The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media.
“The way you get democracy to function is by informing the public.” – Robert Kennedy Jr.
“Science is more than a body of knowledge. It is a way of thinking; a way of sceptically interrogating the universe with a fine understanding of human fallibility. If we are not able to ask sceptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be sceptical of those in authority, then, we are up for grabs for the next charlatan (political or religious) who comes rambling along.” – Carl Sagan
“Never worry about who will be offended if you speak the Truth. Worry about who will be misled, deceived and destroyed, if you do not.” and
”Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by and that has made all the difference.” – Robert Frost
Though the chapters interrelate, they are divided into six sections and have a common realisation that a cabal of corporate elites have captured global trade, global and national governance, mainstream and online media, and ultimately many of our minds.
As a stenographer, I link to an article or audio and paste a key section. My most trusted websites are platforms for journalists who don’t compromise on the truth and have thereby been shunned by the mainstream media. Click the button below to view my list of top trusted news sources:
SUSTAIN
Sustainable Food Trust,
Soil Association
Farm Gate
The Organic Grower Podcast
Wicked Leeks
Slow Food
Food Farming & Countryside Commission
Landworkers’ Alliance
Censorship / Surveillance / Coercion/ Corruption / Blackmail
Mattias Desmet
Assange News
Alex Krainer
Covid / Vaccines Scam
Robert F Kennedy podcast
Dr John Campbell
Children’s Health Defence
The Exposé
Combining the Provoked War with Russia and Israel
The Grayzone
Judging Freedom
The Intercept
For The People
Global Research News
Consortium News
Geopolitical Economy Report
Declassified UK
Zionism is a Colonial State Project / Gaza, Syria, Yemen, Lebanon & Iran
Palestine Declassified
Pepe Escobar
Resistance News Network
Juan Sinmiedo
Resistance News Network
B’Tselem
Quds News Network
The Electronic Intifada
Jonathan Cook
Richard Medhurst
Craig Murray
Syriana Analysis
Links are to all categories:
Unlimited Hangout
The Jimmy Dore Show
21st Century Wire
UK Column
The Cradle
Russell Brand
The Truth Contract
The Light printed newspaper
Many people don’t realise that on an iPhone you can get the text read out loud by dragging two fingers down from the black section at the top of the screen. In short; ‘navigate to Settings > Accessibility > Spoken Content. Then, toggle on Speak Screen to have the entire screen read aloud, or Speak Selection to have only selected text read aloud’.
Food & Farming
Gareth Wyn Jones
Gareth Wyn Jones, Welsh hill farmer and campaigner for British, sustainable, seasonal produce says the problems farmers face are the weather, big corporations, supermarkets and government.
He says that the introduction of an inheritance tax is devastating many family farms. There are already farmers who have committed suicide so that their families won’t have to sell their farms to pay the tax that starts in April next year.
“My father’s 88, never had a passport, never went on holiday, never bought expensive cars. He invested all his money back into the land, hopefully for the next generation to have it.”
“Any working farm that wasn’t sold to solar, that wasn’t sold to a wind farm, that wasn’t sold for building or construction, if that farm is producing food, that should be exempt from inheritance tax.”
If you want to avoid starvation from the government’s destruction of our farmers, you must listen to Gareth and buy food directly from our farms.
“Let’s start a farming food revolution right here, right now. It can never happen until the public gets behind the farming industry and starts to ask questions on our governments, on our supermarkets and on the elite in Davos. Because in my opinion, they’re the ones that are pushing the Net Zero agenda, which is absolutely ludicrous. If you’re blaming my cow farts for the problems we’ve got, you need to go and see a doctor.”
Corporate control over food means no farmers, but ‘fake food, fake economics and fake knowledge’.
Watch; Vandana Shiva, 19 September 2025
Vandana Shiva; “There are literally five billionaires that have as much wealth as half of humanity and it’s growing fast. If you look at where their wealth comes from…….. do they work? No, they don’t. They just collect rents from money, our money. They collect rents from our minds. What does Facebook do? You exchange messages, they mine data from your Facebook messages. That extracted data is then sold on, either to corporations to sell you things or through Cambridge Analytica, to political parties. So you get an artificial intelligence president. I’ve quoted the Monsanto person saying ‘we need farming without farmers, because by getting rid of farmers we have new markets for surveillance, robotics and artificial intelligence’. Two big assaults that are coming are fake food and fake economics, and fake knowledge I would add. So the fake knowledge is replacing real intelligence, ecological intelligence, emotional intelligence, cooperative intelligence of communities at work, including the intelligence in the plants, the intelligence in the microbes, the intelligence of the bacteria in our gut. We are super intelligent, life is intelligence. They want artificial intelligence with some of our narrow programmes that are very mechanical, downloaded into a machine. Machine learning is artificial intelligence that will get rid of the farmer on the farm. I mentioned the fake economics of zero budgeting. Look out for it. When you see the term zero budget, be suspicious, it’s about externalising costs. Our studies have shown that farmers in the industrial system, whether it’s industrial production and industrial distribution, through the Walmarts, the Amazons and the big supermarket chains, farmers receive no more than 1 to 4% of the value. And that’s the case for coffee too. It’s only when farmers do direct distribution that you can have a chance of a fair price.
Fake food is the next big desperate attempt to try and extinguish our movement. The biggest solution to climate change is not to eat bad food and fake food and kill yourself through that, but become part of the healing of the earth by returning organic matter to the soil. We should stop calling ourselves producers of food because that’s a by-product of something much bigger that we do. We care for the earth, we generate her health, we regenerate the health, social health of our communities through social justice and the ecological health of each of our children through making their fundamental right to life real through the right to good food and real food, which can only come from real farms and real intelligence and real love and real giving.”
Bill Gates-funded projects set ‘science-based targets’ which will mean we will be eating factory-produced protein sludge, genetically-modified insects and franko-veg created in a genetic lab. Hungry?
Read; Jon Fleetwood on Substack ‘Dystopian Plan to Govern the World’s Diet’ Jon Fleetwood, 6 October 2025
‘A Thursday publication in The Lancet, titled “The EAT-Lancet Commission on Healthy, Sustainable, and Just Food Systems,” presents what the authors call “a great food transformation”—a coordinated global programme to reshape agriculture, diets, and financing so that every nation’s food supply fits within quantified “planetary boundaries.”
The food-system power grab comes as the same network of government agencies and Gates-funded projects are already re-engineering the genetic code of crops themselves—turning destructive plant viruses into self-replicating DNA platforms, illustrating how the push for “sustainability” and “climate-smart” agriculture doubles as a bid to centralise control over both the seeds in the ground and the food on our plates.
The new 80-page commission links its plan to the debunked “climate change”-aligned Paris Agreement, UN Sustainable Development Goals, and the Convention on Biological Diversity.
It proposes:
– worldwide limits on red-meat consumption,
– a yearly re-allocation of $200–$500 billion in farm subsidies,
– and continuous monitoring of national food systems under “science-based targets with monitoring and accountability mechanisms.”
The paper’s declared funders include the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, Wellcome Trust, IKEA Foundation, and Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, whose grants financed the work through the EAT Foundation in Oslo.’
Though the article itself laments that people don’t want to eat insects, we can celebrate that despite the massive PR stunt to promote insect food, common sense tells us to reject it. I can’t cut and paste any of the article but you can read it.
Read; Does the edible insect dream still have wings? The Grocer, 2 October 2025
For years supermarkets have been greenwashing by labelling products with farm-like names – some of the names already belong to real farms but the law doesn’t help the real owner end the theft of their brand name.
Watch; I Investigated Fake British Farms (What I Found Will Shock You) Radmore Farm, 21 October 2025
Ben Aveling; “Quick question. When you see Rose Dean Farm eggs in Tesco or Woodside Farm Chicken, you would think it comes from a British farm, wouldn’t you? Then you would be wrong, those farms do not exist, they’re made up, fake, invented, pure marketing. And it’s not just Tesco, it’s across the entire supermarket industry. They call it farm branding. I call it farm washing, because that’s exactly what it is. So stick around, because what I’m going to say will change how you shop forever. Let me give you an example, Woodside Farm, run by a lovely guy in Devon called Richard, and Richard tried to sue Tesco because people kept asking him if he supplied Tesco and he said, no, I don’t supply Tesco. His name was at risk, reputation and everything, and on inspection he had realised that Tesco had been using the name since 2016, but just stole it. This is Radmore Farm, a real farm, where you can come, you can see it through the TV screen and you can see the animals. We exist, ‘Woodside Farm’ (on the Tesco label) does not exist. So you have Rosedean Farm, an invention by Tesco, it sounds beautiful, sounds quaint. It doesn’t exist, it’s purely invented, fabricated to trick you. And it’s not just named, there’s pictures of barns, all the things you normally see on real farm packaging has been stolen for marketing. Yet the product will not be from anything but mass-produced, huge commercial conglomerates, massive factory farms and more than likely it will be imported from a different country as well. You bought it thinking it was British. Even Morrisons used to do it, but about 2017 they got called out and they tried their best to stop doing it, but this practice is rampant across the whole industry. So then you’ve got another trick, the Union Jack, which can be placed on products even though they’ve been imported as long as they’ve been packed in this country, and other little loopholes. There was a case documented that Lidl put a Union Jack on New Zealand lamb just because it was packed in the UK. So you could have vegetables from Spain, eggs from Poland, chicken from China, and they slap a lovely flag on it with the Union Jack to make you think it’s from here, purely because of where it’s packed. They’ll probably even stick a little Farm Fresh label on it with a farmer with a flat cap, just to deceive us further. In the summer, we could literally get so much more from Britain and yet they’ll still use that Farm Fresh branding, which is nonsense. Riverford actually called supermarkets out on this. This is a real farm, no marketing, real mud, real farmers, no marketing fantasy. But why should this matter? It matters because you are getting conned. Supermarkets know you want to support British produce, you’re willing to part with your hard earned cash to buy what you believe is the best, supporting your nation and supporting your farmers. Instead, they’re taking the mick, taking us all for idiots and all while slapping on premium British price on foreign produce. In 2017, they did a survey and 70% of consumers felt completely conned by supermarkets. They are literally taking something that would be illegal to grow here and slapping on a British flag. And as farmers and consumers, we can’t compete with fake. You pay more, supermarkets make more and we all lose out. If you buy something that’s substandard, thinking it’s British, it can ruin our reputation. You expect the best from British farms and that’s what you should be getting, but we’re competing against farms that don’t exist. And when that Woodside guy found out he was supplying Tesco, that’s fraud, so what’s being done about it? What are farmers doing about it? We are standing up for you. But this is where I come in. This is my opportunity to do something about it, because fundamentally it affects you more than it affects me. So I’m going to share a few tips onto how you can spot it and not get caught. Tip number one, look out for the quaint little farm names in supermarkets, they’re more than likely going to be nonsense. Two, if you want real British produce in supermarkets, look for that tractor logo with the Union Jack. Red Tractor is probably the most reliable assurance scheme in Britain, but my favourite, buy direct from your farmer. And this is my mission here on this farm to give you the information you need to make informed choices. I don’t supply supermarkets. I can come on here and call them out and I’m going to make sure I do not stop doing that. Farm washing is undermining you, undermining farmers, and it has to stop. More videos like this and more information and you voting with your wallets will stop supermarkets doing it.”
Though the Red Tractor label guarantees that the product is British, their claim that the label guarantees high standards has once again been found to be false as it doesn’t even guarantee UK legal standards.
Read; Watchdog rules Red Tractor exaggerated its environmental standards, The Guardian, 15th October 2025
‘The UK’s advertising watchdog has upheld a complaint that Britain’s biggest farm assurance scheme misled the public in a TV ad about its environmental standards… the ASA said the ad must not be shown again in its current form. It said in future Red Tractor should make clear exactly what standards it is referring to when it uses the phrases “farmed with care” and “all our standards are met.”‘
Yes, people need homes to be built, but the public should be consulted to ensure housing developments look attractive for owners and neighbours and not just for banksters’ bank accounts.
Listen; Planning reform, beer and growing hops, BBC Farming Today, 20 October 2025
Presenter; ‘The Government’s bill to ‘get Britain building’ returns to the House of Lords for its report stage. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill gained more than sixty Government amendments earlier this month to streamline the process and give ministers more power to grant permission for big planning projects. However conservation campaigners are not happy about the developments, and the Government’s rhetoric.’
It’s good that pigs being suffocated to death might end but the solutions also sound abysmal. The gentle solution must not be driven by cost as the constant drive to produce pork cheaper than a competing company will undermine pigs’ wellbeing and farmers’ survival.
Listen; Welfare report on CO2 and the slaughter of pigs, BBC Farming Today, 21 October 2025
Presenter; “An independent review of the way pigs are slaughtered has called for the use of carbon dioxide gassing to be prohibited, because it causes too much distress and pain to the animals. Ninety percent of pigs reared in England and Wales are slaughtered this way. The report was carried out by the Animal Welfare Committee, an independent expert committee from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the Scottish government and the Welsh government. It recommends that argon gas should be used instead. We speak to vet Dr Jane Downes, who led the Animal Welfare Committee at the time the report was prepared. We also speak to the National Pig Association.”
Local, small-scale ethical production must be the driver.
Read; Survey: Small abattoirs critical to farming and meat businesses, Agriland, 1 October 2025
‘Fifty-eight percent of respondents said their business would not be profitable without selling direct to consumers or through local markets – a model which depends heavily on private kill and further processing services offered by small and local abattoirs. ‘
For better tasting, ethically-produced pork, buy from farmers who keep pigs outdoors on fields and avoid unlabelled supermarket pork from factory farms where overcrowded pigs are pumped with antibiotics and fed genetically-modified soy from South America.
“Industrial animal production – in which large numbers of animals are crammed together in overcrowded sheds – is praised as being resource-efficient. ‘Look at how many pigs and chickens we can produce on this small parcel of land.’ But this is a deception, the clever trick of the card cheat. It hides the reality that a much larger amount of land is needed to produce the grain and soy used to feed industrially farmed animals. In fact, literally 99 times more land is needed to produce the feed for industrially farmed pigs and chickens than is used to house them on the farm. But a second tranche of resource-inefficiency must be factored in. Animals convert grain – wheat, maize/corn, barley – very inefficiently into meat and milk. Studies show that for every 100 calories of human-edible grain fed to animals, just 3-25 calories enter the human food chain as meat. And for every 100 grams of protein in human-edible grain fed to animals, just 5-40 grams of protein enter the human food chain as meat.”
When the big intensive farms go bankrupt due to the high cost of chemicals and machinery, solar farms are seen as the alternative. Instead we need people who are cooped up in cities to have access to land to grow food.
Read; Top farm manager cancels contracts amid struggle to make money The Times, 19 October 2025
‘The largest farm management company in Britain is cancelling 20 percent of its contracts with landowners because it is becoming harder to make money from arable farming. Industry insiders fear swathes of the soon-to-be-released farmland could be turned into solar parks, which give landowners a greater return on investment.’
Factory pig farms in Northern Ireland are a major cause of pollution of Lough Neagh, a highest-level protected habitat.
Watch; Stormont declared ‘crime scene’ over crisis at Lough Neagh, Friends of the Earth Northern Ireland, 21 October 2025
“This week Friends of the Earth NI declared Stormont a crime scene. Decisions made by the Executive have caused the death of Lough Neagh and we’ve had enough. Give us an Environmental Protection Agency now!”
“So we’re declaring this building (Stormont) and the executive that resides in it a crime scene. Lough Neagh has been murdered by a whole range of different government departments.”
” I’m placing this MLA (Member of Legislative Assembly) under a citizen’s arrest.”
“Around Ballyronan for much of the year. It is covered in toxic algae. We’ve had pets die locally. The stench is unbearable.”
“The real issues are sand mining on an industrial scale, the defunding of northern water and most importantly, the agricultural strategy, which is to demolish family farms and replace them with factory farms, despite the phosphorus inputs from the factory farms that has led to the death of Lough Neagh.”
The River Wye suffered a pollution disaster from hundreds of new-build factory chicken farms that reversed decades of work to clean the water. A judge ruled that the councils should not have granted the chicken farm permits, a verdict that is too late for the Wye but perhaps a good precedent to give councils the confidence to fight against factory farms in the future.
Read; Local councils warned: approving unlawful megafarms could lead to costly legal battles, Sustain, 29 September 2025
‘A series of recent landmark legal rulings have made it clear that councils must protect local people and wildlife from pollution caused by industrial chicken and pig units. The cases in Herefordshire, Norfolk and Shropshire relate to the pollution risks from untreated waste slurry and manure, climate change, and on protected conservation areas.’
Global trade treaties ensure that whichever corporation can produce the cheapest pork wins the competition, but if the true costs of lower standards (animal cruelty, antibiotic over-use, pollution, disease) were internalised, local small scale production would out- compete industrially produced pork. Vietnamese pork is a glaring example of the corporate take over. Cheap imports to Vietnam are now threatening the dominance of existing single-story factory farms, so they plan to remain competitive by building vertical, multi-story pig farms.
Read; Vietnam’s pig sector: crisis for farmers, boom for corporations, porciNews, 19th October 2025
“While small-scale farmers are struggling with the African Swine Fever (ASF) outbreak and have had to cull over 1 million pigs, several major livestock companies are reporting massive profits exceeding VND1 trillion.”
Even on a the small island of Jersey, corporate-sponsored politicians refuse to ban the toxic cancer-linked herbicide Roundup produced by Bayer which has already settled 131,000 cancer claims worth $11 billion, with thousands more in the pipeline.
Read; Glyphosate use to continue in Jersey despite new cancer study, Bailiwick Express, 20 October 2025
‘Jersey will continue to follow UK and EU guidance on the use of glyphosate, despite new research suggesting the widely used and controversial weedkiller may cause multiple forms of cancer – even at doses previously considered safe. Deputy Hilary Jeune asked Environment Minister Steve Luce whether he would review the use of glyphosate after the Global Glyphosate Study by the Ramazzini Institute linked the chemical to several types of cancer.
Back in 2017, the Jersey Organic Association (JOA) petitioned the Environment Minister – which was also then Deputy Steve Luce – to bring forward legislation to ban the sale, importation and use of the products within the island. But his department dismissed a potential ban as “unreasonable and unjustified”. The department responsible for public works in Guernsey stopped using glyphosate in 2019 after a vote in the Island’s States Assembly. However, as recently as 2023, Guernsey’s politicians stopped short of banning its use by others in the island.’
As Jane Goodall famously said, “How could we have ever believed that it was a good idea to grow our food with poisons?”
Watch; Chemical Carrots Green Earth Organics, 12 September 2025
Kenneth Keavey; “Back in my granddad’s day, all carrots were organic. He certainly didn’t have to prove that any of the carrots he grew didn’t have chemicals on them like we organic farmers have to do today. So here’s one, instead of organic farmers proving that their carrots are chemical free, how about conventional carrots are labelled chemical carrots and all the chemicals, pesticides, herbicides and fungicides that have been used in the production of chemical carrots are listed on the label. You go into a supermarket, you pick up your plastic bag of washed carrots, and you see all the different chemicals that are listed on these chemical carrots. Do you think things would change if that were the case? I certainly think so. As always, thank you for your support, it means an awful lot for sustainable, organic agriculture.”
Everything you need to know about how and why the food economy is being destroyed and how we can take back control by buying local food from real farmers.
Read; How to Feed the World and Save the Planet – A View from the Ground Helena Norberg-Hodge and Henry Coleman, Local Futures, 22 October 2025
Intro; ‘Anyone who tuned into the FAO’s World Food Day programme last week would be forgiven for coming away feeling that the world’s food system is in good hands.
Now wouldn’t that be a relief? Because, currently, the global food system is the single largest driver of climate breakdown, ecosystem degradation, pollution and preventable disease, and the number of hungry human mouths to feed is 800 million and rising. Wouldn’t it be nice if the UN truly had a cohesive, holistic plan to transform the global food economy into something that works for both people and planet?
The good news is such a plan exists. The bad news is the UN doesn’t have it. There is a way to produce considerably more food per acre while restoring soils, supporting biodiversity, and healing ecosystems. There is a way to feed the world and save the planet.
But that would mean going directly against what our governments – and the agribusiness interests that influence them – have been funding for decades.
Feeding the World and Saving the World – It’s up to us!
The propaganda surrounding the digital takeover of agriculture insists that young people don’t want to farm – they’d rather push buttons on screens. But that story is already outdated. Across the world, a new generation is returning to the land. From peri-urban farms outside Melbourne to community gardens in Detroit to cooperatives in Kerala, young people are trading office cubicles for the open sky, computer keystrokes for seeds and soil.
Supporting this movement would actually be far easier – and far less expensive – than to continue the ongoing displacement of populations, urbanisation, destruction of ecosystems, and scaling up of technological infrastructure involved in the top-down, globalist plan. It would be easier to listen to the global peasant movement and support them to stay where they are and do what they do. It would be easier to support young farmers and the local food economies which are already emerging naturally, without the support of policy. It would be easier to localise the production of our basic needs than to ship products around the world and back again.
This is the shift that can feed the world by producing much more food per acre with less energy, minerals and chemicals. This is the shift that can return health and life to ecosystems, rebuild soils and restore watersheds, contributing to long-term food security and the flourishing of the planet. This is the shift that provides more meaningful livelihoods while reweaving the fabric of community interdependence that makes life rich and joyous.
But for this movement to work its wonders, we all need to get involved. We can’t leave it to farmers, whose workload is already heavy. We can’t leave it to blinkered economists and politicians. And, despite their proficiency in all the right language, we can’t leave it to the FAO.
We need people to be involved, consumers to take a stand. We need a global, cross-sectoral movement for localisation.’
It’s a global tragedy that small scale farmers who feed their local communities are being forced off their land and into cities, to be replaced by mechanised, monoculture farming for distant markets.
