The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media. If you would like to keep up to date with the very latest information, then please follow me on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram or Telegram.
“The way you get democracy to function is by informing the public.” – Robert Kennedy Jr.
“Science is more than a body of knowledge. It is a way of thinking; a way of sceptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask sceptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be sceptical of those in authority, then, we are up for grabs for the next charlatan (political or religious) who comes rambling along.” – Carl Sagan
“Never worry about who will be offended if you speak the Truth. Worry about who will be misled, deceived and destroyed, if you do not.” and
”Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by and that has made all the difference.” – Robert Frost
Though the newsletter chapters interrelate, they are divided into five sections and have a common realisation that a cabal of corporate elites have captured global trade, global governance, mainstream and online media, and ultimately many of our minds.
As a stenographer, I link to an article or audio and paste a key paragraph or two. My most trusted websites are platforms for journalists who don’t compromise on the truth and have thereby been shunned by the mainstream media. These include; Local Futures, SUSTAIN, Farm Gate, Global Research, Children’s Health Defence, Geopolitical Economy Report, The Grayzone, Unlimited Hangout, 21st Century Wire, UK Column; The Duran, Robert F Kennedy podcast, The Jimmy Dore Show, Palestine Declassified, Alex Krainer, Mattias Desmet, Dr John Campbell, The Cradle, Quds News Network, The Grayzone News, The Electronic Intifada, Jonathan Cook, Richard Medhurst, The Light printed newspaper, and Russell Brand or follow us on Telegram, For The People, Assange News, Resistance News Network, Juan Sinmiedo, Resistance News Network, B’Tselem, Pepe Escobar and TheElectronicIntifada.
Wise Farmers Series: Nicolette Niman
Nicolette Niman, author and environmental lawyer, and her husband Bill run a ranch in North California using high welfare and ecologically sound agricultural methods. A vegetarian for over three decades, Nicolette now believes that eating meat from cattle raised on pasture and from pigs raised outdoors is beneficial for our health, nourishes soils, and fertilises herbal leys. To explain how eating no meat at all is the wrong solution to the evils of factory farming, in 2021 she published her rebuttal, Defending Beef. For many years she and Bill ran Niman Ranch which now markets high welfare meat produced by a network of 600 farms that all follow the exacting standards that allow the meat to be sold across the US with the Niman Ranch label.
Read the blog here. Give the video a like and a share:
The two articles below are so interesting that I have put them at the start of the newsletter.
Photo credit: Benedikt Loebell & Forbidden Fruit and Veg
Under the NetZero matrix, the World Economic Forum research concludes that home grown food is bad for the climate. When governments follow this insanity, it’s time to wake up to the fact that we are ruled by a few billionaire psychopaths, their bankster colleagues and neocon politicians who control our politicians and increasingly us. It’s time to resist their entire NetZero scam by, as much as you possibly can, buying direct from your local farmer, growing your own food and forming local communities.
Read; WEF Demands Ban on Home-Grown Food to Stop ‘Global Warming’ Slay News; Frank Bergman; 6 October 2024
‘The World Economic Forum (WEF) is demanding that governments enforce bans on members of the general public growing their own food at home in order to comply with the unelected globalist organisation’s “Net Zero” agenda. The WEF argues that home-grown food creates “emissions” that allegedly cause “global warming.” According to so-called “experts” behind a recent WEF study, researchers apparently discovered that the “carbon footprint” of home-grown food is “destroying the planet.” As a result, the WEF and other globalist climate zealots are now demanding that governments intervene and ban individuals from growing their own food in order to “save the planet” from “global warming.” Globalists insist that allowing citizens to grow their own food will undermine efforts to meet the goals of the “Net Zero” agenda as dedicated by the WEF and the United Nations (UN).
The research indicated that garden-to-table produce causes a far greater carbon footprint than conventional agricultural practices, such as rural farms. This research, conducted by WEF-funded scientists at the University of Michigan, was published in the journal Nature Cities. The study looked at different types of urban farms to see how much carbon dioxide (CO2) was produced when growing food. On average, a serving of food made from traditional farms (industrial farms – TW comment) creates 0.07 kilogram (kg) of CO2, according to the study. However, the WEF-funded researchers claim that the impact on the environment is almost five times higher at 0.34kg per portion for individual city gardens. The paper’s first author Jake Hawes said:
“The most significant contributor to carbon emissions on the urban agriculture sites we studied was the infrastructure used to grow the food, from raised beds to garden sheds to pathways, these constructions had a lot of carbon invested in their construction.”
The study recruited 73 urban agriculture sites around the world. Those farms included some in Europe, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The researchers say they conducted a comprehensive life cycle assessment on the site’s infrastructure, irrigation, and supplies. Hawes and his teammates grouped urban agriculture sites into three categories: individual or family gardens, including allotments; collective gardens, such as community gardens; and larger, commercial-orientated urban farms. The researchers also found other factors that they claimed are “hazardous” when it comes to impacting the alleged “climate crisis.” Poorly managed compost and other synthetic inputs contribute to “global warming,” they warned. They further advised that fruit was 8.6 times more “eco-friendly” when grown conventionally (industrial farms – TW comment) compared to in a city. Vegetables, meanwhile, were 5.8 times better for the environment when left to the professionals (industrial farms – TW comment) , they claim. Moreover, two-thirds of the “carbon footprint” of allotments is created by the garden itself, as per their data.
As Slay News reported, 14 major American cities have set a “target” to comply with the WEF’s green agenda goals by banning meat and dairy products by 2030. The agreement also seeks to ban private car ownership and place other restrictions on public freedoms to meet the WEF’s “Net Zero” goals. The U.S. cities have formed a coalition called the “C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group” (C40) which has established an “ambitious target” to meet the WEF’s goals by the year 2030. To fulfil the “target,” the C40 Cities have pledged that their residents will comply with the following list of mandatory rules:
– “0 kg [of] meat consumption”
– “0 kg [of] dairy consumption”
– “3 new clothing items per person per year”
– “0 private vehicles” owned
– “1 short-haul return flight (less than 1500 km) every 3 years per person”
We could stop these endless wars if enough of us put our taxes in a collective trust whose sole beneficiary is the Government but they would only receive it if they cease funding and arming genocide. Otherwise, ‘…if you pay tax to a government which uses the money for a criminal purpose, you are complicit in the crime, you are aiding and abetting the crime.’
Watch; Tax Resistance and a Declaration of Sovereignty with Chris Coverdale; UK Column; 9th Oct 2024
Intro; ‘Paying taxes to a government which will spend it on illegal wars is to break the law, Chris Coverdale explains to Charles Malet. During more than two decades of tax resistance, Chris has been sent to prison three times, highlighting the enormous corruption infesting the legal system. Citing the provisions of the UN Charter, the International Criminal Court Act 2001 (and the Scotland Act) and the Terrorism Act 2000, among other articles of legislation, he explains the method by which he calls upon the British Government to cease engaging in hostile actions involving armed forces.
Further information on Chris’s campaign, his contact details, and the specifics of his Declaration of Sovereignty, can be found on his website.’
Chris Coverdale; “It really started for me in 2002 when the Afghanistan war was on by about 6/7 months, and I started to get very concerned about the legality of what was going on. So I investigated. I was investigating fraud and corruption in the Foreign Commonwealth Office and discovered, to my horror, that we had been deceived. The whole British public and everybody, had been deceived for 70 years or so over the illegality of war. It was quite illegal.
I started to really look at the criminal offences that had been introduced into Britain in 2001 in the International Criminal Court Act. 2001. It had started off as an international statute and the world had agreed in Rome in 1998 to set up the law enforcement authority in the Hague to prosecute leaders who took us to war and committed the worst crimes known to mankind, mainly war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. So I was starting to look at that in detail. I realised that the criminal offence our leaders were committing was not actually genocide, but conduct ancillary to genocide. I started to look at that in detail and realised that aiding and abetting genocide was the crime that I was committing by paying tax. It struck me then, and I’m still totally committed to the issue that if you pay tax to a government which uses the money for a criminal purpose, you are complicit in the crime, you are aiding and abetting the crime.
And that’s when I first started to realise that I must withhold taxes on the ground that it is a criminal offence to hand them over, knowing some of it will be used to murder men, women and children in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and now in Gaza and the Yemen and the Ukraine.”
Food, Farming & Ecocide
The Labour government’s budget has put the final nail in the coffin of our precious family farms.
Read; Farmers ‘betrayed’ by £1m inheritance tax relief cap BBC News, 30 October 2024
‘Farmers across the UK have met the news that inheritance tax relief for farms will be limited to £1m with anger. The National Farmers’ Union said it had been a “disastrous budget” for family farms, that would “snatch away the next generation’s ability to carry on producing British food” and see farmers forced to sell land to pay the tax.
For years, the APR (Agricultural Property Relief) has enabled small family farms – including land used for crops or rearing animals, as well as farm buildings, cottages and houses – to be handed down through the generations.
Somerset farmer Richard Payne told the BBC that he had already told his son to think of going into something other than farming, as the business would become “completely unviable” as a result of inheritance tax. He added that the £1m limit would only cover the smallest farms and that the change could result in more land being bought up by bigger businesses, changing the future shape of UK farming.
“Right across the land there will be a sea-change for the worse. Everyone says they don’t like mega-farms and they don’t want factory farming, but I can see that will be one answer out of all of this,” he explained.
Victoria Vyvyan, president of the Country Land and Business Association, said the change was “nothing short of a betrayal”, as Secretary of State Steve Reed had last year said: “We have no intention of changing APR.” She added that it was estimated 70,000 farms could be adversely affected by the £1m cap: “This puts dynamite beneath the livelihoods of British farming, and flies in the face of growth and investment.”
Tom Bradshaw, president of the NFU, said: “It’s been a disastrous budget for family farmers. “The shameless breaking of clear promises on Agricultural Property Relief will snatch away the next generation’s ability to carry on producing British food, plan for the future and shepherd the environment.”‘
Keir Starmer’s preference of Davos to Westminster, shows he has fully signed up to the globalist agenda of getting rid of farmers. His budget’s imposing a massive inheritance tax on farmers is yet another way of getting rid of real farmers and real food. In future we will have to buy insects, lab grown meat or GMO seed vegetables highly processed to taste like meat and grown by scientists in labs, owned by global banks and corporations.
Listen; Farming Today 31 Oct 2024 discuss the disastrous budget
Victoria Vyvyan from the CLA (Country Landowners Association); “The smaller the farm gets, the less viable it is. And its wider investment in food security for the future is also diminished because it will have that lack of investment in the future for efficiency, for intensifying the productivity of the farm. I think this constant eating away at the size of the farm is not going to produce a viable farming or business future.”
Tom Bradshaw, NFU; “By our figures, we look at the average size of a farm being about 88 hectares, having a value of £2 million, without any building or without any house, and trying to generate the income to pay that inheritance tax is just impossible unless we expect food prices to rise. And there’s absolutely no sign at all that that is going to happen. But we are seeing dramatic increases in the cost of producing food here. The primary ingredients, the cost of producing them is increasing because of this budget. And farming has nothing left to give.
It’s been bled dry and it will have to be passed up the supply chain.”
BBC Presenter; “But what Ministers will say is that what they’re trying to do is to stop raids from big money buying agricultural land for tax protection, which has been happening.
Tom Bradshaw from the NFU; “If they were trying to close loopholes, then there were different ways of doing that. But we’ve got family farms that feed one family, we’ve got family farms that feed four or five families. They’re still family businesses.
It will have an impact on tenants because the removal of that land from the tenanted market will potentially happen. I don’t think anyone has really worked through the repercussions of exactly what this means for our rural economies, for the farming industry, farming community, which is at the heart of those rural economies and the impact on food production at a time of geopolitical instability around the world. We have to take control of our food production here.”
Andrew Ward owns 600 acres in Lincolnshire and rents 400 more growing arable crops; “It’s catastrophic for British agriculture when you see the first million pounds they say is tax free. Well, £1 million might get you an allotment or 20 or 30 acres and a house and that’s it. Whereas most farms are far bigger than that. And I’m talking about family farms, not the large estates and people like Dyson and all the very large farms and National Trust and all those.”
BBC Presenter; “The Government says that actually it’s 2 million because this 1 million allowance comes on top of existing allowances, which they say gets us little higher. And I guess others will say, well, you’re lucky enough to own all that land, you might just have to sell a bit of it to pass it on.”
Andrew Ward; “It’s not viable to do that. And it goes down to the Government wanting to support agriculture. Do they want home produced UK food grown to the standards and produced to the standards we do, or are they quite happy for farms to go to the wall and import inferior food from abroad?”
BBC Presenter; “Are you going to change your succession planning now as a result of this?”
Andrew Ward; “I have to look at that now and decide what we do with it and how we carry on. It’s put a massive spanner in the planning and the viability of British Agriculture.”
Read; NFU plans London rally over future of family farms; Tim Scrivener Nov19
Farmers from across the UK are set to converge on London for a rally against the government’s agricultural policies which they say put the future of fragile family farms at risk and threaten food security and environmental goals.
The NFU is organising the rally which will take place on Tuesday 19 November at Church House conference centre at Westminster, central London, which will be able to accommodate about 600 farmers. But many more are expected to descend on the capital.
The NFU Council held an emergency meeting at 11am on Thursday 31 October where there was widespread agreement among council delegates to hold an event in London “to get farmers’ voices heard”.
See also: Budget delivers heavy cut to farming’s inheritance tax reliefs
NFU president Tom Bradshaw will address the event, which will also include speeches from other well-known farm leaders from across the devolved regions.
In the name of reducing CO2 emissions the Danish government is also at war with its farmers. All the lawyers that specialise in the property field have been retained by the government to ensure they are not available to help the farmers fight for their rights.
Watch; 2 mins; Exposing the plot to push Flemish farmers off and take their land; MCC Brussels, 13 October 2024
The UK needs a farmers’ movement like this plus knocking on doors with leaflets explaining the food security position and encouraging people to buy their food directly from small farmers or, at the very least, not from supermarkets.
Watch; Small farmers speak out: EU’s “strategic dialogue” is fake MCC Brussels, 19 October 2024
‘In this video, one year after the initial protests that rocked Europe, MCC Brussels sat down with some of the key figures of the Flemish farming movement to evaluate the progress, challenges, and betrayals in their fight to save the rural way of life. They tackle the myth of “magic subsidies” and critically examine the European Union’s so-called strategic dialogue on farming, which farmers know is neither strategic nor a dialogue.’
While our farmers are being bankrupted by phoney NetZero targets, eating bugs will be introduced by a massive PR campaign helped along by depriving us of real food at affordable prices on the supermarket shelf.
Watch; Its not about global warming X, 30 September 2024
“This was sent to me by the parent of a concerned fifth grader. She was told that she had to do these workshops, and bugs are the food of the future.
And she said, actually, in the class, they told the kids that eating meat is bad for the planet. Your parents are bad for wanting to eat steak all the time, they say, here’s the list of how much CO2 emissions, right? Crickets. You get 47.47 kilos of crickets per ounce of CO2. And you see that apparently bugs are really, really, really sustainable.
The government knows quite a bit about eating bugs. Turns out it’s very, very unhealthy. I pulled these right out of the National Library of Medicine 2017 study funded by the government which said that the chitin in bugs, the exoskeletons, will provoke human innate immunity to generate a deluge of inflammatory cytokines, which injure organs, and in persistent situations lead to death, multiple cirrhosis, systemic lupus, and cancer. Sign me up.
So the goal, folks, is not to save the planet. It’s not to save the climate. Like the revolutionaries used to say back in the sixties, the students for democratic society, the issue is never the issue. It’s not about global warming.
It’s not about sustainable development. It’s about enslaving humanity. They want to wipe out small, medium sized producers, centralise food control in the hands of mega corporations in bed with the mega governments. They want to move the population into the megacities and ultimately bring about this great reset and what they call the New World Order.”
Heavily invested lab meat companies are reliant on ever more government subsidies to persuade us that it’s safe to eat frankenstein burgers. Let’s hope the Covid 19 vaccine scam has woken people up not to buy into their promises that lab meat is safe to eat.
Listen; BBC Farming Today, 8 October 2024;
Presenter; “Now it might seem lab grown burgers are a long way off, but they could be on the menu sooner than you think. More than a million pounds is being given by the government to the Food Standards Agency to decide what needs to be put in place to ensure new cell cultivated foodstuffs will be safe to eat. Professor Robin May is chief scientific advisor at the Food Standards Agency. He told me companies around the world are working on artificial meat and dairy products for human consumption.”
Robin May; “There’s a really wide range of products that are at varying stages in the pipeline, globally actually. So at one end you have things that are relatively straightforward scientifically. So for example, some of the milk substitutes in which you have cells that are producing one or two proteins and therefore producing a liquid that looks and tastes similar to milk. At the other end of the extreme you have really complicated three dimensional structures created from different cell types, and they range from things like burgers and steaks through foie gras. Fish substitutes, eel substitutes are in development all around the world.”
Presenter; “Do we know how it works and how safe it is?”
Robin May; “That’s one of the reasons why today we’ve been announcing this investment, specifically to develop a regulatory regime that’s appropriate for these products because they are very different to anything we’ve eaten before. And there are lots of unknowns about the types of media you grow the cells in, the kind of chemicals you might to use to turn them into muscle or fat cells, and the processes you use afterwards to turn those single cells into something that looks more like the kind of food that consumers will want to eat. And so for us as a regulator, there are lots of kinds of exciting science questions, interesting science questions, but also really important that we get these decisions right about safety before we authorise any of these products.”
Presenter; “There is a bit of a push pull there though, isn’t there? As you mentioned, between regulation and safety and food companies wanting to release a new product as quickly as possible.”
Robin May; “We are very clear that for us, safety is the most critical feature. And so we look very, very cautiously at that and we’re certainly not going to speed anything along in any way that kind of reduces that confidence in the safety of the product. But I think it’s also probably important to say that no company wants to have a product that is dangerous or has a health risk associated with it. So actually, I think we’re all on the same page here.”
Presenter; “You’re talking about muscles and fat. Are these end products the same as the food we eat now or are they novel? Are they absolutely different from what we eat now.”
Robin May; “So they’re sort of both Anna. So obviously, if you’re a company in this space, what you’re typically aiming to do is create a product that is very similar, perhaps indistinguishable from a traditional product that we eat now. So a fillet steak that looks and tastes and feels like a fillet steak. So in that sense, they are very, very familiar. In the sense of the kind of science and innovation that produces them, they are completely different because these are cells grown in large fermenter vats, for example. They might be then induced using chemical or physical signals to clump together and form muscle fibres or fat tissues in order to reconstitute that kind of mouth feel you get with a classical steak.”
Presenter; “Is there a potential for this to disrupt the real meat market?”
Robin May; “Yeah, I think it’s a very interesting question and one that’s hard to predict how consumers will see this and how they will respond to it. I think at the moment, most companies are very clear that they are not aiming to totally replace the meat market, far from it. What they’re aiming to do is to offer an alternative to consumers. It’s also important to point out that some of the companies, at least initially, are looking to combine this with meat. So, for example, to have classical meat and a cell cultivated product in a single entity.”
But thankfully a Florida judge disagrees, and upholds a ban on lab meat
Read; Federal Judge Upholds Florida Ban on Lab-Grown Meat, as Other States Propose Similar Bans Children’s Health Defense, 23 October 2024
‘Lab-grown or cultivated meat is produced from cultured stem cells taken from live animals or an animal cell bank and then reproduced in bioreactors using techniques borrowed from Big Pharma.
The cells are “fed” a mixture of sugars, amino and fatty acids, salts and vitamins to make them proliferate quickly. Once they’ve grown into a mass or a sheet — depending on the manufacturer — they are formed into meat-looking shapes like cutlets or nuggets.
Although the companies promote lab-grown meat in part by claiming it has environmental benefits, the process is energy-intensive. Research from the University of California, Davis, found that cultured meat’s environmental impact is likely “orders of magnitude” higher than real meat, based on current production methods.
Attorney Ray Flores, who worked in the natural health industry for 35 years, told The Defender that even if it provides environmental benefits, “Any environmental benefit is greatly outweighed by the possible dangers that these cutting-edge products may pose to one’s health.”
An investigation by The New York Times revealed several incidents during the development of some of Upside’s products that raised safety concerns. The company in 2018 found its chicken cell line contaminated with mouse cells. And in 2019, the cell line was found to be contaminated with rat cells.
A few weeks after Florida passed its bill, Alabama passed a similar law making the manufacture, sale or distribution of food products made from cultured animal cells a Class C misdemeanour, with fines ranging from $100 to $10,000.
Iowa’s governor in May signed a bill prohibiting schools from buying lab-grown meat products and requiring clear labelling for lab-grown meats sold in other venues.
Five other states have proposed similar laws. And in August, Nebraska Gov. Jim Pillen signed an executive order banning the state government from purchasing it.’
Under the green mask of abating climate change, factory farming is given a green light as the manure used in bioreactors sequesters CO2. They are not interested in the fact that livestock grazing on pasture, sequesters the same amount of CO2 that the cow produces.
Read; New Report: California’s manure biogas subsidies are devastating local communities, Friends of the Earth USA, 21st October 2024
‘Profit incentives associated with producing factory farm gas in California entrench and intensify harmful farming practices. The more manure produced, the more cows, the more water degradation, water depletion, and air and climate pollution—all in the already disproportionately impacted communities of colour in the San Joaquin Valley,” said Leslie Martinez, community engagement specialist, Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability.’
Using the falsehood that factory farming sequesters CO2, banks are funding the expansion of factory farms where animals are incarcerated into concrete and metal prisons, where CO2 is released at every stage of the factory farm process, from the construction of the buildings, from the waste and from the transportation of pig feed across the globe. The reality is they know that climate change is not caused by anthropogenic emissions of CO2, and this is a scam to replace real farmers with animal factories and fake food that line the pockets of the corporate elite.
Read; White Paper: Development Finance Support for Animal Agriculture, Stop Financing Factory Farming, 21st October 2024
‘Despite increasing awareness of the devastating social, economic, and environmental impacts of factory farming, development banks are still funnelling billions into its expansion. A new white paper by the Stop Financing Factory Farming (S3F) campaign tracks how 16 development banks continue to finance these harmful practices.’
UK politicians’ NetZero policies are decreasing the amount of land available to produce food for an increasing population.
Watch; England Suffers Second Worst Harvest on Record: Climate Change or a 107% Increase in Uncropped Arable Land? UK Column; 16th Oct 2024
“The agricultural land use statistics most recently provided on the 26 September of this year, DEFRA reports that the utilised agricultural area has decreased by 1%. But that’s a misleading figure. I should state that this is for England and not the whole of the United Kingdom. Arable crops within that, down by 6.4% and the uncropped arable area has increased by 107%. It’s gone up 581,000 ha. This is a direct result of the environmental schemes. Wheat yield down by 11%, oil seed down by 26%, and horticultural crops down by 3.2%.”
“I will leave you with the consideration of the massive population increase that the United Kingdom has seen over the last two years in particular, and indeed, of course, its projections, which are never, ever mentioned in any of these statistics provided by the government. So food shortage, as I say, in some way or other, seems extremely likely in the near future..”
Bill Gates funds The Guardian so this article about manure improving the soil may sound good, but it’s riddled with the scam that cattle are a problem because they emit methane.
Read; Cows help farms capture more carbon in soil, study shows, Guardian, 28th Sep 2024
‘Research by the Soil Association Exchange shows that farms with a mixture of arable crops and livestock have about a third more carbon stored within their soil than those with only arable crops, thanks to the animals’ manure.’
