The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media.
“The way you get democracy to function is by informing the public.” – Robert Kennedy Jr.
“Science is more than a body of knowledge. It is a way of thinking; a way of sceptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask sceptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be sceptical of those in authority, then, we are up for grabs for the next charlatan (political or religious) who comes rambling along.” – Carl Sagan
“Never worry about who will be offended if you speak the Truth. Worry about who will be misled, deceived and destroyed, if you do not.” and
”Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by and that has made all the difference.” – Robert Frost
Though the chapters interrelate, they are divided into six sections and have a common realisation that a cabal of corporate elites have captured global trade, global and national governance, mainstream and online media, and ultimately many of our minds.
As a stenographer, I link to an article or audio and paste a key section. My most trusted websites are platforms for journalists who don’t compromise on the truth and have thereby been shunned by the mainstream media. Click the button below to view my list of top trusted news sources:
SUSTAIN
Sustainable Food Trust,
Soil Association
Farm Gate
The Organic Grower Podcast
Wicked Leeks
Slow Food
Food Farming & Countryside Commission
Landworkers’ Alliance
Censorship / Surveillance / Coercion/ Corruption / Blackmail
Mattias Desmet
Assange News
Alex Krainer
Covid / Vaccines Scam
Robert F Kennedy podcast
Dr John Campbell
Children’s Health Defence
The Exposé
Combining the Provoked War with Russia and Israel
The Grayzone
Judging Freedom
The Intercept
For The People
Global Research News
Consortium News
Geopolitical Economy Report
Declassified UK
Zionism is a Colonial State Project / Gaza, Syria, Yemen, Lebanon & Iran
Palestine Declassified
Pepe Escobar
Resistance News Network
Juan Sinmiedo
Resistance News Network
B’Tselem
Quds News Network
The Electronic Intifada
Jonathan Cook
Richard Medhurst
Craig Murray
Syriana Analysis
Links are to all categories:
Unlimited Hangout
The Jimmy Dore Show
21st Century Wire
UK Column
The Cradle
Russell Brand
The Truth Contract
The Light printed newspaper
Disclaimer: Farms Not Factories newsletters share and repost material that is already publicly accessible. The views expressed in the articles do not necessarily represent those of Farms Not Factories but are selected to promote open discussion on issues often omitted or misrepresented in the mainstream media.
Food & Farming / Co2
Georgian Family Farmers Vs. Global Trade
Last summer we filmed seven family farmers in Georgia (read the full story in my blog) who in their different ways feed their communities with pasture-raised meat, heritage cheese, yogurt, honey, veg and fruit from small plots in and around the villages. Cattle graze on mountain pastures, livestock roam freely in the villages and local markets are thriving.
The industrial farming system that has taken hold across the globe, is producing unhealthy food and undermining rural communities. We can support small-scale, artisan producers and farms by buying their healthy locally-produced food and avoiding imported food and food from debt-trapped monocultures on supermarket shelves. One Georgian farmer, lamenting the debt he took on to produce monoculture apples and tomatoes admits, “Spraying is done weekly without fail… it costs us a lot of money to apply fertilisers and poison the soil.” He told us he has to do this to compete with cheap imports that “last longer, even when they have no taste or quality.”
Don’t let corporations replace your local food economy with junk food. For natural, unprocessed food buy from local small scale farms or their markets.. Once gone, they won’t come back. Watch and share the video to pass on this important message.
It’s time farmers woke up to the fact that they have been brainwashed into using inputs at the cost of their soil, profits and consumers’ health. These four farms became more financially viable by reducing their chemical inputs.
Listen; ‘Regen is a chance to reset farm economics’ Farm Gate, 24 February 2026
ffinlo Costain; “A lot of regenerative farmers feel more financially resilient, they’re less vulnerable to the vagaries of global markets and things like fertilisers.”
Graham Rutherford; “We’re certainly more financially resilient than we were as an arable farm, absolutely. Then as we transitioned through, I think becoming organic was a big help. There’s not always a massive premium there, but there’s no doubt there seems to be a market and there’s one or two farmers in our area always looking to store organic stock. So that has been good. Then adding the hens on, I think that was a decision because something else to help to pay that mortgage. The package is all an awful lot better. And the regen side of things, not spending the money on the fertiliser, the seed, trying to put as many input costs out as possible, all feels a positive move.”
ffinlo Costain (Talking to Regen farmer Sian Jones); “And your key motivation for becoming regenerative was to try and cut your costs in the first stages. How have you achieved that? Where have those particular costs come down?”
Sian Jones; “Being more resilient as a farm and not having to rely on expensive input costs like we saw with fertiliser a few years back, just with the prices going so high. At the time we were part of the grass check project and we were measuring grass every week. And since completely cutting fertiliser from the grazing ground, we haven’t really seen much difference to yield thankfully. We were expecting it to go down and then hopefully go back up, but thankfully it stayed the same. Other costs we’ve reduced is concentrate costs. Only the male young stock gets concentrates now. We used to buy 20 tonnes of concentrates for the ewes, where they’re now on a pre-lamb rotation and get silage bales. Silage cost is another one we’ve managed to reduce. We only do one cut now of silage rather than two cuts. By deferring ground we’ve managed to reduce it down to one cut of silage.”
Another report confirms that pesticides, fungicides and herbicides damage soil biomes and reduce fertility.
Read; Widespread pesticide use harms soils life, Pesticide Action Network, 23 February 2026
‘Soil covers this month’s front page of the science journal Nature, headlining with: “Down to Earth – How pesticides reshape soil biodiversity”. The cover refers to the recently published extensive research of an international team of researchers: “Pesticide residues alter taxonomic and functional biodiversity in soils”.
Soils host about 59% of Earth’s biodiversity. Soil life is essential for soil and wider ecosystem functions, and for our subsistence. Soil organisms provide critical functions such as plant growth, food production, water purification, buffering and storage, and carbon storage. The harmful impacts of pesticides on soil biodiversity, threatening ecosystem health, have been demonstrated in scientific literature. We dug into the topic in our recent earlier blog, celebrating World Soil Day.
The impressive continent-wide work by Köninger & Labourie et al. provides further key evidence on the effects of pesticides on soil biodiversity. The study investigated the effects of pesticides found on soil archaea, bacteria, fungi, protists, nematodes, arthropods, key functional groups and functional gene groups. The effects were assessed across 373 study sites, comprising annual croplands, permanent croplands, former croplands recently converted to grasslands, extensive grasslands and woodlands, in 26 European countries.
As a rare exception, the Scottish Government is waking up to the benefits of organic over conventional farming.
Read; Scottish Organic Action Plan 2026 – 2029, Scotland Food & Drink, 28 January 2026
‘Scotland Food & Drink, alongside the Scottish Government and a partnership of organisations, including SAOS and Soil Association Scotland, has today shared an innovative new action plan designed to grow the country’s thriving organic sector.
Now worth £3.7 billion to the UK market, the value of organic food and drink has grown for 13 consecutive years while, within Scotland, the value of the organic market has grown by 20.6% in five years.
To meet increasing demand, growers have been adapting. Between 2021 and 2024, the area of Scottish agricultural land committed to organic production (either fully organic or in conversion) grew by 26.6%, from 103,900 hectares to 131,500 hectares.
With consumers increasingly seeking organic options for health, environmental and quality reasons, the Scottish Organic Action Plan, published today, sets out a roadmap for catalysing that growth for the benefit of the Scottish economy – while also contributing to NetZero, biodiversity, and Scotland’s global food reputation.
To support the ongoing growth of the organic sector and drive demand at home and abroad, the Scottish Government has supported the initial delivery this year with investment of £200,000.’
Ever more people are waking up to the fact that food, drenched in pesticides, is making us sick, killing eco-systems and poisoning our water, so are choosing to buy organic.
Read; ‘Quality really matters’: why the organic food market is booming again, The Guardian, 6 February 2026
‘Greater awareness of healthy diets and concerns over ‘trusted’ food mean sales are growing at the fastest pace in two decades.
When household finances were plunged into turmoil during the credit crunch, one of the first things that Britons cancelled was their veg box delivery.
But although the cost of living crisis persists, the organic market is enjoying its biggest boom in two decades, according to the veg box seller Riverford. It is not just fruit and veg, with a “massive” increase in sales of organic meat. Organic chicken was up 13% year on year, despite costing three times as much as other birds.
“People are still concerned about the cost of living but health is also really important, and for the last two years organic has been outperforming non-organic,” said Clare Hadway-Ball, the senior commercial manager at the Soil Association.
“Organic poultry is about three times more expensive but it’s in massive growth,” she said. Sales of organic birds are up 15% by value and 13% by volume year on year.
“One in three households are concerned about ultra-processed foods and moving to cleaner products,” said Tor Crockatt, the head of marketing at yoghurt-maker Yeo Valley. With a turnover of £230m the company has benefited from a 40% increase in demand for natural and Greek yoghurts in the last three years as customers go back to basics to avoid processed food.
“Gen Z are particularly interested in organic and making sustainable choices,” said Crockatt. “They have been brought up in an era where they have heard a lot about the health of people and the planet, and the impact we are having. There’s a lot of scepticism from consumers [about the food industry] so it feels like now is the time for organic to shine.”
Of course everyone wants to buy healthy food but not everyone can afford it. If the government really cared about people’s nutrition and health, they would direct subsidies to increase the nutritional value of food, not the quantity produced.
Read; 100+ organisations unite in calling for landmark Good Food Bill, The Food Foundation, 25 February 2026
‘More than 100 organisations, including supermarkets, food businesses and investors have joined forces to call for the introduction of a Good Food Bill. Led by The Food Foundation, Sustain and Green Alliance, they have warned the government that a failing food system is a threat to national security and public health. Today’s statement, also supported by dozens of NGOs and academics, comes as polling finds: 69% of people think the government should be doing more to ensure everyone can afford and access healthy food, 65% of people support a ‘Food Bill’ that would introduce duties and targets on government bodies to make healthy food more accessible and affordable.
Given the unprecedented challenges posed by biodiversity loss, the collapse of vital ecosystems, and the potential of food shortages and additional rises in food prices, we believe a Good Food Bill offers a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the government to protect citizens, farmers and food businesses. Anna Taylor, Executive Director at The Food Foundation, believes a Good Food Bill would transform the food system for generations to come. “Governments can achieve important wins within a single term, but only legislation can lock in change, providing certainty and protecting progress from shifting political priorities,” she said. “With food strategies and legislation already in place across the devolved nations, this is a timely opportunity for Westminster to introduce legislation that benefits the whole UK. “We are calling on the Government to seize this moment, commit to new primary legislation and lead the change needed to build a food system fit for the future.”
Some simple guidance from the Soil Association on how to produce healthy food from resilient soils using mixed farming and diverse crops and avoiding chemical inputs and intensively-reared livestock.
Read; No drought about it: Farming agroecologically for climate resilience, Soil Association, 16 February 2026
‘A truly resilient farm has healthy soils that hold water during dry periods and drain better in heavy rain. It grows a wider diversity of crops, reducing the risk of total crop failure. It doesn’t rely on expensive synthetic and fossil-fuel based inputs, which are vulnerable to price shocks and disruption to supply. It supports wildlife and natural processes that help crops and livestock. Resilience also depends on fair supply chains and localised infrastructure. One-off quick fixes won’t be enough. We need a whole-system approach that works with nature, not against it, across landscapes. The current food system encourages intensive production, heavy reliance on synthetic inputs and high concentrations of livestock. These factors undermine resilience by driving pollution and harming nature. Intensive animal agriculture is reliant on imported feed – and increases vulnerability to price shocks.
Agroecology offers an alternative solution and organic farming demonstrates a tried and tested model for delivery. It delivers multiple wins for adaptation and resilience. It supports a just transition to resilient food production – with environmental, economic and social benefits baked in. It prioritises whole foods such as beans and pulses – healthy sources of protein, which fix nitrogen and boost soil health. It prioritises mixed farming systems, rotating livestock with diverse crops, enabling a shift towards less and better meat.’
Warmongers in Westminster are pouring money into war while claiming there isn’t enough to fix our food system.
Read; Why we need a Defence Strategy which is rooted in Agroecology and Food Sovereignty, Jyoti Fernandes, 6th February 2026
‘Government spending on food, farming and the environment may seem substantial, but it is minuscule compared to the amount that is spent on military defence. In this blog post, Landworkers Alliance Campaigns Coordinator Jyoti Fernandes asks why it is that when it comes to strategic thinking around national security, our food system and the health of our planet seems to be forgotten.’
Jyoti Fernandes; “‘I spent several days in Government consultations on England’s 25-year Farming Roadmap, where DEFRA sought input from key stakeholders on future farming policy, including payments. As usual, we sought better funding for agri-environment schemes, and particularly for small farms, horticulture, new entrants and public engagement. As usual, there was push back and in-fighting as farming and environment organisations scramble for crumbs from a shrinking pie. It’s tempting to think that the Government is short of money. It is not. Just after these consultation meetings I went straight to a conference sponsored by Declassified UK called ‘Challenging the War Machine’. Beyond the outrage I felt learning more about the level of complicity of the UK Government in exporting arms to Turkey and Israel, I was bamboozled by the figures of UK Government expenditure on our own military force.
The UK’s 2025-26 defence budget has now risen to £61.7 billion, in contrast to the UK’s 2025-26 farming budget which is £2.4 billion (a figure which also covers most Government commitments to ecosystem restoration, through agri-environment schemes).This narrow view of what it means to ‘invest in UK national security’ completely ignores the issues we are facing on a global scale, and the urgent need to invest in foreign aid, climate finance and international reparations. If we want to live on a secure, healthy and peaceful planet then we cannot separate our own security and wellbeing from those in other countries. If we do, we are likely to face mass migration on an unprecedented scale as people will be forced to leave their homes and their lands from extreme weather and hunger, rising global temperatures and biodiversity collapse, and even more precarious food supply chains than we have now. We need to build the case for investment in agroecology, land rights, fair incomes for farmers and farmworkers, ecosystem restoration, jobs in agroecological food production and localised supply chains – these all play a central role in our national security. I am interested in working with members and artists who want to investigate and imagine how we build the case for food sovereignty and agroecology creating conditions for peace which are rooted in justice. If you are interested in working with me on this please me on jyoti.fernandes@landworkersalliance.org.uk.’
If left to graze, cattle recover from Foot and Mouth in a couple of weeks. However, in 2001 the idiots in DEFRA decided to cull not only infected cattle but also neighbouring healthy cattle in the continuous cull.
Listen; BBC Farming Today, Foot and Mouth lessons learnt; 20 February 2026
Anthony Gibson (Former SW Regional Director NFU); “Well, the continuous cull was just about the biggest tragedy of all. We lost 173 farms in Devon that had confirmed outbreaks of foot and mouth disease. 800 farms had their animals slaughtered, 670 of them in the contiguous cull.”
Presenter; ” The theory being that if you took out neighbouring farms, then you were creating a firebreak.”
Anthony Gibson; “Absolutely. But it was based on computer modelling and it was based on a sort of theoretical, like a sort of gridiron of farms where they’re all neatly connected together. Farming in Devon isn’t like that. We had a lot of NFU members who wouldn’t go along with the contiguous cull, who barricaded their farms, kept the Ministry vets at bay for the necessary 20, 21 days and all of those farms, and there were hundreds of them, only one in post outbreak testing was found to have the disease.”
UK Column Jerm discusses the present foot and mouth outbreak in South Africa, exposing the same idiotic mistakes the UK made in 2001, this time using the flawed PCR test and flawed mRNA vaccine.
Watch; The Globalist Attack on Farmers, UK Column, 20 February 2026
Jeremy Nell (Jerm); “Right now, as we are speaking, there’s an apparent outbreak of foot and mouth disease right across South Africa. In fact, the President announced a national emergency on TV. It’s weird how people do not see the similarity to something that happened six years ago. What is going on? PCR testing.”
Mike Robinson; “Are they running a slaughter on suspicion policy?”
Jerm; “Cattle across the country are being killed because apparently this is a highly contagious, deadly disease. I read a data point and this guy is coming onto my show to discuss the actual data. Only 0.2% of all cattle in South Africa have the symptoms of what would be described as Foot and Mouth. And even then you can go into a whole discussion around what actually are those symptoms and how serious they are, but it’s basically just sores in the mouth and some issues with the hooves. That’s really it and if you leave them, they come right after one or two weeks. But the government is now rolling out a mass vaccination programme which includes mRNA. Think about where this is going.”
Mike Robinson; “You know, this happened in the UK in 2001 and this is being presented as being a viral disease. And we know that disinfectant does not kill viruses according to the mainstream narrative, and yet they had people walking through disinfectant soaked mats at ports and airports across the United Kingdom. This was the beginning of the COVID mind-control operation really, in the modern generation. A couple of points here. Neil Ferguson, who was the Imperial College guy who developed the models which justified lockdown and so on, was the same Neil Ferguson that justified the slaughter on suspicion policy during the 2001 Foot and Mouth outbreak in the United Kingdom. Now I don’t know enough about the flora and fauna of South Africa to answer this question, but one of the points that was made by the farmers that we spoke to when we were making the Slaughtered on Suspicion documentary was that they were busy killing hundreds of thousands of animals, burning them in these massive funeral pyres, which, according to their narrative, the science around the thing was undoubtedly helping distribute the virus to other farms. But aside from that, they weren’t doing anything about all the other cloven-hoofed animals that were running around in the wild – deer and so on that were potentially getting the same illness, nobody was concerned about those. So it was only the domesticated cattle that were being dealt with in this way. So it was absolutely clear that this was an attack on farming, not an attack on a virus. It was exactly the same type of operation that was eventually done on us all during the COVID time; quarantines, lockdowns of farms and areas. One of the other things that they would do is that they would compensate a proportion of a community and not compensate somebody else. This was creating divisions within communities and between farmers and farms. And so where prior to that you had a sense of community there was definitely an attack on community cases and the ability for people to act in a cohesive way. It was quite an incredible operation from start to finish. And there’s lessons to be learned on what happened in the UK in 2001. And people that are living in South Africa now and going through that need to understand what happened here and maybe that will give them some ammunition to help push back on what’s happening to them or help them understand what’s happening to them anyway.”
Jerm; ” Farmer Angus.co.za. says, man destroys the cow’s immune system and is then taught that the pharmaceutical industry will fix the problem. The basics of cattle husbandry are ensuring a varied diet of herbivorous plants and moving the animals at least once a day to fresh grazing. Depending on where you are farming and your access to water, it is a minimum of four weeks before the cattle return to the same field and this breaks the parasite cycle and allows the plants to recover. He says the cow is not a grain-ivore or a chicken-ivore or an expired chip-ivore or a fruit pulp-ivore. It was designed as a herbivore. Routine antibiotics and ASPA drugs are not in their dietary design either, he says, ‘we don’t live in our toilets yet. Man has ordained that most farmed animals have to live in theirs’. He’s making the point, simply fix the environment and you’re not going to have to have these vaccination drives.”
Cheap, low-welfare imports depress the price of pork forcing UK farmers to compete by cramming too many animals into sheds without bedding, and gene editing pigs to survive in these conditions, risking the farm being targeted by animal welfare charities campaigning for better animal welfare.
Listen; National Farmers’ Union Conference 2026, BBC Farming Today, 25 February 2026
Angela Kirkwood, Pig Farmer; “I think it’s really important that we’re starting to talk about food resilience in the UK, and I think all of our businesses, we look at how we can be more resilient, whether that’s to extreme weather, whether it’s to other threats, such as animal rights activism, especially in the pig industry at the moment, and looking to the future of how do we look at better genetics in order to improve our carbon footprint by being more productive. So we’ve been looking at reducing antibiotic use, improving productivity of our pigs, getting the best genetics that there are in the country to try and be the best that we possibly can be.”
Presenter; “How confident do you feel then about the future of your profitability as well?”
Angela Kirkwood; “I think there’s real concerns in the supply chain, especially in the pig supply chain at the moment, we have a pig prices plummeting, and this is really knocking confidence for investment. We’re seeing huge consolidation of ownership in the pig industry. The industry is getting smaller, and it’s both consolidation of the processing sector, but also consolidation of the farmers.”
Presenter; “Fewer but larger farms and fewer but larger processing plants.What does it mean for you on the farm?”
Angela Kirkwood; “We’ve just got to be open to change, and I think all farmers have to be open to change, because we are being pushed down an avenue of change, even if it’s one that not everybody really wants.”
Patrick Holden is the CEO of the Sustainable Food Trust and a dairy farmer in W Wales. He explains how the crash in milk prices destroyed dairy farms across the country.
Watch; The overproduction of milk affecting price per litre, Sustainable Food Trust, 29 January 2026
Patrick Holden; “The milk that we got collected 17 pence a litre. Now I reckon our cost of production is 60 pence a litre, so we were losing shed loads of money on all the milk that we sent away to First Milk. And it wasn’t their fault, what’s happened has been that the price of milk, as you probably know, has collapsed because of overproduction. Because all the dairy farmers during the what they called high milk to concentrate feed price ratio, to use the jargon, which means that even during the drought they could afford to buy God knows what from who knows where, concentrates, probably from South America actually, to boost the milk production despite the absence of grass. So there was a lot of overproduction and milk prices collapsed and everybody’s on the receiving end of that actually leads to all organic farmers who get it still getting a better price. But because we were selling to what’s called the SP spot market, which means you just get whatever the auction price is, we suffered. So how about that? No one’s immune from these weird things that are going on in the world today. We certainly weren’t.”
The most important lesson in avoiding antibiotic use is to treat your animals right but farmers can only do that if consumers are prepared to pay the fair price for their meat.
Intro; ‘Antibiotics are critical medicines for humans and livestock – but profligate use has led to rapidly increasing resistance, which is a threat for animal and human health. How then do we replace, reduce and refine the use of antibiotics in farm settings? And what are the opportunities for livestock producers?
ffinlo Costain is joined by two southwest dairy farmers – Sophie Alexander from Hemsworth Farm, and Karolina Klaskova from Higher Mere Park Farm – and by two livestock vets, Rebecca Price and Lucy Hepworth, both from Friars Moor Livestock Health.’
ffinlo Costain; “My feeling is that the sort of routine use of antibiotics is really masking challenges that are inherent in that particular system. Is that something that you would broadly agree with?”
Lucy Hepworth, Vet; “Yes, I would. I would see antibiotics as potentially a sticking plaster for a problem. So they will help control levels of disease, but the disease is there for a reason, be it that animal immunity is being compromised, that nutrition is not meeting what the animal needs. The animals are being housed in an environment that’s not, again, meeting their needs. And a sticking plaster isn’t perhaps what we want to have for optimal performance in a system. And so actually, by looking at what we could do to create that environment for an animal to thrive, we’ll actually get far more gains than just using the sticking plaster.”
ffinlo Costain; “And what are the risks for those farmers in those sorts of systems who are moving away from that routine prophylactic use, that preventative use of antibiotics?”
Lucy Hepworth; “The risks by just removing an antibiotic are really significant. And no farmer wants to see disease in their stock. But I turn the question round and encourage a farmer to look at the opportunity that is there for healthier, more productive stock by taking out the antibiotics, but being able to institute management changes so that they’re not required.”
ffinlo Costain; “So that’s about a sort of healthier farm system overall, a more robust animal.”
Lucy Hepworth; “Absolutely. So, for example, Karolina has talked quite a lot about the importance of colostrum and immunity in the calves. And yes, that will protect the calves to a degree against calf pneumonia, but actually has lifelong opportunity in terms of influencing the longevity of that animal in the dairy herd, the amount of milk that the animal will go on and produce if it’s had optimal levels of colostrum, which is why I think those can’t be overlooked, making the most of those inputs into the animal and not using the sticking plaster of antibiotics as a routine and only resorting to them when a disease occurs in an animal.”
Because we relyon charities and activists to campaign to improve welfare conditions for farm livestock, unsurprisingly the cruelty persists even on farms in the higher welfare label categories. Corporate captured government departments are not prepared to enforce animal welfare laws, so we must rely on consumers buying outdoor raised, free range or organic meat, so that farmers can afford to provide it.
Read; Outdoor-bred’ RSPCA Assured pigs found ‘suffering and lame’ in farm barns, The Independent, 18 February 2026
‘Pigs reared on a farm for “outdoor-bred” RSPCA Assured meat labels were found with what a vet says were advanced infections or suffering “prolonged discomfort”.’ Stockcroft Pigs, one of Britain’s largest “outdoor-bred” meat companies, supplies pork to several high-street brands, including at least two supermarkets and a fast-food chain. The animals were filmed in what appeared to be a crowded “hospital pen” with limited bedding that was heavily soiled and with minimal enrichment, in a video filmed secretly by activists. A former pig-industry vet who examined the footage said she believed some were so ill that they should have been euthanised weeks earlier. The scenes were filmed at a Herefordshire pig-rearing farm contracted to Oxfordshire-based Stockcroft Pigs. Stockcroft said the animals were being treated on a vet’s advice, and some parts of the clips were not representative of the farm.
But the Animal Justice Project organisation, which obtained the footage, claimed some pigs were too injured to walk. Their footage appeared to show that one was so badly injured that it was limping and visibly deteriorated over six weeks of filming. The investigators said the only ‘enrichment’ in the pen was a single suspended plastic bottle – for up to 40 pigs. But Animal Justice Project says the video demonstrated that animals suffer even under “high-welfare”, “outdoor-bred” and RSPCA Assured labels, which led shoppers to believe that animals live entirely outdoors, on grass and free to roam. The organisation says there is a huge gulf between supermarket marketing – which depicts “outdoor-bred” pigs as always outdoors – and the reality, when more than 90 per cent of all UK pigs are reared indoors in intensive systems. Even in “outdoor-bred” systems, piglets born outside are usually moved indoors at just four to 10 weeks old, and only around 3 or 4 per cent of UK pigs spend their whole lives outdoors.’
PETITION – Read; Stop the spread of polluting megafarms! Ends 10 March 2026
‘If you live in Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, Herefordshire, Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin, Norfolk or Suffolk, you live in a megafarm hotspot. The government wants to make it easier to build even more – here’s how to stop them.
US-style megafarms are multiplying at an alarming rate, destroying our countryside and precious ecosystems. With profits flowing out of local areas, this type of farming leaves rural communities with fewer jobs and filthy rivers.
The government should be making it easier for our local farmers to produce sustainably, and harder for Big Ag to take over.
But they just announced new planning rules that will open up the countryside to even more factory farms. Please ask your local MP to step in.’
Please take 2 minutes to email your MP if you live in Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, Shropshire, Herefordshire, Telford and Wrekin, Norfolk or Suffolk. Tell them to support local, nature-friendly farming instead.
The deadline for consultation closes Tuesday 10 March.
Farmers get the blame for polluting watercourses when in fact, the corporate water companies are pouring poorly treated water into our rivers and getting away with it.
Watch; The Globalist Attack on Farmers; UK Column, 20 February 2026
Mike Robinson; “When we look at the scale of pollution in Britain’s rivers, it’s not farming that’s the major problem here, it’s the water companies themselves who are pumping raw human sewage into rivers and other waterways on a scale that farming has never done. There’s no consequence for the water companies whatsoever. They might get a ticking off from OFWAT, the water regulator in the UK, they might get a fine which represents a half of a millionth of a percent of their turnover, a few hundred thousand pounds or something, when they’re bringing in billions every year. So the disparity between the way that farming has been dealt with for water, relatively speaking, minor incidents, a single farm causing a minor incident relative to a major water corporation causing major incidents not just in the rivers but also right along our coastline and no consequence for them whatsoever. I think that the agenda at work is pretty clear there.”
Climate change is the excuse for authorities to introduce yet another tech farming practice to take farming ever further from working with nature and people. We should not be replacing farmers with chemicals, and bird songs with the mind-numbing hum of drones.
Listen; Could Artificial Intelligence help arable farmers make their growing season BBC Farming Today, 13 February 2026
Emanuel Zuza, Senior lecturer in Environment and Sustainability Royal Agricultural University in Cirencester teaching on environment, climate change and also artificial intelligence; “We are seeing the impacts of climate change and also the excessive use of chemicals such as herbicides, fertilisers, weeds have become resistant to some of the herbicides. But as we are doing that, we are also polluting the environment, but also increasing greenhouse gases and leading to climate change. Artificial intelligence and spot spraying rather than spraying the entire field. What we are basically saying is after the analysis, the drone can only pinpoint and spray the areas where there is possibly significant damage than the entire field where the spraying isn’t even needed at all.”
BBC Presenter; “Precision treatment (using drones) to reduce cost and to reduce the environmental impact.”
Emanuel Zuza; “Exactly, so we are looking at a DJI Mini 3 drone. We are taking pictures of wheat crops, we analyse them on a computer to identify whether you have pests, whether you have weeds. AI, there are various algorithms, you can use them to identify weeds, pests and diseases. But for this specific study, what we were looking at was to see if the artificial intelligence algorithms can be able to distinguish a weed from a crop.”
BBC Presenter; “When can you get to the point where this can be used on a farm and used with success to support a farmer in managing their crop and managing their weeds? I mean, are you at that point yet? Can you see that happening?”
Emanuel Zuza; “We are seeing that there are some farmers that are picking up artificial intelligence on their farm. The issue about this is it’s about data. So we have conducted it here at the Royal Agriculture University farm, but we are currently continuing this to expand to other farms to basically see if what we are saying is actually true.”
It’s well worth subscribing to the non-profit, Local Futures, to regularly get their newsletters that are full of wisdom and optimism that change is possible and information about events, new books and courses
Read; Local Futures newsletter
‘Dear Tracy,
At some level, we all know our spiraling global problems stem from an out-of-control global system – one in which unaccountable corporations and financial institutions own the media, direct political parties, and profit from the war-machine. Taking steps to localise any aspect of our lives will always mean withdrawing from dependence on this system; and will therefore always be of value, no matter how small those steps are.
Still, the news cycle brings on bouts of depression and feelings of impotence, and it’s hard to look away. This is normal – a sign that we are alive and responsive to the world.
But notice – so often, those who feel powerless are often the same people who take action. We plant gardens, save and share seeds, hold exchanges and workshops at neighborhood centers and festivals. We forge community in places that have been stripped of it for decades.
It is okay to be only part idealist. It is okay to only occasionally play the optimist. It is okay to act as if community and the planet will one day have their renaissance, even when that faith is fleeting.’
DEFRA has finally announced the new, revised Sustainable Farming Incentive, (SFI) scheme which will open in June this year.
