The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. If you would like to keep up to date with the latest information, then please follow me on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram or Telegram.
“The way you get democracy to function is by informing the public.” – Robert Kennedy Jr.
“Science is more than a body of knowledge. It is a way of thinking; a way of sceptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask sceptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be sceptical of those in authority, then, we are up for grabs for the next charlatan (political or religious) who comes rambling along.” – Carl Sagan
“Never worry about who will be offended if you speak the Truth. Worry about who will be misled, deceived and destroyed, if you do not.” and
”Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by and that has made all the difference.” – Robert Frost
Though the newsletter chapters interrelate, they are divided into five sections and have a common realisation that a cabal of corporate elites have captured global trade, global governance, mainstream and online media, and ultimately many of our minds.
As a stenographer, I link to an article or audio and paste a key paragraph or two. My most trusted websites are platforms for journalists who don’t compromise on the truth and have thereby been shunned by the mainstream media. These include; Local Futures, SUSTAIN, Farm Gate, Global Research, Children’s Health Defence, Geopolitical Economy Report, The Grayzone, Unlimited Hangout, 21st Century Wire, UK Column; The Duran, Robert F Kennedy podcast, The Jimmy Dore Show, Palestine Declassified, Alex Krainer, Mattias Desmet, Dr John Campbell, The Cradle, Quds News Network, The Grayzone News, The Electronic Intifada, Jonathan Cook, Richard Medhurst, The Light printed newspaper, and Russell Brand or follow us on Telegram, For The People, Assange News, Resistance News Network, Juan Sinmiedo and Pepe Escobar.
Disclaimer: Farms Not Factories newsletters share and repost material that is already publicly accessible. The views expressed in the articles do not necessarily represent those of Farms Not Factories but are selected to promote open discussion on issues often overlooked by mainstream media.
Featured Video
The 28th COP (The UN Climate Change Conference) ended its 12-day meeting in Dubai on 12 December. Although the stated purposes were to limit global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees, compensate climate-impacted communities and achieve ‘Net Zero’ by 2050, the fact that there were 2,456 lobbyists from the fossil fuel industry (almost four times as many as last year), says it all. The reality is that at COP 28, global governance was the name of the game; the leaders are corporate investors, philanthro-capitalists, development banks and their stooges in government and think tanks, dictating the rules of our lives behind the veil of abating climate change. Farmers’ naturally grown food has been dismissed as too inefficient to feed the world and not compatible with the changing climate, and only their patented, high tech, AI, GM, drones and robots, will suffice.
Big Ag leaders are on a revolving door to food and farming regulatory bodies so they know what they can get away with in terms of the food’s nutritional quality. With little independent monitoring, what is passed as food can be worms, insects and precision fermentation of multiplied microbes or, if you’re lucky, food grown in vertical farms on a small section of land in a sea of solar panels and monoculture trees. Patented GM seeds will grow on racks in desalinated sea water with a malteser size ball of clay to produce nutritionally deficient food. The illusion of their providing healthy, convenient food while avoiding a climate catastrophe, has manipulated and lulled us into a dystopia that will enslave, make us sick and possibly starve us.
Post the COP 28 discussions that ended on 12th Dec, we interviewed attendee Dr Camila Moreno, whose background is in philosophy and in law with a Master’s, PhD and postdoc on sociology and the new carbon economy, the bioeconomy, the green transition. She is brilliant at dismantling the charade of regenerating the planet when, in fact, the corporations and their stooges are regenerating their humongous profits. The full film is 1hour 11mins, there are two shorter versions, one at 35m and one at 3m 30s.
Important News Re Julian Assange
Please join what promises to be – and must be – a massive demonstration outside Royal Courts of Justice from 8:30AM on 20th and 21st of February 2024 to DEMAND that the verdict on the U.S. demand to extradite Julian Assange to the evil Empire is a firm NO and that Julian is to be immediately released and heavily compensated for this farcical case against him for reporting truthful information in the public interest.
Julian Assange’s Final Appeal to be held in UK High Court 20-21 February 2024 Stella Assange, 19 December 2023;
‘The UK High Court has confirmed that a public hearing will take place on 20-21 February 2024. The two-day hearing may be the final chance for Julian Assange to prevent his extradition to the United States. If extradited, Assange faces a sentence of 175 years for exposing war crimes committed by the United States in the Afghan and Iraq wars.
Immediately after the court date was announced, protestors responded by calling for a mass protest at the court on the days of the hearing at 8:30am. They welcome all those who support press freedom to join them in London and around the world.
Assange has been confined in the high-security Belmarsh Prison since he was arrested on a US extradition request on 11 April 2019. This will be his fifth Christmas in Belmarsh.
The upcoming public hearing will be held before a panel of two judges who will review an earlier High Court decision taken by a single judge on 6 June 2023 which refused Mr Assange permission to appeal.
This decisive stage in Mr Assange’s appeals will determine one of two outcomes: whether Mr. Assange will have further opportunities to argue his case before the domestic (UK) courts, or whether he will have exhausted all appeals without a possibility for further appeal in the UK and thus enter the process of extradition. An application before the European Court of Human Rights remains a possibility.
Assange’s campaign for freedom is supported by Amnesty International, the National Union of Journalists, Reporters Without Borders and virtually every civil rights, press freedom, and journalists’ union in the world. More than 70 Australian federal politicians have called on the US to drop the prosecution. In the United States, the Congressional representatives calling for the case to be dropped grows steadily, currently H. Res 934 sponsored by Paul Gosar is gathering signatures from all sides of politics.
John Rees of the Free Assange campaign, said: “The US is attempting to convict Julian Assange under the 1917 Espionage Act. If they get away with it, they will have succeeded in redefining journalism as spying. Every journalist will be intimidated. Every newspaper and broadcaster will look at material critical of the government and feel significant pressure not to publish for fear of prosecution and imprisonment. This is the most important press freedom case of the 21st century and we need to ensure we don’t lose any hard-won freedoms.”
Stella Assange, Julian’s wife, who he married while in prison, and who has been campaigning relentlessly for his freedom, said, “The last four and a half years have taken the most considerable toll on Julian and his family, including our two young sons. His mental health and physical state have deteriorated significantly. With the myriad of evidence that has come to light since the original hearing in 2019, such as the violation of legal privilege and reports that senior US officials were involved in formulating assassination plots against my husband, there is no denying that a fair trial, let alone Julian’s safety on US soil, is an impossibility were he to be extradited. The persecution of this innocent journalist and publisher must end.”
WikiLeaks has also supported their founder throughout this whole process, stressing the importance of this case for press freedom. Kristinn Hrafnsson, Editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, said, “There is no press without the protection to operate freely. Julian’s case is a landmark moment; the UK needs to decide if it wishes to be a haven for free press or if it wishes to be complicit in the degradation of a core value of our democracy. This is the last chance for judges in the UK to halt this unjust extradition of an innocent man.”
For more information about the court hearing and subsequent protest, scheduled to commence at 8.30am, and how to participate, please visit here and/or here.’
Meanwhile in the United States, an incredible development took place this week where a judge ruled for a case against the CIA – regarding violation of civil liberties – to proceed:
Read; Judge Rules Assange Visitors May Sue CIA For Allegedly Violating Privacy by Kevin Gosztola at The Dissenter, 19 December 2023;
Food, Farming & Ecocide
No matter how much or little you believe that climate change is anthropogenic compared to a natural change in weather patterns, the weather is changing, but the solutions offered are false. Fear porn (mainstream media content that deliberately and enticingly plays on people’s fears about disaster, disease, and death), works, as it did with the Covid jab; ‘if you don’t do as you are told as a responsible citizen, you will kill granny or, in this case, fry and drown the planet’. If we are not vigilant to the corporate-captured authorities’ lies and propaganda, spread by the corporate-owned mainstream media, in the name of abating climate change, we will accept a suicidal pact with the corporate psychopaths.
The UN has been captured, so the COP 28 discussions in Dubai were not about leaving oil in the soil but about carbon markets; pushing for industry to offset their CO2 emissions by incentivising every sector to take on new NetZero goals or lose out on aid, investment and trade. Instead of giving subsidies to grow healthy food in the soil, they give them to supercharge solar panels, monoculture woods, geneedited climate friendly seeds and livestock, and vertical farming where there is no place for farmers. It is time we used the power of our purse to support our local real farmers!
Read and watch; Regenerative agroecology: the necessary solution to counter climate change; Dr Vandana Shiva, President of Navdanya International; 12 December 2023;
The industrial agriculture paradigm, which sees the world as a machine, and not as a self-organised living system, has created devastation on the planet, while contributing significantly to the issue of climate change. Navdanya International’s latest graphic report, ‘Regeneration is Life‘, presented at Cop 28 in Dubai, analyses the actual causes at the root of climate change and highlights the true regenerative solutions against the false solutions proposed by polluters.
As pointed out in the report, the ecologically destructive practices of industrial agriculture account for 29% of all greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), making the global food system one of the main culprits behind climate change and environmental degradation.
The fertiliser industry is responsible for more than a fifth of total estimated greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture systems worldwide. Factory farms are significant contributors to soil and water pollution. The FAO considers that livestock in CAFOs accounts for 14.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions, while some estimates put the figure above 30%.
Today, the majority of the industrialised and globalised food system is concentrated in the hands of a few companies. Five agrochemical companies hold a 55% monopoly over the $61.5 USD billion world seed market. In 2018, 61% of global seeds and pesticide production was owned by three mega-corporations. Four corporations hold a monopoly over global commodity food trade, and approximately 80% of the US beef market is controlled by only four firms. In 2018, seven firms dominated poultry, pigs, cattle, and aquaculture genetics, and made over $80 billion in sales.
But these very corporations are behind the push for synthetic and lab-made foods, with meat industry giants like Tyson foods, JBS, Cargill, Nestlé, and Maple Leaf Foods having invested up to $2.78 billion in this new sector. Synthetic and lab-cultured foods are quickly becoming a next means to consolidate even more power and profit into the hands of a few food giants without holding them accountable to the consequences of the system they perpetuate.
The dominant corporate-sponsored narratives are now pushing for the reduction of complex ecological collapse, and climate change, into dualistic narratives around plant versus animal, instead of addressing the larger crisis of how current industrial practices are destroying the Earth’s ecosystems.
Acting as if the world were a machine undermines and ultimately destroys life processes and organic systems. In the European Union, for example, total numbers of all types of farmers fell from 14.4 million to 9.1 million between 2005 to 2020. Meaning that over 5 million small and medium-sized companies have had to shut down. Meanwhile, global biodiversity has decreased by an average of 69% since 1970.
The colonising mentality sees nature as dead matter to be exploited and used. Colonisers do not see self-organisation. They do not see creativity. They just see control and profits while bringing disease and ill health, destroying the land, the soil, and the water.
False solutions, such as synthetic foods, involve a further separation from nature. But the separation between us and nature is the root of the problem.
We are now at a watershed between perpetuating the mechanistic model or choosing to live in harmony with nature and its regenerative and creative capacities. We need to bring life back into the soil. In the micro-organisms of the soil we find the life we cannot see, which is the basis of our health and the solution to the climate problem.
The real solution to the ecological and climate crisis does not lie in creating substitutes for food or expanding the industrial paradigm, but in scaling the initiatives all over the world that are already working on healing our connection with the Earth through care.