The hurdles that UK farmers have to jump through to meet the NetZero scam are going to ultimately bankrupt them. All week (listen) BBC Farming Today 26th Oct 2024 focused on the government’s rules for farmers to reduce CO2 emissions from livestock to reach NetZero by 2040. Subsidies are pumped into persuading farmers to breed from sheep that emit less CO2 and to grow smaller, faster growing cattle so they lead shorter lives and so emit less CO2. Subsidy dependent farmers have little choice but to follow captured politicians’ narrative.
Email objection from listener read by BBC Presenter; “Mary Mead from Yeo Valley Farms says methane is a flow gas. It doesn’t accumulate, it only lasts for about 10 years. Livestock numbers have reduced in the UK, therefore there’s less methane anyway. And she says; ‘rotational grazing contributes hugely to carbon capture, so methane is dealt with in the cycle.’”
Richard Miller from the Climate Change Committee. “So methane is a shorter lived gas than carbon dioxide that is well understood by climate science for a while now. It’s needed as part of the global transition for that methane level to be reduced. And, thinking about herd sizes and how efficiently we produce food and meat, is part of the picture of doing that.”
BBC Presenter; “Leslie Sinclair also emailed, I think summing up the feelings of some livestock farmers when you talk to them; ‘It’s becoming tiresome and exasperating to hear doom sayers banging the drum for reducing meat production and consumption, while at the same time there appears to be minimal, if any attempt to rethink policy on tourism, which by definition involves transport of some kind or other.’ He says is there a balance where you say people don’t need to necessarily take a long haul flight, but do need to eat?”
Richard Miller from the Climate Change Committee. “So I think it’s important to see agriculture as one of a set of sectors, if not every sector of the economy that needs to make this transition. Everyone needs to eat. And I think it’s important that we have a thriving food production sector in the country. And our advice has always been to set out what a low carbon farming sector looks like. Farming is at the forefront of many of the climate impacts we face today as the recent 18 months that were the wettest on record show that can have a real impact on our ability to produce food here. And all of these things need to be thought about in the round so that we can ensure we have a thriving food sector going forward as well as a pathway that’s consistent with our overall legally binding net zero targets.”
Tim Phipps, is a beef farmer in Northamptonshire who supplies Morrisons and they’ve been working with him to make his farm more sustainable; “So these are our in calf heifers, a breed called a stabiliser. They are slightly smaller and then hopefully the calves will grow nice and quickly.”
BBC Presenter; “And in terms of emissions, what are the advantages of having these faster growing cattle?”
Tim Phipps; “The advantage of the faster growing is that it means you need to keep an animal for less time.The biggest emission is enteric fermentation. So effectively cows and cattle burping. The shorter time they are growing, the less burping they need to do. We have also changed from finishing cattle as castrated steers. We are now retaining all of the male calves as bulls, which is giving much higher growth rates. As much as 20% improvement in growth rates.”
BBC Presenter; Tim has worked very closely with a consultancy called the Map of Ag.
Hugh Martineau. “So we’ve been working with Tim and family at Bragborough hall since 2020 as part of the Morrisons Net Zero commitment. One of the main arguments when it comes to talking about emissions from livestock, should Tim be growing veg or crops that people can eat. In the case of Tim, actually, there’s a large portion of permanent grassland, which would be a disaster from a climate perspective to plough that up because there’s a huge amount of carbon stock which has sat under the soils. There’s a real case for continuing to use ruminant animals to process the nutrition which is generated on those soils and on those pastures”.
BBC Presenter; “A selective breeding trial on a sheep farm in Shropshire is hoping to reduce methane emissions from the animals by around 35% within five years. Bob Huckenhall reports.”
Bob Huckenhall; “Racing through the autumn leaves, Hayden Woolley’s flock of Easy Care and New Zealand Wiltshire sheep. Hayden, from Bridgnorth in Shropshire currently keeps four and a half thousand sheep and has been taking part in an experiment to see if he can lower the amount of methane his flock will produce in the future. It involves putting animals through sealed chambers and they spend 50 minutes in a chamber. And carbon dioxide, methane and oxygen is measured at the start, halfway through and at the end of the hour. And they rank your animals in order of emissions.”
Bob Huckenhall; “How many of your sheep have you actually put through this last year?”
Hayden Woolley; “We put 120. I think we’re putting twice the number through this time this year.”
Bob Huckenhall; “And why are you doing it?”
Hayden Woolley; “I think emissions (he is obviously not convinced!). Every industry that you can mention is focusing on its emissions. And I think farmers have gone a long way down the route of increasing productivity. That will become increasingly harder as time goes on. And I think we’ve got to try and produce what we make, what we produce for less cost and less environmental damage.”
Bob Huckenhall; “Once you’ve detected which are the lowest emitting sheep, what do you do then?”
Hayden Woolley; We’ve been flushing embryos from the lowest emitting ewe lambs fertilised to the lowest emitting male animals and we were planning to do that on subsequent generations and hoping to get 35 or 40% reduction in emissions within five years in a flock.”
Bob Huckenhall; “Does it cost much to do this?”
Hayden Woolley; “I think it was about £12,000 last year. We’ve been very lucky to be awarded £55,000 Innovate UK grant funding for the next two years and after that we’ll probably be back to funding ourselves. So, yeah, it’s cost quite a lot.”
One of the reasons why the climate is changing is our demented politicians are allowing geoengineering – weather modification, above all for military weather warfare
Watch; This is one of the most articulate explanations of geoengineering I have heard Instagram, 9 August 2024
Presenter; “You’re a military veteran, right?”
Kristen Meghan; “Yes, I was in the U.S. Air Force for nine years.”
Presenter; “Wow. And you came out and blew the whistle on geoengineering. Things that you witnessed were going on. Can you give us the real nutshell?”
Kristen Meghan; “Basically I had heard of what many people know as the term chemtrails. I worked in a job called bioenvironmental engineering and I thought that was insane. Why would we do something like modify the weather by using hazardous materials in our atmosphere? And actually in the process of trying to debunk it or disprove it, I realised it was actually coming right out of my office as I was one of the people that was approving the chemicals. And it really shook the core of my oath. I did a lot of sampling, did a lot of investigation and I blew the whistle and I got out. And I’ve now used my credentials, my oath and my powers for good, to help people understand it’s very real. It’s now openly admitted. There are multiple forms of weather modification. I specifically found the one of Stratosphere Aerosol Injection. Collectively, around the globe, we have to understand that it is now being admitted because they’re saying it’s ‘combating’ climate change, while the climate change we need to be worried about is manmade climate engineering, also known as geoengineering.”
Presenter; “And when you say you had chemicals being pumped into the air, what kind of chemicals are they putting out that rain down on humanity basically?”
Kristen Meghan; “Nanoparticulate metals. Like we had different sulphates and barium and strontium. I know it’s probably changed over time, I know they use silver iodide for certain things. The odd part of it was the quantities that I saw them coming in, the form that they were coming in, and it’s the same type of materials that I was trying to engineer out of the workplace to substitute with safer materials. When you notice that the what’s called the safety data sheet, the information about a chemical, of what personal protective equipment to wear, how do you dispose of it, how do you pack it to ship it. When key information is missing, I ask questions, and my questions led to demonisation. And I knew I found something I shouldn’t have.”
Presenter; “That’s insane. So these metals are basically toxic for humans, I would presume”.
Kristen Meghan; “Yes, because it also has aluminium. And a lot of people will tell you, these things aren’t horrible in small quantities. It’s not small quantities, because when you are putting things above us, the dissipation rates are dependent on weather and climate, but it’s getting into the food, it’s getting into the soil and around the world, wastewater treatment plants. When it comes to pharmaceuticals, or these toxicants is what they’re called, they are not able to filter them out. So if you’re growing organic food, are we going to go back to the plexiglass barriers on our plants? It’s horrible. That’s why you can ban it anywhere. We’ve had states in the United States ban it. and that is great to get the ball rolling, but people really need to wake up to it, irrespective of any political party. It’s not okay, and you’re seeing a huge increase in neurodegenerative issues like Alzheimer’s. It’s really difficult for people with respiratory issues and asthma, and people are wondering why they have allergies 24/7, 365.”
Presenter; “I like what you said about that climate change or the change we experience in weather often we can’t disconnect that from these geoengineering activities. Do you want to say something more about that? How do we feel that? Is there proof or so that is definitely coming from that?”
Kristen Meghan; “Yes, there are places that openly admitted it. Remember Dubai. And then when people got upset, they retracted it. But the can was already opened. The issue is, I know this sounds silly, but when you watch movies with time change, they say if you do something and something changes, it changes the ripple throughout time. If you are modifying the weather, you are messing with mother nature. And meteorology is a very, very thorough study and I do know a lot of it because of my profession of plotting hazards.
But it does not make sense when you are altering nature where things are not naturally supposed to occur. We had massive flooding in California and we have a system called HAARP that is in the United States. And the same people who demonised me 5, 10 years ago are now going, ‘wow’ because they’re finding it’s openly admitted in all of our US documents. The US is absolutely not the only country doing it.”
For decades scientists have been playing with our ecosystem with experiments to control the weather as a weapon in their wars and other demented games.
Watch; This aired 9 years ago on CBS Instagram, 9 October 2024
Presenter “And researchers are looking at how to change the weather on purpose. That’s right. Lasers now could one day manipulate rain and lightning. CBS This Morning contributor Michio Kaku is a physics professor at City College of New York”
Professor Michio Kaku; “As Mark Twain once famously said, everyone complains about the weather, but no one ever does anything about it. Well, instead of doing a rain dance, we physicists are firing trillion-watt lasers into the sky to actually precipitate rain clouds and actually bring down lightning bolts. This is potentially a game changer.
It’s experimental. However, in the laboratory so far, it works. When you have water vapour and you have dust particles or ice crystals, you can precipitate rain. It condenses around the seeds. These seeds can also be created by laser beams. By firing trillion-watt lasers, you rip apart the electrons, creating what are called ions. And these ions act like seeds, like dust particles, bringing down rain and even lightning.”
Presenter “Well, this fascinates me in part because too I remember reading the stories that China had used this during the Olympics, that the USSR had used this after Chernobyl.”
For more on geo engineering go to Geoengineering Watch and watch the documentary, The Dimming.
For years supermarkets have been tricking us to believe that food they are selling comes from real farms whereas the farms don’t exist and the meat comes from animal factories where animals are kept in cruel, barren sheds and overdosed with antibiotics.
Read; Stop Farmwashing; Riverford; 26 Sept 2024
British farmers need your help. We’re asking supermarkets to show some integrity, and stop #farmwashing
‘What is farmwashing? It’s where supermarkets use fake farm brands, vague welfare labels, and overuse of the Union Jack to give shoppers the impression that their products come from quaint British family farms. However, much of the food is increasingly sourced from industrial US-style, mega farms or from overseas. What’s more, these tactics mask a harsh reality – the decline of Britain’s family farms, in large thanks to unethical practices like these.
We’ve written to the CEOs of the Big Six supermarkets @tescofood @sainsburys @asda @morrisons @aldi and @lidlgb asking them to be honest about where their food comes from, and how it’s produced.
Farming is on the brink. According to new research that we conducted, 61% of farmers fear having to give up their farm in the next 18 months. Only 1 in 4 (24%) farmers think that supermarket claims to support British farmers are credible and backed up by their buying behaviour
It’s not what shoppers want either. We found that 67% of shoppers felt distrustful and annoyed when they learned that the word ‘farm’ can be used by supermarkets without it being from a real farm, while 74% of shoppers demand transparency from supermarkets about the origins of their food.
Read our open letter, then head to the link in out bio to find out more about our #stopfarmwashing campaign, and how you can help us get our message heard.’
As our farmers disappear, so will any hope of finding healthy food. Those who voted for Brexit believed that ‘Take Back Control’ meant to protect the UK from lower – standard EU food imports were misled. Rather than protecting our businesses the reality of Brexit was to open our trade to transnational companies operating in countries with even lower food standards, and in this case using even more pesticides than were allowed in the EU.
Read: Far higher pesticide residues allowed on food since Brexit The Guardian, 19 September 2024
‘The amount of pesticide residue allowed on scores of food types in England, Wales and Scotland has soared since Brexit, analysis reveals, with some now thousands of times higher.
Changes to regulations in Great Britain mean more than 100 items are now allowed to carry more pesticides when sold to the public, ranging from potatoes to onions, grapes to avocados, and coffee to rice.
For tea, the maximum residue level (MRL) was increased by 4,000 times for both the insecticide chlorantraniliprole and the fungicide boscalid. For the controversial weedkiller glyphosate, classed as a “probable human carcinogen” by the World Health Organization (WHO), the MRL for beans was raised by 7.5 times.
The purpose of the pesticide MRL regime is to protect public health, wildlife and the natural environment. Campaigners said the list of pesticides included reproductive toxins and carcinogens and that the weaker MRLs reduced protections for consumers in Great Britain. Northern Ireland has retained the EU MRLs.’
Even the trusted National Trust is abandoning its farmers and their vital role in feeding us.
They are breaking their own promises to keep properties in the form instructed by the donors. This video shows a farmer who is being ousted despite the covenant made with the National Trust that his farm would always remain a working farm.
“This is Lower Halsden Farm, located between Exmouth town and Lympston village. It’s a green haven of 110 acres for wildlife, livestock and people. Kate, my wife and I have farmed here under a farm business tenancy, with our landlord being the National Trust. The National Trust have told us, and indeed given us notice, that we have to be out in May 2026 because they want to take the farm back.
The farm was given to the Trust in 1999 on the death of Stanley Long, who had farmed here as the owner from the fifties. Stanley was concerned that the farm would be built on and developed, and was desperate for that not to happen. He wanted it to remain as a working farm in perpetuity. In fact, Stanley knew the land was valuable and was very desirable for developers, because in 1991 he’d been offered 4 million pounds for twelve acres of the land, which he refused. He was desperate for it to stay as a farm, so he gave it to the National Trust on his death in 1999, in the belief and the understanding that it would always remain as a farm with a tenant farmer living and working in the farmhouse.
Now, we’ve been informed we will be given our notice by the National Trust, so we will be out on May 26. They tell us no new tenant will be coming in. They will take the land in and they will do conservative grazing, some cropping and looking after the wildlife, exactly what we do, basically. But there will be no tenant farmer here. Trust tell me they have no plans to sell off any of the land at all at the moment.
I have no reason to believe they’re telling me lies there, but my concern is, my fear is that in the future, with no tenant here, the trust will take the opportunity to sell some of the land for development. It’s very, very desirable land. It would be very, very expensive. This is compounded somewhat by what I’ve been told by Giles Hunt, the land and estates director of National Trust, who says that the restrictive covenants related to the farm are no longer enforceable. Restrictive covenants stated that the farm should always remain as a farm and be used for farming.
He now tells us that those covenants are no longer enforceable.”
Farmers have so many conflicting messages that they don’t know which way to turn. They all point to their ultimate demise.
Listen; Why do some farmers fail with regen ag? Farm Gate, 11 October 2024
ffinlo Costain; ” Perhaps what you’re saying is that there needs to be a globally recognised framework of outcomes around regenerative rather than prescriptions for how it’s done and how it’s delivered.”
Tim Williams; “I think the substitution of a plough for glyphosate is really going to come back to haunt a few people. And we need to move beyond this if we’re actually to understand what a truly regenerative system is. Because one of the tools that we use in a regenerative system is harming us as a society. We have to be intelligent about it, we have to look at outcomes. What are the objectives? Increasing aggregation is one of the most important things. How do we increase aggregation? Complex plant communities, capturing energy, feeding plant synergies into the soil. Pretty straightforward, pretty simple.”
We can’t trust a word the supermarkets say.
Read; Sainsbury’s and Tesco accused of ‘misleading shoppers’ after trackers left in soft plastic recycling Steve Farrell, The Grocer, 1 October 2024;
‘Campaign Group Everyday Plastic and the Environmental Investigation Agency put tracking devices in 40 bundles of soft plastic packaging left in collection points at Tesco and Sainsbury’ supermarkets to see where they ended up between July 2023 and February 2024.
Collectively, the tracked bundles of soft plastic were found to have travelled over 15,000 miles, according to the campaigners’ report, called The Hard Truth About Soft Plastic.
Out of the bundles that are known to have reached a final destination, seven were turned into fuel pellets, five were burnt for energy, four were downcycled overseas and only one was downcycled in the UK, according to the report.
Eight of the tracked bundles are confirmed to have been sent overseas.
Environmental law NGO ClientEarth has claimed the findings show supermarkets are misleading customers with on-pack labelling saying ‘Recycle with bags at large supermarkets’.’
We can end factory farming, chemical agriculture and ultra processed food injuring our health by taking back control of our food by buying directly from them. This is a very useful podcast for those growing their own veg or running a market garden.
Listen; Ed Hamer and Chagfood Community Market Garden; The Organic Grower Podcast; 24th Oct 2024
James Butterworth from Cotswold Market Garden speaks to Ed Hamer of Chagfood Community Market Garden in the Dartmoor National Park.
‘CSAs or Community Supported Agriculture is very much the focus in this one. We talk about, Ed’s split growing site, leaning into the restrictive nature of the CSA model, dealing with and sharing risk, the importance and challenges of communicating with customers/members, the benefits of hard copy newsletters, member recruitment and retention, dealing with crop failures, surviving without cold storage and calculating value in CSA models. We also speak about Ed’s recent travels around the US, where as part of a Churchill Fellowship, he visited 25 CSA farms to see how things compare across the pond and see what lessons could be brought back to the UK. Later on, we get into the nitty gritty of growing carrots and discuss how woodland coppicing has allowed Ed to integrate biochar and woodchip into the growing operation.
This podcast is brought to you by the Organic Growers Alliance, the UK’s only grower-led organisation providing technical and practical advice and support on organic growing.’
Those who have seen the environmentalists’ concerns hijacked into having a totally different meaning, will fully identify with Paul Cudenect’s world view.
Watch; THE RADICAL ORGANIC TRADITION Paul Cudenec, June 2024
And read; Against the dark enslaving empire Paul Cudenec
“The title of my talk as you have heard is the organic radical tradition and I suspect that you might have two questions to ask about that title, the first being what on earth is organic radicalism which is one question I’m hopefully going to answer, and the second one being in what way could organic radicalism be described as a tradition, because I have to admit that I made the term up myself about six years ago.
The actual content of this philosophy is very traditional because in my mind, it’s the sort of lost human wisdom. It’s the shared human wisdom that we’ve had for hundreds and thousands of years that should have been fueling our current way of seeing things. But thanks to interference from the various authorities and controlling forces that want us to think in such a way as we go along with their vile system, this alternative understanding and knowledge has been lost to sight.
I see it as being in a sort of another dimension that there’s everything that we think now, all the political opinions we think we can have. There’s a sort of range of things we can have from far left to far right and all these categories that you can place yourself in politically and philosophically. But all that is just a screen to hide us from this ancient wisdom, this alternative wisdom.
In order to get through to the other side of this screen, you have to have seen through the deceit and the lies. So, anyway, it’s a philosophy that fits in very well with what people have been undergoing over the last few years, especially since COVID. There’s been this process a lot of people have had of saying suddenly that everything they thought was true isn’t true, and that all of that was just propaganda and a spectacle, and of passing through this barrier into another place where suddenly everything looks completely different. And you can pass through this invisible barrier of deceit from a number of different directions, from a number of different starting points. So if you’re an environmentalist, for example, and your belief is that you love nature, you hate to see nature being destroyed, you hate to see the effects of development and industry and pollution, chemicals and everything that’s happening, phone masts going up everywhere. You want things to be how they should be in the natural world. So you’ve always given yourself the label of environmentalists. And maybe you’ve joined some environmental organisation or other, and suddenly you realise, hang on, they’re not actually standing up for nature anymore. They’re not actually talking about nature anymore. They’re just talking about technology and renewable energy and wind farms and solar panels and climate. They’re not even talking about air pollution or river pollution or the pollution of the sea with plastics or anything. No, they’re only talking about the climate and the fact that this is an emergency which is going to necessitate governments across the world being pushed into certain private pockets that turn out to be the same private pockets that are funding the so-called environmentalist movement. If you realise all this as an environmentalist, you then step through this invisible barrier and you find yourself saying, ‘oh, you know, I’ve still got my beliefs, my original beliefs of being an environmentalist in the real sense, but now I see all this had been constructed to push my environmentalism into certain other purposes.”
If only the Tories were still conserv-ative, they would presumably reject the globalists’ Great Reset scam that both the Tories and New Labour are pushing in the name of ‘Build Back Better’. NO! ‘Go Back to when it was Better’, when small national businesses thrived and paid their taxes. Instead both Tories and New Labour have swallowed the globalists’ NetZero scam. They cover our land in solar panels, pylons and chemicals, GMOs and high tech machine-intensive agri industry. Follow the money and you will understand the drivers of a world gone mad.
Read; Proposed Solar Farms Spell Disaster for English Countryside Graham Barnfield, The European Conservative, 26 September 2024
‘Labour’s dash for Net Zero would override local democracy and bury acres of farmland under photovoltaic cells.’
‘The British government looks likely to fast-track the imposition of solar farms in rural locations, with serious consequences for agriculture and rural communities.
In response, Shadow Energy Security and Net Zero Minister Joy Morrissey declared, “The government must not ride roughshod over our rural communities in pursuit of their mad targets, paving over important green spaces, putting at risk our agricultural industries, and compromising our national food security.”
While the Labour government promises a ‘clean energy superpower,’ residents in Norfolk anticipate the loss of farmland, increasing food prices, and dependence on agricultural imports. The government’s counter-argument, based on a reduced UK-wide carbon footprint, seems scant consolation—alongside the disappearance of local beauty spots under the eyesore of solar panel farms.’
Watch Campaigners fight 2,500-acre solar development in Norfolk; Oct 24 2024
Though Ed Miliband promised a “rooftop revolution” in solar power soon after the election, instead of requiring house builders to equip new homes with an adequate number of solar panels, current plans for the future homes standard are only to “encourage” builders to equip homes with some solar panels “where appropriate”.
Labour is aware that building solar panels on homes that would provide the owner with free energy would defeat their paymaster banksters agenda to reap all the profits from sales of the power collected from homes and businesses.
Read; Solar panels for new homes may just be optional The Guardian, 23 October 2023
Jess Ralston, at the ECIU (Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit), an independent research organisation, said the real reason housebuilders objected to solar was the extra cost to them. “Putting solar panels on new homes is a no-brainer, but builders have the government over a barrel because of the target to build 1.5m new homes,” she said. “The issue is that the builders don’t want to pay for panels. But the public are fully behind putting solar on new homes.”
The extra cost of solar panels for new homes can be as little as £2,000 for an average house, but it costs much more to retrofit panels afterwards. Solar panels, along with other green technology, can substantially reduce the running costs for a house. A recent study from the MCS Foundation found that an average three-bedroom house with solar panels, battery storage, a heat pump and high-grade insulation would cost £1,340 a year less to run than one without.
Though politicians in the House of Commons are alarmed about the amount of land being used to produce energy instead of food, Energy Secretary Ed Milliband, is overriding local planners advice and giving permission for massive solar parks on working farm fields.
Read; Large-scale Energy Projects and Food Security House of Commons Debate, 22 October 2024, in Westminster Hall at 4:30 pm on 22 October 2024.
Llinos Medi Plaid Cymru, Ynys Môn; “A recent news report has shown that only 6% of vegetables used in school dinners in Wales are grown in Wales. As the climate crisis continues we should grow more locally, not decreasing the amount of food we grow on our land. I note that the UK Government have established a solar taskforce and have a target for delivering 70 GW of solar energy by 2035—more than quadrupling the current capacity of 15.5 GW. The development of solar farms is an issue that will be of great importance going forward. It is crucial that our energy security plans are coordinated with food security plans. That means thinking carefully about where the projects go and how they affect our economy, food security and community resilience.
