too. But it may change the nature of achieving that victory.”
2003 Blair; “On Tuesday night, I gave the order for British forces to take part in military action in Iraq. Tonight, British servicemen and women are engaged from air, land and sea. Their mission? To remove Saddam Hussein from power and disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction.”
2003 Bush; “My fellow citizens, at this hour American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free it’s people and to defend the world from grave danger.
2024 Netanyahu; “In the Middle East, Iran’s axis of terror confronts America, Israel and our Arab friends. This is not a clash of civilizations. It’s a clash between barbarism and civilization.
2024 Netanyahu; “We can’t allow Iran to have nuclear weapons. And I said I absolutely, I absolutely believe that. I have Devoted a good chunk of my life to prevent that which they intend to use to destroy my country and threaten America. Once they have the weapons of delivery, ballistic missiles, Icbms, intercontinental ballistic missiles, they will threaten every city in the United States. That is a palpable danger to Israel and to the free world, and it must be prevented. The way to prevent it is to dismantle all the infrastructure of Iran’s nuclear programme.”
Despite the clamp down on free speech, we must continue to call out zionism as a racist genocidal ideology.
Listen; What are our rights at the border and beyond? Electronic Intafada, 19 April 2025
‘We speak to ADC legal director Chris Godshall-Bennett about protecting rights amid US crackdown.’
Chris Godshall-Bennett; “It is not just about the individuals though, of course, our hearts and our thoughts and our minds and our efforts are with them because they are paying the price. The goal is to scare everyone of their activism, not just going to a protest, right, but talking at an event, posting something online like it is very basics. So it’s it’s an attack on not only the idea of who gets to be part of the American community that is certainly one of their goals, but the other goal is certainly to eradicate dissent and under the guise of supposed anti-semitism. I believe him as well. His good Jewish friend wrote recently about how it’s shocking to them and they’re a zionist even, and the idea of saying he’s an anti-semite is absurd. So it really just shows that their goal is to really stop and scare everyone away from any sort of activism. And I think it reflects that they’ve lost the ideological fight here. I’m Jewish, I’ve been involved in Palestine activism for a long time now. when I was young, it was a few of us, and now I believe it’s well over 50% of young Jews. The fight is lost in terms of opinion, and so they’re resorting to these fascist techniques to suppress dissent and to scare the crap out of everybody, frankly, to get them to stop.”
Annie Machon, a former British MI5 intelligence officer, and whistleblower, explains the results of the investigation into the Israeli embassy bombing in 1994 ; ‘Mossad, the Israeli external intelligence agency, bombed their own embassy – that’s his formal verdict.’
Watch All Activists always be aware, this could happen to any of us! mokhanofficial, 21 April 2025
Annie Machon; There was a false flag attack in London in 1994 where a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli embassy in the centre of London. It was a very sophisticated device, it appeared to eat all the forensics. Now this is very, very rare. Even the IRA, which is a very sophisticated terrorist organisation, could not make bombs that effective. What emerged from that, the senior MI5 officer who was in charge of the investigation and had seen all the evidence but also all the intelligence, wrote his formal assessment at the end of the case. And he said that Mossad, the Israeli external intelligence agency that bombed their own embassy, that’s his formal verdict. If you read that on the Internet now, you would say that sounds like some bad conspiracy theory, but it wasn’t. This was the official position of MI5 and he said that they did it for two reasons. One, they were always hassling MI5 for increased security around their embassy and other interests in London and MI5 kept saying well there’s no reason to increase the threat assessment, you don’t need extra protection. So letting off a controlled explosion outside, of course they immediately got what they wanted there. But crucially, 2 innocent Palestinians were arrested and charged and convicted of conspiracy to cause that attack. And they were very active in Palestinian support network in London, political campaigning for the people on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. And they were getting some traction in the media. They’re getting quite a lot of support. So by arresting these people and framing them from attack and sticking in prison, the whole network just shattered and hasn’t got back on its feet to this day. So that would be a clear political advantage from Mossad. Where are these two people now? They’re still rotting in prison. So they’ve been in prison for 14 years, they both got 20-year sentences, they both proclaim their innocence. They will serve the whole sentence. And it was a young woman called Samar Alami and a young man called Jawad Botney. The linkage was a mysterious figure who was known as Raida Mughrabi. He was a man, apparently middle-eastern, who befriended many people in this Palestinian support network. And Jawad Botney knew a little bit about second hand cars, so Raida Mughrabi asked him to go along to an auction and help him buy a second hand car. This was the car that was used in the explosion. This was the linkage that pulled these Palestinians into the case. And of course, during the investigation, Raider Mughrabi just disappeared, so the speculation would be that actually this guy was a Mossad person.”