These solutions already exist and are being implemented by local, diverse food communities around the world. Showing us that it is possible to walk a path of living in harmony with nature. We are part of the Earth’s systems, our food is a continuum of health from the ecosystems of the earth. We are deeply and inherently interconnected.
Agroecological systems can improve soil health, reduce erosion and increase resilience against the impacts of climate change through biodiversity conservation.
Agroecology and organic farming also reduce the need for external inputs through integration of agroecosystem, increase crop diversification and soil management. By increasing carbon sequestration, organic agriculture has a lower climate impact than industrial agriculture. Regenerative agroecology, if systemised, has the regenerative potential to reverse the course and serve as an important tool for climate change mitigation.
There are two ways of seeing ourselves and our relationship with the Earth. Either we think of ourselves as separate from Nature or as one with it. It only takes putting a seed in the ground to create this vision. And every additional community that lives ecologically, lives a better life. It is a very exciting time to be alive to regenerate life.
The BBC generously gives air time to the corporate view of farming, where we see tech taking our food ever further from nature. So to balance the discussion, I, Tracy, give the missing view.
Listen; COP 28 and Agriculture, Vertical Farming BBC Farming Today, 5 December.
BBC Presenter; “What are they growing in?”
Tristan Fisher; “So essentially what you have here is a growing mat that allows you seed on a very uniform basis. You’ll see really, really deep, thick white roots emerging underneath and that’s really a sign of a very, very healthy crop”
Tracy; He avoided answering that they are grown in water with a malteser size ball of clay i.e. devoid of the trace elements present in healthy soil that are essential for both healthy plants and their consumers.
BBC Presenter; “How can this be more environmentally sound than growing a crop in earth, in the soil, in a field?
Tristan Fisher; “If you think about this as a four acre building, producing the same amount of food as a thousand acres, effectively you could just say, let’s take a thousand acres out of farming and rewild 996 acres and just keep four acres in actually growing food. So from that perspective, you can see there is a huge biodiversity benefit you get from going from a conventional farm into a vertical farm”.
Tracy; how about sharing food production with biodiversity as with Organic farming? Vertical farms are owned by corporations and so they will syphon up all the profits once made by farmers. Very little of that finance will stay in the local economy, the majority ends up in the corporate coffers.
BBC Presenter; “What about the infrastructure side? We’re standing in a massive building”.
Tristan Fisher; “So, we have done a comparison between ourselves and a field-grown crop, and we’ve looked at all the various aspects and we’ve had a third party company actually assess how well we’re doing. We produce on a per-kilo of product, about 127 times less carbon emissions than a UK grown product.
Tracy; How about including the true cost of vertical farming not only on our health but even the increased CO2 emissions embodied in the building from mining the metal, cement, glass and cooling and heating the buildings, driving the robots and conveyor belts and then the cost of transporting the food in this centralised system..
BBC Presenter; “Do we need watercress? Do we need rocket? Nutritionally, it’s not a huge part of our intake as a human being, is it?”
Tristan Fisher; “Yes. I mean, that’s a really good question. So we have divided the world into three phases. So we have our phase one crops, we have our phase two crops and our phase three crops. So our phase one crops are where we can make money today selling a product which people want. However, over time we are looking at other crops. So our phase two crops are things like our fruits, things like strawberries and blueberries and raspberries and tomatoes. But ultimately where the business is going is our phase three crops. Our phase three crops are rice and wheat, which represent 52% of human calorie intake comes from those crops. And then soy and peas, which are fantastic substitutes for meat.”
Tracy; Pasture fed livestock are carbon neutral whereas fake meat substitutes owned by the corporations, emit between 4% and 25% more CO2.
BBC Presenter; “One of the issues we have now, as we’re sort of going into COP 28 is, people are thinking, ‘how are we gonna survive in this world with climate change?’”
Tristan Fisher; “With increased population with less soil, with less water in places like North Africa where they have serious problems with soil quality, serious problems with water. And you know, we could be in a situation where we could build huge vertical farms connected with huge solar farms and actually grow things like wheat in those environments so they can actually feed themselves and actually potentially export into other parts of Africa as well. And I think that it is really a difficult sell for Westerners to say everybody else around the world should have less when we have more. And so what we are offering is essentially the abundance which we want without trashing a planet at the same time,”
Tracy; Great if they grow food in the desert but there are similar examples where farmers revitalised the desert, using traditional drought-resistant seed and kept the money to sustain a livelihood in the locality.
Africa is to have its traditional, nutritionally rich crop varieties stolen, hybridised, and/or gene edited and genetically engineered, and patented, promising the earth in terms of climate abatement but in fact only improved to have a longer shelf life, so that it can be transported across the globe to rich countries.
As part of the COP 28 coverage, Farming Today Dec 7 gives the corporate view, so again I, Tracy, balance the discussion.
BBC Presenter introduction; “$50 million of new investment in what’s described as accelerating agriculture and food innovations has been announced at COP. This is part of AIM, The Agriculture Innovation Mission for Climate, a global coalition set up at COP 26 and led by the USA and the UAE, it aims to get more money into Climate Smart Ag and new technologies to adapt to and mitigate climate change. At this COP number 28, the AIM for Climate Innovation Sprint, launched in Africa earlier this year, has been expanded. Dr. Kerry Fowler is special envoy for global food security at the US State Department.”
US State Department; “AIM’s attention, is focused on soil health and fertility and on crop adaptation particularly to climate change and particularly focused on Africa, and they’re focused on traditional and indigenous crops. What we want to do is to improve the productivity of those crops that are, by and large, very nutrition rich, but historically have benefited from very little investment and very little involvement by scientific plant breeders. In fact, some of those crops have never had any scientific attention paid to them at all, but they are in fact high potential crops; some people call them Opportunity Crops for the Future. So that’s where we’re focusing our attention. And, we think these investments will pay high dividends. I think there’s quite a large return on investment for them.”
Tracy; It’s yet another ‘opportunity’ to make mega-bucks for biotech companies. Money is pouring into hybridising and gene editing and then patenting Africa’s traditional healthy crops into unhealthy, mass produced commodities, sold via a centralised system of supermarkets. Local farmers, deprived of their livelihoods in the local economy, are forced to eke out a living in the city.
BBC Presenter; “And how exactly do you hope they will help develop those crops to make them drought resistant or just more productive?”
US State Department; “ all of those things. if you look at Africa, the major staple crops are all imported crops, if you will. In other words, crops that originated were domesticated in other regions, such as maize from Central and South America, cassava, which is also from South America, Asian rice, bananas from Asia, wheat, and a few cases in Africa and from the near East. And so what’s happened is that the indigenous crops had been underdeveloped, not for any scientific reasons.
There’s no indication that the traditional crops, and here I’m talking about sorghum and fonio millets and a wide range of legumes and vegetables. There’s no reason to believe that those crops are at all inherently inferior. In fact, if you look at the nutritional qualities of those crops, some of ’em are quite superior to those being grown now. But the productivity levels, because they haven’t benefited from plant breeding, have remained low. And as we look into the future, with the effects of climate change, you know, we’re going to need about 50 to 70% more food to be produced in Africa by mid-century than is being grown now.”
Tracy; He has chosen to avoid answering her question about how exactly you hope to develop these crops because he would have to admit it is via controversial genetic engineering and hybridisation, that will be patented and so, corporate owned. This technique will reduce the health benefits of Africa’s traditional seeds to the level of those hybridised less healthy crops that he quotes are from other countries. Population growth is the fear porn used but in fact, it has been proved time and again that small scale local family farms produce far more food than monocultures.
BBC Presenter; “As you say, this is costing millions of millions of dollars, but you talk about a return on investment. So how does the business end of this work, if you like?”
US State Department; “Well, there are a couple ways of thinking about that. Of course, there’s a real return on investment in terms of the benefit to society. Many of these particular crops have traditionally been tended by women. If we improve the productivity of the crops that are tended by women, that will have a great impact on not just their health, but also the health of the children. So when you think about return on investment, you have to think about the impact that improving nutrition would have, not just on individual lives, but on the country as a whole and its development prospects.
But getting down to the hard business end of it, there’s traditionally been a very high rate of return just in economic sense from investments in agricultural research and development. So it makes good business sense, but it makes a lot of humanitarian and social sense as well to do this kind of work.
Tracy; He tries to pretend that the benefits are for women who produce the food but he has to admit that the real reason is for corporate investors.
BBC Presenter; “As you’ll know, here and in Europe, there has been some nervousness about some crop technology, particularly genetic modification. Is there that concern in Africa and particularly about who will own these crops and how much farmers will have to pay?”
US State Department;There certainly is some concern in Africa. It varies from country to country. We’re agnostic, frankly, on the issue of the technologies that are used in plant breeding. We know that some countries, including some that have joined up with this venture have certain views about certain technologies. And it’s quite possible within the confines of the work that we’re doing to specify that certain crop technologies not be used, for example. And we know that, in Africa, there are many countries that have regulations concerning the use of these technologies.
So we’re working with our African partners where this whole venture is co-sponsored by the African Union. What we intend to do is to largely work in the public domain and make these new materials easily available to farmers. Most of these crops that we’re working with are not of great interest currently to the international private sector involved in agriculture. But if we want to really advance agricultural food systems on the continent, obviously the private sector has to play a role.”
Tracy; He knows that presently many African countries have refused to plant GM seeds largely because they don’t want to be deprived of their food sovereignty. In so many words, he says he plans to use a massive PR machine to press the public to want the so called ‘cheap’ food and will subsidise the new varieties so the farmers can’t resist buying them. Plus they will only release aid money or improve crippling conditionalities if they comply, and sign up to their so called ‘climate friendly’ shopping list, including gene edited seed varieties. The farmers will then be trapped into forever having to buy more expensive seeds that don’t live up to the promises. If they refuse to continue to purchase new, and traces of the original patented gene edited seed varieties are found in their fields, like Percy Schmeiser, they will be sued for not paying the corporate patent owner..
The climate friendly narrative is about corporate profits and their control over the land, energy, food production and economy – a new colonialism where debt forgiveness, development bank loans and private equity investment has conditionalities that require the country losing its food sovereignty.
Read or listen; Bill Gates: Africans need genetically modified seeds and chickens to fight climate change Rhoda Wilson, The Expose, 23 November 2023;
“Too often, climate advocates claim a consensus on the feasibility and affordability of 100 per cent renewable power globally when such a consensus simply does not exist – certainly not among energy systems experts, when they consider real-world constraints,” the two directors said. “Claims that it will be cheaper for African countries to use only renewable energy to grow their economies rather than a mix of fuels are unrealistic.”
However, Gates will continue to push his green ideology because, as global management consulting firm McKinsey & Company noted, “Green energy in Africa presents significant investment opportunities.”
Gates then went on to describe to the Africa Climate Summit a conversation he had with a farmer in Kenya named Mary. He talked to her about “how the new seeds and new approaches were helping her. She had drought tolerant (GM) seeds that made a very big difference. She also had (gene edited) chickens that were bred so they could be more heat tolerant.”
We should question the validity of Gates’ conversation with “Mary” – what the nature of the conversation was and whether the conversation took place at all.
