The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narrative that is censored in the mainstream media. If you would like to keep up to date with the very latest information, then please follow me on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram or Telegram.
“The way you get democracy to function is by informing the public.” – Robert Kennedy Jr.
“Science is more than a body of knowledge. It is a way of thinking; a way of sceptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask sceptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be sceptical of those in authority, then, we are up for grabs for the next charlatan (political or religious) who comes rambling along.” – Carl Sagan
“Never worry about who will be offended if you speak the Truth. Worry about who will be misled, deceived and destroyed, if you do not.” and
”Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by and that has made all the difference.” – Robert Frost
Though the newsletter chapters interrelate, they are divided into five sections and have a common realisation that a cabal of corporate elites have captured global trade, global governance, mainstream and online media, and ultimately many of our minds.
As a stenographer, I link to an article or audio and paste a key paragraph or two. My most trusted websites are platforms for journalists who don’t compromise on the truth and have thereby been shunned by the mainstream media. These include; Local Futures, SUSTAIN, Farm Gate, Global Research, Children’s Health Defence, Geopolitical Economy Report, The Grayzone, Unlimited Hangout, 21st Century Wire, UK Column; The Duran, Robert F Kennedy podcast, The Jimmy Dore Show, Palestine Declassified, Alex Krainer, Mattias Desmet, Dr John Campbell, The Cradle, Quds News Network, The Grayzone News, The Electronic Intifada, Jonathan Cook, Richard Medhurst, The Light printed newspaper, and Russell Brand or follow us on Telegram, For The People, Assange News, Resistance News Network, Juan Sinmiedo and Pepe Escobar.
Wise Farmers Series: David Wilson
Meet David Wilson, a true visionary in regenerative, organic farming at Fir Farm, Gloucestershire where rare-breed Red Poll cows graze outdoors on pasture to produce high-quality milk, sold directly to consumers via the farm vending machine.
Red Poll cows thrive on a zero-input pasture, efficiently converting CO2- absorbing grass into nutritious milk and high-quality meat. David’s commitment to ultra-low input milk production and sustainable farming practices is truly inspiring. In contrast to conventional farming, which often compromises animal welfare for higher yields through indoor systems that rely on high impact and unhealthy imported protein, David’s approach prioritises the health and happiness of his livestock and consumers.
Support our real farmers by only buying pasture fed beef and dairy. Find out more by reading the blog.
Food, Farming & Ecocide
People’s disgust with factory farming has been hijacked by the banksters to get us to eat bugs.
Watch; The Global War on Farmers and ‘Push to Eat the Bugs’ Facts Matter, 8 July 2024;
‘The government knows quite a bit about eating bugs. Turns out it’s very, very unhealthy. I pulled these right out of the National Library of Medicine 2017 study funded by the government that said that the chitins in bugs, the exoskeletons, will provoke human innate immunity to generate a deluge of inflammatory cytokines which injure organs and in persistent situations lead to death, multiple cirrhosis, systemic lupus, and cancer. Sign me up. Right? So the goal, folks, is not to save the planet. It’s not to save the climate.
Like the revolutionaries used to say back in the sixties, the Students for a Democratic Society, the issue is never the issue. It’s not about global warming. It’s not about sustainable development. It’s about enslaving humanity.
They want to wipe out small, medium sized producers, centralise food control in the hands of mega corporations in bed with the mega governments. They want to move the population into the megacities and ultimately bring about this great reset and what they call the new world order.’
Read; ‘Sign of Things to Come’: Singapore Approves 16 Insects for Human Food; Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.;JULY 24, 2024
Singapore became the latest country to authorise insect products for human consumption, in what The Guardian described as a move that “paves the way for plates to become wrigglier, leggier and more sustainable” and as “a sign of things to come.
In a July 8 announcement, the Singapore Food Agency (SFA) approved the 16 insects, which include silkworm pupa and mealworm, “With immediate effect.”
“These insects and insect products can be used for human consumption or as animal feed for food producing animals,” the SFA stated.
Countries and entities such as the United Kingdom (U.K.), Australia and the European Union (EU) have already approved some insects for human consumption. However, in the U.S. existing regulations contain few references specifically addressing insects.
This regulatory gap has enabled an ecosystem of “alternative protein” startups to enter the insect food market — with the backing of figures such as Bill Gates and government agencies including the United Nations (U.N.) and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the National Science Foundation.
“The United Nations Food And Agricultural Organisation (FAO) continues to promote insect consumption as an environmentally friendly way to get protein in your diet — for both humans and their livestock,” The Guardian reported.
Proponents of insects as food for humans, including the FAO, argue this will help combat climate change, as insects produce a smaller carbon footprint than traditional livestock. But critics challenge this view.
“The justification for insects is to produce protein using fewer inputs: to save the planet by reducing climate change, methane from cows, less pollution,” internist Dr. Meryl Nass, founder of Door to Freedom, told The Defender. “But just because it is protein doesn’t mean it’s good for us.”
Hospitals should have the healthiest food possible so patients should not be victims of nutritionally deficient, ultra-processed, hi-tech food to boost dwindling sales of ultra-processed food to the NHS.
Read; Quorn pork sausages to be blended with fake meat to tackle climate change The Telegraph, 25 June 2024;
‘Pork sausages will be blended with fake meat to help tackle climate change, Quorn has said. The company said the move is part of its shift from encouraging consumers to reduce their meat intake rather than switch to an entirely vegetarian or vegan diet.
Meat products containing Quorn’s mycoprotein will be available by the end of the year within the NHS and from some food service operators, according to food industry publication The Grocer.
The new products, including burgers and sausages, will not carry the Quorn logo, but will include mycoprotein among their ingredients, Marco Bertacca, the company’s chief executive, told the publication.
It comes amid falling sales in fake meat products, with data from The Grocer showing sales fell 6.5 per cent last year, although Quorn’s sales rose 0.2 per cent.’
Supermarket chains cut costs, but the greater expense is paid for in our long-term health. It’s time to get informed, avoid it and thereby end industrial food, farming and retailing by buying high quality local food.
Read; UK in Grip of Top Down Starvation Policy; Julian Rose; Global Research, July 29, 2024
Intro; ‘A food security issue is looming. ‘Food security’ means following an agricultural policy which ensures that a nation state is broadly capable of feeding its own people.The UK was running at 60% self-sufficiency home production figure for most of the past two to three decades. It dropped to around 45% five years ago and this year (2024) that figure has fallen to just 32%.’
‘Denatured, depleted and highly processed foods have become the daily norm for the great majority of convenience-corrupted consumers of the British Isles and for much of the post-industrial modern world. A regime which has also deeply infiltrated Southern hemisphere countries, undermining their traditional diets and ways of life.
But it’s not just poor quality vitamin-deficient foods that are degrading the health and welfare of consumers. Due to various purposefully inflated international conflicts and politically motivated power play using the fake green ‘zero carbon’ agenda to divert resources away from agricultural production, major supermarket chains such as Tesco now hold 60% less reserve food in their systems than they did five years ago.’
The existence of contaminated and fake food is due to our lack of awareness.
Watch short picture-led; Know The Food You Eat Blossom, 10 July 2024;
This article counters the above video, but whether every case of contaminated food is proven or not, it is still worth remembering that supermarket food is NOT as fresh, nutritious and pure as is organic food from a trusted farmer or retailer like Riverford Veg boxes or better still from your local supplier like our Forbidden Fruit and Veg market garden.
The corporate-captured Labour Party is promoting tech food and farming instead of advising us to buy less but better meat from high welfare farms. This would not only help spread the cost of buying real meat but also avoid obesity related illnesses like diabetes, heart disease and cancer that are caused by eating too much meat because it is cheap.
Read; From badger culls to sewage: Labour under pressure over animal-welfare and farming policies The Independent, 15th July 2024;
Labour’s manifesto has been criticised for not mentioning factory farm animal welfare. Alick Simmons, a former government deputy chief vet, writing for Wild Justice, said: “A pledge to address puppy farming while ignoring industrial pig and poultry farming does not strike me as a balanced manifesto.”
Compassion in World Farming (CiWF) has lobbied all parties for a ban on cages, saying around 8 million farmed animals are kept in them each year in the UK. “The previous government said they’d prepared consultations on this issue, and we want to see them published,” it said.
CiWF also called for method-of-production food labelling, following a consultation earlier this year.
This investigation into factory farming in Europe has truly horrendous images of animals being abused and of diseased carcasses being fed into the food chain. While these industrial meat producers increase profits by ignoring animal welfare laws, politicians set up schemes that reward factory farming.
Watch; Food for Profit (Password FFP2024!) by Giulia Innocenzi and Pablo D’Ambrosi, Released 22 February 2024;
‘The agri-food sector is very powerful and through lobbying is able to influence politics and get a huge amount of money in public subsidies through the Common Agriculture Policy. That means more than €50 billion per year.
I’m Giulia, an investigative journalist. I used to host prime ministers and political debates on Italian TV. During my first investigation on food production, I sneaked inside a factory farm, and since then, everything changed for me. After seeing this, I couldn’t turn my face away from it. I finally realised how the meat that is sitting on our plates is produced, which as Europeans, we assume to be a world excellence. But its really not the case.
I don’t want them to get away with it. So I organised activists in different European countries to infiltrate factory farms which are subsidised with our money.’
The Green Party offers flawed solutions to cruel and polluting factory farming by demanding we eat “plant-powered menus”; aka highly processed plant based meals. They haven’t considered the real solution which is to eat less but better meat from sustainable, outdoor pasture systems where animals are cared for by real farmers, not by the operators of animal factories and pink slime fast food producers.
Big Ag’s war against small farmers marches on. Get Big or Get Out is the message from the money men in suits.
Listen; Farming Today 20 July 2024;
Presenter; “One of the UK’s big dairy processors, Muller is ending contracts with more than two dozen smaller farms. The company says it’s because they don’t supply enough milk or because of welfare and sustainability concerns, and that all have been given a year’s notice. It is, though, devastating for family farms already struggling to stay afloat as their costs climb and income falls.
The BBC’s rural affairs correspondent for the East Midlands, Sally Bowman, has been to visit a fourth-generation Derbyshire dairy farmer who’s now selling his herd.”
Farmer; “The red one is Lilybet, after the Queen, because it was born near the diamond jubilee. We’ve got one called Frosty because it was born on a cold morning.”
Presenter; “At Puddle Hill farm near Matlock in Derbyshire, dairy farmer Neil Taylor is preparing to sell his milkers here. They all have names, but they’re about to become numbered lots at a nearby livestock market.”
Farmer; “Absolutely devastating. I’ve bought them, I’ve reared them. I can remember their mums, their grandmas. I’ve had 40 years of breeding cows and just have it taken away from you. It’s a bit of a bitter pill to swallow.”
In five interviews, we hear why we should have agro-ecological farming and local food networks, not agro-tech farming and long food chains.
Listen; 8.9 Newsweek: War for soil, regen tech, and reducing nutrient pollution Farm Gate, ffinlo Costain, 19 July 2024;
ffinlo Costain; “We have an international focus from Professor Sebastian Deuteron, who says that the war in Ukraine is a conflict over soil. And we’ll hear from Million Belay, the coordinator of the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa, about the importance of local markets and local food chains. I’ll speak to dairy and arable farmer Alan Thomas about reducing nutrient pollution in the rivers Wye and Usk, and Emily Bull from FAI farms about some excellent online regenerative dairy training that’s freely available as a result of FarmWell and FAI’s regen dairy project. Later we’ll hear from Vicky Hird, from the wildlife trusts, about why we need to double the land used to grow fruit and vegetables using nature friendly farming.
But first up today is Pat Thomas, the director of A Bigger Conversation. A new report from A Bigger Conversation highlights the unique needs and perspectives of agro-ecological farmers when it comes to agricultural technologies. I asked Pat what sort of new technologies the research was focused on.
Pat Thomas; “A lot of the farmers we spoke to felt that the government’s approach to agriculture at the moment was lacking vision, or that just focusing on technology is a replacement for having a total vision for farming. The government’s approach is very much about farming being a driver for the economy so it’s not looking at farming as a whole system, not even as a provider of food.”
There’s hardly any data on UK agro-ecological farmers at all. We don’t know how many there are. We don’t know where they are. We don’t know what they’re producing. The government simply does not track them. So we’d like to see that agro-ecology is recognized as not just another tool in the toolbox, but an entirely different toolbox that needs to be looked at and nurtured and scaled out. A lot of the farmers we spoke to were particularly concerned that rather than putting new tech into the farm, let’s improve what’s working already, because a lot of things could be more efficient.”
ffinlo Costain 42m 14s; “With progress on world hunger in reverse, global food experts are calling for an urgent shift to more localised and resilient food provision to achieve the goal of zero hunger by 2030. Million Belay is an IPES food expert and co founder and general coordinator of the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa. I asked him why local markets and local food chains are important globally to begin with.”
Million Belay; “They are accessible and they are close to people. The food that you get from these markets is also diverse. Diversity means resilience, diversity means health. So it’s a healthy food that you get.
And also they have economic and social benefits to local people. There are millions and billions of people who depend on these markets. I mean, in Africa, basically, these are the markets that people depend on, you see. So they are very much important.
They are also resilient. They are resilient against shocks in most of the cases, because when things happen, when local economic and social ways go out of control people do rely on these markets, they’re very close to people.”
ffinlo Costain 55m 33s; “A new report says that the UK must stop relying on imports and fix diets by doubling the land used to grow fruit and vegetables using nature friendly farming. I spoke to report co-author Vicki Hird, the strategic lead on agriculture for the Wildlife Trusts, and I asked her why we need to increase the amount of fruit and veg that we grow in the UK.”
Vicki Hird; “It’s been important for so long. We eat far too little of our own fruit and veg, and it’s so critical for our health. The health impacts of not eating fruit and veg are enormous, in the billions cost to the National Health Service. But then we could also benefit our environment and our farmers if we were eating more of our own fruit and veg here, because they’re high value crops, they don’t take too much land, and they can be part of a really good agro-ecological system.”
ffinlo Costain; “So in many ways it makes sense to grow more fruit and veg, as well as increasing the amount of fruit and veg, do we also need to change the way that we grow it?”
Vicki Hird; “Yes, I mean, there’s several ways we need to do this. We want all fruit and veg to be grown in agro-ecological ways, so minimising the inputs, the chemicals, because we know that’s really bad for nature, which is in crisis in the UK, and it can actually lower the cost for farmers as well if they’re changing the way they produce. Using natural products, like natural fertiliser, through use of legumes, for instance, in a system, but also using predatory pests for controlling pests and diseases. But it’s not easy. Those are big risks for farmers. So we need to have support in that transition for all growers of horticulture crops.”
Pet food today, our food tomorrow;
Read; Lab-grown meat set to be sold in UK pet food BBC News, 17 July 2024;
‘The UK has become the first European country to approve putting lab-grown meat in pet food. Regulators cleared the use of chicken cultivated from animal cells, which lab meat company Meatly is planning to sell to manufacturers.’
Under the veil of abating climate change our farm animals are not only being replaced by tech food but their pastures are being covered in industrial scale solar parks.
No farmland, no food.
Mass-scale solar panels should not be put on prime agricultural land. pic.twitter.com/eFnxWNJGIh
— No Farmers, No Food (@NoFarmsNoFoods) June 14, 2024
At the same time as Mr Miliband said “I want to unleash a UK solar rooftop revolution,” he gave planning permission for 3 massive solar industrial park projects on UK’s precious farmland. Instead, how about investing in tidal power alongside a total ban on solar panels in fields, like in Italy and Germany. Lobbied by the banksters who profit from selling solar energy, Milliband is ignorant about the true costs of being an industrial solar panel zealot. Below is a letter from a local resident campaigning against a 2,000-acre solar panel development;
‘Solar Potential Along UK Motorways and Rail Lines: A Missed Opportunity?
In an era where renewable energy is paramount, an intriguing question emerges: Why is there no significant push to install solar panels along the vast stretches of land adjacent to the UK’s motorways and rail lines? This underutilised land, typically flat, of low agricultural value, and free from residential concerns, presents an obvious opportunity for solar development.
Despite occasional sightings of solar installations near motorways or rail tracks, a large-scale initiative remains absent. The private sector’s preference for extensive parcels of farmland, which minimises dealings with multiple landowners, might explain the hesitation. However, a government-led approach could overcome this hurdle. Farmers, according to anecdotal evidence, would likely welcome the compulsory purchase of this largely unused land.