Listen; National Farmers’ Union Conference 2026, BBC Farming Today, 25 February 2026
Presenter; “The DEFRA Secretary of State Emma Reynolds divulged some of the details about the next phase of the Sustainable Farming Incentive, the SFI in England. Now, this is the scheme which was intended to partially replace payments from the EU Common Agricultural Policy. But it’s been a stop start affair, cut off in March last year when the money ran out. Apart from a brief resumption for some applicants in the summer, we knew that the Sustainable Farming Incentive would reopen in June and we also knew that small farms would get first dibs at applying. What we’ve had confirmed here is how small is small. So it’s seven and a half acres to 123 acres, roughly speaking. Larger farms, which haven’t previously been signed up to the overarching Environmental Land Management Scheme, which the SFI is part of, will also be allowed to apply in June, but everyone else has to wait until September if they want to apply. One of the key details that was announced here at the NFU Conference was that the amount a single farming business can claim is going to be capped at £100,000 per year for each agreement. Now, the government says that 97% of farms with existing SFI agreements are already under this threshold.”
More on the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI)
Listen; The updated environmental farm payment scheme, BBC Farming Today, 26 February 2026
Vicki Hird, the strategic lead on agriculture for the Wildlife Trusts; “We’re so pleased that they’re finally out with a level of detail that will help farmers plan, and that all farmers from September onwards will be able to take advantage. Good to see agroforestry in there, organic in there, but as ever, we need assurance that the budget is there long term.”
Presenter; ” What do you make of the idea of having a cap? Because some people are saying, well, that will mean that estates and big farms that have gone for this in a major way will actually rack back and land will come out of being an advantage for nature.”
Vicki Hird; ” That would be a disaster. I understand the cap is only for this year. They are obviously very worried about their budgets and that is important because we need budgets for everything. But there is a risk and that should be mitigated with possible payments through countries stewardship or other schemes so that we don’t see a back sliding in those good works that those farmers have done so far.”
Martin Lines, Nature Friendly Farming Network; ” I think it’s a positive step forward that sets out a framework of what’s going to be on offer over the next three years. It’s disappointing to see some of the actions removed and some of the payments reduced, but it gives us a foundation for what’s coming.”
Presenter; “For farmers like the ones in your organisation who are moving towards nature friendly farming, does this encourage them a bit more or the fact that it’s always changing put them off a bit?”
Martin Lines; “What’s put them off is a continual change in the past. But what the Secretary of State set out is the foundation for the next three years, so people can build a business plan around it and look at where do these payments and actions fit within their farm and their business.”
Presenter; “Three years isn’t a long time in farming though, is it?”
Martin Lines; “No, it’s longer than in politics though. And we really need certainty from all political parties that farming will get rewarded for delivering environmental outputs, soil health and the foundations for food security by having a healthy landscape in a changing climate.”
Read; UK Prime Minister BREAKS DOWN Over Britain’s Farming Crisis Pending; Ukrural Report; 26 Feb 2026
Intro; ‘Britain’s farming sector is on the brink as mounting costs, collapsing incomes, extreme weather, and growing imports push producers to breaking point. Across the countryside, farmers warn that a full-scale agricultural crisis is pending, with closures accelerating and food production shrinking at a worrying pace. Many say urgent intervention is needed before permanent damage is done.
The UK Prime Minister is now under intense political pressure as protests spread and confidence in government support weakens. With food security concerns rising and rural communities facing economic collapse, this video explains why the farming crisis is deepening, what warning signs were ignored, and how serious the consequences could become’.
You’d think DEFRA employees would be chosen from applicants with a basic knowledge of farming but in fact DEFRA is spending £650k to teach their civil servants the basics of food and farming. Is this a mistake or is it because they have to teach politicians to counter common sense, and push a chemical-intensive and high-tech food and farming system?
Watch; Government food and farming department spends £650k, Radmore Farm, 17 February 2026
Ben Aveling; “Imagine you hired a builder to fix your roof and then a few weeks later you find a receipt, he’s taken 650 grand of your money and spent it on a training course called How to Climb A Ladder. You’d more than likely sack him on the spot, wouldn’t you? I would. Well, the government Department for Food have done just this. They’ve admitted in writing and on the news that they don’t understand the basics of how farming works and they are spending nearly three quarters of a million pounds on paying someone to tell them how to farm. These are the government bodies that decide what we’re allowed to put in your food to spray on your crops, etc. They also decide how much tax we pay and all these other bits and bobs that go into farming. It just proves this whole time they’ve had no clue about what they’re doing anyway. So things they’re paying someone else to teach them are, I’ve got a list here, Introduction to Agriculture, Soil and Crops, Livestock, The Commercial side of Farming. Think about that for a second. The people responsible for our national food security right at this moment don’t feel confident enough in those subjects yet. They run British Food. They need a course to teach them about livestock.”
Though about the US, this article could refer to the UK…
Read; Human “biology was never intended to handle” ultraprocessed foods, former FDA head David Kessler warns; CBS News, 15 February 2026
‘Today, an increasing number of Americans across the political spectrum – from Make America Healthy Again activists to everyday shoppers – are voicing concern about the health impact of ultraprocessed foods – those boxed and wrapped in plastic, ready-to-eat items lining grocery store shelves.
Leading the charge are two men who disagree on pretty much everything else about public health – Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Dr. David Kessler, the former commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
The two men have found common ground over a common culprit: a 67-year-old government classification for substances in our food. It’s called GRAS, or generally recognized as safe. Kennedy and Kessler say it has allowed big food companies to use ingredients without a full government safety review and flood the market with ultraprocessed foods that now make up 50% of our calories and 60% of our children’s diets.
David Kessler: Over the last 40 years, the United States has been exposed to something that our biology was never intended to handle. Energy-dense, highly palatable, rapidly absorbable, ultraprocessed foods that have altered our metabolism and have resulted in the greatest increase in chronic disease in our history. Type 2 diabetes, pre-diabetes, hypertension, abnormal lipids, fatty liver, heart attacks, stroke, heart failure.
Bill Whitaker: From our food
David Kessler: From our food.
David Kessler was commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration during the 1990s when he helped expose how the tobacco companies manipulated nicotine levels to hook consumers.’
I guess Trump is going to have to put out a new Food Guide Pyramid now. It will probably look like this: pic.twitter.com/lNO0awJP94
— HealthRanger (@HealthRanger) February 19, 2026
Read; Trump Directs USDA to Boost Production of Glyphosate; Civil Eats; Feb 16 2026
The executive order comes months after the administration approved Bayer’s plan for a new phosphate mine, partially on public land. If companies were liable for the cancer from toxic herbicides, they would be banned
‘February 19, 2026 – President Donald Trump issued an executive order late Wednesday directing the Secretary of Agriculture to boost the domestic supply of glyphosate, the active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup, in the name of national security.
The order emphasizes increasing domestic production of elemental phosphorus, which is created by mining phosphate, to make glyphosate. Bayer currently imports most of its phosphate; its domestic supply comes from a long-running mine in Idaho that is nearly tapped out. But in October, Trump’s Bureau of Land Management approved the company’s proposal to build a new mine nearby, which will cover more than 1,800 acres of public and private land.
It’s not clear exactly what Wednesday’s executive order will mean for Bayer, but it essentially promises federal support for expanding glyphosate production.
“As the most widely used crop protection tools in United States agriculture, glyphosate-based herbicides are a cornerstone of this Nation’s agricultural productivity and rural economy, allowing United States farmers and ranchers to maintain high yields and low production costs,” Trump said in the order.
The directive was met with dismay among prominent supporters of Secretary of Health and Human Services’ Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA). On X, toxicologist Alexandra Muñoz called it “outrageous and unacceptable” and anti-glyphosate advocate Kelly Ryerson said glyphosate is the pesticide “MAHA cares about most.”
Kennedy told The New York Times he supported the president’s decision.
The order, signed Wednesday night, comes at a fraught moment in the debate over the most widely used weedkiller in history.
This week, Bayer proposed a $7.25 billion settlement to resolve thousands of lawsuits in which individuals claim using its product gave them non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The company has worked to change state and federal laws to prevent future lawsuits. House Republicans included an immunity clause in a draft farm bill last week, and the Trump administration has sided with Bayer in a case the Supreme Court will hear in April.’
Bayer, makers of glyphosate herbicide Roundup, are spending millions to get immunity from liability for causing cancer.
Watch; We shouldn’t succumb to the lobbyists, Forbes Breaking News, 24 February 2026
Congressman Thomas Massie; “I rise today to let the American people know that this government is under siege. All three branches of this government is under siege by lobbyists and lawyers from a German company named Bayer. They spent over $9 million lobbying the executive branch and the legislative branch so that they don’t have to be liable for any damages that their herbicide causes, otherwise known as Roundup. And they’re having some success now. They haven’t had any success yet in this chamber to get that immunity. They’ve had some success in the state legislatures, which are also under siege to get this immunity from liability. Look, the Constitution guarantees people a trial if they’ve been harmed. Why are we contemplating going against the Constitution? The Attorney General has opined favourably for this German company in front of the Supreme Court about getting rid of any liability that they should have for any damages. And the most recent thing that we’ve seen, the executive branch, by the way, the President’s Chief of Staff and the President’s Attorney General work for one of the biggest lobbying firms that’s received hundreds of thousands, millions of dollars from Bayer. And maybe that’s why we’ve seen an executive order that says that the production of this chemical from this German company is a national defence priority. And we know why they’re doing that. It’s to keep them from having any liability. Everybody in this country deserves their day in court. This is wrong. We shouldn’t succumb to the lobbyists. Not in the executive branch, not in the judicial branch, and certainly not here in Congress and not in the state legislatures. But there’s a lot of money at play and I implore my colleagues to resist it and do not give them immunity.”
This article might be about the USA but Big Ag has just as much power over UK authorities to ensure they won’t be liable when their toxic products poison consumers.
Read; 2026 Farm Bill Would Let Pesticide Companies Poison Us With Impunity by Alexis Baden-Mayer, 18 February 2026
‘To avoid compensating the people they’ve sickened or killed, Bayer has spent millions of dollars lobbying Congress. They’ve managed to get a huge pesticide deregulation subtitle included in the U.S. House of Representatives’ version of the 2026 Farm Bill. Not only would it prevent Roundup-exposed cancer victims from taking Bayer to court for hiding the fact that Monsanto’s glyphosate-based herbicide causes cancer, it would severely restrict the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate pesticides and completely eliminate states’ power to protect us.
The 2026 Farm Bill is the deregulation dream of companies like Bayer that peddle pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
It completely guts the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), the law that governs how the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates pesticides, with sweeping exemptions to FIFRA and huge changes to EPA reviews.
At the same time that it makes EPA’s pesticide authority weak to non-existent, it concentrates power over pesticides with the agency, forbidding states from doing anything to protect us, including preventing courts from hearing cases brought on behalf of people who have been killed, injured, or sickened by pesticides.’
The BBC has chosen one of the many enormous Danish factory farms which operate in Western Ukraine. All very sad and harrowing but of our making. See the Ukraine section of this newsletter to understand how the UK is complicit not only in provoking the proxy war but in keeping it going longer to bleed Russia using young Ukraine men as cannon fodder in another US/UK/EU regime change operation to install puppet leaders who will do the bidding of global capital.
Listen; Farming in Ukraine BBC Farming Today, 25 February 2026
Presenter; ” Kees Huizinga is a Dutch farmer who moved to Ukraine to run a large mixed farm just before the invasion took place. He estimates that 20% of farmland has been lost to the war.”
Kees Huizinga; “For the farming itself, it’s not so bad. It’s worse for the people, especially for the people in the cities. For farming we’ve been preparing for this for like four years since the war started. We bought generators, some of us have batteries. We are heating on wood, drying maize with wood chips, for example, building heat exchangers. We bought a special oven, solar panels on the roof. So we can produce our own heat in our own electricity and we have to because otherwise we can’t milk the cows or we can’t feed the pigs or we can’t prepare the machinery, we can’t weld. So we didn’t have a choice, otherwise everything would have stopped already a long time ago.”
Presenter; “You’re a relatively big farm. What about labour? Because obviously many of the men have gone, they’re fighting. Who’s working on the farm and how many people have you got now?”
Kees Huizinga; “So we had like 40 people in the army. There’s still a little bit more than 30. So some guys came back from the army and a few guys died as well on the front lines. We can reserve 50% of our workforce, so they can’t take them to the army. So of course the choice is on us, whom we reserve and whom we kind of don’t reserve and the guys who are not reserved, they can be picked up every day for the army, but luckily they don’t pick up so many guys from us.”
Presenter; “Is Ukraine managing to feed its people?”
Kees Huizinga; “That’s absolutely no problem. Ukraine exports like 70, 80% of what it produces, and the rest is for domestic consumption, and domestic consumption is also to feed cattle or chicken, cows, pigs, or to make sunflower oil, for example. But the biggest chunk is for exports. So Ukrainian farmers, they know how to grow crops, so we will always have enough for own consumption. But if you take out like, 50, 60, 70 million tonnes of commodities from the world market, it has a huge effect on world market price, and then it’s the poor countries, like a lot of African countries, for example, where people won’t have enough money to buy these commodities. We had this situation in the first half year when the war started. The most vulnerable place we have is our export ports on the Black Sea near Odessa and if somehow the Russians managed to block these or to destroy these, then we have a real problem. And of course the farms close to the front line, it’s very hard to farm there, there’s unexploded missiles in the fields, there’s mines in the fields, there is Russian drones flying over their fields. They shot them out of the air, and they fall into the fields. But that’s closer to the front line, and those farmers who still farm there, they are really brave. I know guys who were cultivating and they hit a mine, the mine exploded, the whole cultivator was gone, tractor’s windows were blown out. The guy survived and he had this already two times, so now he’s afraid to go back into the fields. They are really brave, keep things going. And then if you come even closer to the front line, of course, or the front line itself, nothing’s grown there. So those fields are overgrown with weeds, they can’t do anything there.”
Watch; Why the Food System Is About to Collapse, Deep Seed and Soil Capital, 27 January 2026
‘In this episode of Deep Seed, we speak with Tim Benton, leading expert on global food security, to understand what’s driving the collapse of our food systems — and what it would take to build something truly regenerative.’
Tim Benton; “We’re in the situation where we’re making the planet unhealthy. And just as humans are starting to really suffer from the perils of over consumption, whether it’s over consumption of fuel or plastic wrapping or food, it’s making us ill and our life expectancy is going down because of it. The world is also getting to the point where it is sufficiently unhealthy that we’ve got ourselves into a bind that the more we demand stuff that comes from the planet, the less able the planet is to absorb those demands, and the more likely it is that the planet won’t be able to continue to let us get away with it. And within that, the food system is perhaps the biggest contributor that people often don’t think of in terms of its impacts on land use, biodiversity, climate, pollution around the world, and therefore is a very big, unsustainable body of work in everyday activity. At the same time, the food system is not doing what it should do if you or I were to design it from scratch, which is to feed people healthily and nutritiously. So what we’ve got is increasingly a food system that makes quite a lot of profit, particularly for some people within the system, it makes food abundant and relatively cheap for most people, particularly in the rich world, but it’s making us ill and is making the planet ill. So put all of that together and if you look into the future, you can see a world where the pressures of climate change and biodiversity loss and unsustainable land use, soil degradation, et cetera, and the human costs of poor diet, whether it is illnesses associated with obesity, diabetes, heart disease, or whether it’s cancers or whatever, plus the weight of plastic packaging and the pollution from fertiliser, pesticides, plastic, etc, will not make the world unlivable, but will make the world much more challenging to live in and particularly challenging to our way of life. I think there has been a lot of conversation over the years about all lifestyle change, blah, blah, blah. But what worries me most at the moment, particularly in 2025 and over the last five years, is the relationship between the politics and geopolitics of sustainability and what that does to the way our democracies work, the way our countries relate to each other. You can see, looking ahead, if you just follow the sorts of things that have happened over the last five, six years, whether it is Trump or whether it is Brexit or whether it is Covid or whether it is the Ukraine war, you can just see those sorts of things becoming more common, partly being driven by climate change, but partly being driven by countries competing to maintain the standard of living and the expectation that we can still continue with infinite economic growth. Why do I say that? If you take all of our governments, everywhere in the world wants to have a positive GDP, so that’s 2%, 3%, 4%, and 8% if you’re China, economic growth per year. So if you take an economy and increase it by 2% a year or 4% per year, effectively you’ve got an exponential growth process, and we live on a finite planet. And whilst most consumption is underpinned in some way by material consumption, whether food, whether land, whether plastics, whether oil and gas, whether minerals, et cetera. Malthus first pointed this out 200 and something years ago. You don’t have to be a genius to work out that eventually something’s got to give. So for me, the sustainability argument is not a kind of middle class nice to have, let’s all be organic and wear sandals and grow a long bushy beard and live in a commune. It’s not about that (TW; YES IT IS!). It’s about trying to maintain the world so peace and prosperity can stay the norm, rather than be something that was particularly of the 20th century.”
The reality of food produced by corporate agribusiness is that it’s contaminated with toxic chemicals and causes chronic diseases.
Listen; Military Food Testing; Food Integrity Now, 5 February 2026
‘Food Integrity Now spoke with Zen Honeycutt of Moms Across America regarding the recent testing that Moms Across America initiated of our nation’s military food. The military food testing results are in and they are not good. Moms Across America has been the leading organisation that has initiated food testing of fast foods, school lunches.’
Caril Grieve; “Moms across America has done food testing on school lunches, fast food and so much more. And today we’re going to be speaking with Zen about the latest testing of military food. So, Zen, welcome again. And I looked at these results and they’re pretty shocking. So let’s dig in and see what you found.
Zen Honeycut; ” The dismal situation of the military food and the farming practises have been going on for decades. So this military food is tested, it’s an example of what’s been happening for a very long time. In fact, I wanted to test military food back in 2014, I was invited to China to be one of 30 speakers from 15 countries to speak on food safety. It was a food safety conference right outside of Beijing. And after I spoke, the general of the Chinese military came up to me in his full military garb and said that they wanted to let me know that the Chinese military does not feed their soldiers GMOs. And right next to him there were two of the women who were right-hand people to Putin, they were the food experts and they said, and we do not allow GMOs in Russia at all. They can’t come in at all.
We’ve tested for glyphosate. We found 95% of the military samples positive for glyphosate, which was very similar to fast food and school lunches. The levels of glyphosate in military food were, were all above what is considered harmful, which is 0.1 parts per billion by, you know, Saralini shows that that amount is, is harmful also. Dr. Don Huber. So the levels of glyphosate, which is a carcinogen, an endocrine disruptor. It causes liver disease, kidney disease, neurological damage, nervous system damage. It damages sperm in four different ways, and it’s been shown to androgynise baby girls. Were very concerned about the levels of glyphosate in 95% of the military food. We also found 100% of the military food samples were positive for pesticides. Many of them were banned. Some of them are extremely harmful. And these banned pesticides and veteran drugs and hormones indicate that either illegal use is happening or that this food is coming from other countries that do not follow the regulations of US, Canada and Europe. And so we’re concerned about meat sources, particularly processed in China or coming from Africa or South America, that do not adhere to higher regulatory standards. And to us, that indicates that a good solution would be for American soldiers to have American regeneratively raised meat.”
Interesting, inspiring and honest information about how we can overcome the corporation’s industrial food system by buying real food from local farmers.
Watch; Farmacy: Manifesto on the Future of Food, Farmacy UK, 14 November 2025
‘What is the future of food? A radical look at how the food we eat affects the humans we are. Farmacy’s Manifesto is a call for a food revolution. With our bodies ailing and our mental health straining, humanity needs a radically different way of eating and farming. Tracing a path from the health of the soil to the health of human beings, Farmacy highlights how food is the connecting agent between our mental, physical and planetary wellbeing. Let’s vote with our forks.
Manifesto on the Future of Food, narrated by Woody Harrelson.’
When the zionist lobby is promoting islamophobia, perhaps we should look a little closer of the many ways their culture trumps ours.
Islam prohibits usury, (charging interest on loans), and believes that money should not be used to make money, but instead that wealth must be generated through legitimate trade and investment in assets. Now that we are drowning in a corrupt banking scam, the future must lie in the Islamic belief that money should not be manipulated for gain but used as a medium for fair and honest exchange.
Read; Why Islamic finance could provide an ethical model for funding the green transition, 20 February 2026
‘In recent years, green finance has become a key policy in developed countries. The term refers to the loans and investments that fund the transition to a low-carbon economy. But one of the main challenges in this area is the gap between environmental claims and realities – so-called “greenwashing”.
Because of this, alternative finance models that emphasise a direct link between capital and actual economic activities have been receiving more attention. The Islamic financial system is one such alternative. In this system, financing (in other words, lending) is legitimate when it is linked to real economic activities that benefit people and society.
Islamic finance, with its core values of fairness and social responsibility, could be a means of enhancing credibility and transparency within green finance. In other words, its principles could be seen as more than just an ideological or faith alternative to the conventional system.
Unlike other models, Islamic finance emphasises a direct link between financing and actual assets or activities. Profits must come from work – simply lending money to make a profit is not permitted. This allows for a clearer definition of green projects, helping to ensure that resources are spent on activities with a specific economic and social purpose.’
I wasn’t impressed by the first few minutes of the film about King Charles’s book Harmony. However, the King genuinely cares about organic farming and thinks we should re-connect with Nature, so it’s worth watching.
Film and read; Charles III’s philosophy of harmony by Esme Partridge, Engelsberg Ideas, 17 February 2026
Intro; ‘The documentary looks back to his early interventions in the 1970s when, he reflects, he saw the dangers of the ‘great acceleration’ of industrial modernity. With the so-called green revolution came a fatal loss of biodiversity, with pesticides isolating only one crop and squandering the rest. This, the King says, violates the ‘interconnected web’ of nature, in which diversity must flourish for the survival of the whole.’
CO2
Politicians have no more respect for farmers than they did for miners. NetZero is a great smoke screen to get rid of those farmers that put feeding the nation above covering their land in solar panels to provide expensive energy for their AI and cloud computing.
Watch; British farmers at risk as a result of Labour’s NetZero plans, GBNewsOnline, 21 February 2026
Presenter; “For British farmers times are tough with rising costs, slashed profits and government policy causing struggles at every turn. More than a third could go out of business by the end of the decade. But now a new report has found that NetZero also poses an existential threat to British farmers.”
Farmer; “There appears to have been a decision at government level to make farming ever more difficult. And NetZero is being applied, possibly without consideration for the long term implications for most farmers right now. Losses of a thousand pounds a day will be realistic for the next 12 months. None of them can survive. So the question has to be, ‘is it an accident or is it deliberate or is it ignorance?’ I don’t know.”
Presenter; “According to research from the Resolution Foundation, decarbonisation plans could drive the average farm income down by a fifth. One of their economists, Zachary Leather, said the transition to NetZero in agriculture is set to add just 1% to the weekly shop by 2050. But while the impact for consumers is small, pushing the cost onto farmers instead would pose big risks to their livelihoods. Policy must ensure the costs of greening agriculture are borne by other parts of the supply chain or through small increases in food prices, rather than by farmers who are already struggling.”
Ed Milliband; “Today, we set aside up to £1 billion of funding from Great British Energy to invest. This will offer grants to local authorities and community groups to support projects in their early stages, loans and project finance to support construction and operation, and funding to help communities buy a stake in larger renewable projects in their areas.”
Presenter; “Yet whilst the government announces energy support for local communities, potential plans for livestock reduction and giving up land to solar farms is leaving farmers feeling forgotten.”
Farmer; “Solar is not very efficient, wind is very dependent on conditions, and we have 7,000 dairy farmers out there with lots of cows producing muck. If that muck went into AD plants and subsidies went to the farmers, they could produce vast amounts of electricity from a natural resource. So the government is doing nothing to help farmers and up the chain, we have people who will still make a profit when the farmer can’t put food on his own table.”
Useful facts for anyone suggesting sheep can be grazed under solar panels.
Read; They can graze sheep, can’t they? Lincolnshire Against Needless Destruction, 15 January 2026
‘In well designed small scale solar farms it may be possible to graze smaller breed sheep but with industrial scale solar farms this would not be suitable. Any proposal suggesting use of sheep should be scrutinized to establish flock size and where exactly on the site they will likely be kept and how the welfare issues will be mitigated. In reality the proposals will likely be putting forward a very small flock that will live in the mitigated wildlife areas of the site as natural lawnmowers and not be a food production flock within the areas of panels.
Here are a few of the risks:
Fly Strike Risk: Warm, shaded, and moist microclimates beneath panels create ideal conditions for blowfly larvae, increasing the risk of fly strike—a painful and potentially fatal condition for sheep.
Mechanical Hazards: Tracking panels introduce moving parts that can trap or injure sheep. Emergency shutdown buttons and exposed wiring pose electrocution and operational risks.
Infrastructure Damage: Sheep rubbing, chewing, and trampling are incompatible with fragile solar components such as cabling, junction boxes, and glass panels.
Operational Challenges: Herding sheep around tightly packed arrays is logistically difficult. Limited forage beneath panels often requires supplemental feeding, undermining claims of sustainable grazing.
Welfare Issues: Requirements for parasite control, forage rotation, supplementary feeding due to reduced quality of grazing.’
Anthropocentric climate change is being used as an excuse for corporations to continue to screw farmers with BS like ‘slower-growing birds typically require more feed and water and produce higher greenhouse gas emissions due to their longer lifespan.’
Read; Fast-growing breed row erupts after firms quit Better Chicken Commitment
FarmingUK, 20 February 2026
‘While animal welfare organisations see slower-growing breeds as essential, parts of the sector point to environmental trade-offs, noting that slower-growing birds typically require more feed and water and produce higher greenhouse gas emissions due to their longer lifespan.
Industry estimates suggest slower-growing breeds can consume around 10% more feed and significantly more water than standard broilers, with associated increases in emissions.
For companies with public NetZero targets, this presents what they describe as a complex balancing act between welfare ambitions and climate commitments.
Large-scale buyers also highlight the challenge of sourcing sufficient volumes of slower-growing birds. Despite growing awareness, such breeds are estimated to account for only around 5% of UK chicken production — far below the levels required to convert major national restaurant supply chains.’
If debating a subject is banned, we should immediately question the narrative being promoted.
Watch; The Cult | A NetZero Watch Short Film, NetZero Watch, 16 February 2026
Colin Brazier; “The NetZero project didn’t arise from nothing. It was the result of a seismic cultural change in our civilisation. This change reshaped our universities, our media, and even seeks to police our very thoughts. As a result, what should be a technical debate about emissions and energy has become a moral crusade, one that cannot be questioned. The question is no longer what’s true, but who is allowed to speak? And when a civilisation can no longer question its beliefs, it loses its grip on reality and soon after, its freedom. The university, home to the most brilliant minds in our country, pursuing the great questions of culture and science courageously, with only one concern, the truth. You could propose any theory you like, provided you did one thing, namely, you defended it. Advancing knowledge, not in spite of disagreements, but because of it. Not anymore. Today, academia has been captured by a new dogma, and one of its most important pillars is climate alarmism. The science, they say, is settled. Franklin Delano Roosevelt once spoke of four freedoms, of speech, of belief, from want, from fear. But in the climate era, two of those have quietly been removed. The new orthodoxy says even questioning climate policy isn’t just wrong, it’s immoral, it’s denial, it’s disinformation. Dissenters aren’t just thinkers, they are now considered to be heretics. Remember Climategate emails showing top scientists boasting about how to keep sceptical papers out of the scientific literature? The scandal should have shocked academia. Instead, it became a footnote. Buried. Scientists who question the climate narrative pay the price. Careers end quietly, offices disappear, grants vanish. Roger Pilkey Jr., Judith Curry, Leonard Bengson, all punished or othered, not for fraud or failure, but for asking the wrong questions. Search climate sceptic today and you’ll find words like denier, crank, fossil-funded. It’s the oldest trick in politics. Delegitimise the opponent, pretend their motives are corrupt, then you never have to engage with their arguments.”
Read; The decades-long “climate change” plan to strip away personal freedom, wealth and property by Rhoda Wilson, The Exposé, 13 February 2026
‘The Rockefeller family and the Trilateral Commission have been orchestrating a sinister plan under the guise of “climate change.” This scheme raises serious threats to individual freedom, personal wealth and property rights. What’s really at stake in this agenda and how might it impact our way of life? Jesse Smith dives into the implications and uncovers the truth behind the headlines.’
‘Through their Quality of the Environment programme, also launched in 1974, the Rockefellers helped pioneer climate research at US universities such as the University of Michigan, University of California at Davis, Pennsylvania State University and Utah State University. They also played a key role in convening early climate conferences. Through foundation Fellowships in Environmental Affairs, they supported researchers who were instrumental in forging the alleged scientific consensus on man-made global warming. Those who opposed the theory often had their careers and lives destroyed by deliberate sidelining, censorship and cancellation of grants and other funding. The technocratic climate agenda steadily advanced through these NGOs operating in clandestine unison, but it took another Rockefeller minion to propel the faux climate crisis to the forefront as the most pertinent issue facing the world. His name was Maurice Strong.
Strong was a Rockefeller (and Rothschild) made man through and through. In addition to his connection to David, Strong also forged close relationships with his brother Laurance and Steven Rockefeller, grandson of former US Vice President Nelson Rockefeller. Laurance, the third son of John D. Rockefeller Jr., is most remembered as a devout conservationist. He served as a longtime trustee, president and chairman of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund (“RBF”). He was also a member of the CFR, Trilaterals and Bilderbergs, which Strong was also connected to. Laurance was a founding member and trustee of The Conservation Foundation established in 1947. In 1985 the organisation became affiliated with the World Wildlife Fund (“WWF”) started by transhumanist and eugenicist Julian Huxley, and fully merged with it in 1990. Strong, a lifetime affiliate, served as the WWF’s Vice President in 1977, serving under Prince Philip, who once said that if he were reincarnated, he wished “to be returned to Earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”
Geoengineering
Sign; Petition to Stop Geoengineering; James Roguski; 26 February 2026
Petition to President Donald J. Trump
Stop Geoengineering Experiments on the American people
Preamble: President Donald J. Trump, we respectfully urge you to take decisive action to prevent any geoengineering experimentation or deployment that could threaten the American people.
Whereas: If deployed at scale, geoengineering would have profound, unpredictable, and potentially irreversible consequences—including disrupted weather and rainfall patterns, extreme drought, risks to planetary food security and ecological diversity, unintended warming or excessive cooling, stratospheric ozone depletion, greater exposure to air pollutants and ultraviolet exposure with associated health risks, acid rain, diminution of solar power systems, and geopolitical conflict over control of the global thermostat. These impacts would harm biodiversity, agriculture, and human health on a global scale.