A 2021 article published by Scientific America describes how the mission of the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (“AFSA”) to protect agroecology in Africa is at odds with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Cornell Alliance for Science’s insistence that genetically modified seeds are healthy, productive and environmentally friendly, while attacking agroecology as economically and socially regressive.
AFSA is the largest social movement in Africa. It represents more than 200 million farmers, fishers, pastoralists, indigenous peoples, women, consumers and others across all but five African countries.
In 2022, AFSA published an open letter to Gates to challenge several inaccurate claims he had made in articles published by The New York Times and Associated Press. One of Gates’ inaccuracies related to the development of climate-resilient seeds, which, without Gates’ help, are already in existence and being developed by farmers and traded through informal seed markets.
“The [Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa] initiative, which your foundation continues to fund, has also pushed restrictive seed legislation that limits and restricts crop innovation to well-resourced labs and companies. These initiatives don’t increase widespread innovation, but rather contribute to the privatisation and consolidation of corporate monopolies over seed development and seed markets,” AFSA wrote in their letter to Gates. “There is no shortage of practical solutions and innovations by African farmers and organisations. We invite you to step back and learn from those on the ground.”
As for Gates’ chickens to “fight poverty,” or his more recent claim to “fight climate change”, that too, is not for the benefit of Africans.
In a 2016 blog post, Bill Gates made a case for egg production as a way to fight poverty and improve nutrition in malnourished populations. As you can guess, there is a catch to Gates’ “philanthropy” because all his chickens would be “properly vaccinated.” After Gates’ covid “vaccination” programme, we are left with no doubt that “properly vaccinated” does not mean “protection against disease” or for our “health and well-being.”
Gates has similar genetic engineering plans for cows…………
Read or Listen; Gates Calls for Cows to Be Modified to Fight ‘Climate Change’ Patricia Harrity, The Expose, 15 December 2023;
‘Bill Gates is yet again attempting to play god, this time he has yet again spoken of his plans to modify cows as part of a claimed effort to “fight climate change” by reducing the “methane emissions” from beef cattle. Gates made the call while speaking at the third edition of the French finance ministry’s “Rendez-vous de Bercy” event in Paris which is held every two years to address different issues related to the French, European, and world economies.
Frank Bergman reported that it was during a panel discussion at the globalist event Gates complained that no country is moving fast enough to develop and innovate renewable energy solutions to tackle the alleged “climate crisis.”
Bergman continues the article below originally published in Slay News.
The third edition of “Rendez-vous de Bercy” was devoted to environmental issues and economic growth in the face of “climate change.”
Gates told the summit in Paris that nations worldwide are not advancing quickly enough to meet the goals of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Net Zero” targets.
“We are behind on our short-term goals” in advancing the globalist green agenda, Gates warned.
“Rich countries owe it to the world to keep costs low for green technology,” he said.
The philanthropist sounded a more positive note when he spoke about the United Nations COP28 global climate summit, which concluded in the United Arab Emirates on December 12.
He said there was much more focus on innovation this year than at past meetings.
During his remarks at the Paris summit, Gates argued that artificial intelligence (AI) was helping the agriculture sectors in developing countries.
He claims that AI helps third-world farmers to obtain better weather forecasts and analysis of crops and climate.
Gates then argued that “methane emissions” from meat production are a major contributor to “climate change.”
He continued by pushing plans to manipulate cows through “breeding” to lower their “methane” output.
Gates suggested that cows could be given “some other inputs” that would presumably alter their genetic state to stop them farting and burping.
“No, I see two new very amazing approaches,” Gates said after steering the conversation to meat production.
“By improving the cow breeding, and giving them some other inputs, we can reduce their methane emissions.
And this new prioritisation of the methane work, I applaud that because, in terms of the near-term temperature increase, methane plays a very big role.”
This is not the first time Gates has promoted plans to target cows’ “methane emissions,” however.
In January, Gates joined a slew of billionaires investing in an Australian climate technology startup.
The company plans to disrupt the methane-emitting animal agriculture industry with a lab-grown feed additive, according to Bloomberg’.
Below is the type of farming most rural Africans want to protect;
Watch; Grains of Hope-Bikita, Zimbabwe The Gaia Foundation, 16 November 2021;
“The bees are everything in Tharakan communities. When I was very young my father would climb the tallest trees with just his hands and feet. I could see his outline against the night sky, and felt scared. He would put his hand in amongst all those bees, without upsetting them. One bad move and he would be showered with stings. But it never went wrong. He would fill a container with some of their honey, leaving plenty for them. The bee hives are still here today, and my uncle still climbs trees, aged 70! But now, when you tell someone that Tharaka means ‘The Land of the Bees’, their next question is ‘where have the bees gone?’”
In this documentary, Simon sets out to find an answer.
His search reveals their worldwide importance, and a worldwide decline – WWF estimates that 1 in 3 mouthfuls of our food rely on pollinators like bees, with the UN finding that bee extinction is happening 1000% times faster because of humans. Why? A type of insecticide created in the 1980s and currently used in 120 countries, called neonicotinoids. Cheap and toxic, it impairs a bee’s central nervous system to such an extent that they cannot even fly home.
Every single African country is using neonicotinoids, and back in Kenya, Simon discovers that industrial farms are spraying it on a vast scale. Despite scientific evidence of its impact, companies from the global north are still supplying the global south in huge quantities, where restrictions are weak and allow for the devastation of biodiversity hotspots, like Tharaka.
Simon is now a member of the African Earth Jurisprudence Collective, having become an Earth Jurisprudence Practitioner through The Gaia Foundation’s three-year training programme. Supported by peers across the continent who are reviving Indigenous lifeways, Simon is supporting the Tharakan people to turn the tide on a history of cultural and ecological loss in their ancestral lands.
“Our work started slowly by creating ‘community dialogue’ spaces for interested people, especially Elders, to come together and discuss Tharakan culture: what things were like and how things were done in the past, compared to how they are now. Slowly the number of people coming to these meetings grew. Since then we have been able to revive many aspects of our culture in a very practical way.”
This includes farming agro-ecologically – using Indigenous seed, harvesting rainwater and eliminating chemicals like neonicotinoids. Tharakans are also replanting and protecting the trees where bees nest, reviving their bee-keeping traditions and brewing honey beer again. This is bringing people and place, together once more, through ecological governance of their territory and ceremonies that celebrate it.
“We are encouraging everyone to abandon pesticides and use organic farming methods. The rituals honey is used in are coming back, bringing us into a more caring relationship with all the beings in our territory. Perhaps most importantly, our young people are now being trained in the old ways.”
This transformation has created a network of clans who once again care for the wider community of life. Simon may have started out as a man without bees, but today he is accompanying the landscape-level restoration of biocultural diversity in Tharaka.’
Great to see our #EndTheCageAge photo stunt yesterday make @thetimes news in pictures. Read our press release here: https://t.co/jLqFYR3fEy https://t.co/0m30Dymnpc
— CIWF Media Team (@media_ciwf) December 14, 2023
The only way to defeat the brutality of the vampire supermarkets sucking the life blood from our precious farmers, is simple; avoid them. Instead buy from farmers markets, box schemes like Riverford and trusted online sources like Big Barn and Pipers Farm.
Watch; British Farming’s Christmas Advert 2023. “Like all British farmers, I can smell bullshit a mile off and none more so than at Christmas. It’s at this time of year the big retailers spend millions on adverts filled with fake farmers trying to convince you that they actually care about their suppliers and that we are one big happy family ”.
Amazing to hear Philip Dunn, Conservative MP, chair of the Environmental Audit Committee, demand that we subsidise farmers for producing food as well as protecting biodiversity. I wish he would also advocate land-sharing so that we grow our food in symbiosis with biodiversity, not land-sparing where we continue to douse the land in chemicals and only improve biodiversity on any spare land.
Listen; Farming Today BBC Radio, 9 December 2023;
Philip Dunn MP; “Food security is something that the government has paid sort of lip service to for some time. In our report, we feel that with the introduction of the new support systems, The Environmental Land Management Schemes, (ELMS) there is an opportunity to explicitly spell out that food security itself is a public good. Farmers will be paid for performing public goods. Contributing towards food security is not one of them at the moment, and we think it should be,”
BBC Presenter; “Some people might say, well, hang on a minute, because food security and self-sufficiency aren’t quite the same thing. Are you using those terms sort of interchangeably here?”
Philip Dunn MP; “No, we’re not. We absolutely recognize that there are many foods that we cannot grow here or could only grow in an extremely inefficient way in terms of energy and the environment. But we also recognize that as the international trading situation gets affected by conflict and climate, we need to be capable of increasing self-sufficiency. And that requires a greater degree of focus on food security so that we’re not left high and dry, should calamities occur, we need to feed our population.
It’s a very important part of the role of government and the role of farming in this country.”
If Philip Dunn MP succeeds in getting more food grown in the UK, he is going to need the government to intervene to ensure farmers get a fair price. Though they are reviewing each sector, there’s no sign of any action three years after the first review. Farming Today 18th Dec;
Philip Clark, Farmer’s Weekly. This is the fourth. It started off with one in the dairy sector, and that was followed by one in the pig sector. Then just in October, the government launched a third review into the egg sector. And now this week they’ve introduced the review of the fresh produce sector.
BBC Presenter; “And pretty much all the farmers in those sectors are saying similar things.”
Philip Clark, Farmer’s Weekly. “Absolutely, well, maybe not so much the dairy sector. Things have kind of turned a corner a bit there now. But particularly the egg sector has just been through a really torrid time with reduction in the laying flock problems with even influenza, but more particularly problems with low prices which led to a massive contraction of, of the laying flock. and then in, in the fresh produce sector, similar problems around energy costs labour availability have led to a drop in production there, which we saw earlier in the year with empty supermarket shelves. And sadly, you know, some producers are calling it a day and going out of business”
BBC Presenter; “And timing is an issue here, isn’t it? I mean, it was some years ago that the review into dairy was launched.”
Philip Clark, Farmer’s Weekly. “I think it was pre pre covid even. So yes, it has been a very long haul. You know, there’ll be an election next year, which may interrupt things, may derail things, but for some producers I’m sure it’ll be too little, too late.”
BBC Presenter; “Well, indeed, I have heard some producers rather cynically saying that this smacks of a pre-election move, which may or may not make an actual difference somewhere down the line.”
Philip Clark, Farmer’s Weekly. “You could easily take that view. I mean, as Defra would say, this was something that Rishi Sunak committed to, and they had the Farmed Fork Summit back in May in Downing Street. Maybe they had thoughts of general elections then. But it was something committed to earlier in the year, more in response to the very real problems that were being seen in supermarkets’ empty shelves. Quite likely the fact that an election is now looming into sight probably ups the ante a bit as far as the government is concerned.”
BBC Presenter; “What difference actually could these reviews make, albeit in some time?”
Philip Clark, Farmer’s Weekly. “I mean, certainly, you know, we hear so many stories of malpractice in the supply chain of, you know, contracts being cancelled at the last minute, adjustments being made to price without proper negotiation or consultation. So anything that improves that, you know, will hopefully make a difference to give farmers who are used to being price takers, a little bit more opportunity to not be price makers, but to have a fairer say in the returns that they get from the marketplace.”
Taxing globally-sourced food that could be produced locally is an obvious winner, but the fact that the government is not doing so indicates that it is only interested in reducing CO2 if it means new casino markets and food-tech patents for corporations to profit from.