It should be Government policy to safeguard good quality agricultural land when considering development of large-scale energy projects. Will the Minister explain what importance the new Labour Government will give to food security in the process of deciding on new energy projects? There are alternatives to large-scale solar farms, such as the use of rooftop solar on buildings and car parks.
The countryside charity Campaign to Protect Rural England estimates that all suitable roof space and car parks in the UK could generate a staggering 117 GW, substantially more than the Government’s total target of 70 GW by 2035.”
“David (Miliband) now works for a company that stands to profit from climate policies introduced by his brother Ed (Miliband).”
Read; The Miliband Files, DavidRoseUK, 30 September 2024
‘… in September 2020, five months after his brother (Ed Miliband) became shadow energy secretary in Sir Keir Starmer’s new shadow cabinet, it was revealed that David (Miliband) had become a paid advisor to Giant Ventures, a London-based venture capital firm that has a particular focus on green technology and energy. Following a series of earlier investments, it recently launched a new “climate focused growth fund” and claims it wants to invest a further $1 billion in “sustainable technologies” by the end of the decade.
All of which may seem perfectly in fitting with David’s form when it comes to juggling multiple jobs. Except for one thing: at least two of the companies Giant Ventures has invested in are likely to prosper as a direct result of decisions made by the new government. In other words, David now works for a company that stands to profit from climate policies introduced by his brother Ed.’
The solar panel technology being installed across our precious food growing fields, with a guaranteed income to the farmer of £1,000 per acre per year for 40 years, may soon be out of date. How about investing in wave power? If energy provision were nationalised, these long term investments would make economic sense.
Read; Advantages and Disadvantages of Wave Energy Greentumble, 4 January 2023
‘Wave power is a type of hydropower that converts the energy of ocean waves into electricity. This is done by capturing the motion of ocean waves using various technologies such as wave energy converters, floating devices, and bottom-mounted structures. These systems are designed to absorb the energy from the waves and convert it into mechanical energy, which can then be transformed into electricity. Wave power offers several benefits as a source of renewable energy. It is a consistent and predictable source of energy, as ocean waves are generated by a combination of wind, sun, and moon, which are constant and dependable. Additionally, wave power does not produce greenhouse gases or other pollutants, making it a clean and sustainable source of energy. However, there are also challenges associated with the development of wave power as a viable source of energy. One of the main challenges is the cost, as wave power technology is currently more expensive than other forms of renewable energy. Another challenge is the harsh marine environment, which can pose a significant challenge for the design, installation, and maintenance of wave power systems.’
Bill Gates, the emperor who has no clothes, is slowly but surely being exposed as the fraud who destroys everything he pours his money into. Not by mistake, but because he makes money from GMO and chemical farming which undermines local food economies and makes people sick.
Listen; What’s Bill Gates doing to Africa’s food? Farm Gate, By ffinlo Costain; 31 October 2024; Tim Schwabe, author of the new book, The Bill Gates Problem, and Million Belay, the co-founder of the Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa.
Tim Schwabe; “I don’t think that what Gates is engaged in is really philanthropy. I think it’s unregulated political influence. It’s money in politics. He’s not giving away money, he’s buying influence. And he has that right and privilege because of the extreme wealth he has.”
ffinlo Costain; “The aspect that we’re particularly concerned about here is the impact of the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation on African agriculture. How would you summarise that impact?”
Tim Schwabe; “I think the impact can be summarised as having done more harm than good. Gates embarked on a grand scheme to revolutionise African agriculture two decades ago. You had farmer organisations, you had experts and scholars at the time telling him that it wouldn’t work. And indeed it has not worked. And it’s not only that the Gates Foundation’s interventions have failed, but you also have to consider all the damage it has done along the way. One term I learned writing my book is this idea of opportunity costs, which is this idea of if we follow Bill Gates’s narrow agenda and narrow priorities on agricultural development or any other topic, if we put our resources and attention and time and money into that, that means we’re not taking a different pathway in a different alternative pathway. How much further along could agricultural development be across the African continent if we hadn’t followed Gates’ wrong headed schemes? And if we listened to local farmers, local experts, like we will today on this podcast.
Million Belay; I do agree if I tell you a particular instance. I don’t know whether 10 years ago or something, Gates came to Addis Ababa and he was given honorary degree by the Addis Ababa University. And almost all the ministers were there, the Prime Minister of the country was there, the President was there at the university. So all the political echelon was there. They had a number of times one to one discussion with Bill Gates. So I wrote an article ‘what is our Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn and Bill Gates talking about’. I assume that it’s probably about GMOs. And then I tried to elaborate the impact of GMOs on our agricultural system. So I’m hugely worried about his influence. A person with an idea. I’m sure so many of the people around him would agree with his idea rather than oppose him because he’s very powerful. Anything that he sets his mind on, he implements. And he sees the world as a machine, as a computer, especially Africa, as a machine to be fixed. I have never seen him or his institution asking farmers what they want.”
ffinlo Costain; “Now a lot of Bill Gates money in African food systems has gone into the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa or agra. Now this set out to replicate India’s Green Revolution from the 1960s”
Million Belay; “Because it didn’t work in India. It focused on rich farmers poor farmers were sidelined. It polluted the environment, the soil, the water, whatever, in the Punjabi. So there is this place, a city in Malawa which is called the Cancer City. And there is this train which is going from Punjab to Rajasthan, you know, and it’s called the Cancer Train. Why? Because that the Punjab area is an agricultural area of India and the Green Revolution was practised there. So it has impacted on the health of the people. Obviously there was a lot of cultural erosion. Culture and the diversity in seeds are very much related. So we could see the impact there. And it didn’t succeed in Africa. in some of our countries, in Ethiopia too.”
ffinlo Costain; “what was it in particular that didn’t succeed? What were the impacts? Why was it that the Green Revolution in your view was not a success in India?”
Million Belay; “I think this is a few elements of the Green Revolution. One, it is based on chemicals, agrochemicals, you know, there are artificial fertilisers and pesticides. And the majority of the cause for this cancer that Indians are suffering is iron elements in the soil, you know, the elements in the fertilisers. And also that’s one thing. The second thing is this market oriented agriculture. We should focus on a few crops rather than on the diverse crops. If that is not successful, as it is the case, then it is a failure of the whole agricultural system. It erodes the diversity in crops. So instead of building resilience into the system, you build in crisis. You lead the farming, agriculture into a direction, into a path which is very difficult to get it back from. So these are one of the reasons. And it erodes farmers knowledge. It’s a very violent and aggressive form of agriculture.”
When one hears a people or country has been ‘lifted out of poverty’, as boasted by the US and China, my first question is how do you define poverty ? Are you poor if you are not developed and industrialised and instead retain your independence, community, extended family and self sufficiency – like the Amish? Does being developed mean to depend on toxic food, polluted water, killer vaccines and medication, to suffer surveillance and censorship and be coerced into a job and rent or own a house that a kleptocratic government can disappear with the stroke of a budget pen? Unless we say no! the globalists will continue to brainwash us into believing their stated intentions are benign when in fact it is profits for them and servitude and a cost of living crisis for us.
Read; Industrialism is a manifestation of Evil; Paul Cudenec; Oct 28, 2024
Certain apologists for the current industrial system like to claim that the enormous social and environmental problems associated with it are the result only of the specific way in which our society is being run at the moment. The technology, or Technik, involved, they insist, is itself “neutral” – it is merely the way in which it is used which is problematic. However, to fairly assess this so-called “neutrality”, we need to consider what lies behind the industrial impulse. While the official narrative insists that its aim has always been to relieve people of the need for manual labour, to lift them out of poverty, to elevate humankind to greater cultural and civilisational heights, this is just window-dressing for something much less worthy. Industrialism is about profit. Labour-saving machinery has always been about saving the costs of human labour for the machine’s owners and thus increasing their profit margins. Increases in scale, in productivity, in efficiency, in quantity and in speed are likewise all aimed at increasing profit. Those who “invest” in the latest “innovations” are doing so in the hope of extracting the greatest possible financial profit. Property development is about making profit from destroying our countryside and sustainable development is about continuing to profit from the pillaging of the living world while pretending to be “green”. Industrialism, from the First Industrial Revolution of steam engines and factories through to the proposed Fourth Industrial Revolution of transhumanism and nanotechnology, has always been – and always will be – a means of making money. This, in itself, is damning.’
Events;
This farm event on 22-23 November is a great way to connect to local farmers and buy their produce. Graham Harvey who is the agricultural story editor for The Archers and the author of books including The Killing of the Countryside and The Carbon Fields, is a co-organiser of the conference.
Listen; Land Alive Farm Gate, 25 October 2024
Graham Harvey; Land Alive is a new conference here in the Southwest. It’s taking place at the Bath and West Showground in Shepton Mallet. It’s really about the new way of farming, which is sometimes called regenerative, some people call it nature friendly, but it will transform our countryside and probably put more nutrients in our food.
It’s actually less reliant on chemicals and it relies more on building the natural fertility of the soil. So it’s really all about soil, but it’s going to improve everything about farming, including income for farmers. It’s kind of a grassroots movement in farming, really, to take out the chemicals and build back soil fertility.
We think this is going to be transformative not only for the rural communities and really the economy of rural Britain. We think it’s going to improve all our food and our health as well, so we are very keen here in the Southwest, which were a major sort of livestock producing area, principally, I suppose. We wanted a conference for the Southwest, where the emphasis is perhaps on grazing animals and pasture and what we call herbal leys, for all the benefits, the economic benefits they bring to the West country, but also for the benefits they bring to health.
The neo-liberal economy is a disaster. Leaving essential services like water and sewage to the market is going to cost us our health and pollute our entire ecosystem.
March for Clean Water, Central London on Sunday 3rd November 2024; River Action
‘Thousands of people dismayed at the appalling state of Britain’s waterways will join the March for Clean Water in London on Sunday 3rd November. Groups as diverse as British Rowing, Extinction Rebellion, the National Trust and the Women’s Institute have backed the march.
Together they will send a clear message to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer: take immediate and decisive action to end the poisoning of our rivers, lakes and seas by the lethal cocktail of raw sewage, agricultural waste and other chemical pollutants, that over recent years have been allowed to leave most of our waterways so filthy that they present major risks to human health and untold damage to nature.’
Censorship/Surveillance/Coercion/Corruption
A good rant about the UN’s Agenda 2030 plans to survey, censor and coerce our every move.
Watch; The UN’s DARK Agenda: What You’re Not Being Told About Agenda 2030 GB News, 18 October 2024. All links from Global Research News.
‘In this video, Bev Turner dives into the UN’s Summit for the Future and the true intentions behind their Pact for the Future and Agenda 2030. On the surface, it’s all about sustainability, global cooperation, and protecting future generations. But what if there’s a darker side? From digital governance to global control, Bev explores how these initiatives could reshape our world – and not for the better. Is it really about equality, or is it about control? Watch to find out how this global agenda might impact your freedoms, privacy, and way of life.’
Bev Turner; “…it is not possible to achieve these utopian ideals without a deliberate, perhaps forceful redistribution of food, goods, property and rights. Just like good old fashioned communism, the ambition for equal outcome for everyone always results in the very rich getting supremely richer, the very poor perhaps being lifted up a little, but the billions in the middle getting colder, poorer, hungrier, and enslaved within their digital prison. Just as Communism was never really about equality, this new version, which is deceptively called Stakeholder Capitalism, is not about equality either. This is Klaus Schwab’s ‘you will own nothing and you will be happy’ mantra. No you won’t.
You’ll be miserable, you’ll be weak, you’ll be obedient, but hopefully sufficiently angry to try and break free. The UN’s Agenda 2030 is all about control. Leaders lacking empathy are not troubled by reducing humanity to a mere data set upon which they can keep tabs. And at that point, we the people are nothing more than a commodity which can be monetised. Will the people of the world comply with this technocratic vision?
Or will we rebel? Can we even find a different way to function outside of a digital prison? The Patent for the Future and its complementary documents are, on the surface, designed to create a more interconnected and cooperative world. The Global Digital Compact claims to aspire to making the use of digital technologies more responsible and inclusive. Who wouldn’t want that?
They claim that they are concerned about digital privacy, cybersecurity and the digital divide. But whenever governments try to control the behemoth that is the online world, every road leads to the suppression of free speech and the ludicrous idea that someone, somewhere in a lavishly glazed office can decide what is factual information and what is misinformation. The Declaration on Future Generations cleverly ramps up the guilt. Who could possibly resist measures that would be required to protect the planet for their children and grandchildren? And yes, of course, we need to leave this world in a better state than when we found it. But this has all been decided on the publicly indisputable assumption that there is consensus on, for example, man made climate change due to carbon emissions.”
The links in the above podcast are added from articles published by Global Research News;
Read; Global Tyranny Never Sounded So Good: UN Summit of the Future; Michael Bryant, 21 October 2024
‘Lost in the hoopla of the coming US presidential election and the pandemonium of current global affairs was an unheralded summit last month that could cause more upheaval on the planet than anything our self-described world leaders have thrown at the populace yet.
On September 22, representatives of 193 sovereign nation-states gathered at the United Nations headquarters in New York City to adopt a Pact for the Future.
The document, which includes a Global Digital Compact and a Declaration on Future Generations, promises to “open the door to new opportunities and untapped possibilities,” according to UN Secretary-General António Guterres.
The landmark agreement, which Guterres called a “step-change towards more effective, inclusive, networked multilateralism,” contains 56 “actions” that countries pledged to achieve.
The net effect of the Pact for the Future and its two so-called annexes is intended to radically accelerate the push toward completion of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and its Agenda 2030.
Marketed as a blueprint to “lay the foundations for a sustainable, just, and peaceful global order—for all peoples and nations” (and who could possibly object to such a heavenly vision?)—this latest flurry of UN paperwork may have set new records in linguistic manoeuvres and platitudes per page.’
‘Putting aside the fact that the UN and its affiliates have a track record that proves they are part of the problem instead of the solution to anything, the terms “multilateralism” and “global governance”—repeated throughout the UN documents—need to be exposed for what they actually mean.
Apparently, from what we can ascertain, the UN decided that the more sinister-sounding terms “one world government” and “new world order” had worn out their welcome and were justifiably raising alarm bells in the public sphere. Thus, kinder, gentler surrogate words have been introduced in an attempt to pacify the people and soften the not-so-fuzzy image of global totalitarianism.
It’s called marketing.
When the curtains are pulled back, exposing the spin machine, we find that the true intent of these autocrats, who claim to “represent the peoples of the world,” is to create a global governance structure with dramatically increased powers over all human activity.
Such a centralised control system would, by design, erode a nation’s ability to control its own domestic and foreign policy, eliminating such “quaint” notions as national sovereignty.
One example of how this might play out in the real world can be found in how the UN pushes the idea that the only possible way to effectively tackle what it determines to be “complex global shocks” is through “multilateralism,” as defined by the UN.
In a March 2023 policy paper titled “Strengthening the International Response to Complex Global Shocks — An Emergency Platform,” the UN Secretary-General proposed that “the General Assembly provide the Secretary-General and the United Nations system with a standing authority to convene and operationalize automatically an Emergency Platform in the event of a future complex global shock of sufficient scale, severity and reach.”
In practice, what this could mean is that the standing UN Secretary-General would become a “global emergency czar” who is given power to preside over any international emergency, be it real or manufactured.
The proposal would strip nations, businesses, and the public sector of the right to make their own decisions, while handing over all authority to intergovernmental bodies within the UN’s orbit. NGOs, UN agencies and private “stakeholders” would effectively rule, like dictators, over every nation and even over every jurisdiction (province, state, county, city) within each nation. National sovereignty would be null and void.
Another major item on the UN menu is the concept of a “Common Digital Future,” which is embedded within the aforementioned “Global Digital Compact.”
Curiously, the UN directly compares these digital technologies to natural resources, observing that the potential of digital technology can be only optimised through shared access and use of resources such as the air around us and earth’s bodies of water.
Setting aside the fact that we can’t drink technology or eat data, the irony of the UN suggesting that shared access will be a defining feature of any of its programs flies in the face of the UN’s history as a vehicle for increased privatisation of the commons.
As part of this Common Digital Future, the UN promotes the idea of “working together to promote information integrity, tolerance and respect in the digital space.” Again, more noble-sounding words, but how does the UN propose to do this?
Here’s a clue: The UN offers to help the public sort through the flotsam and jetsam of the social media landscape by promising to “strengthen international cooperation to address the challenge of misinformation and disinformation and hate speech online and mitigate the risks of information manipulation in a manner consistent with international law.”
If you are uncertain as to what that means, consider that the UN is seeking tighter controls over what they judge to be misinformation in order to manage and restrict what information the public can freely access. The end product, if implemented, would allow certain UN agencies to have complete control over all information sources.
This has long been one of the principal desires of the globocrats, who know that a well-informed public that is able to discern between government deceptions (such as the propaganda used to sell the corona crisis) and on-the-ground realities is exceedingly difficult to control.
At the conclusion of the September summit, UN leaders stressed the importance of the need for “a reinvigorated multilateral system.” The countries in attendance reached the consensus that “the world must accelerate progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.”
If you didn’t hear about the summit and its outcome on your evening news, don’t be surprised. It was scarcely covered by any nation’s news media. Are your eyebrows raised at the thought of the world’s “leaders” making plans to reshape the earth, its economy, and its inhabitants without so much as a whisper or a whimper from mainstream journalists?
If these journalists were to scrutinise the UN’s latest plans, they would find that what is being presented as a new and necessary plan of action is really the same old story of the megalomaniacs’ desire for total control of the planet, dressed up in a shiny new package to conceal their intentions.
The bottom line is that any time you see a program being forwarded by a gaggle of unelected, unaccountable globalists, you can rest assured that the program being promised is as thoroughly tyrannical as it can be. And that’s by design.’
Who is behind the UN’s Agenda 30 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)?
Watch; The Elite’s Are About To SHOCK The World Whitney Webb; Blackrock Exposed, NCash Official; 14 October 2024
Whitney Webb; “The Sustainable Development Goals have been developed essentially by bankers, I would describe it as a global Wall Street coup essentially. Well not necessarily Wall Street but transnational finance. You have people like Mark Carney, former Goldman Sachs, former head of Bank of England, Bank of Canada, Financial Stability Board, aider and abetter of HSBC’s money laundering for drug cartels, he’s the person that’s in charge of Climate Action for the United Nations.
Their other point man is Mike Bloomberg, former Solomon Brothers, former Mayor of New York, billionaire guy, and if you think these people care about the environment and sustainable development and building a more inclusive world, I’m sorry but you have been had. Larry Fink is in this group too, and to think that he wants to make a more inclusive world is insane, he’s interested in increasing the amount of assets that Blackrock manages and pretty much only that.”
Larry Fink; “We believe it’s so important to be anticipating the next move on the beginnings of a ETF (Exchange Traded Fund) Bitcoin. We believe ETFs are a technology, no different than Bitcoin was a technology for asset storage. We believe the next step going forward will be the tokenization of financial assets, and that means every stock, every bond will have its own basically CUSIP, it’ll be on one general ledger, every investor, you and I, will have our own number, our own identification. We could rid ourselves of all issues around illicit activities of bonds and stocks and digital by having tokenization. But most importantly we could customise strategy through tokenization that fits every individual, we would have instantaneous settlement. Think about all the costs of settling bonds and stocks, but if you had a tokenization everything would be immediate because it’s just a line item, and so we believe this is a technological transformation for financial assets. If you want to talk about voting and voting choice, if we know every moment who is the owner of that stock and it’s now time to vote, every individual who has ownership is identified and they can vote their own share.”
Whitney Webb; “The people that are essentially behind a lot of the NetZero plans, behind a lot of the other SDG plans, that essentially move us from the free market capitalist model into more this technocratic model where every commodity, everything, is going to be tokenized. You’ve seen Larry Fink in the past couple of days be very open about that, following the approval of the BlackRock Bitcoin ETF, for example, talking about the tokenization revolution and all of this. But there’s an effort here to take this much farther than it’s ever been taken before and to essentially not just tokenize existing assets or traditional assets, but also create new asset classes like natural assets. All these natural asset corporations that have sort of been in the news lately and have received some pushback, but there’s definitely a lot of efforts underway to essentially tokenize the whole planet; increase the amount of assets in the existing economy. Like this lake is an asset, this forest is an asset and all of the stuff, tokenize, fractionalise it, and basically create this insane new financial system that’s different than previous financial systems where everything, including nature and humans, will be tokenized and traded like financial products. That’s essentially what a lot of this is leading to. You have most of the countries in the world that are pursuing Agenda 2030, are essentially leading us into that. I think the geopolitical push and pull between BRICS and the West is real, at the higher levels, they ultimately agree on the goals. So I don’t really think one is necessarily a true effective challenge to the other. And if you’re against the ambitions of the SDGs and Agenda 2030, then you should be against them, regardless of if they’re being championed by Russia and China or the United States and the EU. Ultimately, it leads us to the same place which is going to financialise and tokenize everything, but also surveil and everything to an unprecedented extent and increasingly uses debt slavery. Mark Carney and Fink and all of these guys, under the auspices of the UN, talked about reimagining the World Bank and the IMF, all the multilateral development banks, for the purpose of basically using debt to finance the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) and doing all these things like debt for climate swaps, debt for nature swaps, which are essentially land grabs and all sorts of things, framing it as necessary to save the planet. Maybe that justification works for the left, but I think it would be naive to assume that they aren’t going to retool the talking points to appeal to the right. I think that’s definitely going to be happening.
If you look at Fink himself he’s tried to go away from being the point man for ESG and all of this towards the guy that’s saying, like, ‘look how profitable this is going to be for us, and you can have a part of the riches, by tokenizing your land and putting it on this platform where it can be traded and whatever. You can have a piece of all this wealth and whatever.’ I think that’s how they’re going to try and frame it. I think people need to be very aware because the efforts to manipulate us to acquiesce to the system, are unprecedented. I think ultimately, if you have a good grasp of what they want to enact on the global stage, regardless of the justifications or the political figures they use or influencers and media that they try to use to sell this to you, if you are firm in your opposition to these agendas, then you’ll be able to sort through the nonsense. All the stuff coming out online is increasingly just psyop after psyop after psyop and it’s hard to know who to trust and who to believe. But if you know that the end goal is global governance, mass surveillance, the end of privacy, all of that, you can look at who is pushing those agendas and say no. And ultimately, at the end of the day, you have to say no.”
To find the truth, seek out the increasing number of journalists who, like Julian Assange, have been punished for challenging the mainstream narrative. On Tuesday 1st October Julian gave testimony to a parliamentary hearing of the Legal Affairs Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) in Strasbourg. It was the first time he had spoken publicly since his release from Belmarsh on 24th June 2024. On Wednesday 2nd October the Assembly held a plenary debate and vote on his detention and conviction – and its chilling effects on human rights – based on a report by Thorhildur Sunna Ævarsdóttir (Iceland, SOC). Though the vote was won on the premise of the report, all will be done to enact the reforms suggested below.
Read and watch; Assange Was A Political Prisoner, Council Of Europe Parliamentarians Declare In Vote; Kevin Gosztola; Oct 2, 2024
‘The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, or PACE, approved a resolution that states WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was prosecuted and detained in the United Kingdom as a political prisoner.
Þórhildur Sunna Ævarsdóttir, the general rapporteur for political prisoners and an Icelandic parliamentarian who serves on the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, drafted the resolution, which passed by a vote of 88-13.