The potential benefits are enormous. Thousands of miles of open land along motorways such as the M4 between Reading and Bristol, and the M5 from Birmingham to Exeter, could significantly surpass current clean energy goals. Proximity to national grid networks would also alleviate one of the main obstacles to solar deployment—transmission costs.
For more on this, see CPRE’s latest article on rooftop solar here and their article on how the potential of rooftop solar is being overlooked here.
Within days of becoming government, Labour have ditched their promise not to cover farmland with solar panels.
Listen; Farming Today, 20 July 2024;
Katherine Judkins, Say No to Seneca; They said throughout that we would not, under Labour, see vast swathes of productive farmland go under panels and under a Labour government, and then three days later, this is what we’re facing.
Isabel Cross, Say No to Seneca; This is just not thought through. And the examination and the public inquiry brought all of these issues to the fore. And the saddest thing for everybody here is the experts say this should be rejected.
Presenter; Campaigners say the solar farm will stretch 15 miles from end to end. It will cover 2,500 acres. That’s around 2,000 football pitches, or another way of looking at it, it’s equivalent to the footprint of Heathrow airport and it will be built on prime farmland.
The National Farmers Union warned, we need to strike a careful balance between our food security and renewable energy ambitions. While the UK is not the only place wrestling with this, earlier this year, the Italian government banned the installation of new solar panels on farmland. But speaking in the House of Commons this week, Ed Miliband said the climate crisis is the biggest threat to food security.’
If you got away with not having an industrial-sized solar park on your door step with 4 metre-high panels and razor wire security fencing, watch out, you may be on the path of their transmission pylons.
Read; Green MP says communities must be heard over pylons BBC East, 27 July 2024;
‘The MP for Waveney Valley, Adrian Ramsay, has hit back at the prime minister and told him to work with communities who are worried about plans for new pylons.
Mr Ramsay was speaking after Sir Keir Starmer attacked the Green Party co-leader at Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday.
He told Mr Ramsay to “show some leadership” and support the plans for more than 100 miles of pylons between Norwich and Tilbury, Essex.
National Grid says the pylons are needed to carry power from the offshore windfarms, but opponents of the plans want the cabling to go out to sea around the coast.’
A colleague in our local Stop Lime Down group, which is opposing a 2,000 acre solar panel development on farm land, exposes the lie about renewables reducing our energy bills;
“If Miliband is concerned about people being able to pay their electric bills, he shouldn’t be forcing us to pay through the nose for renewables. Solar price is £82 per MWh compared to £56 for gas-fired power. Onshore wind is £85. Offshore wind a staggering £101. All the excess over £56 is added to our bills because of government diktats to energy companies. We need pitchfork protests like France and Holland. Main political parties ignore the interests of ordinary people.”
If the industrialisation of our food system has led to dead seas and rivers, sick animals and humans, pollution and planetary collapse, the solution is to de-industrialise not to go vegan. The problems described in this film Eating For Tomorrow are accurate and shocking, but their pushing ultra-processed meat and dairy substitutes is not the solution. I also treated my cancer with a vegan diet of fresh and diverse organic vegetables and other proteins like nuts and grains. However, the fake meat that the film is advocating for the rest of us is not a healthy diet.
Terra Madre Salone del Gusto is organised by Slow Food, the City of Turin and the Piedmont Region. 26-30 September 2024
Read; Food is the link between nature and culture. Hence food biodiversity and cultural DIVERSITY matter
‘From September 26th to 30th in Turin’s Parco Dora (Italy) the international event Terra Madre Salone del Gusto 2024 will mobilise the energies of Slow Food’s delegates and activists gathering from over 120 countries to transform food systems.
Slow Food has identified five keywords that anchor the solutions to the multiple crises we face: Diversity – Community – Synergy – Justice – Knowledge
Around the world, 75% of edible plant species have become extinct, while three cereals—wheat, rice, and corn—make up 60% of our food production.
Biodiversity in plants and animals matters because it holds the genetic abundance that we need to cope with the climate crisis and its extreme weather events.
Promoting food biodiversity by preserving, cultivating and integrating it in diets and food systems is at the heart of what Slow Food does. Biodiversity is at the core of agro-ecology. Agro-ecological farming systems help combat the climate crisis and produce good, clean, and fair food for all, as has been acknowledged by several authoritative international scientific sources, one among them the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
The way to feed a growing global population is for everyone to eat less but better meat, NOT go vegan and eat highly processed food made in labs.
Read; 10 years of collaborating on Eating Better. A decade of campaigning for less and better meat and dairy Sarah Wakefield, Executive Director at Eating Better, 1 July 2024;
‘Founded in 2013 with 25 members, Eating Better was set up to address the thorniest issue in food. Meat. How do we stay within planetary boundaries, ensure healthy sustainable diets, and protect animal welfare? Since our founding we have matured into a model of cross-sectoral collaboration. We have grown by 156% and now consist of 65 civil society organisations – from the environment, health, animal welfare, farming, public health and social justice sectors.
Read; Better by Half roadmap
Introduction;
‘The Eating Better alliance is working to stimulate a 50% reduction in meat and dairy consumption in the UK by 2030, and for a transition to ‘better’ meat and dairy as standard. This will be better for the environment, our health, for land use, animal welfare and social justice.
Better by Half: A roadmap to less and better meat and dairy provides 24 actions to be taken across 5 sectors; Government. Producers, Food Retail, Food Service and investors, to create an enabling environment to drive the necessary transformation in eating habits.’
Read; Pesticide Action Network asks us all to join their campaign to end urban pesticide use 29 July 2024;
‘For a number of years we have been working with campaigners and councillors across the country to end the use of pesticides on the streets, parks, playgrounds, and other public areas of our villages, towns and cities.
France, Denmark and Luxembourg have already banned the use of pesticides in urban areas, which proves that it is perfectly possible to manage these spaces with non-chemical alternatives. Here in the UK, many councils are also proving that, despite budget restrictions, going pesticide-free is achievable.
Today, we are thrilled to share that a new national campaign calling for the UK government to ban the use of pesticides in urban areas once and for all has been kick-started by the Pesticide Collaboration.
The Pesticide Collaboration – hosted by PAN UK and the RSPB – brings together health and environmental organisations, academics, trade unions and others, working under a shared vision to urgently reduce pesticide-related harms in the UK.
Committing to a phase-out is a tangible and achievable action for the new Labour administration, that will support biodiversity in our towns and cities whilst also protecting human health.
Local councils need support, with funding and advice in place, to make the journey to going pesticide-free easier for everyone. We are in the midst of a nature crisis and the overuse of pesticides by councils is destroying many of the areas where wildlife forage for food. These chemicals contaminate water courses and harm aquatic life. They also undermine many of the efforts undertaken by local residents to improve biodiversity in urban areas. This is our chance to reach many more people and encourage them to take action on this issue.
Sign the petition and join us in this urgent call to action. Thank you.’
Censorship/Surveillance/Coercion/Corruption
Orwellian Doublespeak is the way our corrupt officials are disguising the truth behind their actions. Words have been given new meanings and alleged solutions to massive problems are themselves perpetuating the problems.
Read; The de-souling of the world by Mattias Desmet 6 July 2024;
‘Rationalism promises to bring humanity to paradise, but so far, that has not been very successful. The air of the 21st century is constantly saturated with a sense of crisis. The war on terror, the banking crisis, the climate crisis, the Me Too crisis, the Corona crisis, the Ukraine crisis – the thundering echo of one crisis still resonates when the lightning bolt of the next crisis strikes the fragile structure of society again.
In a way, the major social crises of the 21st century all reflect a problem in the relationships in which humans are caught; they all stem from problematic and failing relationships between humans and institutions (banking crisis), between humans and fellow humans (war on terror), between men and women (Me Too crisis), between humans and nature (climate crisis).
Initially, rationalism itself tries to provide the solution to the problems it causes. The proposed solution for problematic sexual identity is a mechanistic-surgical adjustment of the body; the solution for the threat of terrorism is the surveillance state; the solution for the detrimental impact of humans on nature is digitised “five-minute cities” where humans live in small housing units and never go more than a few kilometres from their homes, hyper-technological electric cars that can be switched on and off by the state at will, a forest of wind turbines, and plains of solar panels. And if that doesn’t work – everyone knows, by the way, that it won’t work – we will move on to exploding nitrate bombs in the atmosphere and installing manipulable mirrors between Earth and the Sun.
The more the rationalist vision fails, the more desperately it claims the truth. With every new crisis, the representatives of the dominant narrative – the mainstream media, national governments, global institutions – respond with more censorship. Armies of fact-checkers and “digital first responders” scour the internet looking for any dissenting voice; algorithms slow the spread of any dissenting voice on social media; millions of posts, even from people who recently gained worldwide fame by winning prestigious scientific awards, are removed from the internet.
These “ambassadors of truth” remain remarkably unmoved when it later turns out that the story they defended uncritically was wrong. The Corona crisis abundantly demonstrated this. Almost everything about the mainstream narrative turned out to be wrong; the virus was bred in a lab rather than arising from zoonosis; the mortality of the virus was at least ten times lower than stated; the vaccine did not prevent the spread of the virus and had many more side effects than suggested, and so on.
The reaction of the population when the lies are revealed is especially astonishing. Hannah Arendt put it this way, “The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in cynicism. Instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness” (The Origins of Totalitarianism p. 382).’
Be careful what you say and where you say it, but don’t stop resisting the censorship and coercion – keep researching the truth and resisting Big Brother’s dictates.
Watch and Read; Big Brother is Watching You; So Where is the outrage? Robert W Malone, 13 July 2024;
Michael Schellenberger; ‘The totalitarianism we warned of is happening. The European Union is at this moment forcing big tech companies to secretly engage in mass censorship. Google and Facebook are, apparently, going along with it.
Only Elon Musk’s X, among the major platforms, is resisting. A few hours ago, Musk said, “The European Commission offered ???? an illegal secret deal: if we quietly censored speech without telling anyone, they would not fine us. The other platforms accepted that deal. ???? did not.” And so now, the EU is preparing to punish X with massive fines — up to 6% of total global revenue.
I can’t imagine a more egregious form of foreign interference in our domestic affairs than foreign governments demanding mass secret censorship for ideological and political purposes. Most terrifying is the apparently direct involvement of government intelligence and security agencies, and their intermediaries, in demanding censorship.
This is all happening at the very moment that the same governments, including our own, warn of Russian disinformation through spam accounts that hardly anybody ever sees. Don’t be fooled by what is happening. Governments and former intelligence officials in Europe, Australia, Israel, Brazil, and Ukraine and other nations are not only demanding censorship but also often spreading their own disinformation. For example, the EU claims that there is more false information on X than on other platforms, and more censorship would reduce it.
This is false. Only X has the open-source Community Notes system, which allows for real-time corrections to false information. A recent study in JAMA, the Journal of American Medicine, found that 97.5% of the Community Notes were entirely accurate, 2%, partially accurate, and 0.5%, inaccurate.
It’s not perfect. I myself sometimes disagree with them. And of course, science is never standing still, so what appears accurate today might not be accurate in the future. However, X’s Community Notes uses more speech, not censorship, to provide context to controversial content. You can still agree or disagree with the content, even with a Community Note attached.
What the EU wants is for its committees of experts, not Community Notes, to secretly decide what we can read and say online. This is unethical and unconstitutional.
Another key part of the EU’s disinformation is that “researchers” should have access to X’s internal data, which Musk cut off when he bought Twitter. But those people who want the data aren’t researchers. They’re censorship activists, many of whom have deep relationships with governments in general and intelligence agencies in particular.
If the EU succeeds in censoring X, Facebook, Google, and every other major Internet platform, then there is no free speech. There is only government-controlled speech.
Many people rightly worry about the implications of a single man, Elon Musk, being all that stands between us and foreign governments’ totalitarian censorship plans. I worry about that, too. Our speech is inalienable. It is not something governments give to us.’
Follow the money to find the corporate puppeteers behind our stooge leaders.
Read; My Thoughts On the Attempted Trump Assassination Chris Hedges, 14 July 2024;
‘The assassination of Trump would not remove the yearning of tens of millions of people, many conditioned by the Christian right, for a cult leader. Most of the leaders of the Christian right have built cult followings of their own. These Christian fascists embraced magical thinking, attacked their enemies as agents of Satan and denounced reality-based science and journalism long before Trump did. Cults are a product of social decay and despair, and our decay and despair are expanding, soon to explode in another financial crisis.
The efforts by the Democratic Party and much of the press, including CNN and The New York Times, to discredit Trump, as if our problems are embodied in him, are futile. The smug, self-righteousness of this crusade against Trump only contributes to the national reality television show that has replaced journalism and politics. This crusade attempts to reduce a social, economic and political crisis to the personality of Trump. It is accompanied by a refusal to confront and name the corporate forces responsible for our failed democracy. This collusion with the forces of corporate oppression, which have impoverished the working class, fostered endless war, militarised our police, created the largest prison system in the world, licensed corporations to exploit the most vulnerable and transferred wealth upwards into the hands of a billionaire class, neuters the press, Trump’s critics and the Democratic Party.
Our only hope is to organise the overthrow of the corporate state that vomited up Trump. Our democratic institutions, including the legislative bodies, the courts and the media, are hostage to corporate power. They are no longer democratic. We must, like resistance movements of the past, engage in acts of sustained mass civil disobedience, especially strikes, and non-cooperation. By turning our ire on the corporate state, rather than Trump, we name the true sources of power and abuse. We expose the absurdity of blaming our demise on demonized groups such as undocumented workers, Muslims, African-Americans, Latinos, liberals, feminists, gays and others. We give people an alternative to a bankrupt Democratic Party — whose presidential candidate is in clear cognitive decline — that is a full partner in corporate oppression and cannot be rehabilitated. We make possible the restoration of an open society. If we fail to embrace this resistance, which alone has the ability to destroy cult leaders, we will continue the march toward tyranny.’
Robert Kennedy Jr.’s decades of litigation against the corporations gives him a special insight into their blinkered obsession to achieve power and control at the expense of humanity.
Watch; Robert F Kennedy jr. 5 July 2024;
“Siri is not working for you. Alexa is not working for you. They’re working for Bill Gates and the NSA. So it’s more important than ever that we have a deep commitment to our constitutional rights in this country.
Because the capacity of the government to enslave us is like nothing before. They have technology that can look through walls. You can’t hide in your house anymore. And this is the time we need to be raising the barrier of our constitutional rights, imbuing the generation of Americans that nobody is allowed to touch these.
And what I recognized during Covid when I was fighting these incursions, they gave us back a lot of these rights. But once the government sets the precedent that they’re allowed to take them away, that right is much weaker than ever before. So now they can take them away. If they’re for any crisis or war, for financial crisis, they have an endless pipeline of new epidemics that they can use the justification that our rights are going to mean nothing.
The only way those rights are going to exist is just a piece of paper unless we all believe in them, unless we’re all committed to them.”
Words describing a green or social justice ideology have been hijacked to have a totally different meaning to promote the corporate agenda.
Read; The military-industrial guilt complex Paul Cudenec, 3 July 2024;
‘The spectre of the Nazi regime and its crimes was also used to discredit political movements that could plausibly be accused of sharing some aspect of its ideology.
Any nationalistic tendencies – whether against US domination, European centralisation or the power of transnational corporations and institutions – could easily be demonised as a resurgence of the Hitlerian horrors.
This device was later extended to non-nationalist criticism of the international financial system – we were told that using the term “banksters” was hate speech and that any reference to a global financial mafia was clearly an anti-semitic trope.
Even environmentalism (the real, nature-loving, kind) has been depicted as a slippery slope to fascism, as I have previously described at some length.
This ridiculous claim is based on the fact that the Nazis, like today’s climate racketeers, used “green” language to initially sell their ultra-industrialist project to the public.
“The “anti-semitic” smears have become increasingly far-fetched in recent years.
Anyone speaking up against the mass-murdering ethnic cleansing in Palestine, no matter how obviously non-Nazi and non-racist they are, is treated as if they were personally responsible for events at Auschwitz 80 years ago.
And any challenging of general official agendas is now likely to be met with the same hysterical response, as I reported at the beginning of this year.
There I described how the EU Strategy on Combating Antisemitism and Fostering Jewish Life (2021-2030) justified its claims that anti-semitism was on the rise by applying the label to questioning of the Covid “pandemic”.
The authors of that report, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (whose dubious connections I detailed in the article), is also one of several zionist organisations behind a more recent document.”
Conspiracy Theories: A Guide for Members of Parliament and Candidates basically warns that the rule of the global military-industrial complex is threatened by people finding out what it is and what it is up to.