Read; Farmers For Action (NI) call for a carbon tax on needless food imports; 5th Dec.
‘In the week that saw COP28 in the UAE sound serious warnings about insufficient action on climate change as the world has now reached a 1.4C temperature increase in 2023 and scientists are warning that the tipping point is 1.5C, Farmers for Action issued a press release calling for a massive carbon tax on needless food imports and food miles immediately’!
‘The UK is not self-sufficient in beef and imports from Southern Ireland, our nearest neighbour. This is fine, but the UK should not be importing from Argentina, Brazil or Australia.
We should import from our next nearest neighbours and this process should be replicated around the world, eliminating unnecessary import of all food commodities, increasing food miles purely for profit.
Representatives from FFA recently attended a meeting at Queen’s University (Belfast) where Lord Deben, formerly chair of the Climate Change Committee, gave a lecture followed by a Q&A session.
FFA highlighted the issue of food ships passing in the night (food swaps), purely to increase the profits of corporate food retailers, corporate food wholesalers and shipping companies. This question was followed by another: asking why governments are not dealing with this, if they are serious about climate change, and how can we stop these swaps.’
The Channel 4 film; The Big British Beef Battle, could have been life saving for UK pasture fed beef farmers but instead it packaged them along with intensive beef and dairy production (mostly imported) thanks to the presenter falling for the Bill Gates funded Guardian’s climate narrative.
‘Avoiding meat and dairy products is the single biggest way to reduce your environmental impact on the planet, according to the scientists behind the most comprehensive analysis to date of the damage farming does to the planet.’
Ade Adepitan, British television presenter, childrens’ book writer and wheelchair basketball player, in his mission to persuade people to give up beef, is in lock step with the owner of the plant based Impossible Burger, Bill Gates. Gates’s mission is to get the government to nudge consumers into giving up meat and if it fails, recommends that beef and dairy be banned.
The misguided presenter suggests that eating beef is a disaster for the climate and eating chicken is better. He fails to research the massive cost of factory farmed chickens, not least the cost of soy feed grown on destroyed Rainforest in South America. In his ultimate objective that we all eat fake meat, has omitted to mention that fake meat emits between 4% and 25% times more CO2 in its production than UK pasture fed beef.
As a last minute addition, he briefly mentioned that UK beef is largely pasture fed so is not the problem as the grass sequesters the CO2 equivalent to the burping and farting from the cow, but he then continues to bunch all meat and dairy as the enemy. The program was so utterly inaccurate that the livestock industry complained to Ofcom!
Read/Watch: AHDB submits complaint to Ofcom about Channel 4’s Big British Beef Battle; ADHB, 5th December 2023;
“The programme was described on the Channel 4 website as a documentary that looks at the “impact of our diet on climate change”, which aims to answer the question, “does eating chicken instead of beef reduce our impact on the climate?” Which, under due impartially, viewers would expect exploration of the science around this topic, highlighting the arguments for and against the posed question.
Instead, the programme was incredibly biassed against beef, highlighting basic, and very limited scientific evidence and arguments within this complex field of science. With the presenter’s opinions against beef very apparent and forthright, and undue focus on the global situation for a UK audience..”
There is no end to the cruelty the human race is prepared to inflict on sentient beings for profit. As the government has no morals, it is up to us to boycott factory-farmed octopus from our plates.
Sign; TAKE A STAND: STOP THE OCTOPUS FARM Petition by Compassion in World Farming;
‘In the Canary Islands, Spain, there are plans for a colossal octopus farm, threatening the wellbeing of these intelligent creatures. Their fate hangs in the balance. The government of the Canary Islands remains silent to our calls, we need your help to stop it! Take action now: shut down the farm.
Imagine: one million octopuses confined every year in stressful and cramped conditions. This stress is known to trigger aggression and cannibalism. And the farm’s barbaric practices, like the use of ice slurry for slaughter, threaten unimaginable suffering.
It’s not just inhumane. Both local communities and tourism businesses could face the threat of pollution, which endangers scenic spots impacting their lives.
Octopus farming, beyond its inhumanity, adds strain on our planetary resources. Relying on wild-caught fish intensifies overfishing, worsening food insecurities globally. Despite our collective efforts, a letter co-signed by 75 organisations and public figures to the Canary Islands and Spanish Government received no response.
Please send your email to the Government of the Canary Islands in Spain demanding to stop the farm from opening!
Preview your message to the Canary Islands before sending your email.
Watch My Octopus Teacher film to understand this beautiful creature
Three pilots testify about the difference between con trails, ie trails of vapour from an aeroplane that last in the air for about a minute, and the new chem trails that are aluminium floating in the air, deposited to control the weather and reflect the sun’s rays to allegedly abate climate change!
Watch; Airline pilots testify about chem trails; Illuminatibot, 17 December 2023;
“The con trails occur because of cold air -30 degrees at high altitude, around 30,000 feet. Plus there’s a carbon dioxide and water vapour in that exhaust that turns to ice crystals and that’s what you see. The white stream behind it, those white crystals of ice, warm up, dissolve, and the smoke goes away. And it never lasts more than a minute. What we’re seeing now, and I at first could not believe it, I started looking at the skies. And these are not normal. They’re not natural. There’s something going on. I don’t know who it is or why they’re doing it. All I can testify is it’s not natural and it’s not normal. It’s got to be some outside influence doing that.”
“I’m here to give you testimony that chemtrails, they’re not contrails, are indeed real. They’re spraying almost every day I watch the clouds and watch the spraying programme going on. I want to tell you that we’re in very great danger from the pollution that’s coming down over us and we’ve been led astray by the military industrial complex and they’re responsible for the cloud’s creation and weather manipulation programmes, their dark operations. That’s why they’re not out in the media.”
“I look around and I see people are starting to look up and see them. Many times I’ve spoken about chemtrails and I get this blank look on my face. What are you talking about? I’m saying look up as a pilot. What? Before I fly, I look up and so boy, they’re really out there working.” “When you look up at the sun you see a white haze, that is aluminium floating in the air right now.”
Censorship/Surveillance/Coercion/Corruption
The more of us that wake up to the distinctly un-human, unjust and unhealthy transhumanist new world order planned by a few super rich psychopathic plutocrats, the sooner we can take back control of our governance. We must wake up to the fear propaganda like Climate change, Net Zero, lock down, neither safe nor effective vaccine jab; the breakdown of the extended family, health decisions handed down by the unelected, unaccountable body, the World Health Organisation (WHO); diminishing individuals’ ability to own property; AI forcing us into to a jobless society to be appeased by a social credit lifeline that can be terminated if we deviate from their narrative, or spread counter-narrative information; pushing us into a cashless society that, as with the Canadian truckers, bank accounts can be frozen because of any counter-narrative activism; loss of independent businesses, not least farms, abattoirs, food producers and retailers; censorship and loss of free speech as platforms are infiltrated by the secret service to ensure those that are effective at exposing the truth are deplatformed and arrested such as Reiner Fuellmich in Germany and Barry Young in NZ; surveillance to impose lock downs and imprison us in 15 minute cities if we go outside the narrative; phony taboos like anti-semitism, climate change, pandemic and gender identity; ending of fossil fuels to control trade with countries that counter the collective West’s colonial imperative of global governance, erosion of spirituality and tolerance of the diversity of spiritual guidance.
We need to form strong communities to take back control of our lives through locally exchanging our most basic needs like food and water, energy and heating.
THE GREAT RESET
An amusing Christmas spoof starring Klaus Schwab, CEO of the World Economic Forum, as Santa promising the world to his viewers. Lyrics to classic songs changed into spoofs about gifts Klaus would like for Xmas and what us deplorables think of his bullshit, ending with the sanity of Julian Assange’s words that all we really want is to be free.
Watch; The World Enslavement Forum presents Christmas hits with Klaus Schwab Kim Dotcom, 15 December 2023;
‘Hello, my name is Klaus, the ‘situation’ Schwab. This Christmas cuddle up with your loved ones while you enjoy a delicious holiday feast of mealworms and crunchy crickets and pop in a very special collection of songs, the World Enslavement Forum presents Vaccine Hits 23;
Song; I’m dreaming of a Great Reset like communism just in smart. With gene selection and eye detection and drone surveillance everywhere…….’
In this book, “world leader” (NOT), Klaus Schwab, lays out his dream, and our dystopian world. We must resist his global governance and go in the opposite direction by relocalising our economies.
Read or listen; Klaus Schwab wants to stop the retreat of globalisation and global governance with a new form of globalisation and global governance Rhoda Wilson, The Expose, 19 December 2023;
‘Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret’s book ‘Covid-19: The Great Reset’ identified “the global governance free fall” as an existential challenge and if we do not collaborate “we are doomed.”
“Nation states make global governance possible (one leads the other),” the book states. “The more nationalism and isolationism pervade the global polity, the greater the chance that global governance loses its relevance and becomes ineffective. Sadly, we are now at this critical juncture. Put bluntly, we live in a world in which nobody is really in charge.”
The book defines “global governance” as the cooperation among transnational actors to respond to global problems and “globalisation” as a broad and vague notion that refers to the global exchange between nations of goods, services, people, capital and data.
Although global governance is defined as a different concept, they are intertwined and the reasons for its “free fall” are the same as those for the retreat of globalisation.
The solution to the retreat from globalisation, Schwab and Malleret said, was a new form of globalisation which required policies and effective global governance.’
18/01/2024
The Fight To Free Julian Assange Public Rally
Featuring @Stella_assange, @richardburgon, @daviddavismpConway Hall
25 Red Lion Square
London
WC1R 4RLRegister your attendance here:https://t.co/VmyHnB3PnZ pic.twitter.com/Vf90IV8wYX
— Don’t Extradite Assange – #FreeAssange (@FreeAssangeNews) December 21, 2023
At the Belmarsh Tribunal in Washington D.C., a former intelligence operative, academics and journalists expressed their appreciation of Julian Assange’s brave and ingenious work to expose authorities’ and mainstream media’s collusion to hide the truth. They are all brilliant, but I particularly love how disgusted and exasperated journalist Abby Martin always is with the prevailing system.
Watch; The Belmarsh Tribunal D.C. — “Free the Truth” — The Case of Julian Assange; Democracy Now! 9 December 2023;
‘On December 9, 2023, the Belmarsh Tribunal returned to Washington, D.C., for its most urgent session since its launch in 2020. The Tribunal calls for the release of WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange as his potential extradition from the U.K. to the U.S. reaches its denouement with his final UK court hearing expected in early 2024.
Inspired by the Russell-Sartre Tribunals of the Vietnam War, the Belmarsh Tribunal brings together a range of expert witnesses — from constitutional lawyers to acclaimed journalists and human rights defenders — to present evidence of the assault on press freedom and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.’ This D.C. sitting of the Tribunal is co-chaired by Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman and The Intercept’s Ryan Grim.’
Amy Goodman; “Abby Martin, investigative journalist host of the Empire files an independent documentary and interview series, reporting on conflicts, repression and the future of the First Amendment. She’s been active as an editor and international journalist for more than a decade, published several books and directed several movies, most recently, Gaza Fights for Freedom.”