The resolution urged the United States to reform the Espionage Act and “make its application conditional to the presence of a malicious intent to harm the national security of the United States or to aid a foreign power” and “exclude the application of the Espionage Act to publishers, journalists and whistleblowers,” especially those who try to inform the public about war crimes, torture, and illegal surveillance.
Assange, his wife Stella Assange, and WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Kristinn Hrafnsson were present for the debate and vote on the resolution.
The debate and vote on the resolution came after Assange testified before PACE’s Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights on October 1. It was his first public testimony since he accepted a plea deal that ended the United States Justice Department’s political case against him.
PACE’s consideration of Assange’s case was part of a wider examination by the assembly of the increased threats that journalists and whistleblowers face in Europe. A fact-finding visit to the U.K. by Ævarsdóttir occurred while Assange was still detained at Belmarsh.
“If you look at the definition of a political prisoner, Julian Assange and his case fulfills this definition,” Ævarsdóttir told the assembly. “He was convicted for engaging in acts of journalism. This is a clear instance of a politically motivated incarceration.”
She continued, “If it were any other country, if it were one of the countries that we are happy to point to having political prisoners on a regular basis here in the Parliamentary Assembly, I don’t think that there would be much of a question on whether or not this assembly is fit to determine whether someone is or is not a political prisoner. We create this definition.”
“What does this case say to those who risk their lives to report on corruption, war crimes, and human rights abuses? It says that if you dare to publish the truth you may face the full wrath of the law, however archaic and unjust the law is,” Ævarsdóttir stated. “It says that in the struggle between power and truth, power will prevail.”
Lesia Vasylenko, a parliamentarian from Ukraine, supported the resolution and agreed that the “biggest threat” presented by the Assange case was that journalists may now be prosecuted under the U.S. Espionage Act.
“Editors and publishers will start discussing whether they can publish classified information that contributes to public debate,” Vasylenko said. “The climate of self-censorship must be avoided at all costs so that our societies can remain free and hold their governments to account.”
“What I do regret is that his release was not underpinned by a legal verdict. I think it would have been very important to have some kind of legal ruling, which would have provided greater legal certainty to those who dare to denounce illegal actions,” Austrian parliamentarian Petra Bayr argued. “So without a ruling from either a U.K. court or the European Court of Human Rights, this does leave something of a void. Which means that there’s a justified fear that such goings on will continue, and journalists won’t necessarily benefit from protection.”
Julian Pahlke, a parliamentarian from Germany, said that the case had ended with a deal that helped the United States “maintain their image.” It was crucial for PACE to advocate for an “umbrella of protection” against Espionage Act prosecutions against journalists, publishers, and civil society organisations in Council of Europe member states.’
Journalist’s right to publish is our right to know.
Read; Journalists must be free to publish leaked documents – From the Pentagon Papers to Hunter Biden’s laptop, it’s a legitimate and necessary public service; Hamish McKenzie, 27 September 2024
‘The truth can arrive in many guises: an informant, a whistleblower, a leaked document, even stolen materials. In all cases, parties that don’t want that information to come to light will aggressively move to prevent its distribution. Often they will sow fear and doubt and resort to smearing the reporter. But in many cases, it’s this kind of reporting that is the most indispensable. Think of the New York Times and Washington Post’s coverage of the Pentagon Papers, based on stolen documents, that revealed that the U.S. government had secretly expanded its war in Vietnam; or the Abu Ghraib scandal, in which Seymour Hersh and CBS revealed the U.S. military’s torture and abuse of prisoners in Iraq; or Glenn Greenwald’s coverage for The Guardian exposing the widespread tapping of ordinary Americans’ phones, revealed by the documents leaked by Edward Snowden. It’s in these moments that journalism fulfils its highest calling: holding power to account.’
“Wednesday at 6am, 10 fascist pigs raided Asa Winstanley’s home and stole his electronic devices, claiming his social media posts opposing genocide “encourage terrorism”
Listen; Pro-Palestine Journalist Raided for “Supporting Terrorism” Abby Martin, Empire Files, 26 October 2024
Abby Martin; “On October 17, UK counterterrorism police raided the home of London based journalist Asa Winstanley, demanding that he turn over his electronic devices to them, suggesting that his journalism and social media posts encourage terrorism. Asa is a reporter for the Electronic Intifada and the author of the book Weaponizing Antisemitism: How the Israel Lobby Brought Down Jeremy Corbyn. Asa joins me now in the Empire Files to discuss.”
Asa Winstanley; “Yeah, at 5:40am exactly, we were woken up in the house by the doorbell and then by a loud banging and repeated ringing on the doorbell. We asked who it was, they said the police and to open up. They were very insistent that we open up. So I went downstairs in my night clothes and I opened up the door and at the doorstep in the dark, there were around 10 or so police officers, plain clothes police officers with stab vests and whatnot. You could tell they were police. It’s not like they were undercover. But as I later clarified, this was the Counter Terror Squad, you could say they’re sort of a secret police force in Britain. They have special powers under these draconian British so called counter terror laws.
They’re not the intelligence services, but they report to the intelligence services, to MI5. And so, yeah, they were in the house for around three hours, more than three hours.
Abby Martin; Did they present you with a warrant and an explanation at the beginning or did they just force their way in?
They said that the senior officer was on the doorstep and he said straight away, we’ve got a warrant to search the premises. And then after I was able to change into some clothes, he presented me with the warrants, I was able to read them. In this sort of agitated state, you can’t really take anything in what it says. But they didn’t really give an explanation. They said, ‘we suspect you may have violated the law under the Counter Terrorism Act 2006′. And we’ve got a warrant to search the premises and the car for any digital devices they wanted, devices this my office here, where obviously carry out most of my work, they demanded entry to it.
I now have an excellent legal team and they are very much following this up. Like me and my editor at the editor at the Electronic Intifada. The whole team at the Electronic Intifada are extremely determined to resist this and the primary concern right now is to protect my sources.”
Amaryllis Fox Kennedy is a member of the Kennedy family and a former CIA officer for 10 years, extremely intelligent and insightful and highly critical of UK’s current censorship regime.
Watch; When Amaryllis Fox Kennedy says the intel agencies are a threat to our country, she’s not guessing. She spent ten years as a CIA officer before running Bobby Kennedy Jr.’s presidential campaign. She’s now campaigning for Trump; Tucker Carlson, X, 25 October 2024
(0:00) The Ukraine War Scam; (9:50) Why Washington Doesn’t Care About Domestic Policy; (14:13) Intel Agencies Operating Within the Media; (19:48) How America’s War on Iraq Caused the Fall of Europe; (27:43) The Classified Documents About 9/11; (33:20) The Kennedy Assassinations; (36:21) Intel Agencies Working with Drug Cartels; (43:49) Our Politicians Are Controlled by the Intel Agencies; (57:12) The Impending EMP Crisis; (1:14:20) Why Biden Reversed Trump’s EMP Preparedness Measures; (1:26:31) The Media Blackout of Kennedy’s Campaign; (1:37:41) Bobby Kennedy Endorsing Trump
Amaryllis Kennedy; “What’s interesting about CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) is that it’s a part of the Department of Homeland Security, but it’s supposed to protect our nation’s infrastructure from terror attacks. At the beginning of the Biden administration, a decision was made that ‘information is infrastructure’ which has an Orwellian ting to it. As a result, in order to secure it, CISA was quietly empowered with the ability, sometimes directly and sometimes through NGO cutouts, to present to all the social media companies and Wikipedia and Amazon, any content that was flagged as concerning.
And alerts went out to be on the lookout. They held weekly meetings and put an enormous amount of financial pressure on these companies, saying that their legal protections from liability would be withdrawn if they didn’t cooperate, naming and shaming them if they took longer than a week to respond on something from the podium in the White House. Mark Zuckerberg has spoken publicly and written about the degree of pressure that he felt to censor American people. And we’re now seeing the UK’s Labour Party doing the exact same thing here in our own country, which is in some ways, more egregious. The Labour Party, which is currently in power in the UK, has a series of NGOs that it funds and directs that have waged war on free speech, especially what they call ‘Twitter under Musk’ or ‘Musk’s Twitter’, that they have gone into multiple offices, Amy Klobuchar, Kamala Harris, and said that they want to participate in and provide support for destroying Musk’s Twitter.
Tucker; they would be the dreaded foreign actor interfering in our democracy. Correct. That we’re always hearing so much about it. It turns out to be the Brits.
Kennedy; And many others. Right. But nobody’s fighting them, because Labour has just sent, I think, 30 people over to campaign for Kamala Harris.
Tucker; Is that legal? That seems like foreign interference in our democracy?
Kennedy; Evidently their approach is that as long as you’re not donating money, if you’re out on the campaign trail volunteering, that it’s legal, but certainly unwise in my opinion, because if President Trump wins this election, which he’s looking very likely to do right now, it’s an improper way to conduct foreign relations. You don’t go to another country and campaign for a particular candidate for office.
Tucker; Or try and shut down their most basic rights.
Kennedy; The First Amendment, as everybody always says, it’s first for a reason. The Constitution was written a decade later, but largely in response to our secession from Great Britain, to come and to meddle with that constitution in our own country.
Of course, this follows suit with some of the challenges that we’re seeing free speech face in the United Kingdom, where people are being thrown in prison for 10 months, for two years and so forth, for social media posts.
Tucker; You’re half English. You were educated heavily in England.
Kennedy; I love England. And by the way, that does not reflect England or Great Britain.It is a very small group of leaders there who have aligned themselves with a very small group of leaders here. In the same way that censorship and undermining the Constitution does not reflect the American people, and yet our leaders persist in doing it.”
Whoever wins the election, the Deep State’s banking oligarchs and political neocons will remain in control. Both parties are subservient to their wish for war in the Middle East post the alleged Arab attack on the Twin Towers. From his office in the Pentagon, General Wesley Clark said ; “This is a memo of how we’re going to take out seven countries in five years.” Former FBI operative Ted L. Gunderson explains how the destruction of the World Trade Centre on 9/11 was the false flag catalyst to dupe us into thinking that the Muslims were attacking us so we must go to war with 7 countries. Iran is the last war to complete the Pentagon’s mission……..While this article in Global Research News, corroborates with other whistleblowers, the so-called fact checkers have denounced him as a conspiracy theorist. You do your own research to decide if you believe him or not.
Watch; Former Head of the FBI confirms that 9/11 was orchestrated at the highest level by the U.S. Government X, 29 September 2024
‘Former Head of the FBI confirms that 9/11 was orchestrated at the highest level by the U.S. Government. Oklahoma city bombing, JFK, RFK assassinations, World Trade Center and Child Sex Trafficking by the Military, CIA and Politicians.’
Ted L. Gunderson; “Actually, I had quite an illustrious career; 27 and a half years in the FBI, and in those 27 and a half years I had 13 assignments. So I moved around the country. The only part of the country I never did live in was really the extreme Northeast US. So also during my career I handled just about everything.
I was counter espionage, counterterrorism in New York and Connecticut. And I negotiated with some skyjackers at Philadelphia International Airport for two and a half hours, July 12, 1972. And I ended up being in charge of most of Southern California, I had over 700 personnel under my command. I personally investigated the Oklahoma City bombing case. Huge cover up. Jack Kennedy’s assassination, huge cover up. Bobby Kennedy’s assassination, huge cover up. World Trade Center, huge cover up.
Okay? Terrorism. They’re using it as an excuse to take away our constitutional rights and our civil liberties. The Bilderbergs.
I’m Ted L. Gunderson, a 27 year veteran of the FBI who retired in March of 1979. At the time of my retirement, I was the senior special agent in charge of the FBI Los Angeles division with more than 700 personnel under my command and a budget of $22.5 million.
I was an agent on the street for nine and a half years and then I advanced administratively. I was a supervisor and then I was number’s two man in Connecticut and Philadelphia – Assistant Special Agent in Charge, was the title. Then I became a chief inspector. And then I was the agent in charge of Memphis, Dallas, and the Senior Special Agent in Charge in Los Angeles because I had three other Special Agents in Charge under me and 24 supervisors under them. I have information, chiselled in stone, documenting that the FBI had advanced knowledge about 9/11 and did nothing to prevent it from occurring. This is atrocious. It’s unbelievable, having been a former FBI agent myself, and it’s very obvious that this whole thing is being orchestrated by the powers that be, at the highest level of our government, and I want the world to know about it.
The minute I saw the planes fly into the tower on television live, as a matter of fact, the question I had in my mind was there is no way, absolutely no way, that somebody could skyjack four planes. Twenty people skyjacked four planes, in this case, 19 individuals, and our government would not know about it in advance.
We have, the US government, the most advanced intelligence techniques of anybody in the world, and you will never convince me we didn’t have advanced knowledge about what was going on. We saw the aeroplanes go in and it’s also questionable whether they’re remotely controlled. I don’t know about that. I hate to comment on something where I have no documentation, but there’s much more to this story than has come out so far. You will never in a million years convince me that those buildings, those towers collapsed because those planes hit them. I’m confident that they were imploded. As a matter of fact, there were seismograph readings, they think from the basement, two of them about the time that the buildings collapsed.
There was also molten steel that was in the basement, which is a very high temperature for melting steel and those planes hit above the 80th floor, so there’s no way that that aeroplane fuel could have dropped down that low. Also, there were fires that burned in the basement for some 100 days afterwards. So there’s some implication, there’s some finagling, there’s some manoeuvring as far as I’m concerned and there are many, many more people involved in this than these so-called skyjackers and terrorists.”
A treasure chest of brilliant reasons why we have to keep revealing the truth no matter the consequence – better for one’s self belief as well as for the rest of humanity. I am sure all of us identify with Margaret Anna Alice’s wisdom;
‘What you’ve seen cannot be un-seen.
What you’ve heard cannot be un-heard.
What you’ve felt cannot be un-felt.
What you know cannot be un-known.
To speak that knowledge,
to sing that secret,
to roar that truth
is to risk all—
career, reputation, security, relationships,
life.
And yet to stifle it,
to tamp it down,
to suffocate it
is to sap your integrity,
to stoke your guilt,
to stab your soul.’
When Tyranny Is in Vogue; Jackie’s Final Interview + Special Messages from Margaret Anna Alice, Lisa Henry, and SeanBFlanagan; Oct 07, 2024
Dedicated to Dr. Jackie Stone (1965–2024)
“If it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter-friction to stop the machine. What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn.”
—Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience
Margaret Anna Alice;
When tyranny is in vogue,
dissent is unfashionable.
You get hatcheted by propagandists,
accused by mockingheads,
savaged by kapos,
fact-choked by flunkies,
harassed by cyberbullies,
threatened by psychophants,
flagged by lobbyists,
disappeared by Big Tech,
cash-blocked by banksters,
sacked by employers,
gaslit by “experts,”
banished by tyrants,
rights-stripped by cruelites,
fleeced by billionaires,
delicensed by boards,
gagged by legislators,
barred by hospitals,
shrugged off by amnesty-demanders,
eyerolled by narrative-believers,
cut off by family,
rejected by friends,
divorced by spouses,
separated from children,
uninvited from gatherings,
expelled from society,
clubbed by clockwork oranges,
convicted in kangaroo court,
tossed into jail,
driven to suicide,
bashed upon death.
Governments pay
“comedians” to sneer at you,
screenwriters to caricature you,
influencers to make fun of you,
celebrities to vituperate you,
media to saturate you,
agencies to quarantine you.
Corporations pay
outlets to vilify you,
advertisers to stigmatize you,
universities to marginalize you,
global entities to delete you,
tear-downers to exhaust you,
governing bodies to unperson you.
Philanthropaths pay
$cientists to discredit you,
journals to sideline you,
carpetbaggers to enslave you,
organizations to surveil you,
institutions to invisibilize you,
nations to eradicate you.
But when tyranny becomes passé,
you will be the envy
of the conformists, the colluders,
the accomplices, the corrupt.
They will hide in the shadows behind you,
pretending they were with you all along,
acting like everything is fine now,
insisting you move on.
The nice, compliant people who
violated their values to
keep their jobs,
protect their assets,
avoid being called names,
get invited to parties,
travel, dine out,
be loved by those with terms and conditions
will wish they’d had your badass bravery,
crystalline conscience,
unsoiled integrity,
Apocaloptimistic joy,
wild-weather friends.
Those who sided with
power over truth,
lies over love,
illusions over reality,
rules over rights,
authority over intuition,
astroturf over grassroots,
vaxxiteers over truth-tellers,
pharma over people,
governments over liberty
will detest you.
Your very existence will condemn them.
You were supposed to be
sick,
wrong,
dead.
Instead, you are
healthy,
right,
vibrant.
Your heart will be pure and full
while theirs is foul and empty.
Your mind will be free and open
while theirs is tethered and clenched.
Your soul will be tranquil and light
while theirs is tortured and heavy.
Unless they discover their lost traits—
critical thinking,
courage,
empathy,
humility,
discernment,
humor,
wisdom—
and become
the next generation
of daring, despised, despicable dissidents
when tyranny is in vogue again.
Like Julian Assange, this German lawyer is considered too successful at challenging the Deep State neocons narrative to be a free man. For his prolific work exposing the Covid lies, US stooge Germany has jailed him without trial for over a year.
Read; Reiner Fuellmich issues four written statements – The Exposé + Elsa; Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD 10 Oct 2024
‘It is almost unfathomable that our colleague international attorney Reiner Fuellmich has been in jail without a trial as a political prisoner for one year now. Amongst all the chaos in the world, from military weather warfare against its own citizens with massive hurricanes in the US, withholding disaster relief in North Carolina to enhance the death counts, attacking Republican states before the election, the war in the Middle East itching to escalate to a more official world war, the war of deep state Ukraine and Russia… all of this on the heels of the COVID plandemic crisis where hospitals killed their patients with remdesivir, midazolam and mechanical ventilation.
It is challenging to keep up with it all, but if you understand the writing on the wall and the objective of DEPOPULATION – killing citizens every which way possible is what they are doing. Poison the air we breathe, the food we eat, the medications we take. This is exactly as it was written in the Secret Covenant, that Sean from SGT Report discussed in our interview and I posted here:”
Below are the evil words of the transnational financiers’ UN Sustainable Development Goals whose end goal is the global governance, mass surveillance, mandatory vaccines and the end of privacy that Whiteny Webb speaks about in the article above.
Watch: Demons Of The MRNA VAX; Interview on SGT Report; Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD; Jul 11, 2024
‘In this interview, I discuss an update on militarised cognitive warfare, how geoengineering and the COVID bioweapons have similar composition of self assembly nanotechnology biosensors and metals. This further reveals the technology that is transforming and depopulating humanity and destroying our biosphere. Sean shared this document, (Satanists’ Secret Covenant), which was released in 2002 anonymously. It certainly describes exactly what I have been talking about and what we have been seeing in the world.’
The Secret Covenant
An illusion that will be so large, so vast it will escape their perception. Those who will see it will be thought of as insane.
We will create separate fronts to prevent them from seeing the connection between us.
We will behave as if we are not connected to keep the illusion alive.
Our goal will be accomplished one drop at a time so as to never bring suspicion upon ourselves. This will also prevent them from seeing the changes as they occur.
We will always stand above the relative field of their experience for we know the secrets of the absolute.
We will work together always and will remain bound by blood and secrecy. Death will come to he who speaks.
We will keep their lifespan short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite.
We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so they will never see what is happening.
We will use soft metals, ageing accelerators and sedatives in food and water, also in the air. They will be blanketed by poisons everywhere they turn.
The soft metals will cause them to lose their minds. We will promise to find a cure from our many fronts, yet we will feed them more poison.
The poisons will be absorbed through their skin and mouths, they will destroy their minds and reproductive systems.
From all this, their children will be born dead, and we will conceal this information.
The poisons will be hidden in everything that surrounds them, in what they drink, eat, breathe and wear.
We must be ingenious in dispensing the poisons for they can see far.
We will teach them that the poisons are good, with fun images and musical tones. Those they look up to will help. We will enlist them to push our poisons…………”
(Satans Secret Convenant goes on for several pages)
The Germans appear to be the most tyrannical country in their treatment of dissidents from the globalist’s Covid19 narrative
Read; Dawn raids, assaults, imprisonment: how Germany’s government treats good doctors; World Council for Health 2 Oct 2024
Around 200 doctors issuing mask exemptions were put on a blacklist – and the consequences are shocking
Intro; ‘On June 8, 2024, a call regarding ‘Mask Exemption Certificates and House Searches’ was initiated by Dr Walter Weber, head of the doctors’ association Ärzte für Aufklärung. On this call, we received some shocking information: in Germany, there is a ‘blacklist’ of about 200 doctors who issued mask exemptions and as a result are apparently monitored by state security. Around 100 doctors who had issued similar certificates then came forward. Approximately 95% of these doctors experienced unannounced house searches, with one doctor being searched eight times.
These house searches typically took place from 6am and often lasted during office hours for 1-3 hours. In many cases, doors were broken down, and there were reports of inappropriate treatment of those affected. One example is Rolf Kron, who had to endure sitting in his nightgown with an open door for hours in the winter. Physical violence was also a concerning issue: Dr. Woitzel had to undergo a leg amputation due to police violence.’
While George Monbiot’s opinions are mostly awake, there are times when one can only deduce that he has been silenced by the Guardian.
Read or listen to reading; Monbiot is right about the wickedness of capitalism. Yet he acts as its propagandist Jonathan Cook, Oct 10, 2024
Intro; ‘Capitalism is irredeemably destructive, warns George Monbiot. So why is he shilling for the Guardian, when its role is to create bipartisan support for crushing the anti-capitalist, anti-war left?’
‘Monbiot is as much a victim of this human tendency towards cognitive dissonance as anyone else. In fact, he appears supremely vulnerable to it.
‘As I have noted in a previous article, Monbiot has been a consistently outspoken champion of the West’s endless wars, apparently oblivious to the fact that they are integral to capitalism’s efforts to rationalise vacuuming up huge sums of money to enrich the wealth elite through the war industries rather than looking after the public, and that these wars come at an incalculable cost to the environment, as the destruction of Gaza and now Lebanon should underscore.”
“He has expended a great deal of his time and energies on policing the left’s discourse and smearing its most long-standing figureheads, from Noam Chomsky to the late John Pilger. He has tarred both as “genocide belittlers” in at least two columns for questioning what the West’s “humanitarian wars” are really about. And he did so while he was also claiming to be too busy to make the time to write a column about Assange’s years-long torture and show trial for doing journalism about the West’s war crimes.
The West’s latest “humanitarian war” – Israel supposedly “defending itself” through genocide against the Palestinian people it has been belligerently occupying for decades and whose lands it has stolen – has been an especially hard sell for the corporate media. But it is precisely where we were bound to end up by ignoring – or worse invalidating – the voices of figures like Chomsky and Pilger who were trying to show us the bigger picture of what these wars were really about.
And Monbiot served precisely that role at the Guardian of invalidating them.
Read his new book on capitalism if you need to. Absorb its lessons. But remember, the biggest one is this: Monbiot can be right about the wickedness of capitalism while himself being thoroughly complicit in its wickedness.’
Free speech is under attack by stasi Starmer
Read; Labour-linked censorship group plans to ‘kill Musk’s Twitter The Spectator, 23 October 2024
‘Leaked documents thought to be drawn up by the Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) – founded by Sir Keir Starmer’s now-chief of staff Morgan McSweeney – have been posted on Paul Thacker and Matt Taibbi’s Disinformation Chronicle substack. The files reportedly list ‘kill Musk’s Twitter’ as one of the group’s annual priorities, with the sentiment appearing in multiple documents dating back to the early months of 2024. As Freddy Gray noted today, these days ‘countering digital hate’ tends to mean shutting down speech on platforms that don’t already censor right-wing political views. Another of its top priorities is to ‘trigger EU and UK regulatory action’, while the documents also purportedly show that the group has sought to strengthen ties with senior Democrats, like Senator Amy Klobuchar, in a bid to further its ‘US policy engagement’. How very interesting.