Whereas: Unlike traditional technologies, geoengineering cannot be meaningfully tested without large-scale deployment. In effect, it proposes turning the Earth into a laboratory—locking humanity into dangerous outcomes that may be impossible to reverse and could worsen the very problems they claim to solve. America should never consent to policies that treat its citizens—or the rest of the world—as test subjects.
Whereas: We cannot afford to be distracted by the false promise of speculative, high-risk technologies pushed by special interests and global bureaucracies. The United States must lead with prudence, humility, and respect for natural systems—not reckless experimentation.
Therefore: We respectfully call on you to:
1. Immediately prohibit federal funding, authorisation, or participation in geoengineering research, testing, or deployment.
2. Require full transparency and investigation into any proposed geoengineering activities that could affect U.S. airspace, land, or waters.
3. Protect American sovereignty, public health, and environmental integrity by rejecting efforts by other nations to promote geoengineering.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN THE PETITION
Watch; Why are they doing this? Newsmax, 5 February 2026
‘Kristen Meghan worked for the US Army as an environmental specialist and during her employment witnessed what was happening with the toxic materials being used in the geoengineering programs.’
Kristen Meghan; “I think there’s a multitude of reasonings. You control the weather, you can handicap many people. We did it flooding the Ho Chi Minh Trail. But when you had this huge climate change initiative, we needed to find ways to dim the sun and decrease the solar load. So this is fear based. I also think it’s financially incentivised through betting on crops and again, handicapping anyone in war. So it takes away the organic from anything organic you’re buying because this is then sprayed into the air and then gravity brings it down. Eventually the rain brings it down and it is all over all of us. What are these chemicals doing to people? Well, a lot of them are heavy alkaline metals and salts. And what they do, again is that synergistic toxicity. You’re breathing it in, you have the dermal absorption and an inhalation. It does depend on relative humidity and different weather patterns. I live in Michigan, so we have all seasons on the same day, the dissipation rates are faster when you ingest that. It is eating away at your gut health. When they’re using strontium and barium, those things bioaccumulate in the bones. It also displaces potassium. And if anyone’s ever had low potassium that causes a massive issue with your nerves and your heart, and it can mimic a heart attack. So we’re getting massively bombarded because again, different routes of exposure and, depending on where you live, you can be more exposed already because you have background elements in your drinking water.”
Listen; Frankenskies – The Lies In The Sky Exposed nogps, 3 February 2026
‘Listen to Matt Landman, the filmmaker that brought us the excellent documentary on geoengineering – Frankenskies – The Lies In The Sky Exposed.’
Matt Landman; “A lot of us know about chemtrails. Some call it geoengineering. Today we’re going to talk about the different acronyms that the military industrial complex hide behind. Hidden in plain sight. So NASA, with a budget of $80 million per day, taxpayer money, NASA has a programme called Care C A R E. I encourage you to look this up on their website. It’s called the Charged Aerosol Release Experiment. CARE well, they don’t really care. And that term is kind of like rubbing it in your face, where they make noctilucent clouds by spraying heavy metals. And they even say this on their website. We spray aluminium, barium and strontium to experiment with the sky and make fake clouds. The budget is unchecked. How much of their spending goes towards the daily spraying of the chemtrails? To me, I think a lot of that $80 million a day goes towards the spraying of the skies. Also look up the programme SPICE, that stands for the Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering. Another term out of the Department of Energy that I highly recommend you look up is TAP, the Tropospheric Aerosol Programme. The Tropospheric Aerosol programme started in 2001, just before the biggest distraction of our lives. Well, the lockdowns were now the biggest destruction of our lives, but before that it was 9/11. Right before 9/11, the Department of Energy came out with a Tropospheric Aerosol Programme and they outlined their entire budget of how they’re going to spray the skies, how much money they’re going to spend, how much money they’re going to spend on risk aversion and detection assessment, like not getting caught and figuring out how to like spray the skies without people knowing. Another programme I encourage you to look up is SATAN, it’s out of the UK government and it stands for the Stratospheric Aerosol Transport and Nucleation Programme. Publications out of the UK government, which they officially launched their spraying programme last year, where they say, ‘we’re going to spend US$66 million and start spraying the skies publicly’. To dim the sun, to block the light and turn it to darkness, essentially, because it’s a war of light and dark. They call their programme Satan, the Stratospheric Aerosol Transport and Nucleation Programme. I highly recommend you look that one up because the acronym is just baffling, mind blowing. So, we think the terms are just geoengineering chemtrails, but it gets a lot deeper than that. So I encourage you to try to look up these acronyms that I’ve shared with you. And there’s many more, but I’ll leave it at that for now. And thank you. Wisdom is power.”
Censorship / Surveillance / Coercion/ Corruption / Blackmail
Watch; How Epstein Was Only the Front for a Global Power Network | Whitney Webb’s Terrifying Discovery, History’s Darkest Hour; 25 February 2026
Epstein Files Exposed: Wexner, Shadow Networks & Hidden Power — Deep Dive
In this powerful interview originally aired on Redacted News, investigative journalist Whitney Webb breaks down what the newly released Epstein Files reveal — and what they may be designed to hide. Instead of focusing on surface-level scandals, Webb examines the deeper financial, intelligence, and political structures surrounding Jeffrey Epstein.
Key topics include the extraordinary relationship between Epstein and billionaire retail magnate Leslie Wexner, including Epstein’s sweeping power of attorney, allegations of money laundering, and possible links to organized crime and Iran-Contra–era logistics networks such as Southern Air Transport and routes connected to Rickenbacker Airport in Ohio.
Webb also connects the network to the Clinton-era “China Gate” controversy, arguing that intelligence-linked smuggling and financial operations may have been far larger than publicly acknowledged. The role of the Wexner Foundation is examined, including its leadership programs and ties to influential political circles such as AIPAC, potentially creating layers of institutional protection.
The discussion further explores Wexner’s long-standing ties to Ohio State University, questions surrounding institutional abuse scandals, and separate misconduct allegations involving executives connected to his corporate empire. Beyond trafficking, Webb emphasizes Epstein’s alleged function as a financial operative — referencing forex activity, currency destabilization, high-level banking connections, and implications for U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding Iran.
Finally, Webb previews upcoming reporting linking Dubai Ports World, Andrew Farkas, Virgin Islands infrastructure, proprietary telecom systems, missing HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development) funds, and threads extending into Middle East policy during the Trump administration — suggesting the Epstein network’s reach extended far beyond personal scandal into global finance and geopolitics.
The only hero in US politics, Thomas Massie, member of the Republican Party, demands justice for those in the Epstein Files exposed for child sex trafficking and corruption.
Watch; Thomas Massie Explodes On DOJ Over Epstein Handling, Names People He Wants Prosecuted; Forbes Breaking News, 24 February 2026
‘On the House floor, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) slammed the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein Files.
Congressman Thomas Massie; “Congress created the Department of Justice. Congress funds the Department of Justice, and Congress is responsible for the oversight of the Department of Justice. When will we see Justice? I’ll tell you what I’ve not seen. I’ve not seen any arrests. From the revelations in the Epstein files. Over 3 million documents describing horrible things, describing unspeakable things, much of it redacted. Over two dozen people have resigned, CEOs, members of government worldwide. But I haven’t seen any arrests or investigations here in the United States from this Department of Justice. Prince Andrew Duke of York, who has since been stripped of his royalty, his royal titles, due to his affiliation with Jeffrey Epstein, has been arrested. Peter Mandelson, who previously served as UK’s Ambassador to the United States, resigned in disgrace from the United Kingdom’s House of Lords and the Labour Party, and he’s been arrested. Former Prime Minister of Norway, Thorbjorn Jogland has been charged. But we don’t see any charges, arrests or investigations in the United States. What do we see? We see our FBI director celebrating in the locker room at the Olympics overseas. It’s fine to be proud of this country, but we should be proud of this country because we have a system of justice that works and yet we do not. Who are the men that should be investigated? I’ll name them right here. Leon Black. You don’t even have to see past the redactions to see that this man needs to be investigated. Jess Staley, accused of terrible things. It’s right there in the files. Why is he not being investigated? And Leslie Wexner. Why did the FBI list him as a co-conspirator in their own documents in a child sex trafficking case and then tell him, according to him, that they had no questions for him? Why is that? Well, the Epstein Files Transparency act requires the DOJ and the FBI to disclose to us their internal memos and emails about how they made those decisions, whether to prosecute or not prosecute. Yet they have not delivered those memos. And we still don’t have the memos and documents and emails from 2008 to explain why Jeffrey Epstein was given such a light sentence in what would have been an open and shut case of child sex trafficking, which allowed him to go back and recommit these terrible crimes, create hundreds of more victims and ensnare so many other people in his conspiracy. Where are those documents that describe those decisions? We need justice. We want the Department of Justice to get to work. And that’s what they need to do now.”
Watch; Jacob Cohen: Epstein was ‘pushed by Mossad’, footage used for blackmail, Al Mayadeen English, 24 February 2026
Intro; ‘Appearing as a guest on Al Mayadeen’s The Proximate Aspect, author Jacob Cohen discussed how convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was “pushed by the Mossad” and used to build a blackmail network targeting powerful figures. Cohen argued that Epstein, initially “only a mathematics teacher,” was elevated into elite financial circles with a $100 million portfolio and developed connections across politics, finance, and entertainment. He claimed that Epstein “built a huge system with cameras and recordings” and invited influential individuals to his private island, creating compromising material. Cohen also pointed to Epstein’s ties with Ehud Barak and the Maxwell family, claiming these relationships were part of a broader intelligence-linked operation. Discussing why Trump consented to the release of the Epstein files, if he was “blackmailed by the Mossad,” Cohen stated, “They cannot release the most important things,” but “they give the people something to bite on.”
Watch; Epstein Atrocities and the Fate of Our Children, Global Research, 7 February 2026
Drago Bosnic; “When we see the contents of the Epstein files, when we compare that to what we knew and what we know now, we see the horrifying nature of these people. So not only that they should not be in power, all of those people who participated in this should be in jail at best. I would probably prefer a harsher punishment, but of course we’re not going to get into that. But anyway, the entire thing is completely horrifying. It seems to me that all of those who called us conspiracy theorists, all of us who called us crazy or whatever, they all owe us an apology because the reality is ten times worse than what we were saying. So that means that we didn’t even know the extent of the crimes that these people committed. And these crimes were committed against the most vulnerable part of our population, kids, including toddlers, including even babies, I have to say, because some of the kids that were, I have to say brutally murdered, and that’s an understatement, they were just several months old, some of the kids that were killed by this cabal of paedophiles and I don’t know how else to call them. So I remember because when I started working for Infobricks years ago, I and my colleagues, we covered the issue of child trafficking in NATO-occupied Ukraine. And of course everything we wrote was based on very real reports. And this was deemed Russian propaganda. This was deemed totally false. We were fact checked by the so-called disinformation, by the disservice. We were fact checked and also proclaimed disinformation because of what we were saying by these fact checkers from the EU. The truth is the Epstein files revealed that everything we said was true. But as I said, it’s not just true, it’s far, far worse, unfortunately, I have to say, and it seems to me that the vast majority of Western politicians who have been in power in the last at least 30 years have been heavily involved in child trafficking, in paedophilia, in essentially child rape and several other things. Extremely graphic things I don’t want to get into because I don’t want anyone to have their lunch end up on the floor because it really is horrifying to even think what was done to these kids. I have to say Serbia and my country and my people were also among the first to push back against this because we were attacked by the same people who have been killing kids for decades. The Serbian province of Kosovo was taken away, it was given to Albanian narco-terrorists. And guess what they did in return for giving them the country or sovereignty, whatever you want to call it, they helped facilitate the kidnapping and transfer of over a million kids from all over the world to these deranged elites who have done all sorts of monstrous things to these kids. And I just want to say that they knew very well that this was happening because these kids vanished without a trace.”
George Galloway’s summary of the Epstein network
Watch; MONOLOGUE: One big dirty club, George Galloway, 1 February 2026
George Galloway; “The revelations that have emerged are simply devastating to the entire credibility of the western political media and business class. They are all in it. It’s one big dirty club and you’re not in it, and thank your lucky stars for that. For the secrets that have tumbled out of this latest dump, and I use the word advisedly, a sewage dump, the revelations that have dumped on us are truly breathtaking. We’re talking about male rape, we’re talking about female rape, we’re talking about child rape, we’re talking about child Impregnation, we’re talking about male sodomy of drugged victims, we’re talking about president after president of the American Republic accused in FBI documents of raping men and women, boys and girls, we’re talking about murder, we’re talking about cannibalism, we’re talking about the eating of human flesh sacrificed in satanic rituals. And it’s all in the Epstein files. Now, where does one begin with a dump like that? Well, let’s start with the royal families. The British royal family tonight is in ruins.”
I doubt Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffery Epstein are reunited on some island but today, anything is possible!
Watch; Will the real Maxwell please stand up?! Because that sure wasn’t her on the video, George Galloway, 16 February 2026
George Galloway; “It’s a while since I’ve seen Ghislaine Maxwell, but she has developed an extraordinary likeness to Mike Myers to Austin Powers in the time, short time, actually, that she has been in an open, soft prison in the United States, at least for the latter part of the sentence that she has served so far. It begs the question, why would they put up a fake Ghislaine Maxwell, albeit with a long prison vantage point? The camera was seldom up close, but all it needed was some wag to blow the picture up. And I don’t just mean the extra pounds that the pasta in the prison has, of course, put on Ghislaine Maxwell, a famously thin faced woman. But no amount of pasta can change the length and the shape of your nose. And no amount of pasta can alter the distance between your eyes. And I’ve got to tell you, as someone who knows Ghislaine Maxwell, that wasn’t Ghislaine Maxwell in that hearing. It was an entirely different woman. Which begs the question, was the corpse that was carted out of the penitentiary in New York a different Jeffrey Epstein? And if so, are the couple now reunited somewhere? I don’t know. On an island? Probably. Perhaps now. Once upon a time, what I am saying to you now would seem completely unhinged, and some will pretend that it is still unhinged. But the rest of us know that so many conspiracy theories have turned into conspiracy facts that it is highly likely that what I am saying to you right now is true. And there could only be two reasons for it. One would be that Ghislaine Maxwell, like Jeffrey Epstein before her, has hanged herself with paper towels from the door of her cell. Or that Ghislaine Maxwell is no longer in that prison. And that somebody, some patsy, presumably using her voice, because I would say it was definitely her voice, someone is serving the time for her. Which makes the demand for a pardon all the more urgent because it would mean that an entirely innocent woman was serving time in the United States prison system for crimes for which Ghislaine Maxwell was found guilty.”
Virginia Giuffre said Epstein planned to use her to potentially blackmail powerful people.
Watch; Exposing Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking empire, 60 Minutes Australia, 16 February 2026
Presenter; “What sort of men were you being trafficked to?”
Virginia Giuffre; “I was trafficked to a lot of types of different men. I was trafficked to other billionaires, I was trafficked to politicians, professors, even royalty. So the circles that Jeffrey Epstein ran in weren’t your typical setting of human trafficking, you know, it was the elite of the world, it was the people who run the world, it was the most powerful people in the world and those are our leaders, those are the people that we are supposed to look up to. It’s corrupt. It’s corrupt to the core.”
Presenter; “Why do you think Epstein did that to you? And what. Why do you think he gave you over to other men?”
Virginia Giuffre; “I think for Epstein it was a miryad of reasons. It wasn’t just one reason at all, it wasn’t just doing it to make money or anything like that. I don’t even know if he ever made money from it, in my opinion it was to show off to his friends, to always have a bevvy of girls around him. It was like going to a dinner party, you bring a bottle of champagne. I was the bottle of champagne. And that’s who was shared with his friends or his people that he knew. Some of them were just acquaintances. And the other reason, and he’s touched on this subject with me before, so I can use the words from his mouth, is that he used me as a form of blackmail. So these people would owe them favours, owe him favours. So, I mean, there was a many of reasons that he did it, but the biggest reason in my mind was because he wanted to always have something on someone just in case he needed it.”
Watch; The Epstein Scandal, Decline and Fall, 5 February 2026
Alexander McKay; “The point about rampant sexual abuse in ruling class institutions in the Anglo-American empire is this, though the starting point to understand this is that we live under an imperialist system which as Lenin stated is the highest stage of capitalism. If you are in the hierarchy of the Anglo-American capitalist system, not just now but for hundreds of years, what you have had to do to get there is to profit from a system which reduces human beings to simple centres of profit generation. And if you have to work hundreds, thousands of human beings to death, then you do so if you are a capitalist because it is profitable to do so. What that creates is a mentality within the capitalist class by necessity which is cold, brutal and inhuman. Because you see the working class as being not just beneath you but being unworthy of human consideration, they’re just there to be exploited and disposed of. That’s the mentality of the upper levels of the capitalist class. In fact all levels of the capitalist class share that mentality, so if that’s the kind of mentality the system breeds in those who own the means of production, those who control the state, those who control academia, the entertainment industry. The ideas of any epoch, as Marx said, are the ideas of the ruling class. So their mentality, their ideology, their foul and depraved way that they see the world bleeds into all of the institutions of capitalism, of the state of academia, media, the entertainment industry. Now we combine that with the fact that Anglo- American imperialism has been the dominating power in the world for 200 years, really, with some competition at various different points. It is an entirely parasitic system now based on extracting profit from all over the world, on exploiting, indeed hyper-exploiting every area of the world they possibly can in order to keep a wholly parasitic non-productive capitalist class in the style to which it has become accustomed. And again let’s go back to the kind of behaviour that this creates. They see the entire world as their profit centre. It is there to benefit them and only benefit them. Human life is only worth something if it can be used to turn a profit for them. Particularly this is true after the collapse and due to the counter-revolutions of 1991 of the Soviet Union, the Eastern Bloc, Socialist Yugoslavia etc, they had an unrivalled 35- year period now in which they could go anywhere and do anything they liked. And what this does is this creates like late period Roman Emperor stuff. Because the capitalist class operates now also operated for decades with no limitations on their power whatsoever. Donald Trump said a very interesting thing in his recent interview, I believe it, with the Washington Post, where he said the only restriction on him was what his conscience told him. Well, if you’re familiar at all with Donald Trump and his class, there’s no such thing as a conscience. There’s no such thing as any kind of restraint. Again, these people have almost limitless amounts of money. They have the ability to go anywhere and do anything and because of their class position, they see everybody else in the world as existing only to serve them, make them profit or amuse them in some way. And what there that leads you is exactly the world that the Marquis de Sade described in his novels, exactly the world that Pier Paolo Pasolini put onto film in Salo when he adapted the Marquis de Sade novel into a film you will only want to see once, let’s just put it that way. But the point about de Sade and Pasolini’s adaptation was that Pasolini’s adaptation of the work of de Sade was meant to be all about fascist Italy, but if you read de Sade and you are aware of what Pasolini put in that film, it’s Epstein stuff, it is a ruling class run completely out of control, and when they run completely out of control with no constraints on them, this is what they get up to. And it’s not only the fact that they get up to this due to the fact that there’s no constraints on them, but it’s particularly true of Western Europe and Anglo American ruling class institutions. The systematic rape and abuse of women and children is embedded in all of these institutions, and this is no longer in doubt. The first to get found out were the Catholic Church 20 years ago. Now they were revealed as not only engaging in all this and not only covering it up, but promoting the men that committed horrible crimes. Because when you are a tiny elite group trying to manage states that consist of hundreds of millions of people, it is very important that you have a strict code of silence, therefore, they all need dirt on each other, therefore those who commit hideous crimes are promoted and those who cover up for them are promoted because everybody has dirt on each other, therefore, if anybody tries to go rogue, you can easily crush their reputation and crush them by revealing some of the things that they’ve done. So this is why it is institutionalised, because this is how tightly knit cabals are bonded together, going all the way back to the days of ancient Greece. It is to bond them together in shared rituals of psychopathic behaviour. That’s what late stage imperialism requires of a ruling class, and that is what the British private school system and its American equivalent literally ingrain into, particularly the men from the earliest possible age, particularly those who are sent away from home to school. So the very nature of imperialism requires a ruling class that are cold blooded, sociopathic or psychopathic individuals whose contempt and completely inhuman nature is bred into them from the earliest possible age. All of the institutions that they run have this abusive, horrifically exploitative, criminal nature about them, because that’s the nature of the class that actually runs the show in the Anglo-American empire. And therefore, to understand the criminality of Epstein, and I’ll conclude on this point, you have to understand that he wasn’t out of kilter with the class he worked for. He is representative of the ruling classes of Britain, America, France, Italy, Germany, etc. And the Epstein network was rooted and indeed had got its start as an anti-communist network that stretched all the way across America, Britain, Europe, into Israel, into West Asia, and Epstein was the man who inherited this from other people such as Adnan Khashoggi, etc. The notorious arms dealer. So, as friend of the show Sopo Japaridze said on Twitter yesterday, the way to understand the Epstein network as an intelligence operation is that it was an anti-communist organisation, and that’s the correct way to look at it.”
Epstein being a Russian spy is an absurd joke cooked up by the ruling cabal’s PR machine, namely the mainstream media.
Watch; Bassem Youssef used satire to prove Jeffrey Epstein was an Israeli spy, not Russian, MiddleEastEye, 13 February 2026
Bassem Youssef; “I mean, the evidence is there that he is actually a Russian asset. His girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, was the daughter of a Mossad super spy. He was represented by you, Mr. Dershowitz, Israel’s favourite lawyer, who you’re also a lawyer to the Mossad, which of course, everything you tell us will be true. Ehud Barak was at his place the whole time, he fled to Israel when he was charged with sex crimes and he was pictured wearing an IDF shirt, he was funded by pro-Israel fanatics, he worked for the Rothschilds, he donated to pro-Israel student groups, he was responsible for the Wexner’s group’s pro-Israel philanthropy, he supported Israeli settlement projects, his friends were all zionists, he referred to us as Goyim, he was involved in Israel diplomacy effort, he brokered security deals with Israel, and even a former Israeli intelligence officer, Ari Ben-Menashi, like Mr. Ryan Grimm said, he said he ran a honeypot for Israel. So yes, of course he was definitely a Russian spy. Makes sense!”
Lowkey reveals how Peter Mandelson gave advanced notice of market movements to banker, paedophile, Epstein.
Watch; Epstein Linked to Downing Street Leaks! VoicesForGaza, 15 February 2026
Lowkey; “So here was the number two in government at the time (Mandelson), giving advance notice of market movements to this paedophile banker and Israeli agent, Jeffrey Epstein, and updating him on all the goings on inside 10 Downing Street. This information that Mandelson was leaking to Jeffrey Epstein, who himself was working with his own clients in finance, was exactly what he needed to manipulate markets and generate millions, if not billions, on the back of working people.”
Read; Epstein, the Rothschilds and the global cabal, Paul Cudenec, 11 February 2026
‘The recent release of a tidal wave of shocking information from the Jeffrey Epstein papers confirmed a lot of things. Top of the list has to be the utterly demonic nature of the ruling global cabal to which he belonged. Many of us have heard this before – such as via Anneke Lucas – but these monsters really do rape, torture and murder innocent children. It was also confirmed that Epstein was very close to the world of banking and in particular to the Rothschilds, as Escapekey sets out in detail in an excellent article. Epstein even presented himself to Peter Thiel of Palantir by saying: “As you probably know I represent the Rothschilds…” Escapekey notes: “Epstein sat between the Rothschild branches, owned by none, useful to all”. He was their “fixer” in multiple realms. For instance, in 2013 when Ariane de Rothschild was irritated by the popularity of French comedian Dieudonné – and his critique of the bankster clique to which she belongs – she asked Epstein to do something about it. A few weeks later the French authorities started banning Dieudonné’s shows and trying to silence him – a totalitarian assault on free speech that continues to this day.’
Read; Flawed ‘Epstein Files’ disclosures undermine accountability for grave crimes against women and girls: UN experts, UNHR Press Release, 16 February 2026
‘The so-called ‘Epstein Files’ contain disturbing and credible evidence of systematic and large-scale sexual abuse, trafficking and exploitation of women and girls, UN experts said today. According to the experts, these acts could amount to sexual slavery, reproductive violence, enforced disappearance, torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, and femicide. “These crimes were committed against a backdrop of supremacist beliefs, racism, corruption, extreme misogyny, and the commodification and dehumanisation of women and girls from different parts of the world,” the experts said. “The ‘Epstein Files’, which are suggestive of the existence of a global criminal enterprise have shocked the conscience of humanity and raised terrifying implications of the level of impunity for such crimes.” “So grave is the scale, nature, systematic character, and transnational reach of these atrocities against women and girls, that a number of them may reasonably meet the legal threshold of crimes against humanity,” they said.
Under international criminal law, crimes against humanity occur when acts such as sexual slavery, rape, enforced prostitution, trafficking, persecution, torture, or murder are committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population with, with knowledge of the attack. The experts warned the components reported patterns may meet this threshold and these crimes must be prosecuted in all competent national and international courts. “All the allegations contained in the ‘Epstein Files’ are egregious in nature and require independent, thorough, and impartial investigation, as well as inquiries to determine how such crimes could have taken place for so long,” they said. The disclosure process is taking place under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law on 19 November 2025. On 30 January 2026, after delays, the Department of Justice released a major tranche of material, including more than 3 million pages, 2,000 videos and 180,000 images.
Despite the scale of disclosures, experts warned of serious compliance failures and botched redactions that exposed sensitive victim information, with harm often occurring before records were withdrawn. Accountability has been limited, with only one close associate under investigation. Under international human rights law, States are obligated to prevent, investigate and punish violence against women and girls, including acts committed by private actors.
“The grave errors in the release process underscore the urgent need for victim-centered standard operating procedures for disclosure and redaction, so that no victim suffers further harm,” they said. The experts hailed the courage and resilience of victims in seeking accountability at significant personal cost. A group of these survivors recently met with the UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls.
“The failure to safeguard their privacy puts them at risk of retaliation and stigma. The reluctance to fully disclose information or broaden investigations, has left many survivors feeling retraumatised and subjected to what they describe as “institutional gaslighting.” The experts urged US Authorities to urgently remedy these failures, ensure full disclosure to understand methods of the criminal enterprise, full remedy and reparation for victims for all harms sustained, and end impunity for perpetrators. Statutes of limitations preventing prosecution of grave crimes attributed to the Epstein criminal enterprise must be lifted. “Any suggestion that it is time to move on from the ‘Epstein files’ is unacceptable. It represents a failure of responsibility towards victims,” they said. “Resignations of implicated individuals alone are not an adequate substitute for criminal accountability,” the experts said. They welcomed steps by some governments to probe current and former officials and private individuals named in the files. They called on other states to do the same.
“Failure by governments to effectively investigate, and prosecute those responsible for these crimes, including by complicity or acquiescence, where jurisdiction exists, risks undermining legal frameworks aimed at preventing and responding to violence against women and girls,” they warned. “It is imperative that governments act decisively to hold perpetrators accountable,” the experts said. “No one is too wealthy or too powerful to be above the law.”
Read; 10 Things I Learned From the Epstein Files The Corbett Report, 7 February 2026
1) Epstein was an agent and he was working for…
2) Jeffrey Epstein was a Fed Truther who “represented” the Rothschilds
3) Someone changed Epstein’s Apple ID password after he was dead
4) A fake Epstein was created with boxes and sheets to fool the media
5) Epstein was a member of the Trilateral Commission
6) Pizzagate was real
7) Epstein and 4chan
8) Epstein co-opted Bitcoin (and made Call of Duty a microtransaction hellscape)
9) Ghislaine was invited to be on the 9/11 “Shadow Commission”
10) Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself
Read; I’ve spent weeks inside the Epstein files — not looking for names, but for infrastructure Sayer Ji, 17 February 2026
‘What I found: Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t just a sex trafficker. He was a switchboard — routing government secrets, Wall Street intelligence, and political power through one network.The same network that built the censorship machine that targeted your speech during COVID. Five parts. All sourced to DOJ documents. Here’s the whole investigation.’
‘PART 1: The DOJ released thousands of pages of Epstein files. Buried inside them is a 20-year financial architecture designed to turn pandemics into a profit center. Offshore vaccine funds. Donor-advised fund structures naming “pandemic” as a key area — three years before COVID. JPMorgan treated a convicted sex offender as the operational architect of a Gates-linked charitable fund. Every claim sourced. Every document numbered.
PART 2: Inside Project Molecule — the 14-page JPMorgan proposal that turned biology into investable infrastructure. $20M to “finance the surveillance network in Pakistan.” Parametric triggers. Reinsurance markets. Vaccine capital positioned in structures designed for offshore flexibility and arm’s-length profit. This wasn’t pandemic response. It was pandemic business planning — years before any pandemic.
PART 3: The censorship machine that decided what Americans could say during COVID was built by Epstein-connected British political operatives — in a room above a pub in Brixton. Peter Mandelson routed UK Treasury intelligence to Epstein within minutes of receiving it. His protégé Morgan McSweeney co-founded CCDH — the organisation that gave Twitter its “Disinformation Dozen” list. Same office. Same staff. Same dark money.
PART 4: Obama. Gates. Epstein. Ebola. In one week in September 2014, global health became global control — and the COVID-19 playbook was written six years early. Gates emailed Epstein his full itinerary: Monday with the President on “the budget and Ebola.” Epstein replied: “perfect time for you to pitch DAF.” Crisis-to-institution conversion. In real time. In their own words.
PART 5: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer says “none of us knew” about Epstein’s British connections. The documents say otherwise. Britain’s National Crime Agency ran a classified intelligence operation on Epstein from its Washington embassy — starting January 2020. Starmer spent five years running the institution structurally designed to receive that intelligence. Then he appointed Mandelson ambassador to the country investigating Epstein. Every document has a file number. Every quote is verbatim. Every claim is independently verifiable. If this investigation matters to you, share it. Lawmakers need to see it. Journalists should be building on it.’
‘Jeffrey Epstein, in writing, said, “I have known many bad people in my life, but I’ve never known anybody more bad than Donald Trump. He has no scruples”.’
Watch; If Epstein thinks you “have no scruples” how bad must you be? George Galloway, 14 February 2026
George Galloway; “Donald Trump is leading a merry dance of the pitiful specimens that call themselves journalists in the White House press retinue. When he says that the American economy has never, ever been as strong, he is lying. Why don’t the journalists say, you’re lying, Mr. President? When he says that petrol is such and such a price, when in 99% of gas stations, it’s far more than that. He is lying. When he says that he’s cleared by the 2,700,000 pages of the Epstein files so far released, he’s lying. He appears in those files tens, tens, tens of thousands of times. One of the main takeaways for me was Jeffrey Epstein in writing, saying, I have known many bad people in my life, but I’ve never known anybody more bad than Donald Trump. He has no scruples. Now, when Jeffrey Epstein thinks you have no scruples, when Jeffrey Epstein, the paedophile, sexual predator and trafficker of underage children, girls and boys, when he thinks you have no scruples, well, you must be a rum individual indeed. But then we already knew how rum Donald Trump was.”