Abby Martin; “Thank you so much, it’s an honour to be on this panel and to be with all of you here today for this very important call to action. The past eight weeks have been the deadliest on record for journalists, with 60 confirmed killed in Gaza so far. They are being targeted for assassination, many alongside their entire families. The reporters who remain say that their press vests, which should be their protective barrier from bombs and bullets, are actually what is marking them for murder. The genocide in Gaza has been exposed by these heroes. The only way the world knows the depth of crimes committed by the US and Israel, things that would otherwise remain hidden for years, is because journalists are able to document them on their phones and instantly upload them for the world to see. The Iraqi people did not have the capacity to film their reality. When a crime of this scale was being committed to them they had no ability to break through the lies and propaganda disseminated by our so-called free press. Instead it was whistleblowers like Sergeant Joe Darby who leaked the infamous Abu Ghraib torture photos which dealt a major blow to the US war effort.
Imagine for one second if the Bush Administration locked up the CBS reporter who dared to publish those. Iraqis didn’t have social media but they did have Wikileaks which finally showed the world what American forces had kept hidden for so long. Washington worked very hard to control where journalists could access and what they could and could not report. Wikileaks was the antidote for that lack of free press during what was the greatest atrocity in the modern era. The Iraq war logs forced Americans to confront what the United States was doing in our names. They gave proof to Iraqi society the extent to which US soldiers had been killing civilians, and the revelations made the occupation untenable. Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange helped end the Iraq War. Forgive the repetition, but I think this quote bears repeating. Julian Assange once declared that if wars can start with lies, peace can start with the truth. Those words ring as our beacon when we look at the threat that truth poses to power, the powers that decide who lives and who dies, how wars start and how wars end.
Truth poses the ultimate threat indeed. It gives the peons the power to know and the agency to act, that’s why Julian Assange is deemed enemy number one. Let’s turn to Gaza once again, where, not only journalists, but Palestinians who become viral like our great late friend Refaat Alareer are openly assassinated for exposing Israel’s crimes. Let’s not forget the CIA tried to do the exact same thing to Julian Assange; they wanted to kill him for the same reason that Israel is killing Palestinian journalists. But America is not as brazen as Israel and needs to maintain this veneer of respectability, humanitarianism and democracy, so instead they chose a different means to the same end, silencing him, punishing him and taking away his life by throwing him in a dungeon. And they relied on the willing agents of empire, the dutiful media stenographers to articulate to us why Assange is not a journalist and persecute him at the stake. Assange has been in prison for so long it actually might be hard to remember what it was like when Wikileaks came out. It’s hard to remember how much of a relief it was to witness an organisation braving the truth, armed with proof, a figurehead that challenged power in such a superb way.”
Read; First Resolution In US Congress To Call For End To Assange Case Kevin Gosztola, The Dissenter, 17 December 2023;
‘A resolution in support of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was introduced in the United States House of Representatives on December 13.
Co-sponsored by eight representatives, it states that “regular journalistic activities are protected under the First Amendment,” and the U.S. government should “drop all charges against, and attempts to extradite, Julian Assange.”
The resolution, introduced by six Republican and two Democratic representatives marks the first time that representatives have used the legislature to try and mobilise support for Assange and freedom of the press.’
‘The resolution concludes by stating that the U.S. government should abandon its effort to extradite Assange and put him on trial. It should also allow Assange to return home to Australia “if he so desires.”
Whether the resolution will pass in the House or not, the resolution shows the potential for making the Assange case a political issue for President Joe Biden. In a year where Biden will be campaigning for re-election, that may prove to be crucial in freeing Assange.’
The US/UK/EU doctrine of ‘The Right to Protect’ (R2P) that was used to justify invasion, bombing and assassinations in Iraq, Libya, Syria and Afghanistan, is strangely absent when it comes to protecting Palestinian civilians from relentless genocide. Could it be because the zionist lobby controls western media and politics, because the US/UK/EU axis wants a military foothold in the Middle East with access to oil and gas and because we are loyal customers of Israeli arms dealers?
Read; The West agonises over an ‘atrocity upsurge’ while backing Israel’s genocide in Gaza Jonathan Cook, Declassified UK, 11 December 2023;
‘The problem isn’t ‘global inaction’ to prevent mass atrocities, as the Guardian claims. It’s intense US and UK support for atrocities so long as they bolster their global power.
How do politicians, diplomats, the media and even the human rights community, keep us politically ignorant, docile and passive – a collective mindset that prevents us from challenging their power as well as the status quo they benefit from?
The answer: By constantly misrepresenting reality to us and their own role in shaping it. And they do it so successfully because, at the same time, they gaslight us by flaunting the pretence that they crave to make the world a better place – a better place where, in truth, the unspoken danger is that, were those advances to be realised, their own power would be severely diminished.
A perfect illustration of how this grand deception works was provided in a report at the weekend in the supposedly progressive Guardian newspaper, headlined “World faces ‘heightened risk’ of mass atrocities due to global inaction”.
The opening paragraph reports that human rights activists fear the “international community has given up on intervention efforts to stop mass atrocities, leading to fears that such occurrences may become the norm around the world”.
In practice, this “failure”, according to the report, has manifested in an abandonment by Western states of the principle of R2P – or “responsibility to protect”. This principle and related “humanitarian” pretexts were used to justify the US and its allies meddling since the 1990s, variously in Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, with disastrous consequences.
Millions were killed as a result of R2P-type interventions and tens of millions displaced, leading to mass movements of people that are seen today by Western states in terms of an “illegal immigration threat”.’
As if the CIA couldn’t get any worse, David Rogers Webb, an ex hedge funder, has uncovered a plot to seize assets belonging to investors.
Read and Watch; Interview with David Rogers Webb, author of the book; The Great Taking, Children’s Health Defense, 9 December 2023;
‘In a CHD.TV interview Saturday with Children’s Heath Defense (CHD) President and CEO Mary Holland, Webb said he has been studying global financial systems and warning of a coming “Great Taking” financial collapse for more than 20 years. His decades of hedge fund experience gave him insight into money flows and systemic risks that he believes foreshadow an orchestrated crash.’
‘Webb spent years researching historical precedents like Great Depression-era bank closures and gold confiscation to help him understand the “playbook used by powerful banking interests during times of financial turmoil.”
Webb compared the state of the economy just before World War I to today’s hyper-financialized economy, saying both are about “looting” in the late phase of economic bubbles, just prior to a crash.
Webb also witnessed a decade-long campaign to change commercial banking statutes and ownership definitions, state by state, that set the stage for revoking investor property rights during defaults.
“The underpinning of the entire securities infrastructure in the U.S. is the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, and this is the entity that was first formed to dematerialize all securities in the U.S.,” Webb said.
Webb told Holland that a career CIA operative with “absolutely no background and banking or finance” was involved in this project and was later made the superintendent of banks in New York state by Nelson Rockefeller.
“It’s very clear that this was a CIA project,” he said.
The Lehman Brothers failure during the 2008 financial crisis was “teed up” to cement new precedents allowing elite creditors to seize client assets during financial busts, Webb told Holland.
The Lehman collapse involved using client assets secured through derivatives and securitized bonds as collateral, which creditors then seized.
“The bankruptcy judge said that J.P. Morgan was under ‘safe harbour’ and could take the client assets” and, as one of the largest banks, it was “certainly a member of the ‘protected class,’” Webb said. “And those words are used in the decision.”’
Dr Brar, an NHS vascular surgeon, was arrested and held for 24 hours because a pamphlet on his stall accurately describes zionism as racism and settler-colonialism and explains what has led to the bloodbath in Gaza.
Watch; Dr Ranjeet Brar recounts his arrest for distributing a book about the history of zionism, George Galloway, 28 November 2023;
“My father is an author. As it happens, he’s written books over a long period of time on this struggle, on imperialism in the Middle East, one specifically called ‘zionism’ and it’s subtitled ‘a racist anti-semitic and reactionary tool of imperialism’ which is a mouthful but really what it does is it it documents the history of zionism, how zionism was implanted into Palestine …they wanted to create a state which would help them to colonise and loot their newly conquered territories… and this booklet really explains that history, it also explains amongst other things the fact that, because zionism was an ultra nationalist ideology which thought actually that Jews were the chosen people, it’s a supremacist ideology and it’s a racist ideology.
They arrested me, they went through the process. They said that I was in breach of section 5 and later added section 18 of the public order act. I didn’t know really what it means, it means threatening words and behavior. Then they said it was racially aggravated and then later on they said it’s distributing imagery likely to cause racial hatred. And so I’ve sat with them in an interview, I’ve explained to them I’m a lifelong campaigner against racism, I’m a lifelong campaigner for equality, but what I’m here to demonstrate against are concrete crimes which are war crimes, mass transfer of population, civilian population, siege of a civilian population, bombing of hospitals, bombing of schools, bombing of churches, bombing of mosques, genocide against the civilian population.
But what’s quite clear is that our government are so intent on standing in solidarity and supporting that genocide that they wish to criminalize dissent, they wish to criminalize historical facts and truth in this case. I don’t know yet, the full repercussions. At the moment, they’ve bailed me, they haven’t pressed any charges, but I will have to re-present to a police station. Obviously I will do so, I’m hopeful that they won’t actually follow this through and that they will back down, but whatever happens I won’t accept it, I will fight it for as long as I need to as part of the widest cause of defending the right to free speech in this country and of defending the right of all those who want to stand in solidarity with Palestine to do so.”
Post-colonial corporate fascism still rules the world and using secret courts, companies can steal huge sums from small countries that enact policies for the public good that negatively impact their corporate profits.
Listen; ‘Silent Coup’—How corporations rule the world Chris Hedges with Matt Kennard, Chris Hedges Report, 22 September 2023;
‘Matt Kennard and Claire Provost’s book, Silent Coup: How Corporations Overthrew Democracy, looks inside the international architecture of global corporate governance that exists to flout and crush any attempts by the former colonial world to enact development on their own terms.’
Chris Hedges; “The US, like many industrialised countries, has undergone a corporate coup d’etat in slow motion, cementing into place a system of control the political philosopher, Sheldon Wolin, calls “inverted totalitarianism.” Inverted totalitarianism retains the institutions, symbols, iconography, and language of the old capitalist democracy but internally, corporations have seized all the levers of power to accrue ever-greater profits and political control.
Claire Provost and Matt Kennard in their book, Silent Coup: How Corporations Overthrew Democracy, chart the way the corporate coup d’etat was orchestrated. It examines the use of an international legal system to control and plunder the resources in the developing world, including the overthrow of governments that challenge corporate dominance. The authors expose the nefarious alliance between nonprofit organisations and corporations, one that prioritises profit rather than justice. They document the weakening of labour laws and the evisceration of workers’ protections and rights. To enforce this predatory behaviour, corporations have not only created, in essence, a global supreme court, but raised and funded private mercenary militias to crush labour movements and intimidate, and even murder, activists. The subversion of democracy abroad is accompanied, the authors argue, by the subversion of democracy at home; a mechanism used to plunder the developing world, is also used in the industrial world.
Joining me to discuss Silent Coup is Matt Kenard, a former staff reporter for Financial Times and Co-founder and chief investigator, Declassified UK, a news outlet that investigates British foreign policy. Matt, in your first chapter entitled Democracy on Trial, you write about an international legal case that was launched by a Vancouver based company called Pacific Rim against the government of El Salvador. You used this case as a kind of template throughout the book for how large corporations loot and pillage developing countries by forcing them to accept international agreements, investment treaties, which you call corporate courts that favour vulnerable corporations. So I want you to explain what happened in El Salvador and how this system works.”