2) Internal Center for Countering Digital Hate document shows their annual objective is “Kill Musk’s Twitter”
This is their internal monthly planner. Their goal is to also trigger regulatory action, although they are a tax-exempt nonprofit. pic.twitter.com/b3TFMA5LLm
— Paul D. Thacker (@thackerpd) October 22, 2024
CCDH’s strong ties with Labour come from the organisation being founded by the Labour leader’s campaign guru – who also founded influential think tank Labour Together. In fact, Thacker’s Disinformation Chronicle dubs CCDH as the ‘messaging vehicle’ for Labour Together – which has close ties to Starmer’s army not least as many of its former staffers are now MPs. More recently, it emerged that Labour Together has been focusing attention on the US after senior figures in the organisation, including former Labour MP Jonathan Ashworth, were reported to be sharing campaign tips with Kamala Harris. The Labour-Democrat links are becoming quite curious…’
This important petition has nearly reached the 100,000 signatures it needs before it will be considered for debate in Parliament by the Petitions Committee, so please sign it:
Sign; Stop the Government from spying on all of our bank accounts Campaign created by Big Brother Watch;
‘Sir Keir Starmer is pushing plans we defeated under the Conservative Government – to spy on all of our bank accounts on the premise of dealing with welfare fraud and error.
It will force banks to flag people who meet secret criteria to the government.
Everyone wants fraudulent uses of public money to be dealt with, and the government already has strong powers to check the bank statements of suspects.
But this is a major expansion of government power that takes away our financial privacy like never before and does away with the presumption of innocence – the democratic principle that you shouldn’t be spied on unless police suspect you of wrongdoing. People who are disabled, sick, carers or looking for work should not be treated like criminals by default. None of us should.
We must stop this! I don’t want my bank account to be spied on. If thousands of us sign this petition, we can make Starmer drop these dangerous mass bank spying powers.’
No government that represents the interests of its people, as opposed to Western imperialists, is safe from a US led coup. In the case of Gaddafi, the UK’s leader, David Cameron, followed orders from Washington to front the war that destroyed him and his country.
Watch 5 mins; THIS Is Why Gaddafi Thought He Was Safe From An Overthrow! w/ Moussa Ibrahim The Jimmy Dore Show, 19 October 2024
“Gaddafi started to fund projects of liberation in Africa. He knew that Europe and the West in general would oppose these projects and would try their best to stop them. So he thought, and I think this is his mistake, that he could neutralise the West, he could appease the West for a short period of time. Gaddafi genuinely believed that he needed 10 to 15 years to create, establish and run all of these projects that he talked about.
And he thought he could have some sort of peace with the West for this time. He went as far as convincing France, the United Kingdom, Italy, that they could have economic relations, profitable economic relations with Libya. And indeed, Libya, for the first time since 1969, signed quite lucrative economic and financial agreements with these countries. But Gaddafi really did not have the intention of going through with these agreements. They were just his plan to push the West back until he was able to make the African Union strong.”
Friends – if you weren’t able to get to the UK Column event “UK Column on Location” in Bristol last Saturday, you can watch the whole day online here for just £25 – a great way to support the UK Column and the fantastic journalists and activists they gathered for an amazing event!
Timestamps; 00:13:10 Welcome & Intro: Brian Gerrish; 00:25:45 Dr Ahmad Malik; 01:00:46 Rachel Mathews; 01:57:33 Clare Wills Harrison; 03:38:41 Sonia Poulton; 04:21:19 Media on Trial: Mike Robinson, Piers Robinson, David Miller and Peter Ford; 06:01:32 UK Column Team: Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson, Alex Thomson, Charles Malet, Debi Evans, Diane McAdie and Ben Rubin; 06:36:28 Kim Isherwood; 07:30:44 Katy-Jo & Sadie; 08:18:50 Bob Moran; 09:02:00 Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson, Charles Malet and Willsy
Covid/Vaccines Scam and Pandemic Treaty
— illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) May 30, 2023
What a joy to think that the chief liars in the Covid19 scamdemic might go to jail for killing millions of people .
Read; Judge Rules Bill Gates Must Face Vaccine-Injured in Netherlands Court Children’s Health Defense, 22 October 2024
A Netherlands judge last week ruled that Bill Gates must face seven people injured by COVID-19 vaccines in court in the Netherlands. Other defendants include Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, and the Dutch state.
‘A Netherlands judge last week ruled that Bill Gates must face seven people injured by COVID-19 vaccines in court in the Netherlands.
According to Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf, the seven “corona sceptics” sued Gates last year, along with former Dutch prime minister and newly appointed NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, and “several members” of the Dutch government’s COVID-19 “Outbreak Management Team.”
Other defendants include Albert Bourla, Ph.D., CEO of Pfizer, and the Dutch state.
“Because Bill Gates’ foundation was involved in combating the Corona pandemic, he has also been summoned,” De Telegraaf reported.
According to Dutch independent news outlet Zebra Inspiratie, the plaintiffs allege that Gates, through his representatives, deliberately misled them about the safety of the COVID-19 shots, despite knowing “that these injections were not safe and effective.”
Dutch independent journalist Erica Krikke told The Defender that the seven plaintiffs — whose names are redacted in the lawsuit’s publicly available documents — “are ordinary Dutch people, and they have been jabbed and after the jabs they got sick.”
Krikke said that of the seven original plaintiffs, one has since died, leaving the other six plaintiffs to continue the lawsuit.
The lawsuit was filed in the District Court of Leeuwarden. According to De Telegraaf, “Gates had objected because, according to him, the judges did not have jurisdiction.” Accordingly, the court first “had to rule in the so-called incident procedure,” De Andere Krant reported.
Zebra Inspiratie reported that the hearing in this “incident procedure” took place on Sept. 18 and that Gates’ representatives disputed jurisdiction, but not the claim.
According to De Andere Krant, Gates was represented by the Pels Rijcken law firm, based in The Hague, described as “the largest and the premier litigation law firm in the Netherlands.” Gates did not appear at the Sept 18 hearing, but attorneys for Gates argued that the court “had no jurisdiction over him because he lives in the United States.”
However, in its Oct. 16 ruling, the Leeuwarden court ruled it does have jurisdiction over Gates. De Andere Krant reported that the court found “sufficient evidence” that the claims against Gates and the other defendants are “connected” and based on the same “complex of facts.”
Other defendants who reside outside of the Netherlands, including Bourla, did not challenge the court’s jurisdiction.
The court ruled Gates must pay attorneys’ fees and additional legal costs totaling 1,406 euros (approximately $1,520). A hearing is scheduled for Nov. 27.’
Fantastic news…
Read; Southwest Idaho Health District Board pulls COVID vaccines from its clinics; Boise State Public Radio News | By Julie Luch
https://x.com/Ultrafrog17/status/1848863843205976146/photo/1
Will they time a Mpox or bird flu lockdown in time to disrupt the US election??
Read; Bird Flu or Monkeypox — Which Will They Weaponize Next? Brownstone Institute, Clayton J. Baker, M.D., 24 Sept 2024
Intro; ‘Health authorities have put bird flu on the back burner since the WHO last month declared Mpox a global public health emergency. However, evidence suggests that bird flu could be used as a bioweapon — and maybe even to disrupt the November presidential election.’
‘Bird flu was the hot topic in pandemic fear-mongering until very recently. Just a few months ago, former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield publicly described bird flu (also known as H5N1 influenza A or avian influenza virus) as the likely next pandemic — predicting a laboratory-leaked virus as the cause.
Meanwhile, Deborah Birx, aka the “Scarf Lady” of COVID-19 infamy, was making the TV news, promoting an unrealistic and excessive program of testing farm animals and humans for bird flu.
At present, bird flu seems to have been put on the back burner by the authorities. Monkeypox has since taken centre stage, with the World Health Organization declaring a state of emergency over that virus.
Furthermore, the “experts” have trotted out numerous other viruses with which to terrify the public. Examples include West Nile virus — who no less than Dr. Anthony Fauci himself supposedly contracted — and even the exotic “Sloth virus” (also known as Oropouche virus).
The first step in dealing with these continual reports of horrific pathogens is recognizing the vital importance of living in knowledge rather than in fear.
“Fear porn” is a real psychological weapon and one that is being used against us on a daily basis. As we painfully learned during COVID-19, a terrified population is easily manipulated, controlled and exploited.
As free citizens, we must remain mindful and knowledgeable, rather than fearful, about the flood of information and propaganda that is hurled at us.
Regarding bird flu, we should remain mindful of the following. In its current iteration, bird flu has caused no widespread human illness, no human deaths and sporadic outbreaks in farm animal populations.
However, there is much evidence that bird flu could be used as a bioweapon. Furthermore, it could also be applied to disrupt the 5 Nov U.S. presidential election.’
My body, my choice. Unless they are forcing a fake vaccine on you.
Utter hypocrites. pic.twitter.com/Xn3JvhONWz— We the People | Populism is Democracy ???????? (@Jude_62) May 27, 2024
Looking more closely at what the mRNA vaccine has unleashed onto the human race, with the potential to destroy all living things.
Watch; The Replicon Agenda: Another Dose Of Bioterrorism? In The Lion’s Den – Interview with Dr Bill Lionberger, Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD, 4 October 2024
Intro; ‘In this interview with Dr. Bill Lionberger we discuss the roll out of replicon mRNA injections in Japan and how that affects the world. I discuss RNA machines and how the delivery of replicons can happen via virus-like particles or liposomal carriers, which I have already filmed in the COVID19 injections and embalmed blood, are uncontrolled self replicating nanotechnology.’
Dr Bill Lionberger; “We’re here to dive into the world of replicon vaccination. What it really sounds like is a sci fi movie with the potential dangers of world vaccine injury with the potential to spread unchecked outside the host, and has the ability to cross between species and Alpha virus to permanently introduce artificial genes into the entire ecosystem. So what exactly is a replicon? Sounds like Omicron, remember? Simply put, it’s a genetic element that can replicate independently within a cell. A self amplifying technology RNA vaccine that has an innate ability to make copies of itself.
What could possibly go wrong? The potential of a replicon plus influenza or a replicon plus coronavirus supervirus can potentially transmit as a multi species Alpha virus that could be capable of deadly harm to humans, that’s what.”
Dr Mihalcea; ”So I look at it from the perspective of self assembling and self replicating nanotechnology, because remember, this is still nanotechnology. And this aspect of nanotechnology and the danger of the extinction of species, was discussed 20 and 30 years ago. It’s even in Ray Kurzweil’s book, The Singularity is Near, where it was discussed that if nanotechnology builds self assembling machines and that these machines can self replicate and that then is unchecked and uncontrollable by those who manufacture it, then there can be what’s called a grey goo scenario. What does that mean? That these machines use up the energy of the material world and exterminate all life on Earth. And this sounds like a big thing, but in fact, these experts like Dr. Drexler and Kurzweil, and they were all aware of this. So machines can be biological machines because now with synthetic biology and nanotechnology, the fusion of it has created artificial machines from organic materials, from RNA, from DNA.
And so this is the context in which I think is the danger to our species.”
The only way to stop another lockdown and fake ‘vaccine’ is to say NO. So we need to spread the message to inform and empower more people to be part of the resistance.
Watch; VAXXED 3 – AUTHORIZED TO KILL ???? DEPLOYMENT EUGENICS TO PROFITABLY CULL THE POPULATION Children’s Health Defense
“People are believing the information that they’re being fed. They’re not questioning it. They’re trusting the sources where it’s coming from. And those sources are not to be trusted. And, you know, prior to Covid, I trusted those sources.
It’s a shorter list to tell you what was true than, you know, to tell you about all the lies. Everything was a lie. About the vaccine, about the masks, about the tests, about the lockdowns, about school closures, about the safety, about the efficacy.
The government was lying, the media was lying, and they’re still lying.
They’re telling us the unvaccinated are dying in hospital.
They’re telling us the unvaccinated are spreading this disease. Everything we were told was a lie. There were so many lies during COVID It was just wave after wave after wave. All these things that don’t add up. So there’s only one thing left for us to do.
We need to get a bus and get back out on the road and find out for ourselves what is going on, because only the people will tell us the truth. We knew that from the last bus. So it was time to get back out again. So on the first bus, we started to sign the names. We were honouring the people that had been injured or killed by vaccinations, and these were approved vaccinations on the first tour.
So it would sign the names on the bus, and it would fill the bus up. I think that bus had been incredibly important in uncovering the extent of vaccine injury. So we went to Children’s Health Defense and said, we need a bus. And they said, “yes”.
Abuse of power by testing drugs on human guinea pigs – this time the killer drug, Remdesivir on military personnel.
Read; ‘Remdesivir Papers’ Allege Controversial Drug Used to Treat Service Members Led to 601 Deaths Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., 7 October 2024
Intro; ‘A military whistleblower released a series of documents revealing that the military began “liberally” administering Remdesivir to service members who were suspected of having COVID-19 — months before the FDA approved the drug’.
“A military whistleblower released a series of documents revealing 601 deaths of military service members and a high rate of serious adverse events in clinical trials involving Remdesivir, an antiviral commonly administered to COVID-19 patients during the pandemic.
According to “The Remdesivir Papers,” some clinical trials were improperly run. In the case of at least one study, results were never made public. The whistleblower also alleged a widespread lack of informed consent for trial participants.
“Data derived from the Department of Defense [DOD] Joint Trauma System … by a military whistleblower offers a stark contrast to results of multiple clinical trials involving the liberal usage of Remdesivir in military treatment facilities and other civilian facilities, as well as its potential contribution to, at minimum, hundreds of untimely deaths,” the documents state.
Yet according to the documents, the military began “liberally” administering Remdesivir to service members who were suspected of having COVID-19 — months before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the drug.
The whistleblower, known by the pseudonym Daniel LeMay, shared the documents with investigative journalist J.M. Phelps, who published them last week in The Gateway Pundit.
In interviews with The Defender, LeMay and Phelps discussed the documents and their significance.
LeMay said the DOD’s Joint Trauma System is responsible for tracking “all sorts of patient data.” He told The Defender that the “initial trial depicted data manipulation in favour of Remdesivir.”
Killer physicians are shielded from justice.
Read; Taxpayers Paid $262 Million to U.S. Virologist Who Worked With Wuhan Lab — But Court Rules He Can Hide the Data, Children’s Health Defense, 23 October 2024
‘A North Carolina judge rejected a FOIA claim for documents related to gain-of-function experiments conducted by virologist Ralph Baric, Ph.D.
U.S. Right to Know sued to obtain the documents, believing they contain crucial evidence about the origin of COVID-19.’
‘A judge in North Carolina has rejected a Freedom of Information (FOIA) claim for documents that almost certainly contain crucial evidence about the origin of COVID-19.
The case was brought by the transparency group U.S. Right to Know. The target of the request was the world’s most renowned expert on coronaviruses and godfather of gain-of-function experiments, Ralph Baric, Ph.D., who runs the Baric Lab at the University of North Carolina (UNC).
Baric is the brains behind the 2018 DEFUSE blueprint for making COVID-19-like viruses in the lab. The blueprint was designed in collaboration with Shi Zhengli, the Director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, at whose lab some of the work was to have been done.
DEFUSE was not the first project on which Shi and Baric worked together. In 2015, they created SARS viruses in a lab that could infect humans. At the time, Rutgers biologist Richard Ebright warned that the Shi-Baric experiments would cause a worldwide pandemic. He was sadly proven right.
While Shi and her laboratory have garnered significant attention, Baric has largely remained under the radar. This may be understandable, given that Shi’s lab is situated in the city where the pandemic originated; however, it is somewhat counterintuitive when one considers the availability of evidence.
On Sept. 12, 2019, shortly before the outbreak began in Wuhan, Shi’s lab deleted its entire virus database. Although this action is incriminating, the likelihood of obtaining any data from China has always been virtually nonexistent.
In contrast, for Baric, who falls under U.S. jurisdiction, the prospects of acquiring information should have been nearly certain — unless he was being shielded from scrutiny.
What makes the lack of interest in Baric — whether from the media, Congress, or any other oversight body — even more curious is that, as we report here for the first time, he has received at least a quarter of a billion dollars in U.S. taxpayer funding over the past two decades.
A further curiosity is that when Dr. Anthony Fauci learned of the likely lab origin of COVID-19 in January 2020 and convened his now infamous secret conference among supposed experts, Baric was notably missing.
It never made any sense why the world’s most prominent expert on coronaviruses was excluded from a crucial meeting at the highest levels of the U.S. government, whose reported intention was to learn more about the new virus.
When Fauci was asked about Baric, he claimed, under oath, that he had heard of the name but had never met the man.
It was later revealed, when Fauci’s schedules were released pursuant to a FOIA lawsuit against Fauci’s organisation, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), that not only did Fauci know Baric well, but that the two men had a long meeting in Fauci’s office shortly after the pandemic started. All these facts were hidden from the public.’
Listen; Richie Allen Radio Show; 1 July 2024
Radiologist, Oncologist, Cancer Researcher, Author of 100+ publications.
‘William Makis MD is an oncologist and radiologist based in Alberta, Canada. He is one of the authors of a hugely important new study entitled: “A Systematic Review of Autopsy findings in deaths after COVID-19 vaccination.”
In the study, 325 autopsy cases were reviewed. William and his co-authors found that “73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.”’
34 mins; “ And this is the largest autopsy series and autopsy review that has been done. Now we have 325 autopsies. We found that when someone who was vaccinated died within days or weeks of vaccination had an autopsy, that the evidence in about 74% of cases was that the vaccine directly caused, or significantly contributed to, the death. This is what you would expect in the broader population if autopsies were being done on every sudden and unexpected death and they’re simply not being done.”
54min; “When we look at the mainstream media and the mainstream medical establishment’s response to this increase in cancer rates, they usually have two responses. One is that there is no increase in cancer rates, that it’s all made up. And the other response is, yes, there is an explosion of aggressive cancers in young people, but it’s anything but the vaccine. And usually they don’t have an explanation. So, for example, when Yale admits that there’s an explosion of colon cancers, and people under the age of 50, they have no idea what’s causing it, right? They have no idea why people are developing bile duct cancers, a cancer that people get in their seventies. Now, people are getting it in their twenties, 20 year olds are getting diseases of 70 year olds. They have no explanation for any of this. So how can these vaccines cause cancer?
That is a complicated topic. No one knows for sure. I’ll start with that. No one knows for sure. There are certainly many theories, many good theories, and you have to look at the technology itself…….”
“The lipid nanoparticles with the mRNA inside them. And now, as we know, the DNA contamination that’s inside them as well. The DNA plasmids, some of those plasmids contain sv 40 promoter. That’s from a carcinogenic virus, simian virus 40. So the components of the vaccine, you’ve got the lipid nanoparticle, and that’s actually a key component in this, because if you didn’t have the lipid nanoparticle, I think we wouldn’t have the cancers. The lipid nanoparticle is the vehicle that delivers the payload, which is the genetic material, and it delivers it throughout the different parts of the body. If the vaccine had just stayed in the arm, as we were told, and as we were promised, I really think we wouldn’t see the kinds of injuries that we’re seeing. We wouldn’t see the myocarditis, the neurological injuries, the autoimmune diseases, and we wouldn’t see the cancers. So I think the fact that it ends up in the systemic circulation is crucial.”
……“it basically wreaks havoc on your immune system. It completely changes immune signalling, it completely changes the production of the types of antibodies”
“…….So cancer cells become invisible to the immune system, and you need the immune system to kill cancer cells. We have cancer cells and mutated cells being produced all the time. And when you mess with the immune system and you damage the immune system, and you start shutting things off in the immune system, which is what the mRNA and spike protein do, that’s when cancers start exploding.”
Watch out, our authorities have plans that only those asleep or bribed to remain silent, will not be alarmed about …….sadly I can think of a few!
Watch 6 mins; Northern Ireland Public Health Bill will impose medical tyranny – forced injections and quarantine; David Kurten; Oct 1 2024;
“UKMFA (UK Medical Freedom Alliance) are joining many groups in opposing the Proposed Northern Ireland Public Health Bill proposed new Northern Ireland Public Health Bill, which would give unprecedented powers to the state in a health emergency, including the ability to mandate vaccines and preventative treatment on individuals, potentially opening the door to forced vaccinations. It also seeks to give authorities the power to detain and quarantine individuals, force medical examinations, forcibly enter premises, require children to be kept off school and adults off work. The legislation appears to be adopting key elements of the WHO’s amendments to the International Health Regulations.
This is a deeply disturbing bill, seeking to expand the powers of the state in ways which would violate fundamental principles of medical ethics – informed consent, bodily autonomy, medical choice – and also infringe many other human rights.
Here is a petition they took down –
https://x.com/KSCUBKEE/status/1843624147785789748
‘Over 6,000 signed the petition in 36 hours to stop the NI health bill….that was deemed to be ‘inappropriate’ and the petition was removed…meanwhile the UKGov have stopped petitions citing there is no committee. YOU ARE BEING PREVENTED FROM OBJECTING.’
For exposing the lies behind the Covid 18 scam, Dr. Aseem Malhotra has been persecuted by the state. His film is an inspiring reminder that we can avoid most of big pharma’s drugs by doing our own research to find doctors who cure ailments through natural medication.
Watch; Scientific integrity; Dr. John Campbell reviews produced made by Dr. Aseem Malhotra ; First do no Pharm; 28 Oct 2024
‘This film isn’t just an exposé – it’s a call to arms. It will provide you with the knowledge and tools to fight back against a system that values profits over patients. We’ll show you how to navigate this treacherous landscape, how to protect yourself and your loved ones from the excesses of an industry gone mad.’
Email for Dr. Malhotra consultations; concierge@hum2n.com;
Note from Dr. Malhotra; We Have Had Too Much Medicine For Too Many Years; The Time To Act Is Now
Dear Friend,
We stand at a critical juncture in the history of medicine, and I’m writing to you with a sense of urgency that cannot be overstated. For over a decade, I’ve been sounding the alarm about the pervasive and pernicious influence of “too much medicine” in our lives. Today, I’m calling on you to join me in a fight that affects us all.The harsh reality is this: we are drowning in a sea of pharmaceuticals, pushed upon us by an industry that has long since abandoned its moral compass in pursuit of profit.Big Pharma, more powerful and profitable than ever before, has infiltrated every aspect of our healthcare system.Our regulatory bodies, meant to protect us, have instead become puppets of the very corporations they should be overseeing. Let me be clear – this is not a victimless crime. The cost is measured in human lives, in suffering and the erosion of trust in a system that should heal, not harm.We’ve witnessed these companies pay billions in fines as if they were mere parking tickets, their CEOs offering hollow apologies before returning to their boardrooms to plot the next money-making scheme. The numbers are staggering, almost beyond comprehension. That’s why I’m producing “First Do No Pharm”, a documentary that will rip away the veil of secrecy and expose the ugly truth of how our health has been commodified and exploited for decades.
Provoked War with Russia/China Conflicts
The Western banking oligarchs’ and political neocons’ war in pursuit of Ukraine’s and Russia’s resources, divides the world and directs huge funds to arms companies.
Watch; BRICS rise and Europe’s economic decline w/ Alex Krainer The Duran, 15 October 2024
Alex Krainer; “Russian resources are estimated to be worth between US$75 and US$90 trillion. That would be a whole lot of collateral which, if the Western banking system controlled them, all the development loans, all the trade, all the financing would turn into a massive conveyor belt transferring wealth from everybody who develops those resources to the Western banking oligarchy.