His project was to design the world’s digital currency.
Read; Epstein III, The Intelligence Channel, 11 February 2026
‘By the autumn of 2013, three tracks were running simultaneously through the channel. The first was the digital currency operation — documented in ‘The Development of a Digital Currency’ — which had moved from WEF reconnaissance through Jem Bendell’s commission to active sovereign pitches. On August 10, (Ehud) Barak had emailed Boris Nikolic through Epstein reporting that ‘the pilot test in India succeeded and a report will follow’42 — biometric digital identity linked to financial transactions, confirmed operational at population scale. The second was the financial architecture — the Global Health Investment Fund, designed by Epstein with JPMorgan in 2011, which had proven the concept of programmable conditionality applied to capital flows43. The third was the climate disclosure framework that would create the mechanism for redirecting global capital — the Stranded Assets Forums at Waddesdon Manor (Rothschild residence), which would launch in 2014, feeding the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, feeding the Network for Greening the Financial System, feeding the BIS (Bank of International Settlement) and thus Basel. All three tracks were about to become operational — and all three ran through Epstein’s address on 71st Street.’
Why Epstein was scared of Imran Khan
Watch; EXPLAINED: Why Epstein Was Threatened by Imran Khan, Katie Halper, 6 December 2025
Katie Halper; “Talk to us about the latest Epstein files revelations that relate to Imran Khan and his comments about Imran Khan. Okay,
Epstein; Putin has been kind so far not to point out how the US involves itself in others elections. And then his correspondent says, LOL.
Epstein says ‘hasn’t pointed out assassinations to overthrow governments, coup funding Imran Khan in Pakistan, a much greater threat to peace than Erdogan, Khomeini, Xi or Putin’.
Then the correspondent says, ‘the populist in Pakistan?’,
Epstein says ‘really bad news.’
Then the correspondent says, ‘the cricket player? How could he be worse than the Islamist?’
And then Epstein says, ‘ makes Donald look like Einstein, incapable of truth, devout Islamist, many nuclear weapons, not Erdogan or Khomeini. He was married to two friends of mine, one daughter of Jimmy Goldsmith, super wealthy takeover guy, forced her to convert, wacko.
And it is funny to hear Epstein call anyone wacko, by the way. But that’s a pretty good endorsement of Khan when you have someone like Jeffrey Epstein criticising you. Okay, so that’s one set of exchanges, the takeaway there is that he’s saying that he’s bad news and dangerous. Then Epstein says’ it follows your prediction around cults of personality. He’s a cricket captain, not a chess player. But he’s good at rousing the crowd’.
Moeed Pirzada; “So I can instinctively understand this conversation. The significance of this is that Jeffrey Epstein was very influential. He had a huge network of a power system in which he was advising at one time. He was also advising Ehud Barak for almost 10 plus years, the Israeli former politician leader. We don’t know who he was talking to at this time. My hunch is this might actually be someone in Israel. He was kind of giving his geopolitical geostrategic view that Imran Khan. And this is a totally flawed understanding of Jeffrey Epstein because he says that Imran Khan is more dangerous than Putin, than Erdogan and Khamenei, for two reasons, because Putin of course has the nuclear weapons, but he thinks that Imran Khan is mentally disturbed or a waco and that he has nuclear weapons which Erdogan and Khamenei in Iran don’t have. This is such a flawed understanding on part of Jeffrey Epstein because Pakistan’s nuclear weapons are not in the control or the mandate of any Pakistani prime minister. The Pakistani military has firm control on the Pakistani nuclear weapons. And no one has really challenged the domination of military on the nuclear weapons. So this is a very flawed understanding. The second thing is sector biases that he’s an Islamist, which I discussed earlier, he’s not an Islamist. He’s married to two of my friends’ daughters. One, Jeffrey Epstein is referring to Jemima Goldsmith. The other he’s probably referring to Rehan Khan, another British ex-wife of Imran Khan. He’s referring to both of them, but it’s a very flawed understanding, it basically reveals that how within this strategic community of decision makers, within United States or Israel in the West, Pakistan and its politics is so misunderstood that Imran Khan is being seen as Islamist, as dangerous with possession of nuclear weapons. He’s neither an Islamist nor is in possession of the nuclear weapons, the whole thing is in control of the military. But people have also connected as the Drop Site editor Ryan Grimm has connected. Then maybe this was the mentality that was working behind the scenes in Washington that set the stage for the regime change in Pakistan, because he was presented as a very dangerous person. So whether Washington was directly involved in regime change or not, Pakistani military definitely played up the fears of Imran Khan as an Islamist, as a dangerous person, as mentally unstable, who was a popular person, as a threat to the west, as a threat to Israel, as a threat to Washington. This is what is these email exchanges explain.”
Listen; Messages from Mandelson to Epstein UK Column News, 4 February 2026
Ben Rubin; “I’d seen some messages from Mandelson to Epstein on the day that Epstein was released from prison for child sexual abuse crimes, congratulating him on his freedom day and asking him what he was going to be getting up to. Absolutely extraordinary. And then this yesterday, which is from Mandelson to Epstein, notifying him of internal recommendations from inside number 10 about the need to sell national assets to pay down government debt. This was an internal government email from Gordon Brown’s team back in 2009 telling him that the UK needed to sell national assets. Mandelson has forwarded this to Epstein and Epstein has replied, saying, what saleable assets? Because obviously he’s in the business of buying up those kinds of assets.
Mike Robinson; Is that treasonous?
Ben Rubin; It’s a really good question because these people are clearly not working in the best interest of the country and certainly not working within law. And if they’re putting the nation state at risk, that in my book would be treason. But of course, mainstream media is not going to even suggest that is the case.
Epstein was a Rothschild agent. He represented the Rothschild family. He was paid $25 million to do so, that we know of, so that’s just one transaction that we’ve seen. And you can see here, part of the advice that he was delivering to them was that the upheaval in Ukraine back in 2014 would provide many opportunities, many. And I think that probably tells us quite a bit about what’s happening in Ukraine today.”
Mike Robinson; “Opportunities that are now the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians, hundreds of thousands of Russians slaughtered while the assets are stripped. But that’s an ‘opportunity’. It’s quite disgusting, Ben.”
Interesting how blatant the US and UK lie but even more interesting how the population believes their BS.
Watch; Attempts to Russiagate the Epstein Files, Glenn Diesen, 17 February 2026
‘John Helmer is one of the longest-serving Western journalists in Moscow. Helmer discusses the significance of the Epstein files, the attempts to Russiagate the scandal, and the political divisions that have grown in Moscow. Jeffrey Epstein’s Putin Hustle.’
John Helmer; “For him (Epstein) to be trying to approach Russia and the Russian oligarchs and sell them what he thought were original ideas for tax evasion and money laundering is funny. It’s funny because the Russian oligarchs have been pioneering their own systems for money laundering, tax evasion for 10 years before Epstein arrived on the scene and they had their own US, European and worldwide networks for doing that. What we have at the moment, then, are particulars of what he tried to do, and those have been blown up because the emails can be misread in the English press to make him appear in the columns of, let’s say, the Telegraph, the Times, to make it appear that he was a Russian agent, in other press to make it appear that he was close to Russian oligarchs in New York. We can go through the facts. The facts are that if you go, and our audience who doubts what I’m about to say can go to the Epstein library and put in the word the search names put in Putin you get approximately 1,021 entries. Of the 1,021 entries, believe me, reading through them is a dreary job. Most of them are press clips that Epstein’s offices in New York or elsewhere received from all sorts of sources. And the interesting thing about them is that they’re not particularly competent, they don’t reflect his effort to understand Russian politics. He was sent clips from the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal. Now what do you learn about Russian politics from those media? You learn nothing but misinformation. Epstein was too ignorant to know the difference between misinformation, disinformation and the truth of any matter. He had a second rate brain with a huge ego attached and a lot of money flowed through his pocket, and he misunderstood the difference between his pocket and his brain, also his fly. So what he tried to do was to use the Norwegian Thorbjørn Jagland to approach Putin. He tried to use the Slovak Miroslav Lajčák who had been Foreign Minister and had met Sergei Lavrov four times to arrange a meeting. He tried to get Ehud Barak, the former Israeli Prime Minister and head of military intelligence who met Putin twice as prime minister in 2001 and 2000, to arrange a meeting with Putin. All he got back was offers of invitations to the Vladivostok Economic Forum, which you know very well, or the St. Petersburg Economic Forum, which you know equally well, or one or two of these business forums in places like Sochi, where as a lure, he was offered a crowd handshake, a handshake with the President of Russia in a crowd of businessmen all selling something specially themselves. Epstein declined and insisted, you can see it in the email record, on a one on one meeting. What did he offer, he thought, to Putin. What was he telling these go betweens? He thought he had a digital or cryptocurrency scheme that would make Russia a global leader in cryptocurrency transfers. And he thought he could sell that to Putin as he’d been selling it to his tax adjustment, tax optimisation clients in the United States. Well, maybe the Chomsky family fell for it. Maybe Stephen Bannon fell for it. Maybe Wexner and Black fell for it. But they’re Americans, and they weren’t either as experienced tax evaders as the Russian oligarchs or as experienced in handling American deceptions and salesmen and hustlers, as Putin had been already. So they turned it down.”
Economist Michael Hudson explains the difference between US and African debt.
Watch; The Real Reason Poor Countries Stay Poor, EconomicalandFinancialReports, 17 February 2026
Question from Audience; “I have a question. What’s the difference between the US debt and the debt that African nations owe? Because the US debt doesn’t keep the US from being one of the leading powers of the world, but then African nations can’t make it because of that debt that is strangling them.”
Michael Hudson; “The first question is a very important question. What makes African and Third World debt different from American debt? Number one, America is never going to pay its debts. It doesn’t have to, its debts are in its own currency. We can simply print it. The African debt is not in its currency, the African debt is in US dollars. Africa has to earn the US dollars and the only way it can earn the US dollars is not to be assassinated for growing its own food and becoming independent and doing something that the United States does not like. The principle underlying the foundation of the World Bank, the International bank for Research and Development, is that no country should grow its own food. Africa and the Third World should only grow export crops to export in order to have an oversupply of cocoa and other tropical raw materials to keep down the price. They must buy their grain from the United States or Europe so that if they do something that we don’t like, we can do what America tried to do to China in the 60s, we can sanction them. We can say, we’re going to starve you, we’re going to not export any grain to you. So owing their foreign debt in dollars means that they have to somehow sell something that the United States wants, not what they want. I think the most evil organisations in the world today are the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. And my book ‘Super Imperialism’ that I wrote in 1972 is all about that. And my boss said, we’ve run rings around the British imperialists. This is how to do it. You make them owe the debts in your currency, not their own. You control their central bank and make them financially dependent on you and then you’ve got a stranglehold for them. So certainly the Third World countries should cancel the debts under the odious debt principle. I haven’t been able to convince any of them to do it because they said if we do that, the CIA will kill us. So how do you break that cycle? That’s a problem I’ve not been able to solve.”
Watch; Financial Futurism and the New World Order | Simon Dixon Full interview, Propaganda & Co, 25 November 2025
Presenter; “So what I’d like to ask you is why do you feel that destabilisation was in the US’s interest and not in Israel’s interest or at least not being driven by Israel’s interests. So when I say, I guess what I’m arguing is escalating with Iran or the war with Iraq, et cetera, et cetera, whatever destabilising wars have taken place in the Middle East, whether it’s in Syria, Iraq, Iran, why do you view that as being like solely in the US’s interests and not necessarily in Israel’s?”
Simon Dixon; ” I’m very familiar with David Miller’s work, so I deeply respect that as well. And what I’m saying is that zionism was an interest group, it had a lobby and it was a faction of hidden power that is now being brought to the surface. Now we’re led to believe that this is a bottom up movement that has now finally exposed what zionism is, which is an imperial project based upon ethno supremacy to radicalise the Jews into working for the IDF, grow the population and then get them to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians and have an outpost in the Middle East by which you can fund all these covert militia groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda and various other groups. Now the great thing is that by doing it through this mechanism, you have a plausible deniability story, oh, it was because Jeffrey Epstein blackmailed us. Oh, it was because the AIPAC lobby is incredibly powerful. Oh, it was because there’s all these Jewish billionaires that control technology, media and everything, so you have all these reasons which are 90% true, but it’s only when you understand the monetary flows and power dynamics that I think you can get to the real story. And so what you have to understand is that the structure of America, if you look back at the Constitution, it was designed to protect Americans from the tyranny of government. But what it didn’t do is it didn’t protect from the tyranny of the government being co-opted by corporate interests, and that is because the founding fathers were the corporate interest, they were the elites. And so the elites constructed a system by which the people could be protected from government, but the elites would end up controlling the government. And that is the structure of America, and by having this whole democracy stroke free markets, which there is no free market that has $38 trillion of debt and a government the size of the American government, you have this illusion, and when you understand central banking and various other constructs, you understand what happened to the British Empire, you compare that to the American empire and you can see exactly what’s happening. So the British Empire was a private interest group called the Bank of England, bankrupted the UK government by creating a Ponzi scheme which is create money as debt. There’s not enough interest to pay off the debt, and so therefore you have a continual debt cycle. You use war in order to perpetuate debt.That serves the interest of those that profit from wars, and the big finance houses, use mercantilism, colonialism in order to extract resources, and then eventually the government and the pound has no utility anymore. So we entered into the Federal Reserve era in 1913. That took us to World War I. That led to the confiscation of gold and things like the Balfour Declaration to install Israel, the Bolshevik Revolution to install the Soviet Union over the Russian Tsar and the funding of Nazi fascist Germany later. Then you have World War II and then you had the construct of this military industrial complex and the US empire. It was based upon a manufacturing base. It was based upon installing a debt-based Ponzi scheme called the dollar, but persuading everyone to convert their currencies to dollars as long as you could convert the dollar back into gold. And this is what we call the post Bretton Woods era. The IMF and the World Bank were set up in order to perpetuate dollars and debt around the world, and then the military industrial complex was used. Now at that stage there was a concept of national interest, because most of the companies that benefited from the military industrial complex were manufactured in America, built in America for America to perpetuate the dollar. Now what has happened over time is that that whole mechanism turned into a very elaborate money laundering scheme. And it was that you steal money by continually taking on debt. That means the average American pays the inflation as a result, and this redistributes wealth, and as long as you can get these massive Pentagon budgets, they go back into the corporate interest that receives essentially socialism for companies while everyone else pays the bill in inflation. And anytime the people try to get some money, you call them communists and evil and socialists. And so the people were enslaving themselves to this system and it got more and more predatory as the debt increased. All that to say, what is America? America is actually the financial industrial complex. Whether it be large asset managers like Blackrock, State Street and Vanguard, whether it be private equity firms like KKR and Blackstone, whether it be investment banks like Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan or whether it be the creators of the dollar, which is retail banks like Bank of America and Citibank, that makes up a complex, I call it a financial industrial complex. And they fire financial weapons of mass destruction in order to control other factions of power. Subordinate to that is the military industrial complex. Subordinate to that is the technical industrial complex. If you look at Google, if you look at Palantir, if you look at App, all of those technologies came from Pentagon budgets. The technologies were created for killing and war and then eventually commercialised into a corporate structure, handed over to the CIA and intelligence funded operatives and then commercialised and created into iPhones and various other things. But they always needed intelligence to steal the resources from Africa and when you look at all the flows of resource to electric car, vehicle or semiconductor chip. And so all of these resources are the covert wars and operations that are for. But there’s one fundamental thing, because the dollar fundamentally is a debt based Ponzi scheme. There is no America, There is what I call a K-shaped economy. A K-shaped economy. If you think of Trump when he goes like this, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. And I need to put a MAGA narrative to make people think that what’s happening here is acceptable. And so the media is used to weaponise narrative, when essentially all that’s happening is the debt ceiling’s increased to 5 trillion. A big beautiful bill has sent $1.3 trillion over to corporate interest and you need to create a narrative. And he’s also reset the world order through tariffs. We’ll go into that one in a bit. But to get back to the question, there is a structure above America and most people focus on the Israeli lobby because they allowed that narrative to slip. And I believe that was a deliberate operation. So when I look at Benjamin Netanyahu, most people think he rules the world via Israel and he’s on top of the chain in Israel. When I look at Benjamin Netanyahu, I see just middle management for military industrial complex interests. His job is to syphon money back to the American stock market, away from the American people. And when they want to manage that divorce, they just say, oh, it’s those. It was them. You know, it was only because we were blackmailed, it was only because AIPAC rules the world. They don’t say these things, but they allow the narrative to perpetuate and you become a propaganda outlet for their propaganda agenda, which is to manage a divorce with Israel. Why? Because there’s a lot more money in working with the Gulf countries. You know, you got to compare. AIPAC is raising $50 million from Jewish billionaires in America. That’s not much money. You know, that’s not much money at all. And so their $50 million pays for a bunch of Congress people. But they’re normally connected to military companies and financial companies. These are much bigger lobbies, much bigger lobbies. They have way more power. But the AIPAC one takes the front stage. But when you compare that to Jared Kushner, Trump’s son in law, creating a $2 billion fund where it was allocated to Trump’s family, where they’re going to get rebuild revenue and regional stability in the Middle East, the ability to invest in a Trump Tower in Saudi Arabia, UAE, and you get ongoing revenue in a real estate transaction that can’t compete with a $50 million AIPAC budget.”
Watch; Starmer government is up to its neck in sleaze; Peter Oborne, Democracy For Sale with Peter Geoghegan, 24 February 2026
‘Peter Geoghegan sits down with veteran investigative journalist Peter Oborne to discuss how British democracy has been systematically “purchased” by billionaires and political operatives over the last thirty years. We discuss how a sitting Cabinet Office Minister used a private firm to profile journalists and then tried to involve the secret services to shut down an investigation into Labour’s dark money. This is the story of Labour Together, and why they were so terrified of the truth that was first broken by Democracy For Sale.’
Watch; This Scandal Should’ve Brought Down The Government; Double Down News, 5 February 2026
‘Keir Starmer’s Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney used £730,000 of illegally undeclared donations to fund a campaign to bring down Jeremy Corbyn and elect Keir Starmer as Labour Leader. This scandal should’ve brought down the government. But we have a servile sycophantic media.’
Paul Holden; “Without Morgan McSweeney, there simply is no Keir Starmer. This is the story of how he got that power and how he used a secret unlawful fund of over £700,000 to seize that power. This web of secrecy and these backroom deals should terrify anybody who cares about British democracy. About four years ago, in 2021, I got access to a phenomenal leak of documents out of the Labour Party that sparked my investigation into Morgan McSweeney and the Labour Party. An incredible story of the reckless and arguably lawless project that has delivered us this particular Keir Starmer government. Between 2017 and 2020, Morgan McSweeney ran an undisclosed secret project to destroy the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn. He did so with a pot of money, £730,000 he wasn’t declaring, as required by law, to the Electoral Commission. While he was running the secret project. He wrote to the Electoral Commission and spoke to them over the phone and said, I don’t want to report donations. And the Electoral Commission said, I’m sorry, you have to report donations. In February 2020, Shibana Mahmood, who’s currently the Home Secretary, said on Labour Together’s behalf, yes, we are reporting donations. Labour Together was a seemingly anodyne think tank that Morgan McSweeney ran for a number of years. Labour Together really came into play after Corbyn’s Labour Party exceeded all expectations in the general election of 2017. But for people like Morgan McSweeney, this wasn’t something to be celebrated. This was a threat. Morgan McSweeney is from the right wing, the Labour Party. And Jeremy Corbyn’s success was a threat to his own personal political ambitions and to his vision for the Labour Party. For a period of three years, Morgan McSweeney used Labour Together to undertake secret projects. Secret projects to destroy the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn. Secret projects that inflamed the anti semitism crisis that would undermine his reputation, but also to ensure that Keir Starmer was elected leader of the Labour Party. To do that, Morgan McSweeney needed serious money. And between 2017 and late 2020, Labour Together accepted over £800,000 in donations. Of that amount, £730,000 was not reported as required by law, to the Electoral Commission. As a result, nobody had any idea that Labour together, under Morgan McSweeney’s control, was taking £730,000 from a series of multimillionaires. Who? Two of those people who gave the money were Trevor Chin and Martin Taylor. So Trevor Chin is a wealthy UK businessman. One of his animating concerns is Israel. For the last 30 years, he’s been actively involved in pro Israel politics. He’s been connected and linked to Labour Friends of Israel. In fact, early in 2025, Trevor Chin was awarded the Israeli Presidential Medal of Honour for services to the country of Israel. The other donor was a man by the name of Martin Taylor, a very secretive, wealthy hedge fund owner who has interest in private healthcare.”
Should Palantir have access to all our health records since 1948 and the wealth that data will bring to big pharma? Jeremy Corbyn thinks not.
Watch; Jeremy Corbyn: I warned about NHS Privatisation YEARS AGO, PoliticsJOE, 17 February 2025
Jeremy Corbyn; “remember far enough back 2019, I warned that the British government under Theresa May and Boris Johnson was involved in secret talks with the US on bringing their healthcare companies and healthcare providers into Britain. I was told I was actually peddling a Russian plot and it was all Russian propaganda. Utter total nonsense. They were just not prepared to face up to this. We now have Palantir involved. The NHS is busy pushing that every hospital brings in Palantir to manage its records and its databases. Now, that database information, you think about the database, the NHS, everyone that’s ever lived or died in this country since 1948, the records are there. It’s gold dust for health research, it’s gold dust for a big pharmacy. Should that be in private hands? Should that be a source of money for somebody to control it and should we know where it’s going and what sort of protections are in place? Then you look at the way in which Palantir has gained these contracts, one of which was gained during COVID and the lobbying power of Peter Mandelson, when he was the owner of the company that lobbied for Palantir to go in as a preferred bidder, didn’t face competition, was given the contract by the government. And then you ask the question, what was Sir Keir Starmer doing as Prime Minister whilst on a visit to Washington, going with Mandelson to the Palantir head office? What was that about? We’ve asked, a number of MPs have repeatedly, where’s the minutes of that meeting? What Civil Service, what Cabinet Office official was present when the Prime Minister had these discussions? They say they can’t find the records. Well, sorry, if the Prime Minister goes on a meeting with a private sector company in another country, I think we deserve to know. What was Mandelson involved in? And did the Prime Minister know that Mandelson actually owned the company that had introduced Palantir into the whole orbit anyway?”
There is no freedom of speech in the EU any more.
Watch; Patrik Baab: Europe’s New Iron Curtain – Freedom of Speech Dies; Glenn Diesen 14 February 2026
Glenn Diesen; “Today we are joined by Patrick Baab, a German journalist and author, to discuss the massive pressures there currently are on the freedom of expression in Europe and how our various governments are working very hard to reduce this freedom…..
This is the result of a 160-page US Congress report published in early February. According to this US report, the EU Commission established in recent years a system of complete censorship all over the European Union. Let me read the result of this congress report. The EU regime pressured platforms on the Internet to suppress lawful speech, including speech that was true simply because it was politically inconvenient. And this is one of the results of this High House of Judiciary Committee report of the Chairman Jim Jordan. It is very clear that the European Commission is transforming itself into a censorship authority against democracy and in opposition to all democratic constitutions all over the map in the European Union. There’s a person we both know, which is Colonel Jacques Baud, who again, he’s a colonel in the Swiss intelligence services. He’s retired now. He’s very well known for his great analysis and he has worked for NATO as a Swiss intelligence agent or colonel. And apparently the EU didn’t like his analysis, that is; he reached the conclusion that the war in Ukraine had been provoked. Again, while one can agree or disagree, I happen to agree with this analysis. But he never had a day in court or anything. Just one day he woke up and the EU put him on the sanctions list. Not because he said anything that was false, proven that he’s received payments from anywhere, but just because his conclusion or analysis. It was seen as accepting or repeating a Kremlin talking point, which was then seen as advancing the Kremlin narrative. And for this he was punished with sanctions. What exactly does this situation look like?”
Patrik Baab; “I know Colonel Jacques Baud personally and I visited him in Brussels. He’s okay so far, but he’s also really nervous because he’s a Swiss citizen living in Belgium. He cannot travel to his homeland, it’s not allowed for him to travel. His bank accounts are completely frozen and all his property is confiscated. The only thing the Belgium state allows is he can take €500 a month to buy food. I heard that the neighbours are cooking for him. So this is just a situation to censor and to bring men under pressure and persons under pressure who don’t align to the NATO propaganda and the EU propaganda. And this is completely extra-legal. As the EU ministers created an instrument, a tool to bring people under pressure and to shut their mouths by sanctions, which is completely illegal, completely illegal, and again, against all democratic constitutions in the EU. So the only conclusion I can have, and this is the same conclusion of the US Congress, is European political elites are destroying democracy to stay in power.”
I think this is a complete transformation of democracy on the European level into a kind of anti-democratic and warmongering despotism. And this is the goal. According to the Hungarian Minister, President Viktor Orban, the EU decided to wage a war against Russia in the next years. And so warmongering and going into new wars and propaganda and censorship on the other hand, are two sides of the same medal. They want to close up the public debate space to make it easier to bring their own citizens into a new war. This is very dangerous because the Russian Federation announced that this won’t be a war in a Ukrainian style, ie a low level war. So the Russian Federation made very clear that this will become a nuclear war at once. So it’s very, very dangerous. But the background of all this warmongering and all this censorship is they lost control over their investments. NATO General Secretary Mark Rutte signed in 2013, as Prime Minister of the Netherlands, a contract with the Ukrainian government and the company Shell to explore the minerals and the gas in Eastern Ukraine. So it’s an investment of billions. It was an investment of billions. But now all these territories are in Russian hands. So they miscalculated their investments and now European citizens should die for their profits. That’s the background. So people are sleeping against the abyss. They don’t go to the streets and they don’t fight for peace in the European Union. And that is a result of permanent propaganda and permanent censorship in the EU. And I don’t believe that the political elites won’t stop that. They will go on and go on to keep, to stay in power.”
Glenn Diesen; “And it’s quite dramatic because we’re talking about a legitimistic crisis when governments overstep their democratic mandate in this way. And as these governments become more unpopular, they seem to be immune from the ballot box. You know, irrespective of what one thinks about the opposition parties across Europe, it is concerning that the most popular party in Germany now, and the polls are, is AFD again. Doesn’t matter if people support it or not, they’re being criminalised. They’re openly talking about banning it. In France, they arrested Le Pen. Just in Romania, the election result was essentially just ignored and cancelled. Let’s do it over again. We saw how the Moldovan election was manipulated and if you mention these things, the governments in Europe essentially come after you. It’s quite scary. Well, all this talk about our democracy, our values, how it’s just sitting on eggshells, essentially.”
Patrik Baarb; “But we have to keep in mind that the national governments are playing a kickback game. So responsible for the sanctions for example is the EU minister-council of the different states and that means the EU Commission and, on the EU level, will be done what the national governments have decided before. That’s the problem. So it is a kickback game. The national governments decide to set somebody on the sanctions list and they kick to Brussels, and then the ball will be kicked back to the national level and also to the German level. The German Bundestag transformed the EU sanctions against persons on January 15 into national law and reinforced the sanctions. Any helper of a sanctioned person can be punished and can go to prison for 10 years. This is completely crazy and there is no legal ground for that. It is illegal and is completely voluntary. So we are not in a government defined by law.”
Listen or Read; Totalitarian industrial slavery: the modernisation weapon, by Paul Cudenec, 25 February 2026
“A shared emphasis on ‘modernisation’ and industrialisation was one of the first clues I found to suggest that today’s global mafia are pursuing the very same agenda as the 20th century’s fascists and communists”.
New piece from Paul Cudenec.https://t.co/DIdniHwsiw pic.twitter.com/BlJkUZaDx9
— Winter Oak (@WinterOakPress) February 25, 2026
I listened to the article here
‘A shared emphasis on “modernisation” and industrialisation was one of the first clues I found to suggest that today’s global mafia are pursuing the very same agenda as the 20th century’s fascists and communists.
In Benito Mussolini’s Italy, “development” was at the forefront of the Zionist-linked regime’s plans, as I explain in Fascism Rebranded.
More land was cultivated and an infrastructure of roads, new towns and industrial estates was built.
Pierre Milza and Serge Berstein write; “A vast programme of public works was undertaken, carried out by private firms, who were offered lucrative contracts by the State.
“Electrification of the rail system began, with the construction of tunnels on the Rome-Naples and Bologna-Florence lines.
“A massive roadbuilding programme was entrusted to ANAS (Azienda Nazionale Autonoma delle Strade), created in 1928, which oversaw the showcase construction of big toll motorways, the first in Europe”.
As for communism, I explain in The False Red Flag that as early as 1899 Lenin wrote a book called The Development of Capitalism in Russia in which he described the mobility of the workforce and the extension of the market as representing “progress”.
He stressed the need to sweep away all the outmoded institutions that impeded the development of industrial capitalism, that supposedly necessary stage on the road to socialism.
Writes Carroll Quigley; “Communism in Russia alone required, according to Bolshevik thinkers, that the country must be industrialised with breakneck speed, whatever the waste and hardships, and must emphasise heavy industry and armaments, rather than rising standards of living.
“The high speed of industrialisation in the period 1926-1940 was achieved by a merciless oppression of the rural community in which millions of peasants lost their lives”.
Communism was regarded as a “golden opportunity” in certain circles and a year before the revolution, US Ambassador David Francis cabled New York banker Frank Arthur Vanderlip: “Opportunities here during the next ten years are very great along state and industrial financing”.
Like fascism, communism provided financiers with the authoritarian state muscle to impose their industrial development projects on people who would not otherwise have gone along with them.
Totalitarian industrialism is very much the model favoured by Zionist godfathers the Rothschilds, as I set out in my 2022 booklet dedicated to that devilish dynasty, Enemies of the People.
They have, as I summed up, “amassed vast wealth at the expense of the rest of us, consistently put themselves before others, profiteered from war after war, grabbed hold of industrial infrastructure, exploited humanity, destroyed nature, corrupted political life, used royalty for their own purposes, privatised the public sector, imposed their global control in a secretive manner and now imagine that they can dictate our future, confining us to a miserable and denatured state of techno-totalitarian slavery”.