WATCH; April 28; reel; Whitney Webb explains how Epstein’s connections to organised crime and intelligence get overlooked in favor of Epstein’s sex crimes
‘So what are the connections that you found between Epstein and Israel?
Whitney Webb In the case of people like Ratner and people like Epstein, they’re accused of major sex crimes, but they also have major connections to organized crime and or intelligence. The early history of Israel, for example, some of these organized crime linked oligarchs, the Bronfman family, for example, instrumental in arming the Haganah, the precursor to the IDF. A lot of these mob figures collaborated with Mossad, including Lansky himself, but they have a lot of ties to Israeli intelligence and also to US intelligence. You sort of end up finding more often than not that in a lot of the CIA’s most controversial activities, they’re collaborating with Israeli intelligence, and arguably that’s because they have connections that go even beyond those agencies. Because a lot of times when people talk about intelligence related crimes or covert operations, people forget that intelligence agencies aren’t necessarily the power there.
They work for somebody else. the CIA and its precursor to OSS were dominated by Wall Street Bankers, and those bankers teamed up with organized crime. It was an actually beneficial relationship, and the CIA ended up taking over a lot of rackets from the mob like drug trafficking because the mob then, by teaming up with the CIA, gets state protection. A lot of people that were used in assassination efforts backed by the CIA hired mobsters from the US to do that. most of the CIA’s regime change coups were done on behalf of US multinational corporations and because of oligarch moneyed interests.
since you asked about Epstein and the Israeli state, he’s really alleged you have been working more closely with Israeli military intelligence, not necessarily Mossad.
See the rest of the discussion with Whitney here: https://www.patreon.com/posts/126402879
Despite potential reprisals from our zionist captured state, we must get informed and speak out against the zionist racist ideology that has infiltrated every sector of our society.
Watch British actor Juliet Stevenson remains steadfast in her solidarity with Palestine celebrities4palestine, 17 April 2025
“Its catastrophic. The degree of human suffering is beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed. I’ve never seen anything like this. There’s a kind of global sadism going on that people are watching this bombardment, the fires, the burning, the bombs, the starvation, the disease, the bombing of hospitals and the entire infrastructure, the withholding of aid. And the world by and large, (with some very, very honourable exceptions in countries who are not), our country, America, much of Europe is just standing, watching this and turning away. in this country we are still selling parts of F35 jets, which are the planes that are used to bomb Gaza. And nothing seems to be able to persuade our Prime Minister to stop doing that. Like a lot of people, I feel desperate about it. Almost two years now, 20,000 children dead. And that’s not including the ones that will be found under rubble. What has to happen? We need people to see this as the most extreme humanitarian disaster of our time and stand up and call out for this to stop. I don’t want to go to prison, but, I won’t stop, I won’t stop going to demonstrations, I won’t stop talking about Gaza or Palestine because of this. I have to believe that we have the right to free speech in this country, I have to go on believing that.”
Reel; Horrific footage of dead and injured children in war torn Gaza buildings.
The Israeli bombing hurls a child from one house to another; there are also some children who are torn apart.
Drop everything & join the global movement to grind this hideousness to a halt. If you don’t, you’ll have to explain to your children & grandchildren one day why you denied, or were just simply indifferent, to a holocaust.
On the BBC Louis investigates the zionist Settlers and does a brilliant job exposing the fascist state that Israel has truly become..
Watch BBC documentary; The Settlers; Louis Theroux, 27 April 2025
‘Louis Theroux spends time with the growing community of Israeli religious-nationalist settlers. Their settlements are illegal under international law, and they have been protected by the army, the police and the Israeli government.
Since the Hamas-led attacks on 7 October 2023, in which 1,200 Israelis were killed, there has been an acceleration in the establishment of settlements, with settlers pursuing a campaign of violence against local Palestinian communities.