So breaking up Russia, destroying it as a political entity and turning it into a collection of weak client states that could always always be pitted one against the other, is the Western financiers’ wet dream. It’s the biggest prize, and it would also remove the largest and most powerful rival that they have in their quest to control the Eurasian landmass, and the quest to control the Eurasian landmass has been the obsession of the of the imperial class for centuries and we had an explicit formulation of this imperative from Macintyre onwards but also reformulated and reaffirmed by people like Brzezinski who was advisor to five US presidents about foreign policy and it’s basically been embraced by the neocons in US Presidential administrations and the neocons are the people who ultimately formulate the American foreign policy.
Now a big mystery about this that people should focus on is that this is a band of highly ideological individuals who are organised, who are relatively few, whose interests are not really intersecting with the interests of ordinary American individuals and businesses, who should be the bearers of sovereignty in the US democracy, but who somehow have this disproportionate power to wield influence on US foreign policy. Why that is, and how that is, needs to be explained, and I believe that it is because they have the support of the banking oligarchy who ultimately control not only the military industrial complex but also the media.”
“ The Russians and the Chinese and pretty much all of the BRICS countries, even though many of the BRICS countries are still in a relatively vulnerable position with relation to the Empire, they still have extensive ties with the IMF and for some reason they’re very nervous about rocking the boat with the IMF, but I think that the process is moving slowly as a tsunami and I think there’s enough of political and economic power behind it that it will be successful.
So they are already conducting very substantial trade bypassing the US dollar, so I think that something like 90% of trade between China and Russia today is denominated in Roubles or Yuan. Something like 50% of Russia-China and Russia- India trade is denominated in their individual local currencies, and so this is gaining momentum.
It was Pepe Escobar who first brought my attention to it. It seems to be a very serious attempt to completely change the global trade payment architecture for the future, and I initially thought it was a gimmick, that it was yet another crypto something or other, but I read the paper eventually about two weeks ago and I realised this was very very serious, this is a very sophisticated novelty and that I think will be given due attention and it might become the new trade settlement system, not just currency but a system. So rather than it being centralised in the Bank of England or Federal Reserve banks where everybody who wanted to trade internationally had to have an account with the Federal Reserve, like every country, and they had to have all their dollar revenue acrue, and that of course gave the Empire power over them because if you wanted to spend those dollars they could say, ‘no you can’t, you can’t do this, why don’t you just invest in our treasuries? They give you a nice little return, they’re safe’. So the whole world ended up financing the Empire by being forced into the Empire’s trade settlement system and to use the Empire’s currency, so this is now what becomes undone.”
99% of the entire world wants to end the war in Ukraine except the West’s neocons and Ukrainian Nazis – the latter will kill Zelensky if he makes ‘concessions’ to Russia to end the war.
Read; Ukraine Pressured to Negotiate with Russia by Western Allies and Global South Ahmed Adel, Global Research, 10 October 2024
‘More than two years into the Ukrainian conflict, the Kiev regime is facing pressure from both Western allies and the Global South to come to the negotiating table to reach a “flexible” peace with Russia, Bloomberg reported. However, this is complicated because, according to a former US official, making any concessions to Russia “would be fatal” for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.’
‘According to the Bloomberg article, Ukraine is approaching the third winter of the conflict against the backdrop of reduced Western support. Germany is allocating much less funds in its budget to Ukraine, and “France is grappling with its own ballooning deficit.”
Despite Zelensky’s statements that he is unwilling to negotiate any concessions with Moscow, senior Ukrainian officials admitted to the outlet that “an endgame should come into play.”
“Ukraine’s allies are detecting that President Volodymyr Zelensky may be getting ready to adopt a more flexible approach as they look at ways to help bring an end to Russia’s war,” the article quotes its sources close to NATO.
Kiev’s possible membership in NATO has not been confirmed even by US Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris who, in turn, had promised support for Ukraine.
The article admits that in addition to the West, another part of the world, the Global South, also wants peace talks between Russia and Ukraine to take place. Unlike the West, countries in the Global South, particularly Brazil and China, have consistently stated that Russia must be included in peace negotiations.
‘Zelensky’s blueprint to isolate Moscow by securing the support of countries such as China, India and Brazil has stalled amid an insistence that the Kremlin has a seat at the negotiating table’, the article concludes.
On June 15-16, the so-called ‘Peace Summit for Ukraine’ was held in the Swiss resort of Burgenstock, but Russia was not invited. Brazil, India, Mexico, South Africa and other states did not sign the final communiqué. The Kremlin said that it makes no sense to look for options for resolving the situation in the Ukrainian conflict without Russia’s participation.
Zelensky Opens to Talks with Moscow Through Third Parties
For his part, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s peaceful settlement of the conflict calls for Ukrainian troops to withdraw from the new Russian regions, demands that Kiev renounce its intentions to join NATO and adopt a neutral, non-aligned, and nuclear-free status, carry out the country’s demilitarisation and denazification, and lift anti-Russia sanctions.’
However much psychopathic leaders are hated by their electorate, they have a revolving door where they can transform, like chameleons, from politicians to corporate leaders and back again.
Listen; The Western powers in NATO are desperately delusional on Russia, and getting more so on China Geopolitical Economy Report, 2 Oct 2024
Radhika Desai and Michael Hudson. They are joined by scholar Glenn Diesen to discuss the war in Ukraine, disaster in Europe, and farewell speech by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.
Glenn Diesen; “If you’re unpopular in domestic politics, you can still make it big in international politics. In Europe, you have people like EU President, Ursula von der Leyen. They wanted her out of their own country, but she can get the top position in the EU. Look at Kaja Kallas. She was the Prime Minister of Estonia, also at the bottom of the opinion polls in her own country, but her fierce anti-Russian sentiments and obedience to Washington ensures that she would end up in the foreign policy position of the European Union. Now she’s sitting there calling for breaking up Russia, arguing that we cannot have diplomacy with Russians because they were war criminals. So this is kind of the logic.
In terms of the think tanks, I often describe them as being a symptom of market fundamentalism. It’s effectively foreign policy, up for sale to market forces, because think tanks tend to respond to the problem of policymakers; They need to know a little bit about everything; elected officials don’t know everything. So, the argument for think tanks is that they connect the officials with the expert community. They produce information analysis and policy recommendations. The problem is, once you control information in that little network of people, this is huge power. Who has an interest in buying a market share? Of course, the main financier of all of these think tanks is the military industrial complex, essentially allowing them to buy foreign policy. As a result, we see that military solutions are the first choice for most conflicts. If you look at Afghanistan (President) Karzai was trying to make peace with the Taliban. The Americans said, no, no, no, we will go for the military victory option. there’s simply a market interest. if war is your business, and it’s a huge business, a multibillion dollar business, when peace breaks out, this whole industry can be threatened. You get the information, which goes to the politicians, with policy recommendations they should follow. Most of the actual staff are the decision makers. When they’re out of office, they’re sitting in think tanks to remain relevant. And when they’re out of office, when they go back into office, of course, they still remain on the payroll.
Of course, these think tanks, are also pushing all their articles into the media, in which they have more resources than regular journalists. So you can also manufacture consent from the public. So there’s a huge, huge influence. This is the market model. This is why you create little cliques of everyone who is on the same payroll and essentially elevate the people you want up, and you’re able to push down the people you don’t want there. So it’s a very dangerous system.”
BRICS is our big hope to developa multipolar world.
BRICS 16th Summit – First Step Towards a Common Future of Sovereign Multipolarity? Peter Koenig; Global Research, October 28, 2024
‘The BRICS 16th Annual Meeting in Kazan, Russia – 22-24 October 2024, is history.
‘Was the summit successful? Depending on what one looks at and what is considered a success. At the outset, it was a success, if only because it put issues and differences openly on the table to be disputed and eventually resolved. The meeting itself did not produce much novelties. For example, many remarkable happenings, dispute resolutions and agreements happened at the margin of the summit or before. Most notably, what did not happen was another expansion of the BRICS alliance.
Since the 2023 BRICS summit in Johannesburg, when Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) joined the five original members, Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, no new members have joined. However, two more nations that were invited in Johannesburg in 2023 to become members – Argentina and Saudi Arabia – have either declined (Argentina), or, so far, not acted on becoming a member (Saudi Arabia). In fact, Saudi’s acting ruler, Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman, was among the notable absentees in Kazan.
Could it be Western pressure – by Saudi’s Western hydrocarbon clients and military supporters?
BRICS internal rifts or disagreements concern accession conditions for new members. Missing is also a common set of internal rules that would lend the alliance stability and credibility vis-à-vis the outside world.
The BRICS also lack a common Secretariat and common guiding principles on policies of trade, economic and military cooperation.
For a new member to be accepted, it needs the unanimous support of the existing members – currently nine.
For example, Venezuela is an eager candidate to join the Club, but was vetoed by Brazil, for reasons that have more to do with the two countries’ bilateral relationship than with the enlargement of BRICS.
Such bilateral conflicts do not help the group’s coherence and credibility, the so far most important Global South organisation.
Already in September 2024, Turkey had expressed her interest in joining the BRICS and did, indeed, apply for membership. Turkey would be the first NATO member to join the BRICS; yet, so far, her accession has been stalled.
Although, Mark Rutte, the new NATO chief, when recently questioned, did not object at all, saying that Turkey was a sovereign country and could join the BRICS alliance on her own free will. He added that Turkey would nevertheless remain one of the most important NATO members.
Perhaps Turkey’s NATO membership was a thorn in the eyes of some Global South states. However, India, not a de jure NATO member, has close relations with NATO and the US. Yet, India is a founding member of the BRICS. Perhaps the perceptions have changed since the 2006 formation of the alliance.’
More on the above;
Listen; BRICS grows, adding 13 new ‘partner countries’ at historic summit in Russia Geopolitical Economy Report, 25 October 2024
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: Building BRICS Around the West Judging Freedom, Andrew Napolitano, 25 October 2024
Andrew Napolitano; “Professor Sachs, thank you very much for your time. There’s a great deal about which to discuss with you. Let’s start with the BRICS meeting in Kazan, Russia. How significant was that for the economy and geopolitics of this world we inhabit?”
Jeffrey Sachs; “Very significant. This was a meeting of 36 governments. 10 are core BRICS members right now and the other 26 are BRICS aspirants. They want to join the BRICS. The roundtable discussion among the leaders of these 36 countries encompassed 57% of the world population and nearly half of the world output measured in international prices. In other words, this was a very, very significant meeting representing more than half of the world. And it was a meeting of course, in which none of the western countries, meaning the United States, Canada, Britain, the European Union, Japan, Korea, Australia, New Zealand were there. So this is the rest of the world saying we don’t buy your sanctions, your bullying is the way they see it, your actions that are outside of the UN, and so they’re forming a very large global network as an alternative. And it’s very meaningful, very important. What was notable for me in the outcome was not only the very strong show of goodwill among these 36 countries. There was little squabbling, they did their business. It was a very congenial meeting. But these countries did not aim to overturn international law or the UN. The entire declaration, the Kazan Declaration, named after the place where the meeting took place, Kazan, Russia is all about making the United Nations system work.
What these countries were saying was they don’t like the United States and its so-called friends and allies operating outside of the UN system, overthrowing governments, putting on sanctions that are not legal by international standards, bullying countries and so forth. So it wasn’t to overturn the UN- based system, it was to say, behave, live within it. We’re pledged to do so. We will cooperate among ourselves. And it was really tacitly saying to the US and others, you can’t get away with your making up the rules as you go along. We have international rules and processes and you can’t force us to play by your rules.”
Andrew Napoltano; “What is the respective comparative wealth of the BRICS nations, whether it’s a gross domestic product or gross national product?”
Jeffrey Sachs; “China is a larger economy than the United States now, maybe 30% larger. But remember that the population of China is four times the United States. So the output per person in the US is still more than three times China’s level by most measures. But in the aggregate, China’s enormous and it’s the lead trade partner with the most countries in the world actually. Now it carries a great deal of weight. It’s got a manufacturing production base that’s probably roughly twice the size of US production.
And China has arrived at the cutting edge of technology. The idea that the United States is just so far ahead that China can’t catch up is simply wrong. China’s way ahead of the United States in certain areas. For instance in the efficient, low cost production of solar modules, of wind turbines, fourth generation nuclear, nuclear power, of electric vehicles, of many things that the world really wants.
The countries that were around the table, the 10, plus the other 26, the 36 around the table, by my quick calculation came to about 47% of world output and 57% of the world population. So very, very sizeable, extremely important. And by the way, of course we should understand this translates into military power, into technology and so forth. The idea that the United States is just so far ahead militarily that it can get its way, that it can demand countries to do this or that is a thing of the past, if it was ever true.”
Please may the defeat of Ukraine (the US, UK and EU) and Israel (the US, UK and EU) be through conflict resolution not through combatants murdering combatants and civilians. If the combatants were free to connect to their conscience, they would point their weapons at the neocons in the West to demand their arrest for causing wars for geopolitical and resource gains.
Watch; Ukraine & Israel On the Path to Defeat John Mearsheimer, Alexander Mercouris & Glenn Diesen, The Duran, 23 October 2024
John Mearsheimer; “What one would like here is some sort of meaningful peace agreement that puts this conflict to bed once and for all, but I think that’s almost impossible. What Putin is demanding, just for purposes of starting the negotiations, is that Ukraine and the West recognise Russia’s annexation of those four oblasts plus Crimea, and furthermore that the West and Ukraine commit themselves to not putting Ukraine inside of NATO, to creating a legitimately neutral Ukraine. I think the West and Ukraine itself are just not going to agree to that. It’s not in the cards. So if you’re playing Russia’s hand, the question is ‘what do you do then’, and my view is if you’re the Russians you grab as much territory as you can. You don’t want to go too far west because then you start absorbing huge numbers of ethnic Ukrainians which will mean unending trouble, but if you’re the Russians I think if you can take Odessa. If you’re not going to get a meaningful peace agreement, you’re not going to get a neutral Ukraine, you want to take as much territory as you can for purposes of defence. Furthermore you want to do everything you can to weaken Ukraine, to make sure that that dysfunctional rump state is really dysfunctional and controls as little territory as possible and is not a legitimate candidate to become a member of NATO.
So the problem that the West and the Ukrainians face by delaying this war and not reaching some sort of meaningful peace agreement with the Russians is that they give the Russians powerful incentives to take more and more and to do more and more damage to Ukraine. So it’s really counterproductive. In the end result, what you’re going to get is a frozen conflict and that frozen conflict is going to be bad news because it’s going to mean perpetual poisonous relations between Russia and Ukraine and Russia and the West. Given that there are all sorts of potential flash points in Eastern Europe, the Arctic, the Baltic Sea, Kaliningrad, Belarus, Moldova and the Black Sea this one could turn into a hot war again very easily. So we are really in a mess of a situation. It’s just hard to imagine how much trouble we have gotten ourselves into, we meaning the West because I think we’re principally responsible for this disaster and again I just don’t see any meaningful way out.”
Zionism is a Colonial State Project
Watch Iran and Israel, is the escalation over? The Duran, 30 Oct 2024
Alexander Mercouris; “Iran is more powerful and better organised than many people suppose. If the Iranians did manage to shoot down missiles, that was why the bigger strike was called off. It’s another demonstration that Iran is more powerful and better organised in its defences than many people imagine and that is consistent with what we saw with the Iranian missile strike of the 1st of October when a lot of missiles did get through.
A story that I read this morning, in the Times of Israel, is that the Israeli cabinet and top Israeli officials are no longer able to meet in their normal places of work or residence including the headquarters of the IDF (the Israeli Defense Force) because obviously they’re worried that these places could be targeted by Iranian or perhaps Hezbollah drones or missiles. So one way or the other it suggests that we are looking away from Israel and towards Iran.”
“Israel, the hour just after the attack, said that this was the entire attack. That there’s no reason for a further attack. Then a few hours ago they came back and said, ‘Well, actually we’re not really finished because now there’s been these drone attacks on Netanyahu’s residence and therefore we must respond to those’. It’s clear that the perpetrator of all of these is Iran and we’re going to come after the Iranians. There’s been a decision to that effect so one gets the sense that there are divisions and arguments within Israel about whether to stop or not to stop.”
Watch; Will Iran respond to Israel’s latest attack?; The Electronic Intifada; discussion with Ali Abunimah, Nora Barrows-Friedman, Jon Elmer and Asa Winstanley who were joined by writer and human rights advocate Ahmed Alnaouq. You can watch the entire broadcast here: 1 Nov 2024
‘The team discusses Israel’s air strikes on military sites in Iran early on 26 October during which four Iranian soldiers were killed. Israel’s attack came almost a month after a barrage of ballistic missiles fired by Tehran hit at least three military and intelligence installations in Israel.’
Read the full story in the Electronic Intifada 28th Oct here:
‘American intelligence assessments anticipated a much more severe Israeli response than what occurred on Saturday. Highly classified Pentagon documents outlining Israel’s preparations to attack Iran indicated that Israel would strike a more devastating blow than what actually occurred in terms of the sensitivity and quantity of targets. The two documents may have been leaked for the very purpose of undercutting a more severe Israeli attack that would further entangle the US military in an increasingly dangerous regional conflagration. The Iranian military said that Israel used US-controlled Iraqi airspace to carry out its attack on Saturday, the semi-official Tasnim News Agency, associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, reported on Saturday.
“The country’s air defence units were able to prevent Israeli warplanes from entering Iran’s airspace,” Tasnim added, citing the military.
Both Jordanian and Saudi officials claimed that their airspace was not used for the Israeli attack. Riyadh condemned the strikes on its former regional rival as a violation of Iran’s sovereignty “and a violation of international laws and norms.” Iran’s mission to the United Nations accused the US of complicity in the Israeli attack. In the week or so before the Israeli strikes, Washington sent its most advanced anti-missile defence system to Israel along with 100 troops to operate the battery. US officials deny American involvement in the Israeli attack on Saturday. Isaac Herzog, Israel’s president, however, thanked the US for its “overt and covert” cooperation in the strikes.’
Israel has blackmailed Western governments into complicity with a deranged hellscape of torture, murder and hatred that overwhelms normal people with horror and revulsion. Only a handful of psychotic, dehumanised zealots could possibly approve of the Israeli genocide and land theft over the past 70 years. Yet our government speaks for them, and represents them and not the huge majority who want an end to Israeli terrorism and genocide.
Read and watch; Israel is acting with the same tools against Gaza, Lebanon and now starting in Syria; Ibrahim Al Amin for Al Akhbar Arabic; Vanessa Beeley’s substack.1 Nov 2024
‘Ibrahim Al Amin provides a succinct and accurate description of what Israel’s agenda is in the region:’
“Yesterday the clown Hochstein returned from a new show. To be honest, the problem is not with the man who does what is good for him or what is required of him, but with those who still listen to him and take him seriously, With those who believe that the Americans are in a position to pressure Israel to stop the war in Lebanon.”
“In practice we are facing one truth and that is that Israel is acting with the same tools against Gaza and against Lebanon. It started the same thing in Syria and is preparing to move to Iraq and then to Yemen. Netanyahu does not hide his continued preparations to strike Iran. Those who demand to separate the arenas do not want to understand that what Israel is doing with the support of the United States, Britain, Germany, and with the partnership of several Arab countries, is the unification of the arenas by force.”
“Since this is the case, the resistance project is the only option and the alternative is life or death by starvation in oppression and humiliation. And anyone who continues to accuse the resistance (Hezbollah) of being responsible for what is happening should know that from now on he is a partner in this aggression.”
Thank god that Islington North voted for Jeremy Corbyn to be their independent MP so the Palestinians have a voice amongst the vast majority of zionist-captured politicians like the Foreign Secretary, James Cleverly;
Watch; “Isn’t it time we stopped supplying Israel with the weapons” Nadeem Ahmed@Muqadaam, X, 28 October 2024
Jeremy Corbyn question in House of Commons; “You would have heard from the Member from Argyll earlier when he quoted Joyce Msuya, the humanitarian chief of the UN, who says, and I quote, ‘the entire population of northern Gaza is at risk of dying’. On top of the 1,000 that died last week, on top of all those living in the most desperate situation in southern Gaza, on top of the occupation of southern Lebanon, the bombing of southern Beirut and now the dangers of a hot war with Iran and Israel.’ Isn’t it time that instead of expressing concern about the humanitarian catastrophe in the region, we stopped supplying Israel with the weapons that have caused the humanitarian catastrophe in the first place and we suspend arms supplies in total to Israel in order to bring about a ceasefire and a cessation of this, frankly, murder of an innocent civilian population”.
Foreign Secretary; “I know the strength of feeling that my neighbour in North London has on these issues and his long standing campaigning on these issues, but can I just assure him that we’re not just wringing our hands. The work of UK-Med in hospitals is hugely important and I was very pleased to make further funds available to them in coming into office. The work of the Disasters Emergency Committee in raising further funds and the way in which government has match funded to the tune of 10 million is hugely important. It was great and very good to be in Jordan a few weeks ago discussing with King Abdullah his airlifts into Jordan and the planning that he’s getting from UK armed forces in organising those airlifts in that air bridge that he has been keen to take forward. So it’s not just that these are actions, these are real things that we’re doing, not just the wringing of hands. And when he describes the situation in Gaza, he largely describes much that I said in my opening in this debate and as I said before, and I’ll say again, we have suspended arms that could be used in contravention of international humanitarian law where there is a clear risk according to our export licensing regime and he should be reassured that we’ve done that.”
Read; Israel’s burning alive of Shaaban al-Dalou also incinerated the western-led global order Jonathan Cook, 21 October 2024
‘The horrifying images from Gaza last week of fire consuming a Palestinian teenager confined to his hospital bed with an intravenous drip may come to define Israel’s genocide as completely as earlier images of human depravity have defined the world.
Naked, skin-and-bone corpses thrown into mass graves in the death camps of the Nazi Holocaust. Radioactive fields of rubble, interrupted only by charred, skeletal trees, after the atomic levelling of Hiroshima by the United States. A naked Vietnamese girl, her burned skin peeling off, fleeing in terror from a napalm attack.
The flames that burned alive 19-year-old Shaaban al-Dalou, along with his mother and two others, in a tent on the grounds of al-Aqsa Hospital in Deir al-Balah last week were almost certainly unleashed by US- or German-supplied missiles, fired by Israeli pilots.
Dalou was in the tent recovering from an Israeli air strike a week earlier on Deir al-Balah that had killed 26 people. He was already malnourished and immunocompromised from many months of an Israeli blockade, which has denied the entry of food and aid into Gaza.
Dalou’s two sisters, father and younger brother all sustained severe burns from the fire caused by the strike. His 10-year-old brother succumbed to his wounds days later. The victims in Deir al-Balah were charred into oblivion – and with them the “rules-based international order” the West helped establish to prevent a repeat of the horrors of the Second World War.
The year-long genocide in Gaza is entirely a Western co-production. The US and Europe send the weapons, provide the diplomatic cover, orchestrate support from their pliant state- and billionaire-owned media, and stifle all domestic dissent.
The modern era of international humanitarian law that the West proclaimed, as well as the institutions the West championed to uphold it, are going up in flames.
The parties unravelling – week after week, month after month – the rules that kept in check the dangers of a third world war are not the so-called “terrorists”. It’s not Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda or the Islamic State. It’s not even Iran, Russia or China. It is the West. It is Washington and its allies. They are the arsonists.’
The zionists take many guises to promote their racist ideology.
Read; How the Israel lobby fueled the rise of Britain’s top anti-Muslim chaos agent David Miller, The Grayzone, 25 October 2024
‘A wave of anti-Muslim and anti-migrant riots which consumed British society in racist violence this August were fomented almost entirely by a self-proclaimed “counter-Jihad” activist who goes by the moniker Tommy Robinson. This October 26, Robinson will return to the public eye in the UK for a provocative action outside Westminster in London protesting his prosecution for defaming a Syrian refugee in a film he produced.