With all this in mind, I was intrigued to come across a 2022 article by French historical researcher Margot Lyautey about the wartime activities in France of a German business called Ostland.
This entity, boasting the full name Ostdeutsche Landbewirtschaftungsgesellschaft, initially operated in Nazi-occupied Poland from February 1940, where it was involved in installing Germans in farms owned by deported Poles.
I was going to remark that this kind of expropriation was rather communist in nature, until I realised that it was also similar to what Israelis do to Palestinian homes and land.
The similarities are, of course, no coincidence.’
Stop Funding Fake News was set up by New Labour in an attempt to shut down left wing publications like The Canary and Declassified UK.
Watch; Why Starmer’s Epstein scandal is worse than the media says DeclassifiedUK, 10 February 2026
John McEvoy; “For those that don’t know, Morgan McSweeney was the director of Labour Together. He went on to become Keir Starmer’s Chief of Staff and he’s really the figure in the background who’s been guiding Starmer towards the right throughout his political project. As we know, Morgan McSweeney has just been forced to resign following the scandalous appointment of Peter Mandelson, close friend of paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, as Britain’s Ambassador to the US. So I found out that Labour Together, which was spearheaded by Keir Starmer’s Chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, commissioned a PR firm which looked into myself and several other journalists in the UK, specifically naming us as ‘significant persons of interest’ into their investigation into a leak of documents which exposed Labour Together’s fraudulent electoral donations. So I think this is a very serious revelation. It’s quite concerning. I think I was on their radar because back in 2020, I think I was the first person to expose that relationship between Labour Together, Morgan McSweeney, the Centre for Countering Digital Hate, and this astroturf campaign that they’d set up called Stop Funding Fake News, which was trying to destroy left wing media organisations in the UK, namely the Canary. And then what I showed back in 2020 was that Stop Funding Fake News was not a small group of activists trying to prevent fake news from being disseminated online. It was in fact being spearheaded by the Labour right, by the likes of Morgan McSweeney and Labour Together in order to suppress left wing media in the UK, particularly the Canary, and those media organisations that were providing the social basis for Corbynism. Because McSweeney famously stated, ‘we have to destroy the Canary before the Canary destroys us’. So Josh Simons, who was the director of Labour Together at the time that this report was commissioned, has tried to distance himself from the reports. He said that Labour Together were not handed the dossier on journalists, including myself. But what I think is quite sinister is that Labour Together commissioned a report looking into the leak of documents and therefore by association, it was in my opinion, inevitable that APCO, this PR firm, would have investigated journalists. If I had a meeting with Labour Together, one of the first things that I’d ask them was, what was done with this £30,000 that was given to the PR firm APCO. What did APCO do with that? How do they investigate these significant persons of interest, including myself? Was this online investigation, was it in person? You know, it’s very, very sinister terminology, significant persons of interest. So I want to know what specifically APCO actually did.”
Listen; The Predatory Hegemon The Chris Hedges Report, 24 February 2026,
Chris Hedges; “He (Trump) is attempting, on the one hand, to destroy international bodies such as the United Nations. And rhetorically, through his Board of Peace, he appears to be presenting an alternative, but it’s not a serious alternative.”
Stephen Walt; “I think that’s basically right. You should view most of these things roughly the same way one would view Trump University, that it’s a Potemkin arrangement. It’s clear that Trump doesn’t like international institutions. He sees all of these institutions as essentially rules that might constrain the United States. Throughout his career, this is a guy who doesn’t like rules, doesn’t like anything that gets in the way of what he wants to do. So instead, he wants to create his own independent version of the Security Council, which has, of course, when you call it a Board of Peace and you include some of the other people who are on it, when you invite Vladimir Putin to join, when you invite Benjamin Netanyahu to join, and Sisi in Egypt, this doesn’t exactly look like the usual set of diplomats and peace advocates you might expect to see, but I do think it is at part an effort to undercut the existing set of arrangements, which Lord knows have their limitations, have their problems, are badly in need of reform. But this is not a serious solution. Of course, it has this other element to it which we haven’t talked about yet, and that’s the fact that part of predatory hegemony is, of course, extracting benefits for Trump and his family themselves. I think the New York Times reported that he’s made over a billion dollars just in his second term, just in the time he’s been back. Other countries have, Qatar has gifted him a plane, the UAE bought into his crypto-company as well. To be a part of the Board of Peace you have to pony up millions of dollars as well. All of this, I think, is eventually designed to also line his pockets.”
Covid Vaccine Scam
A doctor’s licence was revoked when he connected vaccines with the increase in disease he was witnessing in his practice
Watch; Dr. Paul Thomas: “What I noticed, in the first decade or so of my practice, is kids were getting sicker and sicker.” Joe Rogan Podcast News, 19 February 2026
Dr Paul Thomas; “What I noticed in the first decade or so of my practice is kids were getting sicker and sicker. And over the next decade, as more and more patients chose not to vaccinate, I got to see the difference. But I wanted to see, could I prove it. So we got all the data from my practice, we looked at every baby born into my practice and published it in an international journal of public health. What we found and that study was peer reviewed, it was robust, we found massive increases, we’re talking 400% to 500% more allergies, auto-immune conditions, neuro-developmental issues. And then we had infections of all kinds, massively increased in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. What happened when I published that study, within days of it being available online, I get a call from my attorney. Don’t go see any patients, don’t write any prescriptions. Don’t go into the office. Your licence has been emergently suspended. You are a threat to public health.”
Del Bigtree An inconvenient Study Cover up of largest vaccine study to date
Watch; Del Bigtree: An Inconvenient Study, Mary Talley Bowden MD and Del Bigtree, 22 January 2026
Del Bigtree; “The difference we’re seeing between the vaccinated, unvaccinated groups and just for people watching, the broad strokes are the study finds that you’re 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease, either autoimmune or neurological disorder. You’re 2.5 times more likely to develop a disease if you’ve been vaccinated, six times more likely to have a neurodevelopmental disorder if you’ve been vaccinated compared to unvaccinated, and nearly six times more likely to have autoimmune disease. And there’s a graph that is really shocking in the study that shows looking out 10 years, what are the odds or what is the percentage of vaccinated versus unvaccinated will have a chronic disease within 10 years? It’s expected that 57% of children who receive at least one vaccine will have a chronic disease by the time they’re 10 years old. And only 17% of the unvaccinated appeared that they would have chronic disease. So 25% increase to 60% increase. A 60% increase would be massive. This is 500% increased risks. It’s just off the scale.”
Watch; Dr. Luc Montagnier’s last interview before being FOUND DEAD, healthbot, 13 February 2026
Dr. Luc Montagnier; “I am here to expose Fauci’s gain of function. COVID was the job of a professional, it’s NOT natural. Sequences like HIV have been added in order to make a vaccine.
So, we came to the conclusion that there had indeed been manipulation regarding this virus.
— What do you mean?
Well, that part of it — I’m not saying all of it — but there is a model which is obviously the classic virus, and in this case it was mainly a model coming from the bat, but on top of that model, sequences were added, notably from HIV, the AIDS virus.
— But when you say ‘were added,’ who added them?
I don’t know.
— But it’s not natural, is that what you mean?
No, it’s not natural. It was professional work, the work of a molecular biologist. It’s very meticulous work — you could call it watchmaker’s work — at the sequence level.
— But for what purpose?
For what purpose — that isn’t clear. My job is to present the facts, that’s all. I’m not accusing anyone. I don’t know who did it or why. One possibility is that they wanted to make — they, we don’t know — a vaccine against AIDS. So small sequences of the virus were taken and inserted into the larger coronavirus sequence.
I’m not sure I understand everything you’re saying. Are you saying that in this virus, there is a part of HIV?
Exactly, that’s it. The genetic material of the virus is a long strand of RNA, right? Like DNA, but it’s RNA. And at a certain place on this long strand, small HIV sequences were attached. And these small sequences are not insignificant. They have the ability to modify, for example, what are called antigenic sites. That is to say, if you want to make a vaccine, you can modify the protein that is exposed for the vaccine by inserting a small sequence from another virus.
— But are you certain of that? Because it was said that rumors spread claiming it was ultimately of human origin, and that was later refuted by most scientific authorities.
There is still a will to suppress it, if you like. Our work — we are not the first. A very, very renowned group of Indian researchers had published the same thing.”
— “Sudden And Unexpected” (@toobaffled) February 1, 2026
Read; THE EMAIL THAT CHANGES EVERYTHING alieninvasionai, 26 February 2026
‘Jeffrey Epstein was personally handed the pandemic blueprint years before anyone heard of COVID. This wasn’t science. This was premeditated tyranny dressed up as public health.
Date: March 20, 2015
To: Jeffrey Epstein
Subject: Preparing for Pandemics
Key line: “Please find attached a draft agenda for the meeting on preparing for pandemics, as requested. Let’s discuss next steps, for example how to officially involve the WHO and ICRC (i.e. co-branding).”
THE TIMELINE THEY CAN’T HIDE ANYMORE
An email dated March 20, 2015, sent to Jeffrey Epstein with the subject line “Preparing for Pandemics,” references a draft agenda for a meeting on pandemic preparedness. The message proposes discussing next steps, including how to formally involve the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), specifically mentioning the possibility of “co-branding.”
The text argues that Epstein, who had no medical credentials, was included in discussions related to global pandemic strategy. It presents this as evidence that elements of the international COVID-19 response were planned years in advance and coordinated among elite networks.
The timeline outlined is as follows:
• 2015: Epstein receives communication regarding pandemic preparedness involving international institutions.
• 2017–2019: His properties reportedly host meetings attended by figures from biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and technology sectors.
• Early 2020: COVID-19 emerges globally, the WHO declares a pandemic, and lockdown measures are implemented worldwide.
• 2025: Previously sealed Epstein-related documents are released.
• 2026: The 2015 email becomes public.
The central claim suggests that Epstein may have acted as an intermediary within influential circles, facilitating coordination among high-level actors connected to discussions about pandemic preparedness.
Vaccine morbidity rates in the military increased 1100% in 2020?
Watch; Attorney Todd Callender exposes a 1100% increase in U.S. military deaths throughout 2021, compared to 2020, Stop The Shots, 27 January 2026
Todd Callender; “We know from the D Med database, the military’s database, which we’re looking at, because that’s our plaintiff class, that in 10 months of 2021, so not even the complete year, all causes morbidity and mortality have increased, according to the military zone numbers, by 1100%.
And if you look at the way that the charts go, and don’t forget, I’m in the morbidity business. We underwrite accident, sickness, health and disability insurance. If you look at the forecast, that should be in the neighbourhood of 5,000% increase this year.
If you look at all of the documentation, Pfizer’s documentation, we did mass spectrometry on their vials. We know what’s in these things. And in fact, they even admit that they added an HIV protein into the shots for the purpose of disabling people’s autoimmune. They couldn’t slip these lipid nanoparticles, which are in fact little bombers that carry pathogenic proteins to effectuate gene modification in the individual, gene therapy, as they call it. In order to get those lipid nanoparticles past your cellular defence, your body’s defence, they had to disarm your immune system. And they did that. It’s in all the scientific papers. What they didn’t do is undo that. So effectively, when you talk to our expert, what does he call it? Autoimmune deficiency syndrome. It’s basically vaccine AIDS. And right now they’re coming to understand this. People are showing up HIV positive. People with three shots have no immune system left over whatsoever.”
Watch; The inventor of the PCR test, Dr Kary Mullis, told us that it must NEVER be used, as it will find whatever you want it to find Stop the Shots, 30 January 2026
Dr Kary Mullis; “What is it about humanity that wants to go to all the details and stuff, and listen, these guys like Fauci get up there and start talking, he doesn’t know anything really about anything. And I’d say that to his face, nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope, and if it’s got a virus in there, you’ll know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine. He should not be in a position like he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people, and they don’t know anything about what’s going on on the bottom.Those guys have got an agenda which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda. They make up their own rules as they go, they change them when they want to. Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people that pay his salary and lie directly into the camera. You can’t expect the sheep to really respect the best and brightest, they don’t know the difference. I like humans, don’t get me wrong, but basically, the vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn’t a really good scientist. That’s the main problem, actually, with science, I’d say, in this century, because science is being judged by people, funding is being done by people who don’t understand it. Okay, who do we trust? Fauci? If Fauci wants to get on television with somebody who knows a little bit about this stuff and debate them, he could easily do it because he’s been asked. I’ve had a lot of people, President of the University of South Carolina, ask Fauci if he’d come down there and debate me on the stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was from the other side to come down there and balance, because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that’s going to tell the other side. He didn’t want to do it.”
MEP Christine Anderson in the EU Parliament asking us to resist the totalitarian system imposed by our authorities.
Watch; The so-called “pandemic” was a beta test; Bridgett Fertig, 2 February 2026
Christine Anderson; “This whole Covid madness, this so-called pandemic, it was just a test balloon. A gigantic test balloon. Well, for what you ask? Well, to see how far they could go. To see what exactly they would have to do to get free individuals in a free and democratic society to consent to being forced into compliance. That’s what they were trying to establish. That’s what they were trying to figure out. And they have figured it out. Trust me, they are much smarter now. The goal ultimately is to transform our free and democratic societies into totalitarian societies. Their goal is to strip each and every one of us of our fundamental rights of freedom, democracy, the rule of law. They want to get rid of all of this. This whole Covid thing had never anything to do with public health. It never had anything to do with breaking waves. It always had to do with breaking people in order to make us a part of a mindless malleable mass which they can totally control, and we will be completely dependent upon this globalitarian elite. So I’m really imploring the people, and all the peoples around the world, for God’s sake, stop giving your democratically elected governments the benefit of the doubt. They are not deserving of that. They are not. Stop rationalising whatever your government is doing, stop rationalising and come up with some good intentions. They have no good intentions. Never. As I said before, in the entire history of mankind, there has never been a political elite concerned about the well being of regular people. And it isn’t any different now. Why should it stop giving them the benefit of the doubt? Because I can tell you, you cannot comply your way out of a tyranny. It is impossible trying to do so. You will only feed a gigantic alligator in the hopes of being eaten last. But guess what? Your turn will come and then you will be the one swallowed up. I also have to ask the people, end your silence. Speak up for God’s sake. Stop complying. Start rebelling. They’re out to get you if you do not resist.”
Watch; White clot science; Dr. John Campbell 21 February 2026
Breaking Research Decodes the Mystery of “The Rubbery White Clots”
US Aggression against Cuba, Venezuela, Greenland, China, etc.
The American project of coups worldwide
Watch; Stephen Kinzer: The History & Evolution of U.S. Regime Change, Glenn Diesen, 20 February 2026
Glenn Diesen; “Today we are joined by Stephen Kintzer, an award winning author and foreign correspondent spending 20 years working for the New York Times and also for the Boston Globe. Now he’s working as a senior fellow at the Watson School for International Studies at Brown University. So, thank you for coming on. I’ve been looking forward to discuss, well, not just your book, ‘Overthrow: the History of US Regime Change Operations’, but also how we’ve got to where we are today. Again, this is an older book but it gets no less relevant year by year. So thank you for coming on. In Overthrow you trace over a century of interventions. I was wondering if you can perhaps map out some of these ideas, the history as well as the evolution of the US regime change operations in terms of how they’re carried out over time.”
Stephen Kinzer; “America’s have always been an expansionist power. That’s how we got here from Europe and that’s what the pilgrims did when they moved from Plymouth to Boston. So this has been an impulse that’s deeply ingrained in us now. That was the impulse that led us to try to fulfil what was called our manifest destiny. That is our destiny to fill up the continent of North America from Atlantic to Pacific. In 1890, the US Census Bureau declared that the frontier was closed, North America had been settled. In effect, we had fulfilled our manifest destiny. Then we had to ask ourselves the question, what do we do now? Do we devote ourselves to building a virtuous society in the hopes of being a model to the rest of the world? Or do we continue doing what we’ve been doing ever since we became a country and even before, and that is, try to push on to other lands? Now, there had never been an example in world history of a former colony that became a colonising power. So this was a big psychological leap for Americans. The first real breakthrough came at the end of the 19th century in what became known as the Spanish American War. And it actually set a pattern that we have followed in one sense ever since. So the Spanish American War began as a rebellion of Cubans against Spanish rule. Americans decided to send troops to help the Cuban revolutionaries overthrow Spain. To our shock, the Cuban revolutionaries were reluctant to accept our help because they feared what it might mean to have an American army on their soil. So the United States Congress passed a law called the Teller Amendment in which we vowed that the moment Spanish rule in Cuba was overthrown, Americans would go home and allow Cubans to have their own island. But after the Spanish were thrown out, the United States began to realise what these revolutionaries in Cuba wanted. They wanted a form of national sovereignty that could conflict with American economic interests. Specifically, they wanted to limit the amount of land that foreigners could own in Cuba. That directly affected United Fruit and many other American corporations. They wanted to build a tariff wall around Cuba to foment domestic manufacturing. 90% of the manufactured goods in Cuba at that time were made in the United States. So the Americans decided to ignore that promise or effectively repeal it and decide to impose our own system of government on Cuba under another amendment called the Plat amendment. That’s the one under which we allow local people to rule, but they have to accept our guidance. And that’s become a template. The one thing you can see from that one all the way through to today is that the countries on the receiving end are all characterised by defiance. They have all refused to accept the American project.
Watch; USA uses hunger as weapon to try to starve millions and collapse Cuba Geopolitical Economy Report, 14 February 2026
Ben Norton; “Narco Rubio is overseeing US foreign policy and he and the Miami Mafia are desperate to get control of Cuba once again so they can exploit the country and turn it into a new Epstein island for US elites. They’ve been trying to do this for decades and they think that now with Donald Trump in the White House, this is the perfect opportunity. This has obviously been one of Rubio’s top priorities. In fact, on 31 January, just 11 days after the new Trump administration entered office in 2025, the Rubio State Department published a press statement announcing that it was restoring a tough US Cuba policy, setting the stage for this mediaeval siege. And then in June 2025, the Trump White House boasted that it was strengthening the policy of the US toward Cuba, which is a euphemism, saying that they’re trying to suffocate Cuba by banning companies from doing financial transactions. And this is not only US companies, but foreign companies because the US threatens secondary sanctions on foreign companies that do business with Cuba. They also reaffirmed the ban on tourism and the economic embargo, which was later escalated into a full on siege. And then in January 2026, the Trump administration published an executive order declaring the government of Cuba a quote, ‘unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States’, which is completely crazy, as if Cuba were going to attack the US or something. It’s complete nonsense. But what was the excuse given by the Trump White House? They complained about Cuba’s close relations with Russia, the People’s Republic of China, Iran and also Hamas and Hezbollah, which again is completely absurd. But they made it clear that what they’re really concerned about is that Cuba continues to build deep intelligence and defence cooperation with the People’s Republic of China. So once again, China, China, China, China. And the Trump administration has brought back the 200 year old colonial Monroe Doctrine from back in 1823, the colonial era in which the US Empire declares that it controls all of the Americas and that Latin America is part of the US imperial so called sphere of influence, or the US Empire’s so called backyard. And the Trump administration has proudly dubbed this the Don Row Doctrine. And they have threatened all of the countries in the Western hemisphere and at gunpoint forced them to break off all ties to China and Russia and Iran and instead to allow US corporations to exploit all of the natural resources and, and all of the geostrategic infrastructure in the region, treating it all like a big US colony. So now, the question is, will other countries challenge the US Empire that is trying to suffocate this small island nation? And we’ve seen reports that Russia is going to challenge the US Blockade. And Russia has said it’s going to supply Cuba with oil as humanitarian aid. And Trump has threatened to impose tariffs on Russia in response. But the Russian government has responded saying, fine, impose tariffs on us. We have very little trade with the US Anyway. So Russia is willing to call the US Bluff because it’s not really going to do much damage to the Russian economy. However, the question that many people have is if Russia does send oil to Cuba, will the US Military just seize the oil tanker and steal the oil? Because the Trump administration has already done this multiple times with oil tankers carrying Venezuela oil. In fact, this February, the US Regime illegally seized an oil tanker carrying Venezuelan crude in the Indian Ocean on the other side of the planet. And of course, this is not the first time the Trump administration has done this multiple times. The US Military has illegally seized multiple tankers carrying Venezuelan oil. And then Trump insisted that the US Regime is going to steal that oil and steal those tankers.
Arturo Dominguez pointed out that this is the main reason why Cuba struggles to purchase medical equipment, equipment for its power grid, which it needs to maintain the electrical infrastructure, even if it has oil, which it doesn’t currently have because of the barbaric US blockade. So foreign critics love to say that Cuba’s problems stem from economic mismanagement. But when a country has to navigate sanctions like this, it’s not really about mismanagement, it’s not really about corruption. This is a barbaric blockade that has been going on for decades. But Trump and Marco Rubio have taken it to a whole new extreme level to starve as many Cubans as possible. As the Cuban American journalist Arturo Dominguez wrote, they’ll tell you Cuba is a failed state, but Cuba often outperforms its much wealthier neighbours. Cuba’s infant mortality rate and life expectancy are often equal to or better than those in the US and they’re better than most of the countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, even countries that are much wealthier than Cuba and not under these suffocating sanctions. Since its literacy campaign in 1961, just two years after the Cuban Revolution, Cuba has maintained one of the highest literacy rates on Earth, at nearly 100%. Moreover, Cuba sends doctors all around the world to help people in poor countries. And Cuba has manufactured its own vaccines and led innovation in medicine. In Cuba, everyone has a right to housing, food, free health care, free education. Those are all fundamental human rights. Imagine how much better Cubans would be without a 60 year illegal blockade and sanctions that have cost Cuba trillions of dollars and led to many deaths in Cuba. Arturo Dominguez wrote this, he’s a Cuban American, there are many other Cuban Americans who have the same view, they oppose the US regime’s attempt to starve their countrymen, their family members, but the voices of those Cubans are silenced in the mainstream corporate media. Instead, the mainstream corporate media, largely based in Miami, Florida, interviews these far right extremists in the US Congress, like the representative Carlos Jimenez, also from Miami, Florida, who’s posting photos online of far right extremists in Cuba wearing Make Cuba Great Again hats, who are calling on Trump to invade their country. Just like the far right extremist Venezuelans from the rich elite, the oligarchs who called in Venezuela to invade their country. This far right extremist, Congressman Carlos Jimenez has been posting on Twitter calling for no oil, no travel, no oxygen. That’s the slogan that he and the Miami Mafia are using to call for terrorising the people of Cuba to starve the people of Cuba, to deny them electricity and to deny them oxygen. They’re literally calling for suffocating, asphyxiating the Cuban people. And what is their end game in all of this, what exactly is their goal? Well, the congressman, Carlos Jimenez, the representative of the Miami Mafia, he let the cat out of the bag. He said the quiet part loud. And he admitted that the goal is for US corporations to colonise Cuba. He posted an insane image showing a map of Cuba colonised by US corporations like McDonald’s and Walmart and Airbnb and Tesla, and then luxury brands like Tiffany and Rolex and Gucci. This is the vision that the US empire not only has for Cuba, this is the vision that the US empire has for planet Earth.”
Watch; Max Blumenthal : Lies the Israelis Told Trump Judging Freedom, 26 February 2026
Judge Napolitano; “Max, I want to talk to you about the lies the Israelis have told the President. But before we get there, a couple of other issues. What is your understanding of this incident that happened somewhere between southern Florida and Cuba on a speedboat yesterday involving Cuban intelligence and some, I guess, Americans?”
Max Blumenthal; “This was something that was consistent with the behaviour of Cuban exiles in South Florida and Miami going back to the 1970s, where it looks like they staged a terrorist attack on Cuba, attempting to land a speedboat off the city of Santa Clara in Cuba and and then carry out guerrilla-style terrorist attacks inside Cuba to destabilise the country at a point when its population is suffering in unprecedented ways from the oil embargo imposed by Donald Trump, which, according to people I’ve spoken to on the island and who just came from there, is really causing a humanitarian crisis. So one figure who’s associated with this attack is named Amijayel Sanchez Gonzalez. And there’s a Facebook account associated with Amijayel Sanchez, and it shows records of terrorist attacks that have already taken place in recent months in Cuba, including people setting fire to buildings and farmland, agricultural fields. He was one of the figures who was detained on this boat. There’s so many points to make here. One point is that the Cuban Coast Guard or Cuban Defence Forces managed to neutralise the attackers on this boat and wounded many others. But unlike the United States, which has been carrying out double tap strikes on fishing boats ostensibly carrying marijuana and cocaine, they didn’t kill everybody gratuitously, they captured many people, including Sanchez Gonzalez, and learned the identities and gave them treatment. So much more humane than the US than the Pentagon has been.”
Judge Napolitano; “Didn’t the people on this boat shoot and injure a Cuban officer on the Cuban military or Coast Guard boat?”
Max Blumenthal; “The passengers on this boat attacked the Cuban Defence Forces or Cuban Naval Forces first and wounded the commander on a boat before they were all taken out. So this was an attack on Cuba, an attack on Cuba’s sovereignty. In a press conference today, Secretary of State Marco Rubio was unable to offer a coherent answer on what took place here. He was stuttering, and the question is, what did he know and when did he know it? Because it’s very difficult for an American, even with a fast boat, to disembark from the coast of Florida and get 90 miles through the Caribbean to Cuba without being interdicted by the US Coast Guard. It is illegal to do so from the United States. So how did they get through Coast Guard interdiction and Coast Guard surveillance of that entire highly sensitive area? What did Marco Rubio know? Marco Rubio commands these forces in South Florida in so many ways, this is Marco Rubio’s policy of terrorising Cuba.”
Max Blumenthal : Attacks on Cubans; Judge Napolitano – Judging Freedom; Feb 26 2026
China is not allowed to be a successful nation as it challenges US hegemony.
Watch; Why the US and Silicon Valley hate (and fear) China Geopolitical Economy Report, 22 February 2026
‘The Second Cold War that the United States is waging against China includes a trade war, tech war, and now a mineral war. In alliance with Silicon Valley Big Tech corporations, the US government is trying to recruit countries into Pax Silica, a coalition to create a new global supply chain for critical minerals that cuts out China. Ben Norton explains.
Topics:
0:00 Cold War Two against China 0:30 (CLIP) Marco Rubio on China “threat” 1:33 Trade war 2:26 Why China won the trade war 3:25 Critical mineral supply chain 4:10 Trump plans to restart trade war 4:47 Trump tariffs and SCOTUS ruling 6:15 Tech war against China 7:05 Chip war 8:32 AI chip supply chain 9:58 Military-industrial complex 11:28 Plans for new supply chain 12:14 Project Vault: US mineral stockpile 12:53 Japan deal with USA 13:35 Pax Silica 14:13 Critical minerals ministerial 14:57 Members of US-led Pax Silica 16:17 India 17:03 Other countries 18:04 US State Department narrative 19:41 China is the target 21:10 Big Tech corporations 21:30 Google 22:14 Public-private partnership 23:23 Under Secretary Jacob Helberg 24:32 US attacks on Iran target China 26:00 China oil imports 27:11 Geostrategic oil chokepoints 27:48 Strait of Hormuz 28:27 Strait of Malacca 29:27 Silicon Valley oligarchs 31:04 AI & crypto czar David Sacks 31:32 PayPal Mafia 32:41 Billionaires make US govt policy 33:19 AI race with China 34:57 Silicon Valley fears China 35:32 Billionaires run US government 36:46 India joins US-led Pax Silica 39:22 India’s foreign policy 40:41 Non-Aligned Movement 41:23 New cold war 43:24 Outro’
Jimmy Lai spying for the U.S.
Watch; Jimmy Lai: Deconstruction of western political reaction to prison sentence, UK Column News, 18 February 2026
Charles Malet; “Here we have the Foreign Secretary, Yvette Cooper, responding to the Jimmy Lai sentencing (in China). He’s been sent down for 20 years, supposedly strengthening the pro-democracy stance in Hong Kong that was taken in 2019, or at least so the story goes. Now, what Yvette Cooper actually said in her statement, among other things, was British national Jimmy Lai was today sentenced to 20 years in prison in Hong Kong for exercising his right to freedom of expression following a politically motivated prosecution. Well, that’s not very accurate from Yvette Cooper. That is not why he was sentenced to 20 years in prison. And of course, British national he may be, but it’s worth noting that he spent the first 12 years of his life in mainland China before his family moved to Hong Kong. She went on to say that Beijing’s National Security Law was imposed on Hong Kong to silence China’s critics. And again, she might want to take a look at the very similar National Security Act 2023 in the United Kingdom and examine exactly what the purpose of that is. And then she concludes by saying that we stand with the people of Hong Kong and will always honour the historical commitments made under the legally binding Sino-British Joint Declaration, and China must do the same. Now, we’ll come back to that. But no great surprise to see that across the Atlantic, Marco Rubio has chucked out a sort of abbreviated version of exactly the same thing, saying it shows the world that Beijing will go to extraordinary lengths to silence those who advocate fundamental freedoms in Hong Kong, casting aside the international commitments Beijing made in the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration. So he’s referring back to that again. Now, what I’d like to do is take a look at what Dr. Warwick Powell said to Carl Zha on a recent episode of the Silk and Steel podcast, because he deals with exactly this issue and shatters the myths that the likes of Yvette Cooper and Marco Rubio are putting out.”
Dr Warwick Powell; “Jimmy Lai was part of an American destabilisation, slash regime change, frontline operation, and he was charged ultimately with sedition and for collusion with foreign powers. Now, I don’t know whether it was collusion or not, because collusion kind of implies that it was done in secret, but when you’re actually on a global stage calling for America to launch nuclear weapons on China, I’m not sure that that’s collusion. It’s certainly not the type of collusion, but he was charged under national security laws. Now, those national security laws were, of course, the subject of much controversy, and the Western press will talk about them as being pernicious and this and that, but of course they’re by and large mirrored on national security laws that you find in just about every other country in the world. And the other point to remember is that the national security laws passed by Hong Kong was actually part and parcel of the original agreement with the British, that there would be national security laws. And so the implication these days is that somehow what mainland China is doing runs contrary to the agreements in the original handover is actually, nonsense. There was always a requirement for national security laws to be passed. There was an attempt to do so in the early 2000s, and it failed in the face of orchestrated public protest. Eventually, they’ve succeeded. So Jimmy Lai gets charged. He’s found guilty. Pretty hard to not find him guilty, frankly, given all of the publicly available evidence, on top of the evidence that was presented in the court. And he was sentenced to 20 years. The west has gone absolutely apoplectic about this, but its got nothing to do with free speech.”