It phrases it slightly differently, of course: “Conspiracy theories can pose a danger to democracies, public health, social cohesion, public safety and more; they reduce trust in democratic institutions, in governments, and in mainstream, regulated media outlets. Conspiracy theories can also reduce political participation and conformity to the rule of law”.
Republican Congressman Thomas Massie (the only Republican Congressman who didn’t turn up at Netanyahu’s Washington speech) explains to Tucker Carlson how Israel’s lobby group AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) controls the US Congress.
Watch; How Israel Controls the United States Tucker Carlson, 15 July 2024;
Thomas Massie; ‘I have Republicans who come to me on the floor and say, I wish I could vote with you today, yours is the right vote, but I would just take too much flak back home, and I have Republicans who come to me and say, that’s wrong, what AIPAC is doing to you. Let me talk to my AIPAC person. By the way, everybody but me has an AIPAC person.
Tucker Carlson; What does that mean, an AIPAC person?
Massie; It’s like your babysitter, your AIPAC babysitter, who is always talking to you for AIPAC. They’re probably a constituent in your district, but they are firmly embedded in AIPAC.
Carlson; And every member has something like this?
Massie; I don’t know how it works on the Democrat side, but that’s how it works on the Republican side. And when they come to DC, you go have lunch with them and they’ve got your cell number and you have conversations with them. So I’ve had, like…
Carlson; That’s absolutely crazy.
Massie; I’ve had four members of Congress say, I’ll talk to my AIPAC person, and it’s literally what we call them, my AIPAC guy. I’ll talk to my AIPAC guy and see if I can get them to, you know, dial those ads back.
Carlson; Why have I never heard this before?
Massie; It doesn’t benefit anybody. Why would they want to tell their constituents that? They’ve basically got a buddy system with somebody who’s representing a foreign country. It doesn’t benefit the congressman for people to know that, so they’re not going to tell you that.
Carlson; Have you seen any other country do anything like this? Russia obviously determines the outcome of our elections. We keep hearing that. Does anyone have a Putin guy that they talk to?
Massie; Not only do they not have a Putin guy. Look, they don’t. They don’t have a Britain guy. They don’t have an Australian guy. They don’t have a German dude. Like, it’s the only country that does this. I guarantee there’s some spreadsheet at AIPAC where the AIPAC dude is matched up with the congressman, and then all the congressman’s votes on the issue. Oh, has the congressman been to Israel?
They pay for trips for congressmen and their spouses to go to Israel. I’m not the only Republican who hasn’t taken the AIPAC trip to Israel, but I’m probably one of a dozen that hasn’t taken that trip and the other ones just haven’t got around to it.
Carlson; What’s the trip like? Do you know?
Massie; It’s kind of like, I think, vacationy. You go see the wall, you go see the sites, things like that.
Max Blumenthal; You can look at Joe Biden, and Donald Trump is a perfect example. Who are their two top donors? Joe Biden’s top donor is Chaim Saban. Donald Trump’s top donor is Sheldon Adelson.
Haim Saban says, ‘I’m a one issue guy, and my issue is Israel’. Haim Saban is a Hollywood billionaire mogul with Israeli roots. Sheldon Adelson is dead, and his Israeli wife has taken over his foundation. Sheldon Adelson said he regretted joining the US military and wished he could have fought for the Israeli military and said that he had hoped to see a nuclear weapon dropped on Iran.
He is the top donor to Trump, to figures like Tom Cotton, Marco Rubio, all of these neoconservative, pro war republicans. And Heimsuban and Sheldon Adelson’s foundation work together through something called the IAC, the Israel American Committee, which supplements AIPAC as a bastion of bipartisan, pro settler, colonial Israeli influence, not just on Capitol Hill, but in state houses across the US.’
Watch This Is Why They Hate Trump! w/ Whitney Webb; The Jimmy Dore Show; 29th July 2024;
“Essentially every candidate that gets promoted by either of the two parties is going to be backed by that blob of intelligence and organized crime. Otherwise, you don’t get those big party nominations.”
Read; Only a failing US empire would be so blind as to cheer Netanyahu and his genocide Jonathan Cook, 26 July 2024;
‘There is only one country in the world right now, in the midst of Israel’s slaughter in Gaza, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is guaranteed dozens of standing ovations (link from UK Column 26th July 2024 at 12 mins in) from the vast majority of its elected representatives. That country is not Israel, where he has been a hugely divisive figure for many years. It is the United States.
On Wednesday, Netanyahu was back-slapped, glad-handed, whooped and cheered as he slowly made his way – hailed at every step as a conquering hero – to the podium of the US Congress.
This was the same Netanyahu who has overseen during the past 10 months the slaughter – so far – of some 40,000 Palestinians, around half of them women and children. More than 21,000 other children are reported missing, most of them likely dead under rubble. It was the same Netanyahu who levelled a strip of territory – originally home to 2.3 million Palestinians – that is expected to take 80 years to rebuild, at a cost of at least $50bn.It was the same Netanyahu who has destroyed every hospital and university in Gaza, and bombed almost all of its schools that were serving as shelters for families made homeless by other Israeli bombs.It was the same Netanyahu whose arrest is being sought by the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity, accused of using starvation as a weapon of war by imposing an aid blockade that has engineered a famine across Gaza. It was the same Netanyahu whose government was found last week by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to have been intensifying Israel’s apartheid rule over the Palestinian people in an act of long-term aggression. It was the same Netanyahu whose government is standing trial for committing what the ICJ, the world’s highest judicial body, has termed a “plausible genocide”.
And yet, there was just one visible protester in the congressional chamber. Rashida Tlaib, the only US legislator of Palestinian heritage, sat silently grasping a small black sign. On one side it said: “War criminal”. On the other: “Guilty of genocide”. One person among hundreds mutely trying to point out that the emperor was naked.
There was another small moment of inadvertent truth amid Netanyahu’s outpouring of lies. The Israeli prime minister stated that what was happening in Gaza was “a clash between barbarism and civilisation”. He was not wrong.
On the one side, there is the barbarism of the current joint Israeli-US genocide against the people of Gaza, a dramatic escalation of the 17-year Israeli siege of the enclave that preceded it, and the decades of belligerent rule under an Israeli system of apartheid before that.
And on the other side, there are the embattled few desperately trying to safeguard the West’s professed values of “civilisation”, of international humanitarian law, of the protection of the weak and vulnerable, of the rights of children. The US Congress decisively showed where it stood: with barbarism.
Netanyahu has become the most feted foreign leader in US history, invited to speak to Congress four times, surpassing even Britain’s wartime leader, Winston Churchill. He is fully Washington’s creature. His savagery, his monstrousness is entirely made in America. As he implored his US handlers: “Give us the tools faster and we’ll finish the job (genocide) faster.”
Keir Starmer is a tool of the UK establishment who will continue to allow us to be controlled by psychopathic imperialist colonialists in the US.
Watch; Labour’s Night of the Long Knives Palestine Declassified, 8 June 2024;
Chris Williamson; ‘In today’s show, we’ll be revealing the extent to which the British Labour Party has been colonised by the zionist entity. We’ll also explore the futility of those who support Palestine, but who’ve maintained their membership of the Labour party in the vain hope that it can be reclaimed from the clutches of zionist extremists. Latifa Abouchakra has this report about the way in which Sir Keir Starmer has repurposed the Labour party to turn it into an adjunct to Israel.
Latifa Abouchakra (written by David Miller); The Labour Party, under the leadership of Sir Keir Starmer, has stepped up its purge against left wing supporters of the Palestinian cause. In what has been called ‘Labour’s Night of the Long Knives’, senior Labour members were told that they would not be allowed to stand for election under the Labour banner in the forthcoming general election. Lloyd Russell-Moyle, who was a Labour MP until the UK parliament was recently dissolved, was deselected by the Labour party. Faiza Shaheen, a long standing Labour candidate who almost unseated the notorious Conservative MP Iain Duncan Smith in the 2019 general election, was also told that she would be prevented from standing. This comes after many other senior left wing Labour figures, like Jeremy Corbyn, Mick Whitley, Beth Winter, Sam Terry were blocked by the Labour party machine.
The purge of left wing candidates who have voiced support for Palestine is a nail in the coffin of the so-called ‘Stay and Fight’ campaign. After the pro-Israel MP Keir Starmer was elected Labour leader in 2020, many left wing campaigners stressed that it was important to remain inside Labour to try and change it from within. However, over four years later, many of those same people had been expelled from the party and the most prominent supporters of Palestine have been excluded from standing because of spurious claims of anti-semitism. Meanwhile, the party has parachuted zionist zealots into safe Labour seats, practically guaranteeing their election to parliament in the forthcoming UK general election.
Luke Akehurst, a prominent ally and advisor of Keir Starmer, and director of the Israel lobby group, ‘We Believe in Israel’, has been made a Labour parliamentary candidate. Akehurst defended UK arms sales to Saudi Arabia during its onslaught on Yemen and has openly and proudly described himself as zionist. He has also visited the zionist entity on multiple occasions and has been at the heart of Labour’s crackdown on support for Palestine. Georgia Gould, who was caught on camera in 2022 removing stickers in support of Palestine and who advocates the zionist two-state solution, was also selected as a Labour candidate. The purge against Palestine supporters has been cheered on by some of the UK’s most ardent supporters of Israel.
It is now hard to deny that the Labour party has been the victim of state capture, with the Israel lobby in Britain having a chokehold on not just its policies but also on its parliamentary representatives.’
The establishment is engineering a series of catastrophes so, as investigative journalist Whitney Webb says, they can introduce “the digital ID as a key enabler of surveillance. Knowing what everyone is doing at the transactional level and being able to tweak that micromanagement based on a person’s activity”
Watch; “BlackRock’s Next Plans Will SHOCK THE WORLD” – Whitney Webb’s LATEST LARRY FINK EXPOSE Big Picture Watch, 9th July 2024;
Whitney Webb; “They have essentially said that this will be the only way to prove you have legal identity. And so if you don’t participate in that system, as far as the state or the private sector is concerned, you don’t exist. So by not participating in that system, you’re inherently excluded from the economic system and really essentially everything. It’s going to be a problem, reaction, solution type of situation where they’ve already made the solution, they’ve already developed what they want to be the new financial governance system. After this new Bretton Woods moment, they just need some sort of big event on the scale of World War 2, or some large event that’s equally disruptive, in order to be like, ‘all right, now it’s time for a new financial governance system.”
Presenter; “About a year ago, while speaking at the Global Finance summit in Paris, French President Emmanuel Macron said; ‘the world needs a public financial shock to fight global warming’. Around the same time, World Economic Forum founder and executive chairman, Klaus Schwab, also made a similar statement about revamping the global economy. In his words ‘every country from the United States to China must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed’. ‘We need a great reset of capitalism’, Schwab added in an article published on the non-governmental organisation’s website. According to popular investigative journalist, Whitney Webb, what we are witnessing is the birth of a new international monetary system, a replacement for the current Bretton Woods system, built solely on the blockchain, to aid the complete surveillance and censorship of every aspect of our lives.
Whitney’s warnings are based on the words of several global elites and WEF puppets like Macron, as well as the words of Mark Carney, former governor of the bank of England and bank of Canada, and the UN Special envoy for Climate Action and Finance, who said the three pillars of the new world order are digital IDs, CBDCs and ESG. In a recent discussion with Mark Goodwin, writer and editor in chief at Bitcoin magazine, Whitney warns that all world governments are pushing this new world order agenda, proudly sponsored by the ultra rich and powerful, including Silicon Valley executives like Larry Fink, who wants to tokenise all existing assets and commodities as well as the natural world. Whitney warns that from forests to rivers, mountains and lakes, everything will soon become a commodity, owned and traded by the super rich and powerful to make them even stronger, and move them closer to their goal of completely dominating the rest of us. During the conversation with Goodwin, Whitney discusses two important parts of the new world order: digital IDs and natural world tokenisation, warning that Schwab, Fink and useful puppets like Macron, are on the verge of achieving their grand plans and how disastrous that would be for us all.”
Whitney Webb; “I think the digital ID is a key enabler of surveillance. Knowing what everyone is doing at the transactional level and being able to tweak that micromanagement based on a person’s activity. The digital ID isn’t just limited to the financial system, it’s your travel, your health history, your career history, your education credentials, your access to telecommunications, social media, the internet. With the new AI era they can fuse all that data, analyse it and, depending on how they develop that AI algorithm, use it to control people in unprecedented ways.”
We must wake up to and resist the new world order ruled by psychopaths.
Read; The Great Reset Pivots To War Dean Henderson, 14 July 2024;
‘By December 2022, the Pirbright Institute-patented Coronavirus had killed 6.7 million people worldwide. Meanwhile, global economies were devastated by draconian government lockdowns as planned by Operation Lockstep and Event 201. Though markets initially swooned, a major stock market crash was avoided as small businesses shut down while “essential” Crown corporation businesses stayed open. An even greater consolidation of wealth was underway.
Pfizer, Moderna, and EcoHealth Alliance partner Johnson & Johnson won the initial US vaccine sweepstakes. In 2002, the Gates Foundation purchased a large block of Pfizer stock. In 2013, Moderna, which works closely with the Crown’s AstraZeneca, was awarded a $25 million grant by DARPA to develop mRNA vaccines.
The coordinated government lockdowns also stunted the education of a whole generation of young children that were forced onto the DARPA net for instruction. People were also forced onto computers, to shop and to work from home as the big tech companies and their intelligence agency controllers attempted to bring in their cloud-based Fourth Industrial Revolution. Human batteries were being brought online to power the new electronic feudalism.
But the people continued to remember. By March 2022 people around the world finally stood up to the draconian lockdowns and vaccine mandates that their governments had unanimously imposed. Just as Covert Identification 2019 was being forced to an end by recalcitrant Canadian truckers, Russian troops invaded Ukraine to finally avenge the 2014 overthrow of the pro-Moscow Yanukovych government.
The new Ukrainian President was former movie star Volodymyr Zelenskyy. His movie and political career had been funded by Ukrainian oligarch Ihor Kolomoyskyi, whose Private Group controlled energy, steel, and chemical industries in Ukraine, Russia, the EU, Georgia, and Ghana. He was also the main shareholder at Burisma, the Ukrainian natural gas firm that was paying Hunter Biden exorbitant “consulting fees” and funding secret US bioweapons labs in Ukraine. Kolomoyskyi had been banned from entering the United States in 2021, a year before Russia invaded Ukraine.
The US had been training Ukrainian paramilitary groups in Ukraine since 2014. Many have ties to the far-right pro-Nazi political parties Svoboda and Right Sector, including the Azov Battalion and the Kraken Regiment. These CIA-trained paramilitaries, funded in part by Kolomoyski, had been harassing and murdering Russian-speaking people in Eastern Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin cited these attacks as the reason for his March 2022 invasion.
The US and their Royal Services Institute spokesmen immediately denounced Russia’s move and announced a round of economic sanctions. These sanctions, while aimed at Russia, had a boomerang effect on Western economies, as oil markets skyrocketed, fertiliser shortages curbed global food production, and inflation set in around the world.
While Zelensky set about banning opposition political parties, media outlets, and even the Russian Orthodox Church; he was sold as a freedom-fighting Fauci-like saint by the fawning corporate media and Democratic politicians, who had been primed to be the new warmongers by the Trump/Russiagate psy-op.
The greedy bloodline cartels raised prices at will. The Crown’s oil giants rang up record profits. Chevron quadrupled its profits in the 1st quarter of 2022 to the highest it had seen for ten years. Biden Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin rewarded his former employer Raytheon with fat contracts to send Ukraine anti-missile defence systems. The Bretton Woods-backed US dollar strengthened. And people around the world, especially in the global South, scrambled to afford even basic food to eat. Famines began in Ethiopia, Madagascar, and Somalia, paving the way for yet more human depopulation. It was all part of the Great Reset.’
It is increasingly obvious that the solutions to innumerable crises taking place across the globe, offered by government and their mainstream media mouthpieces, are flawed and the resulting pain is the outcome of the transnational corporate elite’s transition to a transhuman world. Spread the information and resist the totalitarian juggernaut.
Read; Truth, reality, tradition and freedom Paul Cudenec, 22 July 2024;
“If there is no reality and if there is no truth, there can be no freedom either”
‘Silvia Guerini is a powerful contemporary critic of the techno-scientific system and the multi-pronged threat of its global agenda.
She has a background in radical ecology and calls for a new 21st century resistance that goes beyond the “stale and dusty categories” of “right” and “left”. What is at stake today, she says, is the very future of humanity, with a historic clash taking place between “two opposing visions of the world, of the living, of nature, of human beings”.