The riots he helped inspire from abroad shook Britain for almost a week, triggering attacks on police stations and mosques. Though they did not occur in circumstances chosen by Robinson and his street fighting cohort, they perfectly served the agenda set into motion years before by the Israel lobby elements which sponsored his rise to political prominence.
Prominent British leftists have framed the anti-migrant riots led by Robinson as a “classic fascist mobilisation,” painting them as an entirely homegrown, organic phenomenon arising from a reactionary lower middle class. Yet a closer look at the history of those involved demonstrates that the violent rampage reflected a notable break with traditional far-right British activism.
This rupture was accomplished through financial backing and political support by an Israel lobby centred largely in Tel Aviv and the United States, which sought to redirect the rage of the downwardly mobile European working class against Muslim immigrants, and in support of Western and Israeli military campaigns.
Indeed, the state of Israel’s international lobbying apparatus is deeply implicated in the crusade to assail Muslims across Europe. The strategy originated during the 1980’s in Benjamin Netanyahu’s marketing of the concept of ”’Islamic terrorism,” and gained popular currency during the so-called war on terror. The zionist-backed campaign has spawned far-right street groups like the English Defense League, and the broader activist umbrella known as the “Counterjihad” movement.
While millions in pro-Israel astroturf has produced an array of loudmouthed anti-Muslim chaos agents, few have proven as marketable or durable as the agitator who calls himself Tommy Robinson. And none have been more loyal to the cause of zionism. As Robinson declared in a leaked video, “If there was a war and it kicked off, I would be there on the front line, fighting for Israel.’
Very interesting to hear World Economic Forum stooge, Yuval Noah Harari, support the one state solution where Israelis and Palestinians live with equal rights between the river and the sea.
Yuval Noah Harari Speaks Up for Peace; Israeli-Palestinian Rally; 1 July 2024
“The truth is that the world is vast. And even this narrow strip of land between the Mediterranean and the Jordan river is big enough for two peoples.
There is no objective shortage of territory here. There is enough space between the Mediterranean and the Jordan river to build houses and roads, factories, schools, hospitals for everyone.
We suffer not from the narrowness of the land, but from the narrowness of the mind. But each of us can expand our minds. For the mind of each and every person can be vast. A single mind can contain a whole world. Each side should recognise the existence of the other, letting go of the fantasy that they don’t exist, or that one day we might be able to make them disappear.
Peace will come only when both Palestinians and Israelis can honestly say that even if one day we have the power to do so, we would not want to destroy the other side. No matter how right we are, we would not want to destroy the other side.
And no matter what they do to us, they are still a part of reality. They have a right to live with security and dignity in the country of their birth. Because they are humans, just like us.
Between human beings, there are many ideological disputes. But we all share the same feelings and needs. All humans, whether in Gaza or Tel Aviv, in Hebron or Acre, a thirst of water for harmony, for truth and for love. There is any person who doesn’t feel that peace of mind, who does not want to know the truth about love, who does not want to love and be loved.
Slaking this thirst isn’t always easy. Too many of us look for peace of mind through struggle, try to find truth by spreading lies. And I think that it is possible to buy the love of God or the love of humanity in coins of hatred and violence.
It is like people who try to slake their thirst for water in a lake of fire. But it is never too late to make amends. War isn’t a law of nature, it’s a human choice. And at any moment it is possible to make a different choice and start to make peace. True, we have tried to make peace and we weren’t good at it.
So what? We haven’t been that good at making war either. Which doesn’t prevent us from making one another, and another one. Another one, and another one either. Which doesn’t prevent us from making another one and another one.
And all these wars have led us to an abyss. And it’s time to give peace another chance. Remember, war is the attempt by small minds to eradicate the complexity of reality. Peace is large, it contains multitudes.”
The zionist diaspora controls governments across the world, forever aiding their zionist brothers in the Middle East to access oil and other resources belonging to Arab nations. Jews are 2% of the world’s population possessing 10% of the world’s wealth to buy their power to establish The Israel Project that includes conquering the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Jordan.
40 second twitter in French!; In a documentary produced by Arte, Israeli finance minister Bezalel Smotrich says he wants a “Jewish state,” adding that, “It is written that the future of Jerusalem is to expand to Damascus.” X, 10 October 2024
Smotrich; “I want a Jewish state.”
Presenter; “What does that mean, a Jewish state?”
Smotrich; It’s very complicated. It’s a state that operates according to the values of the Jewish people, of sovereignty of the State of Israel.”
Presenter; “Is that all at this stage? Or do you want more beyond the river in the next stage?”
Smotrich; “Okay, bit by bit, it’s written that the future of Jerusalem is to expand to Damascus.”
Presenter; “Only Jerusalem until Damascus. Bekir Smotrich has a radical vision for the Promised Land and it includes all Palestinian lands, but also lands in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Egypt. Even Saudi Arabia. Certainly an extremist vision, but it’s an accepted one in Israel’s public discourse.”
The same message in English in this Instagram post;
“Hey everyone, so have you seen the recent Jerusalem Post article that justifies religiously why Israel should conquer Lebanon? It is so sick and twisted that when you search for the article right now, a 404 error comes up, which means that the Jerusalem Post has yanked it off the Internet. But don’t worry, we’ve got the receipts. So if you ever needed proof that zionism is a colonial state project built on cult-like psychosis, twisting an ancient sacred religion in order to justify conquering more and more land, and if you thought that setting up what is known today as modern day Israel was somehow the final objective, please see this article here from the Jerusalem Post. It literally opens up by saying the recent conflict in Lebanon raises the age-old question, where exactly did Hashem define the borders that was promised to the jewish people?
And most importantly, are we obligated to conquer those areas? What the f is going on? Oh, you didn’t know God was a real estate agent, but also he requires you to kill and ethnically cleanse and genocide so you can conquer the real estate that he promised you. But don’t worry. The article then goes on to dissect exactly what God meant when he supposedly gave the chosen people all the land from the river of Egypt to the great river Euphrates, and says that these regions include part of modern day Israel, Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Iraq.
And to wrap it all in a bow, the article ends with; ‘while we may not be able to reclaim all of it in our time, Hashem will surely return it to us soon.’ Do you see how this whole idea of a two state solution is a total sham, something Israel gave to the international community to parrot as a compromise and a neutral stance, while you have Israeli soldiers literally walking around with the greater Israel map right on their uniform? And of course, when it comes to the Jerusalem Post, you may never see the word Palestine in the articles. But the irony is before the Jerusalem Post changed their name in 1950, for decades before that they used to be called the Palestine Post. It doesn’t get more twisted than this.”
Very clear description…
Watch; Greater Israel Explained: The Israeli Plan to Conquer the Arab World; BreakThrough News; 5th Sept 2024
Murdering non jewish children is allowed in the Talmud.
Watch; Over 20,000 children in G@z@ are missing. Do you understand what that means? X, 10 October 2024
Dr Tarya Haj- Hassan, Paediatrician; “Sam, there are over 20,000 children in Gaza who are missing. These are reports by Save the Children and other very credible organisations. And do you know what I mean by missing? Can you imagine where they might be?
I can’t.
Under the rubble, in mass graves, maimed beyond recognition so that nobody can identify them and know what the child’s identity is. Some of them have been detained, children under the age of 18, under the age of 16 who’ve been detained by Israeli forces who have disappeared.”
A bit of history to substantiate the above statement
Listen or Read; American Pravda: Oddities of the Jewish Religion The Unz Review, 16 July 2024
‘If these ritualistic issues constituted the central features of traditional religious Judaism, we might regard it as a rather colourful and eccentric survival of ancient times. But unfortunately, there is also a far darker side, primarily involving the relationship between Jews and non-Jews, with the highly derogatory term goyim frequently used to describe the latter. To put it bluntly, Jews have divine souls and goyim do not, being merely beasts in the shape of men. Indeed, the primary reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve as the slaves of Jews, with some very high-ranking rabbis occasionally stating this well-known fact. In 2010, Israel’s top Sephardic rabbi used his weekly sermon to declare that the only reason for the existence of non-Jews is to serve Jews and do work for them. The enslavement or extermination of all non-Jews seems an ultimate implied goal of the religion.
Jewish lives have infinite value, and non-Jewish ones none at all, which has obvious policy implications. For example, in a published article a prominent Israeli rabbi explained that if a Jew needed a liver, it would be perfectly fine and indeed obligatory to kill an innocent Gentile and take his. Perhaps we should not be too surprised that today Israel is widely regarded as one of the world centers of organ-trafficking.
As a further illustration of the seething hatred traditional Judaism radiates towards all those of a different background, saving the life of a non-Jew is generally considered improper or even prohibited, and taking any such action on the Sabbath would be an absolute violation of religious edict. Such dogmas are certainly ironic given the widespread presence of Jews in the medical profession during recent centuries, but they came to the fore in Israel when a religiously-minded military doctor took them to heart and his position was supported by the country’s highest religious authorities.
And while religious Judaism has a decidedly negative view towards all non-Jews, Christianity in particular is regarded as a total abomination, which must be wiped from the face of the earth.’
The death of Sinwar, leader of Hamas, a terrorist for the zionists and heroic freedom fighter for the Palestinians, will enthuse the resistance.
Watch; Assassination of Sinwar, Palestine Declassified, Saturday, 26 October 2024
In today’s show, we will be considering the implications of Hamas leader, Yahya Sinwar’s death.’
Sinwar fought for the Palestinian people, to his last breath, against the zionist occupation, and died a heroic death in the ruins of Rafah city at the hands of an Israeli drone operator sitting in a control room many miles away.
In our first report, Latifa Abouchakra looks back at Sinwar’s life and death. Our second report looks at the contrasting responses to Sinwar’s death.
Presenter; “Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim stated, “Malaysia mourns the loss of a fighter and defender of the Palestinian people, Yahya Sinwar, who was brutally murdered by the barbaric zionist regime. Once again, the international community failed to fight and ensure that peace and justice were upheld, thus worsening the conflict situation.”
Social media influencer and businessman Dan Bilzerian posted; ‘Anyone fighting the genocidal Israeli terrorists is a hero. Rest in peace. Sinwar.’
Presenter; “The one noted silence was from Arab leaders, the majority of whom had nothing to say.”
Host, Chris Wilkinson; “David, what do you make of that Salafi scholar revelling in the death of Sinwar? “
David Miller; “Well, it’s truly, truly vile. All of the ideas that one gets from political Islam about the Ummah and the Muslims together, all subverted by this disgusting sectarianism and horrific celebration of the crimes of the zionists. In what world is it that Muslim scholars can actually applaud the genocidal activities of the zionists? It’s truly extraordinary.”
Chris Wilkinson; “No doubt it will put a lot of fair minded Muslims off of that particular strand of Islam”.
Chris Wilkinson; “ US President Joe Biden made an interesting admission when he said that US Special Forces had played a role US in Sinwar’s killing and of course the US is heavily involved in the genocide in Palestine and Gaza, isn’t it?
David Miller; “That’s right. It has been involved for some considerable time directly. We knew this back at the end of last year, that there were boots on the ground in Gaza. U.S. Special forces were on the ground. And of course, the US has given the most of any country to support the genocide. 70%, roughly 69% of the weapons intelligence support, support international diplomatic cover, are defending Israel in international forums. You know, the US Is behind this. But what people have thought is that the US has been trying to tame its attack dock and pull it back a little bit on the leash. They’ve presented themselves as doing this for some considerable time. It looks like now that actually that was just a ruse. Of course, they did the same ruse with the Islamic Republic of Iran. They said to the President of Iran that they would get a negotiated ceasefire if Iran didn’t respond on Ismail Haniyeh. And that was a lie, as the President said at the time. So it looks like what’s happened here is that the Americans are actually authorising every single crime that has been committed by the zionists.”
The information in the article below on how ‘Israel lies at the heart of Washington’s policy of full-spectrum global dominance’ is so important that I have pasted almost the entire article.
Listen or read: Israel wants to finish the job Washington started after 9/11 Jonathan Cook, 15 October 2024
‘And, they note, Israel hasn’t just ignored diplomatic options; it is actively tearing down any chance of them bearing fruit. It assassinated Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh, a relatively moderate figure, as he was leading negotiations towards a long-anticipated ceasefire in Gaza. And it now seems likely that Israel chose to kill Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah’s leader, shortly after he had agreed, along with the Lebanese government, to a 21-day ceasefire while the international community worked on a peace deal.
‘Clash of civilisations’
But this only gets halfway to understanding the problem. True, Israel now appears determined to finish once and for all the job it began in 1948 of eradicating the Palestinian people – the native population its Western-backed, settler-colonial project was predicated on removing. Israel has repeatedly failed to ethnically cleanse historic Palestine, while the fallback position – decades of apartheid rule – could never be more than a holding measure, as South Africa’s experience proved. Now, armed with 7 October as the pretext, Israel has rolled out a genocidal programme instead; first in Gaza, and, if it gets away with it, soon in the occupied West Bank. But Israel has long had a much grander ambition – one that it is getting a second bite of the cherry to achieve. More than 20 years ago, a group of extreme ideologues known as the neoconservatives seized the foreign policy initiative during the presidency of George W Bush. They have since become a permanent foreign policy elite in Washington, whichever administration is in power.
What is distinctive about the neoconservatives is the centrality of Israel to their worldview. They regard Israel’s unapologetic jewish supremacism and militarism as a model for the West – one in which it returns to an unashamed white supremacism and militarism in a revived spirit of colonialism. Like Israel, the neoconservatives see the world in terms of a never-ending clash of civilisations against the so-called Muslim world. In this context, international law becomes an obstacle to the West’s victory, rather than a guarantee of global order. In addition, the neoconservatives view Israel as the battering ram to keep the US in charge of international affairs in the world’s main oil spigot, the Middle East. Israel lies at the heart of Washington’s policy of full-spectrum global dominance.
The neoconservatives have long been sold on Israel’s strategy for achieving such dominance in the Middle East: by Balkanising it. The aim has been to demand utter subservience to Israel, with any source of dissent not only punished, but the social structures that support it crushed into ruins. In Gaza, that method has been on full show. In destroying government buildings, universities, mosques, churches, libraries, schools, hospitals and even bakeries, Israel has sought to reduce the Palestinian population to the barest of human existence. National identity, and the desire to resist, are luxuries no one can afford. Survival is all. Israel is beginning to roll out the same scheme for the occupied West Bank, Lebanon and Iran.
Destabilising the Middle East
None of this is new. Just as Israel is currently grasping the pretext of 7 October to justify its rampage, the neoconservatives earlier seized on al-Qaeda’s destruction of New York’s Twin Towers on 9/11 as their opportunity to “remake the Middle East”.
In 2007, former Nato commander Wesley Clark recounted a meeting at the Pentagon shortly after the US invasion of Afghanistan. An officer told him: “We are going to attack and destroy the governments in seven countries in five years. We’re going to start with Iraq, and then we’re going to move to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.”
Clark added of the neoconservatives: “They wanted us to destabilise the Middle East, turn it upside down, make it under our control.”
As I documented in my 2008 book ‘Israel and the Clash of Civilisations’, Israel was supposed to carry out a central chunk of Washington’s post-Iraq plan, starting with its war on Lebanon in 2006. Israel’s attack there was supposed to drag in Syria and Iran, giving the US a pretext to expand the war. This was what the US secretary of state of the time, Condoleezza Rice, meant when she spoke of the “birth pangs of a new Middle East”. The plan went awry largely because Israel got bogged down in phase one, in Lebanon. It blitzed cities like Beirut with US-supplied bombs, but its soldiers struggled against Hezbollah in a ground invasion of southern Lebanon. The West subsequently found other ways to deal with Syria and Libya.
To the bitter end
Now we are back where we started, nearly 20 years later. Israel, Hezbollah and Iran have all been preparing for this second round. The Western-Israeli goal, as before, is to destroy Lebanon and Iran, just as Gaza has been destroyed. The aim is to smash the infrastructure of Lebanon and Iran, their governing institutions, and their social structures. It is to plunge the Lebanese and Iranian people into a primaeval state, where they can cohere only into simple, tribal units and fight among themselves for the bare essentials.
There is no evidence that this goal is any more realisable today than it was two decades ago. Even Israel’s top military spokesperson, Daniel Hagari, has had to admit: “Anyone who thinks we can eliminate Hamas is wrong.” The Israeli army is once again floundering in southern Lebanon against Hezbollah’s guerrilla fighters. And Iran’s very limited, sampler ballistic-missile attack on Israeli military sites last week showed that its arsenal can get past Israel’s US-supplied defence systems and hit its targets.
But Israel has made clear that for it, and for the US military titan behind it, there is no going back.
Last week, US State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said the quiet part out loud: “We’ve never wanted to see a diplomatic resolution with Hamas.” According to “conservative” calculations from Brown University’s Costs of War project, the US has already spent more than $22.7bn on military assistance to Israel over the past year – equivalent to more than $10,000 for every Palestinian man, woman and child living in Gaza. Washington’s pockets appear to be bottomless. For Israel and the US, there are no red lines. The same holds true in European capitals. They appear ready to continue this to the bitter end.’
Despite its sophisticated propaganda machine painting itself as the eternal victim, Israel has lost the respect of the entire world. Anti-zionism (the zionists’ so-called antisemitism) is inevitable.
Read; In killing Nasrallah, Israel chose to open the gates of hell. We’ll all pay the price; Jonathan Cook; Sep 28, 2024
The West, via Israel, is fomenting for Hezbollah and the Shia resistance their own ISIS moment. Moderates are once again losing the argument – because we lost it for them.’
‘When that whirlwind comes, the job of our politicians and media will be to ensure we make no connection between this moment of savagery and insanity from us and the blowback. The role of Western establishments will be to cry victim, to insist “They hate us for our freedoms”, for our civilisational superiority, because “they” are simply barbarians.
But what comes next, as with what came before, will be entirely predictable. Violence doesn’t beget calm, it begets more violence. Israel knows that. Our leaders know that. But they opened the gates of hell anyway.’
Read; Did Israel use enriched or depleted Uranium to assassinate Nasrallah? Is Israel using DU in Gaza and Lebanon? Vanessa Beeley; Oct 13, 2024
Apocalyptic scenes during zionist bombardment of southern Lebanon.
‘Tonight I will be speaking with Iran-based (originally from Kashmir) journalist and activist Roohullah Razavi who is currently in Beirut covering the horrific events on the ground.
Yesterday he reported that the Lebanese Council of the Chemists Syndicate in Lebanon had warned of the potential for depleted uranium contamination of the site where Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah was assassinated.
Depleted Uranium Bombs: Important Warning Statement Following the Aggression on Lebanon
The Council of the Chemists Syndicate in Lebanon condemned the “barbaric aggression against civilians in the country and the massacres committed against the Lebanese people.”
Al-Majali indicated in a statement that his message today is “to condemn and raise awareness about the effects of inhaling the dust of the bombing that the southern suburbs of Beirut and the rest of the Lebanese regions are being subjected to. The extent of the destruction and the penetration of buildings and land for tens of metres is evidence of the use of bombs containing depleted uranium, which has tremendous penetrating power. The use of these types of internationally banned weapons, especially in the densely populated capital Beirut, leads to massive destruction, and their dust causes many diseases, especially when inhaled.”
The millions of pounds zionists have poured into the PR machine to spread lies and half truths about Israel’s war in the Middle East has helped the political class and the public remain ignorant and go along with their islamophobic leaders’ support for genocide in Palestine and Lebanon.
Watch; Covert zionist cut-outs Palestine Declassified, 28 September 2024;
‘In today’s episode we’ll be highlighting how billionaire zionists are misusing their wealth to fund a disinformation campaign to fool the public about what’s really going on in Palestine.
In our first report Latifa Abouchakra identifies the ringleaders of this malicious mega-rich gang of zionist cranks. Later in the show we look at the activities of a shadowy Israeli political marketing firm and who is funding it.’
Dan Kovalik, Human Rights Lawyer, University of Pittsburgh; “At this point, the Israeli economy, domestic economy, has pretty much been destroyed. And so the US really is propping up Israel. So they need these campaigns, the zionists need these propaganda campaigns to continue to, in the words of Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman, ‘manufacture consent’ amongst the US population to support Israel at extraordinarily high numbers. The US has been funding Israel at about three to $4 billion a year. We’ve expanded many times more since October 7. And there’s a lot of resistance in the US to this.
And so the propaganda is necessary for the zionists to try to overcome that resistance. And I think we see this propaganda manifesting in many ways and being very effective in many ways. One example of this is when Kamala Harris, during the debate, retold the lies of the mass rapes on October 7. Well, that’s a huge propaganda trope of the zionists.
And so it shows how much that is seeped into the consciousness of much of America, including into the halls of Congress in the White House as well.The political class is almost entirely behind Israel. Even if there’s concerns about the civilian casualties in Gaza, you will find nearly no one in Congress, and certainly not in the executive branch who oppose Israel or even oppose the war in Gaza.”
There are many compassionate jews who don’t hold the racist values of zionists.
Watch; Zionist Attack on Anti-Zionist Rabbi for Supporting Palestine Neturei Karta, 3 October 2024
‘While anti-zionist Jews were protesting against the war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu at his hotel in NYC on Friday, September 27, 2024, a zionist attempted to attack a Jewish rabbi for supporting Palestine.’
In case you have been propagandised to think that Hezbollah is a terrorist group, not freedom fighters, see this 2 minute video to learn how many times Israel invaded Lebanon as it openly claims that, like Palestine, Lebanon should be part of Israel.
Watch; Israel’s invasion of Lebanon did not start on October 1 TRT World, 2 October 2024
‘Israel is carrying out a ground invasion deep inside Lebanon. But this is not the first time Israel has invaded its neighbouring country. In 1978, the Israeli army conducted an aggressive invasion of Lebanon under the pretext of neutralising the Palestine Liberation Organisation. However, Lebanon saw the invasion as an occupation of its territory and a violation of its sovereignty. Israel’s bombardment and military assault that year killed over 2,000 Lebanese civilians and displaced around 280,000 others. The assault changed Lebanon’s political landscape forever exacerbating internal divisions and giving rise to groups like Hezbollah. Israel was eventually forced to withdraw after the UN Security Council passed Resolution 425, which called for Tel Aviv’s immediate pullout and the establishment of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon. On June 6, 1982, Israel launched a more extensive invasion called Operation Peace for Galilee.
This time around, Tel Aviv aimed to expel the PLO from Lebanon entirely, accusing it of being responsible for the attempted assassination of the then Israeli Ambassador to the UK. Israeli forces advanced all the way to Beirut, laying siege to the country’s capital. This invasion is notorious for the Sabra and Shatila massacres, when Israeli-supported militias entered Palestinian refugees camps and massacred hundreds to thousands of civilians. By August 1982, the PLO leadership and its fighters were evacuated to Tunisia, marking the end of the organisation’s military presence in Lebanon. Though Israel withdrew in 1985, it continued to occupy southern Lebanon until 2000, facing stiff resistance from Hezbollah throughout this period. After years of sporadic clashes between Israel and Hezbollah, Tel Aviv launched airstrikes on Lebanon, including Beirut. In July 2006, a naval blockade was imposed and a ground invasion into southern Lebanon followed. Israel’s air force bombed much of Lebanon’s civilian infrastructure, including bridges, roads and power plants, severely impacting the population.