Watch; Western reconquest of the world. The Trump-Rubio program revealed George Galloway, 19 February 2026
George Galloway; “Donald Trump is dealing death and devastation, instability and chaos all over the world, even inside the European Union, even inside NATO, even inside Washington, even inside his own cabinet where it is widely believed that the vice-president, J.D. Vance, completely opposes the war against Iran. He’s causing devastation and chaos even in his own country. Multiple mass shootings, assassinations of politicians actually are revealed as plots and conspiracies. When the murder by ICE of two white Americans took place in the last month, half of America cheered, when Charlie Kirk was brutally assassinated on camera the other half of America cheered. America’s on the brink of civil conflict with a minority supporting Donald Trump, but a fanatic and heavily armed minority. This chaos has been unleashed as the prospect of the final end of Western European based hegemony in the world began to be obviously doomed. That’s what Marco Rubio’s speech to the Munich Security Conference was all about. If you haven’t read it, I urge you to read it line by line. It was a declaration that Western civilisation is dying, it’s going down, and that the Western European and their North American kith and kin must unite to reverse the anti-colonial trend, to reverse the trend towards multipolar power in the world. And the Europeans cheered it, in fact, they gave it a standing ovation. So now the global South Africa, Asia, Latin America, Eurasia, they all now know what the American empire plans, it plans a reconquest of the world before it is literally too late for them to mount such an expedition.”
In Munich the US announces its colonial ambitions and gets a standing ovation from the audience made up of EU politicians
Read; Rubio declared a return to brutal western colonialism – and Europe applauded by Jonathan Cook, 19 February 2026
‘In Munich, the US announced its intent to crush all opposition to its permanent status as imperial top dog, even if that means destroying everything, and all of us, in the process. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s speech at the Munich Security Conference last weekend was another troubling declaration of intent by the Trump administration.The explicit goal of US foreign policy, according to Rubio, is to resurrect the western colonial order that persisted for some five centuries until the Second World War. Old-school, white-man’s-burden colonialism is unapologetically back.
In Rubio’s preposterous retelling, Europe’s colonisation of much of the planet, and the rape and pillage of its resources, was a glorious era of western exploration, innovation and creativity. The West brought a “superior” civilisation to backward peoples while maintaining global order. Reflecting on the era before 1945, he observed: “The West had been expanding – its missionaries, its pilgrims, its soldiers, its explorers pouring out from its shores to cross oceans, settle new continents, build vast empires extending out across the globe.”
That course went into reverse 80 years ago: “The great western empires had entered into terminal decline, accelerated by godless communist revolutions and by anti-colonial uprisings that would transform the world and drape the red hammer and sickle across vast swaths of the map in the years to come.”
According to Rubio, that decline was accelerated by what he dismissed as the “abstractions of international law”, established by the United Nations in the immediate postwar period. In the pursuit of what he derisively termed “a perfect world”, these new universal laws – ones that treated all humans as equal – served only to hamstring western colonialism. Rubio neglected to mention that the purpose of international law was to prevent a return to the horrors of the Second World War: the extermination of civilians in death camps and the firebombing of European and Japanese cities. During his speech, Rubio offered Europe the chance to join the Trump administration in reviving “the West’s age of dominance” to “renew the greatest civilisation in human history.”
A deeper dive into the insane speech where Marco Rubio asks Europe to join the US in recolonising the world.
Watch or Listen; The ‘Donroe Doctrine’: This is Trump’s neocolonial plan for Latin America, Geopolitical Economy Report, 18 February 2026
‘US Secretary of State Marco Rubio delivered an overtly pro-colonialist speech at the Munich Security Conference in which he praised “the great Western empires” and said North America and Europe should unite to recolonize the Global South. Ben Norton reports on the increasing desperation of the imperialist West as its global dominance declines.’
Watch; Israel’s role against Venezuela; Palestine Declassified; 31 January 2026
‘In today’s show, we’ll be revealing the Zionist links to the opposition in Venezuela, where successive governments, after Hugo Chavez came to power in 1998, have lent their support to Palestine and the Axis of Resistance.
In 2009 Venezuela expelled Israel’s ambassador and broke off all diplomatic ties with the Zionist colony.
The current Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro, says the Palestinian resistance is engaged in what he describes as a “critical battle against fascism and colonialism.”
That’s why the revolutionary Venezuelan government is a beacon of anti-imperialism, and a symbol of solidarity with the Palestinian people, as Latifa Abouchakra will explain in our first report.
Our next report uncovers the material ways in which the Zionist entity stands to gain from regime change in Venezuela.’
Report by Craig Murray from Venezuela
Watch; The “Dangerous” Barrios of Caracas Craig Murray, 14 February 2026
Craig Murray; “Well, here we are in the Barrio Santa Rosa, and we’re told that the barrios are terribly dangerous places, that they’re full of crime. You shouldn’t go there. Official advice is not to go there. In fact, official advice is not to come to Venezuela at all, but actually, like almost everything else you’re told about Venezuela, it’s simply wrong. This is a perfectly nice place, actually quite a decent place to live. The population seem very happy here. There are no signs of crime. I certainly feel in no danger. I have no security here. Well, I have Natalia, the videographer, but she’s only about 4 foot 11. So. We are not in any danger. And one of the things you are told, which is simply the opposite of the truth, is that the Chavez and Maduro administrations involved in narcotics trafficking. And that’s the exact opposite of the truth. They’ve actually cleaned these streets of narcotics and of crime in general. Levels of crime are way, way, way down. And that’s done by good provision of public services, by making sure the housing is well maintained by the commune. As you can see, the streets are cleaned and they provide entertainment. Things like mobile cinema in public areas, give the kids things to do, sports facilities, all the sensible things you would do to reduce crime. They’ve done it. They’ve improved people’s standards of living and they’ve turned Caracas into a really decent environment. As I say, everything you’ve been told about it is untrue.”
Watch; How US Invaded Honduras 8 Times Because It Raised Banana Prices @financian, 16 December 2025
Dr. Roy Casagranda; ” Central America was the happy hunting ground for the United States. We invaded Honduras eight times and then I think we invaded Nicaragua seven times, Guatemala five times. They would make this terrible mistake of raising the price of bananas. I’m not kidding. It really was bananas. Periodically the government would go, we’re done with this, we’re going to free the peasants, we’re going to give them the land, they’ll get the profits. We don’t need this old feudal system to be here. And then the United States would send in the Marine Corps, invade the place, shoot it up, topple the government, install a puppet government that would restore the old system and then go back. And that’s why there’s a term banana republic. Americans just didn’t want to pay an extra 10 cents for their bananas. And so we would go in and shoot the place up. Central America was the happy hunting ground for the United States.”
Provoked War With Russia
Listen; PROF. John Mearsheimer : Trump Has No Offramp, Judging Freedom, 24 February 2026
Judge Napolitano; “Do you place any significance in the Ukrainian use of a British missile and British and American intelligence to successfully target a Russian munitions factory 800 miles into Russia from the Ukraine, Russian border?”
John Mearsheimer; “Well, I think what this represents is an increasing escalation by Ukraine against Russian targets. And I think we’re going to see more of this moving forward because it’s one of the few cards that the Ukrainians have to play. I don’t place special emphasis on what happened, I don’t think it’s a major escalatory step, I think it is a middle range escalatory step. But what I think is that it all points to the fact that the Russians have to put an end to this war in 2026. They just can’t let this go on, they have to make a major offensive effort over the course of 2026 to get some sort of armistice to bring the conflict to an end. Because this is just going to get worse and worse for the Russians if they don’t do something.”
Judge Napolitano; “Scott Ritter says that the Russians view the munitions plant that was attacked in their top five in level of importance to their defence production. In Ritter’s personal view, it’s number one of those five. But he recognises that not all analysts agree with him. Is there a reason you don’t consider this escalatory? And as you formulate your answer to that, can the Kremlin retaliate against Great Britain?
John Mearsheimer; “Well, there’s no question it’s escalatory. I’m not denying that. And I think what you’ve seen in this war is that both sides have marched up the escalation ladder. Remember, in terms of past escalations, the Ukrainians, with assistance from the United States and Britain, invaded Mother Russia. They put ground troops in there. Furthermore, they hit one leg of the nuclear triad of nuclear forces. Those were major league escalations, in my opinion. Those were escalations of the sort we would have never even contemplated doing in the Cold War. So hitting a missile factory is important, but it’s not the same as those two.
Judge Napolitano; “That’s as always a rational answer from you. But some of the Russian patience has been extraordinary. I mean, this attack on President Putin’s home, is the equivalent of some foreign country attacking Mar A Lago while President Trump was in the White House and yet there’s no massive response. Can you imagine how we would respond if any country, just pick a country, North Korea, Russia, China, Venezuela, any country that has the ability to do it, attacked Mar A Lago. I think that our response would be swift and massive.”
John Mearsheimer; “Well, if you attack Britain or you attack any NATO country, you run the risk of getting into a war with NATO. That’s the problem that the Russians face, they’re up against Ukraine plus the West. But when you talk about the West, you’re talking about NATO, and there’s an Article 5 guarantee built into the NATO Treaty, and the end result is, if the Russians hit any NATO country, they run the risk that the Americans will be dragged in and they’ll end up in a nuclear war, and they want to go to great lengths to avoid that. The point I would make is that I think the Russians are running out of patience. I think the sort of argument that Scott and others make on the show is correct, that you can only push so far and at some point the Russians will retaliate. It’s hard to say what that will look like. There have been reports in the news that the French and the British are talking about giving nuclear weapons to Ukraine, and Medvedev has made it clear that if that happens, Russia will not be reluctant to use nuclear weapons against either Britain or France in retaliation. But you can see where this one is headed. As long as the war continues and as long as The West continues to support the Ukrainians, the Russians become more and more desperate, and at some point, I think they will lash out, I do think that’s coming.”
Listen; UK steps up support for Ukraine, UK Column News, 25 February 2026
Mike Robinson; “Yvette Cooper is there (Kiev) announcing new support for Ukrainian resilience, as they describe it. So they’re talking about military humanitarian reconstruction support, including £20 million of new funding for emergency energy support, £5.7 million to provide humanitarian assistance to frontline communities. Medical mentoring is how they describe it, and also helicopter training. So not quite F16s, but nonetheless. And then Starmer is going to lead a Coalition of the Willing call today as Foreign Secretary, Cooper is in Kiev and they’re basically saying that ‘they were going to continue to support Ukraine. That’s going to make Britain and Europe safer, stronger and more secure as a result.’ Well, we can back that if we like, but let’s just bring Yvette on, saying, ‘today I’m shining a light on Russia’s disgraceful attempts to erase Ukrainian identity in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine.’
Vanessa, let me just get a comment from you on that, because it seems to me that what Russia was intending to do with the special military operation was in fact to reinforce the Russian identity in the Donbas, not raise Ukrainian identity anywhere else.”
Vanessa Beeley; “Yeah, absolutely. They were always very clear about that. And really, basically, what worries me about this nuclear rhetoric. So it’s fine for a Zionist genocidal regime to have nuclear weapons and it’s fine for a Nazi regime in Ukraine to have weapons, which speaks very loudly as to the ideology of members of our own governmental class, whichever side of the divide they’re on.”
The West’s next proxy war against Russia could be in Georgia
Watch; Instability Rising: UK Sanctions Georgia. Azerbaijan Iran-War Threat, Lasha Kasradze; Neutrality Studies, 26 February 2026
Intro; ‘UK moves to sanctioning a Georgian TV network, while its own online safety laws punish citizens but exempt licensed news outlets. What is up between Europe and the Caucasus? To talk about this, I’m joined again today by my friend and colleague, international relations analyst Lasha Kasradze.’
Pascal Lottaz; “One of Georgia’s largest private TV stations, Imedi TV, just got sanctioned by the UK. Can you give me the updates there and also let our viewers know from outside Georgia what Imedi TV is and how big it is in Georgia?”
Lasha Kasradze; “Absolutely. This is another bizarre event in the chain of many bizarre events that have befallen upon Georgia in the last few years and months. So Imedi TV is the largest broadcasting network for our western audiences. I guess CNN or Fox News come to mind, just to compare. But for a small country like Georgia, it’s the most popular and all encompassing, if you will, a broadcasting network, media network. And just this morning I heard this, as everyone did of my colleagues, I’m sure that Imedi TV was sanctioned by the United Kingdom. And the allegation is sort of par for the course, which is that Imedi TV was provoking, just think about what they said, they were paraphrasing of course, but they were provoking or stoking more conflict in Ukraine. As if Imedi TV has anything to do with the conflict in Ukraine or that it has caused the conflict or Ukraine or somehow it’s augmenting the conflict in Ukraine. But by saying that basically overall speaking, Georgia made the right choice not to get entangled in opening up the second front or one way or the other, helping in terms of military support Ukraine, because it understood that it was going to be existential, it would present an existential threat for Georgia. That’s basically the narrative that Imedi TV and its editorial team have maintained all throughout, since the beginning of the war, which under normal circumstances, within normal sort of collective psychological condition of a state, shouldn’t be a shock or something that is so unacceptable that you can sanction a major TV station in a sovereign state. So we all know the phrase liberal fascism, I don’t know what else to call it. In other words, if you don’t peddle their propaganda, then you have no right to speak. And they call it liberalism, they call that democracy, they call that promotion of rights. But if you reverse this, if you reverse the situation, if you listen to, say, the opposition television stations that are continuing to glorify some of the neocon former stars or famous or infamous stars like Toria Nuland, for example, being hero or being a democracy exporter and being this brave woman who was giving away sandwiches in the middle of Maidan in 2014, that is allowed. Propagating the very exact individuals and propping up the reputations of the individuals that are known to be neocons and known to have had visceral hatred of Russia and are basically known to be causes of, basically promoting this war, glorifying them and defending them publicly and in the media sphere, that’s fine. But anyone who says otherwise and says, wait a minute, look, we appreciate what the neocon establishment, say, under Bush was trying to do, but that did not work out, so let us just step back from that and think twice before we get on that bandwagon of cursing Russia or of continuing to allow Georgia to become this battering ram against Russia. No, that’s unacceptable. That’s propaganda that is considered to be pro-Russian. So in other words, long story short, the only time these people will be satisfied is if you sacrifice yourself for their ideology and for their visceral hatred of Russia.”
Watch; NATO’s War of Choice – The Sabotage of the Istanbul Negotiations, Glenn Diesen, 24 February 2026
Glenn Diesen; ” from the second day that the objective of the (Ukraine) war had become regime change (in Russia). Then on the 27th of February, that is the third day of the invasion, the same day that Russia and Ukraine announced that they would hold peace talks, the EU approved 450 million euros in military aid, which then would also reduce the incentives to negotiate with Moscow. On the day after, on 28 February, the spokesperson for Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the UK stated, and is a quote, ‘the measures that a large part of the world are introducing are to bring down the Putin regime‘, just to bring home the argument that this is about regime change. Then in March of 2022, as the talks were going to start between the Ukrainians and the Russians, the US spokesperson, Ned Price, was asked if the US would support the unnegotiated settlement that Zelenskyy was advancing, in which Price answered, quote, ‘this is a war that is in many ways bigger than Russia is bigger than Ukraine. Principles are at stake that must be maintained’. He went on to suggest that this was more about world order and the rules that America had to uphold. So again, it was not the main objective to put an end to the Ukraine war at the negotiation table. The US Secretary of Defence, Lloyd Austin, also outlined the US objective in the Ukraine war as weakening a strategic rival, in which he said, quote, ‘we want to see Russia weakened to the degree that it can’t do the kinds of things it’s done in invading Ukraine. So Russia has already lost a lot of military capabilities and a lot of its troops, quite frankly, and we want to see them not have the capability to very quickly reproduce that capability’. Yet even more direct language coming from Leon Panetta, a former CIA director, who argued then also In March of 2022, quote, ‘we are engaged in a conflict here. It’s a proxy war with Russia, whether we say it or not. The way you get leverage is by frankly going in and killing Russians’. Yet in the media, the narrative was still that this was all about Ukrainian democracy and sovereignty. However, more evidence rolled in on 22 March 2022, when Neil Ferguson reported in Bloomberg, actually he cited sources from the US and the UK governments, and he concluded that the preference now was for, quote, ‘the conflict to be extended and thereby bleed Putin as the only end game now is the end of the Putin regime’. So we see time and time again coming from several Western countries, especially the US and UK, that this is an opportunity to pursue regime change in Moscow. So why hurry with an end to the war?”
Watch; The War on Terror to the Present Day, Dr Lucy Morgan Edwards; UK Column News, 5 February 2026
‘Dr Lucy Morgan Edwards; “I find it very astonishing when I come back to the UK, how anti-Russia the whole media is. And there seems to be a sense that we’re still dealing with the Soviet Union. There’s no awareness that actually we’ve moved on from the Soviet Union. When you go back to people like even Kissinger and George Kennan, who was the great American Cold War strategist, he was the ambassador post war in Moscow and he’s written memoirs and diaries. One thing that I read in Scott Horton’s very excellent book about George Kennan’s attitude to NATO eastward expansion was that we should be supporting Putin as a moderate rather than trying to act in the very belligerent way that we have by continuing to expand NATO eastward.”
Zionism is a Colonial State Project / Iran, Israel, Gaza, Syria
IRAN
Max Blumenthal, How Trump was trapped into Iran war; The Grayzone; Feb 25
‘Max Blumenthal joins Dialogue Works to expose how the National Endowment for Democracy quietly turned Iran’s June riots into a Pentagon talking point, boasting in open session of deploying 200 covert Starlink terminals and partnering with monarchist networks to inflate the death toll into a pretext for war. He traces how this “private CIA” infrastructure, combined with crushing U.S. sanctions, trapped Trump into promising “help is on the way,” then green‑lighting a massive carrier buildup that left him effectively subcontracted to Netanyahu and a small clique of Zionist billionaires and fixers like Kushner and Witkoff. From there, Blumenthal walks through the bigger picture: an Iran that has reached near military parity with Israel through indigenous missiles and drones, Pentagon brass quietly warning the war is unwinnable, Arab vassal states jolted by Mike Huckabee’s on‑air Greater Israel fantasies, and a Trump family that now believes it’s at the mercy of the same oligarchic “they” driving the region toward a long, possibly nuclear, Greater Israel war.’
Iran may have either hacked or taken a MQ-4C Triton drone over the Persian Gulf.
Watch; Iran Takes Down American Drone Propaganda & Co. Feb 27 2026
American bungling in the Middle East.
Watch; ProfessorJohn Mearsheimer : Trump Has No Offramp, Judging Freedom, 24 February 2026
John Mearsheimer; “To go back to the whole question of whether we’re going to attack Iran or not, if you look at this story in the Washington Post, and you look at where we are in terms of whether or not we can succeed in an attack against Iran, it’s quite clear we just shouldn’t do this. So then the question is, why is it likely we will do it? And the reason is it’s likely we will do it because of the influence of The Lobby on President Trump. He’s under tremendous pressure from people in The Lobby and from Israel itself to attack Iran and to solve Israel’s problems. It’s not in our national interest to attack Iran. Iran is not a threat to the United States.”
Judge Napolitano; ” All right, here’s the $64,000 question. Does Donald Trump have an off ramp? Can he get out of this unscathed?”
John Mearsheimer; “No, he cannot get out of it unscathed. He has two terrible options. What if he attacks? He’s not going to succeed militarily, and he’s going to be in a long war with Iran in all likelihood, and that is not a good option. But if he doesn’t attack, he will be crucified by The Lobby and by Israel for being weak and for not having taken care of Israel and they’ll portray this whole situation not in terms of Israel’s interest, but in terms of America’s interests. They’ll say he left the American people down, he talked tough, but he didn’t deliver in the end, and that we’re greatly threatened by the fact that he didn’t attack Iran. That’ll be the argument they’ll make. And he’ll pay a price for that. There’s no question about that. He’ll pay a political price for that. So he loses either way. And then the question is, which is the least bad alternative? And I would argue at this point, it’s quite clear that the least bad alternative is to face the heat from Israel and face the heat from The Lobby. And he would be worse off if he went to war against Iran. But he’s boxed himself in. He has no good option here.
Judge Napolitano; “If he shows up tonight at the State of the Union and waves a piece of paper and says, ‘this has President Pezeshkian’s signature on it and mine, we’ve come to an agreement. No nuclear enrichment, therefore no attack’, Netanyahu will try to undo that, will he not?
John Mearsheimer; “Not only Netanyahu, The Lobby will. This is what happened with the JCPOA. I mean, what we’re talking about here in these negotiations that are taking place now between the Iranians on one side and us on the other side, is coming up with a maybe improved version of the JCPOA. But we’re not going to get anything more than that. As we all know, the Israelis, especially Benjamin Netanyahu, were adamantly opposed to the JCPOA because it left Iran with some nuclear enrichment capability. And that is unacceptable to the Israelis. So the piece of paper he’ll be waving tonight in this hypothetical scenario you were describing, will still leave the Iranians with a nuclear enrichment capability. This will enrage the Israelis. It will enrage The Lobby. It will cause Trump all sorts of problems. It won’t be a deal that anybody who is pro Israel will be happy with.”
Trump’s lies that Iranian missiles could reach the US mainland, echo Blair’s 2002 lies that Iraqi missiles could be launched in 45 minutes, and for the same reason, to drag the world into another war to appease Israel.
Listen; Trump says Iran ‘working to build missiles that will soon reach the United States of America’; UK Column News, 25 February 2026
Trump; (about Iran); “But this is some terrible people. They’ve already developed missiles that can threaten Europe and our bases overseas. And they’re working to build missiles that will soon reach the United States of America. After Midnight Hammer, they were warned to make no future attempts to rebuild their weapons programme, in particular nuclear weapons. Yet they continue.”
Vanessa Beeley; “So we really are in weapons of mass destruction territory now with Iran. And it’s very clear to me that there is going to be no backing off from this. Whether that’s Israeli Netanyahu pressure on Trump or Trump simply has as part of his agenda to fully destabilise Iran. I don’t think it’s going to be simply a kinetic war. I think we’re now entering the territory of really a full blown hybrid war. Let’s just have a look at this map which shows very clearly the Kurdish areas. So the areas in Turkey, in Syria, in Iraq, on the border with Iran and even inside Iran. Now what is interesting, that entire conglomeration of Kurdish population is between 30 to 40 million according to conservative estimates. Of course the separatist factions within those populations are very much backed by Washington and Israel against Iran. So that gives an indication of how big this threat is. Recently on UK Column I published an article which talks about how British intelligence has been radicalising children in the Syrian ISIS programme prisons for the long war against Iran. Trump basically gave the green light to Jolani to retake the northeast, pushing the Kurds out into the far northeast corner and releasing ISIS fighters, up to 15 to 20,000, from the prisons which then become a threat in Iraq and also potentially on the border with Iran. This is effectively the release of an Israeli documentary talking about the training of Kurdish separatists proxies in Iran. So within Iran itself and on the borders of Iran, specialising in protest training and resistance training, that’s the Israeli terminology to Iranian security forces. Then in the last few days, Iranian Kurdish factions have formed an alliance which apparently has as its mission to topple the Tehran government. So it’s an alliance of five members of various political groups within the Iranian Kurdish areas, known as the political forces of Iranian Kurdistan. At the moment, we have videos circulating on social media that I’ve been able to confirm that IRGC and Iranian military are heading to the border between Iran and Iraq, obviously building up defence against the potential of an attack from Kurdistan, Iraqi Kurdistan and even from within Iran itself. So clearly this is part of a hybrid war. There is no chance that the US and Israel are going to be able to cross borders into Iran. They would be eliminated. But what they appear to be doing is grouping their proxy forces together. In addition to that, according to Ehsan Safarnejad who’s an Iranian analyst that I’ve been speaking to quite often in the last few weeks, the Iranian forces are now erecting a security wall on that border. So they seem to be well aware of the threat.”
Watch; Iran War OVER? US Warship Sinking (in sewage!), Pentagon in PANIC | Larry Johnson & Patrick Henningsen; Danny Haiphong; 24 February 2026
‘Has Iran already won the war? The USS Gerald Ford is in big trouble and Patrick Henningsen & Larry Johnson react to the devastating warning sent by the Pentagon which threatens to upend Trump’s war push.’
Professor Marandi and Max Blumenthal discuss Iran.
Watch; ‘An existential war’: Prof. Mohammad Marandi on the coming US-Israeli assault on Iran The Grayzone, 20 February 2026
‘Professor Mohammad Marandi of the University of Tehran joins The Grayzone’s Max Blumenthal to discuss the looming US-Israeli regime change war on Iran and how his country will respond, both militarily and politically. Marandi forecasts economically devastating consequences, with an energy crisis brought on by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the possible collapse of Gulf family monarchies, and a militarily unmanageable environment for the Trump administration. While Trump reportedly considers a series of “symbolic” strikes to weaken Iran’s negotiating hand, Marandi argues that Iran has no choice but to respond with maximum force.’
Read; The Suicidal Folly of a War with Iran, Chris Hedges, 20 February 2026
‘The Laurel and Hardy negotiating team of Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, coupled with Trump’s appalling ignorance of world affairs and megalomania, seem set to push the U.S. into yet another debacle in the Middle East, one the Congress has not approved, and the public does not want. The demands imposed on Iran by the Trump White House are no more acceptable to the regime in Tehran than those imposed on Hamas in Gaza under Trump’s sham peace plan. Trump’s demand that Iran shut down its nuclear program and give up its missile capabilities in return for no new sanctions is as tone deaf as calling on Hamas to disarm in Gaza. But since we have long dispensed with diplomats, who are linguistically, politically and culturally literate, who can step into the shoes of their adversaries, we are being led to another war in the Middle East by our newest coterie of buffoons. The U.S. and Israel foolishly believe they can bomb their way to decapitating the Iranian government and installing a client regime. That this non-reality-based belief system failed in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya eludes them.
The promise of no new sanctions will not incentivise Iran to broker an agreement. Iran is already crippled by onerous sanctions that have gutted its economy. This will do nothing to break the economic stranglehold. Iran will not give up its nuclear program, which has the potential to be weaponized, or its ballistic missile program, which Israel said it would target in an air attack. Israel’s reputed nuclear arsenal of some 300 warheads is a powerful incentive for Iran to retain the capacity to build a nuclear arsenal of its own. Iran, like Hamas, is never going to render itself defenceless against those seeking its annihilation.
An aerial attack on Iran will not be like the 12-day assault last June against Iran’s nuclear facilities and state and security facilities. Then Iran calibrated its response with symbolic strikes on Al Udeid air base in Qatar in the hopes that it would not lead to a wider, protracted conflict. If an aerial assault is launched, Iran will have nothing to lose. It will understand that appeasing its adversaries is impossible. Iran is not Iraq. Iran is not Afghanistan. Iran is not Lebanon. Iran is not Libya. Iran is not Syria. Iran is not Yemen. Iran is the seventeenth largest country in the world, with a land mass equivalent to the size of Western Europe. It has a population of almost 90 million — 10 times greater than Israel — and its military resources, as well as alliances with China and Russia, make it a formidable opponent. Despite Iran’s relative military weakness, when set against the combined forces of the U.S. and Israel, it can inflict a lot of damage. It will do this as swiftly as possible. Hundreds of American troops will likely be killed. Iran will certainly shut down the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most important oil chokepoint that facilitates the passage of 20 percent of the world’s oil supply. This will double or triple the price of oil and devastate the global economy. It will target oil installations along with U.S. ships and military bases in the region.
Mounting losses and a huge spike in oil prices will provide the fodder for Trump, and his vile counterpart in Israel, to ignite a sustained regional war. This is the cost of being governed by imbeciles. God help us.’
‘Lest we forget what happened to trigger a war with Iran – it was the West’s usual regime change and country demolition and nothing to do with the Iranian government killing their own people. The demonstrations were full of Mossad agitators who killed the maximum number of people to then blame the Iranian government.’
Watch; Seyed M. Marandi: Iran Warns of Overwhelming Retaliation to ANY U.S. Strike Glenn Diesen, 31 January 2026
Professor Seyed Marandi; “It’s pretty clear for the Iranians that what we’re seeing today is an extension of the 12-Day War. In the 12-Day War, the Israeli regime and the Trump regime, they collaborated to undermine Iran, and they failed. And the riots and the terror attacks that we saw in the last couple of weeks, a couple of weeks ago, on January 8th and the 9th, they were an extension of that. And we saw how the US Secretary of Treasury admitted this in Davos. He gloated about it. He said this is statecraft, that he was able to manipulate Iranian currency and bring people to the streets. Now, when people came to the streets, it was peaceful. Nothing happened. And then after, on the third day, we saw these very highly trained groups, terrorists and rioters in different cities and in different parts of big cities come to the streets and create great destruction. And on the 8th and 9th January, they were killing large numbers of people, especially on the 8th, they killed large numbers of police officers. And that’s why on the night, the armed policemen and the security forces, they came down very hard on them and ended this. So this was this project killing 350 police officers. They also killed many ordinary people because they wanted the casualty numbers to increase to make the case for war. And then after that, we saw, of course, the Israelis took responsibility, they proudly took responsibility. Western media pretends that they didn’t. They call these peaceful protesters, even though the footage clearly shows them shooting and killing police officers, beating them to death and so on. But Pompeo, the former head of the CIA, said the Israelis were there, Mossad issued a statement saying that they were involved. And Channel 14 of Israel, which is close to Netanyahu, said very clearly that the weapons that we took into Iran caused the deaths of hundreds of Iranian police officers. So imagine if something like that happened in your country, in the United States, what the state would do in response. And then this media campaign that we saw afterwards, from conservative to liberal, from the Guardian to Fox News, from the worst of the neocons like Levin to the supposed progressives like AOC, they’re all talking about ‘helping’ Iran, and of course, we know what that means. So this was obviously a project, and it was an extension of that war which failed. But what it succeeded in doing was to encourage Trump or push Trump, depending on how you view it, towards confrontation with Iran. And of course, the intentions keep changing, because one day it’s about the protesters. Then Trump himself admits that both sides were shooting. Then it’s about the nuclear programme, which was apparently destroyed a few months ago by Trump, obliterated, I think was the word, and so it’s constantly the intent. Then the United States sends messages to Iran saying you have to put aside your missile programme, you have to put aside your support for regional organisations and allies, and you have to of course, end your peaceful nuclear programme. We have conflicting messages coming from the United States, but the Iranian response has been clear. Any attack on Iran will be seen as an all out war and the Iranian response will be overwhelming. And I think Trump has boxed himself in, as you said. I think that’s a very good way of putting it. Trump has come in beating his chest and now he either has to back off or he has to attack. If he attacks, the retaliation is going to be massive. And it won’t just be directed at American bases, it will be directed at American interests across the region. And those Arab dictatorships, family dictatorships, or even Aliyev’s dictatorship in Azerbaijan, all of them have been complicit, they’ve hosted US bases or they’ve assisted the Israelis in the 12 day war. All of them therefore will be punished. And oil and gas from the Persian Gulf region will be disrupted for a very, very long time.”