Matt Kennard; “I’ll start with the system itself and then the El Salvador example. So effectively the system is a shadow legal system, which operates across the world and affects pretty much every country in the world. What it does is enshrines a system whereby multinational corporations can sue states for enacting policies they don’t like, which they say are their ‘ investor rights’. This was a system that was created in the heat of the decolonization movement and the end of formal empire. So the main body where these cases are heard is actually an arm of the World Bank. It’s called the International Center of the Settlement of Investment disputes, (ICSID). Though there is very little knowledge about it in the developed world, it’s everyone in El Salvador, for example, So this was created in 1966 by the World Bank. The sixties obviously was a time when many countries in Africa and other places were getting independence. And a lot of people who had been fighting the imperial powers on the ground were now becoming presidents or prime ministers. Now, in that scenario, the traditional owners of the world were panicking and they thought, how are we gonna maintain control? How are we gonna ensure our investments are protected where we don’t have a formal empire to rely on?
We don’t have a formal garrison of troops based in that country where we can just take out a leader if he does something we don’t like. So they came up with this system, and in fact, it was the brainchild of a German banker called Herman Abs, who was at Deutsch bank, and he was actually associated with the Nazi regime as well.
But after the Second World War, he thought that the world needed a system, what he called a Capitalist Magna Carta. And he made his famous words, which it’s not a famous speech, it should be a famous speech, but he made this speech in San Francisco in 1957 to a group of industrialists from all over the world and all the big wigs in America were there as well. This was 1957. So the context was four years before in 1953, MI6, and the CIA had had to take out the Democratic elected Prime Minister of Iran, Mohammad Mosaddegh, because he nationalised the Anglo Iranian oil company, now BP. The following year, the CIA had to take out the democratically elected president of Guatemala Jacobo Árbenz because he had the temerity to redistribute a bit of fallow land back to landless peasants.
And then in 1956, there was a Suez crisis where Egyptian President Nasser nationalised the Suez canal, and there was an invasion by France, the UK and Israel. He was saying, look, we’re gonna keep coming up against this problem. We don’t want to have to have a system where we have to go in hard, overthrow governments, assassinate leaders, whatever it may be. We need a structure, a legal system, an infrastructure in place where we can exercise power above the head of these people. So even if we get a Naser in power, an Arbenz, and Mosaddegh, they can’t move. So his idea was to say, we need a legal system that operates above states. It’s a supernational institution where investor rights can be enforced.”
A summary of the dystopian world we are sleepwalking into – Wake up!
Watch; Laura Aboli Transhumanism Speech – The Final Goal Is To Eradicate Humanity As We Know It; Wendell L. Malone, 21 November 2023;
‘A fanasating speech by Laura Aboli at the “Better Way Conference” in Bath, southwest England on June 2nd, 2023. If you don’t know what the real goal behind the Transhumanism movement is, you will after listening to her speech. Please share.’
Laura Aboli; “The final goal is to eradicate humanity as we know it. Once you understand the final destination, it becomes much easier to look back and identify the psychological conditioning, the biological tampering, the cultural grooming and the educational prepping that we have been subjected to for decades in preparation to making us accept a post-human future. It takes a lot of physical and psychological abuse to get an intelligent species like ours to agree to its own extinction.
Most, if not all that has transpired in the last 60 years was designed to get us closer to accepting such a dystopian reality. Whether you care to accept it or not, we live in a hyper controlled matrix where our perception of reality is meticulously planned, managed, and executed in order to control and steer us in whichever direction they wish. And the direction is a post-human world. For this, they first needed to destabilise, dehumanise and demoralise humanity through every means possible.
The destruction of the nuclear family, children being indoctrinated by the state, abortion, the eradication of God and spirituality from education, life in mega cities and away from nature, toxic food, air and water, social media, replacing real human connection and interaction, engineered financial crisis and taxation, endless wars and massive migration, stress, society, depression, drugs and alcohol, constant fear mongering, moral relativism as the new religion.
And I could go on and on about how humanity has been influenced and forced to move away from all the things that give us strength, security, purpose, and meaning. A weak, immoral, disconnected, ignorant, and unhealthy population is an easy target for the next stage. The creation of an entire generation of androgynous beings. Masculinity is under attack psychologically, culturally, and biologically.
Women are being replaced in sports, entertainment, and politics by men pretending to be women, and children are being indoctrinated at school to think that gender is a choice. The transgender movement is not a grassroots movement. It comes from the top. It has nothing to do with people’s freedom of expression, sexuality, or civil rights. It’s an evil psy-op with a clear agenda to get us closer to transhumanism by making us question the most fundamental notion of human identity, our gender.
If you don’t know who you are, if you already identify as a hybrid between a man and a woman, you will be easily convinced to become a hybrid between human and machine. Gender ideology is the two plus two equals five from George Orwell’s 1984 dystopian novel. It’s the final test to see whether we will follow the most absurd party line towards our own extinction, but two plus two equals four. And no matter how you choose to dress, call yourself or change your physique will not change that. The sad reality though, is that in the gaslighting process to get us closer to a post-human future, they have mentally and physically harmed an increasing number of children and young people, and it’s only getting worse. This must be stopped.”
If we counter the status quo narrative in public, we must all get used to being bullied by the woke who have been brainwashed to divide us – divided we fall, united we win; @GeorgeMonbiot 10 December 2023;
‘1. I’m very grateful for the response to my appearance on Question Time, but also puzzled. I felt that in all cases I was simply stating the bleeding obvious. Is this now so rare in public life that it becomes an event when someone does it? The grim truth seems to be: yes.
2. It seems to me that almost all public discussion in the UK now falls into one of two categories:
A. Deliberate lying, obfuscation or distraction, whose purpose is to disguise plutocratic power, and to present its interests as the interests of all.
B. Hedging, hesitancy and circumlocution, whose purpose is to avoid confrontation with plutocratic power.
4.
A. is the Conservative / billionaire media / Tufton Street junktank position.
B. is the Labour / centrist / ever-so-reasonable public intellectual position.
5. Through a combination of these two forces, we find ourselves in a world of lies and half-truths. We start to wonder “am I the only one thinking x or y?”
6. Of course you aren’t. Millions of others are. In some cases perhaps the majority. But hardly anyone in public life will voice the bleeding obvious for you. If they do, they’re unlikely to be welcomed back. It might be another 20+ years before they’re on the programme again.
7. Another way of putting this is as follows: Plutocracy has smashed democracy. The oligarchs and corporations who run the Conservative Party and bully Labour into submission have got what they want. Their lies are now almost wall-to-wall.
8. Anyone who breaks this consensus can be isolated as an “extremist”. That’s the label I was given by senior editors at the BBC. Because I advocate violence? No. Because I want to overthrow democracy? No. Because I feel we should clearly identify uncomfortable realities? Tick.
9. It has now reached the point where the government feels confident enough to propose criminalising those who break the lying-hedging consensus. Under the new definition, if you challenge the UK’s prevailing “institutions and values” you’re an extremist.
10. Given the state of the UK’s dominant “institutions and values”, what extremism now means is “stating the bleeding obvious in a public place”.’
Big Ag lobbying in Brussels goes onto another level; Von der Leyen, while pretending to be neutral, looks on as green measures to ban toxic agri chemicals are demolished by fake science, death threats, media bias and a nature- hostile, pro-business Commission.
Read; Fake news and personal attacks: How the political right took down Europe’s green agenda Politico, 1 December 2023;
‘When Sarah Wiener, an organic farmer and celebrity chef, moved to Brussels in 2019 to represent her native Austria in the European Parliament, little did she anticipate that her career move would put a target on her back.
Assigned the pivotal role of leading parliamentary negotiations on a landmark law aimed at weaning farmers off toxic chemical pesticides, the Green Party lawmaker found herself under relentless pressure from lobbyists — and conservative MEPs — to water down the legislation over concerns that it would put many conventional farmers out of business.
The situation took a dark turn on May 25 when a letter, signed by “angry winemakers,” was delivered to her office in Brussels.
In chilling terms, the letter — seen by POLITICO — presented Wiener with three options: resign and return to Austria; be committed to a mental institution for at least two years, ostensibly to reflect on her alleged “crime” against the winemakers; or face the ominous prospect that the winemakers might hire a hit man to target her.
“As we are not brutes, we give you the chance to pack your bags and leave Brussels immediately. If you value your life, then get back behind your cooking pot,” the winemakers wrote.
The law she was working on was defeated in a crushing parliamentary vote on November 22. Wiener and her fellow Greens voted against the final text after it was watered down by the centre-right European People’s Party and other conservative political groups to the point of being “worthless,” she explained afterward.
For Wiener, the threatening letter and other hostile encounters with farm groups were no coincidence. Rather, they grew out of a climate of misinformation fueled by the agricultural industry and right-wing political factions backing them, she said.’
Watch; Elon ATTACKED! The SHUTDOWN Of X Has Begun ; Russell Brand; 19 December 2023;
Yahoo Reporter; “The EU is investigating Elon Musk’s X, formerly known as Twitter, while the (EU) Block’s regulator is probing the social media platform for its suspected failure to counter illicit content and disinformation, a lack of advertising transparency and what it calls a suspected deceptive design of the user interface. It’s the first move in the EU’s landmark Digital Services act.”
Russell Brand; “Oh they’ll find something. You know they’re going to have a good look. If they don’t like you, if you are a dissenting voice they’ll start looking.”
Yahoo Reporter;” The question is what happens after that. They can fine the company and the law says they can fine up to 6% of its annual revenue. Given that X seems to be in pretty bad shape right now, that would be sizable, so there’s a lot to look for here. In terms of anything like this that’s going to happen in the United States Congress”
Russel Brand; “That’s pretty gangster isn’t it, that’s racketeering taking 6%. You notice now that bureaucrats like Thierry Breton and EU officials talk like Don Corleone?”
Elon Musk has largely restored free speech to X but after his brain washing visit to the zionist project in Palestine, will he succumb to the pressure and return to the days when shows like Palestine Declassified and its hosts, Professor David Miller and Chris Williamson, were shadow banned?
Watch; Elon Musk and Palestine; Palestine Declassified, 18 December 2023;
Host of the show is Former Labour Party MP, Chris Williamson, the resident expert is former Professor at Bristol University and non resident Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Islam and Global Affairs at Istanbul Zaim University, and Co Director of the lobbying watchdog Spinwatch and a leading British scholarly critique of Israel, David Miller. Their guest is Ghadi Francis, Lebanese war correspondent who’s worked for Al Meine, Al Jazeera and others and over the years, she’s reported directly from conflict zones in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen.
Ghadi Francis; “I think Elon Musk is a businessman and he’s gonna put his mouth where the money is. I know tech is really involved in this new era of warfare. I know AI is being used to kill us and to kill children, and thank you for exposing that and working on that. But at the end of the day, I would regard him, in the worst case scenario, just like the big moghuls that sell weapons or sell pharma. These decision makers are a blend of these, I wouldn’t take Elon Musk out of that herd.”