“There are no more excuses. We can no longer wait for those who do not want to understand, those who pursue marginal projects, those who do not have a total and clear-cut critique of every aspect and every fundamental element in the transhumanist project”.
“We need to find a firm shore: that line of resistance for those of us who are determined to remain anchored to reality, in defence of humanity and in defence of all that is living”.
“Let’s form alliances to repel the transhumanist vanguard”.
‘What we were witnessing, she said, was an attack on life, on nature, on “what is born, as opposed to artificial”.
“All ties to the real, natural world must be severed. Everything must be artificial, synthetic and virtual”.
And, she warned, the price for so-called “emancipation” from the living and its natural constraints was “submission to the technological constraints of the machine world”.
Transhumanist ideology, embodied in the projects and aims of Silicon Valley, major research hubs, various foundations and international groups, sought to dispose of living processes and bodies.
The end goal was to “transform the human being and everything living into the artificial, cybernetic and engineered world” which would then be declared to be the only possible and imaginable world.
This would involve, Guerini has written elsewhere, the complete eradication of our sense of identity, “the tearing and subjugation of the deepest spirit of the human being”, and ultimately the cancellation of the “very sense of humanity”.
“A total demolition of the previous forms of existence is underway: how one comes into the world, biological sex, education, relationships, the family, even the diet that is about to become synthetic.
“There must be no room for what will be deemed obsolete and a hindrance to the imperatives of the techno-scientific system”.
Yes we want to de-industrialise but when we realise the devious agenda explained above, it is time to question if CO2 is really the enemy or an excuse for radical changes that are antihuman.
Watch; The Truth about CO2 Patrick Moore, Prager University, 26 July 2024;
“According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC, CO2 emissions from fossil fuels, which constitute 85% of our energy use, must be reduced to zero by 2100. If we don’t save ourselves from ourselves, we’re toast. That’s the claim. Here’s what’s strange, though. All life is carbon based, and the carbon for all that life originates from carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. All of the carbon in the fossil fuels we are burning for energy today was once in the atmosphere as carbon dioxide, before it was consumed by plankton in the sea and plants on the land. Coal, oil, and natural gas are the remains of those plankton and plants that have been transformed by heat and pressure deep in the earth’s crust. In other words, fossil fuels are 100% organic and were produced with solar energy.
Sounds positively green. If there were no carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere, the earth would be a dead planet. Talk about catastrophic climate change. Take away CO2 and you’d have it. And yet the US Environmental Protection Agency has deemed this essential ingredient for life a pollutant. But how can something that makes life possible be bad? Before I deal with that question, let’s get clear on our terms. It has become common to refer to the emissions from burning fossil fuels for energy as carbon emissions.
For most of the history of life on Earth, carbon dioxide has been present in the atmosphere at much higher levels than it is today. During the Cambrian explosion, when multicellular life first came on the scene, CO2 levels were as much as ten times higher than they are today.
From a big picture perspective, we’re actually living in a low carbon dioxide era. The optimum level of CO2 for plant growth, for example, is four to five times what is currently found in our atmosphere. That’s why greenhouse growers worldwide actually inject additional CO2 into their greenhouses. They want to promote plant growth.
Likewise, higher CO2 levels in the global atmosphere will boost food and forest productivity. That will come in handy since by mid century we will have to feed 8 to 10 billion people. In fact, we’re already seeing the positive effects of increased carbon dioxide. Now, satellite measurements have noted the greening of the earth as crops and forests grow due to our higher levels of CO2.”
The Rockefellers’ involvement in the climate change movement has nothing to do with saving the planet. It is to coerce and deceive us into an authoritarian nightmare. Remember it was John D Rockefeller’s wealth that closed natural medicine colleges and hospital surgeries to capture and profit from the pharmaceutical medicine market.
Read; How John D. Rockefeller (1839-1937)Founded Big Pharma And Waged War On Natural Cures Global Health, 15 April 2019;
‘This was a wonderful opportunity for Rockefeller who saw the ability to monopolise the oil, chemical and the medical industries at the same time!
The best thing about petrochemicals was that everything could be patented and sold for high profits.
But there was one problem with Rockefeller’s plan for the medical industry: natural/herbal medicines were very popular in America at that time. Almost half the doctors and medical colleges in the U.S. were practising holistic medicine, using knowledge from Europe and Native Americans.
Rockefeller, the monopolist, had to figure out a way to get rid of his biggest competition. So he used the classic strategy of “problem-reaction-solution. (Similar to terrorism scare, followed by the “Patriot Act”).
He went to his buddy Andrew Carnegie – another plutocrat who made his money from monopolising the steel industry – who devised a scheme. From the prestigious Carnegie Foundation, they sent a man named Abraham Flexner to travel around the country and report on the status of medical colleges and hospitals around the country.
This led to the Flexner Report, which gave birth to the modern medicine as we know it. Needless to say, the report talked about the need for revamping and centralising our medical institutions. Based on this report, more than half of all medical colleges were soon closed. Homoeopathy and natural medicines were mocked and demonised; and doctors were even jailed.’
So, it’s not so hard to believe that the billionaires Rockefeller, Gates et al are at it again but this time using Climate Change to trigger a Great Reset that will give massive returns on their tech investments and impose draconian methods of control on the ‘deplorables’- us.
Read; The Rockefellers created 990 “Climate Change” institutions, foundations, and activist groups Elizabeth Nickson, 7 July 2024;
‘In the climate change arena, the Rockefellers call the shots. The whole thing was their idea, they took a silly but interesting theory and amped it up with hundreds and hundreds of million of dollars. They founded institutions and linked the survival of those institutions to promoting climate change and population reduction. They adopted one likely politician after another.
The Rockefellers have created 990 Climate Change activist organisations. They give them directions, financing, and launch them on the world. The Green Movement was started, financed, organised, and militarised by the Rockefellers.
In 2012, the U.N. Climate Fund announced the establishment of the model for the cities of the future, outside Seoul, Korea called Songdo. Songdo is failing. No one wants to live there. Those who visit describe the place as soulless, with no people, no vivid life. Billions were spent creating it.
“Traffic flow and citizen behaviour is monitored in real-time via five hundred surveillance cameras. Household waste is automatically transported via the pneumatic system under the city and converted into energy. All apartments have smart locks, with smart cards which can also be used for loaner bikes, parking, subway, and movie tickets. All apartments have smart metres (enabling residents to compare their energy consumption with that of their neighbours) and built-in cameras everywhere. Floor sensors detect pressure changes and automatically alert an alarm service of a suspected fall. Systems are tested where residents via the TV screen can receive language lessons or communicate with their physician as well as neighbours and relatives, and bracelets for locating children via GPS. In other words, a futuristic dream straight out of the World Future Society’s 1970s vision—or Orwell’s 1984.
And this is South Korea. How successful, environmentally friendly, and inclusive Songdo really turned out to be has been questioned. It was built primarily for an affluent middle class expected to be able to afford the higher standard and the new technology. The electricity comes from coal-fired power plants and the buildings are completely glazed with windows that cannot be opened, which requires air conditioning all year round. Also, the pneumatic waste disposal system does not always work properly. As of March 2018 there was still no cultural life, no street vendors or old people, public transport, transport systems were empty and three-quarters of the homes were empty.”‘
Read; Yellen Eyes $3 TRILLION ANNUALLY For Climate Change Initiatives; Armstrong Economics; July 30
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen once admitted that the Inflation Reduction Act, the largest spending package in American history, was deliberately designed to combat climate change. “The Inflation Reduction Act is, at its core, about turning the climate crisis into an economic opportunity,” Yellen candidly said this April. The act was never intended to curb inflation as it did the exact opposite. Yellen is now seeking TRILLIONS in additional funding for the largest hoax of the century.
Climate change has become the untouchable charitable cause that no one can question. COVID-19 was merely a stepping stone for the lucrative tax opportunity that is climate change and the green agenda. As it is a global issue, it gives rise to the need for globalised institutions and coalitions.’
More insanity from the usual suspects such as Bill Gates….
Read; Scientists Call for Geoengineering of Glaciers To Address Climate Change Need To Know, 29 July 2024;
‘A new white paper warns of catastrophic rise in sea level unless scientists intervene using geoengineering to reduce exposure of ice sheets in the Arctic and Antarctic to warm water and melt. The University of Chicago and Stanford University will hold conferences and take the lead in researching geoengineering ‘solutions’ to the manufactured problem of global warming. Unfortunately, many influential figures now believe that the massive risks of geoengineering are worth taking. There are other geoengineering experiments planned in the US, Australia and Israel that may be harmful. Private companies and individuals are also meddling with the climate.
The scientific community should urgently pursue research into geoengineering of glaciers, according to a new scientific white paper.
According to the white paper, research into geoengineering of ice sheets in the Arctic and Antarctic must be undertaken now, before humanity faces a catastrophic rise in sea-levels that could provoke panicked decision-making to halt it.
Everyone who is a scientist hopes that we don’t have to do this research,” said Douglas MacAyeal, a professor of geophysical sciences and co-author of the paper.
“But we also know that if we don’t think about it, we could be missing an opportunity to help the world in the future.”
The white paper emerged out of two conferences held on geoengineering—deliberate interventions to alter the planet’s climate—at Chicago and Stanford University. The conferences were organised by the newly formed Climate Systems Engineering initiative at U Chicago, which “seeks to understand the benefits, risks, and governance of technologies that might reduce the impacts of accumulated greenhouse gases,” according to a press release.
The scientists at the conferences advocated for two major types of geoengineering to be investigated. The first type consists of “curtains” moored on the seabed to prevent warm water from undermining ice shelves. The biggest threat to ice sheets is not warm air, but warm water.
The second type involves attempts to reduce the flow of meltwater streams that run off ice sheets. This could be achieved, for example, by drilling deep into glaciers, either to drain water from the glacier bed and prevent it from affecting the glacier, or to try and freeze the glacier bed artificially.
The report notes that both approaches are totally untested and their advantages and disadvantages, including potentially environmental disruption, are unclear.
The report calls for any investigation into geoengineering solutions to be conducted in an equitable manner, with input from all the world’s nations. This would involve “robust participation of sociologists, humanists, ecologists, community leaders, scientific and engineering governing bodies, international treaty organizations, and other relevant stakeholders in guiding the research.”
Geoengineering has received increasing coverage in the news in recent months, for good and bad reasons.
First, the good. In a welcome development, Tennessee became the first state in the US to ban geoengineering, including attempts to modify the amount of solar radiation reaching the earth, whether by using physical barriers in the high atmosphere, through spreading reflective chemicals in the sky, or by practices like cloud-seeding, which is used to increase the amount of rainfall over a particular area.
Now, the bad. It’s becoming clear that a shift is taking place in the scientific community and government, as the dangers of geoengineering are being reconsidered in light of the supposed “inevitability” of catastrophic climate change. Many influential figures now believe that the massive risks of geoengineering are worth taking, even if they only buy some extra time for even more sweeping changes to the global regime of carbon-emission reduction.
In February, The Wall Street Journal published a detailed report on three ongoing geoengineering projects taking place across the globe, with a mixture of government and private funding.
In Australia, researchers from Southern Cross University are releasing a brine mixture into the sky to create larger, brighter clouds that will reflect more sunlight and reduce local temperatures. The project is funded by the Australian government, universities, and conservation organisations.
In Israel, Stardust Solutions is testing a delivery system to disperse reflective particles at high altitudes, again to reduce solar radiation. The startup is currently testing the system indoors but will move to outdoor tests in the “next few months.”
And in the US, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute plans to add 6,000 gallons of sodium hydroxide to the ocean off Martha’s Vineyard. They want to produce a “carbon sink” that sucks carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and into the sea, storing it there. The U.S. government and private sources fund the project. The release of the chemical will require further approval from the Environmental Protection Agency.
Even more worryingly, private companies and individuals are experimenting with geoengineering, without government support or approval. In January 2023, a California startup called Make Sunsets admitted to launching test balloons in Mexico containing sulphur dioxide (a corrosive, acidic gas which is predominantly produced from the combustion of coal or crude oil. Direct exposure to SO2 is associated with asthma and chronic bronchitis, and can lead to irritation and constriction of the airways), a chemical that is of great interest to geoengineers because of its ability to reflect solar radiation in the atmosphere.’
Follow the money to know who is controlling our lives and for whose benefit.
Watch; How Big Corporations took over Western governments Geopolitical Economy Report, 7 July 2024;
‘How did Western governments get to the point where major decisions are made by and for large corporate monopolies?’ Ben Norton is joined by political economist Radhika Desai to discuss neoliberalism and the myth of the free market.
This is based on chapter 6 of Radhika’s book “Capitalism, Coronavirus and War”. You can download it for free here:
Check out other episodes in the series here:
“Corporations have grown and the state’s capacities have shrunk, and as this has happened corporations have tried to justify themselves to allay fears about this vast growth of private power by saying ‘we are going to act in a socially responsible way’. There is no control on them, there is no requirement, there is no regulation, there is no state control, but they say we will voluntarily behave in a socially responsible way, so trust us and everything will be fine.
But of course, as people know from all the scandals that we have seen, for example right now in the UK the big topic of discussion is Thames Water, which is a water supply company which was once state-owned which has been privatised and it has not been investing in the infrastructure. So the number of times the sewage has been poured into the rivers and seas around here has been multiplying, costs have been rising, and meanwhile, while all this is happening the private owners of Thames Water are earning fat dividends, and its precisely in order to pay these fat dividends that the quality and quantity of the goods and services provided has been decreasing, investment has been decreasing. So corporate social responsibility is this idea that somehow corporations will naturally and on their own act socially responsibly which is the biggest lie that you have ever heard”
Aldous Huxley’s ‘Brave New World’ dystopia is becoming a reality.
Watch; The Trump assassination attempt – The limits of the Propaganda Model Mattias Desmet, 25 July 2024;
‘What has been happening in the context of the U.S. presidential elections over the past few weeks is, to say the least, remarkable. We are witnessing a social system that – to use a term from complex dynamic systems theory – is heading toward a catastrophe. And the essence of the tipping point we are approaching is this: the propaganda model is beginning to fail.
It started a few weeks ago like this: Trump, the presidential candidate who must not win, is up against Biden, the presidential candidate who must win. After the first debate, it was immediately clear: Trump will win against Biden. The big problem: Biden and Jill are about the only ones who don’t realise this. The media then turned against Biden. That, in itself, is a revolution. They had praised President Biden to the skies for four years, turning a blind eye to the fact that the man either seemed hardly aware of what he was saying or was giving speeches that could only be described as having the characteristics of a fascist’s discourse.
I’m thinking, among other things, of the 2022 midterm speech in which he, against a bombastic-dramatic backdrop and flanked by two soldiers with machine guns, more or less directly called for violence against the Maga followers. Not to mention the shameless prosecution and imprisonment of political opponents and the intimidation and excommunication of hundreds of journalists (carefully kept out of the media by journalists who sided with the regime). Huxley would not be surprised that Biden claims in almost every speech that he had to save democracy, including his most recent speech. I’ve shared the quote of Huxley below before, but it doesn’t hurt to read it a second time:
‘By means of ever more effective methods of mind-manipulation, the democracies will change their nature; the quaint old forms — elections, parliaments, Supreme Courts and all the rest — will remain. The underlying substance will be a new kind of non-violent totalitarianism. All the traditional names, all the hallowed slogans will remain exactly what they were in the good old days. Democracy and freedom will be the theme of every broadcast and editorial — but democracy and freedom in a strictly Pickwickian sense. Meanwhile the ruling oligarchy and its highly trained elite of soldiers, policemen, thought-manufacturers and mind-manipulators will quietly run the show as they see fit.’ (Huxley, Brave New World Revisited).
In any case, the media’s love for Biden was suddenly over when it became clear that he could not possibly win the election, even not with a little help from the media. If you want to know how that ‘little help’ worked in 2020, look at one of the most important interviews of the past year, where Mike Benz – former director of the cyber portfolio of the U.S. government – explains to Tucker Carlson in detail how information flows on the internet were manipulated during the 2020 elections (and the COVID crisis). The guy eventually got disgusted from what he was doing and now runs a project striving for online freedom of speech. I would recommend everyone to spend an hour watching that interview. Such an explanation is what we need: calm, expert, nuanced, and extraordinarily revealing.’
Keir Starmer slips neatly into the new world order
Keir Starmer, is an establishment cut-out who prefers Davos to Westminster and whose policies we must resist with all our energy, hearts and minds.
Watch; Starmer’s hollow victory: He won the UK election but not the popular vote Middle East Eye, 7 July 2024;
Intro; ‘In this op-ed video, Peter Oborne explains how the general election was not quite the great victory it seemed for Keir Starmer.