Watch; Iran WARNS Trump: Next Missile Strike WIPES OUT US Navy & Israel | Mohammad Marandi, Danny Haiphong, 15 February 2026
Professor Marandi; “The US Empire, by targeting Iran, is targeting everybody and it’s targeting the American people, ordinary American people. This is an attempt to create an empire for the zionist regime, full control of West Asia. Other countries in the region are too weak and too compromised to take a stand. Some are just obedient, like Azerbaijan or the Emirates. The others are obedient, but they know this is bad news for them. They’re just thinking if they have to go, they’ll just go to their palaces in New York and in California, wherever, in Europe or Southeast Asia somewhere and in Australia or New Zealand. And then that’s basically going to be it, that this is in order to bring about control over oil and gas resources for the zionist empire. And, of course, to eliminate the Palestinian people. And if they get the upper hand, obviously their borders will expand, they will continue with the Greater Israel Project. They are a ruthless group of people who will just slaughter children, they are slaughtering kids every day in Palestine, in Lebanon, and they’ll continue, they’ll do it in Jordan, they’ll do it in Syria, they’ll do it in Lebanon, they’ll do it in Egypt, they’ll do it in Saudi Arabia, and they’ll go all the way to Iraq. That’s the plan. That’s the Greater Israel project. And if Mr. Erdogan thinks he’s going to be able to benefit from this, that’s utterly immoral. But he won’t. Ultimately, the west supports the zionist empire over everyone else. There’s no competition. So, the axis of resistance is determined to prevent this evil empire from expanding. And the United States is sacrificing itself, its own people and the wellbeing of the American people for this entity. So this is a decisive moment in history. The consequences of war in the Persian Gulf and war between aggression by the United States against Iran will be far greater. The consequences will be far greater than the war. I hope there’s no war. I hope there’s no devastation for the world, but if, if the price of gasoline goes through the roof, the price of energy, that means factories will be shut down, that means businesses will be shut down, and that means there will be an economic depression at a time when things are not going well at all. We know where the global economy is going, we know where the US Economy is going, and there will only be one entity to blame. Everyone will know that it will be the Epstein regimes in Washington and Tel Aviv, and of course, all the Europeans will be complicit as well, because they are all clamouring for war, but it will not go well for anyone.”
Watch; Seyed M. Marandi: Ready for War – Iran’s Major Retaliation, Glen Diesen, 13 February 2026
‘Seyed Mohammad Marandi is a professor at Tehran University and a former advisor to Iran’s Nuclear Negotiation Team. Prof. Marandi argues that even a small token attack on Iran will trigger total war.’
The only country that wants the war in Iran is Israel which proves the power of the Israel lobby on all our complicit politicians.
Watch; John Mearsheimer says Israel pushing Trump towards war with Iran MiddleEastEye, 18 February 2026
John Mearsheimer; “I believe that virtually every country in the Middle East, except maybe the UAE which is pretty closely allied with Israel. But virtually every other country in the Middle East, plus the Chinese, plus the Russians, want this war to not happen. The only country that really wants it to happen is Israel. As we’ve talked about, the Americans really don’t want this war. Trump doesn’t want to fight a war against Iran. He’s being pushed down this road by the Israelis. So you see the remarkable power of Israel simply because it has such a hold over American policymakers. Just think about it, every country in the Middle East, except maybe the UAE, is desperate to avoid this war. The Chinese and the Russians don’t want this war. Trump really doesn’t want this war. Who wants this war? Benjamin Netanyahu.”
Mearsheimer tells Piers Morgan that Iran’s treatment of its people is not our business and not the real reason why we are going to bomb them.
Watch; Had there been no American sanctions, there’d be no protests in Iran today, AnalystNews, 23 January 2026
Piers Morgan; ” But what about the appalling human rights record of this Iranian regime?”
John Mearsheimer; “I’m not defending how they treat their people. I’m just telling you I think that how they treat their people is playing a small part in causing these uprisings today. I agree that the regime under Khomeini is repressive. My view is that’s the Iranians’ business. It’s not your business or my business to go into Iran and rearrange the politics of Iran. I believe in sovereignty. I don’t like the idea of countries coming into the United States and interfering in our politics. And I’m sure you as a Brit don’t want other countries interfering in British politics. But the idea that a country like Iran, which is no threat to the United States or, or a country like Venezuela, which is no…
Piers Morgan (interrupting); ” Iran, is no threat to the United States?”
John Mearsheimer; ” No, it’s not. Why is it a threat to the United States?”
Piers Morgan; “Maybe because the Ayatollah has repeatedly threatened the United States publicly.”
John Mearsheimer; “He can repeatedly threaten the United States till he’s blue in the face. Who cares? The question is, does he have the military capability to do harm to us? Well, he’s had the answer. But you’re making the argument that if they’re not a threat to the United States, they’re a threat to Israel because we’re joined at the hip with Israel. Anything that’s a threat to Israel is a threat to the United States. I don’t buy that argument. I’m an American firster. I care about the US national interest. And it is not in our national interest to have this conflictual relationship with Iran. And if it weren’t for the fact that the Israelis have so much power in the United States and insist that we keep Iran as an adversary, we would otherwise have good relations with the Iranians.”
Turkey could be next in Israel’s targets for regime change
Listen; COL. Douglas Macgregor : Bombing Iran Won’t Fix This Judging Freedom, 8 February 2026
Judge Napolitano; “Naftali Bennett is the former Netanyahu chief of staff and former prime minister who ousted his former boss and then was ousted by him. Here’s what he said about Turkey two days ago.”
Naftali Bennett; “I want to be very clear. Turkey and Qatar have gained influence in Syria, are seeking influence elsewhere and everywhere throughout the region. And from here, I warn Turkey is the new Iran. Erdogan is sophisticated, dangerous, and he seeks to encircle Israel. We can’t close our eyes again, and while some senior Israelis were on Qatar’s payroll, Qatar and Turkey are nourishing the Islamic Brotherhood monster that is growing and eventually might become as dangerous as the one created by Iran. Turkey and Qatar are gaining influence not only in Syria, but also in Gaza through the front door, and everyone. And trying to create a new choke ring. Turkey is trying to flip Saudi Arabia against us and establish a hostile Sunni access with nuclear Pakistan.”
Colonel MacGregor; “if he’s serious, and I think he is, why would you begin a war against Iran? The only thing that the Israelis are doing is creating enemies who are now finding alliance together. Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Turkey, very good examples. Sunni states, they have buried the hatchet for all intents and purposes with the Shiites, at least for the foreseeable future, because they see themselves as ending up exactly like Iran. That’s the point. And why then would you press ahead with this war on Iran? Well, it goes back to this Greater Israel project. Do you have to conquer the entire region or destroy it in order for your Greater Israel project to succeed? Well, I guess so. So the question, Judge, is are we expected once we finish up destroying Iran, to move on to the destruction of Turkey? Is this the next round in this insane series of wars?”
Judge Napolitano; “Well, it probably is, given the control that Netanyahu and the donor class in this country have over the American government.”
Trump; “I’ve always heard peace in the Middle East is impossible. And it’s turned out not to be. And we do have some work to do with Iran. They can’t have a nuclear weapon. It’s very simple. You can’t have peace in the Middle East if they have a nuclear weapon. And they can’t have a nuclear weapon. And they’ve been told that very strongly.”
Judge Napolitano; “If Iran had a nuclear weapon, that might be the best thing for peace.”
Col Douglas Macgregor; “Just recently, within the last 24 hours, the President of Iran has reiterated once again that Iran does not have a nuclear weapon, nor does it aspire to get one, because there is a fatwa, in other words, a decree from the Supreme Leader who leads the Shiite Islamic State, that under no circumstances will nuclear weapons exist on Iranian soil. All the intelligence people that I’ve ever spoken to have all said categorically that the Iranians do not have a nuclear weapon. Now, one thing that I think that we may have discussed in the past, I don’t know, is that after this next round of war with Iran, I would expect nuclear weapons to proliferate. What is the lesson if you are Iran? It’s even more strident and stark and grim than the lesson administered to Libya and Muhammad Gaddafi. The lesson is very simple. If you don’t have a nuclear weapon, you are at risk of destruction at the hands of the United States.”
ISRAEL Palestine, Lebanon & Syria
Now that so many Middle East countries have heard from Huckabee that, like Palestine, they risk being absorbed into Greater Israel, perhaps they will look for support from Iran, Russia, China and Yemen to resist zionist hegemony over the region.
Listen; Huckabee Admits Insanity of Christian Zionism on Tucker: Israel Can Take ‘All’ of Middle East, Rania Khalik Dispatches, 24 February 2026
Intro; ‘Mike Huckabee’s reference to borders stretching “from the Euphrates to the Nile” has sparked a diplomatic firestorm across the Middle East. Even governments that normalised relations with Israel — including the UAE — publicly condemned the remarks. Why did this rhetoric hit such a nerve? And is it really new, or just unusually blunt? At the same time, tensions between Israel and Saudi Arabia are rising, fractures between Riyadh and Abu Dhabi are deepening, and the risk of a US–Iran war looms in the background, a conflict that could drag Gulf states into a confrontation they don’t control. What does this moment reveal about the future of normalisation, regional alliances, and the possibility of a wider war? Rania Khalek was joined by Giorgio Cafiero on Dispatches to break it all down.’
Rania Khalek; “I think a good place to start would be what got a lot of attention over the weekend, which is Tucker Carlson dropped this bombshell interview with US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, who for those who know Mike Huckabee, they’re well aware that he is this like rapture-ready, just fanatical religious freak (Christian Zionist), and he really does believe in the End Times, and he believes Israel is central to the End Times, and as a result, Israel can not only do no wrong, but Huckabee had some words that I’m going to play and then we can talk about the backlash because there has been quite the regional backlash and there’s so much he said in this like hour- long interview with Tucker Carlson. But this is what caused a firestorm in the Middle East.”
Tucker Carlson; “And you tell me, as the theologian, if I’m getting this wrong, but from the Euphrates to the Nile, I think that’s right, and that would include like basically the entire Middle East. That would be the Levant, so that would be Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon. It would also be big parts of Saudi Arabia and Iraq. It would be…”
Mike Huckabee; “I’m not sure it would go that far. It would be a big piece of land, but here’s the point…”
Tucker Carlson; “It would be a lot of places that are now countries.”
Mike Huckabee; “But this particular area that we’re talking about now, Israel, is a land that God gave through Abraham to a people that he chose. It was a people, a place and a purpose. We can look at it that way. Christian Zionism. I want to go back because that’s where we started.”
Tucker Carlson; “I’m not going to let you off on this because you have said it three times that God gave this land to these people. And so it is entirely fair for me with respect to ask what land are you talking about? Because I just read Genesis 15, as I have many times and that land, I think it says from the Nile to the Euphrates, which is once again basically the entire Middle East. So God gave that land to his people, the Jews, or he didn’t. You’re saying he did. What does that mean? Does Israel have the right to that land? Because you’re appealing to Genesis, you’re saying that’s the original deed.”
Mike Huckabee; “It would be fine if they took it all.”
Rania Khalek; “Incredible. ‘It would be fine if they took it all’. And unsurprisingly, we have seen the countries of the region respond very negatively to that remark. They released a joint statement,the Jordanians, the Emiratis, the Republic of Indonesia, Pakistan, Bahrain, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Oman, the State of Palestine, Qatar, Kuwait, Lebanon, Egypt, together with the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and a League of Arab States and the Gulf Cooperation Council, they released this joint statement expressing their strong condemnation and profound concern regarding the statements made by Mike Hukabee in which he indicated it would be acceptable for Israel to exercise control over territories belonging to Arab states, including the occupied West Bank. It’s not common to have a joint statement from so many US allied countries condemning remarks by a US Ambassador to a country.”
Max Blumenthal : Lies the Israelis Told Trump; Judge Napolitano – Judging Freedom; 26 Feb 2026
Watch; Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘one single cause’: Israel Aljazeera, 10 February 2026
Craig Mokhiber; “What we know from the evidence, what the facts present is the systematic corruption of US, UK and other governments, media, social media and businesses by proxies of this foreign regime, Israel. But what the Western media has been doing is they’ve been framing the story, first they tried to frame it as a scandalous tale of a wealthy sexual pervert, financier and paedophile, and some of his rich and powerful friends, but then as more political details started to emerge about the role that he was playing, they tried to shift and this now familiar narrative, ‘blame the Russians!’ Even though there is nothing to suggest in the Epstein files that he was principally concerned with Russian interests. Rather, what we know for certain was that Jeffrey Epstein was a very committed zionist. By the way, these things even reveal that he was a Jewish supremacist, as made clear by a number of racist exchanges in the emails, but that his principal cause was that of the Israeli regime and in fact, beyond his own undeniable arrogance and bigotry and ego and hedonism, what all the documents reveal is that the money, the weapons, the security tech, the spying, the sex, the paedophilia, Epstein’s extensive network, his horrific abuse of women and girls and all the people that fell into his web, they were all essentially commodities to him, traded for the advantage of one single cause, which is Israel. That was the motive. And we know he had extensive high-level connections to the Israeli regime, to its government, to security, intelligence, its financing circles, its business community. That was the means that went with the motive. So this is not some story of a lone sex offender or a new Russiagate, as Western media corporations are trying to convince us. It’s a story about Israeli influence in the highest corridors of power and wealth.”
Aljazeera Presenter; “That’s why this latest drop feels different because there are really two stories happening simultaneously. There’s obviously the depraved trafficking of underage girls, but what this latest drop shows is the absolute rot at the heart of elite institutions. You’ve watched it up close, you’ve seen the decay. You were talking earlier that in the 1980s the UN would stand up for things and then it just stopped after Oslo. Does it feel like the international order has been destroyed or did it commit suicide?”
Craig Mokhiber; “Well, I think there was plenty of internal complicity in its own destruction, but there have been powerful forces operating for many years. And interestingly, where we saw those most visibly was in successive US Governments that were always trying to weaken, contain, obstruct the United Nations in its activities around peace and security. We see it with the US veto repeatedly, but also around human rights, about global development and so on. The US always used the United Nations as a tool when it was useful to it, but obstructed it when it didn’t like any of its purposes, was never committed to a kind of universal normative mission of the UN and has always been committed to ‘might makes right’. What we see with the Trump administration is they stripped away all of the smoke and mirrors and are just openly imperial, colonial as well. Israel is the other force that has for years tried to weaken the United Nations, tried to find, to create, carve out exceptions to international law. And there was a period of time when other member states of the UN stood up to try to make sure that that erosion didn’t continue so openly. We are now in a period of unparalleled complicity where we see country after country, region after region, effectively bowing down to the empire. The pinnacle of that was the adoption of Security Council 2803, which erased 80 years of international law, of international resolutions of the rights of the Palestinian people, and as if we are operating in colonial times, handed the survivors of a genocide in Gaza over to one of the perpetrators with the intimate involvement of the other perpetrator. Which is to say that the survivors of Gaza, their future, their human rights, are now in the hands of the US and Israel, which have dedicated themselves to the destruction of the Palestinian people. The world, including the Security Council, including Europe, including countries of Western Asia, have gone along with this, first in complicit silence, and now with an affirmative act in the Security Council of mandating 19th century colonialism in the 21st century.”
Watch; This is the story of how Israel got a protest group based in another country proscribed a terrorist organisation; doubledownnews, 13 February 2026
Lowkey; “This is the story of how Israel got a protest group based in another country proscribed ‘a terrorist organisation’. The British state is acting at the behest of a foreign power. Let that sink in. When Yvette Cooper called for the proscription of Palestine Action, she almost verbatim was recreating what was written by We Believe in Israel.”
Zionism is a form of racism. Will the Green Party become an anti zionist party?
Read; Will the Greens go anti-zionist? A motion to conference proposes just that, by Prof. David Miller, 23 February 2026
The Zionists use law fare to enforce submission to their politics and ideology and crush resistance to genocide in their precious colony. We can and must engage in counter-lawfare. Here is an encouraging sign that comrades are getting on with the business of creating and expanding a British Anti-Zionist Movement . It is a motion which has been submitted to the Standing Orders committee of the Green Party with the intention that it will be voted for by only members.
It is my understanding that at their meeting on Saturday the SOC delayed consideration of whether this motion could be submitted until a meeting today between 4 and 6.
It is my understanding that this motion has had an unprecedented amount of support from the members. All too predictably it has also galvanised Zionists in the Green Party in efforts to bully, cajole and intimidate the SOC and the leadership of the Greens to make sure this motion never hits the follow of conference, where, it would appear clear, it will be passed by a significant margin.
Those of you who follow me on X will know that my view is that the Greens have a poor record on Zionism. I have for example stated the following
The Green Party is – like Labour and the Tories – captured by the Zionist movement. (7 June 2024)
The Greens have historically been a Zionist party in that they favour a so called “two-state solution”, leaving the genocidal Zionist entity in existence, even if shorn of some of its more recently occupied territories. This is their policy statement from 2014.
Also – shockingly – they are hosting a briefing from a former head of the Shin Bet, the Zionist regime’s internal intelligence agency, Ami Ayalon. That agency is directly involved in terrorising the Palestinians as we speak. Ayalon will advance the “two-state solution” as a means of “defeating” Hamas and thus securing the long term future of the Zionist colony.
In case you are under any illusions about what the Greens will do when the Zionists come knocking, I give you the cautionary tale of myself. See below for the occasion when Caroline Lucas signed on to a letter to the University of Bristol which undoubtedly contributed to my sacking in October 2021. Her statement (below) smeared and defamed me at the very time I had been cleared on two occasions of “anti-Semitism” by the University of Bristol and by an external KC inquiry. I was later cleared in a further KC led enquiry.
Jewish Greens – “united against Islamophobia”.
Jewish Greens also – platforming former Zionist intelligence chief.
Is somebody having a laugh? Shocking and shameful.
DismantleZionism (18 June 2024)
I post these here as a warning from the past. Let us hope that the Greens do the right thing and become a genuinely anti-Zionist party!
Here is the full text of the motion. I have removed the names of the members who are supporting this as I don’t have explicit permission to share them.
If the SOC does not allow this motion to be deliberated upon by the Party conference. All hell must be raised.
Synopsis
This motion defines Zionism, recognises its continued harm to Palestinians, and seeks to clarify that the Green Party is opposed to Zionism. It further affirms the right to self-determination and liberation of the Palestinian people and supports the establishment of a single democratic Palestinian State in all of historic Palestine.
Motion text
Zionism is a political ideology which called for the creation – and, now it exists, the continuity – of an ethnonationalist Jewish State in historic Palestine to the exclusion and/or domination of the non-Jewish population. The real, material manifestation of Zionism has been the historic and ongoing dehumanisation, displacement, dispossession, disenfranchisement and destruction of Palestinians. This is based upon European settler-colonial systems of domination and oppression, which has also created racial hierarchies between Jews of different ethnicities in Palestine.
The practice of Zionist ideology, promoting ethnonationalism, privileges one ethnic group on the basis of the subjugation of others. Zionism is Israel’s foundational ideology.
Zionism has created and seeks to maintain – and where possible – expand, an apartheid regime between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, designed to cement the supremacy of one group, Jews, over another, Palestinians. As such, Zionism is racist.
This motion is aimed at the political ideology and practice of Zionism, as defined, and not at the religious or ethnic background of those who may identify as Zionists. Not all Jews are Zionists and not all Zionists are Jews. Rejecting Zionism and supporting the liberation of the Palestinian people is not discriminatory against Jewish people. Nor is it discriminatory to support the establishment of a single democratic Palestinian State between the Jordan river and the Mediterranean Sea with equal rights for all. Zionism is fundamentally incompatible with anti-racist principles, equality and justice.’
This is a long extract because David Miller explains the zionists’ ascent to empire.
Watch; Pax Judaica Explained | Prof. David Miller; Podcast & Co. and Propaganda & Co, 21 February 2026
Presenter Ahmad; “Professor David Miller, thank you for again joining the podcast today to discuss with us not only the escalating tensions between the United States and Iran, this impending war that’s about to take place, but also we’re going to discuss much of your work on Pax Judaica. A lot of people have been introduced to this concept, not only through you, through your work, but also through the work of Professor Zhang. So people are more and more interested in this concept of Pax Judaica as they begin to realise that Greater Israel has already essentially been actualised, at least via proxy. So now, with the United States moving one third of its entire navy to the Middle East to destroy a country in order to clear a path for Israel to establish itself as the regional hegemon when the US strategy in the region has always been to divide and balance the region so that no one nation can rise atop the others and potentially one day establish themselves into a power great enough to resist US interests in the region. The US is countering their own strategy, at least seemingly so on the surface, in order to give Israel what it wants. And this recent escalation comes after Netanyahu visited the United States for the sixth time in the last year. So it’s quite obvious that Donald Trump is in the pocket of the zionists. He succumbed to the pressure. I’ve heard from certain people, they believe that this is going to happen in the next week and that Trump has essentially given in. So I wanted to hear from you. How do you feel this escalation fits into this argument for Pax Judaica? What are we witnessing right now?”
Prof. David Miller; “As you say, the historic tendency of US imperialism was to try and divide and conquer, to keep the natives in the region fighting amongst each other. The traditional view on the left was that the zionists were an instrument of this and were used to accomplish that. But as you see, we’re now moving towards what is de facto zionist domination over what’s called the Middle East or West Asia. They’ve destroyed the government of Bashar al-Assad. They now effectively are in control there. In Syria, they physically occupy some of the territory, they physically occupy more territory in Lebanon than they did, although, of course, they were beaten back in part by Hezbollah. They are engaged in the normalisation process happening since 2020, when they launched the Abraham Accords with the UAE and with the Saudis and other Arab states in the region. So we’ve already got the sense in which they are the hegemonic power in West Asia, and they want to move beyond that. They want to destroy the only significant serious opposition to the zionist entity, which is led by the Islamic Republic of Iran. That’s the axis of resistance and the Americans are helping them with that but people don’t understand that. They say, ‘well, it can’t possibly be the case that puny little Israel, a nation of some 7 to 10 million people, 7 or so million of whom are Jews, could hijack or hold to ransom or control or manage or even influence the US Empire to such a degree that they would do whatever they wanted. But we are now in new historical times. The key thing to understand what’s happening now is to look back at the historical process. I want to talk about the historical process, but let’s come on to that in a minute. What we see here is a complex set of relationships, one in which it is perfectly clear that the zionists have the whip hand. Now, whether that is for the reason which many suspect, which is the kompromat held, some of which is now being released on Donald Trump and his involvement in rape and the abuse of underage girls, or whether that is to do with the penetration by zionists of American intelligence agencies and policing agencies through their tech companies set up by and large by former members of Unit 8200, (the signals intelligence unit of the Israeli military), or whether that’s because there are zionists infiltrated across the national security state. There are zionists high up in the White House, in the CIA and the Pentagon, in the State Department and Treasury, or whether it’s because of the role of zionist billionaires. Six out of ten of the richest billionaires in the world are Jews, all of which are zionist Jews. So there’s a whole series of different reasons why it’s been possible for the zionists to have the kind of control and power or influence which they now do. And these have all interacted and have grown historically.”
Ahmad; “We’re talking about Pax Judaica essentially as a Jewish empire representing the Jewish state that claims to be a democracy, exerting influence all around the world. As you pointed out in many articles that you’ve written, it goes beyond just Greater Israel in the Middle East. They’re extending their influence to Taiwan. They’re extending their influence to East Africa, primarily Kenya. And then we see what they’re doing with the United States. In my Pax Judaica explainer video, I mentioned that Israel doesn’t have to have an aircraft carrier. They just need to shape the conversation and decide which way it’s heading. And now we see not only one aircraft carrier, but there’s literally a second one now on the way. And that is because of Israel, that is because of zionism. So to me, if I’m understanding you correctly, it sounds like you’re saying that there is this evolution and there’s this fusing between the religious and the secular forms of Jewish supremacy. But you point that out because people have this kind of philo-semitism, where they almost worship Jewish people. And there’s an overreaction to protect Jews and from any kind of criticism because of what happened during the Holocaust. And so for that reason, you are pointing out hey, Jewish supremacy existed before the Holocaust. Jewish supremacy has always existed. And the difference is, you know, there are Jews who historically have believed that they must be passive and wait for, you know, the Messiah or the Moshiach to create their homeland so they can return to it. And there are others who believe they should be active. And this has been, you know, a historical dividing line between Jews, Sabbatai Zevi, who declared himself the false Messiah. He essentially believed that, no, they should be active, and he had ideas for how to take action and trigger the Messianic age. So these Jews who you argue, you know, they’re in Israel and they’re like anti-zionist, but they’re still part of Israel because they believe in being passive, but they have no problem with other Jews being active because they view that as like a historical process that God is ultimately still in control of that brings about the Jewish supremacy that they believe ultimately will take place. So am I describing it correctly for the audience?”
David Miller; “I think that’s about right. But you see, the reason I’m talking about this historical process is that the historical process is important in terms of the emergence of the will to empire, if you like. So when you look back at it without the lens of only seeing this as starting in 1890 with the zionist movement, Well, then you start to ask all the other questions which have always been asked about the role of Jews in society. That’s most famously put in the phrase, ‘the Jewish question’. What is the role of Jews in society? And how do we explain the way in which Jews have interacted with society over the centuries? Now, I don’t want to go too far back. I mean, we could go back a long, long way to the questions of usury and the interpretations of the Old New Testament versus the Torah and all that kind of thing. That can be useful. But let’s just start, shall we, with the 1840s. Now, there’s a guy which is well worth reading this stuff. It’s a guy called Moses Hess, who is a socialist and who was aware of Marx. And Marx came after him mostly. But he wrote a book, A Thesis on the Jewish Question. And he saw the creation of capitalism as being in part a result of a Jewish approach to the way in which finance was operated. And he said that at root, the form that capitalism took was a kind of hucksterism. And that comes from the way in which Jews interacted to create financial institutions. Now, before anyone goes crazy and starts to denounce me for discussing it like that, let me also say that Moses Hess went on to become a proto-zionist. He abandoned the ideas he previously had, and he became effectively a proto-zionist. His book on the Jewish question was published in, I think, 1844. Yes, as it says there on the Wikipedia page, a fore-runner to the political movement that became known as zionism. Now, Marx takes up this idea of the Jewish question and tries to ask, what is it about the way in which the Jews involve themselves in finance and the question of usury and financial institutions and banking which relates to the way in which capitalism operates? Now, you can look back at what Marx wrote about that, and you can see him being denounced as an anti-semite by some zionists. Most Marxists don’t take that view, I think. But it’s well worth looking back at that. Now, just to skirt over this very quickly, because it’s a bit boring, because it’s talking about theoreticians. Well, there’s another guy who talks about the Jewish question, which is a young Trotskyist who gets killed in the Nazi concentration camps, whose name now escapes me. He writes very interestingly about the Jewish question. And his work has then been taken up more recently by a guy called Ian Donovan, who’s based in London, who writes about the coming into existence of the Jews as a people class. So not just a religion, not allegedly an ethnic group or a nation, but a people class, which begins to explain why it is that some of the brute facts about the role of Jews in the ultra-rich in the world, and that I mentioned before the statistic that 6 out of 10 of the world’s richest billionaires are Jews. Now, that wasn’t the case 20 or 30 years ago, that’s an indication of the historical process that I’m talking about. If you look at the overall— if you look at Forbes data on their website, they’ve got— they say there’s something like 3,000 billionaires in the world according to the way in which they calculate it, and of those, approximately 10% are Jewish. So that’s in a context where 0.2% of the world’s population is Jewish, 10% of the world’s billionaires are Jewish. Why is there this massive overrepresentation of Jews in the financial elites? Well, or in the billionaire class, let’s put it that way. And that is part of the set of arguments about how it is the case that there can be this level of power exerted by, for example, Jewish billionaires who are all, of course, overwhelmingly zionist. And let me just pause for a second in case anyone’s objecting to that. I mean, if you look at the 276 Jewish billionaires or something in the Forbes figures and you ask which, which one of these is anti-zionist, well, the only one you’re going to get spat back at you is a guy called George Soros, who — some people say he’s a non-zionist, but he’s not an anti-zionist. He’s the guy who spent $1 million on J Street, the liberal zionist pressure group, and tried to hide it for several years until it was revealed. So whatever you say about Soros— and I know people on various sides of the political spectrum have all sorts of critiques of Soros, he’s not an anti-zionist. Let’s put it as straightforwardly as that. So this overrepresentation of the Jews in finance and in high finance and amongst the billionaire class is an indication of the elevated role that zionists have in that particular part of the world, the billionaire class, financial capital, etc. And that’s important. Because the people who run these corporations are running corporations in, in the interests of zionism, and they, they all more or less are quite open about saying that. So when Larry Ellison talks about his corporation, he talks about it in relation to supporting zionist interests. That of course is why Larry Ellison has bought CBS and, uh, what was it, TikTok, and all those other things which they’ve done, because they realise that the zionists are losing the global argument and they have to try and win it by simply buying the corporations and destroying the possibility of anti-zionist critique. And that’s true of a huge number of other zionist billionaires that you can mention. You know, it’s not—this is not a surprise to people. So that’s part of the idea of Pax Judaica, is that there’s this massive control over key sections of the economy all over the world by zionist billionaires. And that’s, that’s one thing to see, right? It’s one, I would say, one pillar or one, maybe we say a candle. There are 9 candles in a menorah, Jewish menorah. So let’s see if there are perhaps 9 candles in the way in which Pax Judaica is emerging. I think the billionaire class is one of those candles. But I think the other thing to think about, I mean, you said about the role of zionists in, uh, in the White House or in the Pentagon or in the CIA. Now, that again is a historical process, and you’ve got to look back at the history of that. Let’s think about that, the history of that, for a second. We’ve not got time to go into all of this, but there’s a, there’s a long history of this. And, and really, it’s not as if it’s a secret. I mean, you can— because people have got their conceptual blinkers on they don’t put the data which they know about this into the right context because they think that the zionists are just the instrument of US imperialism. So when you see, for example, the process by which the CIA was colonised for zionism, in this perspective, it starts to look much more interesting. So, you know, famously, the person in the US intelligence firmament who, I think the only senior US intelligence officer to whom there are two memorials in occupied Palestine to this day, is a guy called James Jesus Angleton, who was the deputy head of counterintelligence in the CIA., and he was personally responsible for being more zionist than the zionists, as someone from the Mossad once put it. He was personally responsible for helping the zionists to steal US nuclear secrets, and indeed for effectively helping to colonise the CIA for the zionist cause, as was, to a lesser extent, I think, William Colby, who was the director of the CIA slightly after that. So that’s one way in which this process has happened. But another way in which this has happened is the more thoroughgoing takeover of the American security establishment by the neoconservatives. Now, as everyone knows who’s looked at this, neoconservatives were largely Jews, largely leftists, some of them Trotskyists, not that many Stalinists, but quite, quite a lot of them were communists. Many of them were recruited by the CIA as part of what the CIA referred to as the non-communist left. These were people who come from Eastern Europe or from Western Europe even, and who were recruited by the CIA and who moved actually in many cases over the decades from the ’30s to the ’80s, moved from the left towards the CIA, the positions of their CIA handlers, and then to the right of those CIA handlers and became what was called the neoconservatives. And these are the people who launched the war in Iraq on behalf of zionism. So this was a moment where, as everybody knows, the neoconservatives went to war on a false prospectus which they had invented in order to invade and occupy Iraq in the interest of zionism. And it’s that moment where you see the entrenched dominance of zionist ideas in the security elite of the US. And people who witnessed some of this are very clear about it. Lieutenant Colonel Wilkerson, with his clip on this, is always doing the rounds, where he talks about in 2002 seeing people walking into the Pentagon from the Mossad, not even having to use identification to get into the building.They had taken over the Pentagon, he says. And there are many others who say similar sorts of things about that. John Kiriakou, another CIA whistleblower (I don’t agree with everything he says), but he talks about the same thing; we share 99% of our secrets with them, and still they spy on us to get the last 1%’. Now, that’s a question which can be empirically examined. We know that the zionists have spied on successive presidents. They spied on Clinton. They bugged the White House. Famously, Netanyahu offered Clinton the tapes of him and Monica Lewinsky, which now in retrospect looks very much like an op from start to finish. They bugged Donald Trump in the first White House, someone who is in their pockets already. But nevertheless, they will do that. And that’s unusual in the level of spying that there is on alleged allies. So we can see that there is a kind of occupation of the American security establishment, and indeed The State Department, the Treasury Department, people who are in charge of the sanctions on Iran, we’re talking about that, are zionists. These are card-carrying zionists who have even written books about it, about how they went about it. So that’s the nuts and bolts of this, the shell of an account of how it was that the American security establishment was taken over by the zionists. And I believe that’s the case with almost every other Western European state as well, certainly with the UK, certainly with Germany, and certainly with France, although there are different stories and different routes to get there. So that’s on the one hand you’ve got the question of finance and the billionaires, on the other hand you’ve got the question of the security establishment as well. So that’s two key elements of the way in which the zionists have tried to take over. I would point out that I haven’t mentioned in all of what I’ve been talking about either the Israel lobby or the zionist movement more generally and its functions. And I think that they have specific functions as well, but that’s in addition to the things I’m talking about.”