What was once a fringe movement has now won support at the highest levels of government, with their supporters holding key positions in the cabinet and able to influence not only the role the military plays but also the future of this conflict. Louis Theroux embeds himself in the West Bank, meeting prominent settlers – including the ‘godmother’ of the movement, Daniella Weiss – and travelling throughout the territory to understand the consequences of their activity. Louis also meets Palestinians whose lives have been impacted by settlers moving into their communities. As the world focuses on Gaza, where at least 50,000 Palestinians are estimated to have been killed by Israeli forces since 7 October, Louis discovers that the settlers are already making plans to move into that territory, too.’
Watch; Israeli Settlers Show Louis Theroux Their Full Colour; Novara Media, 29 April 2025
Michael Walker; “The BBC has released a new documentary presented by a journalist, Louis Theroux called ‘The Settlers’. It focuses on the figures behind the movement to make the West Bank and Gaza Jewish and to purge the areas of Palestinians. One of those figures is Daniella Weiss, known as the godmother of Israel’s settler movement. She’s the founder of Nashala Settlement Movement. That’s a group that has the explicit backing of several politicians in the Netanyahu government. Now, in one interview, Weiss revealed her political understanding of that movement.
Louis Theroux; “Do you have influence over government?
Daniella Weiss; “No question, who did all this?”
Louis Theroux; “Can you call Netanyahu?”
Daniella Weiss; “Do you mean like this? No, I call his aides.”
Louis Theroux; “So the idea is to force the government by putting people… starts with small settlements, then they get bigger, then they get recognised by the state of Israel and basically creating a new demographic reality.”
Daniella Weiss; “We do not force a government. We do for governments what they cannot do for themselves. Even if you take Netanyahu now, he’s very happy what we do here and also about our plans to build Jewish communities in Gaza. He’s happy about it, but he cannot say it. He says the opposite. It’s not realistic. Good. We will make it realistic. It’s not forcing the government, it’s helping the government.”
Michael Walker; “Really important points. Lots of the documentary is showing how extreme the settlers are. But that I think is the key moment, because it’s saying we are doing the Israeli government’s job for them, because we’re changing facts on the ground. Because obviously, in 1967 it would be a crazy proposition to say that the Israelis could build all of these settlements in the West Bank. No Israeli Prime Minister could come forward and just say that. But if they tolerate the settlements being built, then to say, ‘oh well, the Israelis are already there, we can’t ask them to leave, then that suddenly seems realistic’, So the settlers, their job is to change facts on the ground so that then the Israeli government can just rubber stamp it.. And of course, the map you saw there in the clip shows all the Israeli settlements built in the West Bank since the Six Day War of 1967. During that Israel seized the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, E. Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, bringing 1,000,000 Palestinians under the country’s control. The occupation of those territories remains illegal in international law, a point Theroux put to Weiss.
Louis Theroux; “Because it’s territory that was won in the ’67 War, that, under the Geneva Convention, transferring a civilian population into a conquered terrain, that’s considered a war crime.”
Daniella Weiss; “This what I do here is a war crime according to the UN? It’s a light felony.”
Yemen
Yemen puts a cowardly, complicit world to shame; it is the only country in the world with the courage to take action to challenge the barbaric crimes of the Israeli state.
Watch; Pepe Escobar: Yemen Hits Back, China’s Response, Iran’s Resolve, Russia’s Strategy — U.S. on Alert; Dialogue Works, 30 April 2025
Pepe Escobar; “There is not even a whiff of strategy in this whole operation. To start with the absurdity of it all, when you see a President of the United States authorising an absolutely illegal war (OK, this is the empire specialising in illegal wars, like unilateral, illegal, no consultation with anybody), just because Yemen is fighting against the genocide in Gaza. So essentially the rationale of this war is to protect a genocidal regime. In itself this is already absurd. To compound the absurdity, we have this so-called most spectacular army in the history of all the galaxies combined being humiliated by the Yemeni armed forces practically on a daily basis, 22 MQ-9 Reapers (drones destroyed by Yemen) if I’m not mistaken and counting. , The latest story, which is a beauty, no screenplay in Hollywood would come up with something remotely similar, and if he did everybody would say but you’re lying. This is completely absurd, it actually happened. According to the CENTCOM Pentagon version, you have an aircraft carrier, which as you all know is a monster, practising a sort of Formula One manoeuvre in the middle of the Red Sea, like a sharp turn of 90° or something like that, full speed theoretically to protect itself from incoming Yemeni fire, ballistic missiles and drones. And in the middle of this manoeuvre we have an F18, probably in a sign of protest of disgust, plunging into the Red Sea just like that. So this is the story that they are selling to all of us, the mind boggles, its humiliation after humiliation.”