Watch; The great illusion, ramblinghenry, 29 October 2025
“Did you ever notice how people say everyone left the land because farming was hard and life in the city was better? That’s not what really happened. People didn’t flock to cities out of choice, they were pushed. When the Enclosure Acts came in, wealthy landowners fenced off the commons, the land ordinary people used to grow food, graze animals and live freely. Suddenly, the poor had nowhere to farm, nowhere to live, no way to eat. So they went to the cities, not for freedom, but for survival. And what did they find? Crowded housing, long factory hours, polluted air and a promise of progress that never fed their souls. Then came the movies, the billboards, the glossy dream telling us that cars, money and status were the new symbols of happiness. And we believed it. We chased it until we forgot what real wealth feels like. Because you can have all the money in the world, but you can’t buy a loving meal with your family. You can’t buy meaning, community or connection to the land. That’s the great illusion. And maybe it’s time we wake up from it.”
Scottish politicians are debating the hugely controversial Land Reform Bill. Until the economy allows small scale farms to flourish, land redistribution seems ambitious but essential to allow access to land for new entrants of small scale farmers and allotments. There must be strict rules that the land only goes to people who want to feed us and not the banksters.
Listen; Scottish Land Reform Bill, BBC Farming Today, 29 October 2025
Presenter; “Farmers and landowners in Scotland are keenly watching events at the Holyrood Parliament in Edinburgh this week. The Land Reform Bill has reached its final stages before MSPs get to vote on what’s been described as landmark legislation. The bill, if passed, could for the first time allow the government to intervene in private land sales and require large estates to be broken up. The Government says it wants to address the high concentration of land ownership in the hands of relatively few people in Scotland. But their proposals are proving controversial with landowners and some opposition politicians. Phil Sim is a political correspondent for BBC Scotland and he told me what’s behind this legislation.”
Philip Sim; “It feels like there’s a big land reform bill just about every term of the Scottish Parliament, or at least when looking at crofting, there are perennial issues here. But there is still a big issue with the highly concentrated ownership of land, particularly around the Highlands, around the south of Scotland, these are the big, rural areas of Scotland. They reckon there’s about 400 people own 50% of Scotland’s land, and the government say that just doesn’t feel right. So they’re looking at these reforms which go to really unprecedented places in terms of trying to change how land is owned, how it’s managed. Here is the Scottish Government’s Rural Affairs Secretary, Mairi Gougeon, explaining a little more about it.”
Mairi Gougeon; “It’s about transparency, involving communities in decisions around the land where they live and work, and making sure they’re a fundamental part of those important decisions. It’s about diversifying land ownership. Scottish ministers determining whether we can lot land when large estates go up for sale, which we think is a really significant and important power, and also making sure that our tenant farmers are fairly compensated, that we have the ability to look after our small landholders and see more small landholders in Scotland too.”
Presenter; “So what exactly will the bill do, Phil?”
Philip Sim; “So it’s chiefly focused on large land holdings. So estates of over a thousand hectares, they will have to publish a land management plan so that people have a better idea of what’s going on on the land. And there will also be more opportunities for communities to lease land on these estates and indeed, when they come to be sold, the government could actually step in if there’s a possibility that you’re just going to see like a quick private sale, because you have heard complaints before from communities that they haven’t had the opportunity, they kind of find out their landlord has change after the fact of a private sale, so there could be more time and opportunity for community groups to potentially organise and bid to take control of land. There’s also the possibility of large plots of land being broken up and sold in smaller lots, if that could make the local community more sustainable.”
A Regenerative dairy farmer shows how the soil, the grass and the cows are all healthier from grazing multi-species leys with no fertiliser or machinery inputs. Stuart Rogers won the Carbon Farmer of the Year Award, highlighting the scam that livestock contribute to climate change!
Listen; Stuart Rogers, Carbon Farmer of the Year Farm Gate video shorts, 17 October 2025
Stuart Rogers; “So we have 250 pedigree Holsteins, (producing) eleven and a half thousand litres (of milk), and they graze for as long as we can, which could be six to eight, nine months if the conditions allow. How we’re able to do that is the change of management in the grazing. So we haven’t used any fertiliser on the grazing for five, six years. We don’t use any grassland machinery to manage it, it’s primarily the cows, so that transfers into the health of the soil with the herbal leys and the diverse pastures that the cows are grazing, the way we manage the cows and the different intervals they go into the paddocks to graze, so we have really good soil health, a good functioning ecosystem under the cows, which is created from the management of the cows and then that is able to give us a lot of grass at this time of year, so we’re able to extend our grazing period. So we’ve recently won the Carbon Farmer of the Year award with the farm carbon toolkit and incredibly proud to have done that. And how we’ve managed to do that is the changes we’ve made to the way we grow maize, the cover-cropping, the reductions in inputs, and we continue to push that forward. We’ve made big changes in the grazing and how we manage the cows at pasture, with diverse pastures, with multi-species leys, herbal leys, and then the implementation of the agroforestry. So that is now in its third year and we’re seeing some big changes in and how that’s looking and we’ve rolled that out further. But it then creates so many benefits to the cows, the different browsing opportunities they have, the shade shelter than what we see underground as well, the impacts, the ripple effects down into the soil. We didn’t really appreciate just how that would transfer through, but so now that’s just continues to grow and increase year on year, so thats great.”
Roger Meacock says we can help protect farmers from government and supermarket policies that can only result in annihilation by forming communities that buy food directly from local farmers and food hubs.
Watch; Vet Speaks Out | They’re Attacking Farmers Clive Edwards, 12 October 2025
‘Veterinarian Roger Meacock speaks out about the attack on UK farmers from government and industry policy. Roger covers a wide range of topics, including offering some solutions that farmers can adopt. Roger is a courageous and lone voice from the veterinarian sector that is actively helping and speaking out for farmers and their cause. Roger has produced a peer-reviewed paper which exposes the flaws of the tests that Defra will use to initiate “cull orders” [kill orders] on a farmer’s herd or flock. This paper could be an effective line of defence for farmers, who like Roger question the efficacy of these testing procedures. Roger’s paper is available to download freely from his website, which is linked below. Farmers and the equine industry need to stand shoulder to shoulder with practitioners such as Roger who risk their livelihood to speak out. Currently Roger is the only (very vocal) veterinarian that I am aware of who has gone to such lengths to challenge government policy in support of the farming industry, and he needs our support.
Here is Roger’s website where he can be contacted and where you can find his scientific paper on PCR testing, which can be downloaded for free.’
A ‘market garden renaissance’ with government support targeted towards small-scale horticulture in Northern Ireland should be rolled out across the UK and for that matter, across the world.
Read; Making The Case For A Market Garden Renaissance In Northern Ireland, Landworkers Alliance, 2 October 2025
‘The report shows that if market gardens were to produce 20% of N. Ireland’s vegetable supply, they would be able to supply more than 160,000 households with a weekly veg bag. This would require 1,673 hectares more land to be brought under horticultural production, or the creation of around 557 more market gardens (of around 3ha in size).’
Though many farmers will have made their farm decisions presuming there would be no payment, better this very late reprieve than none!
Read; Countryside Stewardship reprieve secures lifeline for 5,000 farmers, Farming UK, 15th October 2025
‘Farmers and environmental groups have secured a major victory after the government confirmed a one-year roll over of Countryside Stewardship Mid Tier (CS MT) agreements, protecting more than 5,000 schemes and avoiding a damaging funding cliff edge.
The decision, worth up to £70 million, follows months of pressure from farming organisations, including the NFU and the Nature Friendly Farming Network (NFFN).
It will give farmers the certainty they need to continue delivering environmental benefits such as wildflower margins, bird habitats, species-rich grassland and soil improvement alongside food production.’
UK farmers are under attack from government, supermarkets and now energy companies that have doubled their charges under the veil of climate change mitigation.
Listen; Energy costs for salad growers BBC Farming Today, 27 October 2025
Charlotte Smith; “Salad growers are warning that price increases for electricity will drive people out of the sector. Growers in the Lee Valley on the edge of London say they have large electricity connections for times of heavy use, but often use much less power. Since 2022 they’ve been charged based not only on what they use, but also on the size of the connection. And they say that from April next year those standing charges will effectively double. Lee Styles from the Lee Valley Growers association told me energy is already expensive.”
Lee Styles; “Growers are paying over £1,000 per meter per month in standing charges. And obviously, being a seasonal business, they’re not using it for several months of the year. The size of the nursery requires more than one connection, so they’re paying standing charges multiple times.”
Charlotte Smith; “Now you’re expecting price increases from April. How much are you looking at?”
Lee Styles; “Well, it could be at least double, as far as the growers are aware. It’s just another added cost that has to be factored into the cost of producing food. It’s another blow for the grower.”
Charlotte Smith; “Can you pass that price increase on to retailers and ultimately to consumers?”
Lee Styles; “They’ll have to. They’ll either have to pass it on or they’ll have to stop growing and diversify, which unfortunately many already have.”
Charlotte Smith; “And what are they diversifying into?”
Lee Styles; “Well, a lot of them are looking to sell their whole nurseries for housing and a lot of growers are taking down bits of glass and putting in light industrial units just to keep the growing business going. But that’s not sustainable in the long term.”
Charlotte Smith; “There is a network charging compensation scheme where some businesses can recoup up to 60% of the charges that we’re talking about. Can these businesses use that?”
Lee Styles; “No, not at the moment, because growers are not eligible for that. They’re not classed as an energy intensive industry. They already pay climate change levy on their energy bills and have to claim back a percentage of that. But, I mean, they’re not even eligible for this scheme.”
Charlotte Smith; “In the Government’s industrial strategy, it does talk about reducing energy bills for high energy users. Does horticulture come into that?”
Lee Styles; “There’s been no such thing as a reduction in energy bills for any growers. It’s only been going the other way.”
Charlotte Smith; “Given that many of the growers, as you say, are selling off land or turning to other income streams, is it really time that this little section of growers on the edge of London moved out, moved to bigger premises where maybe they can make it pay a bit?”
Lee Styles; “Well, the problem is that you’re looking at £750,000 for an acre of glass house nowadays, and that’s far beyond the means of many growers. And that’s more than they’d get for their existing sites as well. It’s not a viable option.”
Charlotte Smith; “It is a relatively small part of the salad grown here in the UK. Does it matter?”
Lee Styles; “Well, it matters if you don’t want empty shelves again, because we’re so reliant on overseas imports. They can pretty much charge what they like at the moment because there isn’t a domestic competition to go against it.”
Charlotte Smith; “What’s the solution then for this particular issue?”
Lee Styles; “Well, I think growers would just like some help. I mean, we’ve been used to not having any help for many decades now, but it seems to be that we’ve gone from being ignored to being actually targeted. If the government wants to keep food prices low, they’re going to have to help domestic producers.”
Charlotte Smith; ” In a statement the Department of Energy Security and Net Zero told us that only energy-intensive industries, where energy is a high percentage of their costs, qualify for the compensation scheme, but that will be reviewed next year to ensure support continues to be directed to the most energy and trade intensive sectors in the economy.”
US farmers are also facing mass bankruptcy due to their massive debts from expensive inputs while their markets are forever lowering the price paid for commodities. When faced with starvation it’s time for people to squat the land and demand to grow their own food, otherwise the banksters will scoop up the land for rewilding while we are forced to buy franken gloop produced in a lab.
Read; ZeroHedge: Farmers are facing their worst economic downturn in at least 50 years, Meryl Nass, 23 October 2025
‘A sobering article that was recently published by AGWEB that was just shared with me is warning that our farmers are facing a “generational collapse”…Farmers are not crying wolf, the wolf is real and right outside the door in the form of generational collapse.The inescapable crop math of sustained crippling commodity prices and high input costs has many growers screaming for immediate relief, potentially via aid payments in late 2025 or early 2026. However, bailouts are Band-Aids over bullet holes.The giant monopolies, that provide the things that our farmers need, increase their profits by squeezing farmers, and the giant monopolies that purchase what our farmers produce increase their profits by squeezing farmers. For a while, many farms could still at least break even, but now conditions have gotten so bad that many farmers are losing hundreds of dollars per acre…’
Watch; Bill Gates is coming after your water, hustlebitch, 3 July 2025
“Bill Gates is very interested in your water. While everyone’s distracted with indictments and celebrity BS, Bill Gates, BlackRock and Nestle just quietly teamed up. Yes, Nestle, the same company whose chairman literally said water isn’t a human right and now they’re making moves to own it. This isn’t speculation, it’s already happening. Gates is buying up farmland that sits on major aquifers. Blackrock is pouring billions into water infrastructure and Nestle still extracting millions of gallons while local communities run dry. They’re not just buying land, they’re buying access to rivers, lakes, groundwater. They’re investing in the tech to monitor, track and reroute where water flows and who gets it. This isn’t about conservation, this is about control. Food already controls people, but water? Water controls everything. You can live without oil, you can survive without power, but water? You’ve got days. They already run agriculture, finance and energy. Now they want to own survival itself and no-one’s stopping them. This is a hostile takeover of the one thing we need to live, and by the time people wake up, it’ll already be gone.”
CO2
Our food growing land is being industrialised with solar panels to fuel the politicians’ surveillance state of energy intensive AI tech. Local opposition is the front line where the battle against them is fought – please give your skills to local campaigns like Stop Lime Down by for example writing the vital letter of opposition. ‘November 2025 is when it is vital that we have thousands registering as “interested parties” and making a “Relevant Representation” on the Planning Inspectorate website. A Relevant Representation is a summary of your views on the application and means that you can then give a more detailed written representation later. We will guide you. Come to the early November local meetings to learn more.
Read; “A nightmare”: the grim reality of living near a mega solar building site, Stop East Park Energy, 28 October 2025
‘Dust, mud, noise and disruption, HGV convoys, broken promises and cracks in the walls of local houses.The local community is still reeling from the construction of the Cleve Hill solar plant in Kent. But after two years of what was described by a local as a “nightmare” build programme at the UK’s first – and currently only – ‘NSIP’ solar facility to be constructed, locals say that there is still no sign of the landscape planting the developer was required to fund and deliver as part of its Development Consent Order. None of the agreed community ‘benefits’ have been delivered, and the promised biodiversity ‘improvements’ have not materialised either. In the PR for the scheme, the original developer promoted Cleve Hill’s ability to provide clean power to local homes. The output is instead sold under Power Purchase Agreements for Tesco and Shell.
Residents living close to the building site had to deal with problem after problem, from flooding, through illegally closed footpaths, to “soul destroying” noise when the builders switched to a different pile-driving technique for the extensive foundations to support racking for the 600,000 solar panels.
Many people feel that everything has been taken from them: nature, wildlife, birds – all the owls, geese, marsh harriers, kites which so abounded appear to have largely disappeared – recreational space, productive land, culture, heritage, the whole of the marshes and its unique landscape, peace and quiet.”
Island Green Power, owned by Macquarie Bank, aka ‘Vampire Kangaroo’, is bribing landowners not to object to a solar farm that would obliterate food producing fields under 2,000 acres of 4 metre-high black solar panels.
Read; Developer offers £50,000 to landowners to not object to solar farm, Farmers Weekly, 14 October 2025
‘Island Green Power has offered landowners up to £50,000 to secure access for the UK’s largest proposed solar farm, contingent on their agreement not to object to the project near Chippenham, Wiltshire. The developer’s Lime Down Solar Park plans include burying cables across farms, prompting around 45 letters to be sent to farmers, as seen by The Telegraph. The letters, part of agreements lasting up to five years, required recipients not to object to the scheme and to write to energy secretary Ed Miliband, withdrawing any previous objections. Island Green Power has since admitted the condition “should not have been included” and promised to send corrected versions of the offer.
Wiltshire Council opposed the Lime Down plan in July. Speaking to The Telegraph, councillor Martin Smith criticised the developer’s approach, describing the letters as “almost akin to bribery”. He accused the firm of trying “to trample over the democratic process and the people being affected.” A farmer who received the initial letter described feeling “threatened” and said recipients felt they had “no option but to sign”.
If approved, Lime Down Solar Park would cover more than 800ha over five sites, making it the largest solar farm in the UK. Campaign group Stop Lime Down note that arable land in the UK is declining and that the farmland planned for development is 30% “best and most versatile” farmland. The project includes a 14-mile cable route connecting to the National Grid, with solar sites surrounding Norton village and impacting nearby communities including Alderton, Corston, Foxley, Grittleton, Hullavington, Rodbourne, Sherston, and Malmesbury.
Niall Macrae says people aren’t aware that Net Zero, like Covid, is being used to concentrate power in globalist organisations.
Listen; The Lie of Cataclysmic, Anthropogenic Climate Change, UK Column News, 10 October 2025
‘The implementation of the United Nations’ Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and The Great Reset is fostering the development of a global technocracy. The intended outcome is complete control of people and resources, purportedly to ‘save the planet’. Niall’s book Green in Tooth in Claw: The Misanthropic Mission of Climate Alarm presents a sociocultural perspective on the engineered climate crisis and how the world, particularly the West, has been captured by a dystopian oligarchy. We discuss Net Zero policies and how they are not only ineffective, but will cause damage to our economy and food security.
Niall McCrae is a social commentator with a background in mental health. He was a senior lecturer at King’s College London until 2021, when he became an officer of the Workers of England Union. He has written eight books, including Green in Tooth and Claw: The Misanthropic Mission of Climate Alarm (2024), and Moralitis, a Cultural Virus (co-authored with Robert Oulds in 2020). Niall writes regularly for The Light and OffGuardian. Follow him on Substack.’
Even Bill Gates has changed his tune and decided that Climate Change isn’t such a catastrophe.
Read; Bill Gates Says We’ll Survive Climate Change, World Furious Matt Taibbi, 30 October 2025
‘In the panic age, nothing offends like optimism ‘
‘From the “You can’t make this up” file:
Billionaire Bill Gates yesterday gave an interview on CNBC and released an essay called “Three Tough Truths About Climate.” One of the “tough truths” was — this is not a joke — “Climate change is a serious problem, but it will not be the end of civilisation.” Gates put his “truth” in a box under a field, probably the most humorously grasping use of green imagery since the UNorth commercial in Michael Clayton. Why survival should be “tough” news wasn’t clarified, but Gates offered a summary of his thesis:
Bill Gates; ‘There’s a doomsday view of climate change that goes like this: In a few decades, cataclysmic climate change will decimate civilisation. The evidence is all around us—just look at all the heat waves and storms caused by rising global temperatures. Nothing matters more than limiting the rise in temperature. Fortunately for all of us, this view is wrong. Although climate change will have serious consequences—particularly for people in the poorest countries—it will not lead to humanity’s demise. People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future. Emissions projections have gone down, and with the right policies and investments, innovation will allow us to drive emissions down much further.’
Geoengineering
Andrew Bridgen met two people who’d left their job because they considered geoengineering unethical – namely to spray chemicals over Britain .
Watch; ‘geoengineering Britain’ Andrew Bridgen, 11 October 2025
“A couple of years ago, I got to two people who worked at a company flying out of East Midlands Airport in North West Leicestershire and they actually left that company because they were carrying out geoengineering, spraying us with chemicals, and they felt it was morally wrong. The Met Office know what’s going on. I’m not sure they realise or appreciate how much harm it’s doing to our environment and to the people. And that’s why Keir Starmer’s government had to announce that they were creating a fund to experiment with geoengineering cloud seeding. Because with regard to the vaccines, there is some mitigation, they can always claim they didn’t know that they were killing people and we were in an emergency or they thought we were an emergency. You catch somebody spraying you with chemicals from the sky, it’s very difficult to think what the defence is going to be. And they got a bit windy and they needed that cover from the government that they’ve authorised experiments. Can you tell me where was the debate in our Parliament about whether we would authorise geoengineering? The UK is a very small country, probably less than a quarter of a percent of the globe. It’s got to stop. No more geoengineering”.
Censorship / Surveillance / Coercion/ Corruption / Blackmail
Claire Daly calls for member states to say NO to EU government over-reach in cracking down on those who speak against the mainstream narrative on Covid vaccines, the zionist Middle East project and the proxy war in Ukraine.
Watch; ‘Anything They Don’t Like Is Russian Interference’ — Clare Daly Lifts the Lid on EU Propaganda, APT, 9 October 2025
Clare Daly; “Depriving people of their rights based on rumours and innuendo is exactly what these hybrid sanction packages are about, it’s as simple as that. I wouldn’t normally be in the habit of quoting Politico, but you’re lucky, we’ll break a habit seeing as we’re here. And when they even saw some of the dossiers and they said one of the packets that had somebody sanctioned was; 10 open-source links with varying degrees of reliability. Another was 9, another was 4. Articles in publications like the Financial Times and Reuters were heavily relied on, badly translated, probably AI translated articles from Russian and Ukrainian sources. One was a lifestyle magazine affiliated with the Russian government, but it generally talked about cookery rather than actually news and all this sort of stuff. There was even a woman who was sanctioned for performing a concert in Crimea. I kid you not. I mean, this wouldn’t pass muster in a classroom, not to mind a courtroom. But this is what’s been talked about as evidence in the European Union. Evidence of Russian interference. No oversight. Civil servants draw up a list which is on the advice of the Commission and Member states, and then 27 EU foreign ministers go behind a closed door and vote to sanction you or not. And if you’re targeted by an EU sanction, you don’t hear the charges against you, you don’t get a trial, you don’t get a right to defence. The first thing you find out about this is a letter coming in your door telling you that your bank accounts have been frozen and that you’re banned from entering or leaving the country. And the guy who was sanctioned in Germany, I’m just going to briefly read his account of that because sometimes we bandy words around here about things like sanctions and they seem a bit depersonalised. Well, what does that actually mean to a real person? Well, this guy explained it and he said, ‘I haven’t been charged with anything, I haven’t stood trial, I haven’t been found guilty of any crime, I’d no chance to defend myself. But the EU sanctioned me for my pro-Palestinian journalism and stripped me of my rights. I’m not allowed to buy food, I’m not allowed to buy medicine for my children, I’m not allowed to pay for my lawyer, I’m not allowed to leave the country I live in, I’m not allowed to enter the country I live in, I’m not allowed to get a job, I’m not allowed to make payments, I’m not allowed to receive payments. I’m not allowed to pay my rent. Every single time, for every single case, I have to submit a file and ask permission and then I have to wait several days for approval’. And in case any of you are feeling a bit sorry for him and think that you might send him a few bob just to help him out, well, I’d be very careful about that because you too could then be sanctioned for the crime of circumventing a sanction from the European Union and you could find yourself on a sanction list as well. Now this kind of sounds like tin pot sort of stuff, but this is democracy now in the European Union and it is the new repression as Andrew had called it, because we have hybrid sanctions against EU citizens for exercising the very rights that Michael McGrath lauded in these buildings a number of weeks ago as being enshrined in our constitutions here. So what we see is, in their so-called battle between democracy and authoritarianism, the European Union is becoming incredibly authoritarian in their actions.”