Watch; Palestine Action is back!; Palestine Declassified, Prof. David Miller 21 February 2026
‘In today’s show, we’ll be considering the implications of the High Court judgment against the previous Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, for acting unlawfully when she proscribed Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation last year. But the three High Court judges who found against the govt. paused the enforcement of their judgment while an appeal is being decided. So, in our first report, Latifa Abouchakra summarizes the case that the High Court threw out, and which the new Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, is appealing. Our next report looks at the legal arguments that followed the High Court judgment, and highlights the ongoing direct action against the UK’s complicity in zionist genocide.’
Latifa Abouchakra; “In a stunning rebuke to government overreach, judges deemed the prescription of Palestine action a disproportionate attack on free speech. The prescription of Palestine Action was unlawful, they said, handing a resounding victory to campaigners against genocide and backers of the group’s heroic disruptions of arms firms arming the genocidal zionist settler colony. As the judgement from Dame Victoria Sharpe, Mrs. Justice Stein and Mr. Justice Swift makes clear, the ban violated fundamental rights and due process. Sharp emphasised the proscription caused very significant interference with the right to freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. The court’s decision stated the Home Secretary failed to comply with her own policy, rendering the ban unlawful. Judges also ruled it breached articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights, protecting freedom of expression and assembly. The prescription remains in place, however, until a 20th of February hearing where arguments on a stay pending appeal will be made. The government swiftly announced plans to appeal. Huda Amori hailed the outcome triumphantly, declaring this is a monumental victory both for our fundamental freedoms here in Britain and in the struggle for freedom for the Palestinian people. Striking down a decision that will forever be remembered as as one of the most extreme attacks on free speech in recent British history. The judgement dissected Palestine actions tactics, claiming that a small number amounted to so called terrorist acts. The group’s overall nature and scale fell short of justifying proscription. Criminal law already suffices to address such offences. We are satisfied that the decision to proscribe Palestine Action will was disproportionate, the judges stated.”
Watch; ‘I Won’t Condemn Hamas. I Refuse To Do That’ Norman Finkelstein, Novara Media, 21 February 2026
Norman Finkelstein; “But I won’t condemn Hamas. I refuse to do that, because I don’t believe they had any choice except to die as it were, a slave. They tried everything. They really did. They realised that in order to survive, they have to make some compromises, and they did. They proceeded to try to find a diplomatic solution. They did. They tried to find legal support, they tried nonviolent civil resistance, the great march of return. They had exhausted all possibilities of finding any resolution to this conflict which would, at bare minimum, forget about a global solution, which would just lift the blockade. Just lift the blockade.”
Watch; Anti-zionist Jewish Supremacy is a real thing, Prof. David Miller, Propaganda & Co, 20 February 2025
“One key element of breaking the dam, it seems to me, is the notion of Jewish supremacism. I see some people on the left say that even talking about Jewish supremacism or Jewish supremacy is itself anti-Jewish, because of course, you’re assuming that all Jews are Jewish supremacists. Well, of course, there is no such implication in the use of the term, just as there isn’t, in the use of the term Protestant supremacism. The Protestant supremacists of the Orange Order in the North of Ireland are settler colonists, just like the zionists, and no one cares if you call them Protestant supremacists, no one bats an eyelid, no one says, ‘oh, you must be anti-Protestant if you use this analogy’. The same phrase could of course be used for the Boers, the Boer nationalists in apartheid South Africa who were of course partisans of the Dutch Reformed Church, were also Protestant supremacists who thought or who said that they were in the chosen land in Africa. Of course, it’s ridiculous. Jewish supremacism, just like Protestant supremacism, doesn’t just have one guise, as everybody knows, zionism is a form of Jewish supremacy. It’s a form of ideology which says the rights of the Jews trump the rights of the indigenous population of Palestine, of Palestinians. That’s a form of supremacy. But the interesting thing, and the useful nature of the term Jewish supremacism is that it applies not just to the specific form of Jewish supremacy, which is zionism, but also to other forms of Jewish supremacy. First of all, there’s a thing called anti-zionist Jewish supremacism. When you say that, people flip. They say, ‘well, what can you be talking about?’ Well, actually, there was a form of Jewish supremacy which is anti- zionist, which does not believe that the earthly powers, the zionist movement, has the right to create a Jewish state in Eretz Yisrael, the land of Israel, Greater Israel, and only the Moshiach, God’s messenger or the equivalent of the Messiah, but not the Messiah, not divine character, when, till Moshiach returns and the temple is rebuilt. That’s when the land of Israel will be redeemed and at which point the non-Jews will be the slaves of the Jews. That’s also a Jewish supremacist point of view, but it’s anti-zionist, i.e. doesn’t believe in the Jewish state. So that’s an interesting thing about the notion of Jewish supremacism when you start to think about this anti-zionist notion, this comes from certain teachings and ultra orthodox elements of Judaism.”
‘A vindication of these six young people for taking on the might of the zionist regime and its puppet the British State’
Read; Absolutely stunning and yet not really surprising verdict in the Filton Case! Prof. David Miller, 4 February 2026
‘The state has totally failed to convict any of the six defendants of anything at all! The jury even found them not guilty of things that they had admitted to – heroically damaging the zionist war machine! The most serious charge of GBH (Grievous Bodily Harm)with intent, absolutely rightly thrown out by the Jury! A vindication of Jury trials; A vindication of the campaign to support people engaged in Direct Action against genocide; A vindication of the campaign to repeal the proscription of Palestine Action and most of all – a vindication of these six young people for taking on the might of the zionist regime and its puppet the British State.
Zoe Rogers,
Fatema Zainab Rajwani,
Jordan Devlin,
Samuel Corner,
Charlotte “Lottie” Head and
Ellie Kamio
Heroes every one!’
Read; Lion TV investigates proscription of Palestine Action as terror group for C4’s Dispatches; C21 Media, 5 February 2026
‘Channel 4’s Dispatches strand has investigated the UK government’s decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation in a programme that will air next week.’ Palestine Action: The Truth Behind the Ban’ will be available to watch live and stream on Channel 4 in the UK on February 9. The investigation, produced by All3Media-owned Lion Television, examines the legal, political and civil liberty implications of the ban. The UK government’s decision has triggered widespread controversy, mass protests across the UK and the arrest of more than 2,500 people who have publicly expressed support for the group. The programme features an exclusive interview with a Palestine Action activist this week acquitted of aggravated burglary and the first face-to-face interview with Huda Ammori, co-founder of Palestine Action, since Parliament proscribed the group. It sees Dispatches reporter Matt Shea ask why the government felt compelled to proscribe Palestine Action, putting it alongside internationally recognised terrorist organisations such as ISIS and neo-Nazi groups, and explores the evidence and reasoning behind the unprecedented move. Daniel Pearl, creative director at Lion Television, said: “This is a rigorous and timely investigation into a decision with profound consequences for democratic protest and freedom of expression in the UK.’
Watch; Palestine Action: Ban ruled unlawful but proscription remains UK Column News, 13 February 2026
Basil Valentine; “Well, for the time being, the ban remains in place, Brian, although just this morning, Dame Victoria Sharp, sitting with Mr. Justice Swift and Mrs. Justice Steyne, said that Palestine Action is an organisation that promotes its political cause through criminality and encouragement of criminality. A small number of its actions have amounted to terrorist action within the terrorism act of 2000. I’m not quite sure what they are, but that proportion was still disproportionate. So the ban, the proscription of Palestine Action, has been declared unlawful, but remains in place pending an appeal and further legal arguments. Unsurprisingly, the Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, has rejected the Court’s findings and intends to launch an appeal at the Court of Appeal in order to keep the ban in place. Obviously, it’s presented an extraordinary set of circumstances with supporters of Palestine Action declaring their support for the organisation. Once again, outside the Old Bailey, lots of cheering as you can imagine, and police standing around rather nonplussed, not quite knowing what to do. It’s a sort of legal grey area. Now, of course, Palestine Action are jubilant. We were banned because Palestine Action’s disruption of Israel’s largest weapons manufacturer, Elbit systems, cost the corporation millions of pounds in profits and lost out on multi billion pound contracts. We’ve used the same tactics as direct organisations throughout history, including anti war group Keir Starmer himself defended in court and the government acknowledged in these legal proceedings that this ban was based on property damage, not violence against people. This is Huda Ammori speaking outside the High Court this morning, “Banning Palestine Action was always about appeasing pro-Israel lobby groups and weapons manufacturers and nothing to do with terrorism”. Metropolitan Police have released a statement warning that proscription remains in place and so showing support for Palestine Action is still a criminal offence. But they’ve said that they’re going to focus on gathering evidence rather than making more arrests at this time. You know, it’s complete nonsense, really. The Assistant Commissioner, Lawrence Taylor, the national head of counterterrorism policing, said officers will enforce the ban pragmatically and proportionally. Policing’s role is to enforce the law and to do so without fear or favour as the public would expect. Proscription is and always has been a matter for government. Following today’s judgement, the Home Secretary of State that he intends to lodge an appeal. The court has ordered that the proscription order remains in force until further order of the court. We recognise this is an unusual set of circumstances and until further order by the court, counterterrorism policing will approach the whole question of enforcement, pragmatically and proportionally, that seems to be the code word. And we’ll continue to work with forces across the country. So, you know, a huge victory, really, for civil liberties, apart from anything else. It was always nonsense to categorise Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation and the court acknowledged that. So quite what the Home Secretary hopes to achieve at the Court of Appeal, or what new evidence or arguments are going to be presented, particularly when six defendants at Woolwich Crown Court last week were cleared of the key charge of aggravated burglary, which itself doesn’t cross the threshold into terrorism. I’m not quite sure. It’s a bloody nose for the government. February 13, proving unlucky for the Home Secretary, Mike?”
Mike Robinson; “Absolutely. Basil. Just very, very briefly, then, the question in my mind is what happens then with the convictions of the people that were arrested at the various protests in recent months, do you think?”
Basil Valentine; “Well, that’s a very good question. Amnesty International and leader of the Green Party, Zack Polanski, are amongst those saying that all charges should immediately be dropped. People are due in court next week. It’s a grey area. I don’t think anybody knows what’s going to happen because this is the first time any such ban on a proscribed organisation has been overturned in court. So we’re in uncharted territory.”
— Edmonster (@LuEDoty) February 4, 2026
Read; Lebanon says Israel sprayed southern villages with concentrated herbicide BBC News, 5 February 2026
‘Lebanon has accused Israeli aircraft of spraying an agricultural herbicide over southern villages at concentrations authorities described as dangerously high, raising concerns for food and environmental security.The agriculture and environment ministries said laboratory tests confirmed the substance was glyphosate, a chemical used to destroy vegetation, with concentrations in some samples “between 20 and 30 times the levels usually accepted”.
President Joseph Aoun condemned the spraying of what he described as “toxic substances”, calling it a violation of Lebanese sovereignty and an environmental and health crime.The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) told the BBC they had no comment on the matter.Earlier in the week, United Nations peacekeepers in Lebanon said they had been notified by Israel of planned spraying near the border and were advised to take shelter. The communication forced them to cancel some of their planned operations. They said this was not the first time Israeli forces had dropped unknown chemical substances from aircraft over Lebanese territory. With tens of thousands still displaced after hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah in 2023-24, the challenges for returning home are compounded, according to Ramzi Kaiss, a researcher with Human Rights Watch in Lebanon.
“These areas are heavily dependent on agriculture – olive groves, tobacco, and other crops – and this incident complicates people’s ability to return to their homes, maintain their livelihoods, and rebuild after extensive destruction,” Kaiss said.’
The zionist influence was keeping the US entrenched in the Middle East and doing their bidding and Gaddafi fought against that.
Watch; Masterfully Revealed, BreezyPolitics, 15 December 2026
Presenter; “Didn’t Gaddafi actually mention something about zionism in the US?”
Shawn Ryan; “Oh, he did, he was saying that the zionist influence was keeping the US entrenched in the Middle East to do their bidding, basically, and he fought against that. So what happens? The US go in and bomb him and kill him.
Presenter; “And it seems like just about everything we do, they have influence over.”
Shawn Ryan; “More than we would think. Once you start to see it, you notice it . Before you see it the first time, you don’t even think about it. Once you start to notice, then you’re like but this is everywhere. When I start looking at a lot of the things we’ve done in the Middle East, at first we say, well, it’s because of oil, it’s because of this, even that doesn’t always fit. The thing that fits the closest is when you start saying, how does this affect Israel? Iraq? Iraq was building a huge military force, it would have been a threat to Israel, we need to get rid of that. Libya? Libya is growing, huge military, the country was growing, then we bombed them. Iran? Now we’ve got Iran, Iran’s building a big military, you can’t have that because if Israel tries to move in, Iran will fight them. Well, we’ll get rid of it. I don’t want to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but the more you look at this, the closer the parts fit and you start putting all the parts together and you’re like, call me crazy, but the data is showing this, and you start cutting things away and looking at it and you’re like, this pretty much leads to one conclusion.”
Watch; Zionist takeover of UK police, Palestine Declassified, 14 February 2023
Chris Williamson; “Let’s start with the arrest of Latif Abouchakra, our colleague there, who we’ve just heard from, when she was on a way to speak at an event where you were also on the platform in Birmingham at the weekend.”
Prof. David Miller; “This was just last Sunday. It was the launch of the anti-zionist movement. I’m one of the final members and I was on the platform. Latifah was on the platform as well. And it appears that she was followed by West Midlands traffic cops on the say-so of the Metropolitan Police, and she was followed and cut off by several police cars, plainclothes police cars, who stopped her, slammed her door open, grabbed her out and took her to the police station where she was kept overnight before they finally interviewed her the next day in the afternoon, accused her of, under the public order, act of conduct likely to stir up racial hatred to do with stuff which she’d put on social media, including as far back as 7th October, 2023, the date of the launch of Al Aqsa Flood. Incredible stuff. I mean, she was cross examined and interrogated in a completely ridiculous way, as you would expect, by the police. And they’ve now put bail conditions on her, which is going to restrict her movements. And indeed, she’s been forbidden from attending any events to do with Palestine, which will mean she can’t do her job as a reporter, which is completely absurd.”
Chris Williamson; “It’s incredible that they can devote so much police time and resources to dealing with people who are simply protesting and objecting to genocide.”
Prof. David Miller; “Well, you say that, but what’s happened is that the zionists have infiltrated and occupied the administration of justice in the UK, and we can see that perfectly clearly from all of these examples, otherwise none of this would be happening. And instead what they would be doing is prosecuting people who were engaged in supporting genocide, which is thousands of zionists in this country and indeed foreign zionists who visit here.”
Watch; Resolution 181 of the UN, Illegal Expansion, 18 February 2026
“Israel was Created by Resolution 181 of the United Nations that said the Israeli people should have a homeland of their own. Many people know that fact. What they don’t know is that same Resolution 181 said ‘you may not displace people that already lived there’. It didn’t say you get to have a state that is only Jewish and everybody else has to leave or you get to expel them. It also said there will be a Palestinian state, there will be an Israeli state and a Palestinian state. Resolution 181, that was passed in November of 1947. In 1948, Israel declared itself a distinct free and new nation. President Truman recognised them seven minutes later. Seven minutes. It’s like he’s hovering over the phone just waiting for the call. What about the rest of the resolution? Did he recognise Palestine at the same time? No, but we started it off right there, that was where it started.
“Watch; Russia: Rebuilding Gaza? UK Column News, 18 February 2026
Vanessa Beeley; “Israel is bringing in tanks, its bringing in aerial bombing, helicopters into the West Bank in an attempt to further ethnically displace or ethnically cleanse the people from the West Bank in a very similar fashion that was used in Gaza. And in fact, these are figures relating to May 2025, so now, of course, they’ve obviously increased. I think around 7,000 Palestinians have been driven out of their homes in the West Bank and something like probably more than 3,000 Palestinian owned structures in the West Bank have effectively been destroyed. And all of this while Russia, of course, traditionally and China talk about or uphold a two state solution. Well, one has to ask what kind of two state solution is going to exist if all Palestinian territory is effectively annexed and the Palestinians are ethnically cleansed from their homes in both Gaza and in the West Bank? And of course, there’s no statement from Russia on this basis. And then I just want to raise the question, who is going to receive this one billion of reconstruction aid for Gaza? Is it going to go to the Palestinian Authority, which is effectively Israel? Is it going to go directly to Israel, whom we know has no intention of allowing Palestinians to remain in Gaza, accept US cheap labour contained within even smaller labour camps to effectively secure Gaza as part of a free trade zone running in the India Middle east economic corridor, from India through the Gulf states into Gaza and then into Egypt. To Hamas, almost definitely not, of course, although Hamas is the recognised government of Gaza. For to Washington and Israel, through the Trump Board of Peace, to Jared Kushner, who’s been involved in the talks on Iran, but also the talks on Ukraine, it appears that this 1 billion, whatever way you look at it, is effectively going to be used to bail out Israel after it has effectively decimated and destroyed Gaza. It’s a bailout for Israel, in my opinion. And I would ask the question, if Russia had economically boycotted Israel from the very beginning, would it then be necessary for Russia to now contribute 1 billion to the reconstruction of Gaza?”
“Indeed, Vanessa. And if Russia had economically boycotted Israel from the beginning, how many other countries may have joined?”
Post the Epstein revelations, Terje Rod-Larsen tried to committ suicide.
Read or Listen; Compromised peace? Oslo Accords figure deeply linked to Epstein network Aljazeera, 12 February 2026
‘The Norwegian diplomat who was a key architect of the 1993 Oslo Accords is facing a storm of corruption and blackmail allegations after new documents revealed he was deeply embedded in the inner circle of late sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein.
Terje Rod-Larsen, a central figure in the Middle East “peace process” in the 1990s, is implicated in newly released United States Justice Department files and Norwegian media investigations that expose a relationship involving illicit loans, visa fraud for sex-trafficked women, and a beneficiary clause in Epstein’s will worth millions of dollars.
The revelations have sent shockwaves through the diplomatic community and led to the resignation of Rod-Larsen’s wife, Mona Juul – herself a pivotal figure in the Oslo negotiations – from her post as Norway’s ambassador to Jordan and Iraq this month. Her security clearance was also revoked.
Palestinian leaders are now questioning whether Oslo’s foundational agreements of the two-state solution were brokered by a mediator vulnerable to elite blackmail and foreign intelligence pressure.
The plan was heralded in the Western world at the time, and in the 30 years since, has been trampled on by successive Israeli governments, with the far-right leadership now openly pushing for annexation of the occupied West Bank.
Investigations by the Norwegian broadcaster NRK and newspaper Dagens Næringsliv (DN) detail how Rod-Larsen used his position as president of the International Peace Institute (IPI) think tank in New York to launder the reputation of Epstein’s associates.
According to the files, Rod-Larsen wrote official letters of recommendation to US authorities to secure visas for young Russian women in Epstein’s orbit, claiming they possessed “extraordinary abilities” suitable for research roles.
In reality, these women were often models with no academic background who were allegedly trafficked and abused by the financier. One victim told NRK she believed Epstein sent her to Rod-Larsen’s institute “to manipulate” her, while another described how the diplomat facilitated her visa after a direct request from Epstein’s assistant.
The transactional nature of the relationship was explicit. Documents show Epstein loaned Rod-Larsen $130,000 in 2013. More damningly, reports indicate that Epstein’s last will and testament included a clause bequeathing $5m each to Rod-Larsen’s two children – a total of $10m.
For Palestinians living under the reality of the failed agreements Rod-Larsen forged, the scandal offers a disturbing explanation for a “peace process” that many believe was rigged.
Mustafa Barghouti, general secretary of the Palestinian National Initiative political party, told Al Jazeera he was “not surprised at all” by the corruption allegations.
“We never felt comfortable with this person from the very first moment,” Barghouti said. “Oslo was a trap … and I have no doubt that Terje Rod-Larsen was being effectively influenced by the Israeli side all along.”
Barghouti argued that the revelation of millions of dollars potentially flowing from a Mossad-linked figure like Epstein to the Rod-Larsen family suggests the corruption was “directed to serve Israel’s interests against the interests of the Palestinian people”.
The ties between the disgraced Epstein and Israel have come into sharp focus after the release of millions of documents.
Watch; The War on Terror to the Present Day, UK Column News, 5 February 2026
‘Dr Lucy Morgan Edwards is a former political advisor to the EU Ambassador in Kabul, with responsibility for civil military affairs, narcotics, and security sector reform.
During her seven years in Kabul, she also worked for the UN at the height of the Taliban regime, was a correspondent for The Economist and The Daily Telegraph, and was the initial researcher for the International Crisis Group on transitional justice issues.
She also spent many months in Jalalabad, Eastern Afghanistan, with a leading tribal family. While there, she developed forensic insight into the post-9/11 political situation.
Dismayed by what she saw, and learned, she wrote a book about her experiences: The Afghan Solution.
Lucy has a profound understanding of the aims and effects of foreign intervention and the pursuit of endless wars that allow corporations to profit from taxpayers’ money.’
‘I do think that the migration is being weaponised. It seems to be systematic and Britain seems to have this horrendous sort of schism now where everything is blamed on the Muslims and the Jews have become the victims. I think that that is very much something that I see, for example, the Daily Telegraph that I used to write for as a freelance journalist. I’m astonished by the fact that they don’t seem to have any foreign correspondence. They have people like Hamish de Bretton Gordon and Con Coughlin with them all the time, who are basically pure propagandists. They’re warmongering, drumbeating, fervid sort of warmongers. There seems to be a massive zionist bent to everything in the Telegraph. It seems to be edited, as a friend commented, by Conservative Friends of Israel. It’s not the newspaper that I used to know. Whether it’s the comment section which is potentially infiltrated or the editorials, nothing is graduated, nothing is moderate in the way that it used to be. ‘The Muslims are to blame for everything’, and ‘isn’t the antisemitism horrendous in Britain’? I just think it’s completely nonsensical because you look at how Israel has infiltrated all of our political class, how basically you have to be a member of Labour or Conservative or now even Reform Friends of Israel, and why do we have our parliamentary representatives serving a foreign state? That’s what people need to start asking and it seems to be that there’s some evidence that a lot of the migration which has been weaponised is actually being promoted by some Israeli or zionist groups so I think it’s not one thing or the other but I think it’s definitely being weaponised against Britain to destabilise the population.”
The British Museum erases the name Palestine from ancient works from Palestine! UK Lawyers for Israel argue that before 300 BC the region was known as Canaan, although before 500 BC the name Peleshet (Philistia) appears in the Hebrew Bible. Herodotus (5th century BC) also refers to Palestine as the coastal land between Phoenicia and Egypt.
Petition; Erasing a Word Erases a People: Reinstate Palestine in the British Museum change.org, February 2026
‘The British Museum has recently removed the word “Palestine” from several displays in its Ancient Middle East galleries, claiming the term is “anachronistic.” This decision is not supported by historical evidence and contributes to a wider pattern of erasing Palestinian presence from public memory.
The term Palestine has been used for over two millennia. It appears in: Herodotus (5th century BCE) as Palaistinê Roman administrative records as Syria Palaestina (135 CE) Byzantine, early Islamic, Crusader, and Ottoman sources European maps from the medieval period through the 19th century Shakespeare’s Othello — a cornerstone of British cultural heritage If the term is acceptable in Shakespeare, it should not be erased from a national museum.
If the British Museum is genuinely concerned about modern etymology, then consistency would require similar scrutiny of terms such as “Britain”, which is itself a relatively modern political construct. Yet “Britain” remains unchallenged in the museum’s own galleries. This selective removal suggests inconsistency in curatorial standards and raises concerns about political pressure influencing historical presentation.
We call on the British Museum to:
1) Restore the term “Palestine” to all relevant displays.
2) Provide transparency regarding the decision-making process.
3) Ensure that curatorial choices reflect historical accuracy, not political pressure.
4) Uphold its responsibility as a publicly funded institution to present history with integrity.
Erasing a word erases a people. History includes Palestine — and the British Museum must reflect that truth.’
Watch; Zionists against the NHS Palestine Declassified; Saturday, 31 January 2026
Intro; ‘In this episode, Palestine Declassified explores the Zionist campaign against anyone in the UK medical profession who dares to oppose the genocide in Gaza or speak out about the other atrocities perpetrated by Israel. This as doctors and officials in the British hospitals are under intense attack by the Zionist groups and NHS (National Health Service) doctors face crisis of “Institutional Discrimination” for speaking out on Gaza.’
US/Israel real estate project in Gaza
Watch; What is Donald Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’, Declassified UK, 3 February 2026
‘Former Israeli negotiator Daniel Levy breaks down the US president’s new initiative and its dystopian plan for the future of Gaza – and possibly even the world.’
Daniel Levy; “Gaza vision for 2035. It is premised on the entire destruction of Gaza.”
Presenter; “How did you feel when you saw those images that Jared Kushner, Trump’s son in law, was presenting this kind of futuristic or dystopian vision of Gaza?”
Daniel Levy; ” I mostly thought, mate, can’t you come up with something more original? Because I was like, wait a minute, in December of 2023, just pause for a moment, two months in, Netanyahu’s office produces a document, ‘Gaza vision for 2035’. It is premised on the entire destruction of Gaza. It uses the language, ‘rebuild from nothing’. To rebuild from nothing, you have to ensure there is nothing. That’s what they went on to ensure in the subsequent months and years, allowed to do so, not only with impunity, but with the active assistance and enabling of the Biden and then the Trump administration and the European allies. And we all know that recent history. It’s the same images tweaked a little bit. And then I thought, wait a minute, but I recognise those images from further back in 2019, 2020, Jared Kushner, in the first Trump term is putting together the so called ‘Peace Prosperity Plan’, their idea of how you entrench, formalise, make permanent a Bantustan apartheid reality which they call peace. Those images, a likeness thereof, appear there. And the same kind of nonsense has come up elsewhere, ‘Gaza Riviera Plan’ that Trump touted as his first real threat foray into this arena in his second term is finally here. I would also urge people not to fall too much for the theatrics. Look over here, look over here. Gleaming pictures of pictures of gleaming buildings. What’s going on over here? These plans continue to create new layers of a permissive environment for Israel to continue the destruction. What’s going on is not rebuilding. What’s going on on the ground in Beit Hanoun and Rafah is finishing the job of making sure there is nothing.”
Outpouring of shame from an Israeli old guard. Moshe Ya’alon, former Minister of Defence and vice Prime Minister of Israel, has bitterly criticised Israeli government and settler violence after yet another attack in which Palestinian villagers were assaulted, their animals stolen and buildings set on fire. The settlers then obstructed ambulances from reaching the scene to pick up the villagers who were wounded in the attack.
Read; This is probably the most important Hebrew Tweet I’ve ever seen, Shaiel Ben-Ephraim, 30 January 2026
‘This is probably the most important Hebrew Tweet I’ve ever seen. Moshe Ya’alon is a former chief of staff and defence minister. The absolute cream of the Israeli defence establishment. In this text he admits that the Israeli government and settlers have become Judeo-Nazis and their policy is based on Jewish supremacy.
Please donate
Forgive me for pointing out that, while we receive some one-off donations, I am funding Farms Not Factories myself, and if we are to continue to fight the cruel, antibiotic-led factory farm system, we will need some regular donations from like-minded people. Please consider a monthly subscription of £2/month and help us support a network of smaller scale, humane and healthy UK pig farms, local abattoirs and butchers.
“Our message is simple, we want to help bring an end to this dangerous, inhumane system. Vote for real farming over factory farming.”
– Tracy Worcester, Director
Contents
Share This Article
Related ArticlesView All
Protect UK Farmers from Low Standard Imports
The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More
Protectionism vs So-Called Free Trade
The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More
Find A Farmer
The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More
Zionist Money Rules
The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More
The Price of Progress
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More
Silencing Dissent Through Fear
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. If you… Read More