David Miller; “I think that’s right. I think the only curious thing about Elon Musk is that he has these kind of weird ideas about freedom of speech, which do seem to make a difference to how he runs the company. In contrast with how Twitter was before, where they were simply stuffed with zionists at the top of the company, where they asked only zionists to judge who should be on it and who shouldn’t. So, that’s the one distinction I would need.”
Covid/Vaccines Scam and Pandemic
With constant references to a ‘novel virus’, the WHO, via a compliant media that we cannot trust, is preparing a totalitarian global dominance power grab treaty whereby so-called sovereign states will be forced into lockdowns and vaccine programmes justify by the false flag hysteria that normal seasonal flu is a global pandemic.
Along with not signing the Pandemic Treaty, we should suspend the UK’s membership of the World Health Organisation until the corruption within it is removed.
The WHO is making false claims by denying that their proposals will cease states’ sovereignty.
Read: Dr Tess Lawrie’s post quoting from a speech by Andrew Bridgen MP about the lies spread by the mainstream media about the intentions of the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty, 18 December 2023;
“My question is: Why does the WHO make false claims regarding proposals to cease states’ sovereignty? The WHO Director-General has stated that no country will cease sovereignty to the WHO, referring to the WHO’s pandemic agreement and the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations currently being negotiated. His statements are clear and unequivocal and also inconsistent with the texts he is referring to. I would remind the Chamber that this is the unelected, unaccountable, immune from prosecution due to diplomatic immunity Director-General of the WHO.
Any rational examinations of the texts in question show that the documents propose a transfer of decision-making power to the WHO regarding basic aspects of societal function which countries undertake to enact. The WHO Director-General will have the sole authority to decide when and where they are applied and the proposals are intended to be binding under international law.
Continued claims that sovereignty is not lost, echoed by politicians in this house and other elected assemblies and, of course, the media, therefore raise very important questions concerning motivations, competence and, indeed, ethics. The intent of the texts is the transfer of decision-making currently vested in nations and individuals to the WHO.”
For more information on the proposed amendments to the WHO IHR and the pandemic treaty please visit: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/policy/
To emphasise the words of Dr Tess Lawrie, thankfully there is one MP brave enough to call out lies peddled by the World Health Organisation (WHO).Watch; International Health Regulations Amendments Debate in Westminster Hall Andrew Bridgen MP, 19 December 2023;
This debate in the UK Parliament, followed a petition co-ordinated by the public (116,000 signatories) for a debate on the proposed amendments to the WHO’s International Health Regulations; regulations which would give more power to unelected and unaccountable officials at the WHO.
Andrew Bridgen MP; “It is impossible to consider either the pandemic treaty or the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) in isolation, they are two linked instruments of the WHO and they need to be considered in parallel. My opening question is; ‘why does the WHO make false claims regarding proposals to seize state
sovereignty?’
The Director General of the WHO has stated that no country will cede sovereignty to the WHO, referring to the WHO’s new pandemic agreement and the proposed amendments; the International Health Regulations currently being negotiated.
His statements are clear and unequivocal and also wholly inconsistent with the text he’s referring to. I would remind the chamber that this is the unelected, unaccountable, non- tax paying, immune from prosecution, due to diplomatic immunity, Director General of the WHO, and that all employees of the United Nations and the WHO enjoy these particular perks.
Any rational examination of the text in question show that; the documents propose a transfer of decision-making power to the WHO regarding basic aspects of societal function which countries undertake to enact. The WHO Director General will have the sole authority to decide when and where they’re applied and the proposals are intended to be binding under international law. Continued claims that sovereignty is not lost, echoed by politicians in this house and other elected assemblies, and of course the media, therefore raise very important questions concerning motivations, competence and indeed ethics.
The intent of the text is a transfer of decision making currently vested in nations and individuals to the WHO. When its Director General decides that there’s a threat of a significant disease outbreak or other health emergency likely to cross multiple national borders, it is very unusual for nations to undertake to follow external entities regarding the basic rights and health care of their citizens, more so when this has a major economic and geopolitical implication. The question of whether sovereignty is indeed being transferred and the legal status of such an agreement, is therefore of vital importance, particularly to legislators of democratic states such as ourselves. We have an absolute duty to be sure of our ground and I systematically examine that ground here today. So, amending the 2005 International Health Regulations may be a straightforward way to quickly deploy and enforce what appears to be the new normal for health control measures that we’ve seen implemented since the covid-19 pandemic.
The current text applies to virtually the entire global population, counting 196 states including all 194 WHO member states. Approval may or may not be required by a formal vote of the World Health Assembly as the recent 2022 amendment was adopted through consensus. If the same approval mechanism is used in May 2024, many countries and indeed the public, may remain unaware of the broad scope of the new text and its implications to national and individual sovereignty. This is why today’s debate is so important. The IHR sets recommendations under a treaty process that has force currently under international law. They seek to provide the WHO with some moral authority to coordinate and lead responses when an international health emergency such as a pandemic occurs.
Currently, most are non-binding and these contain very specific examples of measures that the WHO can currently recommend including, in the article 18: they can require medical examinations; they can review proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis; require vaccination or other prophylaxis; place suspect persons under public health observation;
implement quarantine or other health measures for suspect persons; implement isolation and treatment where necessary of affected persons; implement tracing of contacts of suspected or affected persons,; refuse entry of suspect or affected persons; refuse entry of unaffected persons to affected areas; and implement exit screening and, or, restrictions on persons from affected areas. These measures when implemented together are generally referred to, since 2020, as lockdowns and mandates. Lockdown was previously a term reserved for people incarcerated as criminals and removes basic universally accepted human rights such as measures that were previously considered by the WHO themselves to be detrimental to public health. However, ever since 2020, it’s become the default standard for Public Health Authorities to manage epidemics, despite its contradictions to multiple stipulations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UDHR (Universal Declaration of Human Rights).”
You’d have thought MPs would take some notice of the experts that Andrew Bridgen MP has assembled to inform them and their constituents about vaccine injuries and deaths, but apparently not. Could it be because they shamefully complied with the government line on mandatory vaccination as well as corrupt sourcing of defective PPE equipment from their friends and donors?
Watch, listen and read; Expert Testimony at UK Parliament on the 4th December 2023 Patricia Harrity, The Expose, 5 December 2023;
‘Yesterday, the 4th of December, MP Andrew Bridgen hosted a historic hearing in the UK Parliament where he was joined by Dr David E. Martin, Dr Robert Malone, Dr Ryan Cole, Dr Pierre Kory, Professor Angus Dalgleish & Steve Kirsch who all gave expert testimony on the Pandemic & its consequences. Unfortunately, there were strict instructions that there would be no recordings allowed at the event, nevertheless, there was someone in Parliament who broke the rules, (that makes a change, doesn’t it!?) and there are just a few videos that have been posted on the X platform that I have published below and when more appear I will update this piece.
Before watching the individual videos, I will first get on my soapbox, as I feel it is important to note that, Members of Parliament (MPs), who contrary to what they themselves seem to think, work for us, had been lobbied by their constituents for weeks before the hearing asking them to attend this important, historic, and informative event.
You may be surprised to learn, but probably not, that out of 650 MPs a total of sixteen turned up to listen to the experts who had travelled hundreds of miles to be there. Sixteen, that’s ‘one, six’, who thought it was worth listening to expert speeches on a topic that affects us all detrimentally, a piddly 2.47 percent of all MPs!’
Steve Kirsch; “The COVID vaccines were pretty much all risk and no benefit. The risk of infection went up, The risk of hospitalisation from COVID didn’t change at all. The risk of death from COVID went up, and the risk of death, just all-cause mortality, went up as well – all due to the COVID vaccines. They were perhaps the worst intervention in all medical history. We have censorship. It’s happening worldwide. People who are trying to tell the truth get censored. We have immunity for the drug companies. And finally, we have intimidation, tactics, things like job loss or loss of credentials against doctors who are simply speaking the truth.”
Canadians gathered outside in Vancouver are demanding answers as to why Bill Gates…who’s not a Medical Doctor…appears to be in charge of our World’s Health through taxpayer-funded WHO.
Watch on Twitter; “Arrest Bill Gates…!” Dr Aseem Malhotra, 19 December 2023;
Yet more experimental drugs, soon to be on offer to Europeans, must be rejected.
Read or Listen; Self-amplifying mRNA “vaccines” are the next-generation bioweapon, Rhoda Wilson, The Expose, 15 December 2023;
‘Two weeks ago, Japan became the first country in the world to approve a new self-amplifying mRNA (“sa-mRNA”) vaccine. With approval for the vaccine secured in Japan, its developers are now seeking authorisation in Europe; a regulatory decision is expected next year.
Self-amplifying RNA (“saRNA”) is engineered to make more copies of itself once delivered into cells. It encodes both the antigen of interest – for example, the covid spike protein – and proteins which enable vaccine RNA replication.’
‘Approval was given despite the Phase 3 trial, funded by the Japanese government, only testing the product on 838 people, with no control group. Additionally, as ZeroHedge reported, the results of the trial have not been published; the manuscript is “in preparation,” according to the Phase 3 study report.
In the US, just as the avalanche of lawsuits piles up against Monsanto because of diseases caused by Roundup, the courts will now also have to hear uncensored evidence of corruption and lies about the effectiveness and safety of the Covid vaccines.
Read; Texas Attorney-General G Ken Paxton Sues Pfizer for Misrepresenting Efficacy of the COVID-19 Jabs and Conspiring to Censor Public Discourse Ohio Star, 2 December 2023;
The AG (Attorney General) said Pfizer’s claim that its product possessed 95 percent efficacy against infection was “highly misleading”
“That metric represented a calculation of the so-called ‘relative risk reduction’ for vaccinated individuals in Pfizer’s initial, two-month clinical trial results,”: Paxton said in the release. “FDA publications indicate ‘relative risk reduction’ is a misleading statistic that ‘unduly influence[s]’ consumer choice.”
Not only did Pfizer’s product fail to protect against infection, it appeared to prolong the pandemic, the AG pointed out.
“COVID-19 cases increased after widespread vaccine administration, and some areas saw a greater percentage of deaths from COVID-19 among the vaccinated population than the unvaccinated,” he said.
“We are pursuing justice for the people of Texas, many of whom were coerced by tyrannical vaccine mandates to take a defective product sold by lies,” Attorney General Paxton said.
According to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), as of 3 November 2023 there have been 36,725 deaths, 212,294 hospitalizations, 5,071 miscarriages, 21,155 heart attacks, and 68,819 people permanently disabled due to the COVID-19 injections.
Why does Lula da Silva, President of Brazil, trust Big Pharma enough to force parents to inject an experimental potion into their 6 month old child? And if Covid isn’t dangerous to kids, why give them a drug that has proven to be neither safe nor effective?
Read; Brazil to Mandate COVID Shots for Children as Young as 6 Months; Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D. 6th December
‘The Brazilian Ministry of Health has added the COVID-19 vaccine to the country’s mandatory vaccination schedule for children 6 months to 5 years old, and is considering establishing school vaccination centres with strict reporting requirements.’
It seems that the widely accepted principle that whistleblowers should be protected doesn’t work in New Zealand where it’s still a criminal offence to publish facts that are inconvenient to the government.