Tony Blair, (speaking at the WEF, where else?) wants digital ID to see who has and who hasn’t been vaccinated – no doubt to crack down against anyone who wants autonomy over their own body.
Watch; We need a digital ID Resist CBDC, 3 October 2025
Tony Blair; “This issue to do with the technology and the digital infrastructure. I just want to emphasise how important I think that is, because in the end, you need the data, you need to know who’s been vaccinated and who hasn’t been. Some of the vaccines that will come on down the line will be multiple, there’ll be multiple shots so you’ve got to have, for reasons to do with healthcare more generally, but certainly for a pandemic or for vaccines you’ve got to have a proper digital infrastructure, and many countries don’t have that, in fact most countries don’t have that.”
Why Dr Mike Yeadon (former vice-president of Pfizer) won’t be signing up to Digital ID – an example to follow if we don’t want to be slaves to satanic authorities and their acolytes.
Watch; I will NEVER accept a Digital ID Global GeoPolitics, 22 September 2025
Mike Yeadon; “If you sign up for digital ID, it’ll be the last really important decision you make, because your digital ID will be the only thing that your governments, institutions and anybody authorised by those holding power will recognise you through. So you won’t exist anymore, you’ll be replaced by a QR code. You are not a number, you’re an address to some resources. And that makes it particularly dangerous because those resources can be edited. And one of those fields for sure will be your vaccination status. And I’m absolutely sure, because I’ve seen it written down in multiple documents, that your digital ID will only remain valid if you comply with the conditions of validity. So one of them will be, have you had your latest recommended or mandated jabs? And because of the fact I’m qualified in toxicology and worked for decades with others in what’s called rational drug design, when I look at these jabs, the constituents, I am certain, formally certain, that they were designed to hurt you. And so the digital ID will lose validity unless you roll your sleeve up. You must see that’s designed to injure and I believe, ultimately kill you. But you won’t be able to escape that because all your money will also be associated with your digital ID. So let’s say you’ve gone to a supermarket, you want to buy a drink and a sandwich, you’ll beat them through and it’ll say, how do you pay? And it’ll say, present your digital ID and the cash register, as it were. The cashless system won’t proceed until you show it your QR code. And if you’re not vaccinated, and if that means your digital ID is not valid, it will say, sorry, transaction refused. The merchant will not be able to sell you the product. So you can see how difficult this is. Now, a valid digital ID, just like a valid passport, is today required to cross a border. And I have no problem with a passport, of course, but I’d be pretty cross if to buy petrol I had to show my passport, or to buy a bottle of water I had to show my passport. But that is what’s coming. You’ll have to show your digital ID. If you said hurtsy words on the Internet, you might find that your digital money doesn’t work. If you’re outside of your 15-minute zone and you’re not authorised to be, you will not be able to buy anything, that’s what’s coming, it’s the ultimate tool of slavery, it’s called the digital gulag by other people. I think that’s not a bad phrase. And the way to stop that happening is to put your foot down and don’t sign up for it.”
What happens when global elites adopt the rhetoric of public-private “partnerships” to justify a sweeping regime of digital surveillance, centralized control, and post-democratic governance? In this in-depth discussion, the speakers argue that the World Economic Forum’s embrace of “stakeholder capitalism” is not benign technocracy but a new, coordinated form of global fascism. They trace the ideological and financial roots of this movement through Klaus Schwab’s controversial family history, Silicon Valley’s entanglements with the U.S. military-industrial complex, and the growing influence of China’s model of total surveillance and AI-driven control.
Central to the conversation is the role of central bank digital currencies, programmable money, and biometric tracking as tools of enforcement—replacing political persuasion with algorithmic coercion. As narratives of climate emergency, pandemics, and national security converge, the panelists contend that institutional actors from Google to Lockheed Martin are rebranding eugenics and control as innovation and public health. The implications are stark: a future where dissent becomes criminal, movement is restricted, and financial systems are weaponized against citizens.
Rise up against digital ID that will enslave us to the corporate elite and their financially captured stooges in government.
Watch; We got less than five years to stop them or we’ll never have another chance Anonymous Media Group, 4 October 2025
“So here’s the thing. We got less than five years to stop them or we’ll never have another chance. Agenda 2030 isn’t some conspiracy theory. It’s written down and it’s written in their words. They come right out and they tell us exactly what they’re going to do. It’s a one world government, one world cashless currency, one world central bank, one world military social credit scores that the government can use to turn off your bank account. Vietnam just deleted 86 million bank accounts of people who refuse to get their digital ID, they just deleted them, I wonder where that money went. If you’re not paying attention, you probably don’t know that England is putting people in prison for social media posts like memes and comments. This is the trajectory that we’re headed. Dude just got put in federal prison in England for saying that he didn’t want his tax dollars prioritising illegal immigrants instead of being used for the betterment of his own countrymen. Listen, if you don’t start standing up and saying something like I am, this will be the end of national sovereignty, it will be the end of privately owned property. They’re literally telling people in other countries that if you don’t accept digital IDs, you’re going to be excluded from society. That’s what they’re telling them. That means they won’t allow you to board a train to get on a plane to go to work. They won’t allow you to do the things that you would normally do if you don’t accept their digital ID. I’m telling you that they won’t allow you to pay your fucking mortgage without providing them a digital ID number. They’ll take away your home for non-compliance. They’ll disallow or remove your children from school. This isn’t a joke, this is what’s happening right now, we have less than five years to do something about it. If you don’t recognise how serious this is, you’re not paying attention.”
Were we asked if we wanted to live in a world where we could be arrested for private conversations in our homes that counter the mainstream narrative? This is communism.
Watch; You are never alone in your home, 9/11 Revisionist, 1 October 2025
Presenter; “A man who knows the dangers only too well is Aman Jabbi, who was at the forefront of digital development in Silicon Valley, California for 25 years. He left when he recognised the dark side of surveillance technology, choosing instead the peace and beauty of Montana. He’s an expert in facial recognition.”
‘You are never alone in your home. And this is why all your devices at home and all smart appliances, they are all connected on a wireless network. Many of these devices will have cameras, many will have microphones, and so they are monitoring everything all the time.’
Presenter; “A man who knows the dangers only too well is Aman Jabbi, who was at the forefront of digital development in Silicon Valley, California for 25 years. He left when he recognised the dark side of surveillance technology, choosing instead the peace and beauty of Montana. He’s an expert in facial recognition.”
Aman Jabbi; “It’s a technique that is used to uniquely identify the biometrics of any face. So in a device like your smartphone and most modern smartphones in the last five or seven years, they have a 3D camera module in the front of the phone, which you cannot see. Within that module is a near infrared projector, which projects tens of thousands of dots on your face. Those dots are then distorted based on the contours and the features of your face. And there’s a near infrared camera then takes a picture of that distortion, captures it, and then reverse engineers the exact profile of your face. In the longer term, facial recognition will be used to unlock your digital identity, which is going to be a tool of control for the agendas that are coming down the pipeline.”
Presenter; “Elements of that control are already with us.”
” Alexa, Good morning.”
“Good morning”.
Aman Jabbi; “You are never alone in your home. And this is why all your devices at home and all smart appliances, they are all connected on a wireless network. Many of these devices will have cameras, many will have microphones, and so they are monitoring everything all the time. Your smart appliances are communicating with the smart meter and sending it real time usage data. If there’s a ring camera also in your home, a mesh network is formed and all your devices are being tracked within the home, its location, its usage, and all the data is going to Amazon servers when you leave your home. All modern vehicles are connected to the Internet, so your automobile is being tracked all the time. When you’re going under a string of smart LED poles and smart LED lights on the highway and in the streets of your towns and cities, those form a wireless network and are tracking your vehicle, they are tracking all the devices on you, from smartphones to smartwatches when you’re walking on the streets. So data is being collected 24/7 continuously on every human being whenever you are within these wireless networks. And it’s obviously not good for health also because of all the electromagnetic radiation.
In the long term, the plan is to pretty much lock up humanity in smart cities, which is kind of a superset of a 15-minute city. They’ve told all the state and local governments and countries that smart cities are about sustainability and the good of the city, but in reality the language from the UN and WEF and their white papers is all inverted. So AI monitoring is really about limiting mobility and no car ownership. Surveillance control via LED grid is why the smart lighting is dead. Water management is about water rationing. Noise pollution is about speech surveillance. Traffic monitoring is about limiting mobility. And then of course, energy conservation is all about rationing heat, electricity and gasoline. Another concept one should be familiar with is called geofencing, think of it as an invisible fence around you where you cannot go beyond a certain point and that’ll be related to your face recognition, digital identity and access control. Your smart contracts software can turn off your digital currency beyond a certain point from your house. Our world has been turned into a digital panopticon. That means you can be monitored, analysed, managed and monetised.”
Presenter; “Surveillance capitalists are already making billions of dollars selling our information to big corporations because this kind of detailed knowledge enables them to predict and influence our behaviour.”
‘One Big Thing’, the government’s plan to digitise the civil service and keep data on everyone, should be renamed ‘One Big Brother’.
Listen; AI: Digital Government – an elaborate scam? UK Column News, 27 October 2025
Ben Rubin; “Artificial intelligence. What could possibly go wrong? We’re going to migrate all of government to a new technological paradigm. It’s completely experimental. All core functions of major government departments are now going to be run on these new algorithmic systems built by multinational corporations owned by unaccountable billionaires with zero loyalty to the British people.
So the One Big Thing, which runs from October until February next year, is about civil servants learning to use AI confidently and responsibly and applying it to the work that they do, which is all about apparently helping us be more efficient and effective as we deliver for citizens, even though that doesn’t appear to be the outcome of this. Who’s pushing this into the system? So Behavioural Insights Team, absolutely front and centre in this, they released a kind of a blockbuster report actually. I mean the amount of work that has gone into this, the AI and Human Behaviour report, where they look at augmentation, alignment and adaptation inside companies and government departments. We’ll put a link to this like really in some ways a phenomenal piece of work until you really begin to understand what it is that they’re trying to achieve with it. They develop this process that they’re taking organisations through, which is about moving from no adoption on the left hand side there in the centre, to deep adoption on the right hand side and helping people to build motivation, trust and capability to migrate along this journey, essentially overcoming threats to things like competence, relevance and identity, so this is about manipulation and coercion into engagement with this new technology and overcoming questions like why am I making myself redundant? Which is probably what a lot of people are asking as this stuff is being rolled out. Now that report has come from this fellow Michael Holdsworth, PhD, who’s the chief behavioural scientist at the Behavioural Insights Team, still basically not directly owned by the British Government, but essentially operating as a kind of non governmental organisation as part of NESTA, we talk about them pretty much every week, certainly I do, and this guy actually was one of the original co-authors of the Mindspace document, so the original document that came out in 2010, which was the precursor to the Behavioural Insights team in the Nudge Unit developed in the Cabinet Office underneath David Cameron, obviously working closely with David Halpern, who’s still the president, I believe, emeritus of the Behavioural Insights team. And this guy’s new book, entertainingly is called the Hypocrisy Trap, which apparently means he’s telling us that we need to rethink hypocrisy and that will improve our relationships. You can’t be too judgmental on this stuff, you know, these are the people pushing this stuff out into the system, and it’s not just Labour Insights Team and UK government, this is the whole, what do they call it? Civil society, charitable foundation, tech-entrepreneur, tech-visionary paradigm is pushing this thing forward. Let’s have a look at Omidyar Network, they’re talking about envisioning a future where our shared humanity steers our digital future. And they introduced this term recently, which is about hardwiring humanity to the grid. Think about that. They want to hardwire us to the digital control grid, starting in government, but then absolutely rapidly moving across the rest of society as well. And this stuff is dangerous. I’m going to be completely upfront with you, and we know it already, not least because of its provenance and where it’s come from. But, you know, this report issued by MIT earlier on this year talks about this idea of cognitive debt and the fact that in their controlled trial, people who were using AI performed worse than their counterparts in all levels. So this is destroying people’s minds and it’s being pushed into the education system. The whole thing’s also built on fraud as well, pretty much, so they’re certainly playing fast and loose with intellectual property legislation. OpenAI submitted some evidence to the Lords Communications and Digital Committee, start of last year, start of 24, and they were asked if they could explain their position on the use of copyrighted material. They said, well, it would be impossible to train today’s leading IO models without using copyright materials which they haven’t paid for, so essentially they’ve ignored the law. Let’s just say that.”
Listen; Digital ID Is The Hill To Die On, UK Column, 7 October 2025
‘Iain Davis, an investigative journalist and author who uncovers globalist agendas on his Substack, reckons the BritCard is a mandatory digital ID scheme aimed at behavioural control and surveillance, with zero real public support as evidenced by petitions racking up over two million signatures.’
Iain Davis; “We are looking at a very draconian behavioural control system that is going to control everything we do, that’s what social credit is all about. Social credit is just the set of rules that you apply to a system like this. So, for example, we’ve got a problem in the UK with lots of people being hounded and in some cases arrested and in fewer cases prosecuted and fewer still go to prison for things that they’ve said on social media. Now, the IMF has already suggested that if we have digital ID log on to the Internet, our Internet browser history should form part of our social credit history. The IMF arguing for that 10 years ago, so if you go online in the UK and say I think Keir Starmer should be booted out of government, or I think the government should be turned off. If you do something like that, that will be a black mark in your social credit history. Now, that won’t necessarily affect you going to the doctor or something like that, but it could well affect you if you go for a job interview, you know, that you’re looking at.
Bill Gates has openly said that he wants digital ID to be linked to your vaccine status. So let’s say you’ve got your biometric digital ID passport and you’re legally entitled to fly, but when you present your document at the airport or whatever it comes up, you haven’t got your vaccines, you’re not up to date with your vaccines and it’s an entry requirement, so you can’t fly. At the moment, none of these systems are quite joined up together, they’re not joined up, and that is the whole point. I’m writing another piece at the moment to stress this point, that the whole point of digital ID, it is to bring all these systems together and that will be done on the back end of these systems to bring them all together so that all of your data is constantly available to anybody with the permission to see it. And that could be anyone, that could be a bank, that could be an insurance broker, that could be the police, obviously, that could be school teachers, anyone that has permission, that is an approved access. So basically, it’s going to be multinational corporations, isn’t it? It’s going to be Palantir, it’s going to be Oracle, it’s going to be Accenture, they’re going to have access to it. And is that the hill to die on? Yeah, I think it is, actually.”
Watch; “Offensive and highly dangerous journalism” UK Column News, 3 October 2025
Brian Gerrish; “This is a big BBC article, which is entitled ‘Why we struggle to protect the young from conspiracy theorist parents. My goodness, this is an extremely dangerous article by Marianna Spring. It’s very offensive still in the way that she has used the suffering of a family in order to get her political points across. But why am I saying this? Well, let’s just have a look at two quotes here. This is the first one, she’s talking about the case, ‘This has raised broader questions around the influence and impact that conspiracy theories held by parents where beliefs stretch far beyond genuine concerns can have on children, including adult children. And in order to help protect children in the most extreme cases, where should the line be drawn between child protection and a parent’s freedom to raise their child according to their own beliefs?’ This is immensely dangerous, and people should remember that a few years ago children’s services were used in the UK to attack a family because of their political beliefs in supporting UKIP.
Marianna Spring goes on to say (trusting parents versus the state). In theory, children should be protected. Any adult can raise concerns about a child’s well-being with a local authority, including if there’s a worry a child is being harmed by parental beliefs. If it’s then decided the child is at risk of harm, an application can be made to the family court for orders to protect them.’
‘But in reality, legal experts tell me’, this is Marianna Spring, ‘the threshold for intervention is high’. Well, of course, she knows nothing about the so-called child protection system. And I believe that what’s happening here is an immensely dangerous attack on parents for their beliefs with the implication that children will be taken from you as a family if you do not have the correct political and social beliefs. So I’ll leave people to take that on board.”
Fabulous to see Bill Gates grilled on air.
Watch; Gates Unmasked Global GeoPolitics, 3 October 2025
Interviewer; “What have you contributed to the world?”
Bill Gates; “I’m not sure if you’re aware, but I created the world’s most popular computer operating system.”
Interviewer; “No, of course. But as we all know, it wasn’t actually you who created it. As a matter of fact, the predecessor of Windows MS-DOS was created by Gary Kildall, which you then basically stole from him for a couple of dollars.”
Bill Gates; “It’s not just development. There’s a whole lot of important factors to running an enormously successful company like Microsoft.”
Interviewer; “So then, let’s leave the computer world for a moment. You have been a major spokesperson for Covid vaccines during the pandemic.”
Bill Gates; “Yes.”
Interviewer; “What exactly makes you, a computer engineer who didn’t even programme his initial product himself, a valid representative of the pharmaceutical industry?”
Bill Gates; ” I have read a lot of books about that topic, yes.”
Interviewer; “How does that…”
Gill Gates; “Wait, wait a second, and met with specialists from the field all over the world.”
Interviewer; “Mr. Gates, with all due respect, how do you feel about it now? Now that it’s becoming more and more evident that the medication you were promoting, whilst having heavily invested in it yourself, thus making billions of it…”
Bill Gates; “This is not how the world works.”
Interviewer;…has caused countless injuries, side effects and deaths.”
Bill Gates; “That’s a very immature way of looking at it, quite frankly.”
Wow, Max Blumenthal exposes the AI Expo as the den of profit over life.
Watch; Palantir-sponsored war tech summit ejects Max Blumenthal The Grayzone, 10 June 2025
Max Blumenthal; ‘This June 3rd, I attended the annual AI Expo of the Special Competitive Studies Project at the Convention Centre in downtown Washington D.C. the project was launched by Google co-founder and Pentagon adviser Eric Schmidt to advance ties between private artificial intelligence, cyber and military firms and the US government. The AI Expo served as a showcase for the future of the American national security state. Sponsored by a who’s who of big tech firms like Google and Meta, as well as private spying and cyber warfare outfits, the conference featured heads of major US intelligence agencies, the Secretary of the Navy, Chairman of the Pentagon, Joint Chiefs, members of Congress, drone manufacturers and universities recruiting for the CIA and other intel branches. At the AI plus Expo, we’ve seen a lot of different people come by the booth as well as other booths and panels that we’ve gotten to see people to interact with. There is a ton of different stakeholders here. People from corporations, government, academia. Ukrainian, Israeli and Taiwanese officials were also on the scene to represent the frontline proxies of American Empire State, sustaining the arms industry through their constant demand for massive military aid. Members of all four branches of the armed forces were present as well, participating throughout the event in a friendly drone competition. A booth by the International Committee of the Red Cross seemed slightly out of place inside this conference. It turned out the Red Cross’s comms team was inside distributing pamphlets advising other AI Expo participants on how to kill fewer civilians and pleading with them to follow international law.
“Mr. Yadlin Can I ask a question? I’m Max Blumenthal from the Grayzone. You were the subject of a New York Review of Books article about how you and Asa Kasher helped loosen the principles of distinction on killing civilians. And I wanted to ask you, like, how do you see your role in the current genocide where thousands of children are being killed. Did you help inspire the genocide?”
What’s interesting here is how few reporters are actually at this place when you have the heads of intelligence, the AI warlords that are getting the biggest government contracts. You have Palantir, whose stock is surging and it just got a massive contract. It has a massive contract from the Trump administration to take Americans data. And you have the former head of Israeli military intelligence, you have the Israeli embassy, the Ukrainian embassy, Taiwanese officials, and there’s hardly any reporters here. One of the few reporters who are inside who are asking questions of any of these AI warlords, foreign governments that are committing genocide like Israel are being escorted out by police and having their badges taken away.”
Have evil people taken control of the world?
Read; The psychopaths in power, Paul Cudenec, 22 October 2025
‘I will now take a look at ‘Political Ponerology: A science on the nature of evil adjusted for political purposes’ by Andrew M. Lobaczewski.
The subject of the book is more relevant than ever, after the literal genocide carried out by zionist monsters in Gaza, with the collaboration of their puppet global “leaders”.
New resonance is thus given to editor Laura Knight-Jadczyk’s 2006 preface in which she writes: “For as long as human hearts have pumped hot blood through their too fragile bodies and glowed with the inexpressible sweetness of life and yearning for all that is good and loving, the sneering, stalking, drooling and scheming beast of unconscious evil has licked its lips in anticipation of its next feast of terror and suffering”.
Describing a category he calls “essential psychopaths”, Lobaczewski explains: “They become experts in our weaknesses and sometimes effect heartless experiments.
The suffering and injustice they cause inspire no guilt within them, since such reactions from others are simply a result of their being different and apply only to ‘those other’ people they perceive to be not quite conspecific.’