Watch US Military Retreats From Red Sea After Houthis ‘HIT’ Warship, ‘Sink’ F/A-18 Hornet? Yemen Says…Times Of India, 30 April 2025
Yemen’s Armed Forces launched a fierce multi-pronged strike on the USS Harry S. Truman. Missiles, drones, and naval units forced the US aircraft carrier to retreat in the Red Sea. Yemen claims the Truman was possibly hit – prompting its reported withdrawal. The attack was in retaliation for deadly US airstrikes and continued support for Israel.
Watch ‘A battle between right and wrong’: Houthi spokesman on confronting the US and Israel The Grayzone, 22 April 2025
Intro; ‘The Grayzone’s Max Blumenthal interviews Muhammad Al-Bukhaiti, senior political officer and spokesman for Ansar Allah (the Houthi movement), on Yemen’s direct confrontation with a US military machine – which is hellbent on destroying its (the Houthi’s) ability to resist Israel. In this third conversation between The Grayzone and Bukhaiti, the Ansar Allah spokesman explains why he believes his movement’s war with the US-Israeli axis is unlike any conflict that preceded it, and why he believes Yemen is engaged in a righteous battle despite the terrible toll its civilians have faced.’
Max Blumenthal; “U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth says the US military is attacking Yemeni territory controlled by Ansar Allah more deeply and more harshly than ever, and that the US attacks will not stop until you are defeated. How much damage have the US attacks actually done to Ansar Allah’s military infrastructure? And how do you assess the effectiveness of the US military campaign?
Muhammad Al-Bukhaiti; “In the name of God the Almighty, the United States has not succeeded in halting our military operations in support of Gaza. Our naval blockade against the zionist entity remains firmly in place. In response, the US has begun targeting civilian infrastructure and expanding its strikes to include areas already devastated since the 2015 war. But we are no strangers to this. American attacks have not deterred us. We have maintained the blockade in the Red Sea and extended our military reach deep into the zionist entity. For 10 years we have lived under American strikes. We have endured, we have adapted. American bombs, American jets and American weapons are nothing new to us.”
Max Blumenthal; “This week the US military attacked Ras Isa port, killing scores of port workers and injuring many more. How does the attack on this civilian port, a fuel port, impact the lives of average Yemenis? And what do you think targeting the port says about the US strategy in Yemen?.
Muhammad Al-Bukhaiti; “At the onset of the US military campaign in Yemen, American officials claimed they were not targeting the Yemeni people, but rather the Ansar Allah movement and its military capabilities. Yet just two days ago, the United States launched a strike on the civilian port of Ras Isa, completely destroying it and incinerating dozens of oil tankers owned by the people of Yemen. This reckless assault killed over 100 workers and tanker crew members and left hundreds more injured. This act lays bare the falsehoods of the American administration. It is now undeniable that they are deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure and Yemeni civilians. These actions reveal the criminal intent behind US operations, not to defend peace, but to shield those carrying out genocide on Gaza and to silence those in Yemen who dared to resist it.”
Please donate
Forgive me for pointing out that, while we receive some one-off donations, I am funding Farms Not Factories myself, and if we are to continue to fight the cruel, antibiotic-led factory farm system, we will need some regular donations from like-minded people. Please consider a monthly subscription of £2/month and help us support a network of smaller scale, humane and healthy UK pig farms, local abattoirs and butchers.
“Our message is simple, we want to help bring an end to this dangerous, inhumane system. Vote for real farming over factory farming.”
– Tracy Worcester, Director
Contents
Share This Article
Related ArticlesView All
Group Think
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. If you… Read More
No Farmers No Food
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. If you… Read More
Plant Truth Bombs in Sleeping Minds
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
Orchestrated Extermination of Independent Farmers
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
I Farm, You Eat
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
Home Grown Food Is Bad For The Climate!
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More