“Labour has secured one of the largest parliamentary majorities in British political history, but with a pitifully low share of the vote.
Labour is set to poll about 34 percent, not even two percentage points more than Jeremy Corbyn scored in 2019 and significantly less than the 40 percent that Corbyn scored in 2017.
To put it another way, thanks to the second lowest turnout since 1885, scarcely 20 percent of eligible British voters support Keir Starmer’s Labour.
Yet, he will end up with approximately two-thirds of all parliamentary seats.
“The collapse in Labour’s vote share is the direct result of Starmer’s calculated decision to run a passionless, risk-free campaign aimed at securing the support of big business, the pro-war British establishment, and the Murdoch press,” says Oborne.’
REVEALED: Keir Starmer’s Brutal Secret Peter Oborne, Double Down News, 16 July 2024;
“‘For the last four years Keir Starmer has been in charge of a brutal, inhuman, pitiless political machine, but you simply wouldn’t know about that if you read or watched the mainstream British media. Five years ago Boris Johnson was elected prime minister and no questions asked, even though his election campaign was a pack of lies. Much the same thing has happened with Keir Starmer this time. His brutal authoritarianism, well documented by the way, has been totally ignored by the mainstream British media. And the reason why client journalism is a worry is that Sir Keir Starmer has a lot of serious questions to answer. He tells lies just like Johnson, he’s actually quite authoritarian, he’s run a very ugly political machine on his way to power, we need to know about that. Instead of which we get quite a lot of articles making him out to be this sort of valiant, patriotic, good chap, who has somehow drifted to the top without really meaning to.
Several years ago Al Jazeera produced an extraordinary film based on the mass leak of documents, the biggest in British history from inside the Labour Party machine, which revealed a scale of hostility inside Labour to Immigrant communities, particular Bangladeshis in East London, Muslims more generally, also contempt for black people particularly, terrible abusive language used about one of the most distinguished of modern Labour Party politicians Diane Abbott, the first black Labour woman MP.
It revealed a right-wing clique inside Labour running the party and targeting vulnerable communities, driving them out of the party, even spying on them. For somebody who cares about democracy, this is very sinister, but that element of Starmer was completely ignored by the mainstream media. My view is that there are deep questions which Starmer should have been asked to answer before he was elected prime minister; they simply weren’t raised in mainstream debate. There is a structural failing in the British media which means it won’t report what is actually happening in British politics.”
Labour’s foreign policy is the same as the Tories’.
Watch; UK Starmer total commitment to neocon policy The Duran, 21 July 2024;
“The new Foreign Secretary David Lammy has published a big article in Foreign Affairs in which he talks about progressive realism which essentially looks exactly like the unrealistic progressivist neoliberalism of the neoliberal humanitarian interventionists. He says there mustn’t be any wars like Iraq and Libya and Afghanistan. ‘We mustn’t have that all over again but at the same time we made a big mistake by not intervening more in Syria and against Russia’. So I don’t really see what the difference is. Why is he saying these wars were bad but these other wars were good. The foreign secretary David Lammy, almost the first country he visits is Israel where he meets with Netanyahu and appears to give Israel the unstinting support he received before.”
Now that Starmer has purged Labour of real Labour MPs and replaced them with obedient party apparatchiks who will loyally support his NeoCon agenda, we can expect more unswerving loyalty to criminal expansionist USA, nazi-run Ukraine and genocidal Israel.
Read; The Need for a New Political Vocabulary Michael Hudson, 6 July 2024;
The July 4 landslide defeat of the neoliberal pro-war British Conservatives by the neoliberal pro-war Labour Party poses the question of just what the media mean when they describe the elections and political alignments throughout Europe in terms of centre-right and centre-left traditional parties challenged by nationalist neo-fascists.
Political differences between Europe’s centrist parties are marginal, all supporting neoliberal cutbacks in social spending in favour of rearmament, fiscal stringency and the deindustrialization that support of U.S.-NATO policy entails. The word “centrist” means not advocating any change in the economy’s neoliberalism. Hyphenated-centrist parties are committed to maintaining the pro-U.S. post-2022 status quo.
That means letting U.S. leaders control European politics via NATO and the European Commission, Europe’s counterpart to America’s Deep State. This passivity is putting its economies onto a war footing, with inflation, trade dependence on the United States and European deficits resulting from U.S.-sponsored trade and financial sanctions against Russia and China. This new status quo has shifted European trade and investment away from Eurasia to the United States.
Voters in France, Germany and Italy are turning away from this blind alley. Every incumbent centrist party has recently lost – and their defeated leaders all had similar pro-U.S. neoliberal policies. As Steve Keen describes the centrist political game: “The Party in power runs neoliberal policies; it loses the next election to rivals who, when they get in power, also run neoliberal policies. They then lose, and the cycle repeats.” European elections, like this November’s one in the United States, are largely a protest vote – with voters having nowhere else to go except to vote for the populist nationalist parties promising to smash this status quo. This is continental Europe’s counterpart to Britain’s Brexit vote.
The AfD in Germany, Marine le Pen’s National Rally in France and Giorgia Melloni’s Brothers of Italy are depicted as smashing and breaking the economy – by being nationalist instead of conforming to the NATO/EU Commission, and specifically by opposing the war in Ukraine and European isolation from Russia. That stance is why voters are supporting them. We are seeing a popular rejection of the status quo. The centrist parties call all nationalist opposition neo-fascist, just as in England the media describe both the Tories and Labour as centrists but Nigel Farage as a far right populist.
The former left parties have joined the centrists, becoming pro-U.S. neoliberals. There is no counterpart on the old left to the new nationalist parties, except for Sara Wagenknecht’s party in East Germany. The “left” no longer exists in the way that it did when I was growing up in the 1950s.
Today’s Social Democratic and Labor parties are neither socialist nor pro-labor, but pro-austerity. The British Labour Party and German Social Democrats are no longer even anti-war, but support the wars against Russia and Palestinians, and have put their faith in neoliberal Thatcherite/Blairite Reaganomics and an economic break from Russia and China.,
Covid/Vaccines Scam and Pandemic Treaty
Wake up to the power of propaganda to coerce people to donate their bodies to an experimental so-called vaccine.
Watch; The mRNA jab is the most horrific medical product in history Dr Aseem Malhotra, X, 18 July 2024;
Dr Aseem Malhotra; “I think the best evidence so far, actually was a re-analysis of the original trials done by Pfizer and Moderna that led to approval, coercion and even mandates of this vaccine, if you call it a vaccine, although it’s not nothing like traditional vaccines. I think it’s better described as a form of genetic technology. That analysis was published in peer reviewed journal Vaccine by very eminent scientists, the associate editor of the BMJ, Peter Doshi, Joseph Freeman, who I know, is a lead author, and what they found from the beginning, and this is what we call the highest quality level of evidence, is that you are more likely to suffer serious harm from the vaccine at a rate of about 1: 800 than you were to be hospitalised with Covid from the very beginning, which for me automatically suggests that it probably is across all age groups. So, we don’t have the data to separate age groups, but 1: 800 is a very high figure. It probably should never have been approved for authorisation for a single human in the first place.
So the question then gets asked is how did this happen? Well, of course, you’ve got the medical regulator, the MHRA, who approved it, but everything happened very quickly. There’s a big problem, which, again, most people don’t know, most doctors aren’t even aware of, the chairman of the BMA was gobsmacked when I gave a presentation at the BMA annual conference in the summer of 2022, when I presented him with information from the British Medical Journal investigation that revealed the MHRA in this country, our regulator, gets 86% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry. So for me, this is a form, if you like, of institutional corruption, which is at the root of the problem.’
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)’s dishonesty is again revealed in this UK Column report.
Watch; UK Column News 26 July 2024;
At 23mins.40secs Debbie asks about; “How safe are blood transfusions, given the infected hepatitis scandal recently. ….. and the safety and efficacy of the AstraZeneca injection.”
Cherl Grainger; “the MHRA are responsible for continually monitoring both medicines and quality blood products and they basically tell us that there’s a thorough review and evaluation of the data. Can I point out that by mid February 21, they already knew, through the yellow card, that 205 people were dead. And there was 1 severe adverse reaction in every 74 doses at that point. Why did the MHRA do nothing? At this point, Norway and Denmark and Iceland start to suspend AstraZeneca.
They also talk about the Pfizer and Moderna Public Assessment reports, and refer us back to those. They were certainly not as detailed as what the EU put out. The European Medicines Agency, who had 16 pages of references at the end of their report, there were no references in the Public Assessment Report.
And the other thing that they throw at us in their email is that 93% of the UK population had had one or more doses of the vaccines. But if you look at the UK HSA (Health and Safety Authority) in April, 22, 19.8 million had actually had no jab. That’s around 30% of people. So we keep getting the same old things told us. It’s as if the MHRA have had no increase in their understanding of the vaccines in the last three and a half years.
So what points did they bring up? They talk about the delivery of genetic material into a muscle through the mRNA vaccinations. They actually say it’s genetic material, they basically talk about the muscles still. So Doctor Byron Brindle in mid 2021, he actually exposed a Japanese distribution study, that all regulators would have seen, that says that the injection actually leaves the site; that it’s put into in the muscle and penetrates all tissues. They also talk about the harmless spike protein, and this obviously is not harmless. So this is the most toxic part of the virus that they’ve used. It’s about 5 to 10% of the virus we’re talking about here. They could have used the other 90%, but no, they used the most toxic part. And all vaccines were based on this same spike protein. And of course the spike is wrapped in a toxic cationic lipid nanoparticle, which tends to be highly inflammatory in the body. The licence is to protect the recipient from the Covid-19 infection. And basically it has been shown that the vaccines don’t stop transmission or infection, hospitalisation and death. They also talk about genetic material; ‘We know that there are DNA plasma contaminants in there, it’s rapidly degraded’, is what they talk about. But of course, we don’t know how much spike is produced. We don’t know how long it actually stays there and this is all complicated by having multiple shots. Also they talk about the mRNA not entering the nucleus. Doctor Bakdi has shown that cells that interact with the vaccines are becoming incorporated into the DNA. And on it goes.
Talking about the blood, they’re actually talking about evidence that it won’t have any effect from it being vaccinated blood. And I ask, have they learnt nothing from the contaminated blood scandal? And then just a quick look at the other question that I asked regarding the AstraZeneca withdrawal, and all I can point out here is that the study that had been done, the long term study, was about to be published. And this was supposed to be submitted in November 23.
And what they found out that all the factors more than doubled in the vaccinated group compared with placebo. And I suggest that this is the reason for the redraw of the vaccine. So that AstraZeneca withdrew it before this long term study could be published. And so next time somebody tells you that something is safe and effective, remind them that this study showed that there’s no long term safety data. And what is the EMA’s position on the safety of AstraZeneca? They don’t need to tell us now, because the study has been withdrawn.”
Watch; There’s a lot of questions about is it safe to get blood transfusions for people who had several of these mRNA shots The Jaxen Report, 17 June 2024;
“Because the studies continue, I’m going to go through one more here about blood transfusions. There’s a lot of questions about is it safe to get blood transfusions for people who had several of these mRNA shots? Researchers out of Japan looked at the safety concerns and they found six of them and I’ll list them right here;
Spike protein contamination is a concern. Contamination with amyloid aggregates and microthrombae, formed by spike proteins. Events attributable to decreased donor immune system and immune abnormalities due to the immune imprinting or class switch. We’ve talked about this, IgG-4 resulting from the multiple doses of these vaccines. Presence in lipid nanoparticles and pseudo uroninated mRNA. Contamination with aggregated red blood cells or platelets and then the memory B cells producing IgG-4 as well as the IgG-4 produced from them.
These are complex medical issues that are just now getting into the conversation for blood transfusion. A major change, and you got to wonder what the Red Cross and what hospitals are doing. Will this change anything? Are they going to just look the other way on this?”
Read; All Cause Mortality Higher in the COVID Vaccinated — New Study Sean Miller, Infowars, 1 July 2024;
‘A study published Sunday detailed how individuals who received the Covid vaccine were more likely to die, while their booster dose did nothing to help them.
In order to view the full study one must download the PDF file.
“…those vaccinated with one or two doses who had significantly higher risks than the unvaccinated,” the study said in the ‘Conclusion’ section. “We found all-cause death risks to be even higher for those vaccinated with one and two doses compared to the unvaccinated, and that the booster doses were ineffective. We also found a slight but statistically significant loss of life expectancy for those vaccinated with 2 or 3/4 doses.”
The researchers analysed data from the Italian province of Pescara for their paper.
The Covid shots are known to make people retarded, increase in lethality after repeated doses and double the death rate of Covid patients, while 74 percent of the vaccinated who’ve died were killed by the shots, yet the death rate is still higher than what is reported and they also increase Covid infection rates, result in tons of bizarre and unusual skin disorders, insane and gross turbo cancers, reproductive destruction, caused miscarriages, paralyzation, tinnitus, blood clots in the brain, non-serious disorders, death by neurological disorder, increased excess death rates, autoimmune disorders in the thyroid, as well as deadly headaches, seizures and heart inflammation including in children, while also causing the vaccinated people’s skin to ‘erupt’, in addition to a multitude of serious ailments seen in massive population studies and contain hundreds of times the allowable levels of DNA contamination leading to mutagenic effects, contaminating the blood supply, as well as permanently altering the DNA of the vaccinated and their offspring, but while some batches are worse than others, the injections are expected to kill people for a very long time into the future.
In the U.S. the CDC recommends that all Americans receive their Covid shot and that young children receive extra, as well as that all Americans now receive another shot, despite receiving them previously, while Canada recommends another Covid shot for the pregnant, indigenous, ‘racialized’ & ‘equity-deserving’.
Read or Listen; Moderna Confirms Link Between COVID mRNA Vaccines and Cancer The Exposé, 26 July 2024;
‘Moderna has admitted its mRNA COVID vaccine causes cancer after billions of DNA fragments were found in vials of the dangerous injection.
The revelation was made after Dr. Robert Malone recently made an appearance at an “Injuries Caused by COVID-19 Vaccines” hearing led by Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), at which he revealed how Moderna’s patent shows that its (COVID-19) “vaccine” vials contain billions of DNA fragments and other contaminants linked to birth defects and cancer.
By seeing through the propaganda that is already paving the way for a new plan-demic, you can resist the next jab.
Read; Countries are purchasing vaccines in preparation for a bird flu pandemic, Rhoda Wilson, The Exposé, 13 July 2024;
‘Yesterday Nature published an article summarising what countries are doing to prepare for a bird flu pandemic. Wealthy nations are purchasing vaccines against H5N1 influenza and boosting surveillance.
Nature expressed no concern that the pandemic of 2020 was declared on spurious grounds. Nor was Nature the slightest bit concerned that the vaccines rolled out for the alleged Covid pandemic are both unsafe and ineffective.The only concern Nature expressed was that low-income countries would be left behind in the race to procure vaccines. So, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (“CEPI”) is working to ensure that the response is “equitable” worldwide.
First, fear must be ramped up to make people concerned a pandemic might be possible with statements such as, ‘The highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 has so far been detected in 145 cattle herds and 4 farm workers in a dozen states across the United States. Researchers say many more cases in cows and people have probably gone undetected. The chances of quashing the outbreak get “more slim by the day,” says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada. Bird flu could become a human pandemic. How are countries preparing?’ Nature, 12 July 2024
Then the problem is presented. ‘Studies suggest that the virus is spreading between cows through contaminated milking equipment, rather than airborne particles. The biggest risk is that it could evolve to infect mammals more effectively, including through the respiratory system, which would make it more difficult to contain. Given the close and regular contact that cows have with people, airborne transmission could spark a pandemic. Bird flu could become a human pandemic. How are countries preparing?’ Nature, 12 July 2024
And finally, the pandemic-vaccine industry’s self-serving “solution” is offered:
‘Efforts to prepare for [the] possibility [of a pandemic] include risk assessments, modelling and outbreak predictions. “There is loads of planning and preparedness going on internationally,” says Michelle Wille, a virus ecologist at the University of Melbourne in Australia. A key focus of pandemic preparedness efforts is vaccines, which would protect people from getting ill should the virus spread more widely.
“Although the current public health risk is low, WHO is operating in a constant state of readiness for a potential influenza pandemic,” says Maria Van Kerkhove, who heads epidemic and pandemic preparedness and prevention at the WHO.
If we have learnt anything from the last four and a half years it is: DO NOT take the vaccines.’