Watch; Jerm Warfare – Todd Hayen on what it means to be evil, UK Column, 30 October 2025
‘In this chat, Jerm and Todd Hayen, a psychotherapist and author who’s peeled back the layers of societal manipulation and engineered conformity, expose the hive-mind grip on society and the hidden agendas rigging our systems from the shadows.
Todd points out that if folks snapped out of their programmed uniformity, the elite’s manufactured crises would crumble, yet he notes even those with good intentions get ensnared in the web of errors.
The discussion drives home how the current setup serves dark purposes far from benefiting the masses, pushing everyone to wake up, spot the deceptions, and challenge the puppet masters pulling the strings.’
Todd’s Substack Shrew Views
A Rockefeller family member explained to Hollywood producer Aaron Russo that they funded the Women’s Lib movement because they profited from women joining the work force.
Watch; Why the Rockefellers funded Women’s Lib, unfiltered3ality, 8 September 2025
Aaron Russo; “He said, Aaron, what do you think women’s liberation was about? And I said, I had pretty conventional thinking about it at that point, I said, I think it’s about women having the right to work, getting equal pay with men, just like they won the right to vote, and he started to laugh and said, you’re an idiot, and I said, why am I an idiot? He said, let me tell you what that was about. We, the Rockefellers funded that, we funded women’s lib and we’re the ones who got it all over the newspapers and television, the Rockefeller Foundation. He says, and you want to know why? He says, there were two primary reasons, one reason was we couldn’t tax half the population before women’s lib, and the second reason was now we get the kids in school at an early age, we can indoctrinate the kids how to think. It breaks up their family, the kids start looking at the state as the family, as the school, as the officials, as their family, not as the parents teaching them. And so those are the two primary reasons for women’s lib, which I thought up to that point was a noble thing. When I saw their intentions behind it, where they were coming from when they created it, the thought of it, I saw the evil behind what I thought was a noble event.”
If you are bored by the drivel spoken around you, seek out your tribe of like-minded people through local events like Stand in the Park and demonstrations and attend in person conferences like UK Column.
Watch; Why intelligent people are always alone – Alan Watts Mindset Machine, 28 October 2025
“Have you ever noticed that the smarter you become, the lonelier you feel? It’s a peculiar thing, isn’t it? You’d think that intelligence would connect you to people, that seeing more, understanding more, would bring you closer to others. But it doesn’t, instead, it separates you. You walk into a room and everyone is laughing at something you don’t find funny. Talking about things that seem trivial, surface level, safe. And you smile, you nod, you play along, but inside, you’re somewhere else entirely. You’re thinking about the conversation beneath the conversation, the patterns no one mentions, the questions no one’s asking. And suddenly you realise you’re alone, not physically, but in every way that matters. This is the hidden cost of intelligence, the price nobody tells you about, the isolation that comes not from being different, but from seeing differently. Let me tell you something about intelligent people, something that might explain why you feel the way you do. Intelligence isn’t just about knowing more, it’s about perceiving more, connecting dots that others don’t see, following thoughts to their logical conclusions, even when those conclusions are uncomfortable. And here’s the problem, most people don’t want to go there, they don’t want to question the game, they want to play it. They don’t want to examine the mask, they want to wear it. They don’t want to wonder if the emperor has clothes, they want to complement the fabric. But you, you can’t help it, you see the threads hanging loose, you notice the inconsistencies, the contradictions, the unspoken agreements everyone pretends are absolute truths. And when you point them out, even gently, even playfully, people get uncomfortable, not because you’re wrong, but because you’re right. And being right about things people don’t want to examine makes you dangerous, so they distance themselves, not consciously, perhaps not maliciously, but they do. They stop inviting you to things, they keep conversations shallow around you, they call you intense or overthinking or too serious, and you learn to keep your thoughts to yourself, you learn to dumb it down, to speak in half truths, to laugh at jokes you don’t find funny, to nod along with opinions you don’t share. You learn to hide, because full honesty, you’ve discovered, is social suicide.”
Covid / Vaccines Scam
Read; Saudi Arabia Bets on 2026 Bird Flu Pandemic, Ramps Up Domestic Vaccine Production Amid International H5N1 Gain-of-Function Fears, Jon Fleetwood, 30 October 2025
‘Country inks deal with CSL Seqirus—the maker of the world’s first licensed cell-based influenza bird flu pandemic vaccine, Audenz—to localise vaccine manufacturing ahead of a potential outbreak.’
‘Saudi Arabia has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with CSL Seqirus and Vaccine Industrial Company (VIC) to localise the production of “cell-based seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines” for 2026 and 2027, according to a new press release from CSL published today.
The press release also highlights that CSL Seqirus already partners with over 30 governments worldwide on pandemic-flu response—underscoring that this is an international network of governments preparing for the same scenario.
The three parties have as “ambition to establish pandemic preparedness in 2026 and supply cell-based flu vaccines for the 2026/27 Flu Season,” per the release.
CSL Seqirus “is an influenza pandemic preparedness and response partner to over 30 governments around the world. This partnership will elevate Saudi Arabia’s influenza pandemic preparedness and response strategies in influenza.”
Translation: Saudi Arabia will be producing and stockpiling a vaccine built for a bird flu pandemic that hasn’t happened yet.’
Sign Petition; The UN Is Rushing To Salvage the Pandemic Treaty – Stop Them Now! CitizenGO, 31 October 2025
‘CitizenGO – started this petition to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Kumar Iyer CMG, UK Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the UN and WTO in Geneva – 2025/09/29
For three years, CitizenGO members like you have been fighting back against the WHO’s dangerous Pandemic Treaty.
And together, we’ve already made an impact:
– We forced delays.
– We exposed their hidden agenda.
– We even pushed countries like the U.S. and Argentina to walk away.
That was our victory. But now the WHO is regrouping and hoping you don’t notice.
Behind closed doors in Geneva, they are rushing to finalise the Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing (PABS) Annex, the backbone of the entire Treaty.
If it passes, unelected WHO bureaucrats could:
– Seize control of your country’s pandemic samples
– Dictate who gets vaccines and when
– Override national laws through endless “global emergencies”
– Divert billions of YOUR tax money into unaccountable international structures
This isn’t about health. It’s about seizing control. Global elites are using fear to impose their will, stripping nations of sovereignty and families of freedom.
And they’re moving fast. Six new negotiation rounds are already scheduled between now and March 2026, and in just days at the World Health Summit in Berlin (Oct 12–14), they plan to showcase “progress” to pressure governments into line.
Here’s the good news, though: resistance works. We’ve already forced cracks in their plan. And now we must finish the job.
But we must act NOW!
Add your name today to urge UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Kumar Iyer CMG, UK Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the UN and WTO in Geneva, to reject the PABS Annex and bring down the Pandemic Treaty before it’s too late.
Together, we can stop the WHO’s power grab and defend the freedom of our children, our families, and our nations.
More information:
– Intergovernmental Working Group on the Pandemic Agreement (IGWG) [WHO]
– World Health Summit – Berlin 2025 [WHO]
– WHO members adopt global pandemic accord, but US absence casts doubts [Reuters (£)]
– FINAL VOTE IMMINENT: REJECT the WHO Pandemic Treaty! [CitizenGO]
Read; All COVID Vaccines Increase Cancer Risk, New Study Concludes by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D. The Defender, 2 October 2025
‘A South Korean
‘COVID-19 vaccines and boosters — both mRNA and non-mRNA — pose an increased risk of six types of cancer and a 27% higher risk of cancer overall, according to a recent South Korean study of over 8 million people. Four South Korean researchers published the report last week as a letter in Biomarker Research, a Springer Nature journal.
According to the study, COVID-19 vaccines and boosters are associated with a higher risk of breast, colorectal, gastric, lung, prostate and thyroid cancer, across all vaccine types and age groups.
Mainstream medical commentators were quick to dismiss the findings, with MedPageTodaydescribing it as “flawed.” But other medical and scientific experts disagreed.
“In plain terms: both major COVID-19 vaccine platforms appear to be carcinogenic,” epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher wrote in a post on Substack.
Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a medical oncologist, told The Defender the study builds on other recent findings but “is the first to show that cDNA non-mRNA] and mRNA vaccines are associated with cancer risk, suggesting that the [spike protein is directly carcinogenic.”
Medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., said this week on his YouTube show that the research marks “the largest-scale study so far” examining the association between the COVID-19 shots and cancer.
Read; COVID Boosters Improve the Health of Pharma’s Bank Accounts, But Do Little to Protect the Public by The Conservative Woman, The Defender, 30 October 2025
‘The problem with public health and Big Pharma is that its high priests are not concerned about you; they are concerned about themselves. In the end, if we roll up our sleeves, the only thing getting boosted is their balance sheets.’
‘The increasing realisation by most sensible people that COVID-19 is not an existential threat to the population of the world presents an existential threat to the coffers of Big Pharma, so its spectre must continue to be raised.
Nobody does it better than Global Health Now, which recently provided a link to an NBC News item, not so much raising the fear of COVID-19, but extolling the virtues of the COVID-19 vaccine boosters.’
Read; Landmark Report Finds Vaccination Is the Dominant Risk Factor for Autism Spectrum Disorder Nicolas Hulscher, 27 October 2025
For decades, scientists have debated what drives the relentless rise in autism. Some have claimed it’s due to “increased screening” while others declare it’s anything but vaccines. Thousands of studies have explored genetic, environmental, and perinatal factors—but very few have ever examined vaccine and non-vaccine determinants together within a unified analytical framework.
Now, the landmark McCullough Foundation Report titled, Determinants of Autism Spectrum Disorder, provides the most comprehensive synthesis on the possible causes of autism to-date. Thanks to the tireless work of Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, John S. Leake, MA, Simon Troupe, MPH, Claire Rogers, MSPAS, PA-C, Kirstin Cosgrove, BM, CCRA, M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc, PhD, Bre Craven, PA-C, Mila Radetich, Andrew Wakefield, MBBS, and Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH — and support from the Bia-Echo Foundation — this historic effort was made possible.
War in Venezuela
Watch; 25 years of war on Venezuela in 8 minutes The Grayzone, 25 October 2025
‘Max Blumenthal describes how Washington’s war on Venezuela has hit new lows—decades of failed coups, brutal sanctions, and now narco-terrorism smears to justify Rubio/CIA-backed regime change ops. US covert action risks destabilising 28 million & sparking a migration tsunami.’
Max Blumenthal; “Well, we’ve been following the war on Venezuela for years at the Grayzone, and this is a war that began, let’s say, in 2002 with a coup, a military coup that removed the elected president Hugo Chavez. The people of Venezuela marched on Miraflores Palace and demanded his release, and Chavez was returned to office, won several successive elections after nationalising the national oil company and using its wealth to fund social programmes. The war was officialised in 2015 when Obama announced a sanctions regime on Venezuela and again attacking its oil industry, which led to migrant waves to the US, mass poverty, we saw the attempt at a military coup in 2019 under the watch of Juan Guaido and his mentor Leopoldo Lopez, who helped lead the 2002 coup that completely failed. What the US and Venezuelan opposition got out of it though, is Venezuela’s largest foreign asset, Citgo, which is like foreign wing of PDVSA (Petrolios de Venezuela), and they’re just feasting on that carcass and making millions and millions of dollars. It’s now under the control of Elliott Capital Management, which is the hedge fund run by Paul Singer, the vulture capitalist who has funded Marco Rubio’s entire career. But up until this point, all of the coup attempts have failed. The Operation Gideon attempt by Jordan Goudreau, the US mercenary who I recently interviewed, failed. And as Goudreau said, the reason it failed is that his contacts in the Trump administration had no ability to recruit high level military figures to actually flip, and the one that they had actually recruited, that Goudreau was training with in the jungle of Colombia, Cliver Alcala, after the coup failed, the Trump administration put a bounty on his head, arrested him and threw him in a federal prison. So the rest of the military looked at this and said, there’s no way we’re breaking with Maduro. So now, as the Wall Street Journal has announced, basically citing US officials, Maduro is coup-proof. So the only other option is straight up military force, but they needed a pretext for the military force and so that’s why Marco Rubio worked to portray Venezuela and Maduro as a narco-terrorist regime. This is how he got Stephen Miller on his side as well, and now they’ve defined any boats that are in the periphery of Venezuela as narco-terrorist targets. The terrorism designation allows them to completely skirt Congress, international law. Any rules of engagement go, and this itself is a pretext for strikes inside Venezuela, which could potentially be decapitation strikes targeting the Venezuelan leadership because they have been defined as the leaders of a cartel which does not actually exist, known as the Cartel of the Suns. This is the source of the $50 million bounty currently over the head of Nicolas Maduro. As we explained at the Grayzone, the Cartel of the Suns was created by the CIA in the early 90s, before Hugo Chavez had even taken power, and all it was were a series of Venezuelan National Guard leaders, or figures who wore a sun patch on their uniforms, who were recruited by the CIA and DEA to preside over drug shipments into the United States. So the CIA was presiding over drug shipments, 20 tonnes of cocaine into the United States, the command was ‘let the dope walk’ and they wanted to provide the DEA with intelligence on who received the cocaine and who was dealing it in US cities. And so they flooded US cities with cocaine. The CIA did that and then this cartel totally disappeared and was resurrected in order to provide a pretext for Marco Rubio’s military assault on Venezuela and potential decapitation strikes. Because every other US coup attempt, colour revolution, violent riots, everything else has failed up until this point. And I’m hearing some rumours that there are US planes currently in Venezuelan airspace. I’m talking to Venezuelan sources who believe something big could happen at any point. And we are now on the precipice of a very, very dangerous war which could destabilise a country of 28 million and lead to another massive migration wave as well as a civil war if this regime change war succeeds.”
Watch; Aaron Maté : Trump and the DC War Lobby Judging Freedom, 29 October 2025
Judge Napolitano; “Do we know of any evidence of the Maduro government being involved in drug trafficking? It is more likely that the CIA has been involved in drug trafficking than the Maduro government. Is that an exaggeration, the statement I just made?”
Aaron Maté; “The supposed Venezuelan cartel that Maduro is alleged to be the head of, they don’t exist anymore, and when they did exist, they worked with the CIA. The CIA worked with them and actually let them bring drugs into the US because they wanted to use that to help penetrate Colombian drug cartels. But that was a long time ago, and now this fictional cartel that Maduro heads is just an invention by the Trump administration to justify the regime change operations. It’s just so obvious. This has been an obsession of people like Marco Rubio for a long time, and in Trump’s first term, they tried a coup in Venezuela, it didn’t work, so now they’re dusting off this old playbook of basically accusing a foreign leader of being the head of a drug cartel and achieving regime change that way.”
Judge Napolitano; ” Is their goal to kill Maduro or to capture him and install this lady that is a CIA and Mossad asset, the one that won the Nobel Peace Prize?”
Aaron Maté; “Her name is María Corina Machado, literally funded by the US government, has called for regime change, has promised to offer up Venezuela’s resources to the US if it can change the government. And yet she’s the current favourite in Washington, and that’s why she was given the Nobel Peace Prize. The US has been trying to overthrow the Venezuelan government for more than two decades. There was a coup against Hugo Chavez back in the early 2000s that didn’t work because Chavez had such massive popular support. And so ever since then, the US has turned to the traditional method of just an economic embargo. Crushing sanctions designed to destroy Venezuela’s economy. John Bolton admitted this. John Bolton admitted recently to the Washington Post that he knew sanctions he imposed on Venezuela would destroy its economy and cause millions of migrants, the same migrants that Trump demonises during his presidential campaigns. But it was all worth it to John Bolton and now the second Trump administration, even though they’re now indicting John Bolton for mishandling documents.”
Judge Napolitano; “Do you believe that we will, that the United States will invade Venezuela?”
Aaron Maté; “That’s a great question. So far they’ve tried other methods. So, for example, a Venezuelan pilot who flies Maduro around the world, he’s just claimed that the US has been trying to bribe him for a long time to get him to switch sides to, during one of Maduro’s flights, to reroute the flight and land somewhere where the US can arrest Maduro. That’s what he claims. And I totally believe that this is what the US does. They’re obsessed with overthrowing disobedient governments. Whether it’s Venezuela, Iran, Nicaragua, Syria, Russia, whatever, like you name it, this is what we do. So whether this will rise to the level of invading Venezuela, it’s a fair question. And you never know. These people. Now, one difficulty is that Venezuela can fight back. They have a disciplined army, an army that’s pretty loyal, from what I can tell, to Maduro, and that doesn’t want to just bow to Washington. But look, the country has seriously suffered. There’s no denying that. And the stock line here, if you watch a recent report on this in 60 Minutes, CBS News, they talk about Maduro’s mismanagement of the economy and corruption and all that stuff. What all this omits is the US sanctions that have destroyed Venezuela’s economy, destroyed its main industry, the oil industry, made it very, very difficult. And that does have the anticipated effect of weakening a country and making it more ripe for regime change.”
When the 1973 ‘Peace’ Prize went to war criminal Henry Kissinger, the commentator Tom Lehrer said, ‘Political satire is obsolete”. Now it’s gone to a pro-Israel US/CIA stooge who wants to violently overthrow the Venezuelan government for the US to steal the oil.
Read; How the Nobel Committee weaponises Peace Prize Films for Action, 27 October 2025
‘The awarding of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize to Venezuelan far-right leader María Corina Machado took nearly everyone by surprise (with the exception of insiders who apparently used advance knowledge to profit on betting markets).The Nobel Committee justified the award on the basis of Machado’s “tireless work promoting democratic rights” and “her struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy.”
However, Machado’s track record paints a very different picture. Rather than scrutinise the opposition politician’s credentials, the media establishment seized the opportunity to whitewash the most unpeaceful elements in her background in order to advance its cynical pro regime-change agenda targeting Venezuela’s socialist government.
Not coincidentally, Machado’s award coincided with an escalation of US military threats against Venezuela, meaning that corporate pundits used a “peace” prize as a platform for war propaganda.
No establishment outlet mentioned Machado’s first relevant political action: supporting the short-lived April 2002 coup against the Chávez government, and signing the infamous “Carmona Decree.” In one fell swoop, this decree did away with all democratically elected institutions, annulled the 1999 Constitution, and established a de facto dictatorship headed by the leader of Venezuela’s corporate business lobby. Machado later denied signing the decree, though her name appeared on a list published by Venezuelan newspaper El Nacional.
Machado’s second act was also the antithesis of peace and democracy, as the opposition politician led the 2014 “La Salida” (“The Exit”) campaign of street violence to overthrow the Nicolás Maduro administration, leaving dozens dead.
But more damning is the complete erasure of Machado’s outspoken support for Israel, even amidst the recent genocide. Venezuela’s far-right leader has repeatedly praised Israel’s defense of “Western values” and “freedom,” while her party established an alliance with Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud in 2020. In 2018, Machado penned a letter to the Israeli prime minister, asking him to lead a foreign intervention to “dismantle the criminal Venezuelan regime.”
At a time when the US/Israeli genocide in Palestine has sparked outrage around the world, no corporate outlet found it relevant to mention that this year’s “peace” laureate did not utter a single word of condemnation. On the contrary, according to Netanyahu himself, Machado told the prime minister she “appreciates” his “resolute” actions in a recent congratulatory phone call. Unsurprisingly, only Reuters briefly reported on the Nobel laureate’s war criminal ally.’
Read; The U.S. Isn’t Even Bothering With Its Usual Lies to Sell Its Regime Change War in Venezuela, The Intercept, 22 October 2025
‘On October 16, an unusual warning went out on Trinidadian airwaves. “Fishermen are being warned to slow down and stay close to shore amid fears of being bombed by the United States military,” the anchor on CNC3 began, “which continues its anti-narcotics operations in the Caribbean Sea.” Two Trinidadian fishermen, Chad Joseph and Richie Samaroo, had been killed in a U.S. Navy airstrike targeting their boat as they left Venezuela for Trinidad, a short 6-mile trip that Joseph had told his family about. President Donald Trump had claimed the boat was a “vessel affiliated with a Designated Terrorist Organisation,” without naming the drug cartel it was supposedly affiliated with, and that “intelligence confirmed the vessel was trafficking narcotics” along a known “DTO route.”
The killing of a friendly country’s nationals, in America’s backyard, in a targeted American airstrike, should have been news alone. But it has been only a brick in the wall of a war that is being constructed in the southern Caribbean, one that is being built up in ways both overt and disturbingly covert.
As of the time of this writing, eight American warships, manned by more than 4,500 Marines and sailors, have been placed just outside of Venezuelan waters. The New York Times has identified guided-missile cruisers moving close to Venezuelan shores, as well as Reaper drones stationed nearby in Puerto Rico, alongside a number of stealth fighter jets. On Wednesday, War Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed on X that the military escalated this campaign by conducting a lethal airstrike on a vessel in the Pacific Ocean for the first time, off of Colombia’s waters, just days after Trump accused its president, Gustavo Petro, of being an “illegal drug dealer” after he criticised the American campaign in the Caribbean.
Some of the ships identified by CNN, like the USS San Antonio and the USS Gravely, have gained combat experience fighting the Houthi movement in Yemen, attempting to break their blockade in the Red Sea against Israel-bound cargo ships. Now, such U.S. military resources have been moved to the Caribbean, to deal with the next American enemy.
The target is clear: Nicolás Maduro, president of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. But the United States government is not saying that, at least outright.
Venezuela has for years been demonised in the media, becoming a favorite bogeyman of American political thrillers and rousing people’s interest whenever anti-government protests rock the country. But Venezuela threatens no American interests militarily, has no ballistic missile program with which to strike the American heartland, no weapons of mass destruction program, nor even accusations of such a program. There are barely any leakers, zero claims of a global threat, no media laundering of intelligence. The narrative, however, has been set in stone from the beginning — and without strong opposition to it, there was no need to justify it.’