Watch and Read; NZ Vaccine Data Whistleblower “Drops Truth Bombs” in First Interview Following His Release From Prison. Patricia Harrity, The Expose, 6 December 2023;
‘Barry Young was a data administrator for the Ministry of Health in New Zealand (NZ) and had access to many people’s vaccination data. He turned whistleblower on the 30th of November, due to his concern with what the statistics were showing. By Saturday his alarming disclosure went viral worldwide and on Sunday his home was surrounded by police, his home was raided and finally he was arrested. The NZ government was said to have been “left scrambling” to cover this event up by limiting media coverage in New Zealand and even claiming they have injunctions to prevent all internet providers sharing this data release.
Mr Young appeared in court on Monday the 4th of December, where he received “rapturous” applause from many supporters who packed out the court gallery. He, however, was not released on bail but was held in an NZ prison for a second night and only released on Tuesday.
Liz Gunn lawyer/investigative journalist who helped Barry Young expose that the COVID vaccination data was causing mass deaths, is staying in a safe house in New Zealand. She gives a major update on the Alex Jones Show.’
Liz Gunn; “When we got the data from Barry and we told him that you would be doing a service here if this data were to be exposed. If a leader of a country (Jacinda Ardern) knowingly risks public health, then I believe they should be subject to being brought back to their country to determine the extent of their liability.
There’s been a risk to New Zealand’s public health. Bring her back. Let’s cross examine her in the public forum. And also to that end, we must have the information that our whistleblower, our brave, heroic whistleblower Barry, put out by me…It’s our data. It’s paid for by us, the taxpayers. Why would they keep it from us like this? And why would they persecute this brave man? I’ll tell you one other thing, Alex, before I go back to you. We offered Barry a safe house here in New Zealand. I’ve been in one for the last few days in the bush. We offered him a couple of those and we offered him a safe house overseas. He said no, I will go home and I will stand and I will meet for whatever comes to me. That is a man who has done this for the right reason. There is privacy law. That’s something to be protected. But the greater importance, the greater thing to protect is you must have a right to expose criminality and those who are at the helm of your country, and that is the much more important duty. And he has executed that duty admirably.”
Watch; Trailer for “Four Died Trying”: John F. Kennedy, Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Robert F. Kennedy Global Research,14 December 2023;
‘It is hard for those who have not lived through the shattering political assassinations of the 1960s to grasp their significance for today. Many might assume that that was then and long before their time, so let’s move on to what we must deal with today.
Let some old folks, the obsessive ones, live in the past. It is an understandable but mistaken attitude that this documentary will quickly shatter, visually and audibly.
The echoes of those guns that killed President John F. Kennedy, Malcolm X, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., and Senator Robert F. Kennedy in rapid succession repeat and repeat and repeat down through the years, and their echoes bang off the walls of all today’s news that springs from the cells of all the little digital dinguses that provide a constant stream of distractions and fear porn meant to titillate but not illuminate the connections between then and now, nor those between the four subjects of this illuminating film.
Today we are living the consequences of the CIA/national security state’s 1960s takeover of the country. Their message then and now: We, the national security state, rule, we have the guns, the media, and the power to dominate you. We control the stories you are meant to hear. If you get uppity, well-known, and dare challenge us, we will buy you off, denigrate you, or, if neither works, we will kill you. You are helpless, they reiterate endlessly. Bang. Bang. Bang.
But they lie, and this series, beginning with its first instalment , will tell you why. It will show why understanding the past is essential for transforming the present. It will profoundly inspire you to see and hear these four bold and courageous men refuse to back down to the evil forces that shot them down. It will open your eyes to the parallel spiritual paths they walked and the similarity of the messages they talked about – peace, justice, racism, human rights, and the need for economic equality – not just in the U.S.A. but across the world, for the fate of all people was then, and is now, linked to the need to transform the U.S. warfare state into a country of peace and human reconciliation, just as these four men radically underwent deep transformations in the last year of their brief lives.’
Russia / NATO conflict
Colonel Macgregor speaking wisdom again about the corrupt US and UK war machine, backed by bloodthirsty media and lying politicians who create a fantasy world where the US and UK are right and everybody else is wrong, and drag America and the UK, yet again, into another pointless and bloody war that the American and British people don’t want and can’t afford.
Watch; US Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor Reveals the TRUTH About Ukraine War Cyrus Jannsen, 4 December 2023;
“Really a minority of Americans, well financed unfortunately, with a lot of political influence managed to drag this administration and Congress, who is always eager to join any conflict which they see as access to cash and money for their own purposes, into a war that should never have happened. Right? We have no real interest in it. I’m talking about the American people, we have no interest in the destruction of Russia, that’s absurd. Right? We’ve had actually pretty good relations with the Russians and contrary to what people say Russia is not a menacing, bad actor that is constantly interested in harming us.
On the other hand you can make a pretty good case that, certainly since 2000, we have fallen into that category regarding Russia, so what’s happened; we grossly miscalculated, underestimated Russia, no one studied carefully the potential strength that Russia had or its ability to respond to an existential threat which is what Ukraine became. Everyone overestimated our ability to exploit a proxy, and stand up an army in the space of a few years, that could stand up to the Russian military establishment. And you know we’ve gone from ‘Putin has to go, his regime has to be destroyed, we need new leadership, we’re going to disintegrate Russia as a state’, to, ‘well you know we we’re going to harm it, we’re going to weaken it, so that it can’t go anywhere else and threaten anybody else’. Of course Russia was no threat to Eastern Europe when this began, and if it is now it certainly isn’t something Russia wanted to be, it is because of what we’ve done, you know Russia today is more more powerful militarily and and certainly economically than it’s been since the 1980s and that’s largely is a response, a consequence of a response to us and what we did in Ukraine.
It’s tragic, it’s why US politicians want more wars. Unfortunately, now the same group of people I think are trying to drag us into a major regional conflict in the Middle East and barring that, I’m sure they’ll do everything in their power to create conflict with China. Remember you’ve got a lot of people that are heavily involved and invested in stupidity like this because they’ve made millions of dollars from it, either in think tanks or through investments with the defence industries or overseas foreign powers. The United States is at the end of a long and destructive period in our history that really began in the aftermath of 1991 (The dissolution of the Soviet Union). We went through this during the Vietnam war, we recovered from that, came out of it with the goal of never doing it again, but then the consequences of having been victorious in ‘ 91 created the illusion of victory over everybody anytime we wanted with minimal loss, and that’s brought us to this disastrous situation.”
Thank you Hungary for moving us closer to peace in Ukraine;
Read; EU fails to agree $54bn aid for Ukraine after Hungary veto Press TV, 15 December 2023;
‘Hungary has vetoed $55 billion in the European Union’s aid for Ukraine, in a double blow to Kiev as US funds are currently blocked in Congress amid resistance from Republican Senators.
European leaders failed to reach a deal on a long-term financial package to Ukraine in talks that extended into the early hours of Friday since Prime Minister Viktor Orban opposed the proposal. The other states of the 27-member bloc agreed to provide the aid to Ukraine from EU coffers through 2027. The decision needs the unanimous backing of all EU leaders.’
When it comes to Ukraine membership of the EU, Orban is the one European leader who is led by what is just and not by what is most lucrative in bribes from their corporate funders and fear of retribution from their empire masters.
Watch; Orban exposes true purpose of European Union; The Duran, 17 December 2023;
Alexander Mercouris; “Orban has made it absolutely clear that he thinks that bringing Ukraine into the EU is a terrible idea. One senses that quite a lot of other people basically agree with him. As is always the way, though, in these sorts of meetings, when it comes down to it, nobody wants to, apart from Orban, nobody’s prepared to go up against the EU combinat. They’re all worried about funds, about having funds frozen or refused by the Commission. So Orban makes it completely clear, I’m not interested, this is a terrible idea. But he talks about 30 billion euros of money supposed to go to Hungary, which is frozen. He’s not prepared to green light Ukraine’s aid package. One senses he’s probably not going to green light, either, the accession talks between Ukraine and the EU, unless something is done with that.
The EU unfreezes 10 billion euros for Hungary just before the accession talks. Orban is not going to vote for something that he fundamentally disagrees with. So he leaves the room and that way he keeps his position uncompromised, he can come round and vote against in the future. And he’s just come back and said, you know, there’s gonna be 75 possible opportunities to vote against it in the future. So he’s not in any way compromised on his views, but he’s got 10 billion Euros, and, the EU has got accession talks, which nobody, I think, who looks at the situation really thinks they’re going to go very far. I mean, even Mark Rutte, the Dutch Prime Minister, the outgoing Dutch Prime Minister, who’s currently been in London, has said that these talks will go on for years. Nobody seriously thinks that Ukraine is remotely ready for EU membership and besides, all of this ignores the military realities of what’s actually happening in Ukraine at the moment, which is that it is losing the war. Now, why is the EU going for accession talks with Ukraine at this moment in time? I mean, we can, I think, park to one side, Moldova and Georgia, if they were going to launch accession talks for Ukraine, they had to give some kind of salt to the Georgians and the Moldovans because otherwise they would’ve been very angry.
Maia Sandu, who’s under a lot of pressure on Moldova would’ve probably felt undermined, compromised. So why do they do it for Ukraine? I think there’s a very simple reason actually, which is that the EU is very worried indeed about all of these signs that the United States is wavering on Ukraine. They’re probably even more alarmed about the words from people like Richard Haass at the Council for Foreign Relations, that there have to be some kind of talks between Russia and Ukraine, because what they are most worried about is that the Americans and the Russians will start to talk to each other over Ukraine. There’s now been a recommendation to that effect by George Beebe, who is an important figure in the American political establishment, foreign policy establishment. So the EU are extremely worried about this. The EU Commission in particular doesn’t want anything to happen which could possibly compromise the principle of unlimited and unending EU expansion, and they don’t want the Americans bargaining over their heads about something like that. So they’ve started these accession talks basically, I think in order to close down any possibility of negotiations.”
The 2014 Maidan massacre was a false flag event to lead the way for a U.S. coup, regime change and eventually, war with Russia
Read; Ukrainian trial demonstrates 2014 Maidan massacre was false flag by Kit Klarenberg, The Grayzone, 11 December 2023
“From the beginning of the Maidan trial, witnesses and prosecutors were subjected by far-right Ukrainian figures to a campaign of intimidation. During proceedings, Neo-Nazi C14 and Azov activists stormed the courtroom, attacked defendants, and placed tyres outside the court in an apparent threat to burn the building down. The presiding judge was even beaten by a Maidan activist.”
Please donate
Forgive me for pointing out that, while we receive some one-off donations, I am funding Farms Not Factories myself, and if we are to continue to fight the cruel, antibiotic-led factory farm system, we will need some regular donations from like-minded people. Please consider a monthly subscription of £2/month and help us support a network of smaller scale, humane and healthy UK pig farms, local abattoirs and butchers.
“Our message is simple, we want to help bring an end to this dangerous, inhumane system. Vote for real farming over factory farming.”
– Tracy Worcester, Director
Contents
Share This Article
Related ArticlesView All
Protectionism vs So-Called Free Trade
The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More
Find A Farmer
The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More
Zionist Money Rules
The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More
The Price of Progress
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More
Silencing Dissent Through Fear
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. If you… Read More
Ukraine and Israel – A United Force
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. If you… Read More