Read; Unveiling the Sinister Agenda: The International Bird Flu Summit and the Next Man-Made Pandemic Truth About Cancer, 17 July 2024;
‘Are you ready for another man-made pandemic?
The upcoming International Bird Flu Summit, scheduled for October 2-3, 2024, is being promoted as a critical meeting for global public health officials, veterinarians, epidemiologists, and industry stakeholders to address the emergent threats posed by avian influenza, aka “bird flu.”
Beneath its seemingly noble mission lies a sinister agenda. Unless we get the word out and stop them, this summit is laying the groundwork for a new “pandemic,” eerily reminiscent of the COVID-19 scam, meticulously designed to tighten control over everyone on earth.
Are you braced to surrender more of your rights?
Let’s unveil the façade: behind the scenes, this summit seems geared towards engineering another fabricated health crisis, leveraging fear to justify heavy-handed tactics like forced vaccinations and an alarming erosion of personal freedoms. Just like COVID-19.
The Bird Flu Summit’s brochure reads like a déjà vu for those who still shudder at the memories of the COVID-19 era. Sessions such as “Surveillance and Data Management” and “Emergency Response Management” seem like a blast from the not-so-distant past, reminding us of the fear-mongering tactics and authoritarian measures employed back then.
The summit eagerly promotes enhanced surveillance systems, data-sharing initiatives, and the ominous utilisation of big data for early detection and response. This not-so-subtle emphasis on snooping around raises red flags about the looming spectre of heightened surveillance under the guise of safeguarding public health. Critics are rightfully concerned that this could pave the way for a dystopian future where privacy is a relic of the past, and every move we make is scrutinised and controlled.
The reality is that the H5N1 (bird flu) virus has been exaggerated as a significant threat for two decades. There was a strain of bird flu 20 years ago with a high fatality rate, killing about 60% of those infected, but according to Dr. Meryl Nass on her Substack, the virus has since mutated and is no longer as deadly.
Currently, bird flu continues to pose a minimal threat to humans. The Associated Press reported that only nine individuals have contracted bird flu, all through direct contact with infected birds, and they experienced mild symptoms with no hospitalizations. Additionally, the CDC noted that there have been no instances of human-to-human transmission of H5N1.
Nevertheless, the summit’s #1 topic is “Mass Fatality Management Planning,” which focuses on developing and maintaining plans for mass fatalities, conducting morgue operations, and directing fatality management tactical operations. This session raises concerns that the authorities are preparing for a large-scale loss of life, possibly from an engineered (aka “gain-of-function”) form of bird flu, which could be used to manipulate public perception and justify extreme government responses, such as lockdowns and enforced quarantines. Just like COVID-19.’
Covid19 was an experimental bioweapon and the so called vaccine an experimental prevention for our allies. Not only must we not be the military industrial complex’s guinea pigs but the whole bioweapons industry must be banned.
Watch; Is This In Fact A Bioweapon? Roger Marshall Grills Doctor About COVID-19 Origins Forbes Breaking News, 19 June 2024;
Senator Marshall; ‘Dr Abber is there a possibility that it could have been a dual purpose, that it could have been used as a bio-weapon?
Dr Abber; So the original SARS virus, SARS-CoV-1, is a tier one select agent in the United States, so it is in the group of pathogens and biological toxins that our federal government has identified as having high potential for use as a bio-weapon in bio-warfare, bio-terrorism or bio-crime. By definition therefore according to our federal government it is a bio-weapon agent. It is not a bio-weapon, but it is an agent that potentially could be used.
Senator Marshall; Is there any good reason to put this in the virus if you’re developing a vaccine?
Dr Abber; I would return to my general comment on gain of function research on potential pandemic pathogens. That research has no civilian practical application. Researchers undertake it because it is fast, it is easy, it requires no specialised equipment or skills and it was prioritised for funding and has been prioritised for publication by scientific journals. These are major incentives to researchers worldwide in China and in the US, the researchers undertake this research because it’s easy they get the money and they can get the papers.’
Sadly the Pandemic Treaty hasn’t gone away and the WHO is pushing hard to get it signed pre the corporate captured Democrats leave office and Trump interferes with Big Pharma’s totalitarian control over the world’s health.
Read; The WHO Pandemic Treaty Negotiations Continue — It’s Not Over Yet Need To Know, 21 July 2024;
‘Researcher James Roguski says that the World Health Organization (WHO) was not defeated and that half of it was adopted. He said the WHO Pandemic Treaty aims to be similar to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) that is an international treaty that was joined by all members of the United Nations (including the United States) and is open ended. Leaders meet every year at conferences and their decisions are pre-accepted as part of the framework. He explained how we got into the climate mess. Roguski said that the Pandemic Treaty negotiations are set for September and the end of the year when they hope to sign the agreement, while Biden is still in office. The bureaucrats behind the treaty said that they are on a “war footing” to bring an end to “vaccine apartheid” by building up pharmaceutical companies.’
Because of the liability shield enjoyed by vaccine manufacturers, the UK/US taxpayer foots the bill for Big Pharma’s vaccine injuries . Few will complain because we are told that it was the zoonotic Covid19 that made people sick, not the vaccine.
Read; Exclusive: U.S. Government ‘Saddled’ With COVID Vaccine Injury ‘Mess’ — While Vaccine Makers Avoid Liability The Defender, 18 July 2024;
‘As early as January 2022, National Institutes of Health (NIH) researchers were aware of at least 850 peer-reviewed case reports and/or research articles about COVID-19 vaccine reactions, according to emails obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).
In one email (name and agency redacted), NIH researchers were told the federal government was “saddled” with the “mess” of dealing with those injured by the COVID-19 vaccines, due to the liability shield enjoyed by vaccine manufacturers.
The emails, part of a 309-page batch of documents released to CHD on June 21, originated from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) request to NIH researchers for input on a report highlighting several injuries common among people who received the vaccines.
CHD requested the documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the NIH in November 2022. When the NIH hadn’t responded by April 2023, CHD sued the agency.
In an October 2023 settlement, the NIH agreed to produce up to 7,500 pages of documents at a rate of 300 pages per month.
The batch of documents released in June — which include emails to Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research — revealed that by fall 2021, key NIH researchers were aware of scientific studies on serious adverse events, including persistent neurological symptoms, following COVID-19 vaccines.
As with prior releases of the NIH documents, June’s tranche also included several emails from vaccine-injured individuals to NIH researchers, seeking help for their symptoms — with one person asking, “Why aren’t you studying vaccine injuries?”’
Russia/China Conflicts
The reason for the proxy war in Ukraine is to steal Ukraine and Russia’s resources.
Watch; We are sending missiles to Ukraine because we want their resources 27 June 2024;
‘Senator Lindsey Graham this weekend finally told the truth and admitted the real reason we are sending billions of dollars to Ukraine in training and weapons.
Listen, either we’re going to help Ukraine or we’re not. It’s now time to give them the F-16s, let them fly the planes, long range artillery to hit targets inside of Russia. They’re sitting on ten to $12 trillion of critical minerals in Ukraine. They could be the richest country in all of Europe.
I don’t want to give that money and those assets to Putin to share with China. If we help Ukraine now, they can become the best business partner we ever dreamed of. That $10 to $12 trillion of critical assets could be used by Ukraine and the west, not given to Putin and China. This is a very big deal how Ukraine ends.
Let’s help them win a war we can’t afford to lose. Let’s find a solution to this war. But they’re sitting on a gold mine. To give Putin $10 or $12 trillion of critical minerals that he will share with China is ridiculous”.
Presenter; So, of course, it’s not about the Ukrainian people. All it was about the Ukrainian people. It’s about $10 trillion of resources. We don’t care about the Ukrainians.
It’s about the minerals. It’s about the resources that we plan to plunder and steal from them. Of course. And Russia is getting in the way to our strategic plans there.
So why are they playing with potential nuclear war over minerals and resources? Our next guest is holding a special emergency press conference this week in Washington, DC. It’s called, ‘the danger of nuclear war is real, and it must be stopped.’
For all those who think that Zelenski is a hero, send them this interview from an extremely brave Ukrainian journalist.
Watch: Ukrainian Journalist REVEALS Horrible Truths About Kiev-Regime; Vasyl Muravytskyi; Neutrality Studies; 30 Jul 2024 Interviews
Introduction; ‘The lie that Ukraine is defending democracy or standing up for “western values” has never been weaker. But now we are getting reports that not just journalistic publications critical of the Kiev-Regime are getting purged, ANYONE who dares to utter opinions not in line with the regime is getting persecuted, even for private conversations. Society is under total surveillance.
I’m talking to Vasyl Muravytskyi, a Ukrainian journalist who has been publishing highly critical reports about his government before and after the Euromaidan events back in 2014, for which he got in a lot of trouble. On 1 August 2017, he was arrested by Ukrainian law enforcement charged with high treason and spent 11 months in prison.’
Lavrov is an honest, intelligent and wise statesman. The reason we don’t have anyone of his calibre is because our politicians are captured by corporate money whose interests are economic growth on a finite planet. They oppose the interests of the vast majority of the world’s people.
Watch; Lavrov’s Bold Speech at the UN Causes Shockwaves Globally The Africa News Network, 16 July 2024;
‘Ladies and gentlemen, Your Excellencies, today the very foundations of the international legal order, strategic stability and the UN-centric system of global politics, are being put to the test. It will be impossible to resolve the conflicts that are multiplying, without getting to their root causes and restoring faith in our ability to join forces for the common good and justice for all. Let us be frank, not all states represented in this room recognise the key principle of the UN Charter, the sovereign equality of all states.
The United States has long, through the words of its presidents, declared its own exceptionalism. This also applies to Washington’s attitude towards its allies, from whom it demands unquestioning obedience, even to the detriment of their national interests. Rule America, that is the essence of the notorious rule-based order which is a direct threat to multilateralism and international law. The most important components of international law, the UN Charter, and the decisions of our Council, are interpreted by the collective West in a perverse and selective manner, depending on what instructions are handed down from the White House, and many Security Council resolutions are outright ignored.
These include Resolution 2202 which endorsed the Minsk Agreements on Ukraine and Resolution 1031 which endorsed the Dayton agreement on peace in Bosnia and Herzogovinia on the basis of the principle of equal rights for the three constituent peoples and the two entities. The sabotage of Resolutions on the Middle East can be discussed endlessly.’
Watch; Lavrov’s Stunning Press Conference On Multipolarity Neutrality Studies, 26 July 2024;
Presenter; “Lavrov gave a press conference at the UN headquarter in which he touched on many important topics, including Russia’s position on peace negotiations with Ukraine and the horrible situation in Gaza. The full press conference is here:
But one aspect I found particularly interesting, which is how Russia sees multipolarity arising now naturally and how Moscow is supporting this process. I clipped these parts together so you can get an idea of what to expect from Russia in this multilateral and organic process.”
Lavrov; “When they repeat like a mantra ‘we will support Ukraine for as long as it takes’, I’m curious, how long will it take? Like in Afghanistan where it took twenty years to realise that you lost, or in Iraq where you also left, although now you are trying to stay despite the Iraqi parliament’s decision that the US should withdraw its troops, or like in Libya where the state collapsed and now everyone is trying to piece it back together. A multipolar world is a reality. It’s not something someone invented”.
Presenter; “The core issue as Mr Lavrov presented is this rules-based International order system, which is not international law, which is not equal and fair to all the member states. It is as Chas Freeman, in a brilliant talk that I uploaded about a week ago explained.
The rules-based international order is the principle of rule by law that you use in order to make everybody follow, and you keep saying what the law is, and you have to follow follow follow, but only the groups of targets have to follow that you designate as such, and other groups you completely exempt from that. You exempt yourself often. And the rules of the rules by-law, are never spelled out. They are never written down because as soon as they’re written down, you would actually run the risk that you have to follow those as well. You just claim that they are there and then designate who has to follow what’s apparently being said. But there are constant exemptions for yourself and your buddies. It’s the opposite of the rule of law where the law is written down.
And we have international law, but we see time and again, how the US, how Europe, how NATO is breaking these rules and that’s why they don’t call them rules for them. I said things use this differently, either you have a differential understanding of who has to follow what kind of rules and that is something a lot of other countries around the globe, in the global South, don’t accept. They see it, they understand it and they intuitively now rally against it. And they try to do something about it. The harder the US is trying to push this down the throats of everybody, the harder the counter reaction is coming and the more they will start building at the frameworks that will allow them to escape”
Important message from the wisest leader in the EU.
Watch; ‘Europeans should come to their senses before it’s too late’: Hungary’s Orban warns of EU’s demise The Economic Times, 27 Jul 2024;
‘Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orban said on Saturday Russia’s leadership was “hyper rational” and that Ukraine would never be able to fulfil its hopes of becoming a member of the European Union or NATO. Orban, a nationalist in power since 2010, made the comments during a speech in which he forecast a shift in global power away from the “irrational” West towards Asia and Russia. “In the next long decades, maybe centuries, Asia will be the dominant centre of the world,” Orban said, mentioning China, India, Pakistan and Indonesia as the world’s future big powers. “And we Westerners pushed the Russians into this bloc as well,” he said in the televised speech before ethnic Hungarians at a festival in the town of Baile Tusnad in neighbouring Romania’.
‘Democracy’ in Ukraine was overthrown by the CIA in the Maidan coup in 2014, then hi-jacked to suit the interests of NATO, US corporations and Ukrainian nazis. In his election campaign Zelensky promised to negotiate a peace accord with Russia, only to suddenly terminate the peace talks in 2022 on instructions from NATO via Boris Johnson, condemning his people to a proxy war that has sacrificed a generation of young Ukrainians for the business interests of a few US corporations poised to ransack Ukrainian, and ultimately Russian assets.
Watch; How thousands of Ukrainian men are trying to dodge the conflict Ukraine War, Sky News; 11 Apr 2024;
‘Thousands of Ukrainian men are trying to flee the country to avoid getting drafted into the war with Russia.
It comes as the country lowers the conscription age from 27 to 25 due to a lack of soldiers fighting on the frontline.
Sky’s John Sparks spoke to a draft-dodger who is preparing to flee Ukraine through the mountains and the smuggler who’s helping men out before they get conscripted.’
Update on the West’s proxy war;
Watch; Scott Ritter REVEALS: NATO Base- Ukraine Weapons Depot Obliterated, U.S Move Makes Russia Worried; Knitting Örgü; 28 Jul 2024
“The basic premise of American existence today in terms of sustaining its current geopolitical status and its economic status is premised on continued conflict. We are not a nation, we’re like sharks. The old theory that if a Ydezenhe shark isn’t swimming, if it stands still, it’s going to die because it needs to have continual motion to flow the water through its gills. I know people are going to say, Scott, that’s not true. I’m just throwing that out as an analogy.
The point is the United States, we need to keep swimming through conflict. Our economy doesn’t work as a peacetime economy. Look at the way we brag about providing aid to Ukraine. The number one selling point wasn’t ‘we’re doing the right thing and we’re trying to help a democracy.’ That comes later.
‘The money’s not actually going to Ukraine. It’s going into America. Jobs, jobs. It’s about jobs, about building weapons for jobs’. If you think about that, that’s sick.
If the health of the American economy is premised on the need to build weapons so that we can feed conflicts abroad, there’s a fundamental problem with the way America works, and there is a fundamental problem with the way America works. The Rules Based International Order that we seek to sustain, again, is premised on America imposing its will on the world economically, politically, and when that fails, as it often does, militarily, constant conflict. China’s signature international relations, is not some alliance with a group of nations, it’s the Belt and Road initiative. It’s about going out there and building global infrastructure. Yeah. To China’s benefit. Of course. China’s not a philanthropy. It’s not giving away its money, but it’s helping. It’s in a mutually beneficial relationship to invest in the development of other nations. America, NATO, there it is. NATO. That’s what we are, baby, NATO. And it’s not a defensive alliance. It’s an offensive alliance. It’s an alliance that is expanding its region in the Pacific. That’s what defines America in terms of foreign policy nowadays. The G7, which is literally the economic extension of NATO. So if America would just stop behaving the way it does, we wouldn’t be in this position.
So what can we do? How do we get America to stop behaving the way it does? That’s a tall order, because the very survival of America, as it currently exists, requires this behaviour to take place. So America would have to retool, reevaluate its position in the world, do a lot of inner searching that we don’t seem to be too capable of doing.
The only way we can get America to actually change in terms of this direction heading towards nuclear war, is ‘scare the hell out of the American people’. A Lot of people have accused me, ‘Scott, you’re being irresponsible, you’re promoting this, that and the other thing’. Hey, I’m sorry guys, I don’t really give a damn because if I’m wrong, I just wasted hot air. But if I’m right, and I don’t scare the people, then we don’t change policy and we all die.