Provoked War with Russia
Read; The harsh reality of the algorithms of attritional warfare; George Galloway interviews ScottRitter; MOATS; Oct 30, 2025;
Ukraine has run out of equipment and manpower, says Scott Ritter. Ukraine simply cannot replace their casualties
‘Ukrainian manpower has been exhausted. They’re down to recruiting 18 to 23 year olds and this is it. There’s nothing else they could do. They’ve done seven mobilizations, maybe eight. They’ve rebuilt their military five times and it’s just can’t go on in perpetuity. NATO has run out of equipment to give Ukraine. Simply there’s nothing left. They’re talking about now of contracts that will see fruition years from now, not weeks or months from now when Ukraine would need this equipment. So Ukraine has run out of equipment and run out of manpower. At a time when Russia is out producing the collective west 4 to one in terms of defense industrial output, the Russians have done a single mobilization in the fall of 2022. Since that time, they’ve sustained their manpower requirements using standard voluntary based recruitment contracts. Um, and they have more than enough manpower. They’re easy. It’s easy for Russia to replace the losses and grow their military. And so we’re at the point now where all of the advantages that Russia’s been working very hard to acrue are coming to the forefront.’
Watch; US diplomacy disaster. Ukraine military disaster The Duran, 28 October 2025
Alexander Mercouris; “By this point in the war, Ukrainian battalions are short of men and, well, 15,000 men would be what you would expect if the battalions were up to strength, but they’re not up to strength. 5,500 men trapped in Pokrovsk, I think, is probably about right. And we’ve discussed in many programmes how important Pokrovsk is, how it is the big piece on the chessboard that the Russians want to capture now, because if they can capture it they can do two things, firstly, there is no obstacle to advance west towards the city of Dnipro on the river, except for one place, which is another actually very important city, which is called Pavlograd. They can advance up the main road. There are no great barriers to reaching Pavlograd. If the Russians reach Pavlograd, that would be a major crisis. Well, it’s already a major crisis for Ukraine, but it would bring the Russians closer to the river. And we’ve discussed in many, many programmes how disastrous for Ukraine that would be if the Russians reach the Dnieper in central Ukraine. So that’s one thing, but the other thing which I think is more likely what the Russians would want to do once Pokrovsk is captured, is that they will advance north. They will outflank the Ukrainians in Slovyansk and Kramatorsk. The town of Konstantinovka, which is located south of these two places, is already in the process of a battle. The Russians, even the Ukrainians, have now confirmed, are fighting well inside Konstantinovka. Sloviansk and Kramatorsk therefore look like being where the Ukrainian forces in Donbas are going to make their last stand. The fall of Pokrovsk brings that last stand closer. I mean, that is briefly the summary of the situation. And again, we can see that Syrsky (Commander in Chief Ukraine Army) and Zelensky have overstayed their time in Pokrovsk. They’ve kept Ukrainian troops there too long with the result of 5,500 of them, according to the Russians, are now encircled. And this isn’t the only encirclement, as you rightly said. There’s another equally disastrous encirclement that’s taking place in Kupiansk, which is further north, that is to the north of Slovyansk, Kramatorsk. And there is a potential third encirclement now starting to develop in another town called Siversk, which is located somewhat to the east of Kupyansk and Slovyansk. So it is a crisis, this is a military crisis. There have been many battles in Donbas. There have been many sieges of towns. Each town the Russians have had to capture has brought them closer in this chess game, if you like, of capturing fortified towns and places, it’s brought them closer to the point where we are at the final crisis. But we are now almost at the brink of the final crisis if Pokrovsk is captured, or rather, more correctly, when Pokrovsk is captured, because it is now a foregone conclusion that it is going to be, then at that point, as I said, we are looking at the last act in the battle of Donbas, and who wins the battle of Donbas has won the war.”
Watch; Putin Calls for Surrender of Ukrainian Troops, Urges “Mercy to the Defeated” APT, 27 October 2025
‘President Vladimir Putin, during a command post briefing, urged Russian military commanders to take “all exhaustive measures” to allow the safe surrender of Ukrainian servicemen wishing to lay down their arms. Emphasizing discipline and humanitarian conduct, Putin reminded that the Russian army has “always shown mercy to a defeated enemy.” The President’s remarks came as Russian forces continue encircling Ukrainian troops in the Kupyansk and Krasnoarmeysk directions, marking a major operational breakthrough on the frontlines.’
Thankfully Zelensky’s plan to get Trump to fire Tomahawk missiles into Russia, has failed. British Field Marshall David Richards calls out western hypocrisy for trying to expand NATO to the Russian border.
Watch; Scott Ritter on Trump’s Ukraine Strategy: Missile Deal Denied, Putin Summit Ahead APT, 21 October 2025
Rick Sanchez; “President Trump met with the unelected leader of Ukraine. It did not go well. Nope, it did not go well at all for Mr. Zelensky, the meeting was described as tense, emotional, and at the very end the President of the United States ended the meeting with Zelensky just saying these words, ‘I think we’re done here’. You never want a meeting to end with those words. Look, Zelensky is simply not in a good place right now, he’s losing militarily, there’s no doubt about that, his approval numbers are horrid amongst his own people, and his soldiers are deserting along the front lines. In fact, the picture is so bleak, even a British field marshal says it’s over for Ukraine. Let me show him to you. This is the guy right here, this is the field marshal and Lord, David Richards is his name, he’s one of the highest ranking officers in the British military and he’s just come out and he said that Ukraine cannot win its war with Russia and should negotiate peace terms now. Why? He says, look, they just don’t have enough soldiers and they can’t depend on NATO. NATO will not and should not, he says, fight this war for them. Here he is.”
Let’s hope delusional Starmer and his, belligerent coalition don’t realise their war based on lies like ‘Putin wants to conquer Europe’.
Watch; Douglas Macgregor: Broken NATO Escalates War on Russia Glenn Diesen, 23 October 2025
Douglas Macgregor; “I think there’s been a sudden realisation that our resources are not limitless. One of the few coherent moments that I’ve heard from him (Trump) is where he talks specifically about the numbers of weapons and munitions and resources on the military side that we need for our own defence, and that we’ve poured about as much as we possibly can into Ukraine. Now, that may explain the sudden use of the Storm Shadow by the British. Who knows, the British, specifically MI6 and selected elements of the British military establishment have been in Ukraine from the very beginning and are into this war up to their necks. I don’t know what the Russians plan to do in the future, but I would not be surprised to see some serious action taken against the British. The place, the timing, I can’t anticipate that, I just don’t know, but at some point. I think the Russians are annoyed, remember, the Russians know that the British have very, very small armed forces, the British have bankrupted themselves, they’re overspent, they could perhaps ship 20, 30,000 troops to Russia or to Poland, that’s about it. I don’t see any evidence that they’re going to implement national service and try to draught people to go in Ukraine. The situation in France is about the same and France is even more volatile internally than Great Britain is. I don’t think the French want to let the army go for fear that things could come unglued in France. So we’ve got lots of sort of empty threats coming from the Europeans. The Russians know that, and I think as a result, the Russians will continue to exercise restraint, but at the same time, they’re going to move forward in Ukraine, because contrary to what a lot of people think, they’d actually like to see this war end. They don’t really want to govern western Ukraine, that would be a catastrophe for them, they know the population there doesn’t want them and they don’t want that population inside Russia. They’re really only interested in other Russians, people that are speaking Russian, that want to be part of Russia, being under Russian control. But every time I or anybody else who knows anything about Russia says this, we’re silenced. We’re told, no, you’re wrong, he wants to conquer Europe and of course, that would require universal service and national mobilisation. Now, here’s something that people in the west don’t get, the Russians can do that, they can mobilise Russia for total war. They don’t want to, but they can be done. And people think, oh, well, if we push them to mobilise for all out war against us once again, this will fatally weaken the Putin government and he will be overthrown. So it’s just a sort of repetition of stupidity and lies over and over and over again.”
By drumming for war with Russia, Britain has played a shameful, dangerous role in the Ukraine debacle.
Watch; Lavrov Exposes Why Europe Is Terrified of Trump–Putin Diplomacy Times Now World, 27 October 2025
Sergey Lavrov, Foreign Minister of Russia; “We don’t want to create some discomfort for the United States, which is under huge, unbelievable pressure from the European hawks, from Zelensky and others, who don’t want to have any American-Russian cooperation on anything. And so there are enough people who are not very polite and who impose themselves upon Washington politicians and use each and every means to undermine the process which could have achieved its goals.
Macron was asked whether this cessation of hostility ceasefire includes the pause in providing weapons to Ukraine. He said, no, it does not. No preconditions at all. So when President Trump, after Anchorage, bluntly publicly stated that in his conviction, it is not a ceasefire but a sustainable, durable peace, which, as he said, must be a long term peace, a very long term, and another quotation we are not talking about a two year peace. And then we end up in this mess again.
Interviewer; “What about Kherson and Zaporizhzhia? Could Russia ever talk about giving them back to Ukraine?”
Sergey Lavrov; “All these lands were founded by the Russian Empire and developed by the Soviet Union only after all of them. Each of these four places, after Crimea held referendum and bluntly expressed their desire to rejoin with Russia. And when we now liberate remaining parts of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, the people, in spite of the attempts of Ukrainian army to pull them into mainland Ukraine, most of them are not leaving, they are staying and they are welcoming the Russian soldiers who liberate them. So this is not our will, our imperialist desire, some people say this is our concern for the future of the people who feel being part of the Russian culture. By the way when Zelensky and his entourage, like Macron, Starmer, Merz and others, they still say Russia must get out of Ukraine, out of 1991 borders. And yesterday, I think they gathered in London for this coalition of the willing, and Starmer, addressing the media before the. event, he said that Russia, Putin is the only one who doesn’t want peace. And this deserves some explanation.
In April 2022, couple of weeks after the special operation started, Ukrainians asked for negotiations. We agreed, we held several rounds in Belarus and. Then moved to Istanbul. In Istanbul, as I said, Ukrainian delegation put a paper with the principles to be developed into a treaty, we accepted this paper, it was initialled, and then Boris Johnson said, don’t do this, continue to fight Russia until we defeat them. So when Starmer said that Putin is the only one who is against negotiations, he should remember about his former prime minister, Boris Johnson. He should remember about those in Germany and in France who signed the deal and then few years later admitted that they never intended to do this, in spite of the fact that it had been endorsed by the Security Council. And then Starmer continued to say that Putin must stop atrocities, must stop killing children, and he must withdraw to the. Borders of 1991 on children. It’s a shame, the amount of lies, the amount of propaganda is astonishing.
We have bluntly a nazist regime (in Ukraine) which as I said, show openly they despise anything Russian and prohibited anything Russian. It’s the only country on earth which prohibits a language. Not to mention that this is an official language of the United Nations. In Palestine, in any Arab country, Hebrew is not prohibited. In Israel, Arabic is not prohibited but Zelensky prohibited the Russian language.”
Read; Leaked: Britain’s Ukrainian sniper training plot, Kit Klarenberg, 29 October 2025
‘Kit Klarenberg reveals a leaked plan by a British academic network to use US civil society and gun groups to train Ukrainian snipers on US soil, a scheme designed to push Washington into deeper, deniable involvement in the proxy war.’
‘A leaked document, authored in April 2022 by St. Andrews University lecturer and the British cabal’s chief NSC contact Marc DeVore, sets out a bold vision for Washington’s “non-profit associations, civil society and private sector businesses” to tutor Ukrainian sharpshooters. US citizens were reputed to possess “the wherewithal and…motivation to provide such training,” while DeVore judged Donbass’ “slow-moving” battlefield – with its emphasis on “urban combat” – to be “an environment ideal for snipers.”
As this journalist has extensively documented, all Kiev’s gravest military disasters, such as the October 2023 – June 2024 Krynky catastrophe, were planned in London. That effort saw wave after wave of British-trained Ukrainian marines attempt to secure a beachhead in Russian-occupied territory, before marching on Crimea and outright victory in the war. Planning was heavily-informed by a desire to recreate the Normandy landings – D-Day – based on fantastical, Hollywood conceptions of that operation. Coincidentally, so too was DeVore’s sniper training program.’
US/EU/UK are on the wrong side again, propping up nazi kleptocrats in Ukraine.
Watch; Zelensky And Allegations Of Corruption In International Aid, AzizGaming, 22 October 2025
Douglas Macgregor; “Ukraine is a catastrophe. Hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians have been killed in this war, pointlessly. They’re still dying, they’re not dying as rapidly as they have before, but they’re dying largely because the Russians, though they are advancing across the front, they’re deliberately moving slowly and offering people the opportunity to surrender because they don’t want to kill them.This is something I don’t think Americans have ever understood, that in Eastern Ukraine, the Russians have taken a position that these really are people like us. We really don’t want to kill them. They’re more Orthodox Christians and they’re Slavs, so why kill them? That’s going to come to an end at some point, but it’s going to be a slow and ponderous end. The question is, what comes afterwards? And we insist on propping up this facade of a legitimate government. It’s illegitimate, it’s not even a government anymore, it’s a massive kleptocracy. Somebody contacted me the other day and said, what about this $61 billion that we’re about to transfer to Ukraine? I said, well, I wouldn’t be too concerned because most of that will stay here, it’ll just be laundered through the congressional machine, end up in the defence industry, and all the donors who profit from this, along with many constituents who want to stay operating naturally on these assembly lines, will be happy. The bad news for the Ukrainians is that most of this equipment will not arrive for at least a year, by which time I suspect this will all be passé. Again, people don’t understand this. And then, of course, we’re employing the Ukrainian army, we pay for it, we’re paying for the Ukrainian government. And I suspect Mr. Zelensky and his cohorts will buy additional mansions with whatever they can steal from what’s coming in.”
Watch; Colonel Douglas Macgregor says Ukraine war is ethnic cleansing for “greater Israel” James Hill, 3 October 2025
‘Retired U.S. Army colonel Douglas Macgregor tells Judge Andrew Napolitano (video above) that non-[redacted] White men — including 1.8 million Ukrainian soldiers —have been deliberately wiped out in Ukraine to be replaced by [redacted] people to create a “greater Israel” or “new Jerusalem.”
Douglas Macgregor; “Now we’re also seeing settlements in southern Ukraine emerge, places where the population has been either denuded or is very, very thin. And we’re seeing large numbers of Jews establish themselves in new communities. In fact, we have something on the internet that talks about the appearance of police around a community in southern Ukraine wearing American-like police uniforms who are stopping anyone from going into the area who is not Jewish. And the people that wanted to go in there were Americans, but obviously they were Christians, they were halted, turned around, and sent away. We’ve always been hearing about this desire to create another greater Israel in parts of Ukraine, where at one point you had large numbers of Jews before the Second World War that were concentrated in places like Ukraine and part of Poland and Southern Belarus. This is very odd. Is this part of the larger plan that’s bankrolled by people like [BlackRock CEO] Larry Fink and others to create this? Is this an extension of Israel as it is today?”
The reason for Russia’s ‘invasion’
Read; For 8 years, the Ukrainian army bombed Donbas, Emilios George Ades Georgiades, 23 October 2024
‘For 8 years, the Ukrainian army bombed Donbas – hospitals, schools, kindergartens, churches and houses. For 8 years, the children lived and studied in bombed basements. For 8 years, children, women and the elderly were torn to pieces by Ukrainian bombs. For 8 years, Donbas, drowning in blood, asked Putin for help. The whole world was silent. And when Russia decided to save people in Donbas and launched a special military operation, the whole world started shouting that Russia had attacked Ukraine.’
If you don’t mind giving the Guardian your data, then you can read this article that connects Boris’s destroying the peace agreement between Zelensky and Russia in the early days of the war in Ukraine and his donor who supplies Ukraine with military hardware.
Read; The £1m man: why did Boris Johnson take his donor to Ukraine? Tom Burgis, The Guardian, 10 October 2025
‘Exclusive: Leaked files offer a glimpse of the ex-prime minister’s relationship with Christopher Harborne.
As he boarded the night train to Ukraine, Boris Johnson had the usual entourage of aides and bodyguards – plus the man who had given him £1m. Less than a year had passed since Johnson accepted what is thought to be the largest donation ever to an individual MP. It was from Christopher Harborne, one of the UK’s biggest and most private political donors. Harborne, whose millions helped bankroll Brexit, made the payment to a private company Johnson set up after resigning as prime minister. Now leaked files show that Johnson, a champion of Ukraine in office and since, was accompanied in September 2023 by his benefactor on a two-day visit that included meetings with top officials.
What the files do not explain is why. And neither the former prime minister nor his backer will say. Boris Johnson after No 10: files reveal troubling secrets of the ex-PM’s pursuit of profit. The organisers of the high-level gathering they attended in Kyiv say Harborne was registered as “adviser, Office of Boris Johnson”. Harborne has wide expertise: a self-described “digital nomad”, his holdings range from cryptocurrency and a wellness centre to jet fuel and stakes in at least three military contractors. His only apparent connection to Ukraine is as the biggest shareholder in a British weapons manufacturer whose robots and drones are reportedly supplied to its armed forces. The Boris Files, leaked documents from Johnson’s private office, have exposed how the former PM has sought to enrich himself since leaving office by sitting down with a Venezuelan despot and courting Mohammed bin Salman, the Saudi crown prince accused of ordering the murder of a journalist.’
Zionism is a Colonial State Project / Gaza, Syria, Yemen, Lebanon & Iran
Read; Gaza Massacres: Israel Kills Over 100 Palestinians as It Violates Ceasefire – Again, Minnah Arshad, Zeteo, 29 October 2025
Israel killed more than 100 Palestinians in Gaza overnight in its deadliest assault since the start of the ceasefire – the long-awaited agreement that new reports indicate Israel had no intention of honoring.The Israeli military said it struck 30 targets, which it claimed were “terrorists holding command positions within the terrorist organisations operating in Gaza.” It accused Hamas of violating the ceasefire, but new reporting shows Israel’s accusations, as is often the case, are not always what they seem.More than half of the victims from Israel’s widespread bombardment were women and children, according to the health ministry. In central Gaza, Israeli bombs killed at least 18 members of the same family, the victims spanning three generations.
The Israeli government and some local media have hailed the strikes as a response to a violation by Hamas. Israeli officials accused the group of not following the guidelines regarding the return of the deceased hostages’ remains and of attacking Israeli soldiers in Rafah, killing one – an ambush Hamas said it had no connection to.
The Israeli military posted on X around 10 am local time on Wednesday that it would return to the ceasefire (after violating the agreement over 100 times, according to Gaza officials). But reporting – again, in Israeli media – paints a different picture. According to former senior Israeli military official Amir Aviv, the military had sought a reprieve in its genocidal campaign only so it could prepare for more fighting.’
Professor David Miller continues to fight – and win – for our right to be anti-zionist. ‘This is a great victory in the battle to develop anti-zionist movement in the UK‘, David Miller
Watch; Professor David Miller won a significant victory against the misnamed ‘Campaign Against Antisemitism’ spinwatchorg, 25 October 2025
David Miller; “So the latest hearing in my case was at the Westminster Magistrates Court just the other day. The misnamed Campaign Against Antisemitism were trying to put forward a motion to say that I was a person of bad character. Now, that motion wasn’t heard, because what happened in the end was that my lawyers argued that the Campaign Against Antisemitism had not properly disclosed the information they were required to disclose. The judge initially thought this was a bit of a big ask, but then we listed all the things which they had done, which he hadn’t been informed about, and which the judge who gave the initial summons to have me called to court hadn’t been told either. And so he realised, therefore, that he would have to order them to disclose. So they’re now ordered to disclose all internal documentation between their employees and their trustees and the directors, which bears on the question of whether they were trying to fit me up and on the question of whether they were trying to undermine my victory at the employment tribunal, where I established that anti-zionist views should be protected. That information now has to be released within 28 days and we will then have a further hearing in the middle of December to determine whether the case should be thrown out in total. They’re charging me with sending four tweets which they say are of menacing character. Now, these were all tweets which were calling for the zionist movement and the zionists to be held accountable to the full extent of the law, and they say what I really mean by that is that ordinary Jews and zionists should be attacked. So of course there is a massive dispute there on what that means, but its perfectly plain that what I was calling for is for zionists to be held accountable.”
‘Please, if you can, support my crowdfunder to help me with my legal costs in defeating the CAA.’
Watch; Nigel Farage, GB News and the Zionists, David Miller, 30 October 2025
‘How the zionist colony is pushing for a far right government.’
‘A new phase of Islamophobia which has been launched in the UK and spearheaded by pro-Israel politician and Reform UK leader Nigel Farage and far-right activist Tel Aviv Tommy Robinson.
A rise of Islamophobic street violence and demonstrations in the UK have heightened worries about a far-right government led by the Reform UK as the country’s largest party.
Palestine Declassified looks at the relationship between Reform UK and the zionist regime.
Israel should be boycotted from all sports events for its policies of apartheid, land theft and genocide. The Maccabi Tel Aviv fans have already inflicted racist violence in Amsterdam and Athens by assaulting people after matches and chanting ‘there are no schools in Gaza because there are no children left’, so banning them and their racist chants and hooligan behaviour from our streets is essential. The article below is so comprehensive that I have pasted it in full.
Read; Maccabi Tel Aviv row breaks Starmer’s cover story for colluding in genocide, Jonathan Cook, 28 October 2025
‘No one should be surprised that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer confected yet another duplicitous antisemitism furore last week – one in which he implicitly cast West Midlands Police as colluding in Jew hatred and insisted that British Muslims be exposed to racist violence from visiting foreign football hooligans.
Starmer had demanded that a decision by the police to bar fans of an Israeli club, Maccabi Tel Aviv, from attending a Europa League match in Birmingham next month be overturned.