However, Israeli ground forces faced strong resistance from Hezbollah, which used guerrilla warfare tactics, inflicting significant casualties on the Israeli side. By August 2006, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 1701, calling for a ceasefire. the disarmament of Hezbollah and the deployment of the Lebanese army and UN peacekeeping forces in southern Lebanon. Approximately 1,200 to 1,500 Lebanese were killed, with over 1 million people displaced through the heavy Israeli bombardment of civilian areas. Israel’s invasions and destructive attacks on Lebanon have severely impeded the country’s growth and the future of its people. Lebanon is now once again facing the prospect of weathering yet another storm, and although Israel’s onslaught has only just begun, the vulnerable nation is already heading towards turmoil.’
Aaron Maté argues that for years Israel has been offered a two state solution by the Arab League of Nations, and rejected it. Hezbollah calls for a single democratic state in which everybody has equal rights, but Israel wants a single apartheid state for Jews. He then talks about how mega donors like Adelson play an instrumental role in pro-israel US policy. Sheldon Adelson and his wife, Miriam Adelson, were such big donors, as a gift, Trump recognised Israeli settlers in the Golan Heights and moved the US embassy to Jerusalem.’
Watch; Biden admin greenlit Israeli aggression in Lebanon Judge Neopolitano interview with Aaron Maté; 2 October 2024
‘New revelations that the Biden admin encouraged Israel’s aggression in Lebanon. Plus, as Julian Assange speaks for the first time since winning freedom, the Israel tie in his US-led persecution.’
7.30 mins “ He (Netanyahu) doesn’t want peace. He wants to destroy Arab peoples in order to expand the borders of Israel. The Iranian government and the people in Iran know and understand that.
The only extremists in the region, or the main extremists in the region, who are the obstacle to a peaceful resolution to all this, are the Israelis, backed by the US. These are the only two major parties in the region that explicitly reject what has been for decades, the global consensus of how to resolve all this, which is Palestinian self determination. The Arab League has offered Israel full normalisation if it ends the occupation of the West bank and Gaza, withdraws from the occupied territories, allows for the creation of a Palestinian state with its capital in East Jerusalem. That’s been the offer on the table for decades now from the Arab League. Iran in 2017 endorsed a resolution at the Organization for Islamic Cooperation endorsing that two state solution. Even Iran did.
Hezbollah did not, because Hezbollah calls for a single democratic state in which everybody is equal. So Hezbollah doesn’t recognize Israel’s right to create an ethno state. That’s a hard position to argue with, because if you believe in democracy, then how can you support the apartheid system in Israel? But practically, because people have just recognized that Israel is a state, it’s got nuclear weapons, and that’s the only practical solution in the eyes of many people. That’s been the solution on the table.
The proposal on the table, which also has been endorsed by the Palestinian Authority and even members of Hamas, who have basically tacitly accepted Israel’s existence by saying they would accept a Palestinian state in the West bank and Gaza, which for them is a massive compromise. That’s just 22% of the land Israel stole from them. The only parties, the major parties in the region that reject that are Israel and the US. Israel said many times they will not accept the Arab League proposal. And they’re backed up by the US, which every single year votes against UN General Assembly resolutions calling for a settlement along those lines.”
“Julian Assange, in that clip, is talking about the fact that Mike Pompeo, after becoming the director of the CIA, sees the opportunity to go after WikiLeaks, which he declared to be a hostile, non government organisation, basically saying it’s a terrorist organisation. Essentially, Pompeo came in and declared war on WikiLeaks. And one of the things that the CIA did, and this directly ties to the crisis in the Middle east. The CIA worked with the casino and the security firm owned by Sheldon Adelson, the pro Israel Trump mega donor, to spy on Assange. They were basically a CIA front in this operation to spy and harass Assange.
Max Blumenthal at the Grayzone, had a story about this four years ago, going through all the details that Julian Assange referenced; the attempt to poison him, to monitor his family, to obtain the diapers of his kids. Deep, deep surveillance. And Trump mega donor’s security firm was used for that purpose. And all this came out, a lot of it came out in court files from a Spanish investigation, which Max got access to and published this story.
So it connects directly to the current situation because it just shows the forces we’re dealing with. The same forces that are backing Israel in its mass murder campaign. Mega donors like Adelson, which play an instrumental role in policy. Trump recently talked about how he basically gave the recognition of Israel’s theft of the Golan Heights and the recognition of moving the US embassy to Jerusalem as a gift to Sheldon Adelson and his wife, Miriam Adelson, because they’re such big donors to him. You can see the influence that they play and the role that they play in enforcing US hegemony by doing things like taking part in targeting the world’s most important journalists, the one who’s exposed more secrets than anybody else. And by the way you can take a globe and just spin it around and just randomly put your finger anywhere and the odds are high that Julian Assange will have exposed vital information on the negative role that the US has played there or some other powerful government has played there. Think about Israel and the Middle East alone. It’s from Julian Assange that I learned that, according to an email from Jake Sullivan to Hillary Clinton in February 2012, Jake Sullivan wrote to Hillary Clinton, “al Qaeda is on our side in Syria”. So the US was knowingly supporting an al Qaeda dominated insurgency in Syria.
And why? Because there’s another email in the Hillary Clinton archive explained, “if we can destroy Syria, we can at least either take out a member of the axis of resistance or we can really bleed other members, including Hezbollah, and this will be good for Israel”. That was from another email to Hillary Clinton. We know this thanks to Julian Assange. That’s why the CIA, with the help of a Trump mega donor, Sheldon Adelson, went after him. Of course, this is firmly bipartisan.
Joe Biden called Julian Assange a high tech terrorist. Hillary Clinton spoke about droning him. So you can see the threat that he poses to this system, as evidenced by the fact that there’s been such a targeted effort to take him down.”
Russia and China are not going to let the zionists destroy Iran.
Watch; Colonel Douglas Macgregor Reveals Truth on Israel War with Cyrus Janssen, 21 September 2024;
4 mins; Macgregor; “He’s (Netanyahu) made it very clear he wants to widen the war. He has provoked the Iranians repeatedly with a goal of precipitating an Iranian attack that he could then point to and say, see, they are the aggressive, dangerous party here. Now we must all work to destroy Iran. I think that’s what he would like to see happen.
There are some problems with it. The first problem is that the Russians, over the last several weeks, through successive visits of the foreign minister, the defence minister, the Security Council and so forth, have fashioned and a relationship with Iran that has resulted in the arrival in Iran of large numbers of Russian missiles, Russian electronic warfare gear, Russian radars, including S 400 and even elements of the S 500 air and missile defence systems. It’s very clear that the Russians have thousands of people on the ground now in Iran. They have committed themselves to help Iran defend itself. So that’s number one.
Number two, just this morning, of course, it may have been last night, depending upon your time zone, the Chinese foreign minister called to speak specifically with the Iranian foreign minister and supreme leader and reassure them that China stands with them, that if iranian sovereignty is at risk, that they will intervene to help. Now, he didn’t say intervene, but the implication is we’re not going to let you go under. And of course, China has enormous interest in the Straits of Hormuz. Correct. If they can’t get access to the natural gas and the oil, their production engine effectively seizes up.
Right. So I think that those two developments are things that we should watch carefully. Now, look at the Saudis. The Saudis have now said no. If the Iranians are going to attack Israel, we’re not going to, we’re not going to assist Israel.
The Egyptians have said the same thing. So the Jordanians right now in Egypt and Jordan, those governments hang by a thread. General Sisi in Egypt, King Abdullah in Jordan are on very, very fragile ground. They are seen, rightly or wrongly, by their populations as Israeli and American puppets. They’ve got to think carefully about what their next moves are or they may vanish.
And if they vanish quickly, then you will have governments that are absolutely universally hostile, 100% to Israel and will cooperate not only with Iran, but also with the Turks to take on and destroy Israel.”
The Israeli PR machine frequently quotes the number of people killed on Oct 7th but fails to mention that hundreds of them were killed by Israeli helicopter fire.
How Israel killed hundreds of its own people on 7 October, with Asa Winstanley and Ali Abunimah; The Electronic Intifada (EI); 19 Oct 2024
‘Last week, we marked the first anniversary of the start of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, which followed the Palestinian resistance operation that routed the Israeli army’s Gaza Division in mere hours. EI associate editor Asa Winstanley and executive director Ali Abunimah speak to associate editor Nora Barrows-Friedman about the latest reporting on Israel’s wide scale application of the Hannibal Directive on 7 October 2023 – the order that allows its forces to kill Israeli citizens to stop them being taken captive. This is a segment from The Electronic Intifada’s day 376 live stream. You can watch the entire broadcast here.’
A film that documents the litany of zionist lies that, however unsubstantiated, the zionist-captured mainstream media and politicians repeat verbatim.
Watch 45-min film Atrocity Inc: How Israel Sells The Destruction Of Gaza Max Blumenthal, 7 October 2024
The Grayzone News’s new documentary takedown of the media deceptions and hoaxes Israel pushed to manufacture consent for its genocidal assault on Gaza.
Very powerful and informative film;
Watch; 1hr 20min film Investigating war crimes in Gaza Al Jazeera English, 3 October 2024
‘This feature length investigation by Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit exposes Israeli war crimes in the Gaza Strip through the medium of photos and videos posted online by Israeli soldiers themselves during the year long conflict.
‘The I-Unit has built up a database of thousands of videos, photos and social media posts. Where possible it has identified the posters and those who appear.
The material reveals a range of illegal activities, from wanton destruction and looting to the demolition of entire neighbourhoods and murder.
The film also tells the story of the war through the eyes of Palestinian journalists, human rights workers and ordinary residents of the Gaza Strip. And it exposes the complicity of Western governments – in particular the use of RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus as a base for British surveillance flights over Gaza.
“The West cannot hide, they cannot claim ignorance. Nobody can say they didn’t know,” says Palestinian writer, Susan Abulhawa.This is “the first livestream genocide in history … If people are ignorant they are wilfully ignorant,” she says.’
Thanks to David Miller, we are now free to say, zionism is “inherently racist, imperialist and colonial”.
Read; Anti-zionist beliefs ‘worthy of respect’, UK tribunal finds The Guardian, 14 October 2024
‘The belief that Israel’s actions amount to apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide are “worthy of respect in a democratic society”, an employment tribunal has concluded in a landmark decision.
In February the tribunal ruled that Prof David Miller was unfairly discriminated against when he was dismissed by the University of Bristol over allegations of making antisemitic remarks, in a decision the Union of Jewish Students said set a dangerous precedent.
The tribunal has now published its 120-page judgement setting out why Miller’s beliefs warranted protection under anti discrimination laws.
Passing the ruling, the employment judge Rohan Pirani said: “Although many would vehemently and cogently disagree with [Miller]’s analysis of politics and history, others have the same or similar beliefs.
“We find that he has established that [the criteria] have been met and that his belief amounted to a philosophical belief.”
Miller, who lectured at the university on political sociology, told the panel he thought zionism was “inherently racist, imperialist and colonial”.
He added that zionism was “ideologically bound to lead to the practices of apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide in pursuit of territorial control and expansion”. But he told the panel that his anti-zionism did not equate to opposition towards Jews.
The panel’s judgement noted Miller’s expertise on zionism.’
Nauseating pro-zionist cant from Rees Mogg trying to resurrect the lie that anti-zionism is antisemitic, although he knows perfectly well that David Miller’s tribunal ruled that to criticise zionism is protected free speech and not antisemitic.
Watch; FURIOUS Mogg ENDS interview as pro-Palestine activist drops SHOCKING ‘antisemitic TROPE’ GB News, 16 October 2024
Rees Mogg; “Thank you very much for joining me and the question really here is are you anti-semitic?”
David Miller; “Well the question that the court was asked to determine was in part was I anti-semitic and the court determined that I was not anti-semitic and indeed the university had itself had three separate investigations by an external QC all of which determined I was not anti-semitic. They concluded that my views were anti-zionist and the courts concluded that the reason I was sacked was because my views were anti zionist. The University was so freaked out by the idea of anti-zionism that they had to sack me and, if I said everything else that I had said absent the anti-zionist views, I would not have been sacked so that’s what the court thought.”
Rees Mogg; “You’ve just admitted that the Jews, because they’re powerful, promote zionism so you have been using zionism as cover for your anti-semitic views.”
David Miller; “Well it’s a nice try Jacob, but it’s not the case. Look, the reason that the Israelis are able to dominate certain elements of our our politics in Parliament, in terms of counter extremism, in terms of counterterrorism, is because of the Israel lobby which is important, but also because Jews are over represented, and the Jews who are over represented in the senior levels of business and politics, tend to be zionist. There’s hardly any anti-zionists who are jewish billionaires for example, and so that actually gives them an advantage in discriminating against others including in particular of course the group in society who are the the least advantaged who are the most disadvantaged and the most discriminated against which is of course Muslims.”
Zionists manufacture consent to their brutality by censorship, blackmail, lies and surveillance, forcing people to contain their criticism. They are like Big Brother and his henchmen in George Orwell’s 1984.
Read; ‘Project Esther’: The Right-Wing Group Behind Project 2025 Has a Plan to Crack Down on America’s Pro-Palestine Movement Zeteo, 29 October 2024
The Trump-aligned Heritage Foundation is now going after what they call the “Hamas Support Network” – groups like Jewish Voice for Peace and American Muslims for Palestine; Prem Thakker; Oct 29, 2024
Posting a brilliant editorial statement from Australian @caitoz, who’s one of the sanest journalists still left to us. Agree with her 100% — and I’d include our stated desire to destabilize Russia. Why are Biden, Jake Sullivan, Anthony Blinken, and that whole gang starting this?… pic.twitter.com/VXFEY2SLhl
— Oliver Stone (@TheOliverStone) May 25, 2024
Students at the University of Central Florida in Orlando rally in support of Palestinians on Oct. 13, 2023. Photo by Paul Hennesy/Anadolu via Getty Images
‘As if Project 2025 – the 900-page repressive blueprint for the US put together by scores of Donald Trump-tied political staffers – wasn’t enough, the Heritage Foundation has released another lengthy and radical document, this time targeting pro-Palestine and anti-war Americans. The 10,000-word “Project Esther: A National Strategy to Combat Antisemitism” targets what it calls the “Hamas Support Network” (HSN), made up of groups that the document claims are “decidedly antisemitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American” and “involved in furthering Hamas’s cause in contravention of American values and to the detriment of American citizens and America’s national security interests.”
The network, the project says, revolves around American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) with “action arms” comprised of what the project falsely claims are “Hamas Support Organizations” (HSOs), including Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine, that recruit members, spread propaganda, and conduct rallies with the support of “a coalition of leftist, progressive organisations” such as the Open Society Foundations and Tides Foundation.
Released on Oct. 7 – the one-year anniversary of the Hamas attacks on Israel and Israel’s subsequent genocide in Gaza – the project emerged just weeks before the election but has garnered no attention whatsoever in the US mainstream media.’
There has already been wide repression of Americans speaking out against US support for Israel’s genocide of Palestine, but Project Esther embodies a right-wing push to institutionalize the repression through the weaponization of government — especially one led by Trump.
Joseph Howley, a Columbia professor who has been involved in organising Jewish faculty against the war and the instrumentalization of antisemitism, told Zeteo that the “far-right zionist hegemonists have wanted for years to make being an anti-zionist or non-zionist or Israel-critical Jew illegal. This year they’ve succeeded in getting universities to make it policy …. Now they want to make it federal law.”
Project Esther “is just more of the same enthusiastic authoritarianism from the American Christian-nationalist right, made all the scarier by the thousands of lives it’s costing overseas and the willingness of so much of this country’s Jewish institutional establishment to sign onto it,” Howley added. “It’s disgraceful.”’
Trump, the Lesser of 2 Evils
Are you paying attention yet? pic.twitter.com/K9oBeGHFFb
— Sal the Agorist (@SallyMayweather) October 14, 2024
If you are finding it hard to decide which of the 2 evils you should vote for, remember that Bill Gates wants the Democrats to win!
Read; Bill Gates quietly donated $50 million to back Kamala Harris—and it comes as Trump appears to be catching up in polls; Brooke Seipel, Amanda Gerut, Fortune, 23 October 2024
‘In a statement to the Times, Gates did not confirm or deny the donation but said, “this election is different.” Fortune has reached out to Gates for comment.
According to The Times report, Gates is concerned about former President Donald Trump’s economic policies and potential cuts to family planning and global health programs.
News of Gates’ donation supporting the Democratic nominee comes as sentiment has shifted in recent days about Harris’ chances to defeat Trump in the presidential election. Crypto prediction platform Polymarket, which has $2.3 billion in wagers on the election outcome, is tilted heavily in favour of Trump with 64% odds on the Republican as the victor. PredictIt has similar odds favouring a Trump win next month.’
The US election is going to be rigged by the Democrats; This is how they’ll play it;
Watch; A STAGED INSURRECTION TO JUSTIFY DOMESTIC MILITARY OPS — Jeffrey Prather; SGT Report; 30th Oct 2024
Major Geoffrey Prather; “What I see here is the weather weaponry being used to create a crisis. Then you have your insurgent plants. Then you have some troops sacrificed and there you have your false flag crisis for a lockdown. In the meantime, of course, Antifa (a left-wing anti-fascist and anti-racist political movement in the United States) will continue to burn ballot boxes. That’s the new philosophy from Washington and Oregon. They’re just burning ballot boxes and they’ll go back into burning buildings so that the vote can then be stolen again. It has to be because they’re mass murderers, they’re mass rapists, they’re child rapists. They’ve got to play this out to the end”.
Presenter; “Hey, friends. That was Major Jeffrey Prather.” And this is a blockbuster update as we creep toward the most important election in human history, there’s all sorts of shenanigans going on all over the country. In Pennsylvania, they’re already closing down one polling precinct in Bucks county at 1:20pm, when early voting was supposed to stay open till 5pm Central. Josh Shapiro lied. Jack Posobic is all over it. But guess what? I think it’s going to be too big to rig. But that might be why they signed that DoD directive on September 27th allowing the administration currently in power to use the US Military domestically against the people. We have so much to talk about today with Major Jeffrey Prather.
Let me just show people what I was talking about here. Breaking Bucks County, Pennsylvania has now sent out police officers in the middle of early voting to stop people from standing in line to vote. They want to rig this thing, Jeffrey, but some weird stuff is going on. What if it’s too big to rig? Why were military aircraft at the Capitol last night performing an evacuation drill a week prior to the election? Folks, there is some crazy, crazy stuff going on. They can steer hurricanes. Jeffrey’s got some information on another possible hurricane set to hit on November 5th. You just can’t make this stuff up, guys. Jeff, where would you like to start? There’s so much news to report, I don’t even even know where to begin.”
Major Geoffrey Prather; “ Pennsylvania, of course, the Deep State tried to assassinate Trump there and failed. That’s the real value of an assassination, is the psychological impact. With JFK, it was; ‘Look what we can do – so step in line’. But the myth is ‘we’re not all powerful, we’re not giants or geniuses, we’re just failures with father wounds’. It has now come out that the counter sniper team has admitted that they believe they heard suppressed shots. So they didn’t miss just once, they missed multiple times. So they’re shutting down the polls early is nothing new, because they intend to steal it. Trump plans on winning the Deep State, not Harris, not hysterical Harris, but the Deep State. Joe Paedo’s plan on not losing is by provoking the American people to such heresy, to such abomination, to such desecration, that they provoke them to react to something. And then they get another nationwide January 6th where everybody surges in some place, which has happened in Brazil, it’s happened in Venezuela, both of which I’ve worked as well. Then people surge out because it’s not controlled, it’s not purposeful. They geofence them, and then they just start picking them up. I think that’s the real plan. And at the same time, after that, the DHS can crack down with some kind of lockdown, maybe even martial law, although martial law wouldn’t really work. But DHS, via Secret Service, is going to count the electoral votes in January as well. So that’s a total tell as well as to what’s happening.”
Like the Democrats, Trump is captured by the zionists but on just about everything else, he is the lesser of two evils. Watch this huge Trump rally where his supporting speakers include Robert Kennedy, Tucker Carlson and Nicole Shanahan. Nicole, x-wife of Google co-founder, stood as Kennedy’s Vice President due to her 180 degrees turn away from the mainstream narrative.
Tucker Carlson Live Tour Grand Finale With President Donald Trump LIVE in Glendale, AZ; 1 Nov 2024
Comedian and podcast presenter, Jimmy Dore is awake, intellegent, witty and self deprecating
Listen; Lifelong Democrat Jimmy Dore on why it’s essential to punish and humiliate the Democratic Party eight days from now.Tucker Carlson interview; 28 Oct 2024
(1:29) Reacting to Trump’s Madison Square Garden Rally;(3:16) The Weaponization of Wokeness;(14:01) Warmongering of the Democratic Party;(24:08) Why the Establishment Turned on Trump;(43:07) The DNC Emails Leak;(59:48) The Deep State Hates Tulsi Gabbard Teaming up with Trump;(1:12:29) Jimmy Dore Being Hacked and Censored;(1:16:35) Are They Going to Let Trump Win?; (1:21:28) Chaos Favours the Establishment;(1:32:42) Bill Gates Nefarious Funding of Scientific Institutions;(1:38:54) The Washington Post Refusing to Endorse Kamala Harris;(1:44:52) Bobby Kennedy Jr.;(1:55:01) The Deep State vs. Crypto;(1:59:17) Who’s Going to Win?
Professor Cornel West says we are living through the ‘grimmest and dimmest moments in the history of the American empire in terms of its levels of organised greed and weaponised hatred and institutionalised indifference toward the vulnerable…, but we know empires come and go.’ If there was any chance he’d win, I’d vote for Cornel West or Jill Stein who is a Harvard-educated doctor, a pioneering environmental health advocate, and an organiser for people, planet, and peace.
Watch or Read; Dismantling the American Empire (w/Cornel West) The Chris Hedges Report, 23 October 2024
Chris Hedges; “Doctor Cornel West, who is running as an independent presidential candidate, is not only one of the country’s most important intellectuals, but one of the standard bearers for the black prophetic tradition, the most important intellectual and spiritual movement in our history. He follows in the footsteps of Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, W.E.B. du Bois, James Baldwin, Richard Wright, Lorraine Hansberry, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, James Cohen, Bell Hooks and many others. His critiques of the American experiment are informed by the nation’s founding myths, still prevalent, based on white supremacy, capitalist exploitation, and the crimes of imperial expansion, including the genocide carried out against Native Americans.”
Cornel West; “I come out of a black people who’ve been so hated for 400 years, but still taught the world so much about love, been terrorised for 400 years and taught the world so much about freedom, been traumatised for 400 years and taught the world so much about healing, when even when you’re wounded, you can still heal. When you’re bombarded with sorrow, you can still generate joy. And I won’t go into it, but for me, you know, the black musical tradition is the greatest tradition of the modern world in terms of not just its artistic creativity and spiritual fortitude, but its courage to love truth, beauty, goodness. Its courage to fight for freedom.”
Please donate
Forgive me for pointing out that, while we receive some one-off donations, I am funding Farms Not Factories myself, and if we are to continue to fight the cruel, antibiotic-led factory farm system, we will need some regular donations from like-minded people. Please consider a monthly subscription of £2/month and help us support a network of smaller scale, humane and healthy UK pig farms, local abattoirs and butchers.
“Our message is simple, we want to help bring an end to this dangerous, inhumane system. Vote for real farming over factory farming.”
– Tracy Worcester, Director
Contents
Share This Article
Related ArticlesView All
I Farm, You Eat
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
Constant Lying
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
Farmers Not Robots
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narratives that are censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
Resist Big Brother
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narrative that is censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
Vote to ‘Drain the Swamp’
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narrative that is censored in the mainstream media…. Read More
Vote for Peace
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information and narrative that is censored in the mainstream media…. Read More