And if you keep looking at the news, maybe you’ll understand that we are all going to die. We do that eventually, but we’d like to leave a world for our children, to leave a world for their children, and so on and so on. That’s sort of what societies are about, sustainable societies. When I say die, I mean all die in a nuclear holocaust, which is going to happen very soon if we don’t change the way we’re doing things.”
Watch; How will US political upheaval influence Ukraine John Mearsheimer, Alexander Mercouris Glenn Diesen The Duran, 27 July 2024;
Mearsheimer; “Boris Johnson is as delusional today as he was in March April 2022. I wonder if these people ever take a course in Strategy 101? Do they understand how International politics works? Its truly just remarkable. He is not to be taken seriously except as an indicator of how delusional the West is in general. Second point is essential and we have been remarkably foolish not to talk to the Russians at all, all along. So we all agree on that.
If you’re the Russians, we’re playing the Russian’s hand, you’ll want to get everything you possibly can.
You cannot trust the West at all. Putin has made it clear on numerous occasions that he was foolish to have trusted the West in the past. All this talk about Trump is pro-Russian and Trump didn’t support the Ukrainians. Trump ended up arming the Ukrainians. He is the one who decided that that United States and the West more generally would arm the Ukrainians in 2017. And he ended up as supportive of Ukraine as his predecessors. So Trump was no great anomaly with regard to US relations toward Ukraine. And if im Putin, i dont care if Trump, or Biden or Harris is in the White House. It doesn’t matter to me. And further more, even if you tend to trust Trump, Trump is not forever. Trump will be in the White House for 4 years and you cannot be sure his replacement will be some second incarnation of Joe Biden or whoever and you’re back to square one. So, if you’re the Russians, in my opinion, you want to grab as much territory as you can without running into those areas where there’s lots of ethnic Ukrainians. If I’m the Russians, I’d want to take more than the four oblasts that they have now annexed. I’d want to take more territory. I’d like to make sure that Ukraine cant become part of NATO. And i go to great lengths to sever security relations between the West and Ukraine. Probably the best way to do that is to put significant limits on how big the Ukrainian military ? will push very hard in this direction. This is to say the Russians are going to drive a very hard bargain. From their point of view, not from the West’s point of view, it’s the smart thing to do. It’s going to be very difficult to get the West, whether Trump is in the White House or Harris is in the White House, to reach a deal that makes the Russians happy. I hope that i am wrong, but that’s my sense.”
Palestine/Israel
Brave journalist reporting from the front line of settler colonists invading and stealing Palestinian land – so much for the 2 state solution.;
Watch; Illegal Settlers Marching to Occupy Palestinian Lands Nomadic Voyager, 28 July 2024;
“The settlers are marching towards an illegal settlement at the top of this hill, which they were forced to leave under the last government. But they’re now being escorted by members of the new far right government as well as the Israeli military. The new government has already allowed nine illegal outposts to become sanctioned settlements.
So behind me is Ben-Gvir, Israel’s national security minister. He’s been previously charged with incitement to racial hatred for being part of a terrorist organisation. But now he’s actually in Israel’s government, and he’s here supporting the settlers. On this march, Ben-Gvir has openly praised soldiers who’ve killed Palestinians.”
The mad, bad Israel project is heading for defeat, but in its collapse, how much of the Middle East will it take with it.
Watch; Scott Ritter: Netanyahu SCARED After Ankara Declares It Will ATTACK Israel If IDF INVADES Lebanon; Lan Handmade;interviewed by George Galloway; 29 Jul 2024
“Israel not only will not win a war against Hezbollah, Israel will be destroyed by a war with Hezbollah. Because it won’t just be a war with Hezbollah. The gloves will come off everywhere. Iran has already said if Israel engages in a large scale conflict with Hezbollah and Lebanon, that it will enter and it will be a war of annihilation. This is what we’re talking about, the literal annihilation of the israeli state.
Egypt is massing troops at Rafah. If you think for a second; if Israel gets involved in a decisive, all encompassing conflict with Hezbollah in the north, that Egypt will stand by idol in the south, think again. Nations that never would have thought of confronting Israel will jump on the Israeli carcass like a starving jackal because there is a lot of animosity in the Middle East. Israel has built up a deep reservoir of hatred. And as Israel goes down, and it will go down, it is going down.
Israel will not survive what it has started. But Israel has a choice now to allow for the peaceful collapse of Zionism, because Zionism’s day is over. It is finished. It is done. It is disgraced.
As an ideology. The world will not tolerate it. We are on the path toward a Palestine. It may take some time, but that’s the direction we’re heading. Or Israel can accelerate not only the timing of its defeat, but the scope and scale of the violence that will be attached to this defeat.
If Israel goes to war against Hezbollah, Israel will be destroyed from the top to the bottom, from the river to the sea. That is a guarantee. The Israeli defence force knows it. And here’s where it gets dangerous, because Israel has factored in such a scenario, and it’s called the Samson option, and that’s the use of Israeli nuclear force. So for all the people out there cheering, saying, ‘yeah, I can’t wait till Hezbollah and Iran take it to Israel’, understand these sick genocidal maniacs are prepared.
These are the same people who embraced the Hannibal doctrine, the Hannibal directive; they kill their own people. They kill their own people, and they will take everybody down with them if it gets to that. So this is a very frightening moment right now in world history. This isn’t a continuation of low scale warfare, because, let’s be honest, what happened in Lebanon in the nineties and the eighties, the nineties that led to Israel’s withdrawal was low scale warfare.
Even August of 2006, low scale warfare. What we’re talking about right now is nation termination. The scope and scale of the violence will be unimaginable on both sides. Lebanon will be devastated by this conflict, absolutely destroyed, because Israel will go down kicking and screaming. And at the last moment, when it becomes clear that the zionist enterprise is about to collapse beneath the weight of the military might arrayed against it, they will lash out using their nuclear weapons.”
Though Roger Waters and Piers Morgan agree on the fundamental premise that Palestinians should have ‘exactly the same human, religious, civil, and legal rights, as all Israeli jews from the river to the sea’, they have very different views on the future of Palestine and the world. So the rest of the discussion is fascinating, fiery and when Morgan is his rude bratish self, it’s fabulous to hear Waters tell him to stop shouting, stop interrupting and to shut up.
Watch; “I’m Not Antisemitic” Roger Waters vs Piers Morgan On Israel-Palestine & More Piers Morgan Uncensored, 7 July 2024;
A powerful voice speaking truth to power;
Watch; “Get out of Palestine, it’s not your country” Sir Alan Duncan to Israel Middle East Eye, 17 July 2024;
“The principal message to Israel is, ‘Get out of Palestine. It’s not your country.’
I thought the recent comments from what was then the Conservative government effectively rejecting The ICC and its process was itself not acceptable. If we are signatories to an international treaty which has set up a Court, we should follow and support that Court. The same applies to the United nations. So what we’ve seen over the last few years is the rise of politicians who think they can challenge the propriety of institutions of which they are a part or to which they are a signatory.
That’s not acceptable.
I’m in a minority because most people don’t dare, because they’d rather have an easy life. But most people don’t know. I think there’s a real lack of understanding about the history and the facts. And it’s very difficult to teach people when so many of them as candidates, now members of parliament, have been on paid trips to Israel, supported or paid for by the Conservative Friends of Israel. Well, they’re basically brainwashed. And then they don’t dare depart from that for fear of aggressive attacks on so many levels. So a lot of people are bullied into this.”
The UNICJ’s order to end Israel’s occupation is excellent but the ability to enforce its judgements is flawed. Hence the Palestinians’ right to take up arms to demand equality of rights for all religions and ethnicity between the river and the sea in Historic Palestine. And nations and citizens across the globe should Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS) all Israeli owned business and products.
Read; UN Court orders Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian territories; The Guardian, 19 July 2024;
‘The UN’s International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Israel to end its occupation of the Palestinian territories “as rapidly as possible” and make full reparations for its “internationally wrongful acts” in a sweeping and damning advisory opinion that says the occupation violates international law.
In a historic, albeit non-binding, opinion, the Court found multiple breaches of international law by Israel including activities that amounted to apartheid.
It will make sobering reading for Israel’s allies, with the Court advising that other states are under an obligation not to recognise the occupation as lawful nor to aid or assist it.
Reading the Court’s opinion on Friday, the president of the ICJ, Nawaf Salam, said: “The Court considers that the violations by Israel of the prohibition of the acquisition of territory by force and of the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination have a direct impact on the legality of the continued presence of Israel, as an occupying power, in the occupied Palestinian territory.
“The sustained abuse by Israel of its position as an occupying power, through annexation and an assertion of permanent control over the occupied Palestinian territory and continued frustration of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, violates fundamental principles of international law and renders Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territory unlawful.”
The UN Secretary General, António Guterres, would promptly transmit the advisory opinion to the 193-member world body and “it is for the General Assembly to decide how to proceed in the matter”, UN deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq said.
The Secretary General reiterated his call for Israel and the Palestinians to engage “on the long-delayed political path towards ending the occupation and resolving the conflict in line with international law, relevant UN resolutions and bilateral agreements”, the spokesperson said.
Breaches of international law identified by the Court included:
– Forcible evictions, extensive house demolitions and restrictions on residence and movement.
– The transfer by Israel of settlers to the West Bank and East Jerusalem and maintenance of their presence.
– Its failure to prevent or to punish attacks by settlers.
– Restricting the access of the Palestinian population to water.
– Israel’s use of the natural resources in the occupied Palestinian territory.
– The extension of Israel’s law to the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
The Hague Court found Israel was in breach of article 3 of the international convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination (CERD), which says: “Parties particularly condemn racial segregation and apartheid and undertake to prevent, prohibit and eradicate all practices of this nature in territories under their jurisdiction.”
As well as ordering an end to the occupation as soon as possible, the Court, which consists of 15 judges, said Israel must put an end to all unlawful acts, including ceasing all new settlement activity and repealing legislation that maintains the occupation, including that which discriminates against Palestinians or seeks to modify the demographic composition of any parts of the occupied territory.
Salam said reparations included restitution, compensation and/or satisfaction, defining the former as “Israel’s obligation to return the land and other immovable property, as well as all assets seized from any natural or legal person since its occupation started in 1967, and all cultural property and assets taken from Palestinians and Palestinian institutions, including archives and documents”.
“It also requires the evacuation of all settlers from existing settlements and the dismantling of the parts of the wall constructed by Israel that are situated in the occupied Palestinian territory, as well as allowing all Palestinians displaced during the occupation to return to their original place of residence.”
He said where reparations were not materially possible, compensation should be paid instead.
Philippe Sands KC, who acted as counsel for Palestine in the proceedings, said: “This is as clear and far-reaching ruling as I have come across from this Court.
“Its legal consequences are entirely without ambiguity, its political consequences far-reaching.
“Among the many practical consequences, the Court has made clear its view, by an overwhelming majority, that the US and other embassies in Jerusalem are illegal and must be removed for international law to be respected.”’
Zionist billions are funding NGOs that have infiltrated every aspect of Palestinian as well as US and EU lives.
Watch; UN Watch is a zionist regime asset; Palestine Declassified, 6 July 2024;
David Miller; “It (U.N. Watch) is a front for the American Jewish Committee, as the AJC website made clear in 2001, announcing that UN Watch was fully integrated into the AJC. So when he (Neuer) claimed that the zionist regime did not fund UN Watch, either directly or indirectly, this is misleading.”
Neuer; “No money whatsoever, directly or indirectly from the Israeli government”.
Miller; “This is because the AJC has closely collaborated with the zionist entity for many decades. At one point, the AJC established a Jewish minorities research bureau which was staffed and run by a regime intelligence agency and headed by Moshe Decter. So reports on the links between UN Watch and Israeli intelligence are not Hamas propaganda. In addition, significant data on the funding is publicly available thanks to the Palestinian Return Center, which commissioned a report on how UN Watch and other zionist lobby groups were conducting a sabotage strategy against the esteemed NGO at the United Nations.”
Watch; The Zionist Movement in Britain: David Miller and Vanessa Beeley UK Column Live, 10 July 2024;
David Miller; “I think there’s been a lot of misunderstanding about what people usually call the Israel lobby and the broader zionist movement, which is what I tend to bang on about quite a lot. And I think it’s really very important for us to understand what the difference is between the Israel lobby, the zionist movement. The Israel lobby, easily defined as all those groups in western countries, in the US, UK, France or Germany, wherever else, who are engaged in attempting to influence policy, either domestic policy or foreign policy, in the interests of zionism, or more specifically, the regime in occupied Palestine, the zionist regime. So that’s organisations which might be in the political parties, like, for example, Conservative Friends of Israel or Labour Friends of Israel in the UK. Or they might be think tanks like the neo-con think tanks that there are in the UK, Policy Exchange, the Henry Jackson society, etcetera.
Or there might be other kinds of lobbying influence groups like BICOM, for example, Britain Israel Communications and Research Center, which is there to influence the media in favour of pro zionist narratives and talking points. Now, all these organisations, one can say, are the Israel lobby, and we can also note other organisations like the Board of Deputies or the Jewish Leadership Council, which are all pro-Israel organisations or umbrellas. And everyone really would admit that those are organisations which are part of a lobby to pursue zionist ideas.
I should say, of course, that is the way in which the Israel lobby is conceptualised by almost everybody who’s talked about it in the academic literature, in particular, most obviously, Mearsheimer and Walt, in their path breaking book called The Israel Lobby in 2006. And that’s the kind of definition they use. In the US they have similar kinds of organisations, for example, think tanks like the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, or WINEP (Washington Institute for Near East Policy), or a whole range of others, or the ADL, the Anti Defamation League and others.
But there’s something more to what I would call the zionist movement than just those organisations. And if you look at Mearsheimer and Walt’s book, for example, you find that the main zionist organisations in the US are either not in the index or only covered fleetingly. I would try to explain that by giving you an indication of what the zionist movement is and how that relates to the lobby.
So the zionist movement is, of course, famously a movement set up at the end of the 19th century through an organisation called the Zionist Organisation. And they had big international conferences in Switzerland and in the UK and in other places, indeed in America as well, much later. And that organisation became, in the middle part of the last century, the World Zionist Organisation. So it’s telling you something significant there, it’s not just that it was a zionist organisation, it’s now saying it’s a world zionist organisation. Of course, they don’t have members in every country in the world. They have members in roughly 45 countries.
But we can come back to that in more detail later and associated with the zionist movement, the aim of which was to set up a jewish state in the historic territory of Mandate Palestine, So the zionist organisation is at the top, the World Zionist Organization, and it has a number of other organisations which are there to help to construct the zionist settler project. So, for example, they have the Jewish National Fund, which is there to expropriate, steal, buy land in Palestine for Jews to settle on, and only Jews. And then, of course, there’s the Jewish Agency, which is a mechanism to try and secure jews from outside Palestine and move them to settle, to become settler colonists in Palestine.
And then, of course, there’s the third organisation, which makes up the four organisations which are at the head of the zionist movement, the Keren Hayesod, which was devoted to providing the money for doing all those tasks. So there’s four organisations which are at the peak of the zionist organisation, World Zionist Organization, and the zionist movement. And they then have affiliate organisations in every country in which the zionist movement is organised. So in order for there to be a jewish state, they created this thing called the movement.”
Read; Tweet from David Miller X, 12 July 2024;
‘This is a good piece by Tony Greenstein on the weakness of the Palestine solidarity movement on the question of zionism. The Palestine Solidarity Campaign is so scared of the z-word, that it was removed from its constitution. Tony also claims that this is a weakness of the Corbyn movement too (including specifically Jeremy Corbyn himself). Have a read of this passage in particular. We cannot win Palestinian rights without understanding that they require the ending of zionism and thus that we must build an explicitly anti-zionist movement. Only anti-zionists are real supporters of Palestine.’
Tony Greenstein; “In 2022 I resigned, for the second time, from the organisation I had helped found, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), because it had adopted, in March of that year, a new constitution which eliminated its previous opposition to zionism. If the truth be told, opposition to zionism had long been abandoned by PSC. But by removing this from its constitution PSC made explicit what before had been implicit.
Prior to its March 2022 annual general meeting (when the PSC executive railroaded through the changes) the PSC’s old constitution had included an unambiguous clause stating that one of the group’s objectives was “opposition to racism, including … the apartheid and zionist nature of the Israeli state.”
The new constitution has watered this down significantly, stating only that Israel’s system of apartheid and settler colonialism is “motivated by zionism,” without explaining PSC’s position on zionism. The argument privately used by the PSC to “justify” this change was that zionism means different things to different people.