He indicated that the West Midlands force had approved the ban on the grounds that hatred towards Jews in Britain had reached such fever pitch that police could no longer guarantee the Israeli fans’ safety from antisemitic violence.
His reasoning defamed both the British public and the police. The media lost no time in amplifying his narrative.
But Starmer’s claims were pure disinformation – as he surely knew from the police intelligence reports that must have been submitted to him before he called for the ban to be reversed.
Sadly for Starmer, those assessments were leaked to the media. They show that West Midlands Police made the decision after receiving reports from Dutch police that Maccabi fans had instigated racist violence in Amsterdam last year – before, during and after a match with local team Ajax.
As one source with inside knowledge of the police assessments told the Guardian: “The biggest risk was always the extreme Maccabi fans who want to fight.” It had taken 5,000 Dutch police officers three days to bring the violence to an end.
The likely cost of policing next month’s Aston Villa game was estimated at at least £6m ($8m), and would have required the deployment of large numbers of specialist riot squads from across the UK.
Not unreasonably, the police concluded that giving licence to Israeli football hooligans seeking to make good on chants of “Death to Arabs” in an ethnically diverse city like Birmingham was a bad idea.
According to the assessment, even members of the Jewish community opposed letting Maccabi fans attend.
Many of the Israeli club’s hardcore supporters – those that attend away fixtures – are likely to be current or reserve soldiers who have participated in the Gaza genocide. They deserve arrest, not the UK rolling out the red carpet.
Race relations fires
But strangely, Starmer did not see it this way. In his eyes, it seems, foreign thugs and war criminals should enjoy greater privileges in Britain than local ethnic minorities. Maccabi hooligans’ right to bring their genocidal incitement and violence to the UK trumps the right of minorities to be protected.
What political advantage his advisers thought he would gain is hard to grasp. Starmer simply added yet more fuel to Britain’s race relations fires – by smearing, once again, Muslims as antisemitic and “un-British”. The only beneficiary will be Nigel Farage’s Reform party.
So what on earth is going on?
In normal circumstances, this kind of behaviour from a government whose polling figures are in freefall – and whose traditional urban heartlands are deserting it – would look like demented self-sabotage. But these are not normal times.
Starmer knows that US President Donald Trump’s “peace plan” has done nothing more than slow Israel’s genocide, and that the so-called “ceasefire”, which Israel is violating on a daily basis, will crumble sooner or later – more likely sooner.
The bad news from Gaza is not going away. But this time Israel will no longer be able to claim as a pretext that the carnage is necessary to “bring home” captives held by Hamas.
Israel’s criminality will be even more starkly on show – and so will Britain’s extensive collusion.
Starmer’s solution has been to furiously pump up fears of “antisemitism”, even if doing so – as with his implicit criticism of the West Midlands Police – makes him and his ministers look ridiculous, incompetent and bad-faith actors.
But there is a logic here – of sorts. The prime minister’s two-fold strategy on Gaza has been evident for a while.
On the one hand, Starmer has done the bare minimum to oppose Israel’s atrocities, and in the most mealy-mouthed way he can, so he can at least claim, however disingenuously, to be respecting international law.
That is what primarily drove his very belated and grudging recognition of Palestinian statehood, though he appended a raft of near-impossible conditions to hollow out the move.
And it is the rationale for his claimed – but entirely bogus – curbing of UK arms sales to Israel. In fact, Britain has been making record weapons sales to Israel since he became prime minister.
On the other, Starmer has sought to deflect attention from his core policy of inertia on Gaza – designed to keep him onside with Washington – by denouncing any meaningful criticism of Israel as posing a threat to British Jews.
Fortress state
To achieve this end, it has been necessary to wildly misrepresent the true source of the antisemitism threat in Britain.
Starmer needs to pin the blame for Jew hatred on those who oppose both Israel’s genocidal actions in Gaza and his own complicity in supporting Israel with arms, surveillance intelligence, and rhetorical and diplomatic cover.
That means his main target is the anti-racist left – a left he has been industriously purging from his own Labour Party since he became leader – and Muslim communities that identify most closely with Gaza’s suffering.
Meanwhile, he must distract attention from the real antisemites – those on the far-right, ranging from sections of the Conservative and Reform parties to an army of white nationalist goons led by Tommy Robinson, a notorious Islamophobe with multiple criminal convictions.
The ultra-right may hate Muslims and Jews equally, but they love the muscular, militarised fortress “Jewish state” of Israel, which prioritises the kind of ethnic purity and anti-Muslim bigotry they would love to see replicated in Britain.
In these circumstances, Starmer’s switch-and-bait has not been easy. Nonetheless, with the media’s backing, he has relentlessly smeared as “antisemites” anti-racists and British Jews – the “wrong sort” – who recoil from a genocide Israel claims it is doing in the name of all Jews.
Meanwhile, he has endorsed the conflation of a genocidal Israel, including its most violent football hooligans, with supposedly “right-thinking” British Jews – that is, those who identify with Israel so strongly they are blind to its crimes.
‘Clash of civilisations’
Starmer now serves as a prominent champion of the hard right’s much-loved “clash of civilisations” thesis, in which a Judeo-Christian West is assumed to be in a life-or-death, defensive war against a supposedly savage, bloodthirsty Islamic East.
In this narrative, Israel is the rampart against “barbarian Muslim hordes” seeking to storm the citadel of western civilisation.
Naturally, the right brushes aside any other explanation. Such as that Israel’s decades-long meddling in the region and relentless onslaughts on local populations – under the banner of Jewish supremacy, and brazenly as a western client state – may have incited the very response western publics are now encouraged to fear.
Starmer is no less dismissive of the self-sabotaging nature of the West’s foreign policy and its unstinting support for Israel, even in the midst of the Gaza genocide.
He cannot countenance the idea that the western-backed slaughter breathes life into assertions – once confined to more extreme groups – that there can be no accommodation with the West. That the West acts in bad faith. That it treats the lives of non-westerners as entirely worthless.
Starmer’s commitment to the “clash of civilisations” worldview was less obvious when he was continuing the previous government’s manufactured fight with “pampered, out-of-touch students” in encampments or “Hamas-sympathising lefties” on anti-genocide marches.
But he has chosen to go further.
He has proscribed as “terrorists” – apparently an upgrade from “antisemites” – the activists of Palestine Action. Their unforgivable sin was to move from street protests to direct action. They sought to put a spoke in the wheels of the British government’s complicity with the genocide, targeting factories in the UK supplying weapons to Israel.
According to Britain’s draconian terrorism laws, it is also a terrorism offence to show any support for a proscribed organisation.
Starmer appears not to have foreseen that, as a result, the police would be forced to arrest thousands of upstanding citizens – including doctors, lawyers, barristers, retired military officers, and even a former adviser to King Charles.
They have refused to bend to his decree that no debate about the legality, let alone the morality, of Britain arming Israel’s genocide can be tolerated.
Face-off with police
But now things have turned even darker. Starmer’s current duplicity has led him into siding with violent Israeli football hooligans against his own police force and Muslim communities.
The fallout from his four-square support for Israel’s genocide is that Starmer has had to import more deeply into British domestic politics the inherently divisive “clash of civilisations” ideology.
In the process, he has risked revealing how much of a charade his antisemitism narrative has been from the start.
The government’s actions were never really about protecting the Jewish community. Rather, it has been cynically using British Jews as a collective human shield, allowing Starmer to denounce any meaningful criticism of Israel as posing a threat to the Jewish community.
Starmer’s need for a cover story has been especially urgent because he was himself once a distinguished human rights lawyer, one who even served as the lead advocate in a case before the International Court of Justice in 2014 arguing that Serbia had committed genocide in the Croatian city of Vukovar.
How is he to explain his behaviour partnering with Israel and Washington over Gaza’s destruction, when it has required him to shred Britain’s obligations under international law?
He cannot claim ignorance, should there come a day when he is brought before the judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
So the story Starmer has been crafting instead is that he is the saviour of Britain’s Jewish community, that he has been charting a difficult course in the face of a supposedly rampant antisemitism from the left, from Muslims, from anti-genocide marchers, from student encampments, from human rights groups, from Holocaust scholars, from the United Nations, from the ICC, and now from the British police.
The over-arching narrative is that Starmer has been one of the key bulwarks against the return of Jew hatred to Europe.
The price required to protect British Jews, so this story goes, has been his role as a “critical friend” to Israel, working behind the scenes to curb its worst excesses, while damping down criticism of Israel that risks inflaming antisemitism.
The main problem for Starmer is that he is being forced to confront more and more groups and institutions to sustain this narrative – to the point where he put himself effectively in a face-off with the British police.
‘Lab rats’
Opponents of the genocide warned from the outset that what started in Gaza could not be contained there. The slaughter would inevitably provoke polarising dissent in the West, require the crushing of basic rights to silence critics of western complicity, and gradually normalise authoritarianism.
Starmer’s behaviour has proved just how correct those prognoses were.
The British prime minister’s woes are not about to end, as recent developments demonstrate. Rather, the danger continues to grow of him being charged one day as an accessory to genocide.
Francesca Albanese, the UN’s international law expert for the occupied Palestinian territories, helps make that case in a report published last week. Entitled “Gaza Genocide: A Collective Crime”, she highlights the collusion of western states in Israel’s litany of atrocities.
She notes how keen western leaders have been to portray Israel’s onslaught “as a battle of civilisation against barbarism”. In doing so, “they have reproduced the Israeli distortions of international law and colonial tropes, seeking to justify their own complicity in genocide”.
She identifies four sectors where western support has been indispensable in allowing Israel to continue its crimes: diplomatic, military and economic backing, as well as the ideological framing of Israel’s bombing and starvation of Gaza’s people as self-defence, producing a “humanitarian” problem that needs addressing rather than serving as proof of Israel’s genocidal intent.
In this last regard, she specifically names Starmer. In three separate interviews as opposition leader, he claimed that Israel had a “right” to carry through threats to cut off water and power to Gaza’s population.
As she points out, Israel cannot invoke a right to “self-defence” in Gaza under Article 51 of the UN Charter, when it has been holding the enclave’s people under a belligerent, decades-old occupation.
Starmer knows this.
Instead she argues that western leaders like Starmer have echoed the assumptions of a racist, colonial discourse in which non-westerners are viewed as “savages” who are undeserving of the protections of international law.
That discourse serves to conceal the huge profits western corporations have been reaping by colluding in Israel’s long occupation, as she documented in a previous report.
Western businesses and governments have looked to Israel to use Palestinians as lab rats for testing new surveillance technologies, systems of control and displacement, and killing machines.
These forms of oppression are already being turned against domestic populations in the West.
She points out that Starmer’s government has made the most cursory of nods to international law, such as imposing entry restrictions on two fascist ministers in Netanyahu’s government, while treating other genocide-cheering figures, such as President Isaac Herzog and senior Israeli military officials, as honoured guests.
The UK has been evasive about whether it would enforce the ICC’s arrest warrant against Netanyahu for crimes against humanity – for the starvation of Gaza that Starmer endorsed. And the UK has done nothing to prosecute British citizens who have chosen to serve on Israel’s side in the Gaza genocide, or even dissuade them from participating.
Perhaps most egregiously, a British airbase on Cyprus has served as a crucial supply line for arms to Israel and for hundreds of UK surveillance flights over Gaza.
Albanese observes: “Flight numbers and durations, often coinciding with major Israeli operations, suggest detailed knowledge and cooperation in the destruction of Gaza, extending beyond ‘hostage rescue’.”
‘Political stunt’
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), often known as the World Court, threw its own substantial weight last week behind a verdict that also implicates western leaders such as Starmer.
It was the court’s third ruling since Israel launched its campaign of slaughter in Gaza two years ago.
The first had found it “plausible” Israel was committing genocide. ICJ judges are currently investigating that charge.
The second ruling, last summer, concluded that Israel’s decades-long occupation and Jewish settlement of the Palestinian territories were illegal; that Israel must immediately withdraw from those territories, including Gaza; and that other states were obligated to put whatever pressure they could on Israel to comply.
Israel has gone in exactly the opposite direction, with its parliament last week voting to formally annex the occupied West Bank.
US Vice-President JD Vance, who was in Israel at the time babysitting Netanyahu to stop him sabotaging the ceasefire, called the parliamentary vote a “political stunt” and an “insult”.
But the White House’s concern appears to relate chiefly to the timing, which might threaten the ceasefire, rather than the substance.
His replacement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who arrived in Israel on Thursday, stated of the annexation vote: “At this time, it’s something that we … think might be counterproductive.” Note the conditional “At this time”.
The new, third ruling builds on the second – and hints at the likely outcome of the ICJ’s investigation of Israel for genocide. It finds Israel’s starvation policy in Gaza – the collective punishment of its population – in flagrant violation of international law.
The World Court justices declare: “The occupying Power may never invoke reasons of security to justify the general suspension of all humanitarian activities in an occupied territory.”
That should serve as a stinging rebuke to Starmer, who, as previously noted, declared that Israel had the right to carry out its declared policy of starving the people of Gaza.
The ICJ also rules that Israel must immediately allow in full supplies of food and aid, and cooperate with Unrwa, the UN aid agency that served as the main lifeline for the people of Gaza until Israel banned its operations last year based on a claim it had been infiltrated by Hamas.
The judges found that Israel had never produced any evidence to support such an allegation.
Health ‘catastrophe’
Israel replaced UN food distribution sites in Gaza with four, hard-to-reach “aid hubs” run by a US and Israeli military front group, the wildly misnamed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. It brought in a trickle of aid while Israeli soldiers regularly sprayed gunfire on desperate Palestinians queueing for food, killing and wounding many thousands.
Trump’s 20-point “peace plan” expressly required of Israel that it allow aid distribution “through the United Nations and its agencies”. And yet last Friday Rubio changed his administration’s own rules, as well as defying the World Court, by stating that Unrwa could play “no role” in aid distribution because it was supposedly “a subsidiary of Hamas”.
Tied to Washington’s apron strings, Starmer, like other western leaders, has made vague noises against Israel’s genocidal starvation campaign in Gaza, notably after images of emaciated children came to dominate social media six months ago.
But beyond the optics, he has done nothing substantive to reverse his original support for Israel’s collective punishment of Gaza, its blocking of food, aid and power.
Albanese notes in her new report that, as the Israeli-engineered famine gripped Gaza in the spring, the UK was among a handful of countries that launched operations to parachute aid into the enclave – an operation she describes as “expensive, inadequate and dangerous”.
But even worse, she concludes, the aid drops “only served to mislead international public opinion while the famine worsened”.
When British citizens recently joined an aid flotilla to Gaza, in an attempt to highlight Israel’s illegal naval blockade of the enclave, Starmer pointedly refused to offer them protection, even when they were abducted on the high seas and held in highly abusive conditions in Israel.
Despite Starmer behaving as if Trump’s so-called “peace plan” has ended the “humanitarian crisis” in Gaza, the UN World Food Programme stated last week that aid deliveries continued to remain well below its daily target of 2,000 tonnes.
The World Health Organisation, meanwhile, has warned that the “health catastrophe” Israel has engineered in Gaza will last for “generations to come”.
Trump’s ‘masterplan’
Last week the US news show 60 Minutes interviewed Trump’s two pointmen on Gaza: his son-in-law Jared Kushner, and his special envoy Steve Witkoff.
Kushner was keen to highlight how much destruction Israel had unleashed there, explaining that it looked like a nuclear bomb had been dropped.
This appeared to be his clumsy way of underscoring what an achievement Trump had secured in bringing to a halt the orgy of violence – a campaign of destruction, of course, that was made possible only because the US endlessly supplied Israel with armaments.
But with rising panic etched on his face, Kushner could only look on as Witkoff revealed that the pair had been working on a “masterplan” for Gaza’s reconstruction for two years – long before Gaza was levelled by the Israeli military. “Jared has been pushing this,” Witkoff explained.
Analysts have preferred to characterise Trump’s earlier, stated ambition to “clear out” the people of Gaza and build a playground for the rich – a Gaza Riviera – as some kind of hair-brained, improvised response to the scale of the enclave’s devastation.
But Witkoff indicated something even more sinister. That the Trump team had been informed from the outset of Israel’s bombing campaign that the intention was to eradicate Gaza, not Hamas. And so the Trump entourage began working on a business plan to cash in on the carnage.
Gaza, long the western military-industrial complex’s laboratory for field-testing weapons and surveillance technology, would now be repurposed as the world’s biggest redevelopment site.
As 60 Minutes’ Lesley Stahl approvingly observed of businessmen Kushner and Witkoff: “Part of the plan is the reconstruction, the building, rebuilding of Gaza. And you’re builders. You’ve been in real estate.”
The implication from Witkoff’s slip was clear: that what looked like a genocidal ethnic cleansing operation from the start was indeed just that. Trump’s team knew of Israel’s intentions and began putting together deals – both with the oil-rich Gulf states and, according to Witkoff, with Europe too.
The only continuing obstacle are armed resistance movements in Gaza that Washington is determined to disarm.
Starmer, like other western leaders, has hitched his wagon to the psychopaths who have been running this two-year horror show. It is not going away. They are determined to see it out, and reap the financial rewards.
Which means Starmer will have to maintain his “clash of civilisations” cover story and continue miring British politics more deeply in this divisive narrative.
That will require further demonising Britain’s ethnic minorities. It will exacerbate the country’s race relations wars. It will deepen the polarisation of British politics. It will lead to an ever-greater hollowing out of fundamental democratic rights. And, ultimately, it will usher in the far right on Farage’s coat-tails.
The legal and ethical earthquake that is the Gaza genocide was never going to be contained in Gaza. Its repercussions are simply too large. As the Maccabi Tel Aviv row demonstrates, the shockwaves for Britain are only going to keep growing louder.’
Watch; Ireland’s president-elect defends Palestine’s sovereignty, MiddleEastEye, 26 October 2025
‘Ireland’s new president-elect Catherine Connolly has called for the world to respect Palestine’s right to decide its own leadership, saying no foreign power has the authority to dictate who represents the Palestinian people.
Drawing on Ireland’s own experience of colonisation, Connolly said she would be “very wary of telling a sovereign people how to run their country.”
In televised interviews with RTE News and Virgin Media’s The Tonight Show, recorded before her election, she emphasised that “history did not start on October the 7th,” urging global leaders to look at Israel’s decades-long record of occupation and atrocities.
Connolly criticised UK Labour leader Keir Starmer for commenting on Hamas, saying, “It’s up to the Palestinian people. What Keir Starmer and other countries should be doing is stopping the genocide.”
She also questioned Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza asking at what point its “military objectives” were achieved after tens of thousands of deaths, and warned that the world must “take off the blinkers” to recognise “genocide unfolding before our eyes.”‘
Watch; Charlie Kirk asked if there was a stand down order on Oct 7 outcastmiddleeast, 17 October 2025
Presenter; “Have you seen that YouTube has now taken down a video in which Charlie Kirk questioned whether or not on October 7th the Israeli government issued a so-called stand down order?”
Charlie Kirk; “Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don’t believe it. Israel’s the size of New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it’s 45 minutes. Six hours, they’re live streaming the killing of Jews. Did somebody in the government say stand down?”
Presenter; “Well, the reality is that Charlie Kirk in his questioning was exactly right. Last year we put together a series of videos specifically about October 7th, and in it we talked specifically about this issue. Was there a stand down order that was issued by the Israeli government that prevented the military from going in and rescuing people, taking them out of this situation where they were being held by Hamas? Again, what Charlie Kirk said there was correct, but here’s the proof that backs it up.
And once the Hamas attacks began, the time it took the Israeli army and rescue teams to arrive, fight and rescue Israelis of the different kibbutz communities and sites being attacked, well that ranged anywhere from four hours to more than twenty hours. Even the New York Times has reported, quote, ‘thousands of soldiers were less than 40 minutes from the towns that were under attack’. So why did it take so long for help to arrive? And we’ve discussed how days before the festival, two entire brigades of soldiers were taken away from the area of the Gaza border and then sent to the West Bank. And you might think that immediately upon receiving information of a devastating attack on partygoers, military authorities would alert units to immediately exit their bases, race to the site of the conflict and go on the counter attack, right? But that’s not what happened. Haaretz reported, quote, ‘At 7 am the party organiser called Lieutenant Colonel Elad Zandani, the man tasked with approving the festival, and told him that terrorists were shooting the partygoers. He suggested that they fend for themselves’. The first IDF forces arrived at the party scene at 3 pm, that’s eight hours for a response time for one of the most efficient, capable and well militarised security forces in the world, operating in a country the size of New Jersey, with their Gaza division only a few miles away. What makes it even more strange, around four hours into the Hamas assault, at 10:46 am, Israel was already launching operations and bombing targets inside of Gaza. So hold on, let that sink in. If Israel could begin an offensive attack into Gaza within four hours, why did it take more than six hours, in most cases more than ten and in some cases more than twenty hours to mobilise inside their own country to stop the on-going attack, to defend the lives of their own people?”
Professor Mearsheimer is a political scientist and international relations scholar. He is the R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Chicago.
Watch; John Mearsheimer: Hamas Did NOT Kill 1200 Civilians on Oct. 7th, The Katie Halper Show, 10 October 2025
John Mearsheimer; “Then there’s the whole issue of the Hannibal Doctrine, because as we know, Palestinians were bent on taking many of their captured Israelis back to Gaza, and the Hannibal Doctrine calls for killing those people before they get there. So some Israelis were killed as a result of the Hannibal Doctrine. And then you want to remember, on top of all that, it’s consistent with international law for Hamas to try to break out of the concentration camp and to engage Israeli military forces in combat, which means they’re going to kill some of them. So the fact that they killed Israeli soldiers is not a case of murder. Now, there were clearly Israeli civilians who were murdered. I’d be willing to bet in the final analysis, however, that Hamas did not murder many of those Israeli civilians. But be that as it may, whoever murdered those civilians murdered those civilians and in my mind, committed a war crime. But I think that most of the Israelis who were killed were either soldiers, who I think are legitimate targets, or they were civilians who were killed by the Israeli forces. I think you cannot underestimate how many Israelis were killed when all that firepower was brought to bear. If you look at a lot of the pictures and you listen to what happened, it’s quite clear that those Apache helicopters really wreaked havoc on everything that was down on the ground, and of course, that included Israeli civilians. So I think we have a pretty good sense of what happened. Now, is that reported in the Western media, as Susan was saying before? Of course it isn’t. The stories that you hear in the Western media are basically a reflection of Israeli propaganda. What’s also quite stunning about this whole issue is that nobody talks about why there was a breakout, nobody talks about the fact that this was a concentration camp and what was being done to the Palestinians was abhorrent. And of course, there was going to be a breakout from that concentration camp at some point. The Israelis like to portray this as if it were a bunch of Nazis, as if the Palestinians were the second coming of the Third Reich and what happened on October 7th is much like what happened in the Holocaust. This is a ridiculous argument. The Palestinians were the victims. They were in this concentration camp, and you had a breakout on October 7th. Hardly surprising. This is not to excuse the murdering of civilians that took place at the hands of Palestinians. I’m opposed to killing civilians, for sure, but again, that, I think, is just part of the story. You have a much more complicated story at play here. And the more you talk in detail about what happened, the clearer it becomes that Israel bears a great deal of the responsibility for what happened that day.”
Watch; How do we live with these monsters? The Katie Halper Show, 10 October 2025
John Mearsheimer; “If you listen to a lot of the media these days, in Israel and even in the west, the argument is that Israel has won all these victories, it’s in a terrific position now to stop the war because it’s on top. I actually believe that’s not true, that Israel is in real trouble militarily. Netanyahu understands that once the fighting stops, people will recognise that all of this killing, all of this death has not produced very much at all and that incentivises him to continue the war. But I think he’s delusional on that front. The IDF is having huge problems, a significant problem with PTSD, suicides, reservists not reporting for duty. They’re heavily dependent on the United States. Israel always prided itself on the fact that it fought its own wars, it can’t fight its own wars now”.
Susan Abulhawa; “We have always said, Palestinians, that the only thing that really holds Israeli society together is their contempt for us. But that’s not working anymore. And, yeah, it’s hard work committing genocide. We have never been surprised by the amount of violence that they inflict on us. But I have to say, it has come as a very bitter surprise to see the level of sadism that they can look at our children utterly mutilated, torn, burned alive, and they see that as a cause of celebration. I know that I speak for a lot of Palestinians, like, how do we live with these monsters? How can we ever consider them neighbours and feel safe next to them?”
Watch; Lowkey Exposes Truth Behind Gaza Ceasefire doubledownnews, 19 October 2025
Lowkey; “A deal has been announced by US President Donald Trump to bring a cessation of Israel’s genocidal military campaign in Gaza. But let’s be clear, Israel has broken every single ceasefire agreement it has ever had with any state, ever. This will be no different, however, what has happened during this period of time is Israel has brought itself directly into an antagonistic conflict with the vast majority of humanity through its genocidal actions in Gaza. When people are seeing on a daily basis, children killed, on their phones, they have gone away to try and understand what could the cause of this be? What is the ideological underpinning of all of this killing and murder and that has led them to the ideology of zionism. In the United States you see stalwart supporters of Israel on the right wing side of the equation turning against Israel and turning against zionism in large numbers.
Charlie Kirk; “Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question. You know that maybe we shouldn’t believe everything the media says because I know I’ve been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years.”
Joe Rogan; “What they’ve done to Gaza is fucking insane and if you can’t see that, if you can’t say that, and all your response is Israel has the right to defend itself, like, what are you talking about? Against what? Children?
Interviewee; “I would literally rather saw off my own foot than support Israel ever again by the way, never supporting that demonic nation ever again. That’s like I am so, so off that train it’s crazy.”
Interviewee; “I feel like America is just like. ..it feels like we’re just owned by Israel, you know, and we just never knew it.”
Interviewee; “I thought we owned them.”
Interviewee; “That’s what I thought.”
Tucker Carlson; “Bibi’s running, this is a fact I’m not guessing about this, is running around the Middle East, his region and his own country, and telling people point blank, just stating it, ‘ I control the United States, I control Donald Trump’. It’s too humiliating. I can’t handle that.”
Lowkey; “Israel has woken the world to the horrors of the zionist project practised upon Palestinians and people will never go to sleep again. But also, the story of Palestine is not simply a story of unchecked zionist power. Actually, it’s the story of a refusal to die. The Palestinians have not been defeated, in fact, they are victorious. Palestine was supposed to die in 1948, it didn’t. Palestine was supposed to die across the last two years in Gaza, it didn’t. The Palestinian resistance has taken its place alongside the Viet Cong in Vietnam, the French Resistance In World War II, the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, the heroes of the Irish who refused to bow to 800 years of British colonialism. And all free people of the world, the majority of humanity, support the Palestinians’ right to armed resistance as an occupied people. So what do we see today? We see Spain, which has a history of warm relations with Israel, now engaging in a full arms embargo with the zionist entity, you have Greece and Italy brought to a full standstill by unions in those countries refusing to cooperate with government dictates vis a vis the zionist entity. You see the majority of states in the world taking positions in the United Nations which are at odds with Israel. The victory that this represents is that Israel’s genocide is having to disguise itself and hide in bureaucratic violence. It is no longer able to pursue this genocidal war in the naked way it was before, and with the support of key propagandists that it could rely on for many decades previously. When you look at this recent peace deal, what has been agreed upon is not the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. Instead, what you have is the vague promise of an agreement by Donald Trump, acting as the guarantor of this deal, that Israel will withdraw to particular points within Gaza, the specifics to be agreed upon at a later date. In addition to the release of 20 Israeli prisoners of war and captives within Gaza, in exchange, there should be around 2,000 Palestinian prisoners released, with several hundred of them those who received life sentences. What you also have is Israel now obligated to allow the delivery of around 600 trucks of aid daily. Implicit within that is the acknowledgment that Israel has been using food as a weapon of war. That is a key characteristic of genocide. The people of Gaza are celebrating a ceasefire agreement which could finally offer them respite from the daily bombings of every single hospital in the Strip, from an entity that left children on incubators to later be discovered by a journalist. What happened to the journalist that made that discovery, Mohammed Balousha that discovered the rotted corpses of babies? Eventually he himself was killed too. The reverberations of Gaza and Israel’s genocidal campaign there will be felt for decades to come. Those reverberations have entailed the changing of laws in other countries, the imprisoning of 33 political prisoners in this country now for their refusal to allow genocide to take place on their watch, the arresting of blind protesters for holding placards with words on them, the arresting of a young man for holding a magazine which has these now criminal words printed on the cover of it. This is the authoritarianism that Israel’s genocide has unleashed on the rest of the world. We have seen heroic support from billions of people across the world to the people of Gaza. We have seen people from wide and far cling onto the hands of those in Gaza and refuse to let them go. But what we have also seen is an unprecedented servility among the political classes of the world who have been materially involved in this genocide in Gaza. Do not allow them to rewrite history. Already you have Israel lobby-backed politicians like John Ashworth coming on TV and trying to claim,”
John Ashworth; “I’ve wanted to see a ceasefire for two years. I think there is a role that the Labour government has played in this as well. Remember, Labour has done what it can diplomatically. “
Lowkey; “Simply not true. The UK has been a party to this genocide by sending RAF spy flights, R1 shadow planes over the top of Gaza on an almost daily basis, even in the hours around the killing of three former UK military personnel in Gaza. Over the next few months they will try and tell you that the war is over. Genocide in new clothes. They will try to assure you that there are legal processes playing out to establish the facts of what did and what didn’t happen in Gaza. Do not allow them to treadmillise you and to nullify your aversion to this human suffering. Do not allow them to demobilise you. Now is not the time to retreat. Now is the time to escalate.”
Read; Gaza Tribunal declares Israel committing genocide in Palestinian enclave, urges action from world powers Anadolu Ajansi, 26 October 2024
‘The Gaza Tribunal issued its final findings and “moral judgment” in Istanbul on Sunday (26 Oct), declaring that Israel is perpetrating genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza, and calling on the international community to take urgent measures to stop it. The statement, delivered on Sunday, concluded four days of public hearings where international jurists, experts and witnesses presented evidence and testimonies on what they described as systematic crimes. Among its recommendations were calls:
• To hold all perpetrators, supporters and enablers accountable “politically, militarily, economically and ideologically”
• To suspend Israel from international organisations, particularly the UN
• To activate the Uniting for Peace mechanism to mandate a protective force for the Palestinian territories
It reaffirmed the Palestinians’ right to self-determination and urged “steadfastness and non-displacement,” along with a coordinated global movement to dismantle zionist structures and isolate the regime across all arenas. “The struggle is with zionism as a racist, supremacist, settler-colonial enterprise—not with Jews or Judaism,” the statement said. It called for a “single rights-based political order grounded in equality, decolonisation, restitution, and the unfettered right of return.” Issuing the findings “in the name of justice, dignity, and peace,” the jury concluded with a final warning: “Silence is not neutral; silence is complicity; neutrality is surrender to evil.”
The public sessions held at the Istanbul University from Thursday to Sunday marked the culmination of a year-long effort by international jurists, scholars, and civil society representatives to document what they describe as Israel’s crimes against Palestinians.
On Thursday, proceedings built on earlier hearings in Sarajevo and other global forums, consolidating findings across three thematic chambers: International Law; International Relations and World Order; and History, Ethics, and Philosophy.
On Friday, the tribunal heard expert presentations and witness testimonies on starvation, ecocide, domicide, and the targeting of civilians and public infrastructure, including the destruction of health care and education systems.
Saturday’s sessions, meanwhile, centered on complicity, the international system, resistance, and global solidarity efforts.
The final day featured a roundtable discussion offering overall reflections and evaluations of the tribunal’s work.
Presided over by Richard Falk, former UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, the initiative aimed to produce a comprehensive “people’s record” of what participants assert amounts to genocide, apartheid, and systemic violations of international law in Gaza.’
Israeli-American anthropologist Jeff Halper speaks at Gaza Tribunal about the genocide in Gaza and the legitimacy of the Palestinian resistance.
Watch; Zionism is a form of settler-colonialism, TRT Francais, 25 October 2025
Jeff Halper; “Zionism is a form of settler colonialism. A group comes to a country with the intent of taking it over, taking its lands, displacing its population and replacing it with its own population. In our case, transforming Palestine into Israel, transforming an Arab country into a Jewish country. You can’t do that without genocide because you can’t remove a population and certainly the population resists so you have to kill some of them or you have to expel them, or you have to marginalise them into little islands like Israel’s done with the Palestinians. So from that point of view, genocide is built into zionism as a form of settler colonialism. Ceasefire from Israel’s point of view in Gaza is only a pause. It can’t be the end, because Israel has to break all Palestinian resistance and Israel wants to keep forever security control over Gaza. So Gaza can never belong to the Gazans, it can never become a part of a Palestinian state, it can never be liberated because Israel always has to control it. So it either controls the population militarily in suppression, or if they resist, which they have a right to do, it’ll kill them. So the ceasefire is simply a little tiny episode in a much longer process of colonisation and conquest. Settler colonialism is unilateral, there’s no conflict, colonists come in and invade the country, want to take it over. The indigenous population has to resist. They can’t say, fine, take our country, we’re leaving, so resistance is built into it. But by calling it a conflict then, you’re creating a false symmetry, so now it’s as if there’s two sides and the colonists have a right to defend themselves. Defend itself against whom? Defending themselves against the native population of Gaza, against colonists. So you see, it becomes a whole distorted thing where all of a sudden the colonists are the ones that have to defend themselves against the indigenous, and the indigenous resistance becomes delegitimised as terrorism.”
‘Peter Oborne is a British journalist and broadcaster. He is the former chief political commentator of The Daily Telegraph, from which he resigned in early 2015. He is author of The Rise of Political Lying (2005), The Triumph of the Political Class(2007), and The Assault on Truth: Boris Johnson, Donald Trump and the Emergence of a New Moral Barbarism (2021), and along with Frances Weaver of the 2011 pamphlet Guilty Men. He has also authored a number of books about cricket. He writes a political column for Declassified UK, Double Down News, openDemocracy, Middle East Eye and a diary column for the Byline Times.’
Watch; Is UK government complicit in the destruction of Gaza? Peter Oborne, Channel 4 News, 23 October 2025
Krishnan Guru-Murthy; “Peter (Oborne), the book is called ‘Complicit’, You don’t hold back and you believe that there are legal and moral wrongs that the British government has committed.”
Peter Oborne; “There certainly are. Well, we start off with the atrocities committed by Hamas, terrible atrocities committed on the 7th of October. And then you look at the British government response. Start off maybe with Sunak going there, it’s a bit like after 9/11 Tony Blair going to Washington. What he didn’t do was issue warnings, because by the time Sunak, it was only about 10 days after the 7th of October he got there, but by then, Israel had started to pummelled Gaza. You know, 5,000 Palestinians had been killed by the end of October, 20,000 by the beginning of January, and whole families were being wiped out. It was indiscriminate slaughter and destruction. And I’m sure that Sunak as Prime Minister would have been briefed about that. And what he never did was issue a proper warning that we can’t back you all the way. And the same was the case with the current Prime Minister Starmer, who made this remarkable support for collective punishment on the Nick Ferrari show. When asked, he was given a quote from one of the Israeli leaders saying, no fuel, no water, that sort of thing, and Starmer said, yes, they have that right to do that, although he sort of said also they must obey international law. But it was a shambles of an answer, he went on supporting it and his fellow ministers, fellow shadow ministers supported him for about a week. And then Osama realised that it had not been a clever thing to say. I mean, it was outrageous thing to say. He was supporting war crimes.
Now. It raises a question, profound moral question. You support an ally when they commit war crimes, when they commit what most experts now regard as a genocide. And you have to remember, in the context of this conversation we’re going to be having for the next half an hour, the enormity of the horror which Israel inflicted on Gaza, 20,000 children, at least, dead, killed by the Israelis. Torture, look at the condition of Israeli prisons, the destruction of 90% of the housing in Gaza, the shooting of children, the targeting of children, the destruction of the health facilities, of hospitals, of schools. Its one of the great crimes of the twenty-first century, and being supported by Britain.”
Watch; A short history of Israel breaking ceasefires w/Max Blumenthal The Grayzone, 24 October 2025
‘The Grayzone’s Max Blumenthal sets Israel’s flagrant violations of the recently signed Gaza ceasefire against a historical backdrop stretching back to the inception of the self-proclaimed Jewish state.
Read; This isn’t some ancient birthright, Abu Ayman Arrayyan, 23 October 2025
Read; Al-Mashat: Yemen will never retreat in support of Palestine, Afghan Voice Agency, 21 October 2025
‘Mahdi Al-Mashat, Chairman of the Supreme Political Council of Yemen, said at the funeral ceremony of martyr Muhammad Al-Ghammari that the martyrdom of the commanders strengthens the resolve of the Yemenis and that his country will remain committed to supporting Palestine regardless of all sacrifices.
Afghan Voice Agency (AVA): Mahdi Al-Mashat, Chairman of the Supreme Political Council of Yemen, during the funeral ceremony of the body of martyr Muhammad Abdul Karim Al-Ghammari, former Chief of Staff of the Yemeni Army, emphasised the continuity of his country’s positions in supporting the Palestinian people and said that the martyrdom of the commanders will not create any disruption in the will and motivation of the Yemeni mujahideen.’
The Community Security Trust (CST), is a charity whose purpose is ‘to protect Britain’s diverse and vibrant Jewish community from the external threats of bigotry, antisemitism and terrorism’. In other words, patrol the streets with the UK police, dictating that anything you say against zionism is antisemitic because they’ve decided that there is no difference between zionism and Judaism. If this were true, how would they explain the huge numbers of Jews worldwide who condemn zionism, are disgusted with the genocide and want an end to the occupation of Palestine?
Listen; CST: Concerns about its relationship with UK police and Home Office, UK Column, 13 October 2025
Charles Malet; ” I make the point again that they do not have any powers over and above those of an ordinary citizen. He went on to say, I will always stand up for the right of Israel to defend its citizens, a right enshrined in international law, in natural justice and fundamental morality. And interesting, of course, considering what’s happened in the intervening 10 years. Now, the next point to make is that prior to this, the Community Security Trust had published what they called a guide to fighting hate crime for the Home Office and in doing so, effectively took ownership of the very notion of a hate crime. And I’ll just remind you what the definition is and how entirely exposed it is to subjective interpretation. Any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a person’s religion or perceived religion. Now, they’ve completely stripped away the element of intent. And since 2023, most notably, there’s been a very well orchestrated push to conflate antizionism with antisemitism. And it’s this video on the CST website which I would say does exactly that. We’ll just have a listen to this.
CST video; “So when people talk about the zionists without qualifying what they mean, they’re generalising about most Jews and it’s dangerous. But because generalising about the vast majority of any minority group will lead to racism. But that doesn’t mean that criticising zionism is racist. If you said to me, listen, I think that the zionist movements had terrible consequences for the Palestinian people, I might say, well, so do I. Another Jewish person might feel totally different. In short, you can assume as much about someone who says they’re a zionist as you can by their favourite TV show, Love Island. You’re a genocidal monster. But what’s this all got to do with learning how to be an antisemite? Well, you can very quickly expand the type and variety of the terms you use for Jew. You can start with plain old zionist, but why not give zio a go? Or if you really want to piss them off, try zio-nazi to be really offensive. Something else you can do is use zionism to accuse a British Jew of not being truly British because they support the existence of a Jewish state. It’s dead racist. And instead of saying that Jews are running the world, you could say that zionism is a secret global power structure that conspires to manipulate governments, cause wars, destabilise countries and incites hatred between communities. Now, don’t let me tell you how to be an antisemite. You should feel free to experiment. If you’re wondering whether something is legitimate criticism of Israel or whether it slips into antisemitism, just take an antisemitic statement. Swap the word Jew for zionist and see how it sounds. For example, if this sentence is antisemitic, ‘Jews run the banks and control the global financial markets’, then so is this, ‘zionists run the bank and control the global financial markets’. Jews control the media, zionists control the media, Jews created ISIS and are behind global terrorism, zionists created ISIS and are behind global terrorism.”
Charles Malet; “A remarkable reframing exercise there under a very thin veil of humour, but that is indeed on the CST website.”
Watch; Palestinian Doctor Suspended for Opposing Israel; 5 Pillars, 24 October 2025
‘British-Palestinian NHS doctor, Dr. Rahmeh Aladwan, has been suspended after a medical tribunal reopened a case in relation to her social media posts opposing Israel and supporting Palestinian armed resistance, which she was cleared for in September.’
Dr Rahmeh Aladwan; “I really appreciate your support, honestly, it means a great, great deal. We just spent a whole day really deliberating on the legitimacy of the case brought forward by the GMC (General Medical Council) and the fact that they are practically submitting the same evidence and trying to get a different outcome. They have so far been unable to tell us exactly how their material that they’ve added since my last hearing, where I won, is any different to the material from that hearing. So I’m basically here again four weeks later for the exact same speech that a panel here, an independent panel, said was fine. Just because the Israeli lobby has an issue with what I said and the fact that I won, they don’t want the movement, they don’t want people to be able to make the same arguments, to be able to have that freedom of speech. So we did appeal the entire process on the base of abusive process, which has a very high threshold, and the other one was estoppel. And the MPTS (Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service) panel shockingly rejected both. The abusive process is clear, estoppel even more so. The fact that they are allowing, potentially allowing the GMC to submit the entire material of the last hearing, thereby admitting indirectly that their decision doesn’t hold, that it’s up for debate and that’s what they’re going to try and do next time. But because it is so contentious and so, one can say, so biassed and just out of the norm for such hearings. They are going to try and book a three-day hearing next time to bring us back to waste public resources. This is not why doctors pay 4 or 500 plus to the general Medical Council, we pay the General Medical Council to make sure that we’re safe for British patients, not to make sure that what we say doesn’t upset Israel or the Israeli lobby here. And it’s a real shame. And all I’m going to say now is that we will not stand for this. This is not how our medical regulator, and certainly I’m shocked that the MPTS have buckled. I mean, the MPTS have today themselves determined that their ruling that they made only four weeks ago cannot stand, that they cannot push back against the GMC who are acting on behalf of Israel. That should worry us all. That should worry every single British doctor and patient and citizen. This is independent regulation being influenced by a foreign hostile entity that just murdered hundreds of thousands of Palestinians and bombed hospitals, raped doctors to death and kidnapped and tortured them. This cannot stand.”
Listen or Read; Israel is the excuse to snatch away freedoms we once took for granted; Jonathan Cook, 13 October 2025
‘What we’re witnessing in Gaza is not just another chapter of zionism — it’s the final stage. That’s the argument of Israeli historian Ilan Pappé, who joins Rania Khalek on Dispatches to explain how zionism is in fact “collapsing” even in its most ruthless moment. He discusses Israeli society is fracturing from within, the impact of Trump’s return, Israel’s widening regional war, and what a post-Israel Palestine could look like.’
Listen or Read; It was never a Gaza ‘war’. The ‘ceasefire’ is a lie cut from the same cloth Jonathan Cook, 17 October 2025
‘Trump’s vision of “peace” is of Palestinians eking out a bare existence among Gaza’s ruins, at the mercy of Israel’s ever-watching drones.
Ramy Abdu, chair of Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, told the Intercept this week that what we are most likely to see over the coming weeks and months is a move by Israel from wanton genocide to what he called a more “managed genocide, a managed forcible displacement”.