Zionism is the racist creed and movement which led to the dispossession and expulsion of the Palestinians.
It was the failure of former Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, and much of the Labour left, to combine support for the Palestinians with opposition to zionism that was their Achilles’ heel. It was no surprise that the Jewish Labour Movement and its faithful poodle Jon Lansman wanted to abolish any mention of zionism.
Their reasoning was that some people used the term “zionist” when they really meant “Jew.” But it was the zionists themselves who had deliberately sought to confuse the distinction in the minds of people.
Their other argument was that “zionism” covered a multitude of sins – from left to right, obscuring the fact that all wings of zionism agreed on establishing a Jewish state with a large majority of Jews.
Corbyn was undoubtedly a supporter of the Palestinians but he had no understanding of zionism and could not therefore explain why or how the Palestinians had become marginalised and oppressed in Israel.’
Watch; shocking footage of Israeli drone bombing Palestinian family as they were travelling by horse and cart; Blackbeard MMA, 18 July 2024;
Listen; The Grayzone live: Government by gunplay Max Blumenthal, 20 July 2024;
Blumenthal; “The RNC (Republican National Convention) was a mixed bag, on that note of imperial violence and the post 9/11 thirst for war in the Middle east, the RNC was a mixed bag. I would say it was refreshing to see some speakers at the RNC question war, and that’s simply a response to their constituents and republican base, which is just fed up, which became fed up with committing men and material to wars like Iraq. And they’re questioning Ukraine.
But at the same time, the preponderance of pressure and influence from the zionist billionaire class on the Republican Party is so extreme that you have this kind of schizophrenic approach of Trump or other speakers, even JD Vance, questioning the logic of pumping more billions into Ukraine. And at the same time, Trump appeared to threaten to attack the Gaza Strip”
Trump; “I tell you this, we want our hostages back, and they better be back before I assume office, or you will be paying a very big price.”
Blumenthal; “Who are our hostages? I thought they were Israeli. And then what is the big price? He’s threatening Hamas. I don’t think it will come to that. But this was, you know, part of the Miriam Adelson, the mega donor who’s pledged $100 million to Trump. Trump similarly issued threats to Iran, kind of promises to starve Iran.”
Trump; “Iran was broke. Iran had no money. Now Iran has $250 billion. They made it all over the last two and a half years. They were broke. I told China and other countries, if you buy from Iran, we will not let you do any business in this country, and we will put tariffs on every product you do send in of 100% or more. And they said to me, well, I think that’s about it. They weren’t going to buy any oil, and they were ready to make a deal. Iran was going to make a deal with us. And then we had that horrible, horrible result that we’ll never let happen again. The election result, we’re never going to let that happen again. They used Covid to cheat.”
Blumenthal; “But this underscores why Biden and his team are just so negligent, because they could have reversed what Trump did, return to the Iran deal or something like it, but they chose to continue his policy because they’re feckless and they have no political courage.”
The truly evil atrocities Israelis are committing on the Palestinains could not be sustained if it wasn’t for the support they are receiving from the US, UK and EU governments. The vast majority of brainwashed Isreali citizens endorse this genocide but no one outside the zionists want this war and definitely don’t want to fund it – shining a light on the failure of democracy.
Read or Listen; Israeli soldiers tell story of savage cruelty in Gaza – one hidden from western publics; Jonathan Cook, 19 July 2024;
‘They just keep coming. On the weekend, Israel launched another devastating air strike on Gaza, killing at least 90 Palestinians and wounding hundreds more, including women, children and rescue workers. Once again, Israel targeted refugees displaced by its earlier bombs, turning an area it had formally declared a “safe zone” into a killing field. And once more, western powers shrugged their shoulders. They were too busy accusing Russia of war crimes to have time to worry about the far worse war crimes being inflicted on Gaza by their Israeli ally – with weapons they supplied.
The atrocity committed at al-Mawasi camp, packed with 80,000 civilians, had the usual Israeli cover story – one rolled out to reassure western publics that their leaders are not the utter hypocrites they appear to be for supporting what the World Court has described as a “plausible genocide”.
Israel said it was trying to hit two Hamas leaders – one of them Mohammed Deif, head of the group’s military wing – although Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seemed uncertain as to whether the strike was successful.
No one in the western media appeared to wonder why the pair preferred to make themselves a target in an overcrowded, makeshift refugee camp, where they were at huge risk of being betrayed by an Israeli informant, rather than sheltering in Hamas’s extensive tunnel network. Or why Israel deemed it necessary to fire a multitude of massive bombs and missiles to take out two individuals. Is that Israel’s new, expansive redefinition of a “targeted assassination”?
Or why its pilots and drone operators continued the strikes to hit emergency rescue crews dealing with the initial destruction. Was there intelligence that Deif was not just hiding in the camp, but had hung around to dig out survivors, too?
Or how killing and maiming hundreds of civilians in an attempt to hit two Hamas fighters could ever possibly satisfy the most basic principles of international law. “Proportion” and “distinction” require armies to weigh the military advantage of an attack against the expected toll on civilian life.
In recent days, Israel has struck several United Nations schools serving as shelters, killing dozens more Palestinians. On Tuesday, another strike in the “safe zone” of al-Mawasi killed 17.
According to the UN refugee agency, Unrwa, more than 70 percent of its schools – almost all of them serving as refugee shelters – have been bombed.
Last week, western doctors who had volunteered in Gaza said Israel was packing its weapons with shrapnel to maximise injuries to those caught in the blast radius. Children, because of their smaller bodies, were being left with much more severe wounds.
Shoot-everyone policy
If that was not clear enough already, six Israeli soldiers recently stepped forward to speak out about what they had witnessed while serving in Gaza – a story the western media has entirely failed to report. Their testimonies, published by the Israel-based publication 972 last week, confirm what Palestinians have been saying for months.
Commanders have authorised their troops to open fire on Palestinians at will. Anyone entering an area the Israeli military is treating as a “no-go zone” is shot on sight, whether man, woman or child.
Back in March, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz warned that the Israeli military had created just such “kill zones”, where anyone entering was executed without warning.
A soldier named B told 972 that the Israeli army enjoyed “total freedom of action”, with soldiers expected to shoot directly at any Palestinian approaching their positions, rather than a warning shot in the air: “It’s permissible to shoot everyone, a young girl, an old woman.”
When civilians were ordered to evacuate from a school serving as a shelter in Gaza City, B added, some mistakenly exited right towards the soldiers, rather than to the left. That included children. “Everyone who went to the right was killed – 15 to 20 people. There was a pile of bodies.”
Any activist working against the settler occupation is a potential target for arrest, imprisonment, torture or death.
Watch; Freed by Hamas from Israel’s jails The Grayzone, 16 July 2024;
‘Reporter; While over 100 Israelis are being held captive in Gaza, Israel is holding over 10,000 Palestinians in its own jails. More than 3,000 of these Palestinians were arrested and detained without charge, trial, or the ability to appeal. The State of Israel calls this type of procedure administrative detention. It’s reserved for Palestinians who engage in any type of political activity or speech against Israeli occupation and their family members. What it amounts to is official kidnapping.
Tala Nasir; “My name is Tala Nasir, I am a lawyer working at Addameer for prisoner support and human rights organisations. We provide legal aid for detainees and prisoners. We also monitor and document the violations against prisoners and then do the advocacy work locally and internationally in Palestine”.
Reporter; “Prisoner support NGOs that investigate torture, abuse, forced disappearances, and attempt to provide legal services to Palestinians, are designated by the israeli state as terrorist organisations. One of the groups that Israel designates as terrorists is called Addameer. It’s run by Palestinian lawyers from an office in Ramallah, the de facto capital of Palestine.”
Tala Nasir; “The Israeli authorities designated my organisation as a terrorist organisation. This means that they can arrest me or my colleagues and charge us with affiliation with a terrorist organisation. And of course, they did this without presenting any evidence on why we are a terrorist organisation? It’s only because of the work we do, they raided our offices two years ago, and they confiscated material. They confiscated laptops, files, legal files, and so on. So, yes, they always target us. But regarding all this, we are continuing with our work because we are defending a cause which we believe in, the Palestinian political prisoners. That’s why we are continuing with our work. Even regarding the threats we have.”
Reporter; “Since October 7, Addameer’s caseload has grown exponentially with military raids on Palestinian communities in the West bank and occupied Jerusalem. Every day, an unprecedented number of Palestinians are being detained and thrown in prison without charge.”
Tala Nasir; “They target especially the activists, political activists, political leaders, journalists, students, university students, and school students. Many of the detainees are detained because of practising the right to freedoms of speech and political speech and so on. Some of the detainees have posted religious statements on their social media, and they were arrested because of that. Some others posted pictures of children killed, children in Gaza or so on.
And they will get arrested because of these posts. Every day they are arresting, raiding villages, refugee campsites, cities, and arresting as many people as they can and putting them under this administrative detention law. If they had the chance, they will take every Palestinian on this land. And you have to know this, like, if they have the capacity in prisons, and at this time especially, they would take every Palestinian”.
Reporter; “Torture, humiliation and starvation are commonplace for Palestinians in israeli prisons.”
Watch; Starmer to ban independent MP’s as a favour to the Israel Lobby? DamoRants, 16 July 2024;
‘Right, so we’ve seen a lot of disgruntled, frankly overly entitled former Labour MPs complaining that voters dared to vote them out and the one thing all of them appear to have latched onto, is that their opponents were liars, abusers, their supporters were bullies and behaved in an intimidating manner, when the truth of the matter was their party won a landslide in the General Election, so them losing their seats ought to tell them that a period of self reflection is in order.
Well things are taking a darker turn now, as those candidates who were successful, those independents who, against all the odds under a First Past The Post voting system, who won their seats may in fact be blocked from running again, as well as any other independents, due to said accusations and also, due to the nature of these Independents having won in no small part having stood on a pro Palestine, pro Gaza platform, now have the Israel Lobby demanding the current set of independent MPs and their supporters designated as extremists. Is the country about to see the level of authoritarianism they were warned would come under a Starmer government and with that same governing party so reliant on Israel Lobby donations, can they afford to not do as instructed, to what ends for us? ‘
Bobby Kennedy Jr and his family have long supported Native Americans and condemned the genocidal violence against them by white colonial settlers. So why does he turn his back on Palestinians when the zionists are stealing their land and committing genocide against them? Read the article below changing the word Native American with Native Palestinians. Like when his Dad won every Sioux vote in the 1968 S Dakota Primary, so Robert Kennedy Jr would not only get every US muslim vote but the votes of the millions that are horrified by the israeli genocide. By supporting the genocide in Gaza, Kennedy is supporting a racist, ethnic cleansing, land theft ideology. Palestinians want equality in the Palestine that has always existed between the River and the Sea just as the Native Americans rightly claim equality with their white settler colonists.Why the cognitive dissonance?
Listen; Native American Rights Panel with Chase Iron Eyes RFK Jr Podcast, 20 July 2024;
Robert Kennedy Jr; ‘I spent about 20% of my time over the 40 years as an environmental advocate working on native issues. I had a long background in this. My father and my uncle saw what had happened to Native Americans in our country. They recognise the genocide of Native Americans as the original sin of american democracy. They believe strongly in our country and american democracy, but they believe that we could never live up to our potential as the world’s exemplary democracy if we didn’t go back and make amends and reconcile in one way or another with the people who had made the ultimate sacrifice and laid the groundwork or the rise of our culture, our political culture in this country.
My father saw a Sioux family living in the burned out hulk of an automobile, and he cried. And it was one of the only times that people had actually seen him cry. And the words read throughout the Sioux reservation. He spent about six, seven hours there. I don’t know exactly how long, but he was keeping a group of white people, 20,000 white people were waiting for him at Rapid City. He kept them waiting all day. And his aides were panicking and saying, we got to leave here. Indians don’t vote anyway. And he said, you don’t know your candidate if you think that’s a good argument. But the last day of his life, he won South Dakota, which nobody had expected. And he won it because the Sioux came out and voted in unprecedented numbers, and he got almost 100% of the vote. I think there were two votes against him on the entire reservation.
There’s a reservation, a Pima reservation in Arizona and New Mexico. It is the sickest group of people in our country. Among the US Pimas, the average lifespan is 47 years. Eighty years ago, these were the healthiest people in our country. They had an 80 year lifespan.They were slim. There was zero diabetes. There was zero asthma. There was no chronic disease, and they were among the most long lived Americans. If you go across the border into Mexico, that’s how they look today.The Pimas in Mexico live to 70 or 80 years old. They have no diabetes. They have no obesity.They have no asthma. Right across that little fake line, the mexican border, Pimas on the north of that border are the sickest people in the world. And it’s because in Mexico, they’re eating their traditional foods. In our country, they’re being mass poisoned by white death.
And so this is a genocide. This is the final act of the indian genocide, which is you take the people who are now the poorest, highest unemployment, alcoholism rate, suicide rates, you take those people who are already besieged by all of these other social attacks and cultural attacks and poverty, and you then besiege them with poison food that is going to kill them. Everybody is going to die from it. And that’s what’s happening on the reservation.
I’m going to end that, but I’m going to start on the reservations by making sure we start teaching these kids how to be healthy and making it so that the companies that provide this poisoned food to them, that they can be held accountable in court, are poisoning people because they know it’s poison.’
Listen; Israel’s Cowardice, As Seen From Lebanon, w/ Ghadi Francis Rania Khalek Dispatches, 20 July 2024;
‘If every human in the region, if every so called Islam person really wanted to stand next to their brothers of Islam in Palestine, I’m talking about Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, but that actually, other than the political side, if everybody wanted to arm Palestinians, that would be the end of it. But nobody wants to say no to America.
And I wanted to get to just put one note. When we say the Israelis wanted an open war with Hezbollah, the Israelis are cowards. They don’t know anything about war. They can’t win any war. It’s an American war. We have seen that the Israelis are like, they bring mercenaries, cowards. They dance very well on TikTok. Other than that, we’ve seen them, some of them are speaking in their congress or whatever. You can see their clips about their tremendous mental health issues that they have because they know they’re fighting for no cause or no reason. They have been brought here to kill innocent people who have been born here to, like, a long line of families.
So in the end, the Israelis cannot do anything. It’s a matter of the American decision, I suppose, because they can stop giving them weapons that would be done in a year. They can stop giving them immunity and the UN and impunity. That will be done. They can stop funding all the organisations that are working to dehumanise Palestinians and media, and that will be done. They are the active part of the war. The Israelis are only the past, the very racist, barbaric, anti human, child killer pawns.
I’m so happy to feel when I see these young people, when I see these young Londoners angry for my people, I swear to God, it’s really relieving in too many ways. I can’t even start describing. It makes me feel seen as a race, as a human, as a country, as a person, as a Palestinian, as a Lebanese. It makes me feel like all the screaming that we have done and all the work that we have done has not gone in vain.’
Watch; Threatening Members of Congress politics in the wild, 22 July 2024;
‘I can’t believe I’m even reporting this. Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House, says he will arrest any members of Congress who dare to interrupt Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech inside of Congress next week. Again, he is threatening members of America’s Congress with arrest if they interrupt a foreign leader giving them advice on what to do. And look at this article.
It’s from the Times of Israel. How much power does a foreign country have over us, where american politicians would be arrested if they spoke out against that dictator, who’s apparently a dictator of America, too? No country in the world would ever allow something like this. Israel themselves would never allow the president of the United States to ever go visit their version of Congress, the Knesset, to give advice to them.
This is absurdity. And when Benjamin Netanyahu gives his speech on camera, it is also broadcasting to the world that Israel rules America.’
Great way to get those still asleep during the genocide in Gaza to wake up!
Watch; Christy Moore sings ‘Palestine’ 24 May 2024;
Please donate
Forgive me for pointing out that, while we receive some one-off donations, I am funding Farms Not Factories myself, and if we are to continue to fight the cruel, antibiotic-led factory farm system, we will need some regular donations from like-minded people. Please consider a monthly subscription of £2/month and help us support a network of smaller scale, humane and healthy UK pig farms, local abattoirs and butchers.
“Our message is simple, we want to help bring an end to this dangerous, inhumane system. Vote for real farming over factory farming.”
– Tracy Worcester, Director
Contents
Share This Article
Related ArticlesView All
Orchestrated Extermination of Independent Farmers
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
I Farm, You Eat
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
Home Grown Food Is Bad For The Climate!
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
Constant Lying
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
Farmers Not Robots
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
Vote to ‘Drain the Swamp’
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narrative that is censored in the mainstream media…. Read More