Israel will now be able to sit back, obstruct the rebuilding of the enclave, sending a clear message to a destitute population that their salvation will never be found in Gaza.
The future for West Bank will not be of peace either, but of Israel intensifying the atrocities there and creating mini-Gazas out of the small city-reservations into which the Palestinians there have been progressively herded.
Palestinian resistance will not end in such circumstances. No people in history has ever resigned itself to permanent servitude and oppression. The Palestinians will prove no different.’
Watch; Richard Wolff & Michael Hudson: Gaza Isn’t Just Israel’s War — It’s NATO’s Silent Battlefield Dialogue Works, 9 October 2025
Michael Hudson; Israel’s strategy is; ‘how do we keep the loyalty of the U.S. now that the opinion polls show that young people are taking the side of the Palestinians, not Israel, what does that bode for continued American support for Israel?’
This is a much longer-lasting fight and it goes beyond the military battlefield and it’s how the world frames the thinking about what’s happening to it. And this is the deepest, and it’s even the most threatening battlefield over control of the narrative, the narrative of how to frame the issue and what’s being taught in the schools and the universities and spread to the Internet platforms and the mass media. That’s passed, that is now coming, already come under the control of extremist zionist hardliners. And that’s what the fight over the last week has been over …….TikTok. President Netanyahu has explained that Israel is at war with what he calls this ninth front to control the United States. That’s the real war that’s happening. And this control isn’t to be established militarily, but by controlling the US public opinion through essentially extremist zionist billionaires who control the Silicon Valley, billionaires who control the mass media. You’ve seen them take control of automatic intelligence to buy out TikTok and redesign the algorithms of TikTok to replace the pictures that TikTok was showing about murdered Palestinian babies, all sorts of horrendous genocidal attacks. All this is going to be out and the new algorithm is blocking any discussion or any exposé of what Israel has been doing to Gaza and to the West Bank. And just like Israel has concentrated, the army is concentrated on killing two groups of people, journalists, they must destroy any attempt to let the world know what they are doing, and doctors. The doctors must not heal the injured, especially the children who can grow up and growing up with a memory of what’s happening to them, and Israel says if these children live, it is a threat to Judaism.
Well, one friend of mine the other day commented that it’s as if Netanyahu has read Orwell’s 1984 and he took to heart his statement that those who control the present control the past, and those who control the past control the future. And so what Israel is trying to do is to reframe the whole past and the whole history of the settlement of Israel from the very beginning, the Israeli Holocaust, the Nakba, the mass assassinations, the whole military history. Well, as I mentioned, to establish all of this, you have to control the narrative, and it’s a historical narrative, it’s an ongoing news narrative and it’s capped by what students are taught. And I want to discuss the economics of how this narrative came about, and I have some personal experience in this. Back in the 1970s, more than seven decades ago, I saw how the groundwork was being laid for the cultural war that was being prepared. I was a Wall street economist and some of my oldest friends were working for Drexel Burnham, that was the investment banking firm for corporate raiding junk bond takeovers. I often met with them and I addressed their board meeting sometimes, and a number of their managers, told me that the most important thing to them in their life was zionism. And Drexel was the investment banking firm that developed the junk bonds to take over companies and turned them into financial vehicles to make capital gains. It was part of the whole transition from America’s industrial capitalism to predatory finance capitalism by making buyout offers to take companies to make them into financial vehicles.
And the financial details of have been widely reported about all of this. But what is not recognised is that there was sort of a personal compact among all of these investors that they were going to be made very rich by playing by new rules that the white shoe law firms and investment companies wouldn’t do, of making hostile takeovers instead of making friendly merger proposals. And the deal was they were all expected to give a substantial portion of their earnings to the zionist cause.”
Read; Who is Larry Ellison? And how does he tie digital ID, Trump, Blair and genocide in Levant? By David Miller, 14 October 2025
‘Larry Ellison is a tech billionaire who is the world’s second richest man. He is behind the takeover of TikTok, the purchase of Paramount which owns CBS News and is bidding to take over Warner Bros. which owns CNN. He runs a firm called Oracle which was started with funds from the CIA, the CIA effectively made Ellison a billionaire. Today, Oracle is the cloud provider for the British Home Office, the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign Office, storing national security data, as well as the National Health Service. The NHS is of particular note since it holds an incredible amount of population data going back to its formation in 1948. No wonder Ellison is desperate to get his hands on it: “The NHS in the UK has an incredible amount of population data,” though, he noted, it remains too “fragmented.”
Ellison is the largest recorded donor to the Friends of the Israel Occupation Forces and previously, reportedly, offered Benjamin Netanyahu directorship of the firm. Its longtime CEO is “Israel” born Safra Catz, who has also donated millions to the Friends of the IOF either directly or via Oracle itself. In late 2024, she told an Israeli business news outlet, “For employees, it’s clear: if you’re not for America or Israel, don’t work here, this is a free country.”
A year ago, Ellison described a future where everyone will face regular surveillance. He predicted artificial intelligence would help process the vast amounts of footage recorded by cameras placed on everything from car dashboards and front doors to security systems and the police. Ellison is the man behind the latest push for digital ID cards in the UK and has said that citizens “will be on their best behaviour” once they are introduced. “We’re going to have supervision,” Ellison said. “If there’s a problem, AI will report that problem… we are constantly recording and reporting everything that’s going on.”
An anonymous US official told reporters TikTok’s algorithm will be “fully inspected and retrained” by Ellison’s consortium.’
Watch; Zionists target MAGA influencers, Palestine Declassified, 25 October 2025
‘In today’s show, we’ll be highlighting how Israel has lost many of its influential right-wing backers in the United States. In our first report, Latifa Abouchakra, explains how it’s now scrambling to repair the damage that it’s sustained, as a result of losing some of its most powerful advocates.Our next report uncovers the lengths to which the zionist colony is going to dodge the impact of the Foreign Agents Registration Act in the United States. And they’re being helped to do so by the Trump administration.’
“Chris Williamson; “Latifa Abouchakra explains how it’s now scrambling to repair the damage that it sustained as a result of losing some of its most powerful advocates.”
Latifa Abouchakra; “The zionist entity has been developing a massive influence operation against the US right. This is because of an emerging split as a result of the genocide and the phenomenon of noticing Jewish privilege and indeed zionism as a form of Jewish supremacy. They lost Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Megyn Kelly. They even lost Charlie Kirk after signs that he was splitting from the pro-Israel camp, frantic efforts were made to pull him back. Candace Owens claimed that Kirk had been pressured to soften criticism that Ackman orchestrated an intervention, that Netanyahu himself had called Kirk to invite him to the zionist entity, and that huge donations totaling $150 million were offered to Turning Point USA to keep Kirk on board. Ackman and even Netanyahu denied the allegations, but what is undeniable is that the zionists have a problem with the right and that’s why they are ploughing millions into funding a programme of US conservative influences.”
David Miller; “The question is, do they really believe in America first or do they believe in Israel first? And that of course has been the split and increasingly there are people on the right who are saying we shouldn’t think of Israel first, we should think of America first. Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, even someone like on the far right, like Nick Fuentes, the white nationalist, these people have all been saying really rather similar things and breaking away from zionism. Marjorie Taylor Greene, congresswoman, is one of the key outspoken people and that’s been extremely interesting that the right is fractured in this way. And of course that’s meant that the zionists have become desperate and they’ve tried to put a lot of effort into shoring up that dissolving wall that there’s been. And of course the Charlie Kirk story is just the latest example of that, we saw the intervention that Bill Ackman, zionist billionaire, launched, Natasha Hausdorf of UK Lawyers for Israel. What she was doing there, who knows, screaming at Kirk, you know, to bring him back on, and then a few days later he’s dead, shot through the neck.”
Watch; Aaron Maté schools Piers Morgan on Gaza’s reality, The Grayzone, 18 October 2025
Aaron Maté; “The Palestinians have been living under one of the most brutal, longest military occupations in the world and have been denied their basic rights. And Trump’s so called peace plan does nothing to address that. When it comes to the issue of Palestine self-determination, there’s one line. It says, we recognise Palestine self-determination and statehood as the aspiration of the Palestinian people. If you recognise something as an aspiration, but not as a right, you have no obligation to grant it. And the message from Israel if you listen to Netanyahu, is that there will be no recognition. And he has the full backing of the US in that. And that’s not just a Trump thing. This has been bipartisan US policy for decades. This isn’t about Hamas. Even if Palestinians were the most pragmatic, docile people in the world, Israel would still insist, as they always have, on their self declared right to steal their land because it’s a Jewish supremacist state. After October 7, Hamas offered Israel to release all the civilian captives in exchange for Israel not attacking Gaza. Israel had no interest in that because October 7th gave them the opportunity to take care of the Gaza problem. That’s why Israel abandoned its own captives.”
Piers Morgan; “But the truth, I mean, you talk about a brutal occupation and I don’t disagree, but there’s also been a brutal occupation of the Palestinian people by Hamas themselves. They have sacrificed Palestinian lives so brazenly and callously as they themselves ran to hide in their tunnels, leaving civilians to be murdered. Then, you know, you could argue the brutal occupation has worked with both. You could say, yeah, the Israelis have had a brutal form of occupation over the Palestinians, but so is Hamas.”
Aaron Maté; ” I see things differently, Piers. Hamas won the elections. What happened? Immediately, Israel put Gaza under a complete siege to the point where Israel was counting the calories inside Gaza that it would let every Palestinian in Gaza consume without having a full blown starvation crisis. Hamas leaders started talking about accepting a long term truce with Israel. Then they started even saying we’d accept a Palestinian state in just 22% of our historic homeland, the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem. What did Netanyahu say? He said there’ll never be a Palestinian state because Israel insists on keeping these major West Bank settlement blocks full of fanatical settlers from Brooklyn, where I am, who terrorise Palestinians and steal their land and water. So Hamas also tried non-violent protests with the Great March of Return. That was a massive march of people who went to protest nonviolently, as all people around the world told Palestinians to do. What did Israel do? They gun people down with US-made weapons, maiming people, killing journalists, killing nurses, killing disabled people and telling Palestinians, no matter what you do, we’re going to control you and make your life impossible. That’s the context in which October 7th happens.”
Could Charlie Kirk’s assassin and accomplices have been caught on camera?
Watch; Here’s Charlie Kirk’s real assassin? 9/11 Revisionist, 26 September 2025
“Tyler Robinson didn’t kill Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk’s Israeli security detail killed Charlie Kirk. And Charlie Kirk’s assassin is caught on tape. Blake Bednar has brought us this video. We’ll break it down. Take a look at this. Here it is. From the wide angle. Watch Charlie Kirk’s right side of his T shirt. Watch the lavalier lapel mic. Do you see it explode? Let’s bring it in just a little bit closer. Watch this. Put it in a freeze frame. That is the explosion from Charlie Kirk’s lavalier lapel mic. Want to see it again? Bring it in closer. Remember when we told you that that was absolutely an exit wound? Yeah, it is. Check the trajectory of the round that was deployed from that lavalier lapel mic. That went directly from Charlie Kirk’s lapel. That went directly from underneath Charlie Kirk’s white T shirt up through his neck and created the exit wound that we told you was an exit wound. Immediately when we saw that exit wound, first we had exploding pagers, now we have exploding mics.”
The Hannibal Directive was used on Oct 7th for Israeli pilots to kill Israeli people; ‘aimed at preventing the abduction of Israeli military personnel at all costs.’
Watch; Israeli Military Secrets The BBC Doesn’t Want You To Know – Part 2 NovaraMedia, 15 October 2025
Harriet Williamson; “These are the Israeli military secrets the BBC doesn’t want you to know, Part Two. In Part One, I covered Israel’s military doctrine that targets civilian life. For Part Two, we’ll look at the Hannibal Directive, a controversial IDF command aimed at preventing the abduction of Israeli military personnel at all costs. It was created in 1986 by three senior IDF officers to reduce the number of soldiers being kidnapped by Hezbollah and the number of jailed Palestinians being handed over in hostage exchanges. The directive instructs the IDF to use heavy fire to prevent its soldiers from being taken into captivity, even when it may result in the death or injury of those IDF soldiers. The command is key to understanding the events that followed Hamas’ attack on 7th October 2023. Israeli media outlet Haaretz found that the IDF employed the directive multiple times. The first instance followed reports of a Hamas kidnapping at the Erez border crossing. The command given to IDF soldiers was ‘Hannibal at Erez, dispatch a Zik’. A Zik is an unmanned assault drone. While a former Israeli officer told Haaretz that the directive was not specifically ordered, he said it was apparently applied by air crews and called the 7th of October a mass Hannibal event. Heretz also called on the IDF to investigate an Israeli tank firing two mortar shells at a home in Kibbutz Be’eri with 14 Israeli hostages inside on 7 October. Only two Israelis survived. The Hannibal Directive remained an Israeli military secret for many years and even today Western media is hesitant about mentioning its existence. The BBC has consistently presented the deaths on the 7th of October as attributable to Hamas fighters, denying its audience context or a proper investigation into how many were killed by Israeli military fire in a so-called mass Hannibal event. The BBC told Novara Media, ‘BBC News has reported and analysed the IDF strategy throughout the war and has highlighted the Dahiya Report and Hannibal Directive in our coverage where we feel it appropriate in aiding the audience’s understanding’. But the BBC did not provide any evidence of reporting on either the Dahiya Doctrine or the Hannibal Directive since 7 October 2023. How much more PR does the BBC want to do for Israel and the IDF?”
Watch; Gideon Levy- three values that drive zionist Jews, Global GeoPolitics, 18 October 2025
Gideon Levy; “There are values which I see as the core of Israeli society nowadays, three or four sets of values which explain everything in my view. The first very deep-rooted value, and let’s face it, is the value that we are the chosen people. Seculars and religious will claim so, and even if they don’t admit it, they feel so. And the implementation is very simple, if we are the chosen people, who are you to tell us what to do? Who are you? Who is the international community to tell Israel what to do? International law, wonderful thing, it doesn’t apply on us, it applies on any other place on earth, not on Israel, because we are the chosen people, don’t you understand it? The second very deep rooted value is obviously the value of we the victims, not only the biggest victims, but the only victims around. I don’t recall one occupation in which the occupier presents himself as the victim. Not only the victim, the only victim, if to quote here, the late Golda Meir, whom I quoted also last time I know, but it is so unforgettable, I have to use it again, she once said that we will never forgive the Arabs for forcing us to kill their children. We are the victims, we are forced to kill their children, poor us. And as the victim and the only victim in history, again, it enables us the rights to do whatever we want, and nobody is going to tell us what to do because we are the only victims. To this, there is a third very deep-rooted value, and this is the very deep belief, again, everyone will deny it, but if you scratch under the skin of almost every Israeli, you’ll find it there. The Palestinians are not equal human beings like us, they are not like us, they don’t love their children like us, they don’t love life like us. This is very, very deep-rooted in Israeli society, and maybe that’s the key issue, because as long as this continues, nothing will move as long as most of Israelis don’t perceive the Palestinians as equal human beings. We are so much better than them, we are so much developed than them, and we are so much human than them. As long as this is the case, all our dreams, and we have some dreams, and I’ll get to them, all our dreams will never become true as long as this core issue will not change.”
George Galloway says “You are not allowed to have a DNA test in Israel” because it would reveal that virtually none of the Israelis are semitic or have any connection to the land of Palestine.
Watch; You’re not allowed to have a DNA test in Israel, George Galloway, 7 March 2025
George Galloway; “You’re not allowed to have a DNA test in Israel. There are Chinese Jews. I’ve met them. There are Vietnamese Jews. I’ve met them. They’re not native to the land of Palestine. There are African Jews. They’re not native to the land of Palestine either. There are Ashkenazi Jews who are entirely European in their DNA. That’s why you’re not allowed to have a DNA test in Israel because it will reveal that virtually none of them are Semitic. Virtually none of them have any ancestral connection to the land. I was viciously assaulted by a manager in the BBC who had recently converted to Judaism. It’s fine, I love all religions but you can’t say I’ve now converted to Judaism and therefore I have a right to go to the land of Palestine in live in the house of someone whose ancestors have been living in it for thousands of years.”
Judaism is religion, zionism is nationalism This exchange was at a demonstration in support of Palestine.
Watch; Asking a jew if he’s a zionist, shorts, 1 October 2025
Interviewer; “Israel is not the Jewish state?”
Jewish Demonstrator; “This is not a Jewish state. It’s a zionist terrorist state.”
Interviewer; “Why is it that they don’t consider you…,. look, a Jewish person is against that, are you antisemitic?”
Jewish Demonstrator; “Let me ask you, am I antisemitic?”
Interviewer; “Not me. That’s what they want to say, anyone who’s against them is antisemitic. You’re a Jew, yet you’re against them.”
Jewish Demonstrator; “But the difference between Judaism, zionism. Judaism is a religion, zionism is nationalism. This is nothing to do with antisemitism, Jews lived in peace with the Palestinian people for hundreds of years, and we could still live in peace. Its only because zionism is the philosophy of this political movement.”
Watch; Zionist bot farm targets Iran, Palestine Declassified, 20 October 2025
‘In today’s show, we’ll be revealing Israel’s attempts to facilitate the overthrow of Iran’s government and install the son of the brutal Shah, who was ousted by the Iranian revolution in 1979. In our first report, Latifa Abouchakra, sets out how social media and AI are being deployed to target young Iranians in particular to foment opposition. Our next report reveals the way in which Israel has attempted to use social media platforms to manipulate public opinion in the Islamic Republic of Iran.’
Press TV’s website can also be accessed at www.presstv.co.uk
Watch; October 7th: Road to Palestinian statehood, Palestine Declassified, 4 October 2025
‘In today’s episode of Palestine Declassified, we examine what the recognition of a Palestinian state by various Western powers—including the UK—actually means in practice, nearly two years after October 7. In our first report, Latifa Abouchakra reflects on the key decisions and actions that have brought us to this point, following the October 7 operation by Palestinian resistance fighters. Our next report explores the response of the zionist colony to the official recognition of Palestine by the UK government and other Western governments.’
Read or Watch; The West’s Dehumanisation Of Arabs Is Completely Unforgivable Caitlin Johnstone, 17 October 2025
In October 2024 a Lebanese writer named Lina Mounzer wrote, “ask any Arab what the most painful realisation of the last year has been and it is this: that we have discovered the extent of our dehumanisation to such a degree that it’s impossible to function in the world in the same way.”
I’ve thought about that line a lot over the last year.
I thought about it as Israel hammered Lebanon with at least 20 airstrikes during a supposed “ceasefire”.
I thought about it during the Gaza ceasefire negotiations when the western political/media class kept calling the Israelis held by Hamas “hostages” while calling the innocent Palestinians held captive by Israel “prisoners”.
I think about it as the IDF continues to murder Palestinian civilians every day during the Gaza “ceasefire” when they are deemed to be traveling into forbidden areas, because Palestinians are so dehumanised that Israel sees bullets as a perfectly legitimate means of directing civilian foot traffic.
I think about it as these daily ceasefire violations and acts of military slaughter barely make a blip in the western news media, while any time anything happens that makes western Jews feel anxious or upset it dominates headlines for days.
I thought about it while the western political/media class solemnly commemorated the second anniversary of the October 7 attack, even as the daily death toll from the Gaza holocaust ticked along with its victims unnamed and unacknowledged by those same institutions.
I thought about it when all of western politics and media stopped dead in its tracks and stood transfixed for days on the assassination of Charlie Kirk while ignoring the genocide he had spent the last two years of his life actively manufacturing consent for.
Day after day after day we see glaring, inexcusable discrepancies between the amount of attention that is given to the violent death of an Arab and the attention that is given to the violent death of an Israeli, a western Jew, or any westerner.
These last two years have been a time of unprecedented unmasking in all sorts of ways, but I think that’s the one that’s going to stick with me the most. The way western civilisation came right out into the cold harsh light to admit, day after day after day, that they don’t truly view Arabs as human beings.
Ours is a profoundly sick society.
One of the main arguments you’ll hear from rightists about why the west needs to support Israel is that Israel is helping to defend the west from the savage Muslim hoards — a sentiment that Israeli pundits and politicians have been all too happy to feed into of late. It’s revealing because it’s just coming right out and saying that slaughtering Muslims is a virtue in and of itself, so anyone who kills Muslims is an ally of the west.
But any time I come across this argument all I can think is, why would anyone want to defend the west if this is what the west has become?
Even if we pretend these delusions that Arabs and Islam pose some kind of threat to western civilisation are valid, why would it even matter? This civilisation does not deserve to be saved. Not if we’re going to be living like this.
If we’ve become so detached from our own humanity that we can’t even see innocent children as fully human just because they live somewhere else and have a different religion, then we are the monsters. We are the villains. We are everything the craziest zionist pretends the Arabs are.
These last two years have shown us that western civilisation doesn’t need protection, it needs redemption. It needs to save its soul.’
Please donate
Forgive me for pointing out that, while we receive some one-off donations, I am funding Farms Not Factories myself, and if we are to continue to fight the cruel, antibiotic-led factory farm system, we will need some regular donations from like-minded people. Please consider a monthly subscription of £2/month and help us support a network of smaller scale, humane and healthy UK pig farms, local abattoirs and butchers.
“Our message is simple, we want to help bring an end to this dangerous, inhumane system. Vote for real farming over factory farming.”
– Tracy Worcester, Director
Contents
Share This Article
Related ArticlesView All
Zionist Money Rules
The purpose of our newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More
The Price of Progress
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. “The way… Read More
Silencing Dissent Through Fear
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. If you… Read More
Ukraine and Israel – A United Force
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. If you… Read More
Buy From UK Farms, Or Lose Them
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. If you… Read More
Group Think
The purpose of my newsletter is to give you important information that is censored in the mainstream media. If you… Read More